PALM GARDEN OF CLEARWATER

3480 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD, CLEARWATER, FL 33761 (727) 786-6697
For profit - Corporation 165 Beds PALM GARDEN HEALTH AND REHABILITATION Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
26/100
#542 of 690 in FL
Last Inspection: February 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Families considering Palm Garden of Clearwater should be aware that the facility has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns and a poor overall quality. It ranks #542 out of 690 facilities in Florida, placing it in the bottom half, and #40 out of 64 in Pinellas County, meaning only a few local options are worse. The facility is worsening, with reported issues increasing from 3 in 2024 to 11 in 2025. Staffing is average with a 3/5 rating, and the turnover rate is at 52%, which is higher than the state average. However, there have been no fines, which is a positive sign. Specific incidents raise serious alarms; for example, a resident fell out of bed and suffered a hip fracture because a staff member left them unattended while collecting supplies. This was classified as an immediate jeopardy situation due to the risk it posed to residents. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the accuracy of mental health assessments for residents, indicating potential gaps in care. Overall, while there are some strengths, such as no fines, the significant deficiencies and critical incidents highlight serious weaknesses that families should consider carefully.

Trust Score
F
26/100
In Florida
#542/690
Bottom 22%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
3 → 11 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 41 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Florida. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
24 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 3 issues
2025: 11 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Florida average (3.2)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 52%

Near Florida avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Chain: PALM GARDEN HEALTH AND REHABILITATI

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 24 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening
Aug 2025 2 deficiencies 2 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed care plan interventions and p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed care plan interventions and perform accurate assessments on residents related to bed mobility assistance for three residents (#5, #6, and #7) out of three residents sampled.On 07/25/2025 Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), independently rolled Resident #5 onto her side in bed to perform incontinence care. Staff A, CNA left Resident #5 unattended in bed to collect supplies. Resident #5 fell out of the bed while unattended and suffered a right hip fracture which required a transfer to a higher level of care and surgical repair.This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and the likelihood for serious injury and or death to residents and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on 08/07/2025. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 08/08/2025 and the scope and severity was reduced to an E after verification of removal of immediacy of harm.Findings Included: 1. During an interview on 08/06/2025 at 8:32 a.m., Resident #5 stated she had a fall a couple months after she was admitted to the facility. Resident #5 stated she was supposed to always have two people assisting her with care. She stated she requested a bigger bed. She stated, Sometimes they come in with two people and sometimes they just come in with one person. She stated, they set up a chair on the side of the bed for her to hold onto because they told her they could not use side rails. She stated, The chair slides while I'm holding onto it. She stated she requested a bigger bed a few times after a fall and was told they would order it, and it never came until after her most recent fall (07/25/2025). She stated, This last fall I broke my hip in two places and had to have surgery. The CNA came in to change me by herself, she rolled me onto my side, she put my legs with one on top of the other, the CNA went to grab something off of the dresser and I told her I was slipping, and she told me, You will be okay, I told her again that I was slipping and then I fell off of the bed. I only got the bigger bed now because I fell. The aides were upset that they were taking so long, to get me a bigger bed because they all knew I was at risk. Review of Resident #5's admission record revealed an initial admission date of 04/05/2025 and a re-admission date of 07/28/2025. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include: displaced apophyseal fracture of left femur (a break in the growth plate area of the large bone of the upper leg), initial encounter for closed fracture (08/04/2025), displaced fracture of greater trochanter (a bony prominence located on the upper part of the thigh bone) of right femur, initial encounter for closed fracture (07/28/2025), spondylolysis (a stress fracture in a vertebra), cervical (neck) region (09/21/2024), unspecified fall, subsequent encounter (09/21/2024), muscle weakness (generalized) (09/21/2024), other abnormalities of gait and mobility (09/21/2024), morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories (09/21/2024), and repeated falls (09/21/2024). Review of Resident #5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] revealed in Section C-Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of Section GG-Functional Abilities revealed Resident #5 had an impairment on one side to her upper and lower extremity. Resident #5 required substantial/maximal assistance revealing helpers do more than half the effort. Helpers lift or hold trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort for rolling left and right. Sitting to lying (the ability to move from sitting on side of bed to lying flat on the bed, lying on side of bed), Resident #5 was dependent, meaning helper does all the effort. Residents do none of the effort to complete the activity. Or the assistance of two or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity. Review of Resident #5's care plan dated 08/03/2024 revealed: Focus: ADL Self-Care and/or mobility deficit. Needs assistance with ADL's Initiated on 09/23/2024.Interventions included: BED MOBILITY-Total ASSIST X 2 TRANSFERS-Total ASSIST with Hoyer X 2TOILETING-Total ASSIST X 2DRESSING-Total ASSIST X 2BATHING-Total ASSIST X 2 Review of Resident #5's Intervention/Task for July revealed one person assistance was provided for ADL-Bed Mobility on 07/26/2025 (day shift), 07/28/2025 (evening shift), 07/30/2025 (day shift), 07/31/2025 (evening shift), 08/01/2025 (day shift), 08/02/2025 (evening shift), 08/03/2025 (day shift and evening shift), 08/05/2025 (evening shift), 08/07/2025 day shift). A review of the physician order summary for Resident #5 revealed: Right hip Xray 2 views due to status post fall pain. Start Date 07/26/2025.Send to ER (emergency room) for further eval and treat. Start Date 07/27/2025. Review of Resident #5's progress notes revealed: -07/28/2025 at 7:47 p.m. Fall Risk Evaluation Fall Risk: History of falls (past 3 months): 1-2 falls in past 3 months. Level of consciousness / mental status: Alert (oriented x 3) OR comatose. Resident is chairbound / incontinent. Systolic blood pressure: No noted drop between lying and standing. Vision status: Adequate (with or without glasses). Predisposing disease: 1-2 present. Residents had a change in condition in the last 14 days. Recent hospitalization history in last 30 days: Yes. Notes: Post right hip surgery 7/27/25 Gait / balance: Requires use of assistive devices (i.e. cane, wheelchair, walker, furniture). Medication: Takes 3-4 these medications (or medication classes) currently and / or within last 7 days. Fall Risk Score: 15.0.-07/28/2025 6:05 p.m. Nursing Note Note Text: readmitted a [AGE] year-old female from [Acute Care Hospital] via stretcher accompanied by 2 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) staff.Surgical incision to right hip clean, dry with dressing intact, with PICO [a single-use, portable negative pressure wound therapy system designed to promote wound healing] dressing functioning well. Patient also has skin tear to right lower leg with sutures in place. Bruising noted to right knee/ right[sic] lower leg. Discoloration and flaking noted BIL [bilateral] feet.-07/27/2025 12:00 a.m. Nursing Note Late Entry:Note Text: Result of X ray[sic] right hip reported to ARNP [Advanced Practical Nurse Practitioner] with order received for resident to be sent to ER [Emergency Room] for further eval and treat. DON [Director of Nursing] notified. This writer called [Family Member] 2x [twice] left message, awaiting for call back. Facility protocol followed. Resident transported to ER via 911.-07/26/2025 07:38 a.m. Radiology Note Note Text: Patient complained of pain of 7 on right hip/pelvis area s/p [status post] fall last evening. Administered PRN [as needed] pain pill. Notified provider on call.received order for STAT (immediate) xray[sic] to right hip/pelvis area 2 views. [Mobile Radiology Company] services needed due to pt [patient] being bed bound.-07/26/2025 3:52 p.m. Nursing Note Note Text: Bariatric [bed] delivered to [room number], resident in new bed without difficulty. Resident[sic] says new bed is comfortable.-07/25/2025 4:56 p.m. Interdisciplinary (IDT) Note Late Entry:Note Text: Resident reviewed by IDT for s/p [status post] fall on 7/25. Resident found by the floor nurse lying on floor on her back next to bed. CNA reported she was providing incontinent care and stepped away to get a towel; during that time, resident rolled off the bed. Head-to-toe assessment completed; no visible injuries noted. Pt [patient] was complaining of left shoulder pain. Neuro checks initiated. NP [Nurse Practitioner] notified; new orders received for STAT [immediate] left shoulder x-ray and one-time dose of oxycodone for pain. Message left for [Family Member] return call regarding notification of family. Interventions: Wider bed ordered for resident. Staff re-educated on following Kardex instructions; emphasized requirement for two-person assist as documented. STAT x-ray of Left shoulder and one time dose of oxycodone was ordered.-7/25/2025 6:27 p.m. Nursing Note Note Text: Called to room by CNA. Observed resident lying on the floor on her back side next to bed. Resident states she rolled off of the side of the bed. Head to toe assessment completed. Complaints of left shoulder pain. No visible sign of injury. Neuro checks initiated. Returned to bed using [mechanical lift] with multiple staff present. [ARNP] notified. New order for STAT left shoulder xray[sic] and one time dose of oxycodone for pain. Message left for [Family Member] to return call to facility.-07/25/2025 7:15 p.m. Nursing Note Note Text: Spoke with [Employee of Bed Supplier]. Bariatric bed to be delivered 7/26 before 11:45am. Resident made aware. Review of Resident #5's Hospital Discharge Records dated 07/27/2025 revealed: Procedure History: Arthroplasty Hip Bipolar (a surgical procedure replaces the damaged femoral head with a prosthetic implant) (Right), (07/27/2025), Open Reduction Internal Fixation Hip (surgical procedure used to treat hip fractures by realigning the bone and securing it with internal hardware) (Right) (07/27/2025). During a phone interview on 08/06/2025 at 12:57 p.m., Staff A, CNA stated on 07/25/2025 she went to provide Resident #5 with care. She said, I rolled [Resident #5] onto her side in the bed, and I went to grab a towel from the dresser. While I was grabbing the towel [Resident #5] slipped off the bed. I usually take everything I need with me. She stated there was not a rail on the bed for the resident to hold onto. Staff A stated Resident #5 holds onto the top of the dresser for support, and It is difficult to roll her sometimes. She stated, I ran out and started screaming for the nurse. I grabbed her a pillow for her head while we were waiting for someone to come in the room. She stated Resident #5 said her hip was hurting after the fall. Staff A stated the nurse did an assessment and then they put Resident #5 back in bed. She said, I don't know if [Resident #5] went out to the hospital or not. I thought [Resident #5] was a one person assist. We look in the Kardex to tell you how many people a resident requires to provide care. She stated after the incident, the Director of Nursing (DON) did a one-on-one in-service. She said, It was something on falls being careful and being aware. During an interview on 08/06/2025 at 10:38 a.m., Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated on 07/25/2025 she did wound care in the morning and worked on the floor from 3:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m. She was called to Resident #5's room by Staff A, CNA, and Resident #5 was on the floor lying on her back between the two beds. Staff A, CNA told her she was in the middle of changing her when she walked to the dresser to grab towels and the resident fell. Staff B stated the aide told her, The weight of her body flipped her to the other side of the bed. [Staff A, CNA], was the only aide in the room. [Resident #5] was supposed to have two people assisting her. She did a head-to-toe assessment on Resident #5. Staff B stated, I did not move the right shoulder much because I know she has had long term pain in that shoulder. Her legs are big, and [Resident #5] cannot hold them up on her own. I lifted both of her legs, and she did not have any pain at that time. There was no redness, swelling or bruise at the time of the assessment. Resident #5 was only complaining of left shoulder pain. She stated she got orders for STAT (emergent) left shoulder Xray. She said Resident #5 never complained of hip pain on the shift. She stated she called the doctor and asked if the pain medication could be given early. She stated when she got back to work on Monday, she was told Resident #5 went out to the hospital for her hip. She stated at the time of the fall Resident #5 had a regular size standard bed. Staff B stated, We talked about getting her a bariatric bed a long time ago. Resident #5 was able to hold herself over by holding onto the nightstand next to the bed or the armoire on the other side. If she was in a bariatric bed she would not be able to reach the nightstand to hold herself up, so we did not get her the bariatric bed. She said Resident #5 does not use her right arm for anything anymore. She stated, The bed she had [at the time of the fall] did not have anything for her to hold onto. She said Resident #5 does not move; she can't reposition herself or anything. There was some room on each side of the bed, if she was a moveable person she would not be able to move much. Residents who need a bariatric bed just need to bring it up to the managers, and they would get them one. There really is not a system in place for determining when a resident needs a bariatric bed. The unit manager can call and request a bariatric bed if they feel a resident needs it. She said, If we need more room to turn the resident we would request for one. But usually, it is a customer service thing when a resident requests for it. During an interview on 08/06/2024 at 3:56 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she did the reportable investigation for Resident #5's fall. On 07/25/2025 at 4:30 p.m. Staff A, CNA was providing incontinent care for Resident #5. Resident #5 was on her side in the bed. Staff A, CNA went to grab the towels off the dresser. Resident #5 legs began to slide down. Resident #5 told Staff A, CNA she was starting to slide and Staff A, CNA could not intercept her fast enough, resulting in Resident #5 falling to the floor. Resident#5 was assessed by the nurse and complained of left shoulder pain. They did an Xray of the left shoulder and it was negative for a fracture. The next day (07/26/2025), Resident #5 started complaining of right hip pain, they did an Xray, and it was positive for a hip fracture. The results came back close to midnight, and Resident #5 was sent to the hospital for further evaluation. Resident #5 was admitted to the hospital and underwent a right hip arthroplasty on 07/27/2025. The DON stated the resident returned back to the facility on [DATE]. During the investigation, she interviewed staff and other residents to see if there were any concerns with Staff A, CNA's care. No residents or other staff had concerns with Staff A, CNA's care. She provided education to all staff related to making sure they have all of their items in reach when providing care. If they need to grab something while providing care residents should be placed back on the bed. They ordered a wider bed for Resident #5, and it was delivered the next day (07/26/2025). They updated Resident #5's Kardex for her to be a two person assist with everything. The DON stated, There is not anything that is black or white to determine what type of assistance a resident needs while providing care. It can be determined by therapy; some people can do more than others. There are a lot of factors, there is not a guide. The DON stated Resident #5 had another event in October 2024. During this event Resident #5's legs were hanging over the side of the bed, they had to assist her down to the floor and then put her back in bed. She said, According to the 10/14/2024 interdisciplinary team (IDT) note it says Resident #5 is a two person assist with incontinence care. I thought this was referring to when Resident #5 was using the bathroom and holding onto the bar. She said bed mobility is how many people it takes to move people in bed. At the time her bed mobility was a one person assist, and her transfer status was two person assist. She stated, There was some confusion, because the two-person changing brief was not under the activities of daily living (ADL) part of the Kardex and her bed mobility in ADL's said Resident #5 was a one person assist. When the care plan was updated in October of 2024, it updated under a different part of the Kardex. She said Resident #5 needing to be a two-person assist for brief changing was only on the safety part of the Kardex. Staff A, CNA was following the ADL Kardex. Residents use different things to hold onto while care is being provided. They can use furniture, she said, Their chair would be up against their bed, or chairs that have handrails, or whatever is there for them to grab onto. If they have a scoop mattress they can hold onto that, it depends on the resident. We try to use trapezes; we try other interventions other than side rails. We don't like to utilize bed rails, she said, It is frowned upon to use them since the initiative for no bed rails. In our setting they don't want us to use the bed rails. If a resident uses bedrails, an evaluation is done for the adaptive rails, and we put them on. The CNA's document under tasks when they perform an activity for a resident. If the task is marked off as one person assist, then one person assists with that activity. We did not substantiate the allegation because everyone was under the impression she was a one person assist with the bed mobility. 2. During an interview on 08/06/2025 at 2:51 p.m., Resident #6 stated she thought she was supposed to have two people assisting her but usually it is only one person assisting. She stated she holds onto the mattress and sheets when she has to turn, especially when she turns on her right side because she has little to no movement on her left side and there has been several times where she feels like she is going to fall head first off of the bed. She stated when that happens the aide usually runs around and moves her upper body back into position, so she does not fall. She stated she wishes there was something sturdier to hold on to, so she was more comfortable with turning. Review of Resident #6's admission record revealed an admission date of 03/26/2024 and diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side (03/26/2024), morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories (03/26/2024), flaccid hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side (03/26/2024). Review of Resident #6's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of Section GG-Functional Abilities revealed, Resident #6 had an impairment to one side of her upper and lower extremity. Resident #6 required Substantial/maximal assistance, helper does more than half the effort. Helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort for Roll left and right and sit to lying. Resident #6 was dependent helper who does all the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. Or the assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity for Lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand, chair/bed to chair transfer and tub/shower transfer. Review of Resident #6's Care Plan, dated 04/09/2025, revealed the following:Focus: ADL Self-Care and/or mobility deficit. Needs assistance with ADL's at risk of developing complications associated with decreased ADL self-performance related to: Cognitive impairment, disease process/condition, weakness. Date Initiated 08/06/2025 Revision Date 08/06/2025Interventions: Encourage and assist to turn and reposition, shifting weight to enhance circulation. Date Initiated: 08/06/2025Provide assistance/supervision as needed: Bed Mobility-Assist x2Transfers-Assist x2 mechanical liftToileting-Assist x 2Dressing-Assist x1Bathing-Assist x2Grooming-Assist x1Eating-SupervisionDate Initiated 08/06/2025 Revision on: 08/06/2025 Review of Resident #6's Visual/Bedside Kardex as of 08/06/2025 revealed: Safety: check for toileting needs; ensure proper footwear; give verbal cues as needed; observe for bleeding gums, nosebleeds, unusual bruising, tarry black stools, pink or discolored urine to nurse and/or MD.Resident care:Encourage residents to report any signs of bleeding or bruising; monitor for side effects IE: abdominal or stomach pain, bloody or cloudy urine; nail care; observed skin rash for increased spread or signs of infection; place items in easy reach and Orient to placement; place items used in easy reach IE water, telephone, call lights; report changes in visual status PRN; resident prefers to have: now male CNA's; splint: apply left [NAME] guard and AM. Remove left [NAME] guard at DHS. Where daily as tolerated. Two person assist with turning and repositioning. Bladder/bowel:assist with toileting and peri care as needed; never mind frequent checks for incontinence; incontinence care as needed; monitor BM's and document; the relocation would be preventative skin care as ordered; keep will be clean dry and odor free daily. Review of Resident #6's Interventions/Task log revealed: ADL-Bed Mobility was provided with a one person assist on 07/25/2025 (day and night shift), 07/26/2025 (day and night shift), 07/27/2025 (day, evening, and night shift), 07/28/2025 (day shift), 07/29/2025 (day and night shift), 07/30/2025 (day and night shift), 08/01/2025 (day and night shift), 08/02/2025 (night shift), 08/03/2025 (night shift), 08/04/2025 (night shift), 08/04/2025 (night shift), 08/05/2025 (evening and night shift), 08/06/2025 (day and night shift). 3. During an interview on 08/06/2025 at 2:59 p.m., Resident #7 stated he usually has only one person but occasionally, there's a second person to assist him. He stated when they turn him he tries to reach down and hold the metal bar underneath the mattress but due to his Multiple Sclerosis (MS) he has very little strength in his hands and often is very uncomfortable and makes him nervous about falling. The resident stated he has asked multiple people about getting some siderails but has been told by everyone he does not qualify. Review of Resident #7's admission record revealed an admission date of 07/26/2023. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include: Multiple Sclerosis (07/26/2023), Muscle wasting and atrophy (07/27/2023), Muscle weakness (07/27/2023), Unspecified lack of coordination (07/27/2023), Functional quadriplegia (07/26/2023), and need for assistance with personal care (07/26/2023). Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed in Section C-Cognitive Patterns a BIMS of 15 out 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of Section GG-Functional Abilities revealed Resident #7 had an impairment to both sides of his upper and lower extremities. Resident #7 was dependent; helper does all the effort. Residents does none of the effort to complete the activity. Or the assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity for Roll left and right, sit to lying, lying to sitting on side of bed, chair/bed to chair transfer, and tub shower transfer. Review of Resident #7's Care Plan, dated 07/26/2023, revealed the following: Focus: Resident's ADL needs include assist with bed mobility; transfers; locomotion/walking; dressing; toileting; personal hygiene; bathing. Date Initiated: 07/27/2023Interventions: The resident cannot transfer without help. The resident will need total mechanical lift with 2 persons assist for transfers. Date Initiated: 07/27/2023The resident needs help to move and reposition in the bed. Will need one or two person assistance to change position or scoot up in bed. This may involve some lifting of the legs or boosts. Date Initiated: 07/27/2023Provide assistance/supervision as needed: Bed Mobility-Assist x1Transfers-Assist x2 mechanical liftToileting-Assist x 1Dressing-Assist x2Bathing-Assist x1Grooming-Assist x1Eating-Setup AssistDate Initiated 08/07/2025 Revision on: 08/07/2025 Review of Resident #7's Visual/Bedside Kardex as of 08/06/2025 revealed: Safety: Check for toileting needs; encourage appropriate footwear; keep adaptive equipment within reach; scoop mattress.Resident Care: CPAP as ordered; nail care; O2 as ordered for OSA/SOB; place items used in easy reach i.e. water, telephone, call lights; use Broda chair.Bladder/Bowel:assessed with toileting and peri care as needed; document bowel movements daily; frequent checks for incontinence; incontinence care as needed; monitor BM's and document; preventative skin care is ordered; will be clean dry and odor free daily.Bed Mobility:ADL-Bed Mobility; The resident needs help to move and reposition in the bed. Will need one or two person assistance to change position or scoot up in bed. This may involve some lifting of the legs or boosts. Turn and reposition frequently as needed.Bathing:ADL-bathing type showers Wednesday and Saturday 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.; The residents needs help getting in and out of the shower and may be able to wash their face or upper body but need assistance washing the rest, including their feet. During an interview on 08/06/2025 at 8:50 a.m., Staff E, CNA stated she knows a resident requires a one or two person assist when they are heavy or aggressive. During an interview on 08/06/2025 at 8:58 a.m., Staff F, CNA stated she looks in the computer, Kardex under resident care to tell her if a Resident is a one or two person assist. During an interview on 08/07/2025 at 3:46 p.m., Staff G, CNA, stated the facility provided education recently. The education reminded them to look at the Kardex under resident care to know if a resident needs one or two person assistance with ADL care. During an interview on 08/07/2025 at 3:47 p.m., Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated she had received education about the Kardex, specifically where to look for one or two person assist for her residents. She goes into the Kardex under Resident Care, and she can find one or two person assist. She said they provided this education to her yesterday and during her orientation in the beginning of July when she was hired. During an interview on 08/07/2025 at 3:51 p.m., Staff D, CNA stated she did receive education two weeks ago on where to look for resident care needs like how many aides are needed to assist with bed mobility, she looks at the Kardex under Resident Care and if she cannot find what she needs she will go ask the nurse. During an interview on 08/07/2025 at 3:52 p.m., Staff H, CNA stated they provided education last week and taught us how to get into the electronic record. She said if they need to know if a resident is a one or two person assist they look under patient care on the Kardex. During an interview on 08/07/2025 at 10:29 a.m., the Director of Rehab (DOR) stated when a resident is admitted to the facility they get an evaluation and a screening completed by therapy. For residents in Long Term Care, they screen them to determine their bed mobility. They review the residents records, speak with the resident and family to determine their prior level of care. We observe them to see if they can perform the action we are evaluating. After the evaluation we tell the nurse. Therapy does not update or document on the care plan. Resident #5 was seen by therapy most recently on 02/27/2025 thru 06/27/2025. She required a max assistance, she really needed a lot of assistance with everything. She has been dependent since 09/21/2024. Resident #7 has MS, and he does not like to participate in therapy. We have picked him up several times. He was last seen in May of 2025. Resident #7 is dependent for bed mobility since his admission in 2023. He is a big guy if the CNA's feel like they need a two person they could use two people. Resident #6 has been dependent since her admission in 2024. The DOR stated when they do the quarterly or annual assessments they use the Task report to show what type of assistance the CNA's have been using for care. If a resident is all over the board we will do an evaluation to determine what their current level of care assistance is. If we determine a different level of care, we communicate it to the CNA and the nurse. It is up to the CNA to determine if they can provide the care for the residents by using one person or two and what is safe for them and the residents. Review of the facilities policy dated October 2022 titled person-centered comprehensive care plan revealed,Guideline:It is the practice of the center to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet their preferences and goals, and address the guest/residents nursing, medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. The comprehensive care plan will be developed within seven days after completion of the comprehensive assessment and no more than 21 days after admission. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both comprehensive and quarterly review assessments and with significant changes in the guest/resident's condition. The interdisciplinary team will work collaboratively with the guest/resident, responsible party and/or family members to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that encompasses each guest/resident personal preferences, goals, and objectives. The comprehensive person-centered care plan will be developed based on the minimum data set (MDS) to assess the guest/residence clinical condition, cognitive and functional status, and use of services. The comprehensive care plan will address the following: services to be furnished to attain or maintain the guest/residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. PASARR recommendations (if applicable) Guest/resident goals for admission and desired outcomes Guest/resident preferences for future discharge referrals to local community resources needs and strengths of the guest/resident culturally competent care and services/preferences trauma informed care/interventions potential triggers guest/residents refusal of care or services and centers action to provide education to guest/resident and or representative Facility immediate actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy included: -Resident #5 had a comparison review of their most recent completed MDS section GG, which included input from the multidisciplinary team with their current ADL care plan/Kardex interventions, and her plan of care was updated to accurately reflect the amount of ADL assistance and type of support for bed mobility and toileting/incontinence care on 7/29/2025. -The care plan specialist/designee reviewed all residents ADL care plan/Kardex utilizing input from the resident's medical record, gg evaluations, staff interviews including therapy documentation as applicable, on 8/6/25 and 8/7/25, which included 1- or 2-person support to clarify the minimum number of people required to safely perform the task. These process changes included guidance for the safest level of ADL support. 13 residents had the level of support assistance revised. For the remainder of the residents the care plan specialist/designee revised the Kardex to place the ADL level of assistance and number of staff support under one section resident care to create a uniform view for nursing assistants to decrease opportunities for error on 8/6/2025. -Director of education/designee educated all nursing staff (CNAs and nurses) on pulling up the care plan and Kardex interventions to identify the correct ADL level assistance and type of support required with a return demonstration. This education was initiated on 7/25/25 on-going for new employees -The DON/designee on 8/8/25 conducted an observational audit of nursing staff providing ADL care at the bedside or completed an ADL documentation review of 15 (10 %) nursing staff providing resident ADL care to ensure appropriate support and safety measures were followed according to the resident's care plan or Kardex. Any identified concerns were corrected immediately with staff utilizing corrective education. Verification of the facility's removal plan was conducted by the survey team on 08/08/2025.On 08/08/2025 interviews with facility staff was conducted for 4 RN's, 9 CNA's, and 2 LPN's to verify education and training had been completed related to topics to include:-Reviewing Kardex before caring for Resident, Safety and Resident Care, prior to providing any care and document accordingly. All staff were able to voice understanding of the policies and processes required to provide competent care to residents. The staff interviewed have worked across all shifts. -A review of the sign in sheets was conducted to verify education and training was completed as outlined in the IJ removal plans. Based on verification
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall with serious injury for one resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall with serious injury for one resident (#5) out of three residents sampled for accidents. On 07/25/2025 Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), independently rolled Resident #5 onto her side in bed to perform incontinence care. Staff A, CNA left Resident #5 unattended in bed to collect supplies. Resident #5 fell out of the bed while unattended and suffered a right hip fracture which required a transfer to a higher level of care and surgical repair.This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and the likelihood for serious injury and or death to residents and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on 08/07/2025. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 08/08/2025 and the scope and severity was reduced to an E after verification of removal of immediacy of harm.Findings included: During an interview on 08/06/2025 at 8:32 a.m., Resident #5 stated she had a fall a couple months after she was admitted to the facility. Resident #5 stated she was supposed to always have two people assisting her with care. She stated she requested a bigger bed. She stated, Sometimes they come in with two people and sometimes they just come in with one person. She stated, they set up a chair on the side of the bed for her to hold onto because they told her they could not use side rails. She stated, The chair slides while I'm holding onto it. She stated she requested a bigger bed a few times after a fall and was told they would order it, and it never came until after her most recent fall (07/25/2025). She stated, This last fall I broke my hip in two places and had to have surgery. The CNA came in to change me by herself, she rolled me onto my side, she put my legs with one on top of the other, the CNA went to grab something off of the dresser and I told her I was slipping, and she told me, You will be okay, I told her again that I was slipping and then I fell off of the bed. I only got the bigger bed now because I fell. The aides were upset that they were taking so long, to get me a bigger bed because they all knew I was at risk. Review of Resident #5's admission record revealed an initial admission date of 04/05/2025 and a re-admission date of 07/28/2025. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include: displaced apophyseal fracture of left femur (a break in the growth plate area of the large bone of the upper leg), initial encounter for closed fracture (08/04/2025), displaced fracture of greater trochanter (a bony prominence located on the upper part of the thigh bone) of right femur, initial encounter for closed fracture (07/28/2025), spondylolysis (a stress fracture in a vertebra), cervical (neck) region (09/21/2024), unspecified fall, subsequent encounter (09/21/2024), muscle weakness (generalized) (09/21/2024), other abnormalities of gait and mobility (09/21/2024), morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories (09/21/2024), and repeated falls (09/21/2024). Review of Resident #5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] revealed in Section C-Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of Section GG-Functional Abilities revealed Resident #5 had an impairment on one side to her upper and lower extremity. Resident #5 required substantial/maximal assistance revealing helpers do more than half the effort. Helpers lift or hold trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort for rolling left and right. Sitting to lying (the ability to move from sitting on side of bed to lying flat on the bed, lying on side of bed), Resident #5 was dependent, meaning helper does all the effort. Residents do none of the effort to complete the activity. Or the assistance of two or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity. Review of Resident #5's care plan dated 08/03/2024 revealed: Focus: ADL Self-Care and/or mobility deficit. Needs assistance with ADL's Initiated on 09/23/2024.Interventions included: BED MOBILITY-Total ASSIST X 2 TRANSFERS-Total ASSIST with Hoyer X 2TOILETING-Total ASSIST X 2DRESSING-Total ASSIST X 2BATHING-Total ASSIST X 2 Review of Resident #5's Intervention/Task for July revealed one person assistance was provided for ADL-Bed Mobility on 07/26/2025 (day shift), 07/28/2025 (evening shift), 07/30/2025 (day shift), 07/31/2025 (evening shift), 08/01/2025 (day shift), 08/02/2025 (evening shift), 08/03/2025 (day shift and evening shift), 08/05/2025 (evening shift), 08/07/2025 day shift). A review of the physician order summary for Resident #5 revealed: Right hip Xray 2 views due to status post fall pain. Start Date 07/26/2025.Send to ER (emergency room) for further eval and treat. Start Date 07/27/2025. A review of Resident #5's right hip Xray, radiology report, dated 07/26/2025 revealed:Reason for Study: Acute Pain Due To TraumaFINDINGS: There is deformity of the femoral neck concerning for a fracture. There is joint space narrowing of the right hip with bony productive change. There is diffuse osteopenia.Conclusion: Deformity of the right femoral neck concerning for a fracture. A follow-up CT (computed tomography) scan of the hip is suggested. Review of Resident #5's progress notes revealed: -07/28/2025 at 7:47 p.m. Fall Risk Evaluation Fall Risk: History of falls (past 3 months): 1-2 falls in past 3 months. Level of consciousness / mental status: Alert (oriented x 3) OR comatose. Resident is chairbound / incontinent. Systolic blood pressure: No noted drop between lying and standing. Vision status: Adequate (with or without glasses). Predisposing disease: 1-2 present. Residents had a change in condition in the last 14 days. Recent hospitalization history in last 30 days: Yes. Notes: Post right hip surgery 7/27/25 Gait / balance: Requires use of assistive devices (i.e. cane, wheelchair, walker, furniture). Medication: Takes 3-4 these medications (or medication classes) currently and / or within last 7 days. Fall Risk Score: 15.0.-07/28/2025 6:05 p.m. Nursing Note Note Text: readmitted a [AGE] year-old female from [Acute Care Hospital] via stretcher accompanied by 2 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) staff.Surgical incision to right hip clean, dry with dressing intact, with PICO [a single-use, portable negative pressure wound therapy system designed to promote wound healing] dressing functioning well. Patient also has skin tear to right lower leg with sutures in place. Bruising noted to right knee/ right[sic] lower leg. Discoloration and flaking noted BIL [bilateral] feet.-07/27/2025 12:00 a.m. Nursing Note Late Entry:Note Text: Result of X ray[sic] right hip reported to ARNP [Advanced Practical Nurse Practitioner] with order received for resident to be sent to ER [Emergency Room] for further eval and treat. DON [Director of Nursing] notified. This writer called [Family Member] 2x [twice] left message, awaiting for call back. Facility protocol followed. Resident transported to ER via 911.-07/26/2025 07:38 a.m. Radiology Note Note Text: Patient complained of pain of 7 on right hip/pelvis area s/p [status post] fall last evening. Administered PRN [as needed] pain pill. Notified provider on call.received order for STAT (immediate) xray[sic] to right hip/pelvis area 2 views. [Mobile Radiology Company] services needed due to pt [patient] being bed bound.-07/26/2025 3:52 p.m. Nursing Note Note Text: Bariatric [bed] delivered to [room number], resident in new bed without difficulty. Resident[sic] says new bed is comfortable.-07/25/2025 4:56 p.m. Interdisciplinary (IDT) Note Late Entry:Note Text: Resident reviewed by IDT for s/p [status post] fall on 7/25. Resident found by the floor nurse lying on floor on her back next to bed. CNA reported she was providing incontinent care and stepped away to get a towel; during that time, resident rolled off the bed. Head-to-toe assessment completed; no visible injuries noted. Pt [patient] was complaining of left shoulder pain. Neuro checks initiated. NP [Nurse Practitioner] notified; new orders received for STAT [immediate] left shoulder x-ray and one-time dose of oxycodone for pain. Message left for [Family Member] return call regarding notification of family. Interventions: Wider bed ordered for resident. Staff re-educated on following Kardex instructions; emphasized requirement for two-person assist as documented. STAT x-ray of Left shoulder and one time dose of oxycodone was ordered.-7/25/2025 6:27 p.m. Nursing Note Note Text: Called to room by CNA. Observed resident lying on the floor on her back side next to bed. Resident states she rolled off of the side of the bed. Head to toe assessment completed. Complaints of left shoulder pain. No visible sign of injury. Neuro checks initiated. Returned to bed using [mechanical lift] with multiple staff present. [ARNP] notified. New order for STAT left shoulder xray[sic] and one time dose of oxycodone for pain. Message left for [Family Member] to return call to facility.-07/25/2025 7:15 p.m. Nursing Note Note Text: Spoke with [Employee of Bed Supplier]. Bariatric bed to be delivered 7/26 before 11:45am. Resident made aware. Review of Resident #5's Hospital Discharge Records dated 07/27/2025 revealed: Procedure History: Arthroplasty Hip Bipolar (a surgical procedure replaces the damaged femoral head with a prosthetic implant) (Right), (07/27/2025), Open Reduction Internal Fixation Hip (surgical procedure used to treat hip fractures by realigning the bone and securing it with internal hardware) (Right) (07/27/2025). During a phone interview on 08/06/2025 at 12:57 p.m., Staff A, CNA stated on 07/25/2025 she went to provide Resident #5 with care. She said, I rolled [Resident #5] onto her side in the bed, and I went to grab a towel from the dresser. While I was grabbing the towel [Resident #5] slipped off the bed. I usually take everything I need with me. She stated there was not a rail on the bed for the resident to hold onto. Staff A stated Resident #5 holds onto the top of the dresser for support, and It is difficult to roll her sometimes. She stated, I ran out and started screaming for the nurse. I grabbed her a pillow for her head while we were waiting for someone to come in the room. She stated Resident #5 said her hip was hurting after the fall. Staff A stated the nurse did an assessment and then they put Resident #5 back in bed. She said, I don't know if [Resident #5] went out to the hospital or not. I thought [Resident #5] was a one person assist. We look in the Kardex to tell you how many people a resident requires to provide care. She stated after the incident, the Director of Nursing (DON) did a one-on-one in-service. She said, It was something on falls being careful and being aware. During an interview on 08/06/2025 at 10:38 a.m., Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated on 07/25/2025 she did wound care in the morning and worked on the floor from 3:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m. She was called to Resident #5's room by Staff A, CNA, and Resident #5 was on the floor lying on her back between the two beds. Staff A, CNA told her she was in the middle of changing her when she walked to the dresser to grab towels and the resident fell. Staff B stated the aide told her, The weight of her body flipped her to the other side of the bed. [Staff A, CNA], was the only aide in the room. [Resident #5] was supposed to have two people assisting her. She did a head-to-toe assessment on Resident #5. Staff B stated, I did not move the right shoulder much because I know she has had long term pain in that shoulder. Her legs are big, and [Resident #5] cannot hold them up on her own. I lifted both of her legs, and she did not have any pain at that time. There was no redness, swelling or bruise at the time of the assessment. Resident #5 was only complaining of left shoulder pain. She stated she got orders for STAT (emergent) left shoulder Xray. She said Resident #5 never complained of hip pain on the shift. She stated she called the doctor and asked if the pain medication could be given early. She stated when she got back to work on Monday, she was told Resident #5 went out to the hospital for her hip. She stated at the time of the fall Resident #5 had a regular size standard bed. Staff B stated, We talked about getting her a bariatric bed a long time ago. Resident #5 was able to hold herself over by holding onto the nightstand next to the bed or the armoire on the other side. If she was in a bariatric bed she would not be able to reach the nightstand to hold herself up, so we did not get her the bariatric bed. She said Resident #5 does not use her right arm for anything anymore. She stated, The bed she had [at the time of the fall] did not have anything for her to hold onto. She said Resident #5 does not move; she can't reposition herself or anything. There was some room on each side of the bed, if she was a moveable person she would not be able to move much. Residents who need a bariatric bed just need to bring it up to the managers, and they would get them one. There really is not a system in place for determining when a resident needs a bariatric bed. The unit manager can call and request a bariatric bed if they feel a resident needs it. She said, If we need more room to turn the resident we would request for one. But usually, it is a customer service thing when a resident requests for it. During an interview on 08/06/2024 at 3:56 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she did the reportable investigation for Resident #5's fall. On 07/25/2025 at 4:30 p.m. Staff A, CNA was providing incontinent care for Resident #5. Resident #5 was on her side in the bed. Staff A, CNA went to grab the towels off the dresser. Resident #5 legs began to slide down. Resident #5 told Staff A, CNA she was starting to slide and Staff A, CNA could not intercept her fast enough, resulting in Resident #5 falling to the floor. Resident#5 was assessed by the nurse and complained of left shoulder pain. They did an Xray of the left shoulder and it was negative for a fracture. The next day (07/26/2025), Resident #5 started complaining of right hip pain, they did an Xray, and it was positive for a hip fracture. The results came back close to midnight, and Resident #5 was sent to the hospital for further evaluation. Resident #5 was admitted to the hospital and underwent a right hip arthroplasty on 07/27/2025. The DON stated the resident returned back to the facility on [DATE]. During the investigation, she interviewed staff and other residents to see if there were any concerns with Staff A, CNA's care. No residents or other staff had concerns with Staff A, CNA's care. She provided education to all staff related to making sure they have all of their items in reach when providing care. If they need to grab something while providing care residents should be placed back on the bed. They ordered a wider bed for Resident #5, and it was delivered the next day (07/26/2025). They updated Resident #5's Kardex for her to be a two person assist with everything. The DON stated, There is not anything that is black or white to determine what type of assistance a resident needs while providing care. It can be determined by therapy; some people can do more than others. There are a lot of factors, there is not a guide. The DON stated Resident #5 had another event in October 2024. During this event Resident #5's legs were hanging over the side of the bed, they had to assist her down to the floor and then put her back in bed. She said, According to the 10/14/2024 interdisciplinary team (IDT) note it says Resident #5 is a two person assist with incontinence care. I thought this was referring to when Resident #5 was using the bathroom and holding onto the bar. She said bed mobility is how many people it takes to move people in bed. At the time her bed mobility was a one person assist, and her transfer status was two person assist. She stated, There was some confusion, because the two-person changing brief was not under the activities of daily living (ADL) part of the Kardex and her bed mobility in ADL's said Resident #5 was a one person assist. When the care plan was updated in October of 2024, it updated under a different part of the Kardex. She said Resident #5 needing to be a two-person assist for brief changing was only on the safety part of the Kardex. Staff A, CNA was following the ADL Kardex. Residents use different things to hold onto while care is being provided. They can use furniture, she said, Their chair would be up against their bed, or chairs that have handrails, or whatever is there for them to grab onto. If they have a scoop mattress they can hold onto that, it depends on the resident. We try to use trapezes; we try other interventions other than side rails. We don't like to utilize bed rails, she said, It is frowned upon to use them since the initiative for no bed rails. In our setting they don't want us to use the bed rails. If a resident uses bedrails, an evaluation is done for the adaptive rails, and we put them on. The CNA's document under tasks when they perform an activity for a resident. If the task is marked off as one person assist, then one person assists with that activity. We did not substantiate the allegation because everyone was under the impression she was a one person assist with the bed mobility. Review of the facility's policy, dated October 2014, revision date November 2018 revealed the following:PALM Program(Preventing Accidental Level Change Mishaps)Purposethe PALM program is designed to identify those residents who are at risk for repeated falls and serves to alert team members to provide interventions designed to reduce fall risk.ProcedureNew Admissions1. During the admission process, residents will be evaluated using the evaluation of risk for falls form.2. A therapy screen will be completed during the admission process, if no therapy is ordered on admission.3. Residents identified at risk for falls will have an interim plan of care developed to address identified risk factors.4. Residents who are identified as being at risk for falls and have fallen within the past 30 days or have had significant injury from a fall prior to admission may be placed in the PALM program.Current Residents1. following a fall, the resident will be reevaluated using the evaluation of risk for falls form. No, this evaluation will also be completed upon hospital return, quarterly and with significant change.2. The care plan will be updated following each fall with modification of interventions based on interdisciplinary team review and resident need.3. All residents experiencing a fall(s) will be reviewed at the next standards of care meeting following the fall(s).4. The interdisciplinary team will determine which residents are to be included in the PALM program. The program may include but is not limited to residents who are at risk for falls and have had one of the following: repeat falls within a 30 day periodProgram Overview1. once a resident has been selected by the interdisciplinary team to participate in the PALM program, a palm symbol will be placed in the following places as applicable: outside the residence room beside the residence name plate/door.2. The residents care plan will be updated to reflect participation in the PALM program.3. Team interventions which may apply to PALM program participants include the following suggested interventions:o Ambulation programo Family/resident educationo therapy processo bowel and bladder evaluation programo increase activities in the evening after dinner; scheduled individual activity, determine resident preferenceso pet therapyo exercise programo assist resident outdoors for fresh airo change nap or bedtimeo soothing music at bedtimeo Dim lights at night, provide quiet environmento lavender hand massageo pain management programo nonskid shoes, slipper socks; evaluate for proper footwearo medication review by pharmacy and or by physician/ARNP/[NAME] labs; chemical panel(s), urinalysiso orthostatic blood pressure checks, vital signso every 15 minute checks, 1 to 1 supervision or two to one supervisiono in view of staff when out of [NAME] encourage family visitso psychiatric consulto neurology consulto ophthalmology or audiology consulto keep glasses cleano heat brakes locked on wheelchair/[NAME] anti tipper device for wheelchairso automatic wheelchair brakeso Dycem chair [NAME] wheelchairs lock during transferso bad adjusted to accommodate resident height (hips at 90 degree angle when feet flat on floor)o specialty mattresso wheelchair cushions as appropriateo adequate lighting, Night Lightso remove clutter and barriers from floorso stop signso raised toilet seatso hipsterso low bed with mats, bed in lowest positiono evaluate resident ability to utilize bathroom assisted/unassisted according to their cognitive status or ability4. interventions to reduce risk of falls unique to each resident should be included in the residence care plan and on Kardex.5. Education regarding the PALM program will be provided to all team members upon hire annually and as needed. Facility immediate actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy included: --The IDT team completed a root cause analysis 7/28/25 and medical record review for resident #5 to identify gaps in the level of supervision, ADL assistance and general safe practices to reduce resident injury. --The care plan specialist team/designee completed a resident review of ADL care plan/ Kardex interventions 8/6/25 and 8/7/25 to ensure there were no discrepancies in the number of staff support needed to complete task toileting/incontinence care or bed mobility. Those 13 residents identified had their care plan/Kardex corrected. The Kardex format was streamlined so all ADL support guidance is contained under the resident care tile to decrease staff error. --The Director of Education/designee provided education to nursing staff to (98.4% 62/63 of CNAs and 100% 29/29 Nurses) on pulling up the care plan/Kardex to identify the level of assistance and supervision required. The Director of Education/designee educated staff on general safety interventions identified based on the root cause analysis such as having required supplies gathered and within reach to provide care, utilize call bell when needed additional support, and to ensure resident is in a safe position prior to leaving the bedside, review care plan/Kardex prior to providing care to ensure level of assistance and support needed. This was initiated on 7/25/25 and is ongoing for new employees. Additionally, the one CNA left for education will return tomorrow and will be educated prior to working her shift. Completed 8/8/25. --The DON/designee on 8/8/25 conducted an observational audit of nursing staff providing ADL care at the bedside or completed an ADL documentation review of 15 (10 %) nursing staff providing resident ADL care to ensure appropriate support and safety measures were followed according to the resident's care plan or Kardex. Any identified concerns were corrected immediately with staff utilizing corrective education. Verification of the facility's removal plan was conducted by the survey team on 08/08/2025. On 08/08/2025 interviews with facility staff was conducted for 4 RN's, 9 CNA's, and 2 LPN's to verify education and training had been completed related to topics to include:-Reviewing Kardex before caring for Resident, Safety and Resident Care, prior to providing any care and document accordingly. All staff were able to voice understanding of the policies and processes required to provide competent care to residents. The staff interviewed have worked across all shifts. -A review of the sign in sheets was conducted to verify education and training was completed as outlined in the IJ removal plans. Based on verification of the facility's Immediate Jeopardy removal plan the immediate jeopardy was determined to be removed on 08/08/2025 and the non-compliance was reduced to a scope and severity of E.
Feb 2025 9 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievance ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievance for two residents (#109 and #268) out of three residents sampled for grievances. Findings included: During an interview and observation on 2/3/2025 at 12:29 p.m., Resident #109 stated repeated concerns regarding meals and care and the facility does not listen to her. During an interview on 2/4/2025 at 11:13 a.m., Resident #109 stated continued concern regarding meals and care. A review of the Grievance Logs from November 2024 to February 5, 2025, did not reveal grievance concern for Resident #109. Review of the grievance log for June 2024 revealed a grievance written for Resident #109 on 6/21/2024. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 9:23 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) stated they spoke with Resident #109 on 2/3/2025 regarding meal concerns and updated the meal ticket. The DM continued to state I receive concerns from residents. I will meet with the resident and discuss, I do not document the concerns. I am trying to get better at that. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 10:19 a.m., the DM presented Resident #109's meal ticket dated 2/5/2025, showing for breakfast the resident prefers cornflakes. The DM said on 2/3/2025, the meal ticket was updated but the update was not reflected until 2/5/2025 and prior to the update the resident's breakfast preference was oatmeal. During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 10:19 a.m., with Staff M, Licensed Practical Nurse and Care Plan Specialist (LPN/CPS) stated Resident #109 had a care plan meeting on 2/3/2025 during which time Resident #109 did have care and food concerns. Staff M, LPN/CPS stated referred Resident #109's concerns to the Unit Manager (UM). During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 10:35 a.m., Staff J, Registered Nurse/Unit Mansager (RN/UM) stated they spoke with Resident #109 regarding the concerns and stated anyone can file a grievance. Staff J, RN/UM stated upon receipt of a grievance, staff will document and send the grievance to the appropriate department for resolution. Once these steps are completed and the resolution occurs, the grievance is given to the Social Service Director. During an interview on 2/3/2025 at 9:55 a.m., Resident #268 stated having concerns about care and food temperatures since admission on [DATE]. Resident #268 also stated he reported the concerns to everyone, certified nursing assistants (CNAs), nurses, and unit manager and nothing has changed. A Review of the Grievance Log from January 2025 to February 5, 2025, did not reveal grievance concerns for Resident #268. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 2:00 p.m., Staff N, CNA confirmed Resident #268 complained about the temperature of the food and some other things. Staff N, CNA also stated they don't really have time to complete the grievance, that is for something really big. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 2:33 p.m., Staff O, RN stated anyone can fill out a grievance and they place the completed form in the Unit Manager's office for follow-up. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 8:00 a.m., the DM stated they did not know of a consistent problem with cold food. The DM also stated there have been concerns with food temperatures but very sporadic and nothing that would need a grievance for. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 2:25 p.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) confirmed being responsible for the grievance process. The SSD explained grievances can be completed by anyone (i.e. staff, family, resident) for the facility to work on. The grievance is filled out and given to her or kept by the manager who filled it out. The grievance is then brought to the morning meeting for discussion and logging. The grievance is given to the appropriate department for follow up and resolution with the resident. Once the department manager resolves the grievance with the resident, the completed form is turned in to the SSD for filing and tracking. The SSD stated they try to resolve the grievances quickly, 3-5 days but she doesn't follow up with any of the residents regarding issues unless they were related to Social Services. The SSD stated they will summarize the areas of concern, weekly and monthly, for the Quality Assurance Committee and they have noticed some trends in call lights and food temperatures, but they were not sure if anything has happened with those trends. During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 10:08 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated the grievance process is coordinated by the SSD and anyone can complete a grievance. The grievance is received and logged by the SSD, then taken to the next manager meeting, which is held twice daily, in the morning and at the end of the day, for discussion and assignment for investigation/resolution. Discussion occurs regarding the grievance at the meetings daily until resolved, usually 3-5 days. The SSD tracks and trends the data for discussion at the Quality Assurance Committee. Review of the facility's policy and procedures titled Grievances with revision date of March 2024 revealed the following: Purpose: F585 - The center recognizes the guest/resident/legal representative/family has the right to voice grievances to the center without discrimination and without fear of reprisal. The center team members are responsible for making prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and to keep the guest/resident appropriately updated on the progress being made toward resolution. Definitions: Prompt effort to resolve includes the center's acknowledgment of a grievance and to actively work toward a documented resolution of that grievance. Policy: The Grievance Official and Social Services personnel will serve as guest/resident liaisons/advocates in the concern grievance procedure. 4. The guest/resident has the right to file a grievance orally or in written format. 5. The center will make a prompt effort to resolve any grievance received. Grievances will be reviewed, investigated, resolved and documented in five days. 7. The center will review with the guest/resident/legal representative/family the final resolution of the grievance. Procedure: The Grievance Official and Social Services personnel will serve as resident liaisons/advocates in the concern grievance procedure. 1. A grievance is defined as any formal expression (verbally or in writing) of interest regarding the well-being of a guest/resident. 4. The center will designate a Grievance Official with whom the grievance can be filed and will post his or her name, business address (mailing and email) and business phone number. Any team member can write or assist in the writing of a grievance. 5. The Grievance Official is the Social Service Director/designee. a. The Grievance Official is responsible for the following items: 1. Overseeing the grievance process to include receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusions to include the investigation, documentation of the summary and the follow up. 5. The Grievance Official will close the grievance and reflect the conclusion/outcome of the grievance investigation or abuse investigation. 6. The Grievance Official will provide the guest/resident/legal representative with a written decision about the filed grievance upon request. 7. The grievances will be brought to the morning stand up meeting daily. They will be reviewed out loud with all the leadership team members. The grievance forms will come to the stand up meeting daily until resolved. 9. Below is a list of items that the investigating team member will include on the grievance form and the Grievance Official will be responsible to assure is completed when a written decision is requested. A written decision will only be provided by the Grievance Official/designee. a. The date the grievance was received. b. The guest/resident name that is involved in the grievance. c. A summary of the guest/resident/legal representative/family grievance. (What is the grievance)? d. The steps that were taken to investigate the grievance. e. A summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions of the investigation regarding the grievance. f. A statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed. g. Documentation of any corrective action taken or to be taken by the center. 10. Upon receipt of the grievance, documentation on the grievance form will be initiated by the Grievance Official/designee or whichever professional team member receives the concern. Instructions for completion are outlined on the Addendum. a. The Grievance Official/designee will document the date the grievance is received on the Grievance Log and copies are made and distributed to the Executive Director and the referenced department representative.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure care to prevent pressure ulcers was receive...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure care to prevent pressure ulcers was received in accordance with professional standards of practice for one resident (#30) of five residents sampled for skin conditions. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the diagnosis sheet revealed diagnoses to include but not limited to palliative care, weakness, muscle weakness/atrophy, reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, and risk for pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #30's February 2025 Order Summary Report revealed the following orders: - Resident to wear right offloading boot when in bed as tolerated; remove for care and skin checks. Re: right heel DTI (deep tissue injury) every shift, order date 11/22/2024. - Offload bilateral heels while in bed as tolerated every shift for preventative, order dated 11/13/2024. On 2/3/2025 at 8:50 a.m., Resident #30 was observed noted in her room and lying upright. Resident #30's feet were observed sticking out from the bed covers at the end of the bed. Resident #30 was not wearing any splint or boot orthotics during the time of the observation. Staff R, CNA was observed going in the room and assisted with breakfast meal/tray set up. Staff R, CNA was interview following the observation and stated she was not sure if Resident #30 had any weakness or contractures in her upper or lower extremities. Staff R, CNA confirmed she had Resident #30 on her assignment regularly during the 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift. On 2/5/2025 at 7:40 a.m., Resident #30 was observed in her room lying in bed with both feet observed sticking out from the bed linen. Both feet were bare and were without any type of splint/orthotics. At 7:55 a.m., an interview with Resident #30's assigned CNA Staff CC, CNA, who revealed she knows the resident and her daily care needs. She also revealed she did not know if Resident #30 had any upper or lower extremity weakness or has any contractures and confirmed she was unaware if the resident utilizes any splints or orthotics, to include use of a soft resting/offloading boot. On 2/5/2025 at 11:00 a.m. and 12:43 p.m., Resident #30 was observed in her room and lying in bed and was not wearing any type of foot splint/orthotic offloading boot during times of the observations. On 2/5/2025 at 1:10 p.m., Resident #30 was observed in her room and was. The resident was asked if she wears any type of splints or boots and she said, bunny boots, but could not remember the last time she wore them. She could not remember a time when she refused to wear them. Following the interview, resident's assigned CNA Staff AA, CNA, was interviewed. Staff AA, CNA confirmed she had Resident #30 on her assignment regularly and revealed the resident is dependent on staff for all her ADLs. Staff AA, CNA was not able to state if the resident wore any splints or boots on her feet. Staff AA, CNA entered Resident #30's room and asked the resident if she could open her stand up closet door. After obtaining permission from the resident, Staff AA, CNA opened the door and at the bottom of the closet was a light blue colored soft boot, right footed. Staff AA, CNA revealed she was not aware of the boot before. The resident saw the boot and said, yes I have worn that before. She continued to say she did not want it anymore because it hurt her foot. She confirmed staff did not offer her to wear it for a while and did not know it was part of a doctor's order. Review of the current Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed; Cognition/BIMS score - 11 of 15, which revealed the resident had mild cognitive impairment. It was evident through review of the nurse progress notes and interviews with the assigned CNA, the resident was not offered to wear the right side offloading boot for at least three days observed 2/3/25, 2/4/25, 2/5/25. Review of Resident #30's Care Plans with a next review date 3/6/2025 did not reveal problem areas/interventions related to Resident #30's right heel, as indicated in the current Order Summary Report. On 2/6/2025 at 7:55 a.m., Resident #30 was observed in her room seated upright in her bed and under the bed sheets/covers. Both of her feet were sticking out from the sheets and were noted with no orthotic or splint/soft boot on her right foot. On 2/6/2025 at 10:00 a.m., an interview with Staff J, RN UM revealed she was knowledgeable of Resident #30 with relation to her daily medical care and services. Staff J, RN UM revealed Resident #30 usually stays in her room throughout the day and does not wish to participate in group activities or eat in the community dining room. Staff J, RN UM confirmed Resident #30 usually does not like to get out from bed to a chair and has right side weakness and skin integrity with risk for pressure ulcers. Staff J, RN UM confirmed the resident was ordered a right foot boot to wear use daily and as tolerated. Staff J, RN UM was not sure if the resident had behaviors of refusing to wear the boot, but revealed staff are to assist with the boot daily, per the order, and to document if used or refused. Staff J, RN UM reviewed Resident #30's medical record and could not find any documentation or care planning behavior problem areas relating to Resident #30 refusing to wear the boot on her right foot. Review of the February 2025 MAR revealed documentation on the 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift on 2/3/2025, 2/4/2025, and 2/5/2025 indicating Resident #30 was offered and assisted with the right foot offloading boot. Observations during the 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift and interview with the resident and Staff AA, CNA and Staff CC, CNA during the same days observed, revealed Resident #30 was not offered or wearing the boot. On 2/6/2025 at 11:00 a.m., an interview with the Rehabilitation Director confirmed the Rehabilitation Department both Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy were not currently seeing Resident #30 on their caseload. The Rehabilitation Director revealed the offloading boot would not come recommended or ordered from their department as this boot was that was ordered from the physician was for pressure ulcer reducing risk.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow contracture maintenance programs for one res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow contracture maintenance programs for one resident (#81) of sixty-seven sampled residents. It was found the resident was not assisted with donning and doffing of their splint device during four of four days observed (2/3/2025, 2/4/2025, 2/5/2025, and 2/6/2025). Findings included: On 2/4/2025 at 2:30 p.m., Resident #81 was noted in his room and lying in bed and under the covers. Resident #81's right hand appeared contracted and he was not wearing any splints or orthotics. There was no evidence in the room of a splint or orthotic. During an interview with the Resident's assigned Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) Staff R, CNA and AA, CNA, both revealed they know the resident and have him on their routine assignments. Staff R, CNA and AA, CNA were unaware Resident #81 had any right hand weakness or contracture and were unaware if he utilized any splints or orthotics on that hand. On 2/5/2025 at 7:23 a.m., 8:43 a.m., and 1:40 p.m., Resident #81 was noted in his room and in bed with the room lights off. Resident #81's right hand was observed without any splint or orthotic on. There was no evidence in the room of any hand splints or orthotic for use. On 2/5/2025 at 8:43 a.m., Resident #81 was observed awake and alert. It was found he was hard of hearing, could speak, but interview questions needed to be written on a pad of paper for him to read. He permitted an interview and it was communicated via pen and paper. The following questions were written for Resident #81 to read, and he communicated back verbally: 1. Are you in any physical pain, to include your ear? Resident #81 responded, Not in any pain, but I am supposed to see an ear doctor. 2. Which hand do you eat with? Resident #81 responded, I eat with my left hand and try with my right hand. 3. Are you in any pain in your right hand? Resident #81 responded, No pain, but I can't use it much. 4. Are you seeing Therapy for your right hand weakness/contracture? Resident #81 responded, I did before but not recently. 5. Do you wear a splint or orthotic on your right hand? Resident #81 responded, No, but I have a splint hanging in my closet. 6. Do you or do staff assist you with wearing of the splint on your right hand? Resident #81 responded, Staff are supposed to help put it on, I can't get it or put it on myself. It was observed the splint was in a yellow bag and hanging on the door. 7. When was the last time staff assisted with putting the splint on your right hand? Resident #81 responded, I can't even remember, it has been awhile and I actually forgot about it. 8. Would you wear it if staff assisted placing it on your right hand? Resident #81 responded, Yes, I would, I know it helps with my weakness. 9. In the past, did you wear the splint on your right hand during the day or during the night? Resident #81 responded, I believe I was helped with it at night, but it's been awhile since I have had it on, and the night staff have not helped put it on. Review of Resident #81's February 2025 Order Summary Report revealed the following order: - Patient to wear R (right) resting hand splint at tolerated, don R hand splint status post p.m. care, doff R hand splint status post a.m. care with frequent checks for redness, edema, or pressure areas. If so, immediately contact Occupational therapy. Order date 3/20/2023. Review of the 1/2025 and 2/2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR)/Treatment Administration Record (TAR) did not reveal documentation related to the right hand splint order or documentation to support the order was followed. Review of the current care plans, with next review date 4/20/2025, revealed the following: - At risk for falls related to: weakness, possible medication side effects, impaired vision. Interventions in place to include: Pressure relieving cushion, right resting hand splint as ordered and tolerated, and keep adaptive equipment within reach. - Resident has self-care deficit related to CVA (cerebrovascular accident) with right sided weakness, functional quadriplegic, requires extensive assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living) and requires mechanical lift and assist of two for transfers. Interventions include: Resident to wear right resting hand splint as tolerated, put on right hand splint after P.M. care, take off right hand splint after A.M. care with frequent skin checks for redness, edema, or pressure areas. On 2/5/2025 at 10:10 a.m., an interview with the Rehabilitation Director revealed she was familiar with Resident #81 and both Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) completed therapy with him but she was going to have OT re-evaluate him for his splint use very soon. The Rehabilitation Director revealed the Rehabilitation Therapy department send the plan and direction out for nursing to follow and usually it is the responsibility of the aide on shift at nights to position the right hand splint, and then to remove during care and also during the days. The Rehabilitation Director was not aware staff were not placing the right hand splint on Resident #81 per the order and plan of care. She also was not aware the Medication Administration Record (MAR), and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) did not have the order to show this splint was offered/placed/removed on a daily basis. Staff BB was aware this Right hand splint was care planned with interventions for nursing staff to place on daily and as tolerated. On 2/6/2025 at 7:30 a.m., Resident #81 was noted in his room and lying flat in bed. The resident was not wearing a splint or orthotic on his right hand. On 2/6/2025 at 7:36 a.m., an interview with Staff W, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed she was knowledgeable of Resident #81 and she has him on her routine daily assignment. She confirmed Resident #81 is hard of hearing and communicates by way of writing on a note pad with a pen. Staff W, LPN revealed Resident #81 can verbalize, he just cannot hear. She further confirmed he has right side upper extremity/hand weakness and he wears an orthotic/splint at night. She stated she believes he refuses the orthotic/splint but verified there was no documentation in the resident's chart to support that. She also confirmed he did not have any Behavior care plans to support refusal of care and treatment. Staff W, LPN revealed the order shows Resident #81 is to wear a right hand splint during the nights and by the time she gets to work for the 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift, the splint should already be removed, so she would not know if he wore it in the evenings or not. Staff W, LPN also confirmed the MAR did not support any information to document if the splint was offered, worn, or refused on a daily basis. On 2/6/2025 at 10:00 a.m., an interview with Staff J, RN Unit Manager (UM) confirmed she was knowledgeable of Resident #81 and his care. She revealed he stays in his room by choice most of the day and receives assistance from staff with most of his ADLs. She revealed he has right sided weakness, to include his upper extremity and right hand. Staff J, RN UM further revealed the resident was on a splinting program, which was ordered by the physician, based on education and recommendation by the OT department. She revealed Resident #81 was to wear a resting hand splint on his right hand in the evenings and as tolerated. She also revealed nursing staff, to include CNAs, are responsible for applying and removing of the splint daily. Staff J, RN UM also revealed Resident #81 will refuse the splint at times but was not able to confirm this through the resident's record documentation. Staff J, RN UM confirmed there was no documented evidence to support Resident #81 refuses to wear the right hand splint. Staff J, RN UM revealed Resident #81 is able to make his daily decisions and was interviewable with knowledge of his medical care and services. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the advance directives revealed he was his own responsible party. Review of the diagnosis sheet revealed diagnoses to include but not limited to hemiplegia, muscle spasms, and repeated falls. Review of the current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed; Cognition/Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score 15 of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. ADL - Upper extremity impairment one side. Active Diagnoses - Hemiplegia and Paraplegia. Review of Resident #81's medical record revealed the following: - Admission/Preadmission Nursing Evaluation dated 10/14/2020 revealed; Section Q under Mobility, resident very limited and makes occasional slight changes in body or extremity position but unable to make frequent or significant changes independently. Notes revealed resident has right sided weakness. - Occupational Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment for certification period of 9/11/2023 to 12/9/2023 revealed primary diagnoses of hemiplegia affecting right dominant side and abnormal posture. The Assessment further revealed objectives and goals to re-establish hand/wrist splint wear to prevent further skin and or joint breakdown. Right wrist 30 degree flex contraction with note slight radial deviation. Patient recently was on OT caseload for splinting and states has not been wearing splint. Target: 9/24/2023. The baseline 9/11/2023 revealed patient reports has been wearing right hand splint. Goal #2 revealed to educate staff/patient on proper splint wear and wheelchair management to prevent further joint and or skin breakdown with target date of 12/9/2023. - Review of the Occupational Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the reason for discharge from therapy was the resident's maximum potential achieved. Comments on 9/21/2023 revealed the resident states he has not been wearing the splint. Further notes revealed; Patient/staff claims to have continue to be wearing right resting splint, Therapist noted decreased tone in RUE (right upper extremity) from last encounters. Patient has been observed wearing splint early mornings. Staff educated on wear, care, and frequent skin checks with good understanding. The summary note revealed; Patient and Caregiver Training: Patient/Staff/caregivers have been provided with therex (therapeutic exercises), theract (therapeutic activities), NMR (neuromuscular reeducation), and ADL prothesis training/education with facility, PROM (passive range of motion)/stretch. The discharge status and recommendation section of the discharge summary revealed; OT recommending PT/Staff continue right hand/wrist resting hand splint to prevent further tone/contracture and ROM (range of motion) of BUE HEP (home exercise program) (specific to RUE) while perform ADL, and encouragement to participate in OOB (out of bed) activities to maintain current level of function. - Review of Nurse Progress Notes dated from 11/5/2024 - 2/5/2025 did not reveal any documentation to support Resident #81 refusing to wear the right hand splint at nights or documentation to support use of the right hand splint. The Rehabilitation Director provided a Rehab to Nursing Communication Form, dated 3/13/2023 for review. The form revealed a topic of: Splint wearing schedule. The remarks revealed; Pt (patient) to wear right resting hand splint as tolerated splint to be put on during p.m. care and removed with a.m. care. Monitor for changes in skin integrity and perform hand and nail hygiene as needed. The form was signed and dated by a therapist on 3/13/2023, nurse on 3/13/2023, Rehabilitation Director on 3/14/2023, and a Unit Manager, not dated. Review of a Splinting and Wheelchair Positioning Program sheet identified precautions and instructions for use of the right hand splint. The sheet revealed precautions to include frequent skin checks and instructions and adaptive equipment to include: Resting hand splint as tolerated, Pt able to don (apply) independently, requires assistance to doff (remove). The notes revealed: Pt to utilize right resting hand splint as tolerates recommended on with p.m. care and doff with a.m. care, receive frequent skin checks; Pt able to doff independently. On 2/6/2025 at 1:00 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) provided the SPLINT and BRACE Program procedure for review. The document did not have a last review date. The procedure revealed; Splints to be worn according to the schedule outlined in the Referral from therapy that then placed in Tasks and the [NAME]. Therapy will train the CNAs and nursing team members how to put the device on and off with the specifics on the SPLINTING PROGRAM form. Each guest or resident with a splint will have a SPLINT BOX or designated splint storage container when it is not in use. It should be labeled with the resident/guest's name and located in their room. The SPLINTING PROGRAM form will be stored in the top of the splint box for reference and any other place deemed appropriate by the center [Interdisciplinary Team]. Cleaning of the splint should be done according to manufacturer's guidelines. Examples of Typical splints seen in our centers are: The Resting Hand Splint, The Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO).
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity related to 1.) wearing of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity related to 1.) wearing of plastic informational bands for ten residents (#30, #50, #72, #33, #90, #121, #45, #34, #123, and #81) of sixty-seven sampled residents and 2.) failed to ensure a urinary catheter bag with contents was positioned in a private manner during two of four days observed (2/3/2025 and 2/4/2025), for one resident (#123) of fourteen residents who utilized indwelling catheters. Findings included: 1. On 2/3/2025 at 8:40 a.m., 11:00 a.m., and 1:00 p.m.; 2/4/2025 at 7:50 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.; 2/5/2025 at 8:00 a.m. and 1:45 p.m.; and 2/6/2025 at 7:50 a.m. and 10:00 a.m., the following residents were observed either in the hallways or in their rooms wearing white plastic and/or pink plastic wrist bands on their wrists. The white plastic wrist bands had photos of the face of the resident, numbers, and an electronic bar code. Resident #30 was observed with the white plastic wrist band on her right wrist. Resident #30 was interviewed during the observation and stated she did not know why she was wearing the wrist band and also stated, I would rather not wear it. A review of Resident #30's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 11 of 15, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #50 was observed with a white plastic wrist band on his right wrist. Resident #50 was interviewed during the observation and stated, I don't want this on, it's filled with bacteria, gross. A review of Resident #50's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the most current Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a BIMS score of 15 of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #72 was not observed with a wrist bands on, but when interviewed stated, I take them off, don't like them on my wrist when discussing the wrist bands. She further revealed when she takes the bands off, she is supplied with more and keeps telling staff she does not want to wear it. A review of Resident #72's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the most current Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a BIMS score of 15 of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #33 was observed with no wrist band on, but when interviewed stated, I don't have one on now, they are supposed to get me another and I would rather not have one if that is ok when discussing the wrist bands. A review of Resident #33's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the most current Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a BIMS score of 15 of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #90 was observed with a white and pink plastic wrist band on his right wrist. Interview with Resident #90 revealed he did not like the feel of the bands and did not want to wear them. He revealed the facility asked him to wear the bands and he does not know why. He preferred to not wear them as they are not comfortable. A review of Resident #90's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The most current Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a BIMS score of 15 of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #121 was observed with a white plastic wrist band on her right wrist. An interview was conducted with the resident following the observation. She revealed she did not like the band on and did not know why she had to wear it. A medical record review revealed Resident #121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the most current Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a BIMS score of 9 of 15, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #45 was observed with a white plastic wrist band on her right wrist. An interview was conducted with the resident following the observation. She revealed she did not know what the band was for and she would rather not wear it. She further revealed the band gets caught on things and she does not like the feeling of wearing it. A brief record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the most current Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a BIMS score of 8 of 15, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #34 was observed with a white plastic band on her right wrist. An interview was conducted with the resident following the observation. Resident #34 revealed she would rather not wear the band and was not told why she had to wear it. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a BIMS score of 7 of 15, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #123 was observed wearing a white plastic band and a pink plastic band on his right wrist. Interview with the resident revealed he was not aware of why he had to wear the bands and did not know what they were for. Most of the photo and bar code on the white plastic band were worn away and was no longer in a readable state. Resident #123 revealed he did not feel comfortable wearing the bands and would rather not wear them. A brief review of the medical record revealed Resident #123 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and recently readmitted from the hospital on 1/28/2025. Review of the most current 5 day MDS assessment, dated 12/9/2024 revealed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a BIMS score of 15 of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #81 was observed wearing a white plastic band on his right wrist. An interview with the resident revealed he did not know why he was wearing it and they just put it on. He also revealed he does not like wearing the band. A brief review of the medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the most current Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a BIMS score of 15 of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. On 2/6/2025 at 10:00 a.m., an interview with Staff J, Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN UM) and the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed the facility implemented the use of wrist bands about three to four months ago. Staff J, RN UM and the DON also confirmed the bands were to identify the resident with first and last name and with a photo of them. The DON further explained the bar code on the band was for staff to obtain medical information from the resident's medical record. Staff J, RN UM and the DON were not able to provide consent forms for the above mentioned residents or any other resident in the facility who were wearing wrist bands. The DON explained the wrist bands were used to ensure staff had the right resident they were providing care and service to. She also explained they would accommodate residents who did not want to wear the wrist band by not placing them on, but was unaware of any residents who did not want to wear them. The DON was also unaware there were so many residents who were not understanding of the purpose of the wrist bands. 2. On 2/3/2025 at 10:00 a.m. and 2:10 p.m., and on 2/4/2025 at 7:50 a.m., 8:50 a.m., and 10:18 a.m., Resident #123's room was observed with the door open. An indwelling catheter bag was observed hanging from the left side of the resident's bed, visible from the hallway and nurses station. The catheter bag was not placed in a privacy bag. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) On 2/4/2025 at 1:50 p.m., Resident #123 was observed in his room seated upright in bed with his over the bed table and lunch meal tray positioned in front of him. An indwelling catheter bag was observed hanging from the left side of the resident's bed, visible from the hallway and nurses station. The catheter bag was not placed in a privacy bag and was approximately ½ full of yellow liquid. On 2/5/2025 at 7:29 a.m., Resident #123 was observed resting in bed. An indwelling catheter bag was observed hanging from the left side of the resident's bed, visible from the hallway. The catheter bag was not placed in a privacy bag and was approximately ½ full of yellow liquid. On 2/5/2025 at 7:56 a.m. Resident #123 was observed in his room lying in bed and had just received his breakfast meal tray from staff. The room light was on the indwelling catheter bag was lying on the floor. At 7:59 a.m., Staff R, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed walking in the room and assisted the resident with setting up the breakfast tray. She left the room and came back in the room with another breakfast tray at 8:03 a.m. for the resident's roommate. She left the room and did not see or attempt to reposition the catheter bag. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) At 8:19 a.m., Staff J, RN UM was observed walking by the room and looked in the room. Staff J, RN UM repositioned the catheter bag to the side of the bed, below the mattress. The catheter bag and contents were visible from the hallway and nurses station. At 9:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff J, RN UM. Staff J, RN UM confirmed she walked by Resident 123's room earlier and saw the catheter bag was lying on the floor. She revealed she went inside and immediately repositioned it on the side and bottom of the bed frame, ensuring the bag was up off the floor. Staff J, RN UM revealed she left the room to retrieve a privacy bag to place the catheter bag in. She could not remember if the bag was without a privacy bag the last two days. Staff J, RN UM stated the resident's catheter bag should have been placed in a privacy bag so the contents were not visible from the hallway. A review of the current Care Plans with a next review date 3/12/2025, revealed the following areas: Risk for complications related to use of indwelling catheter, with interventions in place to include: Anchor to thigh to decrease trauma, Change [indwelling] catheter and bag [as needed], Keep bag below level of bladder, and Privacy bag. On 2/6/2025 at 3:00 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) provided the admission Packet, which is provided to newly admitted residents and/or their representatives. Within the admission Packet was a booklet related to Resident Rights, with a last amended date of 3/8/2022, which revealed: (a) Resident Rights. The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with access to persons and services inside and outside the facility, including those specified in this section. (1) A facility must treat with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident. (c ) Planning and Implementing Care. (4) The right to be informed, in advance, of the care to be furnished and the type of care giver or professional that will furnish care. (6) The right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimented research, and to formulate an advance directive. (d) Respect and dignity. The resident has the right to be treated with respect and dignity, including: (3) The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents. (h) Privacy and Confidentiality. The resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records. (1) Personal privacy includes accommodations, medical treatment, written and telephone communications, personal care, visits, and meetings of family and resident groups, but this does not require the facility to provide a private room for each resident. Further interview with the NHA revealed the facility did not have a specific policy and procedure related to Privacy and Dignity. She revealed they follow the guidelines which is referenced in the Resident Rights section of the admission packet. The NHA further confirmed she did not have consent forms to show residents have consented to wearing plastic wrist bands on their wrists. On 2/6/2025 at 11:00 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator provided the facility's Catheter Care policy and procedure with a date of 7/2023 for review. Review of the Purpose revealed; To provide safe and proper care of a guest/resident with an indwelling catheter by evaluating elimination status, minimizing risk of bladder infection, and maintaining skin integrity. The Equipment section of the policy revealed to utilize a Privacy Bag.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #266 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including infect...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #266 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis and bacteremia. On 2/4/25 at 10:20 a.m., Resident #266 was observed sitting up in a chair and had a dressing on the left knee dated 2/1. Review of Resident #266's Clinical admission evaluation dated 1/31/25 at 10:26 p.m. revealed the resident was admitted with a surgical wound to the left knee. Review of Resident #266's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed dressing to remain until post op day #7 unless it becomes saturated, then change. The incision must remain covered until postop day #14. Review of Resident #266's February 2025 Order Summary Report showed no orders for treatment to the left knee until 2/4/25. During an interview on 2/5/25 at 2:33 p.m., Staff O, RN stated if a dressing is removed or replaced there should be a physician's order and if a resident is admitted with orders to leave a dressing intact then this order should be transcribed, so other nurses don't have to search for the information at a later date. During an interview on 2/5/25 at 4:17 p.m., the DON confirmed there was not an active order for Resident #266's left knee surgical incision until 2/4/25. Her expectation is the facility follow physician orders and call the physician for orders if needed. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Clean Dressing Change (Wound/Surgical Site) Clean, dated 7/23 revealed the following Procedure: 1. Verify physician's order for dressing change and pain medication. 15. Follow treatment order for application of topical medication, if ordered. 18. Document date, time dressing changed, and initials on a piece of tape and place on dressing. 23. Document the following in the electronic medical record: - Date and time of dressing change. 25. Change dressings according to treatment protocols and/or physician orders. 26. Notify the physician of any changes or concerns with wound or surrounding skin. 27. Review and revise treatment plan, as indicated and per physician order. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders and provide wound care in accordance with professional standards of practice for three residents (#5, #138, and #266) of five residents reviewed for surgical and non-surgical wound care. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record for Resident #5 showed initial admission date to the facility was on 3/29/22 with diagnoses to include need for assistance with personal care and disorders of the bone density and structure. Review of Resident #5's care plan revealed the following: Focus initiated 1/18/23 and revision on: 8/20/24: [Resident #5] is at risk for alteration in skin integrity related to: weakness .terminal prognosis. Goal: Skin will remain intact through the next review, revised on 12/3/24. Interventions: Left forehead abrasion cleanse with N/S (normal saline,) pat dry, apply xeroform and cover with dry dressing every other day (QOD) and as needed (PRN) until healed, date initiated 1/24/25. During an observation on 2/3/25 at 8:16 a.m., Resident #5 was lying in bed with a light pink wound dressing with borders secured to the skin on the left side of her forehead dated 2/1/25. During an observation on 2/4/25 at 11:19 a.m., Resident #5 was lying in bed with a light pink wound dressing with borders secured to the skin on the left side of her forehead dated 2/1/25. During an interview, record review, and observation on 2/4/25 at 11:24 a.m., Staff I, Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed the dressing on Resident #5's left forehead was dated 2/1/25. Staff I, RN reviewed Resident #5's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), which showed the wound dressing was completed on 2/3/25 at 10:10 p.m. During an interview on 2/4/25 at 11:30 a.m., Staff J, RN, Unit Manager (UM) said she would check into the date and time the dressing change was documented and the date on Resident #5's current dressing. During an interview on 2/4/25 at 1:56 p.m., Staff J, RN UM said Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) told her on 2/3/24 she documented Resident #5's dressing was changed and did not change the dressing. During a telephone interview on 2/4/25 at 2:18 p.m., Staff K, LPN said on 2/3/25 Resident #5's wound care was documented as completed and the wound care was not completed. Review of Resident #5's February 2025 TAR revealed an order dated 1/23/25 and discontinued on 2/4/25 at 11:42 a.m., showed left forehead wound: Cleanse with normal saline, pat dry. Apply xeroform and cover with a dry dressing every other day and PRN (as needed) if loose or soiled. Review of Resident #5's nursing progress note dated 2/4/25 at 11:52 a.m. showed . forehead treatment, scheduled for yesterday evening, was not performed. 2. On 2/3/25 at 12:37 p.m., an observation of Resident #138 revealed she was ambulating herself in a wheelchair down the B unit hall. Further observations revealed her left pant leg was raised up and exposed an undated bandage on her shin. On 2/4/25 at 10:45 a.m., an observation of Resident #138 revealed she was in bed with the head of bed at approximately a 45-degree angle. An observation of the resident's left shin revealed an undated bandage. A review of Resident #138's admission Record revealed an original admission date of 7/22/23 and re-admission date of 11/8/24. Further review of the resident's admission Record revealed diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, unspecified dementia, moderate, with agitation, weakness, and history of falling. A review of Resident #138's Active Orders revealed the following, Left shin: Cleanse skin tear with normal saline, pat dry. Apply xeroform and cover with a foam dressing every three days and PRN [as needed] if loose or soiled. as needed for loose or soiled dressing, with an order/start date of 2/4/25. Further review of Active Orders revealed the following, Left shin: Cleanse skin tear with normal saline, pat dry. Apply xeroform and cover with a foam dressing every three days and PRN if loose or soiled. every day shift every 3 day(s) for reopened skin tear, with an order/start date of 2/4/25. A review of Resident #138's January 2025 TAR revealed the following, Left shin skin tear: Cleanse with NS [normal saline], pat dry, apply xeroform and DCD [dry clean dressing] q [every] 3 days and PRN until resolved. every evening shift every 3 day(s), with an order date of 1/16/25 and a discontinued date of 1/31/25. A review of Resident #138's wound care notes revealed documentation by Staff G, LPN Wound Care on 1/31/25 and 2/5/25. The note on 2/5/25 by Staff G, LPN Wound Care revealed the following, Previously healed skin tear now noted with weakened most skin to superior aspect of original site . New order received and initiated. No other documentation related to Resident #138's left shin skin tear was observed in the resident's electronic health record from 1/31/25 to 2/4/25. On 2/5/25 at 10:33 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff F, RN. She stated Resident #138 has orders for the left shin skin tear and received xeroform and a dry dressing. She stated the resident's bandage was changed by the wound care nurse. Staff F, RN stated the orders are for wound care every three days, or as needed. She stated Resident #138 is seen by the wound care nurse weekly. Staff F, RN stated floor nurses follow wound orders, and she monitors Resident #138's bandage daily. She stated the wound care nurse dates the resident's bandage. On 2/5/25 at 10:37 a.m., an observation of Resident #138's left shin was conducted with Staff F, RN. An observation of the bandage revealed a date of 2/4/25. She stated the initials on the bandage was the wound care nurse. On 2/5/25 at 10:51 a.m., an interview with Staff P, LPN/Unit Manager (UM) revealed whoever is changing the wound dressing should be documenting and labeling the bandage. She stated the wound care nurse wouldn't be treating a skin tear. Staff P, LPN/UM stated the floor nurse is supposed to treat the skin tear. She confirmed the expectations for wound care is to date the bandage. Staff P, LPN/UM stated, If you see a dressing with no date, who's to say how long it's been there? On 2/5/25 at 4:38 p.m., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Staff G, LPN Wound Care revealed Staff G, LPN Wound Care put Resident #138's dressing on 2/4/25. She stated she resolved treatment and discontinued orders on 1/31/25. Staff G, LPN Wound Care stated she received a call from the floor nurse stating Resident #138 had a dressing on with no date or physician's orders. The DON and Staff G, LPN Wound Care stated they don't know who put the dressing on. Staff G, LPN Wound Care stated, Staff aren't supposed to put anything on without dating it. The DON stated they shouldn't be putting a dressing on without orders.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0809 (Tag F0809)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to offer a nourishing snack at bedtime for five (#268, #266, #269, #39, and #270) out of six residents sampled for dining. Findings included...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to offer a nourishing snack at bedtime for five (#268, #266, #269, #39, and #270) out of six residents sampled for dining. Findings included: During an interview on 2/3/2025 at 8:00 a.m., Resident #268 voiced concerns regarding the food. A follow-up interview occurred on 2/5/2025 at 12:19 p.m. Resident #268 stated not being offered an evening snack and they (the facility staff) said I needed to request a snack from the kitchen, although the kitchen is closed when I call. During an interview on 2/3/2025 at 9:55 a.m., Resident #266 voiced concerns regarding the food. A follow-up interview occurred on 2/5/2025 at 12:23 p.m. Resident #266 stated when requesting a snack, the evening of 2/3/2025, the staff stated they did not have snacks available. The evening of 2/4/2025 the staff member stated they did not usually have snacks, but would see what could be found, and they brought back a moon pie. During an interview on 2/3/2025 at 10:17 a.m., Resident #269 voiced concerns regarding the food. A follow-up interview occurred on 2/5/2025 at 12:15 p.m. Resident #269 stated the staff do not offer snacks after dinner and it would be nice if the facility did offer snacks after dinner. Resident #269 stated enjoying something sweet before going to bed when at home. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 12:37 p.m., Resident #39 stated not being offered evening snack, although they would like a snack. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 12:30 p.m., Resident #270 stated the staff did not offer an evening snack, although that would be wonderful. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 2:46 p.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) stated snacks are sent to the units each evening for residents' that have requested one. The snacks are sent to the unit with the resident's name so the staff know who they are for. We also send a variety of other snacks (i.e., graham crackers, saltines, oatmeal cream pie, applesauce, pudding, and peanut butter crackers) in case a resident requests one. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 4:17 p.m., the Registered Dietitian (RD) reviewed the facility Meal Delivery Schedule and stated there was at least 15 hours between dinner and breakfast. The RD continued to state not having reviewed this as the facility and corporate choose the times for the meals. Review of the facility's Meal Delivery Schedule, not dated, revealed the following: - Dinner: 1A Wing - 4:30 p.m. for Rooms: 100-200; 2C Wing - 4:40 p.m. for Rooms: 300; 3A Wing - 4:50 p.m. for Rooms: 20/40/60; 4C Wing - 5:00 p.m. Rooms: 300 Assist; Main DR (Dining Room) - 5:10 p.m. for Main; 5A Wing - -5:30 p.m. for Rooms: 40/60 Assist; 6B Wing - 5:40 p.m. for Rooms: Rooms #1; 7B Wing - 5:50 p.m. for Rooms: #2; 8D Wing - 6:00 p.m. for Rooms: All. - Breakfast: 1A Wing - 7:30 a.m. for Rooms: 100-200; 2C Wing - 7:40 a.m. for Rooms: 300; 3A Wing - 7:50 a.m. for Rooms: 20/40/60; 4C Wing - 8:00 a.m. for Rooms: 300 Assist; 5A Wing - 8:10 a.m. for Rooms: 40/60 Assist; 6B Wing - 8:20 a.m. for Rooms: #1; 7B Wing - 8:30 a.m. for Rooms: #2; 8D Wing - 8:40 a.m. for Rooms: All. Review of the Meal Delivery Schedule revealed 15 hours between dinner and breakfast for 1A, 2C, 3A, and 4C and 14 hours and 40 minutes for 5A, 6B, 7B, and 8D. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Frequency of Meals dated April 15, 2024, revealed: Purpose: The center will ensure that each resident/guest receives at least three meals daily without extensive time lapses between meals. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The center has scheduled three regular mealtimes, comparable to normal mealtimes in the community, per day and bedtime snack. 3. There will be no more than 14 hours between an evening meal and breakfast the following day, unless a nourishing snack is served at bedtime; then, up to 16 hours may elapse between an evening meal and breakfast the following day if the resident/guest council agrees to this meal time span. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Snacks, HS Snacks and Nourishments dated April 15,2024 revealed: Purpose: Snacks are provided in accordance with the prescribed diet and in accordance with state law and according to residents'/guests' preferences and requests. Individual and/or bulk snacks are available at the nurses' station or other designated locations, i.e., Pantry or Nourishment Rooms. Procedure: . 2. At least one (1) snack is offered at bedtime daily and is included in the menu nutritional analysis. Additional snacks should be available throughout the day per residents'/guests' preferences and requests. 3. Bulk snacks may also be available in the Pantry/Nourishment Room as part of a par level stocking program. 4. A minimum of two (2) of the following four food components is offered to all residents for the bedtime snack and is considered nutritionally complete snack: a. Fruit or Fruit Juice b. Whole grain or enriched variety crackers c. Variety of cookies; 5. Bedtime snacks for restrictive therapeutic diets, i.e., Renal, Liberal House Renal, Gluten Restricted, etc should be outlined on the menu. Diabetics on insulin should also receive a labeled bedtime snack. Snacks should be: a. Labeled with resident's/guest's name, room number, and date. b. Delivered to each nursing unit by the Culinary department. c. Offered to the residents/guests by the Nursing department d. Delivered on ice or placed directly into the Pantry/ Nourishment Room refrigerator or freezer and held at appropriate temperatures (</= 41 degrees or </= 0 degrees).
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 7. Review of Resident #116's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from the hospital...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 7. Review of Resident #116's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from the hospital on 4/23/2024. Review of the diagnosis sheet revealed diagnoses to include but not limited to: Anxiety (onset 10/7/2023), Adjustment disorder with depressed mood (onset 3/7/2023). Review of a Level I PASRR screen was completed on 1/31/2023 revealed under Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making, section A. MI (Mental Illness) or Suspected MI (check all that apply): Anxiety Disorder was checked, but Depressive Disorder was not checked. On 2/6/2025 at 9:00 a.m., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. The DON confirmed there were no other current Level I PASRR screens that reflected Resident #116 having a diagnosis of depression. She confirmed Resident #116 had an onset diagnosis of depression as of 3/7/2023. She revealed she would now update the Level I PASRR screen to reflect the diagnosis. 8. Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the diagnosis sheet revealed diagnoses to include but not limited to: anxiety (onset date 7/29/2024) and major depression (onset date 7/29/2024). Review of a Level I PASRR screen completed on 10/8/2024 revealed under Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making, section A. MI (Mental Illness) or Suspected MI (check all that apply): Depressive Disorder was checked, but Anxiety Disorder was not checked. On 2/6/2025 at 9:00 am., an interview with the DON confirmed there were no other Level I PASRR screens reflecting Resident #60 having a diagnosis of Anxiety. She confirmed Resident #60 had an onset diagnosis of Anxiety as of 7/29/2024. She revealed she would now update the Level I PASRR screen to reflect the diagnosis. 10. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #39 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #39's PASRR Level I screen dated 10/29/2024 revealed under Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making, section A. MI (Mental Illness) or Suspected MI (check all that apply): Depressive Disorder was not checked. Under Section IV: PASRR Screen Completion, Individual may be admitted to a Nursing Facility (check one of the following): No diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation not required, was marked. During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 12:30 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator stated the facility does not have a policy and procedures for PASRR. 9. Review of the admission record showed Resident #90 initial admission to the facility was on 9/22/2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include anxiety disorder, mood affective disorder, psychosis, and depression. Review of a Level I PASRR for Resident #90 dated 12/26/2024 revealed under Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making, section A. MI (Mental Illness) or Suspected MI (check all that apply): Anxiety Disorder, Depressive Disorder, and Other (specify): Mood Disorder were checked, but Psychotic Disorder was not checked. Under Section IV: PASRR Screen Completion, Individual may be admitted to a Nursing Facility (check one of the following): No diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation not required, was marked. Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments were accurate for twelve residents (#1, #126, #44, #97, #71, #119, #116, #60, #90, and #39) out of 32 residents sampled. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's admission Record showed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of unspecified dementia. Other diagnoses include major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of the Level I PASRR dated 11/2/2024 showed in Section II: Other Indications for PASRR Screen Decision-Making, 5. Does the individual have a primary diagnosis of dementia, was marked No. A Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the individual has a primary or secondary diagnosis of dementia or related neurocognitive disorder (including Alzheimer's disease), and a suspicion or diagnosis of a Serious Mental Illness. Review of Section IV: PASRR Screen Completion revealed: Individual may be admitted to a Nursing Facility (check one of the following): No diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation not required, was marked. 2. Review of resident #126's admission Record showed Resident #126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and unspecified dementia. Review of the Level I PASRR dated 9/24/2024 showed in Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making, section A. MI (Mental Illness) or Suspected MI (check all that apply): Depressive Disorder, was checked. Anxiety Disorder was not checked. Section II: Other Indications for PASRR Screen Decision-Making revealed a Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the individual has a primary or secondary diagnosis of dementia or related neurocognitive disorder (including Alzheimer's disease), and a suspicion or diagnosis of a Serious Mental Illness. Under Section IV: PASRR Screen Completion, Individual may be admitted to a Nursing Facility (check one of the following): No diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation not required, was marked. 3. Review of Resident #44's admission Record showed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Level I PASRR dated 7/30/2023 showed in Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making, section A. MI (Mental Illness) or Suspected MI (check all that apply): Anxiety Disorder, Depressive Disorder, and Psychotic Disorder, were checked. Section II: Other Indications for PASRR Screen Decision-Making revealed a Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the individual has a primary or secondary diagnosis of dementia or related neurocognitive disorder (including Alzheimer's disease), and a suspicion or diagnosis of a Serious Mental Illness. Under Section IV: PASRR Screen Completion, Individual may be admitted to a Nursing Facility (check one of the following): No diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation not required, was marked. 4. Review of Resident #97's admission Record showed Resident #97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of unspecified dementia with a date of 4/10/2023. Other diagnoses include major depressive disorder. Review of the Level I PASRR, dated 4/5/2023 showed in Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making, section A. MI (Mental Illness) or Suspected MI (check all that apply): No diagnoses were checked. Section II: Other Indications for PASRR Screen Decision-Making revealed under question 6. Does the individual have a secondary diagnosis of dementia, related neurocognitive disorder (including Alzheimer's disease) and the primary diagnosis of a Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability?, Yes was marked. Section II also revealed a Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the individual has a primary or secondary diagnosis of dementia or related neurocognitive disorder (including Alzheimer's disease), and a suspicion or diagnosis of a Serious Mental Illness. Under Section IV: PASRR Screen Completion, Individual may be admitted to a Nursing Facility (check one of the following): No diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation not required, was marked. 5. Review of Resident #71's admission Record showed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Other diagnoses include dementia with a date of 6/4/2021, and anxiety disorder with a date of 7/15/2023. Review of the Level I PASRR, dated 07/17/2023 showed in Section II: Other Indications for PASRR Screen Decision-Making revealed under question 6. Does the individual have a secondary diagnosis of dementia, related neurocognitive disorder (including Alzheimer's disease) and the primary diagnosis of a Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability?, Yes was marked. Section II also revealed under question 7. Does the individual have validating documentation to support the dementia or related neurocognitive disorder (including Alzheimer's disease)?, Yes was marked. Section II revealed a Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the individual has a primary or secondary diagnosis of dementia or related neurocognitive disorder (including Alzheimer's disease), and a suspicion or diagnosis of a Serious Mental Illness. Under Section IV: PASRR Screen Completion, Individual may be admitted to a Nursing Facility (check one of the following): No diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation not required, was marked. 6. Review of Resident #119's admission Record showed Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia. Other diagnoses include major depressive disorder with a date of 12/24/2024, and anxiety disorder with a date of 1/23/2025. Review of the Level I PASRR, dated 12/5/2024 showed in Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making, section A. MI (Mental Illness) or Suspected MI (check all that apply): Depressive Disorder was checked, but Anxiety Disorder was not checked. Section II: Other Indications for PASRR Screen Decision-Making revealed a Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the individual has a primary or secondary diagnosis of dementia or related neurocognitive disorder (including Alzheimer's disease), and a suspicion or diagnosis of a Serious Mental Illness. Under Section IV: PASRR Screen Completion, Individual may be admitted to a Nursing Facility (check one of the following): No diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation not required, was marked.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing in order to provide timely meal service to residents on two units (B & D units) of four units in...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing in order to provide timely meal service to residents on two units (B & D units) of four units in the facility. Findings included: During an interview on 2/3/2025 at 8:00 a.m., Resident #268 stated concerns regarding the food temperature, stating it was always cold. During an interview on 2/3/2025 at 9:55 a.m., Resident #266 stated having concerns regarding the temperature of the food when served. During an interview on 2/3/2025 at 10:17 a.m., Resident #269 stated having concerns regarding the temperature of the food when it is received. During an interview on 2/3/2025 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #270 stated having concerns regarding the food temperatures, everything is always cold. On 2/3/2025 at 12:34 p.m., the first meal cart arrived at B unit and at 12:42 p.m., the staff started to serve the trays from the cart. At 1:07 p.m., the last tray was passed for the first cart. The staff observed for meal service was three Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and one nurse. On 2/3/2025 at 12:38 p.m., the second meal cart arrived at B unit and at 12:45 p.m., the cart was taken to D unit. At 12:55 p.m., the cart was taken back to B unit for rooms 240-260. At 1:01 p.m., the staff started passing the trays and the last tray was removed at 1:15 p.m. The staff observed for meal service was three CNAs and two nurses. On 2/3/2025 at 1:18 p.m., a third meal cart arrived at B unit abd the staff took the cart to D unit. At 1:25 p.m., the staff started to serve trays and at 2:00 p.m., the last tray was removed and served. Two CNAs and one nurse were available to pass the trays. During an interview on 2/4/2025 at 2:40 p.m., Resident #266 stated the food was still cold, especially breakfast, but all meals have been so far. During an interview on 2/4/2025 at 2:44 p.m., Resident #39 stated the meals have been ice cold. During an interview on 2/4/2025 at 2:48 p.m., Resident #268 stated the food was better than usual, but still not warm. During an interview on 2/4/2025 at 2:52 p.m., Resident #269 stated the food has remained cold. On 2/5/2025 at 8:40 a.m., a test tray was requested for D unit. The meal to be served was baked egg casserole, toast, oatmeal, and two links of sausage. The facility utilized top and bottom insulated domes and plate warmer. At 8:55 a.m., the eggs were plated at 146°F; the sausage 160°F, with the toast. The oatmeal was placed in an insulated bowl and temperature was 164°F. At 8:57 a.m., the tray was placed on an open cart with five other trays as the insulated meal delivery cart did not have enough room for those six trays. At 8:59 a.m., the trays arrived on to D unit. The staff available to assist with meals was the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), the Director of Nursing (DON), the Infection Control Nurse (ICN), and two CNAs. The last tray was served at 9:00 a.m. The egg casserole's temperature was 164°F, sausage temperature was 172°F, and the oatmeal's temperature was 86°F. Two state surveyors tasted the meal; egg casserole was warm and oatmeal was lukewarm. During an interview on 2/5/2025 at 8:03 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) stated not being aware of cold food issues and the facility would be happy to heat up anyone's meal who needed it. During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 11:15 a.m., Staff Q, CNA stated they were responsible for 10-13 residents. Staff Q, CNA stated anything over 10 makes it difficult to give good patient care. During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 10:45 a.m., Staff R, CNA stated they were responsible for 11 residents. Staff R, CNA also stated being able to accomplish her tasks most of the time, but not always. Staff R, CNA stated they have been requested to stay late for hours on a regular basis and the administration does not ask about staffing. During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 8:55 a.m., Staff P, CNA stated they were responsible for 13 residents and the facility does not ask the staff for opinions in staffing, to her knowledge everything is based on numbers. During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 8:50 a.m., Staff O, Registered Nurse (RN) stated documentation sometimes does not occur as patient care is the priority. During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 8:39 a.m., Staff U, CNA/Staffing Coordinator (SC) stated they were responsible for staffing the building. The facility bases everything off of the census. The facility tries to have more staff on the rehab side of the facility, as these units have more visitors coming and going. Staff U, CNA SC stated they review the census daily to ensure they are staffing appropriately and they don't change the number of staff from the week to the weekend unless the census changes. During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 9:20 a.m. with the NHA and DON, the NHA stated the facility staffs the building on acuity and needs of the residents. There is no difference in the staffing from the weekends to the weekdays for direct patient care. The facility does have four unit managers (32 hours/day) throughout the week and on the weekends they go to a 12 hour/day supervisor. The facility has a staffing coordinator in the facility seven days per week to ensure coverage and assist if there happens to be a call off. A nurse manager is on call to ensure coverage. A policy and procedure for staffing was requested from the NHA. The NHA stated she was not certain if the facility had a policy and procedure or if they just followed the regulations. The facility did not provide a staffing policy and procedure.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility did not follow professional standards for food service safety in the kitchen and one of four nourishment rooms. Findings included: ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility did not follow professional standards for food service safety in the kitchen and one of four nourishment rooms. Findings included: On 2/3/25 at 8:26 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). Upon entrance to the kitchen, an observation of three staff revealed they were on the tray line for breakfast. An observation of Staff D, [NAME] revealed he was wearing a restraint not fully covering his hair and more than a quarter of an inch was exposed. The same concerns were observed at 8:40 a.m. On 2/3/25 at 8:45 a.m., observations of the walk-in fridge were conducted with the CDM. A clear container containing boiled eggs, without the shell, was observed. An observation of the container of boiled eggs revealed they were not labeled. An interview with the CDM revealed the container of boiled eggs should have been labeled. She was observed labeling the container with a date of 2/2/25. Further observations of the walk-in fridge revealed a box of green and red whole peppers that had wrinkles across the surface, noticeable softness, and dark brown/black spots, which appeared not good for use. The CDM was observed removing the box of peppers. Further observations of the walk-in fridge revealed a sheet pan rack with trays of dessert. The CDM confirmed the desserts were going to be used for meal service that day. Observations of the top tray of desserts, which were in individual clear containers, had no label or date. The CDM was observed labeling the top tray of desserts with a date of 2/3/25. On 2/3/25 at 8:49 a.m., observations of the walk-in freezer revealed frozen vegetables were scattered on the floor along with other food particles/debris. Further observations revealed unidentifiable frozen food and debris toward the back of the freezer, underneath a metal rack where French fried potatoes were placed on top. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) On 2/3/25 at 9:05 a.m., a tour of the four facility nourishment rooms was conducted with the CDM. An observation of the inside of the A wing microwave revealed food particles were stuck to the sides and top. Splatters of food were observed that appeared to be dried. The CDM stated it should be clean and was observed calling a staff member to clean the microwave. She confirmed resident food is re-heated in the microwaves in the nourishment rooms. On 2/4/25 at 9:20 a.m., an observation of the dish machine in use revealed Staff A, Culinary Assistant was using her cell phone while putting clean kitchen items on the drying rack. An interview with the CDM revealed Staff A, Culinary Assistant's role is considered, Catcher, as they are responsible for placing clean kitchenware to dry or putting away as needed. Further observation of the dish machine in use revealed Staff C, Culinary Assistant's hair restraint was not fully covering her hair. The hair restraint appeared to be coming off, towards the back of her head. On 2/5/25 at 11:12 a.m., an observation of the lunch meal service revealed Staff D, [NAME] was taking temperatures of the hot food items. Staff D, [NAME] was observed touching his pants with his hands before he started taking food temperatures. He was not observed performing hand hygiene after touching his pants. At approximately 11:13 a.m., Staff D, [NAME] was observed removing a wipe from the wrapper to wipe down the probe of the digital thermometer. A piece of the wrapper was observed on a clean plate in front of him. Staff D, [NAME] was observed removing the piece of wrapper from the clean plate with his un-gloved hand. He was not observed performing hand hygiene before or after this task. During the observation of lunch meal temperatures, Staff D, [NAME] did not wipe the thermometer probe between mashed sweet potato and whole sweet potato. Further observation of the lunch meal temperatures revealed the ribs had an internal temperature of 129 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). Staff D, [NAME] stated he completed and recorded the temperatures about 10-15 minutes before this observation and the temperature was 147 °F. He stated the ribs needed to go back into the oven as he expected a temperature of 145 °F. On 2/5/25 at 11:20 a.m., an observation of Staff A, Culinary Assistant revealed she was taking the temperatures of the cold food/beverage items to include cake, pudding and milk. Observations of Staff A, Culinary Assistant revealed she did not perform hand hygiene before taking the temperatures of the cold food/beverage items. An observation of the temperature of the cake revealed it was 46 °F and the pudding was 42 °F. Staff A, Culinary Assistant stated the pudding and cake were taken out of the fridge and placed on the sheet pan rack around 11:12 a.m. Further observations of Staff A, Culinary Assistant revealed she did not wipe down the thermometer probe between taking the temperatures of the cake and pudding. Both food items were not observed being discarded and remained on the rack. On 2/5/25 at 11:25 a.m., an observation of the kitchen hood, over the stove, revealed the vents and sides had a brown rusted color. Further observation of the hood revealed areas of oxidation as evidenced by a white color/residue. An interview with the CDM revealed when the vents are removed every Friday, they are oily and have some residue. She stated the dietary staff do a deep clean of the hood every month. The Director of Maintenance (DOM) provided an invoice of the last time the hood was cleaned by [Vendor name], which revealed a date of 9/25/24. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) On 2/6/25 at 11:07 a.m., a review of the meal temperature log for 2/3/25 to 2/9/25 was conducted with the CDM. A review of Wednesday's log revealed the entrée for lunch had a temperature of 170 °F. The CDM stated the cook took the final cooking temperature, but they are not expected to document it. She could not confirm why the cook documented 170 °F, however, during the lunch meal observation on 2/5/25 he stated the entrée was 147 °F when he tested it. The CDM stated she educated the cook on keeping the food covered, as she noticed it was not covered while on the tray line and thinks that's what contributed to the low temperature. The CDM stated the temperature of the ribs on 2/5/25 was not appropriate, as they are looking for a minimum of 135 °F. She stated she tried to observe the cooks on the tray line monthly. On 2/6/25 at 11:10 a.m., an interview with the CDM revealed her expectation is the thermometer probe should be wiped with probe wipes between each food when taking and recording meal temperatures. She stated she's not sure if staff were educated on this task prior to her starting as CDM in August 2024. An interview with the CDM regarding hand hygiene revealed she expected staff to wash their hands before and after they complete meal temperatures. Regarding cold food temperatures, she stated cold food and beverages should be 41°F or below. On 2/6/25 at 11:16 a.m., the CDM stated if staff have a quarter inch of hair or longer, they need to wear a hair restraint. She stated it's the same rule for beards. An interview with the CDM related to labeling/dating revealed she tries to complete rounds every morning. She stated there is a poster on the walk-in fridge and freezer door for staff to refer to regarding labeling/dating expectations. She stated she's provided multiple in-service trainings related to labeling/dating and how long food and beverage items are good for. She stated herself, the assistant food service manager, and/or cook are expected to review the labels/dates. On 2/6/25 at 11:23 a.m., an interview with the CDM revealed the whole dietary team is responsible for cleanliness of the kitchen. She stated floors are cleaned after lunch and at night. The CDM stated staff clean between meals, as needed. She stated the green beans that were observed on the floor on 2/3/25 should have been cleaned up. On 2/6/25 at 11:32 a.m., an interview with the CDM revealed dietary aides are responsible for cleaning the nourishment rooms. She stated, I should be the second set of eyes. She stated the dietary aide goes to the nourishment rooms every night as it's an evening shift task. An interview with the CDM regarding cell phone use revealed staff, Shouldn't be using cellphones at all. She stated she's educated staff multiple times regarding cell phone use in the kitchen. A review of the facility's policy titled, Personal Hygiene, with an effective date of April 15, 2024, revealed the following: Purpose: Guidelines for personal hygiene to promote a safe and sanitary department must be followed. Procedure: . 2. Clean Hands and Fingernails: a. Hands must be washed prior to beginning work. 3. Head Covering Worn: .b. Hair must be appropriately restrained or completely covered. 4. Conduct: .e. Team members' personal items are to be stored in designated areas away from the food preparation area. A review of the facility's policy titled, Food Labeling & Dating - Refrigeration, with no effective date, revealed the following: Purpose: The center adheres to a labeling and dating system to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for food safety. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines for Staffing: . 2. The food shall be stored, covered, marked for contents, and dated when placed in the refrigerator or freezer. 4. The individual opening or preparing a food shall be responsible for covering, labeling, dating and storying the food at the time of production or end of the meal service. 7. The Head Cook, or designee, shall be responsible for checking the refrigerator daily for food items that are expiring, and shall discard accordingly. 8. The Culinary Manger, or designee, shall spot check refrigerators for compliance, and document accordingly. Corrective action shall be taken as needed. A review of the facility's policy titled, Record of Food Temperatures, with an effective date of April 15, 2024, revealed the following: Purpose: It is the policy of this center to record food temperatures daily to ensure food is at the proper serving temperature(s) before trays are assembled. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .2. Hot foods will be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or greater. 4. Potentially hazardous cold food temperatures will be kept at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit . 8. If the food temperature falls into an unsafe range, immediately follow procedures for reheating previously cooked food . 14. Food temperatures will be verified using a thermometer which is both clean, sanitized and calibrated to ensure accuracy. A review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing - Culinary and Glove Use, with an effective date of April 15, 2024, revealed the following: Compliance Guidelines: 1. Culinary team members shall keep their hands and exposed portions of their arms clean. 6. Frequency of Handwashing: a. Culinary team member shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arm immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single service and single use articles and also in the following situations: . ii. After hands have touched anything unsanitary i.e., garbage, soiled utensils/equipment, dirty dishes, etc. iii. After hands have touched bare human body parts other than clean hands (such as face, nose, hair etc.)
Apr 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an event that led to transfer to a higher level of care with...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an event that led to transfer to a higher level of care within the specified timeframe of the allegation for one of one sampled residents (#1). Findings included: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation, revised September 2023 showed the center recognizes each resident's right to be free from abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE), misappropriation of resident property. Neglect: Neglect as defined in statute 483.5 is the failure of the center, its team members or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. This occurs when the center was aware of or should have been aware of, goods, or services that the resident (s) required but the center failed to provide them resulting in or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. 6. Reporting: All team members are required to report suspected maltreatment to their immediate Supervisor or Director of Quality Assurance / designee or Executive Director. Notifications can take place in person or via telephone. The employee must report to department manager or supervisor in the center so that the resident may immediately be protected from further maltreatment. The Executive Director or The Director of Quality Assurance are to be informed immediately of the situation. In the absence of the Executive Director and the Director of Quality Assurance the Director of Clinical Services and / or the Social Service Director are to be informed of the situation immediately. The center also must report all alleged violations of any type of abuse or any event that led to significant bodily injury immediately but no later than 2 hours from the time of the allegation. The center must report all alleged violations of neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation immediately but no later than 24 hours from the time of the allegation. If any of these resulted in serious bodily injury, then you must report within 2 hours of the time of the allegation. Incidents of ANE or Misappropriation requires notification to outside agencies. These include the State Survey Agency (Agency for Healthcare Administration), Adult Protective Services / Department of Children and Families and if there is suspicion that a crime is involved then notification to local law enforcement. The Director of Clinical Services / designee shall notify the physician and the resident's representative concerning the suspected maltreatment and the findings of the assessment. The Director of Clinical Services / designee shall reassure the resident's representative that an investigation has been initiated, that the resident is being protected and that appropriate action has been taken. All verbal contact with the resident's representative shall be documented accordingly. The Director of Quality Assurance / designee will file the Immediate Federal report with AHCA, and then submit the summary and findings of the investigation with the 5-Day Federal Report. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 03/30/2024 to the hospital according to the face sheet. Review of the Admissions Report showed diagnoses included but were not limited to pneumonia, Urinary Tract Infection, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, hemiplegia following a Cerebral Vascular Accident, hypotension, polyneuropathy, muscle weakness, history of falls, dysphagia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, gastrostomy, spinal stenosis, anemia, recurrent severe depressive disorder, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, other specified interstitial pulmonary diseases, and bronchiectasis. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Section C Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Section GG showed the ability to eat was not applicable, he required partial to moderate assistance for toileting and bathing. The resident used a wheelchair. Section K, Swallowing Disorder showed the resident used a feeding tube for nutrition. Review of the physician orders showed a full code and revealed; NPO diet. Enteral Feeding of Boost Very High Calorie, 237 ml [milliliter] bolus four times a day, family to provide as of 03/29/2024. Enteral feeding at bedtime, Jevity 1.5 237 ml every evening, flush with 120 ml water before and after as of 3/29/2024. Flush feeding tube with 120 ml of water before and after each feeding 5 times a day and four times a day for hydration as of 3/29/2024. Send to ER [emergency room] on 3/30/2024. Review of the nursing progress notes showed: On 03/30/2024 at 15:42 (3:42 p.m.) the patient was in the ice cream social and began to become hypoxia and de-sating. Brought back to his room and placed in his bed. O2 (oxygen) sats (saturation) in the 40s. Placed on portable oxygen. Put on 15 Liter rebreather mask which only improved to the 70s. Still pallor in color. Order to send out was made. 911 called. Pt [patient] sent out around 2 p.m. family aware. Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) Review of SNF/NF [skilled nursing facility/nursing facility] to Hospital Transfer Form dated 03/30/2024 at 14:20 (12:20 p.m.) showed SOB [short of breath], oxygen saturation in the 60's. Enteral feeding via peg tube. Staff B, RN During an interview on 04/10/2024 at 1:47 p.m. with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Director of Quality Assurance / Risk Manager (DOQA/RM), the DOQA / RM stated during the investigative process, Resident #1 was self-propelling in the facility. Resident #1 self-propelled from his room on the D wing to the C wing to the main dining room where a group activity was occurring. This was normal for him. Resident #1 was alert and oriented. Resident #1 performed his own transferring. Resident #1 socialized and was into mingling. DOQA / RM stated that Staff C, RN was his nurse and stated she last observed Resident #1 at 1 p.m. for his bolus feeding and medications. Resident #1's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated she observed him in his room at 1:30 p.m. for personal care. DOQA / RM stated he was independent at baseline. DOQA / RM stated Resident #1 has had the peg tube for greater than a year according to the family. Resident #1 managed the peg tube at home and gave his own bolus feedings at home. DOQA / RM stated that day (03/30/2024) at 3:30 p.m. he ate ice cream. The activity was an ice cream social. DOQA / RM stated, Originally, I was told he grabbed the ice cream. During the reenactment, Staff A, Activity Aide (AA) showed that she stands in front of the congregated group (20 residents), and she said she asks who wants ice cream and then she gives them ice cream. The NHA stated they have a rolling cart / cooler for activities only. It was scooped ice cream into cones. The DOQA / RM stated there were no other staff members in the ice cream social. There were other residents there but no staff. The DOQA / RM stated through the investigation it was determined Resident #1 had asked for the ice cream and Staff A, AA handed it to him. The NHA stated that the story changed a couple of times. The DOQA / RM stated the investigation was started on 04/01/2024, after DOQA / RM reenacted the scene with Staff A, AA. The DOQA / RM stated that Staff A, AA admitted she had the Dietary List. The Dietary List included all the residents and included all the residents' dietary types, NPO [nothing by mouth], thickened liquids, etc. The DOQA / RM stated the Dietary Tool was 11 pages long that day, it was a list of the whole house. The DOQA / RM stated Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The DOQA / RM stated Staff A. AA was removed from the schedule on 04/01/2024 after full knowledge of the incident. The DOQA / RM stated she was first informed he grabbed the ice cream. DOQA / RM found out it was given to him, and it was on a cone, not just a cup. On 04/04/2024, Staff A, AA was terminated from service with closure of the investigation. The DOQA / RM stated the Federal Report went in on 04/01/2024 for 1-day at 8:50 p.m., the 5-day on 04/05/2024 at 4:50 p.m. The DOQA / RM called DCF (Stated Agency: Department of Children and Families) on 04/01/2024 at 19:58 (7:58 p.m.) and Law Enforcement was called on 04/01/2024 at 18:56 (6:56 p.m.) The DOQA / RM stated she got the call of the incident on 03/30/2024 from the Staff B, RN, weekend supervisor, that Resident #1 had gotten ahold of ice cream and was being sent out to the hospital at 2:38 p.m. (on 03/30/2024). The DOQA / RM asked Staff A, AA to call her and with the initial call from Staff A, AA, and what was communicated to me, was he grabbed the ice cream, He got ice cream, he grabbed it. The DOQA / RM stated, Had I known the details I would have reported immediately. We did not follow MD [medical doctor] orders and a higher level of care was necessary. The NHA stated she was not notified about the incident until 04/01/2024.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Patient-Centered Care Plan was developed a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Patient-Centered Care Plan was developed and accurate related to NPO (nothing by mouth) status and behaviors for one of three sampled residents (#1). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 03/30/2024 to the hospital. Review of the Admissions Report showed diagnoses included but were not limited to pneumonia, Urinary Tract Infection, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, hemiplegia following a Cerebral Vascular Accident, hypotension, polyneuropathy, muscle weakness, history of falls, dysphagia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, gastrostomy, spinal stenosis, anemia, recurrent severe depressive disorder, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, other specified interstitial pulmonary diseases, and bronchiectasis. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Section C Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Section GG showed the ability to eat was not applicable, he required partial to moderate assistance for toileting and bathing. The resident used a wheelchair. Section K, Swallowing Disorder showed the resident used a feeding tube for nutrition. Review of the physician orders showed a full code and revealed: -NPO diet; -Enteral Feeding of Boost Very High Calorie, 237 ml (milliliters) bolus four times a day, family to provide as of 03/29/2024; -Enteral feeding at bedtime, Jevity 1.5 237 ml every evening, flush with 120 ml water before and after as of 3/29/2024; -Flush feeding tube with 120 ml of water before and after each feeding 5 times a day and four times a day for hydration as of 3/29/2024. Review of the Baseline Care Pla) showed admitted from hospital with pneumonia, community acquired, with aspiration; acute hypoxia, respiratory failure, UTI [urinary tract infection], CVA [cerbral vascular accident] with right hemiparesis dysphagia g-tube. Nutrition / Hydration: diet order. Review of Resident #1's care plans showed: The resident was dependent on GT [gastric tube] for nutrition and hydration as of 03/29/2024. Interventions included but not limited to administer tube feeding as ordered, family to provide product as of 3/29/2024; advance to oral intake per ST [speech therapy] as of 3/29/2024; flush tube with water as ordered as of 3/29/2024; keep head of bed elevated during feed tubing administration as of 3/29/2024; monitor as as available as of 3/29/2024; monitor tolerance of tube feeding via nursing documentation and / or discussion with resident; verify tube placement prior to administering feeding; weight per protocol all as of 3/29/2024. Resident #1 has behavior problems related to non-compliance with diet. He has chronic dysphagia, g-tube dependent, and is aware of risk involved, as evidenced by (drinking tap water from the bathroom sink, eating cookies, cheese found in room that he grabs off tray at nurses' station). As of 03/20/2024. Interventions included to explain care in advance, in terms resident understands as of 3/20/2024; observe behavior episodes and attempt to determine underlying cause as of 3/20/2024; re-approach later if becomes agitated as of 3/20/2024; report changes in behavior status to physician / nurse as of 3/20/2024; and strive to anticipate care needs and provide them before resident becomes overly stressed as of 3/20/2024. During an interview on 04/11/2024 at 10:04 a.m. the MDS coordinator confirmed the behavior care plan focus area did not indicate the resident was NPO (nothing by mouth). She stated the interventions were a checked box area, but she did have the option to personalize the interventions for the resident. During an interview on 04/11/2024 at 10:57 a.m. the Director of Quality Assurance / Risk Manager (DOQA / RM) stated, I became aware of the behaviors during the investigation, not before. She stated she found an unopened package of cheez-its snacks in the resident's room; however, no-one saw him eating or drinking. During an interview on 04/11/2024 at 11:33 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that at morning meeting, DOQA / RM stated she had spoken with the significant other the significant other had stated he tried to get cookies from her. The DON stated she spoke with the MDS Director and reviewed Resident #1's behavior care plan with the DOQA / RM. The DON stated we were discussing the in the morning meeting. We wanted to make sure something was in the care plan that he may get something on his own based on the significant other's interview. The DON verified the behavior care plan looked like the facility knew about the non-compliant behaviors as of the admission and were occurring at the facility. The DON agreed the interventions were very basic for a behavior care plan and needed to be more focused on his behaviors and specific to him. The Regional Nurse stated on 04/11/2024 at 12:00 p.m. they use the MDS 3.0 RAI User's Manual as the care plan policy. Review of the facility's policy, Baseline Care Plan, effective October 2022 showed it is the practice of the center to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each guest/resident within 48 hours of the admission. The baseline care plan will include instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care to the guest / resident that meet professional standards of quality care .will include specific health and safety concerns. The baseline care plan will address at a minimum: Dietary orders.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the documentation was accurate in the medical record for thr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the documentation was accurate in the medical record for three of three sampled residents (#1, #2, #3). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 03/30/2024 to the hospital according to the face sheet. Review of the Admissions Report showed diagnoses included but were not limited to pneumonia, Urinary Tract Infection, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, hemiplegia following a Cerebral Vascular Accident, hypotension, polyneuropathy, muscle weakness, history of falls, dysphagia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, gastrostomy, spinal stenosis, anemia, recurrent severe depressive disorder, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, other specified interstitial pulmonary diseases, and bronchiectasis. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Section C Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Section GG showed the ability to eat was not applicable, he required partial to moderate assistance for toileting and bathing. The resident used a wheelchair. Section K, Swallowing Disorder showed the resident used a feeding tube for nutrition. Review of the physician orders showed a full code; NPO (nothing by mouth) diet Review of the Clinical admission on [DATE] showed under 11. Nutrition section 3. He was receiving nutrition orally. 4. Taking nutrition and hydration orally. No complaints of thirst. No signs and symptoms of swallowing disorder. Mucous membranes moist. 5. Intake, NPO was not checked. Education does not address Gastrostomy tube. Review of the nursing progress notes showed: -On 03/20/2024 at 1557, resident continues on antibiotic po (by mouth) for pneumonia with no adverse effect. Resident has a productive cough with moderate secretions, denies SOB (shortness of breath). No active fever, fluids encouraged. Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) -On 03/20/2024 at 19:02 (7:02 p.m.) showed no signs of difficulty breathing. No SOB noted. Head of bed elevated. Head elevated at 30 degrees. Cough present. Moist/loose productive cough noted. Moderate amount of secretions. Secretions are moderate in consistency. Secretion clear. Cough with effective airway. Cough with retained secretions. No pain related to cough. Taking nutrition and hydration orally. No complaints of thirst. No signs / symptoms of swallowing disorder. Staff E, LPN -On 03/21/2024 at 15:52 (3:52 p.m.), HOB (Head of Bed) elevated at 30 degrees. Cough present. Moist/loose productive cough noted. Moderate amount of secretions. Secretions are moderate in consistency. Secretions clear. cough with effective airway. Taking nutrition and hydration orally. No complaints of thirst. No signs / symptoms of a swallowing disorder. Currently on antibiotics (ABT) for pneumonia. Staff E, LPN -On 03/21/2024 at 15:59 (3:59 p.m.), resident continues on ABT po for pneumonia with no adverse effects presents with productive cough with moderate clear secretions. Resident denies SOB or pain with coughing. No current fever. Staff E, LPN -On 03/22/2024 at 15:34 (3:34 p.m.) no signs of difficulty breathing. No SOB noted. HOB elevated at 30 degrees. Cough present. Moist/loose productive cough noted. Moderate amount of secretions. Secretions are moderate in consistency. Secretions clear. cough with effective airway. Taking nutrition and hydration orally. No complaints of thirst. No signs / symptoms of a swallowing disorder. Currently on antibiotics. Staff E, LPN -On 03/23/2024 at 17:46 (5:46 p.m.), pt (patient) had several opened back dated g-tube syringes on dresser in room, pt used an opened syringe and bolus self with Boost which was located in drawer. Old open g-tube syringes removed from room. Pt approached this writer and stated he bolus self with Boost for years and he wants g-tube syringes to remain at bedside for his own personal use. PCP (primary care physician) will follow up with pt. LPN -On 03/24/2024 at 15:09 (3:09 p.m.) HOB elevated at 30 degrees. No signs of difficulty breathing. No SOB noted. No cough. Nutrition was blank. Staff B, Registered Nurse, weekend supervisor (RN, WE supervisor) -On 03/25/2024 at 16:50 (4:50 p.m.) No signs of difficulty breathing. No SOB noted. HOB elevated 30 degrees. Cough present. Cough present. Moist/loose productive cough noted. Moderate amount of secretions. Secretions are moderate in consistency. Secretions yellow. cough with effective airway. Taking nutrition and hydration orally. No complaint of thirst. No s/s of a swallowing disorder. Currently on Abt for pneumonia. Staff E, LPN -On 03/26/2024 at 20:31 (8:31 p.m.) No signs of difficulty breathing. No SOB noted. HOB elevated 30 degrees. Cough present. Cough present. Moist/loose productive cough noted. Moderate amount of secretions. Secretions are moderate in consistency. Secretions clear. cough with effective airway. Taking nutrition and hydration orally. No complaint of thirst. No s/s of a swallowing disorder. Currently on Abt for pneumonia. Staff E, LPN -On 03/28/2024 at 15:22 (3:52 p.m.) No signs of difficulty breathing. No SOB noted. HOB elevated 30 degrees. Cough present. Moist/loose productive cough noted. Moderate amount of secretions. Secretions are moderate in consistency. Cough with effective airway. Taking nutrition and hydration orally. No complaint of thirst. No s/s of a swallowing disorder. Currently on Abt for pneumonia. Staff E, LPN -On 03/29/2024 at 15:17 (3:17 p.m.) pulse ox at 94%. Alert and oriented x 3. No signs of difficulty breathing. No SOB noted. HOB elevated 30 degrees. Cough present. Moist/loose productive cough noted. Moderate amount of secretions. Secretions are moderate in consistency. Cough with effective airway. Taking nutrition and hydration orally. No complaint of thirst. No s/s of a swallowing disorder. Currently on Abt for pneumonia. Staff E, LPN Review of the Aide Tasks showed: What percentage of the meal was eaten? -03/20/24: 08:00 x (times) 25-50%; 12:30 x 51-75%; 17:31 x 51-75% -03/26/24: 17:42 x 51-75% -03/28/24: 17:22 x 51-75% -03/29/24: 20:59 x 0-25% Number of times fluid offered: -03/19/24: 21:33 x 100 -03/20/24: 14:59 x 3; 1733 x 3 -03/21/24: 02:04 x 1; 1309 x 2; 2259 x 3 -03/22/24: 02:46 x 1 -03/24/24: 03:12 x 1; 1452 x 2 -03/25/24: 14:38 x 2 -03/26/24: 01:47 x 1; 14:59 x 2; 17:40 x 3 -03/27/24: 06:59 x 1; 22:34 x 3 -03/28/24: 17:24 x 3 -03/29/24: 11:30 x 2; 21:02 x 3 -03/30/24: 09:08 x 4 Does resident take snack? -03/20/24: 10:00 x yes; 14:00 x yes -03/21/24: 22:59 x yes -03/24/24: 21:00 x yes -03/26/24: 22:24 x yes During an interview on 04/11/2024 at 11:16 a.m. Staff E, LPN stated it was a mistake on her documentation that he (Resident #1) was nothing by mouth for medications. He was getting everything by his g-tube. Staff E, LPN reviewed the skilled notes she had documented and stated it was incorrect documentation. He was taking his meds and nutrition via g-tube. Staff E, LPN stated, It was careless charting. She stated she never saw him take anything orally. He (Resident #1) had stated he had a g-tube for 10 years. During an interview on 04/11/2024 at 11:33 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the documentation was an error, referring to the nursing notes and aide task notes. The DON stated she would have to call these staff members and ask them about their documentation. She stated she did not look at the documentation in the ADL (activities of daily living ) tasks after the incident. The DON stated, I truly feel they were just checking it off. We will look into that and start education today. It is very concerning to me. A review of Resident #2's clinical chart, the face sheet, documented an admission of 03/01/2024 with a readmission of 03/25/2024. His diagnoses information included Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit. A review of Resident #2's physician orders reflected he was ordered a NPO (Nothing by mouth) diet. A review of Resident #2's snack provision, as documented by the certified nursing assistants for the period of 03/28/2024 through 04/09/2024, reflected the resident had been documented to have been provided a snack on 03/28, 03/29, 03/30, 04/01, 04/02, 04/03, 04/04, 04/05, 04/06, 04/07,04/08, and 04/09. An observation was conducted on 04/10/2024 of Resident #2 in his room. Resident #2's eyes were open, alert, but he did not verbally answer questions. He nodded acknowledgment, and nodded when asked if he was comfortable. A review of Resident #3's clinical chart, the face sheet, documented an admission of 02/23/2021 with a readmission of 03/15/2024. His diagnoses information included Pleural effusion and dysphagia. A review of Resident #3's physician orders reflected he was ordered a NPO diet. A review of Resident #3's snack provision, as documented by the certified nursing assistants for the period of 03/28/2024 through 04/09/2024, reflected the resident had been documented to have been provided a snack on 04/05/2024. An observation was conducted on 04/10/2024 at 11:15 a.m. of Resident #3, in his room. He was observed in bed, the television was on. Resident #3 did not answer when spoken to.
Dec 2022 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (Residents #43 and #86) of 46 sampled r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (Residents #43 and #86) of 46 sampled residents were assessed for self-administration of medications. Findings included: 1. During an interview with Resident #43 on 12/13/22 at 10:56 a.m., an observation was made of a clear bag sitting on the bed next to the resident. The bag contained 2 bottles of over-the counter (OTC) medications: Cal-Mag and a relabeled Vitamin B2 bottle, Body Gold Ginsana Energy Brain. The resident stated staff did not know of the OTC medications, and she took them daily because of not getting any vitamins at the facility. The resident stated the Vitamin B2 was relabeled. Photographic evidence was obtained. The admission Record identified Resident #43 was admitted on [DATE] and included diagnoses not limited to cellulitis of left lower limb, Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, and type 2 Diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating an intact cognition. A review of the Order Summary Report did not include a physician order for either Cal-Mag (Calcium/Magnesium) or Body Gold Ginsana Energy Brain or that the resident was able to self-administer medication. On 12/14/22 at 8:58 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted with Staff F, agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) of Resident #43. The residents' OTC bottles were not observed. The resident reported throwing away the OTC medications yesterday as if they were given to the facility they would not be given back. On 12/14/22 at 5:48 p.m., the Director of Nursing was interviewed regarding the observation of the OTC medication that had been in Resident #43 possession and had reported throwing away the two bottles. She stated, which means she still has them. 2. An observation was made, on 12/14/22 at 9:06 a.m., of Resident #86 lying in bed, wearing a nebulizer mask, the nebulizer machine could be heard from the hallway. On 12/14/22 at 9:08 a.m., the observation revealed a steady amount of aerosol was coming from the residents' nebulizer mask, the resident stated it was just a nebulizer. This writer left the residents' room and when reaching the opposite side of the hallway, on 12/14/22 at 9:08 a.m., the nebulizer machine stopped. An observation, on 12/14/22 at 9:09 a.m., indicated the resident had removed the nebulizer mask. On 12/14/22 beginning at 9:17 a.m., during an observation of Resident #86 and an interview with Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff I stated, a nebulizer treatment had been given to Resident #86. Staff I reported nebulizer treatments could take about 10 - 15 minutes depending on the machine's compressor. Staff I reviewed Resident #86's physician orders and stated it did not look like the resident had an order to allow for the self-administration of the nebulizer medication. Staff I entered Resident #86's room, picked up the nebulizer mask from top of the bedside dresser, looked at it, then placed it into the plastic bag hanging from the bedside dresser under the nebulizer machine. When asked, the nurse removed the mask and indicated the nebulizer's medication cup still held a clear liquid. Staff I informed the resident the treatment would have to continue and placed the mask on the resident. The nurse stated, have to stay and watch [the treatment]. Staff I sat in the bedside chair next to Resident #86's bed. Staff I stated the procedure [for administration of nebulizer medication] was they (nurses) generally check back in on them [the residents]. On 12/14/22 at 5:48 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she knew about the incident with Resident #86. She said she was there, and heard what the nurse (Staff I) had told this writer. She stated her expectation would be that staff stay with the resident during the treatment. A review of Resident #86's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The record included a diagnosis not limited to unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, indicating a moderate cognition impairment. The review of Resident #86's Order Summary Report, active as of 12/14/22 at 9:47 a.m., did not include a physician order for the self-administration of any medication. The consent form for Self-Administration of Medication (undated) indicated It is the policy of this facility that the resident has the right to self-administer his or her own mediation if the interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice is safe. The form included but was not limited to the following criteria be met: 1. Physician's orders for administration of medication must be on file at the facility (may be all or a specific drug). 2. The resident has signed a document stating his/her desire to self-medicate. 3. The level of ability to identify medication, dosage, time, and to store properly has been determined as sage by the interdisciplinary team.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement an effective grievance program for two (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement an effective grievance program for two (Residents #515 and #43) of 47 sampled residents related to the operation of in-room telephone service and missing property. Findings included: 1. On 12/13/22 at 10:42 a.m., the family member of Resident #515 stated the phone in the resident's room did not work and asked how families were supposed to communicate if they (the resident) did not have a cell phone. The family member expressed, on 12/13/22 at 11:50 a.m., the only issue was the phone was not working and said maintenance had been in over the weekend and changed it out but it still only got a busy signal. The observation identified a white telephone handset that when turned on, a busy signal could be heard. On 12/13/22 at 11:52 a.m., during an interview with Staff M, Agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), she stated she was unaware of the telephone not working and if something did not work she would put it into the electronic maintenance system. On 12/13/22 at 12:06 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Plant Operations (DPO), he stated the phone not working in Resident #515's room was an ongoing issue. He stated they (the facility) was putting in a new system, business phones, going to be 4 phases, and as far as he knew phase one had been completed last week. The director stated to make a phone call, the resident could ask to use the cordless phone at the nursing station. On 12/15/22 at 2:39 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated phone numbers (to rooms) were posted in the rooms and the receptionist informed families of individual room numbers. She stated the Director of Customer Service should be notifying the family regarding (facility) phone numbers. She reported that room [ROOM NUMBER]'s phone was not going to work. On 12/15/22 at 2:46 p.m., the Director of Customer Service (DCS) stated, the Guest Relations department was responsible to let family and residents the phone in room [ROOM NUMBER] did not work. He stated a cordless phone was always available and the phone number was the facility's main phone number. The DCS identified the main phone number was on every business care and every room had a teepee card with the main phone number. He stated if there was a known issue I informed them and room [ROOM NUMBER]'s phone had been out. The clinical record for Resident #515 identified that the resident was admitted on [DATE]. A review of the grievance log, dated December 2022, did not identify a grievance had been filed regarding Resident #515's phone. 2. On 12/13/22 at 10:56 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #43. She reported a personal cell phone was missing and had disappeared either Friday or Saturday (12/10 or 12/11/2022). She said she reported the missing phone to an aide and was told laundry was looking for it. A review of the December 2022 did not indicate a grievance had been implemented regarding Resident #43's missing personal possessions. The admission Record identified Resident #43 was admitted on [DATE] and included the following diagnoses of cellulitis of left lower limb and type 2 Diabetes mellitus. The 5-day Minimum Data Set indicated Resident #43 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 14 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #43's Inventory of Personal Effects list, dated 11/27/22, identified the resident had one cell phone and no valuables. On 12/14/22 at 5:22 p.m., interviews were conducted with Staff N and O, Social Service Directors, they revealed they were just made aware of Resident #43's missing phone. Staff O stated they would be making a grievance out regarding the phone. On 12/15/22 at 8:35 a.m., Staff O reported the cell phone had been located on the 200- unit, way over there and did not know how it had gotten there. The policy - Grievance Policy and Procedure, effective March 2015 and revised January 2018 and July 2021, identified that The center recognizes the resident/legal representative/family has the right to voice grievances and recommendations for changes through an orderly and timely process free from discrimination and/or reprisal. The have a right to expect the center will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances and, upon request, have the right to obtain written decision regarding the grievance. The procedure defined a concern as any formal expression of interest regarding the well-being of a resident. Upon receipt of the concern/grievance, documentation on the Record o Resident/Family Grievance/Complaint/Concern form will be initiated by the Grievance Official/designee or whichever professional team members receives the concern. The policy identified that the grievance official/designee would document the date the grievance was received on the Grievance log and copies would be made and distributed to the Executive Director and referenced department representative. The person filing the grievance has the right to expect the center will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances and, upon request, have the right to obtain written decision regarding the grievance. Residents who are unable to prepare a written grievance without assistance, may elect to receive support from any center team members or third party chosen by the resident.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure fall interventions were implemented per care p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure fall interventions were implemented per care plan for one (Resident #144) of eight residents reviewed for falls. Findings included: Resident #144 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Encephalopathy unspecified Dementia, Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and history of falling. A care plan for Resident #144 dated 12/6/22, showed the resident was at risk for falls related to Parkinson's disease , Glaucoma, unsteady Gait, and history of falls. Interventions included: Calf pads in place when [Resident #144] is in wheelchair. Review of a document titled, SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) Communication form, dated 12/07/22, showed Resident #144 was found on the floor in the activity room on C-wing by housekeeping. Resident was lying in front of his wheelchair with his back against his foot pedals, seems as if he slid down out of his wheelchair and onto the floor . On 12/12/22 at 10:45 a.m., Resident #144 was observed in the dining room visiting with his Responsible Party (RP). The resident's feet were observed hanging off his chair, and his ankles were stuck between the wheelchair foot rests. The RP stated the resident's feet were not supposed to be hanging like that. The RP said, It is not comfortable. He is supposed to have calf supports. On 12/12/22 at 10:52 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff A, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA). Staff A stated she did not know about the chair, or if there were interventions related to that. She stated she would let the nurse know. On 12/13/22 at 10:06 a.m., Resident #144 was observed outside the 300 nurse's station hallway. The resident was observed reclined in his chair sleeping. The resident's feet were noted hanging between the footrests of his chair without calf supports. In an interview with Staff A, CNA on 12/13/22 at 10:08 a.m., Staff A stated she noted the resident's feet hanging over the chair. Staff A said, I think he is supposed to have some supports on his legs. Review of a document titled, Active Orders, dated 12/15/22 showed a PT (Physical Therapy) clarification order. PT to treat 3 times/week, x 4 weeks for w/c (wheelchair) management and safety education, as clinically indicated, order date 12/08/22. On 12/13/22 at 12:29 p.m., Resident #144 was observed in the dining room with his RP. The RP stated his feet were hanging off the chair, pointing to his feet. The RP stated she would follow up with PT on the concern. The RP stated the resident fell on [DATE] because he did not have his calf supports. On 12/14/22 at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR). The DOR stated Resident #144 was assessed recently due to a fall. The care plan was updated to ensure calf pads were in place. She stated the resident was declining due to the Parkinson's diagnosis and should be closely monitored. The DOR said, He [Resident #144) should have calf pads on to protect his heels and secure his feet for positioning. She stated, The CNAs should be putting the calf pads on. The task is on their [NAME] (meaning a documentation system used by CNAs to document resident's care). The DOR confirmed when she looked at the resident, the calf pads were not on. She stated she would follow-up with nursing. On 12/14/22 at 12:02 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Risk Manager. The Risk Manager confirmed the resident had an unwitnessed fall where he was found on the floor in front of the wheelchair. She stated the resident had an extensive history of falls with recent interventions for alterations of chair, and calf pad supports. The Risk Manager said, At the time of the fall, the resident slid off the chair because his calf pads were not in place. She stated therapy assessed him for positioning and determined calf pads supports should be in place when the resident was out of bed and in his wheelchair. The Risk Manager stated the resident needed the calf pad supports because he was too rigid and would otherwise slide out of the chair. The Risk Manager stated they updated Resident #144's care plan interventions, CNA [NAME] task logs, and notified the primary care nurse to ensure compliance. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/14/22 at 11:42 a.m., the DON confirmed the calf pads should have been on the resident's chair. She stated they had in-serviced all the CNAs who were working related to proper placement of the calf pads. She stated they had printed visual pictures for the CNAs to reference. (Visual copy was provided). The DON stated education would be on-going for the CNAs who were not at the facility at the time to ensure they were in-serviced prior to working with this resident. On 12/15/22 at 12:09 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) The ADON stated she was responsible for ensuring nursing staff competencies. She stated the CNA should be following care plan interventions and implement as indicated. She stated if the therapist had ordered the calf pads to be in place when the resident was in his chair, the CNAs should follow the plan. The ADON stated she expected the nurses to know the care plan expectations and pass it on to the CNAs. The ADON stated it was expected that the CNAs review the [NAME] prior to each shift and follow it accordingly. On 12/15/22 at 03:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with the DON and Regional Clinical Nurse. They stated they recognized they did not have a plan to ensure the CNAs were aware of new interventions. The DON stated going forward, therapy would print interventions to include pictures, so the CNAs know what was new in the care plan and how to apply the directions accordingly. She stated they had started in-services. The DON said, The plan is to make sure the CNAs know when there are updated interventions and ensure they are able to implement the plan of care. Review of a document titled, Physical Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment, dated 12/08/22, showed treatment approaches may include wheelchair management training, new goal patient will safely sit in the wheelchair 6 to 8 hours without sliding forward in the seat to decrease potential fall from the wheelchair. The assessment summary showed the resident was found on the floor potentially sliding out of the wheelchair patient would potentially benefit from calf panel to decrease sliding forward in the seat. Review of a document titled, Task List Report, showed on functional assistance; calf pad to wheelchair when resident is up in wheelchair. Review of a facility policy titled, Nursing/Risk Management- Falls, dated November 2018, showed a purpose to identify and address risk factors associated with resident falls to decrease the likelihood of falls. Procedure: 1. After a resident has fallen a comprehensive risk evaluation will be completed by the interdisciplinary team. 2. The evaluation may include but will not be limited to the following: cause of fall or contributing risk factors if known, review of medications to include pharmacy intermediate medication regimen review, review of any assistive or safety devices currently in use, therapy screen, and recommendations of the team to address fall risk factors. 3. Review and revise care plan with new interventions. 4. Review findings with Resident, Resident Representative and Physician. Review of a facility policy titled, Person - centered Comprehensive Care Plan, dated October 2022, showed it is the practice of the center to develop and implement a person- centered comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet their preferences and goals, and address the guest/resident's nursing, medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both comprehensive and quarterly review assessments and with significant changes in the guest/resident's condition.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. An observation was made, on 12/12/22 at 11:28 a.m., of Resident #514 sitting in the common area of the 400-unit, across from...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. An observation was made, on 12/12/22 at 11:28 a.m., of Resident #514 sitting in the common area of the 400-unit, across from the nursing station. The residents' left arm was wrapped with an elastic bandage, was edematous with purple-blue discoloration, and resting on an over-the-bed table. The resident appeared to be mildly confused and stated she had broken her arm but not at the facility. An interview was conducted at 10:14 a.m. on 12/13/22, with Resident #514 and a family member. The family member reported the resident had fallen on Sunday (12/11/22) and the ulna bone was broken. The cotton padding and elastic bandage was lying on the residents' bedside dresser. The family member reported the resident had kept picking at it and did not know if the resident had taken it off or if they (the facility) had. The family member stated the resident had fallen three times and had been moved closer to the nursing station for staff to watch her. On 12/14/22 at 9:02 a.m., Resident #514 was observed sitting in bed, feeding self, and wearing a wrist brace on her left arm with a white border dressing to left elbow. The resident stated, It's absolutely miserable (the brace). During an interview on 12/14/22 at 11:02 a.m., Staff G, Registered Nurse (RN) stated the resident was in therapy and the facility was doing 15 minutes checks. The staff member reported the resident had attempted to stand and get up last night so the facility ran STAT labs which included a complete blood count and a comprehensive metabolic panel. Resident #514's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The record included diagnoses not limited to unspecified Encephalopathy, site not specified urinary tract infection, not elsewhere classified senile degeneration of brain, and age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture. The Incident Log, dated 12/15/22, identified Resident #514 had a witnessed fall on 12/2/22, and unwitnessed falls on 12/11 and 12/12/22. The Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (SBAR), dated 12/2/22, identified Resident #514's change in condition was related to a fall. The form identified mental status, functional status, or pain had changed from baseline, that the resident's behavior was not clinically applicable, and the resident had suffered a skin tear. The primary care clinician (PCC) recommended to increase oral fluids and other (which was described). The nursing note, attached to the SBAR, did not describe the incident. An electronic Change in Condition note (eINTERACT), dated 12/2/22, indicated Resident #514 had a fall, suffered a skin tear, was accompanied by significant pain or bleeding, and was positive for a Urinary Tract infection (UTI) on admission. The note indicated the resident was seen sitting on [buttocks] outside of the resident's room in the doorway. The resident notified staff of a fall in the bathroom. The resident suffered 5 skin tears to the right upper extremity. The SBAR, dated 12/11/22, identified Resident #514 had a change in condition related to Trauma (fall related or other). The evaluation indicated the resident had increased confusion or disorientation, falls (one or more), and discoloration of the skin with no pain. The PCC recommended to send to the Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation (eval) and treatment (tx). A progress note identified that Resident #514 had suffered a fall on 12/11/22, transferred to the hospital, mentation was not at residents' baseline, and a Urinalysis had been requested from the physician. The resident had returned with left arm splinting. A record review of an eINTERACT note, dated 12/11/22 and completed on 12/13/22, revealed Resident #514 had a fall-related trauma. The note indicated the nurse was alerted by the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) that the resident was lying in a supine position on the floor. An order had been obtained to send to ED for eval. and tx. A SBAR, dated 12/12/22, indicated Resident #514 had a fall and this condition, symptom, or sign has occurred before. The evaluation of the resident indicated the resident had increased confusion or disorientation, one or more falls and no pain. The behavioral, respiratory, cardiovascular, abdominal, urinary evaluations were not clinically applicable to the change in condition being reported. The resident suffered a skin tear. The recommendations from the PCC indicated neuros per policy, continue frequent monitoring, (and) pending lab results. A progress note, dated 12/12/22 at 12:13 p.m., described Resident #514 was seen sitting by the nursing station then seen in front of wheelchair by the nursing station with the phone hanging by the cord off of the desk. Labs and Urinalysis (UA) were pending. The one evaluation of Fall Risk included with Resident #514, which was completed after the residents second fall on 12/11/22 identified the resident had 1 or 2 falls in the past month, had impaired safety awareness, and a recent fracture. The evaluation indicated the resident used a walker, had an unsteady gait, no self-release or safety device were ordered, and the resident was a high risk for falls. The acute facilities radiology results, on 12/11/22 at 11:08 a.m., for Resident #514 identified a comminuted and displaced intra-articular distal radial fracture and minimally displaced ulnar styloid fracture. The review of Resident #514's care plan included a focus, initiated on 11/30/22 and revised on 12/2/22, that identified the resident was At risk for falls related to: history (Hx) Falls, bilateral lower extremity (BLE) weakness, Osteoporosis, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Bursitis Multiple areas, Encephalopathy, (and) Advancing Age. The goal was Will strive to have falls and/or injuries minimized thru management of risk factors while maintaining independence and quality of life through the review date. The interventions included: - Observe for unsafe actions and intervene as needed, initiated 11/30/22. - Observe for unsafe ambulation, initiated 11/30/22. - Check for toileting needs, initiated 11/30/22. - Keep adaptive equipment within reach, initiated 11/30/22. - Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) to screen as needed (prn), initiated 11/30/22. - Place items used in easy reach i.e. Water, telephone, (and) call lights, initiated 11/30/22. - Encourage appropriate footwear, initiated 11/30/22. - Four wheeled walker with seat, initiated 12/2/22. - Palm Program, initiated 12/2/22. - Reinforce utilization of call light; (Resident) able to return demonstration, initiated 12/2/22. - Frequent Observation: 15-minute monitoring, initiated 12/11/22. - Change of room assignment for increased visualization, initiated 12/12/22. The observation logs, provided by the facility for Resident #514 identified they began on 12/13 and continued through 12/15/22. The Director of Quality Assurance (DQA) stated, on 12/15/22 at 9:13 a.m., the facility had identified an increase in falls, updated on 12/6/22. The DQA stated the facility had initiated a fall committee which included a nurse from each unit and an aide from each shift, so each shift could cooperate, implement measures, and communicate with agency and part-time staff. She identified the facility had implemented a huddle. On 12/15/22 at 1:38 p.m., the Risk Manager/DQA said regarding Resident #514's fall on 12/2/22, she had collaborated with the son and the resident had demonstrated an acute decline in executive decisions. She stated the fall on 12/2/22 was unwitnessed and the resident had reported sliding down the shower curtain while in the bathroom, putting self on towel, and sliding to the door entrance. The family reported the resident did better with a 4 wheeled walker (which family brought to the facility). The DQA stated staff enforced the use of call light and assistive device. The DQA said cognitive changes had been noted with Resident #514 on the morning of 12/11/22. She was brought to the nursing station, did not want to stay there, continued to ambulate without assistance, and was found on the floor without the walker. When the resident went to the hospital the facility did a room change. The resident came back with a soft cast for a wrist fracture. The DQA stated the care plan was updated to keep the resident in common areas. The DQA said, on 12/12/22 Resident #514 stood up at the nursing station while on the phone with daughter and ended up with a skin tear. She stated the nurse requested a urinalysis and labs from the physician, did a clinical review, asked the physician to look at medications, psych to see resident, and ordered labs. She reported the following was initiated: Pain Management consult following the third fall, anti-roll backs and anti-tippers on wheelchair, and leg rests were removed. Resident #514 fell on [DATE] when in the common area of the unit and per the family member continued to have poor safety awareness (toileting self during the night of 12/12 - 12/13/22) despite being moved to a room closer to the nurses station and being brought to the common area for visualization. 3. Resident # 111's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Parkinson Disease. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], Section C titled Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS), revealed Resident #111's BIMS score was a 7 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. A review of The Nursing Care plan dated 10/20/2022, showed Resident # 111 was at risk for falls. Care Plan interventions for Resident #111 showed he should be observed for unsafe ambulation and unsafe actions and intervene as needed. A record review of The Change in Condition note dated 12/14/2022, showed Resident #111 was evaluated for a fall. A record review of the nursing progress note dated 12/11/2022, showed Resident # 111 had a unwitnessed fall in the dayroom by the Christmas tree. On 12/15/2022 at 8:47 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Risk Manager. The Risk Manger said Resident # 111 had an unwitnessed fall in the dayroom on 12/14/2022, he was trying to transfer out of his wheelchair into another chair in the dayroom. On 12/15/2022 at 8:47 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing, DON. The DON said Resident #111 had an unwitnessed fall on 12/11/2022 and 12/14/2022, in the dayroom. The DON said the dayroom was a high traffic area and it was not supervised all the time. Based on Observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls for three (Residents #98, #111, and #514) of eight residents sampled for falls. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #98's record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Displaced Fracture of Base of Neck of Right Femur, Parkinson's, Generalized anxiety, Dementia, Depression Abnormality of Gait and Mobility, and History of Falling. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 12/2/22 revealed a score of 02, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Observations on 12/12/22 at 10:53 a.m., during the initial tour of the facility, while walking past Resident #98's room, the resident was observed with a low bed and his wheelchair in front of the bed facing the door. The resident was observed with both his knees in the seat of the wheelchair and facing backwards. The resident was hanging over the back of the chair. His torso extended over the back of the wheelchair and his arms were outstretched, touching the bed. The room was noted to have bilateral floor mats next to each side of the bed. At this point, this surveyor stopped the initial tour and notified Staff E Registered Nurse, Unit Manager, who redirected the resident and transferred him from his wheelchair to his bed. An interview with Staff E on 12/12/22 at 10:59 a.m., revealed the resident wanted to go to bed and was a high fall risk, with behaviors. An interview with the resident on 12/12/22 at 11:00 a.m., revealed he was trying to get in bed all day and no one would help him. The resident was unable to understand the use of the call bell. A review of the resident's transfer form (3008) dated 11/16/22 revealed the resident had a risk alert for falls. A review of the resident's evaluation of fall risk dated 11/16/22 revealed a score of 13 (High Risk) A review of the resident's evaluation of fall risk dated 12/6/22 revealed a score of 19 (High Risk) A review of the behavior monitoring on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 12/12/22, day shift, revealed no documentation of the behavior observed on this day. A review of the progress notes from 11/16/22 to present, revealed no documentation of the observations noted on 12/12/22. A review of the resident's record and the facility's incident reports revealed the following: 12/14/22 19:46 (7:46 p.m.)- Incident report- Resident found on floor lying in supine position; head positioned -Incident Report 12/6/22 22:58 (10:58 p.m.)-resident on floor next to wheelchair in living room wants to go home. Found on floor in dayroom; not witnessed; Resident continues with impulsive behaviors; POC updated; Engagement with activities; dining with peers. -Change in condition dated 12/6/22 -Incident note 12/5/22 13:42 1:42 p.m.) Resident found on floor in tv room after breakfast. no injuries noted, neuro check wnl [within normal limits]. when assisting back to w/c [wheelchair] resident stated 'hey I'm comfortable.' -Incident report 12/5/22 8:40 a.m.- Collaborative efforts with IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] to address continued behaviors resulting in change of plane; Resident continues to be frequently monitored; 15 minute checks; Staff continue to anticipate Residents needs; Medication profile reviewed; Nicotine patch reordered; Alternate w/c cushion provided. -Change in condition 12/4/22 -Nursing Note 12/4/22 01:00 (1:00 a.m.)-Resident found by CNA on the floor in front of the bathroom. Fall unwitnessed. Resident had gotten out of bed with scoop mattress, put himself in his wheelchair without calling for assistance. Non skid socks on resident. Resident on the floor of room with bathroom door closed and his pants down just above his knees. resident assessed and found to have no visible injuries. Vital signs stable. Stated some back pain, medication given. Resident cleaned up and returned to bed. -Incident Report 12/4/22 0100 (1:00 a.m.)-POC updated :Frequent monitoring, Alternate wheelchair. -Change in condition 12/1/22 17:00 (5:00 p.m.) -SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) 12/1/22 17:00 (5:00 p.m.)-resident was observed sitting on floor in front of wheelchair no injury noted no c/o pain or discomfort resident assisted off floor by staff rom [Range of motion] wnl neuro wnl. no new orders. -Incident Report 12/1/22 18:07 (6:07 p.m.) Resident observed sitting on floor in front of wheelchair by recliner was in bed climbed out of bed was walking around room. Resident stated, 'I was going over there.' 12/2/22, Historical Falls Palm program identified by magnet; Common areas; Toileting management; psychiatric consultation; manual wheelchair safety adjustments; Clinical review Lab Monitoring; 15 minute checks in progress; additional manual wheelchair adjustments. -Care plan related to falls -Assist resident to common areas for increased visualization; and to maximize socialization initiated 11/21/22 with revision 12/2/22 -Change in condition 12/1/22 13:15 (1:15 p.m.) -Nursing Note 12/1/22/13:20 (1:20 -p.m.) -Resident was seen sitting on his bottom laying slightly on his back in front of his recliner. The wheelchair was seen flipped on its side. The client stated he was trying to go to bed. The call bell was not on and he had removed non-skid socks. therapy and CNA helped his writer assist him into his wheelchair and placed in common areas. No noted new injuries. Hand grasps WNL and vitals stable at this time. Director of Quality assurance notified of incident. Family and physician notified and neuro checks started per facility protocol. -Incident report 12/1/22 13:15 (1:15 p.m.)- POC reviewed: Psychiatric consult for re-evaluation; Medication management. -Change in condition 11/27/22 -Incident note 11/27/22 11:39 a.m. -Called to room, resident on floor lying on his back. confused stating stating I was trying to get my chair. skin tear to right upper shin. able to move all extremities pupils equal and reactive to light. Helped up to w/c brought to nurses station. -Incident report 11/27/22 11:32 a.m. -Care plan related to fall with interventions Anti tippers to manual wheelchair initiated 11/28/22, revised on 12/12/22 -Care plan related to fall with intervention related to falls Drop Seat to manual wheelchair -Incident Report 11/21/22 22:32 (10:32 p.m.) -Resident sitting on floor next to wheelchair wearing non skid shoes, pants and shirt. resident stated he wanted coffee and his pants from laundry.-Awaiting return call from interested parties to gain a greater perspective on usual and customary daily activities; POC updated: Scoop Mattress; Common areas. -Fall care plan with revised interventions include Scoop mattress, initiated 11/21/22; Assist to common areas for increased visualization; and to maximize socialization. -Fall care plan with revised intervention floor mats at bedside while in bed initiated 11/21/22 -Change in condition 11/20/22 -Progress note 11/20/22 01:45 1:45 a.m. -Resident found on the floor in his room by the door. Fall unwitnessed. Stated he was looking for a phone to call his boss. Vital signs stable. No visible injuries. Notified Physician, no new orders given. Resident assessed and declined returning to bed, requested to sit in his wheelchair. Resident assisted to wheelchair by CNA and nurse. -Incident report dated 11/20/22- indicated Resident linens on bed wet with urine and a mess. Identified as a fall risk with palm magnet placement outside door; POC update: floor mats; Toileting management -Care plan related to falls- with intervention initiated 11/20/22, Toileting management Assist Resident to the bathroom upon rising; before and after meals; at bedtime; and frequently throughout the day. Observations on 12/14/22 at 08:19 a.m. revealed the resident to be calm, navigating hallways independently in his wheelchair, requesting assistance to go to his room. An interview on 12/14/22 at 08:38 a.m. with Staff S, LPN revealed the resident was a fall risk and staff had to constantly check in on him. She reported the resident should always be in line of sight, which had been in place for some time. An interview on 12/14/22 at 08:46 a.m. with Staff T, CNA, revealed the resident was very confused and was a fall risk. She reported after his meals she would toilet him and would put him down to rest. She reported he was on every 15 minute checks since the weekend. An interview was conducted on 12/15/22 at 11:25 a.m., with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Risk Manager. The Risk Manager reported the fall last night, 12/14/22, was an unwitnessed fall. The Risk manager reported the resident was on 15 minute checks from 12/4-12/6 only. She reported all staff were aware the resident was a high fall risk and everyone looked out for him and everyone knew he was impulsive. Resident was on frequent supervision and moved to the front hall for higher traffic supervision. The Risk Manger and NHA were unaware of the incident this surveyor witnessed on Monday 12/12/22. An interview on 12/15/22 at 12:28 p.m. with the NHA revealed nursing reports any concerns to the morning/clinical meeting, this was where they would discuss behaviors and possible interventions. She reported the observation reported to staff on 12/12/22 should have gone to the risk manager, and should have been documented. An interview on 12/15/22 at 12:30 p.m., with the DON, revealed if the resident had a change in behavior, a note would be written and the DON would pull a 24 hour report and would discuss the concern in the clinical/stand up meeting. She reported staff were trained in this process during orientation. Review of the facility policy titled Nursing/Risk Management-PALM Program with an effective date of October 2014 and a revised date of November 2018 revealed the following: 3. Team intervention which may apply to PALM Program participants include the following suggested interventions: -in view of staff when OOB
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to secure medications properly for four (Residents #3...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to secure medications properly for four (Residents #37, #127, and # 43) of 46 sampled residents , in one of two medication storage rooms, and in two of four medication carts. Findings included: 1. On 12/14/22 at 9:04 a.m., an observation was made in the room of Resident #127. There was a medicine cup with 10-12 medication tablets inside the cup. (Photographic evidence obtained.) A review of admission records indicated Resident #127 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer disease, major depressive disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, coagulation factor deficiency, and heart disease. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the following orders signed off on the morning of 12/14/22: Omega 3 fatty acid capsule 1000 mg. Signed off as given at 8:37 a.m. Spironolactone tablet 50 mg x 2 tablets. Signed off as given at 8:37 a.m. Jardiance tablet 10 mg. Signed off as given at 8:40 a.m. Allopurinol tablet 100 mg. Signed off as given at 8:40 a.m. Divalproex sodium ER tablet 500 mg. Signed off as given at 8:40 a.m. Risperidone tablet 0.25 mg. Signed off as given at 8:40 a.m. Gemfibrozil tablet 600mg. Signed off as given at 8:40 a.m. Pepcid tablet 20 mg. Signed off as given at 8:40 a.m. Metoprolol tartrate tablet 50 mg. Signed off as given at 8:40 a.m. Apixaban tablet 2.5 mg. Signed off as given at 8:40 a.m. Bumetanide tablet 2 mg. Signed off as given at 8:40 a.m. All medications were signed off by Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN.) He was currently assigned as the nurse for Resident #127 An interview was conducted with Staff B, LPN, on 12/14/22 at 9:06 a.m. Staff B walked into the room and observed Resident #127 sleeping and a medication cup full of tablets in front of the resident on the overbed table. Staff B said, That's my fault. I should not have left the medications unattended. He usually swallows them right away. He must have fallen asleep. I should have stayed with him. Staff B said the resident did not normally have problems taking his medications; he swallowed them right away. He stated it must have been an off morning. Staff B said, It was my mistake. The expectation is to stay with resident when they are taking their medications. Stay and make sure they swallow. Staff B removed the medications and stepped out of the room, went to the med cart, and then asked the resident if he wanted to take the medications now or later. The resident did not respond. The LPN stated he would give him 15 minutes and attempt to re-administer. On 12/14/22 at 5:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON.) The DON stated she was notified of the medications left at bedside for Resident #127. She stated the nurse informed her the resident had brought the medication cup to his mouth and he left to get the roommate's medication. The DON stated the nurse did not stay to confirm the resident had swallowed the tablets. The DON stated the nurse should have stayed to ensure the resident swallowed the medication. The DON stated they have started education. On 12/14/22 at 5:55 p.m., an observation was made of a bottle of Calcium Carbonate 500 mg on the bedside table of Resident #37. This bottle had been observed on the bedside table on 12/12, 12/13, and 12/14/22. (Photographic evidence obtained.) The DON was shown a photograph of the Calcium Carbonate at the bedside of Resident #37. She stated the resident should not be keeping medications at bedside. She confirmed all medications must be locked up and administered by the nurse unless the resident had been approved for self-administration. A follow-up interview was conducted with the DON on 12/15/22 at 1:56 p.m. The DON confirmed Resident #37 has not been assessed for self-administration of medication. She stated she will speak with the resident, assess her if needed, and provide a lock box if she is approved to self-administering medication. On 12/15/22 at 12:22 p.m. an observation was completed of the 200 hall medication storage room with Staff E, Unit Manager (UM.) In the cabinet, there was a box of eyedrops that had been opened. Staff E opened a new box to see what kind of seal should be on the bottle. The unopened bottle was observed to have a blue safety seal around the lid. The open bottle had no seal and was not labeled or dated. The UM stated she could not imagine someone used eye drops and put them back in the cabinet. She confirmed they should not be in the cabinet like they were. She said she would throw them away because there was no way to know if they had been used on a resident on not. (Photographic evidence obtained.) On 12/15/22 at 12:30 p.m. an observation was completed on medication cart 1B with Staff D, LPN. Two loose medication tablets were found in the drawer of the medication cart. The bottom drawer had a sticky substance spilled in the bottom. Staff D stated there should not be loose medication in the cart. She said the sticky substance appears to be from a bottle of medication waste that was leaking. Staff D said nurses checked their own carts and they were cleaned more in-depth on the 3:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m. shift. She stated she had not had time to check her cart yet today, 12/15/22. (Photographic evidence obtained.) On 12/15/22 at 1:00 p.m. an observation was completed on medication cart 2A with Staff C, UM. She stated the medication cart was being used on the current shift by Staff B, LPN. Four half tablets were found loose in the drawers of the medication cart. The UM stated there should not be any loose medication in the carts. She stated she personally cleaned the carts weekly and nurses should be checking their medication carts every shift. (Photographic evidence obtained.) An interview was conducted with the DON on 12/15/22 at 1:10 p.m. The DON was made aware of the loose tablets in the medication carts and the open eye drops in the medication storage room. She confirmed there should be no loose medication in any medication cart. She also stated there should not be any opened eye drops or unlabeled medications in the medication storage rooms. She said she would ensure the issues were taken care of. Resident Council minutes from a meeting on 10/12/22 were reviewed. The residents indicated they were concerned about medications being left at the bedside during the 3:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. shifts. A facility policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, dated 7/21/22, was reviewed. The policy stated the following: 3.3. Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors. 5.1. Facility staff may record the calculated expiration date based on date opened on the primary medication container. 5.4 When an ophthalmic solution or suspension has a manufacturers shortened beyond use date once opened, the facility staff should record the date opened and the date to expire on the container. 5.4.1. Facility staff should evaluate the continued sterility of the product based on clinical judgement or contamination of the dispenser after contact with eye, eyelid, lashes or finger. 13.2. Facility should store bedside medications or biologicals in a locked compartment within the resident's room. 17. Facility personnel should inspect nursing station storage areas for proper storage compliance on a regular scheduled basis. A facility policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, dated January 2022. The policy stated the following: 3.10. Facility staff should not leave medications or chemicals unattended. 5.10. Observe the resident's consumption of the medication(s). 2. On 12/13/22 at 10:56 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #43 which identified a clear plastic bag sitting on the bed next to the resident. The bag contained two bottles of over-the counter (OTC) medications, one was Cal-Mag (Calcium/Magnesium) and the other had a handwritten label indicating that it contained Body Gold Ginsana Energy Brain, the bottles manufacturer label identified it as a bottle of Vitamin B2. The resident stated staff did not know about the medications and they were taken daily because of not getting any vitamins at the facility. Photographic evidence was obtained. A review of Resident #43's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The record included diagnoses not limited to cellulitis of left lower limb, Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, and type 2 Diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating an intact cognition. A review of the Order Summary Report did not include a physician order for either Cal-Mag (Calcium/Magnesium) or Body Gold Ginsana Energy Brain or that the resident was able to self-administer medication. An observation and interview were conducted, on 12/14/22 at 8:58 a.m., with Staff F, agency LPN for Resident #43. The residents' OTC bottles were not observed and the resident reported throwing away the OTC medications yesterday as if they were given to the facility they would not be given back. The Director of Nursing was interviewed, at 5:48 p.m. on 12/14/22, regarding the observation of the OTC medication that had been in Resident #43's possession and had reported throwing away the two bottles. She stated, which means she still has them.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to label and date opened food and maintain a clean, sanitary kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to label and date opened food and maintain a clean, sanitary kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings: Observation on 12/12/2022 at 10:44 a.m. , revealed packets of food, trash, and a wash rag underneath the shelves on the food pantry room floor. A molded pan of gravy was found underneath the shelf with food stored on the shelf inside the refrigerator on the floor. Observation on 12/14/2022 at 10:00 a.m., was conducted in the nourishment room on the C and D nursing wings. Inside the nourishment room on the D wing was an opened, unlabeled, and undated [brand name] meatball bag left inside the freezer. Inside the nourishment room on the C wing was two boxes of ice cream and two frozen dinner boxes unlabeled and undated. On 12/18/2022 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff L, the Certified Dietary Manager, CDM. The CDM said the nourishment rooms are cleaned, stocked, and maintained by designated culinary aids every day of the week. The CDM said the dietary staff made sure the food inside the refrigerator and freezers were dated and labeled correctly. Food that is not labeled and dated should not be left inside the freezer or refrigerator. The CDM said he could see there was undated and unlabeled food, but he would not throw it out because he hated to waste food. On 12/14/2022 at 4:21 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator, NHA. The NHA said her expectation for food stored inside the nourishment rooms freezer and refrigerators should be labeled and dated and only used for the residents not the staff. The NHA said the dietary staff restocked the refrigerator every afternoon and should check to see if there were any food items unlabeled and undated; they should throw out any items they found inside the freezer or refrigerator not dated our labeled. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage, dated October 2014, showed that food storage areas shall be maintained in a clean manner at all times. Procedure 2. Shelves, racks, dollies, or other surfaces used for food storage should facilitate thorough cleaning. Record review of the facility's policy titles, Resident Personal Food, dated October 2014, showed items brought into the facility will be stored unsanitary conditions. Procedure 2. Labeled and dated perishable items may be stored under refrigeration in thee nursing unit consistent with standards of food storage.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Control program r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Control program related to the unsanitary environment of the laundry room related to personal food items and belongings sitting on same folding counter as resident linen, failed to ensure two (Staff H and J) direct care staff members had fingernails that were per Centers of Disease Control and Prevention guidelines were of an appropriate length, and failed to ensure Seven (Residents #86, #119, #23, #112, #37, #58, and #42) out of eight residents receiving oxygen therapies. Findings included: 1. During an interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 12/14/22 at 11:05 a.m., she stated the facility followed the Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations/guidelines. She stated she had been to the laundry area earlier that day. An observation was conducted on 12/14/22 at 12:28 p.m., with the IP of the facility's laundry processing area. Staff K, Laundry Aide, was standing against the laundry folding counter and stated she had just returned from lunch. In the corner of the laundry counter, which had folded linen and hospital gowns on top of it, was a plate of cookies, an opened bag of cheesy puffed treats, a cell phone, and a key ring with keys. Immediately following the observation of the laundry processing are, the IP confirmed food items should not be on the folding counter. The policy - Handling Linens to Prevent and Control Infection, effective December 2020, identified that written policies and procedures are needed and should include training for staff who will handle linens and laundry. The policy provided by the facility did not address keeping personal items stored with facility linens. The CDC guideline, Appendix D - Linen and laundry management: Best Practices for Environmental Cleaning in Healthcare Facilities: in RLS, reviewed: March 27, 2020, (https://www.cdc.gov/hai/prevent/resource-limited/laundry.html), identified that Best practices for management of clean linen: Sort, package, transport, and store clean linens in a manner that prevents risk of contamination by dust, debris, soiled linens or other soiled items. An observation was made on 12/13/22 at 11:40 a.m., of Staff H's, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), fingernails which extended approximately 1/2 - 3/4 inches past the fingertip. The fingernails were painted white and black, the fourth finger on right hand was white with black raised jewels and the fourth finger on left hand was painted black with white raised jewels. The staff member stated I lost one indicating a shorter nail on the middle finger of left hand. She stated she used double gloves so not to break through. On 12/14/22 at 8:44 a.m., Staff H was observed, on the 400 hall, with the continued long fingernails. On 12/13/22 at 11:59 a.m., Staff J, CNA, was observed propelling a resident in a wheelchair from the residents room. The Staff J's fingernails were thick, painted pink, and extended approximately 1/4-1/2 above the fingertip. Staff J stated, they're long. The Infection Preventionist (IP) reported, on 12/14/22 at 11:05 p.m., that fingernails for direct care staff should not be more than 1/4 past fingertip and if looking at back of hand should be barely seen. She stated that rhinestones could cause a problem and would have to check the protocol for fake and painted fingernails. The facilty policy - Dress Code Policy, effective October 1, 2014 and revised September 2, 2021, indicated that the purpose was to provided the very best service and care possible to out resident/patients. Our manners of dress, grooming, and personal cleanliness speak for us at Palm Garden when we are in contact with residents, family members, guests, and co-workers. The detail #8 identified that Hair and nails should be clean and groomed. Nail length should not be so long as to interfere with work duties. The CDC guideline - Water, Sanitation, and Environmentally Related Hygiene (WASH), last reviewed on June 15, 2022, (https://www.cdc.gov/hygiene/index.html), indicated that Appropriate hand hygiene includes diligently cleaning and trimming fingernails, which may harbor dirt and germs and can contribute to the spread of some infections, such as pinworms. Fingernails should be kept short, and the undersides should be cleaned frequently with soap and water. Because of their length, longer fingernails can harbor more dirt and bacteria than short nails, thus potentially contributing to the spread of infection. The CDC guideline - Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings, last reviewed on January 8, 2021, included the following: - Germs can live under artificial fingernails both before and after using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer and handwashing; - It is recommended that healthcare providers do not wear artificial fingernails or extensions when having direct contact with patients at high risk (e.g., those in intensive-care units or operating rooms); - Keep natural nail tips less than ¼ inch long. On 12/14/22 at 9:06 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #86 wearing a nebulizer mask while lying in bed, the nebulizer machine could be heard from the hallway. The observation revealed, on 12/14/22 at 9:08 a.m., a steady amount of aerosol coming from the residents' nebulizer mask, the resident stated it was just a nebulizer. The nebulizer machine could be heard stopping, as this writer left the residents' room at 9:08 a.m. on 12/14/22 and from the hallway an observation identified that the resident had removed the nebulizer mask. On 12/14/22 at 9:15 a.m., Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated a nebulizer treatment could take between 10-15 minutes depending on the (nebulizer) machines' compressor. Staff I stated, what did she do, take it off? The LPN entered Resident #86's room, on 12/14/22 at 9:21 a.m., and picked up the nebulizer mask from the top of the bedside dresser, looked at it, and placed it into the plastic bag hanging from the bedside dresser. The nurse removed the mask and identified a clear liquid remained in the nebulizer medication cup. The nurse left the residents' room on 12/14/22 a short time later and stated that the nebulizer had been rinsed and dried. During an interview on 12/14/22 at 11:05 a.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) stated that nebulizer/oxygen/continuous positive airway pressure (cpap) equipment should be cleaned, dried, then put in a bag. The oxygen equipment was changed weekly, stay in plastic bag, and not on (resident) dresser. The facility policy - Cleaning and Disinfecting Nebulizer, effective December 2020, indicated that Cleaning and disinfecting of nebulizer machine will be completed based on the manufacturer's recommendations. The procedure portion of policy included the following instructions: - 1. Follow manufacturer's guidelines for cleaning and disinfecting of machine and equipment. Specific instructions may vary with the manufacturer. - 2. Consult with the manufacturer to determine which cleaning procedures. - 3. Apply clean gloves. - 4. Disassemble the nebulizer by removing the cup and mask or mouthpiece. - 5. Thoroughly clean all visible soil or organic material from the cup, mask or mouthpiece before cleaning and disinfection. - 6. Follow manufacturer's recommendations for cleaning instructions, frequency, disinfection, and replacement (i.e. Use warm water and a mild dish detergent to wash the nebulizer parts. Rinse them thoroughly to remove all soap and residue. Allow the parts to air-dry on a clean surface). - 7. Shake off any excess water and allow the cup to air dry on a clean surface. Do not place the nebulizer parts directly on a contaminated surface. 2. On 12/12/22 at 09:59 a.m. Resident #58 was observed in her room sitting in her wheelchair. An oxygen concentrator was noted behind her chair. The resident's oxygen nasal cannula was observed on top of her nightstand, laying above magazines and other objects. The tubing was noted not bagged and exposed to the elements. A clear storage bag was noted by the side of the nightstand, dated 12/6/22. Photographic evidence was obtained. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), showed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include shortness of breath. The resident's active physician orders dated 12/15/22, showed to use oxygen PRN (as needed) to keep O2 Saturation above 90% every shift, order date 2/7/22 and to change and date all oxygen tubing every week when in use, order date 1/27/22. On 12/12/22 at 10:13 a.m., Resident #42's CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine was observed on the resident's bedside table. The mask was laying on top of a container full of personal care items. The tubing and mask were not bagged. Photographic evidence was obtained. A review of the EMR showed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include obstructive sleep apnea. The resident's active physician orders dated 12/15/22 showed CPAP settings for every evening and night shift, order date 8/26/22. The orders did not indicate how the mask or tubing should be stored, or how often they should be cleaned or changed. On 12/12/22 at 10:24 a.m., 12/13/22 at 12:06 p.m., and 12/14/22 at 9:19 a.m., Resident #37's nebulizer machine was observed on her nightstand. The mask was positioned on top of the machine, which was also opened to the elements. Resident #37 confirmed she used it for her nebulizer treatment. The nebulizer mask and machine were exposed to the elements during 3 of 3 days of survey. A review of active physician orders for Resident #37 showed Albuterol sulfate nebulization solution 2.5 MG (milligram)/3 ML(milliliters) 0.083% 3 ml inhale orally via nebulizer every 4 hours as needed for SOB (shortness of breath). The orders did not indicate how the machine, mask or tubing should be stored, or how often they should be cleaned or changed. On 12/14/22 at 5:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated respiratory equipment should be stored in a bag and dated. It should not be left out for sanitary reasons. She stated the concern was brought to her attention earlier, and they have started in-services. The DON stated their expectation is to ensure equipment is stored appropriately. On 12/15/22 at 3:24 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Regional Clinical and the DON. They stated they had already started education, which included to follow the policy related to cleaning, and maintaining equipment in a sanitary manner. The DON said, the policy might not specifically state bagging it does address appropriate storage though. 3. An observation was made on 12/12/22 at 1:18 p.m. in the room of Resident #112. The resident's nebulizer mask was sitting on her bedside table uncovered. On 12/13/22 at 11:44 a.m. Resident #112's nebulizer mask remained uncovered on the table. (Photographic evidence obtained.) A review of admission records indicated Resident #112 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD.) A review of Resident #112's orders revealed an order for Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 mg/3 ml. 3 ml two times a day for shortness of breath. An observation was made on 12/13/22 at 10:09 a.m., in the room of Resident #119. The resident's nebulizer mask was sitting on the bedside table uncovered. The resident stated the mask stayed that way and did not get put in a bag. (Photograph unable to be obtained due to location of the resident.) A review of admission records indicated Resident #119 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including COPD and chronic diastolic heart failure. A review of orders revealed an order for Albuterol Sulfate Nebulization Solution 2.5mg/3 ml. 3 ml inhale orally every six hours as needed for shortness of breath/wheezing. An observation was made on 12/13/22 at 11:44 a.m., in the room of Resident #23. The resident's nebulizer mask was sitting on the bedside table uncovered. An additional observation was made on 12/14/22 at 10:43 a.m., in the room of Resident #23. The resident's nebulizer mask remained uncovered. The resident stated it was kept that way. She said she wondered because at home her nebulizer went in a box, but this one never was. A review of admission records indicated Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including COPD. A review of orders revealed an order for Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 mg/3 ml. 3 ml four times a day for COPD.
Apr 2021 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure fall risk care planned intervent...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure fall risk care planned interventions were followed related to call light placement, for two residents (#100 and #114) of forty sampled residents. It was determined that during three of four days observed, both residents were found with call light buttons not placed within their reach, while in their rooms and in bed. Findings included: 1. On 4/6/2021 at 2:47 p.m. Resident #100 was observed in her room and lying in bed on her left side and facing the window. She was able to answer some simple questions related to her day and care at the facility. Resident #100 was also observed in bed and with her head and body turned to the left and facing the window. She was asked if she needed assistance and she said she did not know how to get staff if she needed anyone. When asked about her call light, she said she did not know what or where it was. An observation revealed the call light button was placed on the head of the bed near the edge of the top on the right side about one and a half feet and out of her reach. She confirmed she could not reach it. On 4/8/2021 at 7:41 a.m. an aide was observed waking the resident up to let her know breakfast was coming and asked if she could do her vitals. Resident #100 allowed for her to conduct the vitals. After the aide was finished with the resident and exited the room, the call light button was observed hooked to the top of her bed linen at head of bed, positioned in a way where she could not reach it. Resident #100 was asked if she could she use her call light. She looked around and indicated she did not know where it was. She confirmed she saw it before. The call light button was placed approximately one and a half feet above her head and away from her reach. On 4/9/2021 at 11:50 a.m. Resident #100 was observed lying in bed and under the covers with a nasal canula receiving oxygen via an oxygen concentrator. Resident #100 was observed without the call light button placed within her reach. The call light button and cord were on the floor on the right side of the bed between the bed and window wall. Resident #100 was asked if she was able to reach her call light, she stated that she did not know where it was. It was pointed out that it was on the floor and she said she could not reach it. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) Review of Resident #100's admission Record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include displaced fracture to the left femur, orthopedic aftercare, bone density structure, hemiplegia, hemiparesis left dominant side, depression, joint degeneration left hip, and risk for falls. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #100 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of a 7 of 15, which indicated she had severe cognitive impact. Review of the active care plan, initiated on 3/3/21 and revised on 3/18/21, revealed a focus described as: - At risk for falls related to weakness, history of fall sustaining left femur fracture. The interventions included: Place items used in easy reach i.e., Water, telephone, call lights; Keep adaptive equipment within reach. During an interview on 4/9/2021 at 11:55 a.m. with Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), she indicated that call lights must be positioned on the resident's stomach area so they can reach the button easily. She was asked about Resident #100 and the call light placement and she confirmed the call light button was on the floor and it should not have been there. Staff G did not say that the resident had a history of throwing it on the floor. She confirmed that the resident does utilize the call light button. 2. On 4/8/2021 at 7:15 a.m. Resident #114 was observed lying in bed with his eyes open, sheets covering him, head of the bed at approximately 40 degrees and the ¼ rails up near the head of the bed. The room was dark, and the television was on, but with the settings turned dim. The call light button was searched for and it could not be located on or around the resident's immediate area. The call light button was observed hanging down behind the head of the bed with the button approximately seven inches above the floor and approximately two and a half feet back and away from the resident's reach. The resident was asked if he knew where his call light was located, and he looked side to side and then shook his head side to side indicating No. He was asked if he uses it, and he shook his head up and down indicating Yes. On 4/9/2021 at 7:35 a.m. Resident #114 was observed with two extra pillows on each side of his upper body and shoulder area between him and the ¼ rails. Further observation revealed the call light button was hanging off the side of the right side of the bed, between the bed and the window wall, hanging off the floor approximately six inches. The call light button was observed in a manner out from his reach. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) Review of Resident #114's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4, cerebral infarction and difficulty in walking. Review of the current MDS assessment, dated 3/13/2021, revealed a BIMS score of 12 out of 15, which indicated the resident had only moderate impairment. Review of the active care plan, initiated on 3/17/21 and revised on 3/23/21, revealed a focus described as: - At risk for falls due to weakness and impaired mobility. The interventions included: Place items used in easy reach i.e., water, telephone, call lights; Keep adaptive equipment within reach. On 4/9/2021 at 3:33 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). She indicated that the expectation for placement of call lights was that they are to be attached to the patient or the bed, so that the resident can call for assistance. She was asked what does it mean in the care plan when it says have call bell within reach? She revealed that it must be in the reach of the resident, so they know where it is, and they can touch/reach it. Staff H was further asked how she monitors residents on the unit for the placement of call bells. She revealed, when a resident is in their room, we make sure they have it and check. On 4/9/2021 at 3:40 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). She revealed, call lights should be placed within the resident's reach, and most of the time staff will clip it to the bed linens, and some residents request how they would want it placed. The DON revealed, the nurses should check that the call bells (lights) are in reach during medication administration and CNAs when they do their rounds throughout the shift, which is 2 hours or more frequently. The DON confirmed that Residents #100 and #114 should always have their call light placed within their reach, while in their room and in bed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that documentation in the medical record for on...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that documentation in the medical record for one resident (#119) out of 40 sampled residents was accurate related to the application of a neck collar for positioning. Findings included: Resident #119 was observed on 04/06/21 at 11:00 a.m. and at 12:30 p.m. At 11:00 a.m. the resident was observed in bed without a neck collar in place, at 12:30 p.m. the resident was observed in bed without a neck collar in place. Multiple observations were made of Resident #119 on 04/08/21: at 7:32 a.m. the resident was observed in bed without a neck collar in place; at 12:03 p.m. the resident was observed in bed without the neck collar in place; at 12:23 p.m. the resident was observed in bed without the neck collar in place; at 4:12 p.m. the resident was observed in bed without the neck collar in place. At each observation there was a plastic hamper observed against the wall in the resident's room and placed on top of it was a neck collar. (Photographic Evidence obtained) Review of the medical record for Resident #119 revealed that she originally had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), Alzheimer's disease, abnormal posture, and rheumatoid arthritis. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 which meant that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed that the resident required extensive to total assistance of two persons for bed mobility, positioning, and transfers. Review of the active April 2021 physician orders for the resident revealed the following order with a start date of 09/10/19: Put neck collar when resident is sitting in the chair. every shift. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for April 2021 revealed that the neck collar was documented with a check mark and nursing staff initials for every shift for dates 04/01/21- 04/06/21, nothing was documented for the day shift on 04/07/21, a check mark and nursing staff initials was documented for the evening and night shift of 04/07/21, and nothing was documented for the day shift of 04/08/21. An interview was conducted on 04/09/21 at 11:00 a.m. with Staff I, Registered Nurse (RN) and Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Unit Manager (UM). Staff I made a confirmatory observation during the interview that Resident #119 was in bed without a neck collar on, and that the neck collar was on top of the hamper against the wall. Staff I was asked to reveal documentation on the TAR and confirmed that it reflected that the neck collar had been provided to the resident every shift 04/01/21-4/06/21, and the evening and night shift 04/07/21. Staff I could not confirm having seen the resident out of bed during the week and did not have an explanation for why the neck collar would have been documented as provided. Staff J confirmed that the documentation on the TAR reflected that the nurse had provided the neck collar to the resident. She confirmed that a check mark meant that a treatment had been administered. She said, If not done [the nurse] should put another code like 9 which I think means see nurse's note .should not be putting a check mark (if not administered) unless they don't understand the order, but the order seems very clear to me. On 04/09/21 at 11:56 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. She confirmed that the documentation on the TAR reflected that the neck collar had been applied. She confirmed that the documentation expectation if something was not administered would be to enter a 9 and a note explaining why it was not administered. She confirmed that a check mark meant administered. The DON confirmed that it was important for documentation in the medical record to be accurate and said, .is a record for what was done and not done. She stated that nursing staff should not be documenting a treatment as administered when it hadn't and said, That's an education moment. Review of facility policy titled Nursing - Charting and Documentation, dated October 2014 revealed the following within the section titled purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide: 1. A complete account of the resident's care treatment, response to the care, signs, symptoms, etc. as well as the progress of the resident's care .3. The facility, as well as other interested parties, with a tool for measuring the quality of care provided to the resident. 4. Nursing services personnel with a record of the physical and mental status of the resident .6. The elements of quality medical nursing care. 7. A legal record that protects the resident, physician, nurse, and the facility. The policy revealed the following within section rules for charting and documentation: .3. Document only the facts. Use only approved abbreviations and symbols.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. On 4/07/21 at 10:10 a.m. an observation was conducted in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a shower chair in the shared ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. On 4/07/21 at 10:10 a.m. an observation was conducted in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a shower chair in the shared bathroom with brown matter observed on and underneath the front of the seat. Upon return to the shared bathroom for resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 4/09/21 at 1:41 p.m., another observation was conducted. [NAME] matter was observed on the shower chair seat. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) An interview was conducted at 1:52 p.m. on 4/09/21 with Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Staff B, CNA confirmed there was brown matter on the shower chair. Staff B, CNA said staff clean the shower chairs after the shower with bleach wipes. She doesn't know when the last time the shower chair was used. Staff B, CNA said both residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] use the shower chair. On 4/09/21 at 4:22 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). She said the expectation is that the equipment is cleaned between uses. Review of the policy, from the Infection Prevention and Control Manual titled, Resident Care Equipment, dated December 2020, reflected the following: Resident Care Equipment and Articles for Handling, Processing, and Transport Purpose Reusable equipment is to be cleaned between resident use and reprocessed appropriately. Single use items are to be properly discarded. The facility must protect indirect transmission through decontamination (i.e., cleaning, sanitizing, or disinfecting) of an object to render it safe fro handling. Policy 2. The employee will disinfect reusable equipment between resident uses or before transport using a hospital grade disinfectant. Procedure 2. Remove body fluids and debris with damp cloth or towel. 3. Apply appropriate EPA registered disinfectant solution identified per manufacturer's recommendations with cloth and wipe surface thoroughly, in accordance with the label use on hospital grade disinfectant. Based on observations, staff interview and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure, 1. two (A wing and B wing) of three self-making ice machines and the internal ice-storage chests were clean and free from bio growth/debris and a gelatinous substance and 2. sanitary maintenance of a shower chair in a shared resident bathroom (#315) on one nursing unit (South) of two nursing units for two of two days observed. Findings included: 1. A review of the policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Manual Ice Chests and Machines, dated 12/2020 revealed, Ice may become contaminated from the use of impure water, contamination of ice making machines, or from improper storage of handling of ice. Ice machines that dispense ice directly into portable containers at a touch of a control provide a more sanitary method to store and obtain ice than the use of ice chests. The policy procedure under #12, revealed, Clean ice storage compartments on a preset schedule. The policy continued with, #2. Employees cleaning ice machines/ice chest must be competent in cleaning procedure. #4. Clean the ice machine on a regular schedule, at least quarterly. #5. Follow the manufacturer's guidelines for cleaning. #6. Use an EPA-registered disinfectant suitable for use on the ice machine, chest, and dispensers. On 4/9/21 at 9:25 a.m. a tour of the nourishment rooms was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and revealed the following: * At 9:25 a.m. the B wing unit nourishment room was entered. There was an ice maker with an internal ice storage chest that held the ice. Upon opening the lid to the machine, it was approximately ¾ full of ice cubes. A further observation revealed the condenser, which makes the ice, and the ice rack and cover, where the ice forms and falls, was observed with a heavy black bio growth covering the entire area. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). An interview, at this time, with the CDM revealed that the ice was used for residents and the ice machine maintenance and cleaning was the responsibility of the maintenance department. He revealed that the maintenance man just cleaned the machine. * At 9:50 a.m. the A wing unit nourishment room was entered. There was an ice maker with an internal ice storage chest that held the ice that was used for residents. Upon opening the lid to the machine, it was approximately ¾ full of ice cubes. A further observation revealed the condenser, and the ice rack and cover had a yellow and clear color gelatinous substance stuck and along the entire area of the rack and the part where the ice falls out. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) On 4/9/21 at 10:30 a.m. an interview with Staff F, Maintenance revealed that he followed an electronic maintenance schedule, and he cleans the ice machines monthly. He indicated that when he cleans the ice machines; he cleans the outside of the machine, changes or cleans the internal filter and then some parts of the internal ice holding chest area if need be. He was unaware that he needed to clean and maintain the condenser area and the area where ice was made. Staff F confirmed there was black bio growth and yellow and clear gelatinous areas observed on the ice making components. He said he never saw that growth before and did not know to look for it.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 24 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • Grade F (26/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 26/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Palm Garden Of Clearwater's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns PALM GARDEN OF CLEARWATER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Palm Garden Of Clearwater Staffed?

CMS rates PALM GARDEN OF CLEARWATER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 59%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Palm Garden Of Clearwater?

State health inspectors documented 24 deficiencies at PALM GARDEN OF CLEARWATER during 2021 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 22 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Palm Garden Of Clearwater?

PALM GARDEN OF CLEARWATER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PALM GARDEN HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 165 certified beds and approximately 154 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in CLEARWATER, Florida.

How Does Palm Garden Of Clearwater Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, PALM GARDEN OF CLEARWATER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Palm Garden Of Clearwater?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Palm Garden Of Clearwater Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, PALM GARDEN OF CLEARWATER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Palm Garden Of Clearwater Stick Around?

PALM GARDEN OF CLEARWATER has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Palm Garden Of Clearwater Ever Fined?

PALM GARDEN OF CLEARWATER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Palm Garden Of Clearwater on Any Federal Watch List?

PALM GARDEN OF CLEARWATER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.