THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF POPLAR GROVE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
The Green House Cottages of Poplar Grove has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average and falls in the middle of the pack among nursing homes. It ranks #172 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the bottom half of the state's offerings, and #16 out of 23 in Pulaski County, indicating only a few local options are better. The facility is improving, as it went from 7 issues in 2024 to just 1 in 2025, although it still has a concerning staffing situation with 52% turnover, which is average, but it does have a 4 out of 5 star rating for staffing, suggesting some stability. While the absence of fines is a positive sign, there are concerning incidents, such as staff not washing their hands when serving meals, which poses infection risks, and issues with food safety and menu adherence that could impact residents' health. Overall, the facility shows both strengths and weaknesses, making it important for families to weigh these factors carefully.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Arkansas
- #172/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 20 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 34 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Arkansas average (3.1)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 34 deficiencies on record
May 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care planned fall interventions were implemented for one (Resident #1) of...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive ca...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the flow rate ordered by the physician to reduce the potential for respiratory complications...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of ba...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed appropriately with peri care to preve...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the rear casters of the mechanical lift were not locked with lifting an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that pills were properly stored in the acceptable package or bottle to prevent mediation errors in Building 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an orderly, uncluttered environment for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 sampled residents.
The finding...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were regularly trimmed to maintain good hygiene and grooming for 1 Resident #4 sampled residents who requir...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands when serving meals, follow the menu and ensure the menu was posted. The findings are:
On 12/27...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
13 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address diabetic fingernail care for 1 (Resident #310) of 1 sampled resident. The finding...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed; glucometers were cleaned before and after each use; hand hygiene was performed between ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain grooming, personal hygiene, and nail care for 1 (Residents #310) of 1 sampled residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident centered activities program was provided daily in each cottage. The findings are:
On 10/16/23 at 10:40 AM, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% during the medication pass. The findings are:
During the medication pass obs...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed to prevent significant medication errors for 2 (Residents #80 and #106) of 2 sampled r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the medication storage rooms and medication carts. The findings are:
On 10/19/23 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu and facility quantified recipe for super calorie w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance and nutritive value of pureed foods that were acceptable t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump-free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the lids on 2 of 2 garbage dumpsters were closed and contained to decrease the potential for pest infestation. The fin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a multi-use glucometer was disinfected after each resident for 2 (Residents #106 and #312) and failed to ensure staff ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer, refrigerator and dry storage area were covered, sealed and dated to minimize the potential...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an elopement was immediately reported to the state agency for 1 (Residents #1) of 1 case mix resident who had eloped from the facili...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide baths or showers to 2 (Residents #2, and #7) sampled residents who were unable to independently perform the task to m...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was as free from accident hazards as possible, as evidenced by failure to ensure medication...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed up on X-Ray results, and on a resident who was sent to the emergency room within a timely manner for 1 (Resident 1) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2022
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #36) of 20 (Resident #31, #35, #4, #85, #14, #73, #84, #47, #52, #36, #51, #82, #309, #27, #49, #76, #25, #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise the care plan to include that the re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure nail care was given to promote good personal hygiene and cleanliness for 3 (Resident #35, #4, #85) of 32 sampled Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders to ensure that residents were free of significant medication error for 1 (Resident #19) of 2 re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that expired meds were not in the medication c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods in the refrigerator/freezer were tightly closed, dated, and stored to allow adequate air circulation, food stored on shelves in ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary equipment was consistently maintained in working order to allow for meal preparation in the cottages. This failed practice had...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 34 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • Grade C (50/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is The Green House Cottages Of Poplar Grove's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF POPLAR GROVE an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is The Green House Cottages Of Poplar Grove Staffed?
CMS rates THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF POPLAR GROVE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 58%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at The Green House Cottages Of Poplar Grove?
State health inspectors documented 34 deficiencies at THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF POPLAR GROVE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 34 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates The Green House Cottages Of Poplar Grove?
THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF POPLAR GROVE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 105 residents (about 88% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in LITTLE ROCK, Arkansas.
How Does The Green House Cottages Of Poplar Grove Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF POPLAR GROVE's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Green House Cottages Of Poplar Grove?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is The Green House Cottages Of Poplar Grove Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF POPLAR GROVE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at The Green House Cottages Of Poplar Grove Stick Around?
THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF POPLAR GROVE has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was The Green House Cottages Of Poplar Grove Ever Fined?
THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF POPLAR GROVE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is The Green House Cottages Of Poplar Grove on Any Federal Watch List?
THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF POPLAR GROVE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.