EDGEWATER AT WATERMAN VILLAGE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Edgewater at Waterman Village has received a Trust Grade of B+, indicating that it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. Ranked #205 out of 690 facilities in Florida, it is in the top half of the state, and #6 of 17 in Lake County, suggesting limited local competition. The facility's trend appears stable, with the same number of issues reported in both 2023 and 2024. Staffing is a strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 40%, which is below the state average, meaning staff are likely familiar with the residents. However, there are some concerns; while there have been no fines, the facility has less RN coverage than 84% of Florida facilities, which could affect the quality of care. Specific incidents include a failure to change oxygen tubing as required and not administering medication as ordered, which raises questions about consistency in care. Overall, while there are some strengths in staffing and overall ratings, families should be aware of these care-related issues.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Florida
- #205/690
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 40% turnover. Near Florida's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 30 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Florida. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (40%)
8 points below Florida average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Florida avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Nov 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents received medication as ordered in accordance ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Laboratory Services
(Tag F0770)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs for 1 (Resident #1) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 1 (Resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans were implemented for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for positioning, Residents #73 and #74.
F...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principl...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment reflective of a resident's status at the time of the assessment for 1 (Resident #84) of 3 residents reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care and services for central venous access devices in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2). During an observation on 05/30/23 at 11:20 AM Resident #238 was lying in bed, nasal cannula wrapping on top of oxygen concen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication storage rooms were free from expired medications for two of two medication storage rooms.
Findings inclu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0847
(Tag F0847)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreements presented to 3 (Resident #66, Resident #237 and Resident #240) of 3 residents reviewed were given 30 days ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. During an observation on 1/24/2022 at 11:10 AM, Resident #362's oxygen delivery tubing was dated 1/16/2022 and the nebulizer ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Florida.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
- • 40% turnover. Below Florida's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Edgewater At Waterman Village's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns EDGEWATER AT WATERMAN VILLAGE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Edgewater At Waterman Village Staffed?
CMS rates EDGEWATER AT WATERMAN VILLAGE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Edgewater At Waterman Village?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at EDGEWATER AT WATERMAN VILLAGE during 2022 to 2024. These included: 11 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Edgewater At Waterman Village?
EDGEWATER AT WATERMAN VILLAGE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 120 certified beds and approximately 96 residents (about 80% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MOUNT DORA, Florida.
How Does Edgewater At Waterman Village Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, EDGEWATER AT WATERMAN VILLAGE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Edgewater At Waterman Village?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Edgewater At Waterman Village Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, EDGEWATER AT WATERMAN VILLAGE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Edgewater At Waterman Village Stick Around?
EDGEWATER AT WATERMAN VILLAGE has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Florida nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Edgewater At Waterman Village Ever Fined?
EDGEWATER AT WATERMAN VILLAGE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Edgewater At Waterman Village on Any Federal Watch List?
EDGEWATER AT WATERMAN VILLAGE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.