MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community has an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating they are highly recommended and perform well compared to other facilities. They rank #126 out of 1,155 in California, placing them in the top half, and #19 out of 81 in San Diego County, meaning there are only 18 local options that are better. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from six in 2023 to three in 2024. Staffing is a strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 33%, which is lower than the state average. However, there were some concerning findings, including a failure to test water for Legionella bacteria, improper food storage that could lead to contamination, and inadequate cleanliness around the kitchen dumpster, which raises potential health risks for residents.
- Trust Score
- A
- In California
- #126/1155
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 33% turnover. Near California's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most California facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 46 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for California. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (33%)
15 points below California average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
13pts below California avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure:
1. Medications (med) were stored properly.
2. Medication Refrigerator temperatures were documented consistently for on...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:
1. Store foods appropriately in the dry storage room and freezer.
2. Cover facial hair while preparing food.
These failure...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately clean the area around their kitchen dumpster.
This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents.
Findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer an unexpired medication to one of 4 residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store a medication according to manufacturer instructions. This failure had the potential for the facility residents to receiv...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation interview and record review, the facility did not ensure confidentiality of the medical records for 12 of 12 sample residents (1, 2, 3,4, 6,7, 9, 10, 11,12, 116, 166). This failur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per 24 hour period for 14 days.
This failure had the potential to negatively impac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a water system that included Legionella testing for thirteen out of thirteen residents affected.
This failure had the potential ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions (actions or treatments that do not include the use of medicine) were implemented for three of five...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0802
(Tag F0802)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food and nutrition services staff maintained current competency in dietetic task operations to safely carry out th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained during food storage when:
1) A container of opened pitted prunes was not discarded...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in California.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most California facilities.
- • 33% turnover. Below California's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within California, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community Staffed?
CMS rates MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 33%, compared to the California average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY during 2022 to 2024. These included: 10 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community?
MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 19 certified beds and approximately 13 residents (about 68% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ESCONDIDO, California.
How Does Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community Compare to Other California Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in California, MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (33%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in California. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community Stick Around?
MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY has a staff turnover rate of 33%, which is about average for California nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community Ever Fined?
MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community on Any Federal Watch List?
MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.