LEGACY TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION

460 AUBURN AVENUE N.E., ATLANTA, GA 30312 (404) 523-1613
For profit - Corporation 186 Beds WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
Last Inspection: April 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation in Atlanta, Georgia, has received a Trust Grade of F, which indicates significant concerns about the quality of care provided. The facility ranks among the lowest in Georgia and Fulton County, with no other facilities ranked lower, highlighting the need for serious consideration. While the trend shows some improvement, moving from 26 issues in 2024 to 7 in 2025, the current state is still concerning, with a high turnover rate of 68% and fines totaling $131,958, which are higher than 93% of facilities in Georgia. Staffing is a weakness here, with less RN coverage than 99% of state facilities, meaning residents may not receive the attention they need. Specific incidents include a failure to protect residents from potential abuse, inadequate supervision for wandering residents, and issues with the call light system not functioning properly, all of which pose serious risks to resident safety.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Georgia
#112/223
Top 50%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
26 → 7 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
68% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$131,958 in fines. Higher than 64% of Georgia facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 5 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Georgia. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
42 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Overall Rating
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Staff Levels
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Care Quality
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 26 issues
2025: 7 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 68%

22pts above Georgia avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $131,958

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (68%)

20 points above Georgia average of 48%

The Ugly 42 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
Apr 2025 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0574 (Tag F0574)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Language Assist...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Language Assistance Service, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (R) (R182) with Limited English skills, was provided with resources to access and understand communications regarding his healthcare regimen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Language Access Policy: Use of Language Line Service, dated 1/1/2025 documented under Purpose: To ensure meaningful access to healthcare services for resident with Limited English Proficiency (LEP). Under Policy: All Name of Corporation facility will provide qualified interpretation through Language Line to all resident, family members, or responsible parties who have limited English proficiency or required ASL (American Sign Language) or other communication support services. Under Procedure: 1. Identification of Language Needs: Upon admission and during care, staff will identify individuals who may need language assistance. Resident language preferences will be documented in their medical records. 2. Accessing language line: Staff can access language line via telephone, tablet, or computer. Quick reference information will be located at nursing stations and intake areas.4. Staff must document the use of Language Line in the resident's chart when identified.6. Prohibited Practices: Family members, friends, or untrained staff may not serve as interpreters for clinical or legal matters unless explicitly requested by the resident and documented, and only when appropriate. Review of the clinical record revealed R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary language documented as Tigrinya (spoken in Ethiopia). Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not scored, unable to determine cognitive level, due to unclear speech. Further review revealed R136 is dependent with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 3/18/2025 R36 is a risk for a communication problem related to language barrier with an outcome for R36 to be able to make basic needs known on a daily basis. Interventions to anticipate and meet needs, ensure or provide a safe environment such as call lights in reach, adequate low glare light, bed in lowest position and wheel locked and avoid isolation, gestures, family supports and pen and paper when needed. During an observation/interview on 4/8/2025 at 12:58 pm with R36 revealed he was a non-English speaking and utilized pointing gesture as a form of communication. When the Surveyor tried to communicate with R36 he responded saying thank you and pointed to his bedside table. There was no form of communication noted in his room. During an observation on 4/9/2025 at 4:11 pm, the surveyor attempted to have a discussion with R36 and noted him using hand gestures to communicate. R36 started pointing at his leg saying the word nurse. After further conversation, R36 responded in his primary language. There was no form of communication noted in his room. An observation on 4/10/2025 at 8:06 am revealed R36 in his room. R36 waved and responded in a language and speech that was not identified. There was no form of communication noted in his room. During an interview on 4/10/2025 at 1:05 pm with a family member of R36 revealed English was not her or R36's primary language. She said, no translate when asked if she understood R36's medical care and treatment he was receiving at the facility. R36's family member was shown the admission documentation, and she nodded her head yes to being familiar with the paperwork. Continued interview with R36's family member revealed they were not able to understand some of the questions and the surveyor proceeded to utilize a language translator based of the language listed in the clinical records and she responded, thank you, thank you. During an interview on 4/10/2025 at 1:50 pm with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) RR, she revealed she worked on the fourth floor and stated they do not have a non-English speaking resident. CNA RR further stated they do not have a communication device or language line on the unit. During an interview on 4/10/2025 at 1:52 pm with CNA SS revealed she worked on the second floor and stated they do not have a language line or a communication device. During an interview on 4/10/2025 at 1:55 pm with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) TT, she stated she was new to the job and was not familiar with R36. She stated no one informed her during on-boarding that her floor had a non-English speaking resident. LPN TT continued to state she had not seen a language line or a communication device. During an interview on 4/10/2025 at 2:18 pm with the Social Worker (SW) UU revealed they have an artificial intelligence (AI) translation box for the residents. SW UU believed she had one non-speaking English resident on the fourth floor and knew there was a 1-800 language line. She stated the language telephone lines should be posted, but most people use the device to communicate. SW UU continued to state R36 understood English and will say or repeat one out of three words back in English during assessment and does head nods as communication gestures. While looking through the AI translation device, SW UU confirmed the language listed on R36's clinical record was not offered on the communication device. During an interview on 4/10/2025 at 3:00 pm with the Director of Nursing (DON), they revealed the staff should be aware of the language line and have access to it along with the newly implemented communication device the facility recently purchased.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Observation of resident rooms beginning on 4/8/2025 at 12:43 pm revealed PTAC units with surface soil including the grills an...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Observation of resident rooms beginning on 4/8/2025 at 12:43 pm revealed PTAC units with surface soil including the grills and dusty filters in rooms 223, 227, 228, and 302. Additional observation of resident rooms on 4/10/2025 beginning at 2:35 pm revealed the PTAC units remained soiled with dusty filters in rooms 223, 227, 228, and 302. Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surface, the facility failed to maintain clean Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) units for seven of 56 rooms on the third and fourth floors (Rooms 223, 227, 228, 302, 316, 317 and 323). The deficient practice had the potential to compromise the health and safety of the residents by increasing the risk of infections. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surface dated October 2024 documented Environmental surface will be clean and disinfected according to current Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for disinfection of healthcare facilities and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Bloodborne Pathogens Standards. 1. An observation on 4/8/2025 at 11:11 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit contained a gray, thick, fuzzy debris on the front dividers of the unit. An observation on 4/9/2025 at 9:06 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit contained a gray, thick, fuzzy debris on the front dividers of the unit. An observation on 4/11/2025 at 9:24 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit contained a gray, thick, fuzzy debris on the front dividers of the unit. An observation on 4/8/2025 at 11:15 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit contained a gray, thick, fuzzy debris on the front dividers of the unit. An observation on 4/9/2025 at 9:07 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit contained a gray, thick, fuzzy debris on the front dividers of the unit. An observation on 4/11/2025 at 9:24 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit contained a gray, thick, fuzzy debris on the front dividers of the unit. An observation on 4/8/2025 at 12:14 pm in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit contained a gray, thick, fuzzy debris on the front dividers of the unit. An observation on 4/9/2025 at 9:12 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit contained a gray, thick, fuzzy debris on the front dividers of the unit. An observation on 4/11/2025 at 9:20 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit contained a gray, thick, fuzzy debris on the front dividers of the unit. An interview on 4/11/2025 at 11:00 am with the Housekeeping Director (HD) stated the maintenance department was responsible for maintaining the units but moving forwards he and maintenance will come up with a schedule together. An interview on 4/11/2025 at 2:44 pm with the Maintenance Director revealed the responsibility was not on one sole person, but it was expected for the HD to ensure the PTAC units were clean.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of facility's policy titled, Residents Assessments, the facility failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of facility's policy titled, Residents Assessments, the facility failed to document a significant change assessment upon re-admittance and change to hospice status for one resident (R) (R 104) and failed to accurately document the discharge status for one of 64 sampled residents R192. This deficient practice had the potential to affect quality of care and resident outcomes. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessments reviewed on 2/4/2025 revealed under Policy Statement: Resident Assessments will be completed upon admission, quarterly, annually and with a significant change on status. 1. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R104 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to adult failure to thrive, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx and malignant neoplasm of tongue. Furthermore, R104 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of R104's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated in Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs) that hospice services were not selected for the resident. Further review revealed no significant change assessment was done after R104 was admitted to hospice on 12/23/2024. Review of R104's physician orders with a revised date of 1/20/2025 revealed R104 was admitted to Hospice Services due to a diagnosis of tongue cancer. Review of R104's hospice contract revealed a date of 12/23/2024. Review of nurses' notes with a late entry of 12/23/2024 revealed R104 returned from the hospital and admitted to hospice services. 2. Review of the EMR for R192 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to dementia, congestive heart failure, delusional disorders, mental disorder, psychotic and mood disturbance and anxiety. Review of R104's discharge return-not- anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated discharge status to short-term general hospital. Review of progress notes dated 3/5/2025 revealed the facility had communication with R192's family representative regarding Personal Care Home (PCH) placement that assisted with behavioral health management. Review of progress notes dated 3/14/2025 stated R192 was discharged to a PCH. Review of R192' discharge summary instructions dated 3/14/2024 revealed R192 to be discharged to a PCH. An interview conducted on 4/11/2025 at 9:05 am with the MDS Manager, MDS Coordinator LL, and MDS Coordinator OO revealed that information for MDS assessments was typically gathered from a variety of sources, including documentation from nursing, rehabilitation, dietary, and nutrition departments, as well as hospital records for new admissions or readmissions. Additional information was obtained verbally from floor staff, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), family members during care plan meetings, through point-of-care documentation, physician progress notes, nurse practitioner notes, lab results, and direct input from the resident. The MDS Manager also noted that when contracted personnel were involved in patient care-such as hospice providers-care plans were discussed collaboratively, particularly when preparing for discharge or arranging personal care services. The MDS Manager stated that R104 was admitted to hospice on 12/23/2024. According to the facility census, hospice billing was stopped on 1/1/2025, and the resident re-entered the facility on 1/4/2025, still under hospice care. The MDS Manager confirmed that a progress note dated 12/23/2024 also documented the hospice admission. However, a review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs), which pertained to hospice services, was not marked. MDS Coordinator OO, who completed the quarterly assessment, planned to capture hospice services on the next scheduled MDS in May 2025. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the omission on the 2/11/2025 assessment was an oversight and noted that this was not typical practice. The MDS Manager stated the resident was discharged to a personal care home based on available documentation. However, MDS Coordinator OO, who completed the MDS, reported that the census indicated a discharge to a hospital, and she relied only on that information when completing the MDS. The MDS Manager emphasized that it was the responsibility of staff to verify discharge destinations by cross-referencing the census with progress notes, consulting nursing staff, and raising discrepancies during clinical meetings. Failure to confirm and accurately document a resident's discharge location may lead to uncertainty about the resident's whereabouts, inaccurate records, and billing issues. During an interview on 4/11/2025 at 9:37 am, the Administrator stated she emphasized the importance of effective communication, stating that collaboration between nursing staff and the MDS team was essential. She noted that residents were reviewed during daily clinical meetings, and any changes in condition should be promptly identified and addressed during these discussions. She further expressed concern that, in this instance, R104 may not have been receiving all necessary care to ensure comfort.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Policy and Language Access Policy: Use of Language Line Service, the facility failed to follow comprehen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Policy and Language Access Policy: Use of Language Line Service, the facility failed to follow comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 64 sampled residents (R) (R36). The deficient practice had the potential for R36's needs to go unmet. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Policy with a revised date 2/4/2025 documented under Policy Statement: Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, and strengths that will identify how the facility staff will provide services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Under Standard of Practice: .7. The facility must provide the resident and the representative, if applicable, with a written summary of the baseline care plan by the completion of the comprehensive care plan. The summary must be in a language and conveyed in a manner the resident and/or representative can understand. This summary must include but is not limited to: (a) the initial goals of the resident . (c) any service and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility and (d) any updated information based on the details of the comprehensive care plan, as necessary. Review of the facility's policy titled Language Access Policy: Use of Language Line Service dated 1/1/2025 documented under Purpose: To ensure meaningful access to healthcare services for resident with Limited English Proficiency (LEP). All Name of facility owner facilities will provide qualified interpretation through Language Line to all resident, family members, or responsible parties who have limited English proficiency or required ASL (American Sign Language) or other communication support services. Under Procedure: 1. Identification of Language Needs: Upon admission and during care, staff will identify individuals who may need language assistance. Resident language preferences will be documented in their medical records. 2. Accessing language line: Staff can access language line via telephone, tablet, or computer. Quick reference information will be located at nursing stations and intake areas.4. Staff must document the use of Language Line in the resident's chart when identified.6. Prohibited Practices: Family members, friends, or untrained staff may not serve as interpreters for clinical or legal matters unless explicitly requested by the resident and documented, and only when appropriate. Review of the care plan dated 3/18/2025 R36 is a risk for a communication problem related to language barrier with an outcome for R36 to be able to make basic needs known on a daily basis. Interventions to anticipate and meet needs, ensure or provide a safe environment such as call lights in reach, adequate low glare light, bed in lowest position and wheel locked and avoid isolation, gestures, family supports and pen and paper when needed. During an interview on 4/10/2025 at 2:57 pm with the MDS LL revealed she was unaware about a communication device and that it was something that should be added to his care plan. During an interview on 4/11/2025 at 11:41 am with the Director of Nursing (DON) if it is on the care plan and it is indicated, then they are expected to follow the resident care.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Gastrostomy Tube Feeding and Monitoring Policy, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to che...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Gastrostomy Tube Feeding and Monitoring Policy, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to check residual and gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement for one of 10 residents (R) (R 243) of ten residents receiving tube feedings. The deficient practice had the potential to cause infection, poor quality of life and negative outcomes for R243. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Gastrostomy Tube Feeding and Monitoring Policy revised 4/16/2024 documented under Standards of Practice, Step number 1: Check physicians' orders for nutritional formula, rate of flow, flush amount, medication administration, checking for tube placement and for gastric residual.7. Check placement of feeding tube prior to feeding, medication, or flush administered by slowly injection approximately 30 ml of air through the tube and listening with stethoscope over the abdomen for a swish sound. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R243 revealed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to gastrostomy status, acute respiratory failure, seizures, encephalopathy. Review of the most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for R243 dated 4/4/2025 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Care Plan for R243 revealed a care plan dated 3/12/2025 that documented in Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs), monitor/document/report to MD PRN (as needed): aspiration-fever, SOB (shortness of breath), tube dislodged infection at tube site, self-extubation (removal of tracheostomy tube), Tube dysfunction or malfunction, abnormal breath/lung sounds, abnormal lab values, abdominal pain, distension, tenderness, constipation or fecal impaction, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, dehydration. Check for tube placement and gastric/contents/residual volume per facility protocol. Review of the Physician orders for R243 dated 4/4/2025 documented enteral feed order, every shift Nutren 1.5 at 55 ml/hr (milliliters per hour) hold for care. G-tube care daily. Tube checks gastric residuals if greater than 60 ml discard and hold feeding, notify physician of gastric emptying as needed. 4/4/2025 tube: check tube placement before initiation of feeding/flushing and prior to medication administration slowly inject 30 ml of air through tube every shift. Observation on 4/9/2025 at 9:31 am during medication administration observation, it was noted Charge Nurse-Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) DD did not measure abdominal contents for residual or check for proper placement G-tube as ordered by physician. Charge Nurse LPN DD administered scheduled medications and flushes to R243 without proper tube placement check. Interview on 4/9/2025 at 9:30 am with Charge Nurse LPN DD revealed he did check for residual and placement, sometimes. He confirmed he did not check during this administration. Interview on 4/10/2025 at 8:15 am with LPN CC revealed the first thing she did was tell the resident what she was going to do for medications. The second thing she stated to do was to check for G-tube placement. She stated she obtained a stethoscope and drew up 30 cc of air and pushed it into the G-tube and listened for the swish sound. If the resident got more than one medication, she would mix medications in a medication cup and flush with 30 cc (cubic centimeters) of water and gave medications, then flushed again with 30 cc of water. She stated to check for residual feeding in the stomach, she checked at the same time she checked for proper tube placement. Interview on 4/11/25 8:51 am with the Human Resource Manager revealed she received skills check-off at hire and annually and put them in the staff personnel files. Review of the personnel file for Charge Nurse LPN DD revealed a Medication Administration Skills Checklist dated 10/31/2024. Tube feeding not addressed directly in skills check-offs. Review of staff inservices provided in 2025 revealed an inservice on 3/16/2025 on medication administration, an in-service conducted on 10/10/2024 on G-Tubes, enhanced barrier precaution, tube placement, checking residuals, flushing G-tubes, and administering medications through a G-tube. Interview on 4/10/2025 at 10:41 am with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed Staff Development performed random audits and observations on the floor with nurses for tube feeding. Medication Techs/Aides cannot administer tube feeding. When the facility saw a need, they implemented education. Interview on 4/11/2025 at 8:46 am with the DON revealed the computer-based education system did not have tube feeding training. She stated it was part of skill checkoffs that were performed by Staff Development and the Infection Control Nurse. Skills checks were done upon hire and annually.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R243 revealed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including bu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R243 revealed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to gastrostomy status, acute respiratory failure, seizures, encephalopathy. Review of the most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R423 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the Care Plan for R243 revealed a care plan dated 3/12/2025 that documented the resident to Monitor/document/report to MD PRN (as needed): aspiration- fever, SOB, tube dislodged, Infection at tube site, self-extubation, Tube dysfunction or malfunction, abnormal breath/lung sounds, abnormal lab values, abdominal pain, distension, tenderness, constipation or fecal impaction, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, dehydration. Provide local care to gastrostomy site (G-Tube) as ordered for signs and symptoms of infection. Review of the Physician orders for R243 dated 4/4/2025 documented Enteral feed order every shift-Nutren 1.5 at 55 ml/hr (milliliters per hour) hold for care. G-tube care daily. Observation on 4/9/2025 at 9:31 am of R243 gastrostomy site during medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) DD revealed the site to have a brown, crusty looking substance at the insertion site. Tape for the G-tube was loose and hanging from the tube. Observation on 4/11/2025 with LPN AA Unit Manager revealed R243's G-tube insertion site to have brown, crusty material remaining at the insertion site. The G-tube was not secured with tape hanging from the tube. LPN AA confirmed the site had not been cleansed. Interview on 4/11/2025 at 8:13 am with LPN DD revealed as LPN charge nurse he was responsible for all the tube feedings on his unit. He revealed he had one resident with a G-tube feeding on the unit at this time. LPN DD stated that he did clean the G-tube sites, sometimes. Interview on 4/11/2025 at 08:17 am with LPN AA revealed she typically tried to check behind on the G-tubes if she could on her unit, but the nurse was responsible for the G-tube care. LPN AA confirmed that R423's G-tube site had not been addressed since the first observation. LPN AA stated that G-tube sites were to be cleansed daily. Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility's policies titled, Water Supply, Infection and Control Committee, and Laundry and Bedding, Soiled, the facility failed to maintain a Water Management Program, failed to prevent the spread of infections by not properly securing and storing one clean linen rack of five racks, to ensure the laundry area was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, and to disinfect a gastronomy tube (G-tube) site per physician orders for one resident (R) (R243). The deficient practices had the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Water Supply reviewed October 20, 2022, revealed under Purpose: To maintain a sanitary water supply and control the spread of waterborne microorganisms. Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Committee reviewed 2/4/2025 revealed under Practice Guidelines: The Infection Control Committee shall oversee the surveillance, investigation, reporting, control and prevention of infections; occupational exposures to blood, body fluids, or other potentially infectious materials; and monitoring for proper implementation of and adherence to infection control policies and procedures. Review of the facility's policy titled Laundry and Bedding, Soiled reviewed October 2024 revealed under Policy Interpretation and Implementation: .2. Place contaminated laundry in a bag or container at the location where it is used and do not sort or rinse at the location of use. 3. Place and transport contaminated laundry in bags or containers in accordance with the established policies governing the handling and disposal of contaminated items. 1. Interview on 4/10/2025 at 9:19 am, the Maintenance Director (MD) stated the City of Atlanta tested the facility's water every other month. When asked for documentation or test results, the MD stated the city does not provide results, and he had never seen any official documentation. The MD noted that the last test for Legionella conducted by the city was in 2024, which was also the first time he had heard of Legionella. When asked about the facility's Water Management Program (WMP), MD confirmed there was none. He also stated that he did not perform routine water system flushing and only flushed the water heaters. Interview on 4/10/2025 at 12:20 pm, the Administrator confirmed that the facility does not have a Water Management Program. She acknowledged that facilities were expected to understand their water system design, ensure water safety, and maintain supporting documentation. She recognized the potential negative outcomes of not having a documented WMP to be that residents could be exposed to water that was not healthy. Observations on 4/9/2025 at 4:51 pm and 4/10/2025 at 8:54 am revealed one clean linen rack was unsupervised and uncovered on the first floor of the facility. There were no residents' rooms located on the first floor of the facility. During an interview and observation conducted on 4/10/2025 at 2:13 pm, the Housekeeping Director (HD) observed that a clean linen cart had been placed on the first floor uncovered, which he stated should not have happened. He confirmed that the facility's expectation was for all clean linen to always be covered to prevent the spread of infection. An interview on 4/10/2025 at 10:00 am with the Administrator revealed the clean linen rack should not be left uncovered outside in the hallway. She stated a possible negative outcome could be risk for infection. An interview and observation on 4/10/2025 at 9:23 am with the HD, the following was observed in the laundry: Puddles of water and brown, rust-like stains on the floor surrounding the washing machine. Grey, fuzzy debris throughout the laundry room, including floor, walls, and ceilings. ] White residue, possibly spilled detergent on and around the washing machines. Grey, fuzzy debris on the washing machines side filters and a sign indicating that filters should be cleaned daily. Debris in between and behind the washing machines which included spoons, wrappers, rags and unidentified objects. Dirty resident clothing piled up in the corner, on the floor, uncovered. The HD stated he realized the leak behind the washing machines a week or two ago. He revealed that the machine manufacturer came into the facility to clean the washing machine filters located on the side of the machine. Observation of the washing machine filter read, Notice Clean Filter Daily. The HD stated the washing machine manufacturer was aware of the leak and they were the ones who could repair it. The HD then stated he called the machine manufacturer a month ago, and they came out to fix the leaking hose, but wasn't sure of where the leak was coming from currently. The MD then stated he had not called them back again since the last time they came out. The MD confirmed that the dirty linen should not be on the floor and that he would bring another blue bin for the laundry aides to use for dirty linen. The MD confirmed that the laundry room was full of gray, fuzzy debris, and stated normally he came in and used a blower for the dust. The MD stated it was the Laundry Aide's responsibility to keep the laundry room clean. Interview on 4/10/2025 at 2:13 pm, the HD stated there should be no leaks on the floor, as this poses a slip hazard. Additionally, he confirmed that dirty linen should not be left on the floor due to hygiene and safety risks. Regarding the washing machine filters, he explained that they were expected to be cleaned daily to ensure that laundry was properly sanitized; failure to do so could result in improperly cleaned clothes. When asked about the presence of dust in the laundry room, he acknowledged that there was dust and agreed that the amount was excessive, which could lead to respiratory issues such as coughing. He also noted that there was often debris between the washing machines, which should not occur, and stated that Laundry Aides were expected to keep the area clean and tidy. If not maintained, this could result in foul odors and a poor appearance, and pose a fire hazard. An interview on 4/10/2023 at 9:40 am, Laundry Aide (LA) QQ stated each shift was responsible for cleaning the laundry room. She stated she noticed the washing machine leak on Monday and informed the HD. An interview on 4/10/2025 at 10:00 am, the Administrator stated that her expectation was for the laundry area to be clean and maintained without needing to be reminded. She emphasized that cleanliness should be standard practice and not something that required constant instruction. She acknowledged personally observing dust accumulation and noted the need for more consistent dusting. The Administrator stated that clothes and other items should never be on the floor, as this can trigger allergies and compromise sanitation. She also reported seeing debris on the floor, and should be removed.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food items in the freezer were labeled and dated and failed to discard the item by expiration date. In addition, the facility ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food items in the freezer were labeled and dated and failed to discard the item by expiration date. In addition, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions of the ice machine in the kitchen. The deficient practices had the potential to affect all resident receiving an oral diet. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour of the kitchen on 4/8/2025 at 9:08 am with the Dietary Manager (DM), the following was observed: The interior components of the ice machine, including the wall lining and the dispenser area, were observed to have visible black residue. The reach in freezer had a large box of beef stew with an expiration date of 12/24/2024, with no expiration date or open date written on the box or a label. During an interview on 4/10/2025 at 2:11 pm with DM, it was confirmed that the ice machine was in regular use for the residents and acknowledged the unsanitary ice machine. He stated mold in an ice machine poses several serious health and safety risks such as respiratory issues, foodborne illnesses and posed a risk to immunocompromised residents. He stated the Maintenance Department was responsible for the routine cleaning and servicing of the ice machine. This included adhering to scheduled cleaning to ensure a sanitary ice machine. During an interview on 4/10/2025 at 1:11 pm with the Head Cook, she stated she received in-service education on the proper way to label, store and discard all food items. She also stated that the proper protocol for expired food was for the staff to discard the expired food within 3 days of expiration. During an interview on 4/9/2025 at 10:12 am with Maintenance Director confirmed his staff was responsible for making sure the ice machine was cleaned and sanitized on a regular basis. He stated after each cleaning, he filled out a log that included the date, time, and what was done. Each log was located on the ice machine for anyone to review. The Maintenance Director revealed he followed the manufactures guidelines along with the facilities rules, which required the machine be deep cleaned once a month. He stated going forward, he will implement a system in which whoever cleaned the machine will check for buildup, and mold.
Nov 2024 9 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medications, the facility failed to ensure one of 60 sampled residents (R) (R684) was assessed to safely self-administer medications. The deficient practice had the potential to allow access to medications otherwise not prescribed by a physician to other residents. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Administration of Medications reviewed October 2024 revealed under Policy Statement: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Revealed under Procedure: All medications are administered accurately and safely, and free of errors. 1. Only licensed nurse or person permitted by the state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so.14. Patient may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. A self-administration assessment will be completed. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R684 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but was not limited to surgical amputation right leg, gangrene, diabetes mellitus type two and chronic kidney disease. Review of R684 quarterly/annual/significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicates R684 was cognitively intact. Section GG, functional status, revealed R684 required moderate assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) with one or more-person assistance. Review of R684's care plan dated 10/24/2024 indicated a problem of mood, problem related to adjustment to placement. Goals included but not limited to will have improved mood state happier, calmer appearance, no signs or symptoms of depression, anxiety, or sadness, through the review date during adjustment process. Interventions included but not limited to administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Behavioral health consults as needed (psycho-geriatric team, psychiatrist etc.) Monitor/record mood to determine if problems seem to be related to external causes, i.e. medications, treatments, concern over diagnosis. Review of the Physician's Orders for R684 included but was not limited to order dated 10/22/2024 for metformin oral tablet 500 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth one time a day for diabetes. Order dated 10/24/2024 for NovoLog injection solution 100 units per milliliter (ml) as per sliding scale. Review R684's of clinical assessments revealed no assessment for self-medication administration was completed. Observation and interview on 11/5/2024 at 11:05 am with R684 revealed he was awake and alert, lying in bed, bed in low position, call light within reach. Medicine cup noted on overbed table with white tablet in the cup. R684 stated he forgot it was there adding they leave my pills, and I just take them, but I forgot that one. R684 was unable to state what this medication was for. An interview on 11/05/2024 at 11:10 am with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) BB at R684's bedside confirmed medication cup was present with a white pill in the cup on the overbed table. LPN BB further confirmed no residents were assessed for self-medication administration and she will talk with the medication aide. An interview on 11/5/2024 at 11:30 am with LPN BB revealed the tablet was a metformin, diabetes medication, and the Certified Medication Aide (CMAT) thought he swallowed it. LPN BB did talk with her about the requirement to watch medication being taken before leaving the room. An interview on 11/5/2024 at 2:36 pm with CMAT GGG revealed R684 had the pills in his mouth and thought he had swallowed them. CMAT GGG stated they never left medication with him or anyone else. An interview on 11/7/2024 at 3:00 pm with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not do self-med administration assessment. No medication should ever be left or kept at the bedside, this included over the counter items. The DON had expectations that the nursing supervisors should research and find a nurse or a medication tech to provide education and if appropriate move forward with corrective action and notify the DON. The DON also confirmed she was notified of this incident by the supervisor.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0582 (Tag F0582)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Beneficiary Notice P...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Beneficiary Notice Policy, the facility failed to appropriately provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) to one of 60 sampled residents (R) (R125). This failure had the potential for R125 not to be able to express her right to make an informed choice about Medicare services as well as being provided with appeal instructions. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Advance Beneficiary Notice Policy revised May 2018 revealed under Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to issue Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABN) per CMS Guidelines to inform Medicare Beneficiaries of items or services that Medicare may not pay. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R125 revealed she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of but not limited to orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. Review of the initial Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that R125 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating R125 had moderately impaired cognition. Section GG (Functional Abilities) documented that R125 requires maximal assistance with mobility and personal hygiene. Review of the NOMNC for R125 revealed no resident signature indicating acceptance and understanding of the notice. Review of the SNF ABN for R125 revealed a signature not R125's name in the signature field indicating acceptance and understanding of the notice. According to the NOMNC and SNF ABN, the Medicare Part A start date was 9/17/2024 and the last covered day of Part A service was 10/23/2024. Interview on 11/7/2024 at 1:05 pm with R125, she stated about a week or two ago, she was verbally notified by the facility that her Medicare Part A coverage was ending. When showed the NOMNC form and SNF ABN form, R125 stated that she has never seen the forms and that the facility had not asked her to sign anything regarding the Medicare non-coverage. R125 indicated she was upset regarding her Medicare benefit running out. R125 stated, the facility is not helping me regarding this matter. They only verbally told me that my benefits were ending but did not give me a number to call for an appeal or provide any further instructions. Telephone Interview on 11/7/2024 at 2:48 pm with a family member of R125 revealed that she did not handle any finances for R125 and stated that the resident handled everything herself. She stated that she was unaware of R125's Medicare Part A coverage expiring. Interview on 11/8/2024 at 10:34 am with the Social Services Director (SSD) confirmed that she was responsible for providing the NOMNC and SNF ABN to the residents. She stated that if a resident cannot sign or refused to sign the forms, she documented it on the form. When asked about R125's NOMNC and SNF ABN forms, the SSD confirmed the resident's signature line on the NOMNC was blank and the SNF ABN form contained the signatures of herself and an assistant. The SSD further stated, I probably need to be more consistent about documenting if the residents cannot sign for themselves.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Interview on 11/5/2024 at 10:30 am with R60 revealed that R60 mentioned that staff didn't clean the bathroom or the room. R60...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Interview on 11/5/2024 at 10:30 am with R60 revealed that R60 mentioned that staff didn't clean the bathroom or the room. R60 stated that they will come in and take the trash out but that's it. R60 stated that they rarely mop in his room or bathroom. R60 said that they need to do something about the mold in the bathroom. R60 said a couple of months ago they sprayed bleach on the ceiling to treat the mold, but it didn't help. Observation on 11/5/2024 at 10:30 am revealed the bathroom had a urine like smell. On the ceiling there was a black, brown substance, and a distinctive, musty smell, a smell similar to mildew. Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for two rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) on two of four units. Specifically, room [ROOM NUMBER] contained a circulating fan with gray substances on its blades and a privacy curtain caught in the fan blades, and room [ROOM NUMBER] had a dirty, damaged bathroom ceiling with black stains. The facility census was 181 residents. Findings include: 1. Observations during initial screening on 11/5/2024 at 11:05 am and on 11/6/2024 at 3:28 pm revealed a personal circulating fan blowing towards bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER], with thick, gray substances on its blades and a privacy curtain caught in the fan blades. Interview and observations during walking rounds on 11/8/2024 at 12:30 pm and 2:30 pm with the Maintenance Director (MD) and Administrator confirmed a circulating fan with gray substances on its blades and a privacy curtain caught in the fan blades in room [ROOM NUMBER], and a dirty, damaged bathroom ceiling with black stains in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s shared bathroom. The Administrator mentioned the MD will immediately correct and address the removal of personal circulating fan, and the damaged/stained items in each room. The Administrator confirmed the facility does not have an Environmental Maintenance policy.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to attempt to obtain fingerprint checks for four of 10 files reviewed and reference checks for two of 10 employee files reviewed. Findin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to attempt to obtain fingerprint checks for four of 10 files reviewed and reference checks for two of 10 employee files reviewed. Findings include: Review of the employee files on 11/7/2024 at 1:00 pm with the Assistant Nursing Home Administrator and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed that there were no fingerprint results for staff who required completion of the GCHEXS (Georgia Criminal History Check System) (fingerprint background check). In addition, there were also no reference checks completed for staff who did not require GCHEXS fingerprint of the 10 staff reviewed. 1. The Administrator was hired on 9/18/2023, no evidence of reference checks performed. 2. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) GGG was hired on 1/16/2024, no evidence of GCHEXS fingerprint results and no references checked. 3. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) HHH was hired on 8/9/2024, no evidence of GCHEXS fingerprint results and no references checked. 4. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) III was hired on 7/16/2024, no evidence of GCHEXS fingerprint results and no references checked. 5. Dietary Manager (DM) NN was hired on 7/24/2024, no evidence of GCHEXS fingerprint results and no references checked. 6. The DON was hired on 10/11/2022, no evidence of reference checks performed. During an interview on 11/7/2024 at 1:45 pm, the Administrator revealed the Human Resources Representative was recently terminated and she was not aware of the missing information in the employee files.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Preadmission Scre...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASRR) (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), the facility failed to refer a Level Il PASRR to the appropriate state-designated authority for evaluation and determination of specialized services for one of 60 sampled residents (R) R171) reviewed with serious mental illness. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the appropriate level of care and services provided for R171. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASRR), revised November 2017 states that Annually and with any significant change of status, the facility will complete the PASRR Level I screen for those individuals identified per the Level II screen requiring specialized services. The facility will report any changes as identified via the screen to the state mental health authority or state intellectual disability authority promptly. In subsection titled, Definitions Applicable to the PASRR Process, number 1 states that an individual is considered to have a serious mental illness if the individual meets a diagnosis of schizophrenic, mood, paranoid, panic or other severe anxiety disorder. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R171revealed diagnoses that included but not limited to post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R171 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R171 had intact cognition. Section N (Medications) documented that R171 is taking an antidepressant medication. Section I (Active Diagnoses) coded yes for PTSD. There was no documented Level 2 PASRR following the diagnosis. R171 had a Level 1 PASRR completed on 08/19/2024. Review of physician orders revealed R171 was on Cymbalta (duloxetine HCl) (an anti-depressant), oral capsule delayed release particles 30 mg (milligrams). Review of the care plan dated 9/4/2024 revealed R171 uses psychotropic medications R171 will be/remain free of drug related complications, including movement disorder, discomfort, hypotension, gait disturbance, constipation/impaction or cognitive/behavioral impairment through review date. Interview on 11/8/2024 at 11:17 am with R171 revealed she had been shot, stabbed, etc. She stated she had been through a lot growing up in the projects. She said that when she first arrived here, she had anger issues and would yell at people. She mentioned she was diagnosed with PTSD prior to admission. When she was at the hospital, her primary doctor gave her medication to help her with her mental health. She believed that she was still taking that medication. She says that the facility wasn't doing anything to address her mental health concerns. She said that she was doing better. She said most of the guys she plays cards talked to her. She found comfort in talking to some of the residents that have been through some of the same things she's been through. Interview on 11/8/2024 at 10:38 am with the Social Services Director revealed she was responsible for making the PASRR referrals. She reviewed them within the first 72 hours of admission. If the PASRR didn't seem consistent with the resident or if the diagnosis changed while the resident was here, she notified the state authority for PASRR 2 on admission, diagnosis change, quarterly or comprehensive assessment change, and looked at the mental illness diagnosis to see if a level 2 was needed. Bipolar, anxiety, schizophrenia, and major depression were the major diagnoses that she looked at. She further stated that for the admission process, Nursing and Admissions review the hospital documents. She stated she gets the PASRR prior to admission from the hospital. She stated that the hospital was not always honest about their time at the hospital. The facility staff would question if something did not seem right from the hospital. She went on to state that they would look at the situations of the residents if there was a change in daily behaviors, sometimes a resident needed grief counseling. She stated there were behavior management binders on each floor. When asked if she agreed that the resident would need a PASRR 2, she stated she didn't have a history of knowing if PTSD would require a level 2 PASRR.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of the EMR revealed R154 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to peripheral vascular ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of the EMR revealed R154 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to peripheral vascular disease, chronic congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, unspecified open wound left leg, pressure ulcer left heal. Review of R154's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicates intact cognition. Section GG (Functional Status) revealed R154 has one side impairment and uses wheelchair, assistance needed is partial to moderate for toileting, maximum with showering, and dressing. Transfer substantial max assistance. Section J (Pain Assessment) revealed average pain rating of three. Review of R154's care plan dated 6/14/2024 documented focus related to ADLs requiring full staff assistance. Observation and interview on 11/5/2024 at 11:14 am with R154 revealed resident lying in bed, bed in low position, responding to verbal stimuli, bandage noted to left lower leg dated for 11/4/2024. R154 asked about his toenails, stated they had been needing to be cut since he was admitted to the facility, adding he had not seen a podiatrist. The toenails were extremely overgrown, especially both great toes. The great toenail on the right foot was extremely thick and twisted laterally. Record review revealed no consultation notes from Podiatry for R154. Review of a Nursing skin assessment dated [DATE] for R154 indicated that a foot assessment was not competed. Review of a Nursing skin assessment dated [DATE] for R154 indicated that a foot assessment was not completed. Interview 11/7/2024 11:24 am with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) AA revealed that for those who can, he would hand residents a washcloth and see what they could do. CNA AA confirmed shower sheets were completed and if they noted any skin abnormalities such as bruising or possible injuries, they brought them to the attention of the nurse. Nail care was also provided currently. CNA AA revealed if a resident refused a shower, we waited and asked again and if the resident still refused, the nurse would ask, and then a bed bath would be offered. An interview on 11/7/2024 at 2:30 pm with LPN BB confirmed she had not seen R154's feet recently. LPN BB reviewed R154's EMR for the presence of a Podiatry visit and none was found. LPN BB placed a call to Social Services to have him added to the list for a Podiatry visit. LPN BB stated that the CNAs gave bed baths daily unless it was on shower days, CNAs should tell the nurse if any issues came up, including nails being overgrown. LPN BB confirmed staff should complete shower sheets with skin and nail evaluation each time the resident has a shower. Review of R154's shower sheet dated 10/12/2024 revealed no indication of nail concerns. Interview on 11/7/2024 at 3:03 pm with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility provided nail care during ADL care and several residents refused and if so, they were care planned. Toenails were cut by nurses unless the nurses felt they were too overgrown, then we would refer them to Podiatry. She revealed her expectation of the CNAs was that they should notify the nurse if nails were overgrown, then the nurse would notify Social Services to get podiatry to see the resident. The DON also added, when nurses did skin assessments, nail condition should be noted. Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), the facility failed to ensure that ADLs were provided for two of 60 sampled residents (R) (R65 and R154) related to nail care. Specifically, nail care was not provided for R65 and R154. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) dated November 2022, the intent of policy indicated based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with resident's needs and choices this facility will provide necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's ability in activities of daily living will not diminish unless the circumstances of the individual's clinical and medical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. Also, the bath will be given for cleanliness, increased circulation, and comfort of the residents at least weekly, the skin will be observed during bath. 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R65 was admitted to the facility diagnoses of but not limited to atrial fibrillation, intracardiac thrombosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, muscle weakness, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R65 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG (Functional Status) revealed R65 had impairment on one side, assistance needed is partial to moderate for toileting, maximum with showering, and dressing. Section J (Pain Assessment) revealed R65 was on a pain management regiment and received scheduled pain medication. Review of the care plan for R65 revealed R65 has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit and required participation from staff with bathing. Record review revealed no shower logs to indicate nail care was provided. Observation on 11/5/2024 at 11:38 am with R65 revealed resident sitting up in bed watching television, with long fingernails with a dark substance underneath. Observation and interview on 11/7/2024 at 1:45 pm with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) CC revealed R65 sitting up in bed, alert, watching television, with fingernails long and jagged with a dark substance underneath. LPN CC confirmed that R65's fingernails were dirty and jagged with a dark substance underneath.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area was maintained in sanitary conditions. The deficient practice had the potential to attract pests and rodents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area was maintained in sanitary conditions. The deficient practice had the potential to attract pests and rodents and transfer harmful microorganisms to food, leading to foodborne illness. Findings include: During the initial observation on 11/5/2024 at 8:15 am, the dumpster area had discarded items such as gloves, plastic forks, cardboard, a chair, and combs on the ground surrounding the two dumpsters. In an interview on 11/5/2024 at 9:15 am, during the observational walk-through with the Dietary Manager (DM), the DM confirmed the dumpster area had discarded items on the ground. The DM stated that everyone used the dumpsters, but the maintenance department was responsible for overseeing the site to make sure the area was maintained in a sanitary manner. In an interview on 11/8/2024 at 9:07 am, the Maintenance Director stated everyone shared the responsibility of ensuring the dumpster area was clean and maintained in sanitary conditions. He stated no one department or person was responsible for overseeing the dumpster site.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure reusable medical equipment was cleaned between use for residents. The deficient practice had the potential lead to the spread ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure reusable medical equipment was cleaned between use for residents. The deficient practice had the potential lead to the spread of infection and illness. The facility census was 181 residents. Findings include: Observation on 11/6/2024 at 8:05 am during medication administration revealed Certified Medication Aid (CMA) DD obtained a blood pressure machine from the hallway, checked a resident's blood pressure with the machine, and returned the blood pressure machine to the hallway without cleaning the cuff or equipment. Observation on 11/6/2024 at 8:44 am during medication administration revealed CMA EE checked a resident's blood pressure with the unit blood pressure cuff and returned the blood pressure cuff to the medication cart drawer without cleaning the equipment. Continued observation revealed CMA EE used the same blood pressure cuff to check another resident's blood pressure without cleaning the equipment. In an interview on 11/6/2024 at 8:05 am, CMA DD revealed all reusable medical equipment should be cleaned between use on different residents. In an interview on 11/6/2024 at 8:05 am, CMA EE confirmed infection prevention includes the cleaning of shared medical equipment. In an interview on 11/7/2024 at 2:45 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed all infection prevention policies were to be followed when passing out medications, including cleaning reusable medical equipment cleaning.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Dating, Labeling, and Discarding Food, the facility failed to discard food items by the expiration or use-by date, f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Dating, Labeling, and Discarding Food, the facility failed to discard food items by the expiration or use-by date, failed to discard food items with a fuzzy green substance on it, and failed to ensure dietary staff wore beard coverings while in the kitchen. The deficient practice had the potential to place the 176 residents who received an oral diet from the kitchen at risk of contracting a foodborne illness. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dating, Labeling, and Discarding Food, revised January 2023, included Dating, labeling, food stored in the coolers, dry storage and freezers ensure the safety of the food that will be served to the residents. According to the 2022 Food Code, food that is RTE (Ready to Eat), Refrigerated and/or Time/Temp Control Food (food that contains ingredients that may cause food poisoning) MUST have an OPEN (or Prepared) Date and a USED BY (or DISCARD) date on each of these foods. The USED BY date that the FOOD CODE is referring to is not the use by or expiration date from the manufacturer, rather, how soon the facility must either use or throw away before it becomes unsafe to eat. All boxes, packages, containers must be dated with the delivery date that the food was delivered to the facility. This ensures food is being used and rotated out quickly and safely. During the initial walk-through of the kitchen on 11/5/2025 at 9:00 am, observation revealed Kitchen Aid (KA) CCC was not wearing a beard net. Observation on 11/5/2024 at 9:12 am of the walk-in cooler revealed a pan of salad (lettuce mixture) was not discarded by the used-by date and had brown discoloration. Observation on 11/7/2024 at 1:45 pm of packaged bread revealed a green fuzzy substance on the bread. In an interview on 11/5/2024 at 10:01 am, the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed she did not know why there were no dates on the identified food items. In an interview on 11/8/2024 at 2:32 pm, the Administrator revealed she expected the DM to be aware of the responsibilities and duties in the dietary department. She explained improper food handling is a concern and food items should have a three-day lifespan. The Administrator continued to confirm the dietary staff was responsible for ensuring items were properly stored and discarded in the kitchen storage areas.
May 2024 8 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, the facility failed to ensure pre-employment screening, specifically fingerprints for two o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, the facility failed to ensure pre-employment screening, specifically fingerprints for two of 10 staff reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy last reviewed May 2024 revealed Background, reference and credential's checks should be conducted on employees prior to or at the time of employment by the facility administration, in accordance with applicable person having knowledge that an employee's license or certification is in question should report such information to the administrator. Review of the facility employee files revealed the following: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) NN was hired on 2/1/2024 with no fingerprint process completed. 2. Certified Medical Assistant (CMA) OO was hired on 1/16/2024 with no fingerprint process completed. CNA NN and CMA OO had active, unencumbered CNA certifications. There were no concerns identified related to abuse or neglect within the facility. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 12:40 pm with the Human Resource Director revealed she must have missed the needed GCheck (Georgia Criminal History Check System). She expressed the need for all CNA's or CMA's need for a fingerprint background check. She stated she would get those completed as soon as possible. Interview on 5/16/2024 at 3:31 pm with the Administrator revealed the facility's standard was for all employees to have the appropriate background checks and fingerprints. She stated background checks were normally performed prior to hire and fingerprints were performed within a thirty-day window after hire. She expressed the two employees that were missed for a GCheck have now being processed.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one resident (R) (R172) that inclu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one resident (R) (R172) that included goals and interventions to meet the immediate care needs present upon admission. The deficient practice had the potential for R172 not to have care needs met. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R172 revealed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to pressure ulcer to left heel, unspecified stage, pressure ulcer of sacral area. Review of R172's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG-Functional Abilities and Goals revealed resident required limited assistance with all care. Section M-Skin Conditions did not indicate that the resident had a surgical wound. Review of the baseline care plan dated 5/3/2024 revealed there was not a completed plan of care that included the goals and interventions needed to provide effective and person-centered care to address care for pressure ulcers/wounds. The only problem areas identified were the resident's personal preferences, code status, and risk of infections. Review on 5/15/2024 and 5/16/2024 of the Licensed Weekly Skin Assessment from 5/10/2024 revealed no new areas. There was no indication of any documentation of present pressure ulcers/wounds. The Skin Assessment was not completed. Interview on 5/16/2024 at 10:19 am with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Director revealed that care plans are completed and reviewed quarterly, annually, upon admission, or as needed. She further stated that upon admission baseline care plans are done within 48 to 72 hours. When asked regarding R172's care plan being incomplete and not addressing the pressure ulcers, the MDS Director stated that she knew the resident had pressure ulcers and was recently admitted and should have had a care plan addressing what care R172 required during their stay at the facility. She revealed that they were still working on the comprehensive care plan as of 5/16/2024. When shown that the resident's baseline care plan did not address his pressure ulcers/wounds, she verbally confirmed that the care plan did not address his pressure ulcer(s), she then stated that the facility has 21 days to complete. She also stated that there was no policy for care plans but stated that they follow the guidelines of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Interview on 5/16/2024 at 11:35 am with the Director of Nursing (DON), the MDS Director, and treatment nurse Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) PP revealed that initial assessments and care plans are to be completed and once completed they are formulized by MDS within 21 days. She also revealed that all residents being admitted should include being at risk for potential related to skin breakdown and residents with ulcers/wounds should be included in the actual wound care plan. She and the MDS Director stated that the current practice of the facility was that if the resident had a pressure ulcer/wound, that they should have an actual care plan. When asked about R172 not having his pressure wounds addressed on the care plan, she pulled up the resident's care plan and showed surveyor that it was addressed, however it was dated 5/16/2024. She was made aware that the care plan did not include these items when reviewed by surveyor on 5/14/2024, 5/15/2024 and 5/16/2024, prior to making the MDS Director aware. The DON stated moving forward they will have actual and potential care plans for each resident. She voiced that it would be beneficial for other nursing staff to be vigilant of resident's needs. No policy was given regarding the care planning and admission assessments of skin prior to end of the survey.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R1 revealed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R1 revealed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to dependence on supplemental O2, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with (acute) exacerbation. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated little or no cognitive impairment. Review of a physician's order with a start date of 8/18/2019 for R1 revealed to change and date all respiratory supplies and tubing weekly. If oxygen concentrator is present, clean filter. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 1:26 pm during initial screening, R172 was noted sitting on side of the bed with O2 tubing and NC lying on the floor. The O2 concentrator (machine to supply oxygen) was on with the settings at 2 LPM. The filter cover on the O2 concentrator had a white, fuzzy substance and the entire concentrator was covered with dust. The tubing was labeled with white medical tape dated 5/6/2024. Interview on 5/14/2024 at 1:26 pm with R1, R1 stated that he does not wear his O2 all the time, and that his O2 machine had not been cleaned in a long time. Observation on 5/15/2024 at 9:32 am with R1 revealed the resident sitting up on the side of the bed, O2 NC not on and O2 concentrator not on. The O2 NC was hanging from the resident's bedside table, uncovered. No distress was noted. The O2 concentrator tubing remained dated 5/6/2024. R1 stated that he often runs out of water bottles, so he turns his machine off to conserve the water. The filter cover was opened to get a better observation of the filter. It revealed a very dirty filter that appeared to have spore looking substances on the outside of the filter casing which was dated 2/7/2023. R1 stated that he can taste dust sometimes while using his O2. Observation on 5/15/2024 at 2:15 pm of R1 sleeping in bed. The O2 concentrator was not on, and the NC was on the floor. The filter cover had not been cleaned and the filter had not been changed. Observation on 5/16/2024 at 10:00 am of R1 in bed resting. The O2 concentrator was at the bedside, not in use. The NC was hanging from the bedside table, uncovered. The O2 concentrator remained dusty as well as the filter cover. The dirty filter and casing remained in the concentrator. During an Interview/walking rounds on 5/15/2024 at 10:04 am with Unit Manager (UM) BB revealed that all staff were responsible for cleaning and maintaining O2concentrators by using germicidal wipes and report any issues with the concentrators. She also stated that she delegated tasks to staff. An order should be in place for changing tubing and labeling tubing with the date. UM BB confirmed that there was no current order for cleaning the O2 concentrator when shown resident orders in the EMR. UM BB was shown tubing and confirmed a date of 5/6/2024 was written on a white piece of tape that was affixed to the tubing and water bottle, and that there was not a bag to keep the NC in when not in use, the humidifier bottle which was almost empty, and confirmed the dirty filter and that it was dated 2/7/2023. Interview at 5/16/2024 at 9:45 am with UM BB stated asked about R1 having access to O2, she replied that there was portable O2 readily available on the floor. Bulk O2 tanks were kept on 4th floor and some O2 tanks were currently on 2nd floor where R1 lives. Interview on 5/16/2024 at 10:55 am with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that her expectations from staff when caring for residents with O2 were that staff were to follow orders, change O2 tubing weekly, date the tubing, and change and clean filter weekly. She also stated that maintenance was responsible for checking the concentrators and reporting any damage or malfunctions. The facility does use an outside vendor for the concentrators. She did confirm that she was aware of the dirty concentrator and filter and confirmed that the outside casing was dated 2/7/2023. She stated that she was not sure why the outside casing was dated because the filter was removable from the casing. When asked if the date could have been the date the filter was changed, she said that that could be possible. Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen (O2) Therapy, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for two of fourteen Residents (R) (R1 and R281) receiving O2 therapy, related to ensuring O2 filters were cleaned and the O2 nasal cannula (NC) was stored in a plastic bag when not in use, and failing to obtain a physician's order for O2. The deficient practice had the potential to cause respiratory distress. Finding include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy stated under the section titled Policy Statement that Oxygen (O2) is administered to promote adequate oxygenation and provide relief of symptoms of respiratory distress. Under the section titled Standard of Practice it stated the following but not limited to 1. Oxygen therapy is to be used with a written order by a physician. A physician's order for O2 therapy is to contain liter flow per minute (LPM) via mask or cannula. 5. Check that the equipment is functioning properly and ensure that mask or cannula is securely and comfortably in place. 8. Change oxygen tubing weekly. 9. Date tube when changed (weekly). Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R281 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but not limited to unspecified asthma, chronic pulmonary edema, mixed disorder of acid-base balance, unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R281 having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident had intact cognition. Further review revealed R281 had no behaviors, required limited assistance with one-person physical assistance for dressing, required one-person physical assistance for hygiene. Observation and interview on 5/14/2024 at 9:43 revealed R281 was sitting up in the bed on 2 liters LPM via NC. R281 stated she used O2 all the time and did not feel comfortable getting up without it. Observation on 05/14/2024 at 10:15 am of R281 in their room revealed the resident using O2 at 2 LPM via NC with no distress. Interview on 5/14/2024 at 10:34 am with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed R281 did not have an order for O2 but had been receiving O2 since admission. She expressed her expectations to include anyone receiving O2 treatments needed an order, and if they do not, the nurse should contact the doctor. The nursing staff manage O2 therapy. The facility does not have a Respiratory Therapist on staff. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 9:50 am with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA confirmed R281 had been on O2 since admission. LPN AA revealed the nurses take care of managing O2 therapy, maintain the flow rate, change it as needed, and that they change the tubing. It was confirmed that R281 had O2 on at 2 LPM via NC.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medications, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medications, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (%). There were two medication errors with a total of 28 opportunities observed for two of four Residents (R) (R27 and R91) for a medication error rate of 7.14%. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Administration of Medications revision date 11/15/2022 revealed under the Standards section, Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R27 revealed diagnosis including, but not limited to spinal stenosis, alcohol abuse, esophagitis, and muscle weakness. Review of the care plan dated 4/11/2024 included R27 has nutritional problems and is at risk for malnutrition related to alcohol abuse. Review of the Physician Orders for R27 included thiamine 100 mg (milligrams), senna tablet 8.6 mg, multivitamin oral tablet (multiple vitamin), and folic acid 1 mg. Review of the EMR for R91 revealed diagnosis including, but not limited to alcohol abuse withdrawal, cerebral infarction, and anemia. Review of the care plan dated 5/14/2024 included R91 is at risk for nutrition/hydration due to therapeutic diet and DX (diagnosis) of HTN (hypertension) and heart failure. Review of the Physician Orders for R91 included Docusate Sodium Tablet 100 MG one tablet, Vitamin C Tablet (Ascorbic Acid) 500 MG, Zinc Tablet 50 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth, Ferrous Sulfate Tablet 325 (65 Fe (iron) MG Give 1 tablet by mouth, and Multivitamin Tablet (Multiple Vitamin) Give 1 tablet by mouth. During observation of medication administration on 5/15/2024 at 9:20 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA administered multivitamin tablet with minerals to R27. The order indicated multivitamin oral tablet (multiple vitamin). During observation of medication administration on 5/15/2024 at 9:45 am, LPN AA administered multivitamin tablet with minerals to R91. The order indicated multivitamin tablet (multiple vitamin). Interview on 5/15/2024 at 1:00 pm with LPN AA, he confirmed the multivitamin order for R27 and R91. He confirmed he gave multivitamin with minerals to both R27 and R91. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 2:00 pm with LPN Unit Manager (UM) BB confirmed that medications should be given as ordered. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 3:00 pm with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that medications should be given per the six rights, including the right patient, right medication, make sure take medication, remove meds refused, documentation, what occurred, and try to go back later if refused.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Interview on 5/14/2024 at 11:40 am with R32 revealed that R32 was not feeling well. Medication from the 9:00 am medication pa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Interview on 5/14/2024 at 11:40 am with R32 revealed that R32 was not feeling well. Medication from the 9:00 am medication pass was observed on R32's bedside table. Interview on 5/14/2024 at 11:45 am with LPN UM KK revealed and confirmed that the medication pass was at 9:00 am. The medicine was no longer on the R32's bedside table. Interview on 5/14/2024 at 11:55 am with R32 in the presence of LPN UM KK revealed that R32 was nauseated and was afraid to take medication, so LPN JJ gave her the pills to take later. LPN UM KK confirmed that LPN JJ did the medication pass at 9:00 am and was not an employee at the facility as she works for an agency. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 10:32 am revealed that R32 was still not feeling well. R32 stated that she did take her medicine that the surveyor observed on her bedside table yesterday. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 11:39 am with LPN MM, R32 was described as alert, oriented and independent. LPN MM stated that R32 does not self-administer her medication. On 5/16/2024 at 12:30 pm surveyor attempted to speak with LPN JJ via phone. LPN JJ was busy and could not speak with the surveyor. LPN JJ ended the call. Interview on 5/16/2024 at 12:35 pm with the DON confirmed that LPN JJ worked for an agency. The surveyor discussed the concern of JJ leaving medication with the resident. The DON's expectations of nurses during medication pass included verifying resident, stand there and ensure that the resident takes the medication, if resident refuses, document refusal and notify the Nurse Practitioner or Physician. On 5/16/2024 at 3:11 pm the DON provided surveyor with documentation of a report filed with the agency regarding LPN JJ leaving medication with R32. LPN JJ will not be allowed to work at the facility right now. Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications and Biologicals, the facility failed to properly store medication for two of 66 sampled Residents (R) (R27 and R32). This failure placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk of having unauthorized access to residents' medications. Findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled, Storage of Medications and Biologicals revision date 3/11/2024 revealed under Practice Guidelines, Facility should ensure that medications and biologicals are stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, refrigerators/freezers of sufficient size to prevent crowding. Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible to residents and visitors. During observation of medication administration on 5/15/2024 at 9:20 am revealed a container of 'brand name' nasal saline on a bedside table in room [ROOM NUMBER]-2. There is no Resident assigned to that area. There is a Resident in 201-1, R27, who stated the Resident that was in 201-2 went home. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA was present during this discovery as he was passing medications to R27 in room [ROOM NUMBER]-1. He confirmed the saline was in the room on the bedside table. LPN AA stated that for Residents who are no longer in the facility, medications should be placed in the medication room. The Nurse Manager or Director of Nursing (DON) would destroy the medication; it should not be left at the bedside. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 9:30 am with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) UU revealed the Resident that was in 201-2 was discharged from the facility about three weeks ago. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 9:40 am with LPN Unit Manager (UM) BB revealed the nasal spray should not have been at the bedside, they should have double backed and checked to make sure there was not medication there.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of a facility document titled, Preventing Infections While Providing Personal Care and the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control,...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of a facility document titled, Preventing Infections While Providing Personal Care and the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control, Cleaning, and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented appropriate hand hygiene during the passing of trays at mealtime, before and after each resident's meal consumption for one of 66 sampled Residents (R) (R425), and failed to sanitize point of care equipment after use for two of 66 sampled Residents (R27 and R114). The deficient practice had the potential to expose residents to infection. The census was 179 residents. Findings include: Review of a document titled Preventing Infections While Providing Personal Care, not dated, revealed Proper handwashing is essential to making sure that the skin is free of contamination by potentially infectious microorganisms. When soap and water are not available, an alcohol-based hand cleanser can be used, and you must rub hands thoroughly until they are dry. Your facility will have guidelines in place for when an antimicrobial agent or a waterless antiseptic agent should be used. Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control, Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment last reviewed on November 29, 2022 under Policy Statement revealed that Resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment, will be cleaned and disinfected according to current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for disinfection and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. A review of the section titled Standard of Practice number three revealed durable medical equipment must be cleaned and disinfected before being reused by another resident. 1. Observation on 5/15/2024 from 12:20 pm to 12:59 pm in the fourth-floor dining room revealed that staff were inconsistent with hand hygiene between passing trays. They were observed shaking hands to dry them after alcohol-based hand cleanser. Observation on 05/15/2024 at 12:55 pm during the fourth-floor dining revealed that R425 was provided lunch while in bed. However, R425 was not offered hand hygiene before or after meal consumption. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 1:12 pm with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) HH revealed that all staff must complete hand hygiene before serving meals. CNA HH revealed that hand hygiene was offered and provided to all residents before meals to prevent the spread of communicable diseases. CNA HH was unaware if hand hygiene was provided to R425 before serving the recommended lunch selection. CNA HH stated she did not offer hand hygiene to R425. 2. Observation on 5/15/2024 at 9:30 am of medication administration by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA revealed he used the blood pressure cuff from the medication cart on R27 and put it in the bottom of the cart without sanitizing the cuff. Observation on 5/15/2024 at 9:45 am of medication administration by LPN AA revealed he took the blood pressure cuff out of the bottom drawer of the medication cart, he did not sanitize it, then used the cuff on R114 and put it on top of the medication cart. He did not sanitize the cuff. LPN AA confirmed he did not sanitize the blood pressure cuff after using it. Observation on 5/15/2024 11:30 am of the fingerstick blood sugar procedure completed by Med (medication) Tech (technician) CC revealed she gathered supplies for the procedure, put supplies on a barrier on the bedside table, except the container for the glucose. She then cleaned the resident's finger. After the stick she put the meter on the bedside table without a barrier. When she left the room, she put the meter on the cart without a barrier, cleaned the meter without gloves on, and put it back on the cart. Med Tech CC confirmed she did not always use a barrier during this process. Interview on 5/16/2024 at 4:00 pm with the Infection Control Nurse revealed when performing a fingerstick procedure, the staff will use a barrier to put supplies on in the room and on the medication cart. This includes the glucose meter. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 1:21 pm with the 4th-floor Unit Manager GG confirmed all staff was expected to complete hand hygiene in preparation for serving meals. Unit Manager GG revealed that hand hygiene, such as hand sanitizer, was expected to be used between tray distribution. Staff was expected to use hand sanitizer three times before washing their hands with soap and water. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/15/2024 at 2:05 pm revealed the facility did not have a hand hygiene policy. The DON revealed that all staff must assist with meal service to ensure meals are hot when served. The DON stated that staff should wash their hands after every third use of hand sanitizer. The DON revealed that the facility does not have a hand hygiene policy, but they provide education to all staff and follow the CDC guidelines related to hand hygiene. The DON provided a document titled Preventing Infections While Providing Personal Care, which stated these are the guidelines used by the facility.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 5. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 10:37 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a missing baseboard along the wall behind the bathroom. O...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 5. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 10:37 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a missing baseboard along the wall behind the bathroom. Observation on 5/15/2024 at 4:22 pm in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the resident dresser was covering the portion of the missing baseboard. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 10:42 am in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealing a large hole the size of a grapefruit located near the bathroom door, a broken toilet paper dispenser with a sharp edge, and exposed plumbing under the bathroom sink. Observation on 5/15/2024 at 4:14 pm in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a large hole in the wall, a broken toilet paper dispenser with a sharp edge, and exposed plumbing under the bathroom sink. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 11:00 am revealed spilled food splattered on R428's feeding pump. Observation on 5/15/2024 at 4:15 pm revealed spilled food splattered on R428's feeding pump. 4. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 10:41 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the smoke detector was beeping, and ceiling damage in the room. There was no privacy curtain on the left side of the bed nearest to the door. There was damage to the ceiling in the bathroom, a gap behind the toilet, and the PTAC unit was damaged. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 10:50 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the smoke detector was beeping. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 11:03 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the smoke detector was beeping, there was a gap behind toilet in the bathroom, and the bathroom sink was stopped up. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 11:07 am in the second-floor bath/shower room revealed it had an out of order sign on the door. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 11:12 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the sink was very loose from the wall. Observation on 5/15/2024 at 11:19 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed damage to the faucet in the bathroom, the pipe was leaking under the sink with a grey colored basin on the floor catching water, and a gap around the toilet base. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 11:31 am of the second-floor revealed several ceiling tiles damaged in the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 11:38 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a medium-sized hole in the bathroom floor, which is a shared bathroom, and large hole in the wall of the resident room near the bed and scuffed and damaged wall behind resident's bed. Also noted was a broken light fixture at the head of the bed, when touched, it partially fell. Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe/clean/comfortable/homelike environment for 11 of 84 resident rooms and 10 of 48 bathrooms and for two of 66 sampled residents (R) (R128 and R428), R128 who had mobility issues from loose handrailing and R428 who had food splattered on their tube feeding pump. Specifically, resident bathrooms contained gaps behind the toilet, stopped up sinks, sinks loose from the wall, damaged faucet, ceiling damage, holes in the floor, and leaks around base of toilet and broken paper toilet paper dispenser with a sharp edge, Additionally, resident rooms and hallways contained stains on the ceiling, broken lighting behind the bed, dim lighting, wall scratches behind the bed, broken bedside table, damaged base boards, damaged packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) unit, drawer to dresser missing, loose handrails, door frame damage, privacy curtain off hooks, call light not working, several floor tiles missing, damaged ceiling, missing baseboard, cracked window, window that would not close, gnats in room, beeping smoke detectors, and one shower room out of order. The deficient practice had the potential to impede residents reaching their highest practicable level of functioning to support their quality of life. The facility census was 179 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 3/14/2024 at 11:23 am revealed in room [ROOM NUMBER]B the overbed light was dim and water spots were observed on the ceiling. Observation on 3/15/2024 at 10:15 am revealed a cracked window in room [ROOM NUMBER]B that would not lock. The bathroom was noted to have chipped paint and holes behind the toilet. Observation on 3/16/2024 at 10:27 am revealed in room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom to have peeling paint and holes behind toilet, the base of the sink was pulling away from the wall, and patches of rough paint were noted behind and on the side of the toilet. Observation on 3/16/2024 at 10:47 am revealed room [ROOM NUMBER]B bedside lighting was dim and needed a cover over the light. Interview during walking rounds on 5/16/2024 at 10:25 am with the Maintenance Manager (MM) and the Administrator on floor 200, 10:40 am on floor 300. At 10:50 am the Administrator and MM confirmed damaged walls, peeling paint, cracked window, window that would not close, holes in the floor, baseboard needing repair, sink loose from wall, damaged faucet, several damaged ceiling tiles, hand rail damaged, damaged privacy curtains, holes in the wall, gap behind the toilet, leaking toilet, and PTAC unit damage. The MM stated cubicle privacy curtain has been ordered. MM stated that he will move forward making the repairs immediately. No policy was provided in regard to the environment. 3. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 10:23 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the window would not close. Observation on 5/15/2024 at 9:34 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the window would not close and the sink was slow to drain water. Observation on 5/16/2024 at 11:38 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the window would not close and the sink was slow to drain water. 2. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for R128 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating little or no cognitive deficit. Observation and interview on 5/14/2024 at 10:15 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the door and door frame had peeling paint, the PTAC casing needs to be replaced due to peeling paint and loose casing, base boards in room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 were peeling and need painting. R128 in 401-2-stated it was difficult to get the wheelchair in the bathroom due to the size of the room and the placement of the handrails. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 10:20 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the hall vent in front of the room was dusty and there were black flying bugs or gnats. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 10:30 am on the fourth floor revealed the baseboard near the Soiled Utility Room was peeling, the side rails were loose in the hallway near the bath area, there was torn tile, and the paint was peeling from the base boards. Observation on 5/14/2024 at 10:45 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the feeding pump had old tube feeding particles on the front of the pump, the wall behind bed B needed patching, the hand rail in the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose, the drawer to the dresser was missing on the 209-2 side, and the bedside table was broken in 209-1.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Receiving and Storage and Service Line Refrigerated Leftover Storage, the facility failed to ensure food items we...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Receiving and Storage and Service Line Refrigerated Leftover Storage, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled, discard expired foods, and to ensure the inside of the ice machine was clean and free from residue. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure opened and frozen food items were properly labeled and dated and leftover food was properly covered and to ensure that kitchen equipment used for food preparation and storage was kept clean and sanitary. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 179 of 179 residents receiving an oral diet from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Receiving and Storage under the section titled Policy, Receiving revealed Receiving is the point at which foodservice operation inspects and take legal ownership and physical possession of items ordered. Its purpose is to ensure that the food and supplies delivered match the established quantity and quality specifications. The section titled Storage revealed Proper storage of Date and Labeling food immediately after it has been received and checked is an important factor in the prevention and control of loss and waste. It also revealed that food should be stored in an orderly and systematic arrangement (FIFO-first in, first out). Food should be protected from pests, rodents, and insects. Review of the undated facility policy titled Service Line Refrigerated Leftover Storage under Policy revealed Leftover foods should not be saved and re-used for human consumption if there is any doubt of wholesome quality. Under the section titled Procedure revealed under 1. Cover with non-absorbent lid or material. 2. Date container with use by date (lids may be misplaced). There was not a policy presented by the facility regarding cleaning of kitchen equipment and food storage areas, however there was a typed Dietary Aide duties list hung on a wall in the facility's kitchen that included specific duties and responsibilities that included cleaning. Observations on 5/14/2024 at 8:50 am during the initial walk through with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed that the kitchen had three large freezers. Upon inspection of all three freezers revealed that none of the items (boxes containing foods) were labeled or dated, but during the inspection the DM proceeded to start dating the boxes with a black marker. There was loose food noted at the bottom in two of three of the freezers. There were unidentified food items wrapped in plastic wrap, unlabeled and undated. Other items included corn dogs in plastic, not labeled/dated, with small holes in the plastic, approximately 10 chicken patties in plastic, not labeled or dated, one bag of approximately 30 shrimp poppers, unlabeled and undated, 20 crab cakes, not labeled or dated, and expired brownie mix. The DM discarded all the items. There were also dry items such as flour and sugar in large white containers that were not dated or labeled. There was an open bag of cereal taped closed with clear tape, not dated. Upon inspection of the two ice machines, one was a dispenser located outside of the kitchen which had dust build up on the filter cover and was dirty all over. The second larger sized ice machine, which was mainly used for the residents, was located inside of the kitchen. It also had a dirty and dusty filter cover. The dispenser was wiped with a white paper towel under where the ice was dispensed and it revealed a pink, jelly-like substance. The DM confirmed the findings. The Maintenance Supervisor (MS) was made aware, and he acknowledged and confirmed the findings and immediately stopped the use of the ice machine. He cleaned and changed the filters and covers on the machine. Follow-up observations on 5/15/2024 at 8:22 am with the DM revealed that some of the previously identified concerns were still observed. She stated, I thought my assistant had taken care of the things I pointed out to him. The DM acknowledged that the two white containers with dry food items were not dated or labeled on the container. The DM acknowledged that the toaster, blender and large sized can opener were dirty. Interview on 5/14/2024 at 8:22 am with the DM revealed that expected dietary staff to label and date all food items and include when to discard the food items. She revealed that she expected dietary staff to clean the kitchen equipment right after use. She stated that she interacts with staff every day about cleaning equipment after use and to date and label food items. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 11:01 am with the MS revealed when asked who was responsible for cleaning the ice machines that he was responsible for cleaning and maintenance of the two ice machines in the facility. He confirmed that the facility uses 'company name' for pest control and presented a log which revealed the last service was dated 5/9/2024. He denied any pest control issues. Regarding the trash/refuse, he stated that the facility utilizes 'waste removal company name' and that they have daily scheduled trash pick-up. There was currently a large contractor roll off container in place for dumping large items such as furniture in, as the facility was changing out furniture. Interview on 5/16/2024 at 1:00 pm with the Administrator revealed that her expectations are that the kitchen staff maintain a clean, orderly kitchen by proper labeling, dating, getting rid of expired items per policy, report any concerns with food and equipment, maintain ordering so that there was enough food for residents, and honor and adhere to specific dietary needs of the residents.
Mar 2024 9 deficiencies 3 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the comprehensive assessment...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the comprehensive assessment addressed the wandering behaviors for one of 30 sampled residents (R) (R1). R1's wandering led to physical altercations with multiple residents, including a physical altercation on 1/25/2024 when R1 wandered into R12's room and R12 pushed R1, causing R1 to sustain a fracture of the left elbow. On 2/28/2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 2/28/2024 at 3:05 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 9/30/2023. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 3/4/2024. Based on observation, record reviews, review of facility policies as outlined in the Removal Plan, and staff interviews, it was validated that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the deficient practice was removed on 3/2/2024. The facility remained out of compliance while the facility continues management level staff oversight as well as continues to develop and implement a Plan of Correction (POC). This oversight process includes the analysis of facility staff's conformance with the facility's policies and procedures governing abuse in the facility. Findings included: A review of the clinical record for R1 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to adjustment disorder with depressed mood, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological diagnosis, and dementia with agitation. A review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed R1 presented with a BIMS score of three, indicating that the resident had severe cognitive impairment, R1 was independent in mobility. The assessment documented that R1 did not exhibit any wandering behaviors. A review of the clinical record and other facility documents revealed the following incidents of resident-to-resident altercations: A review of the progress notes documented by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) KKKK dated 9/30/2023 revealed that R17 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. It was documented that R17 was slapped by R1, a male resident; R17 was removed from immediate danger; and LPN KKKK observed redness to right of R17's face. A review of the progress notes documented by LPN FFFF dated 9/30/2023 revealed R1 slapped R17. When R18 attempted to intervene, R1 hit R18 and R19. Staff intervened. A review of the written statement of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) LLLL dated 9/30/2023 revealed that she observed R1 being physically aggressive towards other residents. She stated that R1 picked up a chair and an unknown resident grabbed the chair from R1, R1 fought R18 outside the breakroom, and that R1 was the aggressor. A review of the written statement of CNA MMMM dated 9/30/2023 revealed that she heard residents shouting in the dining room. She stated that some residents were stating that R1 grabbed R17's hair and slapped her. CNA MMMM stated that she was unable to calm R1 and R1 continued fighting, striking R18 before he was subdued and placed in his room. A review of the facility investigation summary written by the Director of Nursing (DON) dated 9/30/2023 revealed that R17 was seated in the common area in her wheelchair; R1 walked up to R17 and slapped R17 across her face unprovoked; and R18 and R19 attempted to intervene and R1 struck R18 and R19. The DON documented R1 directed his aggression towards staff when staff intervened and was not redirectable. Police were notified and R1 was hospitalized for three days. A review of the written statement of LPN GGGG dated 10/23/2023 revealed that R1 wandered into R12's room, and an argument occurred; and R1 was scratched by R12 on his hands. LPN GGGG documented that she cleansed R1 with nontoxic cleansing solution and notified the Unit Manager. A review of the progress notes documented by LPN IIII dated 11/13/2023 revealed he notified the police department following a verbal altercation between R1 and R16. LPN IIII documented he heard R16 yelling at R1 to get out of R16's room. A review of the facility incident report dated 11/19/2023 revealed that LPN YY documented R1 was exhibiting aggressive behavior; R22 came to get a snack at the nurses' station; and R1 slapped R22, stating that R22 got too close. A review of the progress notes documented by LPN IIII dated 12/13/2023 revealed R1 wandered into R12's room and attempted to pull R12 out of bed by her wrists. Staff immediately intervened and assisted R1 out of the room. A review of the progress notes documented by LPN JJJJ dated 1/25/2024 revealed R1 wandered into R12 room and R12 pushed R1. R1 fell and sustained a fracture of the left elbow. During an observation on 2/20/2024 at 2:30 pm showed R1 walked along the hallway of the third floor with his head facing down. R1 continued pacing along the hallway in the locked unit. During an interview 2/26/2024, at 1:44 pm the DON stated R1 was not cognitively intact and that R1 wanders into resident rooms. The DON stated that the staff constantly had to redirect R1 and that R1 had been involved in resident-to-resident altercations when he wandered into other residents' rooms. During an observation on 2/26/2024 at 3:15 pm, R1 was not in his room and an attempt to locate him was unsuccessful. Approximately five to six minutes later, CNA FFF located R1 in R20's room. During an interview at this time, R20 stated R1 was in his room messing with his table. R20 stated his attempts to make R1 leave were unsuccessful. R20 stated on numerous occasions staff had to help remove R1 from his room. R20 further stated that no one likes to be around R1 and that he was afraid that R1 was going to continue to be physically abusive towards other residents. R20 stated he was afraid R1 would eventually get hurt by other residents. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 1:23 pm, CNA DDD revealed R1 had dementia and was a wanderer and that the DON instructed staff to continue redirecting R1 when he gets into other residents' rooms. CNA DDD stated that they always heard female residents in the unit yelling at R1 to leave their rooms. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 1:40 pm, CNA EEE revealed that R1 did not like to stay in his room. CNA EEE stated R1 walked continuously around the unit. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 4:33 pm, the Physician Assistant (PA) QQ revealed she was aware R1 had behaviors and was physically aggressive towards other residents. She stated R1 wanders into other residents' rooms and has trouble sleeping so they made some medication adjustments and non-pharmacological interventions such staff redirecting R1 to his room. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 4:33 pm, Nurse Practitioner (NP) RR revealed that she had worked with R1 and visits with him monthly. NP RR stated R1 was ambulatory, walked freely around the secured memory unit and went into other resident rooms. The facility implemented the following actions to remove the IJ: 1. On 2/28/2024, R1's MDS and care plan was updated to reflect the behavior of wandering. 2. On 2/29/2024, an Ad Hoc QAPI meeting was held with the Medical Director, Corporate Operations Consultant, Administrator, Director of Nursing, Social Services Director, MDS staff, and Nurse Managers to review the IJ Removal Plan. The MDS/Care Plan policy was reviewed with no changes. 3. On 2/29/2024, the Corporate Nurse Consultant conducted an in-service with the three of three MDS department staff and one of two Social Services department staff on the MDS/Care plan Policy and how to develop a comprehensive care plan. 4. On 2/29/2024, a Wandering MDS and Care Plan Audit was completed on the secure unit. A total of 35 of 63 residents were identified as wanderers and care plans were updated to reflect the behavior of wandering. 5. On 2/29/2024, a behavior management meeting was held with the MDS Director, two MDS Coordinators, and the Social Services Director. They were provided with a copy of all residents involved in resident-to-resident altercations from September 2023 through current and care plans were reviewed for those that wander. Care plans were updated as necessary to reflect individualized interventions. 6. The corrective actions were completed on 3/1/2024 and facility alleges that immediate jeopardy is removed on 3/2/2024. All corrective actions were completed on 3/1/2024. The facility alleges that the IJ is removed on 3/2/2024. 1. A review of the MDS assessment and care plans showed, the MDS and care plans were updated for Residents with behaviors and for wandering residents. Staff were educated on 2/29/2024 and interventions were put in place. The following interviews verified; facility interventions were in place: During an interview on 3/6/2024 at 1:57 pm, the SSD revealed she completed an in-service on 2/29/2024, which was conducted by the staff development coordinator. The topics discussed included care plans. SSD expected the MDS coordinator to update care plans in a timely manner. SSD stated, care plans should be updated to include wandering behaviors. The interdisciplinary team (IDT) was responsible for care plan updates. SSD was part of the IDT. SSD stated Abuse and Care plan In-service's will be ongoing. 2. A review of the sign in sheet revealed that the QAPI Meeting was held on 2/29/2024 with the Medical Director, Corporate Operations Consultant, Administrator, Director of Nursing, Social Services Director, MDS staff, and Nurse Managers to review the IJ Removal Plan. The MDS/Care Plan policy was reviewed with no changes. During an interview on 3/5/2024 at 12:46 pm, NC NN revealed on 2/29/2024, she educated the Administrator, DON, and SSD regarding monitoring residents behaviors including verbally aggressive behavior and physically aggressive behavior. NC NN stated that the QAPI policy was reviewed, she talked to the MDS- Coordinator regarding comprehensive care plans. She identified the care plan was not updated on other occasions. Discussed staff the care plan should be updated as soon as an incident or behavior is identified. Documentation revealed staff were educated. 3. A review of the policy education to staff, QAPI minutes and Resident to Resident documentation audit was conducted and was completed as outlined in the plan. During an interview on 3/5/2024 at 11:56 am, ADON revealed all staff received the education. During an interview on 3/5/2024 at 12:46 pm, Nurse Consultant NN stated the QAPI policy was reviewed, she talked to the MDS- Director MM regarding comprehensive care plans on 2/29/2024. During an interview on 3/5/2024, at 1:13 pm, MDS coordinator MMM, confirmed that education was received related to MDS and Care Plans. During an interview on 3/6/2024 at 1:14 pm, the administrator revealed she attended a personalized additional computerized education. During an interview on 03/07/2024 at 1:25 pm, with the MDS Coordinator EEEE, confirmed that education was received related to MDS and Care Plans. During an interview on 03/07/2024 at 1:45 am MDS director/ RN, MM. NN educated all MDS staff on 2/29/2024 in her office. 4. During an interview on 3/5/2024, at 1:13 pm, MDS coordinator MMM, revealed care plans are updated quarterly, annually, whenever there was a significant change and whenever an incident happened. She was part of a facility wide in service. Review of the wandering Care Plan Audit revealed that it was completed on the secure unit. A total of 35 of 63 residents were identified as wanderers and care plans were updated to reflect the behavior of wandering. 5. A review of the sign in sheet revealed that on 2/29/2024, a behavior management meeting was held with the MDS Director, two MDS Coordinators, and the Social Services Director. 6. It was verified that the corrective actions were completed by 3/1/2024 and the immediate jeopardy was removed on 3/2/2024.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight of 30 sampled residents (R) (R16, R17,...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight of 30 sampled residents (R) (R16, R17, R19, R12, R1, R18, R30 and R22) were free from abuse. On 2/28/2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 2/28/2024 at 3:05 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 9/30/2023. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 3/4/2024. Based on observation, record reviews, review of facility policies as outlined in the Removal Plan, and staff interviews, it was validated that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the deficient practice was removed on 3/2/2024. The facility remained out of compliance while the facility continues management level staff oversight as well as continues to develop and implement a Plan of Correction (POC). This oversight process includes the analysis of facility staff's conformance with the facility's policies and procedures governing abuse in the facility. Findings included: A review of the facility Abuse Prevention Policy dated 9/5/2016 and last revised 11/1/2021 documented the following: The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse including corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, and misappropriation of property. The facility has a zero-tolerance abuse standard regarding all proven allegations of verbal, sexual, physical, mental, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and involuntary seclusion. Abuse means, willful infliction of injury unreasonable confinement intimidation or punishment including physical harm pain or mental anguish. And this also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being abuse maybe resident to resident, staff to resident, family to resident, or visitor to resident. 1. A review of the clinical record for R16 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to alcohol abuse dependence, vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance, and adjustment disorder. A review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R16 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. 2. A review of the clinical record for R17 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to mood disorder due to known physiological diagnosis, delusional disorder, and anxiety disorder. A review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed R17 presented with a BIMS score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact; R17 required staff supervision and oversight for dressing, eating, bathing and toileting; and R17 was independent in mobility. 3. A review of the clinical record for R19 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to adjustment disorder, a history of alcohol abuse, and a history of falling. A review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed R19 presented with a BIMS score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. 4. A review of the clinical record for R12 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. A review of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed R12 presented with a BIMS score of 13, indicating that the resident had mild cognitive impairment; R12 required staff supervision and oversight for dressing, eating, bathing and toileting; and R12 was independent in mobility. 5. A review of the clinical record for R1 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to adjustment disorder with depressed mood, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological diagnosis, and dementia with agitation. A review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed R1 presented with a BIMS score of 3, indicating that the resident had severe cognitive impairment; R1 required staff supervision and oversight for dressing, eating, bathing and toileting; and R1 was independent in mobility. 6. A review of the clinical record for R18 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and difficulty walking. A review of the discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed R18 presented with a BIMS score of 3, indicating that the resident had severe cognitive impairment; and R18 required staff assistance with activities of daily living. 7. A review of the clinical record for R30 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to spinal stenosis (when the space inside the backbone is too small), unsteadiness on feet, repeated falls, and cognitive communication deficit. A review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed R30 presented with a BIMS score of 7, indicating that the resident had severe cognitive impairment; and R30 required staff assistance with activities of daily living and used a wheelchair. 8. A review of the clinical record for R22 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to cognitive communication deficit, liver disease, and difficulty walking. A review of the discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed R22 presented with a BIMS score of 12, indicating that the resident had mild cognitive impairment; and R22 was independently mobile and did not require assistance with activities of daily living. A review of the clinical record, observations, and interviews revealed the following incidents of resident-to-resident abuse: A review of the progress notes documented by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) KKKK dated 9/30/2023 revealed that R17 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. It was documented that R17 was slapped by R1, a male resident; R17 was removed from immediate danger; and LPN KKKK observed redness to right of R17's face. A review of the progress notes documented by LPN FFFF dated 9/30/2023 revealed R1 slapped R17. When R18 attempted to intervene, R1 hit R18 and R19. Staff intervened. A review of the written statement of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) LLLL dated 9/30/2023 revealed that she observed R1 being physically aggressive towards other residents. She stated that R1 picked up a chair and an unknown resident grabbed the chair from R1, R1 fought R18 outside the breakroom, and that R1 was the aggressor. A review of the written statement of CNA MMMM dated 9/30/2023 revealed that she heard residents shouting in the dining room. She stated that some residents were stating that R1 grabbed R17's hair and slapped her. CNA MMMM stated that she was unable to calm R1 and R1 continued fighting, striking R18 before he was subdued and placed in his room. A review of the facility investigation summary written by the Director of Nursing (DON) dated 9/30/2023 revealed that R17 was seated in the common area in her wheelchair; R1 walked up to R17 and slapped R17 across her face unprovoked; and R18 and R19 attempted to intervene and R1 struck R18 and R19. The DON documented R1 directed his aggression towards staff when staff intervened and was not redirectable. Police were notified and R1 was hospitalized for three days. A review of the written statement of LPN GGGG dated 10/23/2023 revealed that R1 wandered into R12's room, and an argument occurred; and R1 was scratched by R12 on his hands. LPN GGGG documented that she cleansed R1 with nontoxic cleansing solution and notified the Unit Manager. A review of the progress notes documented by LPN IIII dated 11/13/2023 revealed he notified the police department following a verbal altercation between R1 and R16. LPN IIII documented he heard R16 yelling at R1 to get out of R16's room. A review of the facility incident report dated 11/19/2023 revealed that LPN YY documented R1 was exhibiting aggressive behavior; R22 came to get a snack at the nurses' station; and R1 slapped R22, stating that R22 got too close. A review of the progress notes documented by LPN IIII dated 12/13/2023 revealed R1 wandered into R12's room and attempted to pull R12 out of bed by her wrists. Staff immediately intervened and assisted R1 out of the room. A review of the progress notes documented by LPN JJJJ dated 1/25/2024 revealed R1 wandered into R12 room and R12 pushed R1. R1 fell and sustained a fracture of the left elbow. During an observation and interview on 2/20/2024 at 1:30 pm, R17 was observed in her room. When interviewed, she was unable to recall the events on 9/30/2023. R17 stated she does not want male residents in her room. During an observation on 2/20/2024 at 2:30 pm, R1 was observed unsupervised and independently ambulating back and forth in the hallway on the third-floor secured memory unit with his head facing down. During an interview on 2/21/2024 at 2:55 pm, R31 revealed that he is afraid of R1 and that R1 always comes into his room and sits on his bed without his permission. He stated that he has to wait for several hours before staff come in to redirect R1. During an interview on 2/26/2024 at 1:44 pm the DON stated R1 was not cognitively intact and wanders into other resident rooms. The DON stated that staff must constantly redirect R1 and confirmed that R1 has been involved in multiple resident-to-resident altercations when he wandered into other residents' rooms. The DON stated R1 was not intentionally aggressive towards other residents but R1 was involved in three or four physical altercations with other residents due to his wandering. The DON stated that R1 was referred to receive psych services and is being seen by a consultant once every quarter as an intervention. During an observation on 2/26/2024 at 3:15 pm, R1 was not in his room and an attempt to locate him was unsuccessful. Approximately five to six minutes later, CNA FFF located R1 in R20's room. During an interview at this time, R20 stated R1 was in his room messing with his table. R20 stated his attempts to make R1 leave were unsuccessful. R20 stated on numerous occasions staff had to help remove R1 from his room. R20 further stated that no one likes to be around R1 and that he was afraid that R1 was going to continue to be physically abusive towards other residents. R20 stated he was afraid R1 would eventually get hurt by other residents. A review of the progress notes documented by LPN TT dated 2/26/2024 revealed that R1 was wandering through hallway and LPN TT observed an altercation between R1 and R30. LPN TT documented that R30 yelled at R1 and pushed R1; R1 retaliated and hit R30 in the face; R1 was immediately separated by staff, assessed for injury, no noted injury; and the family and physician were notified. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 9:34 am, the administrator stated she was aware of R1's aggression when she came on board at the facility in September 2023. She stated R1's aggressive behavior was discussed in meetings with the Medical Director on several different occasions. She confirmed that the facility was unable to assign a staff member to the resident for one-to-one supervision. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 1:23 pm, CNA DDD revealed R1 had dementia and was a wanderer. They further stated the DON instructed staff to continue redirecting R1 when he gets into other residents' rooms. They confirmed that there was never an assigned staff to manage R1's behavior. CNA DDD stated that they always hear female residents in the unit yelling at R1 to leave their rooms. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 1:30 pm LPN TT revealed on 2/26/2024 at approximately 7:30 pm, they noticed R30 was irritable and then R30 pushed R1, causing R1 to stumble back. They stated that R1 then swung and hit R30 on the face. LPN TT stated the incident happened at the nurse's station which was located a few feet from R30's room. R30 stated he was fed up with R1 messing with his possessions. TT instructed staff to continue redirecting R1. TT stated redirection was the only intervention staff had been successfully implemented by the facility. TT stated most of the residents in the locked unit were unbale to verbalize their concerns and it was normal for the residents to retaliate when confronted. TT stated there were sixty-four residents in the locked unit. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 1:40 pm, CNA EEE revealed that R1 did not like to stay in his room and walked continuously around the unit. CNA EEE stated that R1 gets aggressive and violent when other residents confront him and that she would hate to see R1 get hurt by other residents. CNA EEE confirmed that R1 is not always supervised and that it was impossible for the staff to continuously watch all the residents. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 4:33 pm, the Physician Assistant (PA) QQ revealed she was aware R1 had behaviors and was physically aggressive towards other residents. She stated R1 wanders into other residents' rooms and has trouble sleeping so they made some medication adjustments and non-pharmacological interventions such staff redirecting R1 to his room. PA QQ stated she advised staff to leave R1 alone when R1 gets agitated and to attempt to reapproach later. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 4:33 pm, Nurse Practitioner (NP) RR revealed that she had worked with R1 and visits with him monthly. NP RR stated R1 was ambulatory, walked freely around the secured memory unit and went into other resident rooms. NP RR stated they were aware that R1 has had resident-to-resident altercations and confirmed that R1 required closer surveillance. They stated that the most plausible way for that to happen is to increase staff on the unit. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 6:49 pm, R1's representative revealed R1 used to walk continuously on his previous job. She stated that R1 enjoyed exercise and was unable to sit down for long periods, but over the last two years, R1 has been unable to hold a conversation and his confusion has progressed. She stated that she visited R1 on 2/24/2024 and staff took approximately five minutes to locate R1. She said that when the staff found R1, he was in another resident's bathroom. She stated that she was unaware of an action plan staff implemented to stop R1 from roaming and wandering in other resident rooms. The facility implemented the following actions to remove the IJ: 1. On 2/26/2024, R1 was assessed by the Psych Physician Assistant per physician order. On 2/27/2024, a skin assessment was conducted on R1 with no skin alterations noted. On 2/28/2024, the Corporate Operations Consultant, the Administrator and the Social Services Director met to discuss placement options for the R1. On 2/28/2024 at 9:00 pm, the R1 was transferred to a Psychiatric Facility per the physician order. The facility Social Worker will assist the Psychiatric facility with finding placement for R1. On 2/29/2024, an immediate discharge notice was issued to R1 and R1's legal representative. 2. On 2/29/2024 the Behavioral Health Physician's Assistant, the facility's Psychiatric provider, the Administrator, the Director of Nursing Services, and Corporate Operations Consultant had a telephone conference to discuss alternate placement for current of future residents that may present to be a danger to self or others. 3. On 2/29/2024, an Ad Hoc QAPI meeting was held with the Medical Director, Corporate Operations Consultant, Administrator, Director of Nursing, Social Services Director, MDS staff, and Nurse Managers to review the IJ Removal Plan, altercations involving R1 and alternate placement of R1. The Abuse Policy and the Behavior Management Policy were reviewed, and no changes were made. 4. On 2/29/2024 and 3/1/2024, the Staff Development Coordinator educated the following facility staff on the Abuse Policy, the Behavior Management Policy, and Resident to Resident Altercation Policy: three of four Registered Nurses; 21 of 22 Licensed Practical Nurses; 17 of 17 Medication Technician; the Activity Director, three of three Activity Assistants; 33 of 33 Certified Nursing Assistants; the Administrator; the Human Resources Director; the Admissions Director; the Marketing Director; four of four receptionists; the Business Office Manager; the Business Office Assistant, two of two Medical Records Coordinators; the Dietary Manager; 13 of 13 Dietary Assistants; the Housekeeping/ Laundry Director; the Maintenance Director; the Maintenance Assistant; the Laundry Supervisor; 11 of 11 Environmental Employees; the Therapy Director; three of three therapy assistants; the Social Services Director; two of two Social Services Assistants; the MDS Director; and two of two MDS Coordinators. In-services will be conducted on an ongoing basis by the Staff Development Coordinator and nurse managers. Agency staff will be educated on the facility policies prior to working in the facility. Those employees identified to be on LOA or FMLA will be in-serviced upon return, prior to their shift. All new employees will be in-serviced during the facility orientation. 5. On 3/1/2024, a Skin Assessment Audit was conducted by the nurse management team for 63 of 63 residents on the secured memory unit. There were no new areas of concern identified. 6. The corrective actions were completed on 3/1/2024 and facility alleges that immediate jeopardy is removed on 3/2/2024. All corrective actions were completed on 3/1/2024. The facility alleges that the IJ is removed on 3/2/2024. 1. Review of notes taken revealed three facility physicians and the Medical Director and Corporate Operations Consultant, DON and the Administrator met and discussed placement options for R1. A review of the physician's order dated 2/29/2024 revealed that R1 was transferred to a Psychiatric Facility. 2. During an interview on 3/6/2024 at 6:45 pm the Medical Director (MD) revealed he attended a QAPI meeting on 2/29/2024 and they discussed placement for R1 and other residents with behaviors in the future. 3. During an interview on 3/5/2024 at 1:13 pm, the Corporate Nurse NN confirmed that they educated MDS staff regarding abuse, behaviors were discussed regarding who staff should notify and making sure the residents were safe and notifying the proper authorities' doctors and families. During an interview on 3/7/2024 at 10:25 am Corporate Operations Director (COD) HH revealed the Administrator, Medical Director DON, SSD, MDS Director were educated regarding the immediate jeopardy concerns. HHH stated QAPI staff will be tracking trends, and she will be reviewing abuse logs monthly. HHH stated, Nurse Consultant, will be monitoring incidents and accidents. HH stated, R1 will not be returning to the facility. R1 was given an immediate discharge notice, and the facility is assisting R1 in finding alternative placement. 4.On 3/5/2024 at 2:15 pm, RN KKK Infection Preventionist and educator revealed she educated staff and in serviced all nursing and non-nursing staff on Resident-to-Resident altercations, behaviors, care plans and abuse and neglect reporting on 2/29/2024. RN, KKK, stated the in-service will be ongoing, which will include new hires. Record review showed a total of fifty-six staff were interviewed from 3/5/2024 through 3/6/2024, which included Nursing staff, Dietary staff, housekeeping staff, laundry staff, Maintenance staff, Reception staff and Management staff. Signatures and interviews verified staff were in serviced on 2/29/2024 by RN KKK. On 3/5/2024 the following clinical staff were interviewed: LPN KKK at 2:15 pm; LPN RRR at 7:04 pm; CNA HHH at 1:30 pm; CNA III at 1:38 pm; CNA JJJ at 1:49 pm.; CNA EEE at 1:56 pm; CNA AAA at 2:03 pm; CNA SSS at 7:15 pm. On 3/6/2024 the following clinical staff were interviewed: HK OOO at 2:38 pm; Laundry Aide PPP at 3:03 pm; HK Director QQQ at 3:04 pm; Dietary [NAME] LLL at 3:20 pm; Dietary [NAME] UUU at 2:32 pm; Business Office WWW at 2:05 pm; PTA XXX at 2:19 pm; COTA YYY at 2:23 pm; Human Resources ZZZ at 2:26 pm; Activity Aide AAAA at 2:35 pm; and CMT DDDD at 3:28 pm. 5. Record review revealed skin observations audit was conducted on 3/1/2024, of the sixty-three residents assessed one resident refused to be assessed and two residents were actively being seen by a wound care nurse. During an interview on 3/6/2024 at 1:14 pm, The administrator revealed she attended a personalized additional computerized education. In addition, the NC-NN in-serviced the Medical Director (MD), DON, SSD, Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) regarding QAPI review and ongoing quality assurance performance and improvement, which included wandering residents and residents with aggressive behaviors. For residents with repetitive aggressive behaviors, one staff will be instructed to supervise the resident until the behavior improves other services such as psych services will be provided. She stated Care plans should be updated immediately as soon as an incident arises, and an IDT will make a follow up, assessment All staff were educated regarding abuse and behavioral monitoring. New staff will be educated during orientation and the Inservice will be ongoing. During an interview on 3/7/2024 at 10:55 am LPN, TTT revealed on 3/1/2024 she conducted skin assessments on the locked unit on sixty-three residents. TTT was assisted by LPN, XX regarding skin assessments. TTT stated the weekly skin assessments audit will be on going for all the residents. 6. It was verified that the corrective actions were completed by 3/1/2024 and the immediate jeopardy was removed on 3/2/2024.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, interviews, and review of the Administrator's Job Description, Administration failed to provide protective oversight of the facility environment including adequate supervision ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, interviews, and review of the Administrator's Job Description, Administration failed to provide protective oversight of the facility environment including adequate supervision for wandering residents and failed to protect residents on the secured memory unit from an abuse free environment. This failure had the likelihood of affecting all residents residing on the secured memory unit. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that the call light communication system was functioning to alert staff that residents required assistance on one of four floors (Fourth Floor) in the facility. On 2/28/2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 2/28/2024 at 3:05 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 9/30/2023. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 3/4/2024. Based on observation, record reviews, review of facility policies as outlined in the Removal Plan, and staff interviews, it was validated that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the deficient practice was removed on 3/2/2024. The facility remained out of compliance while the facility continues management level staff oversight as well as continues to develop and implement a Plan of Correction (POC). This oversight process includes the analysis of facility staff conformance with the facility's policies and procedures governing abuse in the facility. Findings included: Review of the Administrator Job Description signed and dated 9/18/2024 by the Administrator, documented the summary of the position is to lead and direct facility functions in accordance with the resident's needs, government regulations, and company policies to maintain care for the residents. Essential job functions include: Plan, develop, organize, implement, evaluate, and direct the facility's programs and activities in accordance with guidelines issued by the governing board. Develop and maintain written policies and procedures and professional standards of practice that govern the operation of the facility. Makes routine inspections of the facility to assure that established policies and procedures are being implemented and followed. Assist the Quality Assurance and Assessment Committees in developing and implementing appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. Conducts regular rounds to monitor residents' needs are being met. Ensure that all facility personnel, residents, visitors Maintains a working knowledge and ensures compliance with all governmental regulation Ensures that residents rights to fair and equitable treatment, self-determination, individuality, privacy, property, and civil rights, including rights to wage complaints, are well established, and always maintained. Review resident complaints and grievances and make written reports of action taken. Discuss such actions with resident family as appropriate. 1. R1 with a history of wandering, repeatedly engaged in resident-to-resident physical altercations starting on 9/30/2023 with, R16, R17, R18, R19, R22 and R30. In addition, the facility failed to monitor R1 when R1 continuously wandered into R12's room over a three-month time frame and on 1/25/2024, R12 pushed R1 out of her room and R1 fell and sustained a fracture of the left elbow. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 9:34 am, the administrator stated she was aware of R1's aggression when she came on board at the facility in September 2023. She stated R1's aggressive behavior was discussed in meetings with the Medical Director on several different occasions. She confirmed that the facility was unable to assign a staff member to the resident for one-to-one supervision. Staff interview on 2/27/2024 at 1:40 pm, CNA, EEE revealed, R1 did not like to stay in his room, and R1 walked continuously around the unit. R1, gets aggressive and violent when other residents confront him. EEE further stated she would hate to see R1 get hurt by other residents. CNA EEE concluded it was impossible for staff to continuously watch all the residents. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 4:33 pm, Nurse Practitioner (NP) RR revealed that she had worked with R1 and visits with him monthly. NP RR stated R1 was ambulatory, walked freely around the secured memory unit and went into other resident rooms. NP RR stated they were aware that R1 has had resident-to-resident altercations and confirmed that R1 required closer surveillance. They stated that the most plausible way for that to happen is to increase staff on the unit. Cross refer to F600 2. An observation and interview on 2/22/2024 at 10:30 am, the Fourth-Floor call light system at the nurse's station was blank and there was no sound or signal alerting that residents needed assistance. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) UU was observed behind the nursing station and confirmed that the fourth-floor nursing call system was not functioning and stated the sound was not audible and the monitor did not blink or show residents who required assistance. He stated he was not sure how long the system had not been working. Observations on 2/22/2024 at 10:40 am on the 400 Hall revealed the following rooms were tested by pushing the red button. However, the light above the door did not light up and no sound was heard.: 415 bed A and B; 416 bed A and B; 417 bed A and B; 420 bed A and B and 424 bed A and B. An interview on 2/22/2024 at 10:50 am LPN WW stated the nursing call system had not been operational for three weeks and that the maintenance Director had been made aware, and that the staff put in requests for repair in the electronic maintenance care log. An interview on 2/22/2024 at 10:55 am, the Maintenance Director stated he was not sure why the call light monitoring system was not functioning. He stated that he was aware staff documented in the maintenance care system when equipment needed to be repaired. A review of a letter signed and dated by the facility administrator on 10/22/2023 revealed that the facility call light system was malfunctioning at that time. An interview on 2/22/2024 at 12:06 pm, the administrator revealed the monitoring system was a concern when she got hired and added it was not audible. She was unaware the monitors had stopped working again. Cross refer to F919 The facility implemented the following actions to remove the IJ: 1. On 2/29/2024 at 10:00 am, an Ad Hoc Abuse Performance Improvement Meeting was held with the Administrator, Director of Social Services, the DON, Corporate Operations Consultant, and the Corporate Nurse Consultant to identify the root cause of resident-to-resident altercations with a subsequent plan of action. The Abuse Prevention Policy, Resident to Resident Policy, and the Behavioral Management Policy were reviewed no changes made. 2. On 3/1/2024 the Administrator's job description was reviewed with the Administrator by the Corporate Operations Consultant. No revisions were made. 3. On 2/29/2024, the Corporate Operations Consultant in-serviced the Administrator, DON, and Social Services Director (SSD) on how to properly conduct an abuse investigation, how to track and to determine trends, root cause analysis and communication among departments on abuse reporting. The facility QAPI policy was reviewed specifically regarding how to determine root cause analysis. 4. On 2/29/2024, the Corporate Operations Consultant audited, completed, and signed the facility Abuse Log from September 2023 through current for any further areas of concern. Name of Audit- Abuse Log Audit. Trends noted to be primarily on third floor and in the evenings involving R1. Residents and the time of altercations were discussed with the Administrator and Director of Social Services. Interventions were put into place on the Abuse Performance Improvement Plan. 5. On 2/29/2024 the Corporate Nurse Consultant and DON audited the resident-to-resident altercations from September 2023 through current. The audit is named Resident to Resident Documentation Audit. It was identified that care plans were not initiated on all resident-to-resident altercations. Care plans were implemented on 3/1/2024. The DON and Administrator will discuss all abuse allegations in the morning meeting to ensure all departments respond appropriately. Documentation will be monitored through the Abuse Performance Improvement Plan and reported during QAPI by the Director of Nursing and Administrator. 6. On 2/29/2024, the Administrator was educated through the company online training modules on Implementation of QAPI Programs in Nursing Facilities through a one hour approved course. The Administrator successfully completed a post class test and received a certification. On 2/29/2024, the Corporate Operations Consultant conducted educated the Administrator on how to conduct a QAPI meeting and how to identify and complete a Root Cause Analysis. All corrective actions were completed on 3/1/2024. The facility alleges that the IJ was removed on 3/2/2024. 1. A review of Abuse/Resident to Resident Altercations staff education on 2/9/2024 attended by four Registered Nurses (RN) twenty-two Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), seventeen medical technicians (CMT), four Certified Nurses Assistants (CNA), twelve administration staff, seventeen environmental/maintenance staff, nine Therapy staff, two staff from Social Services and the MDS coordinator. During an interview on 3/5/2024 at 11:51 am, the DON revealed that in services were held regarding abuse, wandering and resident to resident altercations. She verified that all abuse should be reported within two hours to the state. QAPI meetings are addressed monthly, and clinical meetings are held every morning, when interventions are discussed during the QAPI, in service starts the same day if possible. 2. A review of the job description titled, Administrator last revised 3/1/2024, revealed the administrator was hired on 9/18/2024. Review of the administrator's job description included directing day to day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern nursing facilities to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be always provided to all residents. Additionally, duties included Administrative Functions, Committee Functions, Personal Functions, Staff Development, Safety and Sanitation, Equipment and Supply Functions, Budget and Planning Functions, Residents Rights and Working Conditions. 3. The QAPI policy was reviewed and showed the composition of the performance Improvement Committee including, the Administrator, DON, Medical Director, Nurse Practitioner, Resident Assessment Instrument Coordinator. The policy documented QAPI program had the responsibility for designing and implementing corrective action plans as needed to resolve identified resident aspects of care/service problems. During an interview on 3/5/2024 at 12:46 pm, Nurse Consultant (NC) NN, revealed the facility abuse policy was not updated, she stated it was reviewed. On 2/29/2024, she educated the Administrator, DON, and SSD regarding monitoring residents behaviors including verbally aggressive behavior and physically aggressive behavior. The consultant stated, the QAPI policy was reviewed, she talked to the MDS- Coordinator, MMM regarding comprehensive care plans. She identified the care plan was not updated on other occasions. Discussed staff the care plan should be updated as soon as an incident or behavior is identified. Documentation revealed staff received the in-service on 2/29/2024. 4. Documentation and interviews of facility staff (nurses, CNA's, Housekeeping and the Laundry department) and The Abuse Log Audit. During an interview on 3/5/2024 at 11:56 am, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed the following, all staff were in serviced, regarding behavioral management, specifically the way staff are to manage residents with behaviors, skin assessments, QAPI was reviewed. Staff were informed to immediately assess residents for injuries and report to the abuse coordinator immediately whenever a resident-to-resident altercation occurs. Staff discussed alternative placement for residents involved in repetitive resident to resident altercations. There were no changes made to the Abuse Policy. ADON stated all abuse must be reported to the abuse coordinator immediately and to the state within two hours. 5. The QAPI meeting was held for the following Tags F600, F656 and F835, and signatures were documented regarding completion of the in service. A total of fifty-six staff were interviewed from 3/5/2024 through 3/6/2024, which included Nursing staff, Dietary staff, housekeeping staff, laundry staff, Maintenance staff, Reception staff and Management staff. Signatures and interviews verified staff were in serviced on 2/29/2024 by RN-KKK. 6. Reviewed the audit tools dated 2/29/2024 verified that 100% of audits had been completed. A sample was reviewed for R1, R11, R12, R16, R19, R20, and R22. The documentation reviewed for Care Plans, MDS, and Pocket Guides was accurate.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and document behaviors for one resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and document behaviors for one resident (R1) who was involved in multiple resident-to-resident physical altercations due to wandering on the unit. The sample size was 30 residents. Findings included: A review of the Behavioral Management Program policy last revised 10/22/2022 revealed that it is the policy of the facility that each resident must receive, and the facility must provide the necessary behavioral health care and services and medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical mental and psychosocial well-being. The objective of the Mood and Behavior Policy and Procedure is to provide a plan of care that is individualized to the residents' needs based upon the comprehensive assessment by the interdisciplinary team. The plan of care will include medically related social services to address mood and behavioral health services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being. A review of the clinical record revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of adjustment disorder with depressed mood, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological diagnosis, and dementia with agitation. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R1 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive deficit; R1 was assessed to be independently mobile. A review of R1's comprehensive care plan initiated on 5/11/2022 and last revised on 12/8/2023 revealed that R1 had a behavior problem related to auditory hallucinations. Interventions included staff to document behaviors and resident response to interventions. A review of the current behavior monitoring records revealed there was no documentation that R1 was being monitored for any behaviors. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 9:48 am MDS Director MM revealed R1 had dementia and was confused. MDS Director MM stated R1 had behaviors, but she was not aware of a behavior monitoring plans in place for R1. During an observation on 2/20/2024 at 2:30 pm, R1 was observed unsupervised and independently ambulating back and forth in the hallway on the third-floor secured memory unit with his head facing down. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 4:33 pm Physician Assistant (PA), she confirmed that she was aware R1 had behaviors and was physically aggressive towards other residents and that the staff should be monitoring for behaviors. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 4:33 pm with Nurse Practitioner (NP) RR, she had worked with R1 and that he required closer surveillance and monitoring due to his behaviors.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0745 (Tag F0745)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R8) of 30 sampled...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R8) of 30 sampled residents received adequate assistance and support from social services with receiving urgent dental services. Findings included: Review of the facility's dental service policy dated 11/28/2017, and review date of 11/21/2021, revealed routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the residents of oral health service in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. Further review revealed that social service personnel will be responsible for assisting the resident with making appointment transportation as needed. Review of R8 electronic medical record (EMR) admission Record, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and is a current resident. Some of his admitting diagnoses included congested heart failure, diabetes type 2, paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and bruxism. Review of the physician order dated 11/29/2023 revealed a dental consult for evaluation and treatment was ordered for R8. Review of a progress note entered by social service on 11/30/2023 revealed that the resident requested dental services for toothache and a referral was sent by social services. Review of R8's care plan dated 12/4/2023 revealed resident having potential for pain and discomfort related to his mouth. Interventions is to provide pain medication as needed. The care plan for dental care services was not updated until 2/28/2024 after surveyor interviews were conducted about R8. Review of R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] section C -cognitive patterns revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 showing the resident is cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Review of social service assessment dated [DATE] revealed, resident requesting dental services due to tooth pain, and social service sent a referral requests. Interview on 2/20/2024 at 3:00 pm with R8 revealed I need dental care, I'm tired of taking pain medicine for my teeth, I've been asking it's been two to three weeks or so now not sure how long, I don't even like smiling. I was told I was going to see the dentist since I came in here, but I have not seen the dentist yet. They keep telling me I'm going to see the dentist and I want to have all my teeth pulled. Observation at the time of this interview on 2/20/2024 at 3:00 pm revealed R8 has several missing teeth in the front, and some of the upper and lower teeth appear long and jagged. When the resident speaks you can hear his teeth grinding and clinching together. An interview was conducted on 2/26/2024 at 5:50 pm with the administrator and social service director. The social service director confirmed that she did have R8 on the list since November 2023, however the resident was not seen by the dentist that came. The social service director further revealed that the dentist came to the facility in November 2023, but did not see any residents due to issues with water in the building. The dentist service then returned in December 2023 but did not see residents at that time due to scheduling conflicts. The social service director revealed the last time the dentists came to see residents was on 2/14/2024. However, R8 was missed and not seen, and no additional referrals were made for R8 to be seen outside of the facility. Interview on 3/1/2024 at 9:20 am revealed R8 was still waiting to receive dental care services. The investigation revealed it took the social service director almost 4 months before R8 was provided with dental care as ordered by the physician and requested by the resident. A follow up interview with R8 on 3/4/2024 at 12:00 pm revealed he finally got to see the dentist today and was very happy, the resident was smiling and very thankful, and says the dentist plans for removal of all or most of his teeth just as the resident has been wanting.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0790 (Tag F0790)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R8) of 30 sampled...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R8) of 30 sampled residents received dental services timely, after multiple requests and complaints of mouth pain. Findings included: Review of the facility's dental service policy dated 11/28/2017, and review date of 11/21/2021, revealed routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the residents of oral health service in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. It further reveals that those services will be provided to the residents through a contract agreement with the local dentist a referral to a personal dentist a referral to community dentist or referral to any other Health Organization that provides dental care. It further reveals that selected dentists must be available to provide follow-up care. It also reveals that dental assessments will be conducted at a minimum on a quarterly basis through the MSDS assessment process. Social service personnel will be responsible for assisting the resident making appointment transportation as needed. Review of R8 admission Record, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and is a current resident. Some of his admitting diagnoses included congested heart failure, diabetes type 2, paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and bruxism. Review of the physician order section revealed a diet of regular thin liquids with no added salt. Additional orders included a dental consult for evaluation and treatment dated 11/29/2023. Review of R8's care plan dated 12/4/2023 revealed resident having potential for pain and discomfort related to his mouth. Interventions is to provide pain medication as needed. The care plan for dental care services was not updated until 2/28/2024 after surveyor interviews. Review of a progress note entered by social service on 11/30/2023 reveals that the resident requested dental services for toothache and a referral was sent by social services. Review of social service assessment dated [DATE] revealed, resident requesting dental services due to tooth pain, and social service sent a referral requests. Review of progress note dated 3/11/2024 revealed that the resident was placed on doxycycline for tooth pain back on 12/08/2023. Interview on 2/20/2024 at 3:00 pm with R8, he stated I need dental care, I'm tired of taking pain medicine for my teeth, I've been asking it's been two to three weeks or so now not sure how long, I don't even like smiling. I was told I was going to see the dentist since I came in here, but I have not seen the dentist yet. They keep telling me I'm going to see the dentist and I want to have all my teeth pulled. Observation of R8 on 2/20/2024 at 3:00 pm revealed he was speaking clearly but with difficulty due to grinding of his teeth. The grinding teeth can be heard from a distance, R8 has several missing teeth in the front, and some of the upper and lower teeth appear long and jagged. When the resident speaks you can hear his teeth grinding and clinching together. An interview was conducted on 2/26/2024 at 5:50 pm with the administrator and social service director revealed that all residents are provided dental care, dental care is contracted by a dental group that comes in once a month and provides services in the facility. If additional services are needed prior to that the resident is referred out as needed. The administrator also revealed that even if a resident does not have dental coverage the facility will provide the finances for dental care for the resident. Continued interview, the social service director revealed that they use a contracted dental service that comes to see the residents that are on the scheduled list. The social service director confirmed that she did have R8 on the list since November 2023, however the resident was not seen by the dentist that came. The social service director further revealed that the dentist came to the facility in November 2023, but did not see any residents due to issues with water in the building. The dentist service returned in December 2023 but did not see residents at that time due to scheduling conflicts, the social service director revealed the last time the dentists came to see residents was on 2/14/2024. However, R8 was missed and not seen, and no additional referrals were made for R8 to be seen outside of the facility. Observation and interview with R8 on 3/1/2024 at 9:20 am revealed he has not heard anything and still has not received dental services. A follow up interview on 3/4/2024 at 12:00 pm with R8 revealed he finally got to see the dentist today and was very happy, resident was smiling and very thankful and says the dentist plans for removal of all or most of his teeth just as the resident has been wanting. Interview with the registered dietitian on 3/6/2024 at 10:57 am revealed R8's diet and intake indicated a 10-pound weight loss back in January of 2024 due to a possible hospital admission his weight has increased since then to a 3-pound weight gain however the registered dietitian was not aware of the resident having dental issues.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike envi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on two of four floors (Third Floor and Fourth Floor). Findings included: A review of the facility's resident rights revealed that each resident has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including, but not limited to, receiving treatment and support for daily living safely. During an observation tour on the Fourth Floor on 2/20/2024 at 2:00 pm, double occupancy rooms and quad occupancy rooms were observed. The quad shared rooms were set up with four beds lined up in a row with curtain dividers in between them on one side of the room. Clothing closets were on the opposite side of the room near the door entrance for all four residents; these closets are not located near the resident's living space. These rooms appear to be set up institution-like. room [ROOM NUMBER]D was observed to have a broken and peeling bed stand. The divider privacy curtains were broken. room [ROOM NUMBER]D was observed to have a cloth covered chair that was badly stained at the resident's bedside. room [ROOM NUMBER]D was observed to have a bedside stand with peeling and chipped paint. room [ROOM NUMBER], which was a quad room, revealed broken privacy curtains and missing wall moldings. During an observation tour on the Third Floor on 2/20/2024 at 3:00 pm, room [ROOM NUMBER] was set up as a quad room with four residents. The quad shared rooms were set up with four beds lined up in a row with curtain dividers in between them on one side of the room. Clothing closets were on the opposite side of the room near the door entrance for all four residents; these closets were not located near the resident's living space. These rooms appeared to be set up institution-like. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a busted hole in the wall near the door entrance. During an observation and interview with R13 on 3/1/2024 at 9:10 pm, he revealed that his over-bed light does not work, and he had reported it several times. It was observed that the string on the light did not reach the resident and the resident could not turn his bed light on and off as needed. An interview was conducted with the Administrator and Maintenance Director on 3/6/2024 at 12:59 pm. It was revealed that broken furniture in resident rooms is due to be replaced and that they were aware that some of the furniture had begun to fall apart. Further interviews revealed that privacy curtains were only replaced on the Second Floor but had not yet been replaced on the other floors. The administrator acknowledged and confirmed that the quad rooms were set up in an institutional-like manor and stated that they would look into changing the layout. On 3/6/2024 at 1:30 pm during a tour with the Maintenance Director, he confirmed the broken furniture and confirmed that some of the rooms on the Fourth Floor (the quad rooms) did not have nightstands at all. During an observation on the Fourth Floor on 3/11/2024 at 12:15 pm, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with a broken cabinet. room [ROOM NUMBER]A was observed with no privacy curtain. During an interview with the Resident Counsel President, R31, on 3/11/2024 at 12:15 pm revealed that all the rooms should have privacy curtains but some of them don't.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for eight...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for eight of 30 sampled residents (R) (R4, R21, R29, R23, R25, R26, R27, and R28) related to toileting and nail care. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Bath Shower Hygiene Care, revised November 2022, policy documented showers will be given for cleanliness, increased circulation, and comfort. The policy did not address nail care. 1. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R4 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and that R4 was assessed to require substantial to maximum assistance with personal hygiene. A review of R4's care plan, initiated on 10/8/2019, documented that R4 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to a decline in ADL Self Care. Staff documented that R4 required extensive to total assistance with ADL care including bed mobility, transfers, eating, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The care plan directed staff to assist with toileting, dressing and personal hygiene. On 2/22/2024 at 10:15 am R4 was observed sitting sideways across his bed, a strong malodorous odor emanated from his surroundings, and the bed sheets were stained with dark brown substance. At that time, R4 stated that he had a bowel movement (BM). He stated that he had pressed the call light around 7:00 am that morning but no staff assisted him. He further stated that this has been happening for the past three weeks and he told multiple staff, but nothing had been done. He stated that this was the second time that he had to sit in his BM for several hours. During an interview on 2/22/2024 at 10:35 am, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) AAA stated the call monitoring system had not been operational for the last three weeks. She stated the expectation is that the monitoring system is supposed to alert staff of how long the resident had been waiting for the call light to be answered and to alert staff of the origin of the call light. CNA AAA confirmed that R4's call light was not working and that the sheets were soiled. 2. A review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed R21 presented with a BIMS score of four, indicating that the resident presents with severe cognitive impairments and revealed that the resident required substantial to maximum assistance from staff for personal hygiene. A review of the care plan dated 2/7/2024 revealed that R21 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to impaired balance in ADL Self Care and required staff assistance with personal hygiene. During observation on 3/1/2024 at 8:45 am, R21's fingernails were observed to be several inches long and presented with grime and black substance underneath. The resident stated that his fingernails were too long and that he would prefer his nails trimmed. 3. A review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed R29 presented with a BIMS score of five, indicating that the resident presents with severe cognitive impairments and revealed that the resident required substantial to maximum assistance from staff for personal hygiene. A review of R29's care plan dated 1/9/2024 documented that R29 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to confusion and the care plan directed staff to improve and to maintain the resident current level of function. The care plan directed staff to assist with toileting, dressing and personal hygiene. During an observation on 3/1/2024 at 8:54 am R29 had long fingernails with brown substances and grime underneath the nails. R29 said she would like to have her nails trimmed and staff had not assisted, even when she asked for help. During an interview on 3/1/2024 at 9:05 am LPN NNNN stated R29 had been admitted at the facility for a long time and was not diabetic. LPN NNNN stated CNAs are expected to cut and trim nails for non-diabetic residents and she had no explanation as to why the CNAs had not been trimming resident nails. 4. A review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed R23 presented with a BIMS score of three, indicating that the resident presents with severe cognitive impairments and revealed that the resident required substantial to maximum assistance from staff for personal hygiene. A review of R23's care plan last updated dated 6/12/2022 documented that R23 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to confusion and the care plan directed staff to improve and to maintain the resident current level of function. The care plan directed staff to assist with personal hygiene. During an observation on 3/1/2024 at 8:45 am, R23's fingernails were long and untrimmed. There was a brown and black substance underneath the nails. During an interview with LPN NNNN at this time, LPN NNNN stated R23's nails were considerably long and stated they needed to be trimmed. NNNN stated that nurses should trim all diabetic residents' nails. 5. A review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed R25 presented with a BIMS score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact and revealed that the resident required substantial to maximum assistance from staff for personal hygiene. During an interview on 3/1/2024 at 9:20 am, R25 stated he wanted his nails trimmed and stated staff never offered to trim his nails. His nails were observed to be long and untrimmed. During an interview on 3/1/2024 at 9:30 am LPN TT stated CNA's and activities should be cutting resident nails. LPN TT was unaware several residents' nails had not been trimmed in the secured memory unit and confirmed that R25's nails needed to be trimmed. 6. A review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed R26 presented with a BIMS score of three, indicating that the resident presents with severe cognitive impairments and revealed that the resident required substantial to maximum assistance from staff for personal hygiene. A review of R26's care plan last updated dated 11/13/2023 documented that R26 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia and the care plan directed staff to improve and to maintain the resident current level of function. During observation and interview on 3/1/2024 at 9:45 am, R26's fingernails were observed and were long and dirty. During an interview with LPN TT at this time, she stated R26's nails were too long. 7. A review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed R27 presented with a BIMS score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact and revealed that the resident required assistance from staff for personal hygiene. A review of R27's care plan, last updated dated 5/4/2022, documented that R27 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to confusion and the care plan directed staff to improve and to maintain the resident current level of function. During an observation on 3/1/2024 at 9:55 am R27 was observed walking towards the nurse's station. LPN TT was observed to ask R27 if she could see her nails. R27's raised her hands and her middle finger was chipped and reddish in color. R27 stated she injured herself when she attempted to trim her own nails. LPN TT stated she would cut R27's nails. 8. A review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed R28 presented with a BIMS score of 13, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact and revealed that the resident was dependent staff for personal hygiene A review of R28's care plan dated 1/8/2024 documented that R28 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to confusion and the care plan directed staff to improve and to maintain the resident current level of function. The care plan directed staff to assist with personal hygiene. During an observation 3/1/2024 at 10:01 am, R28 was observed with long fingernails. He stated he would prefer to have his nails trimmed and added staff have never offered to trim his nails. During an interview on 3/2/2024 at 10:05 am, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated that the nurses and CNAs were expected to trim residents' nails. The SSD stated that the charge nurses are responsible for making sure the residents nails are being trimmed.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the call light communication system wa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the call light communication system was functioning to alert staff that residents required assistance on one of four floors (Fourth Floor) in the facility. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Call System/Light, last revised 10/20/2022, documented that the call system shall allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system that relays the call directly to a staff member at a centralized staff work area. The bedside call light and the emergency call light shall be in functioning order. A review of the Maintenance Care Log records dated 2/13/2024, revealed that an unknown staff documented the following concerns: 1. Task Number 28680: room [ROOM NUMBER] . call light not working. 2. Task Number 28673: room [ROOM NUMBER] call light not working. During observation and interview on 2/22/2024 at 10:15 am, R4 was observed sitting sideways across his bed. A strong odor emanated from his surroundings and the bed sheets were stained with dark brown substance. R4 stated he pressed the call light several times and the call light did not work. R4 stated he had a bowel movement around 6:00 am. R4 was observed to have pressed his call button at that time, and the call light was observed to not activate the nursing call system. R4 stated for the past three weeks, he had been pressing the call light and staff were not responding because the call light doesn't work. During an observation and interview on 2/22/2024 at 10:30 am, the fourth-floor call light monitor at the nurse's station was blank and there was no sound or signal alerting that residents needed assistance. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) UU was observed behind the nursing station and stated that he was the charge nurse on the floor. He confirmed that the fourth-floor nursing call system was not functioning and stated the sound was not audible and the monitor did not blink or show residents who required assistance. He stated he was not sure how long the system had not been working. During an interview on 2/22/2024 at 10:35 am, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) AAA stated the call monitoring system had not been operational for the last three weeks. CNA AAA stated the expectation was that the monitoring system is supposed to show staff on the monitor how long the resident had been waiting for the call light to be answered and show the origin of the call light. CNA AAA stated Maintenance Director was made aware that the monitor was not working. She stated that she also documented a request for repairs to be completed in the electronic maintenance care log. During an interview on 2/22/2024 at 10:50 am LPN WW stated he had been working at the facility for over a year. LPN WW stated the nursing call system had not been operational for three weeks and that the maintenance Director had been made aware, and that the staff put in requests for repair in the electronic maintenance care log. Further observations on 2/22/2024 at 10:40 am revealed the following: 1. On the 400 Hall, room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A and B, the call lights were tested by pushing the red button. The light above the door did not light up and no sound was heard. 2. On the 400 Hall, room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A and B, the call lights were tested by pushing the red button. The light above the door did not light up and no sound was heard. 3. On the 400 Hall, room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A and B, the call lights were tested by pushing the red button. The light above the door did not light up and no sound was heard. 4. On the 400 Hall, room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A and B, the call lights were tested by pushing the red button. The light above the door did not light up and no sound was heard. 5. On the 400 Hall, room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A and B, the call lights were tested by pushing the red button. The light above the door did not light up and no sound was heard. During an interview on 2/22/2024 at 10:55 am, the Maintenance Director stated he was not sure why the call light monitoring system was not functioning. He stated that he was aware staff documented in the maintenance care system when equipment needed to be repaired. A review of a letter signed and dated by the facility administrator on 10/22/2023 revealed that the facility call light system was malfunctioning at that time. During an interview on 2/22/2024 at 12:06 pm, the administrator revealed the monitoring system was a concern when she got hired and added it was not audible. She was unaware the monitors had stopped working again. During an interview on 2/22/2024 at 1:58 pm, LPN GG, who is also the Staff Development Coordinator, stated that she was aware that the system malfunctioned in the past and that she educated staff regarding the call light monitoring system. She stated the monitoring system should reflect the origin of the call light as soon as the resident pushed the call light. LPN GG stated when staff identified malfunctioning equipment, they were required to document on the electronic maintenance care log and to follow up with a verbal phone call to the Maintenance Director. Cross refer to F835
Oct 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medication, t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medication, the facility failed to ensure medications were documented and administered for two of 35 sampled residents (R) (R 7 and R 100) according to professional standards. The findings include: Review of the facility's Administration of Medication policy, last review dated 11/15/2022, noted the standard of the policy was to administer medications in a safe and timely manner as prescribed: Procedure 1. Only licensed nurses or people permitted by the State to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications. 2. Only licensed nurses may administer IV push/Bolus medications following their individual state board of nursing standard of practice. 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame .8. During administration of medications. The medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication cart. No medications are kept on top of the cart. The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications, and all outward sides must be inaccessible to residents to residents or others passing by . 10. The individual administering the medication must initial the resident's electronic medication administration on the appropriate line entry after giving each medication and before administering the next ones, or document in wet ink the administration of medication .14. Patient may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. A self-administration assessment will be completed. Observation 10/10/2023 at 8:36 am revealed Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) AA exited room [ROOM NUMBER] with a plastic medication cup. CNA AA informed License Practical Nurse (LPN) EE the medication was found on the floor. Observation of the medication cup revealed one white pill with the imprint G-12 (Metformin). An interview was conducted with CNA AA during the observation, who revealed Resident (R) 100 often doesn't take his medication. She stated that any medications found in a resident's room should be given to the nurse. Interview 10/10/2023 at 8:45 am with LPN EE confirmed that the G-12 white pill was R100's Metformin. She stated the resident was not assessed to self-administer his own medications. LPN EE revealed when medications were administered, the nurse should ensure that the resident had taken all the medications before leaving the room. Observation of the 400-unit medication pass on 10/11/2023 at 8:40 am revealed LPN CC administering morning medications. During the observation, the surveyor requested to observe R7's medication administration. LPN CC stated that R7's morning medications had already been administered. An inquiry was made as to why R7's medications were still highlighted in yellow in the electronic Point Click Care system, which indicated that the medication had not been administered. The LPN stated that her medication administration practice was to administer medications first and document the administration at the completion of her medication passes. Interview 10/11/2023 at 2:45 pm with the 400 Unit Manager LPN DD revealed that nurses were trained to administer medication and document the medication administration at the time medications were administered.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike e...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment in twelve of 84 Residents rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) were found to have unclean conditions, broken tile, and unsafe surfaces. In addition, the third floor west and east shower room floors were unclean, and a mechanical door was left open and unlocked. The findings include: The facility did not provide a housekeeping policy for the survey team. Observation 10/10/2023 at 10:35 am revealed the third-floor mechanical room door was open, and no staff was present in the room. A sign on the door read, Door to Remain Locked at All Times. Interview on 10/10/2023 at 10:37 am with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) LL revealed the mechanical room door should always be locked, especially since the third floor was a secured memory care unit. Observation on 10/10/2023 at 10:40 am revealed the Maintenance Assistant (MA) MM said contractors were in the facility putting in a new call light system and must have left the mechanical room door open. MA MM stated it was dangerous to keep the mechanical room door open; that residents could be harmed if they wandered into the room. Observation 10/10/2023 at 10:45 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed dirt and dust on the baseboards of the room. The privacy curtain between beds A and B had small areas of a brown stain on the bottom portion. Observation 10/10/2023 at 11:05 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed dust and debris on the baseboards of the room and in the far corner of the room. The privacy curtain for bed B was partially detached from the ceiling frame. At the head of bed D there was an area of plaster repaired directly under the light which had not been sanded or painted. Observation 10/10/2023 at 11:10 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a large area of scraped paint with exposed drywall directly behind bed B. The privacy curtain for bed A had three small areas of a brown stain. The bed B privacy curtain had three large areas of brown stains and one small area of brown stain. The bed C privacy curtain had four areas of brown stain. The bed D privacy curtain had eight small areas of brown stains and one large area of brown stain. Observation 10/10/2023 at 11:14 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the privacy curtain bed B had several brown stains. The privacy curtain for bed C had numerous brown stains. The privacy curtain for bed D was partially detached from the ceiling frame and had several brown stains. There were large areas of dark and light brown stains on the floor tile directly under the heating/air conditioning unit of room. In the far corner of the room there was an area of tile that lifted away from the main flooring, and there was also dirt/debris in the corners of the room. Observation 10/10/2023 at 11:20 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a portion of the baseboard was missing. Baseboards had built up dust and dirt. The walls throughout the room had areas of dirt. Observation 10/10/2023 at 11:24 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed bed A had a privacy curtain with two small brown stains and one large brown stain. Observation 10/10/2023 at 11:27 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed an area of floor transition strip missing from the floor entrance of room causing an uneven surface and a safety issue. The privacy curtain between bed A and B had four small areas of brown stains. Observation 10/10/2023 at 11:35 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the door and door frame to the room had scuffed areas and missing paint and there was an area of floor tile missing in the room. Observation 10/10/2023 at 11:50 am revealed the third-floor west shower room had a mop bucket with brown water with a mop in the bucket sitting in the middle of the floor upon entrance into the shower room. The flooring throughout the shower room had areas of rust-colored stains, and the baseboards had areas of peeling paint. The shower had a large area of brown colored stain on the wall. There were areas of a brown colored substance in the corners of the toilet area of the shower room. Observation 10/10/2023 at 12:05 pm revealed the third-floor east shower room flooring was observed to have areas of brown stains throughout the shower room. The walls of the shower room had areas of brown colored stains, and dirt and debris were noted in all corners of the shower room. Observation 10/10/2023 at 1:00 pm of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the baseboards in the room had a film of dust and a brown substance in all corners of the room. Observation 10/10/2023 at 1:39 pm of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom revealed accumulation of a black substance around the edges of the bathroom baseboards. Observation and interview 10/10/202 at 3:18 pm of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the floors to be soiled with a buildup of particulate matter in the corners. Resident (R) (R 91) complained about the cleanliness of the environment. Observation and interview 10/11/2023 at 1:15 pm revealed R62 in room [ROOM NUMBER]. When asked about the spills and splashes on the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER], which were at eye level adjacent to the resident, he stated housekeeping should clean better. Interview 10/12/2023 at 9:10 am with Housekeeper B, revealed she had been employed for about three (3) months. She stated the residents' rooms were cleaned daily, which consisted of sweeping, mopping, dusting, and emptying the trash. The housekeeper also stated no training was provided regarding deep cleaning of resident rooms. Interview 10/11/2023 at 9:00 am with Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) NN, he stated that the housekeeping department had just transitioned from an outside contractor to in house housekeeping staff. He said there had not been a cleaning schedule developed for the housekeeping department since the outside contractor left on 9/30/2023. Interview 10/11/2023 at 9:15 am with Housekeeping Manager (HM) MM revealed he started as the manager of the housekeeping department at 8:00 am that morning. He stated that the contract housekeeping company could not keep staff. Interview 10/13/2023 at 8:30 am with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the Administrator had been on leave and would be returning to the facility that morning. The DON stated she and the Administrator had started working at the facility on 9/18/2023. She said their first Quality Assurance (QA) meeting was scheduled in two weeks, and they planned to develop housekeeping rounds as part of the QA program. The DON said the facility had a third-party contractor that provided housekeeping services for the facility, and that the contract was terminated on 10/1/23 due to unsatisfactory work performance. She said the facility was now using facility staff in the housekeeping department, and the new department head for the housekeeping department started on 10/11/2023.
Aug 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately store medications in three of s...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately store medications in three of six medication carts (Fourth Floor Medication Cart #1, Fourth Floor Medication Cart #2, and Third Floor Medication Cart #2) and one of three medication rooms (Third Floor Medication Room). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications and Biologicals date of issue 9/1/18, last reviewed on 10/3/21, revealed the facility should ensure medications are stored appropriately and securely at any given time. A review of the package insert for the insulin Lantus, (revised May 2019) in section 16.2 titled Storage revealed once the 10 ml (milliliter) vial is opened, it may be stored refrigerated or at room temperature for 28 days. A review of the package insert for the insulin Levemir, (revised January 2019) in section 16.2 titled storage revealed Levemir vials can be stored unrefrigerated at room temperature, below 30 degrees Celsius (86 F) (Fahrenheit) as long as it is kept as cool as possible and away from direct heat and light. Unrefrigerated vials should be discarded 42 days after they are first kept out of the refrigerator. A review of the package insert for the insulin Humalog (revised March 2013) in section 16.2 titled Storage and Handling revealed unopened Humalog should be stored in a refrigerator between 36 - 46 F and in-use Humalog vials should be stored at room temperature below 86 F and must be used within 28 days or be discarded. A review of the package insert for the insulin Novolog (revised February 2015) in section 16.2 titled Recommended Storage revealed an in-use opened vial should be stored at room temperature and should be discarded after 28 days after opening. A review of the package insert for the ophthalmic drops Latanoprost (revised 9/16/14) revealed under section titled How to Store It on page 2 revealed once the bottle is opened the bottle may be kept at room temperature and must be use within 28 days after opening the bottle. 1. On 8/8/23 at 12:26 p.m. the Fourth Floor Medication Cart #1 was in the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]. The cart was observed to be unlocked with no nurse or staff in sight. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) FF on 8/8/23 at 12:30 revealed she was assigned to the Fourth Floor Medication Cart #1. She confirmed and verified the medication cart was left unattended and unlocked. She stated she thought she locked her cart before walking away to help a co-worker and stated that the cart should be locked when left unattended and she should have double checked it prior to leaving. 2. On 8/9/23 at 8:25 a.m. observation of the Fourth Floor Medication Cart #2 revealed cart was parked in doorway of room [ROOM NUMBER] with no nurse or staff in sight. A small medication cup was on top of cart with one tablet inside. An interview with Certified Medication Aide-Technician (CMA-T) GG on 8/9/23 at 8:27 a.m. revealed she was assigned to Fourth Floor Medication Cart #2. She confirmed that she stepped away from cart to obtain floor stock from the medication room and she verified and confirmed the cart was locked but a medication cup was located on top of the cart with one tablet inside. She stated it was an aspirin. 3. On 8/9/23 at 10:21 a.m. observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) CC ask LPN EE for the Third Floor Medication Room keys and LPN EE handed a set of keys to CNA CC. An interview with Unit Manager (UM) DD on 8/9/23 at 12:45 p.m. revealed that the nurses should not give the medication room keys to any CNA. 4. On 8/9/23 at 12:20 p.m. observation of the Third Floor Medication Cart #2 revealed: One (10 ml) vial of Lantus (insulin) labeled with an open date of 6/23/23, which revealed the vial had been open and was in use for 47 days. An interview with LPN HH on 8/9/23 at 12:20 p.m., she confirmed and verified the vial of Lantus was labeled with an open date of 6/23/23, she stated she was not sure how long the medication was good for after opening. 5. On 8/9/23 at 12:50 p.m. observation of the Fourth Floor Medication Cart #2 revealed: One (10 ml) vial of Lantus labeled with an open date of 6/20/23, which revealed the vial had been open and was in use for 50 days. One vial of Levemir (insulin) with an open date of 6/10/23, which revealed the vial had been open and was in use for 60 days. One vial of Levemir open with no open dated indicated on the vial. One (10 ml) vial of Humalog (insulin) unopened and stored in the medication cart at room temperature. One (10 ml) vial of Humalog open, with no open date indicated on the vial. One (10 ml) vial of Humalog labeled with the open date of 3/25/23, which revealed the vial had been opened and was in use for 137 days. One (10 ml) vial of Novolog (insulin) open and labeled with the open date of 6/20/23, which revealed the vial had been opened and was in use for 50 days. One bottle of Latanoprost ophthalmic drops open with no open date labeled on the bottle. An interview with CMA-T II on 8/9/23 at 12:50 p.m., she confirmed and verified there was one vial of Lantus labeled with open date of 6/20/23, one vial of Levemir labeled with an open date of 6/10/23, one vial of Levemir labeled with an open date of 7/5/23, one vial of Levemir opened with no open date on the label, one vial of Novolog labeled with an open date of 6/20/23, one vial of Humalog labeled with an open date of 3/25/23, one vial of Humalog opened with no open date on the label, one vial of Humalog unopened and stored at room temperature in the cart, and on bottle of latanoprost ophthalmic solution with no open date on the label. An interview with UM DD on 8/9/23 at 1:05 p.m. revealed medications should be stored in a locked cart or locked medication room, no cart should be left unlocked and unattended, nor should medications be left on top of medication cart unattended. An interview with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing on 8/10/23 at 12:24 p.m. revealed their expectation of nursing staff was to follow the manufacturers recommendations related to storage of medications. They expected medication carts to be locked when unattended and no medications should be left on top of cart unattended. They expected the licensed nurses to maintain the medication room keys and not allow unlicensed staff to use keys to enter the medication room unattended.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call system for 19 of 8...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call system for 19 of 84 rooms (415A, 406A, 406B, 406C, 406D, 408A, 408B, 408C, 408D, 413A, 413B, 414A, 414B, 415A, 415B, 212A, 212B, 224A, and 224B) in the building. Findings included: A review of the policy titled Call Light Policy, .Resident Call System date of issue 11/28/17, and last revised 10/20/22, revealed the call light is to provide a system for the resident to call for assistance. Under the section titled Standard of Practice revealed: Step 2 was to ensure all residents have access to the call light and Step 7 revealed that any defective call lights should be reported to the charge nurse and maintenance department immediately. 1. During an observation on 8/8/23 at 1:09 p.m. the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER]A was observed to not be functioning when an attempt was made to activate the system. During an interview with the resident in 415A, he stated that he had told multiple staff members that he had to wait long periods of time for them to answer the call light. The staff told him that his call light was not working, and that maintenance did not have time to fix it. On 8/8/23 at 1:33 p.m. Unit Manager (UM) DD confirmed and verified that the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER]A did not light up outside the door when pressed and needed to be repaired. 2. On 8/8/23 at 1:40 p.m. observation revealed that the call lights in rooms 406A, 406B, 406C, 406D, 408A, 408B, 408C, 408D, 413A, 413B, 414A, 414B, 415A, and 415B did not work. At this time, the CNA working on the fourth floor walked around and confirmed that the call lights were not working. They stated that they would notify maintenance right away. 3. On 8/9/2023 at 9:40 a.m. observation revealed that the call lights in room [ROOM NUMBER] turned on, a small green light on a box mounted to the wall between bed A and bed B turned on but the light outside the door did not light up. During an interview with resident in 212A on 8/9/23 at 9:40 a.m., she stated that she had attempted to use her call light to call the nurse previously that morning and no one came. During an interview with the Wound Care Manager and the Wound Care Treatment Tech on 8/9/23 at 9:42 a.m., they both confirmed the call light was not working properly, therefore needed to be repaired. 4. On 8/9/23 at 1:00 p.m. observed room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have a call light for either bed A or bed B. During an interview with resident in 224B on 8/9/23 at 1:00 p.m. revealed that he was admitted to the facility approximately one month ago and he stated he has not had a call light in his room since his admission. He had told staff, but it was never repaired. During an interview with CNA AA at that time revealed she had been employed at the facility for approximately one year. She confirmed that there was not a call light in room [ROOM NUMBER]. She stated that she had reported it in the past to the charge nurse and unit manager on several occasions, but it has not been fixed. During an interview with Unit Manager BB on 8/10/23 at 11:55 a.m. revealed she expected staff to report non-working call lights to Maintenance and to her. She stated the process is to notify Maintenance verbally and she follows that with a written work order placed in a folder at the nurse's desk and an email sent to Maintenance regarding the repair issue. During an interview with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing on 8/10/23 at 12:24 p.m. revealed their expectation related to call lights malfunctioning was to notify maintenance immediately for immediate repair.
Jun 2023 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility management failed to ensure one of fou...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility management failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (R)(R#2) were free from abuse and/or neglect. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy, last reviewed 11/1/21, revealed Standards: the resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect . the policy defines neglect as failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish or mental illness .5. Protect: .It is the responsibility of all staff to provide a safe environment for the residents. Resident care and treatments shall be monitored by all staff, on an ongoing basis, so that residents are free from abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Care will be monitored so that the resident's care plan is followed. Record review revealed that R#2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were: morbid obesity (weight was 439 pounds (lbs.) on 2/26/21), hypertension, major depressive disorder, right heart failure, and seborrheic dermatitis. Record review of the care plan revealed refusal to allow staff to provide personal care and to go to physician appointments. Further review of the Minimum Dat Set (MDS) assessment completed on 1/13/23 revealed she was cognitively intact, was able to verbally communicate her wants and needs. During an observation and interview on 6/13/23 at 10:30 a.m. with R#2 in revealed she was in the bed. The bed was littered with papers, napkins, paper towels, and a garbage bag that had various items that had urine on them. R#2 confirmed she was able to use her call light and it was within reach. R#2 stated that she did her own peri care, which was reason for the garbage. The room also smelled like urine and bowel movement. The sheet on the bed had a brown stain about 10 inches around her lower body. Upon inquiry regarding the stain R#2 stated it was because she changed herself and would make a mess and the staff would not change it. She was in a hospital gown, did not have a brief or underwear on and had a brief placed in front of her peri area. Her legs and feet had thick flaking skin, yellow crusted/cracked skin, which also littered the floor and the bed. She reported she got a bath every three months or so. R#2 did not believe they had enough staff working to assist her safely. During an interview on 6/15/23 at 9:15 a.m. with the Unit Manager (UM) DD, he revealed they had given her a bath and changed her sheets the evening of 6/14/23. He reported it took eight people to move her and turn her. He said they could not provide care with only two staff members as indicated on her current care plan. The UM DD stated he told R#2 that they had to give her a bath and change her bedding because that was her complaint during the survey.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to appropriately discharge on e...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to appropriately discharge on e of three sampled residents (R) (R#6) related to not notifying the resident's representative and ombudsman of a facility-initiated discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Emergency Policy, last reviewed 10/11/21 revealed Policy Statement- Emergency transfers or discharges may be necessary to protect the health and/or well-being of the resident(s) .4. Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institution, our facility will implement the following procedures: a. Notify the resident's Attending Physician; b. Notify the receiving facility that the transfer is being made; c. Prepare the resident for transfer; d. Prepare a transfer form to send with the resident; e. Notify the representative (sponsor) or other family member; f: Assist in obtaining transportation; and g. Others as appropriate or as necessary. A review of the facility's policy titled Admission, Transfer, and Discharge Register Policy, last revised 10/20/22, revealed Standard of Practice- 3. Initiation of discharge while a resident is in the hospital must be based on the resident's current condition when the resident seeks return to the facility .4. The facility must have evidence that the resident's status at the time the resident seeks to return to the facility (not at the time resident was transferred to acute care) meets one of the criteria for discharge . A review of the facility's policy titled Notice Before Discharge and Transfer, last reviewed 11/2022, revealed Definitions: Facility-initiated Discharge- Discharge which the resident objects to and/or is not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences .Upon notice of a facility-initiated transfer or discharge, the resident will be provided with statement of his or her right to appeal the transfer or discharge, including: a. the name, address, email and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests. B. information about how to obtain, complete and submit an appeal form; c. how to get assistance completing the appeal process; and d. the facility bed-hold policy. A review of R#6 face sheet revealed s/he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital 1/31/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to alcohol use, cocaine use, depression, and dementia with agitation. A review of R#6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/1/22, revealed s/he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of R#6's Progress Note dated 1/31/23 at 7:45 p.m., revealed Writer was notified by another resident that two residents were fighting . R#6 was assessed and it was noted that he had no s/sx (signs/symptoms) of injury, he was assisted back to his w/c (wheelchair), APD (Atlanta Police Department) - DON (Director of Nursing) - UM (Unit Manager) - ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) - EMS (Emergency Medical Service) were all notified, this resident was sent to [NAME] for further examination. A review of R#6's Electronic Medical Record did not reveal any documentation indicating R#6 was discharged from the facility and reason for discharge. On 6/15/23 at 11:29 a.m., during an interview with the Admissions Coordinator, the Admissions Coordinator revealed R#6 was sent out of the facility with police on 1/31/23. The admission Coordinator stated the police were called because of a resident-to-resident physical altercation and that s/he spoke with a case manager, via telephone, from the hospital regarding R#6 return to the facility. The admission Coordinator stated s/he explained R#6 was not permitted to return because the facility was not able to me his/her needs. The admission Coordinator stated s/he did not speak with R#6, the resident's responsible party, or the ombudsman regarding R#6 not being admitted back to the facility. On 6/15/23 at 12:08 p.m., during an interview with the Social Service Director (SSD), they stated that they were instructed that R#6 was not to be permitted back into the facility because R#6 assaulted another resident. SSD stated if a resident is taken away from the facility by the police, that would indicate a facility-initiated discharge. SSD stated that process would normally be to issue a discharge, in writing, to the resident and/or family indicating the reason for discharge and include a complete discharge summary. SSD stated that s/he did not complete a discharge summary for R#6. On 6/15/23 at 3:50 p.m., during an interview with the local ombudsman representative, s/he confirmed that they did not receive any information indicating R#6 was discharged from the facility. On 6/16/23 at 1:13 p.m., during an interview with the Administrator, the Administrator stated s/he did not issue a discharge notice to R#6 because after an incident on 1/31/23, R#6 was taken away from the facility in handcuffs. The Administrator stated s/he assumed R#6 was being arrested and that would constitute a discharge. The Administrator revealed R#6 left with police on 1/31/23 and has not been back in the facility since then.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clean and comfortable living spaces for residents on one of three floors (Fourth Floor), in the dining room, and t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clean and comfortable living spaces for residents on one of three floors (Fourth Floor), in the dining room, and the main floor entrance. Findings included: Upon entrance of the facility on 6/13/23 at 8:45 a.m. there was a strong smell of urine. The dining room had pallets of boxes, dirty plates, coffee cup with dried coffee in the bottom, food particles on the tables and floors, there were multiple small flying insects in the room. Upon entering the elevator there was a concentrated smell of urine in the elevator. On 6/13/23 at 10:30 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted with R#2, who resides on the fourth floor. Observation revealed that the bed was littered with papers, napkins, paper towels, and a garbage bag that had various items that had urine on them. She stated that she did her own peri care, which was reason for the garbage. The room also smelled like urine and bowel movement. The sheet on the bed had a brown stain about 10 inches around her lower body. Upon inquiry regarding the stain, R#2 stated it was because she changed herself and would make a mess. She confirmed that the staff would not change her. Observation on 6/14/23 at 9:20 a.m. on the fourth floor revealed a smell of urine and bowel movement throughout the unit. Various observations on 6/14/23 at 3:05 p.m., 6/15/23 at 9:00 a.m., 11:45 am revealed the same smell of urine throughout the hallway and when entering the facility. Observation of random resident rooms on the fourth floor revealed dirty floors, over bed tables that had old food on them, and dirty serving dishes. On 6/14/23 at 10:15 a.m. observation of the soiled linen closet revealed plastic bags with soiled laundry, wet incontinence products in bins and on the floor. The room had a strong smell of urine that wafted out of the room when the door was opened. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, last revised 10/20/22, revealed .30. The resident has a right to as safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the garbage disposal area in a sanitary manner. Findings included: On 6/13/23 at 8:50 a.m., on 6/14/23 at 9:00 a.m., and on 6/14/2...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the garbage disposal area in a sanitary manner. Findings included: On 6/13/23 at 8:50 a.m., on 6/14/23 at 9:00 a.m., and on 6/14/23 at 10:55 a.m., the facility outside dumpster area was observed with a heavy accumulation of trash and trash bags surrounding the facility's garbage receptacles. The garbage receptacle lids were not closed, and several bags of trash were observed open with items falling out of the bags. Several flying insects were observed in and around the open trash bags and garbage receptacles. On 6/14/23 at 11:11 a.m., the Administrator stated that he thought that trash was removed from the area daily. He stated, I think every day, don't quote me on that. But I think it is picked up every day from five to six a.m. On 6/14/23 at 1:33 p.m., during an interview with the Maintenance Manager (MM), the MM stated that the trash is usually picked up every day early in the morning. The MM stated he/she was unsure why the trash had not been picked up on Tuesday, 6/13/23 and Wednesday 6/14/23. The MM stated he/she called the company to request the trash to be picked up. The MM revealed he/she expected the area to be clean and trash to be picked up in a timely manner. The MM further stated, It's the resident's home. It should be clean inside and out.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by the presence of small flying pests. Findings included: Upon ent...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by the presence of small flying pests. Findings included: Upon entrance of the facility on 6/13/23 at 8:45 a.m. there was a strong smell of urine. The dining room area was observed with pallets of boxes, dirty plates, coffee cup with dried coffee in the bottom, food particles on the tables and floors and there were multiple small flying insects in the room. The conference room area was observed throughout the survey (from 6/13/23 through 6/16/23) to have many flying insects. During an observation and interview on 6/13/23 at 10:35 a.m. with R#2, there were many flying insects flying around her bed, around the windows, and around her body. R#2 stated that the bugs were always there, and they would get in her hair. She stated that she would put tissue in her ears to prevent them from getting in her ears. She stated that she would kill the bugs and keep them in a medicine cup. The medicine cup was observed and revealed many dead insects. During observations on 6/13/23 at 10:00 a.m. and 12:30 p.m., on 6/14/23 at 9:30 a.m., and 1:00 p.m., revealed several insects flying around the resident common areas on Unit 2 and Unit 3. Interviews during the survey with unidentified residents revealed the flying pests were a problem all throughout the building. A review of the facilities Pest Control Policy on 11/15/22 revealed The aim of the policy is to ensure that, as far as possible, pests (rats, mice, roaches, ants, fruit flies, silver fish, etc.) within the premises are kept to an absolute minimum with the ideal being eradication but due to the resilience and persistence of some species this ideal is impossible to achieve.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, $131,958 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 42 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $131,958 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Georgia. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility is on CMS's Special Focus list for poor performance. Consider alternatives strongly.

About This Facility

What is Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?

LEGACY TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION does not currently have a CMS star rating on record.

How is Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation Staffed?

Staff turnover is 68%, which is 22 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 86%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation?

State health inspectors documented 42 deficiencies at LEGACY TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 39 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation?

LEGACY TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 186 certified beds and approximately 182 residents (about 98% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in ATLANTA, Georgia.

How Does Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, LEGACY TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION's staff turnover (68%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, LEGACY TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 0-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation Stick Around?

Staff turnover at LEGACY TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION is high. At 68%, the facility is 22 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 86%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation Ever Fined?

LEGACY TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION has been fined $131,958 across 8 penalty actions. This is 3.8x the Georgia average of $34,398. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?

LEGACY TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION is currently on the Special Focus Facility (SFF) watch list. This federal program identifies the roughly 1% of nursing homes nationally with the most serious and persistent quality problems. SFF facilities receive inspections roughly twice as often as typical nursing homes. Factors in this facility's record include 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings and $131,958 in federal fines. Facilities that fail to improve face escalating consequences, potentially including termination from Medicare and Medicaid. Families considering this facility should ask for documentation of recent improvements and what specific changes have been made since the designation.