WOODBRIAR NURSING HOME
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Woodbriar Nursing Home in Harrisburg, Arkansas has received a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good option for families seeking care, though not without some concerns. Ranking #97 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas places it in the top half, and it is the top facility in Poinsett County. The facility is improving, with a decrease in reported issues from five in 2023 to three in 2024, but it still has some significant weaknesses, including $16,467 in fines, which is higher than 89% of Arkansas facilities. Staffing is a concern, with a low rating of 2 out of 5 stars, but a very low turnover rate of 0% suggests that the staff is stable and familiar with the residents. Specific incidents raised by inspectors included failures in food safety, oxygen therapy not being administered correctly for two residents, and potential infection risks due to improper handling of food items near clean linens, highlighting the need for better adherence to protocols to ensure resident safety.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #97/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $16,467 in fines. Higher than 66% of Arkansas facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document and complete a person-centered care plan to facilitate the ability to plan and provide necessary care and services f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0728
(Tag F0728)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, employee record review, and document review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure five Nursing Assistants (NA) completed competency training and failed to complete the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0848
(Tag F0848)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to include the selection of a neutral arbitrator to be agreed upon by both parties and for the selection of a venue convenient to both parties...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity, and to care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to secure confidential and private medical information on an open laptop. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 13...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure fingernails were clean, groomed, and free from ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen therapy at the physician ordered flow rate. This failed practice affected 2 (Resident #17, #1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to prevent the potential for infection and cross contamination in the facility laundry processing area as evidenced...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was worn for a resident who was on contact isolation for 1 (Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator were dated when pulled from the freezer and placed in the refrigerator to ensure they were used within ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge assessment was encoded correctly for 1 (Resident #59) of 2 (Resident #59 and #60) sampled who wer...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0568
(Tag F0568)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper bookkeeping techniques were followed to accurately reconcile individual resident funds for 22 of 22 (Residents #2, 3, 4, 6, 7...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • $16,467 in fines. Above average for Arkansas. Some compliance problems on record.
About This Facility
What is Woodbriar's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WOODBRIAR NURSING HOME an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Woodbriar Staffed?
CMS rates WOODBRIAR NURSING HOME's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Woodbriar?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at WOODBRIAR NURSING HOME during 2022 to 2024. These included: 9 with potential for harm and 3 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Woodbriar?
WOODBRIAR NURSING HOME is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 62 certified beds and approximately 61 residents (about 98% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HARRISBURG, Arkansas.
How Does Woodbriar Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, WOODBRIAR NURSING HOME's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1 and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Woodbriar?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Woodbriar Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WOODBRIAR NURSING HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Woodbriar Stick Around?
WOODBRIAR NURSING HOME has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Woodbriar Ever Fined?
WOODBRIAR NURSING HOME has been fined $16,467 across 4 penalty actions. This is below the Arkansas average of $33,244. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Woodbriar on Any Federal Watch List?
WOODBRIAR NURSING HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.