AVIATA AT PALMA SOLA BAY

6305 CORTEZ RD W, BRADENTON, FL 34210 (941) 761-3499
For profit - Limited Liability company 105 Beds AVIATA HEALTH GROUP Data: November 2025 5 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#605 of 690 in FL
Last Inspection: July 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Aviata at Palma Sola Bay has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor quality and significant concerns about care. It ranks #605 out of 690 facilities in Florida, placing it in the bottom half of nursing homes statewide, and #11 out of 12 in Manatee County, meaning there is only one local option that is better. The facility's performance is worsening, having increased from 8 issues in 2022 to 10 in 2024. Staffing is average with a rating of 3 out of 5, but the turnover rate is concerning at 58%, higher than the state average, which may affect continuity of care. Additionally, the facility has been fined $191,561, a figure that is higher than 95% of Florida facilities, indicating ongoing compliance issues. Specific incidents raise serious red flags; for example, a newly admitted resident did not receive essential medications for seven days, leading to hospitalization and exacerbated health issues. Another critical finding involved poor documentation and communication among the staff, which resulted in residents not receiving their prescribed medications. Furthermore, there were failures to respond to significant changes in a resident's condition, leading to severe health consequences. While the facility has some strengths, such as a good quality measures rating of 4 out of 5, the weaknesses are substantial and warrant careful consideration.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Florida
#605/690
Bottom 13%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
8 → 10 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$191,561 in fines. Higher than 82% of Florida facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 31 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Florida. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
20 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 8 issues
2024: 10 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Florida average (3.2)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 58%

11pts above Florida avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $191,561

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: AVIATA HEALTH GROUP

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (58%)

10 points above Florida average of 48%

The Ugly 20 deficiencies on record

5 life-threatening
Aug 2024 2 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Cross Reference F842 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Cross Reference F842 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident (#6) out of five newly admitted residents reviewed was free from significant medication errors as evidenced by not receiving physician ordered medications for a period of seven days resulting in a readmission to a local hospital due to a hematoma and exacerbation of her medical diagnoses to include a flare-up of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) symptoms to include paralysis in her hands, confusion, and a low hemoglobin requiring a transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) . On 8/9/24, Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with medication orders from the acute facility. Resident #6's ordered medications were not entered into the electronic medical record. On 8/16/24, Resident #6 went to a scheduled outside medical appointment, which resulted in a transfer and admission back to the hospital on 8/16/24 with a hematoma. Facility staff did not discover Resident #6's missed medications until the re-admission back to the hospital. The failure to administer significant medications for a period of 7 days to include Prednisone, Amiodarone, Gabapentin, Ferrous Sulfate, and Wellbutrin resulted in serious harm and could have led to additional medical complications to include further serious medical complications, injury and possible death. This failure resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on 8/9/24. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 8/29/24 and the severity and scope was reduced to a D. Findings included: Review of the census page in the electronical medical record revealed Resident #6 was initially admitted to the facility on Friday, 08/09/24 at 4:20 PM from an acute care facility. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #6 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses to include subsequent encounter fracture with routine healing, multiple sclerosis (MS), paraplegia, urinary tract infection (UTI), major depressive disorder recurrent, ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and other pulmonary embolism without acute COR pulmonale (alteration in the structure and function of the right ventricle of the heart caused by a primary disorder of the respiratory system), acute kidney failure, anemia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and personal history of other venous thrombosis and embolism. Review of the [Local Hospital] Discharge Patient Med Rec (Medication Reconciliation) - Single report, dated 08/08/24, showed: This is the list of medications for you to take upon discharge. Please take this list to your primary care doctor at the next visit. Your hospital doctor wants you to take the drugs on this list when you go home. The list of medications included the following: - Amiodarone 200 MG (milligrams), trade name Cordarone, Oral, twice daily. A note showed this order was sent to the resident's preferred pharmacy. - Atorvastatin 10 MG, trade name Lipitor, Oral, daily. - Bupropion HCL 100 MG, trade name Wellbutrin, Oral, daily. - Collagenase Clostridium 1 application, trade name Santyl, Topical, twice daily. A note showed this order was sent to the resident's preferred pharmacy. - Ferrous Sulfate 325 MG, trade name Feosol, Oral, every other day. - Gabapentin 300 MG, trade name Neurontin, per feeding tube, three times daily. A note showed this prescription was printed. - Guaifenesin/Dextromethorphan 5 ML (milliliters), per feeding tube, Q6H (every six hours). A note showed this order was sent to the resident's preferred pharmacy. - Metoprolol Tartrate 25 MG, trade name Lopressor, Oral, twice daily. - Multivitamin 1 tablet, trade name Multivitamin-Mineral Daily, Oral, daily. - Pantoprazole 40 MG, trade name Protonix, Oral, before breakfast and dinner. - Polyethylene Glycol 3350 17 MG, trade name Miralax, Oral, daily as needed. A note showed this prescription was printed. - Prednisone 5 MG, trade name Prednisone, Oral, take 1 tablet by mouth 1 time every 72 hours. - Rivaroxaban 20 40 MG, trade name Xarelto, Oral, with breakfast. - Sennosides 1 tablet, trade name Senokot, Oral, daily as needed. A note showed this order was sent to the resident's preferred pharmacy. - Sodium Chloride 3% Inhalation Solution 4 ML, trade name Sodium Chloride 3% Inhalation Solution, inhalation every 6 hours while awake. A note showed this order was sent to the resident's preferred pharmacy. Review of the complete Order Summary Report and the August Medication Administration (MAR) showed only two of the 15 medications were ordered by the facility on 08/09/24 during Resident #6's initial admission: - Metoprolol Tartrate oral tablet 25 milligrams (MG)- Give 1 tablet by mouth twice daily. - Multivitamin 1 tablet, trade name Multivitamin-Mineral Daily, Oral, daily. Review of the Medication Reconciliation dated 08/09/24 showed A. Completed medication reconciliation utilizing the following data sources (check all that apply); 2. Discharge Summary Section B. Medication Issues Identified was blank. Section C. Physician Contact was blank. Review of Resident #6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed in Section C- Cognitive Patterns a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (cognitively intact). Section I-Active Diagnosis showed Resident #6 had the following diagnoses: anemia, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (EP), hypertension, renal insufficiency, multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO), urinary tract infection (UTI), wound infection, hyperlipemia, paraplegia, multiple sclerosis, depression and respiratory failure. Section N-Medications showed Resident #6 was taking none of the above medication classifications that included: antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, hypnotic, anticoagulant, antibiotic diuretic, opioid and antiplatelet. Review of a Nursing Progress Note, dated 08/13/24, showed Resident complained of being hot. Temp in room was decreased to 60 degrees. NP [Nurse Practitioner] notified. Nurse gave resident some PRN [as needed] Tylenol. NP states it could be MS [Multiple Sclerosis] flush. Nurse also put wet washcloth on neck and forehead. Will continue to observe. Review of a Nursing Progress Note, dated 08/14/24, showed, Resident [family member] has concern that his [Resident #6] has an UTI, he stated her current orientation is not her baseline the pt [patient] is showing signs of increased confusion and would like for her to be tested for an UTI. The writer notified the house NP about [family member] concerns, NP gave new orders to give for UA C&S [Urine Analysis Culture and Sensitivity] and to monitor for other s/s[signs and symptoms]. Review of a Physician Progress Note dated 08/15/24, with a service date of 08/12/24, showed Patient seen today is new to provider. She was in the hospital for hypoxia due to respiratory failure. She was also found to be tachycardia, hypotensive, and had a fever, she was a sepsis alert. She has multiple sclerosis is a paraplegic. She has a foley catheter for urinary retention. She is seen at bedside and states she is doing well .She is currently on 2L [liters] oxygen, she is at baseline. She has tube feeds and states that she eats regular food too. Medications Reconciled .Medications: Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25 MG, Multivitamin-Minerals Oral Tablet, Tubersol Solution 5 unit/0.1 ml, Fleet Enema 7-19 GM [gram]/118 ML, Milk of Magnesia Suspension 400 MG/5ML, Biscolax Suppository 10 MG, Acetaminophen Tablet 325 MG, Santyl External Ointment 250 Unit/GM. Review of a Nursing Progress Note, dated 08/16/24, showed, Resident went to [Local Hospital] wound care appointment this am [morning]. Received a call from them approximately 11:30 am stating that the resident is being sent to the ER to evaluate a hematoma to her left arm. NP made aware. Review of the Emergency Provider Report, dated 8/16/24, revealed the chief complaint was left arm swelling and reports extremity pain, extremity swelling. The section for Home Medications - Active Scripts included: - Amiodarone 200 MG, PO (by mouth). - Collagenase Clostridium 1 application, trade name Santyl, Topical, BID (two times daily). - Ferrous Sulfate 325 MG, PO Q48HR (every other day). - Gabapentin 300 MG, per feeding tube, TID (three times daily). - Guaifenesin/Dextromethorphan 5 ML (milliliters), per feeding tube, Q6H (every six hours), 7 days. - Multivitamin 1 tablet, PO daily. - Pantoprazole 40 MG, PO AC BK DIN (before breakfast and dinner). - Polyethylene Glycol 3350 17 GM, PO daily, PRN (as needed). - Rivaroxaban 20 MG, PO (by mouth). - Sennosides 1 tablet, PRN daily as needed. - Sodium Chloride 3% Inhalation Solution 4 ML, INH RTQ6H (inhalation every 6 hours while awake). Reported Medications included: - Prednisone 5 MG, PO Q72HR (every 72 hours). - Bupropion HCL 100 MG, PO daily. - Atorvastatin 10 MG, PO daily. - Metoprolol Tartrate 25 MG, PO BID. The Impression for the vascular Lab, dated 8/16/24, of her upper left arm showed: No sonographic evidence of deep venous thrombosis. Left upper arm soft tissue mass most consistent with fluid which may reflect hematoma, seroma, abscess of lymphocele. Ultrasound-guided aspiration appears technically possible if clinically indicated. The Impression for the radiology report, dated 8/16/24, of the left forearm showed: Diffuse infiltrative changes soft tissues distal left upper arm and proximal-mid forearm consistent with edema or cellulitis. The Re-Evaluation/Progress #1 note showed: Left upper extremity shows a moderate-sized hematoma. There is no DVT. I consulted with plastics, and they recommended admission for hematoma evacuation. The patient will require cardiology clearance given her recent cardiac arrest. Review of the History and Physical Report from the local hospital and dated 8/17/24 revealed Patient is a . year old female with a past medical history paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, VFib [ventricular fibrillation] cardia arrest, MS, anxiety, OSA [obstructive sleep apnea], hyperlipidemia, PE [pulmonary embolism]/DVT previously on Xarelto, sacral decubitus ulcer, and ESBL [extended spectrum beta-lactamase] E [Escherichia] coli bacteremia that presented to [local hospital] for evaluation of upper extremity swelling and pain. Patient was found to have a hematoma. Plastics evaluated and recommended no intervention at this time .Labs were remarkable for hemoglobin 6.6 and given a unit of PRBCs. Review of https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/003645.htm showed Hemoglobin is a protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen . Normal results for adults vary, but in general are: . Female: 12.1 to 15.1 . The ranges above are common measurements for results of these tests. Normal value ranges may vary slightly among different laboratories During an interview on 08/27/24 at 9:50 a.m. Resident #6 stated she was out of it and did not remember much about her stay at the facility between 08/09/24 and 08/16/24. Resident #6 stated she knew the medications she took and why. Resident #6 stated that had she not been confused during the initial admission on [DATE]. She reported that if she had not become confused, she would have asked about the facility not administering her regular medications. Resident #6 stated her family member was very upset about the facility not administering all the medications as ordered during the initial admission. Resident #6 stated both she and her family member still did not understand why the facility was not treating the multiple sclerosis (MS) flareup causing her hands to be paralyzed and did not understand why the facility would not provide her with Prednisone, which assists her in regaining her functions when MS attacks. Resident #6 stated because of the latest MS flareup she was not able to feed herself because the MS flareup attacked her hands. During an interview on 08/27/24 at 10:32 a.m. Resident #6's family member stated the Director of Nursing (DON) from the facility called him to let him know Resident #6 did not receive her medications from the initial admission date on 08/09/24 through her hospitalization on 08/16/24. The family member stated the DON told him the facility did not input Resident #6's medications into the medical record. The family member stated when he came to visit Resident #6, he spoke with staff who came into Resident #6's room and voiced his concerns that Resident #6 seemed to be out of it. The family member stated Resident #6 was fuzzy about things and was not able to pay attention, which was not her normal. The family member stated prior to her initial admission on [DATE] Resident #6 was her normal self, and he noticed the change in her status during the week after her initial admission to the facility until the time of discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. The family member stated Resident #6 went out to the wound center and when the wound care physician was looking at the wound, they noticed the hematoma on her arm. The family member stated the wound care center immediately sent her over to the ER (emergency room) where she was admitted into the hospital. The family member stated he noticed a positive change in her mental status back to normal once she was at the hospital and stated she began acting more like her coherent self again. During an interview on 08/27/24 at 2:50 p.m. the DON stated Resident #6 went to a scheduled outside appointment on 08/16/24. The DON stated it was then that the outside provider sent Resident #6 to the ER. The DON stated she reviewed Resident #6's medical record when Resident #6 was hospitalized . This was when she recognized Resident #6 was not administered all her physician ordered medications. The DON stated Resident #6 did not have a DVT (deep vein thrombosis) and the hospital said it was just cellulitis. The DON stated upon reviewing Resident #6's medications it was discovered they were not reconciled and were not entered into the medical record. The DON stated that Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was the admitting nurse for Resident #6 on Friday, 08/09/24. The DON stated that Staff E, LPN should have ensured all medications were entered into the electronical medical record as medications are a priority. The DON stated her understanding was Staff E, LPN started the admission process and was called away and failed to communicate with the oncoming nurse that all the medications were not added into the electronical medical record. The DON stated nurses are supposed to document the medication reconciliation. The DON stated after speaking with Staff E, LPN she was informed that Staff E, LPN left at 7:00 p.m., the end of her scheduled shift, and assumed the oncoming nurse scheduled for the 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. shift would complete Resident #6's physician ordered medications. The DON stated she then spoke with Staff F, LPN (the oncoming nurse) for the 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. shift. The DON discovered Staff F, LPN thought the admission was completed by the 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. nurse since some entries were completed in the physician orders of Resident #6's medical record. The DON stated chart scrubs (reviews) should be completed on Mondays (more than 48 hours after Resident #6's admission), however the Unit Manager ended up having to work on the medication cart passing medications and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was not in the facility. During an interview on 08/27/24 at 5:50 p.m. Staff E, LPN stated the admission process was to get a list of admissions, and the nurses were responsible for getting the chart ready. Staff E, LPN stated the nurse was also responsible for checking the new admissions' medication lists. Staff E, LPN stated that her work schedule was usually 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. shift and medications were the responsibility of the night shift nurse working 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. since the medications were usually delivered after 7:00 p.m. During an interview on 08/28/24 at 1:45 p.m. Staff F, LPN stated he has worked in the facility for two years. Staff F, LPN stated when the new admission comes to the facility it is the nurse's responsibility to complete the admission, however if the nurse is new, a seasoned nurse will help to train them. Staff F, LPN stated the nurse's responsibility for a resident who is newly admitted would consist of assessments to include skin and wounds, consents for treatment, and then the physician orders for medications are entered into the electronical medical record. Staff F, LPN stated, ensuring everything is entered into the electronical medical record, a seasoned nurse would check to make sure a medication reconciliation was completed. Staff F, LPN stated if medications were not available the nurse could also look in the [Emergency Drug Kit] for the medications. An interview was conducted with the Consultant Pharmacist on 8/28/24 at 8:37 a.m. The consultant reported that although he does not review new admissions, new admission medications should arrive to the facility within 24 hours. During an interview on 08/28/24 at 12:00 p.m. the NP confirmed Resident #6 had medications that were not entered into the medical record when she was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE]. The NP stated the missing medications were not found until after Resident #6 went out to the hospital. During an interview on 08/28/24 at 3:11p.m., the Pharmacist in Charge (PC) stated in review of Resident #6's medications upon admission all the medications put into the electronical medical record system were house stocked medications except for Metoprolol. The PC stated that should the drug Amiodarone be stopped abruptly this drug was a serious drug for the heart and should be tapered off if possible. The PC stated for the drug Gabapentin this drug should be tapered off gradually over a week's time and had withdrawal side effects such as Tachycardia and Seizures. The PC stated for the drug Wellbutrin this drug should also be tapered off and if stopped abruptly withdrawal symptoms would be depression, irritation and confusion however all these medications could cause confusion. Review of the website medlineplus.gov showed: Gabapentin should be gradually reduced. Do not stop taking gabapentin without talking to your doctor, even if you experience side effects such as unusual changes in behavior or mood. If you suddenly stop taking gabapentin tablets, capsules, oral solution, you may experience withdrawal symptoms such as anxiety, difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep, nausea, pain, and sweating. If you are taking gabapentin to treat seizures and you suddenly stop taking the medication, you may experience seizures more often. Your doctor may decrease your dose gradually over at least a week. Review of the website addictionresources.com showed: Wellbutrin if discontinued may cause the following withdrawal symptoms within two to four days after discontinuation of the drug: Mood Changes: Mood swings, irritability, heightened emotional sensitivity Physical Symptoms: Headaches, fatigue, dizziness and flu-like symptoms Cognitive Effects: Difficulty concentrating, memory lapse and cognitive fog. Review of the website medlineplus.gov showed: Amiodarone You may need to be closely monitored or even hospitalized when you stop taking amiodarone . Review of the website https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/drugs/14568-iron-oral-supplements-for-anemia showed: Ferrous sulfate is a type of iron supplement. Iron is one of the minerals your body needs to function properly. Your body needs iron to produce hemoglobin and myoglobin. Hemoglobin is a protein in your red blood cells. Hemoglobin helps your blood carry oxygen from your lungs to all your body's tissues and organs. Myoglobin is a protein in your muscles and helps supply oxygen to the cells in your muscles. If you don't have enough iron, your body can't make these proteins, and you may develop iron-deficiency anemia. Iron-deficiency anemia is the most common type of anemia. Anemia is a blood disorder in which your body doesn't have enough red blood cells. During an interview on 08/28/24 at 4:12 p.m., the Medical Director (MD)(who was the resident's primary care physician at the facility) stated the process for new admissions would be medications are uploaded into the electronic medical record system by the nurse and then facility staff would message him so he could look at the new resident's profile within 24 hours. The MD stated he was not aware that Resident #6 was not getting all her medications. The MD stated that he was at the facility and met with Resident #6 on 08/12/24. The MD stated that according to his physician notes, he only discussed Metoprolol with Resident #6 so that must have been the only medication that was documented in her medical record. The MD stated he was not aware all the medications were not entered into the electronic medical record system, but stated he did remember questioning that she only had one medication and had found it odd. The MD stated that if you review my physician note when I came to the facility and examined Resident #6 for her re-admission you will see I listed a lot more medications because the facility had entered all the medications into the electronic medical record system during the re-admission process. During an interview on 08/29/24 at 4:00 p.m. Registered Nurse (RN)/Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) confirmed the medication errors for Resident #6 at the time of her initial admission on [DATE]. The RN/RDCS stated a resident missing a cardiac medication is significant. Review of the policy titled, Physician Orders, revised 3/3/21, revealed: The center will ensure that physician orders are appropriately and timely documented in the medical record. The policy described the procedure for admission orders as Information received from the referring facility or agency to be reviewed, verified with the physician, and transcribed to the electronic medical record. The attending physician will review and confirm orders. Confirmation of admission orders requires that the physician sign and date the order during, or as soon as practical after it is provided, to maintain an accurate medical record. Review of the facility's policy Administering Medications revised date 04/2019 showed Policy Statement: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed .3. Staffing schedules are arranged to ensure that medications are administered without necessary interruption. 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame .6. Medication errors are documented, reported and reviewed by the QAPI committee to inform process changes and or the need for additional staffing. 7. Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before or after meal orders). Review of the facility's policy titled, Nursing Documentation Guidelines, not dated, revealed Policy: Pertinent Information should be documented in the individual's record in an accurate, timely and legible manner. Procedure: General Guidelines When to Chart 1. Record resident's condition, nursing actions and individual responses as soon as possible after they occur What to Chart 1. Symptoms/Subjective Data 2. Your observations and/or Assessments, 3. All injuries, illness and unusual health changes until they are resolved. There should be entries in the nursing notes on a regular basis until the problem is no longer present. When the problem is resolved, it should be documented. 4. All contacts with the primary care prescriber. A. document what information was relayed to the primary care prescriber. b. If the primary care prescriber sees or reviews an individual's specific health problem, document what occurred: the chart was reviewed, the individual was seen or if the individual was examined. c. contact is made by phone document what was discussed and results of the contact (e.g. [for example] no orders given, observe) d. document the plan for follow-up (e.g. to see the physician on morning rounds) e. Documentation on all meds. 5. response to a medication or treatment this includes therapeutic effects as well as side effects 6. new symptoms or conditions document in then nurses notes at time of occurrence or as soon as possible. Document nursing action taken and person's response. Facility immediate actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy included: Immediate and Five (5) day reports were completed for Resident #6 on 8/17/24 and 8/23/24 related to neglect respectively. Resident was discharged on 8/16/2024 from a physician office visit to the hospital. re-admitted to facility on 8/19/24. Medication reconciliation completed on 8/19/2024 by licensed nurse. Education completed with one identified nurse directly related to Resident #6's identified deficiency on 8/17/24. Education provided reviewed the process of new admissions, medication reconciliation of physician orders, and follow up with pharmacy regarding delivery of medications. As of 8/28/24, corrective action was written for the one identified nurse. A thirty (30) day look back of all admissions and readmissions from 7/16/2024 to 8/16/2024 to ensure systems are in place to confirm residents are admitted into the facility's electronic medical record and medications ordered at the time of admission are received and administered per physician orders. As of 8/27/2024, a MAR to cart audit reconciliation was completed by the Director of Nursing/designee to ensure medications are available according to physician order. A pharmacy representative also conducted a full cart audit on 8/28/2024. Facility personnel received education beginning on 8/28/2024 related to abuse policy to include preventing abuse, identification, protection, investigating and reporting and reporting inappropriate resident behaviors to the nurse. Neglect is the failure of the center, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. As of 8/17/2024 all license nurses were educated by Director of Nursing/Designee on the admission process to ensure discharge medications are reconciled before clarifying with physician and ensure residents are receiving their physician ordered medications to meet their needs. Licensed Nurses received additional education beginning on 8/27/2024 on errors in medication administration to include: -omissions of medications not given -transcribing and reconciliation of discharge orders -following physician orders -steps taken when medication is not available (check med bank backup machine, check central supply, call pharmacy and notify physician of medication unavailability and document in progress note) If unable to reach physician in timely manner, contact Director of Nursing/Designee Any staff member that did not receive education related to the above-mentioned items will be sent a letter as of 8/29/2024 indicating they may not return to work until the education is received. Newly hired staff will receive education in orientation. Verification of the facility's removal plan was conducted by the survey team on 8/29/24. All steps contained in the removal plan were reviewed and verified. Interviews were conducted with 15 of the 20 licensed nurses employed by the facility. The LPN's and RN's interviewed worked across all shifts. All nurses were able to provide details on the medication order process for new admissions. The nurses responded appropriately when asked what they would do in various situations if a concern was to arise. No concerns were identified with the answers provided. Based on verification of the facility's Immediate Jeopardy removal plan, the immediate jeopardy was determined to be removed on 08/29/24 and the non-compliance was reduced to a scope and severity of D.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Cross Reference F760 Based on observation, review of medical records, policy and procedure review, interviews with residents, re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Cross Reference F760 Based on observation, review of medical records, policy and procedure review, interviews with residents, resident representative, nursing staff, key management staff, the residents' physician and pharmacist, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the medical records were complete and accurate in accordance to accepted professional standards and practices for two residents (#3, and #6) out of 9 residents reviewed. This failure contributed to the lack of communication amongst staff in delivering care and services for Resident #3 and Resident #6 resulting in the residents not receiving physician ordered medications. The facility staff did not ensure documentation was completed upon admission for Resident #6 related to medication reconciliation. The facility failed to enter physician ordered medications resulting in the resident not receiving prescribed medications from 8/9/24 to 8/16/24. In addition, an antibiotic, deemed to be ineffective for Resident #6's urinary tract infection (UTI) by a lab result, was administered eight times upon the readmission of Resident #6. The nursing staff administered two different antibiotic medications on the same day at the same time for the same infection without consulting the physician. The facility staff did not ensure Resident #3's physician order for Methadone was obtained or administered for approximately 77 hours resulting in the resident suffering pain and withdrawal symptoms. The facility staff failed to complete the medication reconciliation by not clarifying the physicians order for Methadone timely with the physician. The report did not document if the physician or the date and time the physician had been contacted to reconcile the discharged medications. The failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and the likelihood for serious injury and or death and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on 8/9/24. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 8/29/24 and the severity and scope was reduced to a D. Findings included: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Nursing Documentation Guidelines, not dated, revealed Policy: Pertinent Information should be documented in the individual's record in an accurate, timely and legible manner. Procedure: General Guidelines When to Chart 1. Record resident's condition, nursing actions and individual responses as soon as possible after they occur What to Chart 1. Symptoms/Subjective Data 2. Your observations and/or Assessments, 3. All injuries, illness and unusual health changes until they are resolved. There should be entries in the nursing notes on a regular basis until the problem is no longer present. When the problem is resolved, it should be documented. 4. All contacts with the primary care prescriber. A. document what information was relayed to the primary care prescriber. b. If the primary care prescriber sees or reviews an individual's specific health problem, document what occurred: the chart was reviewed, the individual was seen or if the individual was examined. c. contact is made by phone document what was discussed and results of the contact (e.g. [for example] no orders given, observe) d. document the plan for follow-up (e.g. to see the physician on morning rounds) e. Documentation on all meds. 5. response to a medication or treatment this includes therapeutic effects as well as side effects 6. new symptoms or conditions document in then nurses notes at time of occurrence or as soon as possible. Document nursing action taken and person's response. Further review of the policy titled, Nursing Documentation Guideline, undated, showed the policy defined an individual's record as A permanent legal document that provides a comprehensive account of information about the individual's health care status. Review of the policy titled, Physician Orders, revised 3/3/21, revealed: The center will ensure that physician orders are appropriately and timely documented in the medical record. The policy described the procedure for admission orders as Information received from the referring facility or agency to be reviewed, verified with the physician, and transcribed to the electronic medical record. The attending physician will review and confirm orders. Confirmation of admission orders requires that the physician sign and date the order during, or as soon as practical after it is provided, to maintain an accurate medical record. Review of the census page in the electronical medical record revealed Resident #6 was initially admitted to the facility on Friday, 08/09/24 at 4:20 PM. Review of the admission Record confirmed the initial admission on [DATE] and a re-admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included subsequent encounter fracture with routine healing, multiple sclerosis (MS), paraplegia, urinary tract infection (UTI), major depressive disorder recurrent, ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and other pulmonary embolism without acute COR pulmonale (alteration in the structure and function of the right ventricle of the heart caused by a primary disorder of the respiratory system), acute kidney failure, anemia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, personal history of other venous thrombosis and embolism. Review of the Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Transfer Form (3008), dated 8/8/24, revealed Resident #6 had no medication due near the time of transfer on 08/09/24, and a script was checked as not attached for a controlled substance. Resident #6 had ESBL (extended spectrum beta-lactamase) of the urine, a pressure ulcer on coccyx, and the reason for transfer was for care/rehabilitation with a poor prognosis for rehabilitation potential. Review of the [Local Hospital] Discharge Patient Med Rec (Medication Reconciliation) - Single report, dated 08/08/24, showed: This is the list of medications for you to take upon discharge. Please take this list to your primary care doctor at the next visit. Your hospital doctor wants you to take the drugs on this list when you go home. The list of medications included the following: - Amiodarone 200 MG (milligrams), trade name Cordarone, Oral, twice daily. A note showed this order was sent to the resident's preferred pharmacy. - Atorvastatin 10 MG, trade name Lipitor, Oral, daily. - Bupropion HCL 100 MG, trade name Wellbutrin, Oral, daily. - Collagenase Clostridium 1 application, trade name Santyl, Topical, twice daily. A note showed this order was sent to the resident's preferred pharmacy. - Ferrous Sulfate 325 MG, trade name Feosol, Oral, every other day. - Gabapentin 300 MG, trade name Neurontin, per feeding tube, three times daily. A note showed this prescription was printed. - Guaifenesin/Dextromethorphan 5 ML (milliliters), per feeding tube, Q6H (every six hours). A note showed this order was sent to the resident's preferred pharmacy. - Metoprolol Tartrate 25 MG, trade name Lopressor, Oral, twice daily. - Multivitamin 1 tablet, trade name Multivitamin-Mineral Daily, Oral, daily. - Pantoprazole 40 MG, trade name Protonix, Oral, before breakfast and dinner. - Polyethylene Glycol 3350 17 MG, trade name Miralax, Oral, daily as needed. A note showed this prescription was printed. - Prednisone 5 MG, trade name Prednisone, Oral, take 1 tablet by mouth 1 time every 72 hours. - Rivaroxaban 20 40 MG, trade name Xarelto, Oral, with breakfast. - Sennosides 1 tablet, trade name Senokot, Oral, daily as needed. A note showed this order was sent to the resident's preferred pharmacy. - Sodium Chloride 3% Inhalation Solution 4 ML, trade name Sodium Chloride 3% Inhalation Solution, inhalation every 6 hours while awake. A note showed this order was sent to the resident's preferred pharmacy. Review of the Order Summary Report for Active Orders as of 8/9/24 and the August 2024 Medication Administration Report (MAR) revealed the following medications were ordered on 08/09/24 during Resident #6's initial admission: - Metoprolol Tartrate oral tablet 25 MG- Give 1 tablet by mouth twice daily. - Multivitamin-Minerals Oral Tablet Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. Review of the Medication Reconciliation form, dated 08/09/24, showed: Section A. Completed medication reconciliation utilizing the following data sources (check all that apply) - 2. Discharge Summary: Section B. Medication Issues Identified was blank and showed no medications listed or needing clarification; Section C. Physician Contact was blank. Review of the baseline care plan for the 8/9/24 admission showed for the Problem of Pain that Goal was for Resident #6 will maintain comfort to highest degree possible and the Interventions included to administer pain medication as ordered. The Problems of Psychotropic Use, Infection, Altered Cardiac/Respiratory Functioning and Altered Mood State and/or Behavior were blank. Review of Resident #6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed in Section C- Cognitive Patterns a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (cognitively intact). Section I-Active Diagnosis showed Resident #6 had the following diagnoses: anemia, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (EP), hypertension, renal insufficiency, multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO), urinary tract infection (UTI), wound infection, hyperlipidemia, paraplegia, multiple sclerosis, depression and respiratory failure. Section N-Medications showed Resident #6 was taking none of the above medication classifications that included: antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, hypnotic, anticoagulant, antibiotic, diuretic, opioid and antiplatelet. Review of a Nursing Progress Note, dated 08/14/24, showed, Resident [family member] has concern that [Resident #6] has an UTI, he stated her current orientation is not her baseline the pt [patient] is showing signs of increased confusion and would like for her to be tested for an UTI. The writer notified the house NP about [family member's] concerns, NP gave new orders to give for UA C&S [Urine Culture and Sensitivity] and to monitor for other s/s [signs and symptoms]. Review of a SBAR (Situation, Background, Action, Response) Communication Form, dated 8/14/24, showed since the situation started the staff member was unable to determine if it had gotten worse and the condition, symptom or sign occurring prior was unknown. The Resident/Patient Evaluation showed increased confusion or disorientation. Review of a Physician Progress Note, dated 08/15/24, with a service date of 08/12/24, showed, Patient seen today is new to provider. She was in the hospital for hypoxia due to respiratory failure. She was also found to be tachycardia, hypotensive, and had a fever, she was a sepsis alert. She has multiple sclerosis is a paraplegic. She has a foley catheter for urinary retention. She is seen at bedside and states she is doing well .She is currently on 2L [liters] oxygen, she is at baseline. She has tube feeds and states that she eats regular food too. Medications Reconciled .Medications: Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25 MG, Multivitamin-Minerals Oral Tablet, Tubersol Solution 5 unit/0.1 ml, Fleet Enema 7-19 GM [gram]/118 ML, Milk of Magnesia Suspension 400 MG/5ML, Biscolax Suppository 10 MG, Acetaminophen Tablet 325 MG, Santyl External Ointment 250 Unit/GM. Review of a Nursing Progress Note, dated 08/16/24, showed, Resident went to [Local Hospital] wound care appointment this am [morning]. Received a call from them approximately 11:30 am stating that the resident is being sent to the ER [Emergency Room] to evaluate a hematoma to her left arm. NP made aware. Review of a Nursing Progress Note, dated 08/16/24, showed, [Local] hospital was called to check the resident's status; the nurse informed this writer that resident was admitted to the hospital with dx [diagnosis] of hematoma to the left arm and resident is scheduled for surgery on Monday. [Medical Director] made aware. Review of the Emergency Provider Report, dated 8/16/24, revealed the chief complaint was left arm swelling and reports extremity pain, extremity swelling. The section for Home Medications - Active Scripts included: - Amiodarone 200 MG, PO (by mouth). - Collagenase Clostridium 1 application, trade name Santyl, Topical, BID (two times daily). - Ferrous Sulfate 325 MG, PO Q48HR (every other day). - Gabapentin 300 MG, per feeding tube, TID (three times daily). - Guaifenesin/Dextromethorphan 5 ML (milliliters), per feeding tube, Q6H (every six hours), 7 days. - Multivitamin 1 tablet, PO daily. - Pantoprazole 40 MG, PO AC BK DIN (before breakfast and dinner). - Polyethylene Glycol 3350 17 GM, PO daily, PRN (as needed). - Rivaroxaban 20 MG, PO (by mouth). - Sennosides 1 tablet, PRN daily as needed. - Sodium Chloride 3% Inhalation Solution 4 ML, INH RTQ6H (inhalation every 6 hours while awake). Reported Medications included: - Prednisone 5 MG, PO Q72HR (every 72 hours). - Bupropion HCL 100 MG, PO daily. - Atorvastatin 10 MG, PO daily. - Metoprolol Tartrate 25 MG, PO BID. Review of the History and Physical Report from the local hospital dated 8/17/24 revealed Patient is a . year old female with a past medical history paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, VFib [ventricular fibrillation] cardiac arrest, MS, anxiety, OSA [obstructive sleep apnea], hyperlipidemia, PE[pulmonary embolism]/DVT previously on Xarelto, sacral decubitus ulcer, and ESBL E coli bacteremia that presented to [local hospital] for evaluation of upper extremity swelling and pain. Patient was found to have a hematoma. Plastics evaluated and recommended no intervention at this time .Labs were remarkable for hemoglobin 6.6 and given a unit of PRBCs [packed red blood cells - transfusion]. Review of the August physician orders, and the August MAR showed the following medications were ordered on or after 08/19/24 during Resident #6's re-admission: - Amiodarone HCI Oral Tablet 200 MG- Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to htn (hypertension) with start date of 08/20/24 and d/c (discontinue) date of 8/20/24. - Amiodarone HCI Oral Tablet 200 MG- Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation with start date of 08/21/24. Atorvastatin Calcium Oral Tablet 10 MG- Give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for hyperlipidemia with start date of 08/20/24. Cipro Oral Tablet 500 MG- Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for UTI for 7 days with start date 08/17/24 and d/c 8/23/24. Bactrim DS Oral Tablet 800-160 MG- Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for infection for 14 days with start date of 08/23/24. Bupropion HCI Oral Tablet 100 MG- Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to Mood Disorder, Recurrent with start date of 08/20/24 and d/c date of 8/20/24. Bupropion HCI Oral Tablet 100 MG- Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent with start date of 08/21/24. Ferrous Sulfate Oral Tablet 325 MG- Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning every 2 day(s) for anemia with start date of 08/20/24 and d/c date of 8/20/24. Ferrous Sulfate Oral Tablet 325 MG- Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning every other day for anemia with start date of 08/21/24. Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Table 25 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for HTN with a start date of 8/9/24. Gabapentin Oral Capsule 300 MG- Give 1 capsule by mouth three times a day for neuropathy with start date 08/20/24. Pantoprazole Sodium Oral Tablet Delayed Release 40 MG- Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for GERD with start date 08/20/24. Review of the Lab Results Report, with a report date of 08/17/24 at 10:03 a.m., showed the NP reviewed the Urinalysis (UA) results, Urine Culture and Sensitivity (C&S) results on 08/19/24 at 8:09 a.m. The results of the Urine C&S revealed Ciprofloxacin (Trade Name Cipro) was R meaning resistant greater than four. Review of a Physician Progress Note, dated 08/19/24 at 3:09 p.m., showed, Patient seen today for a follow up visit . She is seen at bedside and states she was positive for a UTI while in the hospital but did not receive any antibiotics . A UA was obtained and is positive for UTI. Cipro 500 was started until C&S is completed. Further review of the August MAR showed Resident #6 was administered Cipro Oral Tablet 500 MG eight doses between the first administration on 08/19/24 at 5:00 p.m. to the last administration on 08/23/24 at 9:00 a.m. In addition, Resident #6 was also administered Bactrim DS Oral Tablet 800-160 MG on 08/23/24 at 9:00 a.m. The August MAR showed both the medications of Cipro and Bactrim were administered at their scheduled times of 9:00 a.m. on 08/23/24 prior to the discontinuation of Cipro. During an interview on 08/27/24 at 9:50 a.m. Resident #6 stated she was out of it and did not remember much about her stay at the facility between 08/09/24 and 08/16/24. Resident #6 stated she knew the medications she took and why. Resident #6 stated that had she not been confused during the initial admission on [DATE], she would have asked about the facility not administering her regular medications. Resident #6 stated her family member was very upset about the facility not administering all the medications as ordered during the initial admission. Resident #6 stated both she and her family member still did not understand why the facility was not treating the multiple sclerosis (MS) flareup causing her hands to be paralyzed and did not understand why the facility would not provide her with Prednisone, which assists her in regaining her functions when MS attacks. Resident #6 stated because of the latest MS flareup she was not able to feed herself because the MS flareup attacked her hands. During an interview on 08/27/24 at 10:32 a.m. Resident #6's family member stated the Director of Nursing (DON) from the facility called him to let him know Resident #6 did not receive her medications from the initial admission date on 08/09/24 through her hospitalization on 08/16/24. The family member stated the DON told him the facility did not input Resident #6's medications into the medical record. The family member stated when he came to visit Resident #6, he spoke with staff who came into Resident #6's room and voiced his concerns that Resident #6 seemed to be out of it. The family member stated Resident #6 was fuzzy about things and was not able to pay attention, which was not her normal. The family member stated prior to her initial admission on [DATE] Resident #6 was her normal self, and he noticed the change in her status during the week after her initial admission to the facility until the time of discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on 08/27/24 at 2:50 p.m. the DON stated Resident #6 went to a scheduled outside appointment on 08/16/24. The DON stated it was then that the outside provider sent Resident #6 to the ER. The DON stated she reviewed Resident #6's medical record when Resident #6 was hospitalized . This was when she recognized Resident #6 was not administered all her physician ordered medications. The DON stated Resident #6 did not have a DVT (deep vein thrombosis) and the hospital said it was just cellulitis. The DON stated upon reviewing Resident #6's medications it was discovered they were not reconciled and were not entered into the medical record. The DON stated that Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was the admitting nurse for Resident #6 on Friday, 08/09/24. The DON stated that Staff E, LPN should have ensured all medications were entered into the electronical medical record as medications are a priority. The DON stated her understanding was Staff E, LPN started the admission process and was called away and failed to communicate with the oncoming nurse that all the medications were not added into the electronical medical record. The DON stated after speaking with Staff E, LPN she was informed that Staff E, LPN left at 7:00 p.m., the end of her scheduled shift, and assumed the oncoming nurse scheduled for the 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. shift would complete Resident #6's physician ordered medications. The DON stated she then spoke with Staff F, LPN (the oncoming nurse) for the 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. shift. The DON discovered Staff F, LPN thought the admission was completed by the 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. nurse since some entries were completed in the physician orders of Resident #6's medical record. The DON stated chart scrubs (reviews) should be completed on Mondays (more than 48 hours after Resident #6's admission). The DON stated Resident #6's medical record and medication reconciliation was just overlooked. The DON stated the nurses were continually being educated on the importance of completing medication reconciliation, documentation of admissions assessments, and who they spoke to in clarifying any medications. The DON stated that both Staff E, LPN and Staff F, LPN were educated about the admission process after Resident #6's 08/09/24 incident. During an interview on 08/28/24 at 10:42 a.m. the DON stated all UA C&S results were reviewed by the facility's nurse practitioner. The DON reviewed Resident #6's Lab Results Report with a reported date of 08/17/24 and stated that the R (resistance greater than four for Ciprofloxacin) meant that this specific medication would not help Resident #6's UTI if administered. The DON stated after reviewing the Lab Results Report she was not sure why the NP did not change the medication when reviewed. The DON stated the only thing that could have happened was when Resident #6 was hospitalized , I didn't clear the medication list, and when Resident #6 was re-admitted on [DATE] the medications that were ordered were just resumed. During an interview on 08/28/24 at 12:00 p.m. the NP reviewed Resident #6's Lab Results with a report date of 08/17/24. The NP stated she ordered Ciprofloxacin but once Resident #6's Lab Report was reviewed and showed Ciprofloxacin was resistant it was not administered. The NP stated Resident #6 did not get a dose of Ciprofloxacin when re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The NP was presented with Resident #6's August MAR and the NP responded, What is this? The NP reviewed Resident #6's August MAR, and the NP responded, I don't ever look at that. The NP stated she did not have access to residents' electronic medical records but had asked about obtaining access to the electronic medical record system in the past. The NP confirmed that Ciprofloxacin being R resistant to the UTI bacteria would not have helped clear Resident #6's UTI. The NP reviewed Resident #6's August MAR and stated Bactrim was prescribed on 08/23/24 and this was S sensitive to the bacteria for Resident #6's UTI. The NP stated when Resident #6 returned to the facility on [DATE] there should have been another order for labs. The NP looked in Resident #6's electronical medical record and confirmed no further lab testing was completed upon re-admission on [DATE]. Further interview with the NP was conducted regarding medication reconciliation during admission. The NP stated Resident #6 had medications that were not entered into the medical record when she was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE]. The NP stated the missing medications were not found until after Resident #6 went out to the hospital. The NP stated that Xarelto was held upon Resident #6's admission because she believed Resident #6 had some bleeding. The NP stated that any medications that are considered on hold are not entered into a resident's medical record because the facility was afraid the nursing staff would disregard the hold and give those medications anyway. The NP stated that any medications on hold would not show up on a resident's MAR because it was simply not entered in the medical record as a physician ordered medication. The NP stated that either the NP or the Medical Director (MD) would revisit all medications on hold for a later time. The NP stated that no medications were revisited for Resident #6 because she went out to the hospital and when she re-admitted the medications were reconciled again off the hospital discharge summary. The NP stated that if the hospital wanted Resident #6 to be on any additional medication the hospital would have made those changes there and sent the updated medication list back on the discharge summary. The NP stated some medications placed on hold may never be resumed or are not lifelong medications but stated the MD may have different views about this. During an interview on 08/28/24 at 3:11p.m. the Pharmacist in Charge (PC) stated in review of Resident #6's medications upon admission on [DATE] all the medications put into the electronical medical record system were house stocked medications except for Metoprolol. During an interview on 08/28/24 at 4:12 p.m. the Medical Director (MD) (who was the resident's primary care physician at the facility) stated the process for new admissions would be medications are uploaded into [Electronical Medical Record System] by the nurse and then facility staff would message me so that I can look at the new resident's profile within 24 hours. The MD stated he was not aware that Resident #6 was not getting all of her medications. The MD stated he was at the facility and met with Resident #6 on Monday, 08/12/24. The MD stated that according to his physician notes, he only discussed Metoprolol with Resident #6 so that must have been the only medication that was documented in her medical record. The MD stated he was not aware all the medications were not entered into the electronic medical record system, but stated he did remember questioning that she only had one physician ordered medication and had found it odd. The MD stated if you review my physician note when I came to the facility and examined Resident #6 for her re-admission, you will see I listed a lot more medications because the facility had entered all the medications into the electronic medical record system during that re-admission process. The MD stated as far as Resident #6 being administered Ciprofloxacin for the UTI, it would not have made a significant change in the UTI because it was resistant. The MD stated he remembered addressing the concern as to why Resident #6 was ordered two antibiotics (Bactrim and Ciprofloxacin) when he visited with Resident #6 and ordered the Ciprofloxacin at that time to be discontinued. The MD stated he was not presented with the results of Resident #6's Urinalysis with Sensitivities for review. The MD reported this was only reviewed by the NP. Review of a Physician Progress Note, dated 08/22/24, showed: - -Cont. [continue] Metoprolol for BP [blood pressure] Cont. Atorvastatin for HLD [Hyperlipidemia] - Cont. Pantoprazole for GERD [Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease] - Cont. Amiodarone for cardiac dysrhythmia (history of VF[Ventricular Fibrillation] arrest) - Cont. bowel regimen - Cont. Burprion [trade name Wellbutrin] for mood - Currently on Cipro [Ciprofloxacin] and Bactrim for undefined source. Clarify need for both antibiotics. During an interview on 08/29/24 at 10:16 a.m. the DON stated the nurse does assessments, checks the papers, reconciles orders, and verifies MD orders, especially if they have a discrepancy. They should call the acute care facility for clarification if needed. They are supposed to reconcile medications with the primary care physician (PCP) with every admission. They reconcile the hospital records with the PCP. The DON stated they review admissions over the weekend. She looks through what is uploaded. She checks to see if the records are accurate with proper diagnoses based on what is uploaded in the computer. The DON stated that she does not always get notification when the admit comes, but she would like to be notified when they arrive. The DON stated that she does not look at the MAR; she looks on the dashboard to see what was and was not done. The DON stated they (nurses) should be looking for new orders. When they get a new admit, the next nurse would audit the admission. During an interview on 08/29/24 at 4:00 p.m. RN/Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) confirmed the medication errors for Resident #6. She stated a resident missing a cardiac medication is significant. 2. On 8/27/24 at 11:15 a.m. Resident #3 was sitting in his wheelchair at bedside. The resident was frail-looking, with bony prominences noted, pleasant, and able to answer questions appropriately. Resident #3 reported having pain all the time, has taken the opioid, Methadone, for the last 5 years, and has been on pain management for the past 28 years. The resident described his current pain as achy sharp pains, and rated the current pain between 7 and 8 out of a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the worst. The resident stated while at the facility the pain has not been below a 6. Resident #3 reported being at the facility for 5 days and has started to go through withdraw symptoms. Resident #3 described those symptoms as watery eyes, watery nose, nausea, and loose stools. Resident #3 stated he was normally constipated. The resident stated nurses say they are doing what they can, and the Methadone was on order. Resident #3 reported the facility made an admission exception for him due to his use of Methadone. Review of the admission Data Collection form revealed an initial admission date on Friday, 8/23/24. The admission nurse's note showed Patient arrived to facility at 1905 [7:05PM] . Review of the admission Record showed Resident #3 admission diagnoses to include malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of left bronchus or lung, malignant neoplasm of parietal lobe, lumbar region osteomyelitis of vertebra, unspecified site other specified arthritis, lumbar region fusion of spine, unspecified site unspecified discitis, right shoulder abscess of bursa, and other low back pain. Review of the admission MDS dated [DATE] showed in Section C - a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the care plan, dated 8/26/24 for Resident #3 revealed the following: - Resident is on pain medication therapy r/t (related to) cancer. The goal was for the resident to be free of any discomfort or adverse side effects from pain medication through the review date. Interventions related to the resident's pain instructed staff to Administer medications as ordered by physician. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness every shift. - Resident has actual/potential for pain r/t cancer (and) chronic back pain. The goals were for the resident to have minimal interruption in normal activities due to pain through the review date, and resident will verbalize adequate relief of pain or ability to cope with incompletely relieved pain through the review date. The interventions included: Administer analgesia as per orders; Anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain; and evaluate the effectiveness of pain interventions and review for compliance, alleviating of symptoms, dosing schedules and resident satisfaction with results, impact on functional ability and impact on cognition. Review of the acute facility's Finalized Discharge Medications, dated 8/22/24 at 12:55 p.m., showed Resident #3 was ordered Methadone Dispersible 40 mg orally daily for non-acute pain. The medication summary rev
Jul 2024 8 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse/neglect by 1) f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse/neglect by 1) failing to respond to a serious change in condition in a timely manner for one resident (#404) out of seven residents sampled for abuse/neglect and, 2) use of a Geri-chair as a restraint to limit a residents movement for one resident (#248) out of seven sampled for abuse/neglect. Resident #404 experienced a change of condition secondary to bleeding from four skin wounds on his arms and legs, which began on [DATE] at 1:00 p.m. The bleeding required four dressing changes to the upper extremities and two dressing changes to the lower extremities due to bleeding through the dressings over the course of 17 hours. On [DATE] at 7:25 a.m. Resident #404 was transferred to the hospital and subsequently died from widespread sepsis and bleeding caused by DIC (disseminated intravascular anticoagulation [a rare but serious condition that causes abnormal blood clotting throughout the body's blood vessels]). The resident was not provided the care and services to benefit from earlier assessment and treatment from a higher level of care. This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and the likelihood for serious injury and or death to Resident #404 and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE]. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on [DATE] and the severity and scope was reduced to a D after verification of removal of immediacy of harm. Findings included: 1. On [DATE] at 4:15 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) to review a reportable incident for Resident #404. The DON stated she was familiar with Resident #404, and she could speak to the investigation conducted at the time of the incident. The DON stated a family member complaint was received on social media. The DON stated they investigated and did not find any problem with the care. The DON stated Resident #404 was not compliant with care and had displaced a wound vac. She stated Resident #404 was in and out of the hospital and the last time he was sent to the hospital he passed away. The DON stated Resident #404 was sent to the hospital due to bleeding, and he had saturated the dressings on his arms. The DON stated the resident was on Eliquis as a blood thinner, and the family member complained that the resident was not sent to the hospital soon enough. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #404 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, including but not limited to, cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of right middle cerebral artery, chronic pancreatitis, unspecified open wounds to left ankle, neck, right lower leg, right thigh, left hip, left lower leg, lower back, and pelvis without penetration to retroperitoneum (the tissue that lines the abdominal wall and covers most of the organs in the abdomen), unspecified atrial fibrillation, gastrostomy status, unspecified gastrointestinal hemorrhage, unspecified anemia, and unspecified coagulation defect. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #404 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. A review of the Order Summary Report for Resident #404 revealed the following: [DATE] Full Code. [DATE] Labs: CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic profile) one time only for admission labs for one day. [DATE] Aspirin 81 tablet chewable 81 MG (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth one time a day for DVT (deep vein thrombosis) prevention. [DATE] Eliquis oral tablet 5 MG (Apixaban) give one tablet by mouth two times a day for coagulopathy. [DATE] Furosemide oral tablet 80 MG give one tablet by mouth two times a day for pleural effusion. [DATE] Left hip cleanse with normal saline, silver nitrate dampened gauze, and place border dressing every day shift every Tuesday and Friday for wound. [DATE] Left lateral ankle change wound vac every Tuesday and Friday, apply black granulofoam, set section to 125 MMHG (millimeters/mercury) every day shift every Tuesday and Friday for wound. [DATE] Mid thoracic back cleanse with normal saline, xeroform, and place border dressing every day shift for wound. [DATE] Right heel cleanse with normal saline, apply skin prep, leave open to air every day shift every other day for DTI (deep tissue injury). [DATE] Left lateral ankle change wound vac, apply black granulofoam, set suction to 125 MMHG one time only for wound care for one day. [DATE] Right heel cleanse with normal saline, apply skin prep, leave open to air every night shift every other day to DTI. [DATE] Mid thoracic back cleanse with normal saline, xeroform, and place border dressing every night shift for wound. [DATE] Left ischium cleanse with normal saline, apply medihoney, then cover with mepilex every day shift every other day for wound care. [DATE] Left lateral ankle and mid back change wound vac every Monday and Thursday, apply black granulofoam, set suction to 125 MMHG, connect with Y-tubing every day shift every Monday and Thursday for wound. [DATE] Cleanse skin tear to left elbow apply TAO (triple antibiotic ointment) and DSD (dry sterile dressing) until healed then discontinue every night shift for skin tear care. [DATE] Cleanse skin tear to upper leg apply TAO and DSD until healed then discontinue every night shift for skin tear care. [DATE] Zofran oral tablet 4 MG (Ondansetron) give one table by mouth every six hours as needed for nausea/vomiting. [DATE] CBC, CMP one time only for bleeding for one day. [DATE] Send to ER (emergency room) for evaluation one time only for bleeding for one day. A review of the Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated on [DATE], for Resident #404 revealed the following: Focus: The resident is on anticoagulant/anti-platelet therapy related to atrial fibrillation and CVA (cardiovascular accident). Revision [DATE]. Goal: The resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to anticoagulant use through the review date. Interventions: Administer anticoagulant medications as ordered by physician. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness every shift. Daily skin inspection. Report abnormalities to the nurse. Monitor/document/report as needed adverse reactions of anticoagulant therapy: blood tinged or red blood in urine, black tarry stools, dark or bright red blood in stools, sudden severe headaches, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle joint pain, lethargy, bruising, blurred vision, shortness of breath, loss of appetite, sudden changes in mental status, significant or sudden changes in vital signs. Focus: The resident has a skin tear to left elbow and left leg. Initiated on [DATE]. Goal: The resident's skin tear will show signs of healing by review date. Interventions: Monitor/document location, size, and treatment of skin tear. Report abnormalities. A review of the Progress Notes for Resident #404 revealed the following: -[DATE] 10:17 a.m. Physician progress note: Patient is seen today for follow-up visit. It was reported by staff that he had a fall last night and hit his head. He was sitting on the side of the bed and was trying to position himself back to lying down when he fell over. He did not ask for help or use call light. Patient states he was having hallucinations and confused after he hit his head. The incident was not reported until this morning. Patient is on Eliquis and Aspirin, so he was sent out to the ER for a CT (computed tomography scan) of the head. He did receive multiple skin tears on his arm and leg. He also has a bruise/redness on his face. -[DATE] 10:50 a.m. Nursing progress note: Resident heard calling out, resident observed on side of bed holding onto bed on right side and bedside table to the left side. Resident was in between. Resident assisted back to bed and care provided. ROM [range of motion] WNL [within normal limits]. No s/s [signs/symptoms] of acute distress. Routine pain med given, and wound care provided to skin tears. -[DATE] 7:51 a.m. Nursing progress note: Patient observed to have dislodged/saturated dressing to LUE [left upper extremity] at start of shift, changed patients dressing per physicians order. after receiving PM [evening] medications dressings observed to be saturated again, cleaned wounds to LUE and R [right] forearm and applied ABD [abdominal] pads with krelix [sig] and ace wrap on top to apply pressure. Patient c/o [complains of] nausea and prior emesis,, administer PRN [as needed] Zofran to good effect. Notified physician at 2130 of patients saturation of dressings and treatment applied. Physician ordered for dressing to stay in place until am then to be removed for assessment and CBC to be drawn on [DATE]. At approximately 0630 dressing was removed with some saturation through the ace wrap with the gauze noted to be heavily saturated. Notified physician and received order to send to ER to evaluation and to control bleeding .Called 911 at 0714 upon entering room at approximately 0725 with EMS [emergency medical services] patient had emesis in container dark brown with some red noted approximately 100 ML [milliliter] in container, Resident left facility with EMS at approximately 0730 via stretcher, notified patients emergency contact A review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated [DATE]-[DATE], for Resident #404 revealed the following: Cleanse Skin tear to left elbow apply TAO and DSD until healed every night shift for skin tear documented as completed once on [DATE]. Cleanse skin tear to left upper leg apply TAO and DSD until healed every night shift for skin tear care documented as completed once on [DATE]. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated [DATE]-[DATE], for Resident #404 revealed the following: Aspirin 81 MG give one tablet by mouth one time a day for DVT prevention documented as administered on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. Eliquis oral tablet 5 MG give one tablet by mouth two times a day for coagulopathy documented as administered on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Furosemide oral tablet 80 MG give one tablet by mouth two times a day for pleural effusion documented as administered on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Zofran oral tablet 4 MG give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for N/V not documented as given on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 5:49 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with a Family Member (FM) of Resident #404. The FM stated Resident #404 transferred from the hospital to the facility in March and seemed to be getting better. The FM stated the resident went to the hospital for an abscessed tooth. The FM stated she went to see Resident #404 every day and stayed with him all day long at the facility. The FM stated she would have a good friend drive her there and pick her up. The FM stated on [DATE] she escorted the resident to the courtyard to smoke and when she put her hand on the handle of the wheelchair she picked up her hand to find it full of blood. She stated that was a few days before Resident #404 died. The FM stated the resident was bleeding from his leg, arm, and shoulder area. The FM stated the shoulder was sopping with blood, and she took the dressing off and went in to the facility to get someone to put something over the area. The FM stated the nurse started yelling at Resident #404 for taking off the dressing. She stated then someone came in and put a dressing on the area. The FM stated she had seen the Resident #404 throwing up blood during the day in his urinal. The FM stated she went to the nursing station and asked the nurse to please call EMS and get an ambulance to come. The FM stated when she told the nurse Resident #404 was bleeding out the staff all started laughing and said they wouldn't let him bleed out. She stated the nurse never went down to check on the resident at all. She stated her friend was with Resident #404 in the room and saw him take two sips of water and throw up blood in the urinal. The FM stated it was close to 7pm [DATE], the day before he went to the hospital. The FM stated the next morning she got a call from a man who said he sent Resident #404 to the hospital because he was bleeding out. The FM stated when she got to the hospital, Resident #404 was on life support, and they had to keep giving him blood. The FM stated the nurse never left the nurse's station the night she was there to go in and check on Resident #404 from the time she asked for the resident to go to the hospital until the time she left the facility. On [DATE] at 07:06 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). She stated she remembers the resident, and mentioned the mother visited daily. She confirmed she was the assigned nurse to Resident #404 on [DATE] day shift a.m. to 7 p.m. She stated she remembered he was bleeding while in the courtyard with his FM. She stated the resident told her he took his bandages off so he could let them breathe. She stated after he returned inside the facility, she applied dressings to both upper extremities. Staff A stated she informed the oncoming nurse for the night shift. She stated during her shift she changed the dressings twice because of visible blood and saturation through the dressings. She stated she used a kerlix roll dressing. She stated she thought she changed it around 1-2 p.m., then prior to shift change at 7 p.m. it needed to be changed again. She stated the FM was on the patio with the resident while he was smoking. Staff A stated she let the night nurse know Resident #404 was bleeding from his arms. She stated she reported she had re-wrapped the arms. She stated it was unusual to have to change the dressings twice. She stated she did not call the doctor. She stated Resident #404 had quite a few wounds and she had changed one on his leg and his wound vac. She stated the wound vac had quite a bit of drainage and had an odor to it. She stated she did not recall any nausea or vomiting. She stated she really was not thinking about the resident being on blood thinners. She stated she did not make any notes, do a change of status, or notify the doctor of the need to change dressings due to bleeding. On [DATE] at 7:29 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff O, RN (Registered Nurse, Unit Manager). She stated Resident #404 was admitted from the hospital but unable to recall the specifics of his admission. She stated Resident #404 had a lot of different wounds. She said his FM visited almost every day. She stated she knew the resident was sent out for a bleed. She stated she was told there were allegations of neglect because of an on-line review. She stated she did not participate in the investigation and stated abuse investigations are generally completed by the DON/NHA. She stated the nurses are expected to document changes in condition and notify the physician in the medical record. She stated if a resident's family asked for them to be sent to the hospital the nurses are supposed to do so and let the doctor know what is happening. On [DATE] at 9:22 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff P, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). He stated he knew Resident #404 had falls, skin tears and could be grumpy, but did not recall Resident #404's plan of care. He stated Resident #404 had dressings all over, had a lot of skin tears, and a wound vac to his sacrum. The nurse stated in report he was told while the FM visited with the resident in the courtyard, the resident was picking at his dressings, and (Staff A) told him she had just changed his dressings. He stated he did not recall (Staff A) saying that was the second time she had to change the dressings. He stated, After report around 7:45 p.m., I saw the dressing on his left arm was not really on but the mepilex dressing had some bleeding on it. I'm not sure who transferred the resident back to bed but there was some blood smeared on the wall by his bed. I changed the dressings to his arms and legs all at once and cleaned the blood off the wall. When giving him his night meds [9:00 p.m.], I saw the dressings on his upper arms were saturated and the current dressing was not appropriate for the amount of bleeding. The dressing was red in color. The dressing to his legs were not saturated. I changed the dressings on his legs. I applied ABD, Kerlix and pressure dressings to his arms. I changed all the dressings [legs and arms] to have a timeline of how much he was bleeding. I used gauze pads on his legs, because they were absorbent and easy to see changes. I notified the MD about 9:30 p.m. and he said to leave the dressings in place and draw a CBC [[DATE]] and leave those dressings in place until the morning and then to remove them for assessment. I rounded on him to make sure there was no visible bleeding throughout the shift. The nurse stated he did not remove the ace wrap during the night to keep pressure on the arms. He stated about 6:00 a.m. he removed the ace wrap and saw the wound had bled through to the ace and Resident #404 told him he had vomited on the prior shift. Staff P, LPN stated the previous nurse had not reported the resident had vomited. On [DATE] at 11:02 a.m. an interview was conducted with the Primary Care Physician (PCP) for Resident #404. The PCP stated he did not recall specifically being notified about Resident #404 on [DATE]. He stated if he was notified for the first time that a resident was having a bleeding episode he would have told them to monitor and apply a pressure dressing. He stated he did not recall being contacted during the day shift about any bleeding the resident was having. He stated if he was told of previous episodes of bleeding and multiple changes of dressings he would have told them to send the resident out to be evaluated. He stated it was not ideal that the nurses did not notify him of multiple dressing changes, and he would have expected them to report any vomiting of blood as well. The PCP stated if he had been aware of the bleeding wounds and vomiting blood, he would have sent him out. He stated what he was told was not the same as what occurred. He stated his partner admitted Resident #404 to the hospital and the resident died of sepsis with complications. He stated the resident had fungus in the blood cultures. He stated he reviewed the chart in the hospital and Resident #404 had DIC, his platelets dropped, and the resident passed away. He stated he usually investigates the reason if a resident passes away because he wants to know what happened. Disseminated intravascular coagulation, or DIC, is a complicated condition that can occur when someone has severe sepsis or septic shock. Both blood clotting and difficulty with clotting may occur, causing a vicious cycle. Small blood clots can develop throughout your bloodstream, especially in the microscopic blood vessels called capillaries. This blocks the blood flow to many parts of your body, including your limbs and your organs. Blood is then not able to bring oxygen and nutrients to the tissues. On the reverse side of the cycle, DIC can increase bleeding. The body uses up so many of the blood clotting proteins for the multiple blood clots in the blood vessels that there are not enough left to clot the blood elsewhere. Several medical conditions can cause DIC, including sepsis. DIC affects about 35% of patients who have sepsis. Sepsis, which was often called blood poisoning, is the body's life-threatening response to infection. Like strokes or heart attacks, sepsis is a medical emergency that requires rapid diagnosis and treatment. (Sepsis Alliance, Sepsis and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation. 2023. https://www.sepsis.org/sepsisand?disseminated-intravascular-coagulation-dic/) On [DATE] at 11:23 a.m. an interview was conducted with Staff Q, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). The CNA stated she remembered Resident #404 and she provided care for him often. She stated a FM came to see the resident almost every day. She stated she remembered the resident vomiting a lot and bleeding from the dressings. She stated the resident always asked for pain medications. She stated she would clean up the resident and empty his urinal because he would vomit in it. She stated she always reported vomiting to the nurse, but she did not document that in the medical record because there is no place for them to do that, she stated she left that for the nurse to do. She stated she did recall him having bleeding and vomiting before he went to the hospital, and she told the nurse, but she does not recall if the nurse went in to check on the resident. She described the bleeding and vomiting as dark brown. She stated the only reasons Resident #404 would call was to be changed, have his dressings changed, vomiting, or taking pain pills. On [DATE] at 8:07 p.m. an interview was conducted with a Family Friend (FF), who would transport the FM to and from the facility and visit with Resident #404. The FF stated he would take the FM to visit Resident #404 nearly every day and he was present at the facility on [DATE] the weekend before Resident #404 passed away. He stated when he saw Resident #404 on the evening of [DATE] the resident was coherent and he had bruises all over, blood on his sheets, and blood on the walls in his room. He stated he and the FM where in the room with Resident #404 for about an hour and a half. The FF stated he got the resident a glass of water, but the resident was not able to keep it down and he was throwing up blood. He stated they informed the nurses. The FF stated if the resident took a drink of water he would throw up blood in less than a minute and it was dark red. The FF stated Resident #404 asked him to take him to the hospital to avoid getting charged any money and he told him he couldn't take him because of his medical needs. The FF stated he went to the hallway and told a lady nurse that Resident #404 was throwing up blood and she was just like oh ok. He stated the nurse did not go to the room to see what was going on. He stated he has really tried to block the whole incident out of his memory. A review of the facility policy titled Anticoagulant Therapy, revised on [DATE], revealed the following: Procedure: -Obtain physician's order for anticoagulant therapy and labs. -Alert lab -Initiate anticoagulant flow sheets or electronic equivalent -Post lab results on flow sheet or electronic equivalent, indicating date -Identify resident and explain therapy -Perform hand hygiene -Document the time, dose administration on MAR and anticoagulant flow sheet/ electronic equivalent -Monitor the resident for signs of bleeding. *Observe for hematoma development or excessive bleeding or bruising. *Test stool, urine, emesis for Guaiac/Hemoccult as ordered by physician. *Monitor labs per physician's order. *Use pressure-dressing PRN until bleeding stops. *Perform hand hygiene. *Document in the medical record. Note-Residents requiring Coumadin (Warfarin) administration should have lab work drawn as ordered by the physician to determine effectiveness of therapy and subsequent dosages. A review of the facility policy titled Notification of Change in Condition, revised on [DATE], revealed the following: Policy: The Center to promptly notify the Patient/Resident, the attending physician, and the Resident Representative when there is a change in the status or condition. Procedure: -The nurse to notify the attending physician and Resident Representative when there is a(n): *Accidents *Significant change in the patient/resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status *Need to alter treatment significantly -New treatment -Discontinuation of a current treatment due to but not limited to: *Adverse consequences *Acute condition *Exacerbation of a chronic condition *A transfer or discharge of the Patient/Resident from the Center *Patient/Resident consecutively refuses medication and/or treatment (i.e. two or more times) *Patient/Resident is discharged without proper medical authority -In the event of an emergency situation, 911 to be called and the attending physician and the Resident Representative to be notified as soon as possible. -The nurse to complete an evaluation of the Patient/Resident. Document evaluation in the medical record. -The nurse will contact the physician. In the event that the attending physician does not respond in a reasonable amount of time, the Medical Director may be contacted. -If the Medical Director does not respond, call 911 and document in the medical record. -Notify the patient/resident and the resident representative of the change in condition. Document notification in the medical record. -Document resident/patient change in condition on 24 hour report -Complete SBAR as indicated 2. On [DATE] at 10:33 a.m. Resident #248 was observed lying in a geriatric chair by the entrance to the courtyard and facing the nurses' station. On [DATE] at 12:33 p.m. Resident #248 was observed upright in a geriatric chair with a family member assisting him with his meal. On [DATE] at 03:05 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #248's. The family member said Resident #248 likes to sleep in a quiet area and he is always placed by the nurses' station which is noisy. On [DATE] at 8:32 a.m. an interview and observation was conducted with Resident #248. Resident #248 was sitting in a geriatric chair facing the nurses' station. He said he does not necessarily like sitting at the nurses' station I would rather go to my bed A review of Resident #248's admission records showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's Disease, dementia, and seizures. Review of Resident #248's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C- Cognitive Patterns revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #248's order summary report, dated [DATE] showed orders to include: full activity and may have restorative/ maintenance program as indicated. A review of Resident #248's active care plan, initiated [DATE], showed the resident had an actual fall with minor injury related to unsteady gait. The interventions include place resident in common areas, initiated [DATE]. On [DATE] at 12:16 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) he said the use of geriatric chairs can decrease resident function .and it is not an ideal intervention to prevent falls. On [DATE] at 1:39 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Resident #248's nurse. Staff G, LPN said the use of the geriatric chair is because Resident #248 is a fall risk and can get up from the chair when the footrest is lowered. Staff G confirmed Resident # 248 cannot independently get out the geriatric chair. On [DATE] at 2:40 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), she said resident #248 was placed in the geriatric chair for comfort. The DON said the geriatric chair's restriction on Resident #248, it did not cross my mind and is not ideal. On [DATE] at 8:00 p.m. Resident #248 was observed with eyes closed and laying in a geriatric chair facing the nurses' station. On [DATE] at 08:15 a.m. Resident #248 was observed with eyes closed and laying in a geriatric chair facing the nurses' station. A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation, revised on [DATE], revealed the following: Policy: It is inherent in the nature and dignity of each resident that he/she be afforded basic human rights, including the right to be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation and/or misappropriation of property. The management of the facility recognizes these rights and hereby establishes the following statements, policies, and procedures to protect these rights and to establish a disciplinary policy, which results in the fair and timely treatment of occurrences of resident abuse. Employees of the center are charged with a continuing obligation to treat residents, so they are free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment and/or misappropriation of property. No employee may at any time commit an act of physical, psychological, or emotional abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property against any resident. Violation of this standard will subject employees to disciplinary action, including dismissal, provided herein. [ .] Neglect is the failure of the center, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Examples include but are not limited to: -Failure to provide adequate nutrition and fluids. -Failure to take precautionary measures to protect the health and safety of the resident. -Intentional lack of attention to physical needs including, but not limited to, toileting and bathing. Failure to provide services that result in harm to the resident, such as not turning a bedfast resident or leaving a resident in a soiled bed. -Failure or refusal to provide a service for the purpose of punishing or disciplining a resident, unless withholding of a service is being used as part of a documented integrated behavioral management program. -Failure to notify a resident's legal representative in the event of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or emotional condition that a prudent person would recognize. -Failure to notify a resident's legal representative in the event of an incident involving the resident, such as failure to report a fall or conflict between residents that result in injury or possible injury. -Failure to report observed or suspected abuse, neglect or misappropriation of resident property to the proper authorities. -Failure to adequately supervise a resident known to wander from the facility without the staff knowledge. Note: Such things as failure to comb a resident's hair on occasion would not necessarily constitute a reportable incidence of neglect. However, continued omission in providing daily care and/or failure to address and resolve the omission could constitute neglect. [ .] Involuntary seclusion is defined as separation of the resident from his/her room or confinement to his/her room (with or without roommates) against the resident's will, or the will of the resident representative. [ .] Procedure: [ .] Non-action, which results in emotional, psychological, or physical injury, is viewed in the same manner as that caused by improper or excessive action. All actions in which employees[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to 1) a failure to communicate a significant change of condition to other licensed nurses and the physician, resulting in a delay of treatment for one resident (#404) out of seven residents sampled; 2) a failure to implement physician orders related to vital signs monitoring for one resident (#94) out of seven residents sampled and, 3) a failure to recognize and respond to a change in condition related to hypotension for one resident (#401) out of seven residents sampled. Resident #404 experienced a change of condition secondary to bleeding from four skin wounds on his arms and legs, which began on [DATE] at 1:00 p.m. The bleeding required four dressing changes to the upper extremities and two dressing changes to the lower extremities due to bleeding through the dressings over the course of 17 hours. On [DATE] at 7:25 a.m. Resident #404 was transferred to the hospital and subsequently died from widespread sepsis and bleeding caused by DIC (disseminated intravascular anticoagulation [a rare but serious condition that causes abnormal blood clotting throughout the body's blood vessels]). The resident was not provided professional standards of care and services to benefit from earlier assessment and treatment from a higher level of care. This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and the likelihood for serious injury and or death to Resident #404 and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE]. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on [DATE] and the severity and scope was reduced to a D after verification of removal of immediacy of harm. Findings included: 1. On [DATE] at 4:15 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) to review a reportable incident for Resident #404. The DON stated she was familiar with Resident #404, and she could speak to the investigation conducted at the time of the incident. The DON stated a family member complaint was received on social media. The DON stated they investigated and did not find any problem with the care. The DON stated Resident #404 was not compliant with care and had displaced a wound vac. She stated Resident #404 was in and out of the hospital and the last time he was sent to the hospital he passed away. The DON stated Resident #404 was sent to the hospital due to bleeding, and he had saturated the dressings on his arms. The DON stated the resident was on Eliquis as a blood thinner, and the family member complained that the resident was not sent to the hospital soon enough. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #404 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, including but not limited to, cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of right middle cerebral artery, chronic pancreatitis, unspecified open wounds to left ankle, neck, right lower leg, right thigh, left hip, left lower leg, lower back, and pelvis without penetration to retroperitoneum, unspecified atrial fibrillation, gastrostomy status, unspecified gastrointestinal hemorrhage, unspecified anemia, and unspecified coagulation defect. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #404 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. A review of the Order Summary Report for Resident #404 revealed the following: [DATE] Full Code. [DATE] Labs: CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic profile) one time only for admission labs for one day. [DATE] Aspirin 81 tablet chewable 81 MG (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth one time a day for DVT (deep vein thrombosis) prevention. [DATE] Eliquis oral tablet 5 MG (Apixaban) give one tablet by mouth two times a day for coagulopathy. [DATE] Furosemide oral tablet 80 MG give one tablet by mouth two times a day for pleural effusion. [DATE] Left hip cleanse with normal saline, silver nitrate dampened gauze, and place border dressing every day shift every Tuesday and Friday for wound. [DATE] Left lateral ankle change wound vac every Tuesday and Friday, apply black granulofoam, set section to 125 MMHG (millimeters/mercury) every day shift every Tuesday and Friday for wound. [DATE] Mid thoracic back cleanse with normal saline, xeroform, and place border dressing every day shift for wound. [DATE] Right heel cleanse with normal saline, apply skin prep, leave open to air every day shift every other day for DTI (deep tissue injury). [DATE] Left lateral ankle change wound vac, apply black granulofoam, set suction to 125 MMHG one time only for wound care for one day. [DATE] Right heel cleanse with normal saline, apply skin prep, leave open to air every night shift every other day to DTI. [DATE] Mid thoracic back cleanse with normal saline, xeroform, and place border dressing every night shift for wound. [DATE] Left ischium cleanse with normal saline, apply medihoney, then cover with mepilex every day shift every other day for wound care. [DATE] Left lateral ankle and mid back change wound vac every Monday and Thursday, apply black granulofoam, set suction to 125 MMHG, connect with Y-tubing every day shift every Monday and Thursday for wound. [DATE] Cleanse skin tear to left elbow apply TAO (triple antibiotic ointment) and DSD (dry sterile dressing) until healed then discontinue every night shift for skin tear care. [DATE] Cleanse skin tear to upper leg apply TAO and DSD until healed then discontinue every night shift for skin tear care. [DATE] Zofran oral tablet 4 MG (Ondansetron) give one table by mouth every six hours as needed for nausea/vomiting. [DATE] CBC, CMP one time only for bleeding for one day. [DATE] Send to ER (emergency room) for evaluation one time only for bleeding for one day. A review of the Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated on [DATE], for Resident #404 revealed the following: Focus: The resident is on anticoagulant/anti-platelet therapy related to atrial fibrillation and CVA (cardiovascular accident). Revision [DATE]. Goal: The resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to anticoagulant use through the review date. Interventions: Administer anticoagulant medications as ordered by physician. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness every shift. Daily skin inspection. Report abnormalities to the nurse. Monitor/document/report as needed adverse reactions of anticoagulant therapy: blood tinged or red blood in urine, black tarry stools, dark or bright red blood in stools, sudden severe headaches, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle joint pain, lethargy, bruising, blurred vision, shortness of breath, loss of appetite, sudden changes in mental status, significant or sudden changes in vital signs. Focus: The resident has a skin tear to left elbow and left leg. Initiated on [DATE]. Goal: The resident's skin tear will show signs of healing by review date. Interventions: Monitor/document location, size, and treatment of skin tear. Report abnormalities. A review of the Progress Notes for Resident #404 revealed the following: -[DATE] 10:17 a.m. Physician progress note: Patient is seen today for follow-up visit. It was reported by staff that he had a fall last night and hit his head. He was sitting on the side of the bed and was trying to position himself back to lying down when he fell over. He did not ask for help or use call light. Patient states he was having hallucinations and confused after he hit his head. The incident was not reported until this morning. Patient is on Eliquis and Aspirin, so he was sent out to the ER for a CT (computed tomography scan) of the head. He did receive multiple skin tears on his arm and leg. He also has a bruise/redness on his face. -[DATE] 10:50 a.m. Nursing progress note: Resident heard calling out, resident observed on side of bed holding onto bed on right side and bedside table to the left side. Resident was in between. Resident assisted back to bed and care provided. ROM [range of motion] WNL [within normal limits]. No s/s [signs/symptoms] of acute distress. Routine pain med given, and wound care provided to skin tears. -[DATE] 7:51 a.m. Nursing progress note: Patient observed to have dislodged/saturated dressing to LUE [left upper extremity] at start of shift, changed patients dressing per physicians order. after receiving PM [evening] medications dressings observed to be saturated again, cleaned wounds to LUE and R [right] forearm and applied ABD [abdominal] pads with krelix [sig] and ace wrap on top to apply pressure. Patient c/o [complains of] nausea and prior emesis,, administer PRN [as needed] Zofran to good effect. Notified physician at 2130 of patients saturation of dressings and treatment applied. Physician ordered for dressing to stay in place until am then to be removed for assessment and CBC to be drawn on [DATE]. At approximately 0630 dressing was removed with some saturation through the ace wrap with the gauze noted to be heavily saturated. Notified physician and received order to send to ER to evaluation and to control bleeding .Called 911 at 0714 upon entering room at approximately 0725 with EMS [emergency medical services] patient had emesis in container dark brown with some red noted approximately 100 ML [milliliter] in container, Resident left facility with EMS at approximately 0730 via stretcher, notified patients emergency contact A review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated [DATE]-[DATE], for Resident #404 revealed the following: Cleanse Skin tear to left elbow apply TAO and DSD until healed every night shift for skin tear documented as completed once on [DATE]. Cleanse skin tear to left upper leg apply TAO and DSD until healed every night shift for skin tear care documented as completed once on [DATE]. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated [DATE]-[DATE], for Resident #404 revealed the following: Aspirin 81 MG give one tablet by mouth one time a day for DVT prevention documented as administered on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. Eliquis oral tablet 5 MG give one tablet by mouth two times a day for coagulopathy documented as administered on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Furosemide oral tablet 80 MG give one tablet by mouth two times a day for pleural effusion documented as administered on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Zofran oral tablet 4 MG give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for N/V not documented as given on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 5:49 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with a Family Member (FM) of Resident #404. The FM stated Resident #404 transferred from the hospital to the facility in March and seemed to be getting better. The FM stated the resident went to the hospital for an abscessed tooth. The FM stated she went to see Resident #404 every day and stayed with him all day long at the facility. The FM stated she would have a good friend drive her there and pick her up. The FM stated on [DATE] she escorted the resident to the courtyard to smoke and when she put her hand on the handle of the wheelchair she picked up her hand to find it full of blood. She stated that was a few days before Resident #404 died. The FM stated the resident was bleeding from his leg, arm, and shoulder area. The FM stated the shoulder was sopping with blood, and she took the dressing off and went in to the facility to get someone to put something over the area. The FM stated the nurse started yelling at Resident #404 for taking off the dressing. She stated then someone came in and put a dressing on the area. The FM stated she had seen the Resident #404 throwing up blood during the day in his urinal. The FM stated she went to the nursing station and asked the nurse to please call EMS and get an ambulance to come. The FM stated when she told the nurse Resident #404 was bleeding out the staff all started laughing and said they wouldn't let him bleed out. She stated the nurse never went down to check on the resident at all. She stated her friend was with Resident #404 in the room and saw him take two sips of water and throw up blood in the urinal. The FM stated it was close to 7pm [DATE], the day before he went to the hospital. The FM stated the next morning she got a call from a man who said he sent Resident #404 to the hospital because he was bleeding out. The FM stated when she got to the hospital, Resident #404 was on life support, and they had to keep giving him blood. The FM stated the nurse never left the nurse's station the night she was there to go in and check on Resident #404 from the time she asked for the resident to go to the hospital until the time she left the facility. On [DATE] at 07:06 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). She stated she remembers the resident, and mentioned the mother visited daily. She confirmed she was the assigned nurse to Resident #404 on [DATE] day shift a.m. to 7 p.m. She stated she remembered he was bleeding while in the courtyard with his FM. She stated the resident told her he took his bandages off so he could let them breathe. She stated after he returned inside the facility, she applied dressings to both upper extremities. Staff A stated she informed the oncoming nurse for the night shift. She stated during her shift she changed the dressings twice because of visible blood and saturation through the dressings. She stated she used a kerlix roll dressing. She stated she thought she changed it around 1-2 p.m., then prior to shift change at 7 p.m. it needed to be changed again. She stated the FM was on the patio with the resident while he was smoking. Staff A stated she let the night nurse know Resident #404 was bleeding from his arms. She stated she reported she had re-wrapped the arms. She stated it was unusual to have to change the dressings twice. She stated she did not call the doctor. She stated Resident #404 had quite a few wounds and she had changed one on his leg and his wound vac. She stated the wound vac had quite a bit of drainage and had an odor to it. She stated she did not recall any nausea or vomiting. She stated she really was not thinking about the resident being on blood thinners. She stated she did not make any notes, do a change of status, or notify the doctor of the need to change dressings due to bleeding. On [DATE] at 7:29 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff O, RN (Registered Nurse, Unit Manager). She stated Resident #404 was admitted from the hospital but unable to recall the specifics of his admission. She stated Resident #404 had a lot of different wounds. She said his FM visited almost every day. She stated she knew the resident was sent out for a bleed. She stated she was told there were allegations of neglect because of an on-line review. She stated she did not participate in the investigation and stated abuse investigations are generally completed by the DON/NHA. She stated the nurses are expected to document changes in condition and notify the physician in the medical record. She stated if a resident's family asked for them to be sent to the hospital the nurses are supposed to do so and let the doctor know what is happening. On [DATE] at 9:22 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff P, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). He stated he knew Resident #404 had falls, skin tears and could be grumpy, but did not recall Resident #404's plan of care. He stated Resident #404 had dressings all over, had a lot of skin tears, and a wound vac to his sacrum. The nurse stated in report he was told while the FM visited with the resident in the courtyard, the resident was picking at his dressings, and (Staff A) told him she had just changed his dressings. He stated he did not recall (Staff A) saying that was the second time she had to change the dressings. He stated, After report around 7:45 p.m., I saw the dressing on his left arm was not really on but the mepilex dressing had some bleeding on it. I'm not sure who transferred the resident back to bed but there was some blood smeared on the wall by his bed. I changed the dressings to his arms and legs all at once and cleaned the blood off the wall. When giving him his night meds [9:00 p.m.], I saw the dressings on his upper arms were saturated and the current dressing was not appropriate for the amount of bleeding. The dressing was red in color. The dressing to his legs were not saturated. I changed the dressings on his legs. I applied ABD, Kerlix and pressure dressings to his arms. I changed all the dressings [legs and arms] to have a timeline of how much he was bleeding. I used gauze pads on his legs, because they were absorbent and easy to see changes. I notified the MD about 9:30 p.m. and he said to leave the dressings in place and draw a CBC [[DATE]] and leave those dressings in place until the morning and then to remove them for assessment. I rounded on him to make sure there was no visible bleeding throughout the shift. The nurse stated he did not remove the ace wrap during the night to keep pressure on the arms. He stated about 6:00 a.m. he removed the ace wrap and saw the wound had bled through to the ace and Resident #404 told him he had vomited on the prior shift. Staff P, LPN stated the previous nurse had not reported the resident had vomited. On [DATE] at 11:02 a.m. an interview was conducted with the Primary Care Physician (PCP) for Resident #404. The PCP stated he did not recall specifically being notified about Resident #404 on [DATE]. He stated if he was notified for the first time that a resident was having a bleeding episode he would have told them to monitor and apply a pressure dressing. He stated he did not recall being contacted during the day shift about any bleeding the resident was having. He stated if he was told of previous episodes of bleeding and multiple changes of dressings he would have told them to send the resident out to be evaluated. He stated it was not ideal that the nurses did not notify him of multiple dressing changes, and he would have expected them to report any vomiting of blood as well. The PCP stated if he had been aware of the bleeding wounds and vomiting blood, he would have sent him out. He stated what he was told was not the same as what occurred. He stated his partner admitted Resident #404 to the hospital and the resident died of sepsis with complications. He stated the resident had fungus in the blood cultures. He stated he reviewed the chart in the hospital and Resident #404 had DIC, his platelets dropped, and the resident passed away. He stated he usually investigates the reason if a resident passes away because he wants to know what happened. Disseminated intravascular coagulation, or DIC, is a complicated condition that can occur when someone has severe sepsis or septic shock. Both blood clotting and difficulty with clotting may occur, causing a vicious cycle. Small blood clots can develop throughout your bloodstream, especially in the microscopic blood vessels called capillaries. This blocks the blood flow to many parts of your body, including your limbs and your organs. Blood is then not able to bring oxygen and nutrients to the tissues. On the reverse side of the cycle, DIC can increase bleeding. The body uses up so many of the blood clotting proteins for the multiple blood clots in the blood vessels that there are not enough left to clot the blood elsewhere. Several medical conditions can cause DIC, including sepsis. DIC affects about 35% of patients who have sepsis. Sepsis, which was often called blood poisoning, is the body's life-threatening response to infection. Like strokes or heart attacks, sepsis is a medical emergency that requires rapid diagnosis and treatment. (Sepsis Alliance, Sepsis and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation. 2023. https://www.sepsis.org/sepsisand?disseminated-intravascular-coagulation-dic/) On [DATE] at 11:23 a.m. an interview was conducted with Staff Q, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). The CNA stated she remembered Resident #404 and she provided care for him often. She stated a FM came to see the resident almost every day. She stated she remembered the resident vomiting a lot and bleeding from the dressings. She stated the resident always asked for pain medications. She stated she would clean up the resident and empty his urinal because he would vomit in it. She stated she always reported vomiting to the nurse, but she did not document that in the medical record because there is no place for them to do that, she stated she left that for the nurse to do. She stated she did recall him having bleeding and vomiting before he went to the hospital, and she told the nurse, but she does not recall if the nurse went in to check on the resident. She described the bleeding and vomiting as dark brown. She stated the only reasons Resident #404 would call was to be changed, have his dressings changed, vomiting, or taking pain pills. On [DATE] at 8:07 p.m. an interview was conducted with a Family Friend (FF), who would transport the FM to and from the facility and visit with Resident #404. The FF stated he would take the FM to visit Resident #404 nearly every day and he was present at the facility on [DATE] the weekend before Resident #404 passed away. He stated when he saw Resident #404 on the evening of [DATE] the resident was coherent and he had bruises all over, blood on his sheets, and blood on the walls in his room. He stated he and the FM where in the room with Resident #404 for about an hour and a half. The FF stated he got the resident a glass of water, but the resident was not able to keep it down and he was throwing up blood. He stated they informed the nurses. The FF stated if the resident took a drink of water he would throw up blood in less than a minute and it was dark red. The FF stated Resident #404 asked him to take him to the hospital to avoid getting charged any money and he told him he couldn't take him because of his medical needs. The FF stated he went to the hallway and told a lady nurse that Resident #404 was throwing up blood and she was just like oh ok. He stated the nurse did not go to the room to see what was going on. He stated he has really tried to block the whole incident out of his memory. A review of the facility policy titled Anticoagulant Therapy, revised on [DATE], revealed the following: Procedure: -Obtain physician's order for anticoagulant therapy and labs. -Alert lab -Initiate anticoagulant flow sheets or electronic equivalent -Post lab results on flow sheet or electronic equivalent, indicating date -Identify resident and explain therapy -Perform hand hygiene -Document the time, dose administration on MAR and anticoagulant flow sheet/ electronic equivalent -Monitor the resident for signs of bleeding. *Observe for hematoma development or excessive bleeding or bruising. *Test stool, urine, emesis for Guaiac/Hemoccult as ordered by physician. *Monitor labs per physician's order. *Use pressure-dressing PRN until bleeding stops. *Perform hand hygiene. *Document in the medical record. Note-Residents requiring Coumadin (Warfarin) administration should have lab work drawn as ordered by the physician to determine effectiveness of therapy and subsequent dosages. 2. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #94 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including pulmonary fibrosis, unspecified, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute respiratory failure hypercapnia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), unspecified, emphysema, unspecified, pneumoconiosis due to other dust containing silica, shortness of breath (SOB), obstructive sleep apnea, pneumothorax, unspecified. A review of Resident #94's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. A review of the Comprehensive Care Plan, dated [DATE], for Resident #94 revealed the following: Focus: The resident has emphysema/COPD r/t (related to) exposure to industrial pollutants. Goals: Resident will be free of signs/symptoms of respiratory infections through review date. Interventions: Give aerosol or bronchodilators as ordered; Monitor/ document and side effect and effectiveness; Head of the bed elevated or out of bed upright in a chair during episodes of difficulty breathing; Monitor for difficulty breathing (dyspnea) on exertion; Remind resident not to push beyond endurance; Monitor for signs and symptoms of acute respiratory insufficiency: anxiety, confusion, restlessness, shortness of breath at rest, cyanosis, somnolence; Monitor/document/report as needed any signs/symptoms of respiratory infection. Focus: The resident has altered respiratory breathing status/difficulty breathing related to sleep apnea. Goals: The resident will have minimal risk of complications related to SOB. Interventions: Administer medication/puffers as ordered; Monitor for effectiveness and side effects; Monitor/document changes in orientation, increased restlessness, anxiety and air hunger; Monitor for signs/symptoms of respiratory distress and report to doctor as needed. A review of progress notes, dated [DATE] at 08:09:00, revealed a nursing progress note as follows: Certified nursing assistant (CNA) assigned to client called this writer to assess client. This writer observed client lying in semi-Fowlers position and oxygen continues at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula unresponsive. This writer checked for pulse; no pulse noted. CPR [cardiopulmonary resuscitation] was initiated, and this writer called out to another nurse to call 911. CPR continued till EMS's [emergency medical services] arrived. CPR was terminated @0355. MD [medical doctor] and clients POA [power of attorney] was notified @0400 and new orders received to release body. A review of physician orders for Resident #94 revealed an order for vital signs every day shift. The order was to begin on [DATE], there was no end date listed. An order for full code with a start date of [DATE], and end date of [DATE] A review of the medical record revealed under the weights/ vital sign tab only pulse oximetry and respirations were recorded between [DATE] and [DATE]. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 01:00 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON). She stated vital signs should be documented in the weight/vital signs tab, or in progress notes, and in nursing assessments. She stated the vital signs (V/S) may show up in the POC (point of care) if the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) puts them in. The DON stated the orders for the V/S are part of a batch order and should be followed by nursing. The DON confirmed there were no VS taken as ordered from 4-20-24 through 4-26-24. A review of the code sheet, dated [DATE], revealed no vital signs were listed on the document. A review of the facility policy titled Physician Orders, revised on [DATE], revealed the following: Policy: The center will ensure that Physician orders are appropriately and timely documented in the medical record. Procedure: admission ORDERS: Information received from the referring facility or agency to be reviewed, verified with the physician and transcribed to the electronic medical record. The attending physician will review and confirm orders. Confirmation of admission orders requires that the physician sign and date the order during, or as soon as practicable after it is provided, to maintain an accurate medical record. ROUTINE ORDERS: A Nurse may accept a telephone order from the Physician, Physician Assistant or Nurse Practitioner (as permitted by state law). The order will be repeated by the physician, PA or ARNP for his/her verbal confirmation. The other is transcribed to all appropriate areas of the electronic health record (eMAR/eTAR). For pharmacy orders, the nurse will notify the pharmacy per pharmacy policy by telephoning, faxing or completing the order electronically. The ordering physician or physician extender will review and confirm orders. Confirmation of routine orders requires that the physician sign and date the order as soon as practicable after it is provided to maintain an accurate medical record. 3. Resident #401 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified peritonitis, essential hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, unspecified chronic kidney disease stage 3, acute appendicitis with localized peritonitis without perforation or gangrene, cognitive communication deficit, unsteadiness on feet, and need for personal assistance with personal care. Resident #401 was discharged to a higher level of care [hospital] on [DATE]. A review of the physician orders for Resident #401 revealed the following: -Lisinopril -Hydrochlorothiazide oral tablet 20-25 milligrams(mg) to give one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension. -Carvedilol oral tablet 12.5 mg to give one tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension. -Monitor vital signs every shift. On [DATE] during the day shift, Resident #401's blood pressure was documented as 100/60 mmHg (millimeters of Mercury). A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), [DATE], showed Lisinopril-Hydrochlorothiazide and the Carvedilol were administered as scheduled at 09:00 a.m., and Carvedilol was administered as scheduled at 5:00 p.m. A review of Resident #401's progress note, dated [DATE] at 2:39 p.m., showed the following: Resident up for PT (Physical Therapy), resident BP 110 / 67 before PT interaction. [Staff R, Speech Therapist], to give resident fluids previous to PT to ensure swallowing capabilities intact, [Staff S, Physical Therapist] returned patient, resident BP 117 / 72 per [Staff S]. PT reported resident did well in PT, report given to oncoming nurse to ensure residents stay hydrated and eats dinner, also advised oncoming nurse to check BP to ensure patient is not hypotensive. A review of occupational therapy notes, dated [DATE] at 2:59 p.m., showed Client required maximal assist for all bed mobility. She required Hoyer lift into the chair. Attempted to get patient to hold head up and follow verbal directive to sit, lean forward, however she required total assist. A review of physical therapy notes, dated [DATE] at 4:43 p.m., showed Resident #401 participating in therapy. Patient limited with minimal active muscle engagement with bilateral lower extremity therapeutic exercises with maximal performance cuing, assist to complete each. Blood pressure reading have been in a lower range per nursing, and they are aware of functional decline since evaluation. A review of speech therapy notes, dated [DATE] at 5:38 p.m., showed Patient required moderate to maximal cues to follow simple commands and answer simple questions. Patient noted to be lethargic, which nursing noted. Patient was able to indicate personal information independently however response time was increased. A review of the Change of Condition document, dated [DATE] at 6:45 p.m., showed the following: -altered level of consciousness -blood pressure of 71/38 mmHg -summary: This nurse entered pt. (patient) room and observed pt. not behaving in her usual self and difficult to arouse. Vital signs taken B/P 71/38, P-88, temperature 97.7, unable to take O2 (oxygen) sat (saturation) at this moment. The physician was notified at 6:45 p.m. with instructions to call 911. Family member notified on [DATE] at 6:51 p.m. A review of the facility policy titled Notification of Change in Condition, revised on [DATE], revealed the following: Policy: The Center to promptly notify the Patient/Resident, the attending physicia[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure there were competent staff to provide nursing services in ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure there were competent staff to provide nursing services in order to assure resident safety and well-being for three residents (#404, #94, and #401) out of seven residents sampled. Findings included: 1. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #404 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, including but not limited to, cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of right middle cerebral artery, chronic pancreatitis, unspecified open wounds to left ankle, neck, right lower leg, right thigh, left hip, left lower leg, lower back, and pelvis without penetration to retroperitoneum, unspecified atrial fibrillation, gastrostomy status, unspecified gastrointestinal hemorrhage, unspecified anemia, and unspecified coagulation defect. A review of the Order Summary Report for Resident #404 revealed the following: [DATE] Full Code. [DATE] Labs: CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic profile) one time only for admission labs for one day. [DATE] Aspirin 81 tablet chewable 81 MG (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth one time a day for DVT (deep vein thrombosis) prevention. [DATE] Eliquis oral tablet 5 MG (Apixaban) give one tablet by mouth two times a day for coagulopathy. [DATE] Cleanse skin tear to left elbow apply TAO (triple antibiotic ointment) and DSD (dry sterile dressing) until healed then discontinue every night shift for skin tear care. [DATE] Cleanse skin tear to upper leg apply TAO and DSD until healed then discontinue every night shift for skin tear care. [DATE] Zofran oral tablet 4 MG (Ondansetron) give one table by mouth every six hours as needed for nausea/vomiting. [DATE] CBC, CMP one time only for bleeding for one day. [DATE] Send to ER (emergency room) for evaluation one time only for bleeding for one day. A review of the Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated on [DATE], for Resident #404 revealed the following: Focus: The resident is on anticoagulant/anti-platelet therapy related to atrial fibrillation and CVA (cardiovascular accident). Revision [DATE]. Goal: The resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to anticoagulant use through the review date. Interventions: Administer anticoagulant medications as ordered by physician. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness every shift. Daily skin inspection. Report abnormalities to the nurse. Monitor/document/report as needed adverse reactions of anticoagulant therapy: blood tinged or red blood in urine, black tarry stools, dark or bright red blood in stools, sudden severe headaches, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle joint pain, lethargy, bruising, blurred vision, shortness of breath, loss of appetite, sudden changes in mental status, significant or sudden changes in vital signs. Focus: The resident has a skin tear to left elbow and left leg. Initiated on [DATE]. Goal: The resident's skin tear will show signs of healing by review date. Interventions: Monitor/document location, size, and treatment of skin tear. Report abnormalities. A review of the Progress Notes for Resident #404 revealed the following: [DATE] 7:51 a.m. Nursing progress note: Patient observed to have dislodged/saturated dressing to LUE [left upper extremity] at start of shift, changed patients dressing per physicians order. after receiving PM [evening] medications dressings observed to be saturated again, cleaned wounds to LUE and R [right] forearm and applied ABD [abdominal] pads with krelix [sig] and ace wrap on top to apply pressure. Patient c/o [complains of] nausea and prior emesis,, administer PRN [as needed] Zofran to good effect. Notified physician at 2130 of patients saturation of dressings and treatment applied. Physician ordered for dressing to stay in place until am then to be removed for assessment and CBC to be drawn on [DATE]. At approximately 0630 dressing was removed with some saturation through the ace wrap with the gauze noted to be heavily saturated. Notified physician and received order to send to ER to evaluation and to control bleeding .Called 911 at 0714 upon entering room at approximately 0725 with EMS [emergency medical services] patient had emesis in container dark brown with some red noted approximately 100 ML [milliliter] in container, Resident left facility with EMS at approximately 0730 via stretcher, notified patients emergency contact A review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated [DATE]-[DATE], for Resident #404 revealed the following: Cleanse Skin tear to left elbow apply TAO and DSD until healed every night shift for skin tear documented as completed once on [DATE]. Cleanse skin tear to left upper leg apply TAO and DSD until healed every night shift for skin tear care documented as completed once on [DATE]. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated [DATE]-[DATE], for Resident #404 revealed the following: Aspirin 81 MG give one tablet by mouth one time a day for DVT prevention documented as administered on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. Eliquis oral tablet 5 MG give one tablet by mouth two times a day for coagulopathy documented as administered on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Zofran oral tablet 4 MG give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for N/V not documented as given on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 07:06 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). She stated she remembers the resident, and mentioned the mother visited daily. She confirmed she was the assigned nurse to Resident #404 on [DATE] day shift a.m. to 7 p.m. She stated she remembered he was bleeding while in the courtyard with his FM. She stated the resident told her he took his bandages off so he could let them breathe. She stated after he returned inside the facility, she applied dressings to both upper extremities. Staff A stated she informed the oncoming nurse for the night shift. She stated during her shift she changed the dressings twice because of visible blood and saturation through the dressings. She stated she used a kerlix roll dressing. She stated she thought she changed it around 1-2 p.m., then prior to shift change at 7 p.m. it needed to be changed again. She stated the FM was on the patio with the resident while he was smoking. Staff A stated she let the night nurse know Resident #404 was bleeding from his arms. She stated she reported she had re-wrapped the arms. She stated it was unusual to have to change the dressings twice. She stated she did not call the doctor. She stated Resident #404 had quite a few wounds and she had changed one on his leg and his wound vac. She stated the wound vac had quite a bit of drainage and had an odor to it. She stated she did not recall any nausea or vomiting. She stated she really was not thinking about the resident being on blood thinners. She stated she did not make any notes, do a change of status, or notify the doctor of the need to change dressings due to bleeding. On [DATE] at 7:29 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff O, RN (Registered Nurse, Unit Manager). She stated Resident #404 was admitted from the hospital but unable to recall the specifics of his admission. She stated Resident #404 had a lot of different wounds. She said his FM visited almost every day. She stated she knew the resident was sent out for a bleed. She stated she was told there were allegations of neglect because of an on-line review. She stated she did not participate in the investigation and stated abuse investigations are generally completed by the DON/NHA. She stated the nurses are expected to document changes in condition and notify the physician in the medical record. She stated if a resident's family asked for them to be sent to the hospital the nurses are supposed to do so and let the doctor know what is happening. On [DATE] at 9:22 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff P, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). He stated he knew Resident #404 had falls, skin tears and could be grumpy, but did not recall Resident #404's plan of care. He stated Resident #404 had dressings all over, had a lot of skin tears, and a wound vac to his sacrum. The nurse stated in report he was told while the FM visited with the resident in the courtyard, the resident was picking at his dressings, and (Staff A) told him she had just changed his dressings. He stated he did not recall (Staff A) saying that was the second time she had to change the dressings. He stated, After report around 7:45 p.m., I saw the dressing on his left arm was not really on but the mepilex dressing had some bleeding on it. I'm not sure who transferred the resident back to bed but there was some blood smeared on the wall by his bed. I changed the dressings to his arms and legs all at once and cleaned the blood off the wall. When giving him his night meds [9:00 p.m.], I saw the dressings on his upper arms were saturated and the current dressing was not appropriate for the amount of bleeding. The dressing was red in color. The dressing to his legs were not saturated. I changed the dressings on his legs. I applied ABD, Kerlix and pressure dressings to his arms. I changed all the dressings [legs and arms] to have a timeline of how much he was bleeding. I used gauze pads on his legs, because they were absorbent and easy to see changes. I notified the MD about 9:30 p.m. and he said to leave the dressings in place and draw a CBC [[DATE]] and leave those dressings in place until the morning and then to remove them for assessment. I rounded on him to make sure there was no visible bleeding throughout the shift. The nurse stated he did not remove the ace wrap during the night to keep pressure on the arms. He stated about 6:00 a.m. he removed the ace wrap and saw the wound had bled through to the ace and Resident #404 told him he had vomited on the prior shift. Staff P, LPN stated the previous nurse had not reported the resident had vomited. On [DATE] at 11:23 a.m. an interview was conducted with Staff Q, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). The CNA stated she remembered Resident #404 and she provided care for him often. She stated a FM came to see the resident almost every day. She stated she remembered the resident vomiting a lot and bleeding from the dressings. She stated the resident always asked for pain medications. She stated she would clean up the resident and empty his urinal because he would vomit in it. She stated she always reported vomiting to the nurse, but she did not document that in the medical record because there is no place for them to do that, she stated she left that for the nurse to do. She stated she did recall him having bleeding and vomiting before he went to the hospital, and she told the nurse, but she does not recall if the nurse went in to check on the resident. She described the bleeding and vomiting as dark brown. She stated the only reasons Resident #404 would call was to be changed, have his dressings changed, vomiting, or taking pain pills. On [DATE] at 11:02 a.m. an interview was conducted with the Primary Care Physician (PCP) for Resident #404. The PCP stated he did not recall specifically being notified about Resident #404 on [DATE]. He stated if he was notified for the first time that a resident was having a bleeding episode he would have told them to monitor and apply a pressure dressing. He stated he did not recall being contacted during the day shift about any bleeding the resident was having. He stated if he was told of previous episodes of bleeding and multiple changes of dressings he would have told them to send the resident out to be evaluated. He stated it was not ideal that the nurses did not notify him of multiple dressing changes, and he would have expected them to report any vomiting of blood as well. The PCP stated if he had been aware of the bleeding wounds and vomiting blood, he would have sent him out. He stated what he was told was not the same as what occurred. He stated his partner admitted Resident #404 to the hospital and the resident died of sepsis with complications. He stated the resident had fungus in the blood cultures. He stated he reviewed the chart in the hospital and Resident #404 had DIC, his platelets dropped, and the resident passed away. He stated he usually investigates the reason if a resident passes away because he wants to know what happened. A review of the facility policy titled Anticoagulant Therapy, revised on [DATE], revealed the following: Procedure: -Obtain physician's order for anticoagulant therapy and labs. -Alert lab -Initiate anticoagulant flow sheets or electronic equivalent -Post lab results on flow sheet or electronic equivalent, indicating date -Identify resident and explain therapy -Perform hand hygiene -Document the time, dose administration on MAR and anticoagulant flow sheet/ electronic equivalent -Monitor the resident for signs of bleeding. *Observe for hematoma development or excessive bleeding or bruising. *Test stool, urine, emesis for Guaiac/Hemoccult as ordered by physician. *Monitor labs per physician's order. *Use pressure-dressing PRN until bleeding stops. *Perform hand hygiene. *Document in the medical record. Note-Residents requiring Coumadin (Warfarin) administration should have lab work drawn as ordered by the physician to determine effectiveness of therapy and subsequent dosages. 2. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #94 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including pulmonary fibrosis, unspecified, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute respiratory failure hypercapnia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), unspecified, emphysema, unspecified, pneumoconiosis due to other dust containing silica, shortness of breath (SOB), obstructive sleep apnea, pneumothorax, unspecified. A review of the Comprehensive Care Plan, dated [DATE], for Resident #404 revealed the following: Focus: The resident has emphysema/COPD r/t exposure to industrial pollutants. Goals: Resident will be free of signs/symptoms of respiratory infections through review date. Interventions: Give aerosol or bronchodilators as ordered; Monitor/ document and side effect and effectiveness; Head of the bed elevated or out of bed upright in a chair during episodes of difficulty breathing; Monitor for difficulty breathing (dyspnea) on exertion; Remind resident not to push beyond endurance; Monitor for signs and symptoms of acute respiratory insufficiency: anxiety, confusion, restlessness, shortness of breath at rest, cyanosis, somnolence; Monitor/document/report as needed any signs/symptoms of respiratory infection. Focus: The resident has altered respiratory breathing status/difficulty breathing related to sleep apnea. Goals: The resident will have minimal risk of complications related to SOB. Interventions: Administer medication/puffers as ordered; Monitor for effectiveness and side effects;; Monitor/document changes in orientation, increased restlessness, anxiety and air hunger; Monitor for signs/symptoms of respiratory distress and report to doctor as needed. A review of progress notes, dated [DATE] at 08:09:00, revealed a nursing progress note as follows: Certified nursing assistant (CNA) assigned to client called this writer to assess client. This writer observed client lying in semi-Fowlers position and oxygen continues at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula unresponsive. This writer checked for pulse; no pulse noted. CPR [cardiopulmonary resuscitation] was initiated, and this writer called out to another nurse to call 911. CPR continued till EMS's [emergency medical services] arrived. CPR was terminated @0355. MD [medical doctor] and clients POA [power of attorney] was notified @0400 and new orders received to release body. A review of physician orders for Resident #94 revealed an order for vital signs every day shift. The order was to begin on [DATE], there was no end date listed. An order for full code with a start date of [DATE], and end date of [DATE] A review of the medical record revealed under the weights/ vital sign tab only pulse oximetry and respirations were recorded between [DATE] and [DATE]. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 01:00 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON). She stated vital signs should be documented in the weight/vital signs tab, or in progress notes, and in nursing assessments. She stated the vital signs (V/S) may show up in the POC (point of care) if the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) puts them in. The DON stated the orders for the V/S are part of a batch order and should be followed by nursing. The DON confirmed there were no VS taken as ordered from 4-20-24 through 4-26-24. A review of the facility policy titled Physician Orders, revised on [DATE], revealed the following: Policy: The center will ensure that Physician orders are appropriately and timely documented in the medical record. Procedure: admission ORDERS: Information received from the referring facility or agency to be reviewed, verified with the physician and transcribed to the electronic medical record. The attending physician will review and confirm orders. Confirmation of admission orders requires that the physician sign and date the order during, or as soon as practicable after it is provided, to maintain an accurate medical record. ROUTINE ORDERS: A Nurse may accept a telephone order from the Physician, Physician Assistant or Nurse Practitioner (as permitted by state law). The order will be repeated by the physician, PA or ARNP for his/her verbal confirmation. The other is transcribed to all appropriate areas of the electronic health record (eMAR/eTAR). For pharmacy orders, the nurse will notify the pharmacy per pharmacy policy by telephoning, faxing or completing the order electronically. The ordering physician or physician extender will review and confirm orders. Confirmation of routine orders requires that the physician sign and date the order as soon as practicable after it is provided to maintain an accurate medical record. 3. Resident #401 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified peritonitis, essential hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, unspecified chronic kidney disease stage 3, acute appendicitis with localized peritonitis without perforation or gangrene, cognitive communication deficit, unsteadiness on feet, and need for personal assistance with personal care. Resident #401 was discharged to a higher level of care [hospital] on [DATE]. A review of the physician orders for Resident #401 revealed the following: -Lisinopril -Hydrochlorothiazide oral tablet 20-25 milligrams(mg) to give one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension. -Carvedilol oral tablet 12.5 mg to give one tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension. -Monitor vital signs every shift. On [DATE] during the day shift, Resident #401's blood pressure was documented as 100/60 mmHg (millimeters of Mercury), with a second blood pressure documented on the afternoon shift as 71/38 mmHg. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), [DATE], showed Lisinopril-Hydrochlorothiazide and the Carvedilol were administered as scheduled at 09:00 a.m., and Carvedilol was administered as scheduled at 5:00 p.m. A review of the Change of Condition document, dated [DATE] at 6:45 p.m., showed the following: -altered level of consciousness -blood pressure of 71/38 mmHg -summary: This nurse entered pt. room and observed pt. not behaving in her usual self and difficult to arouse. Vital signs taken B/P 71/38, P-88, temperature 97.7, unable to take O2 sat at this moment. The physician was notified at 6:45 p.m. with instructions to call 911. Family member notified on [DATE] at 6:51 p.m. A review of physical therapy notes, dated [DATE] at 4:43 p.m., showed Resident #401 participating in therapy. patient limited with minimal active muscle engagement with bilateral lower extremity therapeutic exercises with maximal performance cuing, assist to complete each. Blood pressure reading have been in a lower range per nursing, and they are aware of functional decline since evaluation. A review of occupational therapy notes, dated [DATE] at 2:59 p.m., showed client required maximal assist for all bed mobility. She required Hoyer lift into the chair. Attempted to get patient to hold head up and follow verbal directive to sit, lean forward, however she required total assist. A review of speech therapy notes, dated [DATE] at 5:38 p.m., showed patient required moderate to maximal cues to follow simple commands and answer simple questions. Patient noted to be lethargic, which nursing noted. Patient was able to indicate personal information independently however response time was increased. A review of Resident #401's progress note, dated [DATE] at 2:39 p.m., showed the following: resident up for PT, resident BP 110 / 67 before PT interaction. [Staff R, Speech Therapist], to give resident fluids previous to PT to ensure swallowing capabilities intact, [Staff S, Physical Therapist]returned patient, resident BP 117 / 72 per [Staff S], PT reported resident did well in PT, report given to oncoming nurse to ensure residents stay hydrated and eats dinner, also advised oncoming nurse to check BP to ensure patient is not hypotensive. A review of the facility policy titled Notification of Change in Condition, revised on [DATE], revealed the following: Policy: The Center to promptly notify the Patient/Resident, the attending physician, and the Resident Representative when there is a change in the status or condition. Procedure: -The nurse to notify the attending physician and Resident Representative when there is a(n): *Accidents *Significant change in the patient/resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status *Need to alter treatment significantly -New treatment -Discontinuation of a current treatment due to but not limited to: *Adverse consequences *Acute condition *Exacerbation of a chronic condition *A transfer or discharge of the Patient/Resident from the Center *Patient/Resident consecutively refuses medication and/or treatment (i.e. two or more times) *Patient/Resident is discharged without proper medical authority -In the event of an emergency situation, 911 to be called and the attending physician and the Resident Representative to be notified as soon as possible. -The nurse to complete an evaluation of the Patient/Resident. Document evaluation in the medical record. -The nurse will contact the physician. In the event that the attending physician does not respond in a reasonable amount of time, the Medical Director may be contacted. -If the Medical Director does not respond, call 911 and document in the medical record. -Notify the patient/resident and the resident representative of the change in condition. Document notification in the medical record. -Document resident/patient change in condition on 24 hour report -Complete SBAR as indicated A review of the facility policy titled Nursing Documentation Guidelines, undated, revealed the following: POLICY: Pertinent information should be documented in the individual's record in an accurate, timely, and legible manner. Definitions: Individual's Record: A permanent legal document that provides a comprehensive account of information about the individual's health care status. PROCEDURE: GENERAL GUIDELINES When to Chart 1. Record resident's condition, nursing actions and individual responses as soon as possible after they occur. 2. Document medications and treatments at the time they are administered. What to Chart 1. Symptoms/Subjective Data 2. Your observations and/or Assessments 3. All injuries, illnesses and unusual health changes until they are resolved. There should be entries in the nursing notes on a regular basis until the problem is no longer present. When the problem is resolved, it should documented [sic]. 4. All contacts with the primary care prescriber. a. Document what information was relayed to the primary care prescriber. b. If the primary care prescriber sees or reviews an individual's specific health problem, document what occurred: -the chart was reviewed, -the individual was seen, or -if the individual was examined. c. If the contact was made by phone, document what was discussed and results of the contact (e.g., no orders given, observe). d. Document the plan for follow-up (e.g., to see the physician on morning rounds). e. Documentation on all meds. 5. Response to a medication or treatment: This includes therapeutic effects as well as side effects. 6. New symptoms or conditions: Document in the nurse's notes at time of occurrence or as soon as possible. Document nursing action taken and the person's response. 7. As a general rule, do not chart actions completed by others. How to Chart 1. All entries in the individual's record should be typed in the electronic health record (EHR) or paper if EHR is not used. 2. Use only abbreviations and symbols approved in agency policies. 3. All entries in the individual's record should be written objectively and without bias, personal opinion, or value judgment. 4. The use of slang, cliches, or labels should be avoided unless used in the context of a direct quote. 5. Interpretations of data should be supported by descriptions of specific observations. 6. Documentation should be clear, concise and specific -Don't use vague terms. -Generalizations such as good, fair, moderate, and normal should be avoided -Findings should be as descriptive as possible including specific information about the appearance or findings related to size, shape, and amount. 7. Correcting errors: -Do a correction note in medical record if necessary 8. Late entries: If you forget to chart something, it may be entered into the record at a later time, but you must clearly state the date and time the entry is being made and the date and time the care or observations actually occurred. The entry should begin with the words, Late entry. 9. All entries in nursing notes are attributed to the author of the note.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure preferences were honored for one resident (#2...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure preferences were honored for one resident (#248) out of nine sampled residents. Findings Included: On 07/08/24 at 10:33 a.m. Resident #248 was observed lying in a geriatric chair by the entrance to the courtyard and facing the nurses' station. On 07/08/24 at 12:33 p.m. Resident #248 was observed upright in a geriatric chair with a family member assisting him with his meal. On 07/08/24 at 03:05 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #248's. The family member said Resident #248 likes to sleep in a quiet area and he is always placed by the nurses' station which is noisy. On 07/09/24 at 8:32 a.m. an interview and observation was conducted with Resident #248. Resident #248 was sitting in a geriatric chair facing the nurses' station. He said he does not necessarily like sitting at the nurses' station I would rather go to my bed A review of Resident #248's admission records showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's Disease, dementia, and seizures. Review of Resident #248's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C- Cognitive Patterns revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #248's order summary report, dated 07/11/24 showed orders to include: full activity and may have restorative/ maintenance program as indicated. A review of Resident #248's active care plan, initiated 07/01/24, showed the resident had an actual fall with minor injury related to unsteady gait. The interventions include place resident in common areas, initiated 7/2/24. On 07/11/24 at 12:16 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) he said the use of geriatric chairs can decrease resident function .and it is not an ideal intervention to prevent falls. On 07/11/24 at 1:39 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Resident #248's nurse. Staff G, LPN said the use of the geriatric chair is because Resident #248 is a fall risk and can get up from the chair when the footrest is lowered. Staff G confirmed Resident # 248 cannot independently get out the geriatric chair. On 07/11/24 at 2:40 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), she said resident #248 was placed in the geriatric chair for comfort. The DON said the geriatric chair's restriction on Resident #248, it did not cross my mind and is not ideal. On 07/11/24 at 8:00 p.m. Resident #248 was observed with eyes closed and laying in a geriatric chair facing the nurses' station. On 07/12/24 at 08:15 a.m. Resident #248 was observed with eyes closed and laying in a geriatric chair facing the nurses' station. Review of facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, effective on 11/30/2024, showed: Policy -1. Make residents and their legal representatives aware of residents' rights. -2. Ensure that residents' rights are known to staff.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of neglect for o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of neglect for one resident (#404) out of seven residents sampled for abuse/neglect. Findings included: On [DATE] at 4:15 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) to review a reportable incident for Resident #404. The DON stated she was familiar with Resident #404, and she could speak to the investigation conducted at the time of the incident. The DON stated a family member complaint was received on social media. The DON stated they investigated and did not find any problem with the care. The DON stated Resident #404 was not compliant with care and had displaced a wound vac. She stated Resident #404 was in and out of the hospital and the last time he was sent to the hospital he passed away. The DON stated Resident #404 was sent to the hospital due to bleeding, and he had saturated the dressings on his arms. The DON stated the resident was on Eliquis as a blood thinner, and the family member complained that the resident was not sent to the hospital soon enough. A review of the Order Summary Report for Resident #404 revealed the following: [DATE] Full Code. [DATE] Labs: CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic profile) one time only for admission labs for one day. [DATE] Aspirin 81 tablet chewable 81 MG (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth one time a day for DVT (deep vein thrombosis) prevention. [DATE] Eliquis oral tablet 5 MG (Apixaban) give one tablet by mouth two times a day for coagulopathy. [DATE] Cleanse skin tear to left elbow apply TAO (triple antibiotic ointment) and DSD (dry sterile dressing) until healed then discontinue every night shift for skin tear care. [DATE] Cleanse skin tear to upper leg apply TAO and DSD until healed then discontinue every night shift for skin tear care. [DATE] Zofran oral tablet 4 MG (Ondansetron) give one table by mouth every six hours as needed for nausea/vomiting. [DATE] CBC, CMP one time only for bleeding for one day. [DATE] Send to ER (emergency room) for evaluation one time only for bleeding for one day. A review of the Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated on [DATE], for Resident #404 revealed the following: Focus: The resident is on anticoagulant/anti-platelet therapy related to atrial fibrillation and CVA (cardiovascular accident). Revision [DATE]. Goal: The resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to anticoagulant use through the review date. Interventions: Administer anticoagulant medications as ordered by physician. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness every shift. Daily skin inspection. Report abnormalities to the nurse. Monitor/document/report as needed adverse reactions of anticoagulant therapy: blood tinged or red blood in urine, black tarry stools, dark or bright red blood in stools, sudden severe headaches, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle joint pain, lethargy, bruising, blurred vision, shortness of breath, loss of appetite, sudden changes in mental status, significant or sudden changes in vital signs. Focus: The resident has a skin tear to left elbow and left leg. Initiated on [DATE]. Goal: The resident's skin tear will show signs of healing by review date. Interventions: Monitor/document location, size, and treatment of skin tear. Report abnormalities. On [DATE] at 7:29 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff O, RN (Registered Nurse, Unit Manager). She stated Resident #404 was admitted from the hospital but unable to recall the specifics of his admission. She stated Resident #404 had a lot of different wounds. She said his FM visited almost every day. She stated she knew the resident was sent out for a bleed. She stated she was told there were allegations of neglect because of an on-line review. She stated she did not participate in the investigation and stated abuse investigations are generally completed by the DON/NHA. She stated the nurses are expected to document changes in condition and notify the physician in the medical record. She stated if a resident's family asked for them to be sent to the hospital the nurses are supposed to do so and let the doctor know what is happening. On [DATE] at 9:22 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff P, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). He stated he knew Resident #404 had falls, skin tears and could be grumpy, but did not recall Resident #404's plan of care. He stated Resident #404 had dressings all over, had a lot of skin tears, and a wound vac to his sacrum. The nurse stated in report he was told while the FM visited with the resident in the courtyard, the resident was picking at his dressings, and (Staff A) told him she had just changed his dressings. He stated he did not recall (Staff A) saying that was the second time she had to change the dressings. He stated, After report around 7:45 p.m., I saw the dressing on his left arm was not really on but the mepilex dressing had some bleeding on it. I'm not sure who transferred the resident back to bed but there was some blood smeared on the wall by his bed. I changed the dressings to his arms and legs all at once and cleaned the blood off the wall. When giving him his night meds [9:00 p.m.], I saw the dressings on his upper arms were saturated and the current dressing was not appropriate for the amount of bleeding. The dressing was red in color. The dressing to his legs were not saturated. I changed the dressings on his legs. I applied ABD, Kerlix and pressure dressings to his arms. I changed all the dressings [legs and arms] to have a timeline of how much he was bleeding. I used gauze pads on his legs, because they were absorbent and easy to see changes. I notified the MD about 9:30 p.m. and he said to leave the dressings in place and draw a CBC [[DATE]] and leave those dressings in place until the morning and then to remove them for assessment. I rounded on him to make sure there was no visible bleeding throughout the shift. The nurse stated he did not remove the ace wrap during the night to keep pressure on the arms. He stated about 6:00 a.m. he removed the ace wrap and saw the wound had bled through to the ace and Resident #404 told him he had vomited on the prior shift. Staff P, LPN stated the previous nurse had not reported the resident had vomited. On [DATE] at 11:23 a.m. an interview was conducted with Staff Q, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). The CNA stated she remembered Resident #404 and she provided care for him often. She stated a FM came to see the resident almost every day. She stated she remembered the resident vomiting a lot and bleeding from the dressings. She stated the resident always asked for pain medications. She stated she would clean up the resident and empty his urinal because he would vomit in it. She stated she always reported vomiting to the nurse, but she did not document that in the medical record because there is no place for them to do that, she stated she left that for the nurse to do. She stated she did recall him having bleeding and vomiting before he went to the hospital, and she told the nurse, but she does not recall if the nurse went in to check on the resident. She described the bleeding and vomiting as dark brown. She stated the only reasons Resident #404 would call was to be changed, have his dressings changed, vomiting, or taking pain pills. On [DATE] at 11:02 a.m. an interview was conducted with the Primary Care Physician (PCP) for Resident #404. The PCP stated he did not recall specifically being notified about Resident #404 on [DATE]. He stated if he was notified for the first time that a resident was having a bleeding episode he would have told them to monitor and apply a pressure dressing. He stated he did not recall being contacted during the day shift about any bleeding the resident was having. He stated if he was told of previous episodes of bleeding and multiple changes of dressings he would have told them to send the resident out to be evaluated. He stated it was not ideal that the nurses did not notify him of multiple dressing changes, and he would have expected them to report any vomiting of blood as well. The PCP stated if he had been aware of the bleeding wounds and vomiting blood, he would have sent him out. He stated what he was told was not the same as what occurred. He stated his partner admitted Resident #404 to the hospital and the resident died of sepsis with complications. He stated the resident had fungus in the blood cultures. He stated he reviewed the chart in the hospital and Resident #404 had DIC, his platelets dropped, and the resident passed away. He stated he usually investigates the reason if a resident passes away because he wants to know what happened. A telephone interview was conducted on [DATE] at 2:40 p.m. with the previous Nursing Home Administrator. She stated she was the Administrator at the facility at the time of the incident and completed the investigation for Resident #404. She stated the investigation was started due to a social media post related to Resident #404. She stated she completed investigation through chart review and staff interviews. She stated based on the chart review and staff interviews; the complaint was not substantiated. She stated she was completing two other investigations at the same time as Resident #404 and was unable to provide the location of the complete/full investigation. She reported the current staff have spoken with her and they are unable to locate all my notes. A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation, revised on [DATE], revealed the following: Policy: It is inherent in the nature and dignity of each resident that he/she be afforded basic human rights, including the right to be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation and/or misappropriation of property. The management of the facility recognizes these rights and hereby establishes the following statements, policies, and procedures to protect these rights and to establish a disciplinary policy, which results in the fair and timely treatment of occurrences of resident abuse. Employees of the center are charged with a continuing obligation to treat residents, so they are free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment and/or misappropriation of property. No employee may at any time commit an act of physical, psychological, or emotional abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property against any resident. Violation of this standard will subject employees to disciplinary action, including dismissal, provided herein. [ .] Neglect is the failure of the center, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Examples include but are not limited to: -Failure to provide adequate nutrition and fluids. -Failure to take precautionary measures to protect the health and safety of the resident. -Intentional lack of attention to physical needs including, but not limited to, toileting and bathing. Failure to provide services that result in harm to the resident, such as not turning a bedfast resident or leaving a resident in a soiled bed. -Failure or refusal to provide a service for the purpose of punishing or disciplining a resident, unless withholding of a service is being used as part of a documented integrated behavioral management program. -Failure to notify a resident's legal representative in the event of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or emotional condition that a prudent person would recognize. -Failure to notify a resident's legal representative in the event of an incident involving the resident, such as failure to report a fall or conflict between residents that result in injury or possible injury. -Failure to report observed or suspected abuse, neglect or misappropriation of resident property to the proper authorities. -Failure to adequately supervise a resident known to wander from the facility without the staff knowledge. Note: Such things as failure to comb a resident's hair on occasion would not necessarily constitute a reportable incidence of neglect. However, continued omission in providing daily care and/or failure to address and resolve the omission could constitute neglect. [ .] Procedure: [ .] Non-action, which results in emotional, psychological, or physical injury, is viewed in the same manner as that caused by improper or excessive action. All actions in which employees engage with residents must have the legitimate goal, the healthful, proper, and humane care and treatment of the resident. [ .] 5. Investigation The Abuse Coordinator or his/her designee shall investigate all reports or allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation and exploitation. A Social Service representative may be offered in the role of resident advocate during any questioning of or interviewing of residents. Investigations will be accomplished in the following manner: [ .] Investigation: -The Abuse Coordinator and/or Director of Nursing shall take statements from the victim, the suspect(s) and all possible witnesses including all other employees in the vicinity of the alleged abuse. He/she shall also secure all physical evidence. Upon completion of the investigation, a detailed report shall be prepared.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comprehensive care plan related to the us...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comprehensive care plan related to the use of a sling for one resident (#18) out of 26 residents sampled. Findings included: On 07/08/24 at 01:07 PM, Resident #18 was observed in the common area of the secured unit during dining with a sling on the left arm that was bunched up by her elbow, not supporting any of her arm . The left hand appeared swollen, and the resident was resting the left arm down on the left thigh. An attempt to interview the resident revealed the resident was not interviewable. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), metabolic encephalopathy, and muscle weakness. A review of the care plan for Resident #18 revealed the following: Focus: The resident is at risk for changes in mood and behavior symptoms related to history of dementia and depression, history of panic attacks, aggression, exit seeking/wandering, elopement risk, removes sling. Date initiated: 05/30/2023; Revision on 05/10/2024 Goal: The resident will maintain involvement in activities of daily living (ADL's) and daily routine through next review date. Date initiated: 05/30/2023; Revision on: 05/28/2024; Target date: 08/27/2024 Interventions: Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects an effectiveness. Date initiated: 05/30/2023 Assist the resident, resident representative to identify strengths, positive coping skills and reinforce these. Date initiated: 05/30/2023 Educate the resident/resident representative regarding expectations of treatment, concerns with side effects and potential adverse effects, evaluation, maintenance. Date initiated: 05/30/2023 Review of Resident #18 orders revealed; Apply sling to left arm as tolerated. Start date:02/06/2024 On 07/08/24 at 03:05 PM an interview was conducted with Staff J, Certified Nursing Assistant. Staff J stated the resident has the sling on to keep her arm from swelling up. Staff J stated she does not know why her arm is swollen. An observation on 07/09/24 at 04:34 PM revealed Resident #18 in the common area of the east wing memory unit ambulating with left arm sling bunched up around her elbow not supporting her arm. Her left arm was hanging down , near her waist. An observation on 07/10/24 at 09:30 AM revealed Resident #18 in common area of east wing memory unit, sitting with left arm sling bunched up to her elbow. Her left hand is swollen resting on her left thigh. An observation on 07/10/24 at 01:35 PM revealed Resident #18 with the left arm sling bunched up to her elbow, her left hand is swollen and resting on her left thigh. An observation on 07/10/24 at 03:43 PM revealed Resident #18 sitting in a chair on the east wing memory unit. Her sling was bunched up to her elbow. Her left hand was swollen and resting on her left thigh. An observation on 07/11/24 at 10:19 AM revealed Resident #18 with her left arm sling bunched up to her elbow. Her left hand was swollen and resting on her left thigh. An interview was conducted on 07/11/24 at 11:35 AM with Staff M,RN. Staff M stated usually the certified nursing assistant (CNA) puts Resident #18 left arm sling on, then the nurse checks it for proper placement. Staff M stated Resident #18 will move her arm down. Staff M stated they remind Resident #18 to position it properly. Staff M went on to state they usually have a compression sleeve on. Staff M stated therapy works with her currently. Staff M stated she does not think Resident #18 has treatment from therapy for edema. Staff M stated she will do range of motion (ROM) with Resident #18 occasionally. Staff M stated she does not think there is an order for compression sleeve. Staff M stated the staff apply it every day. Staff M stated compression sleeves are house stocked in the supply room. Staff M stated therapy does the initial assessment and provided the sling. Staff M stated she usually looks at the care plans. Staff M stated she does not go to care plan meetings because of her schedule. Staff M stated she would talk Director Of Nursing (DON)/ supervisor to initiate change if what they are doing is not effective. Staff M stated Resident #18 is on a diuretic for the edema. An interview was conducted on 07/11/24 at 12:09 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was unable to say why they would continue using the sling if it was not effective. The DON stated compression sleeves are generally ordered. The DON went on to state nursing can put in orders for compression sleeves. The DON stated the facility has not referred Resident #18 to a lymph specialist as far as she is aware. The DON stated they have discussed Resident #18 compliance, but the facility has not discussed any treatment changes, An interview on 07/11/24 at 03:33 PM Staff N,MDS Coordinator is aware of Resident #18 use of sling. Staff N stated Resident #18 left arm sling is in care plan under ADL, was not aware of compression sleeve use. Staff N stated she was aware of the left arm swelling. Staff N stated the facility has not discussed Resident #18's lymph edema. Staff N stated she reviews orders for care plans to initiate interventions and new areas of concern.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain and implement an effective infection preve...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain and implement an effective infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by a lack of enhanced barrier precaution signage on doors of two residents (#81, #297) out of 20 residents on enhanced barrier precautions. Findings included: 1. On 07/08/24 at 1:00pm observed Resident #297 IV (intravenous) port and dressing to right upper arm. Observed no enhanced barrier precaution sign on door and no storage bin outside of Resident #297 door with personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies. On 07/11/24 at 8:52 a.m. observed Resident #297 door with no enhanced barrier precaution signage or storage bin with PPE supplies located outside of door. Photo evidence obtained. Review of electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #297 showed an admission date of 07/05/24 with included diagnoses of encephalopathy, acute and subacute infective endocarditis, presence of artificial heart valve, arteriovenous malformation site unspecified, atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft(s) without angina pectoris. Review of code status showed resident listed as a full code. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #297, dated 07/06/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. A review of the 3008 form, dated 07/05/24, revealed: - Comments section Daptomycin 300 mg IV daily. Duration 6-8 weeks. - Treatment devices, right PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) inserted 06/21/24. Review of the physician orders revealed: - Return IV pump to pharmacy following IV therapy -Change dressing on admission or 24 hours after insertion and weekly thereafter and PRN -IVs: Type of access: midline. - IVs: Flush PICC or Midline with 10 mls of normal saline every shift and as needed. - Infectious disease appt 07/12/24 at 2:00 p.m. A review of the care plan for Resident #297, dated 07/06/24, revealed the following: -A focus of The resident requires enhanced barrier precautions related to use of indwelling medical device IV PICC and is at risk for a CDC MDRO infection. Date initiated 07/08/2024. With intervention, Signage at designated area to alert staff and visitor of enhanced barrier precautions. Date initiated: 07/08/24. - A focus of The resident is on IV Medications r/t [related to] Endocarditis. Date Initiated: 07/06/24. With a goal of The resident will have not have [will not have] any complications related to IV Therapy through the review date. Date Initiated: 07/06/2024, Target Date: 10/04/2024. A review of the medical record for Resident #297 on 07/08/24 showed no physician order for enhanced barrier precaution. Review of the facility matrix revealed 20 residents are marked for enhanced barrier precautions. Resident #297 was not listed on facility matrix for enhanced barrier precautions. 2. On 07/09/24 at 8:48 a.m., observed Resident #81's door with no enhanced barrier precaution signage on door. On 7/11/24 at 8:55 a.m. observed no enhance barrier precaution signage on Resident #81 door. Review of the medical record for Resident #81 showed an admission to facility on 03/02/24 with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region, quadriplegia, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, major depressive disorder, malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of unspecified breast, colostomy status, presence of urogenital implants. Review of code status showed resident listed as do not resuscitate (DNR). A review of the Physician orders revealed: -03/02/24 PEG Tube, catheter and colostomy. -07/09/24 Enhance Barrier Precautions related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) Tube, Foley catheter and colostomy. A review of the care plan, dated 06/03/24, revealed: - A focus of enhanced barrier precautions related to use of indwelling medical device Foley Catheter, Peg tube, Colostomy and is at risk for a CDC MDRO infection. Date initiated 07/09/24. Interventions included Signage at designated area to alert staff and visitor of enhanced barrier precautions. Date initiated 07/09/24. - A focus of the resident requires enhanced barrier precautions related to chronic wounds requiring dressing/covering and is at risk for a CDC MDRO infection dated 07/09/24. With interventions that include education of need for enhanced barrier precaution provided to resident/family/caregivers. and signage at designated area to alert staff and visitor of enhanced barrier precautions. date initiated 07/09/24. An interview was conducted on 07/11/24 at 1:47 p.m. with Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). She stated for any resident on infection precautions she is made aware by the signage on the door. She follows what the sign says, If it says gown and mask, I put on gown and mask before going in the room and take off and put in wastebasket before coming out to the hall. An interview was conducted on 07/11/24 at 1:51 p.m. with Staff D, Housekeeper. She stated, she knows when to wear PPE in a residents room by I follow signs on door and pointed to enhanced barrier precaution sign on a resident's door. An interview was conducted on 07/11/24 at 1:55 p.m. with Staff B, Physical Therapy Assistant. She stated she goes by the sign on resident's door and what is in a residents therapy evaluation to determine if a patient is on precautions before entering the room, to know what type of PPE is necessary. An interview was conducted on 07/11/24 at 2:10 p.m. with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse. She stated the residents should have a precaution sign on their door and plastic bin with proper PPE supplies. She stated they can look in medical record under resident medication administration record (MAR) and they should have a physician order for precautions. She stated enhanced precautions are for residents with Wound, intravenous therapy (IV), Foley etc. She stated PPE for enhanced precautions are gown, gloves and mask to be worn when entering room for staff providing direct care to resident. Hand washing for visitors or staff if no direct care is provided. She stated Staff C, Assistant Director of Nursing is the infection preventionist and is in charge of putting up and taking down all infection precaution signs. She stated if she is not available the nurse in charge of the resident would be responsible. An interview was conducted on 07/11/24 at 3:00 p.m. with Staff C, Infection Preventionist. She stated the three types of precautions followed are droplet, contact and enhanced barrier at the facility. She stated enhanced precautions require gloves, gowns and masks for staff who are providing direct patient care. Any resident with an indwelling medical device such as Foley's, IV's, PEG tubes, nephropathies, wound vac would be placed on enhanced precautions. She stated she would put signage on the door and get a bin of PPE when a confirmed resident is on any type of precaution. She stated currently they have bins ordered so they are being shared on the hallway till new ones arrive. She stated the resident would need to have an order in the EMR for a type of isolation or precaution. She stated if she is off work or resident admits over the weekend, the Director of Nursing (DON) or unit manager would be expected to hang signage and place PPE bin outside the door and ensure physician order is placed in the chart and relay information to hall nurse. She reviewed Resident #297's medical record and stated She has an order for enhanced precautions. It should have started when she was admitted on [DATE]. She stated, She has an IV so she automatically should be on enhanced precautions. She stated she would expect the DON or Unit Manager to complete PPE signage and bin for new resident as she is off when resident admitted . She stated, that's my mistake, the enhanced precautions sign should have been on the door (referring to Resident #297). She stated is should have been placed on day of admission because the resident was admitted with the IV. When questioned why Resident #81 did not have enhanced precaution signage on the door. She stated she should have been placed on enhanced precaution on 5/4/24 because of her Foley, peg tube and colostomy. She stated it was her mistake, I missed it. She stated the order in the chart for enhanced should have started on 05/04/24, the current order started on 07/09/24. She stated, We didn't catch it. Review of facility policy for enhanced barrier precautions, dated August 2022, revealed the policy interpretation and implementation included: -#5 Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are indicated for resident with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices regardless of multidrug resistance organism (MDRO) colonization. -#10 Signs are posted in the door or wall outside the resident room indicating the type of precautions and PPE required.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Cross Reference F600, F684, F726, and F880 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) failed to implement an effective p...

Read full inspector narrative →
Cross Reference F600, F684, F726, and F880 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) failed to implement an effective plan of action to correct deficient practice identified during the recertification survey and complaint survey originally conducted 7/8/24 through 7/12/24 as evidenced by: 1) failure to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect related to not implement implementing systems for providing physician ordered medications to two newly admitted residents (#3 and #6) out of five newly admitted residents sampled (F600), 2) failure to ensure one resident (#5) out of thirteen residents with non-pressure related wounds received treatment per physician orders (F684), 3) failure to have sufficient and competent nurse staffing to complete the admission process for new residents in a timely manner and effectively complete a medication reconciliation for two newly admitted residents (#3 and #6) out of five newly admitted residents (F726), and 4) failed to implement an effective Infection Control program as evidenced by three staff members (B, C, and D), not using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for two residents (#3 and #6) out of three residents reviewed on contact precautions (F880). Findings included: During an interview on 08/29/2024 at 5:11 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated the Quality Assurance (QA) Committee includes herself, the Medical Director, the Director of Nursing (DON), Environmental Services, Pharmacy Regional, Dietician, Social Services Director, Activities Director, Human Resources (HR), Business Office Manager, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and a nurse. The NHA said she was the Committee Chairperson. The NHA reported the QA Committee meets on the last Thursday of every month. She stated the facility held a QAPI meeting in July and the August meeting was originally scheduled for 08/29/2024 and had been postponed for a week. During the QAPI meetings they discuss information for the prior month and find areas that need improvement and set up a plan of action. An action plan was developed based on the situation. Depending on what it was that needed to be monitored, they would start with monitoring daily and then tier it back to weekly, monthly and then quarterly. The NHA reported the only thing they were currently watching was PASARR's (Pre admission Screening and Resident Reviews). The NHA was not sure if there were any other Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) in place and would have to get back with that information. The administrator reported that each year the annual training plan for employees was reviewed in the month of January, and the annual review of procedures was also done every January. The NHA did not return to the team to present any other QAPI information or PIPs in place prior to the survey exit on 8/29/24 beginning at approximately 6:45 p.m. Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) with a revision date of 10/24/22 showed the facility .has a comprehensive, data-driven QAPI Program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. The QAPI program was an on-going comprehensive review of care and services to residents to include: medical care, clinical care, pharmacy services, admissions, and medical records. Important function areas included: admission process, resident assessment, quality of care, potential adverse events, infection control, and allegations of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property. The QAPI activities included: infection control, medication use, wound care/prevention, staff orientation, in-service and competency, and medication errors. The facility's Executive Director/Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was accountable for the overall implementation and functioning of the QAPI program to include implementation which identify priorities, ensures adequate resources, ensures corrective actions are implemented to address identified problems in systems, evaluates the effectiveness of actions, establishes expectations for safety and quality. The Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA) meetings are at least quarterly, but may be held more frequently as appropriate. QAA Committee members include but are not limited to the Executive Director/(NHA), Medical Director/designee, Director of Nursing /designee, Infection Preventionist and at least three other staff members that understand the facility and the care and services delivered by each unit or department. The facility will obtain feedback to assist in identifying problems and areas of opportunity. Feedback may be obtained by direct care staff, other staff members, residents, and resident representatives. The feedback may The facility will identify data sources and timeframe for collection. Data sources may include direct observation tools, audit tools, grievance logs, incident/accident logs, The facility will ensure systems and actions are in place to improve performance by establishing and utilizing a systematic approach to identify underlying causes of problems, including root cause analysis and failure mode effect analysis. The facility will develop corrective actions based on the information gathered and review effectiveness of the actions to include medical errors and adverse events. The facility will obtain and review information on any medical error and adverse event. Information may be obtained from incident/accident logs, skin and wound logs, infection control logs, 24 hour report logs, and allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property. The facility will develop and monitor action plans. The facility will monitor department performance systems to identify issues or adverse events. If a quality deficiency is identified, the committee will oversee the development of corrective action(s). The facility may choose the method of corrective action i.e. Plan, Do, Study, Act'' or Performance Improvement Project'' The facility utilizes performance improvement projects to improve a systemic problem or improve quality in absence of a problem. Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) are based on the facility services and resources identified in the Facility Assessment. At a minimum, the facility must conduct one performance improvement project annually which focuses on high-risk or problem prone areas identified. The team will collect and analyze data, determine root cause, determine steps for resolution, implement corrective action(s), evaluate effectiveness of the action(s), and report progress to the QAPI committee Review of the facility's plan of correction for the survey ending 7/12/24 with a completion date of 8/11/24 revealed the following measures would be taken to correct the deficient practice which was identified at F600: (3) What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes you will make to ensure that the practice does not recur. Director of Clinical Services/Designee re-educated the licensed nurses on the components of this regulation with an emphasis on. Staff education on abuse and neglect was conducted on 7/12/24 and ongoing. License Nursing Staff educated on Change in Condition policy, documentation in change of condition, notifying the physician in a timely manner, anticoagulant therapy policy, monitor signs and symptoms of bleeding, honoring resident and family wishes if they want their family member sent to the hospital. Director of Nursing/Designee initiated competency with all licensed Nursing staff on change in condition on 7/12/24. License Nursing staff and certified nursing assistant educated by Director of Nursing/designee on use of restraints and honoring resident s preferences on 8/2/24. Director of Clinical Services/Designee re-educated the licensed nurses and certified nursing assistants on the components of this regulation with an emphasis on. Residents to be evaluated by physical therapy for the use of geri chair placement During clinical morning meeting Director of Clinical Services/Designee will review the 24 hour report, labs, weekly skin checks, order listing to ensure changes in condition were addressed and documented and physician were notified timely. Evaluations will be completed by physical therapy for the use geri chair placement Newly hired licensed nurses and certified nurse assistant will receive education in orientation. (4) How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place. The facility Director of Clinical Services /designee will conduct a weekly audit of 5 residents to ensure residents with anticoagulants have orders to check for bleeding on all Treatment Administration Recordss [sic] weekly x4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks x 2 months. The facility Director of Clinical Service/designee will conduct a weekly audit of 5 resident to ensure weekly skin sweep are completed and no dressing changes with bleeding weekly x4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks x 2 months. The facility Director of Clinical Services /designee will conduct a weekly audit of 5 residents to ensure residents are properly evaluated for Geri chair placement weekly x 4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks x 2 months. The Executive Director/designee will conduct a weekly audit of 5 residents with a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 9 and above to ensure that they are free from abuse and neglect weekly x 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks x 2 months. The facility Director of Clinical Services/designee will perform a skin check weekly of 5 residents with a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 9 and below to ensure that they are free from abuse and neglect weekly x 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks x 2 months. Director of Clinical Services/Designee will conduct a quality review of 5 residents on each unit weekly x 4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks x 2 months to ensure residents with change in condition has been identified, documented and physician were notified timely. The findings of these quality reviews will be reported to the Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement Committee monthly until committee determines substantial compliance has been met and recommends moving to quarterly monitoring by the Regional Nurse Consultant when completing their systems review. On 8/26/24 through 8/29/24 a revisit survey was conducted to ensure compliance with F600. The revisit survey identified on-going concerns and noncompliance with F600. Review of the facility's plan of correction for the survey ending 7/12/24 with a completion date of 8/11/24 revealed the following measures would be taken to correct the deficient practice which was identified at F684: (3) What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes you will make to ensure that the practice does not recur. License Nursing Staff educated on Change in Condition policy, documentation in change of condition, notifying the physician in a timely manner, anticoagulant therapy policy, monitor signs and symptoms of bleeding, honoring resident and family wishes if they want their family member sent to the hospital. Licensed staff education was initiated on 7/12/24 the components of the regulations related to Quality of Care and Resident Rights and with an emphasis on: Identifying and reporting any change in condition. Listening to the Resident and honoring their wishes as long as it does not impact them negatively. Monitoring and documenting to ensure that the resident is stable. Non-licensed staff education was initiated on 7/12/24 by Director of Nursing/Designee ensuring they understand the purpose and importance of using the Stop and Watch tool. Director of Nursing/Designee initiated competency with all licensed Nursing staff on change in condition on 7/12/24. During clinical morning meeting Director of Clinical Services/Designee will review the 24 hour report, labs, weekly skin checks, order listing to ensure changes in condition were addressed and documented and physician were notified timely. Newly hired licensed nurses and certified nurse assistant will receive education in orientation. (4) How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place. The facility Director of Clinical Services /designee will conduct a weekly audit of 5 residents to ensure residents with changes in condition are completed with MD and family notification weekly x4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks x 2 months. The facility Director of Clinical Service/designee will conduct a weekly audit of 5 resident discharges to ensure changes in condition were captured promptly and documentation is in place weekly x4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks x 2 months. The facility Director of Clinical Service/designee will conduct a weekly audit of 5 resident to ensure physician orders pertaining to vital signs are being followed weekly x4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks x 2 months. The findings of these quality reviews will be reported to the Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement Committee monthly until committee determines substantial compliance has been met and recommends moving to quarterly monitoring by the Divisional Director of Clinical Services when completing their systems review. On 8/26/24 through 8/29/24 a revisit survey was conducted to ensure compliance with F684. The revisit survey identified on-going concerns and noncompliance with F684. Review of the facility's plan of correction for the survey ending 7/12/24 with a completion date of 8/11/24 revealed the following measures would be taken to correct the deficient practice which was identified at F726: (3) What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes you will make to ensure that the practice does not recur. Director of Clinical Services/Designee re-educated the licensed nurses on the components of this regulation with an emphasis on. Documentation on Change in Condition, ensuring anticoagulants have an order showing on the treatment sheet, honoring residents family wishes if they want their family member send out. Director of Clinical Services/Designee re-educated the licensed nurses and certified nursing assistant on the components of this regulation with an emphasis on. Identifying and documenting change in condition. Following physician orders for vital signs. During clinical morning meeting Director of Clinical Services/Designee will review changes in condition documentation. Identify any residents with current issues that may need a change in condition. Orders are reviewed for vitals signs and ensuring they are accurate on Medication Administration Records. Newly hired licensed nurses and certified nursing assistant will receive education in orientation. (4) How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place. The facility Director of Clinical Services /designee will conduct a weekly audit of 5 residents to ensure residents with changes in condition are completed with MD notification and family notification weekly x 4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks for 2 months. The facility Director of Clinical Services /designee will conduct a weekly audit of 5 residents discharges to hospital to ensure changes in condition were captured promptly and documentation is in place weekly x4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks x 2 months. The facility Director of Clinical Service/designee will conduct a weekly audit of 5 resident to ensure physician orders pertaining to vital signs are being followed weekly x4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks x 2 months. The findings of these quality reviews will be reported to the Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement Committee monthly until committee determines substantial compliance has been met and recommends moving to quarterly monitoring by the Divisional Director of Clinical Services when completing their systems review. On 8/26/24 through 8/29/24 a revisit survey was conducted to ensure compliance with F726. The revisit survey identified on-going concerns and noncompliance with F726. Review of the facility's plan of correction for the survey ending 7/12/24 with a completion date of 8/11/24 revealed the following measures would be taken to correct the deficient practice which was identified at F880: (3) What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes you will make to ensure that the practice does not recur. Director of Clinical Services/Designee re-educated the staff on the components of this regulation with an emphasis on. Licensed Nursing Staff educated on enhance barrier signage on admission. During clinical morning meeting Director of Clinical Services/ADON will review all enhance barrier precaution orders and review all new admissions to ensure those who need enhance barrier precautions have the proper signage and discontinue those who no longer need them. Newly hired licensed nurses will receive education in orientation. (4) How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place. The facility Director of Clinical Services /designee will conduct a weekly audit of 5 residents to ensure residents with enhance barrier precautions have proper signage weekly x4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks x 2 months. The findings of these quality reviews will be reported to the Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement Committee monthly until committee determines substantial compliance has been met and recommends moving to quarterly monitoring by the Divisional Director of Clinical Services when completing their systems review. On 8/26/24 through 8/29/24 a revisit survey was conducted to ensure compliance with F880. The revisit survey identified on-going concerns and noncompliance with F880.
Mar 2022 8 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #250) of four resident's advanced directives were verified and accurate within a timely manner. Finding...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #250) of four resident's advanced directives were verified and accurate within a timely manner. Findings included: Resident #250's admission record revealed an admission date of 3/18/22 with medical diagnoses of major depressive disorder and heart disease. Resident #250's medical certification for Medicaid long-term care services and patient transfer form (3008), dated 3/17/2022, revealed the resident required a healthcare surrogate for decision making and had an advanced care planning selection of DO NOT Resuscitate (DNR). An interview on 03/21/22 at 11:56 a.m., with Resident #250's Healthcare Representative/Friend, revealed the representative had documentation within her bag that indicated she was the resident's healthcare surrogate. The Representative stated that should Resident #250 be found non-responsive and without breathing, they had made the code status selection of DNR. A record review of Resident #250's order summary report revealed an active physician order for a code status of full code, which indicated that should the resident be found non-responsive and without breathing, live saving measures would be provided. A record review of Resident #250's progress notes, from 03/18/22 (date of admission) to 3/20/22, revealed no notations related to advanced directives discussions with either the resident or the resident's representative. Interviews on 03/21/22 with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) at 12:00 p.m and Staff B, LPN at 12:15 p.m., revealed the procedure was for the admitting nurse to confirm the resident's advanced directives for code status selection. Also, the online medical physician orders should match the hard medical chart related to advanced directive selection. An interview with Staff C, LPN/Unit Manager on 03/21/22 at 1:14 p.m., revealed the admitting nurse should review a resident's admission paperwork to determine the advanced directives. This was done in-conjunction with speaking with both the resident and/or resident's representative. An interview on 03/21/22 at 1:18 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), Regional Director of Clinical Services, and Interim-DON, revealed the admitting nurse should ask the resident what their code status selection was, and if they were not their own person, the resident's representative. The code status verification process should be done as quickly as possible. If there was conflicting information with the resident's medical record, staff would be expected to contact their higher ups to determine the next steps. This process could be done by the weekend nurses as well. A policy review of Advanced Directives, revised on 11/14/2018, revealed the policy is The center will abide by state and federal laws regarding advanced directives. The center will honor all properly executed advanced directives that have been provided by the resident and/or resident representative . Upon admission, Social Services Director or Business Development Coordinator/designee will: a) Communicate to resident and/or resident representative his or her right to make choices concerning health care and treatments, including life sustaining treatments. B) Determine Whether the resident has an advance directive and, if not, determined whether the resident wishes to establish an advance directive. C) document in the resident's record via the Advance Discussion Form that the resident and/or resident representative has been apprised of his or her right to formulate an advance directive . Advanced Directives will be reviewed . Identify and clarify the content and intent of the existing care instructions, and whether the resident wishes to change or continue these instructions.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #7) of eighteen residents res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #7) of eighteen residents residing on the secured memory care unit received hair care as necessary to prevent matting. Findings included. Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, and schizophreniform disorder. Resident #7 was observed on 3/21/22 at 11:32 a.m., with hair that extended to mid-back and combed straight down in the front, the top, and a thin layer of tendrils in the back, underneath appeared to be matted at the nape. On 3/22/22 at 10:53 a.m., the residents hair continued to be matted at the nape of the neck. Staff L, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, at 11:11 a.m. on 3/22/22, the resident did not allow staff to brush the back of hair. On 3/22/22 at 11:30 a.m., Staff L reported the attempt to brush the resident's hair (attempted between interviews on 11:11 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. on 3/22/22) did not go well. The LPN stated Resident #7 would not allow it and then would make it worse by rubbing the back of the head. She reported staff had untangled the resident's hair on Sunday (3/20/22). On 3/23/22 at 12:16 p.m., the resident was observed sitting near the living room with her hair matted against the nape of the her neck. Staff L stated, on 3/23/22 at 1:01 p.m., another aide was going to bring in detangler for Resident #7 tomorrow (3/24/22). During an interview with the Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) and Director of Nursing (DON), on 3/23/22 at 2:40 p.m., the RDCS stated Resident #7 could be difficult. If staff were unable to take care of the matting of the resident's hair, the Power of Attorney should be notified and asked for assistance and how they wanted the hair to be kept. A review of the admission Record for Resident #7 identified that the resident had short hair when the photo was taken. An observation was made, on 3/24/22 at 11:46 a.m. of Resident #7 ambulating in the secured memory care unit. Her hair was in a ponytail and unmatted. Staff L stated staff had applied a detangler to the resident,s hair, reapplied it and left it like 2 hours, bathed the resident, and was able to comb the hair out. On 3/25/22 at 10:13 a.m., Resident #7 was observed ambulating in the hallway of the unit. The resident was wearing a ponytail that was knotted up in the back around the hair tie. The Visual/Bedside [NAME] Report for Resident #7 identified the resident was to shower on Tuesday and Friday on the 3:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m. shift, required set up assistance with bathing, and staff were to provide assistance as needed. The [NAME] indicated that the resident required assistance with personal hygiene. The Policies and Procedures - Bathing/Showering, effective 11/30/2014 and revised 9/1/2017, indicated that assistance with showering and bathing would be provided at least twice a week and as needed (prn) to cleanse and refresh the resident. The policy did not identify how staff should assist residents with personal hygiene such as the maintenance of hair. The care plan for Resident #7 identified that the resident had a behavior problem of delusional thoughts and included the refusal of personal care. A review of Resident #7's February and March 2022 Medication Administration Records(MAR) identified that staff were to monitor for behaviors every shift related to the administration of psychoactive medications. The legend included on the MAR for the behaviors exhibited indicated that staff were to document 10 - resists care, neither MAR (February or March) indicated that Resident #7 had resisted care during any shift.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a change in condition was documented and mo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a change in condition was documented and monitored for one (Resident #97) of one resident sampled. Findings included: Resident #97 was admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record for the resident included diagnoses not limited to subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing fracture of other parts of pelvis, unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and unspecified atrial fibrillation. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicative of an intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #97 received oxygen therapy prior to admission and received two days of Occupational and Physical Therapy, which started on 1/3/22. A review of Resident #97's progress notes identified on 1/3/22 at 2:27 p.m., the nurse noticed the resident looked a lil [sic] lethargic. The note indicated the residents' vital signs were not stable and an unsuccessful attempt was made to contact the physician. The review of assessments completed for Resident #97 did not indicate any further documentation of the resident's condition until a Skilled Note dated 1/5/22, indicated the resident was oriented to person, had swallowing problems, was depressed, lung sounds were clear with no cough, and oxygen was not in use. The COVID-19 Symptom Monitor assessment, dated 1/8/22, indicated the resident had a cough, shortness of breath, and fatigue. The COVID-19 PCR test for Resident #97, reported on 1/9/22, indicated the resident had positive results. The assessments of Resident #97 did not include any COVID-19 Symptom Monitor assessments from 1/8/22 until 1/12/22. The progress notes included documentation of a skilled note on 1/8/22, eMedication Administration Record (eMAR) notes on 1/10/22 which indicated the resident's blood pressure was low, the resident refused a recheck, and a skilled note on 1/12/22. Neither of the eMAR notes indicated the physician was notified of the resident's blood pressure or the Metoprolol had been withheld. The clinical record did not indicate an assessment was completed for the resident's change in condition on 1/10/22 or that the physician and representatives were notified. The review of the progress notes for Resident #97 indicated staff had documented three daily skilled notes on 1/5/22 at 6:37 a.m., 1/8/22 at 11:36 a.m., and 1/12/22 at 8:49 p.m. during the resident's stay at the facility. The January 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) included an order for, Daily Skilled Note UDA (user defined assessment). Due every shift. Please complete the Daily Skilled Note UDA. The MAR indicated staff had administered a Daily Skilled Note every shift except for the day shift on 1/1/22 and the evening shift on 1/13/22. On 3/23/22 at 2:27 p.m., the Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) stated she would expect the resident to be seen on the next visit by physician and the nurse would have followed up with the family. The RDCS reported staff should have done COVID symptom monitoring and would have expected documentation regarding the residents change in condition and to follow up with it. The policies and procedures - Notification of Change in Condition, effective 11/30/2014 and revised on 12/16/2020, indicated that The Center to promptly notify the Patient/Resident, the attending physician, and the Resident Representative when there is a change in the status or condition. The procedure identified that the nurse was to notify the attending physician and resident representative when there was Significant change in the patient/resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. The procedure instructed staff to complete an evaluation of the patient/resident, to document the evaluation in the medical record, notify the patient/resident and the resident representative of the change in condition and document in the medical record, and to complete a Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) as indicated.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure one (Resident #34) of three residents sampled ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure one (Resident #34) of three residents sampled for nutrition was weighed at least monthly and documented in their health record. Findings included: A review of Resident #34's admission record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #34 had diagnoses of dysphagia, diabetes mellitus (DM), anemia, and Alzheimer's disease upon admission. A review of Resident #34's care plan completed on 01/05/2022 showed a nutritional problem focus related to diagnoses of dysphagia, DM, anemia and Alzheimer's disease. Interventions included monitor, document, and report any signs or symptoms of malnutrition to include significant weight loss. A review of Resident #34's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed no weights documented for February or March of 2022. On 03/23/22 at 12:30 p.m., Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated Resident #34 should be weighed at least once a month and confirmed there were no weights documented in the EMR since January 2022. On 03/23/22 at 1:00 p.m., Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA, stated they (CNAs) were responsible for all resident's weights. She confirmed Resident #34 was not weighed in February of 2022, was weighed in March, but the weight had not been entered into the EMR. A review of the facility's Weighing the Resident Policy and Procedure revealed that residents would be weighed, unless ordered otherwise by the physician, at least monthly.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, resident record, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the least restrictive behavioral health services to one (Resident #251) of two residents to aid in behavioral de-...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, resident record, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the least restrictive behavioral health services to one (Resident #251) of two residents to aid in behavioral de-escalation. Findings included: Resident #251's progress notes, dated 12/31/2021 at 9:25 p.m., revealed patient was very upset and agitated over her cigarettes so she refused to take all her medications and refused for her vitals to be taken. Further review of the resident's progress notes, dated 12/31/21 at 10:05 p.m. and written by Staff ZZ, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed, This resident was transferred out of facility after screaming, yelling . People are stealing, I'm out of here! . This occurring at the nursing desk on [NAME] [west unit], during a code. When this writer attempted to explain that she would need to wait as we had an emergency, she began shouting . She responded . I'm gonna go sit somewhere, I know [City Name] . She continued to be disruptive and exit seeking. [Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)] had her moved to the Memory Unit for her own safety. While a memory unit she was yelling and refusing to move so as not to disturb others. Call place to [Physician] and administrator. this behavior was reported to be a change in resident's baseline . N.O. [new order] to send to [Hospital Name] ED [emergency department] for evaluation with Sheriff Dept [department] escort. Once resident knew she had a ride she calmed right down . Resident #251's admission record revealed the resident's medical diagnoses included cerebral infraction, alcohol abuse, dementia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and tobacco use. A psychiatric evaluation, dated 12/6/21, revealed Resident #251 . will be a long term resident of this SNF [skilled nursing facility], and [Resident #251] past medical history includes dementia, anxiety, depression, and tobacco abuse . Staff reports patient is cooperative with care, is complaint with medications . Per Staff, {Resident #251] has been increasingly tearful and depressed. On page 2 of this document, a goal for the resident stated Patient will not experience any adverse effects throughout the review period. Resident #251's Care Plan revealed a focus area, with a cancellation date of 01/31/2022, . is dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs r/t [related to] Cognitive deficits, Disease Process . [Resident #251] also likes the outdoors. Interventions for this focus area included providing the resident with individualized activities as desired. A smoking evaluation was completed for Resident #251 on 10/25/2021 which revealed the resident was a safe smoker and did not require supervision while smoking. An interview with Resident #251's Family Member on 03/24/22 at 10:41 a.m. revealed the resident had a long history of abusiveness and schizophrenia. The resident was currently homeless with a history of signing herself out of medical facilities against medical advice. The facility notified her after the event in December 2021 that Resident #251 was lashing out at staff. The resident liked being outside and moving around and could be redirected, however, . is a difficult person. Interviews on 03/24/22 at both 11:27 a.m. with Staff P, Registered Nurse (RN) and 11:30 a.m. with Staff O, LPN confirmed if a resident requested to go outside and smoke an aide would go with them. There was usually a CNA assigned to smoking duties. If a resident was exhibiting aggressive behaviors or having an outburst, they would be redirected and reapproached. An interview with Staff N, Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) on 03/24/22 at 1:07 p.m., revealed all smoking materials were located and provided to the residents outside where a CNA stayed with them until they were finished. This was the same procedure during the evening and night shift. The memory unit had an outside patio that could be used for residents that wanted to go outside and smoke. An interview on 03/24/22 at 4:26 p.m. with Staff ZZ, LPN revealed, on the night of 12/31/22, there was an emergency with another resident that required immediate attention by staff. Upon Staff ZZ's arrival to the west unit, Resident #251 was standing by the nursing station screaming, saying she wanted to leave the facility against medical advice because someone stole her cigarettes. Resident #251 kept repeating the desire to walk around the city. Staff ZZ, LPN stated she was not sure what specifically caused the resident to escalate in behaviors. Staff ZZ stated the resident's behaviors of screaming and yelling continued to escalate even after being moved onto the memory unit which resulted in the police needing to be called along with emergency medical services. Staff ZZ confirmed the memory care unit also had an outside patio area for residents to sit and also smoke cigarettes if needed. An interview on 03/24/22 at 1:45 p.m. with Staff XX, Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) revealed Resident #251 was a patient that was not able to express themselves well due to having confusion and forgetfulness. The ARNP stated it could take time for a resident to adjust to their new environment, and that new places could take a toll on a resident. Residents might have behavioral changes and if they had an outburst or change in behavior, it might just be the approach to the situation as to why they were not calming down. An interview on 03/24/22 at 2:43 p.m. with the Executive Director (ED), also known as the Nursing Home Administrator, revealed on 12/31/21 Resident #251 started displaying a change in demeanor with escalating behaviors of screaming, yelling, and wanting to leave the facility. The resident was moved onto the secured memory care unit. However, this did not help the resident and the behaviors only worsened. At this point outside services were called and the resident was sent to the hospital. The resident was baker acted at the hospital. During this interview, the ED said usually during morning meetings, these types of situations would be reviewed, however, the facility was waiting on information from the hospital which did not come. The ED stated he was not aware of any reasons or factors as to why the resident was having the escalating behaviors. The ED confirmed the expectation during these situations was for the staff to attempt to deescalate the resident's behaviors. If the resident requested to smoke and was having a change in behavior, one intervention to deescalate the situation would be to go outside and smoke with the resident. Resident #251's medical record was reviewed during this interview. The ED confirmed he was not aware of the notations that the resident had requested to go outside and smoke, was denied, and therefore this could have been the root-cause as to why the resident had a change in behavior. A policy review of Behavior Management, revised on 3/21/2019, revealed the policy is to Resident with dementia or related disorders are not responsible for their reactions due to the irreversible changes in the brain. Reactionary conduct can only be prevented and controlled by well-trained therapeutic caregivers. The purpose is to improve the quality of life by proving therapeutic interventions to address behavioral concerns which occur as a result of changes in the brain from dementia and related disorders. Primary interventions for this policy include All staff must act in the best interests of the residents at all times. The actions of the staff shall be based on relevant knowledge of dementia and related disorders, specific knowledge of the residents, empathy and knowledge of interventions as listed below to maintain dignity and prevent injury . Hold out your hand and ask the resident to come with you. Take the resident for a short walk, offer a snack or involve in an activity.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #7) of five residents sampled...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #7) of five residents sampled for the administration of unnecessary medications received adequate monitoring for abnormal movements related to the use of antipsychotic medications. Findings included: Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to schizophreniform disorder, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified single episode major depressive disorder, and unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance. Resident #7 was observed ambulating on 3/21/22 at 10:28 a.m. in the secure memory care unit. The resident ambulated to the doors leading to main unit of facility, was brought back to unit's living room by Staff M, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The resident continued to wander throughout the unit. Resident #7 was observed on 3/22/22 at 10:47 a.m. wandering in the hallway of the secure unit. On 3/23/22 at 12:16 p.m., the resident was observed sitting near the unit's living room where other residents had gathered. Resident #7 was observed on 3/24/22 at 11:46 a.m. self-ambulating in the hallway of the secure unit. A review of the March 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) identified physician orders: - Risperdal 0.5 milligram (mg) - Give one tablet by mouth two times a day related to Schizophreniform Disorder. The order was started on 2/8/22 and discontinued on 3/9/22. - Risperdal 1 mg - Give one tablet by mouth two times a day related to Schizophreniform Disorder. The active order was started on 3/9/22. A review of the February 2022 MAR identified a physician order: - Risperdal 0.5 mg - Give one tablet by mouth two times a day related to Schizophreniform Disorder. This order was started on 2/8/22. According to MedlinePlus, located at https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a694015.html, Risperdone (Risperdal) is in a class of medications called atypical antipsychotics that is used to treat symptoms of schizophrenia, amongst other conditions and works by changing the activity of certain natural substances in the brain. The website information identified that some serious side effects that may occur while users are administered Risperdal included unusual movements of your face or body that you cannot control. Resident #7's clinical record identified that the previous Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment was completed on 11/4/21. Photographic evidence was obtained. According to Medscape.com the AIMS assessment is recommended for patients receiving treatment with substances that may cause tardive dyskinesia (TD) and the assessment should be administered at baseline to document if any movements are present prior to medication usage and then at least every 3 months thereafter during the course of treatment. (Medscape.com indicated the role of the assessment (https://www.medscape.com/answers/1151826-4275/what-is-the-role-of-the-abnormal-involuntary-movement-scale-aims-in-the-evaluation-of-tardive-dyskinesia-td, updated October 17, 2018) During an interview, on 3/23/22 at 2:32 p.m., the Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) stated if a resident was receiving a psychotropic medication the expectation was that an AIMS assessment would be done on admission, quarterly and annually. The policy and procedure: Medication Management - Psychotropic Medications, effective 11/30/2014 and revised 3/23/2018, identified that Resident(s) receiving anti-psychotic medications to have an AIMS completed quarterly, with initiation of new antipsychotic medication or increase in dosage.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0635 (Tag F0635)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed obtain physician's admission orders relat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed obtain physician's admission orders related to 1. continuous oxygen for two (Residents #198 and #76) of ten residents who wear oxygen, 2. failed to input physician orders related to wound care for one (Resident #346) of two residents, and 3. catheter care for two (Resident, #52, #197) of six residents with indwelling catheters. Findings included: 1. On 03/21/2022 at 10:14 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #198 sleeping and receiving four liters of oxygen via nasal cannula (NC) from an oxygen concentrator next to her bed. On 03/22/2022 at 10:52 a.m., Resident # 198 was observed speaking to a facility staff member and receiving four liters of oxygen via nasal cannula from an oxygen concentrator next to her bed. On 3/23/2022 at 2:30 p.m. Resident #198 was observed lying in bed sleeping and receiving four liters of oxygen via nasal cannula from an oxygen concentrator next to her bed. Record review of the facility profile sheet for Resident #198 indicated she was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], She was admitted with multiple diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, (COPD). A review of the physician orders revealed no active order for Resident #198 to receive continuous oxygen at four liters per nasal cannula. Record review of Resident #198's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) indicated on 3/3/2020, the resident had oxygen saturations taken each shift, and the four liters of continuous oxygen was to be discontinued on 3/7/2022. Record review of the facility re-admission assessment dated [DATE] under respiratory revealed the following information. 8 A. Oxygen lists 4 L/NC, 8 B. Oxygen Saturation 93%, and 8 C. Continuous Cannula. The transfer form 5000-30008 dated 3/18/2022 from the local hospital listed under Treatment Devices -Oxygen 4 L continuous. On 3/23/2022 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN). Staff D revealed the process for admission orders was to have two nurses check the physician's orders when a new admission came into the facility. An interview was conducted with the Regional Director of Clinical Services and the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/23/2022 at 3:00 p.m., related to Resident #198 wearing continuous oxygen without an active physician order. The Regional Director of Clinical Services indicated the DON was brand new to the facility, and to the process of the facility to verify all orders for newly admitted residents, and stated, if it is prescribed ., it should be in the orders. Resident #76's admission Record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, emphysema, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Section C: Cognitive Patterns revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, which indicated Resident #76 had moderately impaired cognition. Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs revealed Resident #76 used oxygen therapy. A review of the Care Plan dated 03/04/22, revealed Resident #76 had a focus area for altered respiratory status, difficulty breathing related to a history of COVID-19 and respiratory failure. Goals included: the resident will have minimal risk of complications related to shortness of breath. Interventions included administer medications and puffers as ordered. A review of Resident #76's most recent physician orders revealed no orders for the use of oxygen therapy. A review of the nursing progress notes revealed that Resident #76 received oxygen via the nasal cannula on 03/22/22, 03/16/22, 03/15/22, 03/12/22, 03/11/22, 03/09/22, 02/26/22 and 02/22/22. On 03/21/21 at 10:59 a.m., Resident #76 was observed in bed, wearing a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator set at two liters per minute. Additionally, an oxygen tank was observed on the back of the resident's wheelchair. On 03/22/22 at 12:08 p.m., Resident #76 was observed in bed wearing a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator set at two liters per minute. Resident #76 stated that he was not sure if his oxygen was supposed to be set at two or three liters. Additionally, an oxygen tank was observed on the back of the resident's wheelchair (photographic evidence obtained). On 03/23/22 at 12:39 p.m., Resident #76 was observed in bed. The resident was not observed wearing the nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was observed in the room but was not turned on. The oxygen tank remained on the back of the wheelchair. The resident stated that the nurse told him he no longer needed to use the oxygen concentrator. He stated that his breathing was ok for now and he was able to breathe fine without the oxygen concentrator. On 03/24/22 at 10:18 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA and Staff J, CNA. She stated Resident #76 used his nasal cannula and oxygen concentrator most of the time. On 03/24/22 at 1:27 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Unit Manager. She confirmed Resident #76 used oxygen therapy via nasal cannula. She confirmed that she could input orders into the electronic health record (EHR), but it depended on what information was provided from the Admissions Department. Staff C stated if she received a new admission packet that contained only a hospital transfer form (3008) and a medication list, she could only input those along with the general orders into the EHR. If she had not received all the information, the nurse would have been responsible to input the information that remained. She did not confirm who was responsible for inputting the admission orders for Resident #76's usage of oxygen therapy. 2. Resident #346's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of cellulitis of the lower limb. A review of the admission notification form revealed a section titled Special needs that indicated a wound vacuum was needed upon admission. A review of the hospital transfer form (3008) revealed a section titled Skin care- Stage and assessment that indicated a right leg wound vacuum. A review of Physician orders dated 11/24/21 revealed wound vacuum suction and change dressing biweekly. Xeroform petrolat patch 2 (Bismuth Tribromoph-Petrolatum), apply to right lower leg topically every day shift, every three days for wound. Cleanse right lower limb with normal saline and pat dry. Apply Xeroform to wound site and cover with a clean dry dressing every other day and as needed. A review of the treatment administration record (TAR) revealed wound care was performed on 11/19/21, 11/24/21 and 11/30/21. A review of the initial consult with the facility wound care physician on 11/18/22 revealed Resident #346 had a surgical wound located on the right lower leg. Following the consultation, wound care orders to cleanse/irrigate the wound with normal saline/water, apply Xeroform petroleum dressing, cover with dry dressing, and change dressing every other day for three days were provided to the nursing staff. A review of the Admission/readmission Data Collection Assessment Section M: Skin dated 11/15/21 revealed Resident #346 had a right lower leg wound with scant serous drainage, wound bed was red and wound edges were well approximated. A review of the local hospital Diagnosis, Assessment and Plan dated 11/15/21 revealed, Resident #346 had wound vacuum placement to the right leg. An additional Diagnosis, Assessment and Plan dated 11/12/21 revealed the resident was to discharge to a nursing facility with a wound vacuum. On 03/24/22 at 1:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff C, LPN, Unit Manager. She confirmed Resident #346 was admitted to the facility with orders for a wound vacuum but did not have one when she arrived to the facility. She stated the information was documented on the hospital transfer form (3008). She stated after admission, the resident was assessed by Staff C and the previous Director of Nursing (DON). She stated together they agreed the wound did not require a wound vacuum. The DON called the physician for an order for wound care. Staff C confirmed the resident was assessed by the facility Wound Care Physician the following day but did not provide the exact date. Staff C stated during the assessment she was notified that the wound was a surgical wound. Staff C stated the resident's family member notified her that Resident #346 was previously going to the local wound care center for treatment. Staff C called the local wound care center to schedule an appointment. The appointment was scheduled for 11/24/21 and the resident received a wound vacuum the same day. On 03/24/22 at 6:14 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). He confirmed Resident #346 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and he was aware she needed a wound vacuum upon admission. He stated the facility always had at least three wound vacuums on hand and Resident #346 was discussed in the morning meeting after admission on [DATE]. He stated on 11/17/21 Staff C and the previous DON confirmed the resident no longer had a wound vacuum because she did not need it. He confirmed he should not have trusted the clinical team. He stated a grievance was filed later that week or the following week by a family member related to the wound vacuum. The NHA stated the family member told him Resident #346 was supposed to receive a wound vacuum upon admission to the facility. The NHA stated he informed the family member according to his clinical team, she no longer needed the wound vacuum. The NHA stated after Resident #346 was assessed by the facility wound care physician the NHA filed a grievance related to the incident. He confirmed they had the wound vacuum on hand at the facility however, the resident did not receive it. The resident did not receive a wound vacuum until after her appointment at the local wound care center on 11/18/21. He stated that the facility dropped the ball. 3. An observation on 03/21/22 at 10:21 a.m. of Resident #52 revealed the resident lying in bed with an indwelling urinary catheter bag and tubing in place. Resident #52's admission record revealed an admission date of 01/31/22 with a medical diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Resident #52's medical certification for Medicaid long-term care services and patient transfer form (3008), dated 1/31/22, revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter inserted on 1/20/22. The hospital attempted to remove the catheter on 1/18/22 but was not successful. A record review of Resident #52's order summary report revealed the resident did not have physician orders put into place upon admission for the care and treatment of the urinary indwelling catheter. An observation on 03/23/22 at 12:37 p.m., revealed Resident #197 sitting up in her wheelchair with an indwelling catheter bag in place underneath the wheelchair within a privacy bag. Resident #197's admission record revealed an admission date of 03/11/22. Resident #197's 3008, dated 3/11/22, revealed the resident had a urinary catheter in place due to urinary retention. A record review of Resident #197's order summary report revealed the resident did not have physician orders put into place upon admission for the care and treatment of the indwelling urinary catheter. A review of the facility policy titled Physician Orders, with revision made on 03/03/2021, Page 01 reads as follows POLICY: The center will ensure that Physician Orders are appropriately and timely documented in the medical record. Procedure: (admission Orders) Information received from the referring facility or agency to be reviewed, verified with the physician, and transcribed to the electronic medical record. The attending physician will review and confirm orders. Confirmation of admission orders requires that the physician sign and date the order during, or as soon as practicable after it is provided, to maintain an accurate medical record.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure up to date resident assessments were completed related to 1) quarterly elopement assessments for three (Resident #58,...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure up to date resident assessments were completed related to 1) quarterly elopement assessments for three (Resident #58, #7, and #24) of three residents sampled. Findings included: Resident #58's admission record revealed medical diagnoses of muscle weakness, and dementia. The resident's care plan revealed a focus area of . is at risk for elopement, with a Last Care Plan Review Completed: 03/23/2022. A medical record review for Resident #58, under completed assessments, revealed the last completed Elopement Risk Assessment was done on 09/24/2021. Resident #7's admission record revealed medical diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, and schizophreniform disorder. The resident's care plan revealed a focus area of . is at risk for elopement, with a Last Care Plan Review Completed: 12/20/2021. A medical record review for Resident #7, under completed assessments, revealed the last completed Elopement Risk Assessment was done on 09/24/2021. Resident #24's admission record revealed medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and major depressive disorder. The resident's care plan revealed a focus area of . is an elopement risk/wanderer . with a Last Care Plan Review Completed: 12/17/2021. A medical record review for Resident #24, under completed assessments, revealed the last completed Elopement Risk Assessment was done on 09/24/2021. Interviews conducted on 03/23/22 at 11:40 a.m. with Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), 11:41 a.m. with Staff O, LPN, and at 11:45 a.m. with Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN) revealed an elopement risk assessment should be completed upon a resident's admission to the facility, and if any exit seeking behaviors were observed. During these interviews, it was revealed none of the staff members were sure how often after a resident's admission an elopement risk assessment should be updated and completed. During an interview on 03/23/22 at 1:56 p.m. with the Director of Nursing and Regional Director of Clinical Services, it was revealed an elopement risk assessment should be completed quarterly. The elopement risk assessments were normally completed when the quarterly minimum data set assessments were done. An interview with the Director of Nursing and Regional Director of Clinical services on 03/23/22 at 2:20 p.m., revealed quarterly means the assessment should be completed every 90 days. The nursing staff were normally involved in completing these assessments and ensuring they were up to date. A procedure review for Elopement Assessment Procedure, not dated, revealed Initial elopement assessment done in admission assessment. Assessment triggered again on day 7 of stay. Assessment completed quarterly, significant change, annual, or any behaviors/wandering/exit seeking behavior.
Jan 2021 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's quality assurance and assessment (QAA) committee failed to implement an effective plan of action related to infection control and pre...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's quality assurance and assessment (QAA) committee failed to implement an effective plan of action related to infection control and prevention as evidenced by the potential for cross-contamination when gloves were not changed and hand hygiene was not performed during a wound care procedure. Findings included: Review of the facility's plan of correction for the survey ending 01/15/2021 revealed the following measures would be taken to correct the deficient practice which was identified at F880: -All staff referred to in the statement of deficiency were re-educated on hand hygiene, with the nurse who had performed the wound care re-educated on proper wound care technique, including hand hygiene. -Competencies on proper hand hygiene and on wound care technique were completed with all licensed nurses. (The Clean Dressing Competency Skills Checklist was identified as the form used to ensure competency.) -The Director of Clinical Services or their Designee re-educated the licensed nurses on hand hygiene during a wound care procedure and performing the proper hand hygiene when removing dirty gloves and before putting on clean gloves. -The corrective action was to be monitored to ensure the deficient practice did not recur by the Director of Clinical Services or their Designee by conducting weekly observations of wound care to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed. The Clean Dressing Competency Skills Checklist was reviewed and noted to include the area of deficient practice observed during the wound care that was conducted with the Surveyor present on 04/08/2021. Competency Criteria # 17 - 22 defined the competent skill expected during wound care: Actions included: #17 Remove gloves, perform hand hygiene (soap and water or hand sanitizer) #18 Apply gloves. Assess wound for type, color, amount of drainage. Obtain wound culture if indicated. #19 Cleanse wound as ordered. If utilizing gauze to clean wound bed, moisten gauze with wound cleanser or normal saline. Clean wound using circular motion beginning from center toward the outside. Discard gauze and repeat as necessary. #20 Cleanse peri-wound with separate moistened gauze and repeat as necessary. #21 Remove gloves. Perform hand hygiene (soap and water or hand sanitizer). #22 [NAME] gloves and apply treatment as ordered. In an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nurses (DON) on 04/09/2021 beginning at 2:30 p.m., they confirmed all nurses were trained on the wound care policy and were observed for competency while performing wound care. All nurses passed the competency checks and observation continued randomly of the nurses during wound care to ensure there was compliance. The DON confirmed the observation for the competency check off and observations for the auditing for the plan of correction were conducted by the nurse Unit Managers and the Assistant Director of Nurses. The DON confirmed the Unit Manager that was present during the wound care on 04/08/2021 was the same nurse that checked the nurses' competencies and conducted the wound care audits for the plan of correction. A review of the attendance sheets for training on the wound care policy and review of the completed competencies for wound care revealed all facility nurses had been trained and completed the competency review. A review of the wound care audits revealed there was no non-compliance documented. During the survey conducted 04/07/2021 - 04/09/2021 the following concerns related to infection control and prevention during wound care were identified: Medical Record review was conducted for Resident #3 that indicated on admission Record form diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region, encounter for surgical after care following surgery on the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Review of Admission/readmission Data Collection form dated 4/2/2021 showed right buttock surgical incision proximal line 3.0 x 0.3 x 0.3, -5 staples intact then midline dehiscence open 5.0 x 2.5 x 1.5 75% red beefy granulation and 25 % slough distal incision 6.5 x 0.3 x 0.3 x - 8 staples. Review of the Pressure Ulcer Wound Rounds dated 4/2/2021 showed right gluteal fold pressure length 1.5 x width 0.9 x 0.7 depth stage 3. (inaccurate documentation, pressure ulcer is on left gluteal fold). On 4/8/2021 at 1:05 p.m. wound care observation was conducted with Staff Member E, RN and Staff Member H, Wound Care Nurse (WCN); the WCN stated that Resident #3 had a surgical cite and a pressure ulcer that were due for a dressing change. Supplies gathered included a bottle normal saline, collagen powder, small souffle cup that contained medi-honey, cotton tipped applicators, bulk gauze dressing, and 4 packages of adhesive bordered dressings. The supplies were placed on top of a barrier. Resident #3 was observed lying in bed when approached and appeared comfortable. She was receptive to the observation as she smiled when asked. The WCN went to the left side of the bed and assisted the resident to reposition. The WCN stood on the left side of the bed holding the resident in position. The bed sheet was removed and revealed five different dressings in place. The first dressing removed was the left gluteal fold/pressure area. It revealed an opening approximate size of a dime with the surrounding tissue pale white in color. The dressing to the left upper buttock was removed and revealed approximated staples in place. The right buttock was observed with three separate dressings in place. The center of the right buttock revealed the surgical wound that presented a large oblong in shape and width, and the wound bed contained beefy bright red tissue with moderate amount of serosanguinous drainage. The two remaining dressings, one located above, and one located below the surgical cite were removed and presented with additional approximated staples. The WCN directed Staff Member E to change her gloves and wash her hands. Staff Member E applied the normal saline to the surgical wound and with her left hand used a gauze dressing to wipe the wound; the gauze was dropped into the garbage can. The same process was used for the three stapled areas and the left gluteal fold. After the areas were cleaned, and without changing gloves and practicing hand hygiene, Staff Member E individually dried each wound area with a new gauze dressing. Staff E removed her gloves and used Alcohol Based Hand Sanitizer (ABHS) at the bedside and donned new gloves. The surgical wound was packed with the collagen and a secondary dressing applied. Staff Member E removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene. She donned clean gloves and prior to applying the medi-honey into the left gluteal fold the WCN stopped her and informed staff that her glove was ripped. Staff Member E removed the left glove from her hand and immediately donned a clean glove; no hand hygiene was performed. The medi-honey was applied to the pressure ulcer with her left hand, during which her bracelet that contained multiple dangling charms touched the top of the barrier. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) at 1:40 p.m. on 4/8/2021, she confirmed that after cleaning a wound, gloves should be changed, and hand hygiene would be practiced. At 1:50 p.m. on 4/8/2021 an interview was conducted with Staff Member E and the WCN. They confirmed after cleaning the surgical wound, pressure ulcer and staples, Staff Member E did not remove the soiled gloves, or practice hand hygiene, prior to drying the cleaned areas.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, policy review, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Control (CDC) guidelines th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, policy review, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Control (CDC) guidelines the facility did not ensure infection control and prevention practices were implemented to prevent the spread of COVID-19 on one nursing unit (new admission observation unit) of three nursing units as evidence by: 1. Two staff members (A, and B) failed to perform hand hygiene after removing gloves when exiting resident rooms, and failed to changed gloves and perform hand hygiene between providing care for two residents (#327 and #328) and failed to handle trash and soiled linens in a manner to prevent the spread of COVID-19, and 2. Failed to ensure two staff members (D and E) were wearing eye protection on the new admission observation unit, and 3. One staff member (E), during pressure ulcer care for one resident (#328) of two residents reviewed, failed to perform hand hygiene and removed treatment items from the room after care. Findings included: 1. On 1/13/21 at 9:33 a.m. an observation was conducted on the new admission observation unit consisting of 10 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] - 210). There were personal protective equipment (PPE) kits throughout the hallway outside of resident room doors with gowns, gloves, bleach wipes, and surgical masks in them. There were two divided hampers marked for trash and linens in the middle of the hallway on the unit. There was sanitizer on the medication cart, on top of the food delivery cart, one on the wall near the entry to the unit, another at the nurses' station, and one in the middle of the hallway on the wall above the location of one of the divided hampers. During the observation, an interview was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The ADON said he stays on the unit all day to assist with admissions. The ADON confirmed the staff were to wear the required PPE of gown, gloves, mask and eyewear while on the unit. On 1/13/21 at 9:40 a.m. Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed to exit room [ROOM NUMBER] with an unbagged resident gown and took it down the hallway to the divided linen hamper in the middle of the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff A, CNA was wearing gloves when she exited the room. After Staff A, CNA placed the gown in the linen side of the hamper, she removed the gloves and placed them in the trash side of the hamper. Staff A, CNA went back down the hall toward room [ROOM NUMBER] where she stopped at room [ROOM NUMBER] and removed a pair of gloves from the PPE kit outside the door. Staff A, CNA put the clean gloves on without performing hand hygiene and returned and entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 1/13/21 at 9:44 a.m. an observation was conducted. Staff B, CNA exited room [ROOM NUMBER], removed the extra gown, which was recommended by another State Agency, and the gloves she was wearing, walked across the hallway, and placed them in the divided hamper on the side marked trash. Staff B, CNA did not perform hand hygiene. Staff B, CNA went down the hall to the therapy gym. Staff B, CNA opened one of the doors with her contaminated hand and entered the therapy gym. Staff B, CNA returned a moment later through the therapy doors. At 9:45 a.m. in an interview with Staff B, CNA she said she did hand hygiene in the back because she was going to take the trash out. On 1/13/21 at 10:00 a.m. an observation was conducted. Staff A, CNA exited room [ROOM NUMBER] and went to the PPE kit in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] to get a pair of gloves. In an interview with Staff A, CNA she said there weren't any gloves in the rooms because they could get contaminated. She returned to room [ROOM NUMBER], opened the door, and picked up a soiled brief and used gloves that were lying on the floor in the doorway. Staff A, CNA walked down the hallway to the soiled linen and trash hamper with the unbagged trash and placed them in the trash side of the hamper that was located outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 1/13/21 at 10:04 a.m. in an interview with the ADON, he said there are trash bags on the linen cart. He walked down the hallway to the linen cart and pointed out some large trash bags on it. He agreed staff shouldn't be walking with trash and soiled linens down the hall unbagged and should not move the hamper. On 1/13/21 at 10:09 a.m. an observation was conducted. Staff A, CNA exited room [ROOM NUMBER] again with a soiled towel and the meal box from breakfast with gloved hands. She walked down the hallway to the divided linen and trash hamper in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff A, CNA brought the hamper down the hallway and placed it outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff A put trash and linen in the hamper. Staff A, CNA did not perform hand hygiene after removing the gloves. Next, Staff A, CNA removed a clean gown and gloves from the PPE kit outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] and put them on. In an interview with Staff A, CNA conducted after she put on the gown and gloves, she said she performed hand hygiene down there before she brought the hamper down the hallway. She said she used the sanitizer that was on top of the medication cart. Staff A was not observed performing hand hygiene after disposing soiled linen and trash, before donning clean PPE. On 1/13/21 at 10:40 a.m. an observation was conducted. The call light was activated by Resident #327. Staff A, CNA entered the room after putting on another gown and some gloves. She went to the side of the room where Resident #327 was residing. The surveyor was at the bedside of Resident #328 on the other side of the room behind a privacy curtain. It was unknown what type of assistance Staff A, CNA provided to Resident #327. When Staff A, CNA finished attending to the needs of Resident #327, she came over to Resident #328's side of the room wearing the same gloves and asked if she could check Resident #328's brief. Staff A, CNA proceeded to pull the covers back and remove the right-side brief tab. Then Staff A, CNA recovered Resident #328 after returning the brief tab. Staff A, CNA assisted Resident #328 with repositioning because she was complaining of discomfort. Staff A, CNA removed some pillows from the recliner at the bed side. Then Staff A, CNA removed the covers from Resident #328's legs, lifted her feet and placed them on the pillow. Then she returned the covers to her legs. Staff A, CNA returned to the recliner and picked up another pillow. She lifted the fitted sheet on the resident's left side of the bed and placed the pillow under the resident's left side. In an interview with Staff A, CNA conducted in the residents' bathroom, she said she couldn't change her gloves because there aren't any in the room. She doesn't know why they aren't keeping them in the room. In an observation in the residents' bathroom, a glove container on the wall was empty. On 1/13/21 at 11:15 a.m. an interview was conducted with the ADON. He said he doesn't know why there weren't any gloves in the resident rooms. 2. On 1/13/21 at 11:17 a.m. another observation was conducted on the new admission observation unit. Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Supervisor was observed entering room [ROOM NUMBER] wearing an N95 mask with a surgical mask on top and one gown. Staff D, LPN Supervisor did not have any eye protection on, and he was not wearing any gloves. Before Staff D, LPN Supervisor exited the room he went to the bathroom and washed his hands in the sink. On 1/13/21 at 11:25 a.m. an interview was conducted with Staff D, LPN Supervisor. He said he had brought an ice tray and ice packs from the kitchen to the nurse. He said goggles or face shields, a gown and an extra gown, which is based on another State Agency's recommendations, and gloves had to be worn in the rooms. He confirmed he did not have any eye protection on and didn't put on another gown or any gloves, but he said he did wash his hands in the sink. 3. Resident # 328 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of left femur fracture. A review of the January 2021 physician's orders in the medical record revealed the following: 1/9/21 L (left) heel cleanse area with NS (normal saline) pat dry apply skin prep every other day and as needed every night shift for DTI (deep tissue injury) pressure wound. R (right) heel cleanse with NS pat dry apply skin prep every other day and as needed every night shift for DTI pressure wound. On 1/14/21 at 1:55 p.m. an observation was conducted during the treatment to Resident #328's heels, with Staff E, LPN. Staff E, LPN removed a saline syringe, skin prep wipes, and gauze 2x2's form the treatment cart. Staff E, LPN entered Resident #328's room after putting on a pair of gloves and knocking on the door. Staff E, LPN placed the treatment supplies on Resident #328's bed near the resident's feet. The nurse applied the skin prep to the resident's heels and disposed of the gauze in the trash can and removed her gloves. Staff E, LPN picked up the remaining saline syringe and skin prep wipes (2) from Resident #328's bed and exited the room. Staff E, LPN did not perform hand hygiene. Staff E, LPN brought the supplies back down the hallway to the treatment cart that was sitting next to the nurses' station and placed them on top. She removed keys from her pocket and unlocked the treatment cart. The surveyor asked if the residents in that room were on any precautions. She said they were. Then Staff E, LPN threw the saline syringe and skin prep in the trash can nearby. Staff E, LPN failed to clean or disinfect the top of the care that the supplies were on and at that time performed hand hygiene. Based on facility policy and CDC guidelines the residents were on transmission based precautions for being on the new admissions unit. On 1/15/21 at 1:23 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). When asked what has been done to mitigate COVID-19 in the facility the DON stated lots of education, audits, observations, mask techniques, donning/doffing, what COVID is. The DON also said that gloves are expected to be in the rooms. The DON said, That's what we use to provide care. We don't wear gloves in the hallways. So, they have to be in the rooms. The DON also stated that soiled linen and trash go in a bag before they come out of the room. She said these concerns (observations) were not her expectation. The DON agreed staff need to do hand hygiene after they take their gloves off and between patients always. The DON said, Yes, they have to have eye protection . they have to have them on. The treatment supplies stay in the room or go in the trash. A review of the policy title, Safe Handling and Processing of Soiled Linen, dated 11/30/2014, revealed the following information: Policy: To enforce the practice that all soiled linen/laundry is considered contaminated. Staff will be required to use precautions listed in this procedure as well as the capital EPC Plan. For handling all linen by placing same in bags at the place of care/treatment. Staff must also ensure handled, stored, and processed, so as to control the spread of infections. Procedure Handling: a. Ensure appropriate clean bags/containers are available as close to the point of care/treatment as possible. 3. Place soiled linen immediately into bag at the location of care/treatment. Be careful not to touch the outside of the bag with the soiled linen. 4. Linen should not be carried/transported down the hallway without first being placed in the appropriate bag/container (labeled soiled linen). 6. Ensure bag is closed/tightly secured. 7. Place bag in designated covered container/hamper. The container must be labeled soiled linen only. 8. Never place or drop soiled linen on floor or other surfaces. 10. Remove PPE. Wash hands by following our established Hand Washing Procedure. Review of the policy title, COVID-19 Pandemic Plan, revised 1/10/20, revealed the following relevant information: Policy COVID-19 is a respiratory illness thought to be spread mainly from person to person, between people who come in close contact to one another (about 6 feet). The virus is spread through droplets produced when an infected person coughs or sneezes. Symptoms include fever, cough, shortness of breath, sore throat, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle pain, headache, new loss of taste or smell, chills, repeated shaking with chills. 1. Staff will be trained on the facility pandemic COVID-19 plan and related policies and procedures. 2. Staff will be retrained in hand hygiene and proper use of PPE including competency. 17. The center will designate an area and cohort new admissions/readmissions: Initiate transmission based precautions based on CDC guidance (standard, contact, and droplet and eye protection). Including PPE - respirator, (or facemask if respirators are not available), face shield or eye protection, gown, and gloves. The center will designate an area (PUI unit) for residents who: (bullet 4) Place resident in a private room or cohort with another resident whose status is unknown, initiate transmission based precautions (standard, contact, and droplet). Including PPE - respirator, (or facemask if respirators are not available) face shield or eye protection, gown, and gloves. Infection Prevention and Control 8. Implement universal source control for all staff per CDC guidance: Face mask Eye protection for centers located in areas with moderate to substantial community transmission. A review of CDC recommendations on 1/18/21, updated on 11/20/20, found at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/long-term-care.html, included the following information: Provide Supplies Necessary to Adhere to Recommended Infection Prevention and Control Practices. Make necessary PPE available in areas where resident care is provided. Further review of the CDC guidance at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/nursing-homes-responding.html reflected the following: Considerations for establishing a designated COVID-19 care unit for residents with confirmed COVID-19 Assign dedicated HCP to work only on the COVID-19 care unit. At a minimum this should include the primary nursing assistants (NAs) and nurses assigned to care for these residents. HCP working on the COVID-19 care unit should ideally have a restroom, break room, and work area that are separate from HCP working in other areas of the facility. Place signage at the entrance to the COVID-19 care unit that instructs HCP they must wear eye protection and an N95 or higher-level respirator (or facemask if a respirator is not available) at all times while on the unit. Gowns and gloves should be added when entering resident rooms. To the extent possible, restrict access of ancillary personnel (e.g., dietary) to the unit. Additional review of CDC guidelines, updated 11/20/20, at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/long-term-care.html reflected the following: Evaluate and Manage Residents with Symptoms of COVID-19. Residents with known or suspected COVID-19 should be cared for using all recommended PPE, which includes use of an N95 or higher-level respirator (or facemask if a respirator is not available), eye protection (i.e., goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face), gloves, and gown. Cloth face coverings are not considered PPE and should not be worn when PPE is indicated. Additional information was found upon review at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html, updated 12/14/20, and included the following information: Implement Universal Use of Personal Protective Equipment HCP working in facilities located in areas with moderate to substantial community transmission are more likely to encounter asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. If SARS-CoV-2 infection is not suspected in a patient presenting for care (based on symptom and exposure history), HCP should follow Standard Precautions (and Transmission-Based Precautions if required based on the suspected diagnosis). They should also: -Wear eye protection in addition to their facemask to ensure the eyes, nose, and mouth are all protected from exposure to respiratory secretions during patient care encounters. Personal Protective Equipment HCP who enter the room of a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection should adhere to Standard Precautions and use a NIOSH-approved N95 or equivalent or higher-level respirator (or facemask if a respirator is not available), gown, gloves, and eye protection. Hand Hygiene -HCP should perform hand hygiene before and after all patient contact, contact with potentially infectious material, and before putting on and after removing PPE, including gloves. Hand hygiene after removing PPE is particularly important to remove any pathogens that might have been transferred to bare hands during the removal process. -HCP should perform hand hygiene by using ABHS with 60-95% alcohol or washing hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds. If hands are visibly soiled, use soap and water before returning to ABHS. -Healthcare facilities should ensure that hand hygiene supplies are readily available to all personnel in every care location. Eye Protection -Put on eye protection (i.e., goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face) upon entry to the patient room or care area, if not already wearing as part of extended use strategies to optimize PPE supply. Protective eyewear (e.g., safety glasses, trauma glasses) with gaps between glasses and the face likely do not protect eyes from all splashes and sprays. -Ensure that eye protection is compatible with the respirator so there is not interference with proper positioning of the eye protection or with the fit or seal of the respirator. -Remove eye protection after leaving the patient room or care area, unless implementing extended use. Gloves -Put on clean, non-sterile gloves upon entry into the patient room or care area. Change gloves if they become torn or heavily contaminated. -Remove and discard gloves before leaving the patient room or care area, and immediately perform hand hygiene. Gowns -Put on a clean isolation gown upon entry into the patient room or area. Change the gown if it becomes soiled. Remove and discard the gown in a dedicated container for waste or linen before leaving the patient room or care area. Disposable gowns should be discarded after use. Reusable (i.e., washable or cloth) gowns should be laundered after each use.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 5 life-threatening violation(s), $191,561 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 20 deficiencies on record, including 5 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $191,561 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Florida. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 5 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Aviata At Palma Sola Bay's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns AVIATA AT PALMA SOLA BAY an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Aviata At Palma Sola Bay Staffed?

CMS rates AVIATA AT PALMA SOLA BAY's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 11 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 71%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Aviata At Palma Sola Bay?

State health inspectors documented 20 deficiencies at AVIATA AT PALMA SOLA BAY during 2021 to 2024. These included: 5 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 15 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Aviata At Palma Sola Bay?

AVIATA AT PALMA SOLA BAY is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AVIATA HEALTH GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 105 certified beds and approximately 97 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in BRADENTON, Florida.

How Does Aviata At Palma Sola Bay Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, AVIATA AT PALMA SOLA BAY's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Aviata At Palma Sola Bay?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Aviata At Palma Sola Bay Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, AVIATA AT PALMA SOLA BAY has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 5 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Aviata At Palma Sola Bay Stick Around?

Staff turnover at AVIATA AT PALMA SOLA BAY is high. At 58%, the facility is 11 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 71%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Aviata At Palma Sola Bay Ever Fined?

AVIATA AT PALMA SOLA BAY has been fined $191,561 across 4 penalty actions. This is 5.5x the Florida average of $34,994. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Aviata At Palma Sola Bay on Any Federal Watch List?

AVIATA AT PALMA SOLA BAY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.