REGENCY OAKS HEALTH CENTER

2770 REGENCY OAKS BLVD, CLEARWATER, FL 33759 (727) 791-1500
For profit - Limited Liability company 60 Beds HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC. Data: November 2025 5 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#552 of 690 in FL
Last Inspection: December 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Regency Oaks Health Center in Clearwater, Florida, has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its performance. Ranked #552 out of 690 facilities in Florida, it sits in the bottom half, and at #43 of 64 in Pinellas County, only a few local options are better. The facility is currently improving, with issues decreasing from 9 in 2022 to 3 in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, boasting a 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 41%, which is below the state average. However, the facility has faced concerning fines totaling $58,468, higher than 89% of Florida facilities, which suggests ongoing compliance issues. Specific incidents have raised alarms; for example, there were critical failures to investigate and report allegations of abuse involving a resident. An incident where a staff member ignored a resident's repeated requests to stop care was also documented, highlighting serious gaps in resident safety protocols. While staffing and quality measures are strengths, the facility's poor grade and serious allegations require careful consideration for families.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Florida
#552/690
Bottom 20%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
9 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
41% turnover. Near Florida's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
○ Average
$58,468 in fines. Higher than 61% of Florida facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 71 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Florida nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
⚠ Watch
16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 9 issues
2024: 3 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (41%)

    7 points below Florida average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Florida average (3.2)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 41%

Near Florida avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $58,468

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC.

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record

5 life-threatening
Dec 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0676 (Tag F0676)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services to maintain or improve functional abilities, when formalized physical and occupational therapy w...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services to maintain or improve functional abilities, when formalized physical and occupational therapy were discontinued for one (#19) of one sampled resident. Findings Included: During an interview and observation on 12/9/24 at 9:18 a.m., Resident #19 said she was frustrated because her therapy was stopped due to insurance, she was notified by the facility and filed an appeal immediately because she was not receiving therapy. Also an emergency appeal had been submitted and she should receive feedback today, 12/9/24. Review of the admission record showed Resident #19's admission date was 9/29/24 with diagnoses to include but not limited to polyneuropathy, congestive heart failure, rheumatoid arthritis, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #19's order summary report showed on 9/30/24 an Occupational therapy (OT) clarification order: OT five times weekly for sixty days for self-care training, therapeutic exercises, therapeutic activity, neuro reeducation, groups and discharge planning. Physical Therapy (PT) clarification order: PT to treat five times per week for eight weeks, which may include therapy exercises, therapy activities, neuro reeducation, gait training, wheelchair management. Review of Resident #19's care plan focus showed, [Resident #19] has actual functional abilities decline related to unsteady gait, neuropathy and COPD. The goal is [Resident #19] will return to desired/usual level of function; date initiated 9/29/24. Care plan focus, [Resident #19] has an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to disease process, initiated 9/29/24. The goal was [Resident #19] will improve current level of function in bed mobility, transfers, eating, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #19's Minimum Data Set, admission dated 10/6/24, Section C, Cognitive Patterns Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Section O, Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs showed PT and OT five days per week starting on 9/30/24. Review of Resident #19's care plan progress dated 10/24/24 showed, [Resident #19] is working with PT, OT her progress fluctuates, she is able to get in/out of bed with stand by assist . transfers for wheelchair to chair with standby assist .contact guard assist with ambulating up to 50 feet. Review of Resident #19's progress notes revealed on 10/25/24, the Social Services Director notified the resident and a family member that a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was received and services would end on 10/27/24. During an interview on 12/10/ 24 at 11:35 a.m., the Director of Therapy (DOT) was unable to provide documentation that Resident #19 was referred for restorative services between 10/27/24 and 12/9/24. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 12:08 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) said Resident #19 had never received restorative services. Review of a facility policy, titled Restorative Nursing Services, revised 7/2017 revealed the following: Policy Statement: Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. The policy interpretation and implementation include: 1) restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services (e.g., physical, occupational, or speech therapies). 2) residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission and during the course of their stay. 3) Restorative goals objectives are individualized, and resident centered and are outlined in the resident's plan of care. 4) the resident or representative will be included in determining goals and plan of care. 5) Restorative goals may include but are not limited to supporting and assisting the resident in a) adjusting or adapting to changing abilities b) developing, maintaining or strengthening his /her physiological and psychological resources; c) maintaining his dignity, independence and self-esteem; and d) participating in the development and implementation of his /her plan of care. Review of a facility policy, titled, Care Planning Interdisciplinary Team reveals the following: Policy Statement: The interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of resident care plans. Policy Interpretation an Implementation: 1) resident care plans are developed according to the time frames and establish by ss 483.21. 2) Comprehensive, person-centered care plans are based on resident assessments and developed by an interdisciplinary team (IDT). 3) The IDT includes but is not limited to, 3a) the resident's attending physician, 3b) a nurse with the responsibility for the resident 3d) the resident or the resident's representative 3e) other staff as appropriate or necessary to meet the needs of the resident . Review of a facility policy, titled, Specialized Rehabilitative Services, revised 12/2009, policy statement revealed our facility will provide rehabilitative services to residents as indicated by the MSDS. Policy interpretation and implementation 1) in addition to rehabilitative nursing care, the facility provides specialized rehabilitative services by qualified professional personnel. 2) Specialized rehabilitative services include the following physical therapy; speech pathology /audiology; occupational therapy/ activity therapy. 5) Once a resident has met his /her care plan goals, a licensed professional can either discontinue treatment or initiate a maintenance program that nursing aids will implement to assure that the resident maintains his/ her functional and physical status.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program of their choice...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program of their choice for one (#18) of thirty-two sampled residents. Findings included: On 12/9/2024 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #18 was noted in her room lying in bed under the covers and resting with her eyes closed. A visitor, a Private Care Sitter, was seated in a chair next to the bedside. The Private Care Sitter said she had been hired to sit in with Resident #18 on Mondays through Fridays, and mainly during the 7:00 a.m.- 3:00 p.m. shift. She said she typically came in the facility at 10:00 a.m. and left around 3:00 p.m. or 4:00 p.m. She revealed her responsibilities included to assist Resident #18 with toileting, transferring from bed to chair, personal hygiene, showering, and eating assistance. She said, at times, she took the resident from her room to some scheduled activities. She said Resident #18 loved to have books read to her, loved listening to music, and loved participating in group music and religious activities. She revealed that Resident #18 was legally blind and needed assistance with set up with personal items, etc. The Private Care Sitter was asked if Resident #18 used audio books and she revealed she and Resident #18's family were not aware they could ask for that, and that it was a great idea because Resident #18 had been an avid reader before losing most of her eye sight. An attempt to interview Resident #18 revealed she had cognitive deficits and was not able to answer questions related to her medical care and services, and was not able to answer questions related to her choice of activities. On 12/9/2024 at 10:45 a.m., 11:30 a.m. 12:45 p.m., 1:00 p.m., 2:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m., Resident #18 was observed in her room and still lying flat in bed, under the covers, with the private care sitter seated at her side. The private care sitter said the resident had been in bed all day and she had not been up and out of her room. Review of the posted current month (December 2024) activities calendar revealed scheduled activities to include but not limited to: Daily Chronicle group at 9:00 a.m., Hot Chocolate Chat group at 10:00 a.m., Instrumix Class group at 10:00 a.m., and Trivia time group at 3:00 p.m. Resident #18 was not offered or assisted to any of these activities. On 12/10/2024 at 11:15 a.m., the large activity/lounge (Day Room), which was located near the unit station, was observed with approximately ten residents seated in wheelchairs and participating in a religious music activity. An outside activity service was singing and playing musical instruments, as well as religious studies. Resident #18 was not offered and or assisted to this group activity. Review of the posted current month (December 2024) activities calendar revealed scheduled activities to include but not limited to: Daily Chronicle group at 9:00 a.m., Hot Chocolate & Chat group at 10:00 a.m., Church Services and music group at 11:00 a.m. Resident #18 was not offered and/or assisted to any of these scheduled activities. A Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the diagnosis sheet revealed diagnoses to include but not limited to Dementia, Cognitive communication deficit, Legal Blindness, Macular degeneration, Major Depression,and Anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed; Cognition/Brief Interview for Mental Status or BIMS score of 3 which indicated severe cognitive impairment; Vision - Moderately Impaired, no corrective lenses; Activities - this section was not completed. Review of the Data Collection admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed; (Ability to see in adequate light - Adequate; Corrective lenses - None). Review of the PEAK Activity Interview for daily Activities dated 12/16/2022 revealed; (How important is it to you to have books, newspapers, and magazines to read = VERY IMPORTANT; How important is it to you to listen to music = VERY IMPORTANT; How important is it to you to be around animals = VERY IMPORTANT; How important is it to you to keep up with the news = VERY IMPORTANT; How important is it to do thing with groups of people = VERY IMPORTANT; How important is it for you to go outside for fresh air = VERY IMPORTANT; How important is it for you to participate in religious services or practices = VERY IMPORTANT). Review of the Life Enrichment Quarterly Data Collection dated 3/1/2024 revealed; [Resident #18] had likes to include: Family/Friends visits, Men's groups, Happy Hour, Social events, Table games, bingo, likes puzzles, Resident program chat, Religious services, Nature appreciation, Movies, Music, Pet therapy, Social visits and listens to movies, small groups. Review of the Live Enrichment Quarterly Data Collection dated 5/28/24 revealed; [Resident #18] had likes to include: Family/Friends visits, Men's groups, Happy Hour, Social events, Table games, bingo, likes puzzles, Resident program chat, Religious services, Nature appreciation, Movies, Music, Pet therapy, Social visits and listens to movies, small groups. Review of the Life Enrichment Quarterly Data Collection dated 8/21/2024 revealed; [Resident #18] had likes to include: Family/Friends visits, Men's groups, Happy Hour, Social events, Table games, bingo, likes puzzles, Resident program chat, Religious services, Nature appreciation, Movies, Music, Pet therapy, Social visits and listens to movies, small groups). A review of the medical record to include daily nurse progress notes for all departments and dated from 6/1/2024 thought to 12/11/2024 did not reveal any documented evidence of Resident #18 having behaviors of refusing daily scheduled group or daily 1:1 room visit activities. Review of the current care plans with a next review date 3/20/2025 revealed the following areas: a. Risk for falls due to decreased standing balance and tolerance, decreased mobility due to weakness of extremities, she has impaired vision has decreased awareness of physical limitations due to cog. Loss and is receiving psychotropic medications, with interventions in place, to include educate private aide to watch resident at all times, resident is blind, Encourage resident to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility. b. Displays restlessness, anxiousness, paranoia, refusal of care with interventions to include but not limited to: Encourage to attend group activities to divert behavior. c. Resident would benefit from associate support for resident programs with interventions to include: Assure that the activities the resident is attending are: compatible with physical and mental capabilities, Compatible with known interests and preferences; Adapt as needed, Compatible with individual needs and abilities, and age appropriate; POA send resident interactive cat to keep her company and provide positive interaction through the day; Encourage ongoing family involvement. Invite the resident's family to attend special events, activities, meals; Establish and record the resident's prior level of activity involvement and interests by talking with the resident, caregivers, and family on admission and as necessary; Invite resident to scheduled programs; Modify the resident's daily schedule, treatment plan PRN to accommodate activity participation; Provide a program of activities that is of interest and empowers the resident by encouraging/allowing choice, self expression and responsibility; Provide resident with activities calendar; Review the resident's activity needs with the family/representative. On 12/10/2024 at 8:10 a.m., an interview with Staff A,Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who was assigned to Resident #18 revealed he had Resident #18 on his assignment at times and knew that she was legally blind. He revealed she required moderate to full staff assistance with most of her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) to include: Eating, Personal Hygiene, Transferring, Dressing, Showering, Toileting. Staff A confirmed Resident #18 stayed in her room and in bed most of the days, or at least the days he worked with her, and as far as he knew, it was by her choice. Staff A revealed he did not know what types of activities the resident enjoyed, and therefore had not seen or assisted her to activities. He revealed the activities staff were usually the staff that would offer and assist her with activities and was unaware if Resident #18 enjoyed group activities, music activities, religious activities and arts and crafts activities. On 12/11/2024 at 9:00 a.m., the facility's Activities Director was interviewed. She revealed she had been the Activities Director for about two and a half years and that she had one other assistant to help her with departmental activities. The Activities Director revealed she conducted admission activities assessments on all admitted residents approximately twenty four to forty eight hours upon their admission. She revealed he activities assessments go over things like the resident's prior occupation, religion, and what they were during before Long Term Care. She reviewed hobbies, what music they liked, and what they would like to do when they were at the facility. She would provide an electronic I Pad device for those who wished to go on the internet. The Activities Director also revealed she completed Activities Assessments at least once a quarter as well. She also revealed she would do 1:1 room visits, do daily chronicles, tell them about daily calendar, and would have a chat with him or her. She revealed Resident #18 was legally blind and needed assistance to and from scheduled group activities and that her private duty sitter was the person who usually took her out of the room and to activities. The Activities Director further revealed Resident #18 liked live music, live religious activities, and other group activities, and did not know why she was not in attendance in any of the group activities on 12/9/24 and 12/10/2024. She confirmed she did not follow up with the resident or the private duty sitter with relation to the scheduled activities for both days. The Activities Director also revealed Resident #18 was in most to all the scheduled group activities and did not realize she was not in attendance. On 12/11/2024 the Nursing Home Administrator provided the Activity Program policy and procedure with a last revision date of 6/2028 for review. The Policy stated; Activity programs are designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The Policy interpretation and implementation section of the policy revealed the following but not limited areas; 1. The activities program is provided to support the well being of residents and to encourage both independence and community interaction. 2. Activities offered are based on the comprehensive resident-centered assessment and the preference of each resident. 3. The activities program is ongoing and includes facility-organized group activities, independent individual activities and assisted individual activities. 4. Activities are considered any endeavor, other than routine ADLs, in which the resident participates, that is intended to enhance his or her sense of well being and to promote or enhance physical, cognitive or emotional health. 5. Our activities programs are designed to encourage maximum individual participation and are geared to individual resident's needs. 6. Activities are scheduled 7 (seven) days a week and residents are given an opportunity to contribute to the conducting, cleanup and critique of the programs. 7. Our activity programs consist of individual, small group and large group activities that are designed to meet the needs and interests of each resident. Activity programs include activities that promote: a. Self-esteem; b. Comfort; c. Pleasure; d. Education; e. Creativity; f. Success; and g. Independence. 8. Activities are not necessarily limited to formal activities being provided only by activities staff. Other facility staff, volunteers, visitors, residents and family members may also provide the activities. 10. Individual and group activities are provided that: a. Reflect the schedules, choices and rights of the residents; b. Are offered at hours convenient to the residents, holidays and weekends; c. Incorporate family, visitor and resident ideas of desired appropriate activities. 11. Residents are encouraged, but not required, to participate in scheduled activities.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. On 12/09/2024 at 9:59 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted of Resident #36 in his room. The resident resided in a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. On 12/09/2024 at 9:59 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted of Resident #36 in his room. The resident resided in a private room which was clean and organized. Resident #36's room was decorated with many family pictures and lifetime mementos. The resident was dressed, groomed and sitting in his wheelchair. Resident #36 was pleasant and talkative. The resident said his wife died a few years ago and he was ready to die. He said he did not understand why he was still alive. The resident said his children lived nearby and visited him often. He said his wife resided with him in the facility until she died, and they used to go to activities together. However, he said he did not have much interest in the facility offered activities any longer, preferring to spend time with his family or watch television in his room. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Section C-Cognitive Patterns, revealed Resident #36 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #36's Care Plan dated 06/09/2023 showed: -Resident #36 was at risk for communication problems related to Alzheimer's Disease. The resident will be able to make basic needs known on a daily basis through the review date. Anticipate and meet needs. Discuss with resident/family concerns or feelings regarding communication difficulty. Monitor/document for physical/ nonverbal indicators of discomfort or distress, and follow-up as needed. Monitor/document/report to physician changes in: ability to communicate, potential contributing factors for communication problems, potential for improvement. Provide a safe environment: call light in reach, adequate low glare light, bed in lowest position and wheels locked, avoid isolation. Validate resident's message by repeating aloud. -Resident #36 used antidepressant medication related to depression. The resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to antidepressant therapy through the review date. Educate the resident/family/caregivers about risks, benefits and the side effects and/or toxic symptoms of (Specify: anti-depressant drugs being given). Give antidepressant medications ordered by the physician. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. -Resident #36 was at risk for depression, at risk for sadness, behavior and mood changes. He misses his wife, expresses desire to die so he can be with her. The resident will remain free of signs and symptoms of distress, symptoms of depression, anxiety or sad mood by/through review date. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Behavioral Health Services Consult as needed. Monitor/document/report to physician and/or nurse as needed. Resident #36 was at risk for harm to self: suicidal plan, risky actions, (stockpiling pills, saying goodbye to family, giving away possessions or writing a note), refusing to eat or drink, refusing med or therapies, sense of hopelessness or helplessness, impaired judgment or safety awareness. Monitor/document/report to physician and/or nurse signs and symptoms of depression, including: hopelessness, anxiety, sadness, insomnia, anorexia, verbalizing negative statements, repetitive anxious or health related complains, tearfulness. Pharmacy review of medications monthly. The resident needs adequate rest periods. The resident needs time to talk(reminisce). Encourage the resident to express his feelings. Review of Resident #36's PASRR dated 06/02/2023 showed the following: -Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making: Section A. MI or suspected MI no qualifying diagnoses were checked. -Finding is based on: Documented History was checked. -Section II: Other Indications for PASRR Screen Decision-Making Question #5: Does the individual have a primary diagnosis of dementia? The answer checked was No. Related Neurocognitive Disorder (including Alzheimer's Disease)? The answer checked was No. Question #6: Does the individual have a secondary diagnosis of dementia, related neurocognitive disorder (including Alzheimer's Disease) and the primary diagnosis is a Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability? The answer checked was No. Question #7: Does the individual have validating documentation to support the dementia or related neurocognitive disorder (including Alzheimer's Disease)? The answer checked was No. -Section III: PASRR Screen Provisional admission or Hospital Discharge Exemption: Not a Provisional admission was checked. -Section IV: PASRR Screen Completion Individual may be admitted to a Nursing Facility: No diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or intellectual Disability indicated, Level II PASRR evaluation not required was checked. Review of Psychiatric Follow-Up Note dated 11/11/2024 showed Resident #36 was diagnosed with major depressive disorder and other mixed anxiety disorders. Review of physician orders for Resident #36 showed the resident was prescribed Sertraline HCI to be given daily for major depressive disorder. 4. Review of the admission record revealed Resident #19's admission date was 9/29/24 with diagnoses to include alcohol dependence, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder. During a review of Resident #19's medical records a Level II PASRR could not be located. During an interview on 12/22/24 at 11:53 a.m., with the Social Services Director (SSD), the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON said a Level II PASRR was not completed for Resident #19. Review of the facility's policy titled, admission Criteria, revised 3/2019 revealed policy statement: our facility admits only residents whose medical and nursing care needs can be met. Policy interpretation include 1b admit residents who can be cared for adequately by the facility; 9) all new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD) intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). 9a) the facility conducts a level 1 PASARR screen for all potential admissions, regardless of payer source, to determine if the individual meets the criteria for an MD, ID, or RD. 9b) If the level I screen indicates that the individual may meet the criteria for a MD, ID, or RD he or she is referred to the state PASARR representative for the Level II (evaluation and determination) screening process. 9bi) The admitting nurse notifies the social services department when a resident is identified as having a possible (or evident) MD, ID or RD. 9bii) The social worker is responsible for making referrals to the appropriate state-designated authority. 9c) Upon completion of the Level II evaluation, the state PASARR representative determines if the individual has a physical or mental condition, what specialized or rehabilitative services he or she needs, whether placement in the facility is appropriate. 9d) The state PASARR representative provided a copy of the report to the facility. 9e) The interdisciplinary team determines whether the facility is capable of meeting the needs and services of the potential residents that are outlined in the evaluation. 9f) Once a decision is made, the state PASARR representative, the potential resident and his or her representative are notified. 4. On 12/09/2024 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #4 was sitting up in her wheelchair, dressed well-groomed with no signs of distress. She stated that she had no concerns with staff and that she loved the food at the facility. Review of an admission Record dated 12/5/2024 showed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, Alzheimer's Disease, unspecified, mood disorder due to known physiological condition with depressive features. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Section C- Cognitive Patterns- Brief Interview for Mental Status, BIMS score of 03 which indicated severe cognitive impairment Review of the Medical Record showed an Incomplete PASRR Level 1 dated 7/17/2022 and 6/14/2023. On 12/11/2024 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nurses, and the Social Services Director. The Social Services Director stated that prior to admission the PASRR was reviewed by admissions, unless a resident came from home. She stated she reviewed the PASRR for accuracy, if she identified something wrong, she would refer the PASRR back to Admissions or to the Director of Nurses. The Social Service Director stated she referred Resident #4's level I PASRR to admissions because the resident was admitted under the 30-day hospital discharge exemption, and she felt that the resident needed a level II PASRR. The Director of Nurses stated that she did not review Resident #4's PASRR because it was not brought to her attention. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed accurately, and updated to reflect new Mental Illness (MI), or Suspected Mental Illness (SMI) diagnoses for five (#8 , #18, #4, #19, and #36) of thirty-two sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 12/9/2024 at 10:03 a.m., Resident #8 was observed in her room and seated upright in bed and was going though some personal belongings. She had the television on and had the call light placed within her reach. Resident #8 was found able to answer most questions related to her medical care and services. Review of Resident #8's medical record showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the diagnosis sheet revealed diagnoses to include but not limited to; Anxiety (onset 9/28/2021), and Major Depression (onset 6/12/2021). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/13/2024, showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 15 of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Review of the medical record revealed a Level 1 PASRR dated 4/2/2028, was completed by a Registered Nurse from a Hospital. Section 1 (MI/SMI) did not have any MI/SMI diagnoses checked. There was a second Level 1 PASRR dated 12/6/2019, completed by a Registered Nurse from a Hospital. Section 1 (MI/SMI) did not have any MI/SMI diagnosis checked. A third Level 1 PASRR screen was completed by a Registered Nurse on 4/27/2024 from the Hospital. Section 1 (MI/SMI) did not have any MI/SMI diagnosis checked. Resident #8 had a MI/SMI diagnosis of Anxiety on 9/28/2021 and Major Depression on 6/12/2021 that were not reflected on any of the Level 1 PASRR screens. On 12/11/2024 at 9:30 a.m., an interview with the Social Service Director revealed as part of process, it was either the Social Service Department or Admissions Department's responsibility to obtain a fully accurate and timely Level 1 PASRR screen prior to the resident's admission. She revealed if she or Admissions noticed missing MI/SMI diagnoses, she would notify either the Director of Nursing or the Nursing Home Administrator of the incomplete assessment, and then another one would be completed to reflect missing MI/SMI diagnoses. She revealed often times the Level 1 that was completed at the Hospital, were not correct and the facility would have to complete an accurate one, after the resident had been admitted to the facility. The Social Service Director confirmed the admission Level 1 PASRR screen for Resident #8 was not reflective of MI/SMI diagnoses to include Anxiety and Major Depression. The Social Service Director confirmed Resident #8 developed these diagnoses after her admission, but there should have been new Level 1 PASRR screens completed to reflect Anxiety and Major Depression. 2. On 12/9/2024 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #18 was observed in her room, lying flat in bed, and under the covers with her legs out from the sheets. Resident #18 appeared not responsive to an interview, and was observed with cognitive deficits Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the diagnosis sheet revealed the following but not limited to diagnoses; Major Depression (onset 12/9/2022), and Anxiety (onset 3/18/2024). Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed a BIMS score 3 of 15, which indicated severe cognition impairment. Review of the medical record revealed a Level 1 PASRR screen completed on 12/7/2022 by a Medical Social Worker from a Hospital. Further review of the screen under section 1 (MI/SMI) did not have diagnoses of Major Depression and Anxiety checked. On 12/11/2024 at 9:30 a.m., an interview with the Social Service Director revealed as part of process, it was either the Social Service Department or Admissions Department's responsibility to obtain a fully accurate and timely Level 1 PASRR prior to the resident's admission. She revealed if she or Admissions noticed missing MI/SMI diagnoses, she would notify either the Director of Nursing or the Nursing Home Administrator of the incomplete assessment, and then another one would be completed to reflect the missing MI/SMI diagnoses. The Social Service Director revealed the admission Level 1 PASRR screen completed on 12/7/2022 for Resident #18 did not have diagnosis of Anxiety at the time of admission. She did confirm Resident #18 did develop a diagnosis of Anxiety after her admission and there should have been an updated Level 1 PASRR screen to reflect that diagnosis.
Dec 2022 9 deficiencies 5 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of the medical record, incident logs, policy and procedure review, interviews with administration, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of the medical record, incident logs, policy and procedure review, interviews with administration, nursing and therapy staff, the resident's physician, and the resident's representatives, the facility failed to implement a systematic process to carry out their abuse policy for one Resident #17, who was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for incontinent care of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to take actions to report, thoroughly investigate, and take corrective action to prevent abuse to its residents. The facility failed to remove staff alleged to perpetrate the abuse and failed to thoroughly investigate the allegation to determine the root cause of the reported abuse to ensure the safety of the resident involved and ensure all facility residents would remain safe from a similar incident. On 11/24/2022 between 7:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. the Medical Director informed Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) that a male nurse had provided Resident #17 incontinent care, and she did not want a male nurse to provide the care. Between 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. Staff A, LPN stated she spoke to the Director of Nursing (DON) who had just arrived at the facility. Staff A said, I told her (DON) the Medical Director had concerns that the resident said she felt as though she was raped. Staff A said the Risk Manager called her back and I had told her I spoke to the Director of Nursing, she DON said she would handle it. Reports to the required abuse hotline showed the facility reported the verbal incident on 11/29/2022. The facility suspended two staff members (Staff C and Director of Nursing) on 11/29/2022. It was determined the investigation was not completed thoroughly and in a timely manner. This resulted in the findings of Immediate Jeopardy starting on 11/24/2022. The immediacy was removed on 12/02/2022 after verification of the implementation of removal action(s). The scope and severity was reduced to a D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm). Findings included: Cross reference F609, F610, F699, and F835 On 11/29/2022 at 12:10 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #17. She was observed from the hallway lying in bed wearing a hospital gown. She made eye contact and was receptive to an interview. She said she was waiting to get dressed as she pulled at her hospital gown, and that she needed to get ready for therapy. When the resident was asked if she was treated with respect and dignity, she stated, A male aide (Staff C) started to perform incontinent care; I told him no. I told them (Staff C and D) before I only wanted females to care for me. But he proceeded to change my brief anyway. I told him no. At that time, she made eye contact with the surveyor and stated, No means no. She said she had cried and cried no, but he wouldn't stop. She stated, I felt like I was raped. When asked if she told anyone she stated, I told my doctor, and my doctor told them. She said it had occurred just a couple of days ago. She said she has not seen the male nurse since, but, she continued, I see those men walking past my room and looking in. They're just walking by with nothing to do. At that time the resident lowered her head slightly and stated, I don't want to answer any more questions. Resident #17's bed was positioned by the door and when the door is open, she is able see into the hallway. Review of Resident #17's admission Record revealed, she was geriatric in age and was transferred from a local hospital on [DATE] after having an altered mental status. Her admission Record showed she was admitted for short term rehabilitation with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, depression, wedge compression fracture of fourth lumbar vertebra, subsequential encounter for fracture with routine healing, generalized muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C Cognitive Patterns showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score coded as a 14. The code of 14 indicated cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS, Section G Functional Status showed toilet use coded as the number 3. The number 3 reflected extensive assistance. Support needed for toilet use mobility was coded as a 2 and indicated one-person physical assist. Review of the Medical Director's progress note, dated 11/24/2022 at 9:18 a.m., revealed S: [subjective] resident concern about a male nurse. Further record review of the facility Abuse and Neglect log for November 2022 did not reflect Resident #17's allegation. On 11/29/2022 at 2:04 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) related to Resident #17's allegation. The Nursing Home Administrator said the person the staff would contact would be him and the Director of Nursing (DON). Related to Resident #17's allegation, the NHA stated, No one called me on Thanksgiving Day. On 11/29/2022 at 2:26 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with the facility's Medical Director (MD), who confirmed he knew Resident #17 and saw her on 11/24/2022 between 7:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. He said she appeared agitated and told him that morning she had been wet and soiled. She said a nurse had cleaned her and that it was a male nurse. She said she didn't want a male nurse. The MD said the facility always honors resident preferences. He stated, That really troubled him. The MD said Resident #17 told him, A man wiped and cleaned me against my wishes. It was a male. I can't have males down there. She stated, He changed me, and he was not supposed to. I told him to stop, and he just kept going. The MD said she was agitated and asked not to be cleaned as he kept cleaning her and said she felt violated. The MD said he asked the resident if it was okay if he examined her. She told me that was different. The MD stated this was very concerning to him, and he immediately said something to nursing leadership. He said he was 100% confident he spoke to the nurse. The MD stated he reported to the charge nurse (Staff A) We have a potential situation here. The MD went on to state, I told them they had an issue that needed to be escalated to the Director of Nursing. The MD said the nurse (Staff A) confirmed to him that it would be escalated. He said he documented it and instructed the charge nurse (Staff A) to document it. He said he was told they were working on it and thought he heard them say the Director of Nursing was coming in. The MD stated, We have rules about this, no means no. When asked about his expectation he stated, Reporting is expected to be done. He confirmed this is the only facility he goes to, and he is the facility's Medical Director. The MD confirmed on 11/24/2022 Resident #17 was not doing well and said the resident was outside of her normal demeanor. He was informed the survey team was not able to locate documentation of Resident #17's allegation. The MD indicated he was surprised of this and repeated, They said they were going to escalate it. On 11/29/2022 at 2:35 p.m. an interview was conducted with the DON on the incident that occurred on 11/24/2022. The DON said she was aware the Medical Director spoke to Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse) about his concern related to Resident #17. The DON said she was scheduled to work that day and she received a phone call from Staff A. She said at that time she was already in route to the facility. The DON said after she arrived at the facility she spoke to Staff A. The DON stated, [Staff A] told me that everything was fixed. She said Staff A stated that She had rearranged the aide assignment and had spoken to the resident. The resident was okay with the schedule change that no male aide would be providing her care. The DON denied she started a grievance. She denied she spoke to the resident. The DON stated, It was just a patient preference, and it was taken care of. On 11/29/2022 at 2:50 p.m. Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed walking in the middle hallway. He stopped in the middle hall and then suddenly turned back around. As he turned, he was noted looking inside of the rooms. One of the rooms he looked into belonged to Resident #17. He then began to walk towards the nursing station. At that time, he was asked if he had time for an interview. He indicated a new admission had arrived, and he had a few minutes. Staff C, CNA said he had been a certified nursing assistant for thirteen years and only works at this facility. Staff C denied he worked the morning of Thanksgiving Day (11/24/2022). He said he worked the night shift on 11/23/2022, but then confirmed the shift ended on the morning of the 11/24/2022. Staff C said he knew Resident #17 and denied he assisted her with her incontinent care in the morning. He stated, I worked on the long hall and [Resident #17] did not reside on that hall. He then stated, I never worked with her. Staff C was asked to look at his documentation dated 11/24/2022. He looked at the report and confirmed he had documented in Resident #17's record which reflected bladder continence care had been provided on 11/24/2022 at 2:56 a.m. Staff C denied anyone spoke to him about an incident and went on to say he did not remember taking care of the resident and did not recall any objections or problems during the care. He did not recall the resident telling him she did not want a male to care for her. He then added I had taken care of her before. He said no one told him not to take care of her anymore. Staff C said typically, if someone would say they have preferences they don't assign the male aide to the room. He said there are no residents, that he is aware of, who do not want a male to take care of them. He said if there was one, he would get a female aide. Staff C confirmed he worked at the facility yesterday 11/28/2022 and assisted with new admissions. On 11/29/2022 at 3:22 p.m. an interview was conducted with the NHA who stated, No one knew she didn't want a male until Thanksgiving Day. He said, The aide is in the DON office right now and is being suspended. On 11/29/2022 at 3:14 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). She said she talked to the resident today (11/29/2022) and asked her if anything happened. The SSD said, She told me a couple days ago; a male aide came in to change her and she did not want him to change her. She said she cried and told the doctor, who told the nurse. The resident said she hadn't had a male aide since. The SSD said the resident reported that nothing inappropriate happened. The SSD said the resident's family member was in the room during that time and stated years ago she had a bad encounter with a male aide, stating, It happened somewhere else. The SSD said the resident said she has not had any male caregivers giving her care since the incident happened. She indicated on Thursday (11/24/2022) the resident's care plan had been updated to reflect no male aides. The SSD confirmed a grievance form was not filed. When asked what her expectation was, she stated I expect a male aide would stop and get a female. The NHA was present at the time of the interview and stated, Any concerns should be documented, and a grievance should be filed. He confirmed it was not transferred to paper and did not know why. On 11/29/2022 at 3:40 p.m. the NHA provided a copy of a form titled, Administrative Leave, dated 11/29/2022, Suspended pending abuse allegation that revealed Staff C's, CNA name. On 11/30/2022 at 12:25 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). She confirmed she worked on 11/24/2022 and received a verbal report from the Medical Director. She stated, The MD came to me between 8:30 am and 9:30 a.m. and told me there was an issue that needed to be taken care of. He stated to me that [Resident #17] was very upset because she had been raped. I said, excuse me, did you say rape? He stated Yes. He said she used the word rape. Staff A stated, The MD told me he needed it handled right away. The MD said [Resident #17] told the male staff to stop. Staff A, LPN said she spoke to the resident and that she (Resident #17) said she was okay. I asked her, Do you want me to do anything different. She said that Resident #17 said, I'm fine I just don't want a male taking care of me. I do not want a male touching me down there. I told her that no male aide will take care of her and it will be in her plan of care. Continuing, Staff A stated, She told me that she wanted to be left alone, she did not want to be bothered. When asked what type of assessment was performed, she indicated a set of vital signs, and she observed the resident and did not see any bruising to her face or hands. Staff A confirmed she did not perform a full skin assessment. She said Resident #17's demeanor appeared calm, saying she was not disheveled, was alert and oriented, and her mood appeared okay. Staff A said it was her first time working with the resident. Staff A said the DON was in the building between 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. stating, I told her that the Medical Director had concerns and the resident said she felt as though she was raped. The DON said he does not like it when people throw that word around. Staff A said, I also told her that I had spoken to the [family member]. I told her the concerns of the resident not wanting a male aide. The [family member] said I don't know why she is like that lately but thank you for letting me know. Staff A continued, I additionally called the Risk Manager, who is also the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and left her a message. Staff A said later that day she spoke to the ADON, and I told her I had informed the DON. Staff A said the DON told her she would handle it and take care of it. Staff A stated, The ADON had asked if I documented it, I told her the DON had said she would take care of it. Staff A denied seeing the DON going to the resident room after she had given her the report. Staff A confirmed she received abuse training in April 2022. She said, If someone alleges rape, we are to inform the parties that are involved, and that is what I did. If a resident alleges any form of abuse, the expectation is to call the hotline. Staff A stated she Figured the DON was handling it because she was here. On 11/30/2022 at 1:08 p.m. an interview was conducted with the ADON, who is the facility's Risk Manager (RM). She said she was not at the facility on Thanksgiving Day. She confirmed she received a call from Staff A, LPN in the morning, but did not answer the phone. The ADON said she called back later that afternoon and spoke to Staff A who told her a patient had a male CNA and didn't want a male CNA. The RM said, [Staff A] said the doctor had concerns. She told me that the DON was going to take care of it. The DON was at the facility and was taking care of it. The RM confirmed she deals with abuse and neglect allegations. Stating, It is a team process. When asked what she would do, she said she would not assign a male to the room, and she would go to the patient and see what her concerns were. She stated, I would want to know why she doesn't want a male. She said, I would investigate by starting the grievance process. I would speak to the resident to determine what had happened. She confirmed, An allegation of rape is immediately called in. The RM said part of her process would be to call the abuse hotline and perform a skin assessment of the resident. She went on to say, I would start a paper trail that would include witness statements from staff. The RM said she is responsible for training and had started abuse and neglect training yesterday (11/29/2022). On 11/30/2022 at 1:27 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON). She said due to the investigation, she was asked last night around 6:00 p.m. if she could take the interim position. The IDON said the DON was aware of the incident and did not notify the NHA or start the abuse protocol. The IDON said Staff A was directly involved on that day and she was the one the doctor talked to. Staff A was informed by the doctor who used the word rape. Staff A then informed the DON of the doctor's statement. The IDON said if this had been reported to her, she would like to know first-hand information. She said it takes only a minute to see the patient and talk to the patient. The IDON stated, She would want firsthand information. She would have conducted an interview and would have assessed the patient. She would investigate why a resident wouldn't want a particular staff in the room. On 11/30/2022 at 1:41 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff D, CNA. She confirmed she worked on Thanksgiving Day. She said she went into Resident #17's room with Staff A, LPN while she was gathering some bags. She said she overheard Resident #17 wanted a female instead of a male aide. Staff D said she had never mentioned that before, and had never mentioned anything about her past. Staff D said the resident seemed emotional and was upset a little. Staff D stated, She was telling the nurse she prefers a female over a male aide. Felt more comfortable with a female. Staff D said, I have taken care of her since then and has seemed normal since that day. Staff D continued, Later that same day a little after breakfast the resident told me that she had told the male aide she wanted a female, and said he kept going. She said she was crying and that she didn't want a male. She wanted a female. She said he just kept going. He just kept cleaning her and he kept going. She said the resident stated, You are a female like me would you want a male changing you. Staff D said the resident said she can't protect herself if something happens because she is an elderly old lady. Staff D said she did not notice any bruising and that she didn't seem frightened. Staff D said she told another aide (Staff E, CNA). Staff D said Resident #17 is alert and oriented and not forgetful or confused. On 11/30/2022 at 2:00 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff E, CNA and she confirmed she worked on 11/24/2022 -Thanksgiving Day and knows Resident #17 stating, I take care of her all the time. She said she could not recall if the resident had voiced a concern to her about not having a male caregiver. She said on 11/24/2022 she was in Resident #17's room caring for her roommate when Staff A, LPN entered the room. Staff E said she could overhear Staff A ask Resident #17 if she preferred a female and Resident #17 responded, Yes. Staff E said she heard Staff A say, OK we won't have a male taking care of you. Staff E said Resident #17 was upset, she looked like she was just not happy. Staff E said on that day she noticed the resident was a little different and was upset. She did not verbalize to me what happened. Staff E said she remembered her and her roommate at the time both verbally said they didn't want a male in the room. Resident #17's roommate was discharged that day adding that she was an older resident also. She said Resident #17 was very alert. Staff E said most of the residents that are here are here for therapy and then go home. She noticed more of the women in therapy prefer not to have men in the room. Staff E said she talked to Staff C before, who is a male aide, about it and wanted to switch assignments. She said I told Staff C, CNA some of the women just don't feel comfortable with a man taking care of them. Staff C said she did not recall when it conversation occurred. On 11/30/22 at 3:12 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #17's family member who is her documented emergency contact. The family member said she visits the resident daily, and when she is not there another family member is. She stated, [Resident#17] and I are very close. The family member confirmed on 11/24/2022 she received a phone call from the facility nurse, Staff A. She said there was an incident that happened when (Resident #17) was being changed by a male CNA. She said [Resident #17] was very upset and had been crying all morning. Staff A, LPN had assured her [Resident #17] was okay, but she was upset because she did not want him to do it. The family member said she also spoke to the resident who told her the CNA was Staff C. The family member said on 10/26/2022 Staff C performed the resident's admission intake stating, We both remembered him. She said she told Staff C that she wanted a female caregiver for [ Resident #17], and he stated, Oh that's right you do not want a man to change you . The family member stated, He knew she did not want men providing her care. The family member said, I told [Resident #17] he did not care if she preferred female caregivers. Continuing, the family member stated, [Resident #17]said on 11/24/2022 [Staff C] told her if she did not let him change her brief then she had to wait until shift change. [Resident #17] told him fine. I will wait. [Resident #17] said then all of a sudden, he pulled her gown and continued to change her. She said she tried to reach for the buzzer to call staff and she could not reach it because he had moved the blanket to the side. The family member stated, [Resident #17] kept saying No but he would not listen. [Resident #17] told me she said she felt violated, it was her dignity and that she felt helpless. She said [Resident #17] thought she had a right not to have this man touching her. She said [Resident #17] did say she was not touched inappropriately but she did not want him providing care. The family member stated, The resident told her the doctor came in her room that morning and she was crying. [Resident #17] told me she had told him what had happened. The family member stated a couple weeks prior she spoke to Staff F, LPN a nurse who was working the weekend. He told me [Resident #17] said she did not want male staff providing her care. The family member stated that she shared with Staff F the resident's prior trauma, stating, [Resident #17] was married young, and her husband was very abusive. She said Staff F appeared uncomfortable when he heard her concerns. He said he would make note of it. The family member stated, He said word for word there was no reason why we can't make that accommodation here. This conversation happened a couple weeks prior to the incident. The family member said, [Resident #17] has always been independent and was in her right mind . and to have someone mock her feelings . saying oh yeah you are the one who doesn't want male caregivers, he was very condescending. The family member stated she did not realize the CNA would be like that with her. The family member reiterated the resident had past trauma related to being in an abusive marriage. She stated, Him forcing her during care caused her to be upset. The family member confirmed the resident had mentioned she did not feel comfortable with male caregivers several times to staff and to her. The family member confirmed she received a phone call from the DON on 11/29/2022 and stated, I was frustrated. She alleged that this was the first time she had been notified of the resident's preference. I asked the DON why this was not in her record . Why was it not reported? . Why wasn't there an incident report? The family member said, It bothers me. Where there is smoke there is fire. If they are working that hard to cover it up, what else are they hiding? What about residents who cannot speak for themselves? The family member said when she spoke with [Resident#17], she stated she was not going to allow this to happen. She felt helpless. She was crying. Resident #17 said, I told him to stop, and he ignored my request. The family member stated she felt Resident #17 was safe but was scared about the repercussions. She said, Even if that male caregiver is not here, he has his buddies. I just want [Resident #17] to be safe. The family member confirmed when Resident #17 was admitted [DATE] she informed Staff C, CNA of the resident's gender preference for care. On 11/30/2022 at 4:01 p.m. an interview was conducted with the NHA. He stated Staff C, CNA was interviewed on 11/29/2022. Staff C said he was providing care to Resident #17 on Thanksgiving morning and that she did not want him to do it, she kept saying No. He stated he felt he did not want to leave her without clothes on and wanted to make sure she was dry. The NHA stated they identified an educational opportunity. The NHA said, I let him know he should have left her, honor her request and let the nurse know. The NHA stated they initiated education and suspended the CNA. On 12/01/2022 at 11:27 a.m. a phone interview was conducted with Staff F, LPN. Staff F said he knew Resident #17 and indicated he worked on her unit a few times. He said he recalled speaking with the resident and her [family member]. He said he went into the room to inform the [family member] and the resident he had requested orders from the physician. He said they identified she had blood in her brief, and he was concerned about a gastroesophageal bleed. Staff F said when he was in the room the [family member] told him Resident #17 had a very abusive husband. She said she did not want any male aides to go in her room. Staff F could not recall the exact day of the conversation but stated, It was on the same day I received the order for the STAT (immediately) blood work. Staff F continued and said after he was informed by the [family member] of the resident's preference, he stated, I informed [Staff G Registered Nurse (RN)] the weekend supervisor about it right away. He said he then added it to the on shift report. He said the weekend reports are addressed on Monday mornings and indicated at that time the resident's care plan would be updated. Staff F denied he documented anything in Resident #17's medical record related to the conversation related to the resident's preference on the gender of caregivers. Medical record review revealed on 11/13/2022 Staff F, LPN requested and received orders for Resident #17 for a complete blood count (CBC) due to bright red blood in brief. Thus, indicating the facility staff were notified 12 days prior of the resident's gender preference on caregivers. On 12/02/2022 at 9:51 a.m. a return phone call was received from Staff G, RN Weekend Supervisor. Staff G said she heard about the allegation of abuse a couple of days ago when she was called and asked for a statement. She said, I did not know anything about the patient and was unaware of a patient preference related to not wanting a male aide. Staff G stated she did not recall Staff F, LPN telling her about a resident's preference for a caregiver. She denied she was notified. She stated, [Staff F LPN] does not let me know about his residents. She added last Saturday, 11/26/2022, at the nursing station, I had heard the aides, [Staff F] and [Staff A] talking about someone did not want a male aide. They did not mention the patient's name. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, dated 2017, showed 2. Orientation and Training of Employees b. To assist in identification of abuse, the following definitions of abuse are provided during training: Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury; unreasonable confinement; intimidation; punishment with resulting of physical harm, pain, or mental anguish; or deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of good or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Verbal abuse is defined as any use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, to describe residents, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Sexual abuse is defined as, but not limited to, sexual harassment, sexual coercion, or sexual assault. 3. Preventing Resident Abuse- Establish a Resident Sensitive Environment: This Community desires to prevent abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property by establishing a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. This will be accomplished by a comprehensive quality management approach including the following: 4. Concern Identification and Follow-up: Resident and family concerns will be recorded, reviewed, addressed, and responded to using the community's concern identification procedures. Residents and families will be informed of the community's concern identified. 6. Resident Assessment: as part of the resident social history evaluation and MDS assessments, staff will identify residents with increased vulnerability for abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or who have needs and behaviors that might lead to conflict. 9. Identification of Allegation and Internal Reporting Requirements: Employees are required to report any incident, allegation, or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property they observe, hear about, or suspect immediately to the administrator or the person in charge of the community, acting on behalf of the administrator, or an immediate supervisor who then must immediately report it to the administrator. If a crime, particularly involving physical or sexual abuse, is suspected, it must be reported to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement under the following time frames All others -not later than 24 hours after forming the suspicion. Supervisors will immediately inform the administrator or in the absence of the administrator, the person in charge of the community, of all reports of incidents, allegations, or suspicion of potential abuse neglect or misappropriation of property. Upon learning of the report the administrator, or in the absence of the administrator, the person in charge of the community will initiate an incident investigation. 9. Protection of Residents: Employees of this community who have been accused of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment will be immediately suspended until the results of the investigation have been reviewed by the administrator or designee. 10. Investigation of Abuse, Neglect, or Misappropriation Allegation and Response: a. All incidents will be documented, whether or not abuse occurred, was alleged or suspected. B. Any incident or allegation involving abuse, neglect, or misappropriation will result in an abuse investigation. D. Following Abuse Investigation Procedures: The appointed investigator will follow the Abuse Investigation Procedures identified in this policy. Confidentiality: the investigator will do as much as possible to protect the identities of any employees and residents involved in the investigation, until the investigation is concluded. F. Updates to the Administrator: The person in charge of the investigation will update the administrator or designee during the progress of the investigation. The administrator or designee will keep the resident or resident representative informed of the progress of the investigation. G. Final Abuse Investigation Report: The investigator will report the conclusions of the investigation in writing to the administrator or designee within five working days of the reported incident. 11. Reporting of Potential Abuse a. Initial Reporting of Allegations: Any allegations of abuse will be reported to the Administrator immediately and to the State Department of Health and the resident's representative as so[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews with the Nursing Home Administrator, the Director of Nursing, nursing staff, the resident's p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews with the Nursing Home Administrator, the Director of Nursing, nursing staff, the resident's physician, and review of clinical and medical records, policies, and procedures, it was determined the facility failed to provide a systematic process to ensure residents were free from abuse and trauma for one resident (#17) of two residents reviewed for abuse by failing to report an allegation of abuse within the required timeframes to the required state agencies and authorities. On 11/24/2022 around 2:56 a.m. Resident #17 told Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to stop performing incontinent care. The staff member refused to stop after being told multiple times no. On 11/24/2022 between 7:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. the Medical Director (MD) informed Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) that Resident #17 stated, I was raped after telling a male aide no. On 11/24/2022 between 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of the allegation and failed to follow the facility policy and procedure on abuse and neglect investigation and reporting. Reports to the required abuse hotline showed the facility reported the verbal incident on 11/29/2022. The facility suspended two staff members (Staff C and Director of Nursing) on 11/29/2022. This failure resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy starting on 11/24/2022. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 12/02/2022 after verification of the implementation of removal action(s). The scope and severity was reduced to a D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm). Findings included: Cross reference F600, F610, F699, and F835 Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, dated 2017, documented: 2. Orientation and Training of Employees b. To assist in identification of abuse, the following definitions of abuse are provided during training: Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury; unreasonable confinement; intimidation; punishment with resulting of physical harm, pain or mental anguish; or deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of good or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Verbal abuse is defined as any use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, to describe residents, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Sexual abuse is defined as, but not limited to, sexual harassment, sexual coercion, or sexual assault. 3. Preventing Resident Abuse- Establish a Resident Sensitive Environment: This Community desires to prevent abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property by establishing a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. This will be accomplished by a comprehensive quality management approach including the following: 4. Concern Identification and Follow-up: Resident and family concerns will be recorded, reviewed, addressed, and responded to using the community's concern identification procedures. Residents and families will be informed of the community's concern identified. 6. Resident Assessment: as part of the resident social history evaluation and MDS (minimum data set) assessments, staff will identify residents with increased vulnerability for abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or who have needs and behaviors that might lead to conflict. 9. Identification of Allegation and Internal Reporting Requirements: Employees are required to report any incident, allegation, or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property they observe, hear about, or suspect immediately to the administrator or the person in charge of the community, acting on behalf of the administrator, or an immediate supervisor who then must immediately report it to the administrator. If a crime, particularly involving physical or sexual abuse, is suspected, it must be reported to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement under the following time frames All others - not later than 24 hours after forming the suspicion. Supervisors will immediately inform the administrator or in the absence of the administrator, the person in charge of the community, of all reports of incidents, allegations, or suspicion of potential abuse neglect or misappropriation of property. Upon learning of the report, the administrator, or in the absence of the administrator, the person in charge of the community will initiate an incident investigation. 9. Protection of Residents: Employees of this community who have been accused of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment will be immediately suspended until the results of the investigation have been reviewed by the administrator or designee. 10. Investigation of Abuse, Neglect, or Misappropriation Allegation and Response: A. All incidents will be documented, whether or not abuse occurred, was alleged or suspected. B. Any incident or allegation involving abuse, neglect, or misappropriation will result in an abuse investigation. D. Following Abuse Investigation Procedures: The appointed investigator will follow the Abuse Investigation Procedures identified in this policy. Confidentiality: the investigator will do as much as possible to protect the identities of any employees and residents involved in the investigation, until the investigation is concluded. F. Updates to the Administrator: The person in charge of the investigation will update the administrator or designee during the progress of the investigation. The administrator or designee will keep the resident or resident representative informed of the progress of the investigation. G. Final Abuse Investigation Report: The investigator will report the conclusions of the investigation in writing to the administrator or designee within five working days of the reported incident. 11. Reporting of Potential Abuse a. Initial Reporting of Allegations: Any allegations of abuse will be reported to the Administrator immediately and to the State Department of Health and the resident's representative as soon as possible within 24 hours. For reporting unusual occurrences or reasonable suspensions of a crime against a resident to the Department of Health, the community will utilize the incident report form provided by the Department. B. Five-day Final Abuse Investigation Report: Within five working days after the report of the occurrence, a complete written report of the conclusion of the investigation, including the steps the community has taken in response to the allegations, will be sent to the department of health. On 11/29/2022 at 12:10 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #17. She was observed from the hallway lying in bed wearing a hospital gown. She made eye contact and was receptive to an interview. When the resident was asked if she was treated with respect and dignity, she stated, A male aide (Staff C) started to perform incontinent care; I told him no. I told them (Staff C and D) before I only wanted females to care for me. But he proceeded to change my brief anyway. I told him no. At that time, she made eye contact with the surveyor and stated, No means no. She said she had cried and cried no, but he wouldn't stop. She stated, I felt like I was raped. When asked if she told anyone she stated, I told my doctor, and my doctor told them. She said it had occurred just a couple of days ago. She said she has not seen the male nurse since, but, she continued, I see those men walking past my room and looking in. They're just walking by with nothing to do. At that time the resident lowered her head slightly and stated, I don't want to answer any more questions. Resident #17's bed was positioned by the door and when the door is open, she is able see into the hallway. Review of Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C Cognitive Patterns showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score coded as a 14. The code of 14 indicated cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS, Section G Functional Status showed toilet use coded as the number 3. The number 3 reflected extensive assistance. Support needed for toilet use mobility was coded as a 2 and indicated one-person physical assist. Review of the Medical Director's progress note, dated 11/24/2022 at 9:18 a.m., revealed S: [subjective] resident concern about a male nurse. Further record review of the facility Abuse and Neglect log for November 2022 did not reflect Resident #17's allegation. On 11/29/2022 at 2:04 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) related to Resident #17's allegation. The Nursing Home Administrator said the person the staff would contact would be him and the Director of Nursing (DON). Related to Resident #17's allegation, the NHA stated, No one called me on Thanksgiving Day. On 11/29/2022 at 2:26 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with the facility's Medical Director (MD), who confirmed he knew Resident #17 and saw her on 11/24/2022 between 7:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. He said she appeared agitated and told him that morning she had been wet and soiled. She said a nurse had cleaned her and that it was a male nurse. She said she didn't want a male nurse. The MD said the facility always honors resident preferences. He stated, That really troubled him. The MD said Resident #17 told him, A man wiped and cleaned me against my wishes. It was a male. I can't have males down there. She stated, He changed me, and he was not supposed to. I told him to stop, and he just kept going. The MD said she was agitated and asked not to be cleaned as he kept cleaning her and said she felt violated. The MD said he asked the resident if it was okay if he examined her. She told me that was different. The MD stated this was very concerning to him, and he immediately said something to nursing leadership. He said he was 100% confident he spoke to the nurse. The MD stated he reported to the charge nurse (Staff A) We have a potential situation here. The MD went on to state, I told them they had an issue that needed to be escalated to the Director of Nursing. The MD said the nurse (Staff A) confirmed to him that it would be escalated. He said he documented it and instructed the charge nurse (Staff A) to document it. He said he was told they were working on it and thought he heard them say the Director of Nursing was coming in. The MD stated, We have rules about this, no means no. When asked about his expectation he stated, Reporting is expected to be done. He confirmed this is the only facility he goes to, and he is the facility's Medical Director. The MD confirmed on 11/24/2022 Resident #17 was not doing well and said the resident was outside of her normal demeanor. He was informed that the survey team was not able to locate documentation of Resident #17's allegation. The MD indicated he was surprised of this and repeated, They said they were going to escalate it. On 11/29/2022 at 2:35 p.m. an interview was conducted with the DON on the incident that occurred on 11/24/2022. The DON said she was aware the Medical Director spoke to Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse) about his concern related to Resident #17. The DON said she was scheduled to work that day and she received a phone call from Staff A. She said at that time she was already in route to the facility. The DON said after she arrived at the facility she spoke to Staff A. The DON stated, [Staff A] told me that everything was fixed. She said Staff A stated that She had rearranged the aide assignment and had spoken to the resident. The resident was okay with the schedule change that no male aide would be providing her care. The DON denied she started a grievance. She denied she spoke to the resident. The DON stated, It was just a patient preference, and it was taken care of. On 11/29/2022 at 2:50 p.m. Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed walking in the middle hallway. He stopped in the middle hall and then suddenly turned back around. As he turned, he was noted looking inside of the rooms. One of the rooms he looked into belonged to Resident #17. He then began to walk towards the nursing station. At that time, he was asked if he had time for an interview. He indicated a new admission had arrived, and he had a few minutes. Staff C, CNA said he had been a certified nursing assistant for thirteen years and only works at this facility. Staff C denied he worked the morning of Thanksgiving Day (11/24/2022). He said he worked the night shift on 11/23/2022, but then confirmed the shift ended on the morning of the 11/24/2022. Staff C said he knew Resident #17 and denied he assisted her with her incontinent care in the morning. He stated, I worked on the long hall and [Resident #17] did not reside on that hall. He then stated, I never worked with her. Staff C was asked to look at his documentation dated 11/24/2022. He looked at the report and confirmed he had documented in Resident #17's record which reflected bladder continence care had been provided on 11/24/2022 at 2:56 a.m. Staff C denied anyone spoke to him about an incident and went on to say he did not remember taking care of the resident and did not recall any objections or problems during the care. He did not recall the resident telling him she did not want a male to care for her. He then added I had taken care of her before. He said no one told him not to take care of her anymore. Staff C said typically, if someone would say they have preferences they don't assign the male aide to the room. He said there are no residents, that he is aware of, who do not want a male to take care of them. He said if there was one, he would get a female aide. Staff C confirmed he worked at the facility yesterday 11/28/2022 and assisted with new admissions. On 11/29/2022 at 3:22 p.m. an interview was conducted with the NHA who stated, No one knew she didn't want a male until Thanksgiving Day. He said, The aide is in the DON office right now and is being suspended. On 11/29/2022 at 3:14 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). She said she talked to the resident today (11/29/2022) and asked her if anything happened. The SSD said, She told me a couple days ago; a male aide came in to change her and she did not want him to change her. She said she cried and told the doctor, who told the nurse. The resident said she hadn't had a male aide since. The SSD said the resident reported that nothing inappropriate happened. The SSD said the resident's family member was in the room during that time and stated years ago she had a bad encounter with a male aide, stating, It happened somewhere else. The SSD said the resident said she has not had any male caregivers giving her care since the incident happened. She indicated on Thursday (11/24/2022) the resident's care plan had been updated to reflect no male aides. The SSD confirmed a grievance form was not filed. When asked what her expectation was, she stated, I expect a male aide would stop and get a female. The NHA was present at the time of the interview and stated, Any concerns should be documented, and a grievance should be filed. He confirmed it was not transferred to paper and did not know why. On 11/29/2022 at 3:40 p.m. the NHA provided a copy of a form titled, Administrative Leave, dated 11/29/2022, Suspended pending abuse allegation that revealed Staff C's, CNA name. On 11/30/2022 at 12:25 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). She confirmed she worked on 11/24/2022 and received a verbal report from the Medical Director. She stated, The MD came to me between 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. and told me there was an issue that needed to be taken care of. He stated to me that [Resident #17] was very upset because she had been raped. I said, Excuse me, did you say rape? He stated Yes. He said she used the word rape. Staff A stated, The MD told me he needed it handled right away. The MD said [Resident #17] told the male staff to stop. Staff A, LPN said she spoke to the resident and that she (Resident #17) said she was okay. I asked her, Do you want me to do anything different. She said that Resident #17 said, I'm fine I just don't want a male taking care of me. I do not want a male touching me down there. I told her that no male aide will take care of her and it will be in her plan of care. Continuing, Staff A stated, She told me that she wanted to be left alone, she did not want to be bothered. When asked what type of assessment was performed, she indicated a set of vital signs, and she observed the resident and did not see any bruising to her face or hands. Staff A confirmed she did not perform a full skin assessment. She said Resident #17's demeanor appeared calm, saying she was not disheveled, was alert and oriented, and her mood appeared okay. Staff A said it was her first time working with the resident. Staff A said the DON was in the building between 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. stating, I told her that the Medical Director had concerns and the resident said she felt as though she was raped. The DON said he does not like it when people throw that word around. Staff A said, I also told her that I had spoken to the [family member]. I told her the concerns of the resident not wanting a male aide. The [family member] said I don't know why she is like that lately but thank you for letting me know. Staff A continued, I additionally called the Risk Manager, who is also the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and left her a message. Staff A said later that day she spoke to the ADON, and I told her I had informed the DON. Staff A said the DON told her she would handle it and take care of it. Staff A stated, The ADON had asked if I documented it, I told her the DON had said she would take care of it. Staff A denied seeing the DON going to the resident room after she had given her the report. Staff A confirmed she received abuse training in April 2022. She said, If someone alleges rape, we are to inform the parties that are involved, and that is what I did. If a resident alleges any form of abuse, the expectation is to call the hotline. Staff A stated she, Figured the DON was handling it because she was here. On 11/30/2022 at 1:08 p.m. an interview was conducted with the ADON, who is the facility's Risk Manager (RM). She said she was not at the facility on Thanksgiving Day. She confirmed she received a call from Staff A, LPN in the morning, but did not answer the phone. The ADON said she called back later that afternoon and spoke to Staff A who told her a patient had a male CNA and didn't want a male CNA. The RM said, [Staff A] said the doctor had concerns. She told me that the DON was going to take care of it. The DON was at the facility and was taking care of it. The RM confirmed she deals with abuse and neglect allegations. Stating, It is a team process. When asked what she would do, she said she would not assign a male to the room, and she would go to the patient and see what her concerns were. She stated, I would want to know why she doesn't want a male. She said, I would investigate by starting the grievance process. I would speak to the resident to determine what had happened. She confirmed, An allegation of rape is immediately called in. The RM said part of her process would be to call the abuse hotline and perform a skin assessment of the resident. She went on to say, I would start a paper trail that would include witness statements from staff. The RM said she is responsible for training and had started abuse and neglect training yesterday (11/29/2022). On 11/30/2022 at 1:27 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON). She said due to the investigation, she was asked last night around 6:00 p.m. if she could take the interim position The IDON said the DON was aware of the incident and did not notify the NHA or start the abuse protocol. The IDON said Staff A was directly involved on that day and she was the one the doctor talked to. Staff A was informed by the doctor who used the word rape. Staff A then informed the DON of the doctor's statement. The IDON said if this had been reported to her, she would like to know first-hand information. She said it takes only a minute to see the patient and talk to the patient. The IDON stated, She would want firsthand information. She would have conducted an interview and would have assessed the patient. She would investigate why a resident wouldn't want a particular staff in the room. On 11/30/2022 at 1:41 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff D, CNA. She confirmed she worked on Thanksgiving Day. She said she went into Resident #17's room with Staff A, LPN while she was gathering some bags. She said she overheard Resident #17 wanted a female instead of a male aide. Staff D said she had never mentioned that before, and had never mentioned anything about her past. Staff D said the resident seemed emotional and was upset a little. Staff D stated, She was telling the nurse she prefers a female over a male aide. Felt more comfortable with a female. Staff D said, I have taken care of her since then and has seemed normal since that day. Staff D continued, Later that same day a little after breakfast the resident told me that she had told the male aide she wanted a female, and said he kept going. She said she was crying and that she didn't want a male. She wanted a female. She said he just kept going. He just kept cleaning her and he kept going. She said the resident stated, You are a female like me would you want a male changing you. Staff D said the resident said she can't protect herself if something happens because she is an elderly old lady. Staff D said she did not notice any bruising and that she didn't seem frightened. Staff D said she told another aide (Staff E, CNA). Staff D said Resident #17 is alert and oriented and not forgetful or confused. On 11/30/2022 at 2:00 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff E, CNA and she confirmed she worked on 11/24/2022 -Thanksgiving Day and knows Resident #17 stating, I take care of her all the time. She said she could not recall if the resident had voiced a concern to her about not having a male caregiver. She said on 11/24/2022 she was in Resident #17's room caring for her roommate when Staff A, LPN entered the room. Staff E said she could overhear Staff A ask Resident #17 if she preferred a female and Resident #17 responded, Yes. Staff E said she heard Staff A say, OK we won't have a male taking care of you. Staff E said Resident #17 was upset, she looked like she was just not happy. Staff E said on that day she noticed the resident was a little different and was upset. She did not verbalize to me what happened. Staff E said she remembered her and her roommate at the time both verbally said they didn't want a male in the room. Resident #17's roommate was discharged that day adding that she was an older resident also. She said Resident #17 was very alert. Staff E said she talked to Staff C before, who is a male aide, about it and wanted to switch assignments. She said I told Staff C, CNA some of the women just don't feel comfortable with a man taking care of them. Staff C said she did not recall when it conversation occurred. On 11/30/22 at 3:12 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #17's family member who is her documented emergency contact. The family member said she visits the resident daily, and when she is not there another family member is. She stated, [Resident#17] and I are very close. The family member confirmed on 11/24/2022 she received a phone call from the facility nurse, Staff A. She said there was an incident that happened when [Resident #17] was being changed by a male CNA. She said [Resident #17] was very upset and had been crying all morning. Staff A, LPN had assured her [Resident #17] was okay, but she was upset because she did not want him to do it. The family member said she also spoke to the resident who told her the CNA was Staff C. The family member said on 10/26/2022 Staff C performed the resident's admission intake stating, We both remembered him. She said she told Staff C that she wanted a female caregiver for [Resident #17], and he stated, Oh that's right you do not want a man to change you . The family member stated, He knew she did not want men providing her care. The family member said, I told [Resident #17] he did not care if she preferred female caregivers. Continuing, the family member stated, [Resident #17] said on 11/24/2022 [Staff C] told her if she did not let him change her brief then she had to wait until shift change. [Resident #17] told him fine. I will wait. [Resident #17] said then all of a sudden, he pulled her gown and continued to change her. She said she tried to reach for the buzzer to call staff and she could not reach it because he had moved the blanket to the side. The family member stated, [Resident #17] kept saying No but he would not listen. [Resident #17] told me she said she felt violated, it was her dignity and that she felt helpless. She said [Resident #17] thought she had a right not to have this man touching her. She said [Resident #17] did say she was not touched inappropriately but she did not want him providing care. The family member stated, The resident told her the doctor came in her room that morning and she was crying. [Resident #17] told me she had told him what had happened. The family member stated a couple weeks prior she spoke to Staff F, LPN a nurse who was working the weekend. He told me [Resident #17] said she did not want male staff providing her care. The family member stated that she shared with Staff F the resident's prior trauma, stating, [Resident #17] was married young, and her husband was very abusive. She said Staff F appeared uncomfortable when he heard her concerns. He said he would make note of it. The family member stated, He said word for word there was no reason why we can't make that accommodation here. This conversation happened a couple weeks prior to the incident. The family member said, [Resident #17] has always been independent and was in her right mind . and to have someone mock her feelings . saying oh yeah you are the one who doesn't want male caregivers, he was very condescending. The family member stated she did not realize the CNA would be like that with her. The family member reiterated the resident had past trauma related to being in an abusive marriage. She stated, Him forcing her during care caused her to be upset. The family member confirmed the resident had mentioned she did not feel comfortable with male caregivers several times to staff and to her. The family member confirmed she received a phone call from the DON on 11/29/2022 and stated, I was frustrated. She alleged that this was the first time she had been notified of the resident's preference. I asked the DON why this was not in her record . Why was it not reported? . Why wasn't there an incident report? The family member said, It bothers me. Where there is smoke there is fire. If they are working that hard to cover it up, what else are they hiding? What about residents who cannot speak for themselves? The family member said when she spoke with [Resident#17], she stated she was not going to allow this to happen. She felt helpless. She was crying. Resident #17 said, I told him to stop, and he ignored my request. The family member stated she felt Resident #17 was safe but was scared about the repercussions. She said, Even if that male caregiver is not here, he has his buddies. I just want [Resident #17] to be safe. The family member confirmed when Resident #17 was admitted [DATE] she informed Staff C, CNA of the resident's gender preference for care. On 11/30/2022 at 4:01 p.m. an interview was conducted with the NHA. He stated Staff C, CNA was interviewed on 11/29/2022. Staff C said he was providing care to Resident #17 on Thanksgiving morning and that she did not want him to do it, she kept saying No. He stated he felt he did not want to leave her without clothes on and wanted to make sure she was dry. The NHA stated they identified an educational opportunity. The NHA said, I let him know he should have left her, honor her request and let the nurse know. The NHA stated they initiated education and suspended the CNA. On 12/02/2022 at 9:51 a.m. a return phone call was received from Staff G, RN Weekend Supervisor. Staff G said she heard about the allegation of abuse a couple of days ago when she was called and asked for a statement. She said, I did not know anything about the patient and was unaware of a patient preference related to not wanting a male aide. Staff G stated she did not recall Staff F, LPN telling her about a resident's preference for a caregiver. She denied she was notified. She stated, [Staff F LPN] does not let me know about his residents. She added last Saturday, 11/26/2022, at the nursing station, I had heard the aides, [Staff F] and [Staff A] talking about someone did not want a male aide. They did not mention the patient's name. Facility Actions to Remove Immediate Jeopardy included: On 12/02/2022 at 4:45 p.m. a Removal Plan for F 609 was received which was verified and found to be acceptable. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) Review of the removal plan revealed: December 2,2022 in response to Immediate Jeopardy concerns identified during re-licensure survey F609- * 11/29/22 -At around 1:30 p.m. Surveyor brought to NHA attention a potential allegation of abuse that occurred on 11/24/2022 (Thanksgiving Day). Upon investigation, a physician progress note in [medical software] stated that resident had concerns with potential male C.N.A., note dated 11/24/22. * 11/29/22 investigation initiated; CNA suspended immediately pending investigation. * Investigation revealed on 11/24/22 physician communicated with licensed nurse (LPN) that there was potential issue occurring with a resident and to please escalate to clinical leadership. The LPN went immediately and talked to the resident about her concerns. The resident stated that a male C.N.A. came in to change her brief on 11-7 shift and she stated no and the C.N.A. proceeded, and she stated that No mean no and didn't want a male C.N.A. * That nurse then called the DCS around 10:30 a.m. on 11/24/22 and notified her of resident concerns. * 11/29/22-At around 6:00 p.m. with the presence of the HRD and administrator the DCS was suspended pending investigation due to failure to follow community reporting process pertain to abuse allegation. * 11/29/22-Immediate was submitted to AHCA (Agency for Health Care Administration). * 11/29/22 -Police notification * 11/29/22 DCF notification * On 11/29/2022 - Education was initiated with all staff by department leadership regarding Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation, recognizing and reporting abuse per community policy/resident right, grievances and communication. * 11/30/2022- Acting Director of Nursing interviewed residents that were cared for by the alleged perpetrator. * On 11/30/2022 Resident who made allegation was seen by the psychologist however declined visit. He is to follow up week of 12/05/2022. * On 11/30/2022 ADHOC QAPI was completed with the Medical Director, NHA, acting DON, QA nurse, Unit Manager, SS, Clinical Re[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the medical record, incident logs, policy and procedure review, interviews with administration, nursing staff...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the medical record, incident logs, policy and procedure review, interviews with administration, nursing staff, the resident's physician, and the resident and the resident's representative, it was determined the facility failed to provide a systematic process to implement their abuse policy for one resident (#17) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate to determine the root cause of a reported allegation of abuse and failed to remove staff alleged to perpetrate the abuse to ensure the safety of the resident involved and ensure all facility residents would remain safe from a similar incident. On 11/24/2022 around 2:56 a.m. Resident #17 told Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant to stop performing incontinent care. The staff member refused to stop after being told multiple times no. On 11/24/2022 between 7:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. the Medical Director informed Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) that Resident #17 stated, I was raped after telling a male aide no. On 11/24/2022 between 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of the allegation and failed to follow the facility policy and procedure on abuse and neglect, investigation, implement strategies to protect resident(s) and reporting. It was confirmed through interview with Staff C, CNA and review of the working schedules that Staff C, CNA continued to work at the facility on the 2:45 p.m. to 11:15 p.m. shift on 11/28/2022 and part of the same shift on 11/29/2022. Review of reports to the required abuse hotline showed the facility reported the incident on 11/29/2022 and suspended two staff members (C and the Director of Nursing) on 11/29/2022. The investigation was not carried out in a consistent and thorough manner. This failure resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy starting on 11/24/2022. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 12/02/2022 after verification of the implementation of removal action(s). The scope and severity was reduced to a D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm). Findings included: Cross reference F600, F609, F699, and F835 On 11/29/2022 at 12:10 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #17. She was observed from the hallway lying in bed wearing a hospital gown. She made eye contact and was receptive to an interview. She said she was waiting to get dressed as she pulled at her hospital gown, and that she needed to get ready for therapy. When the resident was asked if she was treated with respect and dignity, she stated, A male aide (Staff C) started to perform incontinent care; I told him no. I told them (Staff C and D) before I only wanted females to care for me. But he proceeded to change my brief anyway. I told him no. At that time, she made eye contact with the surveyor and stated, No means no. She said she had cried and cried no, but he wouldn't stop. She stated, I felt like I was raped. When asked if she told anyone she stated, I told my doctor, and my doctor told them. She said it had occurred just a couple of days ago. She said she has not seen the male nurse since, but, she continued, I see those men walking past my room and looking in. They're just walking by with nothing to do. At that time the resident lowered her head slightly and stated, I don't want to answer any more questions. Resident #17's bed was positioned by the door and when the door is open, she is able see into the hallway. Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect log for November 2022 did not reflect Resident #17's allegation. Review of Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C Cognitive Patterns showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score coded as a 14. The code of 14 indicated cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS, Section G Functional Status showed toilet use coded as the number 3. The number 3 reflected extensive assistance. Support needed for toilet use mobility was coded as a 2 and indicated one-person physical assist. On 11/29/2022 at 2:35 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on the incident that occurred on 11/24/2022. The DON said she was aware the Medical Director spoke to Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse) about his concern related to Resident #17. The DON said she was scheduled to work that day and she received a phone call from Staff A. The DON said after she arrived at the facility, she spoke to Staff A. The DON stated, [Staff A] told me that everything was fixed. She said Staff A stated that She had rearranged the aide assignment and had spoken to the resident. The resident was okay with the schedule change that no male aide would be providing her care. The DON denied she started a grievance. She denied she spoke to the resident. The DON stated, It was just a patient preference, and it was taken care of. On 11/29/2022 at 2:04 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) related to Resident #17's allegation. The Nursing Home Administrator said the person the staff would contact would be him and the Director of Nursing (DON). Related to Resident #17's allegation, the NHA stated, No one called me on Thanksgiving Day. Review of the Medical Director's progress note, dated 11/24/2022 at 9:18 a.m., revealed S: [subjective] resident concern about a male nurse. On 11/29/2022 at 2:26 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with the facility's Medical Director (MD), who confirmed he knew Resident #17 and saw her on 11/24/2022 between 7:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. He said she appeared agitated and told him that morning she had been wet and soiled. She said a nurse had cleaned her and that it was a male nurse. She said she didn't want a male nurse. The MD said the facility always honors resident preferences. He stated, That really troubled me. The MD said Resident #17 told him, A man wiped and cleaned me against my wishes. It was a male. I can't have males down there. She stated, He changed me, and he was not supposed to. I told him to stop, and he just kept going. The MD said she was agitated and asked not to be cleaned as he kept cleaning her and said she felt violated. The MD said he asked the resident if it was okay if he examined her. She told me that was different. The MD stated this was very concerning to him, and he immediately said something to nursing leadership. He said he was 100% confident he spoke to the nurse. The MD stated he reported to the charge nurse (Staff A) We have a potential situation here. The MD went on to state, I told them they had an issue that needed to be escalated to the Director of Nursing. The MD said the nurse (Staff A) confirmed to him that it would be escalated. He said he documented it and instructed the charge nurse (Staff A) to document it. He said he was told they were working on it and thought he heard them say the Director of Nursing was coming in. The MD stated, We have rules about this, no means no. When asked about his expectation he stated, Reporting is expected to be done. He confirmed this is the only facility he goes to, and he is the facility's Medical Director. The MD confirmed on 11/24/2022 Resident #17 was not doing well and said the resident was outside of her normal demeanor. He was informed the survey team was not able to locate documentation of Resident #17's allegation. The MD indicated he was surprised of this and repeated, They said they were going to escalate it. On 11/29/2022 at 3:14 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). She said she talked to the resident today (11/29/2022) and asked her if anything happened. The SSD said, She told me a couple days ago; a male aide came in to change her and she did not want him to change her. She said she cried and told the doctor, who told the nurse. The resident said she hadn't had a male aide since. The SSD said the resident reported that nothing inappropriate happened. The SSD said the resident's family member was in the room during that time and stated years ago she had a bad encounter with a male aide, stating, It happened somewhere else. The SSD said the resident said she has not had any male caregivers giving her care since the incident happened. She indicated on Thursday (11/24/2022) the resident's care plan had been updated to reflect no male aides. The SSD confirmed a grievance form was not filed. When asked what her expectation was, she stated I expect a male aide would stop and get a female. The NHA was present at the time of the interview and stated, Any concerns should be documented, and a grievance should be filed. He confirmed it was not transferred to paper and did not know why. On 11/29/2022 at 2:50 p.m. Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed walking in the middle hallway. He stopped in the middle hall and then suddenly turned back around. As he turned, he was noted looking inside of the rooms. One of the rooms he looked into belonged to Resident #17. He then began to walk towards the nursing station. At that time, he was asked if he had time for an interview. Staff C, CNA said he had been a certified nursing assistant for thirteen years and only works at this facility. Staff C denied he worked the morning of Thanksgiving Day (11/24/2022). He said he worked the night shift on 11/23/2022, but then confirmed the shift ended on the morning of the 11/24/2022. Staff C said he knew Resident #17 and denied he assisted her with her incontinent care in the morning. He stated, I worked on the long hall and [Resident #17] did not reside on that hall. He then stated, I never worked with her. Staff C was asked to look at his documentation dated 11/24/2022. He looked at the report and confirmed he had documented in Resident #17's record which reflected bladder continence care had been provided on 11/24/2022 at 2:56 a.m. Staff C denied anyone spoke to him about an incident and went on to say he did not remember taking care of the resident and did not recall any objections or problems during the care. He did not recall the resident telling him she did not want a male to care for her. He then added I had taken care of her before. He said no one told him not to take care of her anymore. Staff C said typically, if someone would say they have preferences they don't assign the male aide to the room. He said there are no residents, that he is aware of, who do not want a male to take care of them. He said if there was one, he would get a female aide. Staff C confirmed he worked at the facility yesterday 11/28/2022 and assisted with new admissions. On 11/29/2022 at 3:22 p.m. an interview was conducted with the NHA who stated, No one knew she didn't want a male until Thanksgiving Day. He said, The aide is in the DON office right now and is being suspended. On 11/29/2022 at 3:40 p.m. the NHA provided a copy of a form titled, Administrative Leave, dated 11/29/2022, Suspended pending abuse allegation that revealed Staff C's, CNA name. On 11/30/2022 at 12:25 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). She confirmed she worked on 11/24/2022 and received a verbal report from the Medical Director. She stated, The MD came to me between 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. and told me there was an issue that needed to be taken care of. He stated to me that [Resident #17] was very upset because she had been raped. I said, Excuse me, did you say rape? He stated Yes. He said she used the word rape. Staff A stated, The MD told me he needed it handled right away. The MD said [Resident #17] told the male staff to stop. Staff A, LPN said she spoke to the resident and that she (Resident #17) said she was okay. I asked her, Do you want me to do anything different. She said that Resident #17 said, I'm fine I just don't want a male taking care of me. I do not want a male touching me down there. I told her that no male aide will take care of her and it will be in her plan of care. Continuing, Staff A stated, She told me that she wanted to be left alone, she did not want to be bothered. When asked what type of assessment was performed, she indicated a set of vital signs, and she observed the resident and did not see any bruising to her face or hands. Staff A confirmed she did not perform a full skin assessment. She said Resident #17's demeanor appeared calm, saying she was not disheveled, was alert and oriented, and her mood appeared okay. Staff A said it was her first time working with the resident. Staff A said the DON was in the building between 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. stating, I told her that the Medical Director had concerns and the resident said she felt as though she was raped. The DON said he does not like it when people throw that word around. Staff A said, I also told her that I had spoken to the [family member]. I told her the concerns of the resident not wanting a male aide. The [family member] said I don't know why she is like that lately but thank you for letting me know. Staff A continued, I additionally called the Risk Manager, who is also the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and left her a message. Staff A said later that day she spoke to the ADON, and I told her I had informed the DON. Staff A said the DON told her she would handle it and take care of it. Staff A stated, The ADON had asked if I documented it, I told her the DON had said she would take care of it. Staff A denied seeing the DON going to the resident room after she had given her the report. Staff A confirmed she received abuse training in April 2022. She said, If someone alleges rape, we are to inform the parties that are involved, and that is what I did. If a resident alleges any form of abuse, the expectation is to call the hotline. Staff A stated she Figured the DON was handling it because she was here. On 11/30/2022 at 1:08 p.m. an interview was conducted with the ADON, who is the facility's Risk Manager (RM). She said she was not at the facility on Thanksgiving Day. She confirmed she received a call from Staff A, LPN in the morning, but did not answer the phone. The ADON said she called back later that afternoon and spoke to Staff A who told her a patient had a male CNA and didn't want a male CNA. The RM said, [Staff A] said the doctor had concerns. She told me that the DON was going to take care of it. The DON was at the facility and was taking care of it. The RM confirmed she deals with abuse and neglect allegations. Stating, It is a team process. When asked what she would do, she said she would not assign a male to the room, and she would go to the patient and see what her concerns were. She stated, I would want to know why she doesn't want a male. She said, I would investigate by starting the grievance process. I would speak to the resident to determine what had happened. She confirmed, An allegation of rape is immediately called in. The RM said part of her process would be to call the abuse hotline and perform a skin assessment of the resident. She went on to say, I would start a paper trail that would include witness statements from staff. The RM said she is responsible for training and had started abuse and neglect training yesterday (11/29/2022). On 11/30/2022 at 1:27 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON). She said due to the investigation, she was asked last night around 6:00 p.m. if she could take the interim position The IDON said the DON was aware of the incident and did not notify the NHA or start the abuse protocol. The IDON said Staff A was directly involved on that day and she was the one the doctor talked to. Staff A was informed by the doctor who used the word rape. Staff A then informed the DON of the doctor's statement. The IDON said if this had been reported to her, she would like to know first-hand information. She said it takes only a minute to see the patient and talk to the patient. The IDON stated, She would want firsthand information. She would have conducted an interview and would have assessed the patient. She would investigate why a resident wouldn't want a particular staff in the room. On 11/30/2022 at 1:41 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff D, CNA. She confirmed she worked on Thanksgiving Day. She said she went into Resident #17's room with Staff A, LPN while she was gathering some bags. She said she overheard Resident #17 wanted a female instead of a male aide. Staff D said she had never mentioned that before and had never mentioned anything about her past. Staff D said the resident seemed emotional and was upset a little. Staff D stated, She was telling the nurse she prefers a female over a male aide. Felt more comfortable with a female. Staff D said, I have taken care of her since then and has seemed normal since that day. Staff D continued, Later that same day a little after breakfast the resident told me that she had told the male aide she wanted a female, and said he kept going. She said she was crying and that she didn't want a male. She wanted a female. She said he just kept going. He just kept cleaning her and he kept going. She said the resident stated, You are a female like me would you want a male changing you. Staff D said the resident said she can't protect herself if something happens because she is an elderly old lady. Staff D said she did not notice any bruising and that she didn't seem frightened. Staff D said she told another aide (Staff E, CNA). Staff D said Resident #17 is alert and oriented and not forgetful or confused. On 11/30/2022 at 2:00 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff E, CNA and she confirmed she worked on 11/24/2022 -Thanksgiving Day and knows Resident #17 stating, I take care of her all the time. She said she could not recall if the resident had voiced a concern to her about not having a male caregiver. She said on 11/24/2022 she was in Resident #17's room caring for her roommate when Staff A, LPN entered the room. Staff E said she could overhear Staff A ask Resident #17 if she preferred a female and Resident #17 responded, Yes. Staff E said she heard Staff A say, OK we won't have a male taking care of you. Staff E said Resident #17 was upset, she looked like she was just not happy. Staff E said on that day she noticed the resident was a little different and was upset. She did not verbalize to me what happened. Staff E said she remembered her and her roommate at the time both verbally said they didn't want a male in the room. Resident #17's roommate was discharged that day adding that she was an older resident also. She said Resident #17 was very alert. On 11/30/22 at 3:12 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #17's family member who is her documented emergency contact. The family member said she visits the resident daily, and when she is not there another family member is. She stated, [Resident#17] and I are very close. The family member confirmed on 11/24/2022 she received a phone call from the facility nurse, Staff A. She said there was an incident that happened when [Resident #17] was being changed by a male CNA. She said [Resident #17] was very upset and had been crying all morning. Staff A, LPN had assured her [Resident #17] was okay, but she was upset because she did not want him to do it. The family member said she also spoke to the resident who told her the CNA was Staff C. The family member said on 10/26/2022 Staff C performed the resident's admission intake stating, We both remembered him. She said she told Staff C that she wanted a female caregiver for [Resident #17], and he stated, Oh that's right you do not want a man to change you . The family member stated, He knew she did not want men providing her care. The family member said, I told [Resident #17] he did not care if she preferred female caregivers. Continuing, the family member stated, [Resident #17] said on 11/24/2022 [Staff C] told her if she did not let him change her brief then she had to wait until shift change. [Resident #17] told him fine. I will wait. [Resident #17] said then all of a sudden, he pulled her gown and continued to change her. She said she tried to reach for the buzzer to call staff and she could not reach it because he had moved the blanket to the side. The family member stated, [Resident #17] kept saying No but he would not listen. [Resident #17] told me she said she felt violated, it was her dignity and that she felt helpless. She said [Resident #17] thought she had a right not to have this man touching her. She said [Resident #17] did say she was not touched inappropriately but she did not want him providing care. The family member stated, The resident told her the doctor came in her room that morning and she was crying. [Resident #17] told me she had told him what had happened. The family member stated a couple weeks prior she spoke to Staff F, LPN a nurse who was working the weekend. He told me [Resident #17] said she did not want male staff providing her care. The family member stated that she shared with Staff F the resident's prior trauma, stating, [Resident #17] was married young, and her husband was very abusive. She said Staff F appeared uncomfortable when he heard her concerns. He said he would make note of it. The family member stated, He said word for word there was no reason why we can't make that accommodation here. This conversation happened a couple weeks prior to the incident. The family member said, [Resident #17] has always been independent and was in her right mind . and to have someone mock her feelings . saying oh yeah you are the one who doesn't want male caregivers, he was very condescending. The family member stated she did not realize the CNA would be like that with her. The family member reiterated the resident had past trauma related to being in an abusive marriage. She stated, Him forcing her during care caused her to be upset. The family member confirmed the resident had mentioned she did not feel comfortable with male caregivers several times to staff and to her. The family member confirmed she received a phone call from the DON on 11/29/2022 and stated, I was frustrated. She alleged that this was the first time she had been notified of the resident's preference. I asked the DON why this was not in her record . Why was it not reported? . Why wasn't there an incident report? The family member said, It bothers me. Where there is smoke there is fire. If they are working that hard to cover it up, what else are they hiding? What about residents who cannot speak for themselves? The family member said when she spoke with [Resident#17], she stated she was not going to allow this to happen. She felt helpless. She was crying. Resident #17 said, I told him to stop, and he ignored my request. The family member stated she felt Resident #17 was safe but was scared about the repercussions. She said, Even if that male caregiver is not here, he has his buddies. I just want [Resident #17] to be safe. The family member confirmed when Resident #17 was admitted [DATE] she informed Staff C, CNA of the resident's gender preference for care. On 11/30/2022 at 4:01 p.m. an interview was conducted with the NHA. He stated Staff C, CNA was interviewed on 11/29/2022. Staff C said he was providing care to Resident #17 on Thanksgiving morning and that she did not want him to do it, she kept saying No. He stated he felt he did not want to leave her without clothes on and wanted to make sure she was dry. The NHA stated they identified an educational opportunity. The NHA said, I let him know he should have left her, honor her request and let the nurse know. The NHA stated they initiated education and suspended the CNA. On 12/01/2022 at 11:27 a.m. a phone interview was conducted with Staff F, LPN. Staff F said he knew Resident #17 and indicated he worked on her unit a few times. He said he recalled speaking with the resident and her [family member]. He said he went into the room to inform the [family member] and the resident he had requested orders from the physician. He said they identified she had blood in her brief, and he was concerned about a gastroesophageal bleed. Staff F said when he was in the room the [family member] told him Resident #17 had a very abusive husband. She said she did not want any male aides to go in her room. Staff F could not recall the exact day of the conversation but stated, It was on the same day I received the order for the STAT (immediately) blood work. Staff F continued and said after he was informed by the [family member] of the resident's preference, he stated, I informed [Staff G Registered Nurse (RN)] the weekend supervisor about it right away. He said he then added it to the on shift report. He said the weekend reports are addressed on Monday mornings and indicated at that time the resident's care plan would be updated. Staff F denied he documented anything in Resident #17's medical record related to the conversation related to the resident's preference on the gender of caregivers. Medical record review revealed on 11/13/2022 Staff F, LPN requested and received orders for Resident #17 for a complete blood count (CBC) due to bright red blood in brief. Thus, indicating the facility staff were notified 12 days prior of the resident's gender preference on caregivers. Facility Actions to Remove Immediate Jeopardy: On 12/02/2022 at 4:45 p.m. a Removal Plan for F 610 was received which was verified and found to be acceptable. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) Review of the removal plan revealed: December 2,2022 in response to Immediate Jeopardy concerns identified during re-licensure survey F610 - * 11/29/22 -At around 1:30 p.m. Surveyor brought to NHA attention a potential allegation of abuse that occurred on 11/24/2022 (Thanksgiving Day). Upon investigation, a physician progress note in [medical software] stated that resident had concerns with potential male C.N.A, note dated 11/24/22. * 11/29/22 investigation initiated; CNA suspended immediately pending investigation. * Investigation revealed on 11/24/22 physician communicated with licensed nurse (LPN) that there was potential issue occurring with a resident and to please escalate to clinical leadership. The LPN went immediately and talked to the resident about her concerns. The resident stated that a male C.N.A. came in to change her brief on 11-7 shift and she stated no and the C.N.A proceeded, and she stated that No mean no and didn't want a male C.N.A. * That nurse then called the DCS around 10:30 a.m. on 11/24/22 and notified her of resident concerns. * 11/29/22-At around 6:00 p.m. with the presence of the HRD and administrator the DCS was suspended pending investigation due to failure to follow community reporting process pertain to abuse allegation. * 11/29/22-Immediate was submitted to AHCA (Agency for Health Care Administration). * 11/29/22 -Police notification * 11/29/22 DCF notification * On 11/29/2022 - Education was initiated with all staff by department leadership regarding Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation, recognizing and reporting abuse per community policy/resident right, grievances and communication. * 11/30/2022- Acting Director of Nursing interviewed residents that were cared for by the alleged perpetrator. * On 11/30/2022 Resident who made allegation was seen by the psychologist however declined visit. He is to follow up week of 12/05/2022. * On 11/30/2022 ADHOC QAPI was completed with the Medical Director, NHA, acting DON, QA nurse, Unit Manager, SS, Clinical Records, Admissions, Business Office Manager, Rehab Manager, Dining Manager, MDS, Housekeeping, Maintenance, Activities, Human Recourses were present. * 12/01/2022 Education provided to acting Director of Nursing and NHA Trauma Informed Care/Brief Trauma Questionnaire/Behavioral and Emotional status by Regional Nurse. * 12/01/2022 Education has been completed for all SNF staff recognizing and reporting abuse per community policy/residents' rights, grievances, and communication. * 12/1/2022 Reviewed and revised Community Specific Brief Trauma Questionnaire. * 12/1/2022 Education conducted by acting DON with licensed nursing staff pertaining to: o Change in condition o Trauma Informed Care/Behavioral and Emotional Status o Brief Trauma Questionnaire o Resident Preference Interview * 12/02/2022 Education conducted with IDT by NHA & Acting DON o Change in condition o Trauma Informed Care/Behavioral and Emotional Status o Brief Trauma Questionnaire o Resident Preference interview with all new admissions * 12/02/2022- ADHOC QAPI (Quality Assessment Performance Improvement) * 12/2/22 New Brief Trauma Questionnaire to be completed with all current residents. * 12/2/22 Abuse investigation finalized by NHA. 12/2/22 Immediate Action: Education as noted above and DON/Designee will conducted a weekly quality review of 5 residents/responsible party weekly for 4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks for 2 months. Questions to include: 1. Has anyone mistreated you, or loved one since a resident here? 2. Has anyone threatened your or your loved one since a resident here? 3. Are you fearful of anyone while residing here? 4. For residents what are not interviewable, complete a skin evaluation and answer, does the resident present with any of the following: a. Distress b. Unusual/suspicious injuries c. Interview with family using above questions. Verification of the facility's removal plan was conducted by the survey team on 12/02/2022. Interviews were conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse-First Shift (FS), Staff H Business office Manager, Staff I, CNA (FS), Staff J, CNA(FS), Staff K, CNA (FS), Staff L, CNA(FS), Staff N, CNA(FS) Staff M, Life Enrichment Manager, Staff O, Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA), Staff T, Director of Rehab, Staff U, PTA, Staff V, Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA), Staff W, OTA, Staff X, Speech Therapist, Staff Y, Dietary Clerk, Staff Z, Dietary Clerk, Staff AA, Housekeeping Supervisor, Staff BB, Receptionist, Staff CC, Maintenance Manager, Staff DD, CNA(FS), Staff EE, CNA(FS), Staff FF, CNA(FS), Staff GG Licensed Practical (LPN/FS), Staff HH, CNA Second shift (SS), Staff II, CNA (SS), Staff JJ, CNA(SS), Staff KK, CNA(SS), Staff LL, CNA(SS), Staff MM, CNA(SS) Third shift (TS), Staff NN, CNA(SS/TS), Staff OO, Licensed Practical Nurse (PM), Staff PP, LPN (SS), Staff QQ, LPN/SS at the facility regarding the policies and procedures on Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation, resident rights and resident preferences. All staff were able to define abuse, neglect and misappropriation, and resident rights. They knew who the allegation should be reported to stating, the NHA, SSD, RM, and their direct supervisor. They knew the hotline abuse phone number and where the number [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0699 (Tag F0699)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of the medical record, incident logs, policy and procedure review, interviews with administration, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of the medical record, incident logs, policy and procedure review, interviews with administration, nursing staff, Resident #17, the resident's physician, and the resident's representative, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice to maintain the resident's highest practical and psychosocial well-being by not ensuring their Behavioral Health Services for Trauma Informed Care was followed for one resident (#17) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to take actions and respond to a family member and cognitively intact resident's request for female caregivers only. The first request was made on 10/26/2022 by the family member and the resident to the Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), who performed the admission intake; the second request was made on 11/13/2022 by the family member and the resident to a Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), who assured the resident and family member a male aide would not provide care. At that time, the LPN was informed of the resident's past traumatic history by the family member, which spanned over twenty-five years and consisted of physical abuse by a spouse who used her as a punching bag. On 11/24/2022 at 2:56 a.m., eleven days after Staff F, LPN was notified of the resident's past traumatic history, a male aide entered her bedroom to provide incontinence care. The resident told him she would wait, but the male aide failed to honor the resident's rights, dignity, and psychosocial well-being. As he pushed back her gown and provided incontinent care, she cried out repeatedly for him to stop; the aide did not stop. As he continued, the resident continued to cry telling him no, resulting in physical abuse, and re-traumatization. The resident informed her Medical Doctor, stating, I was raped, violated. No means no. Resident #17's admission Record revealed she was in her early nineties, cognitively intact, and was admitted for short term rehabilitation with a discharge plan to go back to her own home, where she had previously been independent. Interviews with the resident's family member revealed the resident was a trauma survivor, with a history that included over 25 years of physical abuse. This failure resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy starting on 11/24/2022. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 12/02/2022 after verification of the implementation of removal action(s). The scope and severity was reduced to a D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm). Findings included: Cross reference F600, F609, F610, and F835 Review of a policy titled, Subject: Trauma Informed Care Approved: ADHOC QAPI 12/02/2022 revealed: Intent: It is the policy of the facility to ensure each resident receives the care and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable psycho-social well-being. Procedure: 1. The facility must ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care, in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences, in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. Review of a policy titled, Program, dated 12/02/2022, revealed: Subject: Trauma Informed Care Program Intent: it is the policy of the facility to ensure residents receives care and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable psycho-social well-being. Procedure: 1. All residents admitted to facility will have a Brief Trauma Questionnaire (BTQ) preformed at the time of admission. 2. When trauma has been identified the Social Service Director or Designee will inform the resident's attending physician and request both Psychiatry and Psychology Services for the resident. 4. Through resident interview and Psych Services, a comprehensive Plan of Care will be developed with the Interdisciplinary Team to reduce the risk of re-traumatization. 5. All staff will receive education in Orientation upon hire and annually. Review of the policy titled, Behavioral Health Services, revision date February 2017, revealed: Policy Statement 1. The facility will provide, and residents will receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Behavioral health services are provided to residents as needed as part of the interdisciplinary, person-centered approach to care. 2. Residents who exhibit signs of emotional/psychosocial distress receive services and support that address their individual needs and goals for care. 3. Residents who do not display symptoms of, or have not been diagnosed with, mental, psychiatrist, psychosocial adjustment, substance abuse or post-traumatic stress disorder(s) will not develop behavioral disturbances that cannot be attributed to a specific clinical condition that makes the pattern unavoidable. 4. Staff must promote dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization and safety as appropriate for each resident and are trained in ways to support residents in distress. 5. Behavioral health services are provided by staff who are qualified and competent in behavioral health and trauma-informed care. 6. Staff are scheduled in sufficient numbers to manage resident needs throughout the day, evening, and night. On 11/29/2022 at 12:10 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #17. She was observed from the hallway lying in bed wearing a hospital gown. She made eye contact and was receptive to an interview. She said she was waiting to get dressed as she pulled at her hospital gown, and that she needed to get ready for therapy. When the resident was asked if she was treated with respect and dignity, she stated, A male aide (Staff C) started to perform incontinent care; I told him no. I told them (Staff C and D) before I only wanted females to care for me. But he proceeded to change my brief anyway. I told him no. At that time, she made eye contact with the surveyor and stated, No means no. She said she had cried and cried no, but he wouldn't stop. She stated, I felt like I was raped. When asked if she told anyone she stated, I told my doctor, and my doctor told them. She said it had occurred just a couple of days ago. She said she has not seen the male nurse since, but, she continued, I see those men walking past my room and looking in. They're just walking by with nothing to do. At that time the resident lowered her head slightly and stated, I don't want to answer any more questions. Resident #17's bed was positioned by the door and when the door is open, she is able see into the hallway. On 11/30/22 at 3:12 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #17's family member who is her documented emergency contact. The family member said she visits the resident daily, and when she is not there another family member is. She stated, [Resident#17] and I are very close. The family member confirmed on 11/24/2022 she received a phone call from the facility nurse, Staff A, LPN. She said there was an incident that happened when [Resident #17] was being changed by a male CNA (Staff C, CNA). She said [Resident #17] was very upset and had been crying all morning. Staff A, LPN had assured her [Resident #17] was okay, but she was upset because she did not want him to do it. The family member said she also spoke to the resident who told her the CNA was Staff C. The family member said on 10/26/2022 Staff C performed the resident's admission intake stating, We both remembered him. The family member reiterated the resident had past trauma related to being in an abusive marriage. She stated, [Resident #17] was in an abusive marriage for twenty-five years, he used her as his own punching bag. She stated, Him (Staff C) forcing her during care caused her to be upset. The family member confirmed the resident had mentioned she did not feel comfortable with male caregivers several times to staff and to her. She said she told Staff C that she wanted a female caregiver for [Resident #17], and he stated, Oh that's right you do not want a man to change you . The family member stated, He knew she did not want men providing her care. The family member said, I told [Resident #17] he did not care if she preferred female caregivers. Continuing, the family member stated, [Resident #17] said on 11/24/2022 [Staff C] told her if she did not let him change her brief then she had to wait until shift change. [Resident #17] told him fine. I will wait. [Resident #17] said then all of a sudden, he pulled her gown and continued to change her. She said she tried to reach for the buzzer to call staff and she could not reach it because he had moved the blanket to the side. The family member stated, [Resident #17] kept saying No but he would not listen. [Resident #17] told me she said she felt violated, it was her dignity and that she felt helpless. She said [Resident #17] thought she had a right not to have this man touching her. She said [Resident #17] did say she was not touched inappropriately but she did not want him providing care. The family member stated, The resident told her the doctor came in her room that morning and she was crying. [Resident #17] told me she had told him what had happened. The family member stated a couple weeks prior she spoke to Staff F, LPN a nurse who was working the weekend. He told me [Resident #17] said she did not want male staff providing her care. The family member stated that she shared with Staff F, LPN the resident's prior trauma, stating, [Resident #17] was married young, and her husband was very abusive. She said Staff F appeared uncomfortable when he heard her concerns. He said he would make note of it. The family member stated, He said word for word there was no reason why we can't make that accommodation here. This conversation happened a couple weeks prior to the incident. The family member said, [Resident #17] has always been independent and was in her right mind . and to have someone mock her feelings . saying oh yeah you are the one who doesn't want male caregivers, he was very condescending. The family member stated she did not realize the CNA would be like that with her. The family member reiterated the resident had past trauma related to being in an abusive marriage. She stated, Him forcing her during care caused her to be upset. The family member confirmed she received a phone call from the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/29/2022 and stated, I was frustrated. She alleged that this was the first time she had been notified of the resident's preference. I asked the DON why this was not in her record . Why was it not reported? . Why wasn't there an incident report? The family member said, It bothers me. Where there is smoke there is fire. If they are working that hard to cover it up, what else are they hiding? What about residents who cannot speak for themselves? The family member said when she spoke with [Resident#17], she stated she was not going to allow this to happen. She felt helpless. She was crying. Resident #17 said, I told him to stop, and he ignored my request. The family member stated she felt Resident #17 was safe but was scared about the repercussions. She said, Even if that male caregiver is not here, he has his buddies. I just want [Resident #17] to be safe. The family member confirmed when Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE] she informed Staff C, CNA of the resident's gender preference for care. Review of the Medical Director's progress note, dated 11/24/2022 at 9:18 a.m., revealed S: [subjective] resident concern about a male nurse. On 11/29/2022 at 2:26 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with the facility's Medical Director (MD), who confirmed he knew Resident #17 and saw her on 11/24/2022 between 7:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. He said she appeared agitated and told him that morning she had been wet and soiled. She said a nurse had cleaned her and that it was a male nurse. She said she didn't want a male nurse. The MD said the facility always honors resident preferences. He stated, That really troubled me. The MD said Resident #17 told him, A man wiped and cleaned me against my wishes. It was a male. I can't have males down there. She stated, He changed me, and he was not supposed to. I told him to stop, and he just kept going. The MD said she was agitated and asked not to be cleaned as he kept cleaning her and said she felt violated. The MD said he asked the resident if it was okay if he examined her. She told me that was different. The MD stated this was very concerning to him, and he immediately said something to nursing leadership. He said he was 100% confident he spoke to the nurse. The MD stated he reported to the charge nurse (Staff A) We have a potential situation here. The MD went on to state, I told them they had an issue that needed to be escalated to the Director of Nursing. The MD said the nurse (Staff A) confirmed to him that it would be escalated. He said he documented it and instructed the charge nurse (Staff A) to document it. He said he was told they were working on it and thought he heard them say the Director of Nursing was coming in. The MD stated, We have rules about this, no means no. When asked about his expectation he stated, Reporting is expected to be done. He confirmed this is the only facility he goes to, and he is the facility's Medical Director. The MD confirmed on 11/24/2022 Resident #17 was not doing well and said the resident was outside of her normal demeanor. He was informed that the survey team was not able to locate documentation of Resident #17's allegation. The MD indicated he was surprised of this and repeated, They said they were going to escalate it. Review of Resident #17's admission Record revealed, she was geriatric in age and was transferred from a local hospital on [DATE] after having an altered mental status. Her admission Record showed she was admitted for short term rehabilitation with diagnoses that included depression. Review of Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C Cognitive Patterns showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score coded as a 14. The code of 14 indicated cognitively intact. Medical record was omitted of documentation related to Resident #17 preference on a caregiver gender. On 11/29/2022 at 2:35 p.m. an interview was conducted with the DON on the incident that occurred on 11/24/2022. The DON said she was aware the Medical Director spoke to Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse) about his concern related to Resident #17. The DON said she was scheduled to work that day and she received a phone call from Staff A. She said at that time she was already in route to the facility. The DON said after she arrived at the facility, she spoke to Staff A. The DON stated, [Staff A] told me that everything was fixed. She said Staff A stated that She had rearranged the aide assignment and had spoken to the resident. The resident was okay with the schedule change that no male aide would be providing her care. The DON denied she started a grievance. She denied she spoke to the resident. The DON stated, It was just a patient preference, and it was taken care of. On 11/30/2022 at 12:25 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with Staff A, LPN. She confirmed she worked on 11/24/2022 and received a verbal report from the Medical Director. She stated, The MD came to me between 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. and told me there was an issue that needed to be taken care of. He stated to me that [Resident #17] was very upset because she had been raped. I said, Excuse me, did you say rape? He stated Yes. He said she used the word rape. Staff A stated, The MD told me he needed it handled right away. The MD said [Resident #17] told the male staff to stop. Staff A, LPN said she spoke to the resident and that she (Resident #17) said she was okay. I asked her, Do you want me to do anything different. She said that Resident #17 said, I'm fine I just don't want a male taking care of me. I do not want a male touching me down there. I told her that no male aide will take care of her and it will be in her plan of care. Continuing, Staff A stated, She told me that she wanted to be left alone, she did not want to be bothered. When asked what type of assessment was performed, she indicated a set of vital signs, and she observed the resident and did not see any bruising to her face or hands. Staff A confirmed she did not perform a full skin assessment. She said Resident #17's demeanor appeared calm, saying she was not disheveled, was alert and oriented, and her mood appeared okay. Staff A said it was her first time working with the resident. Staff A said the DON was in the building between 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. stating, I told her that the Medical Director had concerns and the resident said she felt as though she was raped. The DON said he does not like it when people throw that word around. Staff A said, I also told her that I had spoken to the [family member]. I told her the concerns of the resident not wanting a male aide. The [family member] said I don't know why she is like that lately but thank you for letting me know. Staff A continued, I additionally called the Risk Manager, who is also the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and left her a message. Staff A said later that day she spoke to the ADON, and I told her I had informed the DON. Staff A said the DON told her she would handle it and take care of it. Staff A stated, The ADON had asked if I documented it, I told her the DON had said she would take care of it. Staff A denied seeing the DON going to the resident room after she had given her the report. Staff A confirmed she received abuse training in April 2022. She said, If someone alleges rape, we are to inform the parties that are involved, and that is what I did. If a resident alleges any form of abuse, the expectation is to call the hotline. Staff A stated she Figured the DON was handling it because she was here. On 11/29/2022 at 3:14 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). She said she talked to the resident today (11/29/2022) and asked her if anything happened. The SSD said, She told me a couple days ago; a male aide came in to change her and she did not want him to change her. She said she cried and told the doctor, who told the nurse. The resident said she hadn't had a male aide since. The SSD said the resident reported that nothing inappropriate happened. The SSD said the resident's family member was in the room during that time and stated years ago she had a bad encounter with a male aide, stating, It happened somewhere else. The SSD said the resident said she has not had any male caregivers giving her care since the incident happened. She indicated on Thursday (11/24/2022) the resident's care plan had been updated to reflect no male aides. The SSD confirmed a grievance form was not filed. When asked what her expectation was, she stated, I expect a male aide would stop and get a female. The NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) was present at the time of the interview and stated, Any concerns should be documented, and a grievance should be filed. He confirmed it was not transferred to paper and did not know why. On 11/30/2022 at 1:27 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON). Staff A was informed by the doctor who used the word rape. Staff A then informed the DON of the doctor's statement. On 11/30/2022 at 1:41 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff D, CNA. She confirmed she worked on Thanksgiving Day. She said she went into Resident #17's room with Staff A, LPN while she was gathering some bags. She said she overheard Resident #17 wanted a female instead of a male aide. Staff D said she had never mentioned that before and had never mentioned anything about her past. Staff D said the resident seemed emotional and was upset a little. Staff D stated, She was telling the nurse she prefers a female over a male aide. Felt more comfortable with a female. Staff D said, I have taken care of her since then and has seemed normal since that day. Staff D continued, Later that same day a little after breakfast the resident told me that she had told the male aide she wanted a female, and said he kept going. She said she was crying and that she didn't want a male. She wanted a female. She said he just kept going. He just kept cleaning her and he kept going. She said the resident stated, You are a female like me would you want a male changing you. Staff D said the resident said she can't protect herself if something happens because she is an elderly old lady. Staff D said she did not notice any bruising and that she didn't seem frightened. Staff D said she told another aide (Staff E, CNA). Staff D said Resident #17 is alert and oriented and not forgetful or confused. On 11/30/2022 at 2:00 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff E, CNA and she confirmed she worked on 11/24/2022 -Thanksgiving Day and knows Resident #17 stating, I take care of her all the time. She said on 11/24/2022 she was in Resident #17's room caring for her roommate when Staff A, LPN entered the room. Staff E said she could overhear Staff A ask Resident #17 if she preferred a female and Resident #17 responded, Yes. Staff E said she heard Staff A say, OK we won't have a male taking care of you. Staff E said Resident #17 was upset, she looked like she was just not happy. Staff E said on that day she noticed the resident was a little different and was upset. She did not verbalize to me what happened. Staff E said she remembered her and her roommate at the time both verbally said they didn't want a male in the room. She said Resident #17 was very alert. She noticed more of the women in therapy prefer not to have men in the room. Staff E said she talked to Staff C, before about it and wanted to switch assignments. She said I told Staff C, CAN, Some of the women just don't feel comfortable with a man taking care of them. Staff C said she did not recall when it conversation occurred. On 11/30/2022 at 4:01 p.m. an interview was conducted with the NHA. He stated Staff C, CNA was interviewed on 11/29/2022. Staff C said he was providing care to Resident #17 on Thanksgiving morning and that she did not want him to do it, she kept saying No. He stated he felt he did not want to leave her without clothes on and wanted to make sure she was dry. The NHA stated they identified an educational opportunity. The NHA said, I let him know he should have left her, honor her request and let the nurse know. The NHA stated they initiated education and suspended the CNA. On 12/01/2022 at 11:27 a.m. a phone interview was conducted with Staff F, LPN. Staff F said he knew Resident #17 and indicated he worked on her unit a few times. He said he recalled speaking with the resident and her [family member]. He said he went into the room to inform the [family member] and the resident he had requested orders from the physician. Staff F said when he was in the room the [family member] told him Resident #17 had a very abusive husband. She said she did not want any male aides to go in her room. Staff F could not recall the exact day of the conversation but stated, It was on the same day I received the order for the STAT (immediately) blood work. Staff F continued and said after he was informed by the [family member] of the resident's preference, he stated, I informed [Staff G Registered Nurse (RN)] the weekend supervisor about it right away. He said he then added it to the on shift report. He said the weekend reports are addressed on Monday mornings and indicated at that time the resident's care plan would be updated. Staff F denied he documented anything in Resident #17's medical record related to the conversation related to the resident's preference on the gender of caregivers. Medical record review revealed on 11/13/2022 Staff F, LPN requested and received orders for Resident #17 for a complete blood count (CBC). Thus, indicating the facility staff were notified 12 days prior of the resident's gender preference on caregivers. On 12/02/2022 at 9:51 a.m. a return phone call was received from Staff G, RN Weekend Supervisor. She said, I did not know anything about the patient and was unaware of a patient preference related to not wanting a male aide. Staff G stated she did not recall Staff F, LPN telling her about a resident's preference for a caregiver. She denied she was notified. She stated, [Staff F LPN] does not let me know about his residents. She added last Saturday, 11/26/2022, at the nursing station, I had heard the aides, [Staff F] and [Staff A] talking about someone did not want a male aide. They did not mention the patient's name. Facility Actions to Remove Immediate Jeopardy: On 12/02/2022 at 4:45 p.m. a Removal Plan for F 699 was received which was verified and found to be acceptable. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) Review of the removal plan revealed: December 2, 2022 in response to Immediate Jeopardy concerns identified during re-licensure survey F699 * 11/29/22 -At around 1:30 p.m. Surveyor brought to NHA attention a potential allegation of abuse that occurred on 11/24/2022 (Thanksgiving Day). Upon investigation, a physician progress note in [medical software] stated that resident had concerns with potential male C.N.A, note dated 11/24/22. * 11/29/22 investigation initiated; CNA suspended immediately pending investigation. * Investigation revealed on 11/24/22 physician communicated with licensed nurse (LPN) that there was potential issue occurring with a resident and to please escalate to clinical leadership. The LPN went immediately and talked to the resident about her concerns. The resident stated that a male C.N.A. came in to change her brief on 11-7 shift and she stated no and the C.N.A proceeded, and she stated that No mean no and didn't want a male C.N.A. * That nurse then called the DCS around 10:30 a.m. on 11/24/22 and notified her of resident concerns. * 11/29/22-At around 6:00 p.m. with the presence of the HRD and administrator the DCS was suspended pending investigation due to failure to follow community reporting process pertain to abuse allegation. * 11/29/22-Immediate was submitted to AHCA (Agency for Health Care Administration). * 11/29/22 -Police notification * 11/29/22 DCF notification * On 11/29/2022 - Education was initiated with all staff by department leadership regarding Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation, recognizing and reporting abuse per community policy/resident right, grievances and communication. * 11/30/2022- Acting Director of Nursing interviewed residents that were cared for by the alleged perpetrator. * On 11/30/2022 Resident who made allegation was seen by the psychologist however declined visit. He is to follow up week of 12/05/2022. * On 11/30/2022 ADHOC QAPI was completed with the Medical Director, NHA, acting DON, QA nurse, Unit Manager, SS, Clinical Records, Admissions, Business Office Manager, Rehab Manager, Dining Manager, MDS, Housekeeping, Maintenance, Activities, Human Recourses were present. * 12/01/2022 Education provided to acting Director of Nursing and NHA Trauma Informed Care/Brief Trauma Questionnaire/Behavioral and Emotional status by Regional Nurse. * 12/01/2022 Education has been completed for all SNF staff recognizing and reporting abuse per community policy/residents' rights, grievances, and communication. * 12/1/2022 Reviewed and revised Community Specific Brief Trauma Questionnaire. * 12/1/2022 Education conducted by acting DON with licensed nursing staff pertaining to: o Change in condition o Trauma Informed Care/Behavioral and Emotional Status o Brief Trauma Questionnaire o Resident Preference Interview * 12/02/2022 Education conducted with IDT by NHA & Acting DON o Change in condition o Trauma Informed Care/Behavioral and Emotional Status o Brief Trauma Questionnaire o Resident Preference interview with all new admissions * 12/02/2022- ADHOC QAPI (Quality Assessment Performance Improvement) * 12/2/22 New Brief Trauma Questionnaire to be completed with all current residents. * 12/2/22 Abuse investigation finalized by NHA. 12/2/22 Immediate Action: Education as noted above and DON/Designee to be completed by 12/2/22 with licensed nursing associates. New residents will be evaluated utilizing the Brief Trauma Questionnaire with care plan update as required. The DON/designee will conduct audit of new admission daily x 12 weeks to review for questionnaire being completed and care plan updated. Verification of the facility's removal plan was conducted by the survey team on 12/02/2022. Interviews were conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse-First Shift (FS), Staff H Business office Manager, Staff I, CNA (FS), Staff J, CNA(FS), Staff K, CNA (FS), Staff L, CNA(FS), Staff N, CNA(FS) Staff M, Life Enrichment Manager, Staff O, Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA), Staff T, Director of Rehab, Staff U, PTA, Staff V, Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA), Staff W, OTA, Staff X, Speech Therapist, Staff Y, Dietary Clerk, Staff Z, Dietary Clerk, Staff AA, Housekeeping Supervisor, Staff BB, Receptionist, Staff CC, Maintenance Manager, Staff DD, CNA(FS), Staff EE, CNA(FS), Staff FF, CNA(FS), Staff GG Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/FS), Staff HH, CNA Second shift (SS), Staff II, CNA (SS), Staff JJ, CNA(SS), Staff KK, CNA(SS), Staff LL, CNA(SS), Staff MM, CNA(SS) Third shift (TS), Staff NN, CNA(SS/TS), Staff OO, Licensed Practical Nurse (PM), Staff PP, LPN (SS), Staff QQ, LPN/SS at the facility regarding the policies and procedures on Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation, resident rights and resident preferences. All staff were able to define abuse, neglect and misappropriation, and resident rights. They knew who the allegation should be reported to stating, the NHA, SSD, RM, and their direct supervisor. They knew the hotline abuse phone number and where the number could be located within the facility. They verbalized knowing the need for timely reporting of an allegation and verbalized knowledge on the facility policies. They confirmed if a resident has a specific preference their preference would be honored by communicating to the nurse. Nurses indicated it would be documented and addressed immediately to ensure the interdisciplinary team were aware of it. The staff members confirmed the education had included trauma-based care. If the any staff were informed of would immediately report it to their supervisor. On 12/02/2022 after interview and review of the Training log it was determined prior to the exit the facility had conducted 100% of education to their employees. Based on verification of the facility's Immediate Jeopardy removal plan the Immediate Jeopardy was determined to be removed on 12/02/2022 and the non-compliance was reduced to a s[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews with nursing and administrative staff, the resident and the resident's physician, the residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews with nursing and administrative staff, the resident and the resident's physician, the resident's representative, the resident's psychiatric practitioner, and the facility's Medical Director, the facility Administration failed to use its resources effectively to lead and direct the overall operations of the facility in accordance with resident needs, regulations, and company policies related to abuse for one resident (#17) of two residents reviewed for abuse. On 11/24/2022, Resident #17, an elderly female who was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for incontinent care and services, reported a male Certified Nursing Assistant (Staff C, CNA) performed incontinence care that she had repeatedly refused. Resident #17 reported the event to the Medical Director, who then reported it to the supervising nursing staff. The supervising staff (Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse) immediately reported to the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON failed to investigate, report, protect and take corrective action to prevent similar occurrence. Facility administration determined this was not abuse, did not fully investigate, report, protect, and take corrective action to prevent a similar occurrence. The failure of the Administration to follow the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines and to implement their abuse policies created a likelihood that placed all residents at risk of a similar occurrence, and which could lead to serious injury or serious harm such as serious psychosocial harm and re-traumatization. This resulted in the findings of Immediate Jeopardy starting on 11/24/2022. The immediacy was removed on 12/02/2022 after verification of the implementation of removal actions. The scope and severity was reduced to a D (no actual harm with potential for more that minimal harm). Findings included: Cross reference F600, F609, F610 and F699. Review of the Job Description Position Title: Director of Nursing, Department: Health Center, Supervisor: Executive Director Revision Date: 1/2/2022. General Summary: The Director of Nursing is responsible for the overall supervision, provision, and quality of nursing care in the Health Center, and residential apartments. He/she is responsible for the selection, training, discipline, and supervision for all nursing related Health Center personnel. He/she is responsible for the procurement of appropriate supplies and equipment and operating within the department budget. Principle Duties, Essential Job Duties: 1. Responsible for the development, organization and operation of nursing services and supportive services for the Health Care and residential apartments. 3. Responsible for the coordination and direction of the total planning for nursing services including recommendation through a staffing plan. 11. Participates in the coordination of resident care services through department staff meeting. 16. Ensures that significant clinical developments of residents are reported to their families and /or responsible party, physicians, the Medical Director, the Executive Director, and State, as necessary. 17. Review the nursing requirements of each resident admitted to the Health Care Center and assists the attending in planning care. 19. If necessary, acts on behalf of the Administrator in his/her absence. 20. Ensures compliance with all federal, state, and local regulations including corporate compliance and HIPPA Privacy Standards. 28. Services as Manager on Duty on scheduled weekends. Wellness Function: The [Community name] employees are expected to promote a health community culture for all residents and employees. This is a whole person approached to health and wellness which includes eight dimensions of wellness: Emotional, Environmental, Health Services, Intellectual, Physical, Social, Spiritual and Vocational through these efforts we can ensure and exceed residents' wellness needs related to their mind, body, and soul, which may also have a positive effect on the employees, as a result. Review of the Administrator Job Description, dated August 03, 2021, General Summary/Major Function: The Administrator is responsible for assisting the Chief Administrative Officer/Executive Director in the overall administration of the Community. S/he supervises over operation of the service departments as directed by the Executive Director, with primary emphasis on the health center. S/he also handles special projects for the Board of Directors and the Executive Director. In the Executive Director's absence, the Administrator can assume responsibility for all Community operations. Essential Duties and Responsibilities Health Care Management Assist Chief Administrative Officer/Executive Director in maintaining licensure and certification of Community; ensure compliance with state and federal regulations; maintain personal Administrator's license. Maintain current knowledge of applicable laws and regulations. On 11/29/2022 at 12:10 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #17. She was observed from the hallway lying in bed wearing a hospital gown. She made eye contact and was receptive to an interview. She said she was waiting to get dressed as she pulled at her hospital gown, and that she needed to get ready for therapy. When the resident was asked if she was treated with respect and dignity, she stated, A male aide (Staff C) started to perform incontinent care; I told him no. I told them (Staff C and D) before I only wanted females to care for me. But he proceeded to change my brief anyway. I told him no. At that time, she made eye contact with the surveyor and stated, No means no. She said she had cried and cried no, but he wouldn't stop. She stated, I felt like I was raped. When asked if she told anyone she stated, I told my doctor, and my doctor told them. She said it had occurred just a couple of days ago. She said she has not seen the male nurse since, but, she continued, I see those men walking past my room and looking in. They're just walking by with nothing to do. At that time the resident lowered her head slightly and stated, I don't want to answer any more questions. Resident #17's bed was positioned by the door and when the door is open, she is able see into the hallway. Review of Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C Cognitive Patterns showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score coded as a 14. The code of 14 indicated cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS, Section G Functional Status showed toilet use coded as the number 3. The number 3 reflected extensive assistance. Support needed for toilet use mobility was coded as a 2 and indicated one-person physical assist. Review of the Medical Director's progress note, dated 11/24/2022 at 9:18 a.m., revealed S: [subjective] resident concern about a male nurse. Further record review of the facility Abuse and Neglect log for November 2022 did not reflect Resident #17's allegation. On 11/29/2022 at 2:04 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) related to Resident #17's allegation. The Nursing Home Administrator said the person the staff would contact would be him and the Director of Nursing (DON). Related to Resident #17's allegation, the NHA stated, No one called me on Thanksgiving Day. On 11/29/2022 at 2:26 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with the facility's Medical Director (MD), who confirmed he knew Resident #17 and saw her on 11/24/2022 between 7:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. He said she appeared agitated and told him that morning she had been wet and soiled. She said a nurse had cleaned her and that it was a male nurse. She said she didn't want a male nurse. The MD said the facility always honors resident preferences. He stated, That really troubled me. The MD said Resident #17 told him, A man wiped and cleaned me against my wishes. It was a male. I can't have males down there. She stated, He changed me, and he was not supposed to. I told him to stop, and he just kept going. The MD said she was agitated and asked not to be cleaned as he kept cleaning her and said she felt violated. The MD said he asked the resident if it was okay if he examined her. She told me that was different. The MD stated this was very concerning to him, and he immediately said something to nursing leadership. He said he was 100% confident he spoke to the nurse. The MD stated he reported to the charge nurse (Staff A) We have a potential situation here. The MD went on to state, I told them they had an issue that needed to be escalated to the Director of Nursing. The MD said the nurse (Staff A) confirmed to him that it would be escalated. He said he documented it and instructed the charge nurse (Staff A) to document it. He said he was told they were working on it and thought he heard them say the Director of Nursing was coming in. The MD stated, We have rules about this, no means no. When asked about his expectation he stated, Reporting is expected to be done. He confirmed this is the only facility he goes to, and he is the facility's Medical Director. The MD confirmed on 11/24/2022 Resident #17 was not doing well and said the resident was outside of her normal demeanor. He was informed the survey team was not able to locate documentation of Resident #17's allegation. The MD indicated he was surprised of this and repeated, They said they were going to escalate it. On 11/29/2022 at 2:35 p.m. an interview was conducted with the DON on the incident that occurred on 11/24/2022. The DON said she was aware the Medical Director spoke to Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse) about his concern related to Resident #17. The DON said she was scheduled to work that day and she received a phone call from Staff A. She said at that time she was already in route to the facility. The DON said after she arrived at the facility, she spoke to Staff A. The DON stated, [Staff A] told me that everything was fixed. She said Staff A stated that She had rearranged the aide assignment and had spoken to the resident. The resident was okay with the schedule change that no male aide would be providing her care. The DON denied she started a grievance. She denied she spoke to the resident. The DON stated, It was just a patient preference, and it was taken care of. On 11/29/2022 at 2:50 p.m. Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed walking in the middle hallway. He stopped in the middle hall and then suddenly turned back around. As he turned, he was noted looking inside of the rooms. One of the rooms he looked into belonged to Resident #17. He then began to walk towards the nursing station. At that time, he was asked if he had time for an interview. Staff C, CNA said he had been a certified nursing assistant for thirteen years and only works at this facility. Staff C denied he worked the morning of Thanksgiving Day (11/24/2022). He said he worked the night shift on 11/23/2022, but then confirmed the shift ended on the morning of the 11/24/2022. Staff C said he knew Resident #17 and denied he assisted her with her incontinent care in the morning. He stated, I worked on the long hall and [Resident #17] did not reside on that hall. He then stated, I never worked with her. Staff C was asked to look at his documentation dated 11/24/2022. He looked at the report and confirmed he had documented in Resident #17's record which reflected bladder continence care had been provided on 11/24/2022 at 2:56 a.m. Staff C denied anyone spoke to him about an incident and went on to say he did not remember taking care of the resident and did not recall any objections or problems during the care. He did not recall the resident telling him she did not want a male to care for her. He then added I had taken care of her before. He said no one told him not to take care of her anymore. Staff C said typically, if someone would say they have preferences they don't assign the male aide to the room. He said there are no residents, that he is aware of, who do not want a male to take care of them. He said if there was one, he would get a female aide. Staff C confirmed he worked at the facility yesterday 11/28/2022 and assisted with new admissions. On 11/29/2022 at 3:22 p.m. an interview was conducted with the NHA who stated, No one knew she didn't want a male until Thanksgiving Day. He said, The aide is in the DON office right now and is being suspended. On 11/29/2022 at 3:14 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). She said she talked to the resident today (11/29/2022) and asked her if anything happened. The SSD said, She told me a couple days ago; a male aide came in to change her and she did not want him to change her. She said she cried and told the doctor, who told the nurse. The resident said she hadn't had a male aide since. The SSD said the resident reported that nothing inappropriate happened. The SSD said the resident's family member was in the room during that time and stated years ago she had a bad encounter with a male aide, stating, It happened somewhere else. The SSD said the resident said she has not had any male caregivers giving her care since the incident happened. She indicated on Thursday (11/24/2022) the resident's care plan had been updated to reflect no male aides. The SSD confirmed a grievance form was not filed. When asked what her expectation was, she stated I expect a male aide would stop and get a female. The NHA was present at the time of the interview and stated, Any concerns should be documented, and a grievance should be filed. He confirmed it was not transferred to paper and did not know why. On 11/29/2022 at 3:40 p.m. the NHA provided a copy of a form titled, Administrative Leave, dated 11/29/2022, Suspended pending abuse allegation that revealed Staff C's, CNA name. On 11/30/2022 at 12:25 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). She confirmed she worked on 11/24/2022 and received a verbal report from the Medical Director. She stated, The MD came to me between 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. and told me there was an issue that needed to be taken care of. He stated to me that [Resident #17] was very upset because she had been raped. I said, excuse me, did you say rape? He stated Yes. He said she used the word rape. Staff A stated, The MD told me he needed it handled right away. The MD said [Resident #17] told the male staff to stop. Staff A, LPN said she spoke to the resident and that she (Resident #17) said she was okay. I asked her, Do you want me to do anything different. She said that Resident #17 said, I'm fine I just don't want a male taking care of me. I do not want a male touching me down there. I told her that no male aide will take care of her, and it will be in her plan of care. Continuing, Staff A stated, She told me that she wanted to be left alone, she did not want to be bothered. When asked what type of assessment was performed, she indicated a set of vital signs, and she observed the resident and did not see any bruising to her face or hands. Staff A confirmed she did not perform a full skin assessment. She said Resident #17's demeanor appeared calm, saying she was not disheveled, was alert and oriented, and her mood appeared okay. Staff A said it was her first time working with the resident. Staff A said the DON was in the building between 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. stating, I told her that the Medical Director had concerns and the resident said she felt as though she was raped. The DON said he does not like it when people throw that word around. Staff A said, I also told her that I had spoken to the [family member]. I told her the concerns of the resident not wanting a male aide. The [family member] said I don't know why she is like that lately but thank you for letting me know. Staff A continued, I additionally called the Risk Manager, who is also the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and left her a message. Staff A said later that day she spoke to the ADON, and I told her I had informed the DON. Staff A said the DON told her she would handle it and take care of it. Staff A stated, The ADON had asked if I documented it, I told her the DON had said she would take care of it. Staff A denied seeing the DON going to the resident room after she had given her the report. Staff A confirmed she received abuse training in April 2022. She said, If someone alleges rape, we are to inform the parties that are involved, and that is what I did. If a resident alleges any form of abuse, the expectation is to call the hotline. Staff A stated she Figured the DON was handling it because she was here. On 11/30/2022 at 1:08 p.m. an interview was conducted with the ADON who is the facility's Risk Manager (RM). She confirmed she received a call from Staff A, LPN in the morning, but did not answer the phone. The ADON said she called back later that afternoon and spoke to Staff A who told her a patient had a male CNA and didn't want a male CNA. The RM said, [Staff A] said the doctor had concerns. She told me that the DON was going to take care of it. The DON was at the facility and was taking care of it. The RM confirmed she deals with abuse and neglect allegations. Stating, It is a team process. When asked what she would do, she said she would not assign a male to the room, and she would go to the patient and see what her concerns were. She stated, I would want to know why she doesn't want a male. She said, I would investigate by starting the grievance process. I would speak to the resident to determine what had happened. She confirmed, An allegation of rape is immediately called in. The RM said part of her process would be to call the abuse hotline and perform a skin assessment of the resident. She went on to say, I would start a paper trail that would include witness statements from staff. The RM said she is responsible for training and had started abuse and neglect training yesterday (11/29/2022). On 11/30/2022 at 1:27 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON). She said due to the investigation, she was asked last night around 6:00 p.m. if she could take the interim position The IDON said the DON was aware of the incident and did not notify the NHA or start the abuse protocol. The IDON said Staff A was directly involved on that day and she was the one the doctor talked to. Staff A was informed by the doctor who used the word rape. Staff A then informed the DON of the doctor's statement. The IDON said if this had been reported to her, she would like to know first-hand information. She said it takes only a minute to see the patient and talk to the patient. The IDON stated, She would want firsthand information. She would have conducted an interview and would have assessed the patient. She would investigate why a resident wouldn't want a particular staff in the room. On 11/30/2022 at 1:41 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff D, CNA. She confirmed she worked on Thanksgiving Day. She said she went into Resident #17's room with Staff A, LPN while she was gathering some bags. She said she overheard Resident #17 wanted a female instead of a male aide. Staff D said she had never mentioned that before and had never mentioned anything about her past. Staff D said the resident seemed emotional and was upset a little. Staff D stated, She was telling the nurse she prefers a female over a male aide. Felt more comfortable with a female. Staff D said, I have taken care of her since then and has seemed normal since that day. Staff D continued, Later that same day a little after breakfast the resident told me that she had told the male aide she wanted a female, and said he kept going. She said she was crying and that she didn't want a male. She wanted a female. She said he just kept going. He just kept cleaning her and he kept going. She said the resident stated, You are a female like me would you want a male changing you. Staff D said the resident said she can't protect herself if something happens because she is an elderly old lady. Staff D said she did not notice any bruising and that she didn't seem frightened. Staff D said she told another aide (Staff E, CNA). Staff D said Resident #17 is alert and oriented and not forgetful or confused. On 11/30/2022 at 2:00 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff E, CNA and she confirmed she worked on 11/24/2022 -Thanksgiving Day and knows Resident #17 stating, I take care of her all the time. She said she could not recall if the resident had voiced a concern to her about not having a male caregiver. She said on 11/24/2022 she was in Resident #17's room caring for her roommate when Staff A, LPN entered the room. Staff E said she could overhear Staff A ask Resident #17 if she preferred a female and Resident #17 responded, Yes. Staff E said she heard Staff A say, OK we won't have a male taking care of you. Staff E said Resident #17 was upset, she looked like she was just not happy. Staff E said on that day she noticed the resident was a little different and was upset. She did not verbalize to me what happened. Staff E said she remembered her and her roommate at the time both verbally said they didn't want a male in the room. Resident #17's roommate was discharged that day adding that she was an older resident also. She said Resident #17 was very alert. Staff E said most of the residents that are here are here for therapy and then go home. She noticed more of the women in therapy prefer not to have men in the room. Staff E said she talked to Staff C, before who is male aide, about it and wanted to switch assignments. She said I told Staff C, CNA some of the women just don't feel comfortable with a man taking care of them. Staff C said she did not recall when the conversation occurred. On 11/30/22 at 3:12 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #17's family member who is her documented emergency contact. The family member said she visits the resident daily, and when she is not there another family member is. She stated, [Resident#17] and I are very close. The family member confirmed on 11/24/2022 she received a phone call from the facility nurse, Staff A. She said there was an incident that happened when [Resident #17] was being changed by a male CNA. She said [Resident #17] was very upset and had been crying all morning. Staff A, LPN had assured her [Resident #17] was okay, but she was upset because she did not want him to do it. The family member said she also spoke to the resident who told her the CNA was Staff C. The family member said on 10/26/2022 Staff C performed the resident's admission intake stating, We both remembered him. She said she told Staff C that she wanted a female caregiver for [Resident #17], and he stated, Oh that's right you do not want a man to change you . The family member stated, He knew she did not want men providing her care. The family member said, I told [Resident #17] he did not care if she preferred female caregivers. Continuing, the family member stated, [Resident #17] said on 11/24/2022 [Staff C] told her if she did not let him change her brief then she had to wait until shift change. [Resident #17] told him fine. I will wait. [Resident #17] said then all of a sudden, he pulled her gown and continued to change her. She said she tried to reach for the buzzer to call staff and she could not reach it because he had moved the blanket to the side. The family member stated, [Resident #17] kept saying No but he would not listen. [Resident #17] told me she said she felt violated, it was her dignity and that she felt helpless. She said [Resident #17] thought she had a right not to have this man touching her. She said [Resident #17] did say she was not touched inappropriately but she did not want him providing care. The family member stated, The resident told her the doctor came in her room that morning and she was crying. [Resident #17] told me she had told him what had happened. The family member stated a couple weeks prior she spoke to Staff F, LPN a nurse who was working the weekend. He told me [Resident #17] said she did not want male staff providing her care. The family member stated that she shared with Staff F the resident's prior trauma, stating, [Resident #17] was married young, and her husband was very abusive. She said Staff F appeared uncomfortable when he heard her concerns. He said he would make note of it. The family member stated, He said word for word there was no reason why we can't make that accommodation here. This conversation happened a couple weeks prior to the incident. The family member said, [Resident #17] has always been independent and was in her right mind . and to have someone mock her feelings . saying oh yeah you are the one who doesn't want male caregivers, he was very condescending. The family member stated she did not realize the CNA would be like that with her. The family member reiterated the resident had past trauma related to being in an abusive marriage. She stated, Him forcing her during care caused her to be upset. The family member confirmed the resident had mentioned she did not feel comfortable with male caregivers several times to staff and to her. The family member confirmed she received a phone call from the DON on 11/29/2022 and stated, I was frustrated. She alleged that this was the first time she had been notified of the resident's preference. I asked the DON why this was not in her record . Why was it not reported? . Why wasn't there an incident report? The family member said, It bothers me. Where there is smoke there is fire. If they are working that hard to cover it up, what else are they hiding? What about residents who cannot speak for themselves? The family member said when she spoke with [Resident#17], she stated she was not going to allow this to happen. She felt helpless. She was crying. Resident #17 said, I told him to stop, and he ignored my request. The family member stated she felt Resident #17 was safe but was scared about the repercussions. She said, Even if that male caregiver is not here, he has his buddies. I just want [Resident #17] to be safe. The family member confirmed when Resident #17 was admitted [DATE] she informed Staff C, CNA of the resident's gender preference for care. On 11/30/2022 at 4:01 p.m. an interview was conducted with the NHA. He stated Staff C, CNA was interviewed on 11/29/2022. Staff C said he was providing care to Resident #17 on Thanksgiving morning and that she did not want him to do it, she kept saying No. He stated he felt he did not want to leave her without clothes on and wanted to make sure she was dry. The NHA stated they identified an educational opportunity. The NHA said, I let him know he should have left her, honor her request and let the nurse know. The NHA stated they initiated education and suspended the CNA. On 12/01/2022 at 11:27 a.m. a phone interview was conducted with Staff F, LPN. Staff F said he knew Resident #17 and indicated he worked on her unit a few times. He said he recalled speaking with the resident and her [family member]. He said he went into the room to inform the [family member] and the resident he had requested orders from the physician. He said they identified she had blood in her brief, and he was concerned about a gastroesophageal bleed. Staff F said when he was in the room the [family member] told him Resident #17 had a very abusive husband. She said she did not want any male aides to go in her room. Staff F could not recall the exact day of the conversation but stated, It was on the same day I received the order for the STAT (immediately) blood work. Staff F continued and said after he was informed by the [family member] of the resident's preference, he stated, I informed [Staff G Registered Nurse (RN)] the weekend supervisor about it right away. He said he then added it to the on shift report. He said the weekend reports are addressed on Monday mornings and indicated at that time the resident's care plan would be updated. Staff F denied he documented anything in Resident #17's medical record related to the conversation related to the resident's preference on the gender of caregivers. Medical record review revealed on 11/13/2022 Staff F, LPN requested and received orders for Resident #17 for a complete blood count (CBC). Thus, indicating the facility staff were notified 12 days prior of the resident's gender preference on caregivers. On 12/02/2022 at 9:51 a.m. a return phone call was received from Staff G, RN Weekend Supervisor. Staff G said she heard about the allegation of abuse a couple of days ago when she was called and asked for a statement. She said, I did not know anything about the patient and was unaware of a patient preference related to not wanting a male aide. Staff G stated she did not recall Staff F, LPN telling her about a resident's preference for a caregiver. She denied she was notified. She stated, [Staff F LPN] does not let me know about his residents. She added last Saturday, 11/26/2022, at the nursing station, I had heard the aides, [Staff F] and [Staff A] talking about someone did not want a male aide. They did not mention the patient's name. Facility Actions to Remove Immediate Jeopardy: On 12/02/2022 at 4:45 p.m. a Removal Plan for F 835 was received which was verified and found to be acceptable. (Photographic Evidence was Obtained) Review of the removal plan revealed: December 2, 2022. In response to Immediate Jeopardy concerns identified during re-licensure survey F835- * 11/29/22 -At around 1:30 p.m. Surveyor brought to NHA attention a potential allegation of abuse that occurred on 11/24/2022 (Thanksgiving Day). Upon investigation, a physician progress note in [medical software] stated that resident had concerns with potential male C.N.A, note dated 11/24/22. *11/29/22 investigation initiated; CNA suspended immediately pending investigation. *Investigation revealed on 11/24/22 physician communicated with licensed nurse (LPN) that there was potential issue occurring with a resident and to please escalate to clinical leadership. The LPN went immediately and talked to the resident about her concerns. The resident stated that a male C.N.A. came in to change her brief on 11-7 shift and she stated no and the C.N.A proceeded, and she stated that No mean no and didn't want a male C.N.A. *That nurse then called the DCS around 10:30 a.m. on 11/24/22 and notified her of resident concerns. *11/29/22-At around 6:00 p.m. with the presence of the HRD and administrator the DCS was suspended pending investigation due to failure to follow community reporting process pertain to abuse allegation. *11/29/22-Immediate was submitted to AHCA (Agency for Health Care Administration). *11/29/22 -Police notification *11/29/22 DCF notification *On 11/29/2022 - Education was initiated with all staff by department leadership regarding Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation, recognizing and reporting abuse per community policy/resident right, grievances and communication. *11/30/2022- Acting Director of Nursing interviewed residents that were cared for by the alleged perpetrator. *On 11/30/2022 Resident who made allegation was seen by the psychologist however declined visit. He is to follow up week of 12/05/2022. *On 11/30/2022 ADHOC QAPI was completed with the Medical Director, NHA, acting DON, QA nurse, Unit
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not honor resident choices related to a request to discont...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not honor resident choices related to a request to discontinue an as needed (PRN) medication for one resident (#30) out of a sample of three residents. Findings included: Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, fracture of unspecified part of the neck of left femur, encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, and encounter for other orthopedic aftercare. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], for Resident #30 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Section G Functional Status showed Resident #30 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. On 11/29/22 at 12:37 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #30's Responsible Party (RP). The RP stated Resident #30's medications that are supposed to be given as needed (PRN) were not administered as needed. The RP said, They have put them on a schedule. They put her on laxatives and a sleep aide that she does not need. She is over medicated. The RP stated he spoke to the nurses about the medications and had addressed it with the Director of Nursing (DON). The RP stated he consulted with the resident's cardiologist who has known her condition for years and he agreed she should not be on any more medications out of her regular regimen. The RP stated the resident was at the facility for short term rehabilitation. The RP stated the weekend of 11/27/22, Resident #30 received Melatonin the night before from which she slept all day. The RP stated the nurse on the day shift called him apologizing, stating the nurse on the previous shift had given the resident Melatonin without her request. The RP stated, There is no reason for it. She sleeps fine and we have a private caregiver with her 24/7 monitoring her . what's the point of over medicating her? The RP stated the private caregivers denied observing restlessness or lack of sleep for Resident #30. A comprehensive progress note effective 11/26/22 showed patient has a sitter, family also visiting, very involved in care, family does not want patient to have Melatonin since it makes her very sleepy. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of October 2022, showed Resident #30 received Melatonin 3mg (milligrams), 2 tablets daily from 10/24/22 to 10/30/22 on a scheduled basis. A physician order, dated 11/3/22, showed Melatonin tablet 3mg, give 2 tablets by mouth at bedtime for insomnia, start date 11/3/22. Review of the MAR for the month of November 2022, showed Resident #30 received Melatonin 3mg, daily from 11/3/22 to 11/13/22. A physician order, dated 11/15/22 ,showed Melatonin tablet 3mg, give 2 tablets by mouth every 24 hours as needed at bedtime for insomnia, start date 11/15/22. Review of the current physician orders for Resident #30, dated 12/1/22, showed Melatonin tablet 3mg, give 2 tablets by mouth every 24 hours as needed for insomnia. Give 2 tablets PRN. Dated 11/15/22. On 12/01/22 at 11:32 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Social Services Director (SSD) The SSD stated the family had not filed any grievances related to medications, and she had not received grievances from staff. The SSD stated they had not discussed any concerns in care plan meetings related to this resident and the use of PRN medications. On 12/01/22 at 11:49 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff AA, Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager. Staff AA stated she had been notified the resident and family were having concerns related to the use of PRN medications. Staff AA stated they adjusted the stool softeners and changed the softeners to PRNs. Staff AA stated she thought their concerns had been resolved. She stated she thought the resident was on Melatonin because she was not sleeping. Staff AA stated she could not confirm the status of the Melatonin. An interview was conducted with a family member on 12/01/22 at 2:03 p.m. The family member stated on 11/24/22, they came to visit [Resident #30]. The family member stated the resident was very sleepy and tired. The private duty aide stated she [Resident #30] was given Melatonin the night before. The private duty aide reported the resident had not asked for the medication, and the nurse just walked in with it and gave it to the resident. The family member stated he spoke with the DON that day and let her know his [Resident #30] did not need a sleep aide medication and it should be discontinued. The family member stated the DON said she would take care of it. The family member stated the medication was still not discontinued and they had to ask a nurse on 11/26/22. He stated as of the time of this interview, the medication was still active. Review of the MAR for Resident #30 for the month of November 2022 confirmed Melatonin was administered on 11/21/22 and 11/23/22. On 12/01/22 at 2:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff AA. Staff AA stated she reviewed Resident #30's record, which showed the Melatonin was ordered to be administered at bedtime regularly, but the schedule was changed on 11/15/22 to PRN following the cardiologist's request. Staff AA confirmed on 11/26/22 the family stated they did not want her to have it. They spoke to the nurse on duty and she put in a note about it. Staff AA stated the physician should have been notified. Staff AA stated they should have considered the family's wishes. Staff AA stated she would notify the doctor so the medication can be discontinued if the resident no longer needed it. On 12/01/22 at 2:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Acting DON. She stated the nurse should have notified the doctor of the family wishes. The Acting DON stated the doctor would evaluate and consider honoring the family wishes especially if there was no need for the medication. The Acting DON stated a grievance should have been initiated to allow them to investigate and resolve the family's concern. The medication should have been reviewed and discontinued. The Acting DON stated she called the cardiologist, and he sent the order to D/C (discontinue) the Melatonin. A progress note, dated 12/1/22, showed, Resident #30's Melatonin was discontinued at resident's family request. Review of a facility policy titled, Residents Rights, revised December 2016, showed the policy interpretation and implementation as, (1.) Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: (e.) self - determination. (h.) be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights and responsibilities. (p.) be informed of and participate in his or her care planning and treatment. Review of a facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, showed, (28.) If a resident uses PRN medications frequently, the attending physician and interdisciplinary care team, with support from the consultant pharmacist as needed, shall reevaluate the situation, examine the individual as needed, determine if there is a clinical reason for the frequent PRN use, and consider whether a standing dose of medication is clinically indicated.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, medical record review, the facility policy, and professional standards of practice the facility failed to provided care and services for forty-eight hours for one resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, the facility policy, and professional standards of practice the facility failed to provided care and services for forty-eight hours for one resident (#22) out of a sample of two residents identified with a new pressure injury. Findings included: On 11/29/2022 at 10:17 a.m. Resident #22 was observed sitting in his wheelchair in his room. He was accompanied by a family member. Resident #22's family member said she visits the resident a couple of times a day. The family member reported Resident #22's daily routine consists of getting out of his bed every morning, sometimes by a lift and sometimes by two aides. He can stand for a short period of time. She stated, After lunch he goes to bed until the next morning. When asked if his skin was intact Resident #22 stated, My left heel is getting red. The family member said [Staff S, Certified Nursing Assistant] just told us this morning when she helped him out of bed. She said she would put a pillow under it. Resident #22's feet were observed with sandals in place. Both feet rested on the wheelchair foot pedals. Review of admission Record revealed Resident #22 was geriatric in age and had resided at the facility for six months. Diagnosis description included atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, and cerebral infarction. Review of the Braden Scale (tool used to predict pressure sore risk), dated 10/16/2022, reflected a Risk Score of 14, indicative of moderate risk for pressure injury. Review of the care plan, revised on 10/11/22, revealed a Focus of: Has potential impairment to integrity, potential for pressure ulcers due to requiring extensive assistance with bed mobility secondary to weakness of extremities and has frequent incontinence of bowel and bladder. Interventions included: the resident needs heels floated. Review of a Podiatry Report, dated 10/12/2022, showed: Objective - Physical exam; Cardiovascular: Dorsal Pedis pulse is non palpable bilaterally and posterior tibial is non palpable bilaterally; Dermatologic: There is absent hair growth proximal to distal bilateral legs, bilateral skin temperature is cool proximal; to distal bilateral legs and feet. The skin is noted to show shiny, taunt bilateral lower extremities. Review of the Examination of the Extremities: Pulses, Bruits, and Phlebitis, found at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov > books > NBK350, showed: Diminished or absent pulses in the various arteries examined may be indicative of impaired blood flow due to a variety of conditions. Further review of the medical record reflected omission of documentation in reference to his left heel and the change in condition. On 12/01/2022 at 10:52 a.m. the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) was asked for assistance with Resident #22's left heel. The heel revealed an area of dark red colored tissue, that reflected the size of a fifty cent piece. The DON palpated the area and stated, It was boggy, and it is discolored compared to the opposite heel. Review of Wound Classification Suspected Deep Tissue Injury Description, found at https://www.ahrq.gov > webinar6_pu_woundassesst. PDF, revealed: The area may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, or boggy, or warmer or cooler than adjacent tissue. On 12/01/2022 at 11:00 a.m. Staff S, Certified Nursing Assistant confirmed on 11/29/2022 she provided care and services to Resident #22. She said she looked at his heals and noted a red area on his left heel. Staff S said she told one of the nurses that day. She said the nurse responded to her that she would look at it. Staff S said she did not know which nurse she told and she stated, My primary job is in medical records and central supply. But I also work as an assistant when they are short staffed. The DON was present during the interview and requested a pair of podus boots for Resident #22. On 12/01/2022 at 2:44 p.m. the DON confirmed it was her expectation when a change in skin is identified it should be documented in the resident's medical record. The physician should be notified, a change in condition form completed, a new skin assessment performed, and the care plan would be updated to reflect the change. Review of the policy titled, Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown- Clinical Protocol, revised April 2018, revealed: Assessment and Recognition: 1. The nursing staff and practitioner will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers; for example, immobility. 2. In addition, the nurse shall describe and document/report the following: a Full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width, and depth, presence of exudates or necrotic tissue; B. Pain assessment; c. Residents' mobility status; d. Current treatments, including support surfaces; and e. All active diagnosis. Cause Identifications 1. The physician will help identify factors contributing or predisposing residents to skin breakdown.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty six medication administration opportunities were ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty six medication administration opportunities were observed, and four errors were identified for three residents (#101, #7 and #150) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 15.38 % Findings included: 1. On 11/30/2022 at 9:56 a.m. medication administration was observed alongside Staff P Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). She prepared and administered the following medications to Resident #101: Aspirin 81 mg (milligram) enteric coated, Metformin 1,000 mg, Metoprolol 25 mg, vitamin D3 125 mcg (micrograms) (5000 units), Pantoprazole 40 mg, and acetaminophen 325 x 2 tablets. Medication reconciliation revealed the current physician order was aspirin tablet give one 81 mg by mouth one time a day for coronary artery disease (CAD), dated 11/28/2022. The order did not indicate to administer aspirin enteric coated tablet. 2. On 12/1/2022 at 9:15 a.m. a medication observation was conducted alongside Staff Q, LPN. She prepared and administered the following medications to Resident #7: Metformin 1000 mg, Metoprolol 50 mg, Amlodipine 5 mg, Lisinopril 20 mg, multivitamin with mineral, vitamin B12 5000 mcg, and Glycolax 20 cc (cubic centimeters). Medication reconciliation revealed the current physician order was for Glycolax powder give 17 grams by mouth two times a day for constipation, dated 11/05/2022, which indicated the wrong dose was administered. 3. On 12/1/2022 at 9:28 a.m. a medication observation was conducted alongside Staff R, Registered Nurse. She prepared and administered the following medications for Resident #150: MiraLAX 1 cap full, Docusate 100 mg tablet, Lactulose 30 mg. When asked if that was all the resident had ordered to be given, she stated, No. She said the Fluticasone nasal spray, Dorzolamide-timolol eye drops, and the Spironolactone were not available. Staff R provided Resident #150 her medications and informed her the nasal spray had not been sent from the pharmacy yet. Resident #150 told the nurse she had a bottle of it in her bedside table. Staff R removed the bottle of nasal spray from the table and administered it to the resident. Staff R continued to inform the resident that the Spironolactone and the Timolol eye drops were not available. Resident #150 stated, I have not had my eye drops in two days. I need that for my glaucoma. Staff R stated, I will call the pharmacy and have them send it over. Medication reconciliation revealed the current physician orders were for Dorzolamide HCI -Timolol Mal PF Solution 2-0.5% instill 1 drop in left eye two times a day related to UNSPECIFIED GLAUCOMA, dated 11/28/2022; Spironolactone tablet 50 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension (HTN), dated 11/29/2022. On 12/02/2022 at approximately 12:00 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Interim Director of Nursing (DON). She confirmed it was her expectation medications are given as ordered. Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, revealed: Policy - Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy -Interpretation and Implementation: 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frames. 10. The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the minimum temperature for the rinse cycle of the high temperature dish machine per the manufacturer's recommendation in one of o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the minimum temperature for the rinse cycle of the high temperature dish machine per the manufacturer's recommendation in one of one kitchen. Findings included: On 11/29/22 beginning at 9:31 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Executive Chef. The Executive Chef reported the gauges for rinse and rinse press on the high temperature dish machine did not work, but they used a black, square, handheld thermometer to test the temperature for the rinse cycle. He reported that he submitted a work order for new gauges in the beginning of November(2022) but they had not arrived yet. At this time the high temperature dish machine was observed at the following temperatures: First Attempt: Rinse 147-degrees Fahrenheit Second Attempt: Rinse 152-degrees Fahrenheit Third Attempt: Rinse 154-degrees Fahrenheit. The spec plate attached to the high temperature dish machine revealed the following: NSF Machine Operational Requirements as Manufactured by [Vendor Name] Dishmachines: Rinse Temperature Minimum 180 degrees Fahrenheit. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) The Executive Chef confirmed the temperature was not reaching 180 degrees Fahrenheit and he would reach out to the vendor to repair the machine immediately. On 12/01/22 at 11:30 a.m., the Regional Dietitian reported they are now checking the temperature of the dish machine every three to four hours. The vendor came out and increased the temperature of the water for the rinse cycle.
Jun 2021 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services for one resident (#32) related to a suture of three residents sampled. Findings included: ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services for one resident (#32) related to a suture of three residents sampled. Findings included: Resident #32 was observed sitting and watching TV in the day room on 6/2/21 at 2:30 p.m. The right side of her forehead was noted with scabs and a blue suture. Resident #32 observed sitting in the hallway on 6/3/21 at 9:45 a.m. and her hair was combed back, and the right side of her forehead was observed with a small amount of scabs and a blue suture. During an interview on 6/3/21 at 10:20 a.m. Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN) stated, Resident #32 did not have any sutures. She stated she had steri strips coming back from the hospital and looked at the physician orders on the computer and stated the resident did not have sutures. Staff E, RN then confirmed at 10:23 a.m. that Resident #32 did have a blue suture noted on her right forehead and said she would get orders (physician) to have it removed. Staff E, RN confirmed that a physician order should have been in place to observe the wound and remove the suture. Review of the weekly skin integrity review dated 5/30/21 revealed the skin intact. Review of the weekly skin integrity review dated 5/23/21 revealed the skin intact. Review of the weekly skin integrity review dated 5/16/21 revealed the skin intact. Review of the weekly skin integrity review dated 5/7/21 revealed the skin intact, some mild redness noted on the left and right buttock. Review of the active physician orders revealed a new order to remove suture from the forehead one time only dated 6/3/21 at 12:44 p.m. Review of the comprehensive nursing notes dated 5/22/21 at 10:30 p.m. revealed the resident fell from a wheelchair on 5/22/21 at 7:20 p.m. no injuries noted, forehead wound dressing changed per orders. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 5/22/21 at 3:03 a.m. revealed the resident returned back from the hospital. Two steri strips to right forehead laceration noted. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 5/21/21 at 10:42 p.m. revealed the resident fell from her wheelchair unwitnessed and sustained a head laceration and right shoulder pain. Transported to the hospital. Review of the physician progress notes dated 5/21/21 at 2:18 p.m. revealed the resident returned from the hospital after suffering a laceration to the forehead from a ground level fall on 5/16/21. Review of nursing progress notes dated 5/16/21 at 10:41 p.m. revealed the resident returned from the emergency room with head laceration with 6 steri strips, right elbow skin tear and right knee skin tear. During an interview on 6/3/21 at 10:54 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that anytime a resident comes back from the hospital with steri strips or sutures, a physician order should be placed so the nurse can track the healing and look for infection. The DON confirmed she did not see an order to observe or document on the suture. Review of facility policy titled, Resident Examination and Assessment, revised 2/2014, revealed: The purpose of this procedure is to examine and assess the resident for any abnormalities in heal status, which provides a basis for the care plan. 8: skin a. intactness, e. presence of bruises, pressure sores, redness, edema, rashes. 11. Head and neck: c. evidence of trauma. 2. Notify the physician of any abnormalities such as, but not limited to: e. wounds or rashes on the resident's skin.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care according to professional standards of practice by double gloving, not performing hand hygiene and using th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care according to professional standards of practice by double gloving, not performing hand hygiene and using the gloved finger to apply the paste in the wound for one resident (#15) of three residents sampled. Findings included: An observation of wound care on 6/3/21 at 2:35 p.m. with Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) and assisted by Staff C, Patient Care Assistant (PCA) was conducted. Staff D, RN kept her supplies in a plastic bag observed in her right pocket. Staff D, RN washed her hands and placed paper towels on the resident's tray table after she moved the resident's personal belongings. Staff D picked up the barrier, slid it off the table, flipped it over, and put it back down saying, I don't know what these little bugs are, but they are not ants. The PCA stated they were fruit flies and the RN continued to put the supplies on the paper towels. The RN then double gloved and opened the brief, observed stool, and pushed the stool down with the brief. The stool was not in the wound. Staff C, PCA asked the nurse if she should change the resident first and the nurse stated, No, after we are done. Staff D, RN applied the normal saline to the gauze and cleaned the wound once. Doffed the second glove and mixed the normal saline with calcium alginate by swishing the medicine cup around to mix the calcium alginate into a paste. She then used a 4 x 4 gauze with her gloved finger and stuck it down in the medicine cup. Scooped out the paste and attempted to place it on the wound. The paste would not stay on the wound, so the nurse stuck her finger in the paste and pushed it down into the wound bed and removed her gloves without performing hand hygiene she dug through both shirt pockets to find a pen to write on the wound dressing. The nurse finished and Staff C, PCA asked if the nurse would assist with changing the resident since the wound was completed. During an interview with Staff D, RN she stated she tries not to double glove and tries to use her hand sanitizer after cleaning the wound. Staff D, RN stated she does not like to go back and forth, so she double gloved for the wound care. The nurse stated the collagen is porous and it would not stick to the wound from the 4 x 4 and stated that she could not use a tongue depressor and did not bring a cotton tipped applicator or a tongue depressor, so she used her finger. Review of the active physician orders as of 6/1/21 revealed an order to cleanse the sacrum with normal saline. Apply collagen (mix powder with small amount of normal saline) Apply to wound bed as paste. Cover with dry dressing, every 3 days and as needed, dated 5/25/21. Review of the consult wound report dated 5/25/21 revealed the resident's wound was a chronic stage IV pressure ulcer measuring 0.2 cm x 0.2 cm x 0.4 cm. Undermining has been noted at 12:00 and 1:00 with a maximum distance of 0.4 cm. No change in wound progression. Review of the consult wound report dated 5/4/21 revealed the resident's wound was a chronic stage IV pressure ulcer measuring 0.2 cm x 0.2 cm x 0.4 cm. Review of the care plan revealed a resident focus area of impairment to skin initiated 2/27/20. Interventions included to provide treatment per physician order, notify physician upon signs and symptoms of infection or non healing, initiated on 2/27/20. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/3/21 at 3:07 p.m. she stated she would expect the nurse to have all of her supplies and make sure she washed her hands and applied calcium alginate paste with a cotton tipped applicator or tongue depressor. The DON confirmed if the resident had stool in her brief; she would expect that to be cleaned prior to cleaning the wound. The DON said that she expects the wound to be cleaned with normal saline, no double gloving and hand hygiene between dirty and clean. Review of the policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revised October 2019, revealed: 6. Use an alcohol based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or alternatively soap and water for the following; h) Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care. i) After contact with a resident's intact skin. m) After removing gloves. Review of the policy titled, Dressings, Dry/Clean, revised 10/19, revealed: Steps in the procedure: 1. Clean bedside stand. Establish a clean field. 6. Put on clean gloves. Loosen tape and removed soiled dressing. 8. Wash and dry hands thoroughly. 15. Cleanse the wound with ordered cleanser. If using gauze, use clean gauze for each cleansing stroke. 17. Apply ordered dressing and secure with tape or bordered dressing per order.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

A comprehensive inspection of the kitchen was conducted on 6/3/2021 at 11:07 a.m. During the observation, the pilot light would not light for burner #4, and the CDM confirmed the presence of a strong ...

Read full inspector narrative →
A comprehensive inspection of the kitchen was conducted on 6/3/2021 at 11:07 a.m. During the observation, the pilot light would not light for burner #4, and the CDM confirmed the presence of a strong gas odor. The CDM stated, I told maintenance about the burner yesterday. He further revealed that he reported it not functioning to the facility Maintenance Director six months prior. An interview on 6/04/21 at 10:23 a.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor was conducted. The Maintenance Supervisor stated that he was just made me aware of the burner, and the service company will be out Monday (6/7/21) to take care of it. He stated there was no log, but generally we do a digital work order but he (CDM) never told me about it. A subsequent interview was conducted with the CDM on 6/4/2021 at 10:40 a.m. During the interview, the CDM indicated that since the burner (#4) has been out for a while, an appointment will be made to check the gas lines, due to a strong gas odor coming from the burner when turned on. The CDM also stated, The burner has been out for months, we do not use it. A facility provided policy titled, Maintenance Service, revision date December 2009, Page 01 of 02 under Policy Interpretation and Implementation, read: 1. The Maintenance Department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. Based on observations, record review and staff interviews the facility failed to keep kitchen equipment related to one burner (back right side, burner #4) of an eight-burner stove functioning in a safe, and operating condition. Findings included: During the initial survey of the kitchen on 6/1/2021 at 9:57 a.m., it was observed that the back right side burner #4, on an eight-burner gas stove's pilot light wound not ignite. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) turned the gas burner on, and it was observed that a strong gas odor was present. The CDM then tried to light the burner with a pocket lighter and it failed to light.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate and effective supervision for one res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate and effective supervision for one resident (#32) with a pattern of falls to prevent continued falls of three residents sampled. Resident #32 sustained four falls (5/5/21, 5/16/21, 5/21/21 and 5/22/21) in a 17- day period from 5/5/21 to 5/22/21. Findings included: Resident #32 was observed sitting watching TV in the day room on 6/2/21 at 2:30 p.m. The right side of her forehead was noted with scabs and a blue suture. Resident #32 was observed sitting in the hallway on 6/3/21 at 9:45 a.m. and her hair was combed back, and the right side of her forehead was observed with a small amount of scabs and a blue suture. A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE], and diagnosed with dementia without behavioral disturbance, history of falling, fracture of lumbosacral spine and pelvis, and fracture of left femur and difficulty in walking. A review of the medical record for Resident #32 showed the following documentation for the four falls: * Review of the comprehensive nursing notes dated 5/22/21 at 10:30 p.m. revealed the resident fell from a wheelchair on 5/22/21 at 7:20 p.m. no injuries noted, forehead wound dressing changed per orders. Review of Resident #32's change in condition evaluation on 5/22/21 at 8:42 p.m. revealed the resident was at the nurse's station and fell from the wheelchair. No injuries noted. * Review of the nursing progress notes dated 5/22/21 at 3:33 a.m. revealed the resident returned back from the hospital with two steri strips to right forehead laceration. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 5/21/21 at 10:42 p.m. revealed the resident fell from her wheelchair unwitnessed and sustained a head laceration and right shoulder pain. Transported to the hospital. Review of Resident #32's change in condition evaluation on 5/21/21 at 10:14 p.m. the resident had an unwitnessed fall at the nurse's station and sustained a head laceration and right shoulder pain. The resident was transferred to the hospital for evaluation. * Review of the physician progress notes dated 5/21/21 at 2:18 p.m. revealed the resident suffered a ground-level fall on 5/16/21, she suffered a laceration to her forehead, imaging probable nondisplaced right sacral [NAME] and posterior iliac bone fracture. At baseline, patient is wheelchair dependent for mobility, primary nurse repos that her pain is currently controlled on as needed Tramadol. Patient seen and evaluated sitting in wheelchair, she is pleasant and cooperative who presents with no acute complaints. Review of nursing progress notes dated 5/16/21 at 10:41 p.m. revealed the resident returned from the emergency room with head laceration with 6 steri strips, right elbow skin tear and right knee skin tear. Nondisplaced pelvic fracture. Review of CT of Pelvis without contrast report dated 5/16/21 at 20:44 (8:44 p.m.) revealed Impression: probable nondisplaced right sacral Ala and posterior iliac bone fracture correlate with clinical findings. Review of physician orders revealed on 5/16/21 to send Resident #32 to the hospital for a fall with head injury, right arm and hip pain. Review of Resident #32's change in condition evaluation on 5/16/21 at 6:25 p.m. the resident was observed at the nurses station and fell hard to the ground. Resident sent to the hospital with diagnoses of nondisplaced fracture to the right sacral ala and posterior iliac bone, and head laceration. * Review of Resident #32's change in condition evaluation on 5/5/21 at 12:35 a.m. revealed the resident was observed laying on the floor on her left side at bed side. Grimacing and moaning upon assessments. Medicated for pain, cool compress applied to left hip and immediate x-ray ordered. No injuries observed at the time. During an interview with Staff A, RN on 6/3/21 at 4:25 p.m. she stated Resident #32 had another fall from her wheelchair the day after she fell and went to the hospital. Resident #32 came back with steri strips on her forehead. Staff A, RN confirmed the resident was a high fall risk and must be watched closely. An observation of Staff B, Activity Assistant taking Resident #32 back to her room on 6/3/21 at 4:30 p.m. revealed the resident was sitting in her wheelchair to the right of her bed and did not have her call light in reach. The call light was observed on the wall on the left side of the bed. An interview on 6/3/21 at 4:55 p.m. with Staff B, confirmed the resident was taken to her room but did not place the call light in reach. Review of the care plan revealed the resident focus area of potential for falls due to decreased standing balance and tolerance, decreased mobility secondary to weakness of extremities following hospitalizations, fall history and decreased awareness due to cognitive loss secondary to dementia, initiated on 11/10/17. Interventions included maintain scoop mattress on bed dated 5/24/21. Monitor for attempts to stand and transfer without assistance, initiated on 1/29/16, Monitor for proper positioning in wheelchair, reposition as needed initiated on 8/11/19. Occupational therapy to evaluate and treat for wheelchair positioning dated 5/25/21. Return to bed after dinner, therapy will assess for wheelchair positioning, initiated on 5/24/21. Review information on past falls and attempt to determine cause of falls initiated on 8/27/18. Therapy will screen. Frequent position changes while in wheelchair, alleviate and distract upon agitation while at the nurse's station, initiated on 5/17/21. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/03/21 at 10:54 a.m. she stated the resident started falling on 5/5/21 and had not had a fall for five months prior to the 5/5/21. The DON confirmed the fall was not investigated to see when she was last toileted or what she was trying to do at the time of the fall. She stated they only investigate the fall and get witness statements if the resident has injuries. The intervention put in place was to keep the bed at a safe transfer height. The DON stated she was able to transfer at that time. The DON stated the fall on 5/16/21 occurred at the nurses' station and a nurse was present. The resident was irritated and tried to move herself away from other residents when she stood and fell. The DON confirmed the resident was sent to the hospital and diagnosed as a probable fracture of pelvis with history of fractures and no new fractures. The interventions were therapy to screen for wheelchair positioning and distract resident upon irritation. The DON stated on 6/3/21 at 11:08 a.m. the fall on 5/21/21 occurred at 10:40 p.m. and was an unwitnessed fall at the nurses' station. The resident sustained a head laceration and transferred to the hospital then returned with two steri strips to the forehead and no other injuries. The DON confirmed the facility did not investigate the unwitnessed fall. The DON stated the interventions were to screen for therapy caseload and occupational did pick her up for wheelchair positioning. They also added return to bed after dinner. During an interview with the resident's physician on 6/4/21 at 11:47 a.m. he stated the resident sustain a probable nondisplaced fracture and that the resident has advanced osteoporosis. The physician confirmed the treatment is weight bearing as tolerated and would treat the pain with medication. No surgery or other treatment was needed. The DON stated on 6/4/21 at 11:10 a.m. that they are having meetings every morning to discuss the falls and have no control over her falls. Review of facility policy titled, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, revised 3/2018, revealed: Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. 5. If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions, based on assessment of the nature of category of falling, until falling is reduced or stopped, or until the reason for the continuation of falling is identified as unavoidable. Monitoring Subsequent falls and fall risk: 1. The staff will monitor and document each resident's response to interventions intended to reduce falling or the risk of falling. 3. If the resident continues to fall, staff will re-evaluate the situation and whether it is appropriate to continue or change current interventions. Review of facility policy titled, Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting, revised on 7/17 revealed: All accidents or incidents involving residents, on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the Administrator. 1. The nurse supervisor charge nurse and or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident. 2. c. The circumstances surrounding the accident.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 41% turnover. Below Florida's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 5 life-threatening violation(s), $58,468 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 16 deficiencies on record, including 5 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $58,468 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Florida. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 5 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Regency Oaks's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns REGENCY OAKS HEALTH CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Regency Oaks Staffed?

CMS rates REGENCY OAKS HEALTH CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Regency Oaks?

State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at REGENCY OAKS HEALTH CENTER during 2021 to 2024. These included: 5 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 11 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Regency Oaks?

REGENCY OAKS HEALTH CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC., a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 50 residents (about 83% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CLEARWATER, Florida.

How Does Regency Oaks Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, REGENCY OAKS HEALTH CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Regency Oaks?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Regency Oaks Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, REGENCY OAKS HEALTH CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 5 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Regency Oaks Stick Around?

REGENCY OAKS HEALTH CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Florida nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Regency Oaks Ever Fined?

REGENCY OAKS HEALTH CENTER has been fined $58,468 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Florida average of $33,664. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Regency Oaks on Any Federal Watch List?

REGENCY OAKS HEALTH CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.