RECTOR NURSING AND REHAB
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Rector Nursing and Rehab has received a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice compared to other facilities. It ranks #31 out of 218 nursing homes in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 3 in Clay County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility is improving, with a decrease in reported issues from three in 2024 to one in 2025. However, staffing is a concern, as it has a 67% turnover rate-higher than the state average-suggesting instability among caregivers. The facility also faced $14,069 in fines, which is higher than 85% of Arkansas facilities, indicating potential compliance problems. On a positive note, it has good RN coverage, exceeding 88% of state facilities, ensuring better care oversight. Specific incidents include a critical finding where a resident was improperly secured in a wheelchair during transport, posing a serious risk of injury, and dietary staff failed to wash their hands before handling food, potentially risking foodborne illnesses for residents. Additionally, some residents were not fed at the same time, undermining their dignity during mealtimes. Overall, while there are strengths in RN coverage and a solid overall rating, families should be aware of the staffing issues and recent incidents that raise concerns.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #31/218
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 67% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $14,069 in fines. Higher than 70% of Arkansas facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 28 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 6 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
20pts above Arkansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
19 points above Arkansas average of 48%
The Ugly 6 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure transport staff correctly se...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were utilized to prevent worsening of contractures in 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #14).
The findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were stored in a locked...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents who were seated at the same table were fed at the same time to promote resident dignity for 3 (Residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0676
(Tag F0676)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure showers were regularly provided to maintain good hygiene for 2 (Resident #17 and #18) of 16 (#1, #2, #3, #8, #15, #17,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for the re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 6 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $14,069 in fines. Above average for Arkansas. Some compliance problems on record.
- • 67% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Rector Nursing And Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns RECTOR NURSING AND REHAB an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Rector Nursing And Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates RECTOR NURSING AND REHAB's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 67%, which is 20 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Rector Nursing And Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 6 deficiencies at RECTOR NURSING AND REHAB during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 5 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Rector Nursing And Rehab?
RECTOR NURSING AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 70 certified beds and approximately 42 residents (about 60% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in RECTOR, Arkansas.
How Does Rector Nursing And Rehab Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, RECTOR NURSING AND REHAB's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (67%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Rector Nursing And Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Rector Nursing And Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, RECTOR NURSING AND REHAB has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Rector Nursing And Rehab Stick Around?
Staff turnover at RECTOR NURSING AND REHAB is high. At 67%, the facility is 20 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Rector Nursing And Rehab Ever Fined?
RECTOR NURSING AND REHAB has been fined $14,069 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Arkansas average of $33,220. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Rector Nursing And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
RECTOR NURSING AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.