NEWARK MANOR NURSING HOME
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Newark Manor Nursing Home has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality and care. It ranks #35 out of 43 nursing homes in Delaware, putting it in the bottom half of the state, and #20 out of 25 in New Castle County, meaning only a few local options are worse. The facility shows an improving trend, as it reduced its issues from three in 2024 to two in 2025, but it still has serious concerns, including one incident of physical abuse that resulted in harm to a resident. While staffing is a strength with a 4 out of 5 star rating and lower turnover than the state average, there is less RN coverage than 93% of other facilities, which could impact the quality of care. Notably, the facility has not incurred any fines, which is a positive sign, but recent inspector findings highlight issues such as a lack of regular care plan meetings and inadequate monitoring of medication for one resident.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Delaware
- #35/43
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 37% turnover. Near Delaware's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Delaware facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Delaware. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (37%)
11 points below Delaware average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Delaware average (3.3)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Delaware avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review and review of other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R462) out of t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R461) out of one sampled resident, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order to administer tamsulosin HCL, aripiprazole ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, review of facility reported incidents (FRI), and review of the facility's policy, the facili...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or their responsib...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written information regarding the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2021
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Review of R19's clinical record revealed:
12/2/19 - R19 was admitted to the facility.
12/4/19 - Review of R19's inventory list documented that R19 had a partial denture on admission.
12/2/19 - An ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of facility documentation and interview, it was determined that the facility's quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) committee failed to meet at least quarterly. Findings in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. Review of R55's clinical record and interviews revealed:
R55 had an annual MDS assessment on 2/18/21 and quarterly MDS assessments on 5/21/21, 8/21/21 and 11/21/21.
12/15/21 11:45 AM - During an in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that for one (R19) out of five residents for medication review, the facility failed to monitor and have an adequate indication for u...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2019
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a home-like environment with comfortable sound levels in one (the third floor) out of three dining rooms. Findi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an annual MDS assessment was accurate for one (R37) out of 37 residents sampled for investigations. Findings i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R12) out of one resident reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) the facility failed to make a referral to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0685
(Tag F0685)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R312) out of one sampled resident reviewed for hearing/vis...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop a policy that included time frames for all steps of the monthly drug regimen review process and failed to res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview it was determined that for one out of two medication carts, the facility failed to date medications appropriately. Findings include:
6/25/19 11:48 AM - An observatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on a random dining observation it was determined that the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one (2nd floor dining are...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on group resident and staff interviews, observations and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to have an established grievance policy or process of having...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure performance evaluations were completed at least every 12 months for four (E14, E19, E20 an...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on review of facility documents and interview it was determined that the facility failed to conduct an annual review of their Infection Control and Prevention Policies, and to update the program...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Delaware facilities.
- • 37% turnover. Below Delaware's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 19 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade F (35/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Newark Manor's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns NEWARK MANOR NURSING HOME an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Delaware, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Newark Manor Staffed?
CMS rates NEWARK MANOR NURSING HOME's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 37%, compared to the Delaware average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Newark Manor?
State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at NEWARK MANOR NURSING HOME during 2019 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 17 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Newark Manor?
NEWARK MANOR NURSING HOME is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 67 certified beds and approximately 60 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in NEWARK, Delaware.
How Does Newark Manor Compare to Other Delaware Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Delaware, NEWARK MANOR NURSING HOME's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.3, staff turnover (37%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Newark Manor?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Newark Manor Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, NEWARK MANOR NURSING HOME has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Delaware. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Newark Manor Stick Around?
NEWARK MANOR NURSING HOME has a staff turnover rate of 37%, which is about average for Delaware nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Newark Manor Ever Fined?
NEWARK MANOR NURSING HOME has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Newark Manor on Any Federal Watch List?
NEWARK MANOR NURSING HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.