KEYSVILLE NURSING HOME & REHAB

1005 GA HIGHWAY 88, BLYTHE, GA 30805 (706) 547-2591
For profit - Partnership 64 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
95/100
#18 of 353 in GA
Last Inspection: May 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

KeysVille Nursing Home & Rehab has earned a Trust Grade of A+, indicating it is an elite facility with top-tier standards of care. Ranked #18 out of 353 facilities in Georgia, it is positioned in the top half of the state's nursing homes, and it is the best option out of the three facilities in Burke County. The facility's trend is stable, with only two reported issues in recent years, which is a positive sign. However, staffing received a lower rating of 2 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 21%, which is better than the state average but still indicates room for improvement. While there have been no fines, which is a strength, there were concerns noted, such as the failure to maintain cleanliness in the ice machine and an inadequate investigation of an allegation of abuse, highlighting areas that need attention despite the overall positive rating.

Trust Score
A+
95/100
In Georgia
#18/353
Top 5%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Holding Steady
1 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
21% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 27 points below Georgia's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 28 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Georgia. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 1 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • Low Staff Turnover (21%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (21%)

    27 points below Georgia average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Georgia's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

May 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and review of the facility policy titled Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, the facility failed to thorou...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and review of the facility policy titled Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one of 27 sampled residents (R) (R13). Findings included: A facility policy titled, Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, revised 02/2025, indicated, Compliance Guidelines: The facility will develop and operationalize policies and procedures for screening and training employees, protection of residents and for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property. The section of the policy, Procedure for Response and Reporting Allegations of Abuse /Neglect/ Exploitation, indicated the following: When suspicion of abuse/neglect/exploitation or reports of abuse/neglect/exploitation occur, the following procedure will be initiated: 1. The Licensed Nurse will: a. Respond to the needs of the resident and protect him/her from further incident. b. Remove the accused employee from resident care areas. c. Notify the Administrator or designee. d. Notify the attending physician, resident's family/legal representative, and Medical Director. e. Monitor and document the resident's condition, including response to medical treatment or nursing interventions. f. Document actions taken in the medical record. g. Complete an incident report is [sic] indicated. h. Revise the resident's care plan if the resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental, or psychosocial needs or preferences change as a result of an incident of abuse. 2. The Administrator or designee will: a. Notify the appropriate agencies immediately: as soon as possible, but no later than 24 hours after discovery of the incident. In the case of serious bodily injury, no later than 2 hours after discovery or forming the suspicion. b. Obtain statements from direct care staff. The policy also indicated the Administrator would, f. Within 5 working days of the incident, report sufficient information to describe the results of the investigation, and indicate any corrective actions taken, if the allegation was verified. Review of R13's admission Record indicated the facility admitted R13 on 11/25/2024. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, dementia of unspecified severity, anxiety disorder, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of R13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/29/2025, revealed R13 was usually understood when they expressed their ideas and wants, and usually understood others. The MDS revealed R13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident did not exhibit physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms towards others in the seven-day look-back period. Review of R13's Care Plan Report, included a focus area, revised 4/21/2025, that indicated the resident had socially inappropriate behavior as evidenced by yelling out. Interventions directed staff to attempt to redirect the resident when they had inappropriate behavior, and to observe the resident for inappropriate behavior and report to the charge nurse, social worker, and physician. Review of a Facility Incident Report Form, dated 2/4/2025, indicated the facility reported an allegation of abuse for R13 on 2/4/2025 at approximately 4:00 pm. The Facility Incident Report Form revealed that during a routine telephone call to the resident's family member, the facility was informed that the prior Friday [1/31/2025], the resident told the family member that someone hit them on the head with a book. The report indicated the resident was immediately assessed by staff, and no injuries were visible. According to the report, R13 was unable to recall the incident or allegation secondary to significant cognitive impairment. The report indicated an investigation was pending. The report indicated that during a review of camera footage in common areas, it was revealed that another resident (R35) was seen ambulating toward the dining room and lightly patted several residents on top of their heads. The report indicated the Director of Nursing (DON) spoke with this resident, who stated, I was just saying hey. The report indicated the resident was encouraged not to place their hands on others, even in a friendly manner, in case they did not wish to be touched. The facility's investigation documentation included a typed summary that indicated staff and R13's roommate were interviewed regarding the report; however, only two typed witness statements were included in the facility's investigation documentation, one from the nurse who received the allegation from R13's family member and one from Business Office Manager (BOM), who indicated they had spoken with the resident's family member regarding financial matters on 1/31/2025, but received no complaints or comments about the resident's care. There were no witness statements from other staff or residents. Review of R13's Progress Notes revealed no documentation on 2/4/2025 to indicate that staff conducted a skin assessment or implemented other interventions for R13. During an interview on 5/21/2025 at 11:47 am, Family Member (FM)12 revealed that while visiting the facility, R13 stated their head hurt and they were struck on the head with a book. FM12 stated they checked the resident's head and noted two very small abrasions that appeared to be new. According to FM12, R13 stated they could not see the person who hit them on the back of their head. FM12 stated they left the building without telling anyone, but when contacted by the facility the following week, they informed staff of the allegation. FM12 indicated that after the incident, R13 was moved to a different room due to not getting along with the roommate, but this was unrelated to the abuse allegation. (According to the facility's census report, the resident's room change occurred on 4/4/2025). During an interview on 5/21/2025 at 12:00 pm, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 stated she called FM12 on 2/4/2025 to provide an update regarding R13's wound care treatment. LPN1 stated during the call that FM12 stated that when they visited the facility the previous week, R13 stated someone struck them on the head, and FM12 noted two small marks on the resident's head. LPN 1 stated that after the call with FM12, she looked at R13's head and did not see red marks or anything else. LPN1 stated she informed the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and also gave the ADON a written statement. LPN1 stated she did not think she wrote a progress note, but maybe she should have. During an interview on 5/21/2025 at 1:09 pm, R13 could not recall any details of the incident. During an interview on 5/21/2025 at 10:07 am, the ADON stated that when informed of an abuse allegation, she would tell the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON). She stated the DON would then assess the resident, identify any immediate problems and injuries, or remove the resident, get statements from residents and staff, and do an environmental assessment. The ADON confirmed LPN1 received the abuse allegation in a phone call and reported it to her. The ADON stated she immediately notified the DON. During an interview on 5/22/2025 at 8:25 am, the DON confirmed LPN1 did not document that she completed an assessment or write a progress note after being informed that R13 reported being hit on the head with a book. The DON stated that when she returned to work, the day after she was notified, she interviewed R13, but the resident could not remember the details of the incident. The DON stated she reviewed camera footage and saw that on the morning of 1/31/2025, at about 7:30 am, another resident was walking in the hallway and gently tapping other residents on their heads and arms in a friendly manner. The DON acknowledged she had no documentation of interviews with the resident's day and night shift nurses, other staff, or residents. The DON stated she never kept documentation of interviews, and this was a lesson learned. The DON stated that her expectation was that all interviews and assessments would be documented and kept on file. During an interview on 5/22/2025 at 10:35 am, the Administrator stated her expectation was that investigations related to allegations of abuse would include interviews with staff, residents, the victim, and the perpetrator. She confirmed that everything must be documented. The Administrator acknowledged that R13's abuse allegation was not thoroughly investigated.
May 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Base on observation, staff interview, and the facility policy titled Servicing Product Dispensers, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness and sanitation of the ice machine. This had the poten...

Read full inspector narrative →
Base on observation, staff interview, and the facility policy titled Servicing Product Dispensers, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness and sanitation of the ice machine. This had the potential to effect 61 residents receiving an oral diet. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Servicing Product Dispensers dated reviewed/revised 2/22 revealed: All product dispensers are to be maintained in a clean, hygienic serviceable manner. 2. Staff will ensure product dispensers are clean and fully operational. An observation and interview conducted on 5/20/22 at 7:15 a.m. revealed the ice machine in the kitchen had a dark black grime substance on the ice deflector in the back of the inside of the ice machine. Staff wiped the grime build up and it came off easily with a paper towel. Interview with [NAME] BB indicated the Maintenance Supervisor cleans the machine. The Dietary Manager was unavailable for interview. An observation and interview conducted on 5/20/22 at 7:30 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the ice machine had dark black grime build up in it. She indicated she will get the Maintenance Supervisor to clean it and she will ensure the ice currently in use will be discarded. She indicated she would expect it to be clean. An observation and interview conducted on 5/20/22 at 8:34 a.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor revealed the facility leases the ice machine and the company comes out every few months and cleans it and he cleans it in between. He indicated he cleans it at least monthly. He verified the dark black grime build up and will clean it. He began to empty the ice that was currently in the machine. Review of the document titled Ice Machine Maintenance Check indicated the Maintenance Supervisor cleaned the machine monthly and it was last cleaned on 4/16/22. Review of the Service Report revealed the ice machine company serviced, cleaned and sanitized the ice machine on 3/16/22.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A+ (95/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Georgia.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Keysville & Rehab's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns KEYSVILLE NURSING HOME & REHAB an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Keysville & Rehab Staffed?

CMS rates KEYSVILLE NURSING HOME & REHAB's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 21%, compared to the Georgia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Keysville & Rehab?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at KEYSVILLE NURSING HOME & REHAB during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Keysville & Rehab?

KEYSVILLE NURSING HOME & REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 64 certified beds and approximately 59 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BLYTHE, Georgia.

How Does Keysville & Rehab Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, KEYSVILLE NURSING HOME & REHAB's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (21%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Keysville & Rehab?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.

Is Keysville & Rehab Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, KEYSVILLE NURSING HOME & REHAB has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Keysville & Rehab Stick Around?

Staff at KEYSVILLE NURSING HOME & REHAB tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 21%, the facility is 24 percentage points below the Georgia average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.

Was Keysville & Rehab Ever Fined?

KEYSVILLE NURSING HOME & REHAB has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Keysville & Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?

KEYSVILLE NURSING HOME & REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.