CRITICAL
(L)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents
⚠️ Facility-wide issue
Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) fulfilled her job responsibilities of daily kitchen oversight when:
1. The CDM failed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) fulfilled her job responsibilities of daily kitchen oversight when:
1. The CDM failed to monitor daily kitchen operations to ensure a) food safety guidelines and standards of practice were followed; b) effective supervision of kitchen employees was conducted; c) proper preparation of pureed items; d) meal palatability and food was prepared to conserve nutrients; e) resident food preferences and intolerances were followed, and f) kitchen equipment was in safe working order (Cross reference to F812, F802, F803, F804, F806, and F908).
2. The CDM delegated daily departmental oversight responsibilities to [NAME] 1, who was not trained or qualified to perform the duties of a CDM. [NAME] 1 performed the CDM's job duties 40 hours weekly which included but not limited to; ordering food, visitation of residents for food preferences, attending care plan meetings, and providing instruction and guidance to food service employees.
3. [NAME] 2, who was responsible for preparing two meals a day, five days a week, was not competent in adequate hand washing, preventing cross contamination of food, cleaning, sanitizing and storage of food preparation equipment, manual washing of cookware used for resident food preparation, proper testing of the kitchen sanitizing solution, preparing puree food items according to the recipe, ensuring the resident food was prepared in a manner which maintained the nutritional value of resident meals and resident meals were palatable (Cross reference to F802, F803, F804, and F812).
4. The Registered Dietitian (RD) did not provide effective oversight of the kitchen operations.
5. The facility Administrator was not aware that an unqualified, untrained employee was performing CDM's managerial duties on a fulltime basis and the CDM was not fulfilling her job responsibilities.
These failures to ensure the CDM fulfilled her job responsibilities resulted in exposing 76 of 76 residents (17 sampled residents and 59 non-sampled residents), who received food prepared in the kitchen, to practices with the potential to result in food borne illness, bacterial cross contamination, poor meal quality, decreased meal satisfaction and compromised resident nutritional status including but not limited to weight loss.
Due to the lack of daily oversight and monitoring of the food service operations by qualified personnel that could cause serious potential harm of food borne illnesses, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ- a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident) situation was called on 8/25/22 at 5:24 p.m., under Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.60 Staffing (F801) with the Administrator, (ADM) the Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant DON (ADON), Infection Preventionist (IP), Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), and the Staffing and Recourse Nurse in attendance. The IJ template was provided to the ADM.
The facility submitted an acceptable IJ Plan of Removal (Version 3) on 8/26/22, at 5:42 p.m. The IJ Plan of Removal included but was not limited to the following:
1) As of 8/26/2022 the current CDM will resume her role as outlined in the job description to include, but not limited to: planning, controlling, coordinating, directing, and evaluating all aspects of food service, along with data collection for clinical charting, MDS (Minimum Data Set - a comprehensive assessment used for screening, clinical and functional status elements for nursing home residents) participation, and care planning, as well as begin routine monitoring of the kitchen operations to ensure food safety guidelines are met.
- Directing the food service operation following the facility and Dietary Policy and Procedure Manuals,
- Developing and writing schedules for dietary staff, supervising the preparation of food and food service for the resident meals according to established menus and standardized recipes, ensuring food is prepared by methods that conserve nutritional value and is palatable and attractive to residents, purchasing food and supplies according to the facility menu and remains within the budgetary guidelines established by the facility and maintains all cost records as required by administration,
- Participating in planning and conducting departmental meetings and in-service education,
- Ensuring sanitation and safety standards are maintained according to State, Federal, and local regulations, maintains all dietary records, i.e.: temperature records, tray cards, profiles, nutritional assessments, MDS, care plans, etc.,
- Coordinates and gathers the information required by the Registered Dietitian i.e.: resident weights, skin report, facility admissions, dietary consults, enteral feedings, etc.,
- Participates in charting responsibilities as requested by facility and Registered Dietitian,
- Ensures residents receive the proper food items to meet their dietary need and that food is served at the appropriate temperature for safety and palatability,
- Participates in IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) meetings and conferences as requested by the facility,
- Communicates with Registered Dietitian regularly and as requested by the Administrator or Director of Nursing,
- Performs other duties assigned by the Administrator.
The CDM will conduct daily Food Service Sanitation (FSS) Kitchen checks using the California Association of Healthcare Facilities (CAHF) Daily Supervisor Rounds Checklist and will include staff interviews which will be reviewed with the Administrator daily (Monday-Friday) to begin on 8/26/2022 for 30 days. If any line item(s) are not met, item(s) will be reviewed, and corrective action implemented for continued monitoring. At the completion of 30 days, if threshold of 90% is not met, additional daily FSS Kitchen checks will continue for 30 days and then be re-evaluated.
A Performance Evaluation of the CDM utilizing the facility form will be conducted by the Regional Administrator, on 8/30/2022 and at the completion of the 30 days referenced above to include duties as written in the job description (Threshold: Meets Standards).
The Registered Dietitian will conduct a bi-monthly sanitation inspection and review with the Administrator. The Administrator will conduct a bi-monthly Administrator Kitchen Inspection Checklist and review findings with the Registered Dietitian. The Registered Dietitian using the Competency Checklist for Food Service Workers, will complete competencies of all kitchen staff beginning today, 8/26/22, through 8/31/22. Any areas identified requiring improvement will result in 1:1 in-service with staff member with return demonstration to ensure competency is met. By September 30, 2022, all food service workers will be reevaluated by the Registered Dietitian using the Competency Checklist for Food Service Workers. The findings from the daily FSS Kitchen checks and the bi-weekly Dietary Manager Kitchen Inspection Checklist will be discussed at the monthly QA meeting for three months or until substantial compliance is met (Threshold: 90%).
2) As of 8/26/2022 [NAME] 2 was replaced with a qualified dietary cook (Cook 1). [NAME] 1 will prepare breakfast and lunch 5 days per week. [NAME] 1 was an experienced cook when hired on 3/18/2010. [NAME] 1's last competency evaluation was 8/26/2022.
3) The fulltime a.m. [NAME] (Cook 2) was removed from her duties effective immediately and did not cook breakfast on 8/26/22022. [NAME] 2 verbally resigned from her position on 8/26/2022 at 11:00 am.
4) Upon investigation, it was determined that [NAME] 1's recent duties had evolved over several years, but her job description was not updated to reflect changes or additions to her role. The Administrator reviewed the Dietary Department Job Descriptions/Duties, and it has been determined that the assigned role of [NAME] 1 was never reclassified to reflect her recent duties. As of 8/26/2022, the [NAME] 1 has resumed her designated role as cook. All duties defined in her job description upon hire have been reviewed and acknowledged. Systemic problems that occurred resulting in the employment of a cook who did not perform to sanitary standards/expectations are as follows: COVID-19 Pandemic, staffing shortages, failure of Dietary Manager to conduct timely competencies, and failure of the Dietary Manager to provide direct oversight/supervision. The components of the IJ Plan of Removal were validated through observations, interviews, and record review. The IJ was removed on 8/26/22 at 5:53 p.m. with the ADM in attendance.
Findings:
During a review of the professional reference obtained from https://www.foodsafety.gov/food-poisoning, downloaded 9/1/22, indicated, food poisoning or foodborne illnesses can affect anyone who eats food contaminated by bacteria, viruses, parasites, toxins, or other substances.
During a review of the professional reference obtained from https://www.foodsafety.gov/people-at-risk/older-adults downloaded 9/1/22, indicated certain groups of people are more susceptible to foodborne illness. This means they are more likely to get sick from contaminated food and, if they do get sick, the effects are much more serious. Older adults residing in nursing homes are ten times more likely to die from bacterial gastroenteritis than the general population. This increased risk of foodborne illness is because organs and body systems go through changes during aging. These changes include: the gastrointestinal tract holds on to food for a longer period, allowing bacteria to grow; the liver and kidneys may not properly rid bodies of foreign bacteria and toxins; the stomach may not produce enough acid. The acidity helps to reduce the number of bacteria in our intestinal tract. Without proper amounts of acid, there is an increased risk of bacterial growth; underlying chronic conditions, such as diabetes and cancer, may also increase a person's risk of foodborne illnesses.
1. During the tour of the kitchen between 8/23/22 at 8:22 a.m. and 8/25/22 at 4:24 p.m. the following was observed:
a. Proper hand washing was not performed by [NAME] 2 after a trash can was touched,
b. Cross contamination was not prevented when a measuring scoop was stored inside a food bin,
c. Expired food items (three bags of cabbage and five bags of corn tortillas) were available for use and not discarded,
d. Leftover potatoes were observed in the walk-in refrigerator and not cooled down safely,
e. More than five steam table pans, two small and one large frying pans had thick dark brown residue on the insides of the pans, four cutting boards were heavily marred, the can opener blade was brown and worn,
f. The meat slicer, mixer, can opener and a weighing scale were visibly dirty and not clean,
g. Three food items in plastic bins were not labeled and did not have open dates,
h. Milk was stored in crates on the floor of the walk-in refrigerator,
i. [NAME] 2 stored more than five steam table pans wet and not inverted,
j. The walk-in refrigerator door, knife rack and a plastic container with clean divided plates were visibly dirty and not clean,
k. Two kitchen brooms were stored on the floor,
l. A beverage that belonged to an employee was stored in the walk-in freezer,
m. Puree recipes were not followed,
n. Kitchen equipment was not in safe working order when the walk-in freezer had excessive ice build-up, the walk-in refrigerator door was not flush with the door jamb exposing a gap, and the temperatures on the oven dial were worn off and not legible,
o. Resident 80's food preferences and intolerances were not followed, and
p. Resident food was not prepared to provide palatability and conserve nutritive value.
a. During an observation on 8/24/22, at 8:25 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was washing steamtable pans and placing them in the rinse sink. [NAME] 2 touched the trash can then grabbed a rag out of the sanitation bucket and started sanitizing the counter tops. [NAME] 2 then returned to the rinse sink and started removing the steam trays from the rinse sink.
During an interview on 8/24/22, at 8:38 a.m., with [NAME] 2, [NAME] 2 stated, touching the trash can and then sanitizing counters was not the facility's process. [NAME] 2 stated, You need to wash your hands after touching the trash can.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 4:29 p.m., with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), CDM stated, that if kitchen staff touched a trash can, they would need to wash their hands after. CDM stated, staff must wash hands anytime the hands become contaminated (having been made impure by exposure to something) to prevent cross contamination (the process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one thing to another with harmful effect). CDM stated her last in-service on handwashing was in 2021. CDM stated, she did not have an in-service on handwashing for 2022.
During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: DISHWASHING PROCEDURES (DISHMACHINE), dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . the employee must wash hands thoroughly before handling clean dishes, trays and carts .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA [United States Food and Drug Administration] Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 2-301 . When to Wash, food employees shall clean their hands . after engaging in other activities that contaminate the hands .
b. During an interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., with CDM, CDM stated, it was the facility's practice to not store scoops inside bins.
During an observation on 8/24/22, at 10:19 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was preparing to puree (a smooth creamy substance made of liquidized food) food items for the lunch meal on top of a cart. [NAME] 2 had a plastic bin that contained thickener (a substance added to a liquid to make it firmer) on the top of the cart. [NAME] 2 used a metal measuring scoop stored inside the plastic bin to scoop up the thickener. [NAME] 2 added thickener to the food multiple times. [NAME] 2 placed the measuring scoop on the top of the cart more than two times before placing it back into the plastic bin.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 3:10 p.m., with [NAME] 3, in the kitchen, there was a plastic bin containing thickener and a measuring scoop stored inside of it. [NAME] 3 stated, measuring cups should not be stored inside of the plastic bin.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: CLEANING SMALL APPLIANCES/EQUIPMENT, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . Food Storage Bins . The scoop should be stored outside the bins in a designated area .
c. During an observation on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., in the kitchen, the walk-in refrigerator and the dry storage room were observed. The walk-in refrigerator had three bags of cabbage with expiration dates of 8/15/22. The dry storage room was 82 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and had five bags of corn tortillas with manufactures date of 5/23/22. The tortillas had no received date or expiration date on them.
During an interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., with CDM, CDM stated, she did not know when the tortillas were received.
During an interview on 8/23/22, at 10:27 a.m., with CDM, CDM stated, the cabbage should have been discarded.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:35 a.m., with [NAME] 1, in the dry storage room, the five bags of tortillas were stored with a verified received date sticker of 8/17/22. [NAME] 1 stated, the process at the facility was food needed to be dated if it was removed from the original box it came in. [NAME] 1 stated, five bags of tortillas had received date of 8/17/22. [NAME] 1 stated, if tortillas were not dated, she would look at the facility's shelf-life (the length of time for which an item remains fit for consumption) list. [NAME] 1 stated, tortillas were not listed on the facility's shelf-life list.
During an interview on 8/24/22, at 10:44 a.m., with CDM, CDM stated, the shelf life for corn tortillas was 45 days from the manufactures date per [brand name] website. CDM stated that the tortillas were expired.
d. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:22 a.m., with CDM, in the walk-in refrigerator, there was a zip lock bag with sliced potatoes with a date that was not legible. CDM stated, the zip lock bag contained leftover cooked potatoes from 8/22/22. CDM stated, a resident requested cooked potatoes twice a day.
During an interview on 8/24/22, at 3:10 p.m., with [NAME] 3, [NAME] 3 stated, the facility did not save leftovers. [NAME] 3 stated, the facility's process was not to re-heat food for safety reasons.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 9:36 a.m., with [NAME] 1, [NAME] 1 stated, the facility's practice was to prepare food same day the resident was eating it and not keep leftovers. [NAME] 1 stated, if facility was to keep leftovers a record of that food should be documented on the facility's cooling log.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 1:04 p.m., with CDM, CDM stated, the cook made a batch of potatoes for three days. The leftover portion of potatoes would be refrigerated and used for the next meal. The CDM stated she has not kept a record of pre-made potatoes on the cooling log.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:15 p.m., with Registered Dietician (RD) 1, RD 1 stated, she had not seen any leftovers kept at the facility. RD 1 stated, she was not aware facility was keeping leftovers. RD 1 stated, if facility was keeping leftovers the leftovers would need to be cool downed properly.
During a review of the facility's COOLING/CHILLING TEMPERATURE CONTROL LOG, dated 6/17/22 through 8/24/22, the COOLING/CHILLING TEMPERATURE CONTROL LOG indicated, no record of sliced potatoes.
During a review of the facility's (P&P) titled, FOOD PREPARATION SUBJECT: FOOD PREPARATION, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . Leftovers must be refrigerated immediately utilizing cool down log, covered labeled and dated .
e. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:22 a.m., with CDM, there were more than five steam table pans with thick dark brown residue (amount of something that remains after the main part has gone or been used) on the inside and outside of the pans. Two small and one large frying pans had thick dark brown residue on the insides of the pans. Four cutting boards were heavily marred. The can opener blade was brown and worn. CDM stated, the pans with the dark brown residue were not acceptable to cook with and should be replaced. CDM stated, the cutting boards needed to be replaced. CDM stated, the can opener blade was worn.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 10:35 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, there was one rubber spatula with a chip in the rubber area. CDM stated, the spatulas needed to be discarded.
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . 4-202.11 Food-Contact Surfaces. (A) Multiuse FOOD- shall be: CONTACT SURFACES (1) SMOOTH; (2) Free of breaks, open seams, cracks, chips, inclusions, pits, and similar imperfections .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 4-501.12 Cutting Surfaces, surfaces such as cutting blocks that are subject to scratching and scoring [cut or scratch] shall be resurfaced if they can no longer be effectively cleaned and sanitized, or discarded if they are not capable of being resurfaced .
f. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, the meat slicer was covered with a plastic bag. CDM stated, if equipment was clean then it would be covered with a plastic bag. The bag covering the meat slicer was removed. The meat slicers' blade and grip had a brown sticky substance. CDM stated, the brown substance should not be on the meat slicer. CDM stated, the meat slicer was not cleaned appropriately. CDM stated, the meat slicer should be disassembled and sanitized.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, the can opener blade was worn and brown. The can opener and can opener base had a brown sticky residue that transferred to the hand when touched. CDM stated, the can opener and can opener base was not clean.
During a review of August 2022 DAILY CLEANING SCHEDULE SAMPLE FORM dated 8/1/22 through 8/14/22, the August 2022 DAILY CLEANING SCHEDULE SAMPLE FORM indicated, . ITEM . Slicer . RESPONSIBLE PARTY . Cooks . INITIALS AND DATE . Form was dated and signed off (documentation by staff that something was completed) for days 8/1/22 through 8/14/22.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, CONTROL SUBJECT: SANITIZING EQUIPMENT, FOOD AND UTILITY CARTS, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . All kitchen equipment and surfaces, which come in contact with food, will be cleaned and sanitized after each use .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA 2017 Food Code, dated 2017, the USDA Food Code indicated, Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood Contact Surfaces, and Utensils (A): Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:55 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, the mixer was on the counter with a plastic bag covering it. CDM stated, clean equipment was covered with a plastic bag. The plastic bag was removed. The mixer had a white flakey residue on it. CDM stated the mixer was not clean.
During a review of August 2022 DAILY CLEANING SCHEDULE SAMPLE FORM dated 8/1/22 through 8/14/22, the August 2022 DAILY CLEANING SCHEDULE SAMPLE FORM indicated, . ITEM . Mixer . RESPONSIBLE PARTY . Cooks . INITIALS AND DATE . Form was dated and signed off for days 8/1/22 through 8/14/22.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: CLEANING SMALL APPLIANCES/EQUIPMENT, dated 2018, indicated, . Mixers will be cleaned and sanitized after each use .
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 10:15 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, a rubber spatula with food residue was seen with a melted handle. The CDM stated the rubber spatula was dirty and handle not cleanable and would be discarded.
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA 2017 Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood Contact Surfaces, and Utensils (A): Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:34 a.m., with Dietary Aid (DA) 2, in the kitchen, a plate was seen on the plate warmer with an orange residue. DA 2 stated, the plate warmer was an area for clean plates. DA 2 stated, the plate with the orange residue was not clean and removed it from the plate warmer.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 4:29 p.m., with CDM, CDM stated, dishware with food debris would not be clean and should be washed again. CDM stated, dirty dishware should not be placed with clean dishware.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT DISHWASHING PROCEDURES (DISHMACHINE), dated 2018, indicated, . All the dishes should be inspected after coming out of dish-machine and if the dishes are not clean then they should be washed again in the dish-machine .
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 10:15 a.m., with [NAME] 2, in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was slicing meat on the meat slicer. [NAME] 2 then weighed the slice of meat on a scale. [NAME] 2 stated that she was slicing turkey for the lunch meal.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:33 a.m., with [NAME] 2, in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 opened a drawer attached to the counter. [NAME] 2 stated, the drawer contained the scale she used the day before to weigh meat. The weigh scale in the drawer had a sticky residue.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:35 a.m., with [NAME] 1, in the kitchen, a weigh scale had sticky residue on it. [NAME] 1 stated, when the scale is stored in the drawer it should be stored clean. [NAME] 1 stated, the scale was not clean and was sticky. [NAME] 1 removed the weigh scale from the drawer and started cleaning it.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, FOOD PREPARATION SUBJECT: FOOD PREPARATION, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . utensils and equipment will be cleaned and sanitized after each use .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood Contact Surfaces, and Utensils (A): Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . 4-602.13 Non-FOOD CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues .
g. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:22 a.m., with CDM, in the dry storeroom, a plastic bin of brown rice was not labeled or date listed. A plastic bin of dried potato was not labeled or dated. CDM stated she was unable to find a label or date for the brown rice or dried potato.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 10:37 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, a clear plastic bin was seen with a white substance inside. The bin had no label or date on it. CDM stated, the white substance inside the bin was thickener. CDM stated, the bin should have been labeled and dated.
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Commercially processed food . Marking the date or day the original container is opened in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, with a procedure to discard the FOOD on or before the last date or day by which the FOOD must be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded .
h. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., with CDM, in the walk-in refrigerator, crates used to store milk were on the floor. CDM stated, it was the facility's practice to store the milk in crates on the floor.
During a review of the professional reference titled, USDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USDA Food Code indicated, . Section 3-305.11, Foods should be stored six inches above the floor .
i. During an observation on 8/24/22, at 8:25 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was washing steam table pans and placing them in the rinse side of the sink.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:57 a.m., with [NAME] 2, in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 placed a stack of washed stacked steam table pans on a clean rack. The seven steam table pans were wet, stacked together and not inverted. One of the seven pans had food debris. [NAME] 2 stated, the practice was to air dry the steam table pans and store them inverted once they were dry. [NAME] 2 stated, the steam table pans were not stored correctly. [NAME] 2 stated, she usually stored them inverted. [NAME] 2 stated, one of the steam table pans was not clean. [NAME] 2 removed the seven pans from the clean rack.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: DISHWASHING PROCEDURES (DISHMACHINE), dated 2018, indicated, . All dishes should be inspected after coming out of the dish-machine and if the dishes are not clean then they should be washed again in the dish-machine. Allow racks of dishes . to air dry . Do not rack and stack wet dishes . allow dishes to drain thoroughly and air dry after washing .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food- Contact Surfaces, Nonfood Contact Surface, and Utensils, the food- contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations; Nonfood- contact surface of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 4-901.11, Equipment and Utensils, Air Drying Required, after cleaning and sanitizing, equipment and utensils: (A) Shall be air-dried .
j. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, there was a black sticky substance on the walk-in refrigerator door. The black sticky substance obscured (keep from being seen) the color and texture of the door. The black sticky substance when touched with a hand would transfer onto the hand. CDM stated, the walk-in door was not clean. CDM state,d the walk-in door should be cleaned. The walk-in refrigerator had food debris, a package of (brand name) snacks and food wrappers on the floor under the racks. CDM stated, the floor should be free of trash and food.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:36 a.m., with DA 1, in the kitchen, a plastic container containing clean divided plates had food debris and white/yellowish dried substance at the bottom of the container. DA 1 stated, the container was used to store clean divided plates. DA 1 stated, the container was not clean. DA 1, stated the facility's practice was to clean the plastic container every couple of days. DA 1 removed the plastic container.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:33 a.m., with [NAME] 1, in the kitchen, the knife rack had white, beige and brown particles on the top of it. Knives were stored on the rack. [NAME] 1 stated, the knife rack was used to store clean knives. [NAME] 1 stated, the rack was not clean. [NAME] 1 stated, it should have been wiped and sanitized.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 4:29 p.m., with the CDM, the CDM stated, dishware with food debris was not be clean and should have been washed again. CDM stated, dirty items should not be placed with clean dishware.
During a review the professional reference titled, USDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USDA food Code indicated, . 4-602.13 Non-FOOD CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues .
k. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:22 a.m., with CDM, in the sanitation closet, two brooms were touching the floor. CDM stated, the brooms should not be on the floor. CDM stated, the brooms should be hung up so they do not touch the floor.
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . 501.113 Storing Maintenance Tools . Maintenance tools such as brooms, mops, vacuum cleaners, and similar items shall be: (A)Stored so they do not contaminate FOOD, EQUIPMENT,UTENSILS, LINENS, and SINGLE-SERVICE and SINGLE-USE ARTICLES; and (B) Stored in an
SERIOUS
(H)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive systematic approach to ens...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive systematic approach to ensure effective monitoring and maintenance of acceptable parameters of nutritional status for three of three sampled Residents (Residents 6, 34, and 79) when:
1. Resident 6 experienced a severe unplanned weight loss of 21 pounds (lbs.) equivalent to 11.8% of total body weight according to weights obtained from 5/13/22 to 8/8/22. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) staff obtained weights, but Nursing Staff did not communicate the weight loss to the Physician or Registered Dietitian (RD) until 8/7/22. On 8/7/22, RD 1 noted a nine-pound weight loss (5.4%) for one month but did not note the 21 pound loss over 3 months. RD 1 did not communicate the weight loss or her recommendations to the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a healthcare approach that integrates multiple disciplines through collaboration). On 8/16/22, the IDT team noted an 11-pound weight loss from weights obtained from 7/6/22 to 8/8/22 and recommended a referral to RD 1. Nursing staff did not implement the RD's written recommendations for 8/7/22. Nursing staff did not report the recommended RD interventions to the physician.
2. Resident 34 experienced a severe unplanned weight loss of 22 pounds (13.5%) from weights obtained from 2/1/22 to 8/2/22. RD 3 noted weight loss of 15 pounds (8.4%) over 3 months on 2/6/22 and did not recommend individualized interventions to address the weight loss. RD 4 noted continued weight loss on 4/15/22 and made recommendations. The IDT did not implement RD 4's recommendations.
3. Resident 79 experienced a severe unplanned weight loss of 13.2 pounds (10%) over three months, from 5/10/22 to 8/16/22 and weight loss of 12.2 pounds (11%) over six months, from 3/3/22 to 8/16/22 and no RD consult or recommendations were made.
These failures resulted in Residents 6, 34 and 79's decline in nutritional status leading to severe weight loss and the potential for compromised clinical status, fatigue, loss of muscle mass, susceptibility for infection and possibly death.
Findings:
1. During a record review of the document titled, admission Record (AR) dated 6/7/22, for Resident 6, the AR indicated, Resident 6 was a [AGE] year old male with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements), muscle weakness, embolism (obstruction of an artery) and thrombosis (clotting of blood) of deep veins of left lower extremity (leg), anxiety, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD, a condition in which acidic gastric fluid flows backward into the esophagus), depression, anxiety, and heartburn.
During a record review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function), dated 8/5/22, the MDS assessment indicated, Resident 6's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment used to identify a resident's current cognition) score was 14 out of 15, which indicated Resident 6 was cognitively intact.
During a record review, of Resident 6's MDS Section G Functional Status (Section G), dated 8/5/22, indicated Resident 6 ate with . supervision-oversight, encouragement, and cueing . and need assistance . setup help only .
During an interview on 8/23/22, at 9:20 a.m., with Resident 6, Resident 6 stated he had lived at the facility for one year, five weeks and 2 days. Resident 6 stated the facility's food is not good.
During concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 12:03 p.m., with Registered Dietitian (RD) 1, RD 1 reviewed the document titled, Weights and Vital Summary (WVS) for Resident 6, dated 1/1/22 to 8/31/22. RD 1 verified the following weights and dates for Resident 6:
5/13/22
178 lbs.
6/8/22
171 lbs.
6/13/22
171 lbs.
6/18/22
171 lbs.
7/6/22
168 lbs.
8/1/22
159 lbs.
8/8/22
157 lbs.
RD 1 verified the weight loss from 5/13/22 to 8/8/22 was 21 pounds, indicating an 11.8% weight loss over 3 months.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 12:03 p.m., with RD 1, RD 1 reviewed Resident 6's Progress Notes Dietary Note (PNDN), dated 8/7/22. RD 1 verified the PNDN indicated, . Res [Resident] was tested positive for covid [COVID-19, a respiratory virus caused by the SARS-CoV-2] on 7/29. Res is a/o [alert and oriented] x3 [to person, place, and time] and is able to make needs known. Res average po [oral] intake ~ [approximate] 75%. Res has improved po intake from last week . Per snf [Skilled Nursing Facility] progress note on 8/2, res had mildly diminished appetite last week. Suspect last week weight loss dt [due to] decreased po intake dt covid + [positive]. Current po meets > 75% of estimated needs for weight maintenance. Weight: 8/1/22 159 lbs 7/6/22 168 lbs Weight change: -9 [pounds] (-5.4% 0 weight change in a month . Nutrition dx [diagnosis]: Unintentional weight loss RT [sic] decreased appetite dt covid + AEB [abnormal Eating Behaviors] -9# (-5.4%) weight change in a month. I [Intervention]: continue poc [plan of care]- If res weight continues to be downward trending, consider a fortified diet and whole milk 4 oz [ounces, a unit of measure] TID [three times a day] with meals . RD 1 stated, she did not know why she did not address a three month weight loss of 21 pounds (11.8%) in her note. RD 1 stated she noticed the one-month weight loss. RD stated, she did not do look back at previous weight loss for a trend. RD 1 stated, she sometimes attended IDT meetings. RD 1 stated, she was only at the facility 2 days per week. RD 1 stated, the nurses notified the physician of weight loss and RD recommendations.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 1:38 p.m., with RD 2, RD 2 stated, she was the Director of Operations of [consulting nutrition company] and RD 1 reported to RD 2. RD 2 stated, if a resident had weight loss in a week, RD 2 would review the weekly weight loss, but review trends in the total weight loss over time to determine contributing factors. RD 2 stated, a RD needed to look at short-term and long-term weight loss when the resident was evaluated. RD 2 stated, there were triggers to evaluate for weekly, monthly, three month and six-month weight loss that had not been performed.
During a record review of Resident 6's Care Plan (CP), dated 4/12/21, the CP indicated . Monitor and record food intake at each meal . Monitor and evaluate any weight loss. Determine percentage lost and follow the facility protocol for weight loss . Alert dietitian if consumption is poor for more than 48 hours . If weight decline persist [sic], contact Physician and Dietitian immediately . Inform resident representative/surrogate decision maker of resident's significant weight loss .
During a record review of Resident 6's Documentation Survey Report v2 (Intake), dated 5/1/22 to 8/26/22, the Intake indicated, intake was blank for three mealtimes in May, intake was blank for 14 mealtimes in June, and intake was blank for four mealtimes in August.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 11:41 a.m., with CNA 2, CNA 2 reviewed Resident 79's Intake, dated 7/1/22 to 8/26/22. CNA 2 stated, blank spaces on mealtimes meant the CNA did not record intake. CNA 2 stated, if there was no intake, it should have been marked 0.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Weight Monitoring and Management, dated 1/2019, the P&P indicated, . a Weight Variance Committee . will: -Be responsible for the weight monitoring system. - Ensure that intervention(s) to manage the unplanned and significant weight loss/gain of the resident is appropriate and implemented in a timely manner . RNA [Restorative Nursing Assistant] will provide a copy of the weekly and monthly weight to the Director of Nursing, Dietary supervisor/RD, MDS Coordinator, Administrator and DSD [Director of Staff Development] to monitor weight management . any resident who weighs 100 lbs. or more and with a weight change of 5 lbs. in a week will be evaluated by the Weight Variance Committee to determine causative factors for significant weight change. Intervention will be provided to residents with significant weight loss . Any resident weight that varies reporting period by 5% in 30 days, 7.5% in 90 days and 10% in 180 days will be evaluated by the Interdisciplinary Team to determine the cause of weight loss . Assessment of risk factors for weight change and intervention required . Physician and responsible party will be notified by licensed nurse regarding weight loss . notification will be documented in the medical record . A plan of care addressing the significant weight variance . will be initiated by the Licensed Nurse/Dietary Supervisor/RD upon identification . Registered Dietician or Designee will be responsible for reviewing weight report, recommending any additional nutritional interventions, documenting progress . updating the resident care plan . discussing the weight changes with the Weight Variance Committee . Licensed Nurse will communicate and follow up with attending physician dietary recommendation to manage identified significant weight loss . Residents meeting criteria for significant weight loss . will be weighed weekly . Weekly weight will be reviewed by the Weight Variance Committee to address intervention [sic] that will manage significant weight loss . Director of Nursing Services and the Weight Variance Committee will determine the need to initiate the Weight Risk Note with the Attending Physician to address contributing factors . and intervention to manage . The Interdisciplinary Team will address significant weight change identified during initial, quarterly, and annual assessment . to ensure appropriate intervention .
During an interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 4:35 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, the Weight Variance Committee's (WVC) notes were documented in the medical record in the IDT Notes. DON stated, the WVC consisted of DON, ADON, RD, Administrator, and Director of Activities.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 5:24 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the Progress Note IDT Notes (IDT Note), dated 8/16/22, for Resident 6 was reviewed. DON stated, the IDT Note indicated, Regarding his monthly weight loss of 11 lbs [pounds-unit of measure] from 168 to 157 lbs, IDT reviewed the chart he recent [recently] covid recovered [from covid], recommended Dietitian referral. Resident and MD [Medical Doctor] notified . ADON stated, the DON or ADON notify the physician if there was a significant weight loss or a RD recommendation. DON stated, that he notified the physician and family. The Progress Note Dietary Note (Dietary Note), dated 8/7/22, for Resident 6 was reviewed. DON stated the Dietary Note indicated a nine-pound weight loss (5.4%) in one month from 7/6/22 to 8/1/22. ADON stated, We did not notify the physician on 8/7/22 because we were not aware of the RD note. DON stated the IDT did not review the RD's Dietary Note, but rather utilized the paper the RD provided weekly listing residents with weight loss and RD recommendations. The document, titled RD Recommendations (RDR), dated 8/7/22 was reviewed. DON stated, the RDR listed all the residents with weight variance for the week along with RD recommendations. DON stated, Resident 6 was not listed on the RDR for 8/7/22. ADON stated, the list was given to the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) who brought it to the IDT meeting. The WVS, dated 1/1/22 to 8/31/22 for Resident 6 was reviewed. DON stated, Resident 6 lost 21 pounds (-11.8%) from 5/13/22 to 8/8/22. DON stated, the WVS was not reviewed at the IDT meeting.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/6/22, at 2:11 p.m., with DON, the facility policy titled Calculating percentages at Meal Times, dated 2018, was reviewed. DON stated, the policy indicated, . The Food and Nutrition Services department provides the meal percentage charts . for the CNA's [Certified Nursing Assistants] to record the meal intake of each resident . DON stated, the CNAs were to document each meal intake. ADON stated, if staff did not document every meal then there was no documentation. ADON stated, If they don't [document], they don't.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/6/22, at 2:37 p.m., with RD 1, the Nutrition Screen and Assessment (NSA), dated 2/1/21 for Resident 6 was reviewed. RD 1 stated, the NSA type was indicated as Admission and the query for weight was left blank. RD 1 stated, the NSA indicated, . no weight available to assess BMI [Body Mass Index, a measure of body fat calculated with weight and height], will request from nursing . RD 1 stated, Resident 6's weight was available in the medical record and recorded on 1/22/21. RD stated, the weight was important to complete a NSA. RD 1 stated, if no weight had been available, she used the weight from the hospital or other resources.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Nutritional Assessment, dated 10/2017, the Nutritional Assessment indicated, . The nutritional assessment will be conducted by the multidisciplinary team and shall identify at least the following components . Usual body weight . Current height and weight .
During a review of a professional reference, titled, Weight loss and Parkinson's disease retrieved from https://www.apdaparkinson.org/article/weight-loss-parkinsons-disease/, dated 2022, indicated, . Weight loss has been linked to a poorer quality of life and more rapid progression of PD [Parkinson's Disease] . Inadequate food intake can contribute to malnutrition . malnutrition can subsequently be the cause of increased susceptibility to infection, increased fatigue and increased frailty .
During a review of a professional reference titled, Early weight loss in parkinsonism predicts poor outcomes, dated 11/28/17, indicated, monitoring weight and timely dietary interventions to counteract weight loss may significantly improve the outcome of Parkinson's disease patients .,weight loss .,was associated with higher risk of dependency, dementia, and death .
During a review of a professional reference, retrieved from https://www.michaeljfox.org/news/ask-md-weight-loss-and-parkinsons-disease, titled, Ask the MD: Weight loss and Parkinson's Disease, dated 11/9/17, indicated, . weight loss in Parkinson's is common, but it's usually mild or, at most, moderate .
2. During a review of Resident 34's admission Record(AR), dated 1/5/22, indicated, Resident 34 was a [AGE] year old male with diagnoses of hemiplegia (severe or complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow to the brain) affecting the right dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), hyperlipidemia (when the blood has too many lipids or fats, such as cholesterol), dementia, epilepsy (a disorder of the brain characterized by repeated seizures), depression, anxiety, atrial fibrillation (irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots in the heart), gastro-esophageal reflux [GERD- when stomach contents and acid rise up into the esophagus], and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties).
During a review of Resident 34's MDS, dated 6/17/22, Section C Cognitive Patterns (Section C), indicated Resident 34's BIMS score was 3 out of 15, which indicated Resident 34 was severely cognitively impaired.
During a review of Resident 34's MDS, dated 6/17/22, Section G Functional Status (Section G), indicated, for eating, Resident 34 needed . Limited assistance-resident highly involved in activity; staff provide guided maneuvering of limbs or other non-weight-bearing assistance . one person physical assist .
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:39 a.m., Resident 34 was observed sitting up in bed and fed himself with gray handled weighted utensils (provide additional weight in the handles to help stabilize hand and arm movements for those who experience shaking while eating). Resident 34 stated, he was eating well.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 11:52 a.m., with RD 1, the WVS, dated 1/6/22 to 8/8/22, for Resident 34 was reviewed. RD 1 verified that the WVS indicated, the following weights and dates for Resident 34:
1/06/22
167 lbs.
1/17/22
171 lbs.
1/24/22
166 lbs.
2/01/22
163 lbs.
2/10/22
164 lbs.
2/14/22
164 lbs.
3/03/22
157 lbs.
3/09/22
157 lbs.
4/08/22
150 lbs.
4/12/22
150 lbs.
4/20/22
148 lbs.
4/25/22
144 lbs.
5/02/22
144 lbs.
5/09/22
148 lbs.
5/17/22
152 lbs.
5/23/22
151 lbs.
5/30/22
151 lbs.
6/06/22
149 lbs.
6/13/22
144 lbs.
6/20/22
144 lbs.
6/27/22
147 lbs.
7/05/22
146 lbs.
7/13/22
145 lbs.
7/19/22
147 lbs.
7/27/22
144 lbs.
8/02/22
141 lbs.
8/08/22
146 lbs.
During a review of Resident 34's Progress Notes Dietary Note (Dietary Note), dated 1/29/22, indicated RD 3 noted, . Res with weight loss X 1 week. Eating 25-100% of a mechanical soft, NAS [No added salt], NTL [thickened liquid] diet. Also receives [high calorie, high protein] shakes 4 oz TID [three times a day] with meals. Built up utensils provided to encourage self-feeding, assistance also required . At risk for weight loss d/t varied po intake, dementia, COPD, depression, GERD . Involuntary weight loss r/t varied po intake AEB 5 [pound] (2.9%) weight loss x 1 week . Recommend add [fortified nutritional drink] 4 oz BID .
During a review of Resident 34's Order Summary (OS), dated 3/1/22, the OS indicated, (fortified nutritional drink) 4 oz (ounces- unit of measure) two times a day with meals was ordered for Resident 34 on 2/6/22.
During a review of Resident 34's Dietary Note, dated 2/6/22, indicated, RD 3 noted, . Wts [weights]: 163# [#-pounds] (2/1), 178# (11/9) . Involuntary weight loss r/t varied po intake AEB 15# (8.4%) weight loss x 3 months . continue plan of care .
During a review of Resident 34's IDT Note, dated 3/10/22, indicated, . Monthly weights reviewed. Noted 7 lbs weight loss in a month. Eating between 0-50% of . most meals with occasional refusal at times . No s/sx [signs or symptoms] of dehydration . Resident at nutritional risk . NP informed verbally of resident's weight loss. Will continue to monitor weight .
During a review of Resident 34's Dietary Note, dated 4/15/22, indicated RD 4 noted, . Wt [weight] trend: 150 lbs (4/8), 157 lbs (3/9), 167 lbs (1/6),191.2 lbs (10/5) significant wt change: -7 lbs X 1 month, -17 lbs (10%) X 3 months, -41 lbs (21.5%) X 6 months . RD wt review complete d/t sig [significant] wt change . Res continues to tolerate diet as ordered. Averages 50% PO intake and consumes ONS [outside nutritional source, food from outside facility] as ordered . Res is begging to eat in dining room where CNAs and RNAs [Restorative Nursing Assistant] can cue resident and encourage resident to eat more. RD recommends weekly wts to monitor resident more closely . I [interventions]: Increase [fortified nutritional drink] to 120 ml [4 oz] to TID, Offer mech [mechanical] soft snacks TID between meals, Weekly wts monitoring, Resident to eat in dining room with cueing and encouragement from staff .
During a review of Resident 34's Order Summary (OS), dated 5/1/22, the OS indicated, [fortified nutritional drink] 4 oz. three times a day was ordered on 4/26/22. The OS indicated, Mech (mechanical) soft snack TID between meals was ordered on 4/26/22.
During a review of Resident 34's Dietary Note, dated 4/21/22, the Dietary Note indicated RD 4 noted . RNA reports . res has benefited from RNA dining and having cues to eat and consume ONS. RNA reports that res has begun to verbalize swallowing difficulty. RD recommends SLP [Speech Language Pathologist] evaluation for swallowing and choose safest most upgraded diet texture .
During a review of Resident 34's Dietary Note, dated 4/29/22, the Dietary Note indicated RD 4 noted . Wt: 144 lbs . Wt trend: 144 lbs (4/25), 148 lbs (4/20), 150 lbs (3/9), 167 lbs 91/6), 191.2 lbs (10/5) . Significant wt change: -4 lbs X 1 week . PO intake: 50% avg [average] . Res has reported to RNA that he is not tolerating current diet texture. SLP eval [evaluation] is in place to downgrade diet to puree . RD recommends increasing [fortified nutritional drink] to 240 ml [8 oz.] TID .
During a review of Resident 34's Order Summary (OS), dated 6/1/22, the OS indicated, [fortified nutritional drink] 8 oz. three times a day was ordered on 5/8/22.
During a review of Resident 34's Dietary Note, dated 5/16/22, the Dietary Note indicated RD 3 noted, . usually requires extensive assist with meals . Res with 4# weight gain X 1 week . Involuntary weight loss . 15# (9.2%) weight loss x 3 months and 30#(16.9%) weight loss x 6 months . Continue plan of care .
During a review of Resident 34'sDietary note, dated 6/17/22, the Dietary Note indicated RD 4 noted, . Significant weight change: -21 lbs (12.4%) x 6 months . Res maintains PO intake 50% avg with several meal refusals, res may not be tolerating diet as ordered. Refer to SLP for evaluation for proper diet texture . decline in condition .
During a review of Resident 34's Dietary note, dated 7/1/22, the Dietary Note indicated RD 4 noted, . Significant wt change: -5 lbs x 1 week, -20 lbs (12%) x 6 months . Res maintains PO intake 50% avg, multiple high calorie ONS ordered to facilitate increased energy intake and minimize risk for wt loss SLP order to evaluate and potentially modify diet texture is in place . Continues downward trend. Consider appetite stimulating medication . Fortify diet .
During a review of Resident 34's Order Summary (OS), dated 8/1/22, the OS indicated, Resident 34's diet and dietary supplements remain unchanged from 5/8/22.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 11:52 a.m., with RD 1, RD 1 reviewed Resident 34's WVS, dated 1/6/22 to 8/8/22. RD 1 stated, Resident 34 lost 21 pounds (12.6%) from 1/6/22 (167 lbs.) to 7/5/22 (146 lbs.). RD 1 reviewed Resident 34's Dietary Note, dated 8/7/22. RD 1 stated, the Dietary Note indicated, . trending downward x 1 month . -3# (-2.1%) weight change in a week; -5# (-3.4%) weight change in a month; -7# (-4.7%) weight change in 3 months . please offer snacks 2 x daily . RD 1 stated, she did not evaluate Resident 34 for overall long-term weight loss because her visit with Resident 34 was triggered by weekly weight loss. RD 1 stated, she did not notify the physician of weight loss. RD 1 stated she wrote the residents weight loss and recommendations on a sheet and gave it to the DON or ADON at the end of the day.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 11:53 a.m., with RD 1, RD 1 reviewed Resident 34's Dietary Note, dated 7/1/22. RD 1 stated, she did not follow up on the 7/1/22 recommendation for fortified diet and appetite stimulant because that was a different RD's recommendation. The Dietary Note, dated 8/11/22 was reviewed. RD 1 stated, the Dietary Note indicated RD 1 noted, .+5# (+3.5%) weight change in a week . no new nutrition dx [diagnosis] at this time . RD 1 stated, she did not look back at Resident 34's long-term weight loss, as a visit was triggered by weekly weight gain.
During a review of Resident 34's Documentation Survey Report v2 (Intake), dated 10/1/21 to 8/31/22, Intake indicated, for the month of January 2022, record of meal intake was blank for 40 mealtimes. Intake indicated, February 2022 had five blank mealtimes; March 2022 had one blank mealtime; April 2022 had five blank mealtimes; May 2022 had six blank mealtimes; June 2022 had eight blank mealtimes; July 2022 had nine blank mealtimes; and August 2022 had 17 blank mealtimes.
During a review of Resident 34's Care Plan (CP), initiated on 1/5/22, the CP indicated, . offer snack between meals . was entered on 4/26/22. The CP indicated, . [fortified nutritional drink] 8 oz TID . was entered on 5/8/22.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 5:24 p.m., with DON and ADON, the WVS, dated 1/6/22 to 8/8/22, for Resident 34 was reviewed. DON stated, the WVS indicated on 7/5/22, Resident 34 had weight loss of 21 pounds (12.6%) for a six-month period. The Dietary Note for Resident 34, dated 7/1/22, was reviewed. DON stated, the Dietary Note indicated, the RD 4 recommended an appetite stimulant and fortified diet. The Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Intervention (RDNI) sheet, dated 7/1/22 was reviewed. DON stated, Resident 34 was not on the RDNI and therefore the IDT was not aware of the recommendation. DON stated, The RDNI is document we use. DON stated, the IDT did not look at the Dietary Notes. ADON stated, Resident 34's name and recommendation were on the RDNI, dated 7/1/22. The RDNI indicated for Resident 34, . Consider appetite stimulating medication . Fortify diet . ADON stated, the IDT did not address the RD recommendation of 7/1/22.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/6/22, at 3:30 p.m., with DON, DON stated, there was no order for a SLP (Speech-Language Pathologist) evaluation, nor a SLP note in Resident 34's medical record. DON reviewed a document titled, Progress Note, dated 7/4/22 to 7/7/22, indicated, . 7/4/22 . Nurses Notes . Spoke ST [Speech Therapist], resident will be placed on 3 days trial of Pureed NAS [no added salt] diet . [ADON] . e-SIGNED . 7/7/22 . Resident reviewed due to 3 days trial of pureed diet related to wt loss, per nursing staff resident dislikes the food, eats even a little. ST made aware. Previous diet resumed. Dietary informed . [ADON] . e-SIGNED .
During a review of a professional reference retrieved from https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Press-Office/Press-releases/Loss-of-muscle-and-weight-associated-with-disability-after-stroke titled, Loss of muscle and weight associated with disability after stroke, dated 1/25/19, indicated, . older patients with moderately sever stroke were particularly prone to developing cachexia [weakness and wasting of the body] after stroke, so it is very important to monitor their body weight, appetite and nutritional status .
During a review of a professional reference retrieved from https://www.pulmonologyadvisor.com/home/topics/copd/unintended-weight-loss-in-outpatients-with-copd/ titled, Unintended weight loss in outpatients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, dated 6/9/22, indicated, . findings from this study demonstrate the importance of nutritional screening . for patients with COPD who are underweight .
3. During a review of Resident 79's admission Record (AR), dated 6/27/21, the AR indicated, Resident 79 was a [AGE] year old female with diagnoses of dementia, osteoarthritis (OA- a degeneration of joint cartilage and the underlying bone), asthma (a respiratory condition marked by spasms of the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty breathing), anemia (a deficiency of red blood cells leading to lack of oxygen in the blood and fatigue), hyperlipidemia, hypertension (high blood pressure), and anxiety.
During a review of Resident 79's MDS, dated 7/29/22, the MDS indicated, Resident 79's BIMS score was 5 out of 15, which indicated Resident 79 was severely cognitively impaired.
During a review of Resident 79's MDS Section G Functional Status (Section G), dated 7/29/22, the Section G indicated, during eating, Resident 79 needed . supervision- oversight, encouragement or cueing . one person physical assist .
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:33 a.m., with Resident 79, Resident 79 was observed sitting up in bed with a CNA standing at the bedside. Resident 79 yelled, Don't touch me! Get out of here! I don't want to see you!. CNA respectfully told Resident 79, Okay and moved away.
During an observation on 8/23/22, at 1:20 p.m., Resident 79 was sitting up in bed. A lunch tray was set-up by CNA in front of Resident 97. Resident 97 asked for orange juice.
During an observation on 8/23/22, at 1:28 p.m., Resident 79 finished orange juice. No staff were at bedside. Lunch tray was uncovered and 100% of meal on tray was untouched.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 1:41 p.m., Resident 97 was sitting up in bed with eyes closed. 100% of meal was on tray. LVN 9 stated, Resident 97 needed assistance while eating.
During an observation on 8/24/22, at 1:15 p.m., Resident 97 was eating assisted by staff.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/25/22, at 8:47 a.m., CNA 4 was putting away Resident 97's breakfast tray with 100% of meal uneaten. CNA 4 stated, Resident 97 did not want to eat. CNA 4 stated, Resident 97 started fighting CNA 4. CNA 4 stated, the nurse tried to get Resident 97 to eat, but Resident 97 fought with the nurse.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 11:26 a.m., with CNA 2, CNA 2 reviewed Resident 79's Intake, dated 7/1/22 to 8/26/22. CNA 2 stated, blank spaces on mealtimes meant the CNA did not record intake. CNA 2 stated, if there was no intake, it should have been marked 0. CNA 2 stated, there were a lot of blanks for the resident to not be eating. The Intake nine mealtimes were blank for July 2022 and 14 mealtimes were blank for August 2022 at that time. Six of the 14 blank mealtimes for August 2022 were from 8/7/22 to 8/18/22.
During a review of Resident 79's Care Plan, dated 8/10/22, indicated, . monitor meal intake . The Care Plan dated 8/16/22, indicated, . monitor and record food intake at each meal . alert dietitian if consumption is poor for more than 48 hours ."[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of residents' property for one of three sampled residents (Resident 26) when the facility ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of residents' property for one of three sampled residents (Resident 26) when the facility did not take action to resolve Resident 26's lost money which was not logged in his belongings inventory list.
This failure resulted in the loss of Resident 26's 40 dollars.
Findings:
During an interview on 8/23/22, at 9:13 a.m., with Resident 26, Resident 26 stated, a month ago she had lost 40 dollars. Resident 26 stated, she informed Social Service department regarding her loss but was not reimbursed. Resident 26 stated, she asked staff to buy her drinks and snacks from the vending machine. Resident 26 stated, it was the staff who took her money.
During a review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) Assessment, dated 6/10/22, indicated Resident 26's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - assessment of cognitive status for memory and judgment) scored 14 out of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicates cognitively intact, 08-12 indicates moderately impaired, and 00-07 indicates severe impairment). The BIMS assessment indicated Resident 26 was cognitively intact.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 3:29 p.m., with Social Service Director (SSD), Resident 26's Theft and Loss Referral Slip, dated 7/8/22, was reviewed. The slip indicated, . Staff will not replace money, HX [history of allegations of staff stealing money . SSD stated, Resident 26 received money from the business office monthly and would keep her money in the nightstand. SSD stated, at the time Resident 26's roommate was interviewed, she had validated staff did not count the money before putting the envelope with money into the drawer. SSD stated, Resident 26 often asked staff to purchase snacks and soda. SSD stated, it was the Certified Nursing Assistants duty to do inventory of the money.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 3:39 p.m., with Medical Records (MR), Resident 26's Inventory of Personal Possessions was reviewed. MR stated, there was no money inventoried. MR stated, if money was inventoried it would have been listed on the value items.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/25/22, at 9:23 a.m., with Business Office Manager (BOM), Resident 26's Receipt, dated 7/5/22, was reviewed. The receipt indicated, Resident 26's name, address, 40 dollars and signature of two witnesses. BOM stated, Resident 26 received 40 dollars with two witnesses present.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:55 p.m., with BOM, BOM stated, Resident 26's 40 dollars was not replenished due to having a history of accusing staff of stealing her money. BOM stated, there was no system to track and keep record of Resident 26's money. BOM stated, the facility should tally and keep record of Resident 26's money when she buys snacks to ensure remaining balance was inventoried.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 12:59 p.m., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON stated, residents should keep their money in a locked drawer for safekeeping. ADON stated, there should always be a witness (another person) when handling residents' money.
During a review of the policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Theft and loss, dated 1/2021, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, . It is the policy of this facility provide a theft and loss program which protects and conserves residence, facility, visitors and employee property . this policy and procedure shall be the basis for the facility staffed and lost policies and procedures . A written resident personal property inventory must be recorded in the inventory list . upon the resident's admission and it must be: . updated and maintain current by noting all items being added or deleted by the written request of the resident or the person acting upon the residents behalf .
During a review of the policy and procedure titled, Personal Property, dated 9/2012, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, . residents are permitted to retain and use personal possessions and appropriate clothing, as space permits . The facility will promptly investigate any complaints of misappropriation or mistreatment of residents property .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-assessment of physical...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for two of six sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 20) when Resident 9 and Resident 20's smoking habits was inaccurately coded on the MDS assessment.
This failure had the potential to result in Resident 9 and Resident 20's care needs not met.
Findings:
During a review of Resident 9's, Face sheet (document with resident demographic and medical diagnosis information), dated 8/25/22, indicated diagnoses which included nicotine (the substance in tobacco that people become addicted to) dependence, emphysema (damage to the air sacs in the lungs) and shortness of breath.
During a review of Resident 9's, Smoking Safety Evaluation, dated 2/21/22, the Smoking Safety Evaluation indicated, Resident 9 used tobacco.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 9:33 a.m., with Resident 9, Resident 9 stated, she had always smoked since she was admitted to the facility. Resident 9 stated, she and her roommate went out to smoke daily.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/25/22, at 9:53 a.m., with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), MDSC stated, Resident 9 was a smoker. MDSC reviewed Resident 9's smoking assessment dated [DATE] which indicated, Resident 9 was a smoker. MDSC reviewed Resident 9's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], section J. Resident 9's tobacco use was not coded on the annual MDS assessment. MDSC stated, Resident 9 should have been coded as a smoker.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 9: 23 a.m., with Resident 20, Resident 20 stated, the staff asked him if he smoked when he got admitted to the facility. Resident 20 stated, he replied yes, he smoked everyday. Resident 20 stated, the facility had a smoking schedule and he went outside everyday to smoke.
During a review of Resident 20's clinical record titled, admission Record (document containing resident personal information), dated 8/25/22, the admission Record indicated, Resident 20 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included, . Nicotine dependence, emphysema and wheezing (coarse whistling or rattling sound of breath when airway is partially blocked) .
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/25/22, at 9:58 a.m., with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), MDSC stated, Resident 20's name was included in the list of residents who smoked. MDSC reviewed Resident 20's Admission/Medicare 5 day MDS assessment, dated 5/26/2022, section J which indicated, Resident 20's tobacco use was not coded on the MDS assessment. MDSC stated, Resident 20 should have been coded as a smoker.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 4:01 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, the MDS should be accurately coded. DON stated, the MDS was to ensure accuracy of the assessment and to check the need for further assessments for new admissions. DON stated, if a new admissions was a smokers then smoking assessment was completed.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Assessment Instrument, dated 9/2010, the P&P indicated, . The Interdisciplinary Team must use the MDS form currently mandated by federal and State regulations to conduct the resident assessment .
During a review of professional reference titled, Resident Assessment Instrument version #.0 Manual, dated 10/19, indicated, . Tobacco use includes tobacco used in any form . If the resident states he or she used tobacco in some form during the 7-day look back period code 1, yes . If the resident is unable to answer or indicates that he or she did not use tobacco of any kind during the look back period, review the medical record and interview staff for any indication of tobacco use by the resident during the look back period .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident-centered comprehensive care plan for two of three sampled residents (Resident 21 and Resident 20) when:
1....
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident-centered comprehensive care plan for two of three sampled residents (Resident 21 and Resident 20) when:
1. Residents 21 did not have a care plan for the use of anticoagulant [blood thinner] medications. This failure placed resident 21 at risk for complications from not having care needs planned by licensed nurses to determine if nursing interventions needed to be added, changed or completed.
2. Resident 20 did not have a care plan for smoking. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 20's smoking needs going unmet.
Findings:
1. During a review of Resident 21's clinical record titled admission RECORD dated 8/24/22, was reviewed. The admission Record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility with the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow and blood clot formation).
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/25/22, at 10:09 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 21 Medication Orders dated 8/12/22 was reviewed. The Medication Order indicated, . Apixaban [blood thinning medication used to treat and prevent blood clots] Tablet 2.5 MG [milligram-unit of measure] . LVN 1 reviewed resident 21's care plans. LVN 1 stated, there was no care plan developed for the use of apixaban. LVN 1 stated, the care plan should have included interventions such as monitoring for signs of bleeding, bruising, dizziness and GI [gastrointestinal ] discomfort. LVN 1 stated, the nurse who received the order for the medication should have made the care plan.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 1:01 p.m., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON stated, the Licensed Nurse should have developed a care plan for apixaban. ADON stated, a care plan should have been developed as soon as the medication was ordered. ADON stated, the importance of the care plan was to include interventions, risks and monitoring for signs of bleeding.
During a review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 12/16 was reviewed. The policy indicated, . A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives in time timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change .
2. During a review of Resident 20's clinical record titled, admission RECORD [AR], dated 8/25/22, the AR indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility with the diagnosis of nicotine (the substance in tobacco that people become addicted to) dependence, emphysema (damage to the air sacs in the lungs) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease marked by permanent damage to tissues in the lungs, making it hard to breathe).
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/25/22, at 8:45 a.m., with Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS), RNS reviewed Resident 20's clinical record. RNS stated, Resident 20 did not have a care plan for smoking. RNS stated, there should have been a care plan or Resident 20's smoking habits.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/25/22, at 8:56 a.m., with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), MDSC reviewed Resident 20's care plans. MDSC stated, Resident 20 did not have a care plan for smoking. MDSC stated, there should have been a care plan for smoking since Resident 20 was a smoker who goes out to smoke daily.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 3:39 p.m., with DON, DON stated, MDS should have checked all new residents admitted in the facility to ensure care plans were in place. DON stated, if the new resident was a smoker, there should have been a care plan (smoking). DON stated, Resident 20 did not have a care plan for smoking.
During a review of facility's policy and procedure titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 12/16, the policy and procedure indicated, . Identifying problem areas and their causes, and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident . care plan interventions are chosen only after careful gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident-centered comprehensive care plan was revised for two of two non-sampled residents (Residents 80 and Resident 285) when:...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident-centered comprehensive care plan was revised for two of two non-sampled residents (Residents 80 and Resident 285) when:
1. Resident 80 was lactose intolerant and the care plan focus titled, Impaired nutritional and hydration status, did not reflect lactose intolerance. This failure placed Resident 80 at risk for complications abdominal cramps, bloating, and diarrhea) due to lactose intolerance and not having care needs planned by licensed nurses to determine if interventions needed to be added, changed or completed.
2. Resident 285 preferred her breakfast meal to be served at 7:00 a.m. and there was no documentation in Resident 285's care plan stating Resident 285 requested her breakfast at 7:00 a.m. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 285's mealtime preferences not being met.
Findings:
1. During a review of Resident 80's clinical record titled, admission RECORD, dated 8/25/22, was reviewed. The admission Record indicated, Resident 80 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of enterocolitis (inflammation of the small intestine and colon), asthma (respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty breathing) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease when the body's ability to produce insulin [a hormone] was impaired resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose [blood sugar] in the blood).
During an interview on 8/24/22, at 9:01 a.m., with Registered Dietitian (RD) 1. RD 1 stated, she was not involved with resident care plans. RD 1 stated, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) was responsible to revise the dietary care plan. RD 1 stated, care plans were resident centered and resident's lactose intolerance should have been addressed in the care plan.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 11:30 a.m., with RD 1, Resident 80's comprehensive care plan dated 7/26/22 was reviewed. RD 1 stated, if a resident was lactose intolerance it should be addressed on the care plan. RD 1 did not confirm Resident 80's lactose intolerance was addressed in the care plan.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 1:03 p.m., with CDM, CDM stated, nursing staff was responsible in initiating (developing) resident care plans. CDM stated, she was responsible for revising resident care plans to reflect new dietary interventions or problems. CDM stated, if a resident was lactose intolerant, she entered that information on the dietary profile (a document designed to obtain resident food preferences, intolerances and food allergies), the resident meal tray electronic system and the resident care plan. CDM stated, she was the only person in the dietary department responsible for updating resident dietary care plans.
2. During a review of Resident 285's clinical record titled, admission RECORD, dated 8/24/22, the admission Record indicated, Resident 285 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur (the bone of the thigh) and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
During an interview on 8/24/22, at 9:01 a.m., with Registered Dietitian (RD) 1. RD 1 stated, she was not involved with resident care plans. RD 1 stated, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) was responsible to revise the dietary care plan. RD 1 stated, care plans were resident centered and a preference for an early breakfast tray should have been addressed in the care plan.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 11:29 a.m., with RD 1, Resident 285's comprehensive care plan dated 8/24/22 was reviewed. RD 1 stated, care plans were resident-centered and a preference for an early breakfast tray should have been addressed in the care plan. RD 1 did not confirm a preference for an early breakfast tray was addressed in Resident 285's care plan.
During a review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 12/16, the policy indicated, . A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives in time timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provided services which met professional standards of quality of care for one of four sampled residents (Resident 19) when Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provided services which met professional standards of quality of care for one of four sampled residents (Resident 19) when Resident 19's supplemental (added when there is a lack or deficiency) oxygen flow rate was not administered according to the physician order.
This failure resulted in Resident 19 not receiving the amount oxygen she needed which could lead to breathing problems.
Findings:
During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (AR- document containing resident personal information), dated 8/25/22, the ARindicated, Resident 19 was admitted in the facility on 9/10/21, with diagnoses which included . dependence on supplemental oxygen .
During a review of Resident 19's Order Summary Report, dated 8/25/22, the Order Summary Report indicated, . Oxygen @ [at] 2L [liter]/min [minute] via [by way of] nasal cannula [a tubing used to deliver oxygen through the nose] continuously every shift .
During observation on 8/23/22, at 8:25 a.m., in room Resident 19's room, Resident 19 was laying in bed with eyes closed. Resident 19 was receiving oxygen at 1 liter per minute by nasal cannula.
During a concurrent observation, interview and record review on 8/23/22, at 12:05 p.m., in Resident 19's room, Resident 19 was sleeping in bed. Resident 19 had an oxygen cannula on her. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 7 looked at Resident 19's supplemental oxygen flow rate. LVN 7 stated, Resident 19's oxygen flow rate was set at 1 liter per minute. LVN reviewed Resident 19's order summary. LVN stated, . The oxygen order flow rate was 2L/min . LVN stated, Resident 19's oxygen should have been set at 2L/min not 1L/min. LVN stated, she did not check Resident 19's the oxygen flow rate in the morning. LVN stated, Resident 19 could developed respiratory distress as a result of not receiving the right amount of oxygen ordered.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 9:33 a.m., with Resident 19, Resident 19 stated, she used oxygen only when she was in bed.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 9:45 a.m., with Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS), RNS stated, the physician's order for oxygen should be followed. RNS stated, if resident was receiving less oxygen than ordered it could lead to respiratory distress.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 4:15 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, . Resident is able to adjust the oxygen flow rate, but the nurse still have to check the flow rate to make sure resident was receiving the correct amount of oxygen . DON stated the physician order should be followed.
During a review of facility's policy and procedure titled, Medication Orders, dated 11/2014, the policy and procedure indicated, . when recording orders for oxygen, specify the rate of flow, route and rationale .
During a professional reference review retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19377391/ titled, The use of medical orders in acute care oxygen therapy, dated 2009, the professional reference review indicated, . Oxygen is considered to be a drug requiring a medical prescription and is subject to any law that covers its use and prescription . authorized by a physician following legal written instruction to a qualified nurse .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program to support resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities for one of six sampled resident (Resident 61) when Resident 61 was not provided individual and independent activities designed to meet his interest.
This failure resulted in Resident 61 inactivity (lack of activity) which could potentially affect his physical, mental and psychosocial well-being.
Findings:
During an observation on 8/23/22, at 8:07 a.m., in Resident 61's room, Resident 61 was in bed in a semi-sitting position, eating. Resident did not answer to questions asked.
During an observation on 8/23/22, at 1:15 p.m., in Resident 61's room, Resident 61 was sitting in bed eating lunch.
During a review of Resident 61's clinical record titled, admission Record, (document containing resident personal information) dated 8/25/22, the admission Record' indicated Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, . Alzheimer's disease (disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) and muscle weakness .
During a review of Resident 61's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive [pertaining to reasoning, memory and judgement] and physical functional level) Assessment, dated 7/25/22, the MDS indicated, Resident 61's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-screening tool used in nursing to assess cognition) assessment score was 3 (three) out of 15 (0-15 scale [0-6 severe cognitive deficit, 7-12 moderate cognitive deficit, 13-15 no cognitive deficit]) indicating Resident 61 had severe cognitive deficit.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 1:14 p.m., with Activity Coordinator (AD), AD stated, her assistant was doing the activities for the residents while she was on medical leave for almost a month (from July to August). AD stated, there was no documentation to show on the type of activities the residents were receiving and who were attending activities. AD stated, she had just started an attendance calendar for all the residents. AD stated, the last group activities provided was on 6/26/22 due to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. AD stated, activities for the month of July were all in-room activities. AD stated, for Resident 61, he was a one on one in-room visits but there were no documentation of the one on one visits provided to resident. AD stated, they (AD and assistant) did not keep a list of residents they saw when they go out every morning to provide activities. AD stated, they did not have a calendar of activities.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 3:28 p.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 3, CNA 3 stated, she had seen the activity staff do nails with residents, mostly on Sundays. CNA 3 stated, she had not seen activity staff provide one on one activities to residents in their room.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 4:01 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, . Residents need to have activities especially now that they are in their rooms . residents get depressed because they do not have interactions . DON stated, his expectation was for activity staff to visit residents in their rooms to provide one on one activities. DON stated, room activity visits should be done especially to residents who are bedbound (unable to leave one's bed for some reason). DON stated, activity staff needed to start documentation of residents activities and preferences in their care plans.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Activity Policy and Procedure Manual (P&P), dated 7/12, the P&P indicated, . 1. The Activity Director plans and writes a schedule for all activities on a regularly scheduled basis. 2.The Activity Director uses attendance records, progress notes, and other pertinent resident data when planning the schedule . 4. The activity calendar includes inside and outside activities, including field and shopping trips for the residents as well as activities for bedridden residents . Monthly activity calendar will be posted in a conspicuous location. Calendars will be written in a large, visible print and readable from wheelchair height . For those residents whose physical disabilities prohibit movement to a group activity, or those who do not wish to participate in group activities, the activity program provides: Activities which make maximum use of each resident's physical and mental abilities .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from accident hazards for two of three sampled residents (Resident 21 and 43) when Resident 21 an...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from accident hazards for two of three sampled residents (Resident 21 and 43) when Resident 21 and 43's low air loss (LAL- an air mattress with fluctuating air) mattress prescribed air pressure setting was not set based on the patient' weight.
This failure had the potential to cause fall with injury.
Findings:
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:33 a.m., with Resident 21, in Resident 21's room, Resident 21 was laying in bed on a LAL mattress. The LAL mattress air setting was on lock position and the LAL mattress air pressure was set at 180 pounds. Resident 21 stated, her mattress felt lumpy [uncomfortable] and was not at the correct setting.
During a review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) Assessment, dated 5/31/22, indicated, Resident 21's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- assessment of cognitive status for memory and judgment) assessment scored was 15 out of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicates cognitively intact, 8-12 indicates moderately impaired, and 0-7 indicates severe impairment). The BIMS assessment indicated Resident 15 was cognitively intact.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 9:40 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, Resident 21's weight summary was reviewed. The weight summary indicated, Resident 21 weighed 96 pounds on 8/24/22 and 8/16/22. LVN 2 stated, the Licensed Nurses were responsible in ensuring the LAL mattress was functioning correctly and the setting were corresponding with the residents current weight.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:45 a.m., with LVN 2, in Resident 21's room, Resident 21 was laying in bed on a low air loss mattress. The LAL mattress air pressure setting was on lock position and the air pressure was set at 180 pounds. The LAL mattress pump had six weight settings: 90 lb. (pound- unit of measure), 130 lb., 180 lb., 250 lb., 330 lb. LVN 2 stated, the mattress setting was set at 180 lbs. LVN 2 disarmed the lock button and changed the LAL mattress air pressure setting to 90 lbs. LVN 2 stated, Resident 21's weight was 96 pounds and the air pressure setting had been incorrectly set too high. LVN 2 stated, if the LAL mattress was not set at the correct air pressure weight setting, it could cause a fall or an injury to the resident. LVN 2 stated, it was the Licensed nurse responsibility to ensure that the air mattress air pressure setting was set at the correct weight.
During a review of Resident 21's LAL mattress manufacturer's guidelines titled, [Brand name of mattress pump] undated, the LAL mattress guideline indicated, . The product can only be operated by personnel who are qualified to perform general nursing procedures and have received adequate training in knowledge of prevention and treatment of pressure ulcer . According to the weight and height of the patient, adjust the pressure setting to the most comfortable level without bottoming out, then the pressure in the mattress will slowly increase to the intended value after the air mattress is ready to use .
During an observation on 8/24/22, at 9:25 a.m., in Resident 43's room, Resident 43 was laying in bed on a LAL mattress. The LAL mattress air setting was on lock position with the mattress air pressure set at 150 pounds
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 9:37 a.m., with LVN 2, Resident 43's weight summary was reviewed. The weight summary indicated, Resident 43 weighed 94 pounds on 8/24/22 and 8/16/22. LVN 2 stated, the LAL mattress was ordered for wound management.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:48 a.m., with LVN 2, in Resident 43's room, Resident 43 was laying in bed on a low air loss mattress. The LAL mattress air pressure setting was on lock position and the air pressure was set at 150 pounds. The LAL mattress pump had eight weight settings: 50 lb. (pound), 100 lb., 150 lb., 200 lb., 250 lb., 300 lb., 350 lb., 450 lb. LVN 2 stated the mattress setting was set at 150 lbs. LVN 2 disarmed the lock button and changed the LAL mattress air pressure setting to 100 lbs. LVN 2 stated, Resident 43's weight was 94 pounds and the air pressure setting had been incorrectly set too high. LVN 2 stated, if the LAL mattress was not set at the correct air pressure weight setting it could cause a fall or injury to the resident. LVN 2 stated it was the Licensed nurse responsibility to ensure that the air mattress air pressure setting was set at the correct weight.
During a review of Resident 43's Order Summary, dated 7/5/22, the Order Summary indicated, . Provide Air loss mattress for wound management .
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 12:44 p.m. with Administrator (ADM), ADM stated, if the resident needed a LAL mattress the facility called the company to install it. ADM stated, there was no process in place for licensed nurses to monitor the LAL pump setting to ensure the weight was coinciding with the residents' current weight. ADM stated, it was important for Licensed Nurses to be knowledgeable on the operation of the pump for power outages or weight changes. ADM stated, if the LAL mattress pressure was not at the correct setting it could be ineffective for wound management, ADM stated overinflation of the LAL mattress could possibly lead to a fall. ADM stated, the facility did not have a policy for LAL mattress use.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 12:56 p.m., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON stated, the facility did not have an LAL policy. ADON stated, there was no monitoring in place to ensure the LAL mattress was coinciding with the resident's current weights.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 1:34 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, the LAL pressure setting was set up by the company. DON stated, an overinflated mattress could potentially cause a resident to fall out of bed. DON stated, the LAL pressure should have been monitored because residents could have weight gain or weight loss. DON stated, the licensed nurses should have checked the settings to ensure the settings were coinciding with the residents' weight.
During a review of Resident 43's LAL mattress manufacturer's guidelines titled, [Brand name of mattress pump] undated, the LAL mattress guideline indicated, . The Weight Setting Buttons (+) and (-) can be used to adjust the pressure of the inflated cells based on the patient's weight. As the weight setting increase, the pressure level indicator lights up (green) with each added level of pressure . Eight pressure levels are available and indicated by increasing green light indicator .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Nurses have the competencies necessary to meet the needs of the residents for two of three sampled residents (...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Nurses have the competencies necessary to meet the needs of the residents for two of three sampled residents (Resident 21 and 43) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 and 5 did not have training and competencies to operate the low air loss (LAL- an air mattress with fluctuating air) mattress.
This failure had the potential to cause resident falls and injury due to inaccurate LAL pressure settings.
Findings:
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:33 a.m., with Resident 21, in Resident 21' s room, Resident 21 was laying in bed on a LAL mattress. The LAL mattress air setting was on lock position and the LAL mattress air pressure was set at 180 pounds. Resident 21 stated, her mattress felt lumpy [uncomfortable] and was not at the correct setting.
During a review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) Assessment, dated 5/31/22, indicated Resident 21's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS -assessment of cognitive status for memory and judgment) assessment scored was 15 out of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicates cognitively intact, 08-12 indicates moderately impaired, and 00-07 indicates severe impairment). The BIMS assessment indicated Resident 15 was cognitively intact.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 9:40 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, Resident 21's weight summary was reviewed. The weight summary indicated, Resident 21 weighed 96 pounds on 8/24/22 and 8/16/22. LVN 2 stated, it was the licensed nurses responsibility to ensure the LAL mattress was functioning correctly and the setting were corresponding with the resident's current weight.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:45 a.m., with LVN 2, in Resident 21's room, Resident 21 was laying in bed on a low air loss mattress. The LAL mattress air pressure setting was on lock position and the air pressure was set at 180 pounds. The LAL mattress pump had six weight settings: 90 lb. (pound- unit of measure), 130 lb., 180 lb., 250 lb., 330 lb. LVN 2 stated, the mattress setting was set at 180 lbs. LVN 2 disarmed the lock button and changed the LAL mattress air pressure setting to 90 lbs. LVN 2 stated, Resident 21's weight was 96 pounds and the air pressure setting had been incorrectly set too high. LVN 2 stated, if the LAL mattress was not set at the correct air pressure weight setting, it could cause a fall or an injury to the resident. LVN 2 stated, it was the Licensed Nurses' responsibility to ensure that the air mattress air pressure setting was set at the correct weight.
During a review of Resident 21's LAL mattress manufacturer's guidelines titled, [Brand name of mattress pump] undated, the LAL mattress guideline indicated, . The product can only be operated by personnel who are qualified to perform general nursing procedures and have received adequate training in knowledge of prevention and treatment of pressure ulcer . According to the weight and height of the patient, adjust the pressure setting to the most comfortable level without bottoming out, then the pressure in the mattress will slowly increase to the intended value after the air mattress is ready to use .
During an observation on 8/24/22, at 9:25 a.m., in Resident 43's room, Resident 43 was laying in bed on a LAL mattress. The LAL mattress air setting was on lock position with the mattress air pressure set at 150 pounds.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 9:37 a.m., with LVN 2, Resident 43's weight summary was reviewed. The weight summary indicated, Resident 43 weighed 94 pounds on 8/24/22 and 8/16/22. LVN 2 stated, the LAL mattress was ordered for wound management.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:48 a.m., with LVN 2, in Resident 43's room, Resident 43 was laying in bed on a low air loss mattress. The LAL mattress air pressure setting was on lock position and the air pressure was set at 150 pounds. The LAL mattress pump had eight weight settings: 50 lb. (pound), 100 lb., 150 lb., 200 lb., 250 lb., 300 lb., 350 lb., 450 lb. LVN 2 stated the mattress setting was set at 150 lbs. LVN 2 disarmed the lock button and changed the LAL mattress air pressure setting to 100 lbs. LVN 2 stated, Resident 43's weight was 94 pounds and the air pressure setting had been incorrectly set too high. LVN 2 stated, if the LAL mattress was not set at the correct air pressure weight setting it could cause a fall or injury to the resident. LVN 2 stated it was the Licensed nurse responsibility to ensure that the air mattress air pressure setting was set at the correct weight.
During a review of Resident 43's Order Summary, dated 7/5/22, the Order Summary indicated, . Provide Air loss mattress for wound management .
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 10:22 a.m., with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated, when the LAL mattress was installed the company set the weight and settings. LVN 1 stated, the facility did not have a policy on LAL mattress and how to adjust the settings. LVN 1 stated, she was untrained and unaware of how to change the setting of the LAL mattress.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 12:44 p.m. with Administrator (ADM), ADM stated, if the resident needed a LAL mattress the facility called the company to install it. ADM stated, there was no process in place for licensed nurses to monitor the LAL pump setting to ensure the weight was coinciding with the residents' current weight. ADM stated, it was important for Licensed Nurses to be knowledgeable on the operation of the pump for power outages or weight changes. ADM stated, if the LAL mattress pressure was not at the correct setting it could be ineffective for wound management, ADM stated overinflation of the LAL mattress could possibly lead to a fall. ADM stated, the facility did not have a policy for LAL mattress use.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 12:56 p.m., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON stated, the facility did not have an LAL policy. ADON stated, there was no monitoring in place to ensure the LAL mattress was coinciding with the residents current weights. ADON stated, there were no competencies or in-service education for the LAL mattress.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 1:18 p.m., with LVN 5, LVN 5 stated, she was untrained and unaware of how to change the setting of the LAL mattress. LVN 5 stated, she was unfamiliar with the weight settings on the LAL mattress pump.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 1:34 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, the LAL pressure setting was set up by the company. DON stated, an overinflated mattress could potentially cause a resident to fall out of bed. DON stated, the LAL pressure should be monitored because residents could have weight gain or weight loss. DON stated, the licensed nurses should check the settings to ensure the settings were coinciding with the residents weight. DON stated, licensed nurses should be competent in operating the LAL mattress. DON stated, there was no competency done for the operation of the LAL mattress.
During a review of Resident 43's LAL mattress manufacturer's guidelines titled, [Brand name of mattress pump] undated, the LAL mattress guideline indicated, . The Weight Setting Buttons (+) and (-) can be used to adjust the pressure of the inflated cells based on the patient's weight. As the weight setting increase, the pressure level indicator lights up (green) with each added level of pressure . Eight pressure levels are available and indicated by increasing green light indicator .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordanc...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when:
1. One Tuberculin (combination of proteins that are used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis [potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs]) vial (small container for liquids) was opened with no indication of used-by date or open date. This failure had the potential to produce inaccurate PPD (purified protein derivatives) Test (skin test is a test that determines if you have tuberculosis) results and or cause harm to a vulnerable population if administered beyond the manufacturer's used by date.
2. Resident 64's Levalbuterol (medication used to prevent and treat difficulty breathing, wheezing, shortness of breath) medication was opened with no indication of used-by date or when the foil pouch was opened. This failure had the potential to decrease the medication potency that could compromise the therapeutic effectiveness when used by Resident 64.
3. Resident 28's Ipratropium/Albuterol (inhalation spray to treat and prevent wheezing and shortness of breath caused by ongoing lung disease) medication label was torn and was stored in the medication cart, available for use. This failure had the potential for the medication to be given to the wrong resident and cause adverse reactions.
Findings:
1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 11:30 a.m., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), in Station 2's medication room, an opened vial of Tuberculin was found in the medication refrigerator, with no opened or used-by date label. ADON stated, the opened vial of medication should be labeled with a used-by date according to manufacturer's guidelines. ADON stated, the opened vial was good for 30 days after it was opened.
2. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 10:29 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in Station 2 nursing station. One medication cart was by the station. The medication cart contained Levalbuterol 0.63MG (milligram-unit of measurement)/3ML(milliliter-unit of measurement) SOL (solution) with the medication pouch opened without an open date (labeled). LVN 1 stated, the box of Levalbuterol should have been labeled with the open date when the medication pouch was opened. LVN 1 stated, the medication (levalbuterol) was only good for 14 days after it was opened according to manufacturer's guideline. LVN 1 stated, the medication should have been discarded and not stored in the medication cart. LVN 1 stated, being stored in the medication cart made it (levalbuterol) available for use (for residents). LVN 1 stated, she did not know if it was expired because there was no opened by date.
During a review of Resident 64's clinical record titled, admission Record, (document containing resident personal information) dated [DATE], the admission Record, indicated, Resident 64 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included . Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) .
During a review of Resident 64's Order Summary Report, dated [DATE], the Order Summary report indicated, . Levalbuterol HCL Solution 0.63 MG/3ML 3 ml inhale orally [by mouth] via [by] nebulizer every 8 hours for SOB [shortness of breath], wheezing [high-pitched whistling sound made while breathing] stay with resident while giving receiving nebulizer .
3. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 10:40 a.m., with LVN 1, in Station 2 nursing station. One medication cart was by the station. The medication cart contained Ipratropium/Albuterol 20mcg(microgram-unit of measurement)/100mcg per actuation (puff) which had a torned label. LVN 1 stated, the label from the Ipratropium/Albuterol medication was torn and did not show the complete name of the resident and the complete instruction of the medication. LVN 1 stated, she should not have stored the medications in the medication cart. LVN 1 stated, she should have called the pharmacy to replace medication.
During a review of Resident 28's clinical record titled, admission Record, dated [DATE], the admission Record, indicated, Resident 28 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included . shortness of breath .
During a review of Resident 28's Order Summary Report, dated [DATE], the Order Summary report indicated, . [Ipratropium/Albuterol brand name] 1 puff inhale orally every 4 (four) hours as needed for SOB (shortness of breath)/cough .
During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE], at 3:39 p.m., with LVN 2, LVN 2 stated, the vial of PPD should have been labeled with the date it was opened. LVN 2 stated, the PPD vial was only good for 30 days after it was opened. LVN 2 stated, the levalbuterol medication should have been labeled with the date the pouch was opened because it was only good for 14 days. LVN 2 stated, giving the medication after the expiration date could be ineffective. LVN 2, the torn label of Ipratropium/Albuterol medication was not acceptable because the name of the resident and the instruction was ripped from the box. LVN 2 stated, the pharmacy should have been called to send a new medication. LVN 2 stated, the medication could be given to another resident.
During an interview on [DATE], at 4:01 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, the vial of PPD should have been labeled when it was opened since using the medication after the expiration date may give a false positive/negative results. DON stated, the pouch of Levalbuterol should have been dated since it was only good for 14 day from the date it was opened. DON stated, the nurse should have discarded the medication and not kept in the cart. DON stated, medication when used past the expiration will be less effective or can have adverse effects to residents. DON stated the box of Ipratropium/Albuterol medication with a torn label should have been discarded in the discontinued medications to avoid using on other residents.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Vials and Ampules of Injectable Medications, dated 4/2008, the policy and procedure indicated, . The date opened and the initial of the first person to use the vial are recorded on multi-dose vials (on the vial label or an accessory label affixed for that purpose) .
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Medication Labels, dated 4/2008, the policy and procedure indicated, . Labels are permanently affixed to the outside of the prescription container . Each prescription medication label includes: Resident's name, Specific directions for use, including route of administration . Medication name . Strength of medication .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0800
(Tag F0800)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a diet that accommodated residents p...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a diet that accommodated residents preferences for one of one resident (Resident 99) when Resident 99's food preferences and intolerances were not obtained in a timely manner (past 7 days).
This failure posed the risk for Resident 99 to not receive the food he preferred and food that he could tolerate which in turn could contribute to decreased intake and meal dissatisfaction.
Findings:
During a review of the clinical record titled, admission Record (AR), dated 12/13/22, for Resident 99, the AR indicated Resident 99 was a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus (the body's inability to produce the hormone insulin), hypertension (high blood pressure), and peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs).
During a review of Resident 99's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function), dated 12/29/22, the MDS assessment indicated, Resident 99's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment used to identify a resident's current cognition) score was 11 out of 15, which indicated Resident 99 was cognitively intact.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/20/22, at 10:00 a.m., with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the Nutrition Screen and Assessment (NSA), dated 12/19/22 by the RD for Resident 99 was reviewed. Section 2. Meal Consumption 2. Comments showed, . Res [resident] reported meat is kind of hard to chew ., Section 6. Physical and Mental Functioning 2. Comments showed, . Legally blind . edentulous. Section 9. Estimated Nutrient and Energy Needs 4. Comments showed, . preferences updated trial of pureed meat . The RD stated the NSA must be completed within seven days of the resident's admission. The RD was asked to locate the Dietary profile/Malnutrition Risk Tool (Admission/readmission on LY) (DPMRT), a form which included diet order, food texture, fluid, food allergies/intolerances, appetite, food preferences, chewing/swallowing problems, utensils, cultural, religious, ethnic preferences, height, and weight in the medical record for Resident 99. The RD confirmed the DPMRT for Resident 99 had not been completed.
During an interview on 12/20/22 at 10:30 a.m., with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), the DSS stated she had seven days to complete the DPMRT for newly admitted residents. The DSS confirmed a DPMRT had not been completed for Resident 99.
During an interview on 12/20/22 at 11:20 a.m., with the DSS, the DSS stated resident food preferences should be entered in the electronic meal tray system within 48 hours of admission. The DSS stated she had seven days to complete the DPMRT for newly admitted residents.
During an phone interview on 12/20/22 at 11:50 a.m., with the Food and Nutrition Resource Service Director (FNRSD), the FNRSD stated the DPMRT was expected to be completed for all newly admitted residents within 24-48 hours of admission. The FNRSD stated the DPMRT was part of information gathering for the resident assessment and care plan which included resident food preference, allergies and any special dietary needs.
During an interview on 12/20/22 at 12:10 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON confirmed a baseline care plan was initiated by nursing within the first 48 hours of the resident admission. The DON stated the baseline care plan was interdisciplinary, which included dietary. The DON stated the Dietary department should have visited the resident within 48 hours of admission to obtain food preferences, allergies or other special dietary needs.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans- Baseline, dated 12/2016, indicated, . 2. The Interdisciplinary Team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders (e.g., dietary needs ) and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs including but not limited to . c. Dietary orders . 3. The baseline care plan will be used until the staff can conduct the comprehensive assessment and develop an interdisciplinary person-centered care plan .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recipes were followed for puree (a smooth creamy substance made of liquidized food) diets when an unmeasured quant...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recipes were followed for puree (a smooth creamy substance made of liquidized food) diets when an unmeasured quantity of food thickener was added to puree food items by [NAME] 2.
This failure resulted in food recipes not followed which posed the risk to alter the nutritional value and taste of the food being produced which in turn could compromise the nutritional status and meal satisfaction for Residents 44, 28. 46, 31, 27 and 17.
Findings:
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 10:19 a.m., with [NAME] 2, in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was preparing food items for lunch. [NAME] 2 stated, she was preparing puree food for six residents (Residents 44, 28, 46, 31, 27 and 17). [NAME] 2 put an unmeasured quantity of cooked fish in the blender. [NAME] 2 stated, she was using about six pieces of fish. [NAME] 2 added an unmeasured amount of chicken broth to the fish three times. [NAME] 2 placed the blended fish into a steam table pan. The pureed fish had a liquid consistency. [NAME] 2 stated, It will get firmer. [NAME] 2 added more unmeasured broth. [NAME] 2 stated, she added more broth to Make it more smooth. [NAME] 2 added an unmeasured amount of thickener and mixed with a whisk. [NAME] 2 added an additional amount of unmeasured thickener.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:16 p.m., with Registered Dietician (RD), RD stated, the recipe should be followed for residents on puree diets.
During a review of the facility document titled, Orientation, Inservice and Personnel Management, dated 2011, the document indicated, JOB DESCRIPTION . Subject: COOK . FUNCTION: The [NAME] prepares and serves food including texture modified and therapeutic diets according to the facility menu. The cook assists in assuring proper . preparation . procedures are followed . RESPONSIBILITIES: . 5. Follows instruction . in the preparation of meals .
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, FOOD PREPARATION SUBJECT: FOOD PREPARATION, dated 2018, the P&P indicated . Employees will prepare foods by methods that conserve nutrients, enhance flavor, and maintain attractive appearance . Standardized recipes will be used to ensure meals are attractive, palatable and provide necessary nutritive value .
During a review of the facility document titled, Persons by Texture - All Residents By Name, dated 8/25/22, the document indicated, . Puree [Residents 44, 28, 46, 31, 27 and 17 names listed].
During a review of the facility document titled, RECIPE: PUREED MEATS, undated, the document indicated, Serves 6 . Warm fluid such as gravy, or low sodium broth. If the meat is moist, you can start with only a few ounces of liquid . 6 to 12 oz . If needed: Stabilizer: instant potato, non fat dry milk . or commercial instant food thickener . 0 to 6 [tablespoons] . Directions: . Measure out the total number of portions needed for puree diets . Gradually add warm liquid . See above for recommended amounts of liquid, starting with the smaller amount and adding in more as needed to achieve the desired consistency . Add stabilizer to increase the density of the pureed food if needed .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0806
(Tag F0806)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences and intolerances were...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences and intolerances were followed for one of one non-sampled resident (Resident 80) when Resident 80 was served milk with his lunch meal.
This failure had the potential for Resident 80's meal intake to be inadequate which could compromise his nutritional status.
Findings:
During a review of Resident 80's clinical record titled admission RECORD dated 8/25/22, the admission Record indicated, Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].
During an observation on 8/23/22, at 1:09 p.m., in the dining room. Resident 80 was served his lunch meal. Resident 80's lunch meal consisted of eight ounces whole milk, eight ounces of (nutritional shake brand), four ounces cranberry juice, roast turkey with gravy, bread stuffing, broccoli, dinner roll and a glazed apple square.
During a review of Resident 80's lunch meal ticket, dated 8/23/22, the ticket indicated, Resident 80 was on a consistent carbohydrate regular texture diet with large portions. The section titled notes indicated, lactose intolerant, no milk or milk products, vegetable or tomato soup, large portions for lunch and dinner. The section titled lunch preferences indicated, eight-ounce (nutritional shake brand), soup of the day, rice and diet cranberry juice. The section titled Intolerances showed: Milk, milk products, milk rice. The section titled Dislikes showed: milk, chicken, milk products, milk rice, cheese, cottage cheese, ice cream and yogurt.
During an interview on 8/23/22, at 1:15 p.m., with Resident 80, Resident 80 stated, he received milk with his lunch meals but did not tolerate milk. Resident 80 stated, he preferred soup and rice with his lunch meal, but neither were on his lunch tray. Resident 80 did not eat any of his lunch meal. Resident 80 stated, the food was not good; the broccoli was over cooked, and the food was tasteless. Resident 80 stated, he did not want to eat any food on his lunch tray but would drink the (nutritional shake brand).
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:16 p.m., with Registered Dietitian (RD) 1, RD 1 stated, if a resident had a specific request such as rice and soup with meals, the kitchen should honor those preferences. RD 1 stated, if a resident was lactose intolerant and did not tolerate milk, milk should not be served to that resident.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records for residents that were complete, accurate...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records for residents that were complete, accurately documented and readily accessible for two of six sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 16) when the Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form (a legal document that specifies the type of care a resident's treatment and services would like in an emergency life threatening medical situation) was incomplete for Resident 9 and Resident 16.
This failure had the potential risk for Resident 9 and Resident 16's decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment options not being honored.
Findings:
During a review of Resident 9's clinical record titled, admission Record (document containing resident personal information), dated 8/25/22, indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, . Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), emphysema (damage to the alveoli (air sacs in the lungs) and anemia (not enough healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen to your body's organs) .
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/23/22, at 12:22 p.m., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON reviewed Resident 9's POLST form. ADON stated, the POLST form was not accurate. ADON stated, the Medical Records (MR) was responsible in making sure the forms were complete and accurate before they file them in residents charts. ADON stated, the admission nurse were responsible in making sure the family and or the residents signed the POLST form on admission.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/23/22, at 12:30 p.m., with Medical Records Coordinator (MRC), the MRC reviewed Resident 9's POLST form. MRC stated, the POLST form was not accurate since it did not reflect the accurate year it was signed. MRC stated, it was the medical records staff responsibility to ensure resident records are accurate.
During a review of Resident 16's admission Record (AR) dated 8/25/22, the AR indicated, Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, . hemiplegia (hemiplegia refers to paralysis on one side of the body after a stroke) and hemiparesis (hemiparesis causes weakness on one side), dysarthria (speech disorder in which the muscles that are used to produce speech are damaged, paralyzed, or weakened), and anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations) .
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 8:54 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 reviewed Resident 16's POLST form. LVN 2 stated, . The POLST form is incomplete, there was no signature of the responsible party . it should have been signed when [resident] admitted in the facility . LVN 2 stated, it was the responsibility of the admission nurse to fill up the form and the medical records staff to follow-up if there was no signature and to ensure it was complete and accurate.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 4:01 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON reviewed Resident 9 and Resident 16's POLST form. DON stated, the POLST forms were incomplete and inaccurate. DON stated, POLST form must be signed on admission. DON stated, if family was not able to sign, facility staff may obtain a verbal consent and indicate in the POLST form. DON stated, the family can sign as soon as they came in the facility. DON stated, the POLST form needed to be accurate and complete signed both by the Medical Doctor and the Resident and or a family member to be valid otherwise resident will be treated as a full code.
During a review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST), dated 3/2010, the P&P indicated, . Once the POLST form is completed, it must be signed by the resident, or if the resident lacks decision-making capacity the resident's legally recognized health care decision maker, and the attending physician . The POLST will be reviewed by the facility interdisciplinary team during the quarterly care planning conference, anytime there is a significant change in the resident's condition .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0909
(Tag F0909)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of bed rails as part of the facility's regular maintenance program for one of three sampled reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of bed rails as part of the facility's regular maintenance program for one of three sampled residents (Resident 14) when Resident 14's right side rail appeared bent leaning away from the bed.
This failure had the potential to result in an injury or accident to Resident 14.
Findings:
During an observation on 8/23/22, at 11:05 a.m., in Resident 14's room, Resident 14 was laying in bed with two bed rails up. The bed rail (right side) appeared bent leaning away from the bed and had a large gap between the mattress and the bed rail in comparison to the left side rail.
During a review of Resident 14's Order, dated 8/19/22, was reviewed. The Order indicated, . Bilateral ½ siderails up to assist the resident when turning and repositioning in bed .
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 10:56 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5, the facility Maintenance Request Log, undated, was reviewed. The Maintenance Request Log indicated, the date, location, description of problem, requested by and name the request was done by. CNA 5 stated, Resident 14's bed rail problem was not in the maintenance request log. CNA 5 stated, the maintenance request log was a communication tool used by staff to report repairs needed.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 10:59 a.m., with CNA 5, in Resident 14's room, Resident 14 was laying in bed with two bed rails up. CNA 5 stated, the right-side bed rail appeared bent and should have been reported in the maintenance request log.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 11:05 a.m., with Maintenance Technician (MT) and Environmental Services Director (ESD), in Resident 14's room, MT measured the distance between the mattress and side rails. MT stated, the measurement between the mattress and side right rail was two and a half inches and the left side rail was half an inch. ESD stated, the right side rail was uneven and appeared to be leaning away from the bed. ESD stated, the side rail (right) needed adjustment and the gap was an entrapment risk. MT stated, he did not conduct regular inspections of the bed rails. MT stated, he checked the maintenance request log for repair needs.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/25/22, at 9:43 a.m., with MT, the facility policy and procedure titled, Bed Safety, dated 12/2018, was reviewed. The policy indicated, . Our facility shall strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident . To try to prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, mattress, side rails . the facility shop promote the following approaches: a. Inspection by maintenance staff of all beds and related equipment as part of our regular bed safety program to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks . Review the gaps within the bed system or within the dimensions . The review shall consider situations that could be caused by the residents weight, book movement or bed position . The maintenance department shall provide a copy of inspections to the Administrator and report results to the QA Committee for appropriate action . MT stated, the facility policy was not followed because he did not perform regular inspections of the bed and did not have inspection reports. MT stated, he only addressed the issues reported in the maintenance request log when staff reported. MT stated, he did not regularly check the bed rails.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 1:40 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, it was MT's responsibility to inspect the resident beds and ensure there were no malfunctions. DON stated, MT should have inspected beds on a monthly basis to ensure safety and proper fit to prevent entrapment risk.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 12:44 p.m., with (CNA) 1, CNA 1 gloved her right hand and used a...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 12:44 p.m., with (CNA) 1, CNA 1 gloved her right hand and used an ice scoop to scoop ice out of ice chest and poured the ice into a resident's cup in her left hand. CNA delivered cup to resident. CNA 1 returned to the ice chest holding another resident's cup with the handle in her left hand and her gloved right hand holding the bottom of the cup. CNA 1 used her gloved right hand to pick up the ice scoop and scoop ice from the ice chest and poured ice into resident's cup. CNA 1 stated, she should use a new glove each time she scoops ice out of the ice chest. CNA 1 stated, she understood that her gloved hand was contaminated and should have been changed. There was a hand sanitizer and a box of gloves next to the ice chest.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:00 p.m., with Infection Preventionist (IP), IP stated, staff should be using a new set of gloves each time they access the ice scoop.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 4:35 p.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, the expectation for retrieving ice from the ice chest for a resident was to glove before getting ice, remove the glove and wash hands before donning new gloves for next resident.
During a review of a professional reference retrieved from https://www.foodsafety.com.au/blog/how-safely-handle-ice#:~:text=Rules%20for%20handling%20ice,-In%20order%20to&text=Never%20touch%20ice%20with%20bare,sure%20they%20are%20properly%20labelled titled, How to safely handle ice and avoid contamination, dated 2021, indicated, Ice is similar to food in that the sources of contamination are the same . ice can become biologically contaminated from . touching the ice with bare hands . ice is subject to cross-contamination from . the tools used to scoop and portion .
During a review of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) professional reference retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/providers/ , titled When and how to wear gloves, dated 2021, indicated, . Never wear the same pair of gloves in the care of more than one patient .
4. During an observation on 8/24/22, at 9:45 a.m., a linen cart was observed to be uncovered and unattended outside room [ROOM NUMBER].
During an observation on 8/25/22, at 9:47 a.m., a linen cart was observed to be uncovered and unattended outside room [ROOM NUMBER].
During an observation on 8/25/22, at 9:52 a.m., a linen cart was observed to be uncovered and unattended outside room [ROOM NUMBER].
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:00 p.m., with IP, IP stated, linen carts on the units should be covered and closed. IP stated, linen carts should not be left open on the unit even during linen changing times.
During a review of Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Clean Linen Handling, dated 3/2010, the P&P indicated, . Daily excess linen shall be stored on shelves and covered .
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control and prevention program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable (contagious) diseases and infections when:
1. Family (FM) was in a contact isolation room for Clostridium difficile (C. diff- bacterial infection that causes life threatening diarrhea) without gown and gloves. This failure place residents, visitors, and staff at risk for transmission (a process on how an infectious agent can be transferred from one person to another) of C. diff infections.
2. Nurse Practitioner (NP) entered the facility without self-screening for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19- virus that causes a respiratory disease and is spread from person to person through sputum droplets released when an infected person coughs, sneezes, or talks). This failure placed residents, visitors and staff at increased risk for transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
3. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, used a contaminated gloved hand to scoop ice for resident from an ice chest.
4. Three linen carts were left uncovered in the hallways
These failures placed residents at risk for cross-contamination and transmission of infection.
Findings:
1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 1:08 p.m., with FM, in the hallway near Resident 234's room, Resident 234's room door was open and visible from the hallway. FM was in Resident 234's room, seated across Resident 234's bed in Resident 234's wheelchair without gown and gloves. A plastic container with personal protective equipment (PPE) including gown and gloves was stored next to Resident 234's room. FM stated, she was unaware of needing to wear gown and gloves prior to room entry. FM stated, she sanitized her hands and was not told to wash her hands before leaving Resident 234's room. FM stated, she was not informed on wearing PPE and hand washing for C. diff isolation.
During a review of Resident 234's Order Summary Report, dated 8/26/22, the order summary report indicated, . Strict Contact Isolation Precautions r/t [related to] C-Diff infection .
During a review of Resident 234's Care Plan, dated 8/19/22, the Care Plan indicated, Require isolation precaution due to: C. Diff . Instruct resident, family, visitor, regarding proper use of personal protective equipment . observed contact isolation precautions . Inform resident, family, visitor and staff on indication for isolation .
During an interview on 8/24/22, at 11:25 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated, families should be educated on C. diff isolation precautions and should not be allowed into the room if they chose not to follow PPE protocol.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 9:26 a.m., with Infection Preventionist (IP), the facility policy and procedure titled, Clostridium Difficile dated 10/2018 was reviewed. The policy indicated, Measures are taken to prevent the occurrence of Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) among residents. Precautions are taken while caring for residents with C. difficile to prevent transmission to others residents . Increasing awareness of symptoms and risk factors among staff, residents and visitors; . Considering C. difficile in differential diagnoses, especially in residents with symptoms or risk factors; . Frequent hand washing with soap and water by staff and residents; . IP stated, staff and visitors should don gown, gloves before entering a C. diff isolation room and wash their hands when exiting the room. IP stated, on 8/24/22 she noticed FM in Resident 234's room without a gown. IP stated, Resident 234 was admitted from the hospital on 8/19/22 with C. diff. IP stated, she had not provided education to FM. IP stated, there was a risk of C. diff transmission when PPE and hand washing protocols were not followed. IP stated, FM should have been educated on isolation precautions prior to entering Resident 234's room.
During an interview on 8/26/22, at 9:39 a.m., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON stated, the licensed nurses were responsible to educate and document the education provided to FM regarding PPE required in C. diff isolation room. ADON stated, it was the licensed nurses responsibility to ensure FM understood the education and was able to demonstrate safe infection control practices.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/26/22, at 10:26 a.m., with LVN 2, LVN 2 reviewed Resident 234 clinical record. LVN 2 stated, there was no record to indicate that FM was educated on contact isolation precautions. LVN 2 stated, there should have been documentation to include the education provided and confirmation that the education was understood. LVN 2 stated, if it was no documentation it was not done.
During a review of the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) Professional Reference titled, 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings dated 5/2022, retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/isolation-guidelines-H.pdf indicated, . don the indicated personal protective equipment (gowns, gloves, mask) upon entry into the patient's room for patients who are on Contact and/or Droplet Precautions since the nature of the interaction with the patient cannot be predicted with certainty and contaminated environmental surfaces are important sources for transmission of pathogens . Education of . Families . Education on the principles and practices for preventing transmission of infectious agents should begin during training in the health professions and be provided to anyone who has an opportunity for contact with patients . Patients, family members, and visitors can be partners in preventing transmission of infections in healthcare settings . Additional information about Transmission-Based Precautions is best provided at the time they are initiated . Healthcare personnel must be available and prepared to explain this material and answer questions as needed . Wash hands with non-antimicrobial soap and water or with antimicrobial soap and water if contact with spores (e.g., C. difficile . is likely to have occurred. The physical action of washing and rinsing hands under such circumstances is recommended because alcohols . and other antiseptic agents have poor activity against spores .
2. During an observation on 8/24/22, at 8:07 a.m., at the facility entrance lobby, no staff was present at the front entrance. NP entered the facility, stood in the lobby then proceeded to enter the facility without self-screening.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 11:38 a.m., with Activities Director (AD), at the front lobby, AD was seated at the front desk. The lobby had a contactless temperature monitor and two screening tool binder titled Employees and Visitors. AD stated, she was seated at the front desk to ensure staff and visitors were taking their temperature and completing the screening tool. AD stated, there was no exception and that everyone had to take their temperature and answer the questions in the screening tool. AD stated, there were two binders for screening, one for staff and one for visitors. AD stated, after taking the temperature, the screening tool questions needed to be completed (the individuals name, vaccine status, recent COVID test result, signs and symptoms of COVID 19 if present, and if traveled outside the country in last 14 days).
During an interview on 8/24/22, at 12:41 a.m., with ADON, ADON stated, NP visited the facility daily for approximately 2 hours. ADON stated, NP had seen Resident 63 on 8/24/22 and wrote orders for medication. ADON stated, NP was at the facility on 8/23/22 and had signed orders for Resident 183 and Resident 236.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 1:18 p.m. with IP, the facility screening tool titled visitors and employees dated 8/20/22 - 8/24/22 was reviewed. The screening tool indicated, the date, temperature, time, name, vaccination status, recent Covid test result, list of Covid-19 symptoms, travel outside country in last 14 days, and if recent exposure to COVID-19 and location prior to arriving to facility. IP stated, the two binders at the front lobby were the only screening binders where employees and visitors completed. IP stated, she reviewed the screening logs and NP's signature was not on in the employee or visitor screening log. IP stated, the purpose of the screening tool was to prevent the spread of COVID-19. IP stated, there was a risk for Covid-19 exposure to staff and residents when NP was not screened. IP stated, there were no tracking method to ensure the screening tools were reviewed by either the Director of Nurses (DON), Administrator (ADM) or herself to ensure that everyone who enters the building was screened. IP stated, the importance of reviewing the screening tool was to ensure all staff were screened. IP stated, it was important to review the screening tool so she could educate the staff who did not screen themselves.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 1:48 p.m., with IP, the facility policy and procedure titled, COVID-19 General Guidelines, dated 1/6/22, the policy indicated, The facility will have a screening process in place for COVID-19 infection with all persons, regardless of vaccination status. Any person entering the facility will be screened for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 infection, including temperature check, recent travel outside the state in the past 14 days and vaccination status . Screening of Staff and Visitor(s): 1. All staff and visitors, regardless of vaccination status, will be screened for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 infection including but not limited to fever, chills, cough, shortness of breath, new loss of taste or smell, muscle or body aches, headache, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea or vomiting, diarrhea, or not feeling well. Anyone with fever or signs or symptoms of COVID-19 infection is prohibited from entry . IP stated it was the facility policy for everyone to get screened prior to entering the facility.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
4. During an observation and interview on 8/25/22, at 10:43 a.m., with Laundry Supervisor (LS), two laundry dryers were missing the temperature and cool down time knobs. LS stated laundry staff were n...
Read full inspector narrative →
4. During an observation and interview on 8/25/22, at 10:43 a.m., with Laundry Supervisor (LS), two laundry dryers were missing the temperature and cool down time knobs. LS stated laundry staff were not to move the dials. LS stated, staff knew the temperature dial was on high because they are not to move it. There was a Sign taped to dryer which indicated, Attn: [attention] Laundry Please do not move knobs other than the timer and the start button. Thank you.
During a review of professional reference titled, Mold on Clothes, dated May 2022, indicated, . keeping wet or even moist clothes . closely together becomes a breeding ground to grow mold on clothes . The reference also indicated, . the presence of mold has long-term adverse health effects . mold on clothes can easily be inhaled . and has been known to cause respiratory problems . for those who are particularly susceptible, like . the elderly, or asthmatics, the consequences can be serious . long-term effects of having mold on clothes . can lead to a weakened immune system and recurring ill-health that could lead to severe infections .
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper maintenance of essential equipment when:
1. Five of five freezers (including resident refrigerator [two] and medication refrigerator[two]) had excessive ice build-up.
2. The walk-in refrigerator door in the kitchen was not flush with the door frame exposing a gap.
3. The numbers indicating the temperature of the oven located on the oven dial used to prepare resident food were worn and illegible.
These failures had the potential for equipment not functioning in the way they were intended and in turn cause contamination of food and medications which could lead to illnesses for the residents.
4. The two laundry dryers' did not have heat and cool-down time control knobs. This failure placed residents at risk for exposure to mold spores due to laundry not being thoroughly dried.
Findings:
1. During a review of professional reference titled, USDA Food Code 2017, Section 4-501.11, indicated, Good Repair and Proper Adjustment, Proper maintenance of equipment to manufacturer specifications helped ensure that it will continue to operate as designed. The Failure to properly maintain equipment could lead to violations of the associated requirements of the Code that place the health of the consumer at risk.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 9:52 a.m., in the kitchen, the Environmental Service Director (ESD) conducted a walk-through. The walk-in freezer had ice accumulation on the floor, the fan and around the inside of the door. ESD stated, she had not been informed of the ice accumulation in the walk-in freezer. ESD stated, the CDM was responsible for notifying the maintenance department of any kitchen equipment problems.
During an interview on 8/23/22, at 10:27 a.m., with CDM. CDM stated, she was aware of the ice accumulation in the walk-in freezer but was not sure what to do about it. CDM stated ,she kept a maintenance log to notify maintenance of kitchen equipment that needed to be repaired. CDM stated, she had not notified the maintenance department of the ice build-up in the freezer and was unable to confirm the ice build-up located in the walk-in freezer was on the maintenance log.
During a concurrent observation, interview and record review on 8/23/22, at 11:34 a.m., in nursing station one and nursing station two, there were refrigerators used to store resident food brought in from the outside and refrigerator used for resident medication storage. The freezers of both refrigerators used to store resident food brought in from the outside had excessive ice accumulation. LVN 3 stated, the refrigerator freezers should not have ice accumulation (build-up). The freezers on both refrigerators used for storage of resident medications had excessive ice accumulation. LVN 3 stated, the ice accumulation was not acceptable. LVN 3 stated, nursing (staff) was responsible every Friday night to defrost the refrigerator used to store resident food brought in from the outside and the refrigerator used to store resident medications. The facility document located on the outside of the refrigerator doors for the refrigerators used to store resident food from the outside and the medication refrigerators indicated, NOC (night shift) Nurse: Defrost this fridge @ 11 pm every Friday and AM supervisor: turn fridge on after cleaning Saturday a.m.
2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 9:52 a.m., in the kitchen, there was a gap in the door jamb of the walk-in refrigerator door. Maintenance Technician (MT) conducted a walk-through. MT stated, he tried to fix the gasket of the walk-in refrigerator door in the past but was not able to obtain the original material used. MT stated, he installed a foam-like material on the walk-in refrigerator door where the original door gasket was located. MT stated, the foam-like material was worn and coming off the walk-in refrigerator door. MT stated, at the bottom of the walk-in refrigerator door there was a gap between the door and the door jamb, so the walk-in door did not have a complete seal.
3. During an observation on 8/24/22, at 10:18 a.m., in the kitchen, the numbers on the oven dial which indicated the oven temperature were worn off and illegible. [NAME] 2 was unable to state the exact oven temperature. [NAME] 2 stated, the oven temperature was over 400 degrees when the oven dial was turned completely to the left.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/25/22, at 4:24 p.m., in the kitchen, the numbers on the oven dial which indicated the oven temperature were worn off and illegible. ESD stated, she had not been notified of any issue with the temperature dial of the oven.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 4:29 p.m., with CDM, CDM stated, she was aware of the problem with the oven temperature dial. CDM stated, she had not notified maintenance because she needed to contact the oven manufacturer first.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0802
(Tag F0802)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on kitchen observations, interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one of two cooks (Cook 2) was competent in position related duties when [NAME] 2 was unable to dem...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on kitchen observations, interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one of two cooks (Cook 2) was competent in position related duties when [NAME] 2 was unable to demonstrate:
1. Adequate handwashing.
2. Prevention of cross contamination of food (measuring scoop use).
3. Cleaning, sanitizing and properly storing food preparation equipment (meat slicer, steam table pans & weighing scale).
4. Manual ware washing of cookware used for resident food preparation.
5. Proper testing of the kitchen sanitizing solution.
6. Preparation of puree food items for according to the recipe for Residents 44, 28, 46, 31, 27 and 17.
7. Preparation of food in a manner that maintained the nutritional value of resident meals.
8. Food prepared for the facility residents was palatable.
These failures resulted in the inability to meet nutritional needs for residents receiving pureed diets, poor meal quality and decreased meal satisfaction in a medically vulnerable resident population of 76 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen and also posed a risk for food borne illness
Findings:
1. During an observation on 8/24/22, at 8:25 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was washing steam table pans and placing them in the rinse sink. [NAME] 2 touched the trash can then obtained a rag out of the sanitation bucket and started sanitizing the counter tops. [NAME] 2 returned to the rinse sink and started removing the steam table trays from the rinse sink.
During an interview on 8/24/22, at 8:38 a.m., with [NAME] 2, [NAME] 2 stated, sanitizing counters right after touching the trash can was not the facility's process. [NAME] 2 stated, You need to wash your hands after touching the trash can.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 4:29 p.m., with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), CDM stated, if kitchen staff touched a trash can, they would need to wash their hands. CDM stated, staff must wash hands anytime the hands become contaminated (having been made impure by exposure to something) to prevent cross contamination (the process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one thing to another with harmful effect). CDM stated, her last in-service on handwashing was in 2021. CDM stated, she did not have an in-service on handwashing for 2022.
During a review the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT HANDWASHING, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . When to wash hands . after handling carts, soiled dishes, before sanitizing carts and utensils .
During a review the facility document titled, Class Attendance Roster, dated 2/3/2021, the Class Attendance Roster indicated, Proper procedure of hand washing how often it should be done . Trainee Name [Cook 2] .
2. During an interview on 8/23/22, at 08:24 a.m., with CDM, CDM stated, it was the facility's practice to not store scoops inside food bins.
During an observation on 8/24/22, at 10:19 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was preparing to puree (a smooth creamy substance made of liquidized food) food items for the lunch meal on top of a cart. [NAME] 2 had a plastic bin containing thickener (a substance added to a liquid to make it firmer) on the top of the cart. [NAME] 2 used a metal measuring scoop stored inside the plastic bin to scoop up the thickener. [NAME] 2 added thickener to the food multiple times. [NAME] 2 placed the measuring scoop on the top of the cart more than two times before placing it back into the plastic bin.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: CLEANING SMALL APPLIANCES/EQUIPMENT, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . Food Storage Bins . The scoop should be stored outside the bins in a designated area .
3. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., in the kitchen, there was a meat slicer covered with a plastic bag. CDM stated, if equipment was clean then it would be covered with a plastic bag. The bag covering the meat slicer was removed. The meat slicers' blade and grip had a brown sticky substance. CDM stated, the brown substance should not have been on the meat slicer. CDM stated, the meat slicer was not cleaned appropriately. CDM stated, the meat slicer should have been disassembled and sanitized. [NAME] 2 wiped the slicer with a rag she obtained from the sanitizing bucket. The meat slicer blade still had a brown sticky substance. CDM stated, [NAME] 2 needed to disassemble meat slicer and run it through the dish machine.
During an observation on 8/23/22, at 10:15 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was slicing meat using the meat slicer then weighed each piece of meat on a weighing scale.
During an observation on 8/24/22, at 8:25 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was washing steam table pans and placing them in the rinse side of the sink.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:57 a.m., with [NAME] 2, in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 placed a stack of newly washed steam table pans on a clean rack. The seven steam table pans were wet, stacked together and not inverted. One of the seven pans had food debris on the inside of the pan. [NAME] 2 stated, the practice was to air dry the steam table pans and store them inverted once they were dry. [NAME] 2 stated, the steam table pans were not stored correctly. [NAME] 2 stated, she usually stored them inverted. [NAME] 2 stated, one of the steam table pans was not clean. [NAME] 2 removed the seven pans from the clean rack.
During an observation on 8/24/22, at 9:33 a.m., in the kitchen, there was a weighing scale stored in a drawer. [NAME] 2 stated, she used the weigh scale the previous day to weigh the meat used for the lunch meal. The weight scale had sticky substance and was visibly dirty.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:35 a.m., in the kitchen, with [NAME] 1, there was a weight scale with a sticky residue on it in the drawer. [NAME] 1 stated, the weight scale should be clean when stored in the drawer. [NAME] 1 stated, the scale was not clean and was sticky.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, CONTROL SUBJECT: SANITIZING EQUIPMENT, FOOD AND UTILITY CARTS, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . All kitchen equipment and surfaces, which come in contact with food, will be cleaned and sanitized after each use .
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:16 p.m., with the RD 1. RD 1 stated, the steam table pans should have been air dried and put away in a designated area. RD 1 stated, the pans should have been stored upside down (inverted).
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: DISHWASHING PROCEDURES (DISHMACHINE), dated 2018, indicated, . All dishes should be inspected after coming out of the dish-machine and if the dishes are not clean then they should be washed again in the dish-machine. Allow racks of dishes . to air dry . Do not rack and stack wet dishes . allow dishes to drain thoroughly and air dry after washing .
4. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:38 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was manual ware washing. [NAME] 2 stated, she manually washed cookware in the first compartment of the sink with hot water, then rinsed the cookware in the second compartment of the sink. [NAME] 2 stated, she emptied the rinse water and filled the second compartment of the sink with the sanitizing solution. [NAME] 2 stated, the cookware should remain in the sanitizing solution for 15-30 seconds. There was a posted instructions for manual dishwashing by the sink indicating, items (washed) must be kept in the sanitizing solution for a minimum of one minute.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 1:04 p.m., with CDM, CDM stated, it was important to know how long to submerge cookware in the sanitizing solution when manually washing cookware for proper sanitation.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:16 p.m. with RD 1, RD 1 stated, when she performed the monthly sanitation review of the kitchen, she did not observe inappropriate dishware being washed in the manual dishwashing sink. RD 1 stated, she felt the food service employees were competent in manual dishwashing. RD 1 stated, she did not ask food service employees to demonstrate the proper method used for manual ware washing.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: WAREWASHING (HANDWASHING METHOD), dated 2018, indicated, . 6. Sanitize dishes by one of the following methods: . D. Immersion for at least 1 minute in solution containing 200 ppm [parts per million] quaternary ammonium [type of chemical used to kill bacteria, viruses and mold] .
5. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:43 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 demonstrated the testing of the sanitizing solution used to sanitize manually washed cookware and kitchen surfaces. [NAME] 2 obtained a purple chlorine test strip and dipped the test strip in the sanitizing solution and held it in the solution for ten seconds. The purple chlorine test strip did not change color. [NAME] 2 tested the solution with a purple test strip for a second time. The purple chlorine test strip still did not change color. [NAME] 2 went into the kitchen office where [NAME] 1 was. [NAME] 1 gave [NAME] 2 a different testing strips which were orange test strips to test the sanitizing solution. [NAME] 1 stated, the purple sanitizing test strips [NAME] 2 used to test the sanitizing solution was the incorrect sanitizing test strip. [NAME] 1 stated, the correct testing strip was the orange test strips.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:16 p.m., with RD 1, RD 1 stated, she performed the monthly sanitation review of the kitchen, RD 1 stated, she tested the sanitizing solution used to sanitize surfaces in the kitchen. RD 1 stated, she did not ask food service employees to demonstrate proper testing of the sanitizing solution.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: WAREWASHING (HANDWASHING METHOD), dated 2018, indicated, . 6. Sanitize dishes by one of the following methods: . D. Immersion for at least 1 minute in solution containing 200 ppm quaternary ammonium .
6. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 10:19 a.m., with [NAME] 2, in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was preparing food items for lunch. [NAME] 2 stated, she was preparing puree food for six residents (Residents 44, 28, 46, 31, 27 and 17). [NAME] 2 put an unmeasured quantity of cooked fish in the blender. [NAME] 2 stated, she was using about six pieces of fish. [NAME] 2 added an unmeasured amount of chicken broth to the fish three times. [NAME] 2 placed the blended fish into a steam table pan. The pureed fish had a liquid consistency. [NAME] 2 stated, It will get firmer. [NAME] 2 added more unmeasured broth. [NAME] 2 stated, she added more broth to Make it smoother. [NAME] 2 added an unmeasured amount of thickener and mixed with a whisk. [NAME] 2 added an additional amount of unmeasured thickener.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:16 p.m., with RD 1, RD 1 stated the recipe should be followed for residents on puree diets.
During a review of the facility document titled, RECIPE: PUREED MEATS, [undated], the document indicated, . Serves 6 .Warm fluid such as gravy, or low sodium broth. If the meat is moist, you can start with only a few ounces of liquid . 6 to 12 oz . If needed: Stabilizer: instant potato, nonfat dry milk . or commercial instant food thickener .0 to 6 [tablespoons] . Directions: . Measure out the total number of portions needed for puree diets . Gradually add warm liquid . See above for recommended amounts of liquid, starting with the smaller amount and adding in more as needed to achieve the desired consistency . Add stabilizer to increase the density of the pureed food if needed .
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, FOOD PREPARATION SUBJECT: FOOD PREPARATION, dated 2018, the P&P indicated . Employees will prepare foods by methods that conserve nutrients, enhance flavor, and maintain attractive appearance . Standardized recipes will be used to ensure meals are attractive, palatable and provide necessary nutritive value .
7. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:49 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was preparing the lunch meal. There were vegetables in a pot of boiling water on the stove. At 10:18 a.m. [NAME] 2 placed pureed vegetables in the oven. The oven had pans covered with foil of baked fish, italian vegetables and scalloped potatoes. The numbers on the oven dial indicating the temperature of the oven were worn off making the oven temperature illegible. The oven dial was turned all the way to the left. [NAME] 2 stated, she did not know what temperature the oven was set to. [NAME] 2 stated [the oven temperature setting] was over 400 degrees F. [NAME] 2 stated, she knew where 400 degrees was on the oven dial and turned the oven dial completely to the left (she previously stated was over 400 degrees F).
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:16 p.m., with RD I, RD 1 stated, she was not sure cooking vegetable at 400 degrees for more than two hours affected the nutritional value of the vegetables.
During a review of the professional reference titled, https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/cooking-nutrient-content, dated 11/7/2019, the reference indicated, . The following nutrients are often reduced during cooking: water-soluble vitamins: vitamin C and the B vitamins - thiamine (B1), riboflavin (B2), niacin (B3), pantothenic acid (B5), pyridoxine (B6), folic acid (B9), and cobalamin (B12), fat-soluble vitamins: vitamins A, D, E, and K, and minerals: primarily potassium, magnesium, sodium, and calcium .
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, FOOD PREPARATION SUBJECT: FOOD PREPARATION, dated 2018, the P&P indicated . Employees will prepare foods by methods that conserve nutrients, enhance flavor, and maintain attractive appearance . Standardized recipes will be used to ensure meals are attractive, palatable and provide necessary nutritive value .
8. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22 at 1:09 p.m., on the nursing unit one, residents were being served lunch in their rooms. Resident 6 stated, the food was so bland and lacked flavor. Resident 6 did not eat the turkey served with his lunch meal. Resident 287 stated, the food was not good, but he forced himself to eat because he had lost weight in the hospital. Resident 287 did not eat the broccoli served with this lunch meal. Resident 287 stated, the broccoli was over cooked. Resident 80 stated, the food was tasteless, and the broccoli was over cooked. Resident 80 did not eat his entire lunch meal.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:49 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was preparing the lunch meal. There were vegetables in a pot of boiling water on the stove. At 10:18 a.m. [NAME] 2 placed pureed vegetables in the oven. The oven had pans covered with foil of baked fish, italian vegetables and scalloped potatoes. The numbers on the oven dial indicating the temperature of the oven were worn off making the oven temperature illegible. The oven dial was turned all the way to the left. [NAME] 2 stated, she did not know what temperature the oven was set to. [NAME] 2 stated. [the oven temperature setting] was over 400 degrees F. [NAME] 2 stated, she knew where 400 degrees was on the oven dial and turned the oven dial completely to the left (she previously stated was over 400 degrees F).
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 1:15 p.m., in the conference room, a taste-testing of a lunch meal was conducted with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and Registered Dietitian (RD) 2. The lunch meal test tray consisted of fish italiano (fish with italian sauce), puree fish, scalloped potatoes, puree scalloped potatoes, italian herb vegetables (mixture of vegetables), puree italian herb vegetables and peach crisp (peach dessert). CDM stated, the italian herb vegetables lacked flavor and salt and were over cooked. RD 2 stated, the puree vegetables were gummy.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:16 p.m., with RD I. RD 1 stated, the facility used to monitor resident meal satisfaction with a survey. RD 1 stated, the previous RD told her the facility used to have a resident food satisfaction survey but was discontinued due to the COVID 19 pandemic.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, FOOD PREPARATION SUBJECT: FOOD PREPARATION, dated 2018, indicated . Employees will prepare foods by methods that conserve nutrients, enhance flavor, and maintain attractive appearance . Standardized recipes will be used to ensure meals are attractive, palatable and provide necessary nutritive value .
During a review of the facility document titled, Orientation, Inservice and Personnel Management, dated 2011, the document indicated, JOB DESCRIPTION . Subject: COOK . FUNCTION: The [NAME] prepares and serves food including texture modified and therapeutic diets according to the facility menu. The cook assists in assuring proper . preparation . sanitation and cleaning procedures are followed . RESPONSIBILITIES: . 5. Follows instruction . in the preparation of meals .
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 1:03 p.m., with CDM, CDM stated, she assessed the food service employees' competencies by return demonstration. CDM stated, she asked the food service employees to show how they washed their hands. CDM stated, she reviewed the Competency Checklist for Employee of Department of Nutrition and Food Services form with the employees. CDM stated, all food service employees were evaluated on the same competency form. CDM stated, the last page of the competency form was used for areas of improvement and if the last page was blank that meant there were no areas needed for improvement. CDM stated, the competency checklist was scored one through five. CDM stated, a score of four meant they needed to review the topic, a score of three meant there was improvement needed and a score of five meant they were competent in that topic. CDM stated, she quizzed the food service employees to determine if they were competent in the topic. CDM stated, there was no documentation of in-services given on topics including cross contamination, hand washing, cleaning and sanitizing food preparation equipment, manual ware washing, use and testing of the sanitizing solution, and following menus and recipes. CDM stated, the only available documentation of in-services was for hand washing.
During A review of the facility document titled, Class Attendance Roster Course topic: Proper Procedure of Handwashing. How often it should be done, dated 2/3/21, indicated, [NAME] 2 was in attendance. A copy of the Policy and Procedure titled Handwashing dated 2018 was attached to the in-service. There was no documented evidence how competency of the in-service was measured.
During A Review of the facility document titled, Competency Checklist for Employee of Department of Nutrition and Food Services, for [NAME] 2 dated 1/6/21, the checklist was completed with CDM. The section titled, Keep Food Safe, Prevent Cross Contamination, Clean and Sanitize Surface Correctly: a score of four (above standards) was given. The section titled, Proper Hand Washing, method to wash hands and when to wash hands: a score of four was given. The section titled, Operation of Equipment, meat slicer: a score of four was given. The section titled, Sanitation, two compartment sink: a score of four was given. The section titled, Diet, why do you follow recipes: a score of four was given. The last page titled, Job Skills Evaluation was blank. CDM stated, she could not remember why gave [NAME] 2 a score of four for the two-compartment sink, CDM stated, she could not remember how she assessed [NAME] 2's competency. The last page of the Competency Checklist for [NAME] 2 was blank meaning there were no areas needed for improvement for [NAME] 2.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:16 p.m., with RD 1. RD 1 stated, when she performed the monthly sanitation review of the kitchen, she looked at the cleanliness but not the condition of the cookware. RD 1 stated, she did not recall if pots or pans needed to be replaced. RD 1 stated ,she checked for cross contamination by checking appropriate colored cutting boards are being used (meats) and were stored properly. RD 1 stated, she did not observe inappropriate dishware being washed in the manual dishwashing sink. RD 1 stated, she felt the food service employees were competent in manual dishwashing. RD 1 stated, she did not ask food service employees to demonstrate the proper method used for manual ware washing. RD 1 stated, she tested the sanitizing solution used to sanitize surfaces in the kitchen. RD 1 stated, she did not ask food service employees to demonstrate proper testing of the sanitizing solution.
During a review of the facility document titled, Quality Assessment for Performance Improvement [QAPI] completed by RD, dated 7/1/22, indicated, . MEAL PRODUCTION . 15. Does the production staff follow recipes? x [Met] . Kitchen Area . 2. Cleaning and sanitizing based on Policy and Procedure in place. x [Met] . SANITATION CONTINUED . 2. Staff able to show proper handwashing technique? x [Met] . 4. Cross contamination prevention in place? x [Met] . Dishwashing Area . 5. 2-Compartment Sink used properly x [Met] . 7. Dishes are air dried and put away? x [Met] . 8. Food preparation utensils and equipment cleaned and properly and sanitized? x [Met] . The QAPI dated 7/29/22, indicated, . MEAL PRODUCTION . 15. Does the production staff follow recipes? x [Met] . Kitchen Area . 2. Cleaning and sanitizing based on Policy and Procedure in place. x [Met] . SANITATION CONTINUED . 2. Staff able to show proper handwashing technique? x [Met] . 4. Cross contamination prevention in place? x [Met] . Dishwashing Area . 5. 2-Compartment Sink used properly x [Met] . 7. Dishes are air dried and put away? x [Met] . 8. Food preparation utensils and equipment cleaned and properly and sanitized? x [Met] . The QAPI indicated the facility was in compliance with foodservice standards of practice.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food prepared for residents was palatable and cooked to preserve nutritive value when:
1. Residents 6, 80, and 287 com...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food prepared for residents was palatable and cooked to preserve nutritive value when:
1. Residents 6, 80, and 287 complained the food lacked flavor and the vegetables were over cooked.
2. Vegetables were cooked more than two hours prior to meal service in an oven temperature above 400 degrees Fahrenheit (F).
These failures could potentially affect the nutritive content of the food and the amount of food residents consume, which could result to decrease residents' food intake and lead to poor nutrition and health outcomes.
Findings:
1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 1:09 p.m., on nursing unit one, residents were being served lunch in their rooms. Resident 6 stated, the food was so bland and lacked flavor. Resident 6 did not eat the turkey served with his lunch meal. Resident 287 stated, the food was not good, but he forced himself to eat because he had lost weight in the hospital. Resident 287 did not eat the broccoli served with this lunch meal. Resident 287 stated, the broccoli was over cooked. Resident 80 stated, the food was tasteless and the broccoli was over cooked. Resident 80 did not eat his entire lunch meal.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:49 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was preparing the lunch meal. There were vegetables in a pot of boiling water on the stove. At 10:18 a.m. [NAME] 2 placed pureed vegetables in the oven. The oven had pans covered with foil of baked fish, italian vegetables and scalloped potatoes. The numbers on the oven dial indicating the temperature of the oven were worn off making the oven temperature illegible. The oven dial was turned all the way to the left. [NAME] 2 stated, she did not know what temperature the oven was set to. [NAME] 2 stated, [the oven temperature setting] over 400 degrees F. [NAME] 2 stated, she knew where 400 degrees was on the oven dial and turned the oven dial completely to the left (she previously stated was over 400 degrees F).
During an observation on 8/24/22, at 1:15 p.m., in the conference room, a taste-testing of a lunch meal was conducted with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and Registered Dietitian (RD) 2. The lunch meal test tray consisted of fish italiano (fish with italian sauce), puree fish, scalloped potatoes, puree scalloped potatoes, italian herb vegetables (mixture of vegetables), puree italian herb vegetables and peach crisp (peach dessert). CDM stated, the italian herb vegetables lacked flavor and salt and were over cooked. RD 2 stated, the puree vegetables were gummy.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:16 p.m., with RD I. RD 1 stated, the facility used to monitor resident meal satisfaction with a survey. RD 1 stated, the previous RD told her the facility used to have a resident food satisfaction survey but was discontinued due to the COVID 19 pandemic.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, FOOD PREPARATION SUBJECT: FOOD PREPARATION, dated 2018, the (P&P) indicated . Employees will prepare foods by methods that conserve nutrients, enhance flavor, and maintain attractive appearance . Standardized recipes will be used to ensure meals are attractive, palatable and provide necessary nutritive value .
2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:49 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was preparing the lunch meal. There were vegetables in a pot of boiling water on the stove. At 10:18 a.m. [NAME] 2 placed pureed vegetables in the oven. The oven had pans covered with foil of baked fish, italian vegetables and scalloped potatoes. The numbers on the oven dial indicating the temperature of the oven were worn off making the oven temperature illegible. The oven dial was turned all the way to the left. [NAME] 2 stated, she did not know what temperature the oven was set to [NAME] 2 stated [the oven temperature setting] over 400 degrees F. [NAME] 2 stated, she knew where 400 degrees was on the oven dial and turned the oven dial completely to the left (she previously stated was over 400 degrees F).
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:16 p.m., with RD I, RD 1 stated, she was not sure cooking vegetable at 400 degrees for more than two hours affected the nutritional value of the vegetables.
During a review of the professional reference titled, https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/cooking-nutrient-content, dated 11/7/2019, the reference indicated, . The following nutrients are often reduced during cooking: water-soluble vitamins: vitamin C and the B vitamins - thiamine (B1), riboflavin (B2), niacin (B3), pantothenic acid (B5), pyridoxine (B6), folic acid (B9), and cobalamin (B12), fat-soluble vitamins: vitamins A, D, E, and K, and minerals: primarily potassium, magnesium, sodium, and calcium .
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, FOOD PREPARATION SUBJECT: FOOD PREPARATION, dated 2018, the (P&P) indicated . Employees will prepare foods by methods that conserve nutrients, enhance flavor, and maintain attractive appearance . Standardized recipes will be used to ensure meals are attractive, palatable and provide necessary nutritive value .
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for food safety guidelines were followed when:
1. [NAME] 2 touched the trash can then failed to...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for food safety guidelines were followed when:
1. [NAME] 2 touched the trash can then failed to wash hands and sanitized kitchen counters.
2. A measuring scoop was placed on a kitchen cart then placed in a plastic bin containing a food product without being sanitized.
3. Expired food items in the walk-in refrigerator, resident refrigerator, and dry storage room were not discarded.
4. Leftover potatoes were not cooled down properly.
5. Steam table pans, three frying pans, four cutting boards and a can opener blade were not safe for use.
6. A meat slicer, mixer, can opener and a weight scale were not clean.
7. Three food items in plastic bins were not labeled and did not have open dates.
8. Milk was stored in crates on the floor of the walk-in refrigerator.
9. More than five steam table pans were stored wet and not inverted.
10. Walk-in refrigerator door, knife rack and a plastic container with clean divided plates were not clean.
11. Two kitchen brooms were stored on the floor.
12. A beverage that belonged to an employee was stored in the walk-in freezer.
13. The ice machine did not have an air gap.
These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population of 76 residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen.
Findings:
1. During an observation on 8/24/22, at 8:25 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was washing steam table pans and placing them in the rinse sink. [NAME] 2 touched the trash can then grabbed a rag out of the sanitation bucket and started sanitizing the counter tops. [NAME] 2 then returned to the rinse sink and started removing the steam trays from the rinse sink.
During an interview on 8/24/22, at 8:38 a.m., with [NAME] 2, [NAME] 2 stated, touching the trash can and then sanitizing counters was not the facility's process. [NAME] 2 stated, You need to wash your hands after touching the trash can.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 4:29 p.m., with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), CDM stated, if kitchen staff touched a trash can they would need to wash their hands after. CDM stated, staff must wash hands anytime the hands become contaminated (having been made impure by exposure to something) to prevent cross contamination (the process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one thing to another with harmful effect). CDM stated, her last in-service on handwashing was in 2021. CDM stated, she did not have an in-service on handwashing for 2022.
During a review of SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT HANDWASHING, dated 2018, the SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT HANDWASHING indicated, .When to wash hands . after handling carts, soiled dishes, before sanitizing carts and utensils .
During a review of Class Attendance Roster, dated 2/3/2021, the Class Attendance Roster indicated, . Proper procedure of hand washing how often it should be done . Trainee Name [Cook 2] .
During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: DISHWASHING PROCEDURES (DISHMACHINE), dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . the employee must wash hands thoroughly before handling clean dishes, trays and carts .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA [United States Food and Drug Administration] Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 2-301 . When to Wash, food employees shall clean their hands . after engaging in other activities that contaminate the hands .
2. During an interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., with CDM, CDM stated, it was the facility's practice to not store scoops inside bins.
During an observation on 8/24/22, at 10:19 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was preparing to puree (a smooth creamy substance made of liquidized food) food items for the lunch meal on top of a cart. [NAME] 2 had a plastic bin that contained thickener (a substance added to a liquid to make it firmer) on the top of the cart. [NAME] 2 used a metal measuring scoop stored inside the plastic bin to scoop up the thickener. [NAME] 2 added thickener to the food multiple times. [NAME] 2 placed the measuring scoop on the top of the cart more than two times before placing it back into the plastic bin.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 3:10 p.m., with [NAME] 3, in the kitchen, there was a plastic bin containing thickener and a measuring scoop stored inside of it. [NAME] 3 stated, measuring cups should not be stored inside of the plastic bin.
During a review of the facility's P&) titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: CLEANING SMALL APPLIANCES/EQUIPMENT, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . Food Storage Bins . The scoop should be stored outside the bins in a designated area .
3. During an observation on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., in the kitchen, there was a walk-in refrigerator and the dry storage room. The walk-in refrigerator had three bags of cabbage with expiration dates of 8/15/22. The dry storage room was 82 degrees and had five bags of corn tortillas with manufacture date of 5/23/22. The tortillas had no received date or expiration date on them .
During an interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., with CDM, CDM stated, she did not know when the tortillas were received and would find the invoice for them.
During an interview on 8/23/22, at 10:27 a.m., with CDM, CDM stated, the cabbage should have been discarded.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:35 a.m., with [NAME] 1, there were five bags of tortillas were stored in the dry storage room with a verified received date sticker of 8/17/22. [NAME] 1 stated, the process at the facility was food needed to be dated if it was removed from the box it came in. [NAME] 1 stated, the five bags of tortillas had received date of 8/17/22. [NAME] 1 stated, if tortillas were not dated, she would look at the facility's shelf-life (the length of time for which an item remains fit for consumption) list. [NAME] 1 stated, tortillas were not listed on the facility's shelf-life list.
During an interview on 8/24/22, at 10:44 a.m., with CDM, CDM stated, the shelf life for corn tortillas was 45 days from the manufactures date per [brand name] website. CDM stated, that the tortillas were expired.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 12:01 p.m., with CDM, the INVOICE NO. 3132404 dated 8/2/22 was reviewed. The INVOICE NO. 3132404 indicated, . TORTILLA, CORN [WHITE] 6/60 EACH . [brand name] . CDM stated, she could not find any other invoice for tortillas.
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Commercially processed food . Marking the date or day the original container is opened in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, with a procedure to discard the FOOD on or before the last date or day by which the FOOD must be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded .
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 11:34 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, in station two medication room, there was a milk carton with an expiration date of 7/31/22 inside the resident (food storage) refrigerator. LVN 3 stated, expired food items should be thrown away.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, MEAL SERVICE SUBJECT: FOOD FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES, dated 2018, indicated, . All food brought in must be checked . with the resident's/patient's name and date on it . food that does not have a manufacturer's printed date must be thrown out 72 hours from the time it was brought in .
4. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:22 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, the walk-in refrigerator had a zip lock bag with sliced potatoes with a date that was not legible. CDM stated, the zip lock bag contained leftover cooked potatoes from 8/22/22. CDM stated, a resident requested cooked potatoes twice a day.
During an interview on 8/24/22, at 3:10 p.m., with [NAME] 3, [NAME] 3 stated, the facility did not save leftovers. [NAME] 3 stated, the facility's process was not to re-heat food for safety reasons.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 9:36 a.m., with [NAME] 1, [NAME] 1 stated, the facility's practice was to prepare food same day the resident was eating it and not keep leftovers. [NAME] 1 stated, if the facility was to keep leftovers, a record of that food should be documented on the facility's cooling log.
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 2:15 p.m., with Registered Dietician (RD) 1, RD 1 stated, she had not seen any leftovers kept at the facility. RD 1 stated, she was not aware facility was keeping leftovers. RD 1 stated, if facility was keeping leftovers the leftovers would need to be cool downed properly.
During a review of the facility's document titled, COOLING/CHILLING TEMPERATURE CONTROL LOG,, dated 6/17/22 through 8/24/22, the COOLING/CHILLING TEMPERATURE CONTROL LOG indicated, no record of sliced potatoes.
During a review of the facility's (P&P) titled, FOOD PREPARATION SUBJECT: FOOD PREPARATION, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . Leftovers must be refrigerated immediately utilizing cool down log, covered labeled and dated .
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT USAGE AND STORAGE OF LEFTOVERS AND PRECOOKED ITEMS, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . Leftovers and precooked items will be placed in a shallow container to allow cooling to 41 [degrees] . Monitor precooked items by use of the Cooling/Chilling Temperature Control Log to ensure food is cooled to adequate temperature in the appropriate time periods .
5. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:22 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, there were more than five steam table pans with thick dark brown residue (amount of something that remains after the main part has gone or been used) on the inside and outside of the pans. Two small and a large frying pans had thick dark brown residue on the insides of the pans. Four cutting boards were heavily marred. The can opener blade was brown and worn. CDM stated, the pans with the dark brown residue were not acceptable to cook with and should be replaced. CDM stated, the cutting boards needed to be replaced. CDM stated, the can opener blade was worn and she would replace it.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 10:35 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, there was one rubber spatula with a chip in the rubber area. CDM stated, the spatulas needed to be discarded.
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . 4-202.11 Food-Contact Surfaces. (A) Multiuse FOOD- shall be: CONTACT SURFACES (1) SMOOTH; (2) Free of breaks, open seams, cracks, chips, inclusions, pits, and similar imperfections .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 4-501.12 Cutting Surfaces, surfaces such as cutting blocks that are subject to scratching and scoring [cut or scratch] shall be resurfaced if they can no longer be effectively cleaned and sanitized, or discarded if they are not capable of being resurfaced .
6. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, the meat slicer was covered with a plastic bag. CDM stated, if equipment was clean then it would be covered with a plastic bag. The bag covering the meat slicer was removed. The meat slicers' blade and grip had a brown sticky substance. CDM stated, the brown substance should not be on the meat slicer. CDM stated, the meat slicer was not cleaned appropriately. CDM stated, the meat slicer should be disassembled and sanitized.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:25 a.m., with CDM in the kitchen, the can opener blade was worn and brown. The can opener and can opener base had a brown sticky residue that transferred to the hand when touched. CDM stated, the can opener and can opener base was not clean and she would wash it.
During a review of August 2022 DAILY CLEANING SCHEDULE SAMPLE FORM dated 8/1/22 through 8/14/22, the August 2022 DAILY CLEANING SCHEDULE SAMPLE FORM indicated, . ITEM . Slicer . RESPONSIBLE PARTY . Cooks . INITIALS AND DATE . Form was dated and signed off (documentation by staff that something was completed) for days 8/1/22 through 8/14/22.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, CONTROL SUBJECT: SANITIZING EQUIPMENT, FOOD AND UTILITY CARTS, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . All kitchen equipment and surfaces, which come in contact with food, will be cleaned and sanitized after each use .
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:55 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, the mixer was on the counter with a plastic bag covering it. CDM stated, clean equipment was covered with a plastic bag. The plastic bag was removed. The mixer had a white flakey residue on it. CDM stated, the mixer was not clean.
During a review of facility document titled, August 2022 DAILY CLEANING SCHEDULE SAMPLE FORM, dated 8/1/22 through 8/14/22, the August 2022 DAILY CLEANING SCHEDULE SAMPLE FORM indicated, . ITEM . Mixer . RESPONSIBLE PARTY . Cooks . INITIALS AND DATE . Form was dated and signed off for days 8/1/22 through 8/14/22 .
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: CLEANING SMALL APPLIANCES/EQUIPMENT, dated 2018, indicated, . Mixers will be cleaned and sanitized after each use .
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 10:15 a.m., with the CDM, in the kitchen, a rubber spatula with food residue was seen with a melted handle. The CDM stated the rubber spatula was dirty and handle not cleanable and would be discarded.
During a review of USFDA 2017 Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood Contact Surfaces, and Utensils (A): Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch .
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:34 a.m., with Dietary Aid (DA) 2, in the kitchen, a plate was seen on the plate warmer with a orange residue. DA 2 stated, the plate warmer was an area for clean plates. DA 2 stated, the plate with the orange residue was not clean. DA 2 removed the plate from the plate warmer .
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 4:29 p.m., with CDM, CDM stated, dishware with food debris was not be clean and should be washed again. CDM stated, dirty dishware should not be placed with clean dishware.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT DISHWASHING PROCEDURES (DISHMACHINE), dated 2018, indicated, . All the dishes should be inspected after coming out of dish-machine and if the dishes are not clean then they should be washed again in the dish-machine .
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 10:15 a.m., with [NAME] 2, in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was slicing meat on the meat slicer. [NAME] 2 weighed the slice of meat on a scale. [NAME] 2 stated, she was slicing turkey for the lunch meal.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:33 a.m., with [NAME] 2, in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 opened a drawer attached to the counter. [NAME] 2 stated, the drawer contained the scale she used the day before to weigh meat. The weigh scale in the drawer had a sticky residue.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:35 a.m., with [NAME] 1, in the kitchen, a food weight scale had sticky residue on it. [NAME] 1 stated, when the scale is stored in the drawer it should be stored clean. [NAME] 1 stated, the scale was not clean and was sticky. [NAME] 1 removed the weigh scale from the drawer and started cleaning it.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, FOOD PREPARATION SUBJECT: FOOD PREPARATION, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, . utensils and equipment will be cleaned and sanitized after each use .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood Contact Surfaces, and Utensils (A): Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . 4-602.13 Non FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues .
7. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:22 a.m., with CDM, in the dry storeroom, a plastic bin of brown rice was not labeled or had a date listed. A plastic bin of dried potato was not labeled or dated. CDM stated, she was unable to find a label or date for the brown rice or dried potato.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 10:37 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, a clear plastic bin was seen with a white substance inside. The bin had no label or date on it. CDM stated, the white substance inside the bin was thickener. CDM stated, the bin should have been labeled and dated.
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Commercially processed food . Marking the date or day the original container is opened in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, with a procedure to discard the FOOD on or before the last date or day by which the FOOD must be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded .
8. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., with CDM, in the walk-in refrigerator, crates used to store milk were on the floor. CDM stated, it was the facility's practice to store the milk in crates on the floor .
During a review of professional reference titled, USDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USDA Food Code indicated, . Section 3-305.11, Foods should be stored six inches above the floor .
9. During an observation on 8/24/22, at 8:25 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was washing steam table pans and placing them in the rinse side of the sink.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:57 a.m., with [NAME] 2, in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 placed a group of washed stacked steam table pans on a clean rack. The seven steam table pans were wet, stacked together and not inverted. One of the seven pans had food debris. [NAME] 2 stated, the practice was to air dry the steam table pans and store them inverted once they were dry. [NAME] 2 stated, the steam table pans were not stored correctly. [NAME] 2 stated, she usually stored them inverted. [NAME] 2 stated, one of the steam table pans was not clean. [NAME] 2 removed the seven pans from the clean rack .
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: DISHWASHING PROCEDURES (DISHMACHINE), dated 2018, indicated, . All dishes should be inspected after coming out of the dish-machine and if the dishes are not clean then they should be washed again in the dish-machine. Allow racks of dishes .,to air dry . Do not rack and stack wet dishes . allow dishes to drain thoroughly and air dry after washing .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food- Contact Surfaces, Nonfood Contact Surface, and Utensils, the food- contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations; Nonfood- contact surface of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 4-901.11, Equipment and Utensils, Air Drying Required, after cleaning and sanitizing, equipment and utensils: (A) Shall be air-dried .
10. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:24 a.m., with CDM, in the kitchen, there was a black sticky substance on the walk-in refrigerator door. The black sticky substance obscured (keep from being seen) the color and texture of the door. CDM stated the walk-in door was not clean. CDM stated, the walk-in door should be cleaned. The walk-in refrigerator had food debris, a package of (brand name) snacks and food wrappers on the floor under the racks. CDM stated, the floor should be free of trash and food.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:36 a.m., with DA 1, in the kitchen, a plastic container containing clean divided plates had food debris and white/yellowish dried substance at the bottom of the container. DA 1 stated, the container was used to store clean divided plates. DA 1 stated, the container was not clean. DA 1 stated, the facility's practice was to clean the plastic container every couple of days.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 9:33 a.m., with [NAME] 1, in the kitchen, the knife rack had white, beige and brown particles on the top of it. Knives were stored on the rack. [NAME] 1 stated, the knife rack was used to store clean knives. [NAME] 1 stated, the rack was not clean. [NAME] 1 stated, it should have been wiped and sanitized .
During an interview on 8/25/22, at 4:29 p.m., with the CDM, the CDM stated, dishware with food debris was not clean and should be washed again. CDM stated, dirty items should not be placed with clean dishware.
During a review of professional reference titled, USDA Food code, dated 2017, the USDA food Code indicated, . 4-602.13 Non FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues .
11. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:22 a.m., with CDM, in the sanitation closet, two brooms were touching the floor. CDM stated ,the brooms should not be on the floor. CDM stated, the brooms should be hung up so they do not touch the floor .
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . 501.113 Storing Maintenance Tools . Maintenance tools such as brooms, mops, vacuum cleaners, and similar items shall be: (A)Stored so they do not contaminate FOOD, EQUIPMENT,UTENSILS, LINENS, and SINGLE-SERVICE and SINGLE-USE ARTICLES; and (B) Stored in an orderly manner that facilitates cleaning the area used for storing the maintenance tools .
12. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 8:22 a.m., with CDM, in the walk-in freezer, a white foam cup containing a beverage without a date was on a shelf. CDM stated, the cup belonged to an employee and should not have been stored in the walk-in freezer.
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 6-403.11 Designated Areas, (B) - lockers or suitable facilities are to be located in a designated area where contamination of food, equipment, utensils cannot occur .
13. During an observation on 8/32/22, at 9:21 a.m., in the kitchen, the ice machine had 3 pipes underneath for drainage. One of three pipes was below the flood level.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 9:52 a.m., in the kitchen, the ice machines had 3 pipes for drainage. Maintenance Technician (MT) stated, the ice machine should have an air gap (an amount of space that separates a water line from an ice machine drain to a sewer). MT looked under the ice machine. MT stated, one of the pipes was below the flood level and should be cut.
During a review of the professional reference titled, USFDA Food Code, dated 2017, the USFDA Food Code indicated, . Section 5-202.13 Backflow Prevention, Air Gap, an air gap between the water supply inlet and the flood level rim of the plumbing fixture, equipment, or nonfood equipment, shall be at least twice the diameter of the water supply inlet and may not be less than 25 mm (1 inch) .