BELLE VIEW ESTATES REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Belle View Estates Rehabilitation and Care Center in Monticello, Arkansas, has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families seeking care. It ranks #3 out of 218 facilities in the state and is the top choice in Drew County, suggesting a strong local option. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from 7 in 2024 to none in 2025. While staffing received a 3/5 star rating and has a turnover rate of 30%, which is better than the state average, it has concerning RN coverage, being lower than 79% of facilities in Arkansas. Recent inspections revealed serious concerns, such as a resident being injured due to improper wheelchair securing during transport and ongoing issues with food safety practices that could lead to contamination, highlighting the need for improvement alongside its strengths.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Arkansas
- #3/218
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 30% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 18 points below Arkansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $7,443 in fines. Lower than most Arkansas facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 15 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (30%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (30%)
18 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Mar 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a catheter tubing was secured to prevent complications from trauma for 1 (Resident #57) of 1 sampled resident who had ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Antibiotic Stewardship Program was consistently implemented, as evidenced by an antibiotic was prescribed for a diagnosis of Abno...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were cleaned and trimmed to promot...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ' s orders were followed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% to prevent potential complicati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the refrigerated narcotic medications in the medication storage room for the 200 and 400 Halls were stored in a perman...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clean linens were transported in a manner to prevent the potential for contamination; failed to ensure staff performed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 puree machine was maintained in a clean condition to prevent the potential contamination of residents' food whi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly secure a resident wheelchair in the facility van prior to transport, which resulted in a fall with injury to the head...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's wishes regarding Cardiopulmonary Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs by not having the call light within reach for 2 Residents (R #34 and R #108) that r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choices for 2 residents (R #14 and R #108) who ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure planned fall prevention interventions were con...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Activity of Daily Living (ADL)s were carried out to promote good health and wellbeing for one (Resident #25) of 19 (R #2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure planned fall prevention interventions were con...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly store and dated to prevent contamination for 1 (Resident #34) of 4 (Resident #15, R ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure leftover food items were maintained to promote food quality and/ or prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received me...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (81/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Arkansas.
- • 30% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 18 points below Arkansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 17 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BELLE VIEW ESTATES REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And Staffed?
CMS rates BELLE VIEW ESTATES REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 30%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at BELLE VIEW ESTATES REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 16 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And?
BELLE VIEW ESTATES REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 68 residents (about 85% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MONTICELLO, Arkansas.
How Does Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, BELLE VIEW ESTATES REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (30%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BELLE VIEW ESTATES REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And Stick Around?
Staff at BELLE VIEW ESTATES REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 30%, the facility is 16 percentage points below the Arkansas average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And Ever Fined?
BELLE VIEW ESTATES REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER has been fined $7,443 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Arkansas average of $33,153. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And on Any Federal Watch List?
BELLE VIEW ESTATES REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.