JACKSON MEMORIAL LONG TERM CARE CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Jackson Memorial Long Term Care Center has a Trust Grade of A, indicating that it is highly recommended and performs excellently among nursing homes. It ranks #53 out of 690 facilities in Florida, putting it in the top half of all state facilities, and #9 out of 54 in Miami-Dade County, meaning only eight local options are better. The facility is improving, reducing its issues from five in 2024 to three in 2025, though it still has some concerns. Staffing is a strength, with a perfect 5/5 star rating and only 12% turnover, which is well below the Florida average. However, there are some concerning incidents noted, such as a lack of safety measures leading to potential hazards for residents, improper positioning of a urinary catheter that could cause discomfort, and lapses in infection control practices that increase the risk of infections. Overall, while there are notable strengths, families should be aware of these weaknesses when considering this facility.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Florida
- #53/690
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 12% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 36 points below Florida's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $7,901 in fines. Lower than most Florida facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 112 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Florida nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ○ Average
- 8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (12%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (12%)
36 points below Florida average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to properly position an indwelling urinary tubing to fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement infection control measures for three (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free of potential accident...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Section 0 for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for one resident (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to obtain a prescribed order for a skin graft dressing cha...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Ensure oxygen therapy was being provided at an accurate flow rate of oxygen setting for one resident (Resident # 77) out of ten ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow pharmacy procedures for one out of two carts; a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (93/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Florida.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • 12% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 36 points below Florida's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Jackson Memorial Long Term's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns JACKSON MEMORIAL LONG TERM CARE CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Jackson Memorial Long Term Staffed?
CMS rates JACKSON MEMORIAL LONG TERM CARE CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 12%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Jackson Memorial Long Term?
State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at JACKSON MEMORIAL LONG TERM CARE CENTER during 2024 to 2025. These included: 8 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Jackson Memorial Long Term?
JACKSON MEMORIAL LONG TERM CARE CENTER is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 180 certified beds and approximately 173 residents (about 96% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MIAMI, Florida.
How Does Jackson Memorial Long Term Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, JACKSON MEMORIAL LONG TERM CARE CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (12%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Jackson Memorial Long Term?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Jackson Memorial Long Term Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, JACKSON MEMORIAL LONG TERM CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Jackson Memorial Long Term Stick Around?
Staff at JACKSON MEMORIAL LONG TERM CARE CENTER tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 12%, the facility is 34 percentage points below the Florida average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 14%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Jackson Memorial Long Term Ever Fined?
JACKSON MEMORIAL LONG TERM CARE CENTER has been fined $7,901 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Florida average of $33,158. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Jackson Memorial Long Term on Any Federal Watch List?
JACKSON MEMORIAL LONG TERM CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.