LAKEVIEW TERRACE REHAB AND HEALTH CARE CENTER

110 LODGE TERRACE DR, ALTOONA, FL 32702 (352) 669-2133
Non profit - Corporation 40 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
78/100
#225 of 690 in FL
Last Inspection: July 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Lakeview Terrace Rehab and Health Care Center has received a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for care, though not the top tier. It ranks #225 out of 690 facilities in Florida, placing it in the top half, and #7 out of 17 facilities in Lake County, signifying that only a few local options are better. Unfortunately, the facility's trend is worsening, with reported issues increasing from 1 in 2023 to 4 in 2024. Staffing is a relative strength, with a 4 out of 5 rating and a turnover rate of 32%, which is better than the state average. However, there are concerns about RN coverage, as it has less coverage than 97% of Florida facilities, which could impact the quality of care. Recent inspections revealed specific issues, such as staff failing to wash hands before handling medications and applying nicotine patches, which raises infection risks. Additionally, the facility did not accurately assess the status of some residents requiring respiratory services, potentially compromising their care. Overall, while Lakeview Terrace has some strengths, these deficiencies highlight the need for improvement in hygiene practices and care assessments.

Trust Score
B
78/100
In Florida
#225/690
Top 32%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
32% turnover. Near Florida's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$6,201 in fines. Higher than 88% of Florida facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 35 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Florida. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
○ Average
6 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 1 issues
2024: 4 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (32%)

    16 points below Florida average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 32%

14pts below Florida avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $6,201

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 6 deficiencies on record

Jul 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services, Residents #3 and #23. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unspecified dementia, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, and stage 3B chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 2/24/2023 read, Oxygen at 2.5 LPM [liters per minute] via nasal cannula PRN [as needed] for O2 sats [oxygen saturation] below 90% as needed related to facial weakness following cerebral infraction. Review of Resident #3's Weights and Vitals Summary for O2 sats summary showed the resident received oxygen via nasal cannula on 5/21/2024 at 1:47 PM and 11:48 PM, on 5/22/2024 at 2:00 PM, on 5/23/2024 at 3:34 PM, on 5/24/2024 at 11:57 PM, on 5/25/2024 at 7:27 AM and 3:33 PM, on 5/26/2024 at 7:32 AM and 3:22 PM, on 5/28/2024 at 12:00 AM, on 5/29/2024 at 4:01 PM, on 5/30/2024 at 8:21 PM and 3:15 PM, on 5/31/2024 at 7:40 AM and 3:54 PM, and on 6/2/2024 at 7:09 PM. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] read, Section O0110- Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs . C1. Oxygen therapy . B. While a Resident: No. During an interview on 7/9/2024 at 1:35 PM, the MDS Coordinator stated, [Resident #3's name] has orders for oxygen and checking of saturation. I do see where it was coded no on the MDS. It should be changed to yes. 2. Review of Resident #23's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, essential (primary) hypertension, cerebral aneurysm, other seizures, and anemia. Review of Resident #23's physician order dated 11/17/2023 read, Oxygen at 2 LPM [liters per minute] via nasal cannula continuously every shift. Review of Resident #23's care plan initiated on 11/20/2023 and last revised on 6/14/2024 read, Focus: [Resident #23's name] receives oxygen therapy r/t [related to] COPD, shortness of breath . Interventions . Oxygen Settings: O2 @ [at] 2 LPM via NC [nasal cannula] as ordered. During an observation on 7/8/2024 at 9:38 AM, Resident #23 was resting in bed, administered oxygen via nasal cannula. During an observation on 7/8/2024 at 12:08 PM, Resident #23 was resting in bed, administered oxygen via nasal cannula. During an observation on 7/9/2024 at 12:02 PM, Resident #23 was resting in bed, administered oxygen via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #23's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] read, Section O0110- Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs . C1. Oxygen therapy . B. While a Resident: No. During an interview on 7/10/2024 at 10:15 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated, She [Resident #23] has been on oxygen since November of last year. The MDS is not correct. It should have been documented correctly. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Initial Assessment- MDS (Minimum Data Set) with the last review date of 1/29/2024 read, Procedures: 1. A Comprehensive assessment (MDS) will be developed for all residents based on resident needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences utilizing the Resident Assessment Instrument. It will be developed in collaboration with the IDT [Intradisciplinary Team], resident and coordinated to include PASRR [Preadmission Screening and Resident Review] recommendations. It will include direct observation and communication with the resident, as well as communication with licensed and non-licensed direct care staff members on all shifts . 7. All staff participating in completion of this assessment must sign to certify that all above information is correct and truthful to the best of their knowledge or face monetary penalties.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of Resident #3's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of Resident #3's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and allergic dermatitis of unspecified eye (onset date of 3/18/2024). During an interview on 7/8/2024 at 9:19 AM, Resident #3's Wife stated, Now that he [Resident #3] is blind, I will go with him to the activities or to participate in exercise activities and he can hear what they are saying, but I assist him in doing the actual activities. During an interview on 7/9/2024 at 12:59 PM, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, [Resident #3's name] has an eye condition and something happened that he lost his vision. He is able to see now a bit more, but we have to get really up close to him in order for him to recognize us. [Resident #3's name] is alert and oriented and his wife is here day and night. She is very involved. We will always let him know what we will be doing and assist him. He [Resident #3] is able to verbally communicate with us. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] read, Section B- Hearing, Speech, and Vision . B100. Vision: 3. Highly Impaired. Review of Resident #3's physician note dated 4/26/2024 read, Assessments . 6. Encounter for examination of eyes and vision with abnormal findings. Treatment . 6. Encounter for examination of eyes and vision with abnormal findings: Notes: Opthomology [Sic.] referral to evaluate eyes as wife reports that patient is now blind from one eye. Review of Resident #3's care plan showed no focus or interventions for vision impairment. During an interview on 7/9/2024 at 1:30 PM, the MDS Coordinator stated, Based on [Resident #3's name] diagnosis and MDS coding, I should have made an entry for vision with interventions for safety. I do not see a focus for vision on [Resident #3's name] care plan and there should be a separate entry for this. 3. Review of Resident #2's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 2/1/2024 read, Divalproex Sodium Capsule Delayed Release Sprinkle 125 mg [milligrams], Give 250 mg by mouth one time a day for Bipolar HX [history] of. Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 2/1/2024 read, Divalproex Sodium Capsule Delayed Release Sprinkle 125 mg, Give 375 mg by mouth at bedtime for bipolar HX of. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed bipolar disorder under Section I. Active Diagnoses. Review of Resident #2's physician progress note dated 3/5/2024 read, Assessments . 5. Bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, mild. Treatment . 5. Bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, mild. Notes: Continue current medication. Monitor for increased or new onset major depression symptoms (i.e. tearfulness, sadness, change in appetite, self-isolation), manic/hypomania episodes, decreased sleep, flight of ideas, or functional impairment- if these symptoms exacerbate or are new onset call MD/ARNP [Medical Doctor/ Advance Registered Nurse Practitioner] immediately. Psych consulted as needed. Review of Resident #2's psychiatry subsequent note dated 3/15/2024 read, Chief complaint: Depression, dementia, and bipolar disorder . History of Present Illness: This is an [AGE] years old patient with past psychiatrics history of depression, dementia and bipolar disorder. Prior to last visit, patient had mood swings. Patient had sundowning. Patient was irritable. Signs and symptoms related to depression or anxiety were not observed. Patient was sleeping and eating well without trouble. Increased Depakote to 375 mg QHS [once a day at bedtime] for behaviors/agitation. During an interview on 7/9/2024 at 1:45 PM, the MDS Coordinator stated, [Resident #2's name] has a history of bipolar disorder and should have been care planned for a separate entry for the diagnosis. During an interview on 7/10/2024 at 8:40 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, [Resident #2's name] has a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and is followed by psych. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Resident-Centered Care Planning with the last review date of 1/19/2024 read, Purpose: To provide comprehensive and Person-Centered care and services so that residents attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental and psychological well-being. Standards . A comprehensive Person-Centered care plan must be developed for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables . Procedures . 5. The comprehensive care plan shall be developed collaboratively with input from the IDT [Intradisciplinary Team], including the resident or resident representative to the extent possible. It shall include the following: a. Measurable goals and time frame to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychological needs identified in the comprehensive assessment. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed for 3 of 12 residents reviewed, Residents #2, #3, #33. Findings include: Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed for 3 of 12 residents reviewed, Residents #2, #3, and #33. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's admission record documented the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation, essential (primary) hypertension, arthritis, generalized anxiety disorder, muscle weakness (generalized), unsteadiness on feet, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #33's physician order dated 2/9/2024 read, Eliquis Oral Tablet 5 mg [milligram] (Apixaban), Give one tablet by mouth every 12 hours for A-fib. Review of Resident #33's care plan dated 5/16/2024 showed no focus or intervention related to anticoagulant therapy. During an interview on 7/9/2024 at 2:55 PM, the MDS Coordinator stated, I don't see she [Resident #33] was care planned for anticoagulant therapy.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen as ordered by the ph...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Resident #23. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, essential (primary) hypertension, cerebral aneurysm, other seizures, and anemia. Review of Resident #23's physician order dated 11/17/2023 read, Oxygen at 2 LPM [liters per minute] via nasal cannula continuously every shift. During an observation on 7/8/2024 at 9:38 AM, Resident #23 was resting in bed, being administered oxygen at 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula on oxygen concentrator. During an observation on 7/8/2024 at 12:08 PM, Resident #23 was resting in bed, being administered oxygen at 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula. During an observation on 7/9/2024 at 12:02 PM, Resident #23 was resting in bed, being administered oxygen at 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula on oxygen concentrator. During an observation on 7/9/2024 at 12:04 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verified that the oxygen was being administered at 4 liters per minute. During an interview on 7/9/2024 at 12:05 PM, the DON stated, Her [Resident #23] order is for oxygen at 2 liters. Nurses should check oxygen when they assess the residents or when giving medications. During an interview on 7/9/2024 at 12:13 PM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, We should be checking oxygen first thing in the morning. I did check her this morning, but she was on her portable tank. I did not check her when she went back on the concentrator. During an interview on 7/9/2024 at 12:41 PM, Staff D, LPN, Unit Manager, stated, Typically, we should be checking the oxygen when there is a change in a resident's condition, when we do a change over from portable to concentrator, when we are assessing their lung sounds. There are no notes that show she had a need to increase the oxygen. When we change oxygen, we should call and get orders to increase the oxygen. Review of Resident #23's nursing progress notes from 7/5/2024 through 7/9/2024 did not document notes for the need to increase the amount of oxygen being administered. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Oxygen Administration with the last approval date of 1/19/2024 read, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration . Assessment . 10. Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered . 13. Observe the resident upon setup and periodically thereafter to be sure oxygen is being tolerated.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

2. During an observation on 7/8/2024 at 9:54 AM, Resident #17's Wife asked Staff A, LPN, for lotion due to the resident being itchy. Staff A went to the medication cart and returned with a bottle of l...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. During an observation on 7/8/2024 at 9:54 AM, Resident #17's Wife asked Staff A, LPN, for lotion due to the resident being itchy. Staff A went to the medication cart and returned with a bottle of lotion and handed it to Resident #17's wife. Staff A returned to the medication cart and removed a nicotine patch for Resident #20 without performing hand hygiene. Staff A followed the Physical Therapist and Resident #20 into the resident's room and without performing hand hygiene, removed the nicotine patch from the package and placed the nicotine patch on Resident #20. Staff A exited Resident #20' room and returned to the medication cart and began preparing medications for Resident #15 without performing hand hygiene. Staff A entered the resident's room and administered the medications to the resident without performing hand hygiene. Staff A exited Resident #15's room without performing hand hygiene and returned to the medication cart. During an interview on 7/8/2024 at 10:10 AM, Staff A, LPN, stated, I should have done hand hygiene in between each resident. I think I did hand hygiene for one of them, but I cannot honestly remember. During an interview on 7/10/2024 at 8:47 AM, the DON stated, Staff is expected to perform hand hygiene in between each resident. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Administering Medications with the last approval date of 1/19/2024 read, Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 25: Staff follows established infection control procedures (e.g., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications, as applicable. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Hand Hygiene/Hand Washing with the last approval date of 1/19/2024 read, Purpose: To prevent transmissible infections and prevent contamination by bloodborne pathogens. Hand washing is the single most effective deterrent to the spread of infection . Procedure: 1. All staff shall perform hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection. When coming on shift; Before applying and after removing gloves; Before and after each Resident contact or touching Resident surroundings (before and after resident contact, includes going between residents during dinner, activities and direct care); Before and after assisting with medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration for 6 of 10 medication administration observations to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable disease. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 7/10/2024 at 5:55 AM, Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), exited the nurses' station and went to the medication cart, removed keys from her pocket, unlocked the medication cart and prepared Resident #140's medications without performing hand hygiene. Staff E donned gloves without performing hand hygiene and locked the medication cart with her gloved hand. Staff E knocked on Resident #140's room door with her gloved hand, entered the resident's room, used the bed controls to adjust the height of the head of the bed with her gloved hands and administered Resident #140's oral medications. Staff E then pulled a syringe and alcohol swab out of her pocket with her gloved hand, cleaned Resident #140's arm with alcohol and administered medication to the resident. Staff E doffed her gloves and exited the room without performing hand hygiene and returned to the medication cart to prepare medications for another resident. During an observation on 7/10/2024 at 6:05 AM, Staff E, LPN, returned to the medication cart and began preparing medications for Resident #9 without performing hand hygiene. Staff E entered the resident's room, adjusted the overbed table and used the bed control to adjust the height of the head of the bed. Staff E administered the medications and exited the room without performing hand hygiene, returning to the medication cart to prepare medications for another resident. During an observation on 7/10/2024 at 6:15 AM, Staff E, LPN, returned to the medication cart and began preparing medications for Resident #23 without performing hand hygiene. Staff E donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, removed keys from her pocket and locked the medication cart with her gloved hand. Staff E knocked on the resident's room door with her gloved hand, entered the resident's room, adjusted the overbed table and used the bed controls to adjust the height of the head of the bed and administered the oral medication. Staff E then opened the nightstand, and removed respiratory equipment with her gloved hand, poured the medication into the passive nebulizer and adjusted the nebulizer mask on Resident #23's face. Staff E doffed her gloves and exited the room after the nebulizer was completed without performing hand hygiene. During an interview on 7/10/2024 at 6:50 AM, Staff E, LPN, stated, I should have used hand sanitizer before I put on gloves and before I did my medications.
Mar 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dressing on a Peripherally Inserted Centra...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dressing on a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line was changed every 48 hours as per professional standards of care for 1 of 1 resident with a PICC Line, Resident #36. Findings include: During an observation on 3/15/2023 at 2:30 PM, Resident #36 had a PICC line on left upper arm with gauze under transparent dressing. The dressing was dated 3/10/23 (photographic evidence obtained). Review of the admission record for Resident #36 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fusion of spine, spinal stenosis of lumbar region, and lower back pain. Review of Resident #36's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the PICC line dressing change was completed on 3/14/2023. Review of the physician orders for Resident #36 reads, Order Summary: Change PICC site dressing on admission, then once weekly and PRN [as needed] every day shift every 7 day(s) for PICC care. Order Date: 03/06/2023 . Order Summary: Daptomycin Intravenous Solution Reconstituted (Daptomycin) Use 850 mg [milligram] intravenously in the evening for MRSA until 04/13/2023 23:59 [11:59 PM]. Order Date: 03/07/2023 . Order Summary: Meropenem Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 1 GM [gram] (Meropenem) Use 1 gram intravenously every 8 hours for MRSA until 04/17/2023 23:59. Order Date: 03/06/2023 During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 3:00 PM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, Yes, the date on PICC dressing is 3/10/23. During an interview on 3/15/2023 at 3:07 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, That is wrong. I know that dressing change was done on admission. It is a documentation error. The dressing change on 3/10/23 was a PRN dressing change and not documented. My expectation for my nurses is for them to follow orders and document. I did not realize the batch orders from the pharmacy does not include to change the PICC line dressing every 48 hours when there is gauze. I was not familiar with this pharmacy batch PICC line orders. Review of facility policy and procedure titled Central Venous Catheter Dressing Changes dated April 2017 reads, Policy: Central venous catheter dressings will be changed at specific intervals, or when needed, to prevent catheter -related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled, or wet dressings . General Guidelines . 6. Change gauze dressings or TSM [Transparent Semi-permeable Membrane] over gauze dressings every 48 hours . Documentation: 1. The following should be recorded in the resident's medical record: a. Date and time dressing was changed.
Sept 2021 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good pers...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for one of three sampled residents, Resident #14. Findings: On 9/20/2021 at 12:16 PM, Resident #14 was observed in his bedroom seated in a chair with his feet exposed that showed long toenails. During an interview on 9/20/2021 at 12:18 PM, Resident # 14 stated, I know my toenails are long. I want to see a podiatrist. During an interview on 9/21/2021 at 2:00 PM, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), verified Resident #14's toenails were long and the resident needed staff help with hygiene and a podiatrist to cut the resident's toenails. During an interview on 9/21/2021 at 2:06 PM, Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated she provided Resident #14 help with hygiene. Staff C verified that the resident's toenails were long and they needed to be cut. Review of Resident #14's care plan read, Focus: [Resident #14's name] has an ADL [Activities of Daily Living] self-care performance deficit r/t [related to] disease process (recent COVID-19), Date Initiated: 10/27/2020 . Interventions: . Bathing/ Showering: Check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary. Report any change to the nurse. Review of Resident #14's clinical records revealed task list documentation that showed Resident #14 had received a shower on 9/21/2021 with no documentation of nail condition recorded. Review of Resident #14's Monthly Summary, dated 8/23/2021, read, Nails: . 21 B. Toes: D. Cut PRN [as needed] by staff. Review of the facility policy titled Fingernails/ Toenails, Care of, revised in February 2018, read, General Guidelines: 1. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • 32% turnover. Below Florida's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • No major red flags. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Lakeview Terrace Rehab And Health's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns LAKEVIEW TERRACE REHAB AND HEALTH CARE CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Lakeview Terrace Rehab And Health Staffed?

CMS rates LAKEVIEW TERRACE REHAB AND HEALTH CARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 32%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Lakeview Terrace Rehab And Health?

State health inspectors documented 6 deficiencies at LAKEVIEW TERRACE REHAB AND HEALTH CARE CENTER during 2021 to 2024. These included: 6 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Lakeview Terrace Rehab And Health?

LAKEVIEW TERRACE REHAB AND HEALTH CARE CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 40 certified beds and approximately 30 residents (about 75% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ALTOONA, Florida.

How Does Lakeview Terrace Rehab And Health Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, LAKEVIEW TERRACE REHAB AND HEALTH CARE CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (32%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lakeview Terrace Rehab And Health?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Lakeview Terrace Rehab And Health Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, LAKEVIEW TERRACE REHAB AND HEALTH CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Lakeview Terrace Rehab And Health Stick Around?

LAKEVIEW TERRACE REHAB AND HEALTH CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 32%, which is about average for Florida nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Lakeview Terrace Rehab And Health Ever Fined?

LAKEVIEW TERRACE REHAB AND HEALTH CARE CENTER has been fined $6,201 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Florida average of $33,141. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Lakeview Terrace Rehab And Health on Any Federal Watch List?

LAKEVIEW TERRACE REHAB AND HEALTH CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.