SIESTA KEY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

4602 NORTHGATE COURT, SARASOTA, FL 34234 (941) 355-2913
For profit - Limited Liability company 120 Beds SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER Data: November 2025 12 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#673 of 690 in FL
Last Inspection: August 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Siesta Key Health and Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its operations and care quality. With a state ranking of #673 out of 690, it is in the bottom half of Florida facilities, and locally, it ranks #27 out of 30 in Sarasota County, meaning that only a few options are worse. Although the facility's issues have decreased significantly from 29 in 2023 to 6 in 2024, it still has a concerning history, including a critical failure to manage a rodent infestation that posed serious health risks to residents. Staffing is average with a 3/5 rating, but the turnover rate of 66% is troubling, as it is much higher than the state average. Additionally, the facility has accumulated $1,133,449 in fines, indicating repeated compliance problems, and it provides less RN coverage than 88% of Florida facilities, which is a concern for resident care.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Florida
#673/690
Bottom 3%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
29 → 6 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
66% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$1,133,449 in fines. Lower than most Florida facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 25 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Florida. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
40 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 29 issues
2024: 6 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Florida average (3.2)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 66%

20pts above Florida avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $1,133,449

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (66%)

18 points above Florida average of 48%

The Ugly 40 deficiencies on record

12 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Aug 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to ma...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 3 (Residents #25, #68 and #12) of 4 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The findings included: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) implemented 11/3/20 (revised 11/29/22) documented Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #12 had a readmission date of 8/1/22 with diagnoses including dementia, depression and anxiety. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date of 4/30/24 documented the resident required substantial to maximum staff assistance for personal hygiene. The MDS noted Resident #12's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. Review of the care plan initiated 8/8/22 identified Resident #12 had an ADL self-care deficit due to confusion and dementia. The care plan instructed staff to check nail length and trim and clean on bath day every Monday and Thursday and as necessary and report any changes to the nurse. On 7/29/24 at 9:55 a.m., Resident #12 was observed in his room, seated in a wheelchair. His fingernails were noted be very long approximately ½ inch in length with a brown substance under the nail beds. His left thumb nail was thick, black and was approximately 1 inch in length. Resident #12 had a strong body odor of urine. On 7/29/24 at 11:51 a.m., Resident #12 was observed in the main dining room awaiting the noon meal. The Regional Nurse Consultant handed the resident a wet wipe to clean his hands and commented that his nails were very long. During random observations on 7/30/24 at 12:02 p.m., and 8/1/24 at 9:23 a.m., Resident #12 was observed with his fingernails in the same condition and not trimmed or cleaned. 2. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #25 had a readmission date of 8/31/22 with diagnoses including bi-polar disorder, depression, and anxiety. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented the resident required moderate staff assistance for personal hygiene. The MDS noted Resident #25's cognitive skills for daily decision making were moderately impaired. The care plan initiated on 9/4/22 identified Resident #25 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to decreased ability to perform ADLS in grooming and personal hygiene. The goal for Resident #25 specified the resident will have bathing, grooming, toileting, and ADL needs met with assistance from staff. The care plan specified Resident #25's scheduled shower days were Tuesday and Friday on the 3:00 p.m., to 11:00 p.m., shift. The care plan instructed staff to check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary. On 7/29/24 at 10:07 a.m., Resident #25 was observed in his room in bed without clothing, wearing a disposable brief. He was unshaven with approximately 4 to 5 days growth of facial hair. His fingernails were long, approximately ½ inch in length with a brown and black substance under the nail beds. Resident #25 did not answer questions appropriately. On 7/29/24 at 3:26 p.m., Resident # 25 was observed in the television the South Unit room dressed in his own clothing. He remained unshaven, with long and dirty nails. On 7/30/24 at 8:33 a.m., Resident # 25 was observed in his room in bed wearing the same clothing as the previous day. He remained unshaven and his fingernails remained long and dirty. Resident # 25 did not respond when spoken to. On 7/31/24 at 11:23 a.m., in an interview CNA Staff C said Resident #25 required total care with his ADLS. He does refuse care sometimes. He likes to be showered at night and he will ask you to shower him. He asks to be shaved, if you try to do it when he does not want it, he will fight you. I try and talk him into it, asking him would he like me to shave him. We do nail care on shower days and as needed. Sometimes they don't want you to touch their nails. 3. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #68 had an admission date of 4/11/24 with diagnoses including hemiparesis and hemiplegia (loss of movement on one side of the body) affecting the left side. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented the resident required moderate staff assistance for personal hygiene. The MDS noted Resident #68's cognitive skills for daily decision making were intact. The care plan initiated 4/11/24 identified Resident #68 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to recent cerebral vascular accident (stroke) with left sided weakness. The goal for Resident #68 was to have bathing, grooming, toileting, and ADL needs met with assistance from staff. On 7/29/24 at 11:13 a.m., Resident # 68 was observed in his room in bed. He said sometimes he gets his showers and other times he gets a bed bath. The residents fingernails on the left hand were very long , approximately 1/2 inch in length with a brown substance under the nail beds. He said his brother is supposed to come with a pair of clippers and cut them for him. He said he did not know why the staff don't trim and clean them. During random observations on 7/30/24 at 8:32 a.m., and 8/1/24 at 8:58 a.m., Resident # 68's left hand fingernails remained in the same condition. On 8/1/24 at 9:31 a.m., in an interview Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff C said nail care is usually done weekly at shower times. Sometimes activities will do the nails and sometimes if I have time, I will do nail care for the residents in the TV lounge. I am not assigned to this resident, but I can do his nail care if you want, I don't mind. On 8/1/24 at 10:21 a.m., in an interview the Director of Nursing said the expectation is for nail care to be done on shower days as part of the care. On 8/1/24 at 10:27 a.m., in an interview and observation the South Unit Manager Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff B was with Resident #25 and said I'm aware of the residents need for nail care. Resident #25 looked at the LPN and showed her his long fingernails and said, I really need someone to trim them, they are bad. Staff B said she is one who usually does the nail care but she had been off for 2 weeks. She said we can't do toenails, podiatry does them, but I will take care of the fingernails today for Residents #12, #25 and #68.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of practi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #63) of 7 residents reviewed by failing to follow physician's orders parameters for medication administration. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled Medication Administration dated 5/24/2023 showed, Policy Statement: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. Policy Compliance Guidelines: 8. obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters . Clinical record review revealed Resident #63's diagnoses included Essential (Primary) Hypertension (High Blood Pressure). Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #63's medication regimen included: Amlodipine Besylate 10 mg (milligrams) one tablet by mouth one time a day related to Essential (Primary) Hypertension. Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg one tablet by mouth one time a day related to localized edema (swelling caused by fluid buildup in the tissues). Lisinopril 40 mg one tablet by mouth one time a day related to Essential (Primary) Hypertension. The physician's orders for the Amlodipine, the Hydrochlorothiazide and the Lisinopril specified to hold the medications for the systolic (top number) blood pressure below 140. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2024, June 2024 and July 2024 revealed: In May 2024, the Amlodipine, Hydrochlorothiazide and the Lisinopril were administered 17 times when the documented systolic blood pressure was below 140. In June 2024, the Amlodipine, Hydrochlorothiazide and the Lisinopril were administered 18 times when the documented systolic blood pressure was below 140. In July 2024, the Amlodipine, Hydrochlorothiazide and the Lisinopril were administered 11 times when the documented systolic blood pressure was below 140. On 7/31/24 at 10:58 a.m., in an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff F said if the blood pressure is out of the specified parameter, the nurse should hold the medication and document in the electronic record the medication was held due to the blood pressure being out of parameter. Staff F said if a resident receives blood pressure medication the physicians are supposed to review the vital signs (blood pressure and pulse) when they come in. On 7/31/24 at 11:18 a.m., in an interview LPN Staff G said if a blood pressure medication has parameters, she would take the blood pressure before administering the medication. If the blood pressure was outside of the specified parameter, she would hold the medication and document the medication was held because the medication was outside of the specified parameters. On 7/31/24 at 11:45 a.m., in an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) said the expectation is for the nurses to hold the medication if the blood pressure is outside the specified parameters. The DON said the physicians are able to and should monitor the residents' blood pressure through the system and adjust the medications if needed. The DON reviewed Resident #63's MARs for July 2024 and verified 11 times Resident #63's systolic blood pressure was lower than 140 and the resident was administered the Amlodipine, Hydrochlorothiazide and Lisinopril. On 7/31/24 at 2:10 p.m., in an interview Resident #63's attending physician said he expects the nurses to follow his orders as written. He expects the nurses to call him if they have any questions or if there are any issues. The physician said he did not notice in July 2024 the nurses administered all three blood pressure medications on 11 different occasions when the resident's systolic blood pressure was below 140 and did not notice on 16 occasions the resident's systolic blood pressure was below 140 and all three blood pressure medications were held. On 7/31/24 at 3:04 p.m., in an interview the Consultant Pharmacist said the monthly medication regimen review includes reviewing the blood pressure medications, the blood pressure readings obtained to verify the parameters are being followed. The Consultant Pharmacist said during his reviews, he did not notice staff administered the three blood pressure medications 46 times to Resident #63 when the blood pressure was outside of the specified parameters in the past three months. He said he did not notice Resident #63's systolic blood pressure was below 140 in 16 occasions resulting in all three blood pressure medications being held. On 8/1/24 at 11:14 a.m., in an interview the Administrator said she expects the nurses to follow the physician ordered parameters for blood pressure medications. She expects the Consultant Pharmacist to notice and notify the facility in a timely manner of any issues related to medications being given outside of specified parameters or medications being held.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Drug Regimen Review (Tag F0756)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on clinical record review, review of facility's policies and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication regimen review identified medications administered with...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review, review of facility's policies and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication regimen review identified medications administered without adequate monitoring for 1 (Resident #63) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Medication Regimen Review with a date reviewed/revised of 1/2022 noted, The drug regimen of each resident is reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and includes a review of the resident's medical chart . Medication Regimen Review (MRR), or Drug Regimen Review, is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medications. The MMR includes: a. Review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. b. Collaboration with other members of the interdisciplinary team . Facility staff shall act upon all recommendations according to procedures for addressing medication regimen review irregularities. Clinical record review revealed Resident #63's diagnoses included Essential (Primary) Hypertension (High Blood Pressure). Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #63's medication regimen included: Amlodipine Besylate 10 mg (milligrams) one tablet by mouth one time a day related to Essential (Primary) Hypertension. Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg one tablet by mouth one time a day related to localized edema (swelling caused by fluid buildup in the tissues). Lisinopril 40 mg one tablet by mouth one time a day related to Essential (Primary) Hypertension. The physician's orders for the Amlodipine, the Hydrochlorothiazide and the Lisinopril specified to hold the medications for the systolic (top number) blood pressure below 140. Review of the Medication Regimen Review and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2024, June 2024 and July 2024 revealed: In May 2024, the MAR showed 29 times the resident's systolic blood pressure was below 140. The Amlodipine, Hydrochlorothiazide and the Lisinopril were administered 17 times when the documented systolic blood pressure was below 140. The Medication Regimen Review performed between 5/20/24 and 5/21/24 showed Resident #63 was included in the list of Patients with no irregularities noted. In June 2024, the MAR showed 28 times the resident's systolic blood pressure was below 140. The Amlodipine, Hydrochlorothiazide and the Lisinopril were administered 18 times when the documented systolic blood pressure was below 140. The Medication Regimen Review performed between 6/23/24 and 6/24/24 showed Resident #63 was included in the list of Patients with no irregularities noted. In July 2024, 27 times Resident #63's systolic blood pressure was below 140. The Amlodipine, Hydrochlorothiazide and the Lisinopril were administered 11 times when the documented systolic blood pressure was below 140. On 7/31/24 at 10:58 a.m., in an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff F said if a resident receives blood pressure medication the physicians are supposed to review the vital signs (blood pressure and pulse) when they come in. On 7/31/24 at 11:45 a.m., in an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) said the expectation is for the nurses to hold the medication if the blood pressure is outside the specified parameters. The DON said the physicians are able to and should monitor the residents' blood pressure through the system and adjust the medications if needed. The DON reviewed Resident #63's MARs for July 2024 and verified 11 times Resident #63's systolic blood pressure was lower than 140 and the resident was administered the Amlodipine, Hydrochlorothiazide and Lisinopril. On 7/31/24 at 2:10 p.m., in an interview Resident #63's attending physician said he expects the nurses to follow his orders as written. He expects the nurses to call him if they have any questions or if there are any issues. The physician said he did not notice in July 2024 the nurses administered all three blood pressure medications on 11 different occasions when the resident's systolic blood pressure was below 140 and did not notice on 16 occasions the resident's systolic blood pressure was below 140 and all three medications were held. On 7/31/24 at 3:04 p.m., in an interview the Consultant Pharmacist said the monthly medication regimen review includes reviewing the blood pressure medications, the blood pressure readings obtained to verify the parameters are being followed. The Consultant Pharmacist said during his reviews, he did not notice staff administered the Amlodipine, Hydrochlorothiazide and the Lisinopril 46 times to Resident #63 when the blood pressure was outside of the specified parameters in the past three months. He said he did not notice Resident #63's systolic blood pressure was below 140 in 16 occasions resulting in all three medications being held. On 8/1/24 at 11:14 a.m., in an interview the Administrator said she expects the nurses to follow the physician ordered parameters for blood pressure medications. She expects the Consultant Pharmacist to notice and notify the facility in a timely manner of any issues related to medications being given outside of specified parameters or medications being held.
Feb 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, review of the clinical records, review of facility policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the fac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, review of the clinical records, review of facility policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility the facility failed to implement meaningful resident centered activities to meet the interest and wellbeing of 2 (Resident #7 and #12) of 2 residents reviewed for activities. The lack of an individualized activity program has the potential to cause social isolation, boredom, agitation, and frustration. The findings included: The facility policy Activities implemented 11/2023 (revised 2/24) documented, It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan and preferences. Facility sponsored group, individual and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 1. Each resident's interest and needs will be assessed on a routine basis. The assessment shall include, but not limited to: b. Activity assessment to include residents interest, preferences and needed adaptations. 2. Activities will be designed with the intent to: a. Enhance the resident's sense of well-being, belonging and usefulness. b. Create opportunities for each resident to have a meaningful life. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #7 was [AGE] years old with an admission date of 5/26/22. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, dementia, and schizoaffective disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/7/23 documented Resident #7 was dependent on staff for all care. The MDS noted Resident #7's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. On 2/19/24 at 9:55 a.m., Resident #7 was observed in the South Unit television room (TV) room across from the nurse's station. He was in a special reclining chair. The TV was on, and 4 other residents were in the room. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff E said, the ones who can't talk or do much, we bring them in here and they watch TV. The resident does not speak, occasionally he might say a word and he is total care with everything. On 2/20/24 at 10:22 a.m., and 10:47 a.m., Resident #7 was observed in the TV room with 3 other residents sitting in a reclined position since 8:30 a.m. The resident had uncontrollable movements and was not able to watch the television. No staff was observed interacting with him. Review of the activity calendar specified at 9:30 a.m., coffee social and at 10:00 a.m., and Movin and Grooving. On 2/20/24 at 3:07 p.m., in an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse Staff C said the residents in the TV room are there to watch TV. It is not a fall or increased supervision room; it is just a TV room where they go to watch TV. During random observations on 2/21/24 at 8:51 a.m., and 9:47 a.m., Resident #7 was in a wheelchair in the TV room, the TV was on but he was not meaningfully engaged and was not looking in the direction of the TV. The activity calendar specified at 9:30 a.m., coffee social and Catholic mass at 10:00 a.m. The initial activity assessment dated [DATE] specified the resident enjoyed music, watching movies, going outside and exercise (active games) as appropriate. He enjoys most of all leisure activities but has cognitive and physical limitations where staff encouragement and support is needed for participation. He needs staff involvement daily to participate in leisure programs and needs staff to encourage and bring him to groups of interest. Review of the Activity documentation for January 2024 revealed Resident #7 had no one to one activities on the day shift on 1/1/24, 1/4/24, 1/5/24, 1/6/24, 1/7/24, 1/12/24, 1/14/24, 1/15/24, 1/17/24, 1/23/24, 1/26/24, 1/27/24, 1/28/24 and 1/31/34. On the 3-11 shift Resident #7 had one documented one to one activity on 1/14/24, and one group activity on 1/13/24. On 2/22/24 during random observations at 9:14 a.m., 9:40 a.m., and 10:12 a.m., Resident #7 was in the TV room but not watching the television. The calendar on the wall documented coffee social at 9:30 a.m. and moving and grooving at 10:00 a.m. 2. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #12 had an admission date of 8/1/22. Diagnoses included dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and adjustment disorder. The Annual MDS with an ARD of 1/30/24 documented Resident #12 cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. The initial activity assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident enjoys music, going outside, interacting with staff and others, watching TV (movies & shows). He was not very active in leisure pursuits prior to admission. Lead a sedentary leisure lifestyle at home. He is alert but confused. Needs staff and family assistance for any leisure involvement and needs cues to participate, eat or receive care. He verbalizes but most times not appropriate or accurate. On 2/19/24 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #12 was observed in the TV room on the South Unit sitting in a wheelchair, facing away from the television. Review of the activity calendar specified coffee social at 9:30 a.m., and trivia at 10:00 a.m. On 2/20/24 at 11:33 a.m., Resident #12 was observed in the TV room on the South Unit with three other residents. Resident #12 said he did not know what it was he was watching and did not know what was supposed to be on the TV. On 2/21/24 from 9:11 a.m., to 11:25 a.m., Resident #12 was observed in the TV room. The television was on, but he was not watching the television. The activity calendar specified coffee social at 9:30 a.m., and Catholic mass at 10:00 a.m. During observations on 2/22/24 at 9:18 a.m., and 9:41 a.m., Resident #12 was seated in his w/c in the TV room on the south unit. The TV was on. Resident #12 was in his wheelchair at the back of the room and looking around. No facility staff was in the television room interacting with the resident. The activity calendar specified coffee social at 9:30 a.m. Review of the Activity Documentation for January 2024 revealed Resident #12 attended no group activities on 1/1/24, 1/4/24, 1/5/24, 1/6/24, 1/7/24, 1/10/24, 1/11/24, 1/12/24, 1/13/24, 1/14/24, 1/15/24, 1/17/24, 1/18/24, 1/19/24, 1/20/24, 1/21/24, 1/22/24, 1/23/24, 1/24/24, 1/25/24, 1/26/24, 1/27/24, 1/28/24 and 1/31/24. There was no documentation Resident #12 participated in one to one activities on 1/1/24, 1/2/24, 1/5/24, 1/6/24, 1/7/24, 1/8/24, 1/9/24, 1/10/24, 1/12/24, 1/15/24, 1/16/24, 1/17/24, 1/20/24, 1/23/24, 1/26/24, 1/27/24, 1/28/24, 1/29/24, 1/30/24 and 1/30/24. Review of the February 2024 Activity Documentation revealed Resident #12 had no participation in group activities 2/1/24 through 2/7/24, on 2/10/24, 2/12/24, 2/15/24, 2/17/24 and 2/21/24. No one-to-one activities were documented on 2/1/24, 2/3/24, 2/4/24, 2/5/24, 2/9/24, 2/13/24, 2/14/24, 2/16/24, 1/17/24 and 2/21/24. On 2/20/24 at 3:08 p.m., in an interview the Activity Director said, The TV room is for the residents to watch TV. There is no special calendar for the residents who are not cognitively able to participate in the daily activities. The Activity Director said, we do take them to group activities so they can watch and be a part of things. Right now, I have only one assistant and we are short two activity aides. The Activity Director said she started employment at the facility a few weeks ago. She said she does sensory items like watching television, touch balls and different items for five to ten minutes daily. The Activity Director said she did not have a schedule for the sensory activities for the residents with impaired cognition.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0582 (Tag F0582)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to issue in writing the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and/or the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Co...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to issue in writing the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and/or the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) for 3 (Residents #17, #463, and #464) of 3 residents reviewed for advanced beneficiary notices. This had the potential for residents to not be aware of the right to appeal the facility decision to terminate Medicare services. The findings included: The facility policy Advanced Beneficiary Notices documented, It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage . A Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Form shall be issued to the resident/representative when Medicare covered service(s) are ending, no matter if the resident is leaving the facility or remaining in the facility. This informs the resident on how to request an appeal or expedited determination from their Quality Improvement Organization . The notice shall be written legibly in a language and or format that the resident/representative understands. Verbal explanations detailing the reasons for non-coverage shall be provided . If the notice cannot be hand-delivered, a telephone notice shall be made, followed up immediately with a mailed, emailed, faxed or hand-delivered notice. Documentation shall comply with form instructions regarding telephone notices. 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident #17 revealed a PPS (Prospective Payment System) Minimum Data Set (MDS) Part A discharge assessment with a target date of 12/15/23. The MDS noted the resident's most recent Medicare stay started on 10/2/23 and ended on 12/14/23. Resident #17 remained at the facility. On 2/20/24 at 3:40 p.m., the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Notification Review form provided by the facility noted Medicare Part A Skilled Services Episode started on 10/2/23, and the last covered day was 12/15/23. The form noted the facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when the benefit days were not exhausted. The facility provided a SNFABN and a NOMNC form which noted Resident #17 was unable to sign the notice due to significant cognitive impairment and the information was conveyed to the resident's power of attorney via telephone on 12/13/23. She said she started employment at the facility on 11/2/23 and the information for the NOMNC was done verbally in a phone conversation. On 2/20/24 at 3:35 p.m., in an interview the Social Service Director (SSD) verified the clinical record contained no documentation the facility provided the required notice to the resident or representative in writing. 2. Review of the clinical record for Resident #463 revealed a Discharge MDS assessment with a target date of 11/4/23 for a planned discharge, return not anticipated. On 2/20/24 the SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form provided by the facility noted Medicare Part A Skilled Services start date was 10/2/23 and the last covered day of Part A services was 11/3/23. The form noted, Cannot determine from record if D/C (discharge) was self-initiated. On 2/20/24 at 3:55 p.m., the Social Service Director (SSD) said she could not locate documentation the facility provided Resident #463 with the required SNFABN or NOMNC form. 3. Review of the clinical record for Resident #464 revealed a Part A discharge MDS assessment with a target date of 9/14/23. The MDS noted the most recent Medicare Stay started on 9/1/23 and ended on 9/14/23. Resident #464 remained at the facility until 12/26/23. On 2/20/24 review of the SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form provided by the facility showed the facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted. The form noted the SNFABN notice was not given. Under Other/Explain the facility noted, Unknown. Review of the NOMNC form showed the resident's guardian was notified via telephone on 9/11/23. On 2/20/24 at 3:55 p.m., in an interview the SSD verified the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was not given in writing to the resident's guardian.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of the clinical record and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necess...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of the clinical record and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 3 (Residents #7, #12 and #461) of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The findings included: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) (Revised 11/29/22) documented, The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADL's do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #7 was had an admission date of 5/26/22. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, dementia, and schizoaffective disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/7/23 documented Resident #7 was dependent on staff for all care. The MDS noted Resident #7's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. On 2/19/24 at 9:56 a.m., Resident #7 was observed in the television (TV) room on the South Nursing Unit in a specialized reclining wheelchair. He was nonverbal and made no eye contact. The resident had a very strong odor of feces and had approximately 2-3 days growth of facial hair. Resident #7 appeared unkempt with greasy, uncombed hair. On 2/19/24 at 10:00 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff E who was present during the observation verified Resident #7 had a very strong odor of feces, two to three days growth of facial hair, looked unkempt with greasy, uncombed hair. CNA Staff E did not remove Resident #7 from the television room. On 2/19/24 at 12:34 p.m., Resident #7 was observed in the main dining room for the noon meal. He remained with a strong odor of feces. On 2/20/24 during random observations at 10:03 a.m., 10:49 a.m., and 12:06 p.m., Resident #7 was observed in the day room. He had approximately three to four days of facial hair growth. Review of the CNA documentation revealed Resident #7 received personal hygiene assistance, was shaved on 2/19/24 and 2/20/24. On 2/21/24 at 9:07 a.m., in an interview and observation, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), confirmed Resident #7 had approximately five days of facial hair growth. The ADON said, we are waiting for an electric razor to shave him and have asked the guardian to bring one for him. The ADON said it is hard to shave him because of the constant movements of his head and we don't want to hurt him. The clinical record showed no documentation of contact with Resident #7's representative to request an electric razor. Review of the CNA documentation for January 2024 revealed Resident #7's shower days were Tuesdays and Fridays on the 3:00 p.m., to 11:00 p.m., shift. The document showed on 1/2/24, 1/16/24, 1/26/24 and 1/30/24 Resident # 7 received a bed bath in lieu of the scheduled shower. Review of the CNA documentation from 2/1/24 to 2/20/24 revealed Resident #7 received a bed bath instead of the scheduled shower on 2/2/24, 2/9/24, 2/13/24 and 2/20/24. There was no documentation in the clinical record Resident #7 refused the scheduled showers. 2. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #12 had an admission date of 8/1/22. Diagnoses included dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and adjustment disorder. The Annual MDS with an ARD of 1/30/24 documented Resident #12 cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #12 required assistance from staff for toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene. On 2/19/24 at 9:20 a.m., Resident #12 was observed in the television room on the South Unit, across from the nursing desk sitting in a wheelchair. He was facing away from the television. Resident #12 had a strong urine smell, and an accumulation of a brown substance under his nails. Resident #12 had approximately three days of facial hair growth. On 2/19/24 form 11:00 a.m., to approximately 12:00 p.m., observation showed Resident #12 remained in the television room on the South Unit, across from the nursing desk sitting in a wheelchair, facing away from the television. Resident #12 had obvious sign of incontinence, and a strong urine smell. The resident's pants were wet with urine dripping on the floor forming a puddle under the resident's wheelchair. On 2/19/24 at approximately 12:00 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff G entered the television room and stepped in the puddle of urine on the floor. LPN Staff G took the resident to his room and left him there. LPN Staff G was observed walking down the hall and calling for a CNA. On 2/20/24 at 9:00 a.m., to 11:00 a.m., Resident #12 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the South Unit television room, facing the wall. No staff were observed in the television room. On 2/20/24 at 12:00 p.m., Resident #12 remained in the television room in his wheelchair, facing the wall. A staff member took the resident to the main dining room for lunch. On 2/20/24 at 2:41 p.m., in an interview CNA Staff D said, Residents are changed every two hours, some are offered to be changed or toileted more frequently if they request it of if you know they are heavy wetters. 3. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #461 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, complete small bowel obstruction, Myasthenia Gravis, anxiety, and need for assistance with personal care. The 5-day MDS dated [DATE] documented the resident required partial to moderate assistance with ADL's including showers. The MDS indicated Resident #461's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. On 2/19/24 at 10:23 a.m., Resident #461 was observed in his room in his wheelchair. He had approximately two days of facial hair growth. The resident had an accumulation of brown substance under his nails. In an interview Resident #461 said he received one shower since his admission. On 2/20/24 at 8:47 a.m., Resident #461 was observed in his room in his wheelchair. Resident #461 had approximately three days of facial hair growth. The resident was wearing pajama pants and lifting his shirt. Resident #461 lifted his upper body clothing showing he was wearing five shirts. Review of the CNA documentation for February 2024 revealed the residents scheduled shower days were Tuesdays and Fridays on the day shift. The documentation from 2/8/24 to 2/20/24 revealed Resident #461 received one shower (2/20/24) since his admission on [DATE]. The documentation showed he received a bed bath on 2/8/24, 2/9/24 and 2/16/24. On 2/13/24 the CNA documented N/A (not applicable). The clinical record showed no documentation Resident #461 had refused his scheduled showers. On 2/21/24 at 10:23 a.m., in an interview CNA Staff E said, men are shaved on shower days and at least every other day. Staff E explained the showers are located in the CNA assignment books; it goes by room numbers and there are 2 books. The shower list is also in the documentation we do on the computer. We also fill out a shower sheet, the CNA provided and demonstrated how she would mark any skin changes and if the resident refused the shower, you would write it on the sheet and in the electronic record.
Aug 2023 19 deficiencies 7 IJ (7 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement processes to ensure the residents' r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement processes to ensure the residents' right to a safe and clean environment in that they failed to ensure an environment free of disease-causing pests. On 12/19/22 the facility became aware of rodent infestation in the building, including the kitchen. The facility consistently failed to implement the recommendations from the contracted pest control company to trim back over hanging trees next to the building to prevent wildlife from getting easier access to the building. The facility failed to identify and repair all rodent entry points. The failure to provide a safe and sanitary environment free of disease causing pests created a likelihood of spread of diseases through direct or indirect contact with infected rodents which could result in serious illness, or death, resulting in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) starting on 12/19/22. Rodents can also damage building structures and start fires by gnawing electrical wiring. On 8/4/23 at 7:28 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy and provided the IJ templates. The Immediate Jeopardy was ongoing. The facility census was 86. The findings included: Cross reference to F600, F812, F835, F867, F880 and F925. The facility's Standard Precautions Infection Control policy (copyright 2023. The compliance Store LLC) noted, Care of the Environment: Policies and procedures have been established for routine and targeted cleaning of environmental surfaces as indicated by the level of resident contract and degree of soiling. Personnel are trained in the use of the procedures . The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (copyright 2023. The compliance Store LLC), noted, . Environmental cleaning and disinfection shall be performed according to facility policy. All staff have responsibilities related to the cleanliness of the facility, and are to report problems outside of their scope to the appropriate department . Equipment Protocol: a. All reusable items and equipment requiring special cleaning, disinfection, or sterilization shall be cleaned in accordance with our current procedures governing the cleaning and sterilization of soiled or contaminated equipment . Review of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention document titled, How to Control Wild Rodent Infestations, last reviewed on January 3, 2023, noted, Rats and mice are known to carry many diseases. These diseases can spread to people directly, through handling of rodents; contact with rodent feces (poop), urine, or saliva (such as through breathing in air or eating food that is contaminated with rodent waste); or rodent bites. Rodents can also carry ticks, mites, or fleas that can act as vectors to spread diseases between rodents and people. Many diseases do not cause any apparent illness in rodents, so you cannot tell if a rodent is carrying a disease just by looking at it . Rodents, such as rats, mice . are known to carry many diseases. Diseases can spread to people directly and indirectly from rodents .'' The CDC document listed 17 Diseases that can be spread directly by rodents (depending on geographic region), including Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome (The condition affects many organ systems of the body, damages the overall cardiovascular system, and reduces the body's ability to function on its own. Symptoms of this type often include bleeding and hemorrhaging. This can cause a severe life threatening disease), Monkeypox (Virus that affects rodents, and causes a painful rash, enlarged lymph nodes and fever in humans), and rat-bite fever (causes fever, vomiting, headache, muscle, and joint pain, and rash in humans). Certain diseases can spread from rodents to people through indirect contact. This can occur when people are bitten by ticks, mites, fleas, and mosquitos that have fed on infected rodents. Diseases can also spread to people from rodents through the consumption of an intermediate host (for example, beetles or cockroaches) . The CDC document lists 17 diseases spread indirectly by rodents (depending on geographic region), including Angiostrongylus (rat lungworm), a disease transmitted from rodents to humans through infected larvae that affects the brain and spinal cord in humans, and Powassan virus (transmitted by ticks, and causes brain infection in humans). The Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommendation to clean up rodent urine and droppings (last reviewed January 3, 2023) noted, Step 1: Put on rubber or plastic gloves. Step 2: Spray urine and droppings with bleach solution or an EPA-registered disinfectant until very wet. Let it soak for 5 minutes or according to instructions on the disinfectant label. Step 3: Use paper towels to wipe up the urine or droppings and cleaning product. Step 4: Throw the paper towels in a covered garbage can that is regularly emptied. Step 5: Mop or sponge the area with a disinfectant. o Clean all hard surfaces including floors, countertops, cabinets, and drawers. o Follow instructions below to clean and disinfect other types of surfaces. Step 6: Wash gloved hands with soap and water or a disinfectant before removing gloves. Step 7: Wash hands with soap and warm water after removing gloves or use a waterless alcohol-based hand rub when soap is not available, and hands are not visibly soiled. On 8/2/23 at 12:20 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff NN said she has never seen a rat but has heard them running in the ceiling, and residents have complained about hearing rats in the ceiling. On 8/2/23 4:45 p.m., the Senior Regional Director of Culinary Services stated, I was told the rat trap in the kitchen was placed there as a preventative measure because there had been rat sightings in the past. On 8/3/23 at 9:25 a.m., LPN Staff I said, The rats are so bad. They have roaches and rats, but I'm more afraid of the rats. You hear them running across the ceiling. I'm so scared they are going to fall on me. They are out anytime of the day. You have to open the doors to the soiled utility room and the nourishment room really carefully because they run away from you and go into the holes in the cabinets. On 8/3/23 at 9:25 a.m., observation of the South Unit soiled utility room with LPN Staff I revealed a hole in the baseboard of the wall, with a missing tile. Photographic evidence obtained. There was hole at the lower left bottom of the storage cabinet. Photographic evidence obtained. There was a hole in the baseboard where two cabinets met. Photographic evidence obtained. LPN Staff I said, I report it to the management all the time. I have told the pest control and he said he can't do anything about it if the management will not pay to have the rats removed. LPN Staff I said she doesn't go in the soiled utility room because of the rats. She stands at the door and throws soiled linen and garbage into the bins. On 8/3/23 at 9:35 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff D said, The rats and roaches are disgusting and everywhere in the building. I have seen them in residents' rooms, the utility rooms and nourishment rooms. They run in the ceiling, you hear scratching, and you can hear them run around up there. If it fell on me, I would be screaming. I know I have reported it to the management staff, but the rats are still here. It doesn't matter what time of day, you will see them, but they are worse at night. On 8/3/23 at 9:45 a.m., Resident #89 reported he saw a rodent in his room approximately three weeks ago, and Maintenance filled the hole in the bathroom. On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director said about two weeks ago staff informed him they saw a rat in Resident #89's bathroom. He observed a hole in the wall, which he plugged at that time. There was no documentation the resident's room was disinfected after the sighting of the rat. On 8/3/23 at 12:00 p.m., the Infection Preventionist said she was extremely surprised and had never heard of rats in the facility. She said, I don't know anything about it. I certainly have never seen any; this is the first I'm hearing about it. After reviewing the content of the reports of the contracted pest control company and the observation of rodent feces on the floor of the kitchen storage area with the Infection Preventionist, she said, I knew there were rats in the kitchen about six months ago when the former Administration was here, but I was told it was taken care of. On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director said he has been employed with the company since September 2022, and had been the acting Maintenance Director at the facility since the beginning of July 2023. He said he became aware of possible rat problem after they started to replace the facility roof in February 2023 which was completed sometimes in June 2023. He said he started hearing from some of the facility staff about seeing rats and hearing rats in the ceiling during the roof construction. He said the first time he heard of rats in the kitchen was two weeks ago when a kitchen staff told him they saw a rat in the kitchen. He looked at the area where the kitchen staff said they saw the rat, and noted there was a hole in the wall. He said he has not had any meetings with the administrative staff related to the rats in the facility. He said as of this time no one from administration has asked him what interventions he had put into place to address the staff seeing rats in the facility. He said he conducted an informal meeting with the housekeeping director to remind her staff to ensure they were not leaving food which the rats might be eating, and remind them to do proper cleaning and disinfection in general. It was an informal meeting; he doesn't have any documentation related to the meeting. On 8/3/2023 at 12:08 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff A said she has worked at the facility for over 10 years, and she can smell the rats. On 8/3/23 at 12:10 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff K said she has seen rats in the facility, usually at night on the South Unit. The CNA said the rats are really bad on the secured memory unit. She said, I have seen roaches and the rats over there. It is an infestation there. On 8/3/23 at 12:20 p.m., CNA Staff E said, The roaches and the rats here are terrible, it is a problem. I have seen them both here in the facility, they know about it. On 8/3/2023 at 12:25 p.m., Resident #29 said he had seen rats in the front and back of the building and heard them in the ceiling. On 8/3/23 at 12:33 p.m., the Housekeeping Manager stated, There are pest issues at facility, they called the pest guy weekly. On 8/3/23 at 1:00 p.m., RN Staff KK stated, I have heard people saying they have seen rats mostly in the big dining room. On 8/3/23 review of the pest control logbook located at the front desk of the facility noted the following dietary staff entries: 11/3/22 at 6:00 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 11/13/22 at 6:00 a.m., rats, location found: Kitchen. 11/23/22 at 6:30 p.m., rat, location found: Homestead dining room. 12/13/22 at 6:30 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 2/16/23, (no time in the morning), rat, location found: Kitchen. 2/20/23 in the morning, rat, location found: Beverage station, department: Kitchen. 3/18/23 (no time indicated), rat, location found: Kitchen. 3/25/23 (no time indicated), rat, location found: North dining room. 4/6/23 at 6:15 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 4/22/23 at 6:00 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 4/25/23 at 6:15 a.m., 3 rats, location found: Kitchen. The North Unit Pest sighting log noted: 7/1/23 at 2:00 a.m., roach back hall nursing medication cart. An initial was placed next to the entry and dated 7/13/23. 7/24/23 at 1:30 a.m., Rats (2) in soiled utility. An initial was placed next to the entry and dated 7/28/23. 7/24/23 at 1:30 a.m., Roaches in med carts, on nurses station counters, on the floors. An initial was placed next to the entry and dated 7/28/23. The contracted Pest Control inspection report dated 7/28/23 noted, Checked all 3 logbooks and scanned them. Signed off on rodent issues after checking on them. Baited nurse main cart with roach gel for roach sightings. Lots more rodent activity this month. On 8/3/23 at 12:22 p.m., during a telephone interview, the technician from the contracted pest control company said two rodents were caught in the kitchen yesterday. He said he told the kitchen staff not to leave bread and other food items the rats can get into on the counters or where it would be accessible to the rats. He told them to put the bread in the refrigerator. On 8/3/23 at 12:30 p.m., the Administrator said the rat problem had been identified prior to her arrival to the facility. She said she has been employed at the facility since May 19, 2023. She did not know how long it has gone on. She said she knows the pest control company comes out weekly as needed. She said the Maintenance Director is in charge of pest control and has direct oversight over the building. She said she could provide a copy of the contract signed on 7/20/2023 addressing the rat problem. On 8/4/23 at 11:15 a.m., black smear marks, resembling rodent grease marks were observed along the baseboard of the South Unit soiled utility room. Dried yellow stains, and rodent feces were observed on the floor of the soiled utility room. On 7/31/23 at 9:46 a.m., Resident #88's shared bathroom had dried feces on the toilet tank, around the toilet base, and splattered on the wall. Photographic evidence obtained. On 8/1/23 at 9:28 a.m., Resident #88's shared bathroom remained with dried feces on the toilet tank, the toilet base, and on the wall. A used adult incontinent brief was observed on the floor underneath the sink in the bathroom. Photographic evidence obtained. On 8/1/23 at 3:03 p.m., Resident #88's shared bathroom remained with dried feces on the toilet tank, the toilet base, and on the wall. On 8/1/23 at 3:10 p.m., the Housekeeping manager stated all rooms are cleaned daily. The housekeepers spray and wipe all surfaces, empty trash can, dust, sweep and mop the floor, but do not clean up body fluids such as feces, urine, or emesis. The expectation is to get someone from nursing, have them dispose of the body fluids and then housekeeping will clean and sanitize the area. On 7/31/23 at 10:08 a.m., a trail of foul smelling watery stool of approximately 20 feet was noted on the hallway floor of the memory care unit between rooms 405, and 410. Photographic evidence obtained. Multiple staff members and residents were observed walking in the hallway. On 7/31/23 at approximately 10:15 a.m., a staff member was observed wiping, and smearing the watery stool in a circular motion. Housekeeping was not observed sanitizing the area once the stool was wiped. On 8/1/23 at 9:38 a.m., Resident #73's room was observed with a large amount of live white crawling bugs on the bedside table. Video documentation obtained. LPN Staff MM verified the observation of the bugs and said she had seen them in other rooms as well. Resident #73 said, Just brush them off on the floor. On 8/3/23 at 11:50 a.m., multiple ant-like insects were observed crawling on Resident #2's bed, and on the resident's wound dressings on both ankles. Photographic evidence obtained. The resident said the nurse who changed the dressings to her ankles this morning told her she had ants crawling in her bed, and on her legs. The resident said she requested to have her bed sheets changed since then to get rid of the ants and no one has come all morning. On 8/3/23 at 12:00 p.m., LPN Staff I was notified of the observation of the crawling insects on the resident's bed and her request to have her sheets changed and the pest removed. LPN Staff I said she would let the Certified Nursing Assistant know. On 8/3/23 at 3:30 p.m., Resident #2 said she felt, terrible, just terrible when the nurse told her she had ants in her bed. She said the ants were crawling in her dressings. She said, no one wants bugs in their bed. I told the nurse I wanted an aide to change my bed, but no one has come yet. On 8/3/23 at 3:45 p.m., Housekeeper Staff BB was observed cleaning Resident #2's mattress. Staff BB said there were ants in the resident's open bags of chips and in the resident's bed. On 8/3/23 at 4:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing said she was informed of the ants in Resident #2's bed and on her legs. She said she thought the ants were attracted to the Medi honey (medical grade honey) used to treat the resident's wounds. She said they will be changing the resident's wound treatment. On 7/31/23 at 10:00 a.m., the ceiling tiles in room [ROOM NUMBER] in the secured memory care unit had multiple brown stains. Photographic evidence obtained. On 7/31/23 at 10:25 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s floor had dirt, grime and food particles. The shared toilet was dirty with brown stains, the bathroom light was broken, and the dresser was broken with exposed wood. Photographic evidence obtained. On 7/31/23 at 10:45 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] had a broken bathroom light. The paint in the bathroom was chipped and the toilet was running continuously. Photographic evidence obtained. On 8/3/23 at 11:55 a.m., brown bugs were observed crawling in the shower room and in the clean utility room of the memory unit. On 8/3/23 at 12:20 p.m., CNA Staff FF, in the memory care unit said, I see a lot of roaches. The guy comes and sprays and it is not doing anything. I also see ants sometimes, but I see roaches every time I work. I have heard about the rats but not seen them. On 8/3/23 at 12:33 p.m., Housekeeping Manager Staff U said she would expect staff to report to her if they saw roaches or bugs. She said they have a book in the front of the facility where they write the concerns. The pest guy reviews the book and then treats the identified concerns. On 8/3/23 at 1:00 p.m., RN Staff KK said, Most of the time we see roaches at nurses' stations and residents' rooms, I haven't seen rats. I have heard people saying they have seen rats mostly in the big dining room. We have a binder at the nurses' station to document if we see anything. Review of the binder provided by RN Staff KK revealed: On 7/1/23 a roach in the back hall nursing cart. On 7/24/23 two rats in the soiled utility room, roaches in med carts, roaches on nurse's station counters and on floor. On 8/3/23 at 1:15 p.m., LPN Unit Manager Staff AA said, That is not the master binder. I would like to see the master binder which is kept in the front. She confirmed she was aware of rats in the soiled utility. She said, It was reported to me, and I believe maintenance. I don't know where it went from there. I don't meet with maintenance. We don't have a set person for this facility. Reviewed master binder, sightings were not documented in master binder. On 8/4/23 at 1:00 p.m., a follow up tour of the memory care unit to review concerns identified on 7/31/23 revealed: room [ROOM NUMBER] remained with the stained ceiling tiles. room [ROOM NUMBER] still had the light out in bathroom, the dresser remained with missing front piece exposing wood. room [ROOM NUMBER] remained with the bathroom light bulb out, chipped paint on the bathroom wall and the toilet continuously running. On 7/31/23 during the initial tour of the 300 and 400 hallways in the memory care unit, observation included multiple areas, on both hallway walls, were damaged, and repaired but the damaged walls which were repaired were not painted to match the rest of the walls. One of the handrails on the 400 hallway was missing the end cap. Two hallway electrical outlet cover plates in the 400 hallway and two of the electrical outlet cover plates in room [ROOM NUMBER] were warped causing the corners to protrude outward. Several ceiling tiles in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were observed to have had large brown stains. One ceiling tile in room [ROOM NUMBER] by the window was observed to have had a black fuzzy substance in the middle of the brown stain. The chair rail on the wall behind bed 318B was observed to be broken and missing sections. The baseboard across from 318B was observed to be damaged and coming off the wall. The bathroom bulbs in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were observed as not working. On 8/3/23 at 10:47 a.m., the Director of Plant Operations said the facility currently did not have a Maintenance Director since 7/5/23. He said he had been filling in as the facility's Maintenance Director since then until they were able to hire a new Maintenance Director for the facility. He said all staff were required when they observed and/or heard of any facility damage or equipment not working to place the information in their computer maintenance program called TELS as a work order (is a web-based software designed to help senior Living operators and maintenance tract and schedule maintenance anf fire safety task). He stated he reviewed the TELS system on a routine basis, completed all work orders in the TELS system, and marked them as completed in the TELS program when he had finished the repair and/or work order. On 8/4/23 at 3:00 p.m. after a tour of the 300 and 400 hallways, the Director of Plant Operations confirmed multiple damaged wall repairs in the 300 and 400 hallways which were not painted to match the walls as required. He confirmed the end cap on the handrail on the 400 hallway was missing, there were several brown stained ceiling tiles in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], and 1 ceiling tile in room [ROOM NUMBER] which had a black fuzzy substance in the middle of the brown stain. He confirmed the light bulbs in the bathroom in 305 and 308 were not working. He confirmed 2 electrical outlets in the 400 hallway and two electrical outlets in room [ROOM NUMBER] were warped and protruding outward which could cause an injury to the residents on the memory care unit. He also confirmed the chair rail around 318B bed was broken and missing a section, and the baseboard across from 318B's bed was damaged and falling off the wall. The Director of Plant Operations, after reviewing the work orders in the TELS computer system, said the facility staff did not enter the rooms and hallway damages and damage/repairs observed during our tour of the memory care unit into the TELS system as work orders as required. He said since the facility staff did not enter the work orders into the TELS system, he was unaware of the repairs needing to be completed in the facility.
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, review of the facility's policies and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, review of the facility's policies and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from neglect in that they failed to adequately address ongoing presence of rats in the facility, including the kitchen. On 12/19/22 the facility became aware of the rodent infestation in the building, including the kitchen, and neglected to implement appropriate immediate actions to eradicate the rodent infestation. Certain diseases can spread from rodents to people from direct or indirect contact with infected rodents which could result in serious illness, or death. Rodents can also damage building structures and start fires by gnawing electrical wiring. The facility failed to consistently implement recommendations from the contracted pest control company, including trimming back over hanging trees next to the building to prevent wildlife easier access to the building. The facility failed to identify and repair all rodent entry points into the building. The facility failure to provide services to ensure a clean and safe environment, free from disease causing pests resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) starting on 12/19/22. On 8/4/23 at 7:28 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy and provided the IJ templates. The Immediate Jeopardy was ongoing. The facility census was 86. The findings included: Cross reference to F584, F812, F835, F867, F880 and F925. Facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revised 11/29/22 noted it is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit neglect. The facility policy defines neglect as, The failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. The policy noted the facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of neglect and ensure the health and safety of each resident, addressing features of the physical environment that may make neglect more likely to occur. The facility's pest sighting logbooks located at the front desk included the following entries: 11/3/22 at 6:00 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 11/13/22 at 6:00 a.m., rats, location found: Kitchen. 11/23/22 at 6:30 p.m., rat, location found: Homestead dining room. 12/13/22 at 6:30 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 2/16/23, (no time in the morning), rat, location found: Kitchen. 2/20/23 in the morning, rat, location found: Beverage station, department: Kitchen. 3/18/23 (no time indicated), rat, location found: Kitchen. 3/25/23 (no time indicated), rat, location found: North dining room. 4/6/23 at 6:15 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 4/22/23 at 6:00 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 4/25/23 at 6:15 a.m., 3 rats, location found: Kitchen. The North Unit Pest sighting log noted: 7/1/23 at 2:00 a.m., roach back hall nursing medication cart. An initial was placed next to the entry and dated 7/13/23. 7/11/23, evening, rat, location found: room [ROOM NUMBER]. 7/24/23 at 1:30 a.m., Rats (2) in soiled utility. An initial was placed next to the entry and dated 7/28/23. 7/24/23 at 1:30 a.m., Roaches in med carts, on nurses station counters, on the floors. An initial was placed next to the entry and dated 7/28/23. Review of the contracted Pest Control company reports from 11/2022 through 7/28/23 revealed: 12/19/22: The facility has been given a quote for all other exclusions. Inspected several large rodent snap traps, previously placed in the Family Room and Kitchen areas. Four rodents were captured and removed. All traps were baited and reset, to monitor activity until mass trapping service and exclusion service are approved. 3/10/23: Couldn't find 3rd logbook at the 2nd nurse station. Inspected outside perimeter. Noticed multiple spots for wildlife to get in . 3/24/23: Overhanging trees next to building needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife to getting easier access to building . 3/28/23: Caught a rat on glueboard [sic] underneath kitchen equipment. Replaced with 2 more glueboards. Dining room has roof rat activity. Set out 2 large glueboards in drawer. And 4 large glueboards on floor by cabinets. Inspected rest of dining room . 4/25/23: Inspected kitchen area, last nite [sic] 3 roof rats were caught and disposed of. Will be back this Friday with a follow-up to check on kitchen . 4/28/23: There is a lot of rodent activity feeding off bait. Spoke with head chef in the kitchen and we caught 2 more roof rats in kitchen on our large glueboards. Set out 8 more large glueboards in kitchen . 5/12/23: There are overhanging branches over building that needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building . 6/2/23: There is moderate amount of rodent activity at this time. Spoke with front desk before leaving. There are overhanging branches over building that needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building . 6/8/23: The roof is repaired. There are overhanging branches over building that needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building . 6/15/23: Arrived on property and spoke with front desk. Spoke with kitchen staff. They had caught a large rat last nite [sic] . There are overhanging branches over building that needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building . 6/29/23: Texting mrs.[sic] (name) info. There are overhanging branches over building that needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building . 7/28/23: Arrived on the property and spoke with acting director . Rodent activity in building. They know exclusion is being done . Signed off on rodent issues after checking on them . On 8/3/23 at 3:01 p.m., observation of the outside of the building revealed multiple overhanging branches over building that need to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building as per the multiple recommendations of the contracted pest control company. Photographic evidence obtained. On 8/3/23 at 3:10 p.m., the Administrator said since she has been employed at the facility in May 2023, the overhanging branches had not been trimmed. The Administrator provided a receipt dated 1/2/23 from an outside tree service company listing a different address from the facility that read, Canary palm + (plus) 1 Palm. She said the receipt was from an outside company for tree trimming at the facility. On 8/10/23 at 11:57 a.m., in a telephone interview, a representative from the outside tree service company said on 1/2/23 the company did not provide any tree trimming services at the facility. The address listed on the receipt was private residence. As of the exit date of 8/6/23, the facility failed to provide documentation the overhanging branches over building were trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building as per the multiple recommendations of the contracted pest control company on 3/24/23, 5/12/23, 6/2/23, 6/8/23, 6/15/23, and 6/29/23. On 8/3/23, the facility provided copies of email exchanges between the facility and the pest control company. On 4/18/23 the pest control company noted, The best option to rid the facility of this rodent issue is a multi-step process. First we will need to seal up any holes, openings, entry points, and areas where rodents access into the building. I found several openings such as roof returns, plumbing stacks, AC (air conditioning) chases, opening around wires, and around conduits entering into building. The next step is a full trapping program for 1 month. We will do a 3 day trapping where we place traps in drop down ceiling but not set the traps. This will get the rodents from being trap shy and allow for the best capture rate . I know this facility is undergoing roof repairs, but my recommendation is for us to start this exclusion right after the roofers have completed their service . On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director said he has been employed with the company since September 2022, and has been the acting Maintenance Director at the facility since the beginning of July 2023. He said he became aware of possible rat problem after they started to replace the facility roof in February 2023. The roof repair was completed several months later, sometime in June 2023. He said he started hearing from some of the facility staff about seeing rats and hearing rats in the ceiling during the roof construction. He said started emailing the pest control company in April 2023 about the rats in the facility, who gave him some recommendations about what they can do about stopping the rats from entering the facility. He said the pest control company told him the rats could not be fully removed from the facility until the new roof was completed and all entry points were sealed. The Regional Plant Operation Director said he got over a hundred rodent entry points sealed sometime in June 2023, and the pest control company signed an eradication agreement to remove all the rats in the facility on 7/20/23. The Regional Plant Operation Director toured the exterior of the facility and showed some possible rodent entry points he closed or covered to prevent the rats from entering the facility. He said the pest control company provides him with their findings for each visit, and he was aware of all the pest control recommendations the facility needed to implement to address the rats in the facility. He said he had not had an opportunity to trim back the trees overhanging branches the rats could use to get on the roof and enter the facility. On 8/3/23 at 9:25 a.m., Licensed practical Nurse (LPN) Staff I said, The rats are so bad. They have roaches and rats, but I'm more afraid of the rats. You hear them running across the ceiling. I'm so scared they are going to fall on me. They are out anytime of the day. You have to open the doors to the soiled utility room and the nourishment room really carefully because they run away from you and go into the holes in the cabinets. On 8/3/23 at 9:25 a.m., observation of the South Unit soiled utility room with LPN Staff I revealed a hole in the baseboard of the wall, with a missing tile. Photographic evidence obtained. There was hole at the lower left bottom of the storage cabinet. Photographic evidence obtained. There was a hole in the baseboard where two cabinets met. Photographic evidence obtained. LPN Staff I said, I report it to the management all the time. I have told the pest control and he said he can't do anything about it if the management will not pay to have the rats removed. On 8/4/23 at 11:15 a.m., black smear marks, resembling rodent grease marks, were observed along the baseboard of the South Unit soiled utility room. Dried yellow stains, and rodent feces were observed on the floor of the soiled utility room. On 8/3/23 at 9:45 a.m., Resident #89 reported he saw a rodent in his room approximately three weeks ago, and Maintenance filled the hole in the bathroom. On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director said about two weeks ago staff informed him they saw a rat in Resident #89's bathroom. He observed a hole in the wall, which he plugged at that time. On 8/3/23 at 10:04 a.m., during a follow up tour of the kitchen with the Director of Food and Nutrition Services and the Regional Hospitality director, rodent feces were noted on the floor beneath the canned goods cart and bread cart. The kitchen door leading to the outside had a visible gap at the bottom with outside daylight shining through the gap. The Director of Food and Nutrition Services and Regional Hospitality Director verified the observation of the rodent feces and stated they had swept there the day before. The Director of Food and Nutrition Services said a mouse ran across her foot last week in her office located in the kitchen. She said she noted the rodents chewed the tartar sauce packets. She cleaned them off and wiped the area with bleach. On 8/3/23 at 12:00 p.m., the Infection Preventionist said she was extremely surprised and had never heard of rats in the facility. She said, I don't know anything about it. I certainly have never seen any; this is the first I'm hearing about it. After reviewing the content of the reports of the contracted pest control company, and the observation of rodent feces on the floor of the kitchen storage area with the Infection Preventionist, she said, I knew there were rats in the kitchen about six months ago when the former Administration was here, but I was told it was taken care of. She verified she was not aware of any plan to address the rodent infestation at the facility. On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director said the first time he heard of rats in the kitchen was two weeks ago when a kitchen staff told him they saw a rat in the kitchen. He looked at the area where the kitchen staff said they saw the rat, and noted there was a hole in the wall. He has not had any meetings with the administrative staff related to the reporting of rats in the facility. He said as of this time no one from administration has asked him what interventions he had put into place to address the staff seeing rats in the facility. On 8/3/23 at 12:10 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff K, she said she has seen rats in the facility, usually at night on the South Unit. The CNA said the rats are really bad on the secured memory unit. She said, I have seen roaches and the rats over there. It is an infestation there. On 8/3/23 at 12:22 p.m., during a telephone interview, the technician from the contracted pest control company said two rodents were caught in the kitchen yesterday. He said he told the kitchen staff not to leave bread and other food items the rats can get into on the counters or where it would be accessible to rats. He told them to put the bread in the refrigerator. On 8/3/23 at 3:18 p.m., a follow up tour of the kitchen with the Senior Regional Director of Culinary Services revealed rodent feces on the floor throughout the kitchen food storage area. Photographic evidence obtained. Rodent feces were noted on canned good items, and metal shelving racks storing canned food. Photographic evidence obtained. Single service packages of mayonnaise stored in a basket in the kitchen were observed with visible rodent bite marks. Photographic evidence obtained. Multiple loaves of packaged bread were observed stored on shelves in the dry storage area where the rodent feces were observed on the floor. Photographic evidence obtained. The Senior Regional Director of Culinary Services verified the rodent feces throughout the kitchen storage area floor and metal shelves used to store food. He verified the bread, packets of mayonnaise and other food items were not stored in rodent proof containers as per the pest company recommendation. He stated there was no policy in place for additional cleaning precautions once rodent feces have been visualized. He stated, We have been cleaning and sanitizing being sure to change out the water, and rags to prevent cross-contamination. In regard to canned goods, we are especially sure to sanitize the can where it will connect with the opener. On 8/4/23 at 6:20 p.m., the technician from the contracted pest control company said rats were entering the building through the air conditioning pipes. On July 25, 2023, he closed that hole. He said he usually gets three rats every two days. On 8/3/23 at 11:50 a.m., multiple ant-like crawling insects were observed crawling on Resident #2's bed, and on the wound dressings on both ankles. Photographic evidence obtained. The resident said the nurse who changed the dressings to her ankles this morning told her she had ants crawling in her bed, and on her legs. The resident said she requested to have her bed sheets changed since then to get rid of the ants and no one has come all morning. On 8/3/23 at 12:00 p.m., LPN Staff I was notified of the observation of the crawling insects observed on the resident's bed and her request to have her sheets changed and the pest removed. LPN Staff I said she would let the Certified Nursing Assistant know. On 8/3/23 at 3:30 p.m., Resident #2 said she felt terrible, just terrible when the nurse told her she had ants in her bed. She said the ants were crawling in her dressings. She said, no one wants bugs in their bed. I told the nurse I wanted an aide to change my bed, but no one had come yet. On 8/3/23 at 3:45 p.m., three hours and forty five minutes after LPN Staff I was notified of the ants in the resident's bed, Housekeeper staff BB was observed cleaning Resident #2's mattress. Staff BB said there were ants in the resident's open bags of chips and in the resident's bed. On 8/3/23 at 4:55 p.m., the Administrator said the trees have not been trimmed since she's been employed at the facility on 5/19/23 for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building . She said the facility did not have a PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) in place to address the pest control, including the rat infestation.
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to mitigate rodent infestation in the foodservice establi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to mitigate rodent infestation in the foodservice establishment and failed to take effective measures to protect packaged food, clean equipment, single service, and single use items from contamination from rodents. On 12/19/22 the facility became aware of rodent infestation in the kitchen and failed to take effective immediate actions to eradicate rodent infestation, store and prepare food in a manner to prevent contamination from disease causing rodents. This failure created a serious threat to residents health and safety due to the spread of certain diseases from rodents to people from cross contamination of food and equipment from infected rodent urine, feces, and saliva which could result in serious illness or death and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy at a scope and severity of pattern (K) starting on 12/19/22. On 8/4/23 at 7:28 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy and provided the IJ templates. The Immediate Jeopardy was ongoing. The facility census was 86 with 85 residents consuming an oral diet. The findings included: Cross reference to F584, F600, F835, F867, F880 and F925. The facility's NEXTLEVEL policy Food Storage-Dry Goods (policy 18), with an effective date of 10/2019, stated it is the center policy to ensure all dry goods will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food Code . The Dining Services Director or designees ensures that the storage area . shall not be subject to contamination by condensation, leakage, rodents, or vermin. The Dining services Director or designee ensures that all packaged and canned food items shall be kept clean, dry, and properly sealed. Review of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention document titled, How to Control Wild Rodent Infestations, last reviewed on January 3, 2023, noted, Rats and mice are known to carry many diseases. These diseases can spread to people directly, through handling of rodents; contact with rodent feces (poop), urine, or saliva (such as through breathing in air or eating food that is contaminated with rodent waste); or rodent bites. Rodents can also carry ticks, mites, or fleas that can act as vectors to spread diseases between rodents and people. Many diseases do not cause any apparent illness in rodents, so you cannot tell if a rodent is carrying a disease just by looking at it . Rodents, such as rats, mice . are known to carry many diseases. Diseases can spread to people directly and indirectly from rodents .'' Rodents can transmit food pathogens, such as Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes. These pathogens can make nursing home residents seriously ill or die from foodborne illness, as they are a highly susceptible population. On 7/31/23 at 2:57 p.m., during a kitchen tour, a large wooden trigger snap rat trap was noted on the floor located behind an open storage shelf unit. Photographic evidence obtained. On 8/2/23 4:45 p.m., The Senior Regional Director of Culinary Services stated he was told the rat trap in the kitchen was placed there as a preventative measure because there had been rat sightings in the past. Review of the contracted pest control company reports from 11/2022 through 7/28/23 revealed: On 12/19/23 the company had given the facility a quote for all other exclusions. The report noted, Inspected several large rodent snap traps, previously placed in the Family Room and Kitchen areas. Four rodents were captured and removed. All traps were baited and reset, to monitor activity until mass trapping service and exclusion service are approved. On 3/24/23, Inspected with head chef in main kitchen for rodent issues. Set up and baited 1 rat trap under kitchen equipment. Set up 4 large rat glueboards under other side of main kitchen equipment. Roof is still under construction. Overhanging trees next to building needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife to getting easier access to building. On 3/28/23, Arrived on property and spoke with front desk and head chef. Caught a rat on glueboard underneath kitchen equipment. Replaced with 2 more glueboards. Dining room has roofrat [sic] activity. Set out 2 large glueboards in drawer. And 4 large glueboards on floor by cabinets. On 4/25/23, Inspected kitchen area, last nite [sic] 3 roof rats were caught and disposed of. Will be back this Friday with a follow-up check on kitchen. On 4/28/23, Arrived on property and spoke with manager and front desk. There is a lot of rodent activity feeding off bait. Spoke with head chef in kitchen and we caught 2 more roof rats in kitchen on our large glueboards. Set out 8 more glueboards in kitchen. On 6/2/23, Inspected, cleaned, and rebaited rodent stations 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, rodent station 4 is missing. There is moderate amount of rodent activity at this time. Spoke with front desk before leaving. On 6/15/23, Spoke with kitchen staff. They caught a large rat last night. There are overhanging branches over building that needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building. On 6/29/23, Texting mrs.[sic] (name) info. There are overhanging branches over building that needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building. On 7/13/23, Spoke with (Maintenance Director) about adding more rodents stations. On 7/28/23, Checked all 3 logbooks and scanned them. Signed off on rodent issues after checking on them. Lots more rodent activity this month. Spoke with [name] before leaving. On 8/3/23 at 9:25 a.m., Licensed practical Nurse (LPN) Staff I said, The rats are so bad. They have roaches and rats, but I'm more afraid of the rats. You hear them running across the ceiling. I'm so scared they are going to fall on me. They are out anytime of the day. You have to open the doors to the soiled utility room and the nourishment room really carefully because they run away from you and go into the holes in the cabinets. I report it to the management all the time. I have told the pest control and he said he can't do anything about it if the management will not pay to have the rats removed. On 8/3/23 at 9:35 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff D, said, The rats and roaches are disgusting and everywhere in the building. I have seen them in the resident rooms, in the utility rooms and nourishment rooms. They run in the ceiling, you hear scratching, and you can hear them run around up there. If it fell on me, I would be screaming. I know I have reported it to the management staff, but the rats are still here. It doesn't matter what time of day, you will see them, but they are worse at night. On 8/3/23 at 10:04 a.m., during a follow up tour of the kitchen, rodent feces were noted on the floor beneath the canned goods cart and bread cart. The Director of Food and Nutrition Services, and Regional Hospitality Director verified the observation of the rodent feces and stated they had swept there the day before. There was no documentation the facility followed the CDC guidelines to clean up rodent urine and droppings. Review of the CDC document titled Clean up rodent urine and droppings with a review date of January 3, 2023 noted, Step 1: Put on rubber or plastic gloves. Step 2: Spray urine and droppings with bleach solution or an EPA-registered disinfectant until very wet. Let it soak for 5 minutes or according to instructions on the disinfectant label. Step 3: Use paper towels to wipe up the urine or droppings and cleaning product. Step 4: Throw the paper towels in a covered garbage can that is regularly emptied. Step 5: Mop or sponge the area with a disinfectant. Clean all hard surfaces including floors, countertops, cabinets, and drawers. Step 6: Wash gloved hands with soap and water or a disinfectant before removing gloves. Step 7: Wash hands with soap and warm water after removing gloves or use a waterless alcohol-based hand rub when soap is not available, and hands are not visibly soiled. https://www.cdc.gov/healthypets/pets/wildlife/clean-up.html The Director of Food and Nutrition Services stated she had a mouse run across her foot last week. She said she noted the rodents chewed the tartar sauce packets. She cleaned them off and wiped the area with bleach. She said the rats were very fond of the tartar sauce. On 8/3/23 at 12:00 p.m., the Infection Preventionist said she was extremely surprised and had never heard of rats in the facility. She said, I don't know anything about it. I certainly have never seen any; this is the first I'm hearing about it. After reviewing the content of the reports of the contracted pest control company with the Infection Preventionist, and the observation of rodent feces on the floor of the kitchen storage area, she said, I knew there were rats in the kitchen about six months ago when the former Administration was here, but I was told it was taken care of. On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director said he has been the acting Maintenance Director at the facility since the beginning of July 2023. He said the housekeeping nor kitchen director had informed him of seeing rodents/rats in the facility. He said he became aware of possible rat problem after they started to replace the facility roof in February 2023 which was completed sometimes in June 2023. He said he started hearing from some of the facility staff about seeing rats and hearing rats in the ceiling during the roof construction. He said the first time he heard of rats in the kitchen was two weeks ago when a kitchen staff told him they saw a rat in the kitchen. He looked at the area where the kitchen staff said they saw the rat, and noted there was a hole in the wall. He knows of two rodent traps in the facility located in the memory care dining room. On 8/3/23 review of the pest control logbook located at the front desk of the facility noted the following dietary staff entries: 12/13/22 at 6:30 a.m., rat, location: Kitchen. 2/16/23, (no time in the morning), rat, location: Kitchen. 2/20/23 in the morning, rat, Kitchen, beverage station. 3/18/23 (no time indicated), rat, location: Kitchen. 3/25/23 (no time indicated), rat, location: North dining room. 4/6/23 at 6:15 a.m., rat in the kitchen. 4/22/23 at 6:00 a.m., Dietary Staff Z documented rat, location: Kitchen. 4/25/23 at 6:15 a.m., Dietary Staff Z documented 3 rats, location: Kitchen. On 8/1/23 at 11:07 a.m., Dietary Staff Z said if he saw rodent activity, he would put it in the log/sighting book. On 8/3/23 at 12:22 p.m., during a telephone interview, the technician from the contracted pest control company said two rodents were caught in the kitchen yesterday. He said he told the kitchen staff not to leave bread and other food items the rats can get into on the counters or where it would be accessible to the rats. He told them to put the bread in the refrigerator. On 8/3/23 at 12:30 p.m., The Administrator said the rat problem had been identified prior to her arrival to the facility. She said she has been employed at the facility since May 19, 2023, and did not know how long the rodent problem has been going on. She said she knows pest control comes out weekly as needed. She said the Maintenance Director was in charge of pest control and had direct oversight over the building. She said the facility had a contract as of 7/20/23 with the pest control company to address the rat problem. On 8/3/23 at 1:00 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff KK stated I have heard people saying they have seen rats mostly in the big dining room, (The big dining room is located next to the kitchen). On 8/3/23 at 3:18 p.m., a follow up tour of the kitchen with the Senior Regional Director of Culinary Services revealed rodent feces on the floor throughout the kitchen food storage area. Photographic evidence obtained. Rodent feces were noted on canned good items, and metal shelving racks storing canned food. Photographic evidence obtained. Single service packages of mayonnaise stored in a basket in the kitchen were observed with visible rodent bite marks. Photographic evidence obtained. Multiple loaves of packaged bread were observed stored on shelves in the dry storage area where the rodent feces were observed on the floor. Photographic evidence obtained. The Senior Regional Director of Culinary Services verified the rodent feces throughout the kitchen storage area floor and metal shelves used to store food. He verified the bread; packets of mayonnaise and other food items were not stored in rodent proof containers. He stated there was no policy in place for additional cleaning precautions once rodent feces have been visualized. He stated, We have been cleaning and sanitizing being sure to change out the water, and rags to prevent cross-contamination. In regard to canned goods, we are especially sure to sanitize the can where it will connect with the opener. On 8/4/23 at 6:20 p.m., the technician from the contracted pest control company said rats were entering the building through the air conditioning pipes. On July 25, 2023, he closed that hole. He said he usually gets three rats every two days. The facility continued foodservice operations despite rodent infestation in the kitchen area. The facility failed to protect packaged foods, clean equipment and utensils and single-use items from being contaminated with rodent excrement and failed to discart rodent contaminated foods. On 8/4/23 at 2:00 p.m., the State Survey Agency mandated that the facility cease foodservice operations due to the rodent infestations.
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility's Administration failed to utilize resources effectively to protect the residents right to be free from neglect in that the Administra...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility's Administration failed to utilize resources effectively to protect the residents right to be free from neglect in that the Administration failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment free from disease causing pests. On 12/19/22 the facility administration became aware of a rodent infestation. The facility Administration failed to take appropriate actions to eradicate the rodent infestation. Certain diseases can spread from rodents to people through direct or indirect contact with infected rodents which could result in serious illness, or death of residents. Rodents can also damage building structures and start fires by gnawing electrical wiring, the extent to which is not known at this time. On 7/31/23 through 8/3/23 multiple observations of rodent feces on the kitchen floor, and on the shelves of the dry storage food area used to store ready to eat food. Observation of ready to use packets of mayonnaise with visible rodent bite marks stored in a basket in the kitchen. The facility Administration failure to take immediate appropriate actions to address the ongoing rodent infestation resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy at a scope and severity of pattern (K), starting on 12/19/22. On 8/4/23 at 7:27 p.m., the facility's Administrator was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and provided the IJ Templates. The Immediate Jeopardy was ongoing. The facility census was 86. The findings included: Cross Reference to F584, F600, F812, F867, F880, and F925. The Administrator's job description signed 2/24/2021 noted the duties and responsibilities included to verify that the building and grounds are maintained appropriately, and that equipment and work areas are clean, safe, and orderly, and any hazardous conditions are addressed. The Director of Nursing's job description signed on 3/24/23 noted, Summary: To manage the overall operations of the Nursing department in accordance with Company policies, standards of nursing practices and governmental regulations to maintain excellent care of all residents' needs. On 7/31/23 at 2:57 p.m., during a kitchen tour, a large wooden trigger snap rat trap was noted on the floor located behind an open storage shelf unit. On 8/2/23 at 12:20 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff NN said she has heard rats running in the ceiling, and residents have complained about hearing rats in the ceiling. On 8/3/23 at 9:25 a.m., LPN Staff I said the rat problem was bad. She said they were out any time of the day. She said there were holes in the soiled utility room where the rats came in. She said she's reported the rat problem to the management all the time, and the pest control company technician who said the management would not pay to have the rats removed. On 8/3/23 at 9:25 a.m., the soiled utility room of the South Unit was observed with holes in the baseboard and the bottom of the cabinets where LPN Staff I said the rats come in. On 8/3/23 at 9:35 a.m., Registered Nurse Staff D said rats were everywhere in the building. She has seen them in residents' rooms, utility rooms and nourishment rooms. She said she has reported it to the management but the rats were still here. On 8/3/23 at 9:45 a.m., Resident #89 said he saw a rodent in his room approximately three weeks ago. On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director verified approximately two weeks ago there was a rat in Resident #89's room and he plugged a hole in the wall at that time. He said he has been the Maintenance Director at the facility since the beginning of July 2023. On 8/3/23 at 10:04 a.m., the Director of Food and Nutrition Services said the week before she was in her office located in the kitchen and a mouse ran across her foot. On 8/3/23 at 10:04 a.m., during a tour of the kitchen, rodent feces were noted on the floor beneath the canned goods cart and bread cart in the kitchen dry storage area. The Director of Food and Nutrition Services verified the rodent feces on the floor beneath the canned goods cart and bread cart. On 8/3/23 at 12:00 p.m., the Infection Preventionist said she was extremely surprised and had never heard of rats in the facility. She said about six months ago there were rats in the kitchen, but the former administration said it was taken care of. On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director said he became aware of seeing rats and hearing rats during the roof construction in March 2023. He said no one from administration has asked him about interventions in place to address the rats in the building. On 8/3/23 review of the pest control logbook located at the front desk of the facility noted on 11/3/22, 11/13/22, 11/23/22, 12/13/22, 2/16/23, 2/20/23, 3/18/23, 3/25/23, 4/6/23, 4/22/23, 4/25/23, and 7/24/23, rats were observed in the facility, kitchen, or dining room. On 8/3/23 at 12:30 p.m., the Administrator said the rat problem had been identified prior to her arrival at the facility on May 19, 2023. She did not know how long it had been going on. She said the Maintenance Director was in charge of pest control and had direct oversight over the building. The pest control company was responsible to check the pest control sighting log and address it. The Administrator said on 7/20/23 the facility signed a contract with the pest control company addressing the rat problem. The Administrator said she did not know the extent of the rat infestation until 7/31/23 and developed a performance improvement plan. She said they have just changed the process and the pest control log will be reviewed by Administrator or designee daily. On 8/3/23 at 4:55 p.m., the Administrator said the trees have not been trimmed since she's been employed at the facility on 5/19/23. She said the facility did not have a PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) in place to address the pest control, including the rat infestation.
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, review of the facility's policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to show effective communication and coordination to develop and implement adequate c...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, review of the facility's policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to show effective communication and coordination to develop and implement adequate corrective actions related to pest control and rodent infestation to ensure a safe and sanitary environment free from disease causing pests, which could lead to the spread of diseases from direct and indirect contact with infected rodents. On 12/19/22 the facility administration became aware of a rodent infestation. On 7/31/23 through 8/3/23 multiple observations of rodent feces on the kitchen floor, and on the shelves of the dry storage food area used to store ready to eat food. Observation of single service packets of mayonnaise with visible rodent bite marks stored in a basket in the kitchen. The facility's lack of an effective ongoing QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) process to protect residents' health and safety created a likelihood of serious illness or death for the residents from direct or indirect contact with infected rodents resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy starting on 12/19/22. On 8/4/23 at 7:27 p.m., the facility's Administrator was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and provided the IJ Templates. The Immediate Jeopardy was ongoing. The facility census was 86. The findings included: Cross Reference to F584, F600, F812, F835, F880, and F925. The Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee Policy implemented 11/2020 and last revised 8/8/2022 stated This facility will maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee to identify issues and develop appropriate plans of action to correct quality deficiencies through an interdisciplinary approach. The Administrator's job description signed on 2/24/21 noted the Administrator is Responsible for the QA (Quality Assurance) program. Review of the contracted pest control company's reports from 12/19/2022 through 7/28/23 noted multiple incidents of rodent sightings on the Memory Care Unit, the kitchen, and South Nursing Unit. Rodent stations, live traps and glue sticks have been placed in the kitchen and throughout the building. Roaches and ants were also identified throughout the building. Review of the pest control logbook located at the front desk of the facility revealed multiple entries of rat sighting in the facility from 11/3/22 through 7/24/23 (11/3/22, 11/13/22, 11/23/22, 12/13/22, 2/16/23, 2/20/23, 3/18/23, 3/25/23, 4/6/23, 4/22/23, 4/25/23, 7/24/23). Review of an email from the contracted pest control company dated April 19, 2023, to the facility's corporate employees noted, The best option to rid the facility of this rodent issue is a multistep process. The process recommended was to seal up any holes, openings, entry points and areas where rodents access into the building . The next step is a full trapping program for one month . On 7/31/23 through 8/3/23 multiple observations were made of rodent feces on the floor and shelves used to store food items in the kitchen, and live crawling bugs in residents' rooms, shower room, soiled and clean utility rooms. Holes observed in walls and cabinets in the soiled utility room of the memory care units were identified by staff as entry points for the rats. Ant-like insects were observed crawling on a resident's bed and wound dressings. On 7/31/23 through 8/3/23 multiple staff interviews conducted with direct care staff and dietary staff revealed an ongoing concern with roaches and rat infestation in the facility, including the kitchen, dining room and residents' rooms. Staff reported they communicated the ongoing rat sightings to the facility administration without any sign of improvement. On 8/3/23 at 12:00 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director verified he was aware of the sightings of rats in the facility, including the kitchen. He said he has not had any meetings with the administrative staff related to the rats in the facility. He said as of this time no one from administration has asked him what interventions he had put into place to address the staff seeing rats in the facility. He said he conducted an informal meeting with the Housekeeping Director to remind her staff to ensure they were not leaving food which the rats might be eating and remind them to do proper cleaning and disinfection in general. It was an informal meeting; he doesn't have any documentation related to the meeting. He said he has not had time to trim the overhanging branches over the building as per the multiple recommendations of the contracted pest control company on 3/24/23, 5/12/23, 6/2/23, 6/8/23, 6/15/23, and 6/29/23 to prevent ants and wildlife easier access to the building. On 8/3/23 at 12:33 p.m., the Housekeeping Manager stated, There are pest issues at facility, they called the pest guy weekly. On 8/3/23 at 12:20 p.m., the technician from the pest control company reported in a telephone interview two rodents were caught in the kitchen yesterday. Review of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings from May 2023 through June 2023 showed the QAPI committee met on 5/17/23 for QAPI plan updates, and 5/18/23. The facility provided documentation of QAPI- PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) dated 5/15/23 (updated 6/7/23 and 6/28/23), an Action Plan/PIP dated 5/16/23 (updated 6/6/23, and 6/28/23) and a QAPI-PIP Action Plan dated 6/27/23. There was no documentation of discussion of evaluation of the effectiveness of the pest control program, including eradication of rats. There was no discussion in the QAPI meetings about continued foodservice operations in light of rodent infestation and the high risk of food contamination from rodent excrement. On 8/4/2023 at 12:45 p.m., the Administrator verified the lack of documentation of evaluation of the actions implemented to ensure the eradication of pests, including rats in the facility. She said there was a noticed increase of rodent activities in 2022 and also a noticed need for new roof. The Administrator provided a typewritten timeline, and root cause analysis documenting the steps taken to address the rats and pests. The document read, Situation: Identified an ongoing concern related to pests. Most observations include insects; however, there have been a number of observations of rodents and or rodent droppings. Initially the facility experienced a level of pests (insects and rodents' activity) in 2022 that was addressed and viewed as corrected. At the time, the determination was the need for external rodent boxes. These were added and seemingly effective with low to no further rodent activity. It was recognized that the facility had need for a new roof. There was a correlation to the need for the new roof, leaking, etc. That this had an impact of pest concerns. Quotes were received late 2022, the new roof quote was selected . roof company had to apply for permits on March 14, 2023, and the room company initiated replacement on 3/27/23. The roof completion was on 5/12/23. Additional tree work was completed on 1/2/23, in preparation for roof replacement. The Administrator said, When I got here in May of 2023, there were no QAPI minutes before me. The rodent issue was first addressed in QAPI on 7/31/2023. She said there was no current PIP for the rodent issue. She said, the Process for approving expenditures above $1500.00 was put in an email to the Corporate Regional Director of Maintenance on 7/19/2023 for approval. On 7/19/2023, the contract was approved by Corporate Director of Plant Operations for rodent/pest control. The Administrator presented a timeline of actions implemented in a root cause analysis document which listed additional services as follows: 5/12/23 added rodent station boxes. 5/15/23 no activity, prevention remedies. 5/18/23 insect treatments. 5/26/23 inspected for spiders, wasps, baited for roaches. 6/2/23 insect monitor set for flying bugs, of 11 rodent stations, one is missing, moderate rodent activity. 6/8/23 treated exterior prevention for pests, rebaited rodent stations. 6/15/23 a rat was caught last evening, treated all areas for pest and roach control. 6/22/23 pest prevention. 6/29/23 low rodent activity, 2 rodent boxes missing and will be replaced. 7/13/23 exterior and interior areas treated for pest prevention, discussed adding more rodent stations, had rebaited 2 weeks ago, replaced missing boxes. The Administrator said the interdisciplinary team met and held an Ad-Hoc (impromptu) meeting on 8/3/23 to discuss the ongoing pest concern at the facility.
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 7/31/23 at 11:50 a.m., observed lunch tray service for the 300 hall. Observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff JJ, pas...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 7/31/23 at 11:50 a.m., observed lunch tray service for the 300 hall. Observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff JJ, passing lunch trays. CNA, Staff JJ, entered a room to deliver lunch tray to resident #27 who was on transmission based precautions for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The signage posted on the resident's door indicating what Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) should be worn when entering room including eye protection. The CNA donned a gown and entered the room with the meal tray without wearing eye protection. Several minutes later the CNA came out of the room. The CNA did not remove the exposed gown, proceeded to the food service cart, and removed a meal tray for resident #71. The lunch cart contained eight meal trays when she removed the tray while wearing the exposed cover gown. The CNA returned to Resident #27's room, without wearing eye protection. CNA Staff JJ was also observed entering delivering a meal tray to Resident #84 who was on transmission based precautions for COVID-19 without wearing the posted required PPE including eye protection. On 7/31/23 at 12:05 p.m., observed CNA Staff P don PPE prior to entering Resident #65's room. The signage posted on the door clearly indicated gowns, gloves and eye protection were required for entrance. The CNA did not use eye protection and entered the resident's room. After providing set up for the resident CNA Staff P exited the room and went to lunch tray cart containing five other residents' lunch trays without changing isolation exposed gown. CNA Staff P retrieved a meal tray from the meal cart and took it to Resident #28's room who was on transmission based precautions for COVID-19 without eye protection. On 7/31/23 at 12:15 p.m., CNA Staff P said, I did not know I needed to wear them, I didn't notice the signage, when asked about wearing eye precautions to enter the room of residents on transmission based precautions for COVID-19. CNA Staff P verified she failed to change the isolation gown when going in and out of residents' rooms who were on transmission based precautions for COVID-19. CNA Staff P said, I was told that I did not need to change gowns between residents who are in the same room when they are both in isolation. On 7/31/23 at 12:30 p.m. CNA Staff JJ verified she did not wear eye precautions when going in residents' rooms who were on transmission based precautions for COVID-19 disease. She verified the rooms had the signage on the door clearly indicating to wear eye precautions. The CNA said, I was passing trays by myself. I looked in the cart for a face shield but there weren't any. So, I just did what I needed to do. When asked about leaving Resident #27's room with the contaminated gown and going to the lunch tray cart for the roommate's meal, the CNA replied, I can see now that it was wrong, I should have changed everything and washed my hands. On 8/2/23 at 10:00 a.m., observed LPN Staff I, administering medications to Resident #33. LPN Staff I placed six tablets of Vitamin D 25 mcg (micrograms) into the cap of the medication bottle. She said, I don't need all of them and placed her ungloved thumb on the pills and shook one back into the bottle. Upon interview, LPN Staff I said she shouldn't have touched the pills with her bare hands. She said, I shouldn't have done that. I know better.'' On 8/3/23 at 10:07 a.m., the observation of LPN Staff I touching the Vitamin D pills with her bare hands was shared with the DON. She said this was unacceptable and would be working with the staff for improvement. Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment, and to help prevent the developement and transmission of zoonotic (animals) and vector-borne (e.g., mosquitoes, ticks, and fleas) disease and infections by rodent infestation. The facility failed to follow infection control practices and failed maintain urinary catheter drainage in a sanitary manner for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #5) of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility failed to ensure staff followed infection prevention measures by failure to follow personal protective equipment (PPE) guidelines for residents on transmission based precautions for COVID-19, and failure to handle medications in a sanitary manner. The facility became aware on 12/19/22 of a rodent infestation in the building. On 7/31/23 through 8/3/23 multiple observations of rodent feces on the kitchen floor, and on the shelves of the dry storage food area used to store ready to eat food. Observation of ready to use packets of mayonnaise with visible rodent bite marks stored in a basket in the kitchen. The failure of the facility to implement systems with effective actions to eradicate rodent infestations created a serious threat to residents health and safety due to the spread of certain diseases from direct or indirect contact with rodents and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) starting on 12/19/22. On 8/4/23 at 7:28 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy and provided the IJ templates. The Immediate Jeopardy was ongoing. The facility census was 86. The findings included: Cross reference to F584, F600, F812, F835, F867, F925. Review of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention document titled, How to Control Wild Rodent Infestations, last reviewed on January 3, 2023, noted, Rats and mice are known to carry many diseases. These diseases can spread to people directly, through handling of rodents; contact with rodent feces (poop), urine, or saliva (such as through breathing in air or eating food that is contaminated with rodent waste); or rodent bites. Rodents can also carry ticks, mites, or fleas that can act as vectors to spread diseases between rodents and people. Many diseases do not cause any apparent illness in rodents, so you cannot tell if a rodent is carrying a disease just by looking at it . Rodents, such as rats, mice . are known to carry many diseases. Diseases can spread to people directly and indirectly from rodents . Diseases spread directly by rodents . Hantavirus, Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome, Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome, [NAME] Fever, Leptospirosis, Lujo Hemorrhagic Fever, Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis (LCM), Monkeypox, Omsk Hemorrhagic Fever, Rat-Bite Fever, Salmonellosis, South American Arenaviruses ([NAME] hemorrhagic fever, Bolivian hemorrhagic fever, Chapare Hemorrhagic Fever, Sabiá-associated hemorrhagic fever, and Venezuelan hemorrhagic fever), Sylvatic Typhus, Tularemia . Diseases spread indirectly by rodents . Anaplasmosis, Angiostrongylus, Babesiosis, Borreliosis, Colorado tick fever, Cutaneous leishmaniasis, Flea-borne (Murine) Typhus, Hymenolepis diminuta, La [NAME] virus, Lyme disease, Moniliformis moniliformis, Plague, Powassan virus, Rickettsialpox, Scrub typhus, Tick-borne Relapsing Fever, Tularemia . These viral, bacterial, or parasitic diseases can cause damage or failure of the major organs; gastrointestinal infection; bloodstream infection; or severe, sometimes fatal, respiratory disease in humans. These diseases can result in serious illness or death. The CDC website (https://www.cdc.gov/hantavirus/index.html) page last reviewed November 16, 2021, noted, Each hantavirus serotype has a specific rodent host species and is spread to people via aerosolized virus that is shed in urine, feces, and saliva, and less frequently by a bite from an infected host. (accessed on 8/10/23) The facility policy Pest Control Program implemented 1/2022 documented, It is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents. Effective pest control program is identified as measures to eradicate and contain common household pests (e.g., bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitos, flies, mice and rats). The facility's pest sighting logbooks located at the front desk included the following entries: 11/3/22 at 6:00 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 11/13/22 at 6:00 a.m., rats, location found: Kitchen. 11/23/22 at 6:30 p.m., rat, location found: Homestead dining room. 12/13/22 at 6:30 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 2/16/23, (no time in the morning), rat, location found: Kitchen. 2/20/23 in the morning, rat, location found: Beverage station, department: Kitchen. 3/18/23 (no time indicated), rat, location found: Kitchen. 3/25/23 (no time indicated), rat, location found: North dining room. 4/6/23 at 6:15 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 4/22/23 at 6:00 a.m., rat, location found: Kitchen. 4/25/23 at 6:15 a.m., 3 rats, location found: Kitchen. The North Unit Pest sighting log noted: 7/1/23 at 2:00 a.m., roach back hall nursing medication cart. An initial was placed next to the entry and dated 7/13/23. 7/11/23, evening, rat, location found: room [ROOM NUMBER]. 7/24/23 at 1:30 a.m., Rats (2) in soiled utility. An initial was placed next to the entry and dated 7/28/23. 7/24/23 at 1:30 a.m., Roaches in med carts, on nurses station counters, on the floors. An initial was placed next to the entry and dated 7/28/23. Review of the contracted Pest Control company reports from 11/2022 through 7/28/23 revealed on 12/19/22 the contracted pest control company gave the facility a quote for mass rodent trapping. The contracted pest control company reports from 11/2022 through 7/28/23 noted multiple sightings of rats in the facility, including the kitchen. 3/28/23: Caught a rat on glueboard [sic] underneath kitchen equipment. Replaced with 2 more glueboards. Dining room has roof rat activity. Set out 2 large glueboards in drawer. And 4 large glueboards on floor by cabinets. Inspected rest of dining room. 4/25/23: Inspected kitchen area, last nite [sic] 3 roof rats were caught and disposed of. Will be back this Friday with a follow-up to check on kitchen. 4/28/23: There is a lot of rodent activity feeding off bait. Spoke with head chef in the kitchen and we caught 2 more roof rats in kitchen on our large glueboards. Set out 8 more large glueboards in kitchen. 6/2/23: There is moderate amount of rodent activity at this time. Spoke with front desk before leaving. There are overhanging branches over building that needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building. 6/15/23: Arrived on property and spoke with front desk. Spoke with kitchen staff. They had caught a large rat last nite [sic]. There are overhanging branches over building that needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building. 7/28/23: Arrived on the property and spoke with acting director . Rodent activity in building. They know exclusion is being done . Signed off on rodent issues after checking on them. There was no documentation of effective measures by the facility of ongoing measures to properly disinfect areas of rodent sightings to prevent cross contamination of food and possible spread of harmful bacteria and viruses generated from the rodent infestation in the kitchen and dry food storage area. There was no documentation in the pest control reports of inspection of the air ducts for the presence of rodent nesting, droppings, and urine. On 7/31/23 at 2:57 p.m., during a kitchen tour, a large wooden trigger snap rat trap was noted on the floor located behind an open storage shelf unit. Photographic evidence obtained. On 8/2/23 4:45 p.m., The Senior Regional Director of Culinary Services stated he was told the rat trap in the kitchen was placed there as a preventative measure because there had been rat sightings in the past. On 8/3/23 at 9:25 a.m., Licensed practical Nurse (LPN) Staff I said the facility had roaches and rats. They were out anytime of the day. They are in the soiled utility room and the nourishment rooms. She reports it all the time to management. On 8/3/23 at 9:35 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff D said the rats and roaches were everywhere in the building, the residents' rooms, the utility rooms, and nourishment rooms. She has reported it to the management staff, but the rats are still here. She sees them any time of the day, but they are worse at night. On 8/3/23 at 9:45 a.m., Resident #89 reported he saw a rodent in his room approximately three weeks ago, and Maintenance filled the hole in the bathroom. On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director said about two weeks ago staff informed him they saw a rat in Resident #89's bathroom. He observed a hole in the wall, which he plugged at that time. There was no documentation that the resident's room was disinfected after the sighting of the rat. On 8/3/23 at 10:04 a.m., rodent feces were noted on the floor beneath the canned goods cart and bread cart, in the kitchen dry storage area. The Regional Hospitality Director and the Director of Food and Nutrition services verified the observation of rodent feces. They said they had swept the floor the day before. The Director of Food and Nutrition Services said a mouse ran over her foot the week before in her office located within the kitchen. She said the rodents chewed the tartar sauce packets. She cleaned the packets and wiped off the area with bleach. On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director said two weeks ago a kitchen staff told him they saw a rat in the kitchen. He said he conducted an informal meeting with the Housekeeping Director to remind her staff to ensure they were not leaving food which the rats might be eating and remind them to do proper cleaning and disinfection in general. It was an informal meeting; he doesn't have any documentation related to the meeting. On 8/3/23 at 12:00 p.m., the Infection Preventionist said she was extremely surprised and had never heard of rats in the facility. She said, I don't know anything about it. I certainly have never seen any; this is the first I'm hearing about it. After reviewing the content of the reports of the contracted pest control company with the Infection Preventionist, and the observation of rodent feces on the floor of the kitchen storage area, she said, I knew there were rats in the kitchen about six months ago when the former Administration was here, but I was told it was taken care of. On 8/4/23 at 11:55 a.m., in a telephone interview the Medical Director said the facility notified him on 8/3/23 of the rats in the kitchen and other areas. He said as long as the residents look and don't touch the rats, they are ok. He said there was no air spread of infection from the rats, It is not like years ago with the plague, that is not going to happen. The food is fine, as long as the rodent droppings don't go into the food. He said he had a meeting with the facility's team the day before and there were no rat droppings on the food, and the kitchen was cleaned the day before. When interviewed about rat droppings on food packaging the Medical Director said that was fine as long as the rodent droppings don't go into the food. He said again he met with the facility team yesterday and there were no rat droppings on the food. The plan is for the staff to write in the pest control book if they see any pests and the pest control will come. The physician said there was no chance the residents would get any infection as long as they did not touch the rats. The Medical Director said, I was told there were no rodent droppings anywhere in the kitchen. On 8/4/23 at 3:27 p.m., the Infection Preventionist said she spoke with the Medical Director today about the rat infestation. She said the Medical Director told her, There is nothing I need to do infection control wise for the rats. She repeated, He said it really wasn't necessary for me to do anything. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommendation to clean up rodent urine and droppings (last reviewed January 3, 2023) noted, Step 1: Put on rubber or plastic gloves. Step 2: Spray urine and droppings with bleach solution or an EPA-registered disinfectant until very wet. Let it soak for 5 minutes or according to instructions on the disinfectant label. Step 3: Use paper towels to wipe up the urine or droppings and cleaning product. Step 4: Throw the paper towels in a covered garbage can that is regularly emptied. Step 5: Mop or sponge the area with a disinfectant. o Clean all hard surfaces including floors, countertops, cabinets, and drawers. o Follow instructions below to clean and disinfect other types of surfaces. Step 6: Wash gloved hands with soap and water or a disinfectant before removing gloves. Step 7: Wash hands with soap and warm water after removing gloves or use a waterless alcohol-based hand rub when soap is not available, and hands are not visibly soiled. The facility continued foodservice operations despite rodent infestation in the kitchen area. The facility failed to protect packaged foods, clean equipment and utensils and single service and single-use items from being contaminated with rodent excrement and failed to discard rodent contaminated foods. On 8/3/23 at 11:50 a.m., multiple ant-like crawling insects were observed crawling on Resident #2's bed, and on the resident's wound dressings on both ankles. Photographic evidence obtained. The resident said the nurse who changed the dressings to her ankles this morning told her she had ants crawling in her bed, and on her legs. The resident said she requested to have her bed sheets changed since then to get rid of the ants and no one has come all morning. On 8/3/23 at 12:00 p.m., LPN Staff I was notified of the observation of the crawling insects observed on the resident's bed and her request to have her sheets changed and the pest removed. LPN Staff I said she would let the Certified Nursing Assistant know. On 8/3/23 at 3:30 p.m., Resident #2 said she felt, terrible, just terrible when the nurse told her she had ants in her bed. She said the ants were crawling in her dressing. She said, no one wants bugs in their bed. I told the nurse I wanted an aide to change my bed, but no one has come yet. On 8/3/23 at 3:45 p.m., Housekeeper Staff BB was observed cleaning Resident #2's mattress. Staff BB said there were ants in the resident's open bags of chips and in the resident's bed. On 8/3/23 at 4:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing said she was informed of the ants in Resident #2's bed and on her legs. She said she thought the ants were attracted to the Medi honey (medical grade honey) used to treat the resident's wounds. She said they will be changing the resident's wound treatment. The facility policy Catheter Care revised (1/6/23), documented It is the policy of this facility to ensure residents with indwelling catheters (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy. Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by nursing personnel. Empty drainage bags when bag is hall-full or every 2-3 hours. Review of the clinical record showed Resident #4 had an admission date of 7/30/23 with diagnoses including neurogenic bladder caused by a cerebral vascular accident requiring an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident #4's care plan instructed staff to keep the catheter off the floor. On 7/31/23 at 9:39 a.m., Resident #4's urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing were observed on the floor. The drainage bag was completely full, and the urine was beginning to flow back into the tubing. The observation was verified by LPN Staff I. Photographic evidence obtained. Review of the clinical record showed Resident #5 had an admission date of 4/23/23 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection and obstructive and reflux uropathy requiring an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident #5's care plan instructed staff to keep the catheter off the floor. On 7/31/23 at 9:32 a.m., Resident #5's urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing were observed on the floor. LPN Staff I confirmed the observation. Photographic evidence obtained. On 7/31/23 at 9:23 a.m., Housekeeping Staff G was observed entering the room of a resident on transmission-based precautions for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The signage posted on the door instructed staff on the personal protective equipment (PPE) required to enter the room, including mask, gown, and gloves. Staff G had a KN95 mask on and no other PPE. Photographic evidence obtained. Staff G began emptying the garbage and cleaning the room. LPN Staff I was present during the observation. Housekeeper Staff G verified she failed to don the proper PPE before entering the resident's room. LPN Staff I was present during the observation.
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate pest control measures to eradicate an ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate pest control measures to eradicate an ongoing rodent infestation. On 12/19/22 the facility became aware of rodent infestation in the building, including the kitchen. The facility failed to consistently implement the recommendations from the contracted pest control company to trim back over hanging trees next to the building to prevent wildlife from getting easier access to the building. The facility failed to identify and repair all rodent entry points. The failure to implement adequate measures to eradicate and contain a rodent infestation created a serious threat to residents health and safety due to the spread of certain diseases from direct or indirect contact with rodents and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) starting on 12/19/22. On 8/4/23 at 7:28 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy and provided the IJ templates. The Immediate Jeopardy was ongoing. The facility census was 86. The findings included: Cross reference to F600, F812, F835, F867, and F880. The facility policy titled Pest Control Program implemented 1/2022 stated it is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents. An effective pest control program is defined as measures to eradicate and contain common household pests, (bed buds, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitos, flies, mice, and rats). The facility will maintain a report system of issues that may arise in between scheduled visits with outside pest services and treat as indicated. Review of the pest control logbook located at the front of the facility noted on 12/13/22, 2/16/23, 2/20/23, 3/18/23, 3/25/23, 4/6/23, 4/22/23, 4/25/23, the dietary staff documented sightings of rats in the kitchen and/or the North Dining Room. The North Unit Pest sighting logbook noted on 7/11/23 a rat was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], and on 7/24/23 two rats in the soiled utility room. The pest control company reports showed on 3/24/23, 5/12/23, 6/2/23, 6/8/23, 6/15/23, 6/29/23 the company recommended trimming back over hanging trees next to the building to prevent ants and wildlife from getting easier access to the building. On 8/3/23 at 3:01 p.m., observation of the outside of the building revealed multiple overhanging branches over building that needs to be trimmed back for preventing ants and wildlife easier access to building as per the multiple recommendations of the contracted pest control company. Photographic evidence obtained. Pest control records from 12/19/2022 through 7/28/23 noted multiple incidents of rodent sightings on the Memory Care Unit, the kitchen, and South Nursing Unit. Rodent stations, live traps and glue sticks have been placed in the kitchen and throughout the building. Roaches and ants were also identified throughout the building. The contracted Pest Control inspection report dated 7/28/23 noted, Checked all 3 logbooks and scanned them. Signed off on rodent issues after checking on them. Baited nurse main cart with roach gel for roach sightings. Lots more rodent activity this month. Review of an email from the contracted pest control company dated April 19, 2023 to the Facility Plant operations and a facility corporate employee noted the pest control company representative stated he visited the facility today and saw several openings, activity and conditions leading to the rodent activity. The representative informed (name) the best option to rid the facility of this rodent issue is a multistep process. The process recommended was to seal up any holes, openings, entry points and areas where rodents access into the building . The next step is a full trapping program for one month . Lastly, I have included extra rodent bait stations around the facility for more control and better monitoring. My recommendation is to start this exclusion right after the roofers have completed their service. This program I am sure will take an entire day. On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Regional Plant Operation Director said he has been employed with the company since September 2022, and has been the acting Maintenance Director at the facility since the beginning of July 2023. He said he became aware of possible rat problem after they started to replace the facility roof in February 2023. The roof repair was completed several months later, sometimes in June 2023. He said started emailing the pest control company in April 2023 about the rats in the facility, who gave him some recommendations about what they can do about stopping the rats from entering the facility. He said the pest control company told him the rats could not be fully removed from the facility until the new roof was completed and all entry points were sealed. The Regional Plant Operation Director said he got over a hundred rodent entry points sealed sometimes in June 2023, and the pest control company signed an eradication agreement to remove all the rats in the facility on 7/20/23. On 8/3/23 at 3:10 p.m., the Administrator said since she has been employed at the facility in May 19, 2023, the overhanging branches had not been trimmed. The facility did not complete a Pest Exclusion agreement until 7/20/23. This agreement allows the pest control company to inspect and seal all holes and cracks throughout the building to eliminate rodent points of entry even though the roof completion was on 5/12/23. On 7/31/23 at 2:57 p.m., during a kitchen tour, a large wooden trigger snap rat trap was noted on the floor located behind an open storage shelf unit. Photographic evidence obtained. On 8/2/23 4:45 p.m., The Senior Regional Director of Culinary Services stated he was told the rat trap in the kitchen was placed there as a preventative measure because there had been rat sightings in the past. On 8/3/23 at 9:25 a.m., Licensed practical Nurse (LPN) Staff I said, The rats are so bad. They have roaches and rats, but I'm more afraid of the rats. You hear them running across the ceiling. I'm so scared they are going to fall on me. They are out anytime of the day. You have to open the doors to the soiled utility room and the nourishment room really carefully because they run away from you and go into the holes in the cabinets. I report it to the management all the time. I have told the pest control and he said he can't do anything about it if the management will not pay to have the rats removed. On 8/3/23 at 9:25 a.m., observation of the South Unit soiled utility room with LPN Staff I revealed a hole in the baseboard of the wall, with a missing tile. Photographic evidence obtained. There was hole at the lower left bottom of the storage cabinet. Photographic evidence obtained. There was a hole in the baseboard where two cabinets met. Photographic evidence obtained. LPN Staff I said, I report it to the management all the time. I have told the pest control and he said he can't do anything about it if the management will not pay to have the rats removed. On 8/3/23 at 9:35 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff D, said, The rats and roaches are disgusting and everywhere in the building. I have seen them in the resident rooms, in the utility rooms and nourishment rooms. They run in the ceiling, you hear scratching, and you can hear them run around up there. If it fell on me, I would be screaming. I know I have reported it to the management staff, but the rats are still here. It doesn't matter what time of day, you will see them, but they are worse at night. On 8/3/23 at 10:04 a.m., during a follow up tour of the kitchen, rodent feces were noted on the floor beneath the canned goods cart and bread cart. The Director of Food and Nutrition Services, and Regional Hospitality Director verified the observation of the rodent feces and stated they had swept there the day before. The Director of Food and Nutrition Services stated she had a mouse run across her foot last week. On 8/3/23 at 11:50 a.m., multiple ant-like crawling insects were observed crawling on Resident #2's bed, and on the resident's wound dressings on both ankles. Photographic evidence obtained. The resident said the nurse who changed the dressings to her ankles this morning told her she had ants crawling in her bed, and on her legs. On 8/3/23 at 12:22 p.m., during a telephone interview, the technician from the contracted pest control company said two rodents were caught in the kitchen yesterday. He said he told the kitchen staff not to leave bread and other food items the rats can get into on the counters or where it would be accessible to the rats. He told them to put the bread in the refrigerator. On 8/3/23 at 12:30 p.m., the Administrator said the rat problem had been identified prior to her arrival to the facility on May 19, 2023. She said she knew the pest control came out weekly as needed. She said the Maintenance Director was in charge of pest control and had direct oversight over the building. She said she could provide a copy of the contract signed on 7/20/2023 addressing the rat problem. On 8/3/23 at 3:18 p.m., a follow up tour of the kitchen with the Senior Regional Director of Culinary Services revealed rodent feces on the floor throughout the kitchen food storage area. Rodent feces were noted on canned good items, and metal shelving racks storing canned food. Single service packages of mayonnaise stored in a basket in the kitchen were observed with visible rodent bite marks. Multiple loaves of packaged bread were observed stored on shelves in the dry storage area where the rodent feces were observed on the floor. The Senior Regional Director of Culinary Services verified the rodent feces throughout the kitchen storage area floor and metal shelves used to store food. He verified the bread; packets of mayonnaise and other food items were not stored in rodent proof containers. On 8/4/23 at 12:45 p.m., the Administrator provided a timeline, and root cause analysis documenting the steps taken to address the rats and pests. The document read, Situation: Identified an ongoing concern related to pests. Most observations include insects; however, there have been a number of observations of rodents and or rodent droppings. Initially the facility experienced a level of pests (insects and rodents' activity) in 2022 that was addressed and viewed as corrected. At the time, the determination was the need for external rodent boxes. These were added and seemingly effective with low to no further rodent activity. It was recognized that the facility had need for a new roof. There was a correlation to the need for the new roof, leaking, etc. That this had an impact of pest concerns. Quotes were received late 2022, the new roof quote was selected . roof company had to apply for permits on March 14, 2023, and the room company initiated replacement on 3/27/23. The roof completion was on 5/12/23. Additional tree work was completed on 1/2/23, in preparation for roof replacement. The root cause analysis document included a list of additional services as follows: 5/12/23 added rodent station boxes. 5/15/23 no activity, prevention remedies. 5/18/23 insect treatments. 5/26/23 inspected for spiders, wasps, baited for roaches. 6/2/23 insect monitor set for flying bugs, of 11 rodent stations, one is missing, moderate rodent activity. 6/8/23 treated exterior prevention for pests, rebaited rodent stations. 6/15/23 a rat was caught last evening, treated all areas for pest and roach control. 6/22/23 pest prevention. 6/29/23 low rodent activity, 2 rodent boxes missing and will be replaced. 7/13/23 exterior and interior areas treated for pest prevention, discussed adding more rodent stations, had rebaited 2 weeks ago, replaced missing boxes. 7/28/23 after start of exclusion, rodent activity reported, traps were not set and no rodent activity observed at this time interior. Rodent stations outside of building, lots of rodent activity, cleaned and rebaited rodent stations. The Administrator provided a receipt dated 1/2/23 from an outside tree service company listing a different address from the facility that read, Canary palm + (plus) 1 Palm. She said the receipt was from an outside company for tree trimming at the facility. On 8/10/23 at 11:57 a.m., in a telephone interview, a representative from the outside tree service company said on 1/2/23 the company did not provide any tree trimming services at the facility. The address listed on the receipt was private property. On 8/4/23 at 2:00 p.m., the State Survey Agency mandated that the facility cease foodservice operations due to the rodent infestations. On 8/4/23 at 6:20 p.m., the technician from the contracted pest control company said rats were entering the building through the air conditioning pipes. On July 25, 2023, he closed that hole. He said he usually gets three rats every two days. On 8/3/23 at 11:55 a.m., live crawling brown bugs were observed in the shower room and in the clean utility room in the memory unit. On 8/3/23 at 12:05 p.m., several brown crawling insects were observed in the memory care unit clean utility room in front of storage cabinet. On 8/3/23 at 12:20 p.m., CNA Staff FF, in the memory care unit said, I see a lot of roaches. The guy comes and sprays and it is not doing anything. I also see ants sometimes, but I see roaches every time I work. I have heard about the rats but not seen them. On 8/3/23 at 12:33 p.m., Housekeeping manager Staff U said she would expect staff to report to her if they saw roaches or bugs. She said they have a book in the front of the facility where they write the concerns. The pest guy reviews the book and then treats the identified concerns. On 8/3/23 at 1:00 p.m., RN Staff KK said, Most of the time we see roaches at nurses' stations and residents' rooms, I haven't seen rats. I have heard people saying they have seen rats mostly in the big dining room. We have a binder in the nurses' station to document if we see anything.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Dental Services (Tag F0791)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Record review revealed Resident #88 admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record information noted the payor source was Medicaid. ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Record review revealed Resident #88 admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record information noted the payor source was Medicaid. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 4/18/23 noted diagnoses of Alzheimers Dementia, and Anxiety. The Brief interview of Mental Status (BIMS) indicated Resident #88's cognition was moderately impaired with a score of 9. The MDS noted the resident had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. A physician order with an effective date of 6/22/23 noted Resident #88, may be seen and evaluated by dental. Resident #88's care plan with an effective date of 4/26/23 noted resident has a dental or oral problem related to chipped teeth to his upper ridge and edentulous (without teeth) to lower ridge. Interventions included to assist or complete mouth/oral care daily and as needed. On 8/2/23 at 1:48 p.m., Resident #88 stated his front teeth hurt. He stated, It's hard to chew and bite down, it hurts. Resident #88's upper front teeth were observed to be broken, and jagged. The resident stated he had not brushed his teeth. On 8/4/23 at 9:02 a.m., Resident #88 was observed eating breakfast, chewing on the side. He opened his mouth, and showed the DON his teeth. They were brown with debris along the gum line and between teeth. The DON verified his teeth looked bad and needed to see a dentist. The DON verified the resident did not have a toothbrush or toothpaste in his room, bathroom or drawers. On 8/4/23 at 9:24 a.m., Resident #88 stated his teeth were worse than they have ever been. On 8/4/23 at 9:32 a.m., the interim Social Service Director (SSD) stated the dental provider was in the building on 6/27/23 but there was no record of Resident #88 receiving dental services since admission. The SSD stated she was not aware resident had mouth pain. Record review revealed no documentation of a referral to the dentist for Resident #88. On 8/4/23 at 12:27 p.m., the Regional Nurse stated, we would ask the resident if they would like to see the dentist, and we would do a consult. That is the way it should be. The dental evaluation should be completed by Social Services and documented in the progress notes. Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure 2 (Resident #29 and Resident #88) of 2 residents reviewed experiencing mouth pain, received dental services to meet their needs. The findings included: The facility policy for Dental Services Implemented 1/2022 and last revised 5/2022 stated, it is the policy of this facility to assist residents in obtaining routine (to the extent covered under the State plan) and emergency dental care. Routine dental services means an annual inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease, diagnosis of dental disease/dental radiographs as needed, dental cleaning, fillings, minor partial or full denture adjustments, smoothing broken teeth, and limited prosthodontic procedures, e.g., taking impressions for dentures and fitting dentures. Emergency dental services include services needed to treat an episode of acute pain in teeth, gums, or palate; broken, or otherwise damaged teeth, or any other problem of the oral cavity that required immediate attention by a dentist. On 8/01/23 at 11:45 a.m., Resident #29, he said he has been a resident at the facility for 16 months. He said he had pain when he ate due to broken teeth. The resident opened his mouth. Multiple broken teeth were observed worn down to the down to the gum line on his lower jaw. He said the facility offered to send him to a dentist when he was admitted but no one has mentioned it since. He said he told them he would have to be put to sleep to have the work done because he was scared of going to the dentist. He said he was afraid of the pain and would be unable to have dental work if he was awake. He said he would love to get his teeth fixed or get dentures. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was a 15 of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The admission Record noted the primary payer to be Humana Medicaid. Resident # 29's Care Plan initiated on 4/27/2023 stated Resident #29 has 1 tooth, history of inflamed gums, but no complaints of anything new. The goal was for resident to be free of infection, pain, or bleeding in the oral cavity by review date. Interventions listed as initiated were coordinate arrangements for dental care, transportation as needed/as ordered . Diet as ordered. Consult with dietitian and change if chewing/swallowing problems are noted . Monitor/document/report as needed any signs or symptoms of oral/dental problems needing attention: Pain, abscess, debris in mouth, lips cracked or bleeding, teeth missing, loose, broken, eroded, decayed, tongue inflamed, ulcers in mouth, lesions. There were no further interventions or documentation addressing Resident # 29 dental issues in the resident's care plan. Resident #29's oral evaluation completed on 4/20/2022 noted some missing teeth and, has very few teeth. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Oral/Dental Status dated 11/8/2022 and 7/24/2023 for Resident #29 reported no broken or loosely fitting full or partial denture and no mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty with chewing. The Nutritional Risk Screen completed on 4/5/2023 for Resident #29 reported no chewing problems reported or observed. The diet upon admission to facility and the current diet ordered for Resident #29 was a Regular diet. On 8/2/2023 at 1:00 p.m., the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) both said Resident #29 never wanted to see a dentist. They said it was offered but he refused. They denied having knowledge of the resident having pain when chewing. On 8/2/23 at 1:30 p.m., Resident #29 said he had no teeth to chew so there was pain every time he ate, he was just used to the pain. He said he would love to have teeth, but was so scared of the dentist. He denied saying he didn't want to go to the dentist, he just said he was afraid to go to the dentist. He said he had not seen a dentist since his admission to the facility. The DON provided an email from Medical Records dated 8/3/2023 stating that Resident #29 had refused dental services in the past. The email noted there was no documentation the resident had ever been seen by the dentist before.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0565 (Tag F0565)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on resident interview, review of facility policy, record review and staff interview the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances expressed by the resident group. The facility failed t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on resident interview, review of facility policy, record review and staff interview the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances expressed by the resident group. The facility failed to have documentation of their response and rationale. Five residents participated in the Resident Council interview. The findings included: The facility policy Resident and Family Grievances (revised 3/8/22) documented it is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal . Prompt efforts to resolve include facility acknowledgement of complaint/grievance and actively working toward resolution of that complaint/grievance. 1. At the Resident Council meeting, attended by five residents, on 8/1/23 at 2:10 p.m., Resident #2 said she had not received her scheduled showers since May 31, 2023. Resident #2 said she had reported her concern regarding showers during the council meetings. On 8/1/23 at 2:15 p.m., the Activity Director confirmed Resident #2 had expressed concerns with not receiving scheduled showers. The Activity Director said she had not completed a grievance form to address the resident's concern. Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) documentation showed Resident #2 received no scheduled showers in June 2023 or July 2023. On 8/2/23 at 12:48 p.m., in an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) said she was unaware there was an issue with residents not receiving showers. 2. The Resident Council group said they would like to go outside but they are stopped at the front door and told they are not permitted to go outside. Residents #2 and #56 said they would love to sit outside in front of the facility. Review of the grievance log revealed a grievance dated 6/1/23 filed by Resident #56's son, reporting the resident does not get outside enough. The findings of the grievance documented, Resident is allowed to go outside on the south wing patio. Resident will let staff aware of when she would like to go out. On 8/1/23 at 3:25 p.m., the DON (Director of Nursing) said the residents can go outside, but they are required to make an appointment. If a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) has the time, will they escort the resident outside. On 8/1/23 at 3:50 p.m., the DON said if a resident wanted to go outside, they needed to be assessed to see if they are safe to be outside alone. If not, they need to make a request to go out and a staff member must take them because they can't be outside alone. The DON confirmed Residents #2 and #56 had not been screened to identify if they were safe to go outside of the facility alone. On 8/2/23 at 8:50 a.m., in an interview with the DON, the Administrator and the Regional Nurse Consultant, the DON said she checked the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score for Resident #2 and #56, and both residents have a high BIMS score and may go outside. The Administrator said, we would like for them to go in the supervised courtyard because it is supervised. We are concerned they may become affected by the heat, and we can provide fluids out there. The Administrator said she would speak to the residents today so they know they can go outside on the supervised patio area. The DON said, we are a secured facility, and the doors are always locked because we don't want the residents to wander off.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure they had discussed formulating an advance directive wh...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure they had discussed formulating an advance directive which would include the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment with the resident or their representative for 1 (Resident #86) of 3 residents reviewed for advance directives. The findings included: A review of the facility policy, The Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives implemented 11/2020, and last reviewed/revised on 1/2022 stated it was the policy of the facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive. Under the Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, number 5 stated the facility would identify or arrange for an appropriate representative for the resident to serve as the primary decision maker if the resident was assessed as unable to make relevant health care decisions. On 8/1/23 review of Resident #86's medical records revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and placed in the facility's secure memory care unit. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) admission assessment, (a standardized assessment tool that measures health status) dated 12/11/22, assessed Resident #86's cognitive score as 5 out of 15, with a score of 0 to 7 meaning the resident's cognition status was severely impaired. Resident #86's MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE] noted a cognitive score of 7 and Resident #86's MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE] noted a cognitive score of 00. On 6/9/23 Resident #86's primary care physician conducted an evaluation and determined Resident #86 lacked the capacity to give informed consent to make medical decisions. A Social Service Progress note dated 2/17/23 stated they were asked to start a guardianship for Resident #86. They had contacted a legal representative to see if they would be a guardian for Resident #86. A nursing progress note dated 5/11/23 stated they had called Resident #86's daughter and husband, but all the phone numbers were disconnected or had been blocked. The note stated the facility would be looking into a guardianship for Resident #86. On 8/2/23 at 9:36 a.m., the Social Service Director (SSD) said the nursing home currently does not have a full-time SSD, so the nursing home's sister facility are sending their SSD to the facility Monday through Friday to complete the required social service duties. The SSD confirmed after reviewing Resident #86 medical record, Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] to the facility's memory care unit due to her severely impaired cognition. She confirmed the MDS assessments dated 12/11/22, 3/28/23, and 4/23/23 assessed Resident #86's cognition as severely impaired. The SSD said due to the facility staff being unable to contact Resident #86's family since Resident #86's admission, she had written a progress note on 2/17/23 stating she would try to arrange for a guardianship for Resident #86. She said she was unable to find any documentation in Resident #86's medical record, the facility had obtained a guardianship for Resident #86. She said she was unable to find documentation the facility had discussed with Resident #86 and/or a representative about Resident #86's health care decision related to formulating an advance directive. On 8/3/23 at 5:26 p.m., in an interview with MDS Coordinator, after she reviewed Resident #86's medical record, she confirmed Resident #86 was admitted to the facility's memory care unit on 12/7/22 due to her impaired cognition. She confirmed the MDS assessments dated 12/11/22, 3/28/23, and 4/23/23 assessed Resident #86's cognition as severely impaired. The MDS Coordinator said currently Resident #86 did not have a Power of Attorney (POA), Healthcare Surrogate or court appointed guardian to assist in making health care decisions for her. She further said she was unable to find documentation the facility had discussed with Resident #86 and/or a representative about Resident #86's health care decision related to formulating an advance directive. On 8/4/23 at 9:51 a.m., the Administrator said the facility's policy stated if the resident was unable to make their own health care decisions and they were unable to get in touch with a resident representative, the facility was responsible to attempt to find a legal guardianship for that resident. The Administrator confirmed after reviewing Resident #86's medical record, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She said due to Resident #86's cognitive impairment since her admission she was unable to make health care decisions for herself. The Administrator said there was no documentation the facility had discussed with Resident #86 and/or a representative about Resident #86's health care decisions related to formulating an advance directive as required per their Advance Directive policy.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

On 8/2/23 at 8:20 a.m., while observing Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff H, administer medications to Resident #55, observation revealed Resident #55 did not have a breakfast tray at the bedside o...

Read full inspector narrative →
On 8/2/23 at 8:20 a.m., while observing Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff H, administer medications to Resident #55, observation revealed Resident #55 did not have a breakfast tray at the bedside or in the room. Resident #55's roommate had a breakfast tray. LPN Staff H finished administering medications and said to Resident #55, They will be in to feed you soon. On 8/2/23 at 8:40 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistants were observed collecting breakfast trays for the assigned hall area. LPN Staff H said, I don't know if she [Resident #55] got any breakfast. LPN Staff H looked in the collected breakfast trays and said she could not find one for Resident #55. After reviewing Resident #55's paperwork she said Resident #55 came from the hospital the day before and it looked like the nurse from the evening and night shift did not send a diet order to the kitchen for Resident #55. She said the kitchen would not have known to send her a tray. LPN Staff H said Resident #55 required total assistance with feeding, was aphasic (inability speak) and could not communicate she had not eaten. LPN Staff H said, I hope this does not come back to fall on me. I will enter the order now and go get her a breakfast. On 8/2/23 at 8:50 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the evening nurse who readmitted the resident should have activated the medication and diet orders. The DON said she did not know why it was not done. On 8/2/23 at 9:10 a.m., CNA Staff L, assigned to Resident #55 for the shift said I didn't see her tray. I thought someone fed her. I was in room (Room #) feeding someone else. CNA Staff L confirmed she had not asked anyone else to assist Resident #55 with her meal and was unaware Resident #55 had not received anything to eat when she repositioned and settled her in bed a short while ago. CNA Staff L confirmed the resident did not communicate verbally and said, I can go get her something now. I did not know she had not eaten. Clinical records reviewed for Resident #55 including comprehensive care plan revised on 5/19/23 which documents Resident is at risk for decreased ability to perform ADLs including eating with interventions including resident required supervision of 1 staff to eat. Care plan also has focus stating the resident was at risk for malnutrition related to dementia, schizophrenia, hypothyroidism, hypertension, and history of significant weight loss with interventions to monitor po (by mouth) intake of meals/ fluids. Reviewed CNA documentation for meal intake for past 30 days. Resident #55 had been in the hospital for six of the 30 days. Resident #55 had 72 opportunities for staff to document meal intake during the time period reviewed. No documentation of a meal being provided or eaten in the clinical records for 39 of the 72 meals. On 8/3/23 at 10:30 a.m., the DON said she expects staff assigned to each resident to make sure the resident has their meals. If they are unable to feed the resident themselves then they need to hand off to either another CNA or the assigned nurse. The DON said she was unaware so many of the meals had not been documented for Resident #55. The DON said she knew resident had her meals but could not guarantee it because of the lack of documentation and the resident's condition. She said, I have work to do with the staff. On 8/4/23 at 12:15 p.m., interviewed CNA, Staff GG, assigned to resident #65 about the resident's daily hygiene needs. The CNA said if the resident is not scheduled for a shower, she will get her up and dressed, wash her face, and brush her teeth to get her ready for the day. She said she had already done these things for the resident today. Observation of Resident #65's room, and bathroom with CNA Staff GG failed to reveal a toothbrush, or toothpaste. CNA Staff GG said, I usually keep them in the upper drawer. She opened the drawer of the resident's dresser, no toothbrush or toothpaste were present. CNA Staff GG said, I remember. She did not have a toothbrush, so I had her gargle today. CNA Staff GG verified it was not routine to have residents gargle instead of brushing their teeth. She said, We don't have toothbrushes a lot. Gargling cleans out their mouths too. On 8/4/23 at 12:30 p.m., Unit Manager LPN, Staff AA said gargling was not acceptable in place of brushing teeth. She said, We have been having issues with having the toothbrushes available. We are making tooth care kits for one time use now and they can be placed on the high shelf in the closet. On 8/4/23 at 12:50 p.m., the DON said they have been having issues with toothbrush supplies, so they were making oral kits today. The kits were to make sure the CNAs have toothbrushes and toothpaste available for the residents in their rooms. The DON confirmed it was unacceptable to have the resident gargle instead of brushing their teeth, and the CNAs were expected to help them brush their teeth and perform oral care. Records reviewed for Resident #65 including comprehensive care plan documented the resident has potential for dental or oral problem related to some missing teeth. Interventions included assist or complete mouth/oral care daily and PRN (as needed). Review of the CNA documentation for July 2023 showed no oral care provided for seven of 31 days in the month. Based on observation, review of facility policy, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene and nutrition for 4 (Resident #2, #52, #55 and #65)) of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The findings included: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living documented, The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care . 3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #2 had an admission date of 7/13/23 with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis, muscle weakness, and Bipolar disorder. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date of 4/10/23 documented Resident #2 required extensive assist of 1 for toileting and dressing and was dependent on staff for bathing. The care plan identified Resident #2 can be resistive to care related to paranoid schizophrenia, Alzheimer's. The interventions instructed staff to provide cueing for safety and sequencing to maximize current level of function and allow the resident to make decisions about treatment regime, to provide sense of control and offer different days and times for bathing. On 8/1/23 at 2:10 p.m., Resident #2 said she had not received her scheduled showers since May 31, 2023, and had reported it to the Activity Director during Resident Council meetings. Review of the shower schedule revealed Resident #2 was scheduled for showers on the 3:00 p.m., to 11:00 p.m., shift on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Review of the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) documentation for June 2023 showed Resident #2 received a scheduled shower on 6/1/23. The CNA documentation showed bed baths were provided on 6/6/23, 6/8/23, 6/20/23 and 6/24/23. There was no documentation of care provided on 6/3/23, 6/10/23, 6/13/23, 6/15/23, 6/17/23 and 6/22/23. The CNA documentation for July 2023 showed no documentation scheduled showers or bed bath were provided for Resident #2. The clinical record showed no documentation Resident #2 had refused her scheduled showers. 2. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #52 had an admission date of 5/31/23 with diagnoses including Dementia, Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Major Depressive Disorder. The Significant Change Minimum MDS with an assessment reference date of 6/4/23 documented Resident #52 required extensive assist of one for personal hygiene and dressing and was dependent on staff for bathing. The MDS noted Resident #52's cognitive skills for daily decision making were moderately impaired. The care plan identified Resident #52 had an ADL self-care deficit and instructed staff to encourage her to participate and to assist her with ADL's as needed. Amount of assistance varies depending on how she is feeling. Review of the shower schedule showed Resident #52 was scheduled for showers on the 3:00 p.m., to 11:00 p.m., shift on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. On 7/31/23 at 1:31 p.m., Resident #52's hair was observed to be greasy, and uncombed. Resident #52 said she was unsure if she was receiving her scheduled showers. Review of the CNA documentation for June 2023 showed Resident #52 received a bed bath on 6/2/23, 6/5/23, 6/7/23, 6/9/23, 6/12/23, 6/16/23, 6/19/23, 6/21/23, 6/23/23, 6/26/23, 6/28/23 and 6/30/23. On 6/14/23 there was no documentation of care provided to the resident. The documentation showed Resident #52 did not receive scheduled showers for the month of June. Review of the CNA charting for July 2023 showed Resident #52 received a bed bath on 7/3/23, 7/5/23, 7/7/23, 7/12/23, 7/17/23, 7/19/23, 7/24/23, 7/28/23, 7/31/23. There was no documentation care was provided to the resident on 7/10/23, 7/14/23, 7/21/23 and 7/26/23. The documentation showed Resident #52 received no scheduled showers for the month of July. There was no documentation the resident refused her scheduled showers. On 8/2/23 at 11:10 a.m., CNA Staff J said, We have a shower sheet, and it goes by room numbers and that is what we go by. The schedule is in the shower book. We provide showers per the schedule and of course if needed and if the resident asks for one. If the resident refuses, we come back in an hour or so and ask again, if they still refuse, we let the nurse know. The nurse will try and talk them into it and if they can't it is documented the resident refused. On 8/2/23 at 12:48 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) said she was unaware there was an issue with residents not receiving scheduled showers. On 8/2/23 at 12:50 p.m., the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), said the CNAs document the showers in the electronic record. The RNC was informed the CNA documentation showed Resident #2 and #52 did not receive their scheduled showers. The RNC said Resident #2 had a care plan for refusal of showers and said the resident does not like to get out of bed, it is a whole process for her. On 8/2/23 at 2:43 p.m., the RNC confirmed there was no documentation Residents #2 and #52 had refused their scheduled showers. The RNC said, We are aware of the concern and will work to tighten it up.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0685 (Tag F0685)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff and resident interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with lost glasses ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff and resident interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with lost glasses received the proper treatment to maintain vision and assist with arrangements to have the glasses replaced in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #88) of 1 resident reviewed for vision impairment. The findings included: The Facility policy titled Hearing and Vision Services, revised 5/2022 stated the facility is to ensure that all residents have access to hearing and vision services and receive adaptive equipment as indicated. Employees should refer any identified need for vision services to the social worker or social service designee. The social worker or designee will assist the resident by making appointments and arranging for transportation. Employees will assist the resident with the use of any devices or adaptive equipment needed to maintain vision. Assistive devices to maintain vision include glasses, contact lenses, and magnifying lens or other devices used by the resident. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Dementia, Anxiety, and a history of Transient Ischemic Attacks. Section B of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the residents' vision was moderately impaired. The resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9. Resident #88's care plan initiated on 4/26/23 indicated Resident #88 has vision impairment related to: history of TIA'S (Transient Ischemic Attacks, sometimes known as mini strokes). Interventions included assist with activities of daily living, arrange meals in residents' visual field, resident requires task-focused lighting when reading, during activities, and approach resident from the front and face to face contact to promote communication. On 7/31/23 at 9:46 a.m., Resident #88 stated he had worn glasses since grade school, sometime around 3rd grade and they helped a lot. He stated he had not seen an eye doctor in a long time. On 8/01/23 at 9:37 a.m., Resident #88 was observed in bed. He stated he has not had his glasses for a while. On 8/1/23 at 7:56 p.m., Resident #88's daughter stated in a telephone interview Resident #88, had glasses and is horribly visually impaired without them. Somewhere between the transfer to the hospital and to the sister facility, the glasses have been lost. Resident #88's daughter stated she had talked to so many people at the facility about them but could not recall who specifically. On 8/2/23 at 2:14 p.m., the Administrator stated she showed the resident a piece of paper and he was able to read two words from it. The Administrator stated, I think the MDS assessment was inaccurate because he could read this. The Administrator agreed the resident should be evaluated by a vision professional. On 8/4/23 at 9:31 a.m., the Interim Social Service Director (SSD) stated Resident #88 has been scheduled for a vision appointment on September 5, 2023 and stated he should have been seen by now. The SSD agreed resident should not have had to wait so long to get his glasses replaced.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of the clinical records and staff interviews, the facility failed to pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of the clinical records and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate restorative services and physician ordered interventions for the management of contractures (fixed deformity of joints) for 1 (Resident #31) of 1 resident reviewed with positioning devices. The findings included: The facility policy Restorative Nursing Programs (revised 5/2022) documented, It is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level. Restorative nursing program refers to nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. This concept actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning. The interdisciplinary team with the support and guidance form the physician, will assure the ongoing review, evaluation, and decision making regarding the services needed to maintain or improve resident's abilities in accordance with the resident's comprehensive assessment, goals, and preferences. Nursing personnel are trained on basic, or maintenance nursing care that does not require the use of a qualified therapist or licenses nurse oversight. The training may include but is not limited to: Assisting residents in adjustment to their disabilities and use of any assistive devices. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #31 had an admission date of 9/3/19 with diagnoses including dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, anxiety, and chronic pain syndrome. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date of 5/11/23 documented Resident #31 was dependent on staff for bed mobility and had limitation in range of motion on both sides of the lower body. The MDS noted Resident #31's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. Review of the physician orders revealed the following orders: 1. Apply soft heel boot to left foot and wear at all times when in bed. 2. Wear offloading boot to right foot at all times. 3. Recommend bilateral knee brace and abductor brace while in bed and sitting up in chair for 3- (to) 4 hours or as tolerated during am care and remove before lunch, skin check before and after donning brace and every shift. 4. Recommend bilateral knee brace for knee flexion contracture and hip abductor orthosis, therapy to work on wearing schedule. On 7/31/23 at 10:07 a.m., Resident #31 was in bed in a fetal position (legs bent and drawn up) and did not answer any questions. There was a pair of heel boots lying on the floor in the room. The resident was not able to straighten his legs due to knee contractures. The resident did not have any positioning devices on. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff I said the resident was to have the boots on at all times and confirmed the heel boots were on the floor and not on the resident as ordered. During additional random observations on 7/31/23 at 3:00 p.m., 8/1/23 at 8:29 a.m., and 2:30 p.m., Resident #31 was in bed with no positioning devices or knee braces in use. The heel boots remained on the floor in the room. Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) care [NAME] (instructions on care needs) revealed for staff to apply bilateral knee brace for knee flexion contracture and hip abductor orthosis. On 8/2/23 at 8:56 a.m., CNA Staff L said Resident #31 was to have the boots on when in bed, it was the only device she knew the resident used. The CNA said she had not seen splints for the residents legs or knees. The CNA said the resident was not able to straighten his legs and was non ambulatory. On 8/2/23 at 10:07 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff H confirmed Resident #31 was to have heel boots on at all times and confirmed the boots had not been applied. LPN Staff H confirmed the resident had no positioning devices in place including the ordered knee braces. On 8/2/23 at 12:30 p.m., LPN Staff C, wound care nurse, said Resident #31 did not have splints for his knees. Staff C said the resident had heel boots and had no pressure wounds on the heels. On 8/4/23 at 8:30 a.m., the Registered Nurse Consultant (RNC) said the information for the application of splints was located in the restorative binder and the Restorative CNA applies the devices. 8/4/23 at 8:36 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) said she was aware Resident #31 did not have the physician ordered knee braces, orthosis and heel boots applied. The DON said the devices caused him pain and, we don't want to do anything to cause pain. The DON said Resident #31 refuses the devices due to pain but confirmed there was no documentation the resident had refused the positioning and pressure reduction devices. On 8/4/23 at 8:49 a.m., a review of the Restorative CNA book documented a Therapy Referral to Restorative Nursing Program or Functional Maintenance Program form dated 6/13/23 provided instructions for right and left knee abduction brace in bed or wheelchair for 3 to 4 hours as tolerated. There was no documentation in the Restorative book indicating the program was initiated or completed by the Restorative CNA. On 8/4/23 at 9:00 a.m., during an observation and interview, Resident #31 was in bed with no splints in place. Registered Nurse (RN) Staff D said she did not know anything regarding the use of braces or other positing device for Resident #31. The nurse said, The only thing I know is he has boots that are supposed to be on. On 8/4/23 at 9:09 a.m., the RNC said the documentation in the Restorative binder was for a therapy referral and the process was the Physical Therapist (PT) would review to see if it was appropriate for the resident. If it was, the therapist would initiate a program and provide education to the Restorative CNA. On 8/4/23 at 9:55 a.m., CNA Staff K said she did not know anything about leg/knee braces for Resident #31. Staff K said she had never seen them or put them on him. On 8/4/23 at 10:05 a.m., the Restorative CNA Staff J said Resident #31 wears a soft inflatable heel boot and it is considered a splint, all foot boots are splints. Resident #31 will refuse and kick off the boots. I try and get him to keep them in place for 3-4 hours and I document if he refuses to wear them. I document in the CNA documentation. We have a weekly restorative meeting with the DON, the unit nurse and therapy to review the program. The bilateral knee splints the resident does not wear so we put the pillows between his knees. On 8/4/23 at 11:45 a.m., Restorative CNA Staff J said she documented in the CNA task section when Resident #31 refused to have the knee brace and orthosis applied. A review of the CNA task section of the documentation for August 2023, showed no documentation of the restorative program or documentation Resident #31 refused the knee brace. Restorative CNA Staff J said she was not able to locate her documentation of care in the CNA task list, because there was none. Restorative CNA Staff J confirmed she had no documentation the restorative program for the knee brace and abductor orthosis was initiated and had not applied the devices. On 8/4/23 at 12:46 p.m., the Rehab Director said, Once a resident comes off therapy and has a restorative program, the nurses are responsible to oversee that it is done. (Resident #31) has contractures of both knees and hands and is in a fetal position, he is not able to straighten his legs. The splints are bilateral knee abductor braces, and it is used to keep the contracture form getting worse, it will not get better. The pillow is to keep the knees separated and to prevent pressure ulcers. The splints and pillow are to be used when in the resident is in bed or wheelchair. On 8/4/23 at 12:33 p.m., the RNC confirmed there was no documentation the Restorative CNA completed the assigned tasks to apply the bilateral knee braces, the heel boots and abductor pillow for Resident #31.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interview, records review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications le...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interview, records review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications left at the bedside were appropriately stored for 1 (Resident #73) of 1 resident observed with unsecured medications at the bedside and 1 (North Hall) of 2 medication carts observed. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled, Medication Storage, revised [DATE] noted, It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security . Unused Medications: The pharmacy and all medication rooms are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, outdated, defective or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible, or missing labels. Review of facility policy titled, Destruction of Unused Drugs, revised 5/2022 which stated, All unused, contaminated, or expired prescription drugs shall be disposed of in accordance with state laws and regulations . Unused, unwanted and non-returnable medications should be removed from their storage area and secured until destroyed. On [DATE] at 09:27 a.m., Resident #73 was observed with an unsecured medication cup on the bedside table containing four red capsules and three small pills. Photographic Evidence Obtained Resident #73 stated he couldn't take all the pills at one time so the nurse left them with him. On [DATE] at 9:38 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff MM, verified she left the medication at the bedside and stated she should not have left them in the room. On [DATE] at 5:10 p.m., observation of the North Back hall medication cart with Registered Nurse (RN) Staff M revealed 11 loose pills in the medication drawer and one ½ loose pill in the controlled substance drawer. On 8/2 at 5:30 p.m., the DON said, We just checked the carts the other day. I don't know why there are so many loose pills. It is a nurse's responsibility to ensure the carts are clean and the counts are correct.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 7 (Residents #35, #40, #55, #67, #73, #194, #88) of 7 residents received medications in accordance with professi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 7 (Residents #35, #40, #55, #67, #73, #194, #88) of 7 residents received medications in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to order medications on a timely manner or failure to administer medications in accordance with the physician's orders. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled, admission Orders, revised 5/2022 which states, A physician must personally approve, in writing, a recommendation that an individual be admitted to a facility. A physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist must provide written and /or verbal orders for the residents' immediate care and needs. 1. The written and/or verbal orders should include at a minimum: (a) Dietary, (b) Medication orders if indicated; (c) Routine care orders. 2. The orders should allow facility staff to provide essential care to the resident consistent with the resident's mental and physical status on admission. 3. The orders should provide information to maintain or improve the resident's functional abilities. Review of facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revised 5/3/2022 which states Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. 1. Keep medication cart clean, organized and stocked with adequate supplies .11. Compare medication source with medication administration record (MAR) to verify resident name. form, dose, route and time. (b) Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by a physician . 13. Remove medication from source, taking care not to touch medication with bare hand. Review of facility policy titled Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability, revised 7/19/22 which stated, It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion or accidental exposure . 1.(j) The charge nurse or other designee conducts a daily visual audit of the required documentation of controlled substances. Spot checks are performed to verify: i. Controlled substances that are destroyed are appropriately documented; and ii. Medications removed from either the automated dispensing system or medication cart/ cabinet have a documented physician order. Review of facility policy titled, Unavailable Medications, revised 2/9/2022 which states, If a resident misses a scheduled dose of a medication, staff shall follow procedures for medication errors, including physician/ family notification, completion of a medication error report, and monitoring the resident for adverse reactions to omission of the medication. 1. On 8/2/23 at 8:04 a.m., observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff H administer scheduled medications to Resident #40. The physician's orders included Cyclobenzaprine HCl Tablet 10 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth three times a day related to chronic pain syndrome. LPN Staff H said the medication was not available to be given. There was none available in the medication cart and this medication was not included in the floor stock of prescription medications. On 8/2/23 at 8:15 a.m., LPN Staff H said, It does not happen that often, looks like someone did not request the reorder. She said she would reorder the Cyclobenzaprine now. 2. On 8/2/23 at 8:20 a.m., observed LPN Staff H, administering scheduled medications to Resident #55. LPN Staff H said the resident returned to the facility the previous afternoon into the evening. She noted her medications had not been ordered so she was unable to administer the medications as ordered. Medications unable to be administered included Dexamethasone 6 mg tablet once a day for two days for COVID-19; Famotidine tablet 10 mg once a day for indigestion; Labetalol HCl 100 mg tablet, 1 tablet twice a day for hypertension (high blood pressure); Incruse Ellipta 62.5 mcg (micrograms)/ACT inhaler 1 puff once a day for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD); Depakene Solution 250 mg/ml (milliliter) 10 ml 2 times a day for mood disorder. LPN Staff H said, I don't know why they did not order them. I got two of the medications from the medication room supply. I will have the rest later today. On 8/2/23 at 8:45 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed about Resident #55's orders not sent to the pharmacy after readmission the previous evening 8/1/23 around 6:00 p.m. The DON reviewed the records and said, I don't know why the nurse did not get the medications from the pharmacy. That should not have happened. 3. On 8/2/23 at 5:30 p.m., RN Staff M was observed conducting a narcotic count with the Director of Nursing RN, Staff M, said, Let me get the book. I can't leave it on the cart because the residents will take it. RN, Staff M said, Wait let me fill in the medications I have already given. RN Staff M documented on the declining inventory of the narcotic log for six residents, #67, #73, #70, # 35, #194 and #88 as follows: Resident #35, administered lorazepam tablet 1 mg 8/2/23 at 2000 (8:00 p.m.) Resident #194, administered lorazepam tablet 0.5 mg at 2000 (8:00 p.m.) Resident #88, administered alprazolam (used to treat anxiety) 0.25 mg at 2000 (8:00p.m.) Resident #67, administered tramadol (opioid analgesic) HCL tablet 50 mg on 8/2/23 at 1800 (6:00p.m.) Resident #73, administered oxycodone/acetaminophen 5-325 mg (opioid analgesic) tablet 8/2/23 at 1800 (6:00 p.m.) Resident #70, administered lorazepam (antianxiety) tablet 0.5 mg 8/2/23 at 1800 (6:00 p.m.) RN Staff M verified he documented he administered the Lorazepam to Residents #35, and #194, and the alprazolam to Resident #88 approximately three hours before scheduled time. RN Staff M said, I know that you should do one hour before and one hour after. RN, Staff M said, You need to understand that these residents get very confused and sundown [confusion occurring in late afternoon]. They will have behaviors, so they need their medications early. Review of the clinical record with the DON for Resident #35 revealed a physician's order dated 6/9/23 to discontinue the lorazepam 1 mg. There was no documentation in the clinical record Resident #35 was experiencing anxiety, and the physician was contacted and had authorized the administration of the discontinued lorazepam to Resident #35. Review of the clinical record with the DON for Resident #194 revealed an active physician's order dated 7/12/23 to administer lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet twice a day for restlessness. The medication was scheduled to be administered every 12 hours, at 9:00 a.m., and 9:00 p.m. Staff M had administered the lorazepam to the resident four hours before the scheduled time. There was no documentation in the clinical record Resident #194 was experiencing any restlessness and the physician was contacted and authorized the administration of the lorazepam outside of the scheduled time. Review of the clinical record for Resident #88 with the DON revealed an active physician's order dated 7/1/23 for alprazolam once a day at bedtime for anxiety. The medication was scheduled to be administered every evening at 8:00 p.m. RN Staff M had administered the alprazolam to the resident three hours prior to the scheduled time. The clinical record lacked documentation of behavior to support the early administration. There was no documentation the physician was contacted and had authorized the early administration of the alprazolam. Review of the physician's orders with the DON for Resident #67 revealed to administer Tramadol HCl 50 mg twice a day for pain. The medication was scheduled to be administered every 12 hours at 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. RN Staff M had administered the Tramadol four hours prior to the scheduled time. There was no documentation in the clinical record, Resident #67 was experiencing any pain and the physician had authorized the administration of the Tramadol outside of the scheduled time. Review of the clinical record with the DON for Resident #73 revealed a physician's order for oxycodone/acetaminophen 5-325 mg which was discontinued on 7/3/23. Resident #73 did not have an active order for the oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325 RN Staff M documented he administered on 8/2/23 at 6:00 p.m. There was no documentation in the clinical record Resident #73 was experiencing any pain and the physician had authorized the administration of the discontinued oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325. On 8/2/23 at 6:30 p.m., the Administrator who is the risk manager, and the Regional Nurse Consultant said RN Staff M was suspended pending investigation. On 8/3/23 at 10:07 a.m., the DON said she could not explain why the narcotics were kept in the medications carts several weeks after they were discontinued. She said the discontinued narcotics would be brought to the DON for destruction. The DON said, I cannot control everything. Best practice we know they should not have been in the cart. It is an expectation that when medication is discontinued you bring to the DON. The DON verified she has been employed at the facility since April 2023 and she has not sought out discontinued narcotics but has waited for staff to bring them to her. The DON said, moving forward I will be going to those carts every day.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0730 (Tag F0730)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on staff interview and staff record review the facility failed to ensure 4 (Staff O, CC, DD, and FF) of 5 staff employee records had a performance review completed at least once every 12 months ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview and staff record review the facility failed to ensure 4 (Staff O, CC, DD, and FF) of 5 staff employee records had a performance review completed at least once every 12 months with in-service education based on the outcome of the performance reviews. The findings included: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool last updated on 5/19/23, noted documentation in the Staff Training/Education and Competencies section the nurse aides are required to have in-service training throughout the year. In-service training must . address areas of weakness as determined in nurse aides' performance reviews as noted in the Facility Assessment Tool and the training may address the special needs of residents as determined by the facility staff. On 8/3/23 a review of Staff O's employee file, a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), revealed a date of hire of 6/11/14. Further review of Staff O's employee file failed to reveal documentation of an annual performance review for 2022 nor 2023. On 8/3/23 a review of Staff CC's employee file a CNA, revealed a date of hire of 11/21/12. Further review of Staff CC's employee file revealed the employee did not have an annual performance review completed for 2022 or 2023. On 8/3/23 a review of Staff DD's employee file a CNA, revealed a date of hire of 8/9/17. Further review of Staff DD's employee file revealed the employee did not have an annual performance review completed for 2022 or 2023. On 8/4/23 at 12:43 p.m., in an interview with Staff FF, a CNA, she said she was hired over 6 years ago. She said she did not remember the last time the facility completed her annual performance review, but she knew her annual performance review was not conducted in 2022 or 2023. On 8/4/23 at 1:25 p.m., in an interview with the Administrator, she said all CNA/nurse aides were required to have a performance review completed every 12 months which should address the CNA/nurse aides' areas of weakness as noted in the facility's Facility Assessment Tool. She said she was told by the Human Resource (HR) Director several months ago during an employee file audit, the HR Director noted several of the CNA/nurse aides annual performance reviews were not completed as required. The Administrator confirmed Staff O, CC, DD, and FF's annual performance reviews were not completed as of 8/4/23. On 8/4/23 at 2:01 p.m., in an interview with the HR Director, during an employee file audit, she informed the Administrator several of the staff required annual performance reviews were not completed. The HR Director confirmed Staff (O, CC, DD, EE, and FF)'s annual performance reviews were not completed for 2022 and 2023 as of this time.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, staff interviews, resident records review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiri...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, resident records review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revised 5/3/2022 which states Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. 1. Keep medication cart clean, organized and stocked with adequate supplies . 11. Compare medication source with medication administration record (MAR) to verify resident name. form, dose, route, and time. (b) Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by a physician . 13. Remove medication from source, taking care not to touch medication with bare hand. Review of facility policy titled Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability, revised 7/19/22 which stated, It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion, or accidental exposure . 1.(j) The charge nurse or other designee conducts a daily visual audit of the required documentation of controlled substances. Spot checks are performed to verify i. Controlled substances that are destroyed are appropriately documented; and ii. Medications removed from either the automated dispensing system or medication cart/ cabinet have a documented physician order. Review of facility policy titled, Unavailable Medications, revised 2/9/2022 which states, If a resident misses a scheduled dose of a medication, staff shall follow procedures for medication errors, including physician/ family notification, completion of a medication error report, and monitoring the resident for adverse reactions to omission of the medication. On 8/2/23 at 8:04 a.m., observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff H, administer scheduled medications to Resident #40. Resident was ordered to receive Cyclobenzaprine HCl Tablet 10 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth three times a day related to chronic pain syndrome. LPN Staff H said the medication was not available to be given. There was none available in the medication cart and this medication was not in the floor stock of prescription medications. On 8/2/23 at 8:15 a.m., LPN Staff H said, It does not happen that often, looks like someone did not request the reorder. She said she would reorder the Cyclobenzaprine now. On 8/2/23 at 8:20 a.m., observed LPN Staff H, attempting to administer scheduled medications to Resident #55. LPN Staff H said the resident returned to the facility the previous afternoon into evening. She noted her medications had not been ordered so she was unable to administer the medications as ordered. Medications unable to be administered included Dexamethasone 6 mg tablet once a day for two days for COVID-19; Famotidine tablet 10 mg once a day for indigestion; Labetalol HCl 100 mg tablet, 1 tablet twice a day for hypertension (high blood pressure); Incruse Ellipta 62.5 mcg (micrograms)/ACT inhaler 1 puff once a day for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD); Depakene Solution 250 mg/ml (milliliter) 10 ml 2 times a day for mood disorder. LPN Staff H said, I don't know why they did not order them. I got two of the medications from the medication room supply. I will have the rest later today. On 8/2/23 at 8:45 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed about Resident #55's orders not sent to the pharmacy after readmission the previous evening 8/1/23 around 600 p.m. The DON reviewed the records and said, I don't know why the nurse did not get the medications from pharmacy. That should not have happened. On 8/2/23 at 5:10 p.m., observation of the North Back Hall medication cart with Registered Nurse (RN) Staff M revealed a personal coffee cup stored in the center of the medication drawer. RN Staff M verified personal cups should not be stored in the medication cart and said, I had to go into a room, and we can't leave anything on the cart. RN Staff M said, I can't lie, and I don't want anyone else to get into trouble. It is mine. 11 full loose pills and many partial pill pieces were found in the bottom of the drawer among the medication cards. A white, half pill was observed loose in the controlled substance (narcotic) drawer. The half pill appeared to be Ativan (antianxiety). RN Staff M could not explain who was responsible for ensuring the cart did not have any loose pills. When asked if he checks the cart when working, RN Staff M replied, I don't know. On 8/2/23 at 5:30 p.m., The DON said, we just checked the carts the other day. I don't know why there are so many loose pills. It is a nurse's responsibility to ensure the carts are clean and the counts are correct. The DON said it was unacceptable for a nurse to store his coffee cup inside the medication drawer and that there should not be loose unaccounted for medications in the bottom of the drawer. On 8/2/23 at 5:30 p.m., RN Staff M was observed conducting a narcotic count with the Director of Nursing (due to the loose half pill in the narcotic drawer which appeared to be Ativan. The narcotic book was at nurses' station not with cart. RN, Staff M, said, Let me get the book. I can't leave it on the cart because the residents will take it. RN, Staff M said, Wait let me fill in the medications I have already given. RN Staff M documented on the declining inventory of the narcotic log for six residents, #67, #73, #70, # 35, #194 and #88 as follows: Resident #67, administered tramadol (opioid analgesic) HCL tablet 50 mg on 8/2/23 at 1800 (6:00p.m.) Resident #73, administered oxycodone/acetaminophen 5-325 mg (opioid analgesic) tablet 8/2/23 at 1800 (6:00 p.m.) Resident #70, administered lorazepam (antianxiety) tablet 0.5 mg 8/2/23 at 1800 (6:00 p.m.) Resident #35, administered lorazepam tablet 1 mg 8/2/23 at 2000 (8:00 p.m.) Resident #194, administered lorazepam tablet 0.5 mg at 2000 (8:00 p.m.) Resident #88, administered alprazolam (used to treat anxiety) 0.25 mg at 2000 (8:00p.m.) RN Staff M verified he documented he administered the Lorazepam to Residents #35, and #194, and the alprazolam to Resident #88 approximately three hours before scheduled time. RN Staff M said, I know that you should do one hour before and 1 hour after. RN, Staff M said, You need to understand that these residents get very confused and sundown [confusion occurring in late afternoon]. They will have behaviors, so they need their medications early. Review of the physician's orders with the DON for Resident #67 revealed to administer Tramadol HCl 50 mg twice a day for pain. The medication was scheduled to be administered every 12 hours at 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. RN Staff M had administered the Tramadol four hours prior to the scheduled time. There was no documentation in the clinical record, Resident #67 was experiencing any pain and the physician had authorized the administration of the Tramadol outside of the scheduled time. Review of the clinical record with the DON for Resident #73 revealed a physician's order for oxycodone/acetaminophen 5-325 mg which was discontinued on 7/3/23. Resident #73 did not have an active order for the oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325 RN Staff M documented he administered on 8/2/23 at 6:00 p.m. There was no documentation in the clinical record Resident #73 was experiencing any pain and the physician had authorized the administration of the discontinued oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325. Review of the clinical record with the DON for Resident #35 revealed a physician's order dated 6/9/23 to discontinue the lorazepam 1 mg. There was no documentation in the clinical record Resident #35 was experiencing any anxiety, and the physician was contacted and had authorized the administration of the discontinued lorazepam to Resident #35. Review of the clinical record with the DON for Resident #194 revealed an active physician's order dated 7/12/23 to administer lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet twice a day for restlessness. The medication was scheduled to be administered every 12 hours, at 9:00 a.m., and 9:00 p.m. Staff M had administered the lorazepam to the resident four hours before the scheduled time. There was no documentation in the clinical record Resident #194 was experiencing any restlessness and the physician was contacted and authorized the administration of the lorazepam outside of the scheduled time. Review of the clinical record for Resident #88 revealed an active physician's order dated 7/1/23 for alprazolam once a day at bedtime for anxiety. The medication was scheduled to be administered every evening at 8:00 p.m. RN Staff M had administered the alprazolam to the resident three hours prior to the scheduled time. The clinical record lacked documentation of behavior to support the early administration. There was no documentation the physician was contacted and had authorized the early administration of the alprazolam. On 8/2/23 at 6:30 p.m., the Administrator who is the risk manager, and the Regional Nurse Consultant said RN Staff M, was suspended pending investigation. They said they were not sure if the situation was drug diversion or medicating without orders and had contacted the police. The administrator said she did not know why the discontinued controlled substances were still in the medication carts. On 8/3/23 at 10:07 a.m., the DON said she could not explain why the narcotics were kept in the medications carts several weeks after they were discontinued. She said the discontinued narcotics would be brought to the DON for destruction. The DON said, I cannot control everything. Best practice we know they should not have been in the cart. It is an expectation that when medication is discontinued you bring to the DON. The DON verified she has been employed at the facility since April 2023 and she has not sought out discontinued narcotics but has waited for staff to bring them to her. The DON said, moving forward I will be going to those carts every day. The DON confirmed when she receives discontinued narcotics, she places them with the declining inventory log paper into the double locked cabinet in her office. The DON said she did not know what was currently in her cabinet and had no means of reconciling if what was in the cabinet matched medications which had been discontinued at facility. On 8/3/23 10:55 a.m., during a telephone interview the consultant pharmacist said he comes to the facility every four to six weeks, but it was not a scheduled visit. The pharmacist said it was the responsibility of the nursing team to collect and secure discontinued narcotics until he is at the facility for destruction. The pharmacist and the pharmacy technicians do not remove discontinued medications from the medication carts.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, staff interviews, resident records review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Two nurses and 25 opportunities were...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, resident records review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Two nurses and 25 opportunities were observed. Six medication errors were identified, resulting in a 24% medication error rate. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revised 5/3/2022 which states, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection . 11. (b) Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician. On 8/2/23 at 8:04 a.m., observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff H, administer seven different scheduled medications to Resident #40. The physician's orders included Cyclobenzaprine HCl Tablet 10 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth three times a day related to chronic pain syndrome. LPN Staff H did not administer the Cyclobenzaprine. She said the medication was not available, and she'll have to reorder it. On 8/2/23 at 8:20 a.m., LPN Staff H administering scheduled medications to Resident #55, including Aspiring 325 mg, one tablet; Citalopram Hydrobromide 20 mg, one tablet and Furosemide 20 mg, one tablet. Review of the clinical record revealed orders for Dexamethasone 6 mg tablet once a day for two days for COVID-19, Famotidine tablet 10 mg once a day for indigestion, Labetalol HCl 100 mg tablet, 1 tablet twice a day for hypertension (high blood pressure), Incruse Ellipta 62.5 mcg (micrograms)/ACT inhaler 1 puff once a day for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Depakene Solution 250 mg/ml (milliliter) 10 ml 2 times a day for mood disorder. LPN Staff H said the resident returned to the facility the previous afternoon into evening. She said her medications had not been ordered so she was unable to administer all the ordered medications. On 8/3/23 at 10:07 a.m., the Director of Nursing said she would be working with the staff for improvement.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0805 (Tag F0805)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with chewing or swallowing problems were served diets in a form to meet their individualized needs as prescribed by thei...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with chewing or swallowing problems were served diets in a form to meet their individualized needs as prescribed by their physician for 2 (Resident #58 and #61) of 9 residents reviewed. This failure could potentially cause inadequate nutritional intake or swallowing concerns. The findings included: The facility dietary guideline titled: Texture Progression stated Pureed: all foods must be presented in a form that is homogenous and cohesive in nature, e.g. foods should have a pudding or mousse like consistency. Most foods would be pureed and/or strained to ensure a smooth cohesive consistency without lumps. On 7/31/23 at 11:54 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff Q was observed feeding Resident #58 a pureed diet. The blueberry muffin was not pureed into a homogenous smooth texture. The CNA stated, those look like blueberries, its chunky. Photographic evidence obtained On 8/1/23 at 12:23 p.m., Resident #61 and Resident #58 were observed eating lunch. Both Residents had orders for a pureed diet and received pureed mixed vegetable with multiple seed like substances. The texture was chunky not a smooth, even texture. Photographic evidence obtained. CNA staff F agreed the pureed vegetable was chunky, not smooth. On 8/1/23 at 12:32 p.m., The Senior Regional Director of Culinary Services observed the food and stated it was not what he would have expected to see for pureed. On 8/1/23 at approximately 1:30 p.m., the cook stated spinach was the vegetable on the menu and he stated spinach was difficult to puree so he used a combination of butter beans and lima beans. On 8/2/23 at 1:21 p.m., Speech Therapist Staff S stated typically puree should be a smooth consistency without texture. There should not be any chunks, it should be a smooth consistency. On 8/3/23 at 3:33 p.m., the Director of Food and Nutrition Services stated she was concerned about the texture of the pureed vegetable and verified the pureed blueberry muffin served to Resident #58 at lunch time on 7/31/23 was left over from breakfast and was not a smooth consistency.
May 2023 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0660 (Tag F0660)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have documentati...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have documentation of an effective discharge planning to ensure a safe transition to the post discharge setting for 1 (Resident #850) of 3 sampled discharged residents. The findings included: The facility's policy and procedure for discharge planning process with a revised date of 4/25/23 noted, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions . An active individualized discharge care plan will address, at a minimum: a. Discharge destination, with assurances the destination meets the resident's health/safety needs and preferences. b. Offer other, more suitable, options of locations that are equipped to meet the needs of the resident. Document any discussions related to the options presented. c. Document refusals of other options that could meet the resident's needs. An active individualized discharge care plan will address, at a minimum: a. Discharge destination, with assurances the destination meets the resident's health/safety needs and preferences. b. Identified needs, such as medical, nursing, equipment, educational, or psychosocial needs. c. Caregiver/support person availability and the resident's or caregiver's/support person's capacity and capability to perform required care. d. Resident's goals of care and treatment preferences. Education needs, as identified in the discharge plan, will be provided to the resident and/or family member prior to discharge. Review of the clinical record for Resident #850 revealed an admission date of 10/5/22 with diagnoses including alcohol dependence with withdrawal; generalized weakness; unspecified dementia, Schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder, mood disorder and Wernicke's encephalopathy (type of brain injury caused by the lack of vitamin B 1 which may result from alcohol abuse). The resident's care plan initiated on 10/21/22 and revised on 4/7/23 noted the resident and representative express the desire for placement in the community at an assisted living facility. Interventions included family involvement in discharge process, anticipate the resident's needs, and services, provide written and verbal instructions to the resident and family for his level of understanding. Review of the progress notes revealed Resident #850 received psychiatry services. On 4/11/23 the psychiatrist documented diagnostic assessment and plan, Major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate; Generalized anxiety disorder. The medications included Citalopram (antidepressant) 20 milligrams daily, Depakote 250 milligrams twice a day for bipolar and mood disorder. The practitioner noted, As per collected information and interview, it appears that patient is doing well overall. The symptoms are causing no or at times only mild distress. As patient is on psych meds, I considered gradual dose reduction (GDR). Based on history, it appears that patient will not be able to tolerate GDR and will likely become unstable (exacerbation of underlying psychiatric disorders that are mentioned in diagnosis section) if medications are reduced. Therefore, I feel patient is on minimal effective dosages of psychotropic medications to maintain functional status. GDR is therefore contraindicated at this time and so GDR was not performed today. We will do follow up appointment as needed . Plan of action: Ordered labs: Primary psych provider ordered Depakote related labs that is CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel), Depakote level in one week and repeat labs every three months. Dx (diagnosis: Mood disorder). On 4/14/23 at 2:53 p.m., the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) documented a late entry note with an effective date of 4/14/23 at 8:56 a.m., which noted Resident #850 had a primary diagnosis of dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and a history of alcoholism. The APRN documented, The patient is requesting discharge home. Dr. [name] had an extensive conversation with the patient. I had an extensive conversation with the patient. The administrator had an extensive conversation with the Patient. The patient is requesting to discharge home to the Salvation Army. He will be going to his sister's house in North Carolina for several months then will return back to Florida. At this time the patient is able to make his own decisions, he is alert and oriented, and he is requesting to discharge to the Salvation Army with his belongings, and his medications. No additional prescriptions will be written, as the patient will need to find a PCP (Primary Care Physician) within 7-14 days . The patient is alert and oriented X3 (Person, place, and time) and although has some episodes of confusion, is aware of his surroundings, and is able to go home if he so chooses. The Discharge return not anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 4/14/23 noted Resident #850's cognition was intact. The resident was discharged to the community (private home/apartment, board/care, assisted living, group home). Resident #850 required supervision for activities of daily living, including bed mobility, transfer, walking in room, walking in corridor, dressing, eating, toilet use, personal hygiene, and bathing. On 4/24/23, review of the clinical record failed to reveal documentation of an evaluation of the resident's needs to ensure a safe discharge, including a post discharge plan of care, support needed and availability of support person, instructions, and arrangements for necessary follow up care, including post-discharge medical services. There was no documentation Resident #850 was discharged with his medications, and instructions provided related to the medications. On 4/25/23 at 8:50 a.m., the Social Service Director said Resident #850 was alert and oriented, and competent to leave the skilled nursing facility. She said the Salvation Army had space and the resident was ok with the decision to be discharged to the Salvation Army. She felt it was a safe discharge for the resident. She said she was aware the resident had mental health issues. The Social Service Director said she spoke to the Salvation Army and collaborated with them. They offer a multitude of services for people with mental health issues therefore she did not have to make any post discharge arrangements for the resident. She said she discussed the discharge with the Interdisciplinary team, and if not documented she still made it known to her colleagues and communicated via email. The Social Service Director provided a copy of an email dated 4/14/23 at 12:59 p.m., addressed to several staff members, including the Unit Manager, the Director of Nursing, the Assistant Director of Nursing, and the Administrator. The subject of the email was, [Resident #850] (early release d/c (discharge) TODAY). The email read, Oh, GOOD NEWS!!! Resident stated his daughter DID drop off his ID/Debit Card; He is good to be d/c TODAY!!! I will call for a taxi to pick him up by 2pm, since he is eating lunch now. First come first served (first 15 people) to get a bed . On 4/25/23 at 9:35 a.m., the Social Service Director said, We as a group did not document a discharge plan of care or a discharge summary. She added she had three other discharges that week and did not have time to document what she had done for Resident #850. On 4/26/23 at 9:39 a.m., in a telephone interview the Salvation Army Director said the facility was a no touch shelter. No one who requires supervision can reside in the shelter. They do not provide any supervision or medical assistance.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, policy review, family member, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to schedule...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, policy review, family member, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to schedule the necessary orthopedic follow up care within specified timeframe for 1 (Resident #1011) of 2 residents reviewed who sustained a fracture at the facility. The findings included: The facility policy titled Provision of Physician Ordered Services, revised 1/2023 stated the policy is to provide a reliable process for the proper and consistent provision of physician ordered services according to professional standards of quality. The policy explanation and compliance guidelines include the following: 1. Facility will maintain a schedule of diagnostic tests in accordance with the physician orders. 2. Qualified nursing personnel will submit timely requests for physician ordered services (laboratory, radiology, consultations) to the appropriate entity. 3. Qualified nursing personnel will receive and review the diagnostic reports or consults and communicate the results to the ordering physician, Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant within 24 hours of receipt. 4. Documentation of consultations, diagnostic test, the results, and date/time of physician notification will be maintained in the resident's clinical record. 5. In instances where diagnostic testing or consultations are not available to be performed on site or the physician has requested services be performed at and off-site facility, this facility will work with the resident and their family to secure appropriate transportation arrangements for such appointments. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #1011 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an assessment reference date of 3/10/23 noted the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Resident #1011 required physical assistance of one person for activity of daily living, including bed mobility and transfer. Review of the facility's incidents and incidents investigations revealed on 3/21/23 at approximately 7:00 a.m., Resident #1011 complained of left thumb pain to the nurse. The left thumb was swollen, dark black in color. The resident was sent to the local hospital for evaluation and treatment of the left thumb, and was diagnosed with a left thumb fracture. On 4/24/23, review of the hospital progress note, and discharge instructions dated 3/21/23 located in the clinical record noted to specific instructions to follow up with an orthopedic specialist in three days. The discharge instructions listed the name, address, phone number and fax number of the orthopedic specialist. The clinical record lacked documentation of a follow up appointment with an orthopedic specialist within three days as specified on 3/21/23 in the discharge instructions from the hospital. On 4/24/23 at 10:53 a.m., Resident #1011 was observed in a wheelchair with a splint on the bed. The resident said he was seen at the hospital, and they gave him a splint for his thumb. He said he was supposed to follow up with another physician for his broken thumb. On 4/26/23 at 8:57 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) staff M verified Resident #1011 had not had a follow up with the orthopedic specialist since the discharge from the hospital on 3/21/23. She said all nurses are responsible to schedule follow up appointment. She said the floor nurse who reviewed the discharge paperwork should have scheduled the appointment. LPN Staff M said she will schedule a follow up appointment with an orthopedic specialist for May 1, 2023. On 4/26/23 at 10:33 am, the Director of Nursing (DON) said the follow up appointment should have been done by March 24, 2023. The Unit Manager or assigned nurse was responsible to schedule the appointment. She said she was not aware the follow up appointment had not been scheduled. On 4/27/23 at 4:45 p.m., Resident #1011's daughter said her father was supposed to follow up with the orthopedic specialist within three days of discharge on [DATE] and the facility still had not arranged for the consult for his broken thumb.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, resident's family and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #850) of 3 discharge sampled residents with a history of alcohol abuse disorder received appro...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, resident's family and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #850) of 3 discharge sampled residents with a history of alcohol abuse disorder received appropriate supervision, treatment, and services, to maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial wellbeing. The findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #850 revealed an admission date of 10/5/22 with diagnoses including alcohol dependence with withdrawal; generalized weakness; unspecified dementia, Schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder, mood disorder and Wernicke's encephalopathy (Neurological symptoms caused by vitamin B1 deficiency). The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/06/2022 documented Resident #850's cognition was intact. The resident was experiencing delusions (misconceptions or beliefs that are firmly held, contrary to reality). The MDS noted the resident was receiving antidepressants, and antipsychotic medications. Review of the Medical Professional progress notes revealed on 10/10/22 the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) documented the resident was being admitted status post hospitalization for acute alcoholic intoxication. He sustained a fall with a wound to his right arm. Significant history of alcohol use and abuse. The care plan initiated on 10/24/22 noted the resident had a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, anxiety, dementia, with history of alcohol abuse, and alcohol dependence withdrawal. The resident was at risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic drugs. The interventions included a gradual dose reduction as ordered, monitor for continued need of medication as related to behavior and mood, monitor for changes in mental status and functional level and report to physician as indicated, monitor for side effects, and consult physician or pharmacist as needed, obtain psych evaluation as ordered, psychiatry services, and/or psychological services as needed and ordered. The care plan did not include provision for behavioral health services, such as individual counseling to address the resident's diagnosis of alcohol abuse. On 11/13/22 the physician documented the resident has underlying dementia plus alcohol abuse in the past. He also has limited depressive disorder. Social history: history of alcohol abuse. The physician documented to continue care in the dementia unit. The diagnoses listed on the physician order summary report included alcohol dependence with withdrawal. The physician orders dated 10/5/22 and 11/18/22 included psychiatry consult for evaluation and follow up as needed. On 3/13/23 the nurse documented the resident became agitated. He threw a plate during dinner and began walking up hallway with his fist balled up. He expressed he was upset because his room was changed. Staff attempted to redirect him by calling his daughter. He began cursing at the daughter via phone. Male staff arrived and resident was directed to going to his room. Resident was requesting rum and coke. The nurse practitioner gave order to give Haldol (antipsychotic) 5 milligrams intramuscularly. On 4/25/23 at 3:30 p.m., the Medical Director said Haldol was appropriate for alcohol induced delirium. Review of the psychiatry progress notes revealed the resident was evaluated by psychiatry on 12/21/22, 1/3/23, 2/7/23, 2/28/23, 3/14/23, 4/7/23, and 4/11/23. The progress notes listed diagnostic assessment and plan for recurrent Major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. The progress notes did notes did not include a specific plan of action for alcohol abuse. On 4/25/23 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the psychiatry Advanced Practice Registered Nurse said during each visit she addressed the history of alcohol abuse with Resident #850 but did not document her evaluation. She said she was not aware on 3/13/23 the resident was requesting rum and coke. She said she would have liked to be notified. She would have addressed it and ordered Naltrexone (medication used to treat alcohol use disorder). On 4/25/23 at 4:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing provided the survey team with a copy of Resident #850's Medication Review Report and highlighted the order for Thiamine (Vitamin B 1)100 milligrams tablet one tablet by mouth one time a day for alcohol abuse. She said the Thiamine was the intervention implemented by the facility to address the resident's alcohol abuse. On 4/11/23 the psychiatrist documented the resident was on one on one supervision trying to get out of the building. He documented as per collected information the resident was doing well overall. The symptoms are causing no or at times only mild distress. As the resident was on psych medications, he considered gradual dose reduction. Based on history it appeared the resident would not be able to tolerate a gradual dose reduction and would likely become unstable. On 4/14/23 Resident #850 was discharged to the Salvation Army. There was no documentation in the clinical record at the time of the survey the facility offered or arranged for services or support to assist Resident #850 coping with alcohol abuse. On 4/24/23 at 4:20 p.m., during a telephone interview, Resident #850's daughter said her father had a long history of alcohol abuse, with multiple admissions to the hospital related to alcohol abuse. She said she spoke to several people at the facility, including the Social Worker, the Director of Nursing, and the Administrator and begged them not to discharge her father. She said he was not able to take care of himself, but the facility said he was his own person therefore she did not have a say in their decision to discharge the resident. They said her father was allowed to make bad decisions. She said he only stayed at the Salvation Army for one night, slept in the streets on Saturday and Sunday. He got drunk, got picked up in the streets and sent to the hospital. She said he was still at the hospital until they could safely discharge him. Review of the local hospital initial psychiatric consultation report dated 4/18/23 at 10:06 p.m., noted Resident #850 had multiple diagnoses including alcohol use disorder. He was found drinking, was later kicked out of that long-term care facility, and referred to the Salvation Army. Since that time, the patient has been drinking heavily, has been going to bars and spending a significant amount of money on alcohol. On evaluation, the patient states, sometimes I feel confused. The physician documented, Based upon this evaluation, which was performed over telemedicine, the patient does meet criteria for treatment under the [NAME] Act (Involuntary admission) petition. At this point, it appears he also lacks medical decision making capacity. He will almost certainly needs to be placed into the care of others in assisted living facility or nursing home .
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0744 (Tag F0744)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement individualized interventions, as well as revise the care...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement individualized interventions, as well as revise the care plan with appropriate interventions, including meaningful activities to address dementia care needs for 2 (Resident #1000 and #1001) of 6 sampled residents with known wandering behavior. The findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #1000 was a vulnerable [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1000 resided on the secured unit for increased supervision. Resident #1000's diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease, Paranoid Schizophrenia, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, and other mixed anxiety disorder. The care plan for Resident #1000 included a focus on potential to be physically aggressive behavior related to Anger and Dementia, Paranoia with schizophrenia. The interventions were not individualized to prevent unsafe wandering and avoid resident-to-resident altercations. Review of the clinical record for Resident #1000 revealed the resident was involved in multiple incidents of resident to resident altercations (1/8/23, 2/14/23, 3/13/23, and 4/3/23) when she wandered unsupervised into other residents' rooms. The care plan did not include a person centered program for activities. On 4/28/23, a review of group activities and one-to-one activities for the last 30 days prior to survey showed no documentation the resident was offered or participated in activities. On 4/28/23 11:46 a.m., the Activities Director verified Resident #1000 had nothing care planned for activities. The Activities Director said there should be one on one activities for residents who don't attend group activities, and these should be documented. On 5/1/23 at 2:53 p.m., Resident #1000's daughter said her mother wanders the halls frequently and no one had asked her about her mother's interests or what she liked to do. Resident #1000's daughter said she was not aware of staff doing any activities with her. 2. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #1001 was a vulnerable adult admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders. Resident #1001 resided in the secured unit of the facility for increased supervision. The Care Plan for Resident #1001 has a focus on aggressive behavior, easily agitated, entering other residents' rooms without permission, physically aggressive, restlessness, verbally aggressive. He tends to refuse his medication at times, he also refuses Hygiene/Bathing frequently. He tends to smear feces on bedroom wall at times. The care plan did not include person-centered interventions were not person-centered interventions to prevent the resident from wandering, entering other resident rooms or avoiding resident to resident altercations. Documentation in the clinical record revealed on 4/23/23 at 8:00 a.m., Resident #1001 was found in Resident #1008's room. Resident #1001 struck Resident #1008 in the face. The care plan for Resident #1001 also revealed nothing was care planned for activities. On 4/28/23, a review of the activity documentation showed the resident participated in five group activities, and three one to one activities in the last 30 days. On 4/28/23 11:46 a.m., the Activities Director verified Resident #1001 had nothing care planned for activities. On 5/1/23 2:57 p.m., Resident #1001's significant other said he had not been getting involved with activities or other people and that had become normal for him. She said Resident #1001 could no longer hold a conversation and had shrunk into himself and lashes out. She said the facility had never discussed things he would like to do but, but everything he used to like he doesn't like anymore.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0838 (Tag F0838)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to revise The Facility Assessment to include the assessment and resources needed to safely care for residents with severe cogni...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to revise The Facility Assessment to include the assessment and resources needed to safely care for residents with severe cognitive impairment in the secured memory care unit with known unsafe wandering and aggressive physical behaviors. The findings included: On 4/24/23 from 9:40 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. during the initial tour of the facility, seven residents were observed wandering aimlessly throughout the secured memory care unit hallways. Residents were observed standing near and attempting to open exit doors without staff redirection. Review of the facility's incidents log revealed three resident-to-resident incidents in January 2023, 15 resident-to-resident incidents in February 2023, 10 resident-to-resident incidents in March 2023, and as of 4/28/23 seven resident-to-resident incidents in April 2023. Review of the clinical record of a sample of six cognitively impaired residents with known aggressive behaviors residing in the memory care unit of the facility from January 2023, through April 2023 revealed a total of 14 resident-to-resident altercations involving the six residents. Three of the six residents reviewed had three or more incidents of unsafe wandering into other residents' rooms resulting in physical altercations. Review of the Facility assessment completed on 3/23/23 showed the facility identified 56 residents with behavioral health needs. There was no specific documentation on the facility assessment as to what behavioral needs these residents have and how the facility would meet the residents' needs. The facility documented on the facility assessment they would Manage medical conditions and medications related to issues causing psychiatric symptoms and behavior, identify and implement interventions to help support individuals with issues as dealing with anxiety, care of someone with cognitive impairment, care of individuals with depression, trauma/PTSD, other psychiatric diagnoses . The facility documented they would, Provide Person Centered/directed care: Psycho/social/spiritual support: The facility included they would, Provide opportunities for social activities/life enrichment (individual, small group, community) .Prevent abuse and neglect. There was no specific documentation as to how the facility would provide social activities specific to residents with severe dementia and aggressive behaviors. The facility assessment showed no documentation they determined the number of staff and competency needed to provide the necessary care and services. The facility documented under Facility Resources Needed to Provide Competent Support and care for our Resident direct care staff would be provided by staffing ratios as per Florida regulations and center acuity. The facility assessment did not identify who would be responsible for assessing the acuity levels to ensure sufficient and competent staffing to meet the needs of the residents. The assessment did not document how often acuity measures would be obtained and what process or system would be used to measure the acuity levels. There was no documentation on the facility assessment to show increased needs for supervision, activities, and resources to prevent resident wandering and resident to resident altercations. There is no specific staff education documented on the facility assessment to initiate interventions to prevent resident wandering and resident to resident altercations. Under Staff training/education and competencies the facility documented, Attachment: Education in-services/Mandatories. The attachment was the facility's education calendar. On 4/25/23 at 10:15 a.m., a joint meeting was held with the Administrator, the Director of Nursing, the Medical Director, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services, and the Regional Director of operation. The Administrator said he was aware of the multiple incidents of resident-to-resident altercations in the memory care unit. He said in March 2023, the facility initiated an activity program with mid-morning and mid-afternoon activities to decrease unsafe wandering and prevent incidents of resident-to-resident altercations for residents with known aggressive behaviors. The Administrator provided the survey team with a facility, Quality Improvement Initiative dated March 2023 (no specific date), Target Measure: Memory Care unit programming. The document noted the stated problem was, Programming in Memory Care unit, engaging all staff to participate in providing short interval activities/programming to engage residents to decrease wandering and resident to resident negative interactions. The goal for compliance was listed as, The goal to reach compliance is to reduce the resident to resident negative altercations by 50% within 60 days. The action steps included: 1. Identify evening small group activities designed to calm and relax residents for preparing for bed. 2. Review residents at high risk for resident to resident negative interaction and high fall risk on the unit. 3. Educate evening CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) on gathering high risk residents in the common area prior to bed with a CNA completing calming group activities. The remaining CNAs on the unit will come get the residents one at a time to get cleaned up and settled in bed while the high risk residents are being monitored . On 4/28/23 at 10:15 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff C stated she had not had any training to provide care for people with Alzheimer's or dementia. She said, we have had some general information about the disease and what it is. Nothing about how to care for the residents, what to do with them, or provide safety. She stated she had not been given any suggestions for activities or interventions we just have to figure it out. We get ignored a lot, that's one of my main problems, no one listens. We could have avoided a lot of altercations and falls if they had listened to us. Staff C said she can tell a nurse there is something wrong with someone and they brush it off and two days later they start falling. On 4/28/23 at 10:44 a.m. Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse and Unit Manager said when residents wander in and out of rooms we are supposed to ask why, look for causes, they may be hungry, thirsty, or might need to use the bathroom they might be in pain. I don't know what the CNAs on the memory care unit have been taught. I don't feel they have been educated to work in this unit. The CNAs and nurses need major education about what to do, how to communicate. Staff get upset with the resident because they ask the same questions over and over. I've been shocked that the staff don't know interventions or how to work with dementia residents. On 5/1/23 at 3:10 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked how she assessed and what system was in place to determine resident acuity. The DON reviewed the staffing information which showed the facility staffed the facility with the minimum state required number of two CNA hours, and one Licensed Nursing hour per day. The DON said she would have to get back with the survey team with information. On 5/1/23 at 4:30 p.m., the DON provided a blank copy of a form for determining root causes of incidents of pain and falls. She stated this was the form she had been using to determine acuity since she was hired in March of 2023 year. On 5/2/23 at approximately 2:30 p.m. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services verified all direct care staff had not been completed Hand-to-Hand dementia training the facility utilizes. The [NAME] President said the facility was in the process of teaching module 3 of the hand-to-hand module to all staff working on the memory care unit. She said they were teaching Module 3 to staff because the module covered residents wandering. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services said all agency staff would be required to have Module 3 of the hand-to-hand dementia training. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services verified the facility had added a hall monitor on 4/27/23 to ensure wandering residents did not enter other resident's rooms. The [NAME] President of Clinical Services said they had added an addition hall monitor (two hall monitors) on the secured memory unit after another incident of resident-to-resident physical altercation occurred on 5/1/23 when a resident wandered into another resident's room and struck the resident residing in the room. On 5/2/23 at 4:40 p.m., the Administrator said he could not provide any documentation staffing had been increased to provide individualized activities to decrease resident to resident abuse on the secured memory care unit in the midmorning or late afternoon.
Jan 2023 5 deficiencies 2 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the facility's policies and procedures, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the facility's policies and procedures, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of corrective actions implemented related to adequate supervision of cognitively impaired residents at risk for elopement and exit seeking behaviors. Resident #800 was a vulnerable [AGE] year-old female who resided on the secured unit (provides specialized care for people with memory issues) of the facility for increased supervision. On 11/27/22 (unknown time after 3:30 p.m.) Resident #800 who was ambulatory, walked out of the secured unit and the facility without staff knowledge. The resident was found by local law enforcement on 11/27/22 at 10:16 p.m., approximately 2.3 miles from the facility. Resident #800 traveled alone in the afternoon and evening along a busy six lanes highway and crossing busy intersections. Resident #800 was missing and wandering alone for approximately six and a half hours. Resident #800 had a likelihood for serious harm, injury, or death, due to risk for serious injury from a fall, being hit by a car from crossing busy streets with a speed limit of 35 miles per hour, getting lost or becoming the victim of a serious crime. On 11/28/22 the facility developed a performance improvement plan with action steps to prevent further unsafe wandering and elopement of residents identified at risk for elopement with exit seeking behavior. The facility failed to fully implement and monitor the corrective actions to determine the effectiveness of the process implemented to prevent further unsafe wandering and elopements. The failure to have an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program resulted in a determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at a scope and severity of isolated (J) starting on 11/27/22. The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 1/24/23 at 5:18 p.m. and provided the IJ templates. There were 57 other residents the facility identified at risk for elopement. The findings included: Cross reference to F689 and F835. The facility's 2022 Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan stated: The QAPI plan . is designed to establish and maintain an organized facility-wide program that is data-driven and utilizes a proactive approach to improving quality of care and services throughout the facility. Address gaps in systems or processes . Establish clear expectations around safety, quality, rights, choice and respect. Systematic Analysis and Systemic Action. The QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) Committee monitors progress to ensure that interventions or actions are implemented and effective in making and sustaining improvements . The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy (no implementation date) stated, Program Systematic Analysis and Systemic Action. The facility takes actions aimed at performance improvement as documented in QAA committee meeting minutes and action plans. Performance/success of the actions will be monitored and documented in subsequent QAA Committee or sub-committee meetings . The facility's Administrator job description signed on 6/20/22 noted the Administrator is responsible for the QA (Quality Assurance) program. Review of the facility's incidents, and investigations revealed on 11/27/22 sometimes after 3:30 p.m., to 3:40 p.m., Resident #800 who was cognitively impaired, and ambulatory walked out of the secured unit and the facility without staff knowledge. The resident was found by local law enforcement on 11/27/22 at 10:16 p.m. Resident #800 was 2.3 miles from the facility and traveled alone in the afternoon and evening along a busy six lanes highway and crossed busy intersections. The facility completed an investigation and determined Resident #800 tailgated a visitor through the front door on 11/27/22 due to an increased number of visitors during the holiday weekend. On 11/28/22 the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) team, including the Director of Nursing, and Administrator participated in an ad hoc (unplanned) meeting to discuss Resident #800's elopement. The QAPI team developed a plan that included to assure residents safety with focused areas to include residents at risk for elopement. The action steps included initiation and continued staff education on elopement policy and drills. New process implemented for visitors to be provided visitor name tag. On 1/18/23 at 9:50 a.m., the receptionist said on 11/27/22 he had to leave the facility at 2:00 p.m. and notified the nurse supervisor who instructed him to leave the key fob (opens the door remotely) on the counter at the reception. The receptionist said when he returned an hour later, the reception desk was unattended, and the key fob was on the counter. He said Resident #998 used the key fob to let him back in the building. On 1/18/23 at 2:13 p.m., in a telephone interview, former Resident #920 said on 11/27/22 when Resident #800 went missing, he used the key fob left unattended at the reception to let his visitor out. He sat outside for a few minutes and put the key fob back on the desk. He said he did not see the receptionist at any time when he had the key fob or returned it. Resident #920 said it was early evening. On 1/18/23 at 4:32 p.m., in a telephone interview the nurse supervisor said on 11/27/22 the receptionist told her he had to leave. She could not remember the exact time. She told him she would be right up. She said she could not remember telling him to leave the key fob unattended. She sat at the reception for approximately 15 to 20 minutes then left to help a resident. When she came back, the receptionist was already back. He was gone for maybe an hour. On 1/19/23 at 2:00 p.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing said she was responsible to ensure all staff were educated on the corrective actions after Resident #800's elopement. She provided 20 in-service education sign-in sheets from 11/28/22 through 1/16/23. Two of the 20 sign-in sheets dated 12/8/22 did not document a topic for the in-service. One of the in-service education sheets only noted the participants were educated on Abuse, Neglect, and exploitation. Six of the sign-in sheets noted the topic was elopement policy/drills/abuse and neglect/Door codes not to be given to visitors. The in-services did not address the new process implemented for visitors to be provided with visitor name tag and ensure visitors sign-in and out. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said the facility utilizes agency nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). She said she educated the agency staff on the new process during the general orientation but did not document. On 1/19/23 at 3:40 p.m., during a review of the QAPI program, the Administrator said as part of the corrective actions, staff was to make sure each visitor is provided a visitor sticker. He said staff was to make sure all visitors sign out before letting them out of the door. The Administrator said Resident #800 tailgated a visitor out of the facility when the front desk was attended. He said Resident #800 did not elope when the key fob was left unattended on the counter hence the implementation of the visitors' stickers, and making sure all visitors sign out to ensure no resident tailgate visitors. Review of the facility's visitor's log with the Administrator from 11/28/22 through 1/19/23 revealed approximately 364 visitors signed in but did not sign out when leaving the facility. The Administrator verified staff did not ensure each visitor signed out of the facility as per their corrective actions. On 1/19/23 at 3:00 p.m., review of the visitors' log from 11/20/22 through 11/27/22 did not show documentation of increased visitors on the secured unit. On 11/20/22, and 1/22/22, one visitor was documented on the log for the secured unit. On 11/21/22, and 11/24/22: 12 visitors were documented on the log. On 11/23/22, nine visitors were documented on the log. On 11/27/22, four visitors were documented on the log. The Administrator said the QAPI team met again on 12/21/22 to discuss the results of audits and corrective actions. He could not provide documentation of tracking and evaluation of interventions implemented to determine if corrective actions were successful to prevent further unsafe wandering and elopement. There was no audit of the visitor's log to ensure staff followed the process to prevent the unsafe wandering of the facility for residents at risk for elopement and exit seeking. The Administrator said, We have had no other elopement. If you're asking if our plan has worked, no one had gotten out. On 1/19/23 at 5:10 p.m., the Regional Director of operations said the facility did not have an analysis of the information collected from the audits to determine if the process in place had achieved 100 % compliance. On 1/23/23 at 11:05 a.m., the Administrator said he determined Resident #800 tailgated a visitor out of the facility due to the increased number of visitors during the holiday weekend. He said, I never counted the number of visitors coming into the building during the investigation to determine if there was an actual increase of visitors. I just reached the conclusion based on the observation of more traffic in the facility that day.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement processes to ensure adequate supervi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement processes to ensure adequate supervision of 1 (Resident #800) of 51 cognitively impaired resident at risk for elopement to prevent unsafe wandering and elopement. The facility also failed to ensure adequate interventions to prevent fall with major injury for 1 (Resident #850) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Resident #800 was a vulnerable [AGE] year-old female who resided on the secured unit (provides specialized care for people with memory issues) of the facility for increased supervision. On 11/27/22 (unknown time after 3:30 p.m.) Resident #800 who was ambulatory, walked out of the secured unit and the facility without staff knowledge. The resident was found by local law enforcement on 11/27/22 at 10:16 p.m., approximately 2.3 miles from the facility. Resident #800 traveled alone in the afternoon and evening along a busy six lanes highway and crossing busy intersections. Resident #800 was missing and wandering alone for approximately six and a half hours. Resident #800 had a likelihood for serious harm, injury, or death, due to risk for serious injury from a fall, being hit by a car from crossing busy streets with a speed limit of 35 miles per hour, getting lost or becoming the victim of a serious crime. The failure to ensure adequate supervision to protect vulnerable residents from unsafe wandering and elopement resulted in a determination of Immediate Jeopardy at a scope and severity of isolated (J) starting on 11/27/22. The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy of 1/24/23 at 5:18 p.m. and provided the IJ templates. The Immediate Jeopardy was ongoing. There were 57 other residents the facility identified at risk for elopement. The findings included: Cross reference to F835 and F867. 1. The facility's Elopements and Wandering Residents policy with a date implemented of 11/27/22, and reviewed/revised of 1/11/23 noted, This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering and elopement risk. Interventions to increase staff awareness of the resident's risk, modify the resident's behavior, or to minimize risks associated with hazards will be added to the resident's care plan and communicated to appropriate staff. Adequate supervision will be provided to help prevent accidents and elopement. Staff to confirm doors are secure and no additional individuals exited behind them when exiting secured units. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #800 was a vulnerable [AGE] year-old female admitted to the secured unit of the facility on 7/29/22. Diagnoses included Dementia, Bipolar disorder (Mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), and Schizophrenia (Mental health condition that affects how someone thinks, feels and behaves). On 7/29/22, the facility completed and elopement evaluation which noted the resident had a medical diagnosis of dementia and cognitive impairment, a history of wandering in the past three months, but has not had exit seeking behaviors in the past month. The subsequent elopement assessments, dated 9/11/22, and 10/29/22 noted Resident #800 has had exit seeking behaviors in the past month (tailgating, packing belongings, and/or actively exit seeking). The assessments noted the resident was ambulatory. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a reference date 8/5/22 noted Resident #800 required supervision with set up assistance to ambulate on the unit. The admission noted the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The care plan initiated on 9/11/22 noted Resident #800 was at risk for elopement/Exit seeking, aimless wandering due to cognition, and had the potential to approach exit doors. The goal was for the resident not leave the facility unattended. The interventions included to monitor the resident for tailgating when visitors are in the building, and for active exit seeking behavior each shift. The care plan did not describe the process to alert staff of visitors on the unit to monitor the resident for tailgating. Review of the progress notes revealed a late entry dated 11/27/22 at 8:36 p.m., noting the attending physician was notified Resident #800 had eloped. Review of the facility's investigation dated 12/13/22 revealed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) last observed Resident #800 on 11/17/22 at approximately 3:30 p.m., to 3:40 p.m., standing in front of her door. On 11/27/22 between 4:45 p.m., and 5:00 p.m., the CNA and the nurse were not able to locate Resident #800 on the unit for dinner or her afternoon medications. The facility activated their elopement policy and procedure, notified the Administrator, the Director of Nursing and local law enforcement. The investigation noted local law enforcement returned the resident to the facility unharmed on 11/27/22 at approximately 10:30 p.m. The resident was dressed in blue jeggings (looks like a pair of skinny jeans), a three quarter length shirt and foot coverings. The investigation did not describe foot covering. Resident #800 had some discomfort in her feet and some edema (swelling). The progress note dated 11/27/22 at 10:45 p.m. noted Resident #800's feet were swollen and pink. The resident had an open area under the ball of her right foot which was not new. On 11/27/22 Registered Nurse Staff Y documented on a statement Resident #800 returned to the facility at approximately 10:30 p.m., escorted by two police officers. The resident was wearing yellow gripper socks. The facility's investigation noted, Based on review of facility visitor log the facility had more than the usual number of visitors on 11/27/22 due to the holiday weekend . Signs were present on the doors to the unit advising staff and visitors to ensure doors were securely shut behind them . As a result of the investigation facility concludes [Resident #800] likely tailgated a visitor off the unit and through the front entrance of the facility . The facility's investigation did not address the lack of adequate supervision to prevent the unsafe wandering and elopement. Review of the visitors' log from 11/20/22 through 11/27/22 did not show documentation of increased visitors on the secured unit. On 11/20/22, and 1/22/22, one visitor was documented on the log for the secured unit. On 11/21/22, and 11/24/22: 12 visitors were documented on the log. On 11/23/22, nine visitors were documented on the log. On 11/27/22, four visitors were documented on the log. The corrective actions noted on the investigation dated 12/13/22 included: The use of a Visitor tag to identify visitors in the facility. Visitors directed to return tag prior to leaving the facility when signing out on visitor's log. Staff was educated not to provide the door codes to visitors. On 1/18/23 at 9:50 a.m., the receptionist said on 11/27/22 he had to leave the facility at 2:00 p.m. and notified the nurse supervisor who instructed him to leave the key fob (opens the door remotely) on the counter at the reception. The receptionist said when he returned an hour later, the reception desk was unattended, and the key fob was on the counter. He said Resident #998 used the key fob to let him back in the building. On 1/23/23 at 1:40 p.m., Resident #998 said he was at the front desk area on 11/27/22 when he saw the receptionist outside. The key fob was unattended on the counter, and he used it to let the receptionist in the building. He said there was no staff attending the front door of the facility when he used the key fob to let the receptionist in. On 1/18/23 at 2:13 p.m., in a telephone interview, former Resident #920 said on 11/27/22 when Resident #800 went missing, he used the key fob left unattended at the reception to let his visitor out. He sat outside for a few minutes and put the key fob back on the desk. He said he did not see the receptionist at any time when he had the key fob or returned it. Resident #920 said it was early evening. On 1/18/23 at 4:32 p.m., in a telephone interview the nurse supervisor said on 11/27/22 the receptionist told her he had to leave. She could not remember the exact time. She told him she would be right up. She said she could not remember telling him to leave the key fob unattended. She sat at the reception for approximately 15 to 20 minutes then left to help a resident. When she came back, the receptionist was already back. He was gone for maybe an hour. On 1/19/23 at 3:40 p.m., the Administrator said as part of the corrective actions, staff was to make sure each visitor is provided a visitor sticker. He said staff was to make sure all visitors sign out before letting them out of the door. The Administrator said Resident #800 tailgated a visitor out of the facility when the front desk was attended. He said Resident #800 did not elope when the key fob was left unattended on the counter hence the implementation of the visitors' stickers, and making sure all visitors sign out to ensure no resident tailgate visitors. Review of the facility's visitor's log with the Administrator from 11/28/22 through 1/19/23 revealed approximately 364 visitors signed in but did not sign out when leaving the facility. The Administrator verified staff did not ensure each visitor signed out of the facility as per their corrective actions. On 1/23/23 at 11:05 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) said, I never counted the number of visitors coming into the building during the investigation to determine if there was an actual increase of visitors. I just reached the conclusion based on the observation of more traffic in the facility that day. 2. Resident #850 was a [AGE] year-old- male admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] noted Resident #850 had no pain and was not receiving any pain medications. The resident required extensive physical assistance of two persons for bed mobility, transfer. The resident was not stable moving from seated to standing position. Resident #850's care plan initiated on 10/24/22 read, At high risk for falls and fall related injury r/t [related to] Difficulty in walking, history of falls, impaired mobility, weakness, A-Fib [Atrial Fibrillation], HTN [Hypertension], Anemia, Alcohol Dependence withdrawal, Wernicke's Encephalopathy (Degenerative brain disorder). The interventions as of 10/24/22 included to ensure the call light was within reach and encourage the resident to use the call light for assistance with standing, transferring and ambulation; Needs a safe environment with even floors free from spills and/or clutter, a working and reachable call light, bed in low position. Upon the initial Therapy evaluation on 10/6/22, Resident #850 complained of pain and was not able to bear weight on his right lower extremity. Resident #850 continued to complain of pain with therapy sessions from 10/6/22 through 10/23/22. On 10/24/22, an X-ray of the right hip showed Resident #850 had a right subcapital (neck) fracture of the femur of indeterminate age. Resident #850 was transferred to the hospital and underwent a surgical repair of the fracture. Review of the facility's incident reports revealed on 11/14/22 at 4:20 a.m., Nurse walked by room and noted the resident [Resident #850] on the floor on the right back at the foot of residents[sic] bed in room [Room #]. The room had adequate lighting but there was liquid on the floor and the resident's brief was on the floor near resident. Resident was able to move extremities, but later began to c/o [complain of] increased pain to right hip. Resident states desire to go to hospital. Dr. notified Resident unable to give description. The incident report documented Resident #850 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Predisposing factors to the fall was documented as Wet floor. Predisposing Physiological Factors were documented as, Incontinent and Recent change in condition. Predisposing Situation Factors were documented as, Ambulating without assistance. On 1/20/23 at 1:10 p.m., Resident #850 was observed in his room. The resident was hard of hearing. All questions had to be written on a note pad. Resident #850 read the questions out loud and answered. Resident #850 verified he fell once since his admission. He said he was trying to get up to go to the bathroom when he fell. The resident said the call light was too far, he could not reach it to call for assistance. On 1/20/23 at approximately 2:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the interdisciplinary team determined the root cause of Resident #850's fall was he did not use his call light. The DON said other than the progress notes and the communication form he had no other documentation pertaining to an investigation of the resident's fall. The DON verified he had no documentation to show the resident's call light was within reach at the time of the fall. Resident #850 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and underwent a second surgery to his right hip. The Orthopedic Surgeon Documented on 11/15/22, . [AGE] year-old, Caucasian male recently had surgery for a femoral neck fracture with myself. He did well in the immediate postoperative period; however, he fell at his assisted living facility and sustained a periprosthetic fracture immediately below my hip replacement . I recommended removing the loose arthroplasty [joint replacement], which was now loose after the fracture .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the necessary repairs to ensure a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1(Resident #910) of 51 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the necessary repairs to ensure a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1(Resident #910) of 51 residents residing in the facility's memory care unit. The findings included: A review of Resident #905's clinical record revealed a progress note dated 1/7/23 at 7:13 a.m., which noted Resident #905 had destroyed the furniture in his room and smashed the glass window. The maintenance staff secured the window. Resident #905 was sent to the hospital on 1/7/23 at 1:19 p.m. A review of Resident #910's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to Resident #905's former room on 1/12/23 at 8:00 p.m. On 1/17/23 at 9:50 a.m., Resident #910 was observed in his room in the memory care unit. The room was dark. The window to the outside was missing the glass. It was covered with plywood. On 1/17/23 at 9:05 a.m., in an interview, the Administrator verified Resident #910 was admitted to the room with the broken and boarded window. On 1/19/23 at 9:45 a.m., observation of Resident #910's room with the Regional Director of Maintenance showed the window to the outside was repaired. The Regional Director of Maintenance said the window was replaced on 1/18/23. He confirmed it was not safe for any resident to reside in the room during the time the window was broken and covered with the plywood.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations which could constitute neglect to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #800) of 3 sampled residents. T...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations which could constitute neglect to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #800) of 3 sampled residents. The findings included: The facilities policy and procedure on Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, with revised date 10/1/22 noted neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Reporting/Response; 1) Reporting of all alleged violations to Administrator, state agency, and adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g. law enforcement when applicable) with specific timeframes: a) Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in seriously bodily injury. The facility failed to adequately supervise a cognitively impaired resident on the secured unit identified at risk for elopement and exit seeking. On 11/27/22 (unknown time after 3:30 p.m.), Resident #800 walked out of the secured unit and the facility without staff knowledge. The police found Resident #800 on 11/27/22 at 10:30 p.m., walking 2.3 miles from the facility. Review of facilities reportable shows the facility failed to submit the Federal Day 1 and Day 5 report to the Florida State Survey Agency, the Agency for Health Care Administration no call was made to the Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF), the state abuse agency. On 1/17/23 at 3:20 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), said the Interdisciplinary Team had discussed the incident involving Resident #800, and determined the elopement did not meet the criteria for an allegation of neglect. the NHA also verified the facility did not notify DCF.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to show effective coordination of care to promptly add...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to show effective coordination of care to promptly address multiple complaints of pain during therapy for 1 (Resident #850) of 3 sampled residents. The findings included: Clinical record review revealed Resident #850 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcohol withdrawal, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. On 10/6/22 a Physical Therapy evaluation documented Resident #850 was having pain in his right leg . The evaluation noted nursing was to address the pain. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] noted Resident #850 had no pain and was not receiving any pain medications. The resident required extensive physical assistance of two persons for bed mobility, transfer. The resident was not stable moving from seated to standing position. Review of the Physical Therapy progress notes revealed documentation on 10/6/22, 10/10/22, 10/11/22, 10/14/22, 10/16/22, 10/18/22, 10/19/22, 10/20/22, 10/21/22, 10/23/22, and 10/24/22 Resident #850 was experiencing pain to the right lower extremity, and nursing was to address the pain . On 10/10/22 the therapist documented nursing was to address Resident #850's pain on movement to the right lower extremity. On 10/14/22 the therapist documented, increased pain in right hip on movement, X ray taken. The clinical record lacked documentation of an X-ray of the right hip until 10/24/22, 10 days after the therapist documented an X-ray was taken. Review of the results of diagnostic testing revealed on 10/24/22 at 8:32 p.m., Resident #850 had an X-ray of both hips which showed a Right subcapital fracture of the femur age indeterminate. Resident #850 was transferred to the hospital and underwent a surgical repair of the right hip fracture. On 1/23/22, review of the facility's investigation, and witness statements related to Resident #850's right hip fracture with the Administrator revealed: On 10/24/22, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff J documented a signed statement stating, On 10/14/22 Physical Therapy reported that patient was experiencing right sided pain hip and leg. I reported to the ARNP [Staff S, Nurse Practitioner] She evaluated the patient no new orders obtained. There was no documentation in the clinical record LPN Staff J reported Resident #850's complaint of pain to Nurse Practitioner Staff S. On 1/23/22 at 2:45 p.m., Staff J verified she signed the witness statement on 10/24/22. Staff J verified the lack of documentation she reported Resident #850's complaint of right hip and leg pain to Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Staff S. On 10/25/22, the Director of therapy signed a statement which read, Patient seen on 10/14/22 for PT treatment. Patient c/o [complained of] Rt hip pain on movement-(10/10) Notified Nurse in charge [Staff J]. as per Nurse x-ray ordered. On 10/25/22 the Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant, wrote a witness statement noting Resident #850 was seen on 10/18/22 for ADL's (Activities of daily living) while seated . pt c/o [patient complained of] pain to RLE (Right lower extremity) in which RLE appeared to have a skin tear to shin . I explained to nurse [Staff J] on the unit that patient was complaining of pain to RLE. [Staff J] then advised [Staff S] of patient's pain and it was assessed. Nurse updated me on the outcome and explained that patient said at the time of the Nurse practitioner's assessment that he had no pain and only a skin tear to the shin area and appears to be ok . An undated typed statement signed by Physical Therapy Assistant, Staff U read, Patient began to complain of pain in the right lower extremity. 10/18/22 with excessive external rotation and significant discomfort with active range of motion and with all functional mobility and transfers . Review of Physical Therapy Assistant Staff U's treatment encounter dated 10/18/22 showed no documentation Resident #850 had, Excessive external rotation and significant discomfort with active range of motion, and with all functional mobility and transfers. There was no documentation the abnormalities Staff U documented on the statement were reported to the nursing staff for further evaluation. On 1/23/23 at 12:07 p.m., Advanced Practice Registered (APRN) Nurse, Staff S stated no one told her Resident #850 had been having pain in his right leg or hip and was unable to bear weight on his right lower extremity. She said, if told, she would have always aired on the side of caution, obtain an x-ray or send the resident to the emergency room to be evaluated. The APRN said she assessed Resident #850 on 10/13/22 and 10/20/22 and he showed no signs of pain. She said Resident #850 was lying in bed at the time she assessed him and would not have had pain without movement. On 1/23/22 at 11:00 a.m., the Director of Physical Therapy (PT) said Resident #850 had been having pain in his right hip since the initial PT assessment on 10/6/22. The PT director said the resident had not been able to bear weigh on his right leg since 10/6/22. The PT Director said she spoke to Resident 850's nurse on 10/14/22. The nurse said they were getting an X-ray of the resident's right hip. On 1/23/22 at 12:30 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) said he was not made aware Resident #850 was experiencing pain until 10/24/22 when the X-ray of the right hip was done. On 1/23/23 at 2:00 p.m., the DON said the facility policy is to complete a pain assessment quarterly or with new onset of pain or changes in condition. Upon review of Resident #850's clinical record, he verified on 10/22/22 Resident #850 was experiencing some pain, and he completed a pain assessment. He said he would normally document the location of the pain on the assessment form. The DON could not recall where the resident was having pain, and why he completed the pain assessment. On 1/23/23 at 3:00 p.m., the Administrator conducted a joint interview with the Director of Physical Therapy and several other therapists, including Staff U. Staff U verified on 10/24/22, he completed therapy with Resident #850. He said he was doing isometric exercises (affected joint does not move) at the time because the resident could not tolerate putting weight on his right leg. Review of the emergency room (ER) physician progress note dated 10/24/22 revealed documentation, This is a [AGE] year-old male with a medical past history of dementia . presents to the emergency department after being brought from his facility due to right leg pain. Patient reports that he fell 6 weeks ago and has been causing worsening pain. Patient right leg is shortened and externally rotated, and x-ray in the ER confirming right subcapital femoral neck fracture . Does not complain of pain at this current time .
Dec 2022 5 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility's policies and procedures, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility's policies and procedures, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement their policy and honor the resident's right to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of cardiac and/or respiratory arrest for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for care at the end of life. On [DATE] shortly after midnight, Resident #1 was found without a pulse or respiration. The facility failed to initiate CPR despite the resident's Power of Attorney directive to do everything that can be done. Resuscitation efforts, if successful, may have prolonged Resident #1's life. On [DATE] at 3:40 p.m., the Administrator was informed of the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and provided the IJ templates. Cross reference: F678 and F835. The findings included: The facility's policy regarding Treatment and Advance Directives, revised 1/2022 noted, It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive. Closed record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia, dementia, coronary artery disease, emphysema, and atrial fibrillation. The admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0 which meant Resident #1 was rarely/never understood. A valid Power of Attorney (POA) for healthcare decision was executed appointing Resident #1's sister as the POA on [DATE]. On [DATE] in a discussion with the facility social worker, the POA stated, Do everything that can be done, meaning full code status (initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of cardiac and/or respiratory arrest). Closed record review revealed a physician's order for full code was written on [DATE] and a care plan initiated on [DATE] which noted Resident #1 had an established CPR (Full code) order in place. Closed record review revealed on [DATE], a little after 12:00 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff C entered Resident #1's room and he did not seem to be breathing. The CNA asked Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff A to come to his room. LPN Staff A nurse entered the room, checked pulse and respirations, and determined Resident #1 was not breathing and did not have a pulse. This occurred at 12:20 a.m. LPN Staff A exited the room and returned to the nursing station. She did not check for code status, start CPR or call 9-1-1. LPN Staff A asked LPN Staff B to contact the physician and family to let them know the resident had expired. Review of the facility investigation revealed a witness statement from LPN Staff A dated [DATE] noting: Resident expired after midnight. During rounds I found the resident to be deceased . He still had the oxygen on, but he was not breathing there was no pulse . Once I saw he was deceased , I came to the desk at the nurse's station and notified the family and the MD (Physician). I didn't check to see that he was a full code. I didn't initiate CPR. The resident was mottled (patchy, irregular colors), and his extremities were cold, but his body was warm. I made a mistake. On [DATE] at 9:30 a.m., the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed LPN Staff A did not follow Resident #1's Power of Attorney's expressed advance directive for a full code and did not initiate CPR. On [DATE] at 7:00 p.m., the Immediate Jeopardy was removed after verification of an acceptable removal plan, and the scope and severity reduced to D (No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy). The removal plan submitted by the facility and verified by the survey team included: [DATE] - The Licensed Nurse who did not perform CPR on the full code status resident was suspended pending investigation. The DON or designee initiated education with the licensed nurses on the facility's policy and procedure for responding to a medical emergency, validating code status, resident rights regarding advanced directives, and abuse and neglect. By end of day, education was completed with 23 of 65 facility licensed nurses and CNAs (35% completion). An ad hoc (unplanned) QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) Committee meeting was held with the Medical Director in attendance. Root Cause Analysis was performed. A Performance Improvement Project (PIP) was implemented. DON/designee conducted a quality review of residents who coded in the last 6 months to ensure advanced directives were followed as ordered by the physician. In addition to Resident #1, 2 of 19 residents reviewed were full code, CPR was performed, and emergency medical personnel was contacted. The DON or designee initiated quality review of advanced directive orders for current residents residing in the facility. Physician orders for advance directives were confirmed present. For residents with DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) orders in place, the Florida DNR form was confirmed to be present in the medical records and care plans related to advanced directives were reviewed/updated accordingly. HR (Human Resources) or designee initiated audit of licensed nurses' CPR certification. DON or designee conducted Code Blue drills with licensed nursing staff. Licensed nursing staff who fail to perform code as per the emergency response policy during the drill will be re-educated and be required to participate in additional code blue drill(s) until competent to carry out emergency medical response policy. By end of day, 21 of 65 licensed nursing staff participated in drills (33% completion). [DATE] - Employment terminated with licensed nurse who did not initiate CPR on the full code resident (Resident #1). Nurse license reported to Florida Department of Health. HR or designee completed audit of licensed nurses' CPR certification. CPR certification current for 19 of 19 licensed nurses consisting of 8 RNs (Registered Nurses) and 11 LPNs (100% validated). The DON or designee initiated education with licensed nurses on the facility's policy and procedure for responding to a medical emergency, validating code status, resident rights regarding advanced directives, and abuse and neglect. By end of day, education completed with 64 of 65 facility licensed nurses and CNAs (98% completion). 1 CNA not yet educated will not be permitted to work until education has been received. Any new hires will receive education prior to providing resident care. The DON or designee completed the quality review of advanced directive orders for current residents residing in the facility. Physician orders for advance directive were confirmed present. For residents with DNR orders in place, the Florida DNR form was confirmed to be present in the medical records. Care plans related to advanced directives were reviewed/updated accordingly. DON or designee conducted Code Blue drills with licensed nursing staff. By end of day, 47 of 65 licensed nursing staff had successfully participated in Code Blue drills (72% completion). Licensed nursing staff will not be permitted to provide direct care to residents until he/she has participated in a code blue drill and has shown competency in implementing the emergency medical response policy. Licensed nursing staff who fail to perform code as per the emergency response policy during the drill will be re-educated and be required to participate in additional code blue drill(s) until competent to carry out emergency medical response policy. Ongoing monitoring to ensure compliant practice remains in place: DON or designee to conduct Code Blue drills weekly on each shift for four weeks, then 2 times monthly on each shift for 2 months to ensure licensed nursing staff respond as per federal regulation and facility policy and procedure. DON or designee to conduct competencies with 10 licensed nursing staff weekly for 3 months regarding following advanced directives and responding to medical emergencies to include identifying when CPR should be performed, and emergency medical personnel contacted. Findings will be reported at monthly QAPI committee meeting. Findings will be reported to QAPI committee monthly. Ongoing quality review schedule may be modified based on findings to ensure compliance practice remains in place.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0678 (Tag F0678)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in accor...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in accordance with the resident's documented wishes and physician's order for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for emergency care. Resident #1 had a full code status effective [DATE]. On [DATE] shortly after midnight, the resident was unresponsive and had no pulse or respiration. The staff nurse on duty did not perform CPR or call 9-1-1. Resident #1 expired at the facility without receiving CPR as per expressed wishes and physician's order. The facility's failure to initiate CPR in accordance with the resident's expressed wishes and physician's order resulted in a determination of Immediate Jeopardy at a scope and severity of isolated (J) starting on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 3:40 p.m., the Administrator was informed of the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and provided the IJ templates. On [DATE] at 7:00 p.m., the Immediate Jeopardy was removed after implementation of an acceptable removal plan was verified, and the scope and severity was reduced to D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy). There were 59 residents with full code status at the time of the event. Cross reference: F578 and F835. The findings included: A Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification (S&C) letter on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in Nursing Home: 14-01-NH, revised [DATE] includes the following: The American Heart Association (AHA) has established evidenced-based decision-making guidelines for initiating CPR when cardiac arrest occurs in or out of the hospital. AHA urges all potential rescuers to initiate CPR unless: 1) a valid DNR order is in place. 2) obvious signs of clinical death (e.g., rigor mortis, dependent lividity, decapitation, transection, or decomposition) are present; or 3) initiating CPR could cause injury or peril to the rescuer. AHA guidelines for CPR provide the standard for the American Red Cross, state EMS agencies, healthcare providers, and the general public. Facility policy should specifically direct staff to initiate CPR when cardiac arrest occurs for residents who have requested CPR in their advance directives, who have not formulated an advance directive, who do not have a valid DNR order, or who do not show AHA signs of clinical death as defined in the AHA Guidelines. Review of the facility policy Medical Emergency Response revised 1/2022 noted, The employee who first witnesses or is first on the site of a medical emergency, that are trained, will initiate immediate action, including CPR as appropriate. The admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0 which meant Resident #1 was rarely/never understood and had severe cognitive impairment. A valid Power of Attorney (POA) for healthcare decision was executed appointing Resident #1's sister as the POA on [DATE]. On [DATE] in a discussion with the facility social worker, the POA stated, Do everything that can be done meaning full code Status. Closed record review revealed a physician's order for full code was written on [DATE]. A care plan noting Resident #1 has an established CPR (full code) order in place was initiated on [DATE]. Closed record review revealed on [DATE], a little after 12:00 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff C entered Resident #1's room and he did not seem to be breathing. The CNA asked LPN Staff A to come to the resident's room. LPN Staff A nurse entered the room, checked pulse and respirations, and determined Resident #1 was not breathing and did not have a pulse. This occurred at 12:20 a.m. LPN Staff A exited the room and returned to the nursing station. She did not check for code status, did not start CPR, and did not call 9-1-1. LPN Staff A asked LPN Staff B to contact the physician and family to let them know the resident had expired. Review of the facility investigation revealed a witness statement from LPN Staff A dated [DATE] noting: Resident expired after midnight. During rounds I found the resident to be deceased . He still had the oxygen on, but he was not breathing there was no pulse . Once I saw he was deceased , I came to the desk at the nurse's station and notified the family and the MD (Physician). I didn't check to see that he was a full code. I didn't initiate CPR. The resident was mottled (patchy, irregular colors), and his extremities were cold, but his body was warm. I made a mistake. Review of the facility generated report submitted to the Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration on [DATE] noted Resident #1 was a long-term resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] staff nurse observed Resident #1 unresponsive and without a pulse. The nurse did not verify the code status and CPR was not initiated. The facility completed a thorough investigation including, but not limited to resident interviews, staff interviews and medical record review. The facility substantiated the allegation of neglect and noted in the conclusion based on the facility investigative findings, it had been validated that the LPN did not initiate CPR when Resident #1 was observed without a pulse or respiration on [DATE]. The resident's care plan and physician orders for advanced directives were not followed. On [DATE] at 9:30 a.m., in an interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON), they confirmed LPN Staff A did not follow Resident #1's Power of Attorney's expressed advance directive for a full code and did not initiate CPR. On [DATE] at 7:00 p.m., the Immediate Jeopardy was removed after verification of an acceptable removal plan, and the scope and severity reduced to D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy). The removal plan submitted by the facility and verified by the survey team included: [DATE] - The Licensed Nurse who did not perform CPR on the full code status resident (Resident #1) was suspended pending investigation. The DON or designee initiated education with the licensed nurses on the facility's policy and procedure for responding to a medical emergency, validating code status, resident rights regarding advanced directives, and abuse and neglect. By end of day, education was completed with 23 of 65 facility licensed nurses and CNAs (35% completion). An ad hoc (unplanned) QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) Committee meeting was held with the Medical Director in attendance. Root Cause Analysis was performed. A Performance Improvement Project (PIP) was implemented. DON/designee conducted a quality review of residents who coded in the last 6 months to ensure advanced directives were followed as ordered by the physician. In addition to Resident #1, 2 of 19 residents reviewed were full codes and CPR was performed and emergency medical personnel was contacted. The DON or designee initiated quality review of advanced directive orders for current residents residing in the facility. Physician orders for advance directives were confirmed present. For residents with DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) orders in place, the Florida DNR form was confirmed to be present in the medical records and care plans related to advanced directives were reviewed/updated accordingly. HR (Human Resources) or designee initiated audit of licensed nurses' CPR certification. DON or designee conducted Code Blue drills with licensed nursing staff. Licensed nursing staff who fail to perform code as per the emergency response policy during the drill will be re-educated and be required to participate in additional code blue drill(s) until competent to carry out emergency medical response policy. By end of day, 21 of 65 licensed nursing staff participated in drills (33% completion). [DATE] - Employment terminated with licensed nurse who did not initiate CPR on the full code resident (Resident #1). Nurse license reported to Florida Department of Health. HR or designee completed audit of licensed nurses' CPR certification. CPR certification current for 19 of 19 licensed nurses consisting of 8 RNs (Registered Nurses) and 11 LPNs (100% validated). The DON or designee initiated education with licensed nurses on the facility's policy and procedure for responding to a medical emergency, validating code status, resident rights regarding advanced directives, and abuse and neglect. By end of day, education was completed with 64 of 65 facility licensed nurses and CNAs (98% completion). 1 CNA not yet educated will not be permitted to work until education has been received. Any new hires will receive education prior providing resident care. The DON or designee completed the quality review of advanced directive orders for current residents residing in the facility. Physician orders for advance directive were confirmed present. For residents with DNR orders in place, the Florida DNR form was confirmed to be present in the medical records. Care plans related to advanced directives were reviewed/updated accordingly. DON or designee conducted Code Blue drills with licensed nursing staff. By end of day, 47 of 65 licensed nursing staff had successfully participated in Code Blue drills (72% completion). Licensed nursing staff will not be permitted to provide direct care to residents until he/she has participated in a code blue drill and has shown competency in implementing the emergency medical response policy. Licensed nursing staff who fail to perform code as per the emergency response policy during the drill will be re-educated and be required to participate in additional code blue drill(s) until competent to carry out emergency medical response policy. Ongoing monitoring to ensure compliant practice remains in place: DON or designee to conduct Code Blue drills weekly on each shift for four weeks, then 2 times monthly on each shift for 2 months to ensure licensed nursing staff respond as per federal regulation and facility policy and procedure. DON or designee to conduct competencies with 10 licensed nursing staff weekly for 3 months regarding following advanced directives and responding to medical emergencies to include identifying when CPR should be performed, and emergency medical personnel contacted. Findings will be reported to QAPI committee monthly. Findings will be reported at monthly QAPI committee meeting. Ongoing quality review schedule may be modified based on findings to ensure compliance practice remains in place.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility administration failed to utilize its resources effectively to ensure li...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility administration failed to utilize its resources effectively to ensure licensed staff were competent to perform emergency response and provide life saving measures, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation for residents requiring such emergency care. This has the potential to negatively impact all 59 residents in the facility who may require emergency services. Resident #1 had a full code status effective [DATE]. On [DATE] shortly after midnight, the resident was unresponsive and had no pulse or respiration. The staff nurse on duty did not perform CPR or call 9-1-1. Resident #1 expired at the facility without receiving CPR as per expressed wishes and physician's order. The failure of the facility's administration to ensure staff training and competency for emergency response resulted in a determination of Immediate Jeopardy at a scope and severity of isolated (J) starting on [DATE] when the licensed nurse failed to initiate CPR when Resident #1, who had a full code status, was found without a pulse or respiration. On [DATE] at 3:40 p.m., the Administrator was informed of the determination of Immediate Jeopardy and provided the IJ templates. On [DATE] at 7:00 p.m., the Immediate Jeopardy was removed after implementation of an acceptable removal plan was verified, and the scope and severity reduced to D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy). Cross reference: F578 and F678. The findings included: The Administrator's job description which he signed on [DATE] revealed, Summary: Lead and direct the overall operations of the facility in accordance with customer needs, government regulations and Company policies, with focus on maintaining excellent care for the residents. The Director of Nursing's job description which she signed on [DATE] included, To manage the overall operations of the Nursing Department in accordance with company policies, standards of nursing practices and governmental regulations to maintain excellent care of all residents' needs. Review of the facility policy Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives revised 1/2022 noted, It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive. Review of the Medical Emergency Response revised 1/2022 noted, The employee who first witnesses or is first on the site of a medical emergency, that are trained, will initiate immediate action, including CPR as appropriate . Review of the closed clinical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia, dementia, atrial fibrillation, emphysema, and coronary heart disease. The admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0 which meant Resident #1 was rarely/never understood. A valid Power of Attorney (POA) for healthcare decision was executed appointing Resident #1's sister as the POA on [DATE]. On [DATE] in a discussion with the facility social worker, the POA stated, Do everything that can be done meaning full code Status. Closed record review revealed a physician's order for full code was written on [DATE] and a care plan noting Resident #1 had an established CPR (full code) order was initiated on [DATE]. Review of the closed clinical record revealed on [DATE], shortly after midnight, Resident #1 was unresponsive and had no pulse or respiration. Resident #1 expired at the facility without receiving CPR as per expressed wishes and physician's order. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff A, the staff nurse on duty, did not perform CPR or call 9-1-1. LPN Staff A asked LPN Staff B to contact the physician and family to let them know the resident had expired. Review of the facility investigation revealed a witness statement from LPN Staff A dated [DATE] noting she did not check the code status and did not initiate CPR. LPN Staff A documented in the statement, I made a mistake . Closed record review revealed no evidence LPN Staff A had been assessed for competency in medical emergency response or trained in resident's rights regarding treatment and advance directives. On [DATE] at 9:30 a.m., the Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed LPN Staff A did not follow Resident #1's expressed advance directive for a full code and did not initiate CPR. On [DATE] at 2:10 p.m., the Director of Clinical Services provided documentation of training dated [DATE] to 17 licensed nurses. The training consisted of a 25-page presentation with two lines that included the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive. The Director of Clinical Services also provided proof of training related to residents' rights dated [DATE] for LPN Staff B. She said the facility did not have documentation of assessment of clinical competencies for all 19 licensed nurses related to emergency response. On [DATE] at 7:00 p.m., the Immediate Jeopardy was removed after verification of an acceptable removal plan, and the scope and severity reduced to D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy). The removal plan submitted by the facility and verified by the survey team included: By [DATE], the facility DON or designee conducted Code Blue drills with licensed nursing staff to include 4 CNAs who had not yet participated in a code blue drill and prior to providing direct patient care. By the end of day, 51 of 65 licensed nursing staff had participated in Code Blue drills (78% completion). Licensed nursing staff will not be permitted to provide direct care to residents until he/she has participated in a code blue drill and has shown competency in implementing the emergency medical response policy. Licensed nursing staff who fail to perform code as per the emergency response policy during the drill will be re-educated and be required to participate in additional code blue drill(s) until competent to carry out emergency medical response policy. Ongoing monitoring to ensure compliant practice remains in place: DON or designee to conduct Code Blue drills weekly on each shift for four weeks, then 2 times monthly on each shift for 2 months to ensure licensed nursing staff respond as per federal regulation and facility policy and procedure. DON or designee to conduct competencies with 10 licensed nursing staff weekly for 3 months regarding following advanced directives and responding to medical emergencies to include identifying when CPR should be performed, and emergency medical personnel contacted. Regional Operations and/or Clinical Consultants to review education and competencies on emergency medical response policy and advanced directives that has been completed with facility staff to include newly hired licensed nurses and CNAs every other week for 4 weeks, then a minimum of monthly to ensure administration is effective in ensuring staff implement their emergency response policy. Chart reviews will be conducted by the DON/designee within 24 hours of a resident coding within the facility to verify the emergency response policy was implemented and advanced directives followed as per their wishes. Findings will be presented to QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee monthly. Ongoing quality review schedule may be modified based on findings to ensure to ensure compliance practice remains in place.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0843 (Tag F0843)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a written transfer agreement in effect with one or more hospitals approved for participation under the Medicaid and Medicare pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a written transfer agreement in effect with one or more hospitals approved for participation under the Medicaid and Medicare programs. The findings included: Record review revealed no evidence of a written transfer agreement in effect with one or more hospitals approved for participation under the Medicaid and Medicare programs. On 12/8/22 at 2:57 p.m., in an interview, the Administrator said he could not locate a written transfer agreement in effect with one or more hospitals approved for participation under the Medicaid and Medicare programs.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0947 (Tag F0947)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide at least 12 hours of in-service education including dementia and abuse training annually (based on employment date) to 3 Cert...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide at least 12 hours of in-service education including dementia and abuse training annually (based on employment date) to 3 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) (Staff D, E, and F) of 4 staff reviewed. This has the potential to jeopardize continued competence of CNAs. The findings included: A record review of employee training files revealed the following: CNA Staff D was hired on 4/1/20. Further review revealed no evidence 12 hours of in-service education was provided between 4/1/21 and 4/1/22. CNA Staff E was hired on 4/1/20. Further review revealed no evidence 12 hours of in-service education was provided between 4/1/21 and 4/1/22. CNA Staff F was hired on 4/1/20. Further review revealed no evidence 12 hours of in-service education was provided between 4/1/21 and 4/1/22. On 12/8/21 at approximately 12:30 p.m., the facility Director of Nursing confirmed the required annual education was not provided for Staff D, E, and F.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 12 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $1,133,449 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 40 deficiencies on record, including 12 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $1,133,449 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Florida. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 12 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Siesta Key Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SIESTA KEY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Siesta Key Center Staffed?

CMS rates SIESTA KEY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 66%, which is 20 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 65%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Siesta Key Center?

State health inspectors documented 40 deficiencies at SIESTA KEY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2022 to 2024. These included: 12 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 27 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Siesta Key Center?

SIESTA KEY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 70 residents (about 58% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in SARASOTA, Florida.

How Does Siesta Key Center Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, SIESTA KEY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (66%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Siesta Key Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Siesta Key Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SIESTA KEY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 12 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Siesta Key Center Stick Around?

Staff turnover at SIESTA KEY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is high. At 66%, the facility is 20 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 65%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Siesta Key Center Ever Fined?

SIESTA KEY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has been fined $1,133,449 across 5 penalty actions. This is 25.5x the Florida average of $44,413. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Siesta Key Center on Any Federal Watch List?

SIESTA KEY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.