OAKS - ATHENS SKILLED NURSING, THE

490 KATHWOOD DR, ATHENS, GA 30607 (706) 355-7400
For profit - Corporation 148 Beds PRUITTHEALTH Data: November 2025 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#302 of 353 in GA
Last Inspection: January 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's care and operations. It ranks #302 out of 353 nursing homes in Georgia, placing it in the bottom half, and #2 out of 4 in Clarke County, meaning only one local option is ranked lower. The facility is improving, with reported issues decreasing from four in 2024 to three in 2025; however, it still faces serious problems. Staffing is a weakness with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars, but turnover is at 45%, slightly below the state average, suggesting some staff remain. The facility has faced $15,646 in fines, which is average, yet recent inspections revealed critical incidents, such as a significant medication error that led to a resident's hospitalization and failure to report allegations of sexual abuse, raising serious safety concerns.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Georgia
#302/353
Bottom 15%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
4 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
45% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$15,646 in fines. Lower than most Georgia facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 23 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Georgia. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 4 issues
2025: 3 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Georgia average (2.6)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 45%

Near Georgia avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $15,646

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: PRUITTHEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record

4 life-threatening
Jan 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy's titled, Oxygen Safety and Storage , Respiratory Equ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy's titled, Oxygen Safety and Storage , Respiratory Equipment Changeouts, and the Procedure: Transferring a Resident Using a Mechanical Lift, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards related to the handling and storage of Oxygen cannisters. In addition, the facility failed to use a mechanical lift device according to facility procedure and the manufacturer recommendation when transferring R100 via mechanical lift. The facility census 112. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Safety and Storage revised 5/9/2023, documented the policy statement as the facility will ensure that Oxygen is administered and stored safely within the healthcare centers or outside storage areas. Procedure: Safety: Number 3. Do not fasten an oxygen tank to a patients/resident's bed. Tanks in use must either be installed on a stable, wheeled dolly or on an oxygen tank stand.Storage .Number 3. Oxygen tanks that are considered in use (regulator attached) should be stored in a rack or carrier in an upright position with the regulator off. Oxygen tanks should never be stored lying down. Number 6. Oxygen tanks shall be protected from tampering by unauthorized individuals. Number 8. Empty oxygen tanks shall be adequately separated from full tanks. Empty and Full tanks shall be marked to avoid confusion and delay if a full tank is needed quickly. A review of the facility policy titled, Respiratory Equipment Changeouts revised 1/25/2022 revealed Procedure: The Respiratory Therapist will change circuits and O2 therapy equipment per the following guidelines: .Oxygen Therapy Equipment: (Can be changed out by Charge Nurse or designee). Observation on 1/28/2025 from 3:02 pm to 3:12 pm, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) KK entered room [ROOM NUMBER] in response to the call light button being pressed. She donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). She stuck her head outside of R20's room to ask surveyor to bring her an oxygen tank from the storage closet. Surveyor respectfully declined stating surveyor does not work for the facility. At that time CNA KK doffed her PPE, and exited the room. Certified Nursing Assistant KK proceeded to the oxygen storage closet and retrieved an oxygen tank from the storage closet. Upon leaving the storage closet halfway back to R20's room, CNA KK inspected the oxygen tank whispering, that it [the oxygen tank] was not full. She walked back to the oxygen storage closet and sat the oxygen tank down on the floor at the door and then retrieved a full oxygen tank. She left the half-empty tank outside the storage closet sitting on the floor, while she carried the full oxygen tank to R20's room door sitting it on the floor in order to put on PPE. CNA KK then dragged the tank across the floor into R20's room. At 3:12 pm CNA KK dragged the oxygen tank that had been in front of the oxygen storage closet down the hall, then came back to the storage door with the oxygen tank in her hand, putting the half empty oxygen tank back in the oxygen storage closet. Interview on 1/28/2025 at 3:15 pm, CNA KK revealed she switched out the oxygen tanks because the first oxygen tank was halfway empty and she was trying to make sure the resident got her oxygen on time which is why she did not put the half full oxygen tank back immediately. She further revealed she left the hall with the half full oxygen tank to ask the nurse if it should be put where the empty tanks should be. She revealed the nurse advised her no because someone else could use what is left in there which is why she put it back in the closet. Interview on 1/30/2025 at 3:13 pm, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) JJ revealed LPN's and Registered Nurses (RN's) are able to administer the oxygen. LPN JJ stated the oxygen tanks have to be put in a canister and at that point, they will go to the resident and hook the tubing up. She revealed that if a tank is not completely empty she does not know where to put it and has never been given the answer as to what to do. She further revealed the nurses can be very bad about checking the room and not returning the canisters to where they should be. Interview on 1/30/2025 at 3:36 pm with Charge Nurse, LPN FF revealed only licensed nurses (LPNs or RNs) can give the tanks to the residents. She further revealed that CNA's are not allowed to carry the tanks to the room or touch the tanks. The nurses will get the tank and make sure that it is filled and turn it on, they will pick it up and carry it to the resident's room. During further interview, she stated when the oxygen therapy is completed the tank is moved out of the room and put in the empty oxygen tank room. She stated that the CNA's can move the empty tanks to the empty tank storage room. LPN FF stated in order for the resident to be safe it is better for the nurse to get the tank and make sure it is turned on properly. Interview on 1/30/2025 at 4:39 pm with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed when the staff realized she was not going to use the tank she should have put it back in the oxygen storage closet at that time. The DON revealed normally the CNA's are not able to handle the oxygen tanks. In addition, the DON added, this could have been devastating, causing an explosion or fire or could injure anyone if the oxygen tank would have fallen. 2. Review of the procedure titled Transferring a Resident Using a Mechanical Lift dated 2019, revealed 28 steps to transferring a resident using a mechanical lift. Considerations: The mechanical lift is a two-person device. One caregiver should never use it alone. After opening the spreader bar, lock the legs in position. Push one side inward with your foot to ensure the legs will not close. If the legs move under pressure, do not move the lift. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to respiratory distress, cerebral vascular accident (CVA), dysphagia, gait abnormality, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, encephalopathy, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was coded as 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Section GG-Functional Abilities and Goals Status revealed resident requires two-person mechanical lift for most activities and is dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). Review of incident reports revealed that the fall occurred on 11/6/2024 at 4:52 pm and was described as resident was lowered to the floor by CNA BB and included but is not limited to CNA CC holding chair, braced fall and lowered resident to the ground. Hoyer then tipped and knocked CNA BB to the floor. Review of x-ray of the spine dated 11/6/2024 revealed images are not conclusive for damage from fall due to other issues with spine making viewing difficult. During interview with R100 on 1/28/2025 at 1:28 pm revealed she is totally dependent on the care staff for all ADLs. She stated that approximately three months ago she fell from a mechanical lift while being taken out of shower chair. She revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) BB operated mechanical lift while CNA CC held onto the shower chair. R100 stated the mechanical lift tipped over and she fell to the floor with strap bar hitting her in the face. She stated that CNA BB fell as well. During further interview, R100 stated the Floor Manager came into the room immediately following the fall and asked why CNA CC had not locked the shower chair wheels and been assisting with mechanical lift operation. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 11:25 am, with CNA BB, she stated she had not been properly trained on the mechanical lift. She stated that following the accident she was told that the legs should have been spread for balance and that this was not included in the training she had. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 5:15 pm with Unit Manager DD confirmed resident had experienced a fall but was found uninjured after x-ray of her spine following the accident.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to provide for the needs of 3 out of 122 residents (R251, R114 and R718) in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to cause resident care needs to be delayed. Findings: 1. R251 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/4/2025. Her diagnoses were unspecified fracture of right femur and multiple fractures of pelvis without disruption of pelvic ring. Review of R251's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS of 15. Mood severity score of two. No behaviors and independent for most activities of daily living (ADLs) and always incontinent of bowel and bladder with presence of surgical wound. Review of care plan for R251 dated 1/2/2025 included risk for complication related to recent orthopedic surgery, requires assistance for all activities of daily living related to weakness, injury, and debility. She was care planned for urinary and bowel incontinence, and she was identified as having the potential for skin breakdown related decreased mobility, incontinence, and obesity. Interview with family of R251 on 1/29/2025 revealed concerns related to R251's untimely response to incontinence as it relates to the recent surgical wound. Specifically, the ffamily stated that on 1/3/2025, During the day she was given a laxative and was sitting in a chair next to her bed. When she felt her feces begin to come out, she called the nursing staff for help. No one came. As more feces came out, she again called for help and I went into the hallway and notified the staff that she needed urgent help. She remained sitting in the chair surrounded by large amounts of loose feces for approximately one half an hour. Finally, two nursing staff came and used a mechanical lift to move her back to her bed. The staff then began to clean her up. After she was somewhat clean, a nurse arrived, and I told the nurse about her surgical incisions from her hip to her knee and asked her to check to see that they were clean and not infected. The nurse gave a very cursory inspection. I was not satisfied that her surgical wounds had been adequately cleaned. I feared severe infection that could compromise the healing of her leg, especially because of R251's lowered immunity as a result of her cancer treatment. I called for emergency transport back to a local hospital to have medical staff examine her surgical wounds. The resident did not return to the facility. 2. R114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cellulitis of groin, acute infections, urinary tract infection, infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, colostomy status, and panic disorder. Review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented a BIMS score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. R114 has limited mobility and requires some set-up and supervision. Review of care plan dated 10/28/2024 revealed R114's need for catheter and ostomy care in addition to need for wound vac care of for groin wound. Interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:12 pm, R114 stated I think the facility has staffing problems. I put my call light on one morning, I learned right quick not to do that. It was almost three hours, from 10:00 am to 1:00 pm before they came. All I wanted was a cup of coffee. When the aide answered the call light, I explained, sarcastically that I was dead. I tell the nurse, I tell everybody, and nothing gets done. It takes at least an hour for them to answer a call light. It is because they are severely short staffed. They just don't have enough people to take care of the residents. During further interview, R114 stated that nobody outside the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs) answer call lights. The administration nurses are nice, but they really don't show it by helping. Observation on 1/29/2025 at 7:58 am, breakfast meal service on 200 hall where R114's tray came out of the dining room at 7:58 am, and she was served at 8:30 am. R114 was the very last person on that hall to be served. Observation on 1/30/2025 at 12:49 pm, lunch meal service on 200 hall. R114 was the very last resident to be served. 3. R718 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of fracture of upper end of right humerus, fall on same level, anxiety disorder, cognitive communication deficit and pain. Review of R718's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R718 requires partial to moderate assistance with ADL's and is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of care plans for R718 dated 1/21/2025 documented approaches to his cognitive communication deficit and psychotropic drug usage. Interview on 1/28/2025 2:07 pm, R718 stated he wasn't exactly happy with his care. He was eating his lunch, so I said I would come back. Follow-up interview on 1/28/2025 3:40 pm speaking with R718 and his family member, revealed It just takes so long for nurses to respond to his bowel and bladder urges. The staff are very pushy. They told me I had to eat on a bedside table by the bed. I wanted them to bring it to my lounge chair. The nurse made me walk over and sit on the edge of my bed to eat. They refused to provide me incontinent service during mealtime. The nurse told me I had to wait until lunch was over. I wanted to go to the bathroom with diarrhea, and they said no. Eventually I went in my pants and was sitting in [NAME] all while looking at my lunch. The nurse just dropped the tray and left. I told her I had to go. Some nurses are very nice, and others treat you like dirt. They said we'll get to you in a mean and threatening way. I've been here only a week, and all this has happened. I don't know anybody here. Observation on 1/28/25 at 10:43 am Resident Council meeting was held and the residents indicated that untimely call light answering continues to be a problem. Review of Patient/Resident Council Minutes/Report Form dated 1/30/2024 under New Business item 1) 3. [name] took notes regarding call light response: 800 hall reported a long wait time during 2nd shift and that CNA will come in turn off the call light, say they will be back, and never return. 800 hall reports that 2nd shift showers are not being completed. 800 hall residents reported they feel they are not getting the assistance they need all the time, because staff assume they can do more. Review of Patient/Resident Council Minutes/Report Form dated 3/28/2024 under New Business item 5. 800 hall residents reported the CNA's can be pushy when asking the residents to come eat breakfast in the dining room. 800 hall residents reported second shift call lights are not being answered in a timely manner. Review of Patient/Resident Council Minutes/Report form dated 4/30/2024 under Old Business/Resolution item 2. Continue need for improvement regarding showers on 700 & 800, lift batteries not working, and poor call light time. Review of Patient/Resident Council minutes/Report form dated 12/12/2024 under New Business. Nursing - 2) All residents reported CNA's are not rounding before breakfast, 3) All residents reported they wait a long time for assistance during lunch and believe a CNA should be assigned to the call lights while others pass trays. 4) Residents stated CNAs are taking long lunches, not at assigned times, leading to long wait times. Review of Grievance/Complaint Log Form: Healthcare Centers and Grievances: Healthcare Centers from 1/1/2024 to 1/16/2025. There were 13 resident grievances documented in this time-period related to untimely call light response. The dates were: 2/14/2024, 3/7/2024, 3/27/2024, 3/26/2024, 3/29/2024, 5/15/2024, 5/9/2024, 5/8/2024, 9/16/2024, 9/19/2024, 9/14/2024, 9/21/2024, and 1/16/2025. Interview on 1/29/2025 at 12:50 pm, CNA BB stated sometimes the mechanical lifts don't work so we can't shower or get folks up. She stated there are one - two aides hall on the low census halls, which makes it a problem using the bathroom or taking a break. During further interview, CNA BB stated during the snowstorm, they were told they would be written up if they couldn't come to work because of the weather. There definitely could be more staff to get things done. Interviewed on 1/29/2025 at 1:46 pm, Licensed Practical Nurse LPN) AA stated staffing is a major issue here. We can pick up on our days off because we are so short staffed. Especially when we work the post-acute care, as the residents are extremely demanding. More Licensed Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants are needed here. The staff come in angry and stressed all the time. I honestly don't know how it could be any worse here. It's awful. Interview on 1/30/2025 at 11:41 am, Director of Nursing (DON) stated she's only the Interim DON. She stated staff are supposed to make rounds prior to meals. If someone has to go to the restroom we're supposed to stop and help them. During further interview, it was revealed the employees use being short staffed as an excuse not to take care of residents. The DON stated, I am not aware of the resident council staffing issues that were brought up on Tuesday of this week. Interview on 1/30/2025 at 12:05 pm, the Administrator stated, my expectation is that we meet at least a 2.5 PPD and the residents are taken care of. I review the resident council meeting minutes. They did have concerns about some of the staff .that there wasn't enough. I can't pinpoint any staffing concerns since I been here since July. She stated the staff need have more teamwork. During further interview, she stated that some of the CNA's won't help each other. By looking at our numbers, the staffing numbers look good to me. I was told about the nursing complaints from Tuesday's meeting, but I don't recall the exact nature of the issues. I'm not aware of the last 12 month's resident council meeting minutes; only the ones since I've been here.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy's titled Transmission -Based Isolation...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy's titled Transmission -Based Isolation Precautions, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and the Procedure: Catheter Care, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to prevent possible cross contamination. Specifically, facility failed to decrease the risk of transmission of infection related to one staff member not properly changing N-95 mask when exiting Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) room; one nurse not performing hand hygiene during catheter care, not using personal protective equipment during catheter care in an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) room, and not properly cleaning the tip of the catheter tubing after emptying the bedside drainage bag for one resident R52 of ten residents with a catheter. The deficient practice had the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. The facility census was 112. Findings: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Transmission - Based Isolation Precautions revised 12/11/2023, revealed that the use of droplet precautions for residents with known or suspected to be infected with pathogens transmitted by respiratory droplets that are generated by a resident who is coughing, sneezing, or talking. Review of the subtitle of Personal Protective Equipment' revealed that staff 1. don a disposable mask, covering mask, covering the nose and mouth, prior to entering the resident's room and 2. Discard the mask and perform hand hygiene when leaving the resident room and do not reuse masks. Observation on 1/28/2025 at 11:25 am, the Maintenance Director (MD) was in room [ROOM NUMBER]. He was talking with the resident in the room. Signage on the door of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that the resident was on contact and droplet precautions. At 11:27 am, the MD left room [ROOM NUMBER], a TBP room, without PPE on, except for an N-95 mask. He then was observed walking down the hall. Outside the room, there was an area set up that contained PPE for staff and visitors. Interview on 1/28/2025 at 11:31 am, the MD was asked if he was in-serviced on Transmission Based Precaution rooms and if he was that he was supposed to change his mask when exiting those rooms. He stated that he knew about it, but he was in a hurry to get out of the room. Interview on 1/29/2025 at 2:00 pm, the Infection Preventionist (IP) stated that she has been in the position since April of 2024. She provided the surveyor with the education that was provided to staff on 1/8/2025 on COVID expectations and donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE). The maintenance director was not on the sign-in sheet. She then provided education and the sign in sheet for education that was provided to staff on 1/29/2025. The review of the education revealed that she had in-serviced staff present on 1/29/2025 on sequence of donning and doffing of PPE. 2. Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP), revised 4/30/2024 revealed that it is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug -resistant organisms. EBP refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. Review of the facility policy titled Transmission -Based Isolation Precautions, revised 12/11/2023, documented that under PPE subtitle, staff should perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves. Review of the undated Procedure: Catheter Care, revealed that step 4. Perform hand hygiene according to facility policy/protocol, and 5. DON personal protective equipment as appropriate for procedure. Review of the electronic medical record for resident R52 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to sepsis due to Escherichia Coli, urinary tract infection (UTI), and pressure ulcer of sacral region, Stage 4. Review of the physician orders for R52 revealed that catheter care to be provided every shift, catheter: diagnosis-bladder outlet obstruction, resident placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Observation on 1/30/2025 at 11:41 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) FF performed catheter care on R52, who is on EBP. She entered the residents room without donning PPE. She went to the sink and washed her hands and then applied gloves. LPN FF repositioned the resident and removed her brief. She cleaned the catheter, going from the meatus towards the catheter bag. She used a different wipe with each stroke. She then performed perineal care in the front going from front to back. She then turned the resident to the side and then cleaned the resident from front to back, cleaning the stool. She then doffed gloves and donned a clean pair of gloves and then applied a clean brief. She then went to the bathroom and retrieved the urinal and went back to the resident to empty the catheter bag. She opened the clamp and drained the urine out of the bag and then clamped the tube and placed it back into its slot. She then emptied the urinal and placed the urinal in the bag in the bathroom. She then repositioned the resident, doffed gloves and then washed hands at the sink before exiting. Interview on 1/30/2025 at 11:57 am, outside R52 room LPN FF was questioned about what EBP means and why a resident would be on it. She stated that R52 would be on EBP but stated that she did not see that she was on it, and then stated yes, she was on it, and yes she was supposed to don PPE to give her care. She was asked about performing hand hygiene when gloves are used, and she stated before starting and after then procedure. She was asked if hand hygiene should be performed in between glove use and she stated yes but she did not do it. She was asked if there was something special that needed to be done when emptying a catheter bag, and she stated that she is supposed to clean it with alcohol before returning it to the sleeve and she confirmed that she did not do that. Interviewed on 1/30/2025 at 12:13 pm, Director of Health Services (DHS) was asked when PPE should be used in an EBP room and stated that PPE should be used when doing any kind of hands-on care in the room and then stated that the nurse should have donned and doffed PPE during catheter and perineal care. She was then asked about hand hygiene during glove use. She stated that hand hygiene should be performed before and after care. She then stated that hand hygiene should be performed between glove use/change. Shen was then asked about what the nurse should have done before returning the catheter tube back into the sleeve, and she stated that it should have been returned after it was clamped and cleaned. Interview on 1/30/2025 at 12:41 pm, Infection Preventionist (IP) stated that any resident that was on EBP, staff needed to don PPE when high contact care will be performed. She stated that catheter care is a high contact care task. She stated that hand hygiene should be performed before donning and after doffing gloves.
Oct 2024 4 deficiencies 4 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled, Reporting Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatmen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled, Reporting Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property, the facility failed to report a significant medication error for one of three sampled residents (R1), with actual harm occurred on 9/14/2024 when R1 was administered the wrong medications and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for higher level of care and monitoring. In addition, the facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency within the required time frame for two of three residents (R) (R7 and R8) when R8 was found in R7's room receiving oral gratification. On 10/2/2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to residents. The facility's Administrator, Interim Director of Health Services, and Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/2/2024 at 12:03 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 9/14/2024 when the facility failed to report an incident of significant medication error for R1, when Registered Nurse AA administered the wrong medications, which included allopurinol 100 milligram (mg), amlodipine 10 mg, Eliquis 2.5 mg, ferrous sulfate 325 mg, Lasix 40 mg, losartan 50 mg, metoprolol 100 mg, oxcarbazepine 300 mg (two tablets), potassium chloride extended release (ER) 10 milliequivalents (mEq), valsartan 80 mg, and vitamin D3 25 micrograms (mcg). R1 had a change in condition (bradycardia and hypotension) and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for higher level of care with diagnosis of poisoning by beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist - accidental (unintentional). The resident received intravenous (IV) fluids for hypotension, IV glucagon, IV Levophed, and IV Calcium. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 10/8/2024. The removal plan included in-service training for nursing staff on medication administration, including competency checks for licensed staff, and in-service training for administration staff on reporting and investigating alleged violations. Through observations, record review, and interviews, the survey team verified all elements of the facility's IJ Removal Plan, and the immediacy of the deficient practice was removed on 10/5/2024. The facility remained out of compliance while the facility continues management level staff oversight as well as continues to develop and implement a Plan of Correction (POC). This oversight process includes the analysis of facility staff's conformance with the facility's policies and procedures regarding reporting of incidents related to medication administration. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Reporting Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property revised 1/11/2024, indicated Policy Statement: It is the policy of the facility and its affiliated entities (collectively, the Organization) to comply with all applicable federal and state requirements regarding the reporting of patient abuse. Procedure No 2: In accordance with applicable laws and regulations, the Administrator or his or her designee should notify the appropriate state agency (or agencies), within 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events upon which the allegation is based involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, and not later than 24 hours if the events upon which the allegation is based do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction, aortic valve stenosis, hypertension (HTN) and hypercholesteremia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. Section D revealed the mood none. Section E revealed no behaviors exhibited during the assessment period. The resident required partial/moderate assistance with bathing, dressing and transfers, supervision with toileting and was independent for eating and oral hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 8/30/2024 revealed that R1 was at risk for decreased cardiac output related to hypertension (HTN). Approaches to care include medications as ordered, monitor for chest pain, observe for syncope, dizziness, palpitations, or feeling of weakness associated with an irregular heart rhythm. Resident will not receive nitroglycerin in any form due to severe aortic stenosis. Nitroglycerin is listed as an allergy due to strict contraindication. Review of Progress Note dated 9/14/2024 and written by Registered Nurse (RN) AA, revealed patient was set to be discharged home with her son and daughter-in-law when she announced she had been given the wrong meds and she was not feeling well. She stated that she had been given approximately 14 pills including two large blue pills that she does not normally take. I only gave her four or five pills and none of them were blue. The son and daughter-in-law were at bedside and were aware of the situation. The patient was sent to the emergency room (ER), and after evaluation, was placed in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Review of the Grievance/Complaint Form dated 9/14/2024 completed by Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) BB, revealed the resident stated, that nurse gave me the wrong medicine. Further review of the grievance revealed the resident had given a Dietary Aide a medicine cup that had '206' written on it, and the resident resides in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The resident complained of dizziness and nausea. The resident was sent to the hospital for possible consumption of the wrong medications. Interview on 9/24/2024 at 11:25 am, LPN/UM BB stated she was working on the 400 Hall on Saturday 9/14/2024, when a dietary staff member told her that a resident on the 200 Hall was upset and wanting to speak to a person in charge. She stated that when she went to R1's room, she was very upset and nervous and informed her that she had been given the wrong pills earlier that morning. She stated R1stated there were about 12 pills in the cup, and she only takes three. She stated she started looking at the residents on the hall close to R1's room, and discovered that R1 could possibly have been given another resident medications, who was room [ROOM NUMBER], next door to R1's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]). Interview on 9/24/2024 at 12:20 pm, with the family member of R1, stated when he arrived at the facility on 9/14/2024, to take his mother home, she informed him she had been given the wrong medications earlier that day, that she had given 12 pills that weren't prescribed to her. R1's son stated that his mom told him she questioned the nurse about the pills, but the nurse told her they were her pills, and that she needed to take them. During further interview, he said that he spoke to the nurse on the hall, and she stated that she didn't give those pills to his mother, so he asked to speak to the 'head' nurse. He stated the head nurse came to his mother's room and he informed her of what his mother had said happened. The nurse returned to R1's room and told him his mother could have possibly been given the resident's meds in room [ROOM NUMBER] (R1 was in 208). He stated he wanted his mother to be sent to the emergency room to be checked out because she was complaining of nausea and her stomach was hurting. He stated that she was admitted to the hospital in ICU for four days, but was at home now with home health. He stated that she is still very weak. Phone interview on 9/24/2024 at 2:43 pm, RN AA confirmed that she was the nurse on duty on 9/14/2024. She stated that she remembers the resident alleged that she had received the wrong medications. She stated that there were four or five medications listed on R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and that she pulled the medications that were listed. During further interview, she stated that the resident did not question her about the medications that were in the cup. 2. Review of the EMR for R7 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia with mood disturbances. Review of R7's significant change MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS was assessed as 4, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Section D revealed the mood none. Section E revealed no behaviors exhibited. Cognitive Loss/Dementia triggered as an area of concern on the Care Area Assessment Summary (CAAS). Review of the care plan initiated 7/17/2024 revealed that R7 was admitted to the behavior management program due to sexually inappropriate behaviors with a male resident. The approach implemented included activities staff to visit resident and provide diversional activities and administer behavior medications as ordered by the physician. Review of the Witness Statement Form dated 7/6/2024 revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) FF documented on 7/6/2024 at 6:45 pm she entered R7's room and observed R8 with his pants down and underwear around his ankles. The resident (R7) head was up against R8's hip area. The CNA documented that she could only see R7's forehead and did not see anything in R7's mouth. The CNA documented immediately that the nurse was notified. Interview on 10/2/2024 at 11:07 am, LPN MM stated she was not working on the day the incident happened between R7 and R8. She stated the incident happened on third shift and she was told about the incident when she came to work. During further interview, she stated the off going nurse told her R8 went into R7's room. She stated she spoke with the daughter of R7 who was very upset and requested that R7 be moved off the unit. She stated the resident has a diagnosis of dementia and is confused. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 12:40 pm, the Interim DHS and Senior Nurse Consultant confirmed that the physician and/or Nurse Practitioner (NP) were not notified of R7's behavior and there was no skin assessment completed on the day of the incident. 3. Review of the EMR for R8 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of depression and heart failure. Review of R8's discharge MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS was assessed as 13, which indicated cognitively intact. Section D revealed the mood none. Section E revealed no behaviors exhibited. Review of the care plan initiated 7/17/2024 revealed that R8 admitted to the behavior management program due to sexually inappropriate behaviors with a female resident. The approach implemented included activities staff to visit resident and provide diversional activities and administer behavior medications as ordered. Review of the Witness Statement Form dated 7/6/2024 revealed the Registered Nurse (RN) EE documented around 6:45 pm, CNA FF approached and asked the RN to go to R7's room. The RN documented upon entering the room it appeared that R8 was receiving oral gratification from R7. The residents were separated, and management was notified. Review of the Facility Incident Report Form submitted to the SSA on 7/17/2024 revealed: date and time of incident: 7/6/2024 documented R7 was observed performing a sexual act on R8. Interview on 10/7/2024 at 12:37 pm, Social Worker (SW) XX stated the Social Service Department is responsible for social/psychosocial assessments and the behavioral management program. The behavioral management program with the list of residents that are at risk for behavior (wandering, yelling, inappropriate behavior with other residents sexual and conversation) is kept by the Social Service Department. She stated residents are placed on the behavior management program or seen by psych services if admitted with psych diagnosis or taking antipsychotic meds. She revealed there are currently 10-12 residents on the behavioral management program. SW XX stated R7 was followed by the behavior management program, and stated the family refused psych services for her. Phone interview on 10/8/2024 at 4:24 pm, Medical Director stated the Administrator notified him of the allegation of sexual abuse between R7 and R8. He stated I do not remember off the top of my head the exact date or time but was sure he was notified. He stated he would expect that a progress note should have been written indicating that the residents were seen by a provider following any type of incident. A post exit phone interview on 10/18/2024 at 3:00 pm with the Senior Nurse Consultant stated she was not aware that the incident between R7 and R8 happened on 7/6/2024 and was not reported until 7/16/2024. She stated facility reportable incident should be reported on the day of the incident. The Senior Nurse Consultant did state at the time of the incident, the facility had a different Administrator. Cross Refer to F760 The facility implemented the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: 1. On 10/2/2024, the facility Administrator reported the incident of significant medication error to the state agency. 2. On 10/2/2024, the facility Administrator and Director of Health Services was provided education by the Regional Senior Nurse Consultant via telephone regarding the reporting requirements using the policy titled Reporting Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property outlining what to report, how to report and reporting allegations within 2 hours if the incident could result in serious bodily, injury. 3. On 10/4/24, the facility Administrator and Director of Health Services provided education to 184 out of 185 staff to total 99.45% of facility staff regarding abuse reporting including the who is abuse coordinator, what constitutes as abuse and the requirements for reporting abuse. The one remaining staff needing education is currently on leave and will be provided education upon return. 96 staff were provided education in person, and 88 staff were provided education via telephone by the Director of Health Services and Administration. The facility currently employs nine RNs, 29 LPNs, 61 CNAs, two Social Services, 21 Dietary, two Maintenance, 23 Housekeeping, 24 Rehab, and 13 Administrative. 4. The Administrator reviewed all grievances on 10/3/2024 that occurred in the last three months to review for any potential missed state reportable incidents. 28 out of 28 grievances reviewed did not require reporting to the state agency. 5. The facility Administrator held an Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) meeting with the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) on 10/2/2024 to discuss the alleged incident and reporting of significant incidents to the state agency. The Administrator, DHS, Unit Manager, Treatment Nurses, Social Service Assistant, Maintenance, Housekeeping Supervisor, Human Resource and the Financial Counselor attended the Ad Hoc meeting. The Policy titled Reporting Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property was reviewed, and no changes or revisions were made to the policy. The Medical Director was in attendance via telephone. A root cause analysis was completed regarding abuse reporting and identified lack of understanding related to reporting of significant incidents. 6. The Medical Director, Administrator, DHS, Senior Nurse Consultant, were all involved in developing the removal plan, reviewed it, and agreed with the contents. The facility will be in compliance effective 10/5/2024. 7. The Administrator and DHS will monitor the implementation of the removal plan. The Administrator and DHS will utilize the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) that is updated with the current interventions listed above. The Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) was started on 10/2/2024 and includes interviews with residents with BIMs above 9/15 and education with staff on the requirements of reporting. 8. The Facility's corrective actions were completed on 10/4/24 and the facility alleges immediacy of IJ removal on 10/5/24. The State Survey Agency (SSA) validated the facility's written IJ Removal Plan as follows: 1. Review of the Facility Incident Report Form dated 10/2/2024 (202445846) revealed the facility reported the incident of alleged significant medication error which occurred on 9/14/2024 to the State Survey Agency (SSA) with steps taken to educate nursing staff and the resident was transferred to the emergency department on 9/14/2024. 2. Review of the In-service Education Program Attendance Record Form dated 10/2/2024 revealed that the Administrator and the DHS were educated on reporting a significant medication error to the SA by the Regional Nurse Consultant. 3. Review of the Inservice Education Program Summary Record Form dated 10/4/2024 revealed the following topic was provided as education to all staff Reporting Resident Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property either in-person or via telephone with a total of 160 staff members and 24 rehab staff in-serviced via phone or in person. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 9:50 am, LPN RR stated she was educated about abuse and what, when and who to report to if you suspect abuse. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 9:55 am, LPN CC stated they had in-service training and they talked about abuse - what and when and who to report to. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 10:25 am, LPN DD stated that she is the Nurse Navigator for the facility and is aware of why surveyors are in the facility. She stated they discussed the abuse policy - that the Administrator is the Abuse Coordinator, and she is who they report suspected abuse to as soon as it is suspected. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 10:45 am, RN QQ, stated that he was educated on different types of abuse, who the Abuse Coordinator is and what and when to report. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 11:11 am, LPN LL stated she has worked at the facility for six years and she is aware of the reason the surveyors are here at the facility is due to a medication error and also sexual abuse allegations. She stated the staff talked about abuse, move the client out of the way of potential abuse and report it immediately. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 11:50 am, LPN/UM KK stated that she is the Unit Manager on the second floor which includes halls 500 - 800. She stated that she has been recently educated on the Abuse Policy but states she can't remember the exact date. 4. Review of the attestation signed and dated by the Administrator on 10/3/2024 revealed that all grievances (28) for the last 3 months were reviewed to ensure that there were no state reportables with no concerns identified. 5. Review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance/QAPI Committee Meeting Attendance Sheet dated 10/2/2024 revealed signatures from the following indicating attendance: The Administrator, the DHS, the Medical Director (via phone), Infection Preventionist (IP), Admissions, Business Office Manager, Clinical Competency Coordinator, Dietary Services, Environmental Services, Human Resources, Maintenance, Medical Records Clerk, Senior Care Partner, Wound/Treatment Nurse, Unit Managers. The following was discussed that all staff are to follow care plans and report abuse as soon as it occurs. The Administrator's cell phone is posted and must be called immediately regarding any allegation of abuse. The policies for Care Plan Implementation and Abuse Reporting were reviewed with no revisions necessary. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 10:43 am, OT/Therapy Outcome Coordinator (TOC 2013) stated if the therapist did not attend the in-service on abuse in person they were in-serviced via phone. She stated the therapy department was not in-serviced on the care plan policy or the administration of medication policy. She stated the therapist were in-serviced on the abuse policy only. The TOC reviewed the Therapy Employee Roster and verified the employees that had not signed the in-service sheet were educated via phone and a copy of the abuse policy was texted to the therapists. Interview on 10/8/2024 at 12:57 pm, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) VV stated she has been educated on abuse. She stated she was educated to always make sure the resident is safe, report the incident immediately to the Abuse Coordinator (Administrator). She stated there are many types of abuse, one being misappropriation of funds. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 10:38 am, Environmental Services (EVS) WW stated the EVS manager did in-service the department that the surveyors were in the facility and be on your best behavior. He stated the facility did an in-service on abuse. He stated several types of abuse, including verbal and physical. He stated all abuse should be reported right away to the Administrator. 6. Review of the facility document dated 10/5/2024 revealed that the removal plan has been developed, reviewed by the Medical Director, Administrator, DHS, and Senior Nurse Consultant and we agree with the contents with signatures from all four listed above. 7. Review of the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) for Medication Administration revealed that the target end date will be 10/16/2024 with interventions in progress. Problem category - medication administration; root cause summary - nurses are provided competency upon hire and annually. The nurse failed to follow the medication administration policy. Overall goal - residents will receive prescribed medications as ordered. Project Conclusions - in progress. 8. The Facility's corrective actions were completed on 10/4/24 and the facility alleges immediacy of IJ removal on 10/5/24.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Care Plans, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Care Plans, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive person-centered care plan related to potential for decreased cardiac and aortic stenosis for one of 12 sampled residents (R) (R1). Actual harm occurred on 9/14/2024 when R1 was allegedly administered the wrong medications and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for higher level of care and monitoring. On 10/2/2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to residents. The facility's Administrator, Interim Director of Health Services, and Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/2/2024 at 12:03 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 9/14/2024 when the facility failed to report an incident of significant medication error for R1, when Registered Nurse AA administered the wrong medications, which included Allopurinol 100 milligram (mg), Amlodipine 10 mg, Eliquis 2.5 mg, Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg, Lasix 40 mg, Losartan 50 mg, Metoprolol 100 mg, Oxcarbazepine 300 mg (two tablets), Potassium Chloride ER 10 milliequivalents (meq), Valsartan 80 mg, and vitamin D3 25 micrograms (mcg). R1 had a change in condition (bradycardia and hypotension) and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and admitted to ICU for higher level of care with diagnosis of poisoning by beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist - accidental (unintentional). The resident received IV glucagon, IV fluids for hypotension, and IV Calcium. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 10/8/2024. The removal plan included in-service training for nursing staff on medication administration, including competency checks for licensed staff, and in-service training for administration staff on reporting and investigating alleged violations. Through observations, record review, and interviews, the survey team verified all elements of the facility's IJ Removal Plan, and the immediacy of the deficient practice was removed on 10/5/2024. The facility remained out of compliance while the facility continues management level staff oversight as well as continues to develop and implement a Plan of Correction (POC). This oversight process includes the analysis of facility staff's conformance with the facility's policies and procedures regarding reporting of incidents related to medication administration. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Care Plans revised 7/11/2023, revealed the policy is the health care center for each resident to have a person-centered comprehensive care plan following completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Care Area Assessment (CAA) according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI). Person centered care focuses on the resident as the center of control, supporting each resident in making his/her own choices, understanding what the resident is communicating, and identifying what is important to each resident with regard to daily routines and preferred activities. Procedure: Number 3. The comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed to include measurable goals ad timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs, the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial needs, Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction due to embolism of other artery, malignant neoplasm of unspecified bronchus or lung, aortic valve stenosis, hypertension (HTN), and hypercholesteremia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. No mood or behavior concerns during the assessment period. The resident required partial/moderate assistance with bathing, dressing and transfers, supervision with toileting and was independent for eating/oral hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 8/30/2024 revealed that R1was at risk for decreased cardiac output related to hypertension (HTN). Approaches to care include medications as ordered, monitor for chest pain, observe for syncope, dizziness, palpitations, or feeling of weakness associated with an irregular heart rhythm. Resident will not receive nitroglycerin in any form due to severe aortic stenosis. Nitroglycerin is listed as an allergy due to strict contraindication. Review of Progress Note dated 9/14/2024 and written by Registered Nurse (RN) AA, revealed patient was set to be discharged home with her son and daughter-in-law when she announced she had been given the wrong meds and she was not feeling well. She stated that she had been given approximately 14 pills including two large blue pills that she does not normally take. I only gave her four or five pills and none of them were blue. The son and daughter-in-law were at bedside and were aware of the situation. The patient was sent to the emergency room (ER), and after evaluation, was placed in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Review of the Grievance/Complaint Form dated 9/14/24 completed by Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) BB, revealed the resident stated, that nurse gave me the wrong medicine. Further review of the grievance revealed the resident had given a Dietary Aide a medicine cup that had '206' written on it, and the resident resides in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The resident complained of dizziness and nausea. The resident was sent to the hospital for possible consumption of the wrong medications. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 11:43 am Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) JJ stated that she works in the MDS department and she completes the MDS assessments for the residents and develops the care plans, based on what the assessment reveals. She stated that she updated the care plans for the residents related to the deficiency. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 7:45 pm with LPN II via telephone, stated that the Unit Manager (UM) provided education on updating and following interventions on the resident care plans. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 11:39 am with RN NN stated she works in the MDS department and gathers data for the resident's MDS and implements the care plan. She stated that she participated in updating all of the residents' care plans regarding the care plan tag. She further stated that she does not work on the units as a charge nurse, so she doesn't give medications to the residents. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 10:25 am, LPN DD stated that she re-educated on care plans - following the care plans and updating the care plans when a change occurs for the resident. The facility implemented the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: 1. The Assistant Director of Health Services began education with all licensed nurses beginning on 9/14/2024 on the topic of Medication Administration and the Rights of Medication Administration. At the time of the incident, the facility employed 11 RNs and 30 LPNs. 40 out of 41 nurses were educated by 9/23/2024 to total 97.56% of nursing staff education completed. 11 licensed nurses were provided education in person, and 30 licensed nurses were provided education via telephone by the Assistant Director of Health Services. The remaining one licensed nurse is on leave and will be provided education upon return. The facility does not utilize Medication Aides or Agency staff. 2. The Assistant Director of Nursing began competencies with licensed nurses beginning on 9/14/24, to review the Medication Administration. 40 out of 41 nurses were reviewed for competency by 9/23/2024 to total 97.56% of nursing staff education completed. The remaining one licensed nurse is on leave and will be provided education upon return. 40 out of 40 licensed nurses passed the medication administration competency. 3. The following medication administration observations were performed: Between 9/14/24 and 9/23/24, The Assistant Director of Health Services and Unit Managers completed a total 54 medication administration observations utilizing the tool titled Medication Administration. The observations were completed for one resident on each of the 6 medication carts each day to include both day shift and night shift between 9/14/24 and 9/23/24. The observations were focused to ensure medications were administered as ordered and that no medication error occurred, the observation was completed with 54 out of 54 observations with no findings. 4. On 10/4/2024, the Director of Health Services provided education to 100 out of 101 clinical staff including licensed nurses, certified nursing assistants, and social services to total 99.03%, on the topic of care plan implementation, reviewing interventions and the importance of following the residents plan of care. The facility currently employs 9 RNs, 29 LPNs, 61 CNAs, and 2 Social Services. 48 clinical staff were provided education in person, and 52 clinical staff were provided education via telephone by the Director of Nursing. The 1 remaining staff needing education is currently on leave and will be provided education upon return. 5. On 9/14/2024, the Medical Director was notified of the alleged medication error by the Administrator with no additional directive regarding the incident other than ensuring the resident was transferred to the hospital. 6. RN AA was provided with a written disciplinary action on 9/14/2024 by the Assistant Director of Nursing and the Administrator and re-educated regarding medication administration. RN AA was also observed with a medication administration competency by the Assistant Director of Nursing on 9/14/2024. RN AA was suspended pending investigation on 10/2/2024 and subsequently terminated of employment on 10/3/2204. 7. The facility Administrator held an Ad Hoc QAPI meeting with the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) on 10/2/2024 to discuss the importance of following the interventions on the resident's care plan and the requirements for reporting abuse and significant incidents. The Administrator, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADHS), Unit Manager, Treatment Nurse, Maintenance, Housekeeping Supervisor, Human Resource and the Financial Counselor. The Care Planning Policy and Reporting Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Funds was reviewed, and no changes or revisions were made to the policy. The medical director attended via phone. A root cause analysis was completed on 10/2/2024 by the Interdisciplinary Team and determined that the licensed nurse failed to follow the care plan policy. 8. The DHS and the ADHS will provide education to licensed nurses upon hire regarding medication. administration and the rights of medication administration during new hire orientation. Licensed nurses will also receive a competency for medication administration upon hire. 9. The Medical Director, Administrator, DHS, Senior Nurse Consultant, were all involved in developing the removal plan, reviewed it, and agreed with the contents. The facility will be in compliance effective 10/5/2024. 10. The Administrator and DHS will monitor the implementation of the removal plan. The Administrator and DHS will utilize the Performance Improvement Plan that was created on 10/2/24 and includes a 100% audit of care plan implementation, education with clinical staff on care plan revision and implementation, and ongoing audits of care plan implementation. 11. The Facility's corrective actions were completed on 10/4/2024 and the facility alleges immediacy of IJ removal on 10/5/2024. The State Survey Agency (SSA) validated the facility's written IJ Removal Plan as follows: 1. Review of the Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan (IJRP) revealed there were two In-service Program Attendance Record Forms dated 9/14/2024. The Program title was Medication Administration. The in-service record was signed or educated by phone: 10 Registered Nurses (RN) and 30 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). There were no other documentation under tab number one. An interview on 10/8/2024 at 10:45 am with the Administrator stated the staff were in-serviced on medication administration per the facility's policy and the five rights of medication administration. She stated the Director of Health Services (DHS) also completed a skills competency with all the nursing staff. The Administrator stated that the Assistant Director of Health Services (ADHS) no longer works at the facility. The Administrator was asked to provide the documents that were used in the in-service and proof that the Interim DHS has been in-serviced. Not provided. Refer to tab 6 for a copy of the medication administration policy. 2. Review of the IJRP revealed 41 skills check off on Medication Administration-Tablets, Pills, and Capsules. An interview on 10/8/2024 at 10:45 am, the Administrator stated the staff were in-serviced on medication administration per the facility's policy and the five rights of medication administration. She stated the DHS also completed a skills competency with all the nursing staff. 3. Review of the IJRP revealed a sheet titled Medication Administration Audit with the date, hall (100, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600/700), medication administered accurately: yes/no, and initials. The Medication Administration Audit sheets were completed on 9/14/2024, 9/15/2024, 9/16/2024, 9/17/2024, 9/18/2024, 9/19/2024, 9/20/2024, 9/21/2024, 9/22/2024, 9/23/2024, 9/25/2024, 9/26/2024, 9/27/2024, 9/28/2024, 9/29/2024, 9/30/2024, 10/1/2024, 10/3/2024, 10/4/2024, 10/5/2024, and 10/6/2024. The facility answered yes to medication administered accurately. There was no other documentation. An interview on 10/8/2024 at 1:33 pm with LPN/ UM BB for 100, 200, 300, and 400 halls stated that she assisted in the medication audit. She stated on 9/14/2024 she observed six nurses on various halls administer medications. The UM stated she compared the medication from the auto fill to the medication administration record (MAR). She stated she came in on off shifts and observed a total of twenty-seven nurses administer medication. The UM stated she did not identify any issues during the medication observation 4. Review of the IJRP revealed a Inservice Education Program Summary Record Form dated 10/4/2024 Program Title: Care Plans. The Care Plan policy was attached with a revised date of 7/27/2023. Review of the in-service record was signed or educated by phone: RNs-10 out of 10; LPN's 24 out of 29; CNA's 62out of 63; Admin/General five out of eight; Activities two out of two; Dietary 11 out of 22; Housekeeping/Laundry 11 out of 24; Maintenance two out of two; Medical Records one out of one; Social Services two out of two; Therapy Department 17 out of 26. Further review of the IJRP revealed one employee would be in-serviced upon return to work. An interview on 10/9/2024 at 10:43 am, Occupational Therapy (OT) Therapy Outcome Coordinator (TOC 2013) stated if the therapist did not attend the in-service in person they were in-serviced via phone. She stated the therapy department was not in-serviced on the care plan policy or the administration of medication policy. She stated the therapist were in-serviced on the abuse policy only. The TOC reviewed the Therapy Employee Roster and verified the employees that had not signed the in-service sheet were educated via phone and a copy of the abuse policy was texted to the therapist. See the attached for employee interviews. 5. Review of the IJRP revealed on an 8x10 white sheet of paper. Typed, I notified the Medical Director of the Medication Error on 9/14/2024 with no additional directive. Signed by Administrator. A phone interview on 10/8/2024 at 4:24 pm, with the facility's Medical Director, stated he was aware of the incident with R1. He stated it was a medication error where the resident was given medication that was not on R1's medication profile. The Medical Director stated receiving the multiple medications caused R1's blood pressure to go down. He stated the resident was sent to the hospital. He stated he was part of the QAPI meeting on 10/2/2024. He stated the team was educated on reviewing the medications to ensure the medications are correct and administered to the right resident. He stated the education will continue. 6. Review of the IJRP revealed RN AA was in-serviced on medication administration policy on 9/14/2024. The document stated I understand the medication administration policy and understand this is a corrective action. Any violation of the policy, I will be subjected to further discipline including possible termination. The in-service was signed by RN AA and the previous Interim Director of Health Services (DHS). A copy of the Medication Administration policy was attached. In addition, a copy of RN AA's termination dated 10/4/2024. 7. Review of the IJRP revealed a document titled Quality Assessment and Assurance/QAPI Committee Meeting Attendance Sheet dated 10/2/2024 signed by 17 attendees. Administrator, Interim DHS, Medical Director, Infection Control Preventionist, Admissions, Business Office, Case Mix Director, Dietary Services, Environmental Services, Human Resource, Maintenance Director, Medical Records, Senior Care Partner, Treatments, Unit Managers KK, BB, and UU. There was an attached typed note stating All staff are to follow care plans and report abuse as soon as it occurs. Administrator's cell phone number is posted, and she must be called immediately. Policies for care planning and abuse reporting were reviewed with no revisions necessary. The Abuse and care plan policy attached. 8. Review of the IJRP revealed under tab 8 was a copy of the Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Care Planning dated 10/7/2024. The PIP identified the problem category care planning. The root cause summary licensed nursing failed to follow the residents plan of care. The overall goal is to follow each resident's individualized plan of care. The PIP remains in progress. Team members Project Director - Administrator, Project Manager - DHS, Team Member - LPN/UM KK and LPN/UM BB. There was no information under Tab 8 regarding medication. 9. Review of the IJRP revealed a document titled Quality Assessment and Assurance/QAPI Committee Meeting Attendance Sheet dated 10/2/2024 signed by seventeen attendees: Administrator, Interim DHS, Medical Director, Infection Control Preventionist, Admissions, Business Office, Case Mix Director, Dietary Services, Environmental Services, Human Resource, Maintenance Director, Medical Records, Senior Care Partner, Treatments, Unit Managers KK, BB, and UU. There was an attached typed note stating All staff are to follow care plans and report abuse as soon as it occurs. Administrator's cell phone number is posted, and she must be called immediately. Policies for care planning and abuse reporting were reviewed with no revisions necessary. Further review revealed 10/5/2024 The removal plan has been developed, reviewed by the medical Director, Administrator, DHS and Senior Nurse Consultant and we agree with the contents. Written in Medical Director by phone and the signature of the Senior Nurse Consultant, Interim DHS, and the Administrator. 10. There was no documentation in the IJRP book for Tab 10. At the beginning of F-Tag 656 IJRP was a copy of The Daily Census Report dated10/4/2024. At the top of the report handwritten care plan audit. An interview on 10/9/2024 at 1:25 pm, LPN JJ stated one hundred and twenty-seven resident care plans were reviewed. She stated the Interim DHS (prior), and unit managers went to each resident's room with a copy of the care plan. The care plan was reviewed to ensure accuracy. Any identified discrepancies were identified with a red pen. She stated the care plan were returned to the MDS department and updated. The residents care plan were signed off in pink to show that the corrections were made. LPN JJ supplied the surveyor with the 127 resident care plans. Thirty-seven care plans had to be corrected/updated. Three resident CP selected for review R4, R7, R12 for the identified concern that was corrected. 11. The Facility's corrective actions were completed on 10/4/2024 and the facility alleges immediacy of IJ removal on 10/5/2024.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration: General Guidelines, the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration: General Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R) (R1) was free from a significant medication error which resulted in actual harm, requiring a transfer to the hospital and admitted to Intensive Care Unit on 9/14/2024. On 10/2/2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to residents. The facility's Administrator, Interim Director of Health Services, and Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/2/2024 at 12:03 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 9/14/2024 when the facility failed to report an incident of significant medication error for R1, when Registered Nurse AA administered the wrong medications, which included allopurinol 100 milligram (mg), amlodipine 10 mg, Eliquis 2.5 mg, ferrous sulfate 325 mg, Lasix 40 mg, losartan 50 mg, metoprolol 100 mg, oxcarbazepine 300 mg (two tablets), potassium chloride extended release (ER) 10 milliequivalents (mEq), valsartan 80 mg, and vitamin D3 25 micrograms (mcg). R1 had a change in condition (bradycardia and hypotension) and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for higher level of care with diagnosis of poisoning by beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist - accidental (unintentional). The resident received intravenous (IV) fluids for hypotension, IV glucagon, IV Levophed, and IV Calcium. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 10/8/2024. The removal plan included in-service training for nursing staff on medication administration, including competency checks for licensed staff, and in-service training for administration staff on reporting and investigating alleged violations. Through observations, record review, and interviews, the survey team verified all elements of the facility's IJ Removal Plan, and the immediacy of the deficient practice was removed on 10/5/2024. The facility remained out of compliance while the facility continues management level staff oversight as well as continues to develop and implement a Plan of Correction (POC). This oversight process includes the analysis of facility staff's conformance with the facility's policies and procedures regarding reporting of incidents related to medication administration. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Medication Administration: General Guidelines dated 7/22/2024 revealed the policy as medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medications. Procedure Number 2. Medications are administered with written orders of the attending physician. Number 4. Medications are administered at the time they are prepared. Medications are not pre-poured/pre-set/pre-crushed. Only one patient/resident's medications are prepared and administered at a time. Number 7. Patients/residents are identified before medication is administered. When in doubt: check photograph attached to medical record, call patient/resident by name, if necessary, verify patient/resident identification with other healthcare center personnel. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction due to embolism of other artery, malignant neoplasm of unspecified bronchus or lung, aortic valve stenosis, hypertension (HTN), and hypercholesteremia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. No mood or behavior concerns during the assessment period. The resident required partial/moderate assistance with bathing, dressing and transfers, supervision with toileting and was independent for eating/oral hygiene. Review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) revealed the report was undated, completed by the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator, revealed a report for type of incident as other - resident reported medication error. The report indicated the incident occurred on 9/14/2024 at morning med pass. Details revealed resident complained of dizziness and headache and was sent to emergency room and admitted . Review of the Situation, Background, Appearance, Review Communication Form (SBAR) dated 9/14/2024 revealed the resident reports ingestion of wrong meds. Background revealed medical history of cerebral infarction, malignant neoplasm, and aortic stenosis. The rest of the form was incomplete with no vital signs documented or signature noted. On 9/14/2024 a significant medication error occurred during the 9:00 am medication pass when RN AA allegedly administered medications to R1 that were not prescribed for her, including allopurinol (medication used to treat gout) 100 milligram (mg) one tablet at 9:00 am, amlodipine (medication used to treat high blood pressure and/or chest pain) 10 mg one tablet at 9:00 am, Eliquis (medication used to treat and prevent blood clots) 2.5 mg one tablet at 9:00 am, ferrous sulfate (medication used to treat iron deficiency anemia) 325 mg one tablet at 9:00 am, furosemide (medication used to treat fluid retention and swelling due to congestive heart failure) 40 mg one tablet at 9:00 am, losartan (medication used to treat high blood pressure) 50 mg one tablet at 9:00 am, metoprolol tartrate (medication used to high blood pressure and/or chest pain) 100 mg one tablet at 9:00 am, natural fiber laxative (medication used to prevent constipation) one tablet at 9:00 am, oxcarbazepine (medication to treat epileptic seizures) 300 mg two tablets at 9:00 am, potassium chloride extended release (ER) (medication used to treat low levels of potassium in the blood) 10 milliequivalents (mEq) two caps at 9:00 am, valsartan (medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure) 80 mg one tablet at 9:00 am, and vitamin D3 (medication used to treat and prevent bone disorders) 25 (micrograms) mcg two tablets at 9:00 am. Review of the Grievance/Complaint Form dated 9/14/2024 completed by Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) BB, revealed the resident stated, that nurse gave me the wrong medicine. Further review of the grievance revealed the resident had given a Dietary Aide a medicine cup that had '206' written on it, and the resident resides in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The resident complained of dizziness and nausea. The resident was sent to the hospital for possible consumption of the wrong medications. Review of Progress Note dated 9/14/2024 at 6:18 pm written by Registered Nurse (RN) AA, revealed patient was set to be discharged home with her son and daughter-in-law when she announced she had been given the wrong meds and she was not feeling well. She stated that she had been given approximately 14 pills including two large blue pills that she does not normally take. I only gave her 4 or 5 pills and none of them were blue. The son and daughter-in-law were at bedside and were aware of the situation. The LPN/UM BB and Director of Health Services (DHS) were notified and the patient was sent to the emergency room (ER), and after evaluation, was placed in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Review of the September 2024 Physician Orders (PO) revealed no evidence that R1 was prescribed allopurinol, amlodipine, Eliquis, ferrous sulfate, furosemide, losartan, metoprolol tartrate, natural fiber laxative, oxcarbazepine, potassium chloride, valsartan, or vitamin D3, which were allegedly administered to her in error on the morning of 9/14/2024 during the 9:00 am medication pass. Review of the [name of hospital] Emergency Department (ED) provider note dated 9/14/2024 at 11:03 am documented resident presents via emergency medical services (EMS) for evaluation of accidental drug ingestion - patient reports she was given and took about 14 pills this morning at the [name of nursing facility] which were not her prescribed medications. She was admitted to the ICU and managed for shock, hypotension (blood pressure 87/47) and bradycardia (heart rate 53) after accidental ingestion of several medications including calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, mood stabilizers, and anticoagulation{sic}. Review of faxed paperwork from the facility from today's date (9/14/2024), patient received oxcarbazepine 300 mg, potassium chloride 10 mEq, valsartan 80 mg, allopurinol 100 mg, amlodipine 10 mg, cyanocobalamin 1000 mcg/ml, Eliquis 2.5 mg, ferrous sulfate 325 mg, furosemide 40 mg, metoprolol tartrate 100 mg, and natural fiber laxative. Today's visit represents an acute illness or injury that poses a threat to life or bodily function. She was administered intravenous (IV) fluids, IV calcium, IV glucagon bolus times two doses and subsequently started on a glucagon drip, and Levophed drip. Interview on 9/24/2024 at 11:25 am. with LPN/UM BB stated she was working on the 400 Hall on Saturday 9/14/2024, when a dietary staff member told her that a resident on the 200 Hall was upset and wanting to speak to a person in charge. She stated that she went to R1's room, and she was very upset and nervous, and informed her that she had been given the wrong pills earlier that morning. She stated R1 said there were about 12 pills in the cup, and she only takes three pills in the morning. LPN/UM BB stated she started looking at the residents on the hall close to R1's room, and discovered that R1 could possibly have been given another residents medications, who was in room [ROOM NUMBER], next door to R1's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]). During further interview, she stated that she questioned RN AA if she had given R1 the wrong medication, and she replied, I did not. Interview on 9/24/2024 at 12:20 pm, a family member of R1, stated when he arrived at the facility on 9/14/2024, to take his mother home, she told him she had been given the wrong medications earlier that day, that she had been given 12 pills that weren't prescribed to her. R1's son stated that his mom told him she questioned the nurse about the extra pills, but the nurse told her they were her pills, and that she needed to take them. During further interview, he said that he spoke to R1's nurse, and she stated that she didn't give those pills to his mother, so he asked to speak to the 'head' nurse. He stated the 'head' nurse came to his mother's room and he explained to her what his mother had told him. The nurse returned to R1's room and told him his mother could have possibly been given the resident's meds in room [ROOM NUMBER] (R1 was in 208). He then stated he wanted his mother to be sent to the emergency room to be checked out because she was complaining of nausea and her stomach was hurting. He stated that she was admitted to the hospital in ICU for four days, but was at home now with home health. He stated that she is still very weak. Phone interview on 9/24/2024 at 2:43 pm, RN AA confirmed that she was the nurse on duty on 9/14/2024. She stated that she remembers the resident alleged that she had received the wrong medications that morning. RN AA stated that there were four or five medications listed on R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and that she administered only the medications that were listed. During further interview, she stated that the resident did not question her about the medications that were in the cup when she gave them to her. Interview on 10/2/2024 at 10:15 am, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated that on the morning of 9/14/2024 she was on her way back to the kitchen when R1 (who was in the hallway sitting in a wheelchair) stated that she took the wrong medication and wanted to talk to a nurse. The DM stated that she went to the 400 Hall and asked the UM to come check on the resident. The facility implemented the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: 1. On 9/14/2024 the Assistant Director of Health Services (ADHS) interviewed 10 residents who are alert and oriented and residing on R1's floor/assignment. 10 of 10 residents stated that they had no concerns with their medication administration and received their medications as ordered. The other two residents on the hall were observed by the UM on 9/14/2024 with no change in condition observed for two out of two residents who were cognitively impaired. 2. On 9/14/2024 six out of six medication carts were audited by the UM with no evidence of improper medication labeling or storage to include the resident's name, medication, dose and frequency. 3. On 9/14/2024 a Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (SBAR) form was completed for R1 related to the alleged medication error and the on-call Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notified. 4. The ADHS began education with all licensed nurses beginning on 9/14/2024, on the topic of Medication Administration and the five Rights of Medication Administration. At the time of the incident, the facility employed 11 RNs and 30 LPNs, 40 out of 41 nurses were educated by 9/23/2024 to total 97.56% of nursing staff education completed. 11 licensed nurses were provided education in person, and 29 licensed nurses were provided education via telephone by the ADHS. The remaining one licensed nurse is on leave ad will be provided education upon return. The facility does not utilize Medication Aides or Agency staff. 5. The ADHS began competencies with licensed nurses beginning on 9/14/2024, to review medication administration. 40 out of 41 nurses were reviewed for competency by 9/23/2024. The remaining one licensed nurse is on leave and will be provided education upon return. 40 out of 40 licensed nurses passed the medication administration competency. 6. The following medication administration observations were performed: a. Between 9/14/2024 and 9/23/2024, the ADHS and the UM completed a total of 54 medication administration observations utilizing the tool titled Medication Administration. The observations were completed for one resident on each of the 6 medication carts each day to include both day and night shifts. The observations were focused to ensure medications were administered as ordered and that no medication error occurred, the observations were completed with 54 out of 54 observations with no findings. 7. On 9/14/2024 the Medical Director was notified of the alleged medication error by the Administrator with no additional directive regarding the incident, other than ensuring that the resident was transferred to the hospital. 8. The facility Administrator held an Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) meeting with the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) on 9/16/2024 to discuss the alleged incident and the plan to implement cart observations, education on medication administration, and medication administration observations. The Administrator, the ADHS, UM, Treatment Nurse, Social Services Director (SSD), Maintenance, Housekeeping Supervisor, Human Resources and the Financial Counselor were in attendance. The Medication Administration Policy was reviewed, and no changes or revisions were made to the policy. The Medical Director attended via telephone. A root cause analysis was completed during the AD Hoc QAPI meeting on 9/16/2024 by the IDT with the outcome that RN AA was provided competency upon hire by the ADHS on 9/9/2024 with a passing review; however, the nurse failed to follow the medication administration policies for R1 on 9/14/2024. 9. The DHS and the ADHS will provide education to the licensed nurses upon hire regarding medication administration and the rights of medication administration during new hire orientation. Licensed nurses will also receive a competency for medication administration upon hire. All findings will be brought to each QAPI meeting. 10. The Medical Director, Administrator, DHS, Senior Nurse Consultant were all involved in developing the removal plan, reviewed the plan, and agreed with the contents. The facility will be in compliance effective 10/5/2024. 11. The Administrator and DHS will monitor the implementation of the removal plan. The Administrator and DHS will utilize the Performance Improvement Plan that was created on 9/16/2024 and is updated with interventions including medication administration observations to ensure residents are free from medication errors and medication cart audits to ensure proper medication labeling and storage to include the resident's name, medication, dose, and frequency. 12. The facility's corrective actions were completed on 10/4/2024, and the facility alleges immediacy of IJ removal on 10/5/2024. The State Survey Agency (SSA) validated the facility's written IJ Removal Plan as follows: 1. Review of the form dated 10/14/2024 revealed that 10 residents were interviewed regarding medications they received on the morning med pass of 9/14/2024 and all residents interviewed voiced no concerns and stated they received their medications as usual. Review of the form dated 9/14/2024 revealed that the two residents who were non-interviewable were observed regarding medications they received on the morning med pass of 9/14/2024, both residents are in wheelchairs sitting in hallway near the nurses' station and both residents were acting as per usual with no concerns noted with either resident. Review of the Medication Administration Audit tool dated 9/14/2024 revealed that all medications passed were administered correctly. Interview on 10/8/2024 at 1:33 pm with LPN/UM BB for 100, 200, 300, and 400 halls stated that she assisted in the medication audit. She stated on 9/14/2024 she observed six nurses on various halls administer medications. The UM stated she compared the medication from the auto fill to the medication administration record (MAR). She stated she came in on off shifts and observed a total of twenty-seven nurses administer medication. The UM stated she did not identify any issues during the medication observations. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 10:00 am with R15, stated that he doesn't remember anyone asking him about his medications, but stated that as far as he knows, he gets the correct medications at the right time. He also stated that the nurses will verify who he is before they give him his medication. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 10:05 am, R16 stated he remembers a nurse asking him about his medications and if he was getting what the doctor had ordered for him. He stated that he gets the medicines that he is supposed to have. He further stated that the nurse will ask him his name before giving him his medicines. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 10:15 am, R12 stated that she thinks she gets her medications as the doctor has prescribed. She stated that she would question the nurse if she had thought she was getting the wrong medication. 2. Review of the Medication Cart Audits dated 9/14/2024 revealed that all medication carts for all eight units were audited with no issues noted - medications were labeled with residents' names, medication, dose and frequency. The following halls share a medication cart on 300 and 400 Halls, and 700 and 800 Halls share a medication cart for a total of six medication carts. 3. Review of the Situation, Background, Appearance, Review (SBAR) form dated 9/14/2024 revealed the change in condition, symptoms, or signs observed and evaluated were resident reports ingestion of wrong medications. The remainder of the form is incomplete and is not signed by facility staff. 4. Review of the Inservice Education Program Summary Record Form dated 9/14/2024 titled Medication Administration by the ADHS revealed 'we do not pre-pour medications in a nursing home, we also don't leave meds at the bedside - this helps prevent serious errors and is essential for patient safety' with the policy titled Medication Administration: General Guidelines attached. Review of the Inservice Program Attendance Record Form dated 9/14/2024 revealed 11 signatures from licensed nurses indicating in-person attendance and 29 licensed nurses names listed as receiving education via telephone on 9/14/2024. Interview on 10/8/2024 at 1:30 pm, Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) revealed that there were 29 licensed nurses who were educated via telephone and 11 nurses were educated in-person. One nurse on leave. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 9:50 am, LPN RR stated she was educated on med administration - verify the resident, check the name of the med, the dose, the frequency, etc. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 10:25 am, LPN DD stated that she is the Nurse Navigator for the facility and is aware of why surveyors are in the facility. She stated that the DHS re-educated her on medication administration, the five rights of the med pass, don't pre-pour meds and leave in the med cart, etc. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 10:45 am, RN QQ stated that he was educated on medication administration, the five rights of med administration, do not pre pour medications, do not label the med cup with the room number. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 11:20 am, LPN PP stated she has worked with the facility for six years on the 600 Hall - spoke about the incident regarding the medication incident where a resident received the wrong medications. She stated she was educated on the medication administration policy and meds that can be crushed or not crushed. Phone interview on 10/9/2024 at 7:45 pm, LPN OO stated she was educated on the medication administration policy where they discussed the five rights of med administration, not to pre-pour meds in the cups and do not label the cups with the room number. 5. Review of the competencies revealed that from 9/14/2024 until 9/23/2024 40 out of 40 licensed nurses were checked-off for medication administration. 6. Review of the Medication Administration Audit tool dated 9/14/2024 revealed that all medications passed were administered correctly. Interview on 10/8/2024 at 1:33 pm with LPN/UM BB for 100, 200, 300, and 400 halls stated that she assisted in the medication audit. She stated on 9/14/2024 she observed six nurses on various halls administer medications. The UM stated she compared the medication from the auto fill to the medication administration record (MAR). She stated she came in on off shifts and observed a total of twenty-seven nurses administer medication. The UM stated she did not identify any issues during the medication observation 7. Review of the facility document which revealed that the Administrator notified the Medical Director of the medication error on 9/14/2024 with no additional directive. 8. Review of the facility form titled AD Hoc Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) Meeting Attendance Sheet dated 9/16/2024 revealed the following were in attendance with signatures present: Administrator, Assistant Director of Health Services (ADHS), Medical Director via phone, Infection Preventionist (IP), Activities Director, Admissions Coordinator, Business Office Manager, Clinical Competency Coordinator, Dietary Director, Environmental Services Director, Human Resources, Maintenance, Medical Records, Restoration Nurse, Senior Care Partner, Social Services Director, Transportation Coordinator, Treatment Nurse, Unit Managers. The following was discussed at the QAPI meeting - discussed/reviewed medication error, the plan will be to re-educate nurses on the medication administration policy and all nurses will be competent to administer medication, the clinical team will complete medication cart audits and medication administration observations daily. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 11:43 am, LPN JJ stated that she works in the MDS department where she does the MDS for the residents and develops the care plans. She further stated that she received education on medication administration even though she does not work on the unit as a charge nurse. Interview on 10/9/2024 at 11:50 am, with LPN/UM KK, stated that she is the UM on the second floor which includes Halls 500 - 800. She stated that she was involved in the med administration observations with the Charge Nurses and med cart audits. 9. No new Licensed Nurse's hired. 10. Review of the facility document dated 10/5/2024 revealed that the removal plan has been developed, reviewed by the Medical Director, Administrator, DHS and Senior Nurse Consultant and we agree with the contents. Four signatures reviewed from above list indicating attendance. 11. Review of the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) for medication administration revealed that the target end date will be 10/16/2024 with interventions in progress. Problem category - medication administration; root cause summary - nurses are provided competency upon hire and annually. The nurse failed to follow the medication administration policy. Overall goal - residents will receive prescribed medications as ordered. Project Conclusions - in progress. 12. The Facility's corrective actions were completed on 10/4/2024 and the facility alleges immediacy of IJ removal on 10/5/2024.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, interviews, review of the Administrator Job Description and Director of Health Services Job Description, and review of the policy titled Reporting Patient Abuse, Neglect, Explo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, interviews, review of the Administrator Job Description and Director of Health Services Job Description, and review of the policy titled Reporting Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property the facility Administration failed to use its resources effectively and efficiently resulting in the failure to attain the highest practicable physical and psychosocial wellbeing of the residents. Specifically, Administration failed to ensure resident (R) R1 was free from significant medication error resulting in actual harm on 9/14/2024, requiring transfer to hospital and admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In addition, Administration failed to report the alleged medication error incident as well as an allegation of sexual abuse between R7 and R8 to the State Survey Agency (SSA) in a timely manner. On 10/2/2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to residents. The facility's Administrator, Interim Director of Health Services, and Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/2/2024 at 12:03 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 9/14/2024 when the facility failed to report an incident of significant medication error for R1, when Registered Nurse AA administered the wrong medications, which included allopurinol 100 milligram (mg), amlodipine 10 mg, Eliquis 2.5 mg, ferrous sulfate 325 mg, Lasix 40 mg, losartan 50 mg, metoprolol 100 mg, oxcarbazepine 300 mg (two tablets), potassium chloride extended release (ER) 10 milliequivalents (mEq), valsartan 80 mg, and vitamin D3 25 micrograms (mcg). R1 had a change in condition (bradycardia and hypotension) and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for higher level of care with diagnosis of poisoning by beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist - accidental (unintentional). The resident received intravenous (IV) fluids for hypotension, IV glucagon, IV Levophed, and IV Calcium. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 10/8/2024. The removal plan included in-service training for nursing staff on medication administration, including competency checks for licensed staff, and in-service training for administration staff on reporting and investigating alleged violations. Through observations, record review, and interviews, the survey team verified all elements of the facility's IJ Removal Plan, and the immediacy of the deficient practice was removed on 10/5/2024. The facility remained out of compliance while the facility continues management level staff oversight as well as continues to develop and implement a Plan of Correction (POC). This oversight process includes the analysis of facility staff's conformance with the facility's policies and procedures regarding reporting of incidents related to medication administration. Review of the document titled Position Description-Administrator revealed a hire date of 7/22/2024. The document revealed the 'Job Purpose' is to direct the day-to-day functions of the nursing center is in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations that govern long-term care centers. Key Responsibilities: Number 5. Ability to apply standards of professional practice to operations of nursing facility and to establish criteria to assure that care provided meets established standards of quality. Number 8. Demonstrates knowledge of and respect for the rights, dignity and individuality of each patient/resident in all interactions. Demonstrates competency in protection and promotion of resident rights. Number 10. Ability to communicate effectively with staff members, other professional staff, consultants and residents in interdisciplinary care setting and to government agencies. The bottom of the document had a statement that indicated the job description was reviewed with no changes needed at this time, dated 10/2024. Review of the document titled Position Description-Director of Health Services revealed a hire date of 9/23/2024. The document revealed the 'Job Purpose' is to plan, organize, develop and directs the overall operation of the Nursing Services Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local regulations governing our nursing center, and as may be directed by the Administrator and the Medical Director to provide appropriate care. Key Responsibilities: Number 34. Maintain knowledge of documentation procedures including appropriate use of forms, timelines, and Medicare documentation. Number 35. Maintain a working knowledge of current licensure standards and the survey process. The bottom of the document had a statement that indicated the job description was reviewed with no changes needed at this time, dated 10/2024. 1. The facility administration failed to ensure one resident was free of significant medication errors. R1 had a change in condition that jeopardized the residents health requiring her to be cared for in the ICU. 2. The facility administration failed to report an incident of significant medication error on 9/14/2024 that occurred during the 9:00 a.m. medication pass, by RN AA. The incident was not reported timely within the mandated two-hour time frame. 3. The facility Administration failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse on 7/6/2024 between R7 and R8, when R8 was found in R7's room receiving oral gratification, in a timely manner. Interview on 10/2/2024 at 1:00 pm, the Administrator stated that she would have never thought to report a medication error to the State because it wasn't abuse or neglect. During continued interview, she acknowledged that the medication error was an adverse incident that caused harm to the resident. Post survey interview on 10/18/2024 at 3:00 pm with Senior Nurse Consultant (SNC) GG stated any reportable sent to the SSA should be sent to herself or the Area [NAME] President (AVP). She stated she did not receive a reportable for the incident between R7 and R8. She also stated she was not aware that the incident happened on 7/6/2024 and was not reported until 7/16/2024. During further interview, the SNC revealed at that time the facility had a different Administrator that is no longer working at the facility. She confirmed the facility reportable incident should be reported on the day of the incident. Cross Refer F609, F760 The facility implemented the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: 1. Education has been provided to facility administration by Senior Nurse Consultant (SNC) to include the Administrator and Director of Health Services (DHS) on the medication administration policy and procedures and the reporting of significant incidents to the state agency on 10/2/24. 2. The Director of Partner Services reviewed the Job Descriptions on 10/2/2024 with no changes or revisions needed. The Area [NAME] President provided education to the Administrator regarding the job responsibilities and a new job description was signed by the Administrator on 10/2/2024 acknowledging the job responsibilities and duties for facility oversight. The Administrator provided education to the Director of Health Services on 10/2/2024 regarding the job responsibilities and a new job description was signed by the Director of Health Services. 3. The Assistant Director of Health Services began education with all licensed nurses beginning on 9/14/2024, on the topic of Medication Administration and the Rights of Medication Administration. At the time of the incident, the facility employed 11 RNs and 30 LPNs. 40 out of 41 nurses were educated by 9/23/2024 to total 97.56% of nursing staff education completed. 11 licensed nurses were provided education in person, and 29 licensed nurses were provided education via telephone by the Assistant Director of Health Services. The remaining one licensed nurse is on leave and will be provided education upon return. The facility does not utilize Medication Aides or Agency staff. 4. The Assistant Director of Health Services began competencies with licensed nurses beginning on 9/14/2024, to review the Medication Administration. 40 out of 41 nurses were reviewed for competency by 9/23/2024 to total 97.56% of nursing staff education completed. The remaining 1 licensed nurse is on leave and will be provided education upon return. 40 out of 40 licensed nurses passed the medication administration competency. 5. On 9/14/2024, the Medical Director was notified of the alleged medication error by the Administrator with no additional directive regarding the incident other than ensuring the resident was transferred to the hospital. 6. RN AA was provided with a written disciplinary action on 9/14/2024 by the Assistant Director of Health Services and the Administrator and re-educated regarding medication administration. RN AA was also observed with a medication administration competency by the Assistant Director of Health Services on 9/14/2024. RN AA was suspended pending investigation on 10/2/2024 and subsequently terminated employment on 10/3/2024. 7. The facility Administrator held an Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting with the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) on 9/16/2024 to discuss the alleged nedication incident and the plan to implement cart observations, education on medication administration. The Administrator, Assistant Director of Health Services (ADHS), Unit Managers, Treatment Nurses, Social Service Director, Maintenance, Housekeeping Supervisor, Human Resource and the Financial Counselor. The Medication Administration Policy was reviewed, and no changes or revisions were made to the policy. Medical Director attended via phone. A root cause analysis was completed during the Ad Hoc QAPI meeting related to administrative oversight where it was identified a lack of understanding regarding the parameter of the administrative role. 8. The DHS and the ADHS will provide education to licensed nurses upon hire regarding medication administration and the rights of medication administration during new hire orientation. Licensed nurses will also receive a competency for medication administration upon hire. 9. The Medical Director, Administrator, DHS, Senior Nurse Consultant, were all involved in developing the removal plan, reviewed it, and agreed with the contents. The facility will be in compliance effective 10/5/2024. 10. The Administrator and DHS will monitor the implementation of the removal plan. The Administrator and DHS will utilize the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) was initiated on 10/2/2024 to include education with administration regarding their roles and responsibilities and monitoring by the Area [NAME] President (AVP). 11. The facility's corrective actions were completed on 10/4/2024 and the facility alleges immediacy of IJ removal on 10/5/2024. The State Survey Agency (SSA) validated the facility's written IJ Removal Plan as follows: 1. Review of the Inservice Education Program Attendance Record Form dated 10/2/2024 revealed the Administrator and the DHS were educated on the Medication Administration Policy, the Abuse Policy and reporting of significant medication errors. 2. Review of the facility document dated 10/2/2024 revealed that the Area [NAME] President (AVP) has reviewed and educated the Administrator on her duties and job description. The skilled nursing administrator job description for [facility name] was reviewed in detail and inservice completed. Signed by Area [NAME] President (AVP). Review of the facility document dated 10/2/2024 revealed the Administrator has reviewed and educated the Director of Health Services (DHS) on her duties and job description. The Director of Health Services job description for [facility name] was reviewed in detail and in-service completed. Signed by Administrator. 3. Review of the Inservice Education Program Summary Record Form dated 9/14/2024 titled Medication Administration by the ADHS revealed 'we do not pre-pour medications in a nursing home, we also don't leave meds at the bedside - this helps prevent serious errors and is essential for patient safety' with the Medication Administration: General Guidelines attached. Review of the In-Service Program Attendance Record Form dated 9/14/2024 revealed 11 signatures from licensed nurses indicating in-person attendance and 29 licensed nurses names listed as receiving education via telephone on 9/14/2024. - Discrepancies being clarified by the Regional Nurse Consultant (should be a total of 40 nurses with one nurse on leave). In an interview with the Regional Nurse Consultant on 10/8/2024 at 1:30 pm revealed that there were 29 licensed nurses who were educated via telephone and 11 nurses were educated in-person. In an interview with LPN/UM BB on 10/9/2024 at 9:50 am stated she was educated on med administration - verify the resident, check the name of the med, the dose, the frequency, etc. She further stated they discussed care plans - following the care plan and updating as needed. She stated they talked about abuse and what, when and who to report to is you suspect abuse. In an interview with LPN CC on 10/9/2024 at 9:55 am stated that the UM educated them on medications administration and watched them pass meds and checked their med carts. She stated they talked about the rights of medication administration, verify the resident, the med, the dose, the frequency, do not pre-pour meds or right the room number on the med cup. She stated they talked about abuse - what and when and who to report to. In an interview with LPN DD on 10/9/2024 at 10:25 am stated that she is the Nurse Navigator for the facility and is aware of why surveyors are in the facility. She stated that the DHS re-educated her on medication administration, the five rights of the med pass, don't pre-pour meds and leave in the med cart, etc. She stated that she was also re-educated on care plans - following the care plans and updating the care plans when a change occurs for the resident. She stated that they also discussed the abuse policy - that the Administrator is the Abuse Coordinator and she is who they report suspected abuse to as soon as it is suspected. In an interview with RN PP on 10/9/2024 at 10:45 am stated that he was educated on medication administration, the five rights of med administration, do not pre pour medications, do not label the med cup with the room number. He also stated that he was educated on abuse, who the Abuse Coordinator is and what and when to report. He further stated that he was also educated on care plans - following the care plan and update the care plan as needed. In an interview with LPN HH 10/9/2024 at 11:00 stated she was educated on medication pass, abuse, care plans, UM KK watched med pass, don't pre-pour the medication, if you suspect abuse to report to the Administrator immediately. Discussed updating the care plan when there is a change in condition. In an interview with RN EE via phone on 10/9/2024 at 7:50 pm stated that she normally works 7:00 pm to 7:00 am as a Charge Nurse. She stated that the UM KK educated them on the abuse policy, medication administration, and care plans. She also stated that they are to follow the medication rights, verify the resident, the medication, the dose, frequency, route, etc. She stated that the Abuse Coordinator is the Administrator. 4. Review of the competencies revealed that from 9/14/2024 until 9/23/2024 40 out of 40 licensed nurses were checked-off for medication administration In an interview with LPN HH on 10/9/2024 at 11:00 am, she stated she was educated on medication pass, abuse, care plans, the UM KK watched med pass, don't pre-pour the medication, if you suspect abuse to report to the Administrator immediately. Discussed updating the care plan when there is a change in condition. In an interview with LPN LL on 10/9/2024 at 11:11 am stated she has worked at the facility for six years. She stated she is aware of the reason the surveyors are here is due to medication administration. She stated the UM KK watched her pass medications, she checked the medication cart and verified all contents. She stated she uses an acronym CTDMR = right client, right time, right dose, right medication, right room. She stated the care plan is all you need to take care of the person, and she was aware of how to locate the care plan in the EMR. During further interview, she stated they discussed abuse, move the client out of the way and report it immediately. 5. Review of the facility document dated 9/14/2024 revealed that the Administrator notified the Medical Director of the medication error which occurred on 9/14/2024 with no additional directive. 6. Review of the facility document revealed that RN AA was educated on medication administration policy on 9/14/2024 and understands the policy and understands that this is a corrective action. Any violation of the policy will result in further discipline including possible termination. Signed by the ADHS and RN AA. Further review of the facility document titled 'Pending Transaction' revealed the RN AA was terminated and not eligible for rehire on 10/4/2024. 7. Review of the facility form titled AD Hoc QAPI Meeting Attendance Sheet dated 9/16/2024 revealed the following were in attendance with signatures present: The Administrator, The ADHS, Medical Director via phone, Infection Preventionist (IP), Activities Director, Admissions Coordinator, Business Office Manager, Clinical Competency Coordinator, Dietary Director, Environmental Services Director, Human Resources, Maintenance, Medical Records, Restoration Nurse, Senior Care Partner, Social Services Director, Transportation Coordinator, Treatment Nurse, Unit Managers. The following was discussed at the QAPI meeting - discussed/reviewed medication error, the plan will be to re-educate nurses on the medication administration policy and all nurses will be competent to administer medication, the clinical team will complete medication cart audits and medication administration observations daily. 8. No new Licensed Nurse's hired. 9. Review of the facility document dated 10/5/2024 revealed that the removal plan has been developed, reviewed by the Medical Director, the Administrator, DHS and Senior Nurse Consultant and we agree with the contents. Four signatures reviewed from above list indicating attendance. 10. Review of the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) for Medication Administration revealed that the target end date will be 10/16/2024 with interventions in progress. Problem category - medication administration; root cause summary - nurses are provided competency upon hire and annually. The nurse failed to follow the medication administration policy. Overall goal - residents will receive prescribed medications as ordered. Project Conclusions - in progress. Review of the facility document dated 10/2/2024 revealed that the Area [NAME] President (AVP) has reviewed and educated the Administrator on her duties and job description. The skilled nursing administrator job description for [facility name] was reviewed in detail and inservice completed. Signed by AVP. Review of the facility document dated 10/2/2024 revealed the Administrator has reviewed and educated the DHS on her duties and job description. The Director of Health Services (DHS) job description for [facility name] was reviewed in detail and in-service completed. Signed by Administrator.
Jun 2022 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy titled, Prevention of Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy titled, Prevention of Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported immediately to the Administrator for one resident (R) (R#25), of three sampled residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Prevention of Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property, revised 10/27/20, revealed, It is the policy of [corporation] and its affiliated entities (collectively, the 'Organization') to actively preserve each patient's right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of patient property, (referred to collectively in this policy as 'abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and exploitation'). The Organization and its partners should assure that best efforts are made to prevent any occurrences of any form of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The policy also indicated, Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental anguish. Further review of the policy revealed, Providers are to assure that patients, families, patient representatives, and staff are provided information on how and to whom they may report concerns, occurrences, and grievances without fear of retribution, and to provide feedback regarding the concerns that have been expressed. Review of the clinical record revealed R#25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, centrilobular emphysema, anxiety, and depression. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R#25 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance of two or more people for bed mobility. Per the MDS, the resident received antianxiety and antidepressant medications. During an interview on 6/6/22 at 12:28 p.m., R#25 stated a staff member came into her room at mealtime on Saturday (6/4/22) and pointed her finger in my face and told me I need to quit lying about people. She stated that the staff member told the resident she was the head of the nurses' aides. R#25 further stated the staff member did not wear a uniform and that the staff member was scary. R#25 also stated that she told the same staff member the previous day to leave her alone. She continued to state that the staff member, looks angry when she came into the resident's room and did so all the time. The resident stated, I wish I never had to hear her voice again. She then stated that she told Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) QQ about the incident but indicated CNA QQ did not know who she was talking about. During an interview on 6/7/22 at 2:32 p.m., CNA QQ revealed staff were supposed to go to the Administrator if someone reported abuse. She stated that no one had reported abuse to her. According to CNA QQ, R#25 had spoken to Social Services staff that morning about an incident. During an interview on 6/7/22 at 2:47 p.m., Social Services RR revealed she had spoken to R#25 and that the resident felt threatened by the way some of the staff spoke to her. Social Services RR also stated that R#25 reported that over the weekend, a CNA shook her finger at the resident and pointed, and that staff were not nice to her. Social Services RR further stated R#25 could not remember the name of the CNA who pointed her finger at her, but said it was a two-part name and provided a description of the CNA's height and race. Social Services RR stated that she felt that shaking a finger at a resident was abusive and that no one should do that to a resident. Social Services RR stated she did report the incident to the Administrator. During a follow-up interview on 6/7/22 at 3:37 p.m., Social Services revealed that R#25 reported the incident to her that day (6/7/22) at 10:34 a.m. During an interview on 6/7/22 at 3:09 p.m., the Administrator revealed no one had recently reported an allegation of resident abuse. She revealed that she considers someone talking to a resident and shaking their finger at the resident abusive. The Administrator stated she would want to know about something like that right away.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0888 (Tag F0888)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews, interviews , and review of the policy titled, Mandatory COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination Policy, the facility failed to ensure one of 140 staff members was fully vaccinated ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, interviews , and review of the policy titled, Mandatory COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination Policy, the facility failed to ensure one of 140 staff members was fully vaccinated or had a medical or religious exemption on file. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Mandatory COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination Policy, revised 4/1/22, revealed, This policy requires vaccination against COVID-19 and Influenza among all partners (employees) of the Organization. The goal is to protect - to the greatest extent possible - our partners, residents, guests, patients, and clients; their families; and the broader community from COVID-19 infection and the Influenza virus as we all do our part to survive this worldwide pandemic. The policy also indicated, All partners must: (a) be 'fully vaccinated' or (b) obtain an approved exemption from the Organization as a medical or religious accommodation. Partners receiving the COVID-19 vaccination are also required to receive any subsequent vaccine shots to become 'fully vaccinated.' For example, partners who receive the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines will need to receive both of the two doses of the 2-dose series to achieve compliance with this Policy. For new hires to meet the requirements of this policy, a new hire must (a) have received their first shot prior to employment and complete their subsequent vaccine shots at the time interval required to become 'fully vaccinated' or (b) obtain an approved exemption from the Organization as a medical or religious accommodation. A new hire must submit their intent to request an exemption after the new hire has signed the offer letter and prior to employment. A review of a Respiratory Infection Self-Assessment, dated 6/8/22, revealed Housekeeper AAA had screened in for work that day. A review of Housekeeper AAA's COVID-19 Vaccination Record Card revealed the housekeeper had their first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine on 10/27/21 and did not receive the second dose until 6/9/22. Review of a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine package insert revealed the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was to be administered as a series of two doses, three weeks apart. During an interview on 6/9/22 at 8:26 a.m., Infection Preventionist (IP), revealed Housekeeper AAA was refusing to get the second COVID19 vaccination. IP stated she had notified the housekeeper's direct supervisor and had told the Housekeeper AAA she needed to get an exemption if she was not going to get vaccinated. She further stated the housekeeper had not asked for an exemption and stated that staff must be fully vaccinated or would need to complete an exemption form and have it approved. During an interview on 6/9/22 at 9:47 a.m., Human Resources Manager stated the facility required COVID-19 vaccinations or COVID-19 exemptions for all staff. Human Resources Manager stated staff were to provide that information, and the exemptions must be approved through their corporate office. Human Resources Manager stated if staff had their first vaccine, they would need to have their second one scheduled before they started working at the facility. According to Human Resources Manager, Housekeeper AAA had received one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine as of her hire date and had the second one scheduled. She stated she had asked Housekeeper AAA's manager to follow up. During an interview on 6/9/22 at 10:02 a.m., Department Manager for Housekeeping revealed Housekeeper AAA was not working that day and was going to get the second COVID-19 vaccination. During a follow-up interview on 6/9/22 at 12:18 p.m., Department Manager for Housekeeping revealed Housekeeper AAA was hired on 5/22/22 but had not filed a medical or religious exemption and did not receive the second COVID-19 vaccination until that day, 6/9/22. During an interview on 6/9/22 at 12:30 p.m., Director of Health Services (DHS) stated it was the facility's policy for everyone to be fully vaccinated and boosted or have a medical or religious exemption on file During an interview on 6/9/22 at 1:12 p.m., Administrator stated every partner who worked at the facility was required to be fully vaccinated. Administrator stated the housekeeper had received her second vaccination today.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, observations, interviews and review of the facility policy , titled Coronavirus - COVID-19 Infection Prevention and Control Practices, the facility failed to implement an effec...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, observations, interviews and review of the facility policy , titled Coronavirus - COVID-19 Infection Prevention and Control Practices, the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Control Program (ICP) to prevent the spread of infections, including COVID-19 virus by not ensuring all staff wore a mask and self- screened for COVID-19 prior to entering the facility. The census was 97. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Coronavirus - COVID-19 Infection Prevention and Control Practices, revised 10/27/20, revealed, All locations are required to setup screening stations at the main entrance to screen partners, vendors, and visitors for the following: - Travel to area where there are ongoing outbreaks of Coronavirus (COVID-19) (out of the country, beaches, and high case areas) - Contact with someone who has or is suspected to have COVID-19 - Symptoms of COVID. The policy also indicated, Should any partner present with all the above risk factors, the partner conducting the screening will: 1) Have the partner wait in the lobby area, and 2) Notify the partner's direct supervisor for further instructions. Review of a Respiratory Self Infection Assessment, dated 6/7/22, revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) QQ and CNA BBB had not completed COVID-19 screenings that day. Review of a Respiratory Self Infection Assessment, dated 6/8/22, revealed Receptionist CCC did not conduct a COVID-19 screening until interviewed by the survey team. Review of a Respiratory Self Infection Assessment, dated 6/8/22, revealed CNA UU screened for COVID-19 at 6:58 a.m. and CNA DDD screened in at 7:20 a.m. after being interviewed by the survey. On 6/6/22 at 8:30 a.m., the survey team entered the facility. Signage on the door revealed anyone entering the facility was required to wear a mask. Any person who did not have a mask had to obtain one at the front entrance. There was no one actively monitoring the entry area at the time of the entrance. There was a kiosk for self-screening, and the survey team had to look for staff for instructions on how to use the kiosk. The kiosk was a screening device that would take temperatures, and there were COVID-19 screening questions to answer. Observation on 6/8/22 at 6:38 a.m. revealed three staff members (Receptionist CCC, CNA UU, and CNA DDD) entering the side entrance of the facility without screening at the front door. Receptionist CCC was interviewed at this time and stated she had screened at the kiosk that morning because she had been in the facility since 5:08 a.m. She stated she did not know whether the kiosk printed a tracking record of staff screenings. Observation and concurrent interview on 6/8/22 at 6:49 a.m., CNA UU was observed putting resident supplies/equipment on a cart. She stated that she had signed in at the front door but had not conducted a COVID-19 screening. According to CNA UU, staff could sign in and screen any time during their shift. Observation and concurrent interview on 6/8/22 at 7:07 a.m. revealed Housekeeper NN entered the facility without a mask. She then walked down a hallway to the restroom without wearing a mask. She had a surgical mask hanging from her neck and had a broken N95 mask in her hand. Housekeeper NN stated that staff were required to have a mask on to enter the facility and that there were masks up front for staff to pick up when they screened in. She stated she picked up a mask that morning, but it broke, and she was going to get another one. Observation on 6/8/22 at 7:13 a.m., Housekeeper JJJ was observed entering the facility without a mask. The staff member went to the nurse's station and obtained a mask. During an interview on 6/7/22 at 2:36 p.m., CNA QQ revealed she arrived at the facility at approximately 6:30 a.m. and did not complete a COVID-19 screen. CNA QQ stated staff did not have to screen for COVID-19. During an interview on 6/7/22 at 4:43 p.m., CNA BBB stated staff were to go up front and check their temperature and answer questions, but she checked her temperature and just came on through. CNA BBB stated she did not answer the screening questions. During an interview on 6/8/22 at 7:00 a.m., CNA DDD stated staff were not required to screen for COVID-19. She stated staff were required to screen, back when COVID was really bad. CNA DDD stated staff would be required to come through the front entrance and take their temperatures but, now I just enter through the side door. CNA DDD stated she did not conduct a COVID-19 screen prior to entering the facility. During an interview on 6/8/22 at 11:41 a.m., the Director of Health Services (DHS) revealed staff were required to get a temperature scan and check in at the kiosk. The DHS stated everyone should come through the front door, and that there were two ladies who worked at the front desk to help with the check-in process. He stated right now, since the county was in the red, (meaning the community COVID-19 transmission level was high), staff should have N95 masks and face shields on when they entered the facility because people could encounter staff or residents at the entry. During an interview on 6/8/22 at 11:51 a.m., the Administrator revealed she expected staff to enter the facility through the front door, sanitize their hands, screen for COVID-19 at the kiosk, and put on personal protective equipment (PPE) before they left the screening area. She also stated that they kept PPE at the front entry in case someone did not have a mask. The Administrator stated the facility had staff in-services in May about all staff needing to enter through the front door and that there were signs on all the doors informing staff not to enter through the side doors.
Mar 2019 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patien...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents the facility failed to determine and assess one Resident, (R) R#29, of 39 sampled residents, for the ability to self-administer medications, prior to the resident exercising that right. Findings include: A review was conducted of the facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medication by Patients/Residents, revised on 8/11/16. The policy documents that each resident that desires to self-administer medication is permitted to do so if the healthcare center's interdisciplinary team (IDT) has determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents at the healthcare center. Medication self-administration also applies to family members who wish to administer medication. The procedure documents at 1, 3 and 6: the opportunity to self-administer medications is reviewed during the routine assessment by the healthcare center's interdisciplinary team; if the IDT determines the resident or family member demonstrates the capability of self-administration of medications, the attending physician must write an order to that effect; all nurses and aides are required to report to the Charge Nurse on duty any medications found at the bedside not authorized for bedside storage and to give unauthorized medications to the Charge Nurse for return to the family or responsible party. Review of the clinical record for R#29 reflects that the resident was admitted on [DATE], with primary diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (a chronic lung disease reducing airflow to the lungs), hypertension, vertebral column fracture, acute heart failure, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and dyspnea. Observation on 3/19/19 at 10:37 a.m. revealed the resident is in a private room and was observed to have the medication, Alendronate Solution, found on the bathroom sink counter and a hand-held inhaler, ProAir, was observed at her bedside. On 3/20/19 at 9:30 a.m. an interview and observation of R#29 was conducted while resident was propelling herself in her wheelchair, she stated she gets short of breath, but now is getting nebulizer treatments because of her heart which are helping her. She also stated that she uses an inhaler sometimes. An interview and observation on 3/20/19 at 9:45 a.m. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA to review R#29's Medication Administration Record (MAR) to confirm the resident's current medications which included Alendronate Solution and a Pro-Air Multi-dose inhaler. LPN AA located an unopened box of the Alendronate Solution was found in the cart, although the Pro-Air multi-dose inhaler was not found in the cart for the resident. Continued observation and interview, at this time in the resident's room, revealed that she located the white plastic container of Alendronate Solution 75mg/70 ml on the sink in the resident's bathroom, it had no label indicating the resident's name. When the bottle was shaken, liquid was heard to be present in it. The LPN AA located a ProAir inhaler in a baggy inside a cracker box located on the window seat area among other personal items. Both medications were removed from the room by the LPN AA and confirmed that the medication should not have been in the resident's room. She again reviewed the MAR with the surveyor and indicated that the Pro-Air inhaler was ordered originally 8/27/18, she confirmed that it is a current order for two puffs by mouth four times daily as needed (PRN) for wheezing. She confirmed the medication Alendronate Solution 75ml (70mg) is a current order, originally ordered 9/2/17, to be given by mouth at 6:00 a.m. once weekly on Friday. LPN AA confirms there is not assessments or orders for the resident to self-administer medications. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE], indicates the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The medication section indicates resident takes an antibiotic and a diuretic. The resident also receives special treatments/programs such as respiratory therapy and restorative services for range of motion and transfers. A review of the Physician's Orders for the period 3/1/9 to 3/31/19 reflects an order for Alendronate Sol 70/75ml (a medication to treat osteoporosis) 75ml (70mg) by mouth once weekly (Friday) 30 min (minutes) before breakfast, to take with a full glass of water and remain upright for 30 minutes. An order for ProAir HFA Aer (a bronchodilator medication to prevent bronchospasm), 2 puffs by mouth four times daily PRN for wheezing, for: Albuterol Sul. No order was found that the resident may take her own medications. A review was conducted of the resident's MAR for the months of 1/2019, 2/2019 and 3/2019 that documented the medication Alendronate was given as ordered for the months of 1/2019, 2/2019 and 3/2019 to date. The PRN medication ProAir inhaler was not documented as given for the months of 1/2019, 2/2019 and 3/2019 to date. A review was conducted of the Multidisciplinary Care Conference Meeting dated 1/17/19; no information was found indicating the resident can self-administer her own medications. Review of the resident's care plan, last update 1/15/19, documents the resident has impaired mobility related to Osteoporosis, has decreased hearing, needs encouragement and verbal reminders of activities, enjoys conversing, reminiscing, news and attending social events. The resident has impaired memory deficits, noted with self-care deficits, activities of daily living (ADLs) related to confusion and poor physical status and uses a wheelchair for locomotion. Review of the care plan provides no information that the resident was assessed and can take her own medications. An interview on 3/21/19 at 1:30 p.m. with R#29 with LPN AA present revealed the resident stated she had gotten the inhaler while at her previous living arrangements and had been using an inhaler for years. The resident them became very agitated and began yelling why are you picking on me. The interview was then stopped. An interview with LPN AA after leaving the resident's room revealed that the resident had been in an assisted living facility before her admission to the facility. LPN AA explained that the Alendronate was like Fosamax that the resident needs the medication for Osteoporosis. She stated that the found medications were put up in the medication room to be destroyed. She stated since the resident was getting nebulizer treatments currently, the ProAir inhaler was probably not needed, but it was re-ordered in case she needed it PRN.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, review of the policy titled Care Plans, and staff interviews, the facility failed to develo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, review of the policy titled Care Plans, and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one (1) resident (R), R#268, of 39 sampled residents, who was admitted to the facility with an indwelling Foley catheter . Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans with a revised date of 10/5/17 revealed the policy is for each resident to have a person centered baseline care plan followed by a comprehensive care plan developed following completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Care Area Assessment (CAA) portions of the comprehensive assessment according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual and the resident choice. Upon new admission, a baseline care plan will be developed by the admitting nurse in conjunction with other interdisciplinary team, the resident or resident representative. The baseline care plan should be initiated in 24 hours and will be completed and implemented within 48 hours of admission. Within the few few days of admission, a Post admission Care Conference will be held for update and review of the baseline care plan. The baseline care plan should be updated to reflect changes since baseline care plan implementation. Review of the clinical record for R#268 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Methicillin Susceptible Staph Aureus (MSSA), septicemia, urinary retention, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes (DM), hypertension (HTN), legal blindness in right eye, leg pain and history of falls. There was no data available on Minimum Data Set (MDS) due to new admission status with entry tracking MDS. Review of the Admission/Nursing Observation Form, dated 3/14/19, revealed on page two (2) Continence: bladder incontinent with catheter. Page six (6) section 19 Bladder: Indwelling catheter for retention. Review of the baseline care plan dated 3/15/19 revealed there was not a plan of care developed that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for a resident to address the presence of indwelling Foley catheter. An interview on 3/21/19 at 9:59 a.m., with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) CC, stated the facility has a meeting every morning, where they discuss new admission residents and in that meeting, baseline care plans are discussed, so that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) team knows what care the resident requires. She further stated that she reviews the admission assessment and compares that information with the baseline care plan for accuracy. She then incorporates the baseline care plan into the comprehensive care plan. An interview on 3/21/19 at 10:44 a.m. with Unit Manager DD, revedaled that her responsibilities as Unit Manager (UM) include chart reviews and audits, doctors orders, checking medication administration records (MARS) for accuracy, verifying physician orders and calling physician's about resident status. Further interview with UM DD revealed that it is the admitting nurse responsibility to provide baseline care plan for all resident's care areas upon the admission. She stated that she reviews all the new admission paperwork and charts, for accuracy. She further stated that she was not aware that R#268 was admitted with a Foley catheter and that did not have a Physicians Order for the catheter. An interview on 3/21/19 at 1:18 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) EE, stated that resident requires total care and confirmed that the resident has a Foley catheter. She further stated that all care provided to residents is documented in the Electronic Medical Record. An interview on 3/21/19 at 3:42 p.m. with Director of Health Services (DHS), stated that the UM's are the checks and balances to make sure that physician orders are accurate for Foley catheters and that orders are carried out and that care plans are accurate (baseline and comprehensive). Cross refer to F690
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0676 (Tag F0676)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily livi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) for one independent resident (R) R#21 related to bathing of 39 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the clinical record for R #21 revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to hypertension (HTN), anemia, hypothyroidism, glaucoma, ileostomy, osteoporosis, neuropathy, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, depression, amyotrophy and fibromyalgia. The resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was coded as 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Section G revealed resident requires supervision with all care. Review of the residents care plan revised on 12/11/18, revealed resident is at risk for self-care deficit for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) related to poor physical status due to colitis, peripheral neuropathy and fibromyalgia. Approaches to car include: Bath/Shower as scheduled, daily grooming, oral, hair and skin care, nail care/shampoo as needed, incontinent care frequently, assure adequate rest periods, assess and observe for s/s (signs and symptoms) of discomfort during ADL care, notify charge nurse if noted and explain all procedures before delivering care. Interview with R#21 on 3/18/19 at 2:30 p.m. during initial screening process, stated that she only gets one shower about every 10 days. She further stated that she's supposed to get showers on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays on the 3-11 shift. She stated she hasn't had a bath in the past two weeks, because staff say they are short staffed. Interview with R#21 on 3/19/19 at 2:40 p.m., resident stated she got a bed bath last evening. Interview with R#21 on 3/21/19 at 8:40 a.m., resident stated that she waited until 8:30 p.m. last night for her bath, but no-one ever came to do it, so she just went to bed. Review of printout dated 3/21/19 at 5:07 p.m. titled Bath (CNA Role) revealed that during the month of February 2019, R#21 received a three (3) showers and two (bed bathes). During the month of March 2019, there was no documentation that R#21 had received any type of bath. An interview on 3/21/19 at 1:18 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) EE revealed that she knows what care the residents need because they have a care plan on the back of their door, in their room. She stated that R#21 bath days are Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays on the 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. shift. She stated because she works 12 hour shifts, she will bathe the first two names of the 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. schedule and bathes them each day, and the 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. CNA usually does the other 2 residents. She stated that she has bathed R#21 in the past, but not this week. She stated that she documents in the care given in the Electronic Medical Record which includes residents bathes. An interview on 3/21/19 at 3:42 p.m. with Director of Health Services (DHS) stated residents have a choice of their preference for type of bath as well as bath days and it is her expectation the staff provide the care as scheduled. She further stated that if the CNA was not able to complete her scheduled assignment for bathes, she should report it to the Charge Nurse, to be reassigned for the oncoming shift to complete. She stated the Unit Managers are responsible for making sure that all care is rendered to the resident as ordered and/or scheduled.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order for the use of an ind...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order for the use of an indwelling catheter for one (1) residents (R) (R#268) of 39 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the Lippincott procedures provided by facility titled Indwelling urinary catheter (Foley) care and Management revised 11/2016, revealed the policy lacked the intervention that the facility needed to have a Physician Order for the use of an indwelling catheter. Review of the clinical record for R#268 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Methicillin Susceptible Staph Aureus (MSSA), septicemia, urinary retention, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes (DM), hypertension (HTN), legal blindness in right eye, leg pain and history of falls. There was no data available on Minimum Data Set (MDS) due to new admission status with entry tracking MDS dated [DATE]. Review of the Admission/Nursing Observation Form, dated 3/14/19, revealed on page two (2) Continence: bladder incontinent with catheter. Page six (6) section 19 Bladder: Indwelling catheter for retention. Review of the March 2019 admitting Physician's Order revealed that there was not a Physician's Order for the indwelling catheter. Observation on 3/20/19 at 3:15 p.m. revealed resident to have a urinary catheter draining amber colored urine to bedside bag which was placed inside a privacy bag. On 3/21/19 at 10:44 a.m. interview with Unit Manager (UM) DD, stated that her responsibilities include chart reviews and audits, doctors orders, checking Medication Administration Records (MARS) for accuracy, verifying physician orders, calling physician about resident status. She stated that she looks over all the new admission paperwork and charts. She stated that she did not notice that R#268 was admitted with a Foley catheter and that she was not able to locate a physicians order for the catheter. She confirmed that R#268 had an indwelling Foley catheter. On 3/21/19 at 1:18 p.m. interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) EE, stated that R#268 requires total care. She stated that she is a two person transfer, since she is not to bear weight on her right leg. She stated that she can feed herself with meal setup. She further stated that resident has a catheter and that she empties the catheter at the end of her 12 hour shift and documents in the Electronic Medical Record system. On 3/21/19 at 3:42 p.m. interview with Director of Health Services (DHS) stated that the Unit Managers (UM) are the checks and balances to make sure that Physician Orders are accurate for Foley catheters and orders are carried out as written.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that psychotropic medications including...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that psychotropic medications including antianxiety and antidepressant medications for one (1) residents (R#21) were not ordered as needed (PRN) beyond 14 days, and failed to document the reason for the extension or the period during which the extended order should be in effect of 39 sampled residents. Findings include: CMS 483.45(e)(4) regulations state that a PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except as provided in §483.45(e)(5), if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident ' s medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. Psychotropic medication order should be limited to 14 days unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner documents their clinical rationale in the medical record and indicates the duration for the PRN order. Review of the clinical record for R #21 revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to hypertension (HTN), anemia, hypothyroidism, glaucoma, ileostomy, osteoporosis, neuropathy, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, depression, amyotrophy and fibromyalgia. The resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was coded as 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Section N revealed resident received psychotopic medications seven of seven days of look back period. Review of the Physcian Orders for R #21 for March 2019 revealed the following medications: Clonazzepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily as needed, with an original order date of 11/12/18 and no stop date indicated. No indication for use was noted on the Physician Orders. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March revealed R #21 received the following PRN medication on 3/1/19, 3/2/19, 3/3/19, 3/5/19, 3/6/19, 3/14/19, 3/16/19 and 3/18/19. Review of Pharmacy Services Consultant Pharmacist Communication to Physician dated 9/18/18 revealed a communication to R#21 Physician regarding Clonazepam 0.5mg twice daily as needed for anxiety. The Physician acknowledged the recommendation on 9/27/18, to continue the medication for 60 days, for anxiety. There was no evidence in residents medical record to indicate the Physician had reordered the PRN medication Clonazepam 0.5mg after the 9/27/18 communication from the Consultant Pharmacist, to continue for 60 days Review of the Consultant Pharmacist Report dated 1/11/19 revealed a communication to R#21 Physician regarding Clonazepam 0.5mg twice daily as needed (PRN) for anxiety. The Physician acknowledged the recommendation on 3/20/19, to continue the medication for 60 days, for anxiety. On 3/21/19 at 10:44 a.m., with Unit Manager (UM) DD, stated that her responsibilities include chart reviews and audits, doctors orders, checking Medication Administration Records (MARS) for accuracy, verifying physician orders, calling physician about resident status, and flooeing up with Pharmacy recommendations. She further stated that she checks the MARS, and did not notice that the resident had a as needed (PRN) order for psychotropic medication without a stop date. on 3/21/19 at 3:42 p.m., with Director of Health Services, stated that the Unit Mangers are the checks and balances to make sure that physician orders are transcribed accurately. She stated that they are also responsible for making sure the physicians are addressing the Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR) from the pharmacy and also the stop order dates for the psychotropic medications. She further stated she was not aware of any issues with physicians not addressing the pharmacy recommendations. Post survey interview on 3/22/19 at 11:00 a.m., with Consultant Pharmacist FF, stated she visits the facilty for four to six days per month, typically all in one week. She stated that she looks at all the medications that are ordered, to make sure there is a rationale for its use and no contra-indications with any other meds ordered. She stated she looks at meds for documentation, any associated monitoring for medication use, such as vital signs, behavior monitoring for psychotropic medications, lab orders and results, any unnecessary medication use and whether medicationss are being crushed and if its appropriate to crush meds. She also stated she looks at Psychotropic medications and makes recommendations for Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR) and looks at as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications for stop order dates. She further stated that the Physician typically has 30 days to respond to a Pharmacy recommendation. If the Physician has not responded, on her next visit, she will inquire from the Nursing staff, if the Physician has responded and the nursing staff will start searching for the response. If they can't find a response from the Physician, she will make a repeated recommendation until she gets a response from the Physician. She stated the for R#21, she made a recommendation about the PRN Klonopin on 9/18/18, again on 11/9/18, again on 1/11/19. She stated that the Nursing staff should write a phone order for the recommendation made by the Physician, such as continue medications for x amount of days.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

MDS Data Transmission (Tag F0640)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitt...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted within 14 days of completion to CMS's (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system for two residents (R) (R#2 and R#6) of 39 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R#2's completed and transmitted MDS records revealed that an Entry Tracking Record dated 9/18/18 and an admission assessment dated [DATE]. Review of the alphabetic resident census revealed that R#2 was not currently a resident in the facility. There is no evidence that a Discharge Assessment was completed. Review of an unlabeled report provided by MDS Case Mix Director, dated 3/19/19 at 6:27 p.m., revealed that a discharge assessment was transmitted 10/16/18 with an accepted status dated 10/19/18 at 2:41 p.m. Interview on 3/19/18 at 4:40 p.m., with MDS Coordinator GG, stated that there was a discharge assessment in the facility computer system; however, she was unable to provide a submission identification number. Interview on 3/20/19 at 10:31 a.m., interview with Case Mix Director, revealed that resident's discharge assessment was batched in a zip file to corporate on 10/16/18. She further stated that corporate sends the assessments into the national QIES system. She stated that the transmit by date is the end date for the facility to submit the MDS and the status date is the date the corporate marks the assessment as accepted or rejected and posts the reports in the national QIES system. She confirmed that the discharge assessment for R#2 was not submitted by corporate into the national QIES system. 2. Review of R#6's completed and transmitted MDS records revealed that an Entry Tracking Record dated 10/2/18, an admission assessment dated [DATE] and a 14 day Prospective Payment System (PPS) dated 10/16/18. Review of the alphabetic resident census revealed that R#6 was not currently a resident in the facility. There is no evidence that a Discharge Assessment was completed. Review of an unlabeled report provided by MDS Case Mix Director, dated 3/20/19 at 7:26 a.m., revealed that a discharge assessment was transmitted 11/2/18 with an accepted status dated 11/5/18 at 3:18 p.m. Interview on 3/19/18 at 4:40 p.m., with MDS Coordinator GG, stated that there was a discharge assessment in the facility computer system; however, she was unable to provide a submission identification number. Interview on 3/20/19 at 10:31 a.m., interview with Case Mix Director, revealed that resident's discharge assessment was batched in a zip file to corporate on 11/2/18. She further stated that corporate sends the assessments into the national QIES system. She stated that the transmit by date is the end date for the facility to submit the MDS and the status date is the date the corporate marks the assessment as accepted or rejected and posts the reports in the national QIES system. She confirmed that the discharge assessment for R#2 was not submitted by corporate into the national QIES system.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 16 deficiencies on record, including 4 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $15,646 in fines. Above average for Georgia. Some compliance problems on record.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 4 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing, The's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns OAKS - ATHENS SKILLED NURSING, THE an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing, The Staffed?

CMS rates OAKS - ATHENS SKILLED NURSING, THE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 45%, compared to the Georgia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 65%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing, The?

State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at OAKS - ATHENS SKILLED NURSING, THE during 2019 to 2025. These included: 4 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 11 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing, The?

OAKS - ATHENS SKILLED NURSING, THE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PRUITTHEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 148 certified beds and approximately 122 residents (about 82% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in ATHENS, Georgia.

How Does Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing, The Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, OAKS - ATHENS SKILLED NURSING, THE's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (45%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing, The?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing, The Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, OAKS - ATHENS SKILLED NURSING, THE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing, The Stick Around?

OAKS - ATHENS SKILLED NURSING, THE has a staff turnover rate of 45%, which is about average for Georgia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing, The Ever Fined?

OAKS - ATHENS SKILLED NURSING, THE has been fined $15,646 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Georgia average of $33,235. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Oaks - Athens Skilled Nursing, The on Any Federal Watch List?

OAKS - ATHENS SKILLED NURSING, THE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.