SHAFTER NURSING CARE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Shafter Nursing Care has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #905 out of 1155 facilities in California places it in the bottom half of the state, while being #6 out of 17 in Kern County shows that only five local options are considered better. The facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 15 in 2023 to 20 in 2024. Staffing is a major weakness here, with a poor rating of 1 out of 5 and concerning RN coverage that is less than 94% of California facilities. Notably, the facility has faced $48,101 in fines, which is higher than 81% of California nursing homes. Specific incidents include a resident suffering a fracture due to inadequate room lighting and lack of proper footwear, and a serious case of financial abuse where a staff member misused a resident's credit card, leading to over $6,500 in unauthorized charges. While the facility does have some strengths with good quality measures, the overall picture raises serious concerns for families considering this option.
- Trust Score
- F
- In California
- #905/1155
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $48,101 in fines. Lower than most California facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 16 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for California. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 54 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below California average (3.1)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 54 deficiencies on record
Dec 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0638
(Tag F0638)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure MDS (Minimum Data Set - assessment tool) quarterly (every three months) assessment was completed for one of 16 sampled residents (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
During a review of Resident 38's admission Record (AR), (undated), Resident 38 had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia (a mental illness that affects a person's thoughts, feelings and behaviors), Major Depre...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0552
(Tag F0552)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Informed Consent for eight of eight sampled residents (Resident 31, Resident 38, Resident 4...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled and on duty eight hours a day, seven days a week. This failure had the potential for resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Performance Evaluation (PE-a process to give employees feedback on their job performance) for two of eight sampled employees (Certif...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:
1. Ensure food was dated and stored under sanitary conditions.
2. Ensure food was maintained at safe temperatures.
These fai...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement one of six sampled residents' (Resident 1) care plan (personalized plan of care outlining a person's needs and how ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) d...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) fr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of financial abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) within 24 hours to the California Department of Pu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Employment Screening
(Tag F0606)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
During an interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Abuse Prevention for two of 15 sampled employees (Licensed Vocational Nurse- LVN 2 and Ce...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ordered medication for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was administered within the ordered time frame. This had the pote...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) from staff verbal abuse. This resulted in staff verbally abused Resident 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the proper authorities for three of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This violated Resident 1, Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Policy and Procedure (P&P) for Bed Hold for one of three...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Transfer
(Tag F0626)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to return to the...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0687
(Tag F0687)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) toe was monitored when a scab was identified by the Physician and Licensed...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) on Theft/Loss Prevention for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potent...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were consistently implemented for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). These failures had the pote...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a dignified meal experience for 3 (Resident #159, Resident #160, Resident #161) of 11 sampled resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0553
(Tag F0553)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative for 1 (Resident #152) of 27 sampled residents were invited to the resident's c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a bed-side commode (BSC) for 1 (Resident #105) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for bowel and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. A review of a Transfer/Discharge Report indicated the facility admitted Resident #152 on 02/26/2021, with diagnoses that incl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #101) of 1 sampled resident received oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. A review of a Transfer/Discharge Report indicated the facility admitted Resident #157 on 06/20/2022 with diagnoses that included generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizop...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication that was not administered was not repackaged. Specifically, the facility did not...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interviews, document reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was registered nurse (RN) coverage seven days a week for the months of September 2023 and October...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not touch ready-to-eat food with their bare hands. This deficient practice had the potential to af...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:
1. Ensure the Ombudsman (Long Term Care Resident Advocate) was notified of facility-initiated discharges prior to the resident's being dis...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), was free from a significant medication error, when Resident 1 did not receive a physicia...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:
1. Ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of four of four sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3 and Resident 4)...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' safety when facility did not:
1. Follow the physician ' s order to use plastic utensils for one of four sam...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0888
(Tag F0888)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were vaccinated against COVID-19 (a highly infectious respiratory illness caused by Coronavirus) when:
1. The facility did not...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
3. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/10/23, at 5:30 PM, with CNA 2, in the conference room, CNA 2 was observed donning and doffing PPE. CNA 2 did not perform hand hygiene before putti...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2021
19 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 68 sampled residents (Resident 23) was assessed to determine her ability to safely self-administer medications....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and facilitate resident choices for one of 68 sampled resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0567
(Tag F0567)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 68 sampled residents (Resident 40), understood how to access their facility-controlled funds at times other than normal busin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment after a significant change in residents condition for two of 68 sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - screening to ensure that residents are not inappropriately placed in nursing h...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan (CCP) for two of 68 sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 16). This failure had the po...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0676
(Tag F0676)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) when providing communication tools to residents with language barriers, for one of 68 s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence Medical Doctor (MD) 1 was notified of abnormal laboratory (lab) results and the MD's response, for one of 68 sampled resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 64 and Resident 79), in A-wing (locked unit for cognitively impaired residents),...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 35) received prompt care and services necessary to prevent a urinary tract infe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four sampled staff (Certified Nursing Assistants [CNA 2, 3, 4, and 5]) demonstrated appropriate competencies to provide care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0773
(Tag F0773)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a urine specimen for one of one sampled residents (Resident 35) was picked up timely by the laboratory for testing. This failure res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0800
(Tag F0800)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a well-balanced diet was coordinated with resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain dignity for 24 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 4, Resident 11, Resident 18, Resident 19, Resident 20, Resident 28,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and provide resident-centered activities in th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0711
(Tag F0711)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely physicians progress notes were in the medical record for 15 of 15 sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 5, Resident 7, Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0712
(Tag F0712)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely visits by a physician for 15 of 15 sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 5, Resident 7, Resident 9, Resident 12, Resident 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a recipe for pureed (blended, whipped, or mashed) food for 19 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 5, Resident 11,Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
5. During an interview on 4/14/21, at 9:12 AM, with Housekeeper (HSK) 2, HSK 2 stated she was unaware of the dwell time (amount of time a cleaning product should remain wet on the surface of an object...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 54 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $48,101 in fines. Higher than 94% of California facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (35/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Shafter Nursing Care's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SHAFTER NURSING CARE an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within California, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Shafter Nursing Care Staffed?
CMS rates SHAFTER NURSING CARE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Shafter Nursing Care?
State health inspectors documented 54 deficiencies at SHAFTER NURSING CARE during 2021 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 52 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Shafter Nursing Care?
SHAFTER NURSING CARE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 99 certified beds and approximately 70 residents (about 71% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SHAFTER, California.
How Does Shafter Nursing Care Compare to Other California Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in California, SHAFTER NURSING CARE's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1 and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Shafter Nursing Care?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Shafter Nursing Care Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SHAFTER NURSING CARE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in California. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Shafter Nursing Care Stick Around?
SHAFTER NURSING CARE has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Shafter Nursing Care Ever Fined?
SHAFTER NURSING CARE has been fined $48,101 across 3 penalty actions. The California average is $33,560. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Shafter Nursing Care on Any Federal Watch List?
SHAFTER NURSING CARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.