CHILDRENS HC ORG NO CA -PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL D/P SNF
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Families considering Children's HC Organization No CA - Pediatric Hospital D/P SNF in Campbell, California should note its Trust Grade of B+, which indicates it is above average and recommended for care. Ranked #43 out of 1,155 facilities in California, it sits comfortably in the top half and is #2 of 50 in Santa Clara County, showing it is one of the better local options. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with the number of reported issues increasing from 3 in 2022 to 6 in 2024. Staffing is a concern, as it received a poor 0 out of 5 stars and despite a turnover rate of 0%, which is significantly below the state average, the lack of sufficient staff can impact resident care. Additionally, the facility faced fines totaling $3,145, which is average, but there were concerning incidents such as failing to provide identification bracelets for residents and not maintaining proper sanitary conditions in the kitchen, which could lead to health risks. Overall, while the facility excels in certain areas, families should weigh these strengths against the noted weaknesses when making their decision.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In California
- #43/1155
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $3,145 in fines. Higher than 87% of California facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services in accordance with professional standards of pract...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 12 sampled residents (Residents 16) was free from unn...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one resident (Residents 9) out of 12 sampled residents, when the front vent cover of an air-co...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen when:
1. Two dietary aides (DA) did not cover their hair completely with hairnets...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2a. A review of Resident 19's medical record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses includi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards or practice for one of six residents observed for medicati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance wit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection control practices and precautions when:
1. Staff did not wear N95 (a type of respirator mask) while ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2019
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. two residents (Residents 8 and 9) care pla...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan (provides direction o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure enteral (delivers liquid nutrition through a cat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (medications that are...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 11.54% when the facility failed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0802
(Tag F0802)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff were safely performing their functions when the dishwasher's temperature was below the manufacturer'...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain one of one dishwasher when the dishwasher temperature was below the manufacturer's water requirements of 120 to 140 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in California.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • $3,145 in fines. Lower than most California facilities. Relatively clean record.
- • 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Childrens Hc Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P Snf's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns CHILDRENS HC ORG NO CA -PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL D/P SNF an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within California, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Childrens Hc Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P Snf Staffed?
Detailed staffing data for CHILDRENS HC ORG NO CA -PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL D/P SNF is not available in the current CMS dataset.
What Have Inspectors Found at Childrens Hc Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P Snf?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at CHILDRENS HC ORG NO CA -PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL D/P SNF during 2019 to 2024. These included: 16 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Childrens Hc Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P Snf?
CHILDRENS HC ORG NO CA -PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL D/P SNF is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 27 certified beds and approximately 25 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CAMPBELL, California.
How Does Childrens Hc Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P Snf Compare to Other California Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in California, CHILDRENS HC ORG NO CA -PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL D/P SNF's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2 and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Childrens Hc Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P Snf?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Childrens Hc Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P Snf Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, CHILDRENS HC ORG NO CA -PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL D/P SNF has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in California. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Childrens Hc Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P Snf Stick Around?
CHILDRENS HC ORG NO CA -PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL D/P SNF has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Childrens Hc Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P Snf Ever Fined?
CHILDRENS HC ORG NO CA -PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL D/P SNF has been fined $3,145 across 1 penalty action. This is below the California average of $33,110. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Childrens Hc Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P Snf on Any Federal Watch List?
CHILDRENS HC ORG NO CA -PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL D/P SNF is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.