HOMESTEAD MANOR A PALACE COMMUNITY

1330 NW 1ST AVE, HOMESTEAD, FL 33030 (305) 248-0271
For profit - Partnership 88 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
93/100
#51 of 690 in FL
Last Inspection: August 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Homestead Manor A Palace Community in Homestead, Florida, has earned a Trust Grade of A, indicating it is an excellent choice for care. It ranks #51 out of 690 facilities in Florida, placing it in the top half, and #7 out of 54 in Miami-Dade County, suggesting only six local options are better. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with reported issues increasing from 1 in 2021 to 3 in 2024. Staffing is generally a strength, with a 4 out of 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 30%, which is significantly lower than the state average. Notably, the facility has not incurred any fines, which is a positive sign. On the downside, inspections revealed concerns about food safety, including the gas burner stove not being maintained properly, which had food stains and buildup that could affect residents' meals. Additionally, there were issues with a resident's mental health assessment not being updated, highlighting a gap in care documentation. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and a strong trust score, families should be aware of the recent concerns raised in inspections.

Trust Score
A
93/100
In Florida
#51/690
Top 7%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
30% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 18 points below Florida's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Florida. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2021: 1 issues
2024: 3 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (30%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (30%)

    18 points below Florida average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Florida's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record

Aug 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed in a timely manner for two residents (Resident #...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed in a timely manner for two residents (Resident #31 and Resident #46) out of 18 residents sampled as evidenced by Level I PASRR dated 2/13/15 for Resident#31 omitted diagnosis of Depression and Psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition and Level I PASRR dated 4/3/24 for Resident#46 omitted diagnosis of Major depressive disorder, and Psychotic disorder. There were 85 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Resident #31 Record review of Level I PASRR for Resident #31 Screen and Determination Admitting diagnosis: Paralysis Agitation others: Altered Mental status: PASRR: Section I: Guide for Determining an indication of, or a Diagnosis of, a serious mental illness (MI), Mental Retardation (MR) or Related Condition: check those that apply: none checked. Section II: Part A: Mental Illness: No Part B- Mental Retardation: No. Signed by Social Worker from Hospice on 2/13/2015. Record review of demographic sheet for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 2/13/15 and readmission date of 12/11/23 with diagnosis that included Depression and Psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition. Record review of an Annual admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 7/8/24 Section A (Identification) revealed the resident is not currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. Section N (medications) revealed Resident #31 was taking antidepressant medication during the last seven (7) days. Section O (special treatments and therapy) revealed the total number of minutes Psychological Therapy (by any licensed mental health professional) administered to the resident in the last 7 days was Zero (0). Record review of Care Plan with Start Date 02/11/2022 and Reviewed/Revised date of 08/04/2024 revealed Resident #31 was at risk for alteration in thought process secondary to diagnosis that included depression, psychotic disorder with delusions. Interventions included: Psychiatry/neurology consult and follow up as needed and anticipate all possible needs and provide them to resident accordingly. Record review of physician orders dated 10/13/2023 revealed Seroquel 25 milligram(mg) tablet directions: one tablet by mouth twice a day for Delusions and Sertraline 25 mg tablet directions: take one tablet by mouth once a day for Depression. Record review of a physician progress note dated 10/19/17 revealed family requested Resident #31 be followed up by a Neurologist from psychiatric point of view. Record review of a Report of Consultation dated 7/7/23 revealed a consulting physician Neurologist Report with findings of a diagnosis that included: Depression. Record review of a Psychiatric Note dated 2/2015 with diagnosis that included: Anxiety. On 08/08/24 10:09 AM The Director of Nursing (DON) stated Resident #31's diagnosis of Depression and Psychotic disorder were secondary to Parkinson Disease, and therefore the PASRR did not need to be reviewed. There is no documentation specifying that this resident's diagnosis of Depression is secondary to Parkinson Disease. The Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) from pharmacy indicated that the hallucinations were secondary to Parkinson. Review of Consultant Pharmacist Services Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber for Resident #31 dated 1/14/24 revealed a recommendation to review the following medications and consider for GDR: Zoloft 25mg QD (daily) and Seroquel 25 mg (milligrams) BID (twice daily). Physician response dated 2/27/24: cannot be reduced or discontinued (d/c) for treatment of Depression and Seroquel cannot be reduced of discontinue (d/c) for treatment of hallucinations secondary to Parkinson disease. Resident #46 Record review of demographic sheet for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 4/4/24 with diagnosis that included Major depressive disorder and Psychotic disorder. Record review of Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for Resident #46 dated 2/19/24 PASRR: Section I: PASRR Screen Decision Making: no diagnosis checked Section IV: PASRR Completion: No diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability Indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation not required. Electronically signed by Social Worker of local hospital on 4/3/24. Record review of a significant change MDS with reference date of 4/10/24 revealed Section A 1500: PASRR: The resident was not considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. Further Record review of a quarterly MDS with reference date of 07/09/2024 Section I (Active diagnosis) revealed Depression. Section N revealed antidepressants and anticoagulants were taken in last 7 days and Section O the number of days psychological therapy (by any licensed mental health professional) was administered for at least 15 minutes a day in the last 7 days was 0. Record review of a Care Plan started on 3/20/24 and revised / reviewed on 7/29/24 revealed R#46 had the potential for changes in mood related to a diagnosis of Depression and history of Psychosis. Interventions included: Approach resident in a calm friendly manner, administer medications as ordered, and encourage interactions with others. Record review of physician orders revealed an order on 4/04/2024 for Trazodone 50 mg directions: take a half of tablet at bedtime for diagnosis of Depression. Record review of a Psychiatric Initial Evaluation/Consultation observation date 4/11/24 and recorded date of 4/27/24 revealed reason for initial psychiatric evaluation was for psychotropic use and a past medical history that included Depression. On 08/08/24 10:09 AM The DON and Director for Admissions revealed they both work together to ensure an accurate PASRR is completed for all residents. The process is to review the PASRR before admission by reviewing all the medications to determine if there is any psychiatric diagnosis and if the resident has a qualifying mental diagnosis, check the appropriate box and submit the PASRR to Atrezzo and they report if a Level II is required. The PASRR stays with the resident for the duration while residing in the facility unless there is a change in behavior or if the psychiatrist is involved or a mental illness history is discovered. Then a resident review of PASRR is performed after consent from the family is obtained. Then the clinicals are submitted to Atrezzo and they inform us if a Level II is required and if the needs for the resident can continued to be met in the facility. A review did not need to be submitted for [Resident #46] prior because her Depression and Psychosis are secondary to a medical diagnosis. Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessment and PASAAR effective date: November 2016 Last revision date: January 7, 2017 last review date: January 7, 2017, April 11, 2017, January 11, 2024 revealed Policy: The facility must make a comprehensive assessment of each residents' needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences, using the residents assessment instrument (RAI) specified by CMS. Procedure: 2. Preadmission Screening for Individuals with a Mental Disorder and Individuals with Intellectual Disability d. A nursing facility must notify the state mental health authority or a state intellectual disability authority, as applicable, promptly after a significant change in the mental or physical condition of a resident who has a mental disorder or intellectual disability for resident review.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary conditions by ensuring the gas burner stove was cleaned and maintained on a regular basis. The ga...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary conditions by ensuring the gas burner stove was cleaned and maintained on a regular basis. The gas burner contained brown-like food stains and food particles on top and black like buildup on the side panel of the stove and grill. This has the potential to affect 84 out of 85 residents who eat orally residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings include: Oberservation of the gas stove burners on 8/7/2024 at 11:24 AM with the Dietary Supervisor revealed brown-like food stains and food particles on top and black like buildup on the side panel of the stove and griddle. Photographic evidence submitted. On 8/7/2024 at 11:26 AM, interview with the Dietary Supervisor, she revealed the gas stove is cleaned everyday and the facility is purchasing a new stove. On 8/7/2024 at 1:38 PM, interview with the Registered Dietician (RD), she revealed the stove is cleaned daily and weekly with a deep clean monthly. On 8/7/2024 at 1:43 PM, interview with the Administrator, he revealed he could probably produce a kitchen cleaning task sheet for weekly and monthly cleaning staff has done but not for daily cleaning. He revealed the black like buildup was soot and accumulated from cooking on it at breakfast and lunch. Record review of the Kitchen Cleaning Task Weekly dated 7//5/2024, 7/12/2024, 7/19/2024, 7/26/2024, and 8/2/2024 and Kitchen Cleaning Task Monthly dated 1/1/2024, 2/1/2024, 3/1/2024, 4/1/2024, 5/1/2024, 6/1/2024/ 7/1/2024, and 8/1/2024 had no documentation the Kitchen Cleaning Task Daily was provided. Kitchen Cleaning Task Weekly and Kitchen Cleaning Task Monthly documented wash behind your ovens and fryers to eliminate grease and clean underneath any applicances and other surfaces. Second observation of the gas stove burners on 8/8/2024 at 7:31 AM during breakfast preparation with the Dietary Supervisor and Administrator revealed attempts were made to clean the black like buildup on the side panel of the stove. The grill still contained black like buildup on the side panel. Photographic evidence submitted. On 8/8/2024 at 7:32 AM interview with the Dietary Supervisor, she stated, At the end of the shift at 7:00 PM yesterday, I cleaned the stove. I spray with degreaser, scrubbed and wash it out. On 8/8/2024 at 7:33 AM interview with the Administrator, he stated, She cleans daily for particles and soot. She cleans weekly and scrubs every part of the stove. Once a month, we remove the burners and clean them with [ ] from Corporate and do a complete cleaning of the stove. Third observation of the gas stove burners on 8/8/2024 at 11:11 AM during lunch preparation revealed attempts were made to clean the black like buildup on the side panel of the stove. The grill still contained black like buildup on the side panel. Photographic evidence submitted.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary condition by ensuring the gas burner stove was cleaned and maintained on a regular basis. The gas...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary condition by ensuring the gas burner stove was cleaned and maintained on a regular basis. The gas burner contained brown-like food stains and food particles on top and black like buildup on the side panel of the stove and grill. This has the potential to affect 84 out of 85 residents who eat orally residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Observation of the gas stove burners on 8/07/24 at 11:24 AM with the Dietary Supervisor revealed brown-like food stains and food particles on top and black like buildup on the side panel of the stove and griddle. Photographic evidence submitted. On 8/07/24 at 11:26 AM, interview with the Dietary Supervisor. She revealed the gas stove is cleaned everyday and that the facility is purchasing a new stove. On 8/07/24 at 1:38 PM, interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD). She revealed the stove is cleaned daily and weekly with a deep clean monthly. On 8/07/24 at 1:43 PM, interview with the Administrator. He revealed he could probably produce kitchen cleaning task sheet for weekly and monthly that the staff has done but not for daily cleaning. He revealed that the black like buildup was soot and was accumulated from cooking on it at breakfast and lunch. Record review of the Kitchen Cleaning Task Weekly dated 7/05/24, 7/12/24, 7/19/24, 7/26/24 and 8/02/24 and Kitchen Cleaning Task Monthly dated 1/01/24, 2/01/24, 3/01/24, 4/01/24, 5/01/24, 6/03/24, 7/01/24 and 8/01/24. No documentation of the Kitchen Cleaning Task Daily was provided. Kitchen Cleaning Task Weekly and Kitchen Cleaning Task Monthly documented wash behind your ovens and fryers to eliminate grease and clean underneath any appliances and other surfaces. Second observation of the gas stove burners on 8/08/24 at 7:31 AM during breakfast preparation with the Dietary Supervisor and the Administrator revealed attempts were made to clean the black like buildup on the side panel of the stove. The grill still contained black like buildup on the side panel. Photographic evidence submitted. On 8/08/24 at 7:32 AM, interview with the Dietary Supervisor. She stated, At the end of the shift at 7:00 PM yesterday, I cleaned the stove. I spray with degreaser, scrubbed and wash it out. On 8/08/24 at 7:33 AM, interview with the Administrator. He stated, She cleans daily for particles and soot. She cleans weekly and scrubs every part of the stove. Once a month, we remove the burners and clean them with [ ] from Corporate and do a complete cleaning of the stove. Third observation of the gas stove burners on 8/08/24 at 11:11 AM during lunch preparation revealed attempts were made to clean the black like buildup on the side panel of the stove. The grill still contained black like buildup on the side panel. Photographic evidence submitted.
Dec 2021 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0637 (Tag F0637)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment (MDS) for 1 (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment (MDS) for 1 (Resident#28) out of 18 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The facility had 87 residents at the time of the survey. The findings included: On 12/14/2021 at 10:30 am, Resident # 28 was observed in bed. The resident did not respond when spoken to, but her eyes were open. It was observed that the resident had two small siderails up on the bed. The resident's left arm appeared to be flaccid, had decreased movement and to have limited range of motion as it laid on the bed. The resident was in a low bed and there were two mats next to the bed, one on the right side and one on the left side. It was observed that the resident had a tube feeding pump with Two Cal HN (High Nitrogen) tube feeding bottle and a water flush at the bedside. The tube feeding was not infusing during this observation. The resident was offsite selected for limited range of motion, and tube feeding with weight loss/dehydration. Observation of Resident #28 on 12/16/21 at 11:50 AM, revealed the resident was sitting up in a high back wheelchair, asleep, the television (TV) was on, and the resident was observed to move both arms. Record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, Alzheimer's Disease, Gastrostomy and was a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). During the review of Resident #28's Annual Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] and a comparison of the most recent MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE], revealed there were declines in Section G, Functional Status, G0110 Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance and Section K Swallowing/Nutritional Status. The following declines were documented: The 01/13/2021 Annual MDS documented for: Section G - Bed Mobility - 3-Extensive Assistance and 2-One person physical assistance, a 3/2. Transfers - 3-Extensive Assistance and 2-One person physical assistance, a 3/2. Locomotion on Unit - 2-Limited Assistance and 2-One person physical assistance, a 2/2. Personal Hygiene - 3-Extensive Assistance and 2-One person physical assistance, a 3/2. The most recent MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented: Section G - Bed Mobility - 3-Extensive Assistance and 3-Two+ persons physical assistance, a 3/3. Transfers - 7-Activity occurred only once or twice and 3-Two+ persons physical assistance, a 7/3. Locomotion on Unit - 7-Activity occurred only once or twice and 2-One person physical assist, a 7/2. Personal Hygiene - 4-Total Dependence and 2-One person physical assistance, a 4/2. The 01/13/2021 Annual MDS documented for: Section K - Swallowing/Nutritional Status. K100 - None. K200 - 66 IN (inches), 131 lbs.(pounds). K300 - Weight Loss - 0 - No or unknown. The most recent MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented: Section K - Swallowing/Nutritional Status. K100 - None. K200 66 IN, 110 lbs. K300 - Weight Loss - 2- Loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months. Yes, not on physician prescribed weight loss regimen. During an interview on 12/16/21 at 4:46 PM with the MDS Coordinator about the declines in Section G and Section K. The MDS Coordinator reported, they followed the guidelines in the MDS manual for the significant change. During an interview on 12/17/21 at 12:59 PM with the MDS Coordinator and Chief Nursing Officer about the declines documented in the MDS, it was revealed that they did not think a significant change assessment needed to be completed.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (93/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Florida.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
  • • Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Homestead Manor A Palace Community's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns HOMESTEAD MANOR A PALACE COMMUNITY an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Homestead Manor A Palace Community Staffed?

CMS rates HOMESTEAD MANOR A PALACE COMMUNITY's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 30%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Homestead Manor A Palace Community?

State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at HOMESTEAD MANOR A PALACE COMMUNITY during 2021 to 2024. These included: 4 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Homestead Manor A Palace Community?

HOMESTEAD MANOR A PALACE COMMUNITY is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 88 certified beds and approximately 87 residents (about 99% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HOMESTEAD, Florida.

How Does Homestead Manor A Palace Community Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, HOMESTEAD MANOR A PALACE COMMUNITY's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (30%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Homestead Manor A Palace Community?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Homestead Manor A Palace Community Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, HOMESTEAD MANOR A PALACE COMMUNITY has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Homestead Manor A Palace Community Stick Around?

Staff at HOMESTEAD MANOR A PALACE COMMUNITY tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 30%, the facility is 16 percentage points below the Florida average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 23%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Homestead Manor A Palace Community Ever Fined?

HOMESTEAD MANOR A PALACE COMMUNITY has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Homestead Manor A Palace Community on Any Federal Watch List?

HOMESTEAD MANOR A PALACE COMMUNITY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.