PIKE CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance and significant concerns regarding resident care. They rank #40 out of 43 facilities in Delaware, placing them in the bottom half of care options in the state, and #24 out of 25 in New Castle County, meaning there is only one local facility with a lower ranking. While the facility is showing signs of improvement, with a reduction in issues from 36 in 2024 to 4 in 2025, there are still alarming concerns, including $484,596 in fines, which is higher than 97% of Delaware facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance problems. Staffing is below average, with a rating of 2 out of 5 and a concerning turnover rate of 79%, significantly higher than the state average. Recent inspections revealed serious incidents, such as a nurse administering medications meant for another resident, which led to the affected resident being sent to the ICU, indicating a critical lack of staff competency. Another issue involved the facility not maintaining proper infection control practices after a COVID-19 outbreak, further raising concerns about the safety of residents. While there are some improvements in the facility's trend, families should weigh these serious weaknesses when considering care options.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Delaware
- #40/43
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 79% turnover. Very high, 31 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $484,596 in fines. Higher than 50% of Delaware facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 40 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Delaware. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 97 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Delaware average (3.3)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
33pts above Delaware avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
31 points above Delaware average of 48%
The Ugly 97 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R22, R153) out of 37 residents reviewed for care plans, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that for two (R111 and R110) out of 37 residents sampled for investigation, the facility failed to ensure that residents received ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promote resident dignity as evidenced by obser...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for eight out of eight days on survey, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information on a daily basis that included, but was not lim...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
36 deficiencies
2 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, review of clinical records including two incidents involving significant medication errors and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for 29 out of 29 licensed nu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, review of clinical records and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R422) out of two residents reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure that the urinary collection container...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0552
(Tag F0552)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review and review of facility documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R324) out of four residents reviewed for falls, the facility failed to inform R324'...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review and review of facility documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R340) out of two residents reviewed for death, the facility failed to consult with ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. R323's clinical record revealed:
11/2/23 - A progress note by E6 (NP) documented that R323 fell on the right side and complained of pain. An x-ray of the right hip redemonstrated acute fracture of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R109) out of three residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that R109 was protected from verbal and emotional a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and review of clinical records and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for two (R176 and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R320) out of four residents reviewed for accidents and one (R31) out of one resident reviewed for care planning, the faciliy faile...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility documentation as indicated, it was determined that for two (R94 and R31) out of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily l...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview it was determined that for one (R129) out of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that for one (R105) out of seven residents reviewed for acti...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for three (R324, R170 and R270) out of 14 residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0691
(Tag F0691)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R111) out of two residents reviewed for neph...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R90) out of one resident reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure that R90 received oxygen per p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R173) out of one resident reviewed for pain management, the facility failed to provide pain management according to professional s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a performance review was completed at least every twelve months for two out of five (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R107) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to act on a pharmacy medication review recom...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored and labeled properly in one out of three medication carts reviewed. Finding's incl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Dental Services
(Tag F0791)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R109) out of two residents reviewed for dental care, the facility failed to provide routine dental services to meet ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0806
(Tag F0806)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R126) out of four sampled residents reviewed for food, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated R126's allergies. Findi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R119) out of fifty-four residents sampled in the survey, the facility did not maintain accurate medical records. Findings include:...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, review of the facility assessment and an identified deficient practice scoped as an Immediate Jeopardy during the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a qu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R21) out of five residents reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to provide evidence that the Pneumococcal vaccine was o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined that one (R26) out of five residents sampled for COVID-19 Immunization the facility failed to provide evidence that R26 had consented or declined...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0943
(Tag F0943)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and review of facility documentation it was determined that for three (E14, E27 and E28) out of nine employees sampled the facility failed to provide abuse, neglect, exploitation, a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0947
(Tag F0947)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for three (E14, E26 and E27) out of five sampled CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistants) reviewed the facility failed to en...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
6. Review of R31's clinical records revealed:
5/31/23 - A facility OT Treatment Encounter Note documented, Patient performed passive ROM of Patient's R (right) hand and applied palm guard which she is...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that for five (R90, R111, R118, R165 and R170) out of f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0800
(Tag F0800)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on random observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food to residents taking into consideration their preferences. Findings include:
8/1/24 - Breakfast and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. Review of R21's clinical records revealed:
2/11/23 - R21 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including heart disease and diabetes.
5/14/24 - R21's quarterly MDS documented a BIMS score of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview it was determined that for three out of three units reviewed the facility failed to ensure food items in the nourishment refrigerators were labeled and dated. Findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0941
(Tag F0941)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and review of the facility's policy and procedure, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure mandatory effective communication training was completed for all direct care ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0944
(Tag F0944)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for two (E57 and E58) out of five nursing staff reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the required QAPI (Qualify ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0946
(Tag F0946)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for two (E57 and E58) out of five nursing staff reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the required training on Co...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0949
(Tag F0949)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for five (E43, E55, E56, E57 and E58) out of five nursing staff reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the require...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
47 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
2. The laundry room tour on 8/21/23 at 10:00 AM revealed the following:
8/21/23 at 10:00 AM - The laundry room back door of the soiled linen room was propped open and not kept closed.
Finding was revi...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined that for three (R173, R174 and R410) out of three residents reviewed for accidents the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was f...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
2. Review of R508's clinical record revealed:
7/24/23 - A most recent admission to the facility with a history of cancer and chronic pain.
a. 8/9/23 - A physician's order for oxycodone HCl Oral Tabl...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(H)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. The facility's policy and procedure entitled Fluid Management/Fluid Restriction, effective date 11/1/19, stated, The nursing ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R35) out of three residents reviewed for notification of c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined that for one (R162) out of 15 residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure R162 was free from verbal abuse and physical abuse when...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined that for one (R162) out of 15 reviewed for abuse the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within the required time frames. Findings i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R170) out of fifteen residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to inv...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R178) out of six residents reviewed for transfer/hospitalization, the facility failed to provide written notice to R178's resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Review of R92's clinical record revealed:
3/31/23 - R92 was admitted to the facility with a broken right leg.
7/5/23 - R92's quarterly MDS assessment documented that R92 had a hip fracture (and no...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R75) out of four residents reviewed for PASARR, the facility failed ensure that a referral for a PASARR (Preadmission Screening an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R125 and R139) out of four residents sampled for PASARR review, the facility failed to provide evidence that a Delaware State PASA...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R160 and R182) out of thirteen residents sampled for quality of care, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for two (R163 and R172) out of seventy-six residents reviewed for investigations, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R103) out of one resident reviewed for activities the facility failed to implement resident centered activities progr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that for two (R126 and R139) out of two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder management, the facility failed to ensure that app...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of R75's clinical records revealed:
7/6/23 - R75 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia.
7/12...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review. it was determined that for one (R132) out of four sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure that R132 was provid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R49) out of two residents reviewed for dialysis services, the facility failed to review a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0710
(Tag F0710)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and reviews of clinical records, the facility failed to ensure that for one (R172) out of seventy-six reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview it was determined that for four (R25, R26, R59 and R75) out of seven residents reviewed for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that for one (R160) out of three reviewed for hospitalization the facility failed to ensure that R160 was free of significant medication errors...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview it was determined that for two (2) out of three medication rooms the facility failed to ensur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0773
(Tag F0773)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R182) out of ten residents reviewed for change of condition, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services. Findings include:
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R182) out of ten residents reviewed for a change of condit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined that one (R136) out of five residents sampled for COVID-19 Immunization the facility failed to provide R136 education for COVID-19. In addition, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of R26's clinical record revealed:
6/29/23 - R26 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of right fifth toe ampu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
8. The following was reviewed in R173's clinical record:
4/11/22 - R173 was admitted to the facility with dementia.
4/11/22 - R173 was care planned for alteration in musculoskeletal status with interv...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
6. Review of R 113's clinical record revealed:
7/8/23 - R113 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including a stroke, that resulted in loss of movement to one sided of his body.
7/14/...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews and reviews of clinical records, it was determined that for nine (R92, R108, R110, R113, R147, R411, R606, R167 and R508) out of 15 residents reviewed for ADLs (including toileting...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a performance review was completed at least every 12 months for five (E78, E79...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation of and two out of two test tray results, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food at a pa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0843
(Tag F0843)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and review of related documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence of a written transfer agreement with one or more hospitals approved for participa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of R143's clinical record revealed:
7/31/23 - R143 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, including lun...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct quarterly Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings and to maintain a QAPI committee ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement a grievance policy and postings that included a process for residents and families to file anonymous grievanc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
7. R125's clinical record revealed:
6/13/23 - R125 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including deep vein thrombosis (blood clot in the right lower extremity).
6/13/23 - R125's physicians' or...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide and store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include:
During the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews and survey investigative findings, it was determined that the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and effi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the QAA committee measured the success of actions, track performance and regularly review, analyze, and act on data collected. Fi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0943
(Tag F0943)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review it was determined that for five (E40, E66, E87, E88 and E89) out of five employees sampled the facility failed to provide abuse, neglect, exploitation, and dementia training at ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0944
(Tag F0944)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review it was determined that for five (E40, E66, E87, E88 and E89) out of five employees sampled the facility f...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the State survey results were available for residents to read. Findings include:
The facility bulletin boar...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility policy for abuse failed to include written procedures that ensure that all residents are protected from physical and psychosoci...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and review of other pertinent documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months. Findings include:
9/...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were served mea...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0745
(Tag F0745)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews and review of other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R1) out of th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that for randomly observed residents, the facility failed to allow residents free of Covid or exposure to Covid to choo...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2022
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a call bell was in reach for one (R55) out of 89 residents reviewed. Findings include:
During an observation on...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Review of R16's clinical records revealed:
12/4/20 - R16 was admitted to the facility.
1/7/22 - A physician's order stated to encourage extra fluids during day and evening shifts as tolerated.
3/7...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor if the fluid restriction was maintained for one (R388) out of four residents reviewed for hydration. Finding...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R16) out of six (6) residents sampled for unnecessary medication review, the facility failed to properly label and s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0806
(Tag F0806)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that for one (R53) out of three residents reviewed for food preferences, the facility failed to accommodate R53's food preferences o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0810
(Tag F0810)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide special adaptive equipm...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide and store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include:
The foll...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Observation of R40's pressure ulcer (PU) wound treatment and review of clinical records revealed the following:
1/25/22 - R40...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, 3 harm violation(s), $484,596 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 97 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $484,596 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Delaware. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns PIKE CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Delaware, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Staffed?
CMS rates PIKE CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 79%, which is 33 percentage points above the Delaware average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 75%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center?
State health inspectors documented 97 deficiencies at PIKE CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 3 that caused actual resident harm, 85 with potential for harm, and 6 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center?
PIKE CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by LIFEWORKS REHAB, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 177 certified beds and approximately 142 residents (about 80% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in WILMINGTON, Delaware.
How Does Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Compare to Other Delaware Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Delaware, PIKE CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.3, staff turnover (79%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, PIKE CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Delaware. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Stick Around?
Staff turnover at PIKE CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER is high. At 79%, the facility is 33 percentage points above the Delaware average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 75%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Ever Fined?
PIKE CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER has been fined $484,596 across 2 penalty actions. This is 12.8x the Delaware average of $37,925. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center on Any Federal Watch List?
PIKE CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER is currently an SFF Candidate, meaning CMS has identified it as potentially qualifying for the Special Focus Facility watch list. SFF Candidates have a history of serious deficiencies but haven't yet reached the threshold for full SFF designation. The facility is being monitored more closely — if problems continue, it may be added to the official watch list. Families should ask what the facility is doing to address the issues that led to this status.
PIKE CREEK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER
5651 LIMESTONE ROAD, WILMINGTON, DE 19808 | (302) 239-8583
Strengths
- Licensed facility
Concerns
- 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
- 1-star rating
- 97 deficiencies
Ask about: Inspection Response, Staff Retention, Rn Coverage
nursinghomedata.org | Data: CMS November 2025