MADISON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

2481 WEST US 90, MADISON, FL 32340 (850) 973-4880
For profit - Limited Liability company 60 Beds SUMMITT CARE II, INC. Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#75 of 690 in FL
Last Inspection: July 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Madison Health and Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of A, indicating it is an excellent facility that is highly recommended. It ranks #75 out of 690 nursing homes in Florida, placing it in the top half, and is #2 out of 3 in Madison County, meaning there is only one local option that is better. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from two in 2024 to none in 2025. While staffing received an average rating of 3 out of 5 stars with a 41% turnover rate, which is slightly below the state average, the absence of fines is a positive sign that suggests compliance with regulations. However, there are some concerns, such as the laundry room not being properly maintained and a resident not having a documented care plan for their oxygen needs, which could lead to potential risks in their care. Overall, while there are strengths in the facility's reputation and compliance, there are areas that need attention to ensure resident safety and proper care.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Florida
#75/690
Top 10%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
2 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
41% turnover. Near Florida's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 31 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Florida. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 2 issues
2025: 0 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (41%)

    7 points below Florida average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 41%

Near Florida avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: SUMMITT CARE II, INC.

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

Aug 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the laundry room area in a clean and sanitary [NAME] and f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the laundry room area in a clean and sanitary [NAME] and failed to maintain laundry equipment in proper working condition. The findings include: A tour of the laundry room was conducted with Staff J, a Laundry Services Aide, on 08/15/24 at 8:35 AM. Upon entering the laundry room, the surveyor observed 2 washing machines and 2 dryers present in the same room. When asked if all the machines were working properly, Staff J stated the first washing machine had been leaking for a while and they had to use a garbage can to catch the water leaking from the door of the machine. The surveyor observed a piece of fabric wrapped around a plastic pipe which went from the side of the washing machine to the door of the washing machine. Further observation revealed water was leaking from this pipe and down the door of the machine despite the machine not being turned on. Closer observation revealed there was no floor drain in the room, which could result in a slipping hazard for the staff. Staff J stated the water would fill the whole floor of the room if the garbage can was not present to catch it. She further stated they had to empty the garbage can multiple times per day as it would fill up with water from the machine. When asked to clarify how long this washing machine had been leaking, Staff J stated it had been 6 to 8 months. She further stated the facility was aware of this issue but that she had been told that parts were not available to fix this washing machine because of its age. Continued observation revealed both washing machines had buckets located behind them which contained numerous foreign objects, including coins, pens, straws, lint, gloves, bandages, and other unidentified matter. When asked how often these buckets are cleaned out, Staff J stated she did not know. Further observation in the laundry room revealed a large number of uncovered pillows which were stacked on a counter next to the washing machines and adjacent to the handwashing sink. This could result in contamination to the pillows from the washing machines or the sink. When asked why these pillows were in the laundry room, Staff J stated the pillows used to be kept in the resident's rooms, but the previous laundry manager told the staff the pillows had to be kept in the laundry room in plastic bags to keep them clean for resident use. The surveyor also observed linens stacked on a shelf next to the handwashing sink which were uncovered. This could result in contamination to the linens from the sink. Two cardboard boxes were located under the sink which could be a tripping hazard for the staff. In the clean linen area, the surveyor observed there were clear shower curtain liners being used to cover the linens on the shelves. There was one area of the shelving which was uncovered. The surveyor observed there were mop heads being stored above the uncovered clean linen area. Staff J told the surveyor that the shower curtain liners often became ripped by the staff or fell off because they were only held on by tape and that they had to be replaced often. An interview was conducted with the facility's Administrator on 08/15/24 at 9:00 AM. The administrator stated he was aware that the washing machines were leaking. He stated he was aware that the staff was using a garbage can to collect the water from the washing machine. When asked why the washing machine was not fixed for 6 to 8 months, he stated he would call to his supplier to see if parts were available. The surveyor explained the concern was that the facility was aware that the machine leaking caused a hazard to the staff and that nothing was done until the surveyor intervened.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #7) The findings include: On 8/13/24, an observation of Resident #7 revealed oxygen equipment next to her bed including an oxygen concentrator, an undated nasal cannula, and a humidifier. On 8/13/24 at 1:18 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #7. She revealed using oxygen at night. She further stated staff would assist her with donning and doffing the nasal cannula every day. A review of Resident #7's medical record was conducted. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). A review of all current and active physician's orders did not include oxygen. A review of the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed no documentation for oxygen care and services. A review of the care plan revealed an intervention that included oxygen settings: oxygen via nasal cannula per physician's orders. On 8/15/24 at 10:42 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff B, a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA). He stated he had been assisting Resident #7 doffing nasal cannula every morning. On 8/15/24 at 10:46 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff D, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Minimal Data Set (MDS) coordinator. She reviewed Resident #7's care plan and stated the resident should have a physician's order for oxygen and confirms the care plan had not been implemented. She further stated she probably went to the hospital and when she came back they missed the oxygen orders. A review of facility policy Nursing: oxygen administration was conducted. The policy stated the purpose of this procedure was to provide guidelines for oxygen administration. Bullet 9 stated turn on the oxygen. Start the flow of oxygen at the prescribed rate. A review of facility policy Person Centered care planning was conducted. Policy stated: When admitted , each resident will have physician orders, dietary needs, medications, treatments, and preliminary discharge plans reviewed by the IDT and will have an interim care plan developed within 24 hours of admission, along with input from the resident and/or representative. Resident assessments are initiated on the first day of admission and completed no later than the 14th day after admission. A comprehensive care plan is completed within 7 days of completing the resident assessment. Daily review of the preceding day's physician orders is one was to continually be aware of any changes in a resident's condition. Care plans are reviewed, at a minimum, quarterly.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Florida.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Madison Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns MADISON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Madison Center Staffed?

CMS rates MADISON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 80%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Madison Center?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at MADISON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2024. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Madison Center?

MADISON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SUMMITT CARE II, INC., a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 57 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MADISON, Florida.

How Does Madison Center Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, MADISON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Madison Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Madison Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, MADISON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Madison Center Stick Around?

MADISON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Florida nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Madison Center Ever Fined?

MADISON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Madison Center on Any Federal Watch List?

MADISON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.