JACKSON MEMORIAL PERDUE MEDICAL CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center in Cutler Bay, Florida, has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it's above average and recommended for families considering care options. Ranking #54 out of 690 facilities in Florida places it in the top half, and it is #10 of 54 in Miami-Dade County, indicating only nine other local facilities are rated higher. However, the facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 4 in 2023 to 8 in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, with a 5/5 star rating and a low turnover rate of 19%, which is significantly better than the state average. Despite having more RN coverage than 91% of Florida facilities, the center has faced issues like a resident suffering burns from hot coffee and failing to implement safety measures for residents at risk of falling. Additionally, the facility has accumulated fines totaling $28,045, which is an average amount compared to others in Florida. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and ranking, families should be aware of the recent trend of increasing concerns and specific incidents that have occurred.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Florida
- #54/690
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 19% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 29 points below Florida's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $28,045 in fines. Lower than most Florida facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 82 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Florida nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (19%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (19%)
29 points below Florida average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (Resident #158) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (Resident #158) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to falls for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safety measures were implemented for two vulner...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to follow pharmacy procedure of less than 5% resulting in a of 6.25% medication error rate out of 31 opportunities; as evidenced...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews and record review facility failed to ensure medication error rate was below 5% as evidenced by a medication error rate of 6.25% out of 31 opportunities which included...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area relate...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety and prevent bodily injury for one Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to bleedi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate and appropriate health care, related to occupational therapy services for two (Resident #65 and 88) out of tw...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment related to bed side rail...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow doctor's orders related to Oxygen administra...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor over the counter medications in a resident's ro...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Florida.
- • 19% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 29 points below Florida's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 harm violation(s), $28,045 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $28,045 in fines. Higher than 94% of Florida facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
About This Facility
What is Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns JACKSON MEMORIAL PERDUE MEDICAL CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center Staffed?
CMS rates JACKSON MEMORIAL PERDUE MEDICAL CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 19%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at JACKSON MEMORIAL PERDUE MEDICAL CENTER during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 12 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center?
JACKSON MEMORIAL PERDUE MEDICAL CENTER is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 163 certified beds and approximately 157 residents (about 96% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in CUTLER BAY, Florida.
How Does Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, JACKSON MEMORIAL PERDUE MEDICAL CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (19%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, JACKSON MEMORIAL PERDUE MEDICAL CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center Stick Around?
Staff at JACKSON MEMORIAL PERDUE MEDICAL CENTER tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 19%, the facility is 27 percentage points below the Florida average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 23%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center Ever Fined?
JACKSON MEMORIAL PERDUE MEDICAL CENTER has been fined $28,045 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Florida average of $33,359. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center on Any Federal Watch List?
JACKSON MEMORIAL PERDUE MEDICAL CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.