AVANTE AT OCALA, INC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Avante at Ocala, Inc. has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average among nursing homes. It ranks #316 out of 690 facilities in Florida, placing it in the top half, and #6 out of 11 in Marion County, meaning only five local options are better. The facility is improving, with the number of issues decreasing from five in 2024 to three in 2025. Staffing is a concern, rated at 2 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 40%, which is better than the state average of 42%, but still indicates that staff may not be as stable as desired. On the positive side, there have been no fines, suggesting compliance with regulations, but there are specific issues noted: for example, the facility failed to ensure proper documentation for the use of psychotropic medications for residents, and there were instances where staff reported insufficient clean linens and towels for resident care, impacting their comfort and hygiene.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Florida
- #316/690
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 40% turnover. Near Florida's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Florida. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (40%)
8 points below Florida average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Florida average (3.2)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Florida avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure sufficient clean linen, washcloths, towels, and protective bed pads, to meet the care needs of residents Findings include:During an ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0809
(Tag F0809)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, observations, and policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure snacks were offered and/or served to 5 of 5 residents, Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5, sampled for ev...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents medical records were complete and accurate for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #1, reviewed for mood and behaviors.
Findings in...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screen was completed for 1 of 2 residents who were diagnosed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care according to professional standard of practice by administering narcotic pain medication out o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2) During an observation on 10/14/2024 at 10:17 AM, Resident #8 was lying in bed watching television. There was one tube of Diclofenac Sodium gel in a plastic bin on the resident's overbed table.
Duri...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was safely stored, covered, labeled, or discarded in the areas of the kitchen and reach-in coolers (Photographic ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper personal protective equipment while providing high contact care to the residents on Enhanced Barrier...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflects the resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was diagnosed with a serious mental illness re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services for central venous access de...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care services c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2) During an observation on 6/12/2023 at 9:39 AM in Resident #14's room, the resident was lying in bed and there was an ampule of Albuterol on the dresser next to the nebulizer machine. (Photographic ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
1 deficiency
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing data was posted on a daily basis.
Findings include:
During an observation upon entrance to the faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician or prescribing practitioner documented their rationale to extend the use of as needed (PRN) psychotropic dru...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records, accordance with accepted professional sta...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. On 1/30/2022 at 9:30 AM, an observation of the South Unit medication room revealed the refrigerator door was not locked. The lock was hanging open on the refrigerator door, the lock was not closed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
- • 40% turnover. Below Florida's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Avante At Ocala, Inc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns AVANTE AT OCALA, INC an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Avante At Ocala, Inc Staffed?
CMS rates AVANTE AT OCALA, INC's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Avante At Ocala, Inc?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at AVANTE AT OCALA, INC during 2022 to 2025. These included: 16 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Avante At Ocala, Inc?
AVANTE AT OCALA, INC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AVANTE CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 133 certified beds and approximately 121 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in OCALA, Florida.
How Does Avante At Ocala, Inc Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, AVANTE AT OCALA, INC's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Avante At Ocala, Inc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Avante At Ocala, Inc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, AVANTE AT OCALA, INC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Avante At Ocala, Inc Stick Around?
AVANTE AT OCALA, INC has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Florida nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Avante At Ocala, Inc Ever Fined?
AVANTE AT OCALA, INC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Avante At Ocala, Inc on Any Federal Watch List?
AVANTE AT OCALA, INC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.