LARSEN HEALTH CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Larsen Health Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its operations and care quality. It ranks #371 out of 690 nursing homes in Florida, placing it in the bottom half of facilities statewide, and #9 out of 19 in Lee County, meaning there are better options available nearby. While the facility is on an improving trend, reducing issues from 8 to 4 over a two-year period, it still faces challenges with 17 reported deficiencies, including serious incidents such as failing to honor a resident's right to refuse care and inadequate supervision leading to preventable falls. On a positive note, staffing is a strength with a perfect score of 5/5 stars, indicating low turnover and experienced staff, and the facility has good RN coverage, which is better than 83% of Florida nursing homes. However, the concerning fines of $60,651, higher than 79% of facilities in the state, suggest ongoing compliance problems that families should consider when researching care options.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Florida
- #371/690
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 45% turnover. Near Florida's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $60,651 in fines. Higher than 77% of Florida facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 104 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Florida nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (45%)
3 points below Florida average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Florida average (3.2)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Florida avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
May 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, facility staff, resident and resident's representative interviews, the facility failed to develop and im...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0825
(Tag F0825)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and provided skilled therapy services for 1 (Residents #89) of 4 residents reviewed for followin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on records review, observation and staff interviews the facility failed to accurately document physician ordered treatments for 2 (Residents #82 and Resident #93) of 2 resident's reviewed with f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
8 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, clinical record review, review of the facility's policy and procedure, resident and staff interviews, the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0687
(Tag F0687)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, resident representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to assist with necessary podiatry follow up appointmen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0680
(Tag F0680)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of facility policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation special...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, records review and facility policy review the facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident/representative or attempt alternative i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0909
(Tag F0909)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct regular inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and grab bars, as part of a regular maintenance program to en...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2021
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on medical record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to develop and implement an activity program consistent with resident preferences choices for 1 (Resident #73) of 28 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to follow Physician orders and Therapy recommendations to provide an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper weight management for a high-ris...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient and consistent nursing ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents, receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPaP) oxygen therapy per a machine, implemented pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 45% turnover. Below Florida's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 2 harm violation(s), $60,651 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 17 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $60,651 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Florida. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (30/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Larsen's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns LARSEN HEALTH CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Larsen Staffed?
CMS rates LARSEN HEALTH CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 45%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Larsen?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at LARSEN HEALTH CENTER during 2021 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 15 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Larsen?
LARSEN HEALTH CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 180 certified beds and approximately 127 residents (about 71% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in FORT MYERS, Florida.
How Does Larsen Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, LARSEN HEALTH CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (45%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Larsen?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Larsen Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, LARSEN HEALTH CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Larsen Stick Around?
LARSEN HEALTH CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 45%, which is about average for Florida nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Larsen Ever Fined?
LARSEN HEALTH CENTER has been fined $60,651 across 2 penalty actions. This is above the Florida average of $33,685. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Larsen on Any Federal Watch List?
LARSEN HEALTH CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.