SURREY PLACE NURSING CENTER

110 SE LEE AVE, LIVE OAK, FL 32064 (386) 364-5961
For profit - Corporation 60 Beds BENJAMIN LANDA Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
9/100
#570 of 690 in FL
Last Inspection: July 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Surrey Place Nursing Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about care quality and overall management. It ranks #570 out of 690 facilities in Florida, placing it in the bottom half, and #3 out of 3 in Suwannee County, meaning there are no local options rated better. While the facility is showing improvement, reducing issues from 12 in 2023 to 3 in 2024, it still has a concerning history, including $65,816 in fines, which is higher than 90% of Florida facilities. Staffing is a relative strength with a 4/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 39%, which is below the state average, indicating that staff members tend to stay longer and are familiar with residents. However, critical incidents have been reported, such as unqualified staff administering intravenous medications without proper training, posing serious risks to resident safety.

Trust Score
F
9/100
In Florida
#570/690
Bottom 18%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
12 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
39% turnover. Near Florida's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$65,816 in fines. Lower than most Florida facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 51 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Florida. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 12 issues
2024: 3 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (39%)

    9 points below Florida average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Florida average (3.2)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 39%

Near Florida avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $65,816

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: BENJAMIN LANDA

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
Jul 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident #36, and for 1 of 3 residents re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident #36, and for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents, Resident #3. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #36's physician order dated 5/1/2024 showed the order read, Cardizem Oral Tablet 30 mg [milligrams] (Diltiazem HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for HTN [Hypertension] Hold for HR [Heart Rate] <60 [less than 60] or SBP [Systolic Blood Pressure] <100 [greater than 100]. Review of Resident #36's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2024 for administration of one Cardizem oral tablet 30 mg (Diltiazem HCl) every 8 hours for hypertension (Hold for HR <60 or SBP <100) with the start date of 5/1/2024 and discontinuation date of 6/6/2024 showed the resident received the medication on 6/4/2024 at 2:00 PM with blood pressure and pulse coded as NA (not applicable). Review of Resident #36's physician order dated 6/6/2024 showed the order read, Cardizem Oral Tablet 30 mg (Diltiazem HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for HTN Hold for HR <60 or SBP <110. Review of Resident #36's MAR for June 2024 for administration of one Cardizem oral tablet 30 mg (Diltiazem HCl) every 8 hours for hypertension (Hold for HR <60 or SBP <110) with the start date of 6/6/2024 showed the resident received the medication on 6/16/2024 at 10:00 PM with blood pressure and pulse documented as X, and on 6/18/2024, 6/21/2024, 6/22/2024, and 6/26/2024 at 2:00 PM with blood pressure and pulse coded as NA and 10 (Vitals/blood sugar out of parameter). During an interview on 7/3/2024 at 9:09 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I reached out to the staff that were involved in the medication administration. The medication was given, but the staff did not go back to put the vitals in. I tried to look for the vitals and I could not locate them. The staff should be inputting the parameters in the electronic record if the medication ask for parameters. 2. Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 6/5/2024 showed the order read, RNP [Restorative Nursing Program]: Splinting- one time daily. Review of Resident #3's task sheet for assistance to apply left hand splint for at least 4 hours daily from 6/3/2024 through 7/1/2024 showed it was documented as Not Applicable on 6/7/2024 at 2:31 PM, 6/14/2024 at 2:54 PM, 6/17/2024 at 5:03 PM, 6/18/2024 at 6:59 PM, 6/21/2024 at 3:21 PM, 6/24/2024 at 3:05 PM, 6/29/2024 at 3:18 PM, 6/30/2024 at 3:12 PM, and 7/1/2024 at 3:57 PM. During an interview on 7/2/2024 at 10:30 AM, the DON stated, The staff should not be recording the splint application as not applicable. It should be either time applied or that the resident refused. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Charting with the last review date of 2/15/2024, showed the policy read, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Medications given, services performed, etc. are recorded in the resident's chart. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Administration of Drugs with the last review date of 2/15/2024, showed the policy read, Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 9. The nurse administering the drug must record such information on the resident's eMAR [electronic medication administration record] before administering the next resident's drug.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control standards during medication administration for 2 of 5 residents observed, Resident #3...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control standards during medication administration for 2 of 5 residents observed, Resident #35 and Resident #7, and during wound care for 1 of 2 residents observed, Resident #32, and failed to ensure staff disinfected the reusable medical equipment to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases. Findings include: During an observation on 7/2/2024 at 7:57 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was preparing medications for Resident #35. A dark colored capsule fell onto the top of the medication cart while popping the medication blister pack. Staff A picked up the capsule from the top of the medication cart with an ungloved hand and placed it into the medication cup. Staff A entered Resident #35's room and administered the medication. During an observation on 7/2/2024 at 8:05 AM, Staff A, LPN, poured medications into a medication cup for Resident #7. Staff A asked Resident #7 if she would like her potassium tablet to be cut in half and the resident replied Yes. Staff A, without donning gloves, removed the potassium tablet from the medication cup with her hands and cut the potassium tablet in half and placed the two halves of the medication back into the medication cup. Resident #7 asked Staff A to take her blood pressure one more time. Staff A placed a wrist blood pressure monitor on the resident's right wrist. Staff A read the blood pressure reading to the resident. Resident #7 asked Staff A if she could take her blood pressure manually. Staff A exited the room and walked towards the vital signs monitor covered with a plastic bag and removed the manual blood pressure cuff from the basket. Staff A returned to Resident #7's room and took Resident #7's blood pressure manually. Staff A read the blood pressure reading and Resident #7 accepted to take the medications. Staff A administered the medications to Resident #7. Staff A exited Resident #7's room and without sanitizing the manual blood pressure cuff, placed it back into the basket and covered the vital signs monitor with the plastic bag. During an interview on 7/2/2024 at 8:25 AM, Staff A, LPN, stated, I should have probably worn gloves when touching the medication and the one capsule that fell. I should have discarded and given another capsule. I should have sanitized the blood pressure cuff after using it with [Resident #7 name]. During an interview on 7/2/2024 at 9:28 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, If the staff drops the medication, they should dispose of it and get a new one. The staff should always wear gloves when handling medication and should clean the medical equipment in between patient use. If the patient vitals machines out in the hallway are covered with the plastic bag, it means they are clean and ready to be used on the next resident. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Cleaning Blood Pressure Cuffs with the last review date of 2/15/2024 showed the policy read, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent cross contamination when cleaning a blood pressure cuff. Procedure Guidelines . 2. Obtain alcohol prep pad or swab and use firm pressure to clean the blood pressure cuff before and after each resident use. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Oral Medications with the last review date of 2/15/2024 showed the policy read, Protective Barriers That May Be Required: Handwashing, Gloves (as indicated) . Steps in the Procedure . 5. For unit dose tablets/capsules put packaged tablet/capsule directly into medicine cup. During an observation on 7/2/2024 at 9:40 AM, Staff B, LPN, Unit Manager, performed hand hygiene and entered Resident #32's room. Staff B donned gloves and removed a dressing dated 7/2/2024 from Resident #32's left heel. Staff B removed gloves and, without performing hand hygiene, donned a new set of gloves. Staff B cleansed the left heel wound area, pat the area dry, applied the ordered treatment and applied a new dressing without performing hand hygiene in between any of the wound care steps. During an interview on 7/2/2024 at 9:48 AM, Staff B, LPN, Unit Manager, stated, I should have washed my hands when I took off my gloves after removing the dressing. I forgot. During an interview on 7/2/2024 at 10:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, The nursing staff should perform hand hygiene after removing gloves and when hands are considered contaminated. The nurse should have washed her hands in between the wound care steps. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Dressing, Non-Sterile with the last review date of 2/15/2024 showed the policy read, Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to provide guideline for non-sterile dressing changes to protect wounds from injury and to prevent the introduction of bacteria . Steps in the procedure . 10. Put on disposable exam gloves. 11. Loosen tape and remove soiled dressing. 12. Pull glove over dressing and discard into appropriate receptacle. 13. Wash hands or sanitize with ABHR [Alcohol Based Hand Rub] (if not visibly soiled). 14. Put on clean gloves. 16. Cleanse the wound. Use separate gauze for each cleansing stroke. Clean from the most contaminated area to the least contaminated area. 17. Use dry gauze to pat the wound dry. 18. Wash hands or sanitize hands with ABHR (if not visibly soiled) and apply new gloves. 19. Supply the ordered dressing and secure with tape.
Feb 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0582 (Tag F0582)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident representative received the refund ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident representative received the refund due the resident within 30 days from the resident's date of discharge from the facility for 1 of 3 residents sampled for financial status review, Resident #1. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission record showed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/13/2023 showed the resident will be discharged to an assisted living facility on 10/16/2023. Review of Resident #1's financial statement dated 2/21/2024 showed the resident has made a payment of $1,614.00 on 10/3/2023. The statement showed the resident was due $1,093.35 on 1/17/2024. During an interview on 2/21/2024 at 8:49 AM, Resident #1's Daughter stated that the resident had moved out on October 16, 2023, and she had not received a refund from the facility for unused days. During an interview on 2/21/2024 at 11:00 AM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) stated, [Resident #1's name] discharged to hospital on [DATE]. I sent refund status to [Third Party [NAME] Company's Staff] on 1/17/24 at 1:26 PM. I called third party billing company on 2/1/24 and asked the status of account for [Resident #1's name]. She told a prior employee left with no access to email with ledger for $1,093.35 due to a liability payment. Payment refund will be sent to [Resident #1's name] daughter. It was signed as accepted status on 1/17/24. During an interview on 2/21/2024 at 12:11 PM, Third Party [NAME] Company's Staff stated, [Resident #1's Name] refund has not been processed due to several employees quitting with no notice and no access to her email. It has been approved, processed and will be mailed today. Review of the facility contract signed by Resident #1 on 3/21/2023 reads, 13. Refunds payable shall be confirmed by audit by the Center's accounting office. All refunds due to the resident: a) shall be made regardless of the reason for the resident leaving.c) refunds will be made for any prepaid room and board services for which payment has been received. The refund of the unused portion of prepaid fees and charges will be made within 30 days following resident's death, refunds will be made in accordance with state and federal law) in cases where third party coverage is involved (Medicare, Medicaid, Insurance) refunds may be delayed until formal determination and documentation of a resident's eligibility is received by the Center from the appropriate agency.
Mar 2023 10 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from medical neglect. T...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from medical neglect. The facility failed to ensure licensed practical nurses had the appropriate skills and competency to administer intravenous (IV) medication via central line access devices for 1 of 1 residents, Resident #197. The lack of IV certification and validation of competency for IV medication administration can result in an increased risk of infection, damage to veins and the injection sites, an air embolism (a blood vessel blockage cause by one or more bubbles of air or other gas in the circulatory system), phlebitis (inflammation of a vein), and blood clots. The lack of training and verification to assess IV patency (the line is open and not blocked allowing the treatment to flow directly into patients' vein) can increase the spread of infection and can result in the likelihood of increased harm and/or death. Findings include: During an observation on [DATE] at 9:03 AM Resident #197 was in his room lying in bed. There is a double lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) covered with a transparent dressing observed to the resident's upper right arm. The transparent dressing was dated [DATE] written with a black marker. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:04 AM Resident #197 stated, I have this IV [intravenous catheter] for antibiotics to treat the infection I have in my big toe. Review of Resident #197's admission record documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm, osteomyelitis of ankle and foot (infection of the bone), cerebral aneurysm (a weak or think spot on an artery in the brain), depression, heart failure unspecified, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician order report for [DATE] through [DATE] documented an order dated [DATE] for Resident #197 that read, Normal Saline Flush [sodium chloride 0.9% flush] syringe; amt [amount to administer]: 10 ml [milliliters]; injection. Special Instructions: Flush before and after each IV medication administration. Every shift. [Dated] [DATE] Meropenem recon soln [reconstituted solution]; 1 gram; amt]: 1 gram; intravenous. Dx [diagnosis]: Other [osteomyelitis, ankle and foot]. Every 8 hours. [Dated] [DATE] Vancomycin recon soln; 1.25 gram; amt: 1.25 gram; intravenous. Dx Other [osteomyelitis, ankle and foot]. Once a day. Review of the Medication Administration History for Resident #197 documented Staff A, License Practical Nurse (LPN), administered 10 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% before and the administration of Meropenem 1 gram on [DATE] at 3:32 PM and on [DATE] at 2:00 PM. Review of the Medication Administration History for Resident #197 documented Staff G, LPN, administered 10 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% before and after the administration of the IV medication Meropenem 1 gram reconstituted solution on [DATE] at 11:56 PM, [DATE] at 10:00 PM, [DATE] at 6:00 AM, [DATE] at 10:00 PM and [DATE] at 6:00 AM. Dated [DATE] Staff G, LPN administered 1.25 grams of Vancomycin reconstituted solution IV on [DATE] at 5:31 AM. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:09 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, We have no IV certification records for Staff A, LPN. He was contacted and cannot produce a certification. If the MAR [Medication Administration Record/Medication Administration History] is initialed by a nurse, it means the medication was given by that nurse unless if there is parenthesis which means they made a note. The Staff Developer and Human Resources are responsible for verification of staff certification. During the interview a request was made for the IV Certification for Staff G. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:30 AM Staff C, Unit Manager LPN, stated, LPNs need to have IV certification. The Human Resource staff and Staff Development is responsible for making sure staff have all certifications upon hire. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:41 AM Staff A, LPN, stated, Yesterday I helped administer medication. The Assistant Director of Nursing was in the room with me. I hung medication, flushed, and cleaned the port. I was supervised. I am always supervised by an RN [Registered Nurse]. The facility did not request IV certification from me upon hire. I did not know I needed IV certification. I have done IV medication administration before. I do not know how to place an IV in an arm [to insert an IV] but I know how to hang medication. When I was hired, I was trained and shown how to administer medication via IV. The first time the nurse showed me [how to administer IV medications]. After that, she has always supervised me doing the administration and flushes. The RN is always with me at all times. Normally I will do it and chart under my name since he is my resident. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:55 PM the Human Resource/ABOM (Assistant Business Office Manager) stated, The IV certification would be kept in the employee file only if provided, it is not requested. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:55 PM the Staffing Coordinator stated, Staff is assigned to halls. I leave it up to the nursing staff to tell me if they are capable or not of treating the resident. I hold a CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] license. I am aware that the RN is the only one who is able to do PICC lines. I do not have copies of all the nurses' certifications. I am the only one who schedules. The head nursing department is responsible to verify certifications. I assume that all the credentials have been verified by the head of nursing. We do not have a 24-hour RN on the schedule. From 7 PM to 7 AM we do not have an RN. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:21 PM the Staff Developer stated, Upon hire, I will request the license, CPR [cardiopulmonary resuscitation], and any certifications. Prior to me, it was [name of the previous owner company] who was in charge of all the onboarding. Upon hire, I request the IV certification and give them up to 30 days. If the staff does not provide the certification, I have to readdress. During orientation, I asked [Staff A's name] for his certification. [Staff A's name] stated he had it. When [Staff A's name] did not provide it in the 30-day time frame, I readdressed, and we were in the process of a teachable moment. Review of the personnel record for Staff A, LPN documented the LPN's hire date as [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:21 PM the DON stated, Newly hired staff are told upon hire if there is something that they are not able to do or do not feel comfortable there is a 24-hour RN that is on call that is able to assist. We stress constantly that if a task is not in their scope of practice or they are unable to complete ask for assistance. Upon hire, the Staff Development will do the competency and skills fair. My expectation for [Staff A's name] would be to get an RN that was on duty and assist and perform the task for him. It is not the practice of the facility to allow a non-IV Certified LPN to administer IV medications supervised. That was not the case there was no RN in the building that approved of [Staff A's name] to administer IV medications. It would be falsification of documentation to only initial; an LPN will not be allowed to initial the task if they had not performed the task themselves. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:40 PM the ADON stated, I have not been in the room with an LPN to supervise or walk through IV medication administration for [Resident #197's name]. Onboarding is done by Staff Development and Human Resources goes behind with a checklist. I don't get an official notification of who is certified. I understand that someone will learn in school what their scope is that would be my expectation. The Staff Developer is the one who should be checking the paperwork and verifying that all LPNs have all certifications. I don't know if the Staff Developer reports to the DON since everything in the building falls under her. I will find out who is responsible for verifying agency [LPNs]. I have provided emergency cover for 7 PM-7 AM. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:05 PM the Medical Director stated, If nursing staff is non-IV certified, they should not be doing medication administration via IV. I was not aware that LPNs were administering medications via IV and were not certified. If the staff is not certified they might not know what they are doing and there is a risk for infection, mishandling of the IV port, bleeding, pain, the list can go on, but it is only a potential. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:35 AM, the DON stated, The facility does not have IV Certification for [Staff A's name] and [Staff G's name]. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:56 PM, Staff G stated, I became a nurse in the 1990s and while working at [Name of facility], I took a [Name of pharmacy] IV certification course in [Name of City], but I have not been able to locate the paperwork. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:58 PM, the DON, stated, There was an IV certified LPN, but I don't know why [Staff G's name] didn't ask for assistance. Ultimately, as far as the nursing department, I oversee nursing staff qualifications and the Staff Developer. [Staff G's name] verbally told us that she is IV certified. IV certification was requested. No documentation was provided of IV certifications for Staff A or Staff G. During an interview on [DATE] at 7:20 AM the Administrator stated, I understand there is a certification LPNs need to obtain that certifies them for IVs. The hiring process is new with all the corporate buy outs. Now we have a Human Resource Manager. Upon hire employees are ask for any and all certificates they have; if they do not produce the certifications, we assume they do not have them. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:30 AM the DON stated, It is not up to me to determine what neglect is. I would have to refer to my neglect policy. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:30 AM with Administrator stated, It would be neglect if we were aware and condoned it. Our policy does not condone. This was a [NAME] employee. We expect the staff to work within their scope of practice. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:34 AM the Director of Clinical Services, stated, I would consider it neglect if the staff worked outside their scope. We did not have a system in place to check for qualifications. We expect staff to work within their scope of practice, we trusted them. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:57 PM with the Administrator stated, We didn't have a process in place for verification of staff qualifications. The previous company took care of the onboarding and now the new company has HR [Human Resource] in house. We have weekly meetings and daily staff meetings. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:57 PM the Staffing Coordinator stated, I depend on higher nursing staff for qualifications. I am responsible for the hours per resident care and PBJ [Payroll Based Journal, a system for facilities to submit staffing information]. I rely on the head of nursing to verify staff certifications and qualifications. I was trained on hours per resident care and PBJ. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property with a last review date of [DATE], read, Definitions of Types of Abuse: Neglect - Is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Policy Components . C. Prevention: Ensuring that residents are free from neglect by having the structures and processes to provide needed care and services to all residents. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Administrative Policies for Infusion Therapy Facility Responsibilities with a last reviewed date of [DATE], read, Policy . 6. Maintain records of personnel qualified by education and experience who may provide infusion therapy in the facility. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Administrative Policies for Infusion Therapy Facility Policies and Procedures with a last review date of [DATE], read, The policies and procedures of a facility may be more stringent, and duties may be more restrictive than what is permitted by state regulations but may never be more lenient. For example: The State Board of Nursing may indicate that it is within the scope of practice for LPNs to flush Central Venous Catheters in long term care facilities, but it is the individual facility's decision to allow or not allow LPNs to perform the procedure. On the other hand, if the State Board of Nursing prohibits LPNs from flushing Central Venous Catheter in long term care facilities, then a facility may NEVER allow an LPN to perform that procedure. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Administrative Policies for Infusion Therapy Legal Issues with a last review date of [DATE], read, Legal Issues . Rule of Personal Liability: No Nurse, LVN [Licensed Vocational Nurse]/LPN or RN, should perform any procedure that he or she has not been specifically trained to do. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Nursing Services with a last review of [DATE], read, Policy . 5. The facility will ensure that licensed nurse have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care. Review of the Board of Nursing Rule Chapter 64B9-12 titled Administration of Intravenous Therapy by Licensed Practical Nurse reads, Section 64B9-12.005 - Competency and Knowledge Requirements Necessary to Qualify the LPN to Administer IV Therapy .(2) Central Lines. The Board recognizes that through appropriate education and training, a Licensed Practical Nurse is capable of performing intravenous therapy via central lines under the direction of a registered professional nurse as defined in subsection 64B9-12.002(2), F.A.C. [Florida Administrative Code] Appropriate education and training requires a minimum of four (4) hours of instruction. The requisite four (4) hours of instruction may be included as part of the thirty (30) hours required for intravenous therapy education specified in subsection (4) of this rule. The education and training required in this subsection shall include, at a minimum, didactic and clinical practicum instruction in the following areas: (a) Central venous anatomy and physiology; (b) CVL [central venous catheters] site assessment; (c) CVL dressing and cap changes; (d) CVL flushing; (e) CVL medication and fluid administration; (f) CVL blood drawing; and (g) CVL complications and remedial measures. Upon completion of the intravenous therapy training via central lines, the Licensed Practical Nurse shall be assessed on both theoretical knowledge and practice, as well as clinical practice and competence. The clinical practice assessment must be witnessed by a Registered Nurse who shall file a proficiency statement regarding the Licensed Practical Nurse's ability to perform intravenous therapy via central lines. The proficiency statement shall be kept in the Licensed Practical Nurse's personnel file. (3) Providers: The LPN/IV education must be sponsored by a provider of continuing education courses approved by the Board pursuant to Rule 64B9-5.005, F.A.C. To be qualified to teach any such course, the instructor must be a currently licensed registered nurse in good standing in this state, have teaching experience, and have professional nursing experience, including IV therapy. The provider will be responsible for issuing a certificate verifying completion of the requisite number of hours and course content. (4) Educational Alternatives. The cognitive training shall include one or more of the following: (a) Post-graduate Level Course. In recognition that the curriculum requirements mandated by Sections 464.019(1)(b), 464.019(1)(f), and 464.019(1)(g), F.S. [Florida Statutes], for practical nursing programs are extensive and that every licensed practical nurse will not administer IV therapy. The course necessary to qualify a licensed practical nurse or graduate practical nurse to administer IV therapy shall be not less than a thirty (30) hour post-graduate level course teaching aspects of IV therapy containing the components enumerated in subsection 64B9-12.005(1), F.A.C.(b) Credit for Previous Education. The continuing education provider may credit the licensed practical nurse or graduate practical nurse for previous IV therapy education on a post-graduate level, providing each component of the course content of subsection 64B9-12.005(1), F.A.C., is tested by and competency demonstrated to the provider. (c) Nontraditional Education. Continuing education providers may select nontraditional education alternatives for acquisition of cognitive content outlined in Rule 64B9-12.005, F.A.C. Such alternatives include: 1. Interactive videos; 2. Self-study; 3. Other nontraditional education that may be submitted to the Board for consideration and possible approval. Any continuing education providers using nontraditional education must make provisions for demonstration of and verification of knowledge. (5) Clinical Competence. The course must be followed by supervised clinical practice in intravenous therapy as needed to demonstrate clinical competence. Verification of clinical competence shall be the responsibility of each institution employing a licensed practical nurse based on institutional protocol. Such verification shall be given through a signed statement of a Florida licensed registered nurse. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed on site on [DATE], after the receipt of an acceptable immediate jeopardy removal plan. The survey team verified the facility's actions for removal of the likelihood of harm and/or possible death as evidenced by the following: On [DATE] during interviews, 6 RNs, 4 LPNs and 5 CNAs confirmed education for abuse/neglect, scope of practice and the 30 hour IV certification requirement for LPN's, the Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Staff Development, Human Resources and the Scheduler confirmed education for abuse/neglect, scope of practice, the 30 hour IV certification requirement for LPN's, and the new system for scheduling per residents needs according to staff qualifications. Review of staff training documented 100% of staff were educated on abuse/neglect and 100% of RNs and LPNs were educated on scope of practice. On [DATE], the facility assessed the residents involved in the IJ situation and conducted a facility-wide audit of all current residents with a PICC line and/or receiving IV medications to identify possible harm, side effects, and injury to the resident due to IV administration. On [DATE], the facility conducted an Ad Hoc QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) meeting and a root cause analysis. On [DATE] all LPN personnel records were audited to verify training credentials. On 3/1 - [DATE], the facility educated all nursing staff related to neglect, scope of practice, and the 30-hour IV certification requirement for LPNs prior to IV medication administration. On [DATE], the Director of Clinical Services provided training to the facility administration on verification of staff competency, working within their scope of practice and abuse/neglect policy. On [DATE], the Director of Clinical Services provided training to the Staff Developer and Staff Scheduler on neglect, scope of practice and supervision of staff. On [DATE], a new system for scheduling per residents needs according to staff qualifications was developed and implemented. On [DATE] the Director of Clinical Services educated the nursing managers on the new scheduling system.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure licensed practical nurses (LPNs) had the appropr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure licensed practical nurses (LPNs) had the appropriate skills and competencies to administer intravenous (IV) medication via central line access devices for 1 of 1 residents, Resident #197. The lack of IV certification and validation of competency for IV medication administration can result in an increased risk of infection, damage to veins and injection sites, an air embolism, phlebitis, and blood clots, causing tissue damage or even be life threatening. The lack of training and verification to assess IV patency (the line is open and not blocked allowing the treatment to flow directly into patients' veins) can increase the spread of infection and can result in the likelihood of increase harm and/or death. Findings include: During an observation on [DATE] at 9:03 AM Resident #197 was in his room lying in bed. There is a double lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) covered with a transparent observed to the resident's upper right arm. The transparent dressing was dated [DATE] written with a black marker. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:04 AM Resident #197 stated, I have this IV [intravenous catheter] for antibiotics to treat the infection I have in my big toe. Review of the physician order report for [DATE] through [DATE] documented an order dated [DATE] for Resident #197 that read, Normal Saline Flush [sodium chloride 0.9% flush] syringe; amt [amount to administer]: 10 ml [milliliters]; injection. Special Instructions: Flush before and after each IV medication administration. Every shift. [Dated] [DATE] Meropenem recon soln [reconstituted solution]; 1 gram; amt]: 1 gram; intravenous. Dx [diagnosis]: Other [osteomyelitis, ankle and foot]. Every 8 hours. [Dated] [DATE] Vancomycin recon soln; 1.25 gram; amt: 1.25 gram; intravenous. Dx Other [osteomyelitis, ankle and foot]. Once a day. Review of the Medication Administration History for Resident #197 documented Staff A, License Practical Nurse (LPN), administered 10 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% before and the administration of Meropenem 1 gram on [DATE] at 3:32 PM and on [DATE] at 2:00 PM. Review of the Medication Administration History for Resident #197 documented Staff G, LPN, administered 10 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% before and after the administration of the IV medication Meropenem 1 gram reconstituted solution on [DATE] at 11:56 PM, [DATE] at 10:00 PM, [DATE] at 6:00 AM, [DATE] at 10:00 PM and [DATE] at 6:00 AM. Dated [DATE] Staff G, LPN administered 1.25 grams of Vancomycin reconstituted solution IV on [DATE] at 5:31 AM. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:09 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, We have no IV certification records for Staff A, LPN. He was contacted and cannot produce a certification. If the MAR [Medication Administration Record/Medication Administration History] is initialed by a nurse, it means the medication was given by that nurse unless if there is parenthesis which means they made a note. The Staff Developer and Human Resources are responsible for verification of staff certification. During the interview a request was made for the IV Certification for Staff G. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:30 AM Staff C, Unit Manager LPN, stated, LPNs need to have IV certification. The Human Resource staff and Staff Development is responsible for making sure staff have all certifications upon hire. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:41 AM Staff A, LPN, stated, Yesterday I helped administer medication. The Assistant Director of Nursing was in the room with me. I hung medication, flushed, and cleaned the port. I was supervised. I am always supervised by an RN [Registered Nurse]. The facility did not request IV certification from me upon hire. I did not know I needed IV certification. I have done IV medication administration before. I do not know how to place an IV in an arm [to insert an IV] but I know how to hang medication. When I was hired, I was trained and shown how to administer medication via IV. The first time the nurse showed me [how to administer IV medications]. After that, she has always supervised me doing the administration and flushes. The RN is always with me at all times. Normally I will do it and chart under my name since he is my resident. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:55 PM the Human Resource/ABOM (Assistant Business Office Manager) stated, The IV certification would be kept in the employee file only if provided, it is not requested. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:55 PM the Staffing Coordinator stated, Staff is assigned to halls. I leave it up to the nursing staff to tell me if they are capable or not of treating the resident. I hold a CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] license. I am aware that the RN is the only one who is able to do PICC lines. I do not have copies of all the nurses' certifications. I am the only one who schedules. The head nursing department is responsible to verify certifications. I assume that all the credentials have been verified by the head of nursing. We do not have a 24-hour RN on the schedule. From 7 PM to 7 AM we do not have an RN. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:21 PM the Staff Developer stated, Upon hire, I will request the license, CPR [cardiopulmonary resuscitation], and any certifications. Prior to me, it was [name of the previous owner company] who was in charge of all the onboarding. Upon hire, I request the IV certification and give them up to 30 days. If the staff does not provide the certification, I have to readdress. During orientation, I asked [Staff A's name] for his certification. [Staff A's name] stated he had it. When [Staff A's name] did not provide it in the 30-day time frame, I readdressed, and we were in the process of a teachable moment. Review of the personnel record for Staff A, LPN documented the LPN's hire date as [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:21 PM the DON stated, Newly hired staff are told upon hire if there is something that they are not able to do or do not feel comfortable there is a 24-hour RN that is on call that is able to assist. We stress constantly that if a task is not in their scope of practice or they are unable to complete ask for assistance. Upon hire, the Staff Development will do the competency and skills fair. My expectation for [Staff A's name] would be to get an RN that was on duty and assist and perform the task for him. It is not the practice of the facility to allow a non-IV Certified LPN to administer IV medications supervised. That was not the case there was no RN in the building that approved of [Staff A's name] to administer IV medications. It would be falsification of documentation to only initial; an LPN will not be allowed to initial the task if they had not performed the task themselves. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:40 PM the ADON stated, I have not been in the room with an LPN to supervise or walk through IV medication administration for [Resident #197's name]. Onboarding is done by Staff Development and Human Resources goes behind with a checklist. I don't get an official notification of who is certified. I understand that someone will learn in school what their scope is that would be my expectation. The Staff Developer is the one who should be checking the paperwork and verifying that all LPNs have all certifications. I don't know if the Staff Developer reports to the DON since everything in the building falls under her. I will find out who is responsible for verifying agency [LPNs]. I have provided emergency cover for 7 PM-7 AM. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:05 PM the Medical Director stated, If nursing staff is non-IV certified, they should not be doing medication administration via IV. I was not aware that LPNs were administering medications via IV and were not certified. If the staff is not certified they might not know what they are doing and there is a risk for infection, mishandling of the IV port, bleeding, pain, the list can go on, but it is only a potential. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:35 AM, the DON stated, The facility does not have IV Certification for [Staff A's name] and [Staff G's name]. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:56 PM, Staff G stated, I became a nurse in the 1990s and while working at [Name of facility], I took a [Name of pharmacy] IV certification course in [Name of City], but I have not been able to locate the paperwork. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:58 PM, the DON, stated, There was an IV certified LPN, but I don't know why [Staff G's name] didn't ask for assistance. Ultimately, as far as the nursing department, I oversee nursing staff qualifications and the Staff Developer. [Staff G's name] verbally told us that she is IV certified. IV certification was requested. No documentation was provided of IV certifications for Staff A or Staff G. During an interview on [DATE] at 7:20 AM the Administrator stated, I understand there is a certification LPNs need to obtain that certifies them for IVs. The hiring process is new with all the corporate buy outs. Now we have a Human Resource Manager. Upon hire employees are ask for any and all certificates they have; if they do not produce the certifications, we assume they do not have them. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:34 AM the Director of Clinical Services stated, We did not have a system in place to check for qualifications. We expect staff to work within their scope of practice, we trusted them. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:57 PM with the Administrator stated, We didn't have a process in place for verification of staff qualifications. The previous company took care of the onboarding and now the new company has HR [Human Resource] in house. We have weekly meetings and daily staff meetings. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:57 PM the Staffing Coordinator stated, I depend on higher nursing staff for qualifications. I am responsible for the hours per resident care and PBJ [Payroll Based Journal, a system for facilities to submit staffing information]. I rely on the head of nursing to verify staff certifications and qualifications. I was trained on hours per resident care and PBJ. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Administrative Policies for Infusion Therapy Facility Responsibilities with a last reviewed date of [DATE], read, Policy . 6. Maintain records of personnel qualified by education and experience who may provide infusion therapy in the facility. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Administrative Policies for Infusion Therapy Facility Policies and Procedures with a last review date of [DATE], read, The policies and procedures of a facility may be more stringent, and duties may be more restrictive than what is permitted by state regulations but may never be more lenient. For example: The State Board of Nursing may indicate that it is within the scope of practice for LPNs to flush Central Venous Catheters in long term care facilities, but it is the individual facility's decision to allow or not allow LPNs to perform the procedure. On the other hand, if the State Board of Nursing prohibits LPNs from flushing Central Venous Catheter in long term care facilities, then a facility may NEVER allow an LPN to perform that procedure. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Administrative Policies for Infusion Therapy Legal Issues with a last review date of [DATE], read, Legal Issues . Rule of Personal Liability: No Nurse, LVN [Licensed Vocational Nurse]/LPN or RN, should perform any procedure that he or she has not been specifically trained to do. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Nursing Services with a last review of [DATE], read, Policy . 5. The facility will ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care. Review of the Board of Nursing Rule Chapter 64B9-12 titled Administration of Intravenous Therapy by Licensed Practical Nurse reads, Section 64B9-12.005 - Competency and Knowledge Requirements Necessary to Qualify the LPN to Administer IV Therapy .(2) Central Lines. The Board recognizes that through appropriate education and training, a Licensed Practical Nurse is capable of performing intravenous therapy via central lines under the direction of a registered professional nurse as defined in subsection 64B9-12.002(2), F.A.C. [Florida Administrative Code] Appropriate education and training requires a minimum of four (4) hours of instruction. The requisite four (4) hours of instruction may be included as part of the thirty (30) hours required for intravenous therapy education specified in subsection (4) of this rule. The education and training required in this subsection shall include, at a minimum, didactic and clinical practicum instruction in the following areas: (a) Central venous anatomy and physiology; (b) CVL [central venous catheters] site assessment; (c) CVL dressing and cap changes; (d) CVL flushing; (e) CVL medication and fluid administration; (f) CVL blood drawing; and (g) CVL complications and remedial measures. Upon completion of the intravenous therapy training via central lines, the Licensed Practical Nurse shall be assessed on both theoretical knowledge and practice, as well as clinical practice and competence. The clinical practice assessment must be witnessed by a Registered Nurse who shall file a proficiency statement regarding the Licensed Practical Nurse's ability to perform intravenous therapy via central lines. The proficiency statement shall be kept in the Licensed Practical Nurse's personnel file. (3) Providers: The LPN/IV education must be sponsored by a provider of continuing education courses approved by the Board pursuant to Rule 64B9-5.005, F.A.C. To be qualified to teach any such course, the instructor must be a currently licensed registered nurse in good standing in this state, have teaching experience, and have professional nursing experience, including IV therapy. The provider will be responsible for issuing a certificate verifying completion of the requisite number of hours and course content. (4) Educational Alternatives. The cognitive training shall include one or more of the following: (a) Post-graduate Level Course. In recognition that the curriculum requirements mandated by Sections 464.019(1)(b), 464.019(1)(f), and 464.019(1)(g), F.S. [Florida Statutes], for practical nursing programs are extensive and that every licensed practical nurse will not administer IV therapy. The course necessary to qualify a licensed practical nurse or graduate practical nurse to administer IV therapy shall be not less than a thirty (30) hour post-graduate level course teaching aspects of IV therapy containing the components enumerated in subsection 64B9-12.005(1), F.A.C.(b) Credit for Previous Education. The continuing education provider may credit the licensed practical nurse or graduate practical nurse for previous IV therapy education on a post-graduate level, providing each component of the course content of subsection 64B9-12.005(1), F.A.C., is tested by and competency demonstrated to the provider. (c) Nontraditional Education. Continuing education providers may select nontraditional education alternatives for acquisition of cognitive content outlined in Rule 64B9-12.005, F.A.C. Such alternatives include: 1. Interactive videos; 2. Self-study; 3. Other nontraditional education that may be submitted to the Board for consideration and possible approval. Any continuing education providers using nontraditional education must make provisions for demonstration of and verification of knowledge. (5) Clinical Competence. The course must be followed by supervised clinical practice in intravenous therapy as needed to demonstrate clinical competence. Verification of clinical competence shall be the responsibility of each institution employing a licensed practical nurse based on institutional protocol. Such verification shall be given through a signed statement of a Florida licensed registered nurse. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed on site on [DATE], after the receipt of an acceptable immediate jeopardy removal plan. The survey team verified the facility's actions for removal of the likelihood of harm and/or possible death as evidenced by the following: On [DATE] during interviews, 6 RNs, 4 LPNs and 5 CNAs confirmed education for abuse/neglect, scope of practice and the 30 hour IV certification requirement for LPN's, the Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Staff Development, Human Resources and the Scheduler confirmed education for abuse/neglect, scope of practice, the 30 hour IV certification requirement for LPN's, and the new system for scheduling per residents needs according to staff qualifications. Review of staff training documented 100% of staff were educated on abuse/neglect and 100% of RNs and LPNs were educated on scope of practice. On [DATE], the facility assessed the residents involved in the IJ situation and conducted a facility-wide audit of all current residents with a PICC line and/or receiving IV medications to identify possible harm, side effects, and injury to the resident due to IV administration. On [DATE], the facility conducted an Ad Hoc QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) meeting and a root cause analysis. On [DATE] all LPN personnel records were audited to verify training credentials. On 3/1 - [DATE], the facility educated all nursing staff related to neglect, scope of practice, and the 30-hour IV certification requirement for LPNs prior to IV medication administration. On [DATE], the Director of Clinical Services provided training to the facility administration on verification of staff competency, working within their scope of practice and abuse/neglect policy. On [DATE], the Director of Clinical Services provided training to the Staff Developer and Staff Scheduler on neglect, scope of practice and supervision of staff. On [DATE], a new system for scheduling per residents needs according to staff qualifications was developed and implemented. On [DATE] the Director of Clinical Services educated the nursing managers on the new scheduling system.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility administration failed to effectively and efficiently attain or ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility administration failed to effectively and efficiently attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident by not assuming full responsibility for the day to day operations of the facility by allowing unqualified facility staff to work outside of their scope of practice, administering IV (intravenous) medications via midline catheters for 1 of 1 residents, Resident #197, without certification of education, training and validation of competency for IV medication infusion to residents who are administered IV medications. IV infusion without IV certification and validation of competency could result in the likelihood of serious harm and/or death for residents who are administered IV medication infusions. This can result in an increased risk of infection, damage to veins and injection sites, an air embolism, phlebitis, and blood clots, which can occur from a poorly administered IV infusion. Phlebitis can cause blood clots, which can block important blood vessels, causing tissue damage or even be life-threatening. Lack of proper training and verification to assess IV patency (the line is open and not blocked allowing the treatment to flow directly into the patient's vein) can increase the spread of infection. Lack of training and verified competency to assess the insertion site for signs and symptoms of phlebitis or infection, fluid leaking (resulting in the treatment not being administered as ordered), redness, pain, tenderness, and swelling can result in the likelihood of increased risk of serious harm and/or death. Findings include: Review of the job description titled, Administrator read, Summary: Lead and direct the overall operation of the facility in accordance with resident needs, government regulations and company policies to maintain excellent care for the residents while achieving the facility's business objective. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: Planning Function: Work with the facility management staff and consultants in planning all aspects of facility operations, including setting priorities and job assignments. Monitor each department's activities, communicate policies, evaluate performance, provide feedback, and assist, coach and discipline as needed. Continuous Quality Improvement Function: Conduct regular rounds to monitor delivery of nursing care, operation of support departments, cleanliness and appearance of facility, morale of staff and to ensure residents needs are being addressed in a proactive manner. Regulatory Compliance Function: Maintain a working knowledge of and ensure compliance with all governmental regulations. Educational Function: Supervise, conduct, and participate in department and facility education activities and staff meetings. Maintain professional competence through participation in continuing education programs, seminars, and training programs. Review of job description titled, Director of Nursing [DON] read, Summary: Lead and direct the overall nursing operation of the Center in accordance with residents' needs, government regulations, and company policies to maintain excellent care for the residents while achieving the Center's business objectives. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: Work with the nursing management staff, Administrator, and Consultants in planning all aspects of the nursing operation, including setting priorities and job assignments. Monitor each unit's activities, communicate policies, evaluate performance, provide feedback, and assist, coach, and discipline as needed. Conduct regular rounds to monitor delivery of nursing care, effective coordination with other support services, cleanliness and appearance of the residents, and morale of staff and to ensure residents' needs are being addressed in a proactive manner. Maintain a working knowledge and ensure compliance with all governmental regulations. Monitor medical records to assure the documentation reflects the skilled services provided and complies with policies and regulations. Monitor associate relations practices key nursing staff to ensure compliance with employment laws and company policies and to ensure practices that maintain high morale and staff retention to include effective communication, prompt problem resolution, positive supervisory practices, and maintaining a positive work environment. Manage turnover and ensure current and future staffing through development of recruiting sources and through appropriate selection, orientation, training, and staff education. Review of job description titled Assistant Director of Nursing [ADON], RN [Registered Nurse] read, Summary: To assist the Director of Nursing in leading and directing the overall nursing operation of the Center in accordance with residents' needs, government regulations, and company policies to maintain excellent care for the residents while achieving the Center's business objective. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: Assist the DON in working with management staff, Administrator, and Consultants in planning all aspects of the nursing operation, including setting priorities and job assignments. Conduct regular rounds to monitor delivery of nursing care, effective coordination with other support services, cleanliness and appearance of the residents, and morale of staff and to ensure residents' needs are being addressed in a proactive manner. Carry out, coordinate, and manage administrative functions in areas or programs related to nursing services, which may include departmental documentation or medical records; nursing supplies; ancillary supplies or services; center CQI [Continuous Quality Improvement]; care plan; MDSs [Minimum Data Sets]; Infection control programs; skin care program; Medicare; special programs; staff scheduling; selection, training, and orientation; and related functions. Maintain a working knowledge and ensure compliance with all governmental regulations. Monitor associate relations practices key nursing staff to ensure compliance with employment laws and company policies and to ensure practices that maintain high morale and staff retention to include effective communication, prompt problem resolution, positive supervisory practices, and maintaining a positive work environment. Manage turnover and ensure current and future staffing through development of recruiting sources and through appropriate selection, orientation, training, and staff education. Review of job description titled, Staff Developer-RN read, Summary: To plan and implement Center orientation, job skills training, and in-service education programs in accordance with Company policies and regulations. The primary function of this position is recruiting and training associates and to monitor and guide these positions throughout the course of employment. Work with the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Center staff in assessing training needs and plan programs that meet priority needs and regulatory requirements. Review of Medical Director Agreement effective [DATE] reads, Section 1. Medical Director Duties . 13. Assuring that the medical standards of the facility comply with applicable laws, licensing, certification, and accreditation and professional standards. During an observation on [DATE] at 9:03 AM Resident #197 was in his room lying in bed. There is a double lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) covered with a transparent observed to the resident's upper right arm. The transparent dressing was dated [DATE] written with a black marker. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:04 AM Resident #197 stated, I have this IV [intravenous catheter] for antibiotics to treat the infection I have in my big toe. Review of the physician order report for [DATE] through [DATE] documented an order dated [DATE] for Resident #197 that read, Normal Saline Flush [sodium chloride 0.9% flush] syringe; amt [amount to administer]: 10 ml [milliliters]; injection. Special Instructions: Flush before and after each IV medication administration. Every shift. [Dated] [DATE] Meropenem recon soln [reconstituted solution]; 1 gram; amt]: 1 gram; intravenous. Dx [diagnosis]: Other [osteomyelitis, ankle and foot]. Every 8 hours. [Dated] [DATE] Vancomycin recon soln; 1.25 gram; amt: 1.25 gram; intravenous. Dx Other [osteomyelitis, ankle and foot]. Once a day. Review of the Medication Administration History for Resident #197 documented Staff A, License Practical Nurse (LPN), administered 10 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% before and the administration of Meropenem 1 gram on [DATE] at 3:32 PM and on [DATE] at 2:00 PM. Review of the Medication Administration History for Resident #197 documented Staff G, LPN, administered 10 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% before and after the administration of the IV medication Meropenem 1 gram reconstituted solution on [DATE] at 11:56 PM, [DATE] at 10:00 PM, [DATE] at 6:00 AM, [DATE] at 10:00 PM and [DATE] at 6:00 AM. Dated [DATE] Staff G, LPN administered 1.25 grams of Vancomycin reconstituted solution IV on [DATE] at 5:31 AM. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:09 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, We have no IV certification records for Staff A, LPN. He was contacted and cannot produce a certification. If the MAR [Medication Administration Record/Medication Administration History] is initialed by a nurse, it means the medication was given by that nurse unless if there is parenthesis which means they made a note. The Staff Developer and Human Resources are responsible for verification of staff certification. During the interview a request was made for the IV Certification for Staff G. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:30 AM Staff C, Unit Manager LPN, stated, LPNs need to have IV certification. The Human Resource staff and Staff Development is responsible for making sure staff have all certifications upon hire. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:41 AM Staff A, LPN, stated, Yesterday I helped administer medication. The Assistant Director of Nursing was in the room with me. I hung medication, flushed, and cleaned the port. I was supervised. I am always supervised by an RN [Registered Nurse]. The facility did not request IV certification from me upon hire. I did not know I needed IV certification. I have done IV medication administration before. I do not know how to place an IV in an arm [to insert an IV] but I know how to hang medication. When I was hired, I was trained and shown how to administer medication via IV. The first time the nurse showed me [how to administer IV medications]. After that, she has always supervised me doing the administration and flushes. The RN is always with me at all times. Normally I will do it and chart under my name since he is my resident. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:55 PM the Human Resource/ABOM (Assistant Business Office Manager) stated, The IV certification would be kept in the employee file only if provided, it is not requested. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:55 PM the Staffing Coordinator stated, Staff is assigned to halls. I leave it up to the nursing staff to tell me if they are capable or not of treating the resident. I hold a CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] license. I am aware that the RN is the only one who is able to do PICC lines. I do not have copies of all the nurses' certifications. I am the only one who schedules. The head nursing department is responsible to verify certifications. I assume that all the credentials have been verified by the head of nursing. We do not have a 24-hour RN on the schedule. From 7 PM to 7 AM that we do not have an RN. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:21 PM the Staff Developer stated, Upon hire, I will request the license, CPR [cardiopulmonary resuscitation], and any certifications. Prior to me, it was [name of the previous owner company] who was in charge of all the onboarding. Upon hire, I request the IV certification and give them up to 30 days. If the staff does not provide the certification, I have to readdress. During orientation, I asked [Staff A's name] for his certification. [Staff A's name] stated he had it. When [Staff A's name] did not provide it in the 30-day time frame, I readdressed, and we were in the process of a teachable moment. Review of the personnel record for Staff A, LPN documented the LPN's hire date as [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:21 PM the DON stated, Newly hired staff are told upon hire if there is something that they are not able to do or do not feel comfortable there is a 24-hour RN that is on call that is able to assist. We stress constantly that if a task is not in their scope of practice or they are unable to complete ask for assistance. Upon hire, the Staff Development will do the competency and skills fair. My expectation for [Staff A's name] would be to get an RN that was on duty and assist and perform the task for him. It is not the practice of the facility to allow a non-IV Certified LPN to administer IV medications supervised. That was not the case there was no RN in the building that approved of [Staff A's name] to administer IV medications. It would be falsification of documentation to only initial; an LPN will not be allowed to initial the task if they had not performed the task themselves. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:40 PM the ADON stated, I have not been in the room with an LPN to supervise or walk through IV medication administration for [Resident #197's name]. Onboarding is done by Staff Development and Human Resources goes behind with a checklist. I don't get an official notification of who is certified. I understand that someone will learn in school what their scope is that would be my expectation. The Staff Developer is the one who should be checking the paperwork and verifying that all LPNs have all certifications. I don't know if the Staff Developer reports to the DON since everything in the building falls under her. I will find out who is responsible for verifying agency [LPNs]. I have provided emergency cover for 7 PM-7 AM. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:05 PM the Medical Director stated, If nursing staff is non-IV certified, they should not be doing medication administration via IV. I was not aware that LPNs were administering medications via IV and were not certified. If the staff is not certified they might not know what they are doing and there is a risk for infection, mishandling of the IV port, bleeding, pain, the list can go on, but it is only a potential. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:35 AM, the DON stated, The facility does not have IV Certification for [Staff A's name] and [Staff G's name]. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:56 PM, Staff G stated, I became a nurse in the 1990s and while working at [Name of facility], I took a [Name of pharmacy] IV certification course in [Name of City], but I have not been able to locate the paperwork. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:58 PM, the DON, stated, There was an IV certified LPN, but I don't know why [Staff G's name] didn't ask for assistance. Ultimately, as far as the nursing department, I oversee nursing staff qualifications and the Staff Developer. [Staff G's name] verbally told us that she is IV certified. IV certification was requested. No documentation was provided of IV certifications for Staff A or Staff G. During an interview on [DATE] at 7:20 AM the Administrator stated, I understand there is a certification LPNs need to obtain that certifies them for IVs. The hiring process is new with all the corporate buy outs. Now we have a Human Resource Manager. Upon hire employees are ask for any and all certificates they have; if they do not produce the certifications, we assume they do not have them. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:30 AM with DON stated, It is not up to me to determine what neglect is. I would have to refer to my neglect policy. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:30 AM with Administrator stated, It would be neglect if we were aware and condoned it. Our policy does not condone. This was a [NAME] employee. We expect the staff to work within their scope of practice. As the facility Administrator I oversee the facility. My responsibilities are listed in my job description. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:34 AM the Director of Clinical Services, stated, I would consider it neglect if the staff worked outside their scope. We did not have a system in place to check for qualifications. We expect staff to work within their scope of practice, we trusted them. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:57 PM with the Administrator stated, We didn't have a process in place for verification of staff qualifications. The previous company took care of the onboarding and now the new company has HR [Human Resource] in house. We have weekly meetings and daily staff meetings. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:57 PM the Staffing Coordinator stated, I depend on higher nursing staff for qualifications. I am responsible for the hours per resident care and PBJ [Payroll Based Journal, a system for facilities to submit staffing information]. I rely on the head of nursing to verify staff certifications and qualifications. I was trained on hours per resident care and PBJ. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property with a last review date of [DATE], read, Definitions of Types of Abuse: Neglect - Is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Policy Components . C. Prevention: Ensuring that residents are free from neglect by having the structures and processes to provide needed care and services to all residents. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Administrative Policies for Infusion Therapy Facility Responsibilities with a last reviewed date of [DATE], read, Policy . 6. Maintain records of personnel qualified by education and experience who may provide infusion therapy in the facility. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Administrative Policies for Infusion Therapy Facility Policies and Procedures with a last review date of [DATE], read, The policies and procedures of a facility may be more stringent, and duties may be more restrictive than what is permitted by state regulations but may never be more lenient. For example: The State Board of Nursing may indicate that it is within the scope of practice for LPNs to flush Central Venous Catheters in long term care facilities, but it is the individual facility's decision to allow or not allow LPNs to perform the procedure. On the other hand, if the State Board of Nursing prohibits LPNs from flushing Central Venous Catheter in long term care facilities, then a facility may NEVER allow an LPN to perform that procedure. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Administrative Policies for Infusion Therapy Legal Issues with a last review date of [DATE], read, Legal Issues . Rule of Personal Liability: No Nurse, LVN [Licensed Vocational Nurse]/LPN or RN, should perform any procedure that he or she has not been specifically trained to do. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Nursing Services with a last review of [DATE], read, Policy . 5. The facility will ensure that licensed nurse have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care. Review of the Board of Nursing Rule Chapter 64B9-12 titled Administration of Intravenous Therapy by Licensed Practical Nurse reads, Section 64B9-12.005 - Competency and Knowledge Requirements Necessary to Qualify the LPN to Administer IV Therapy .(2) Central Lines. The Board recognizes that through appropriate education and training, a Licensed Practical Nurse is capable of performing intravenous therapy via central lines under the direction of a registered professional nurse as defined in subsection 64B9-12.002(2), F.A.C. [Florida Administrative Code] Appropriate education and training requires a minimum of four (4) hours of instruction. The requisite four (4) hours of instruction may be included as part of the thirty (30) hours required for intravenous therapy education specified in subsection (4) of this rule. The education and training required in this subsection shall include, at a minimum, didactic and clinical practicum instruction in the following areas: (a) Central venous anatomy and physiology; (b) CVL [central venous catheters] site assessment; (c) CVL dressing and cap changes; (d) CVL flushing; (e) CVL medication and fluid administration; (f) CVL blood drawing; and (g) CVL complications and remedial measures. Upon completion of the intravenous therapy training via central lines, the Licensed Practical Nurse shall be assessed on both theoretical knowledge and practice, as well as clinical practice and competence. The clinical practice assessment must be witnessed by a Registered Nurse who shall file a proficiency statement regarding the Licensed Practical Nurse's ability to perform intravenous therapy via central lines. The proficiency statement shall be kept in the Licensed Practical Nurse's personnel file. (3) Providers: The LPN/IV education must be sponsored by a provider of continuing education courses approved by the Board pursuant to Rule 64B9-5.005, F.A.C. To be qualified to teach any such course, the instructor must be a currently licensed registered nurse in good standing in this state, have teaching experience, and have professional nursing experience, including IV therapy. The provider will be responsible for issuing a certificate verifying completion of the requisite number of hours and course content. (4) Educational Alternatives. The cognitive training shall include one or more of the following: (a) Post-graduate Level Course. In recognition that the curriculum requirements mandated by Sections 464.019(1)(b), 464.019(1)(f), and 464.019(1)(g), F.S. [Florida Statutes], for practical nursing programs are extensive and that every licensed practical nurse will not administer IV therapy. The course necessary to qualify a licensed practical nurse or graduate practical nurse to administer IV therapy shall be not less than a thirty (30) hour post-graduate level course teaching aspects of IV therapy containing the components enumerated in subsection 64B9-12.005(1), F.A.C.(b) Credit for Previous Education. The continuing education provider may credit the licensed practical nurse or graduate practical nurse for previous IV therapy education on a post-graduate level, providing each component of the course content of subsection 64B9-12.005(1), F.A.C., is tested by and competency demonstrated to the provider. (c) Nontraditional Education. Continuing education providers may select nontraditional education alternatives for acquisition of cognitive content outlined in Rule 64B9-12.005, F.A.C. Such alternatives include: 1. Interactive videos; 2. Self-study; 3. Other nontraditional education that may be submitted to the Board for consideration and possible approval. Any continuing education providers using nontraditional education must make provisions for demonstration of and verification of knowledge. (5) Clinical Competence. The course must be followed by supervised clinical practice in intravenous therapy as needed to demonstrate clinical competence. Verification of clinical competence shall be the responsibility of each institution employing a licensed practical nurse based on institutional protocol. Such verification shall be given through a signed statement of a Florida licensed registered nurse. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed on site on [DATE], after the receipt of an acceptable immediate jeopardy removal plan. The survey team verified the facility's actions for removal of the likelihood of harm and/or possible death as evidenced by the following: On [DATE] during interviews, 6 RNs, 4 LPNs and 5 CNAs confirmed education for abuse/neglect, scope of practice and the 30 hour IV certification requirement for LPN's, the Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Staff Development, Human Resources and the Scheduler confirmed education for abuse/neglect, scope of practice, the 30 hour IV certification requirement for LPN's, and the new system for scheduling per residents needs according to staff qualifications. Review of staff training documented 100% of staff were educated on abuse/neglect and 100% of RNs and LPNs were educated on scope of practice. On [DATE], the facility assessed the residents involved in the IJ situation and conducted a facility-wide audit of all current residents with a PICC line and/or receiving IV medications to identify possible harm, side effects, and injury to the resident due to IV administration. On [DATE], the facility conducted an Ad Hoc QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) meeting and a root cause analysis. On [DATE] all LPN personnel records were audited to verify training credentials. On 3/1 - [DATE], the facility educated all nursing staff related to neglect, scope of practice, and the 30-hour IV certification requirement for LPNs prior to IV medication administration. On [DATE], the Director of Clinical Services provided training to the facility administration on verification of staff competency, working within their scope of practice and abuse/neglect policy. On [DATE], the Director of Clinical Services provided training to the Staff Developer and Staff Scheduler on neglect, scope of practice and supervision of staff. On [DATE], a new system for scheduling per residents needs according to staff qualifications was developed and implemented. On [DATE] the Director of Clinical Services educated the nursing managers on the new scheduling system.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an advanced directive was formulated for 1 of 3 residents, Re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an advanced directive was formulated for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #198. Findings include: During an interview conducted with Resident #198 on [DATE] at approximately 10:17 AM regarding her advanced directives, Resident #198 stated she wished to be a DNR [do not resuscitate]. Review of the Social Services Director's (SSD) progress note dated [DATE] read, Went to [Resident name's] room for her to sign dnr [DNR]. She [Resident #198] stated she wanted to talk to her daughter before she signed it and requested, I come back tomorrow. I [SSD] explained that was not a problem. Explained at this time if she were to stop breathing or her heart stopped, we would initiate CPR [Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation] at this time. She [Resident #198] acknowledged understanding. During an interview conducted on [DATE] at approximately 3:10 PM the SSD and she confirmed she did not go back and revisit for the DNR Advanced Directive paperwork for Resident #198. During an interview conducted with the Administrator (ADM) on [DATE] at 11:03 AM, the ADM confirmed that there was not an advanced directive for Resident #198. Review of the policy and procedure titled, Advanced Directive Policy read, the facility will provide a written description of the facility's policy to implement advance directives and applicable state law, evaluate and document each resident's advance care planning decision.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to identify a problem and approach for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #28, reviewed for unnec...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to identify a problem and approach for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #28, reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the electronic face sheet documented Resident #28 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include type II diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #28's physician orders documented dated 12/28/22 - Levemir FlexTouch U-100 insulin (100unit/ml (milliliter) (3ml)-inject 45 units subcutaneously once a day. Dated 12/27/22-Trulicity pen injector, 1.5mg (milligrams)/0.5ml-inject 1.5mg subcutaneously once a day on Friday. Review of Resident #28's care plan did not provide for documentation of a problem and approach related to the resident's diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus and the use of insulin and other medications to treat diabetes. During an interview conducted on 3/2/23 at 2:30 PM with the facility's Corporate Director of Clinical Services, confirmed Resident #28's care plan did not address the resident's diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus and the use of insulin and other diabetic medications. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan-Comprehensive, last reviewed on 2/16/23 read, Policy Interpretation. 1. An Interdisciplinary Team, in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative, develops and maintains a Comprehensive Care Plan for each resident .2. The Comprehensive Care Plan has been designed to: a. Incorporate identified problem areas, b. Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems, and d. Reflect treatment goals and objectives in measurable outcomes .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #28. Findings in...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #28. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record documented on the Electronic Face Sheet the resident's diagnoses of: type II diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, bipolar disorder, central pain syndrome, and hypertension. Resident #28 was observed on 02/27/23 at 11:15 AM smoking in the facility's smoking area without a smoking apron. Review of Resident #28's care plan dated 1/6/23 read, [Resident #28's Name] prefers to smoke requires smoking apron. Review of Resident #28's medical record did not document a safe smoking assessment was completed which would determine the resident's safety needs while smoking. During an interview conducted on 03/02/23 at 10:33 AM, the Administrator confirmed they did not have a safe smoking assessment completed for Resident #28. Review of the policy and procedure titled, Surrey Place Nursing Center Facility Smoking Policy last reviewed on 2/16/23, read, 1. The facility will complete a safe smoking evaluation within 24 hours of admission for all residents who desire to smoke.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professio...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in 1 of 2 medication carts (East Cart) and unsecured medications observed at resident's bedside, Resident #33. (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: During an observation on 02/27/2023 at 9:25 AM of the East Medication Cart with Staff A, License Practical Nurse (LPN), there were three dark color circular pills in an unlabeled medication cup in the top draw of the cart. During an interview on 2/27/2023 at 9:37 AM Staff A, LPN, stated, These are iron pills. I didn't place them there. I don't know why the medication is there. During an observation on 2/27/2023 at 9:25 AM of Resident #33's room there was a bottle of Nutribiotic throat spray with grapefruit seed extract plus zinc and menthol, a medicated anti-itch spray, a calamine clear lotion, a round orange circular unlabeled pill on top of the bedside table, and a clear plastic cup with a lid, on the lid it was labeled 2/25 For Rash and contained a white cream. During an interview on 2/27/2023 at 9:26 AM Resident #33 stated, I am itchy and my throat is sore at times. This pill on my bedside table is gum. During an interview on 2/27/2023 at 9:55 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, Medication should not be out unlabeled. The DON confirm Resident #33 had unsecure medications in the room and stated, I am not able to say where the labeled cup came from. Review of the policy and procedures titled, Self-Administration of Medication with a last reviewed date of 2/16/2023 read, General Guidelines .2b. storage of medications in the resident's room must be such that it will prevent access by other residents; 2c. Only the medications permitted for self-administration shall be left at the bedside; .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0810 (Tag F0810)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assistive adaptive devices for provided for 1 of 1 residents, Resident #145. Findings include: During an observation on...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assistive adaptive devices for provided for 1 of 1 residents, Resident #145. Findings include: During an observation on 02/28/23 at 12:31 PM of Resident #145 for the adaptive equipment of a high sided separated or divided plate was not provided and was listed on the meal tray ticket. During an observation on 3/01/23 at 8:35 AM of the breakfast tray served to Resident #145 for the adaptive equipment of a high sided separated or divided plate showed it was not provided and was listed on the tray ticket. During an interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) conducted on 3/01/2023 at 1:30 PM related to the adaptive equipment for Resident #145. The CDM stated the dietary department did not have a high sided divided or separated plate for Resident #145. The CDM verified that orders for adaptive equipment allows residents to maintain independence while dining and should be provided as ordered. The CDM confirmed she had not discussed the lack of adaptive equipment or an alternative with the Registered Dietician (RD) or therapy department. During an interview with the Speech Therapist (ST) on 3/02/23 at 12:11 PM related to adaptive and assistive devices. The ST confirmed that adaptive or assistive devices are ordered to promote independence for a resident that has restricted movement, visual impairment, tremors, or other conditions that may benefit from adaptive or assistive devices. The ST stated that her expectations would be for the therapy department to be notified if equipment is not available in the dietary department so that an equivalent substitute can be recommended until the needed equipment can be ordered. Review of the document titled, Resident Adaptive Equipment Report, dated 2/27/23 read, Resident #145 [resident named] adaptive equipment high-sided partition plate, breakfast, lunch and dinner.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food is stored, covered, labeled, and discarded in the kitchen and failed to maintain sanitary standards for equipme...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food is stored, covered, labeled, and discarded in the kitchen and failed to maintain sanitary standards for equipment used to prepare, cook, and serve the residents. (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: A walk-through tour of the kitchen was conducted on 02/27/23 at 09:10 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The walk-in cooler had a large container labeled Chili and labeled with a prepared date of 02/19/23 and a use by date of 02/22/23. A sheet pan was located on the bottom shelf of the walk in cooler and the sheet pan was observed to have a bag of thawed raw chicken and a roll of raw ground beef with no separation of the two items to prevent cross contamination. An observation was made of two quart containers of raw liquid eggs stored directly over an opened box of raw bacon. An observation was made in the walk-in freezer of ice buildup and open boxes exposing food. There was an observation in the dry storage area of three dented cans stored on the ready to use shelving and not in the designated dented can area. There was an observation of four storage bins with black garbage bags being used as liners to hold the bulk foods. There was a soiled, wet cloth resting on the stainless table next to the food tray line. An interview was conducted with the CDM on 2/27/23 at 9:30 AM. The CDM confirmed the walk-in cooler had a large container labeled Chili and showing a prepared date of 02/19/23 and with a use by date of 02/22/23. The CDM stated the chili should have been discarded after 2/22/23. The CDM confirmed the sheet pan containing the large bag of thawed raw chicken and a five pound roll of raw ground beef did not have a separation of the two items to prevent cross contamination. The CDM confirmed the raw ground beef and raw chicken should not be stored together on the same pan. The CDM confirmed there were two-quart containers of raw liquid eggs stored directly over an opened box of raw bacon and that eggs should be stored below other raw foods to prevent cross-contamination. The CDM verified in the walk-in freezer there is an ice buildup and open boxes exposing food with the potential for freezer burn and compromising the integrity of the food stored for preparation of menu items. The CDM confirmed in the dry storage area, the three dented cans stored on the ready to use shelf and not in the designated dented can area. The CDM confirmed four storage bins had black garbage bags being used as liners to hold the bulk foods and garbage bags were not a food grade container for bulk products. The CDM confirmed that all wiping cloths should be kept in a sanitizer bucket when not in use. A review of the policy and procedure titled, Food Storage: Cold Foods last reviewed on 02/16/23 read, Procedures: 5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. A review of the policy and procedure titled, Receiving last reviewed on 02/16/23 read, Procedures: 4. All canned goods will be appropriately inspected for dents, rust or bulges. Damaged cans will be segregated and clearly identified for return to vendor or disposal as appropriate. During an observation on 2/28/23 at 6:45 AM with the CDM the meat slicing equipment was covered. The CDM removed the covering and the meat slicer was observed to have rust-colored debris and food particles on the center connector of the blade. An observation was made of a knife holder on the wall that had a clear plexiglass covering. Food crumbs were observed in the base of the knife holder. An observation of the convection oven showed it had a thick buildup of food and debris on the external and internal parts of the oven. During an interview with the CDM on 2/28/23 at 6:53 AM the CDM confirmed the meat slicer had a rust-colored debris and food particles on the center connector of the blade. The CDM stated that a covered piece of equipment should designate that the equipment is clean and ready for use. During an interview with the CDM on 3/01/23 at 1:45 PM the CDM verified the convection oven had a thick covering of debris and food on the inside and outside of the oven and stated it should be cleaned and not have a buildup of food and debris. The CDM stated there should not be breadcrumbs in the knife container. Review of the policy and procedure titled, Equipment was last reviewed on 02/16/2023 read, Policy Statement: All foodservice equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order. 2. All staff members will be properly trained in the cleaning and maintenance of all equipment. 3. All food contact equipment will be cleaned and sanitized after every use.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain equipment to be in a safe and clean operating manner. Findings include: An observation of the meat slicer equipment...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain equipment to be in a safe and clean operating manner. Findings include: An observation of the meat slicer equipment was conducted on 02/28/23 at 6:45 AM when the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) removed the covering for observation. The meat slicer had a rust-colored debris and food particles on a center connector of the blade. During an interview with the CDM on 2/28/23 at 6:53 AM the CDM confirmed that the meat slicer had a rust-colored debris and food particles on a center connector of the blade. The CDM stated that a covered piece of equipment should designate that the equipment is clean and ready for use. During a follow-up tour conducted on 02/28/23 at 6:45 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager, an observation was made of 24 trays with sharp and broken edges being used for room trays. An observation was made of heated metal insert being used in dome bases that were not designed to need a heated metal insert therefore was sitting above the base exposing the heated metal. An observation was made of a knife holder on the wall that had a clear plexiglass covering that had food crumbs in the base. An observation was made of the convection oven with a buildup of food and debris on the external and internal part of the oven. An interview was conducted with the CDM on 3/01/23 at 1:45 PM related to the observation made during the follow up visit to the dietary department. The CDM confirmed that the trays with broken and sharp edges should not be used. The CDM verified that the convection oven should be cleaned and not have a buildup of food and debris inside or outside. The CDM confirmed that the heated metal inserts should only be used in designated bases to prevent the potential of burns to the staff and residents. The CDM stated that there should not have been breadcrumbs in the knife container. A policy titled Equipment dated September 2017 read, policy statement, all foodservice equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order. 2. All staff members will be properly trained in the cleaning and maintenance of all equipment. 3. All food contact equipment will be cleaned and sanitized after every use.
Jan 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were reviewed by a registered dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional for nutritional...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were reviewed by a registered dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional for nutritional adequacy. Findings include: During an interview on 1/18/2023 at 10:00 AM, the Assistant Dietary Manager stated that the facility was using the hcsg2southern 2022-23 week 2 menus for this week's offerings and today's lunch and dinner entrées were going to be substituted due to supply issues. She confirmed the meatloaf, dinner roll and sweet potato pie was to be substituted with sliced ham and marble cake with no roll being served and the Italian sausage sub with pepper and onion for dinner was to be substituted with egg salad sandwiches. During an observation of the tray line service for the lunch meal on Wednesday 1/18/2023 at 12:00 PM, the main entrée being served included sliced ham and marble cake. No dinner roll was being served. Review of the menus presented as the facility's current menus showed they were labeled as hcsg2southern 2022-23 week 2 and were not signed as being reviewed by a registered dietitian. The entrée for Wednesday was homestyle meatloaf with ketchup glaze 4 ounces, capri vegetables (no portion noted), au gratin potatoes ½ cup, dinner roll/ bread 1 each and sweet potato pie 1 slice. During an interview on 1/18/2023 at 12:47 PM, the Registered Dietitian stated, The food service director makes changes due to the availability. The substitutions list has not been given to me for November and December of 2022. I have not been given the opportunity to sign off on the menus that they are using now. Review of the most current substitution list provided by the facility was dated October of 2022. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Menus revised in 9/2017 reads, Policy Statement: Menus will be planned in advance to meet the nutritional needs of the residents/patients in accordance with established national guidelines . Procedures . 5. A Registered Dietitian/Nutritionist (RDN) or other clinically qualified nutrition professional reviews and approves the menus . 7. A substitution log will be maintained on file.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's food prep area, walk-in cooler...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's food prep area, walk-in cooler, and freezer. Findings include: On 1/18/2023 beginning at 9:38 AM, an observation during a tour of the facility's kitchen with the Assistant Kitchen Manager showed a scoop with no handle in the opened thickening powder bag in a large plastic lidded storage bin in the prep area; two clear plastic pitchers of orange colored liquid and one pitcher of white colored fluid on a wire shelf in the walk-in cooler with no labels or dates on them; an opened 32-ounce carton of liquid whole eggs with no opened date and several clear closed bags of whole peeled eggs in a metal storage bin on a shelf in the walk-in cooler with no label or opened date; an opened bag of crinkle cut French fries in the walk-in freezer with no opened date; an opened bag of breaded chicken cutlets in a box on a pallet with no opened date; and an opened reclosed bag of breaded chicken patties on a wire shelf with no opened date or label (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 1/18/2023 at 10:00 AM, the Assistant Dietary Manager stated the thickening powder should not have the scoop in the bag and that all food items located in the walk-in cooler and freezer should have a label and opened date on them. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Food Storage: Dry Goods revised in 9/2017 reads, Policy Statement: All dry goods will be appropriately stored in accordance with the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] Food Code. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Food Storage: Cold Foods revised in 4/2018 reads, Procedures . 5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated.
Sept 2021 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 4 of 6 reviewed res...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 4 of 6 reviewed residents, Residents #18, #10, #27, and #247. Findings: Observations on 9/7/2021 from 10:30 AM through 11:00 AM showed Residents #18, #27, #10, and #247 were being administered oxygen via nasal cannula and had prefilled humidifier bottles dated and labeled 8/29/2021. Review of Resident #18's physician orders dated 7/27/2020 reads, Change oxygen tubing and bag, label with new date, weekly, once a day on Sunday. Continuous oxygen at 2 liters nasal cannula. Review of Resident #27's physician orders dated 9/7/2021 reads, Oxygen at 2 liters nasal cannula as needed to keep oxygen saturation 94% or greater every shift. Change oxygen tubing and bag, label with new date, weekly, once a day on Sunday. Review of Resident #10's physician orders dated 6/4/2021 reads, Oxygen via nasal cannula continuous at 2 liters per minute. Keep oxygen saturation above 93%. There was no order to change tubing in the order history. Review of Resident #247's physician orders dated 9/8/21 reads, Oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute as needed for shortness of breath every shift. Check humidification bottle every shift change when empty. Oxygen therapy change tubing every week once a day on Sunday. During an interview on 9/7/2021 at 11:00 AM, Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN), confirmed the nasal cannulas and prefilled humidifiers for Residents #18, #27, #10, and #247 showed they were dated 8/29/2021. She stated they should have been changed, dated, and labeled on 9/5/2021. Review of the policy and procedure titled, Oxygen Administration - Nasal Cannula Clinical Practice Guideline, last reviewed on 6/2021, reads, .14. Replace entire set up every seven days. Date and store in treatment bag when not in use. 15. If using a non-disposable humidifier, change bottle every seven days and change water every 24 hours to prevent bacterial contamination.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professio...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed. Findings: On 9/7/2021 beginning at 9:10 AM, an observation of the East Nurses Station medication cart showed one opened 15 ML (milliliter) bottle of Muro 128 eye drops for Resident #23 with an opened date of 7/3/2021 and a label reading expires 30 days after opening, one opened Novolin flex pen insulin for Resident #196 with no opened and expiration dates, and one opened Novolog insulin for Resident #52 with no opened or expiration dates. During an interview on 9/7/2021 beginning at 9:18 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, The insulin is supposed to have the date on the bag or the vial/ bottle when it is opened. I do not see documentation to show when the insulin was opened. The date of the eye drops is greater than 30 days and should have been discarded. On 9/7/2021 beginning at 9:25 AM, an observation of the [NAME] Nurses Station medication cart showed one opened 15 ML bottle of Levemir insulin for Resident #21 with no opened or expiration dates, one opened Lantus insulin injection pen for Resident #12 with no opened or expiration dates, one opened 5 ML bottle of Prednisolone eye drops for Resident #47 with no opened and expiration dates, one 0.5 ML bottle of Lumigan 1.1% eye drops for Resident #47 with no opened and expiration dates, and one opened 5 ML bottle of Timolol for Resident #11 with no opened and expiration dates. During an interview on 9/7/2021 at 9:39 AM, Staff B, LPN, stated, I am not sure why the insulins for [Resident's #21's name and Resident #12's name] do not show the dates the insulins were opened. The insulin is supposed to be dated, because it is only good for so many days after it is opened. I do not know why the eye drops for [Resident #47's name and Resident #11's name] do not show the date the eye drops were opened. I do not see a date to show when the eye drops were opened. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Medication Storage, Storage of Medication, last revised in 9/18, reads, Procedures: . 12. Insulin products should be stored in the refrigerator until opened. Note the date on the label for insulin vials and pens when first used.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during wound care to prevent the possible spread of infection for 1 of 2 resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during wound care to prevent the possible spread of infection for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #24. Findings: On 9/9/2021 beginning at 9:38 AM, an observation was conducted of Staff C, Registered Nurse, providing wound care for Resident #24. Staff C cleansed the wound on the resident's left heel using 4X4 gauze. Staff C did not remove her gloves or perform hand hygiene, and removed the soiled dressing from the resident's right heel. Staff C removed her gloves, did not perform hand hygiene and continued wound care to the stage 3 pressure wound of the resident's right heel. The nurse cleansed the wound using normal saline and 4 X 4 gauze. She removed her gloves and did not sanitize or wash her hands. During an interview on 9/9/2021 at 9:53 AM, Staff C, RN, stated, I forgot to sanitize my hands during wound care for [Resident #24's name]. I should have sanitized my hands. I had hand sanitizer in my pocket, I just didn't use it. Review of the facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revised in 8/2019, last reviewed in 6/2021, reads, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . 7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water in the following situations: . b. Before and after direct contact with residents . g. Before handling clean or soiled dressings, gauze pads, etc. h. Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care . j. After contact with blood or bodily fluids. K. After handling used dressings, contaminated equipment etc.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 39% turnover. Below Florida's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), $65,816 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 18 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $65,816 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Florida. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (9/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Surrey Place Nursing Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SURREY PLACE NURSING CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Surrey Place Nursing Center Staffed?

CMS rates SURREY PLACE NURSING CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 39%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Surrey Place Nursing Center?

State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at SURREY PLACE NURSING CENTER during 2021 to 2024. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 15 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Surrey Place Nursing Center?

SURREY PLACE NURSING CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by BENJAMIN LANDA, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 49 residents (about 82% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LIVE OAK, Florida.

How Does Surrey Place Nursing Center Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, SURREY PLACE NURSING CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (39%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Surrey Place Nursing Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Surrey Place Nursing Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SURREY PLACE NURSING CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Surrey Place Nursing Center Stick Around?

SURREY PLACE NURSING CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 39%, which is about average for Florida nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Surrey Place Nursing Center Ever Fined?

SURREY PLACE NURSING CENTER has been fined $65,816 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Florida average of $33,737. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Surrey Place Nursing Center on Any Federal Watch List?

SURREY PLACE NURSING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.