REGAL HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE & REHAB CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center has a Trust Grade of F, which indicates significant concerns regarding care quality. Ranking #37 out of 43 facilities in Delaware means they are in the bottom half of nursing homes in the state, and #21 out of 25 in New Castle County suggests there are only a few local options that are better. The facility is worsening, with an increase in issues from 17 in 2024 to 26 in 2025. Staffing is a relative strength with a 4/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 38%, which is below the state average. However, the facility has concerning fines totaling $139,846, higher than 79% of Delaware facilities, and less RN coverage than 97% of state facilities. Specific incidents of concern include a resident falling from an elevated bed due to improper assistance, a resident being physically restrained inappropriately, and another suffering second-degree burns due to inadequate supervision. While there are some staffing strengths, the overall picture of care raises significant red flags for families considering this facility.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Delaware
- #37/43
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 38% turnover. Near Delaware's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $139,846 in fines. Lower than most Delaware facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Delaware. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 67 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (38%)
10 points below Delaware average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Delaware average (3.3)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Delaware avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 67 deficiencies on record
May 2025
20 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review and review of other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R70) out of six residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to assure that a phy...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for two (R136 and R163) out of four residents reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure that staff treat each resident with respect...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0551
(Tag F0551)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined for one (R95) out of three residents reviewed for participation in care planning, the facility failed to ensure the correct resident representat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0559
(Tag F0559)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R87) out of four (4) residents reviewed for personal property, the facility failed to provide the family with a written explanatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R167) out of six (6) residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that R167 was protected from verbal abuse. Findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R6 and R22) of six residents reviewed for abuse, the facil...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R14 and R110) out of four residents reviewed for assessmen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R92) out of three residents reviewed for PASRR, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendation from the 9/10/24 PASRR level...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Cross refer to F641, example 2
Review of R14's clinical record revealed:
8/19/24 - R14 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of diabetes.
Review of R14's comprehensive care plan lacked evid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R65) out of thirty-five sampled residents, the facility failed to have a comprehensive care plan in complaince with the standard o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R70) out of 35 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to a resident who was unable to ca...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0685
(Tag F0685)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R22) out of one sampled resident reviewed for hearing/vision, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that R22 receiv...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one resident (R108) out of four (4) residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that R108 received ad...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and review of the facility's policy and procedures it was determined that the facility failed to provide the appropriate care and services to one (R163) out of one samp...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R1 and R81) out of three residents reviewed for respiratory, the facility failed to have the CPAP( a repiratory device the deliers...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. During medication pass observ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prov...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for five (R119, R143, R158, R160 and R267) out of ten residents reviewed for vaccines, the facility failed to ensure that these residents' ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that for three (R143, R158, R160) out of ten residents reviewed for vaccines, the facility failed to assess and offer the COVID vaccine. Findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0940
(Tag F0940)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R65) out of thirty-five sampled residents, the facility failed to provide and evaluate staff for appropriate competencies and skil...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
6 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview and review of other related documents, it was determined that for one (R10) out of nine reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for three (R15, R19, R20) out of seven residents reviewed for falls, the facility failed to meet professional standards of the Delaware Boar...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, interview and review of other facility documents as indicated, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one (R14) out of one resident was provided respiratory ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R12) out of one residents sampled for pain management, the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R1) out of seven residents reviewed for falls, the facilit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R10) out of twenty-eight residents reviewed for environmen...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
17 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of R165's clinical record revealed:
11/17/16 - R165 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not lim...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for two (R154 and R28) out of 40 residents observed the facility fail...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R35) out of four residents reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to offer R35 the opportunity to formulate an advan...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and review of facility and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R132) out of five residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report staff to r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R130) out of six residents sampled for nutrition and one (R146) out of seven residents sampled for hospitalization, the facility f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Review of R169's clinical records revealed the following:
11/8/23 - R169 was readmitted to the facility.
11/9/23 - R169's list of diagnoses included depression and anxiety disorder.
11/14/23 - R169...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0676
(Tag F0676)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined that for one (R35) out of six residents reviewed for communication-sensory, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided communication as...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R53 and R120) out of six residents reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living), the facility failed to ensure each resident was...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, it has been determined that for one (R41) out of one resident reviewed for range of motion and mobility, the facility failed to provide appropriate s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R120) out of six residents reviewed for ADLs, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff on 12/17/23 day shift to pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R91, R132 and R136) out of five residents reviewed for a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. 9/4/23 - R174 was admitted to the facility.
A review of the clinical record revealed the following 9/4/23 facility admission assessments conducted by E68 (LPN): admission evaluation, AIMS (Abnormal...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0712
(Tag F0712)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R12, R165, R174) out of five reviewed for Accidents, the facility failed to ensure that the physician conducted the required vis...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for four out of five unit's nourishment areas the facility failed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0620
(Tag F0620)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R35) out of four residents reviewed for advanced directive...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that for four (R12, R169, R176, R177) out of seven residents reviewed for Hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure that all the mandatory...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
2. Review of R51's clinical record revealed:
7/20/23 - R51 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to diabetes, hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
24 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of R24's clinical record revealed the following:
2/5/16- R24 was admitted to the facility.
1/30/18- A Physician's orde...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0553
(Tag F0553)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. R34's clinical record revealed:
2/1/22- R34 was admitted to the facility.
9/28/22 - R34's Care Plan Conference Summary documented her attendance at the conference with her signature.
1/10/23 - R34'...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to help and support one (R123) sampled resident for self-determination who wanted to be transferred back to bed. Findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the State Agency within two hours after an allegation of mistreatment for one (R222) out of 54 sampled reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan and/or add interventions as needed related to smoking for two (R22 and R84) out of five residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R60) out of 32 sampled residents for care pla...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for two (R26 and E27) out of five residents sampled for inability to carry out their own ADL's (Activities for Daily Living),...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0685
(Tag F0685)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R154) out of two sampled residents reviewed for vision and hearing, the facility failed to ensure that the resident received prope...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. R27's clinical record revealed:
A facility policy titled Range of Motion Exercises, revised in 10/2021, included: The purpose of this process is to exercise the residents' joints and muscles. 1. If...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations and interviews, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for acc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of facility documentation and interviews, it was determined that for one (R222) out of six residents sampled for medication (med) review, the facility failed to ensure that the residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and policy review, it was determined that for one (R34) out of six residents reviewed for MRR, the facility failed to ensure for R34 that the PRN psychotrophic medication, Xanax...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. 6/1/23 9:55 AM - An observation of the [NAME] wing wound and supply storage cart revealed that the cart was unlocked and it c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one (R154) out of seven residents received the correct meal as issued on their meal ticket. Findings inclu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and observation of three out of five units toured, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on clinical record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R219) out of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure that R219 received the necessary ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. 2/5/16- R24 was admitted to the facility.
8/17/19- R24's orders included, but were not limited to-
Oxygen at 2 Liters per minute via trach stoma (trach site on the neck) as needed to maintain oxyge...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. R34's clinical record revealed:
2/1/22- R34 was admitted to the facility.
5/31/23 1:59 PM- R34's MRRs for the months of January through April 2023 revealed:
-- 1/24/23- no recommendations.
-- 2/2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and review of the facility's Infection Control records, the facility failed to ensure that monthly tracking and surveillance data was collected and entered into the monthly Infectio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0943
(Tag F0943)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training to three out of four of the Unit Managers (E6, E9, and E66) regarding the procedure for reporting...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper food storage, food handling, and food service worker and Nursing staff personal hygiene. Findings incl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to effectively monitory and timely clean and sanitize areas of pest droppings. Findings include
During the initial kitc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the QAA committee measured the success of actions, track performance and regularly review, analyze, and act on data collected. Fi...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and en...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 38% turnover. Below Delaware's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 life-threatening violation(s), 3 harm violation(s), $139,846 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 67 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $139,846 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Delaware. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns REGAL HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE & REHAB CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Delaware, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center Staffed?
CMS rates REGAL HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE & REHAB CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Delaware average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center?
State health inspectors documented 67 deficiencies at REGAL HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE & REHAB CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 3 that caused actual resident harm, 59 with potential for harm, and 4 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center?
REGAL HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE & REHAB CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NATIONWIDE HEALTHCARE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 172 certified beds and approximately 164 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HOCKESSIN, Delaware.
How Does Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center Compare to Other Delaware Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Delaware, REGAL HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE & REHAB CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.3, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, REGAL HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE & REHAB CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Delaware. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center Stick Around?
REGAL HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE & REHAB CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Delaware nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center Ever Fined?
REGAL HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE & REHAB CENTER has been fined $139,846 across 4 penalty actions. This is 4.1x the Delaware average of $34,477. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center on Any Federal Watch List?
REGAL HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE & REHAB CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.