GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER

10676 MARVIN JONES BLVD, LIVE OAK, FL 32060 (386) 658-5550
Non profit - Other 161 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
85/100
#42 of 690 in FL
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Good Samaritan Center in Live Oak, Florida, has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it's above average and recommended for families considering care for their loved ones. The facility ranks #42 out of 690 in Florida, placing it in the top half of state nursing homes, and it's the best option among the three facilities in Suwannee County. The trend appears stable, as the number of reported issues has remained consistent over the past two years. Staffing is a strong point, with a perfect 5 out of 5 rating and a turnover rate of only 32%, which is significantly lower than the state average. On the downside, the facility has reported some concerning incidents, including a serious issue where a resident with mental health needs did not receive appropriate care, leading to increased distress. Additionally, there were concerns regarding expired food and sanitation practices in the kitchen, as well as a failure to conduct timely assessments for a resident's discharge status. While there are strengths here, families should weigh these concerns carefully when making their decision.

Trust Score
B+
85/100
In Florida
#42/690
Top 6%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Holding Steady
3 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
32% turnover. Near Florida's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 50 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Florida. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
○ Average
9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 3 issues
2024: 3 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (32%)

    16 points below Florida average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 32%

14pts below Florida avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Oct 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Assessments (Tag F0636)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment in accordance with the specified...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment in accordance with the specified submission timeframes for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for discharge status, Resident #8. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical records showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of upper end of right humerus, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease), and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #8's physician order dated 5/23/2024 showed it read, Discharge Home with Home Health Care. PT [Physical Therapy] to Evaluate and Treat as Required. Review of Resident #8's Interdisciplinary Notes dated 5/22/24 showed it read, Today SW [Social Worker] informed [Resident #8's Name] that her last day of therapy is 05/27/24 and her daughter will be picking her up on 5/28/24. [Resident #8's name] agreed. Review of Resident #8's transfer history showed the resident was discharged to home on 5/28/2024 at 2:00 PM. Review of Resident #8's electronic file did not show a Discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment conducted when the resident was discharged on 5/28/2024. During an interview on 10/29/2024 at 2:45 PM, the MDS Coordinator, RN (Registered Nurse), stated, [Resident #8's Name] discharged and went home. The discharge assessment was not opened. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Resident Assessments with the last review date of 8/20/2024 showed it read, Policy Statement. A comprehensive assessment of each resident is completed at intervals designated by OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] regulations and PPS [Prospective Payment System] requirements . Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. OBRA-Required Assessments are federally mandated, and therefore, must be performed for all residents of Medicare and/or Medicaid certified nursing homes. OBRA assessments include . g. Discharge Assessment (return anticipated and return not anticipated).
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4) Review of Resident #219's physician order dated [DATE] showed it read, Plavix 75 mg [milligram] by mouth once daily. Review o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4) Review of Resident #219's physician order dated [DATE] showed it read, Plavix 75 mg [milligram] by mouth once daily. Review of Resident #219's MDS dated [DATE] revealed that the resident was not receiving antiplatelet medication under Section N0415: High Risk Drug Classes-Use and Indication. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:00 AM, the MDS Coordinator, RN, stated, The system automatically triggers the classes. [Resident #219's name] is taking Plavix. I need to modify it. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Resident Assessments with the last review date of [DATE] showed it read, Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 11. All persons who have completed any portion of the MDS resident assessment form must sign the document attesting to accuracy of such information. 12. Information in the MDS assessment will consistently reflect information in the progress notes, plans of care and resident observations/interviews. 2) Review of Resident #117's medical records showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and iron deficiency anemia. Review of Resident #117's interdisciplinary notes dated [DATE] at 8:30 AM showed that the resident was transferred to a local hospice facility in lake city at 12:27 AM. Review of Resident #117's MDS dated [DATE] showed the resident was discharged to short-term general hospital under section A2105- Discharge Status. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:01 PM, the MDS Coordinator, RN, stated, I did this one. I was sure [Resident #117's name] went to hospital. He should have been coded a 10- discharge status hospice (institutional facility). 3) Review of Resident #70's nursing note dated [DATE] showed it read, Resident's body was released to [name of funeral home, city, and state] at 3:50 PM. Review of Resident #70's physician order dated [DATE] showed it read, Discontinue as of [DATE]; Release body to [name of funeral home, city, and state]; expired. Review of Resident #70's MDS dated [DATE] showed it read, Section A2105. Discharge Status . 08. Intermediate Care Facility. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:22 PM, the MDS Coordinator, RN, stated, I should have put [code] 13 for 'deceased ' not [code] 8 for Intermediate Care Facility. I don't know what happened. I coded it wrong. [Resident #70's name] was deceased . We use the electronic RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument] Manual for policies and procedures on the MDS process. We don't have a printed policy because the RAI Manual is updated so often. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #84, for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for discharge, Residents #70 and #117, and for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication, Resident #219. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #84's physician order dated [DATE] showed it read, Soft and Bite Sized/Thin Liquids. Review of Resident #84's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed no nutritional approach of a mechanically altered diet. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:00 PM, the MDS Coordinator, Registered Nurse (RN), stated, It should have been triggered. Any diet that is not regular should be triggered. The dietitian is the one who fills out that section. It will have to be modified. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:00 PM, the Registered Dietitian stated, Based on [Resident #84' name] dietary order, the section for mechanically altered diet should have been coded in the assessment.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for b...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for behaviors for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutritional services (Residents #74). Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including mood disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, and chronic congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #74's care plan dated 1/17/2024 revealed a focus for nutritional status that read, [Resident #74's name] dietary needs are sufficient at this time related to adequate PO [by mouth] intake . (A [Approach]) Resident prefers to eat on the dining room. Further review of the care plan revealed a focus for activities that read, [Resident #74's name] has potential for altered activity pursuit pattern, is at risk for social isolation. There was no care plan focus or intervention for behaviors related to eating in the dining room. During an observation on 10/28/2024 at 12:40 PM, Resident #74 was sitting at a table by herself outside of the nursing station in front of the television in the resident common area. There were no other residents in the common area. Several residents were sitting together at the tables in the dining room waiting for the afternoon meal service. At 12:45 PM, Resident #74 received a meal tray in the common area and began to eat her food and drink her fluids. At 1:07 PM, Resident #74 entered the dining room and Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), redirected the resident back to her chair and table in the common area away from the dining room. During an interview on 10/28/2024 at 1:07 PM, Staff A, CNA, stated, We put [Resident #74's name] out in the common area by herself away from the other residents for all her meals. She gets up a lot and wanders around and she puts her hands in other resident's plates, so we keep her out here for meals. She tries to carry her tray around the unit. During an observation on 10/29/2024 at 12:30 PM, Resident #74 was sitting at a table by herself near a side entrance/exit to the outdoor patio. There were no other residents or staff in the common area. Several residents were sitting together at the tables in the dining room. At 12:55 PM, Resident #74 received her afternoon meal tray consisting of a bowl of taco meat and vegetables, and a cup of chocolate milk with a sip cover. Resident #74 ate by herself while the nursing staff assisted other residents in the dining room or in their rooms, with meal delivery and setup. Resident #74 remained alone until she finished eating at 1:10 PM when she brought her bowl and cup to the dining cart in the dining room. During an observation on 10/30/2024 at 7:52 AM, Resident #74 was sitting by herself near a side entrance/exit to the outdoor patio. There were no other residents or staff in the common area. Several residents were sitting together at the tables in the dining room waiting for the morning meal tray service. Resident #74 ate by herself in the common area until 8:10 AM when she brought her bowl and drink cup to the tray cart in the dining room. During an interview on 10/30/2024 at 8:10 AM, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, It's better for her to eat alone where we can watch her. I believe she is care planned for not eating in the dining room. During an interview on 10/30/2024 at 9:50 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, I know that staff often seat [Resident #74's name] by herself in the common area away from the other residents for her behaviors. She wouldn't be care planned for dining alone or away from the dining room. If her preferences are the dining room, then the care plan should be based on her behaviors, whether she eats in the dining room or not. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Care Area Assessments last reviewed on 8/20/2024, showed it read, Policy Statement: Care area assessments (CAAs) are used to help analyze data obtained from the MDS [Minimum Data Set] and to develop individualized care plans. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 2. The care area assessments (CAAs) process consists of the following steps . c. Define the problem(s): (1) Identify the functional, physical, and/or behavioral implications of the problem(s) . d. Make decisions about the care plan . (2) Evaluate the resident's goals, wishes, strengths, and needs . e. Document interventions on the care plan. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered last reviewed on 8/20/2024, showed it read, Policy Statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychological and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 7. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan . b. Describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable psychical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including . c. includes the resident's stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes; d. builds on the resident's strengths; and e. reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions.
Jul 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principl...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: During an observation on 7/24/2023 at 10:19 AM, Resident #39 was lying in bed. There was a Cortizone-10 cream on top of the bedside table. During an interview on 7/24/2023 at 10:19 AM, Resident #39 stated, I use the cream when I have pain on my back side. Review of Resident #39's physician orders revealed no orders for Cortizone-10 cream or medication self-administration orders. Review of Resident #39's care plan revealed no medication self-administration intervention. During an observation on 7/24/2023 at 10:23 AM, Resident #322's room was empty. There was a medication cup containing white powder on top of the drawer in front of the bed, with a label reading ABD (abdominal) fold groin and Resident #322's last name. Review of Resident #322's physician order dated 7/13/2023 orders read, Nyamyc 100000 UNIT/GM [gram] Powder- Give 100000 UNIT/GM Powder by External Give 1 Thin Layer Daily during each of 2 shifts Every day at 7am-7pm, 7pm-7am. Review of Resident #322's care plan revealed no medication self-administration intervention. During an interview on 7/26/2023 at 12:12 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, We do not use Cortizone cream on [Resident #39's name]. I would not know where it came from or why she had it. The residents are able to order items from the village and have them delivered. I would think that the staff was going to do personal care on [Resident #322's name] and left it there. [Resident #322's name] has an order for Nystatin Powder. She would be able to apply it herself. I do not see self-administration in [Resident #322's name] care plan. I do not see a self-administration assessment on Resident #39 or Resident #322. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Nursing Home List of Items Not Allowed in Resident Rooms, last reviewed on 8/21/2022, read, Medications: (includes all prescriptions and over-the-counter drugs, which must be ordered by the physician in the facility) . Noxzema or any medicated creams or powders . Note . Many of our residents, due to mental impairments or poor eyesight, might inadvertently drink or eat some of the above items causing irreparable harm.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control standards to prevent the possible development and transmission of infection during wo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control standards to prevent the possible development and transmission of infection during wound care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wounds, Resident #3 (Phoyographic evidence obtained). Findings include: During an observation of wound care for Resident #3 on 7/26/2023 at 9:33 AM with the Wound Care Nurse and the Risk Manager/Registered Nurse (RN), the resident's leg was resting on top of a pillow with a barrier over the pillow. The Risk Manager lifted the resident's right leg revealing stains to the wound dressing on the bottom at the right heel. The Wound Care Nurse removed the soiled dressing. The Risk Manager placed the resident's leg back down on the barrier. The Wound Care Nurse proceeded to clean the wound. The Risk Manager lifted the resident's right foot and the Wound Care Nurse cleansed Resident #3's right heel. Blood stains were observed on the middle portion of the barrier. After cleaning the wounds, the resident's leg was placed back down on the contaminated blood-stained barrier. The cleaned open heel wound came in contact with the contaminated barrier and the open wound on the back of the resident's leg rested on the contaminated barrier. The Risk Manager folded the edge of the contaminated barrier by placing both hands on the bottom portion of barrier. The Risk Manager lifted the resident's leg and touched the open wound located on the back of the resident's right leg. The Wound Care Nurse covered the wounds to the right heel areas and open knee wound areas. Resident #3's wound located on the back of the leg was left uncovered. The Wound Care Nurse began to wrap the resident's wounds with gauze roll. The Risk Manager put her hand on the gauze roll to prevent the roll from falling while the Wound Care Nurse was wrapping the resident's leg. The resident's right leg was wrapped with gauze and placed on top of the contaminated barrier. During an interview on 7/26/2023 at 10:04 AM, the Wound Care Nurse stated, I did not need [the Risk Manager's name] to roll the wound with me. We could have placed a clean pad down after cleaning the wounds. I am not sure if the heel touched the pad. She should have just stood there and supported the leg once we were ready to wrap. I did not want [Resident #3's name] leg to fall since she moves. There is a risk for infection. During an interview on 7/26/2023 at 10:07 AM, the Risk Manager stated, I could not see if the foot was touching the pad from where I was standing. I closed the pad into itself in trying to keep it from coming into contact with me. The wounds were covered when I touched the roll of gauze. Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 7/18/2023 read, Right heel: Cleanse with NS [Normal Saline] or wound cleanse. Pat dry. Slightly moisten 4x4 collagen sheet and apply to wound. Apply absorbent pad, wrap with gauze roll from the bottom of toes to below the knee. Daily and PRN [as needed]. May include all wounds in gauze wrap. 1 time per day, every day at 7:00 AM. Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 7/18/2023, read, Right Lateral ankle: Cleanse with NS or wound cleanse. Pat dry. Apply 2x2 xeroform to wound. Cover with absorbent pad, wrap with gauze roll from the bottom of toes to below knee. May include heel wound in wrap. Daily and PRN. 1 time per day, every day at 7:00 AM. Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 7/24/2023 read, Right lower lateral ankle, Cleanse with NS, or wound cleanse and pat dry. Moisten and apply 1x1 collagen to wound. Wrap with rolled gauze. 1 time per day, every day at 7:00 AM. Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 7/25/2023 read, Right shin/leg: Cleanse open blister areas with NS or wound cleanse. Pat dry. Apply xeroform to areas. Apply absorbent pad and wrap with gauze wrap. (may include all foot in wrap) 1 time per day, every day at 7:00 AM. During an interview on 7/26/2023 at 12:20 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, The wound should not have come in contact with the area [contaminated barrier]. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Wound Care, last reviewed on 8/21/2022, read, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Steps in Procedure . 12. Dress wound. Pick up sponge with paper and apply directly to area. [NAME] tape with initials, time, and date and apply to dressing. Be certain all clean items are on a clean field.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired foods and test strips were discarded in the kitchen and walk-in cooler areas and failed to ensure the equipmen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired foods and test strips were discarded in the kitchen and walk-in cooler areas and failed to ensure the equipment were cleaned to maintain sanitary standards (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: During a walk-through tour of the kitchen on 7/24/2023 at 9:26 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM) and the Dietary Director (DD), the interior door of the ice machine had a black slimy buildup, the blender (chopper/grinder) had water nesting in the bottom of the base, the can opener had a buildup of dried food particles on and around the blade and base of the can opener, the walk-in cooler had three containers of cottage cheese with an expiration date of 7/14/2023 and a nectar juice container dated 5/29/2023. The test strips for the sanitation solution had an expiration date of 7/15/2023. During an interview on 7/24/2023 at 9:35 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) verified the presence of a black slimy substance on the interior door of the ice machine, and confirmed that the can opener had food particles located on the blade and base, the blender bowl (chopper/grinder) should have been inverted to prevent wet-nesting, the blender bowl had water standing in the bottom from being washed and placed back on the base, and the test strips had an expiration date of 7/15/2023, and stated that she was not aware that the test strips were expired. During an interview on 7/24/2023 at 10:45 AM, the Dietary Director (DD) stated that the expired products should have been discarded according to the policy. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Sanitation and Infection Control dated 7/28/2021 read, 4. Food Storage: a. Food that is stored is protected from contamination and growth of any pathogenic organisms. b. Among the food protection measures that are performed by the dietary department are . Foods with expiration dates are used prior to the date on the package. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Cleaning Food Preparation Appliances dated 7/28/2021 read, Policy: Small appliances and food appliances such as mixers and food processors will be cleaned and sanitized after each use. Procedure . 4. Rinse parts with warm water and place in dishwasher or sink. Wash and rinse following procedures for automatic or hand dish washing. 5. Air dry.
Nov 2022 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate assessment and treatment related to mental heal...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate assessment and treatment related to mental health concerns for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #2, experiencing symptoms of confusion and anxiety. This resulted in Resident #2 experiencing repeated and worsening episodes of behavioral distress from September 15, 2022, until October 10, 2022. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (abnormal deposits of a protein in the brain affecting brain changes, in turn, which can lead to problems with thinking, movement, behavior, and mood), Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, depression, hypothyroidism, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of Resident #2's physician orders dated 09/15/22 documented, consult psychiatry services as needed. During an interview on 11/17/22 at 2:12 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, He [Resident #2] has Lewy body and Parkinson's. He had some delusions [false beliefs] and hallucination [seeing or hearing things that others do not see or hear] from the Parkinson's. She [Resident #2's spouse] was resistant to medications wanted a natural approach. Upon admission, they signed a consent to psych [psychiatric] services in case it was needed due to his history. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], documented behaviors including hallucinations, other behavioral symptoms not directed at others, and wandering 4 to 6 days out of the 7-day observation period. Changes in behavior were documented as worse. Review of Resident #2's progress notes documented the following: Behavior note dated 9/15/22 at 5:59 PM read, resident became anxious saying goodnight to spouse wandering around court exit seeking hard to redirect. Behavior note dated 9/16/22 at 5:57 PM read, resident becoming more anxious and wandering aimlessly . going into others' rooms and rummaging through others' belongings. He is not easily redirected. Behavior note dated 9/18/22 at 6:44 AM read, resident ambulating around court . agitated, restless. Ambulating at a fast pace. Resident would come to the med [medication] cart, and staying closely behind this writer, limiting movement, then resident would reach into drawers on the med cart. Behavior noted dated 9/18/22 at 1:07 PM read, resident continues to be anxious and exit seeking . he has been behind nurse's desk trying to go through the plastic bins, he was redirected, but it doesn't last for long, not making sense when he talk [sic]. [Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner's name] was notified and gave orders to give stat [immediately] Ativan [an antianxiety medication] 0.5 milligram (mg) now and then start Ativan 0.5 every eight hours as needed for anxiety and agitation. Wife was notified of behaviors and new order and gave consent to give medication. Behavior note dated 9/18/22 at 11:11 PM read, resident has been agitated and restless since shift began. Has been redirected away from med carts numerous times . placing his hands inside drawers, touching the computer, etc. [sic]. Went into a room down 300 hall and was discovered partially clothed trying to do something to one of the beds. Resident was standing in front of a table, that had been placed in front of the window in 300 hall music room. Staff saw resident pick table up from the floor and was able to take table away from resident before he threw it through the window. PRN [Pro Re Nata - as needed] Ativan 0.5 mg given at that time (10:30 PM) for agitation/restlessness. Behavior note dated 9/19/22 at 9:54 AM read, resident pacing about court looking for car, hard to redirect. Nurse observed resident opening windows several times this AM. Nursing note dated 9/19/22 at 4:10 PM read, new order received for Lorazepam [an antianxiety medication] 0.5 mg TID [three times a day] spouse notified. Behavior note dated 9/20/22 at 6:45 PM read, resident restless, pacing at frequent intervals, turning over chairs, removing items from med cart, removing fall decorations from countertops, going in and out of resident rooms, not easily redirected. Resident went on patio climbed brick wall, noted shaking wooden wall, not easily [redirected]. Resident urinated on floor, went in another resident room, and removed all of his clothing, not easily redirected. Behavior note dated 9/21/22 at 7:15 AM read, resident was pacing the common areas and moving furniture, trying to reach behind the nurses' station to grab items. Resident also was redirected from trying to enter other resident's rooms. He was disrobing walking down the halls. Social Service note dated 9/21/22 at 1:08 PM read, [Resident #2'name] is a new admit GSC [Good Samaritan Center]. He is here for LTC [long term care] and wife does not want d/c [discharge] planning discussed with resident nor herself. Resident is on secured memory care unit d/t [due to] his wandering and elopement risk. He has poor safety awareness. He is very impulsive, haphazard, and quick. He is active and high functioning with activities and needs a lot of things to keep him occupied. Behavior note dated 9/22/22 at 11:37 PM read, resident out in common area at start of shift. Resident invading others privacy. Trying to touch some of the female residents and causing them to get agitated and yell at him. During an interview on 11/17/22 at approximately 2:30 PM Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, [Resident #2's name] didn't touch any of the female residents. He was attempting to approach them to touch them, and we intervened and prevented his attempts to touch them. He would have his hand out as he was approaching like he was going to touch them and this agitated the other residents and they would yell at him to stay away from them. Behavior note dated 9/23/22 at 9:15 PM read, resident came up to this writer and stated, How can you stand it here with all the evil spirits walking around. Asked resident what he meant, and he continued to state he sees evil spirits everywhere and that he doesn't see them all the time, but he sees them right now. Resident redirected. Behavior note dated 9/25/22 at 6:30 PM read, Resident calm this am Wife present through Lunch, later in day Resident restless, pacing at frequent intervals, moving furniture in Common area and in his room. CNA reported finding window in Resident's room off track with access to screen. Maintenance notified and window repaired. Resident made no noted attempt to go through window. Behavior note dated 10/2/22 at 11:36 PM read, Anxious tonight. Observed [resident] over the brick wall at start of shift easily redirected inside. Redirected out of other's rooms several times. Resident moving and lifting up furniture. Behavior note dated 10/6/22 at 1:35 AM read, resident was agitated all evening until staff assisted him to bed. Resident turning over furniture, taking his shirt off. Holding on to other residents. Trying to jump over wall into nursing station. Resident not easily redirected. Behavior note dated 10/7/22 at 6:15 AM read, resident up this morning pacing hallway. Agitated. Redirected numerous times out of female rooms. Resident yelled at this writer that was a bunch of bull that I tell him all the rooms are female. Resident going from door to door shaking the handles. Resident knocking over furniture trying to go out to the patio. This writer sat in a chair by patio and resident told me I was in on the scam involving drugs and money and I was going to regret it. Redirection unsuccessful. Resident grabbed the back of the chair and flipped it over with this writer sitting in it. As I was trying to get up off the floor, resident bolted through patio door and jumped the brick wall. This writer went out to try and get resident in due to it being cold and dark. Resident picked up a wind chime and threw it at me. Resident pacing around brick wall shaking white fence. Other staff came to help, and resident jumped on the brick wall and was halfway over white fence. We grabbed his legs, and he jumped back down. Resident continues delusional [sic]. Grabbed a shepherd's hook [previously holding wind chime] and started hitting the windows of 100 hall rooms. After several redirections, resident through [sic] the shepherd's hook. Resident continues to try and get over white fence with staff continually asking him to get down and come inside. Resident continues to talk about drugs and money and how we are in on it. Male staff came to patio to assist. Resident did not have any change in behavior. Resident picked up lattice and propped it up on the white fence and attempted to climb up it, but it broke. Resident picked up another wind chime and threw it on the roof. Resident kept grabbing this writer's arm and telling me to go. Nursing note dated 10/7/22 at 3:23 PM read, provider [Staff B's name] notified of residents increased behaviors. New orders to start Seroquel 0.25 mg at 12:00 PM in addition to his 8:00 PM dose wife aware. Behavior note dated 10/7/22 at 5:20 PM read, Resident was asleep at beginning of the shift in common area. He was cooperative with med administration and consumed breakfast of 100%. As the day went by he became more active, pacing the court in and out of resident's rooms, and has plundered through others belongings, difficult to divert his attention. This behavior usually occurs after wife has left from visiting and if he happens to verbally mention her to staff that's when he becomes anxious. Behavior note dated 10/7/2022 at 5:30 PM read, Resident continues to search for his wife after she left about an hour ago, staff reassured him that she would return first thing in the morning. Resident then began calm down as stopped pacing and searching for his wife. Resident did mention earlier that the women here are stealing money and that he did not trust people who stold [sic] his money. Once again verbal reassurance given that there are no theifs [sic] here at G.S.C. Nursing note dated 10/08/22 at 6:45 PM read, resident restless in AM, pacing hall at frequent intervals, later less restless. Resident refused 2:00 PM Ativan, denies dizziness states I don't want to take it anymore. Wife reported resident having hallucinations. Resident restless in evening, moving tables, taking down decorations, easily redirected, but requires frequent redirection. Elopement note dated 10/9/22 at 6:44 AM read, This writer was informed by the [200 hall nurse's name] via phone at 3:48 AM on 10/9/22 that resident was combative, agitated and physically aggressive. [200 hall nurse's name] said she could not get through to switchboard to call the on-call provider. Then this writer received another phone call from [200 hall nurse's name] that the resident broke a window, and he eloped through the broken window, and that she just called 911. An interview was attempted on 11/17/22 at approximately 1:28 PM with Staff B, CNA via telephone for clarification of behaviors experienced and resistance to redirection for Resident #1. A message was left, and no return call was received. An interview was attempted on 11/17/22 at approximately 1:28 PM with Staff C, CNA via telephone for clarification of behaviors experienced and resistance to redirection for Resident #1. A message was left, and no return call was received. Review of the documentation provided by the facility on 11/17/22 showed [Name of Psychology Service Provider] onsite visits to Good Samaritan Center conducted by Staff A, ARNP (Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner), providing services to residents on 9/20/22 and 10/4/22. During an interview on 11/17/22 at 2:12 PM, the Director of Nursing confirmed Resident #2 was on the list to be seen by psychology services but was not seen prior to the elopement. During an interview on 11/17/22 at 3:41 PM, the Medical Director/Resident #2's attending physician stated, He [Resident #2] was very dependent on being with his wife. He is a retired mechanic and likes to take apart things, like the air conditioner. He had a lot of high anxiety and had eloped from his house. We did not know that he was disturbed as much as he was. When he started getting more aggressive, we were looking at his medications. I would have expected him to be seen on one of those occasions when [Name of Psychological Service Provider] was in the building prior to the elopement. Review of the medical services agreement between [Name of Psychology Service Provider] doing business as (dba) [Name of Psychology Service Provider] and the facility dba Good Samaritan Center dated 4/1/22 read, Facility hereby engages [Name of Psychology Service Provider] to provide the following services to its patients . psychiatry and psychology services. [Name of Psychology Service Provider] will provide engaged services to facility's patients on a weekly, biweekly, or monthly basis depending on the need of the facility which will be a mutually decided between [Name of Psychology Service Provider] and facility. The agreement was signed by the facility Administrator on 4/12/22 and by [Name of Psychology Service Provider] medical director on 4/1/22. Review of facility's assessment tool Section 1.3. read, Indicate if you may accept residents with, or your residence may develop, the following common diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, or combinations of conditions that require complex medical care and management. Table 2: Common diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities. Category. Psychiatric/Mood disorders. Psychosis (hallucinations, delusions, etc.), Impaired Cognition, Mental Disorder, Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Behavior that Needs Interventions. Section VII. Part 2: Services and care we offer based on our resident's needs. Table 4. Mental Health and Behavior. Manage the medical conditions and medication related issues causing psychiatric symptoms and behavior, identify and implement interventions to help support individuals with issues such as dealing with anxiety, care of someone with cognitive impairment, care of individuals with depression, trauma/PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), other psychiatric diagnosis, intellectual or developmental disabilities. Psychiatrist sees patients in the facility each month and is available for phone consultation 24/7. Review of the facility's policy titled Behavioral Health Services with a revised date of February 2019 read, Policy Statement. 1. The facility will provide, and residents will receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 2. Residents who exhibit signs of emotional psychosocial distress receive services and support that address their individual needs and goals for care.
Mar 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0638 (Tag F0638)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by Centers for Medicaid and Medica...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services not less frequently than once every 3 months for 1 of 2 residents sampled for Minimum Data Set (MDS) review, Resident #1, in a total sample of 46 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the resident had not been discharged from the facility during the time period from 10/20/2021 to 3/3/2022 and that Resident #1's most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was a significant change assessment which was completed on 10/20/2021. During an interview on 3/3/2022 at 9:06 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verified that Resident #1's most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was a significant change assessment, which was completed on 10/20/2021, and that Resident #1 had not had a comprehensive assessment conducted since that date. During an interview on 3/3/2022 at 9:16 AM, Staff D, MDS Registered Nurse, stated, [Resident #1's Name] has missed a quarterly MDS assessment. It will need to be completed. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, reads, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The assessment coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessments are submitted to CMS' QIES Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in accordance with current federal and state guidelines.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident equipment was maintained in a sanitar...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident equipment was maintained in a sanitary and safe operating condition for 1 of 5 residents observed with wheelchairs, Resident #6, in a total sample of 46 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's records revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses to include hemiplegia following cerebral infarction, hypertension, and history of falling. Review of Resident #6's care plan revealed the resident had self-care deficit and required extensive assistance in self-care abilities including dressing, toileting, bathing related to hemiparesis on left side. On 2/28/2022 at 2:02 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 in bed, awake, alert, and oriented to name and place. There was a wide wheelchair at bedside that was unclean with reddish colored stains and food debris on the brake handles, the tread on the wheelchair tires was almost completely worn off and in disrepair, and the left wheel was tilted outward. During an interview with Resident #6 on 2/28/2022 at 2:02 PM, when asked if her wheelchair had been cleaned or checked, Resident #6 stated, Not that I know of. On 3/2/2022 at 8:42 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 was up on her wheelchair. Wheelchair remained unclean, with dust buildup, food debris on break handle, and rust buildup. The tread on the wheelchair tires was almost completely worn off and the left wheel was tilted outward. During an interview on 3/2/2022 at 8:44 AM, Resident #6 stated she came in here over three months ago and stated, I came in here last November and had this same wheelchair and have not seen them clean my wheelchair. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/2/2022 at 8:55 AM, when asked how often the wheelchairs were cleaned and maintained, the DON stated, I do not know. Let me ask housekeeping. The DON confirmed Resident #6's wheelchair was unclean and confirmed that the tires needed repair. During an interview with the Environmental Service Director (ESD) on 3/2/2022 at 9:26 AM, in the presence of the DON, stated that she was the Environmental Service Director (ESD) for the past 10 years. She stated the wheelchairs are pressured cleaned bi-annually, every 6 months by the housekeeping staff. The maintenance department does the preventive maintenance. We clean all the wheelchairs in the entire building, including shower chairs. We take them out court by court (Dogwood, Magnolia, and Camellia units) and pressure clean them. They were last cleaned on January 5, 2022 [Resident #6's name] wheelchair is unclean and has some rust, the wheels are tilted, and agreed that it [wheelchair] has not been pressure cleaned since last January. On 3/2/22 at 9:30 AM, the DON and ESD confirmed that Resident # 6's wheelchair was unclean and needed some repair or replacement. During an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor on 3/2/2022 at 10:49 AM, when asked about the facility's preventive maintenance (PM) process on residents' wheelchairs, he stated, We do not have a PM for wheelchairs. It is done as needed. I will receive a work order from the courts [facility units], then I go and check the wheelchair and do what is needed. I have not seen [Resident #6' name] wheelchair until today when I received a work order. He confirmed that Resident #6's wheelchair wheel was bent outward, and he had to remove some parts. When asked if he does maintenance rounding to check on equipment/wheelchair condition, he stated, I do, but I did not see her wheelchair. The CNAs are probably using the old work order system, so I am not getting the work order sheet. They are aware to use the new work order system. Review of the work order log from December 2021 to March 2022 did not reveal Resident #6's name on the log. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Resident Wheelchair Cleaning last reviewed on 12/29/2021, reads, Policy: The intent of this policy is to establish a procedure for the proper and safe technique to be used for cleaning manually operated wheelchairs. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Preventive Maintenance Program, last reviewed on 12/29/2021, reads, Policy: A Preventive Maintenance Program shall be developed and implemented to ensure the provision of a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for the residents, staff, and the public. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The Maintenance Director or designee is responsible for maintaining a schedule of maintenance services to ensure that the buildings, grounds, and equipment are maintained in a safe and operable manner. 2. The Maintenance Director or designee shall inspect aspects of the physical plant to determine if Preventive maintenance (PM) is required. Required PM may be determined from manufacturer's recommendations, maintenance requests, rounding, life safety requirements, or experience. 3. If preventive maintenance is required, the Maintenance Director or designee shall decide what tasks need to be completed and how often to complete them. 4. The Maintenance Director or designee shall develop a schedule to assist with keeping track of all tasks. 5. Documentation shall be completed of all tasks and kept in Maintenance Directors' office.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Florida.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
  • • 32% turnover. Below Florida's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 9 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Good Samaritan Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Good Samaritan Center Staffed?

CMS rates GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 32%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Good Samaritan Center?

State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 8 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Good Samaritan Center?

GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 161 certified beds and approximately 118 residents (about 73% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in LIVE OAK, Florida.

How Does Good Samaritan Center Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (32%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Good Samaritan Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Good Samaritan Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Good Samaritan Center Stick Around?

GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 32%, which is about average for Florida nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Good Samaritan Center Ever Fined?

GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Good Samaritan Center on Any Federal Watch List?

GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.