EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
East Ridge Retirement Village Inc in Cutler Bay, Florida, has a Trust Grade of B, which means it's a good choice but not the best available. It ranks #30 out of 690 facilities in Florida, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 54 in Miami-Dade County, indicating that only two local options are better. However, the facility is currently experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 2 in 2023 to 3 in 2025. Staffing is a strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, significantly better than the Florida average of 42%, but the facility has received $8,788 in fines, which is average compared to others. While it has more RN coverage than 96% of Florida facilities, there have been serious concerns, such as a delay in care for a resident who suffered a fracture and issues with staff not responding to call lights, which could indicate gaps in immediate care.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Florida
- #30/690
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $8,788 in fines. Lower than most Florida facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 88 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Florida nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to follow pharmaceutical procedures as per facility policy. As evidenced by during observations of one of two Medication storage ro...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate storage of medications on the medication cart for one (1) of three (3) medication carts observed. As evid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #2) out of three sampled residents received c...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to respond to grievances for one out of one resident (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
During an interview with resident # 266 on 11/27/23 at 09:27 AM. The resident stated that the call light to ask for assistance was never responded to. The resident stated that the staff didn't know if...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received a
Preadmission Screening an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow the respiratory care plan for 1 (Resident #366...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free of accident and hazard...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care for 2 out of 25 sam...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory services regarding oxygen for one...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff were current with required trainings for one (Staff #12) out of three staff trainings reviewed. A performance rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Activities (QAPI/QAA) failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper washing of the dishes and utensils by not having an operable final rinse temperature gauge on the high tem...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the high temperature dish machine final rinse cycle was working properly. This has the potential to affect 54 out of 5...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is East Ridge Retirement Village Inc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is East Ridge Retirement Village Inc Staffed?
CMS rates EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at East Ridge Retirement Village Inc?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 13 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates East Ridge Retirement Village Inc?
EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 74 certified beds and approximately 71 residents (about 96% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CUTLER BAY, Florida.
How Does East Ridge Retirement Village Inc Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2 and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting East Ridge Retirement Village Inc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is East Ridge Retirement Village Inc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at East Ridge Retirement Village Inc Stick Around?
EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was East Ridge Retirement Village Inc Ever Fined?
EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC has been fined $8,788 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Florida average of $33,167. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is East Ridge Retirement Village Inc on Any Federal Watch List?
EAST RIDGE RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.