SUMMIT HEALTH & REHAB CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Summit Health & Rehab Center in Taylor, Arkansas has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good facility overall. It ranks #82 out of 218 in the state, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 3 in Columbia County, meaning only one other local option is rated higher. However, the facility is experiencing a concerning trend, as the number of issues has increased from 3 in 2023 to 5 in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 41%, which is below the state average. There are no fines reported, which is positive, and the facility has more registered nurse coverage than 91% of other state facilities. On the downside, recent inspections revealed significant concerns, such as staff not properly washing hands before handling food, which could lead to foodborne illnesses for residents, and issues with the documentation and storage of medications, including expired antianxiety medication that was not properly tracked. Additionally, there were failures to monitor refrigerator temperatures for important vaccines and medications, which could compromise their effectiveness. While the facility has strengths, these incidents indicate areas needing improvement to ensure resident safety and care quality.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #82/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 41% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 37 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Arkansas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (41%)
7 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, observations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff promoted dignity and provided privacy during peri care were not visible to fellow resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff wore Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) in droplet precaution rooms for 1 (Resident #16) resident of 1 sampled (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a refrigerated antianxiety medication was counted and appropriately reconciled each shift by maintaining the d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff appropriately monitored refrige...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interview the facility failed to ensure food was labeled with a use by date to ensure food was not used beyond its safety period in accordance with professional standards for...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set [MDS] accurately reflected the discharge...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure person centered nail care was provided to promote good hygiene and reduce the risk for infection in 1 Resident #22 of 9 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive adequate supervision while smoking affecting 2 Residents (#8, #9) of 5 sampled Residents #8, #9, #12,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2022
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was free from accident hazards by allowing hazardous material to be kept on top of personal protective equi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served in accordance with the planned, written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands and/or changed gloves before handling food items; failed to ensure expired food items...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure written notification of transfer/discharge to the hospital w...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure written information regarding the facility Bed Hold policy w...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 41% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Summit Health & Rehab Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SUMMIT HEALTH & REHAB CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Summit Health & Rehab Center Staffed?
CMS rates SUMMIT HEALTH & REHAB CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Summit Health & Rehab Center?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at SUMMIT HEALTH & REHAB CENTER during 2022 to 2024. These included: 11 with potential for harm and 2 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Summit Health & Rehab Center?
SUMMIT HEALTH & REHAB CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 70 certified beds and approximately 51 residents (about 73% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in TAYLOR, Arkansas.
How Does Summit Health & Rehab Center Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, SUMMIT HEALTH & REHAB CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Summit Health & Rehab Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Summit Health & Rehab Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SUMMIT HEALTH & REHAB CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Summit Health & Rehab Center Stick Around?
SUMMIT HEALTH & REHAB CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Summit Health & Rehab Center Ever Fined?
SUMMIT HEALTH & REHAB CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Summit Health & Rehab Center on Any Federal Watch List?
SUMMIT HEALTH & REHAB CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.