CEDAR VALLEY NSG & REHAB CTR

225 PHILPOT STREET, CEDARTOWN, GA 30125 (770) 748-4116
For profit - Limited Liability company 100 Beds CYPRESS SKILLED NURSING Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
85/100
#7 of 353 in GA
Last Inspection: February 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Cedar Valley Nursing and Rehab Center has received a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering options for their loved ones. It ranks #7 out of 353 facilities in Georgia, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among the three nursing homes in Polk County. The facility's trend is stable, with two concerns noted in both 2022 and 2024, suggesting no worsening issues. Staffing is a weak point, rated only 2 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 57%, which is around the state average, but they do not have any fines recorded, which is a positive sign. However, there are concerns about cleanliness, as some resident rooms had dirty air conditioner filters, and maintenance issues with drywall and air conditioning frames were noted, which could impact residents' comfort and safety. Overall, Cedar Valley has strengths in its high ratings for health inspections and overall care, but families should be aware of the staffing and maintenance concerns.

Trust Score
B+
85/100
In Georgia
#7/353
Top 1%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Holding Steady
1 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 14 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Georgia. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 1 issues
2024: 1 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 57%

10pts above Georgia avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Chain: CYPRESS SKILLED NURSING

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (57%)

9 points above Georgia average of 48%

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

Feb 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment,...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment in five of 52 resident rooms and one of 30 resident bathrooms as evidenced by dirty packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) filters in resident rooms (110, 121, 203, 207, and 209) and one malfunctioning light switch in the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings include: Review the facility policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment revealed in accordance with resident rights the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belonging to the extent possible. This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. 1. Observation on 2/20/2024 at 11:03 am revealed PTAC units with dusty filters and a black substance across the upper rim of the filters. Observation on 2/21/2024 at 11:25 am revealed PTAC units with dusty filters and a black substance across the upper rim of the filters. 2. Observation on 2/20/2024 at 9:50 am revealed in room [ROOM NUMBER] that the light switch in the bathroom was not working. There was a piece of tape holding up the light switch to keep the light from turning off. Observation on 2/22/2024 at 9:15 am revealed in room [ROOM NUMBER] that the light switch in the bathroom was not working. There was a piece of tape holding up the light switch to keep the light from turning off. Observation on 2/22/2024 between 9:40 am and 9:53 am revealed dirty PTAC filters in rooms 110, 121, 203, 207, and 209. Observation/interview on 2/22/2024 at 10:35 am with the Maintenance Assistant (MA), he confirmed the damaged light switch in room [ROOM NUMBER]. He stated the PTAC units in rooms 110, 121, 203, 207, and 209 were last cleaned on 2/16/2024. After removing the filters, the MA acknowledged the PTAC filters and internal structures needed to be cleaned.
Apr 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy titled, Resident's Rights Under Federal Law, the facility fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy titled, Resident's Rights Under Federal Law, the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, orderly, and comfortable interior by failing to repair drywall, air conditioner frames, and an area behind a resident's bed on one (Wing 2) of two wings. Findings include: Review of a policy titled, Resident's Rights Under Federal Law revealed, that the facility will present a 'Homelike Atmosphere. Each resident has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, and to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. Each resident has the right to housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior; clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition; private closet space in their room; adequate and comfortable lighting levels in all areas; comfortable and safe temperature levels; and comfortable sound levels. Observation of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] on Wing 2 on 4/5/22 at 9:44 a.m. revealed that the air conditioners had no frames. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on Wing 2 on 4/5/22 at 9:45 a.m. revealed that there was a board behind the window bed lying on the floor. Further observation revealed there was cracked drywall around an electrical outlet under the window next to the air conditioner. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on Wing 2 on 4/5/22 at 9:56 a.m. revealed that the caulking around the sink had come loose and the sink/vanity was unstable and there was no frame around the air conditioner. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on Wing 2 on 4/5/22 at 9:59 a.m. revealed the framing around the air conditioner was loose and staff could see through cracks to the outside of the building. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on Wing 2 on 4/5/22 at 10:01 a.m. revealed there were no personal effects. Further observation revealed at the bottom right-hand side of the bathroom was an area that had a foam filler around the baseboard. An interview on 4/6/22 at 8:50 a.m. with Licensed Practical Nurse CC revealed that when maintenance issues arise staff can input requests through the maintenance software online system. On 4/7/22 10:13 a.m. a tour of Wing 2 with Maintenance Director, Administrator, and Director of Nursing (DON) were shown above mentioned areas of concern. The administrator stated that the owners have plans to relocate residents to another facility. The other facility is being renovated and remodeled to accommodate long term care residents. The building that is being remodeled is a vacant assisted living facility. The administrator further revealed that there was not a definite date on when the opening and transfer of the residents would occur. Interviews with Maintenance Director, Administrator and DON confirmed the missing air conditioning frames, the unstable sink/vanity, loose board lying in the floor and the foam filler in the baseboard area were in need of repair. On 4/7/22 at 11:17 a.m. interview with the administrator revealed that there was no staff in maintenance for about a month, but they had a corporate environmental staff that was at the facility daily until the current maintenance director was hired.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Georgia.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Cedar Valley Nsg & Rehab Ctr's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CEDAR VALLEY NSG & REHAB CTR an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Cedar Valley Nsg & Rehab Ctr Staffed?

CMS rates CEDAR VALLEY NSG & REHAB CTR's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 57%, which is 10 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Cedar Valley Nsg & Rehab Ctr?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at CEDAR VALLEY NSG & REHAB CTR during 2022 to 2024. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Cedar Valley Nsg & Rehab Ctr?

CEDAR VALLEY NSG & REHAB CTR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CYPRESS SKILLED NURSING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 100 certified beds and approximately 83 residents (about 83% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in CEDARTOWN, Georgia.

How Does Cedar Valley Nsg & Rehab Ctr Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, CEDAR VALLEY NSG & REHAB CTR's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (57%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Cedar Valley Nsg & Rehab Ctr?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Cedar Valley Nsg & Rehab Ctr Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CEDAR VALLEY NSG & REHAB CTR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Cedar Valley Nsg & Rehab Ctr Stick Around?

Staff turnover at CEDAR VALLEY NSG & REHAB CTR is high. At 57%, the facility is 10 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Cedar Valley Nsg & Rehab Ctr Ever Fined?

CEDAR VALLEY NSG & REHAB CTR has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Cedar Valley Nsg & Rehab Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?

CEDAR VALLEY NSG & REHAB CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.