LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER AND REHAB
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Lady Lake Specialty Care Center and Rehab has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average, placing it in the middle of the pack among nursing homes. It ranks #367 out of 690 facilities in Florida and #10 out of 17 in Lake County, indicating it is in the bottom half of local options. The facility is showing some improvement, with the number of reported issues decreasing from 11 in 2023 to 9 in 2024. Staffing is a concern, rated at 2 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 63%, significantly higher than the state average of 42%. While there were no life-threatening issues, there have been several concerns, including failure to label and store medications properly and issues with food safety, such as expired food and unclean kitchen equipment. Overall, while there are some strengths, such as improving trends, families should weigh these against the notable weaknesses in staffing and compliance.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Florida
- #367/690
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 63% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $13,970 in fines. Higher than 80% of Florida facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 32 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Florida. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 27 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Florida average (3.2)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
16pts above Florida avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
15 points above Florida average of 48%
The Ugly 27 deficiencies on record
Jul 2024
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure maintenance and housekeeping provided the services necessary to maintain a sanitary and orderly environment for the 200-hall shower roo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. During an observation on 7/14/2024 at 09:40 AM of Resident #80 it showed oxygen was being administered at 2.5 liters via nasal cannula. The humidified water bottle was empty.
During an observation...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. Twenty-eight medication administration opportunities were observed, and tw...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure medications were secure allowing access by unauthorized personnel, residents, and visitors when medicatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Review of Resident #49's progress note dated 5/8/24 read, Type: Event Note. Effective Date: 5/8/2024 15:43 [3:43 PM]. Note Text: Resident was driving her motorized chair to her room when she lost c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure foods were prepared under sanitary conditions and failed to ensure food temperatures were documented to be at safe leve...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. During an observation on 07/15/24 at 01:50 PM, Staff G, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed coming into the doorway of a resident's room holding a soiled brief, with gloves on. She stood...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate nurse staffing information was posted on a daily basis for 3 of 6 days.
Findings include:
Observation of the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice in 6 of 6 medication carts r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
11 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented for 1 of 3 reviewed residents, Residents #77.
Findings incl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Review of the admission record for Resident #189 documented an admission date of 9/16/2022 and the diagnoses including unspecified fracture of lower end of left tibia and displaced comminuted fract...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents maintained an acceptable parameter of nutritional status and were offered intravenous hydration for 2 of 4 residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurately documented medical records for Residents #338 and 38.
Findings include:
1. During an interview on 3/6/2023 at 10:41 AM...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a written bed-hold notice that included all required informa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. During an observation on 3/6/2023 at 9:40 AM, Resident #65 was resting in bed with oxygen being administered via nasal cannul...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. During an observation on [DATE] at 9:14 AM, there was a medication cup containing multiple pills on Resident #103's bedside t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration to help prevent the possible development and transmissio...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2021
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a recommended Level II evaluation and determination was comp...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage was disposed of properly.
Findings:
An observation of the dumpster area on 9/13/2021 at 7:06 AM showed one...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
2. An observation of the North Hall medication cart on 9/12/2021 at 10:20 AM with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), showed ten opened containers of eye drops with no opened or expiration dates,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Findings:
During the k...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis.
Findings:
An observation on 9/12/2021 at 9:30 AM of the front lobby showed the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • 27 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • $13,970 in fines. Above average for Florida. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade C (53/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
- • 63% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Lady Lake Specialty And Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER AND REHAB an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Lady Lake Specialty And Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER AND REHAB's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 63%, which is 16 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Lady Lake Specialty And Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 27 deficiencies at LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER AND REHAB during 2021 to 2024. These included: 25 with potential for harm and 2 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Lady Lake Specialty And Rehab?
LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by GOLD FL TRUST II, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 145 certified beds and approximately 136 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in LADY LAKE, Florida.
How Does Lady Lake Specialty And Rehab Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER AND REHAB's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (63%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lady Lake Specialty And Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Lady Lake Specialty And Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER AND REHAB has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Lady Lake Specialty And Rehab Stick Around?
Staff turnover at LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER AND REHAB is high. At 63%, the facility is 16 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Lady Lake Specialty And Rehab Ever Fined?
LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER AND REHAB has been fined $13,970 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Florida average of $33,219. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Lady Lake Specialty And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.