BONTERRA TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION

2801 FELTON DRIVE, EAST POINT, GA 30344 (404) 767-7591
For profit - Partnership 118 Beds WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#249 of 353 in GA
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation in East Point, Georgia, has received a Trust Grade of F, which indicates significant concerns about the facility's performance. Ranking #249 out of 353 in Georgia places it in the bottom half of nursing homes in the state, and #10 out of 18 in Fulton County means there are only a few local options that are better. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with the number of health and safety issues increasing from 4 in 2024 to 21 in 2025. Staffing is a weakness here, with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 51%, which is about average for the state; this could impact the consistency of care. The facility has also incurred $57,064 in fines, which is concerning and indicates ongoing compliance problems. Critical incidents include a failure to provide appropriate dietary care for a resident, leading to a serious health crisis and eventual death, highlighting significant risks in care quality. Overall, families should weigh these serious deficiencies against any potential strengths when considering this facility for their loved ones.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Georgia
#249/353
Bottom 30%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
4 → 21 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
51% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$57,064 in fines. Higher than 57% of Georgia facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 13 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Georgia. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
41 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 4 issues
2025: 21 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Georgia average (2.6)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 51%

Near Georgia avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $57,064

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 41 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening 4 actual harm
Mar 2025 21 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Policy, the facility failed to...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Policy, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one of 26 sampled residents (R) (R165) related to nutrition. Specifically, the facility provided R165 a sandwich which resulted in him being sent out to the local emergency room (ER) and admitted to a hospice facility where he expired on 8/31/2024. On 3/13/2025 a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F656, F684, and F835 on 3/13/2025 at 12:48 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 7/23/2024. An Acceptable IJ Removal Plan was received on 3/14/2025 related to Comprehensive Care Plans, C.F.R. 483.21; Quality of Care, C.F.R. 483.25; and Administration, C.F.R. 483.70. Findings included: A review of the policy titled Care Plan Policy with the last revised date of 2/4/2025 stated each resident will have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, and strengths that will identify how the facility staff will provide service to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dysphagia following cerebral infraction, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, cerebrovascular disease affecting the right dominant side, adult failure to thrive, seizures, and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions following unspecified cerebrovascular disease. A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R165 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment and that R165 required supervision/touching while eating. A review of the care plan initiated on 11/3/2022 and updated on 3/5/2024 revealed that R165 has the potential for nutritional deficit problems related to receiving a mechanically altered diet. Interventions indicate NAS (no added salt) pureed /dysphagia puree texture, thin liquids consistency diet as ordered 6/6/2024. A review of the physician orders for R165 dated 6/6/2024 revealed R165 had an order for NAS diet pureed/dysphagia puree texture with thin liquids consistency. A review of the nursing note written by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) OO revealed that R165 was sitting in a wheelchair at the nursing station when she noted that the resident choking on undigested food. It was documented that Food was falling out of his mouth, and he was choking for air. The Heimlich maneuver was started, and a mouth sweep was done but was unsuccessful. She documented that Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) started and at that 911 was called; R165 started breathing again; the Medical Doctor (MD) was called; and R165's family member was called, informed of the resident choking, and that he was sent out by 911 to closet hospital. At 3:45 pm, R165 departed the facility breathing on his own with Emergency Medical Services (EMS). An interview on 3/11/2025 at 9:30 am with the facility Administrator revealed that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) AA was viewed on facility camera handing R165 a sandwich prior to the event. She revealed that she expected R165 to return to the facility but when the facility contacted the local hospital, R165 was discharged from the hospital and sent to a local hospice on 8/5/2025 and expired on 8/31/2025. An interview was conducted on 3/14/2025 at 8:43 am with MDS Coordinator PP and MDS Coordinator QQ revealed they are responsible for putting information into the care plan. They stated diets were entered into the care plan by reviewing the physician's orders and that staff members and residents were interviewed to obtain interventions for nutrition for their abilities to eat. The facility implemented the following corrective action in response to the deficient practice which occurred on 7/30/2024: 1. The facility's Modified Texture of Food Policy, Care Plan Policy, and Resident Food Preferences Policy were reviewed on 7/24/2024; staff in-service education was initiated on 7/24/2024. As of 7/29/2024, all policies were reviewed with 100% staff with the exception of those on Leave of Absence (LOA) and Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). On 7/23/2024, R165's care plan was reviewed to reflect the appropriate diet; no changes were made. As of 7/29/2024, the facility census was 107. A review of the facility's policy titled, Modified Textures of Foods, revealed a revision date of August 2024. A review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Food Preferences, revealed a revision date of May 2024. A review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Policy, revealed a revision date of 2/4/2025. An interview with the Administrator on 3/18/2025 at 1:28 pm revealed that they do not add a new reviewed date unless there are changes to be made. A review of R165's care plan revealed a focus related to his mechanically altered diet. 2. On 7/25/2024, an Ad Hoc QAPI meeting was held with the Medical Director, Corporate Operations Consultant, Administrator, DON, Social Services Director, Staff Development Coordinator, Food Services Director, MDS staff, and Nurse Managers to review the IJ Removal Plan. The Care Plan policy was reviewed with no changes. The Daily Diet Verification Audit was performed for 100% of current residents and was completed on 7/24/2024, by the DON. The audit concluded that 100% of the meal tray cards matched 100% of the residents' diet orders, [NAME], and care plans. See the attached audit of the Daily Diet Verification Audit. The specific number of staff that received the in-service included: Administrative nine out of nine; Registered Nurses (RNs) six out of six; LPNs 15 out of 15; Certified Medication Aides (CMAs) 10 out of 10; CNAs 44 out of 44; Housekeeping/Laundry 14 out of 14; Maintenance two out of two; Dietary nine out of nine; and Activities two of two. Interviews were conducted on 3/19/2025 and all staff were found to be knowledgeable and able to verbalize the information shared during the education. LPN UUU at 1:59 pm; LPN EE at 1:28 pm; CMA RR at 1:50 pm; CNA PPP at 1:31 pm; CNA QQQ at 1:35 pm; CNA RRR at 1:40 pm; CNA LL at 1:47 pm; CNA BBB at 1:52 pm; CNA VVV at 2:06 pm; Laundry Aide (LA) AAA at 1:53 pm; LA XXX at 2:11 pm; Director of Housekeeping at 2:18 pm; Maintenance Director interviewed at 2:20 pm; Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) TTT at 1:56 pm; Housekeeping WWW at 2:09 pm; Floor Tech YYY at 2:26 pm; CNA YY at 1:28 pm; CNA CCC at 1:32 pm; CMA SS at 1:55 pm; LPN AAA at 1:26 pm; Dietary Aide (DA) LLL 1:44 pm; DA MMM at 1:48 pm; DA NNN at 1:50 pm; DA OOO at 1:52 pm; ADON ZZ at 1:30 pm; LPN AA at 1:35 pm; CNA YY at 1:25 pm; CMA MM at 1:29 pm; CNA JJJ at 2:10 pm; Dietary Manager VV at 1:46; DA KK at 1:48 pm; DA HHH at 1:50 pm; DA TT at 1:53 pm; MDS PP at 2:00 pm, Rehab Director III at 2:05 pm; CMA FFFF at 3:27 pm; CNA GGGG3:32 pm; RN Supervisor HHHH at 3:35 pm; LA IIII at 3:40 pm; CMA/CNA JJJJ at 3:49 pm; CNA KKKK at 3:52 pm; and LPN DDDD at 3:55 pm. 3. No staff worked until they had completed the in-service education. There were 14 staff that were part-time; 15 staff PRN (as needed); and 12 staff contracted. These staff will be in-serviced and educated on the Modified Texture of Food Policy, Care Plan Policy, and Resident Food Preferences Policy by the DON or Staff Development Coordinator before being allowed to work. The target date for completion of all education was 7/29/2024. A review of the agency training binder revealed one undated in-service log titled, Care Plan Policy. Signatures of eight agency staff documented attendance dated 2/19/2025, 2/20/2025, 2/27/2025, 2/26/2025, 3/12/2025, and 3/14/2025. A review of the agency in-services titled, Plan of Correction, Dietary Trays, Snack, Care Plan, dated 7/25/2024, 8/30/2024, 9/3/2024, 9/4/2024, 9/20/2024, 9/22/2024, 10/9/2024, 10/11/2024, 11/1/2024, 11/12/2024, and 2/19/2025 revealed documented in-service of agency care staff who have worked in the facility since 7/29/2024. An interview with the Staff Development Coordinator on 3/17/2025 at 12:37 pm revealed that she documents training for the agency in a separate binder and housekeeping in a separate binder. She stated that her process on how she educates agency staff involves putting the in-service in the book, and then they read the book and sign an acknowledgment of understanding. 4. Effective 7/29/2024, all newly hired staff will be in-serviced on their first day of hire by the Staff Development Coordinator, DON, or Nursing Administration. She will be providing the in-service/training during orientation upon hire, annually, and quarterly. Individuals will not work until they have received this in-service/training. A total of 107 out of 107 residents were identified as having correct diet orders. All residents' care plans were reviewed and updated to reflect appropriate diet orders. A review of the Plan of Correction revealed that the following would be discussed: Process of passing out snacks to the residents, Different types of meals given, Where to locate the snacks and what snacks can be given to the residents, Passing trays and checking the Diet Sheet to ensure that the resident gets the correct meal, and what to do if dietary send an incorrect meal. A review of the General Orientation Record revealed new hires received the education in orientation. The staff was re-educated related to the Dietary, Verifying snacks, Correct Diet, Heimlich maneuver, and tray verification. A review of 107 residents' diet orders and care plans, all were updated and correct. A review of the newly hired orientation and in-service training related to the Plan of Correction revealed they were completed. During an interview on 2/18/2025 at 11:12 am, the Administrator stated depending on the staff start date, they would have training before going on the floor training or at orientation. The orientation agenda was revamped to gear towards the IJ. The DON is responsible for letting Human Resources (HR) know if an employee is no longer active. For the new employees, there is an agenda that is presented for the IJ Plan of Correction. There is a summary for Passing Tray and Snacks. It is a general orientation when they have something going on, it is specifically for training that is included in the orientation process. There is an addendum to the orientation regarding policy, summary, and orientation list attached to the sign-in sheets. 5. The facility implemented interventions on 7/29/2024, to minimize the environmental risks and hazards. Interventions include: A Daily Diet Verification Audit was performed for 100% of current residents and was completed on 7/24/2024 by the DON to ensure 100% of residents' meal trays matched 100% of residents' diet orders, [NAME], and care plans. A Snack Distribution Audit was performed for 100% of current residents and was completed on 7/26/2024 by the DON and Nursing Administration to ensure that all residents received an accurate diet including snacks. A Meal Tray Observation Audit was performed for 100% of current residents and was completed on 7/26/2024 by the DON and Nurse Managers to ensure that all residents received their appropriate meal trays. Provided education to all staff regarding Modified Texture of Food Policy, Care Plan Policy, and Resident Food Preferences Policy to include reporting any unmatched meal trays and diet orders to the Food Services Director and Director of Nursing. The initial incident was reported to the state on 7/24/2024. The facility reported all audit findings to the Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) Committee and conducted an Ad Hoc QAPI meeting on 7/25/2024. A review on 7/24/2025 revealed that the Daily Diet Verification Audit was completed at 100% for resident diet orders, [NAME], and care plans. A review on 7/26/2024 revealed that the Meal Tray Observation Aduit was completed at 100% for all residents who received appropriate meal trays. A review on 7/26/2024 revealed that the Snack Distribution Aduit was completed at 100% for all residents who received appropriate meal trays. A review of the all-staff education documented Modified Texture of Food Policy, Care Plan Policy, and Resident Food Preferences Policy were reviewed and completed by the Food Service Director and Director of Nursing. A review of the QAPI Committee minutes revealed all audit findings were discussed and in place. A review of the sign-in sheet revealed that the Ad Hoc QAPI meeting was held on 7/25 2024. 6. New interventions will be monitored by the DON daily for six months for effectiveness using the audit tools Daily Diet Verification Audit, and Snack Distribution Audit to ensure this deficient practice does not reoccur. If a problem is identified, it will be addressed by the Food Service Director, Administrator, DON, and Medical Director. All parties including the resident, the resident's responsible party, the Medical Director, the Administrator, the DON, and the Food Service Director will meet to discuss the policy's violation. If there is a problem and all parties cannot agree, there will be an Ad Hoc QAPI meeting with the Consultant Operations Consultant and possible corrective action. An interview was conducted on 3/18/2025 at 1:15 pm with the administrator revealed the DON is responsible for overseeing the daily audits. Interview on 3/18/2025 at 2:53 pm with DON, she stated there were no errors. She said no one received the incorrect tray during the audits. 7. All dates of corrective action for staff will be completed on 7/29/2024. The facility alleged that the IJ was removed on 7/30/2024. All dates of corrective actions were completed on 7/29/2024. The facility's IJ was determined to be Past Noncompliance, removed on 7/30/2024.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies Modified Texture of Food and Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies Modified Texture of Food and Resident Food Preferences, the facility failed to provide a pureed snack to one of 26 sampled residents (R) (R165) ordered to receive a mechanically altered diet. Specifically, the facility provided R165 a sandwich which resulted in him being sent out to the local emergency room (ER) and admitted to a hospice facility where he expired on 8/31/2024. On 3/13/2025 a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F656, F684, and F835 on 3/13/2025 at 12:48 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 7/23/2024. An Acceptable IJ Removal Plan was received on 3/14/2025 related to Comprehensive Care Plans, C.F.R. 483.21; Quality of Care, C.F.R. 483.25; and Administration, C.F.R. 483.70. Findings included: A review of the Facility policy titled Modified Texture of Food Policy revealed that the facility offers Puree diets. The considerations were to read each tray card carefully to ensure all food textures were served to the residents accurately. Failure to do so may place the resident in a harmful situation. A review of the facility policy titled Resident Food Preferences revealed the Physician and Dietician will communicate the risks and benefits of specialized therapeutic versus liberalized diets. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dysphagia following cerebral infraction, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, cerebrovascular disease affecting the right dominant side, adult failure to thrive, seizures, and signs involving cognitive functions following unspecified cerebrovascular disease. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R165 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed that R165 required supervision or touching assistance with eating and was ordered a mechanically altered diet. A review of the care plan initiated on 11/3/2022 and updated on 3/5/2024 revealed that R165 has the potential for nutritional deficit problems related to receiving a mechanically altered diet. Further interventions indicate NAS (No added salt) pureed /dysphagia puree texture, thin liquids consistency diet as ordered (6/6/2024). A review of the Physician Orders for R165 dated 6/6/2024 revealed an order NAS (No Added Salt) diet, pureed / dysphagia puree texture, and thin liquids consistency. A review of a facility document dated 7/31/2024 revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) found that the allegation of neglect was substantiated and that the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) AA had been terminated. It was noted that the camera footage obtained on 7/24/2024 revealed R165 pointing to the snack tray behind the nurse's station and CNA AA then proceeded to walk behind the nurse's station. Footage then showed CNA AA walking over to R165 and handing him an item that appeared to be a sandwich. A review of the nurse note dated 7/23/2024 at (3:35 pm) by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) OO documented that R165 was sitting in a wheelchair at the nursing station when he was noted the resident choking on undigested food. The nurse documented, Food was falling out of his mouth, and he was choking for air. The Heimlich maneuver was started, and a mouth sweep was done, but was unsuccessful. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) started the emergency services number was called. It was documented that R165 started breathing, the Medical Doctor called, and R165's family member was called and informed of the resident choking. He was sent out to an acute care hospital, and he was breathing on his own when he left the facility with emergency medical transport (EMT) personnel. During an interview on 3/14/2025 at 8:38 am, CNA KK stated that she was present on 7/23/2024 and witnessed the event related to R165. She stated she was sitting at the desk when another resident told her that he thought R165 was choking. She stated she observed LPN OO go to the resident and begin to pat him on the back. CNA KK stated that LPN OO took R165 to his room. She stated that she notified the DON and witnessed the DON enter R165's room. CNA KK stated she then called the emergency services number. During an interview on 3/14/2025 at 8:52 am with Certified Medication Technician (CMT) RR she stated she was present on 7/23/2024 and witnessed the event related to R165. She stated that she had started talking to R165 and she realized something was wrong. She stated that she took him to his room. She stated she thought LPN OO was present. CMT RR stated that she tried getting R165 out of the wheelchair to perform the Heimlich Maneuver, but he required a Hoyer Lift for transfer, and she was not able to get him up. She stated that the DON came into the room and went out to ensure that the emergency services number was called. She further stated that she and LPN OO got R165 out of the chair and onto the floor and performed a finger sweep in R165's mouth and removed what appeared to her to be a bread-like substance. She stated that CPR was started until the EMT service personnel arrived, took over CPR, and transported R165 to the local ER. During an interview on 3/11/2025 at 9:30 am, the facility Administrator revealed employee CNA AA was viewed on the facility camera handing R165 a sandwich before the event. During an interview conducted on 3/11/2025 at 3:25 pm, the Administrator revealed she expected the resident to return but when the facility checked with the local hospital and was informed that R165 had been transferred out to a hospice facility on 8/5/2025 and that he expired on 8/31/2025. An attempt was made but CNA AA was unavailable for an interview. The facility implemented the following corrective action in response to the deficient practice which occurred on 7/30/2024: 1. The facility's Modified Texture of Food Policy, Care Plan Policy, and Resident Food Preferences Policy were reviewed on 7/24/2024; staff in-service education was initiated on 7/24/2024. As of 7/29/2024, all policies were reviewed with 100 percent (%) staff except for those on Leave of Absence (LOA) and Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). On 7/23/2024, R165's care plan was reviewed to reflect the appropriate diet; no changes were made. As of 7/29/2024, our census was 107. A review of the facility's policies titled Modified Textures of Foods, Resident Food Preferences, and Care Plan Policy were reviewed with no concerns. An interview with the Administrator on 3/18/2025 at 1:28 pm stated that these policy reviews are mentioned in the QAPI meetings. A review of in-services in the removal plan binder revealed training specific to the Modified Texture of Food Policy, Care Plan Policy, and Resident Food Preferences Policy initiated on 7/24/2024. 2. On 7/25/2024, an AdHoc Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) meeting was held with the Medical Director (MD), Corporate Operations Consultant (COC), Administrator, DON, Social Services Director (SSD), Staff Development Coordinator (SDC), Food Services Director (FSD), MDS staff, and Nurse Managers to review the self-imposed IJ Removal Plan. The Care Plan policy was reviewed with no changes. The Daily Diet Verification Audit was performed for 100% of current residents and was completed on 7/24/2024 by the DON. The audit concluded that 100% of meal tray cards matched 100% of the residents' diet orders, [NAME], and care plans. See the attached audit of the Daily Diet Verification Audit. The specific number of staff that received the in-service included: nine of nine Administrative Staff; six of six Registered Nurses (RNs);15 of 15 LPNs; 10 of 10 CMAs; 44 of 44 CNAs; 14 of 14 Housekeeping and Laundry staff; two of two Maintenance staff; nine of nine Dietary staff; and two of two Activities staff. A review on 3/17/2025 of the Plan of Correction (PoC) Binder revealed that a QAPI meeting was held on 7/25/2024 and revealed a copy of the Care Plan policy. A review on 3/17/2025 of PoC Binder revealed the Daily Diet Verification Audit was performed for 100% of current residents and completed on 7/24/2024. The audit concluded that 100% of the meal tray cards matched 100% of the residents' diet orders, [NAME], and care plans. Interviews were conducted on 3/19/2025 and all staff were found to be knowledgeable and able to verbalize the information shared during the education. LPN UUU at 1:59 pm; LPN EE at 1:28 pm; CMA RR at 1:50 pm; CNA PPP at 1:31 pm; CNA QQQ at 1:35 pm; CNA RRR at 1:40 pm; CNA LL at 1:47 pm; CNA BBB at 1:52 pm; CNA VVV at 2:06 pm; Laundry Aide (LA) AAA at 1:53 pm; LA XXX at 2:11 pm; Director of Housekeeping at 2:18 pm; Maintenance Director interviewed at 2:20 pm; Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) TTT at 1:56 pm; Housekeeping WWW at 2:09 pm; Floor Tech YYY at 2:26 pm; CNA YY at 1:28 pm; CNA CCC at 1:32 pm; CMA SS at 1:55 pm; LPN AAA at 1:26 pm; Dietary Aide (DA) LLL 1:44 pm; DA MMM at 1:48 pm; DA NNN at 1:50 pm; DA OOO at 1:52 pm; ADON ZZ at 1:30 pm; LPN AA at 1:35 pm; CNA YY at 1:25 pm; CMA MM at 1:29 pm; CNA JJJ at 2:10 pm; Dietary Manager VV at 1:46; DA KK at 1:48 pm; DA HHH at 1:50 pm; DA TT at 1:53 pm; MDS PP at 2:00 pm, Rehab Director III at 2:05 pm; CMA FFFF at 3:27 pm; CNA GGGG3:32 pm; RN Supervisor HHHH at 3:35 pm; LA IIII at 3:40 pm; CMA/CNA JJJJ at 3:49 pm; CNA KKKK at 3:52 pm; and LPN DDDD at 3:55 pm. 3. No staff shall work until they have completed the in-service education. There are 14 staff that are part-time, 15 staff that are PRN (as needed), and 12 staff that are contracted. These staff will be in-serviced and educated on the Modified Texture of Food Policy, Care Plan Policy, and Resident Food Preferences Policy by DON or Nursing Administration before being allowed to work. The target date for completion of all education is 7/29/2024. A review of the agency training binder revealed one undated in-service log titled, Care Plan Policy. Signatures of eight agency staff documented attendance dated 2/19/2025, 2/20/2025, 2/27/2025, 2/26/2025, 3/12/2025, and 3/14/2025. A review of the agency in-services titled, Plan of Correction, Dietary Trays, Snack, Care Plan, dated 7/25/2024, 8/30/2024, 9/3/2024, 9/4/2024, 9/20/2024, 9/22/2024, 10/9/2024, 10/11/2024, 11/1/2024, 11/12/2024, and 2/19/2025 revealed 40 names of agency care staff have documented in-service attendance since 7/29/2024. An interview with the SDC on 3/17/2025 at 12:37 pm revealed that she documents training for the agency staff in a binder and housekeeping in a separate binder. She stated that her process on how she educates agency staff involves putting the in-service in the book and then they are required to read the in-service and sign for understanding. 4. Effective 7/29/2024, all newly hired staff will be in-serviced on their first day of hire by the SDC or Infection Preventionist (IP) Nurse. They will be providing the in-service/training during orientation upon hire, annually, and quarterly. Individuals will not work until they have received this in-service/training. A total of 107 out of 107 residents were identified as having correct diet orders. All residents' care plans were reviewed and updated to reflect appropriate diet orders. A review of the PoC stated the following will be discussed (1) Resident Food Preference Policy, (2) Frequency of Meals Policy, (3) Process of passing out snacks to the residents, (4) Different types of meals given at (the facility), (5) Where to locate the snacks and what snacks can be given to the residents, (6) Passing trays and checking the Diet Sheet to ensuring that the resident get the correct meal, (7) What to do if dietary send an incorrect meal, (8) Offering the resident an alternative meal if they dislike the meal, and (9) Hand hygiene. A review of the General Orientation Record revealed new hires received orientation accordingly. Dietary (PoC) Verifying snacks, Correct Diet, Heimlich maneuver, and Abuse all verified. * A review of 107 of 107 residents' diet orders and care plans were updated and all correct. * A review of the new hire orientation and in-service training related to the PoC revealed they were completed. During an interview on 2/18/2025 at 11:12 am, the Administrator stated depending on the staff start date, they would have training before going on the floor training or at orientation. The orientation agenda was revamped to gear towards the IJ. The DON was responsible for letting Human Resources know if an employee was no longer active. For the new employee, there is an agenda that is presented for the IJ PoC. There was a summary for Passing Tray and Snacks. It was a general orientation when they have something going on, it is specifically for training that is included in the orientation process. There is an addendum to the orientation regarding policy, summary, orientation list, and sign-in sheets. The in-service sheets dated 7/24/2024 through 7/29/2024 were reviewed and verified that staff were re-educated. The [NAME] was updated. 5. The facility implemented interventions on 7/29/2024 to minimize environmental risks and hazards. Interventions include: * A Daily Diet Verification Audit was performed for 100% of current residents and was completed on 7/24/2024, by the Director of Nursing to ensure 100% of residents' meal trays matched 100% of residents' diet orders, [NAME], and care plans. * A Snack Distribution Audit was performed for 100% of current residents and was completed on 7/26/2024 by the DON to ensure that all residents received the accurate diet including snacks. * A Meal Tray Observation Audit was performed for 100% of current residents and was completed on 7/26/2024 by the DON and Nurse Managers to ensure that all residents received their appropriate meal trays. * Provided education to all staff regarding Modified Texture of Food Policy, Care Plan Policy, and Resident Food Preferences Policy including reporting any unmatched meal trays and diet orders to the FSD and DON. It was verified that the initial incident was reported to the state on 7/24/2024. The facility reported all audit findings to the QAPI Committee. Conducted an Ad Hoc QAPI meeting on 7/25/2024. * A review on 7/24/2025 revealed the Daily Diet Verification Audit was completed at 100% for resident diet orders, [NAME], and care plans. * A review on 7/26/2024 revealed the Meal Tray Observation Aduit was completed at 100% for all residents who received appropriate meal trays. * A review on 7/26/2024 revealed the Snack Distribution Aduit was completed at 100% for all residents who received appropriate meal trays. A review of the all-staff education documented Modified Texture of Food Policy, Care Plan Policy, and Resident Food Preferences Policy were reviewed and completed by the FSD and DON. A review of the QAPI Committee minutes revealed all audit findings were discussed and in place. The Ad Hoc QAPI meeting was determined to be held on 7/25/2024. 6. New interventions were monitored by the DON for effectiveness using the audit tools Daily Diet Verification Audit, Snack Distribution Audit, and Meal Tray Observation Audit to ensure the deficient practice did not reoccur. If a problem is identified, it will be addressed by the FSD, Administrator, DON, and Medical Director. All parties including the resident, the resident's responsible party, the Medical Director, the Administrator, the DON, and the FSD will meet to discuss the policy's violation. If there is a problem and all parties cannot agree, there will be an Ad Hoc QAPI meeting with the COC and possible corrective action. A review of the audits dated October 2024, November 2024, and December 2024 revealed the Food Service Director Audit and Meal Tray Observation Aduit were completed. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 2:42 pm, DON stated they have a meeting every day related to diets, and all the issues found were discussed in the QAPI meeting. She stated the audits were discussed at QAPI. 7. All dates of corrective action for staff were alleged by the facility to be completed on 7/29/2024. The facility alleged that the IJ was removed on 7/30/2024. All dates of corrective actions were validated as completed on 7/29/2024. The facility's IJ was determined to be Past Noncompliance, removed on 7/30/2024.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and a review of the documents Administrator and Director of Nursing, the Administration fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and a review of the documents Administrator and Director of Nursing, the Administration failed to effectively and efficiently manage facility compliance with federal regulatory requirements related to Quality of Care for one of 26 sampled residents (R) (R165) receiving an altered diet. Specifically, the facility provided R165 a sandwich, which resulted in him being sent out to the local emergency room (ER) and admitted to a hospice facility where he expired on 8/31/2024. On 3/13/2025, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F656, F684, and F835 on 3/13/2025 at 12:48 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 7/23/2024. An Acceptable IJ Removal Plan was received on 3/14/2025 related to Comprehensive Care Plans, C.F.R. 483.21; Quality of Care, C.F.R. 483.25; and Administration, C.F.R. 483.70. Findings included: A review of the document titled Administrator Job Description revealed under Duties and Responsibilities: Assume the administrative authority, responsibility, and accountability for all programs in the facility. The document is noted to be signed by the Administrator and dated 9/18/2023. A review of the document titled Director of Nursing revealed the primary purpose of this position is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the nursing services department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern the facility and as directed by the Administrator and the Medical Director to ensure the highest degree of quality care is always maintained. * The facility failed to implement the care plan for R165 related to nutrition. * The facility failed to provide a pureed snack to R165, ordered to receive a mechanically altered diet. An interview on 3/11/2024 at 9:30 am with the Administrator revealed she was aware of the incident on 7/24/2024 related to R165. She stated that she viewed the facility camera and saw Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) AA hand R165 a sandwich. The Administrator revealed that she expected R165 to return to the facility after being sent out to the local hospital, but when the facility checked with the local hospital, she found out that R165 had been transferred out to a hospice facility on 8/5/2024 and expired on 8/31/2025. The facility implemented the following corrective action in response to the deficient practice, which occurred on 7/30/2024: 1. On 7/25/2024 at 1:00 pm, an Ad Hoc Quality Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting was held with the Administrator, Social Services Director (SSD), the DON, Corporate Operations Consultant (COC), and Food Service Director (FSD) to identify the root cause of failure to follow R165's care plan. The facility's Modified Texture of Food Policy, Care Plan Policy, and Resident Food Preferences Policy were reviewed; no changes were made. A review of the AD-Hoc QAPI meeting dated 7/25/2024 reviewed the following policies, and no changes were required: Modified texture and Food policy, Care Plan policy, Resident food preferences policy, Heimlich maneuver, Choking policy, and Abuse and Neglect policy. A review of the identified root cause of failure for the R165 care plan was completed. 2. On 7/24/2024, the Administrator's job description was reviewed with the Administrator, FSD, SSD, and DON by the COC. No revisions were made. A review of the Administrator Job description: duties and responsibilities, committee functions, personnel functions, staff development functions, safety and sanitation functions, equipment and supply functions, budget and planning functions, working conditions, education, experience, specific requirements, physical and sensory requirements, job position analysis information, were acknowledge and signed off by the Administrator and COC on 7/24/2024. 3. On 7/24/2024, the COC in-serviced the Administrator, DON, FSD, and SSD on how to implement a process on how to verify diet orders before distributing resident meal trays, how to track and trend to determine a root cause analysis, and communication among departments on reviewing and updating resident care plans timely. The facility's QAPI policy was reviewed specifically regarding how to determine root cause analysis (RCA). A review of facility QAPI meeting minutes dated 7/24/2024 revealed Chief Operating Officer (COO) conducted a one-hour meeting on What is QAPI, When should QAPI be conducted, Who should attend QAPI, What is an RCA, all signatures confirmed. A review of the Attendance Record revealed COO completed in-service on the subject Implementation of a process to verify diet orders, tracking and trending of root cause of incident, updating care plans, policy review. During an interview with the DON, it was confirmed that she attended. 4. On 7/24/2024, the COC reviewed and approved the facility's audit forms and Plan of Correction (PoC) for any further areas of concern. Name of Audits- Daily Diet Verification Audit and Snack Distribution Audit. Residents' diets and care plans were discussed with the Administrator, DON, and FSD. Interventions were put into place, such as removing accessible snacks from the nurse stations; snacks were placed inside the pantry and available upon request. A snack diet reference sheet was initiated and placed inside the pantry. An observation was conducted on 3/11/2025 at 2:43 pm, residents were seen eating pudding and sandwiches, and one CNA was seen with a tray of snacks that contained fig [NAME] bars, vanilla pudding, peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, and fruit cups. When asked how she knew what type of snacks residents could eat, she went to the binder where it had residents' names and the type of diet types. 5. On 7/24/2024, the Corporate Nurse Consultant (CNC) and DON audited the resident's diet orders and meal tray cards from July 2024 through the current. The audits are named Daily Diet Verification Audit and Snack Distribution Audit. The Administrator, DON, and FSD will discuss all diet order changes in the morning and the clinical meeting to ensure all care plans are updated and accurate. Documentation will be monitored through the Abuse Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) and reported during QAPI by the DON and Administrator. The SSA reviewed and compared Diet Master from the Dietary Department and the Facility's Diet Type Report for all residents in the facility on 3/17/2025 was completed no discrepancies were found. 6. The COC met with the Administrator and DON to review the process of providing direct oversight of the following correct processes in the building as it relates to following care plans for resident diet orders. There is ongoing educational training for all members of the facility through the company's online courses. The Administrator was also in-service on how to conduct a QAPI meeting and how to identify and complete an RCA by the COC on 7/24/2024. The SSA reviewed in-service education related to the QAPI meeting and RCA dated 7/24/2024 with no concerns. 7. The corrective actions were completed on 7/29/2024, and the facility alleges that the immediate jeopardy was removed on 7/30/2024. All dates of corrective actions were completed on 7/29/2024. The facility's IJ was determined to be Past Noncompliance, removed on 7/30/2024.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and the facility's policy titled Pain Management - Acute, C...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and the facility's policy titled Pain Management - Acute, Chronic, and Subacute, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided for one of 36 sampled residents (R) (R71) who require such services consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Actual Harm was identified on 3/13/2025, when staples became embedded in R71's amputation surgical site after the facility failed to provide transportation for post-operation (post-op) appointments. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Pain Management- Acute, Chronic, and Subacute dated February 2025 documented the facility will have an effective pain recognition and management that is ongoing and committed to resident's comfort, identifying and addressing barriers to managing pain and addressing any misconceptions that resident, families, and staff have about managing pain. Recognition and Management of Pain - In order to help a resident attain or maintain his or her highest practicable level of well-being and prevent or manage pain, to the extent possible: Recognize when the resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when pain can be anticipated. Manage or prevent pain consistently with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care, the current clinical standard of practice, and the resident's goals and preferences. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, acquired absence of left above the knee, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other skin conditions, infection following a procedure, other surgical site subsequent encounter, unspecified complication of a procedure subsequent encounter, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with rest pain, right leg, and partial traumatic amputation of right foot. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R71 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating that R71 was cognitively intact; had lower extremity impairments; and had a pain medication regimen, PRN (as needed) for pain, non-medication interventions for pain, occasionally in pain, moderate pain intensity, and major orthopedic surgery. A review of the care plan dated 2/12/2015 documented that R71 has the potential for pain related to a recent surgical/medical procedure. A review of the care plan dated 2/12/2015 revealed that R71 had a left above-knee amputation and right transmetatarsal (foot between toes and arch removed) amputation, with interventions that included monitor/document pain management; document frequency, duration, intensity of pain, and phantom pain; and report to physicians if medications are not effective. A review of the care plan dated 2/12/2015 documented R71 had wound management for post-surgical general. A review of physicians' orders for R71 revealed an order for Tramadol HCI (relieves pain) oral 50 milligrams (MG), give one tablet by mouth every six hours PRN for pain and Tylenol extra strength oral tablet (Acetaminophen) (relieves pain), give 100 mg by mouth every 8 hours PRN for right leg stump pain. A review of the Pain assessment dated [DATE] indicated that R71 had frequent pain daily, with pain management to administer Tylenol 500 mg PRN. A review of the nurse note dated 3/11/2025 documented that R71 requested the wound care nurse remove staples to below-knee amputation (BKA) due to an appointment cancellation. The vascular office gave a verbal order to remove staples and for R71 to follow up in their office. R71 was educated . and 28 staples were successfully removed, with six staples left in place due to resident discomfort. During a telephone interview on 3/12/2025 at 9:20 am, the family member of R71 stated R71 had an appointment on 3/11/2025 to remove her staples from her recent surgery, and the facility canceled her appointment. The family member stated she went to the clinic to meet R71 for her appointment, but R71 never arrived. She further revealed that R71 stated the facility never scheduled transportation, and that she was concerned because R71 expressed to her the pain from the staples, and her skin was starting to grow around the staples. During an observation on 3/13/2025 at 1:28 pm, R71 was observed in her room and revealed that the six staples that were not removed were embedded into the skin of her right leg on her surgical wound that appeared to have crust build up in between the staples and skin. She revealed the facility did not schedule transportation for the post-op appointment. R71 stated that she told the facility she wanted the staples out in fear of a possible infection, and she had had enough of taking Tylenol to deal with the pain. She stated that they told her that they had called the clinic to receive an oral order for the wound care nurse to remove the staples at the facility, but she could not go through with the last remaining six staples because of the discomfort and pain. During an interview on 3/13/2025 at 1:41 pm, the wound care nurse revealed that she was alerted by R71 that she did not have an opportunity to make it to her appointment. She stated the East Wing Unit Clerk should have reached out to the vascular clinic to get an oral order from the physician for the wound care nurse to remove the staples from R71's surgical site. The wound care nurse confirmed there was a possibility of infection with the staples being embedded in R71's skin due to the length of time. She further revealed she had removed all the staples except for six, and she would have to get those removed at the vascular clinic. During a telephone interview on 3/14/2025 at 9:53 am, the vascular clinic representative stated R71 had a post-op appointment originally scheduled on 3/4/2025 to remove the staples after the amputation surgery, but that the appointment was cancelled due to the provider's request and was rescheduled for 3/11/2025. She continued to state that the facility called and cancelled R71's appointment for 3/11/2025 due to transportation issues, and the facility rescheduled for 3/18/2025. During a telephone interview on 3/18/2025 at 10:20 am, the Medical Director (MD) revealed she was not aware that R71 missed the post-op appointment to get the staples removed from her surgical site. She stated she was unaware of R71's pain because it was not expressed directly to her. The MD stated that she had a video appointment a few days ago with R71 and had noticed then that the staples were embedded in her skin. She stated that she informed the staff that R71 needed to make it to her rescheduled appointment to remove the remaining staples. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 8:31 am, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) MM revealed R71 would tell them about her pain with the staples in her leg, and she couldn't wait to get them taken out because they hurt. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 9:53 am, CNA XX stated R71 would tell staff that she had pain related to her leg hurting. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:39 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that all residents are assessed for pain via the pain scale every shift, and if there are any changes in condition, they proceed with a pain assessment. She stated R71 has several interventions and medications in place related to her pain post-surgery. She stated that if a resident's pain is unmanageable, they will be sent to the emergency department. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:39 pm, the Administrator confirmed that if pain is not properly managed, it can result in potential harm to a resident. She stated that she expects staff to conduct pain assessments, notify the physician, follow the physician's recommendations, speak with the resident, and monitor the effectiveness of the pain management. [Cross Reference F774]
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0774 (Tag F0774)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to schedule transportation arrangements for a medical appointment for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to schedule transportation arrangements for a medical appointment for one of 36 sampled residents (R) (R71), resulting in a missed post-operation (post-op) appointment after a surgical procedure. Actual Harm was identified on 3/13/2025, when staples became embedded in R71's amputation surgical site after the facility failed to provide transportation for post-operation (post-op) appointments. Findings included: A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of right leg below knee, acquired absence of left above knee, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other skin conditions, infection following a procedure, other surgical site subsequent encounter, unspecified complication of procedure subsequent encounter, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with rest pain, right leg, partial traumatic amputation of right foot, level unspecified subsequent encounter. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented R71 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating little to no cognitive impairment; both lower extremity impairment; and that R71 had pain a medication regimen, PRN (as needed) for pain, non-medication interventions for pain, occasionally in pain, moderate pain intensity, and major orthopedic surgery. A review of the care plan dated 2/12/2015 documented R71 has potential for pain related to a recent surgical/medical procedure. A review of the Grievance Letter dated 1/21/2025 by a family member of R71 stated, On 1/13/2025, it came to my attention that R71's appointment with her vascular doctor, scheduled for 10:30 am, had been changed without informing me or any family member. The appointment was moved to a different doctor on 1/16/2025, and we were not notified of this change. The appointment was canceled due to a late/no-show arriving an hour after the scheduled appointment. A review of the Patient Appointment Reminder dated 1/2/2025 documented that this is a reminder. You have an appointment at 10:00 am on Monday, 1/13/2025. All appointment and transportation forms for January 2025 were requested on 3/14/2025 at 12:49 pm from the [NAME] Wing Unit Clerk. As of the exit date of the survey, this information was not provided. During a telephone interview on 3/12/2025 at 9:20 am with a family member of R71, it was revealed that R71 had an appointment on 3/11/2025 to remove her staples from her recent surgery, and the facility canceled her appointment. She stated she went to the clinic to meet R71 for her appointment, and she never arrived. She further revealed R71 stated the facility never scheduled transportation. During a telephone interview on 3/14/2025 at 9:53 am with the vascular clinic representative stated R71 had a post-operation (post-op) appointment originally scheduled on 3/4/2025 to remove the staples from her amputation surgery, but was cancelled due to the provider's request and was rescheduled for 3/11/2025. She continued to state that the facility called and cancelled R71's appointment for 3/11/2025 due to transportation issues, and the facility rescheduled the appointment for 3/18/2025. During an interview on 3/14/2025 at 1:55 pm, the East Wing Unit Clerk stated she coordinates the transportation for appointments on the East Wing and was aware R71 had an appointment that was rescheduled for 3/11/2025. The East Wing Unit Clerk assumed the clinic called R71 regarding her missed appointment. She further stated she was aware that R71 was supposed to have her staples removed and that R71 informed the staff that she was in pain and complained that her skin was tight around her staples. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:25 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that if appointments are missed, a grievance should be filed. They will contact the center to reschedule any missed appointments, but a lot of their residents make their own appointments, and the transportation company needs a 72-hour advanced notice. She further revealed that the Unit Clerks should have a log on the unit that is provided to the Unit Manager to ensure appointments are made and are accurate. [Cross Reference - F697]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and the review of the facility's policy titled Resident's Rights, the f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and the review of the facility's policy titled Resident's Rights, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity for one of 36 sampled residents (R) (R6). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident's Rights dated 5/30/2024 documented that the resident has the right to exercise his or her rights in the facility and as a citizen or resident of the United States. All residents have rights guaranteed to them under Federal and State laws and regulations. Each resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. All activities and interactions with residents by any staff, temporary agency staff, or volunteers must focus on assisting the resident in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth and incorporating the resident's goals, preferences, and choices. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that R6 had a Brief Minimum Data Set (BIMS) score of 13, indicating that R6 is cognitively intact; has impairment on one side of both upper and lower extremities; and is dependent on staff for toileting, hygiene, and shower/bathing. A review of the care plan dated 12/10/2024 documented R6 has activities of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit related to hemiplegia, limited abilities, and requires extensive to maximal assistance for most ADL care tasks. During an observation on 3/10/2025 at 11:17 am, the door to R6's room was open. The privacy curtain was pulled; however, staff were heard providing care to R6. During an interview on 3/10/2025 at 11:19 am, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) CCC confirmed that peri-care was being provided for R6. She further confirmed that the door should always be closed while personal care is being done. During an observation on 3/10/2025 at 11:30 am, CNA DDD was observed entering R6 rooms and leaving the door open. As CNA DDD exited R6's room with a bag of soiled linen in her hands, she confirmed R6 was receiving assistance with changing. She stated R6 usually changes herself but needs assistance at times. CNA DDD revealed that the procedure is for the resident's door to remain closed at all times with the privacy curtain pulled during care because she has a roommate, and at any time, her roommate could enter the room. During an interview on 3/11/2025 at 9:43 am, R6 stated that staff were in her room the morning before, providing a bed bath when they left the door open. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/11/2025 at 10:00 am, she stated the privacy curtain should be pulled and the door should be closed if personal care is being done. Furthermore, she expects the staff to respect the resident's rights to privacy, and if they are receiving a bed bath, the door should remain closed.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Cleaning and Disinfecting Residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Cleaning and Disinfecting Residents' Rooms and 5-Steps to Room Cleaning, the facility failed to maintain a clean home-like environment for one of 24 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) located on the East Wing. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Cleaning and Disinfecting Residents' Rooms with the revision date of November 2020 revealed that the walls, blinds, and window curtains in residence areas will be cleaned when these surfaces are visibly contaminated or soiled. The staff will clean curtains, window blinds, and walls when they are visibly soiled or dusty. A review of the facility's policy titled 5-Steps to Room Cleaning revealed that the facility staff will spot clean walls daily using a clean rag, spot clean light switches, door handles, and walls. During observations on 3/10/2025 at 11:25 am, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with brown stains on the wall located to the left of the entrance. During an interview conducted on 3/10/2025 at 11:25 am, R19 stated that the brown stains on the wall are feces from his roommate throwing feces against the wall. R19 further stated that the stains have been there for a while. During an observation on 3/11/2025 at 10:02 am, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to still have brown stains on the wall located to the left of the entrance During an interview on 3/12/2025 at 11:30 am, Housekeeping Aide EEE revealed she has been working at the facility for a year and that her job responsibilities include cleaning, sweeping, mopping, and cleaning the edges of the rooms and walls. She stated she did not pay attention to the brown stains on the wall, and that is why they were not cleaned. During an interview conducted on 3/13/2025 at 10:09 am, the Housekeeping Director revealed that he has been working in the facility for about three months. He stated that it is expected that if the housekeeping aides find spots on the walls, they are expected to clean them. During an interview conducted on 3/19/2025 at 5:39 pm, the Administrator revealed her expectations to be that the resident's walls are cleaned and maintained in a clean, sanitary environment.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Abuse Prevention Policy and Drug ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Abuse Prevention Policy and Drug Diversion Policy, the facility failed to ensure one of 36 sampled residents (R) (R71) was free from misappropriation of prescribed narcotics. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy dated [DATE] documented that residents have the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, and misappropriation of property. The facility has a zero-tolerance Abuse Standard regarding all proven allegations of verbal, sexual, physical, mental, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and involuntary seclusion. Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exportation, or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. A review of the facility's policy titled Drug Diversion Policy dated [DATE], documented that the facility shall comply with state and federal regulations regarding medication handling, storage, disposal, documentation, and security, including but not limited to controlled substances. Drug diversion is a medical and legal concept involving the unlawful sharing, selling, or transferring of any legally prescribed controlled substance from the individual for whom it was prescribed to another person. It was further noted that only authorized licensed nursing and/or pharmacy personnel shall have access to Schedule II controlled drugs maintained on premises. The Director of Nursing (DON) will identify staff members who are authorized to handle controlled substances. Controlled substances must be counted upon delivery. The nurse receiving the medication, along with the person delivering the medication, must count the controlled substance together. Both individuals must sign the designated controlled substance record. A controlled substance record sheet must be attached to the resident-controlled medication, or a resident-controlled substance record sheet must be made for each resident who will be receiving a controlled substance. Do not enter more than one prescription per page. Narcotics sheets need to include the name of the resident, the name and strength of medication, the quality received, the amount on hand, the prescription administration, the signature of the person receiving medication, and the signature of the nurse administering medication. Schedule II-V medications must be stored in a separate locked, permanently affixed compartment, permitting only authorized personnel to have access except when the facility uses a single unit medication distribution system in which the quantity stored is minimal and a missing dose can be readily detected. Unless otherwise instructed by the DON, when a resident refuses a non-unit dose medication (or it is not given), or a resident receives partial tablets or single-dose ampules (or it is not given), the medication shall be destroyed and may not be returned to the container. This practice must be witnessed by another authorized licensed nursing personnel. The DON Services shall investigate any discrepancies in narcotics reconciliation to determine the cause and identify any responsible parties and shall give the Administrator a written report of such findings. Controlled medications remaining in the facility after the order has been discontinued or expired are retained in the facility in a secured locked area with restricted access until destroyed by two licensed clinicians or as otherwise directed by state regulation. Performance of periodic reconciliation (as frequently as needed) by the DON Service of records, receipts, disposition, usage, and inventory for all controlled medications to prevent drug diversion, suspicion, or when loss is identified. The reconciliation loss or potential diversion of controlled medications aims to minimize the time between the actual loss or potential diversion and the time of detection and follow-up to determine the extent of loss. If discrepancies are identified: (a) Gather data, investigate suspicious activities, behaviors, and self-disclosure of drug diversion. (b) Provide safe reporting (protect from retribution or retaliation). (c) Get a statement for all parties involved (confidential). (d) Perform an audit of the controlled medication process. (e) DON Services shall consult with the provider/pharmacy consultant and the Administrator to determine whether any further legal action is indicated. (f) Determine findings; inform the local authorities at the Administrator's discretion. (g) Notify State Regulatory Authorities if applicable. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of right leg below knee, acquired absence of left above knee, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other skin conditions, infection following a procedure, other surgical site subsequent encounter, unspecified complication of procedure subsequent encounter, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with rest pain, right leg, partial traumatic amputation of right foot. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented R71 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact; had both lower extremity impairment; had a pain medication regimen, including PRN (as needed) for pain, non-medication interventions for pain, was occasionally in pain, with moderate pain intensity, and major orthopedic surgery. A review of the Hospital Discharge Medication Order dated [DATE] revealed oxycodone (narcotic pain reliever) 5 milligrams (mg) immediate release oral tablet every four hours PRN (as needed). Dispense 15 tablets and 0 refills. A review of Physician's Discontinued/Completed Orders for R71 with a print date of [DATE] revealed oxycodone HCI oral tablet 5 mg *Controlled drugs. Give 1 tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. If needed for moderate pain up to three days with a start date on [DATE] and an indefinite date on [DATE]. This order status was documented as discontinued. A review of Physician's Discontinued/Completed Orders for R71 with a print date of [DATE] revealed oxycodone HCI oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg) *Controlled drug. Give 1 tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. If needed for moderate pain up to three days with a start date on [DATE] and an end date on [DATE]. This order status was documented as completed. A review of the Pharmacy Delivery Receipt dated [DATE] revealed oxycodone 5 mg tablets, and 10 each, based on quantities shipped. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of February revealed R71 was administered two PRN tablets on [DATE], and staff administered one PRN tablet on [DATE]. A review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) BB Written Statement dated [DATE] documented On [DATE], R71 received oxycodone 5 mg per request. It was given with good results. A review of the timecard for LPN BB revealed she did not work on [DATE]. A review of LPN AAA's written statement on [DATE] documented On [DATE], gave (R71) oxycodone 5mg twice and on [DATE], also gave oxycodone 5mg twice with positive results. A review of the February MAR revealed the oxycodone medication was not administered on [DATE]. A review of LPN HH's written statement dated [DATE] documented (R71) received (2) oxycodone 5-325 mg on [DATE] for complaint of 8/10 pain in stump area with phantom pain. (R71) pain was relieved 3/10, (R71) is alert and oriented and vocal when in pain. A review of the MAR for the month of February revealed LPN DD was the last nurse to administer R71's oxycodone medication. A review of the Progress Notes dated [DATE] at 5:17 am documented eMAR (electronic MAR)- Orders Administration Note: oxycodone HCI oral tablet 5 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain for 3 days, only 15 pills. A review of the Progress Notes dated [DATE] at 5:18 am documented eMAR - Orders Administration Note: oxycodone HCI oral tablet 5 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain for 3 days, only 15 pills. On [DATE] at 4:24 pm, a request for the statement of LPN DD from the DON was made. However, this was not provided by the exit of the survey. During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 9:20 am, a family member of R71 revealed that the oxycodone was given to the facility, and by the third day, all 15 pills were gone. She stated the facility informed her the oxycodone pills were taken and does not believe that R71 was given all 15 pills in three days. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:20 pm, the DON stated she does not have the controlled drug sheet for February for R71 and does not have the medication in her locked box. She stated she was told by staff that R71 completed her medication. She further stated that the pharmacist has not been in the facility for a while to discard any medications. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:33 pm, LPN AAA stated R71 came in with 15 tablets and was administered three pills for the three days. She stated that once the medication is over, the protocol is to gather the medication card and narcotic sign-in and sign-out sheets, and turn them in to the DON. Also, if the medication has a discontinued order, they give the leftover medication with the sheet to the DON and stated that they do not keep the narcotics. During an interview with the DON on [DATE] at 10:54 am, she stated that she had not found R71's control drug sheet for her oxycodone medication. During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 11:39 am, the Pharmacy stated they received the hospital discharge order from the facility and changed the order to oxycodone 10 tablets for two days every four hours. The pharmacy stated this order was signed for [DATE] and 5:30 am. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:27 am with R71, she stated that she took three pills of her oxycodone, but the nurses did not inform her how many days she was supposed to be taking the medication and the dose amount. She stated that all she knew was that one day they informed her she did not have any more. An attempt was made on [DATE] at 5:18 pm to interview LPN BB via phone call, but was not successful, and a voicemail was left. An attempt was made on [DATE] at 5:28 pm to interview LPN DD via phone call, but it was not successful, and a voicemail was left. During an interview on [DATE] at 5:49 pm, the DON confirmed R71 should be administered one tablet dose of oxycodone. While looking at the MAR, physician's orders, and timecard, the DON confirmed that LPN DD would have been the last nurse to administer R71's medication. She confirmed while looking at the MAR for February, there is no documentation to determine that medication was administered on [DATE], along with LPN HH's written statement stating she had given R71's medication. DON stated LPN HH probably forgot to click on the PRN tab in the MAR when she administered the medication. The DON verified the administered medication count and the amount of pills that should be remaining, and this should be investigated and reported. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:59 am, LPN HH revealed the facility called her on [DATE] and told her she had to return to the facility and write a statement stating she gave R71 oxycodone on [DATE]. She stated that when she returned to the facility, they told her she forgot to sign off on the MAR. LPN HH further asked where the control drug sheet was, stating she gave R71 the medication because that would help her verify if she gave the medication. In return, the facility told LPN HH that the problem is that the control drug sheet is missing. LPN HH continued to express to the facility that she does not recall her giving the medication and told her she still had to write a statement. During an interview on [DATE] at 5:27 pm, the DON revealed that the receiving nurse is responsible for following the orders as they come in. She stated she expects the nurses to count each shift, the manager conducts their audits weekly. During an interview on [DATE] at 5:31 pm, the Administrator revealed that the DON is responsible for ensuring processes are followed. She expects the Nursing Department to follow the diversion policy and ensure the medication is secured, dispensed according to the orders, and documented. [Cross Reference - F609]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Incident Report- Documentation, Investigating, an...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Incident Report- Documentation, Investigating, and Reporting and Drug Diversion Policy the facility failed to report misappropriation of property related to prescription narcotics for one of 36 sampled residents (R) (R71) to the State Survey Agency (SSA). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Incident Report- Documentation, Investigating, and Reporting with a revision date of February 2025, it was documented that all accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc., occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the Administrator. The Administrator/DON will notify the appropriate Regulatory Agency in accordance with reporting guidelines in the event the incident is reportable. A review of the facility's policy titled Drug Diversion Policy dated 5/20/2024 documented that the facility shall comply with state and federal regulations regarding medication handling, storage, disposal, documentation, and security, including but not limited to controlled substances. Performance of periodic reconciliation (as frequently as needed) by the DON Service of records, receipts, disposition, usage, and inventory for all controlled medications to prevent drug diversion, suspicion, or when loss is identified. Determine findings; inform the local authorities at the Administrator's discretion. Notify State Regulatory Authorities if applicable. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented R71 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact; had both lower extremity impairment; had a pain medication regimen, including PRN (as needed) for pain, non-medication interventions for pain, occasionally in pain, moderate pain intensity, and major orthopedic surgery. A review of the Hospital Discharge Medication Order dated 2/6/2025 revealed oxycodone (narcotic pain reliever) 5 milligrams (mg) immediate release oral tablet every four hours PRN (as needed). Dispense 15 tablets and 0 refills. A review of the Pharmacy Delivery Receipt dated 2/5/2025 revealed oxycodone 5 mg tablets, and 10 each, based on quantities shipped. During a telephone interview on 3/12/2025 at 9:20 am, a family member of R71 revealed that the oxycodone was given to the facility, and by the third day, all 15 pills were gone. She stated the facility informed her the oxycodone pills were taken and does not believe that R71 was given all 15 pills in three days. During an interview on 3/13/2025 at 3:20 pm, the DON stated she does not have the controlled drug sheet for February for R71 and does not have the medication in her locked box. She stated she was told by staff that R71 completed her medication. She further stated that the pharmacist has not been in the facility for a while to discard any medications. During an interview on 3/13/2025 at 3:33 pm, LPN AAA stated R71 came in with 15 tablets and was administered three pills for the three days. She stated that once the medication is over, the protocol is to gather the medication card and narcotic sign-in and sign-out sheets, and turn them in to the DON. Also, if the medication has a discontinued order, they give the leftover medication with the sheet to the DON and state that they do not keep the narcotics. During an interview with the DON on 3/14/2025 at 10:54 am, she stated that she had not found R71's control drug sheet for her oxycodone medication. During a telephone interview on 3/14/2025 at 11:39 am, the Pharmacy stated they received the hospital discharge order from the facility and changed the order to oxycodone 10 tablets for two days every four hours. The pharmacy stated this order was signed for 2/6/2025 and 5:30 am. During an interview on 3/15/2025 at 9:27 am with R71, she stated that she took three pills of her oxycodone, but the nurses did not inform her how many days she was supposed to be taking the medication and the dose amount. She stated that all she knew was that one day they informed her she did not have any more. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 10:28 am, the Medical Director (MD) revealed she was aware R71 came in from the hospital with 15 tablets of her oxycodone. She stated the facility reached out to her, informing her R71 had finished up her medication and needed to switch her to Tramadol (pain reliever). She revealed the DON did not notify her of R71 narcotic situations. The Medical Director continued to state that the DON is responsible for monitoring narcotics and ensuring audits are conducted weekly. Lastly, if there are any concerns, the DON should report them. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:27 pm, the DON confirmed misappropriation of property related to narcotics is a reasonable offense that should be reported. Any other investigation for missing narcotics would be reported to the SSA immediately. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:31 pm, the Administrator confirmed that misappropriation of property related to narcotics should be reported to the SSA.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Preadmission Scr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) Policy, the facility failed to obtain a level II PASARR screening for two of 36 sampled residents (R) (R55 and R76). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) Policy, revised 3/19/2024, section titled Policy Statement revealed that the facility will not admit an individual with a mental disorder or intellectual disability until the Level II screening process has been completed and the recommendations allow for a nursing facility admission and the facility's ability to provide the specialized services determined in the Level II screen. 1. A review of R55's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and pertinent diagnoses included but were not limited to other sequelae of cerebrovascular disease, mental disorder, and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. A review of R55's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not considered, which indicates R55 is rarely or never understood; that R55 displayed verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, such as threatening, screaming at others, and cursing at others, which occurred one to three days; and that R55 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL) care. A review of R55's care plan dated 5/17/2024 indicated a focus on a screen related to cognitive impairment. Goals included reducing the frequency and duration of screaming behavior. Interventions included, but were not limited to, documenting a summary of episodes, removing the resident from the public area where behavior is disruptive or unacceptable, and praising or rewarding the resident for demonstrating consistent desired and acceptable behavior. A review of R55's Physician's Orders included, but was not limited to, an order dated 1/29/2024 for quetiapine fumarate 50mg via G-tube two times a day and an order dated 1/29/2024 for Klonopin one 0.5mg tablet via G-tube two times a day. 2. A review of the EMR for R76 revealed R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and pertinent diagnoses included, but were not limited to, other sequelae of other cerebrovascular disease, mood disorder due to a known physiological condition with mixed features, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A review of R76's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that a BIMS was not considered, which indicates R76 is rarely or never understood, and that R76 displayed delusions. A review of R76's care plan dated 2/26/2025 indicated a focus on negative feelings regarding self and social relationships characterized by: low self-esteem, anxiety, mistrust, conflict/anger, depressive tendencies, ineffective coping related to display of disturbing behavior, yells out at staff when assistance is offered. Often states, I am a man, I don't need help, signs of PTSD and cognitive decline. Additionally, the problematic manner in which the resident acts is characterized by inappropriate behavior; use of profanity with staff, and resistance to treatment/care related to refusing showers/baths, possibly related to PTSD. During an interview conducted on 3/12/2025 at 10:00 am, the SW stated she has been working in the facility for 33 years. SW states residents are generally admitted into the facility with a PASARR Level II from the hospital, and rarely convert when they are admitted . SW stated that if residents have entered the facility without a PASARR Level II, then they would submit one. SW states generally she would collaborate with the DON to submit the PASARR Level II. SW verified R76's diagnosis and stated she was not aware that PTSD was an eligible diagnosis for a PASARR Level II. SW confirmed R76 does not have a PASARR Level II. During an interview conducted on 3/18/25 at 10:25 am, DON stated PASARR Level II is determined on admission and as needed, and residents are referred over to psychiatric services if they have any mental disorder or intellectual disability. The DON revealed the inter-disciplinary team (IDT) is responsible for determining who is eligible for PASSAR Level II and stated the SW has the sole responsibility for determining which residents are eligible for PASSAR Level II. She stated she was not aware that PTSD was a mental disorder. The DON stated her expectations are that the SW follows the facilities policy regarding PASARR Level II, and a possible negative outcome could be that residents don't receive the correct services. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:34 pm, the Administrator stated that the process for conducting the PASARR for new residents includes that a PASARR Level I is completed on the resident prior to admission. If the resident triggers based on mental health or intellectual disabilities, with the caveats of a diagnosis of Alzheimer's or dementia, that could cancel out the need for a PASARR Level II. She further stated that this should be done prior to admission because the purpose is to identify proper placement related to the conditions of the residents. The Administrator further stated that if the resident does not have Alzheimer's or dementia, he or she certainly should have PASARR Level II. She further stated that potential negative outcomes include that the facility may not be an appropriate placement and might not receive services that could benefit the residents.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled ADL Care-Bath (Sho...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled ADL Care-Bath (Shower) Hygiene Care, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was provided for one of 36 sampled residents (R) (R47) relating to nail care. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, ADL Care-Bath (Shower) Hygiene Care with a revised date of April 2024, documented under the section action (8), encourages residents to do as much of his/her own care as possible, supervise and assist residents as necessary. Clean and trim nails as needed. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (heart attack) and metabolic encephalopathy (impaired brain functioning). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that R47 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene care. A review of the care plan dated 1/19/2025 revealed R47 had a preference of refusing activities of daily living (ADL) care, bathing, and changing clothes as follows: R47 will change clothes once a week. Prefers not to shave or trim beard, refuses podiatry care. He has long fingernails and toenails. Refuses showers also. During an observation on 3/10/2025 at 12:06 pm with R47 in his room, revealed that his fingernails were observed to be long and curled with a dark substance underneath. He states his fingernails have been long for a while, and he has expressed to staff he would like them to cut. He stated that the staff would tell him, Oh, your nails are really long, but they do not do anything about it. During an observation on 3/11/2025 at 9:49 am with R47 revealed his fingernails were long with dark substance underneath. R47 confirmed that he does not refuse to get his fingernails cut or refuse nail care. He stated someone came into his room that morning and attempted to cut the tips of his nails, but did not cut them all the way down, and did not clean underneath the nails. The nails were observed to still be long with dark substance underneath. During an interview on 3/12/2024 at 12:05 pm, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) BBB stated that ADL care consists of nail care, hair care, and bathing. CNA BBB stated nails should be cut every two weeks, and depending on the resident, nail care is carried out by podiatry, or if the resident is diabetic, then the nurses have to cut their fingernails. CNA BBB continued to state she is familiar with R47 and has noticed his nails are long with dark substance underneath. She revealed she is not sure what the dark substance underneath his nails is, it could possibly be food. Furthermore, CNA BBB confirmed R47's nails did not look like they were cut within two weeks, and they were still long with a dark substance underneath. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:20 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed R47 was care planned for refusals and stated he won't allow the staff to get them down. She further stated ADLs should be done daily, and staff should attempt to conduct fingernail care if the resident allows.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy Oxygen Therapy Policy, the facility ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy Oxygen Therapy Policy, the facility failed to administer oxygen therapy according to the physician's orders for two of 13 residents (R) (R75 and R99) receiving oxygen therapy. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy Policy, issued 11/28/2017, and last reviewed in April 2024, documented that oxygen therapy is to be used with a written order by a physician. 1. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atelectasis, and respiratory failure with hypoxia. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that R75 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident was cognitively intact and was receiving oxygen therapy. A review of the care plan dated 2/20/2025 revealed that R75 required continuous oxygen related to the disease process, with interventions that included oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician. A review of the physician order dated 2/25/2025 revealed R75 had an order for oxygen at 3 liters (L) per Nasal Cannula (NC) continuously every shift. During an observation on 3/10/2025 at 12:32 pm, the oxygen concentrator for R75 revealed it was set at 4.5L and was being delivered via NC. During an observation on 3/11/2025 at 10:15 am, the oxygen concentrator for R75 was observed set at 5L via NC. During an interview at this time, Medication Technician (MT) SS confirmed the oxygen concentrator was set at 5L. During an interview on 3/12/2025 at 11:15 am, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that orders were written for R75 to be sent for evaluation due to incorrect delivery rate, but the resident refused to go out and refused to use his BiPAP, which was ordered at night. 2. A review of the EMR revealed that R99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale and emphysema. A review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R99 presented with a BIMS score of six, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was receiving oxygen therapy. A review of the care plan dated 1/4/2025 revealed R99 was receiving oxygen therapy related to ineffective gas exchange. A review of the physician order dated 2/25/2025 revealed that R99 had an order for oxygen at 3L per mask or cannula continuously. During an observation on 3/10/2025 at 12:33 pm, the oxygen concentrator for R99 revealed a rate of delivery of 5L. During an interview on 3/11/2025 at 8:49 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) HH revealed that the nursing staff are to check the oxygen rate, resident oxygen saturation, and the date entered on the tubing and the humidification bottle for residents receiving oxygen therapy. She revealed that the physician's orders inform the nursing staff of the rate ordered, and they are to ensure that the rates are set accurately on the concentrators. During an interview on 3/11/2025 at 9:08 am, LPN LL revealed that the nursing staff are supposed to check physician orders for oxygen rate and then check the concentrator when they go into the resident's room to ensure it is set at the correct rate. During an interview on 3/11/2025 at 9:26 am, LPN JJ revealed that the nursing staff checks the physician's order to confirm that the oxygen concentrator is set to the correct rate per the physician's order. She stated they ensure that the oxygen tubing and the humidification bottle are connected properly. During an interview on 3/12/2025 at 11:15 am, the DON confirmed that the nursing staff are responsible for checking oxygen rates. She stated that all residents on oxygen should be checked daily by the nurse on the unit in which they reside.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Dental Services (Tag F0791)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Dental Services ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Dental Services Policy, the facility failed to provide dental services for one of 36 sampled residents (R) (R77). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Dental Services Policy, revised 3/18/2024, revealed that routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health needs in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care and that dental assessments are conducted on an annual basis and as needed. The assessing nurse will notify social services of dental concerns and the resident's need for dental services. A review of R77's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R77 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate assistance for oral hygiene. A review of the care plan dated 4/2/2024 indicated that R77 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) deficit. Interventions included that staff would provide extensive assistance in personal hygiene and oral care for R77. A review of R77's Physician's Orders included, but was not limited to, an order dated 4/2/2024 for a dental consultant for evaluation and treatment as indicated. A review of R77's EMR revealed a document titled Oral Dental Assessment dated 2/27/2025 with the indicator loose teeth marked yes. Further review revealed the assessment prompt, Referral needed to dentist: Yes or No (if yes, give copy to social worker), was left blank. A review of R77's EMR revealed a document titled Oral Dental Assessment dated 10/7/2024 with the indicator loose teeth marked yes. Further review revealed the assessment prompt, Referral needed to the dentist: Yes or No (if yes, give a copy to the social worker), was left blank. During an observation and interview on 3/10/2025 at 11:09 am, R77 stated that a tooth needs to come out, that he has told a nurse about this every day, and that the pain from the tooth is ten on a scale of ten. He further stated that he has not seen a dentist since he has been at the facility. During an interview on 3/12/2025 at 12:25 pm, R77 stated that his tooth had been loose for about one month. An observation at this time revealed R77 demonstrated the loose tooth by pressing his tongue against it, and the tooth easily moved. During an interview on 3/13/2025 at 1:20 pm, R77 stated that his oral pain is a ten out of ten and demonstrated his tooth moving with the push of his tongue. He further stated he told a staff member about it again on the night of 3/12/2025, but still nothing is being done. During an interview on 3/13/2025 at 2:13 pm, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated that in order for a resident to obtain dental services, she would need the nurse assessment to determine if a referral is needed for a dentist consultation. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 9:57 am, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) BBB revealed that CNAs do not perform oral assessments; only the nurses do assessments. She further stated that CNAs assist with brushing residents' teeth and report any broken, loose, or damaged teeth and oral pain to the nurse. She stated she was not aware that R77 had any loose teeth. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 10:05 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) DDDD revealed that nurses conduct oral assessments for residents and should check daily for bad breath, lesions, missing teeth, loose teeth, rotten teeth, and any oral pain, which could lead to discomfort. She further stated that if a resident has any of these, it should be charted to make a referral to the dentist. During an observation at this time, LPN DDDD confirmed that R77 had one loose tooth and was missing all upper teeth. R77 told LPN DDDD that he was experiencing pain at this time. LPN DDDD confirmed this would indicate a referral to the dentist. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 10:17 am, Unit Manager LPN EE confirmed that R77 has not had a referral to the dentist. She confirmed that R77 had physician orders that state a dental consultation and treatment as indicated and clarified that these indications include oral pain, cavities, and loose teeth. LPN EE stated that nurses are responsible for oral assessments, and this should be done quarterly. She further confirmed the documented dental assessment dated [DATE], where the nurse marked yes, indicating R77 had a loose tooth. LPN EE confirmed that this should have been completed fully, indicating if a referral is needed. She further stated that if there was a loose tooth indicated in the assessment, this oral assessment should have been given to the Social Services Director (SSD)for a dental referral. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 10:25 am, the SSD revealed that a resident must qualify to be a part of the in-house Medicaid dental program, otherwise, the facility would need to refer to an out-of-house dentist or the emergency room, depending on the urgency of need. She stated the Medicaid program is the only in-house dental program, and this dentist comes in quarterly. The SSD confirmed she was not aware of any referral to the dentist for R77 or of any loose teeth for R77. She further confirmed that R77 qualifies for Medicaid dental benefits. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:00 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed oral assessments are done annually, but the facility conducts these more often than annually. She stated that in the oral assessments, nurses look for any new missing teeth, oral pain, or loose teeth. She further stated that potential negative outcomes for not having a dentist referral made timely manner for a resident could lead to pain or weight loss. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:32 pm, the Administrator revealed the facility offers a dental program funded by the resident's Medicaid. If a resident qualifies for this program, the dentist comes on-site. If a resident does not qualify for this program, appointments would be made with an outside dentist to serve the resident. The Administrator further stated that potential negative outcomes for not having a dentist referral made for a resident include potential weight loss, pain, or not being able to eat or chew.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Call System/Light Policy, the faci...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Call System/Light Policy, the facility failed to ensure that the nursing call light was answered and accessible for one of 36 sampled residents (R) (R33). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Call System/Light Policy, dated 4/16/2024, documented that the purpose of the residents' call system shall allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system that relays the call directly to a staff member or a centralized staff work area. Answer all call lights in a prompt, calm, courteous manner for assurance of the resident's safety, aiding, and to promote a home-like environment by reducing noise levels. During an observation on the [NAME] Wing on 3/10/2025 at 12:13 pm, Registered Nurse (RN) LLLL was heard repeatedly telling R33, Don't push for nothing, Don't push for nothing, and Don't push for nothing. She was observed to exit the resident's room. During an interview at this time, she stated that she was trying to tell R33 that lunch was not ready yet, and he kept pressing the call device for a snack. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of a history of falling, other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (blood vessels in the brain), symbolic dysfunctions (difficulty reading and spelling), and major depressive disorder moderate. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented R33 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment, that R33 had impairment on both sides of the upper and lower extremities, and that R33 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) care. A review of the care plan dated 1/31/2025 documented that R33 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to the disease process (history of cerebrovascular accident) (stroke), and impaired balance, the resident needs extensive assistance with most of the ADL care tasks, and to encourage the resident to use the bell to call for assistance. During an interview on 3/10/2025 at 12:24 pm with R33's roommates (R60 and R104), they both confirm RN LLLL came into the room to tell R33 to stop pressing the call light. During an observation on 3/10/2025 at 12:26 pm, the nursing call system cord in R33's room was extracted from his wall, causing the system to be unfunctional. During an interview on 3/10/2025 at 12:32 pm, RN LLLL apologized and stated that she did not mean to be rude to R33. She stated that R33 had the call device in his hand, and he kept pushing it repeatedly to the point where staff would not come to answer it. She confirmed they are not supposed to keep the call device away from him, so she was telling him to stop pressing it because she had already given him a snack. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:17 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the call light system is identified by the rooms, and the staff are to answer the call lights. She confirmed that all call lights should remain in place and that staff should not be telling residents not to press the call device.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to make handrails accessible on two of two wings (East...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to make handrails accessible on two of two wings (East Wing and [NAME] Wing); and failed to adequately assess one of 36 sampled residents (R) (R20) for self-administration of medication. Findings included: 1. During observations conducted on 3/10/2025 at 10:24 am, 3/11/2025 at 11:01 am, 3/12/2025 at 3:11 am, 3/13/2025 at 10:47 am, 3/14/2025 at 11:21 am, 3/15/2025 at 9:30 am, 3/16/2025 at 10:21 am, 3/17/2025 at 1:32 pm and 3/18/2025 at 9:37 am on East Wing, the following was revealed: * One dresser was observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], blocking the handrail. * One dresser was observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], blocking the handrail. * Four dressers were observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], blocking the handrail. * Three dressers were observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], blocking the handrail. * Six dressers were observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], blocking the handrail. * One dresser was observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], blocking the handrail. * Four dressers were observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], blocking the handrail. * One dresser was observed on the right side of room [ROOM NUMBER], blocking the handrail. * Three dressers were observed on the left side of room [ROOM NUMBER], blocking the handrail. * Four dressers were observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], blocking the handrail. * One dresser was observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], blocking the handrail. During observations conducted on 3/13/2025 at 12:08 pm, 3/14/2025 at 11:21 am, 3/15/2025 at 9:30 am, 3/16/2025 at 10:21 am, 3/17/2025 at 1:32 pm, and 3/18/2025 at 9:37 am on the [NAME] Wing, the following was revealed: * Three dressers were observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], blocking the handrail. * Two dressers were observed between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], blocking the handrail. During an interview conducted on 3/13/2025 at 10:42 am, the Maintenance Director revealed that he has been employed at the facility for two years. He stated that over the last two weeks, there was ongoing construction on the East Wing, where the facility was remodeling the closets. He stated that the space only had basic closets before the remodeling, but they are now adding individual wardrobes. He stated that the wardrobes were delivered around two weeks ago and that he could not provide an exact completion date because the external contractor is occasionally short-staffed. During an interview conducted on 3/19/2025 at 5:03 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the purpose that the handrails is to help residents who ambulate. The DON stated that a possible negative outcome from handrails not being accessible would be that it can interfere with the resident's ability to use the handrail, and confirmed that the dressers are blocking the handrails from resident use. During an interview conducted on 3/19/2025 at 5:37 pm, the Administrator revealed that the purpose of the handrails is to assist residents with mobility and that a possible negative outcome from handrails not being accessible could be residents requiring more assistance from staff. The Administrator confirmed that the dressers were obstructing the use of the handrails. 2. A review of the policy titled Self-Administration of Medications dated October 2024 documented that residents in the facility who wish to self-administer their own medications may do so, if it is determined that they are capable . Bedside medications will be stored in a uniform fashion. The Director of Nursing (DON) is responsible for instructing all licensed and non-licensed nursing personnel that drugs discovered at the bedside must be reported to the charge nurse on duty. These drugs will be removed unless they have been specifically ordered to be stored at the bedside by a physician. The charge nurse will report to the DON the removal at the earliest reasonable time. Medications will be ordered for bedside use only for residents who are alert and can follow instructions for use. When not in use, beside medications will be stored in a locked cabinet or a drawer in the resident's room. A review of the facility's policy titled Resident's Rights dated 5/30/2024 documented that the resident has the right to exercise his or her rights in the facility and as a citizen or resident of the United States. All residents have rights guaranteed to them under Federal and State laws and regulations. Each resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. All activities and interactions with residents by any staff, temporary agency staff, or volunteers must focus on assisting the resident in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth and incorporating the resident's goals, preferences, and choices. An individual resident may self-administer drugs if the interdisciplinary (IDT) team has determined that this practice is safe. During an observation on 3/10/2025 at 10:58 am, R20 was observed in his room. On the nightstand, the following was observed: triamcinolone acetonide ointment ups 0.1 percent, nystop top powder, and milk of magnesia. During an interview with R20, he stated he received the medication from the hospital. During observations on 3/11/2025 at 9:32 am and on 3/12/2025 at 11:18 am, the same above medications were observed on R20's nightstand. A review of the electronic medical record revealed that R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, psychoactive substance abuse, opioid dependency, alcohol abuse, major depressive disorder, and candidiasis of skin and nails. A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R20 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that R20 was cognitively intact. A review of the care plan dated 2/18/2025 revealed that R20 was observed with over-the-counter medication in his possession and refuses to surrender to staff when requested. Staff explained the importance of compliance and the potential for harm if medications are contraindicated. A review of consolidated physician orders for R20 with print date of 3/11/2025 revealed no orders were found for Triamcinolone Acetonide Ointment USP, 0.1 percent (Skin Cream); for Nystop Top Powder 100,000 60 gram (GM) (Topical Antifungal for skin); or for Milk of Magnesia (Laxative for constipation). A review of R20 EMR revealed no self-administration of medication assessment. During an interview on 3/12/2025 at 11:41 am, R20 stated he could not remember when he went to the hospital and stated that the medications are cream for his feet, hands, and arms. He states they occasionally feel raw, and he uses it daily and nightly on his rashes. He continued to state that the staff have never assessed him for being able to administer the cream on himself. During an interview on 3/12/2025 at 4:09 pm, the DON stated that the facility has a policy for self-administration of medications in the event a resident would like to administer their own medication. She stated that the process would involve that an assessment would be conducted for the residents to ensure they can safely administer or apply it correctly, an order from the Medical Director (MD) for self-administration, and discussion with the IDT team before approval. Further, the DON reviewed R20's EHR and confirmed he does not have an assessment for self-administration of medication. During an observation with the DON of R20's room, it was confirmed that there was prescribed medication on his nightstand. The DON informed that R20 would need to be assessed to self-administer the medications. She further confirmed that all staff are responsible for making rounds to ensure medications are not in the residents' rooms, and she expects her staff to inform her of these concerns.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility policy titled Administration of Medications, the facility failed to properly lock and secure three of four medication carts (Medic...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility policy titled Administration of Medications, the facility failed to properly lock and secure three of four medication carts (Medication Carts A and B on the East Wing and Medication Cart C on the [NAME] Wing). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Administration of Medications with a review date of October 2024 revealed that staff will maintain the medication cart locked at all times when unattended. 1. During an observation and interview on 3/14/2025 at 5:18 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) LPN BB was observed on the East Wing using Medication Cart A. She unlocked the medication cart (Medication Cart A) outside the nurse station with the outward side facing accessibility to three male residents sitting within distance. LPN BB left the cart and was observed sitting behind the nurse station on a computer. LPN BB confirmed she had just come from a resident's room, that a staff member stopped her, and she sat down to do something in a resident's charts. The LPN BB confirmed that she had all medication types on medication cart A, such as psychotropic, diuretic, and narcotics. LPN BB explained that the possible negative outcome when leaving a medication cart unlocked with residents present is that the residents could take medication off the cart. LPN BB mentioned she had in-service on maintaining the medication carts a couple of weeks ago. 2. During an observation and interview on 3/14/2025 at 5:25 am, Medication Cart B was observed on the East Wing, left unlocked outside of the nurse station, with the outward side facing three male residents sitting within distance. A Certified Medical Assistant (CMA) CC was observed sitting behind the nursing station, working on the computer. During an interview, CMA CC confirmed she was away from Medication Cart B for roughly 10-15 minutes. She stated that she does not see how the medication on cart B could have any possible negative outcome or any effects on the resident because she does not pass narcotics. CMA CC confirmed that she had training five months ago on Medication Storage and Administration, and it mentioned to make sure all medications are dated, the medication cart is locked at all times, and nothing is left on top of the medication cart. 3. During an observation and interview on 3/15/2025 at 9:49 am, Medication Cart C on the [NAME] Wing was observed unlocked and unattended. LPN FF confirmed she was trying to get into the computer, but she was not able to get in, so she went into the back of the nurse's station to get into the computer, and she walked away from the medication cart, leaving it unlocked and unattended. LPN FF confirmed she left the medication cart unlocked. During this observation, the Unit Manager/ LPN EE was observed locking Medication Cart C. 4. During an observation and interview on 3/16/2025 at 11:08 am, Medication Cart C on the [NAME] Wing was observed unlocked, and no nurse was observed in the hallway. After a few minutes, LPN GG came out of a resident's room and confirmed the cart was unlocked and was left unattended. LPN GG stated that it was her first day on the floor, and she had been in the resident's room for two minutes, but she thought she had locked the medication cart. LPN GG stated that she has been a nurse for 20 years, and she received in-service training on ensuring that the medication carts are locked when the cart is not within view. LPN GG mentioned that the possible negative outcome is that a patient, staff member, or family member can get into the medication cart. During an interview on 3/14/2025 at 5:33 am, the supervisor, Registered Nurse (RN) DD, revealed that the medication cart should be locked if staff are away. RN DD confirmed that it does not matter how long the staff was away; they should have ensured that the medication cart was locked. RN DD mentioned the procedure was to have the carts locked, but if he finds a cart unlocked, he will lock it and ask the staff why it was unlocked. RN DD explained, We have completed in-service on medication carts and will continually educate and always monitor. RN DD shared that all medications could potentially cause adverse reactions to residents if they were to access the unlocked cart. During an interview on 3/14/2025 at 11:39 am, the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the medication carts should be locked at all times when staff are away from the cart unless they are stocking the cart. The DON explained that residents should not go into a cart, and staff should be present to ensure that. The DON revealed that she expected the medication carts to be locked and secured when out of the eyesight of the nurses and CMAs, and that medications should not be left unsecured. The DON emphasized that the procedure was to keep the medication cart secure, and that she and the Staff Development Nurse had completed in-service.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0800 (Tag F0800)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and review of facilities policy titled Therapeutic Diets, the facility failed to use a recipe when preparing pureed food. This deficient practice...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and review of facilities policy titled Therapeutic Diets, the facility failed to use a recipe when preparing pureed food. This deficient practice has the potential to affect six residents on a pureed diet. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Therapeutic Diets with a revision date of September 2017, it was documented that a mechanically altered diet means one in which the texture of the diet is altered. When the texture is modified, the type of texture must be specific and part of the physician's or delegated registered or licensed dietician's order. Diets are prepared in accordance with the guidelines in the approved diet manual and the individualized plan of care. During an observation on 3/11/2025 at 1:54 pm, [NAME] FF was observed prepping for the puree observation and the Dietary Kitchen Manager (DKM) was observing KC FF. The DKM revealed [NAME] FF was pureeing boiled carrots. [NAME] FF stated she was pureeing carrots for 10 servings, and she was going to use 15 scoops. No formal recipe for guidance was noticed. When asked how she was measuring the scoops she stated she was using a 4 oz ladle scoop. As [NAME] FF was scooping the carrots it was observed there was not enough carrots and she changed her serving size to 7 servings and 9 scoops of boiled carrots. [NAME] FF stated that the carrots were cooked in chicken base broth, and it was observed that there was jug of yellow broth. [NAME] FF proceeded to puree the carrots, and she was seeing pouring some of the chicken base broth without measuring and proceeded to puree again. When asked what consistency she was pureeing she stated, mashed potatoes consistency, then DKM manager proceeded to say it is supposed to be mousse-like consistency. When asked how she measured the broth to know how much to add She indicated that, based on her experience working in the kitchen for a long time, she simply knows how much to add. [NAME] FF acknowledged she is supposed to measure the broth and stated she will measure it in the future. When asked what recipe she was using she pulled a binder from underneath the table and showed the recipe she stated she was following. However, the recipe provided did not coincide with the number of servings pureed or ingredients. During an interview conducted on 3/18/2025 at 9:37 am, the DKM stated that they are in the process of changing their menu system from one system to another. DKM confirmed that there was no recipe followed, and the recipe provided was no longer used since they don't use thickeners. DKM stated a possible negative outcome for not following a recipe is not getting the right consistency of food and that it may cause harm to the residents During an interview conducted on 3/19/2025 at 5:40 pm, the Administrator revealed the kitchen staff should follow a recipe to get the right consistency when preparing pureed food.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policies titled Receiving, Food Storage: Dry Goods, Food Storage: Cold Foods, and Ice, the facility failed to pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policies titled Receiving, Food Storage: Dry Goods, Food Storage: Cold Foods, and Ice, the facility failed to properly label food items with expiration dates, properly cover opened food items, and keep the ice machine free of debris. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 112 residents who received food orally. Findings included: A review of facility policy titled Receiving with a revision date of February 2023 documented that all food items will be appropriately labeled and dated either through manufacturer packaging or staff notation. A review of the facility policy titled Food Storage: Dry Goods with a revision date of February 2023 documented that the storage areas will be neat, arranged for easy identification, and the date marked as appropriate. A review of the facility policy titled Food Storage: Cold Foods with a revision date of February 2023 documented that all food will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross-contamination. A review of facility policy titled Ice with a revision date of October 2022 documented that the dining services director will coordinate with the maintenance director to ensure that the ice machine will be disconnected, cleaned, and sanitized quarterly and as needed, or according to manufacturer guidelines. 3. The exterior of the ice machine will be cleaned weekly. An observation on 3/10/2025 at 9:30 am with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed the following items in the pantry: * 1 bottle of vinegar was opened and not labeled with an expiration date. * 1 jar of creamy peanut butter was opened and not labeled with an expiration date. * 1 container of quick oats was opened and not labeled with an expiration date. * 1 container of quick creamy wheat was opened and not labeled with an expiration date. A continuous observation was conducted on 3/10/2025 at 9:30 am with the Dietary Manager and revealed the following items in the cooler: * 2 bags of cut cabbage with no expiration date. * 1 bag of cut and peeled carrots with no expiration date. * 1 bag of spinach that was wilted and with no expiration date. * 1 bag of hot dogs was opened and not labeled. A continuous observation was conducted on 3/10/2025 at 9:30 am with the DM and revealed the following items in the freezer: * 1 bag of Sysco green peas was not properly sealed An observation and interview conducted on 3/11/2025 at 9:45 am revealed debris inside the ice machine. An interview with DM stated she doesn't know how it was missed, and it is normally cleaned once a month. During an interview conducted on 3/18/2025 at 9:37 am, DM revealed that the expectation is that the staff members date and label items in the pantry, cooler, and freezer. The DM stated that some possible negative outcomes from food items not being properly labeled could be that staff members don't know when to use the product they have and how long it's been in-house. During an interview conducted on 3/18/2025 at 3:03 pm, the Maintenance Director stated he is responsible for cleaning the ice machine twice a month and that it is the facility's policy to do it at a minimum once a month. After being shown a photo of the debris found in the ice machine, the Maintenance Director confirmed it was debris. During an interview conducted on 3/19/2025 at 5:42 pm, the Administrator revealed that staff members should be properly labeling food items with an open date and expiration date according to the policy. Further interview also revealed the Maintenance Director is responsible for cleaning the ice machine and stated she expected that the ice machine to be cleaned according to the cleaning schedule, which was at least monthly or as needed.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Overview, the facility failed to provide proper surveillance...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Overview, the facility failed to provide proper surveillance and monitoring for infections and communicable diseases for 114 out of 114 residents residing in the facility. Furthermore, the facility failed to remove personal clothing items from the unit linen cart and failed to cover the resident's clean clothing while transporting the laundry cart. Findings included: 1. A review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Overview dated 4/1/2018, documented that the goals of the infection prevention program are to decrease the risk of infection to residents and personnel; to monitor for occurrences of infection; and to implement appropriate control measures. The major activities of the program are surveillance of infections, with the implementation of control measures and prevention of infections. There is ongoing monitoring for infections among residents and personnel, and subsequent documentation of infections that occur. Reporting mechanisms for infection prevention: Residents' infection cases are monitored by the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP completes the line listing of infections and monthly reporting forms, and: (1) Reports to the infection preventionist committee. (2) Report to the Director of Nursing (DON)/Designee and others as directed. (3) Provide feedback to staff as needed. (D) The IP Administrator/Designee and appropriate department managers review the compliance monitoring and initiate appropriate actions. A review of the Infection Control Book on 3/18/2025 revealed the facility did not have infection criteria (McGeer's), evidence for collecting accurate data for infection, monitoring, and tracking for colored coded infections on the facility map, and missing surveillance for the months of September 2024 and November 2024. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 3:28 pm, the IP Nurse confirmed she did not have the infection criteria (McGreer) sheets in the infection control book, but she does follow their criteria. While looking through the book, the IP Nurse acknowledged that the monitoring and tracking were not accurate, there were missing color codes for the monitoring on the maps, and the months of September 2024 and November 2024 maps were not in the book. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:06 pm, the DON stated the IP Nurse should be submitting her listening weekly to the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC). She stated her expectations are for the IP Nurse to follow the policy and the infection control process to be complete with no missing items. The DON further confirmed that the lack of information can increase the risk of infections and infections not being treated accordingly. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:56 pm, the Administrator stated that the DON oversees the Infection Control Program, and her expectations are for the staff to follow the facility's Infection Control policy. 2. During an observation and interview on 3/11/2025 at 3:34 pm, the Assistant DON revealed that the East Wing linen cart stored a resident's personal clothing items, and she was unsure why the resident's clothing was inside the linen cart. She continued to confirm resident's personal clothing items should not be stored on the unit's linen cart. 3. During an observation and interview on 3/18/2025 at 3:16 pm, Laundry Aide (LA) WW was observed pushing an uncovered laundry cart with clothing items exposed down the hallways. She stated the process for transporting laundry was to return the clothing items to the resident's room. During the interview, LA WW confirmed the clean items on the chart were not covered and pointed to the white folded sheet on top of the laundry cart. She stated that the sheet should cover clean clothes. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 3:19 pm, the IP Nurse confirmed that the laundry cart hauling resident clean clothing should be covered. She stated her expectations are for the housekeeping department to comply with infection control practices.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0949 (Tag F0949)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Education and Tr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Education and Training Requirements, the facility failed to provide an effective behavioral health training program consistent with the facility assessment and person-centered care for three of 36 samples residents (R) (R55, R66, and R76). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Education and Training Requirements, revised August 2024, revealed that the facility's objective is to provide competent care based on the identified needs of the resident population, based on findings from the facility resource assessment. Educational needs can be identified by the utilization of the Facility Resource Assessment Tool. 1. A review of R55's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, cerebrovascular disease, mental disorder, and schizoaffective disorder/bipolar type. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R55's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not considered, which indicates R55 is rarely or never understood; R55 displayed verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others such as threatening, screaming at others, and cursing at others which occurred one to three days during the lookback period; and that R55 was dependent on staff for all care. A review of the care plan dated 5/17/2024 revealed that R55 presented with the behavior of screaming related to cognitive impairment, and the goals included reducing the frequency and duration of screaming behaviors. Interventions included, but were not limited to, documenting a summary of episodes, removing the resident from the public area where behavior is disruptive or unacceptable, and praising or rewarding the resident for demonstrating consistent desired and acceptable behavior. A review of R55's physician orders included, but was not limited to, an order dated 1/29/2024 for quetiapine fumarate 50 mg (milligrams) via gastrostomy tube (G-tube) two times a day and an order dated 1/29/2024 for Klonopin one 0.5 mg tablet via G-tube two times a day. 2. A review of R66's EMR revealed R66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of, but not limited to, schizophrenia. A review of R66's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating that R55 was cognitively intact and that R66 displayed verbal behavioral symptoms occurring one to three days during the lookback period. A review of the care plan dated 9/27/2024 revealed that R66 presented with behavioral problems related to a diagnosis of schizophrenia, including being easily annoyed, displaying some verbal aggression, accusing others of taking his money and belongings, and seeking attention daily. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administering medications as ordered, anticipating the resident's needs, calmly approaching R66, and documenting behaviors and the resident's response to interventions. A review of the care plan dated 10/3/2024 revealed R66 presented with verbal or physical aggression related to anger towards others if he could not get his opinion expressed or agreement from others. Interventions included, but were not limited to, allowing the resident time to respond to directions or requests. A review of the care plan dated 11/19/2024 revealed R66 presented with suicidal behavior related to psychiatric illness and verbal threats to harm himself. Interventions included, but were not limited to, utilizing any available resources for treatment and documenting summaries of each episode. A review of the physician orders revealed R66 was ordered: 2/4/2025 olanzapine 5 mg at bedtime for schizophrenia; 11/13/2024 trazodone 100 mg two times a day for schizophrenia, and 11/13/2024 Abilify 10 mg at bedtime for schizophrenia. 3. A review of EMR revealed R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, sequelae of other cerebrovascular disease, mood disorder due to known physiological condition with mixed features, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A review of R76's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that a BIMS score was not considered, which indicates R76 is rarely or never understood and presented with behaviors of delusions. A review of the care plan dated 2/26/2025 indicated R76 presented with negative feelings regarding self and social relationships characterized by low self-esteem, anxiety, mistrust, conflict/anger, depressive tendencies, ineffective coping related to display of disturbing behavior, yells out at staff when assistance is offered. It was noted that R76 often states, I am a man, I don't need help. R76 presented with signs of PTSD and cognitive decline. Additionally, the problematic manner in which the resident acts is characterized by inappropriate behavior, use of profanity with staff, and resistance to treatment/care related to refusing showers/baths, possibly related to PTSD. A review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed common diagnoses of residents in the facility included, but were not limited to mental disorder, schizophrenia, and PTSD. A review of in-services for the last twelve months revealed one in-service record titled Behaviors: Managing Crisis dated 3/7/2024 and facilitated by an outside source addressing behaviors related to schizophrenia or mental disorders. A review of in-services for the last twelve months revealed one in-service record titled Behavior Management dated 2/16/2024, which revealed no education specific to schizophrenia or mental disorders. A review of the undated orientation agenda revealed training subjects titled Mood and behavior, PTSD, and past life trauma management and Behavior Management Policy Overview for Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and Registered Nurses (RNs) only. These training subjects were not included in the orientation topics for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), Dietary, Social Services/Activities, Environmental Services, Maintenance, and laundry staff. A review of the agency training binder revealed no behavioral health training or any training related to schizophrenia, mental disorder, or PTSD. During an interview on 3/13/2025 at 10:56 am, CNA ZZZ revealed that she had worked at the facility since December 2024. She stated she has had no training regarding schizophrenia, and she is not familiar with whether residents have a schizophrenia diagnosis on the [NAME] or East wings. During an interview on 3/14/2025 at 6:59 am, CNA AAAA revealed she had worked at the facility for about nine years. She stated that her in-service training had never discussed schizophrenia. She further stated that she does not know if there are any residents in the facility with schizophrenia or a mental disorder, and that the CNAs would have to ask the nurse for diagnoses. During an interview on 3/14/2025 at 12:42 pm, CNA BBBB revealed she had worked at the facility for about one year. She stated she had not had training related to schizophrenia. During an interview on 3/16/2025 at 10:35 am, RN CCCC, an agency nurse, revealed she primarily works at the facility on the weekends and has been working at the facility as an agency nurse since October 2024. She stated she had not had training on behavioral health, schizophrenia, mental disorders, or suicidal ideations. She was not aware of any residents with a schizophrenia diagnosis in her assignment. During an interview on 3/16/2025 at 11:10 am, Housekeeping WWW revealed that she has worked at the facility since April 2024. She stated she has not had in-service on schizophrenia, suicidal ideation, or mental disorders. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 9:51 am, Dietary Aide (DA) LLL revealed she had been working in the facility for one year. She stated she has not had any training on behavioral health, schizophrenia, mental disorders, or PTSD. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 9:57 am, CNA BBB revealed she had worked for five years at this facility. She stated she has not had any training specific to schizophrenia or mental disorders. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 10:05 am, LPN DDDD revealed she had worked at the facility for four months. She stated that most of her behavioral training covered Alzheimer's and dementia, and possibly touched on schizophrenia and mental disorders. She stated she does not think any residents in the [NAME] wing have a diagnosis of schizophrenia or a mental disorder. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 2:17 pm, CNA EEEE revealed she has been in the facility since January 2025. She stated she has not received in-service regarding PTSD. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 2:22 pm, LPN GGG revealed he had been working in the facility on a PRN basis since November 2024 as agency staff. He stated he has not received training regarding PTSD. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 2:58 pm, the Activities Assistant revealed that she had been working in the facility since February 2025. She stated she has not had any training specific to schizophrenia. She stated that she knows there are some residents with a mental disorder diagnosis. When asked how she would know any problematic behaviors to look out for, she stated that she knows based on her observations. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 9:36 am, CNA VVV revealed she had been working at the facility for about two years. When asked about her behavioral health training regarding schizophrenia, mental disorders, or PTSD, she asked, What is that? She further stated she knows about PTSD, but she has not had the training for PTSD at the facility. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 9:42 am, CNA QQQ revealed she had been working at the facility for about three months. She stated she has not had training on schizophrenia. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 12:08 pm, the Activities Director (AD) revealed she has worked at the facility for ten years. She stated that some volunteers are scheduled to come to the facility regularly, and some volunteers come to the facility as needed. She further stated that volunteers report to her. When asked about the volunteers' training, she stated that she cannot say she has trained them; she has only trained them in what to do with specific residents. When asked about the volunteers' behavioral health training, the AD further stated that the volunteers have not had behavioral health training, there is no signature documentation or acknowledgements of training, and the volunteers just show up and help out. The AD further stated that her online training mentioned schizophrenia and PTSD, focusing more on the approach to residents with these conditions. She further stated she has had no training specific to mental disorders and that it has been a while since she has done the online training. When asked if the AD has activities specific to residents with mental disorders, she stated that she does not have activities specific to mental disorders. She further stated that she has huge board games and tries to see what these residents respond to. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 3:19 pm, the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) stated that in-service forms include face-to-face, using online software, and using outside sources. The SDC stated she has not conducted a lot of training on behavior. She further stated that they try to document behaviors to know what the behaviors are for the residents, so they know the triggers, and they try to in-service staff on knowing the triggers. The SDC stated that during orientation, she speaks about residents who get admitted with behaviors. When asked if the facility provides training specific to schizophrenia, mental disorders, and PTSD, the SDC stated that an outside behavioral health services company provided in-service training to staff in March 2024. She further stated this was the only time this company had provided the in-service to staff. The SDC stated that Resident Rights online training mentions schizophrenia. A transcript of this training was requested but not provided. The SDC stated that non-direct staff, such as dietary and housekeeping staff, are in-service with other staff. The SDC further stated that staff competencies are conducted annually or initiated when staff are lacking in something. To train agency staff, the SDC stated she puts in-service training in the agency training binder for agency staff regarding behavioral issues. The agency staff are expected to read the book, and the SDC takes their word for it. The SDC further stated there is no competency test for agency staff. She confirmed she did not see any behavior-related training in the agency training binder. The SDC stated that competency exams are conducted annually for staff but not agency staff. The SDC further stated that the Social Services Director(SSD) provides in-service training on behaviors. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 3:44 pm, the SSD revealed that sometimes she conducts training on behaviors. She stated that she introduces the behavior program during new hire orientation, which is education on a behavior book kept on the unit that staff members will write in to document behaviors for discussion during the management's weekly meetings. The SSD clarified that this is mostly on-the-spot training specific to current events of what is going on with a specific resident at the time. The SSD further stated that her in-service training is in the in-service binder. When asked for training specific to schizophrenia, mental disorders, and PTSD, the SSD stated it has been about three years since this training was conducted. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 1:40 pm, CNA RRR, an agency CNA, revealed that it is her second day working at this facility. She stated that she has not had training on behavioral health, schizophrenia, mental disorders, or PTSD. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 1:56 pm, Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) TTT revealed that he has worked at the facility for about three years. When asked about his behavioral health training, he stated that it was very dementia-focused and tied mental disorders in with dementia, but he did not recall any mention of PTSD. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 1:59 pm, LPN UUU revealed that she is a PRN employee and has worked at the facility for about a year. When asked about her behavioral health training, she stated that she has not had any at the facility. She further stated that she has not had any training related to schizophrenia, mental disorders, or PTSD. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 2:11 pm, Laundry Aide (LA) XXX revealed that she has been working at the facility for eight years. She stated she has not had in-service on behavioral health. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 4:58 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility uses online software as the corporate system for annual training and upon anniversaries for every staff member. She further stated that for agency staff, the facility asks to read the information in the agency training binder. She further stated that volunteers are trained as needed, depending on current events in the facility. When asked what some negative outcomes are if there is insufficient training to meet the behavioral needs listed in the facility assessment, she stated that staff could not take care of residents as needed. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:30 pm, the Administrator stated that she expects to provide training to properly care for the residents and execute behavior monitoring and interventions. She further stated that this should be for all people if they work directly with the residents. When asked what some negative outcomes are if there is insufficient training to meet the behavioral needs listed in the facility assessment, she stated that residents may not be comfortable, and they may have outbursts.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, the fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, the facility failed to establish and maintain an Antibiotic Stewardship program related to clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory reports, stop dates on antibiotics, and monitoring systems in place for residents returning to the hospital. This had the potential to affect all 114 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Steward in April 2024 documented that the purpose of the antibiotic stewardship program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residence. Prescribers will provide complete antibiotic orders including the following elements: (c) frequency of administration; (d) duration of treatment; start and stop date or number of days of therapy. When a resident is admitted from an emergency department, acute care facility, or other care facility, the admitting nurse will review discharge and transfer paperwork for the current antibiotic/anti-infective order. A review of the Infection Control Book on 3/18/2025 at 3:28 pm revealed that residents were missing lab orders, no resolved dates for antibiotics, duration of the antibiotic orders, and monitoring of residents with infections who were admitted or transferred from the hospital. During an interview on 3/18/2025 at 3:38 pm with the Infection Preventionist (IP) Nurse confirmed she did not have the [NAME] requirements in the infection control book to determine true infections. The IP Nurse stated that most of the time, she does not do lab follow-up on infections because she does not do repeated labs, which is why there are no resolved dates for antibiotics. In addition, she confirmed there were missing clinical signs and symptoms, along with some of the clinical signs and symptoms that were present. In addition, IP confirmed that residents who were admitted into the facility, infections were not being tracked or monitored. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:06 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the IP Nurse should be submitting her listings weekly to the Regional Nurse Consultant. She stated that she expects the IP Nurse to follow the policy and that the infection control process be complete with no missing items. The DON further confirmed that the lack of information can increase the risk of infections and infections not being treated accordingly. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 5:56 pm, the Administrator stated that the DON oversees the Infection Control Program and her expectations are for the IP Nurse to follow the facility policy.
Feb 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free of accid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free of accident hazards in one of one shower room on the [NAME] Wing. Specifically, the [NAME] Wing shower room had a divider wall with a sharp, jagged edge hanging away from the wall where residents could get cut and/or injured. Findings include: Observation on 2/13/2024 at 12:20 pm of the [NAME] Wing shower room revealed it had two working shower stalls. Between those two shower stalls was a 1 foot wide column divider wall that had a 2 inch gap between the wall and the panel at the edge of the wall about 3 feet tall, which would normally be covered by an [NAME] (In architecture, an [NAME] is the sharp edge formed by the intersection of two surfaces, such as the corner of a masonry unit.) which was usually covered by a metal or plastic [NAME] (battens are used to cover the seam that is created when two panels butt up to each other, like a corner). The sharp edge sticking out from the wall with the gap between the wall and the plastic edge had the potential for residents to get cut and/or injured on when they went into the shower stall. Review of the Accident Log revealed that there were no reports of any resident being injured in the [NAME] Wing shower room. Interview on 2/13/2024 at 12:47 pm with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) BB, who revealed that the broken wall in the shower stall had been there for the whole year she had worked at the facility. Interview on 2/13/2024 at 12:54 pm with the Infection Control Registered Nurse, she revealed she did environmental rounds every day in the common areas and stated residents could get injured on the crack of the white plastic covering on the edge of the wall between the two stalls in the shower room on the [NAME] Wing. Interview on 2/13/2024 at 1:03 pm, the Maintenance Manager stated he was aware of the crack in the wall that needed repair. Interview on 2/13/2024 at 1:09 pm, the Administrator said she was aware the [NAME] Wing shower room needed repair, including the water-stained ceiling tile, and they planned to remodel it after they got three quotes and picked a contractor to do the repairs. No quotes were obtained. Interview on 2/13/2024 at 5:11 pm, the Administrator provided a text from the Maintenance Director recommending the [NAME] Wing Shower room needed addressing, dated 1/2/2024. Interview on 2/14/2024 at 1:50 pm with the Maintenance Manager, he stated he first identified the hazard about a month ago during his daily morning rounds and that he and the Environmental Service Supervisor put a plan together to remodel the [NAME] Wing shower room and spoke to the Administrator about their ideas.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to promote dignity by serving two meals on two separate days out of a four-day period on Styrofoam containers and with plas...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to promote dignity by serving two meals on two separate days out of a four-day period on Styrofoam containers and with plastic cutlery to 107 of 108 residents on two of two wings (the East Wing and [NAME] Wing) who get their meals from the facility kitchen. Findings include: Observation on 2/12/2024 at 5:39 pm, residents on the East Wing and [NAME] Wing were served meals on Styrofoam clamshell to go containers and plastic cutlery. Observation on 2/15/2024 at 7:45 am, residents on East Wing and [NAME] Wing were served meals on Styrofoam clamshell to go containers and plastic cutlery. Interview on 2/15/2024 at 9:47 am with the Dietary Manager revealed they used Styrofoam clamshell to go containers and plastic cutlery for dinner on 2/12/2024 and breakfast on 2/15/2024 because the kitchen had two staff members call out. Interview on 2/20/2024 at 10:18 am with Resident (R) (R 15) stated she felt it was a lack of dignity when the kitchen serves meals on Styrofoam containers and not on regular plates. R15 went on to state that Styrofoam and plastic are sometimes used at breakfast and sometimes at dinner, it alternates. Interview on 2/20/2024 at 10:49 am with Restorative Certified Nursing Assistant (RCNA) EE, she stated she works every weekday and every other weekend on the 7:00 am to 5:00 pm shift and the kitchen serves meals on Styrofoam some days at breakfast. She does not work during dinner. Interview on 2/20/2024 at 1:54 pm with R20, R20 said, I don't like eating out of Styrofoam or paper plates and plastic. The kitchen serves dinner most of the time on Styrofoam. I don't like it at all. I'm not on a picnic. Styrofoam feels like I'm not worth it and I pay every month. It's a problem with dignity and staff. I don't deserve to eat out of Styrofoam. I feel like I'm homeless when I get Styrofoam. I hate Styrofoam plates.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortab...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment in the [NAME] Wing shower room and in seven of 17 bathrooms (Rooms 107, 111, 126, 127, 129, 133, and 139) on the East wing. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 54 out of 54 residents on the [NAME] Wing and seven of 17 bathrooms on the East Wing. Findings include: 1. Observation on 2/13/2024 at 12:20 pm of the [NAME] Wing shower room revealed a dark black/grey/orange substance in two of the two working shower stalls. In the first shower stall there was patchy and continuous black/grey/orange growth, approximately 3 feet long x 1 1/2 feet high, on three walls. In the second shower stall there was black/grey growth 4 feet long, wrapped around the three walls and approximately 1 foot high. There was also a stained ceiling tile above the shower head at the return air vent, which is directly above a resident's head when they shower. Interview on 2/13/2024 at 12:35 pm with Resident (R) (R 15), R15 said the [NAME] Wing shower room had dark substances up the walls for at least a month. Interview on 2/13/2024 at 12:47 pm with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) BB on the [NAME] Wing, she stated she showered a resident earlier today and noted orange and black/grey marks on the walls in both shower stalls. She stated the marks have been there for the whole year that she has been there working. Interview on 2/13/2024 at 12:54 pm with the Infection Control Registered Nurse about the black/grey and orange growth on the shower room stalls, she verified the growth in the first shower stall was orange and grey. The Infection Control Registered Nurse said she did environmental rounds every day for the last week and a half that she had been working in the facility, and stated she knew about the 3 foot long x 1- and 1/2-foot-high area on three of the three walls and the growth in the second shower stall that was 3 to 4 feet long and 1 foot high and wrapped around 3 of 3 walls. Interview on 2/13/2024 at 1:03 pm with the Maintenance Manager and the Environmental Services Supervisor, the Maintenance Manager stated that the [NAME] Wing shower room was scheduled for remodel, and they were looking for bids. The Environmental Services Supervisor said Housekeeping clean the walls in the shower room every day. The Environmental Services Supervisor stated that the [NAME] Wing shower room will be remodeled and confirmed the dark and orange substance and stated they can't use bleach because of the harmful smell from the bleach would not be good for the CNAs to breathe. They use a cream cleanser for the substances on the shower walls to attempt to clean it and have been using it for a long time, but they still cannot get the substance off, only lighten it. He has seen the [NAME] Wing shower room this dirty since he started in December 2023. Interview on 2/13/2024 at 1:09 pm with the Administrator said they still need to get three quotes before they can pick a contractor for the repairs. On 2/13/2024 at 5:11 pm, the Administrator showed a text from the Maintenance Manager that the [NAME] Wing bathroom needed addressing on 1/2/2024. Interview on 2/14/2024 at 1:50 pm with the Maintenance Manager, he stated the staff put their concerns in a black maintenance mailbox at each nurse's station. He first identified the black and orange growth about a month ago during his daily morning rounds. He and the Environmental Services Supervisor developed a plan for remodeling together and spoke to the Administrator about their ideas. 2. During the Initial tour of the facility on 2/12/2024 from 9:00 am to 10:30 am, the following observations were made: There was a very strong urine odor upon entrance in the East Unit of the facility. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a strong urine odor upon entering the room. The odor was very strong at the entrance of the bathroom. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the bathroom was not clean. It had splatter and dirt throughout the floor and lower walls, with broken and cracked floor tile. The toilet shifted on an angle that exposed the yellow/brownish, odorous substances. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] (and room [ROOM NUMBER]) share the same piping. In rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], the perimeter surrounding the toilet was battered, shambled, and crusted. One of the residents in the room stated they do not like to use it. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the perimeter surrounding the toilet was battered, broken and crusted. The room had a strong odor of urine and feces. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the perimeter of floor around the toilet contained what looked like a thick yellowish-brown substance. The toilet was shifted to an angle that exposed the yellow-brownish, odorous substances. During the environmental tour with the Environmental Director (ED) on 2/13/2024 from 12:00 pm to 12:30 pm, the following observations were made: In room [ROOM NUMBER], the bathroom had a strong odor of feces and urine. The ED stated that the strong odor may stem from the mattresses, residents needing changing, and/or from substances under the tiles. The ED stated that stripping the tiles may eliminate the strong odors. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the base of the toilet and around the perimeter contained a thick brown-yellowish substance. The ED stated that excrement seeps under the tiles so they must pull up the toilet and replace it. The ED added they would then caulk the perimeter and base of the toilet. In room [ROOM NUMBER], broken tiles at the back of the toilet exposed a thick, brown substance. In room [ROOM NUMBER], broken tiles exposed two layers of two different types of tiles. The top layer of broken tiles were about 8 x 8 inches square. The second layer of tiles were small squares about 2 x 2 inches. The toilets were shifted to the side or angled exposing a thick, brown substance and trapped feces and urine. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the toilet had shifted and exposed a yellowish-brown substance at the base of the perimeter around the toilet. During the environmental tour with Maintenance Director on 2/13/2024 from 2:00 pm to 2:21 pm, the following was observed: In room [ROOM NUMBER], the toilet was now caulked but still smelled of urine and feces. The Maintenance Director explained that some rooms share the same piping so when one toilet is compacted, it affects the other two connected toilets in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The Maintenance Director added that sometimes two residents have been known to accidentally pour urine from their urinals onto the floor. Interview and observation on 2/13/2024 at 3:10 pm with R15 revealed that her room needed to be cleaned and asked that I follow her to her room. Her room had a slight odor and was stuffy. The floors around the perimeter of the room and the base boards contained a dark substance. Interview on 2/13/2024 at 3:15 pm with R29 revealed that his bathroom sometimes needed cleaning because a particular roommate caused feces and urine to cover the commode on certain days. R29 said that it happened often. Upon observation, the toilet appeared clean without excrement at this time. Resident Council Notes dated 10/30/2023 revealed the following note by R15, Resident Council President, Housekeeping has not cleaned her room. It was noted that R29 said, The floors in my room smell sour and need cleaning or replacing.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from potential infections. Specifically, the washing machine mixer machine that ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from potential infections. Specifically, the washing machine mixer machine that adds detergent and chlorine bleach to the two industrial sized washing machines was not working and the facility was using household detergent pods to wash personal clothing, linen, and towels. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 108 out of 108 residents. Findings include: Observation on 2/19/2024 at 1:55 pm revealed the washing machine mixer for two of two industrial washing machines was observed with no detergent bottle in the mixer. Inside a light brown plastic bag was an open large red plastic household brand of detergent pods container on the folding counter with four detergent pods out on top of the counter. Laundry Aide DD closed the container (located in a brown plastic grocery bag) and moved the washing machine detergent to a shelf with clean linens. Interview on 2/14/2024 at 12:15 pm with Laundry Aide DD revealed they do laundry 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Interview on 2/19/2024 at 1:55 pm with Laundry Aide CC revealed the washer chemicals were not working now. It was fixed three to four weeks ago and it's still not working. She has the household detergent pods to use instead. Laundry Aide CC revealed she buys laundry detergents that the residents are not allergic to use until it gets fixed, and they reimburse her when she submits the receipt. The Environmental Services Supervisor and Administrator knew that the mixer was not working. In addition, Laundry Aide CC stated she told the Environmental Services Supervisor last week when they called, to come out and fix it, we needed a whole new chemical set up. She stated that they kept coming out to put new pieces in, but the mixer was still not working. The soap detergent and bleach were not working, and hot water wasn't coming up to mix it into the washing machines. The mixing machine digital display read Product empty for pocket. They were using one household detergent pod for each industrial washer and washing was done 24 hours onsite every day of the week. Interview on 2/19/2024 at 2:15 pm with the Environmental Services Supervisor said the detergent/chemical supplier came out and last serviced the chemical mixer for the washing machines in January when the chemicals were not coming out correctly and they recalibrated the machine to take the detergent smell out of the clothes. On January 31, 2024, the washing machine chemical mixer was refurbished. The facility did not have chemicals in the washing machine prior to 2/26/2024. The Environmental Services Supervisor then went looking for the gallon of detergent chemicals that were not in the mixing machine. The Environmental Services Supervisor said the gallon of bleach in the dispenser was not working either. Interview on 2/19/2024 at 2:40 pm with the Administrator revealed she was unaware the washing machine mixer was not working. She stated the plan to clean and sanitize clothing and linens and prevent the possible spread of infection was to use household detergent pods until the washing machine mixer was repaired. Interview on 2/20/2024 at 11:42 am with the Infection Prevention Registered Nurse, who has worked at the facility for two weeks, she stated she was made aware the laundry was using household detergent pods instead of the correct chemical mixture in the laundry yesterday, 2/20/2024. She was researching now to see if the household detergent pods can be used with the towels, linens, and clothes to kill germs. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said household detergent pods are not recommended in industrial washing machines. Using household detergent pods might transfer infections, but she didn't know. She didn't know the consequence of not using the right chemicals to wash resident's personal clothing or the facility linens and towels if there might be an infection present. Interview on 2/20/2024 at 1:30 pm with the Environmental Services Supervisor revealed he knew the two washing machines had not been working since 1/26/2024. Interview on 2/20/2024 at 6:10 pm with the Administrator revealed the washing machine mixer had no manual. Interview on 2/21/2024 at 9:06 am with the Administrator, he provided a receipt for review for services provided on 1/31/2024 for the laundry dispenser issue and the service they provided was to refurbish the laundry dispenser. On 2/20/2024, after the survey team bringing it to their attention on 2/19/2024, the Administrator requested service for the laundry dispenser issue and the service provided by the detergent/chemical supplier included replaced intake and output (I/O) board, performed diagnostic tests for each chemical, checked and inspected water hose and fittings, checked and inspected chemical supply lines, checked and inspected dispenser, and checked and inspected control pads.
Aug 2023 4 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy 'Care Plan', the facility failed to develop and implemen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy 'Care Plan', the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one of three sampled residents (R) (R#2) that specified the need for two person assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Harm was identified on 5/26/23 when R#2 rolled from the bed while receiving ADL care and receiving fractures to the bilateral lower extremities. Findings included: A review of facility policy 'Care Plans' last revised 11/15/22 revealed: 'Policy Statement: Each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs, and strengths that will identify how the facility staff will provide services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Standard of Practice 10. Areas of concern and residents strengths will be addressed with measurable goals and specific person-centered approaches to promote attainment or maintenance of the goals.' A review of the clinical record revealed that R#2 was admitted to the facility 2/19/19 with diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, edema, peripheral vascular disease, and muscle weakness. A review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R#2 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating intact cognition and revealed R#2 required extensive two or more persons to assist with ADL care. A review of R#2's care plan last reviewed/revised 6/22/23 revealed a care plan problem start date 3/10/19 that stated 'R#2 has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit (related to) limitations and impaired balance. staff assist is needed with (ADL care) tasks. Interventions included but was not limited to the following: Bed Mobility. A review of the facility investigation documentation dated 6/1/23 revealed that on 5/26/23, R#2 was receiving ADL care from one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). During care, resident lost grip on side rail causing him to fall from the bed and land on the floor face down on his knees. A review of hospital records dated 5/26/23 revealed R#2 was assessed at hospital following this fall and found to have bilateral fractures of the femurs. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 10:50 a.m. with Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager revealed a CNA was assisting R#2 with ADL care when he rolled off the bed onto the floor. They stated that R#2 landed face down on the floor on his knees and that the resident has lower extremity weakness but is usually able to hold onto the side rail during ADL care. They further revealed after the resident's fall with major injury, the care plan was updated to reflect the need for two-person assistance with bed mobility. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 11:05 a.m. with Director of Nursing revealed resident's care plan should have reflected the number of staff members needed during ADL care and confirmed R#2's care plan did not reflect the number of staff members needed during ADL care.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy 'Fall Prevention Protocol', the facility failed to prote...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy 'Fall Prevention Protocol', the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (R) (R#2) from a fall with major injury during Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Harm was identified to have occurred on 5/26/23 when R#2 fell while receiving ADL care from staff resulting in bilateral femur fractures. Findings included: A review of facility policy 'Fall Prevention Protocol' last reviewed/revised 10/18/21 revealed 'Standard of Practice: CMS Definition of a Fall: Fall refers to unintentionally coming to a rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force (e.g., resident pushes another resident.) A review of the clinical record revealed that R#2 was admitted to the facility 2/19/19 with diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, edema, peripheral vascular disease, and muscle weakness. A review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Section G-Functional Abilities revealed R#1 required extensive two or more persons to assist with ADL care. A review of the facility's investigation documentation dated 6/1/23 revealed during ADL care, R#2 lost his grip on the side rail and fell to the floor, landing face down on his knees. One Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was assisting resident at that time. A review of hospital records dated 5/26/23 revealed that R#2 sustained bilateral femur fractures as a result of the fall. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 10:50 a.m. with Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager revealed a CNA was assisting R#2 with ADL care when he rolled off the bed onto the floor and stated R#2 landed face down on the floor on his knees. They stated that the resident has lower extremity weakness but is usually able to hold onto the side rail during ADL care. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 11:05 a.m. with Director of Nursing revealed that on 5/26/23 when R#2 fell, the staff should have been providing two-person assistance during ADL care for R#2 because the resident needed extensive assistance and had lower extremity weakness.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy 'Incident Report-Documentation, investigating, and repor...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy 'Incident Report-Documentation, investigating, and reporting', the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an incident for one of three sampled residents (R) (R#1) related to the resident having a wrapped cord around her neck. Findings includes: A review of facility policy 'Incident Report-Documentation, investigating, and reporting' revealed: 'Practice Guidelines 4. The Administrator/Director of Nursing will notify the appropriate Regulatory Agency in accordance with 'reporting guidelines' in the event the incident is reportable.' A review of the clinical record revealed that R#1 was admitted to the facility 12/2/21 with diagnoses including but not limited to traumatic brain injury, cognitive communication deficit, and conversion disorder with seizures. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R#1 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental (BIMS) score of 14 out 15, indicating cognitively intact. A review of R#1's medical record revealed a progress noted dated 6/30/23 at 6:21 a.m. 'Resident sitting in day area telling staff someone stole her phone charger. Staff had looked in her room and was unable to find it. Resident came to day area table started yelling, I don't want to be here. This place is dirty. I have a college degree and went to MIT. My brain started working on my right side YOU (explicit). Then resident rolled herself to the front door. Sat in front of door and told staff member she wants to roll herself out the front door and get hit by a car. Resident was talked to by staff Rehab. Dept. and calm down. Resident brought back to unit.' Further review of progress notes for same day at 4:58 p.m. revealed 'Social worker called to inform of outburst today. Resident was verbally aggressive with new roommate, upon arrival, and staff. When she found out she had a new roommate she became very angry. Later, staff returned to room and found her with cord around her neck. Staff removed her from room to monitor at nurses station. Derogatory statements repeated even with (Emergency Medical Transport) and police. She constantly states she is not treated fairly in facility when she actually noted to be targeting new resident. Father called and informed by nurse and social worker. Dad expressed that she has repeatedly told him that she wants to go into the street and get hit by a car. He states, he believes it is a form of attention. Social worker expressed that facility is obligated to take her seriously. Police here and waiting for transportation to hospital. Her Last (BIMS) score was a 15.' An interview on 8/16/23 at 11:15 a.m. with Director of Nursing revealed she is responsible for reporting alleged violations to the state. She stated that she did not report the incident involving R#1 because she did not know the incident was reportable. An interview on 8/16/23 at 11:25 a.m. with Administrator revealed she was not aware of the extent of R#1's behavior that day and stated it should have been reported to the State Survey Agency.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy 'Behavioral Management Program', the facility failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy 'Behavioral Management Program', the facility failed to provide behavior health services to one resident of three sampled residents (R) (R#1) who displayed suicidal ideations. Findings included: A review of facility policy 'Behavioral Management Program' last revised 10/22/22 revealed: 'Policy Statement: It is the policy of the facility that each resident must receive, and the facility must provide the necessary behavioral health care and services and medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Definitions: Behavior-Behavioral symptoms that may cause distress or are potentially harmful to the resident or may be distressing or disruptive to the facility residents, staff members or the environment.' A review of the clinical record revealed that R#1 was admitted to the facility 12/2/21 with diagnoses including but not limited to traumatic brain injury, cognitive communication deficit, and conversion disorder with seizures. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R#1 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental (BIMS) score of 14 out 15, indicating cognitively intact. Section D-Mood revealed R#1 felt down, depressed, or hopeless one to three days of the look back period. Section E-Behaviors revealed physical and behavioral symptoms directed toward others. A review of R#1's medical record revealed a progress noted dated 6/30/23 at 6:21 a.m. 'Resident sitting in day area telling staff someone stole her phone charger. Staff had looked in her room and was unable to find it. Resident came to day area table started yelling, I don't want to be here. This place is dirty. I have a college degree and went to MIT. My brain started working on my right side YOU (explicit). Then resident rolled herself to the front door. Sat in front of door and told staff member she wants to roll herself out the front door and get hit by a car. Resident was talked to by staff Rehab. Dept. and calm down. Resident brought back to unit.' Further review of progress notes for same day at 4:58 p.m. revealed 'Social worker called to inform of outburst today. Resident was verbally aggressive with new roommate, upon arrival, and staff. When she found out she had a new roommate she became very angry. Later, staff returned to room and found her with cord around her neck. Staff removed her from room to monitor at nurses station. Derogatory statements repeated even with (Emergency Medical Transport) and police. She constantly states she is not treated fairly in facility when she actually noted to be targeting new resident. Father called and informed by nurse and social worker. Dad expressed that she has repeatedly told him that she wants to go into the street and get hit by a car. He states, he believes it is a form of attention. Social worker expressed that facility is obligated to take her seriously. Police here and waiting for transportation to hospital. Her Last (BIMS) score was a 15.' An interview on 8/16/23 at 12:20 p.m. with the Social Services Director revealed R#1 was seeing the contracted behavioral health services as needed. Stated after the incident in June 2023, R#1 was not referred to behavioral health services because she was already on the case load. Stated R#1 would have seen behavioral health services in August 2023, but she was in the hospital at the time of their visit. An interview on 8/16/23 at 12:25 p.m. with Director of Nursing revealed R#1 should have been referred to behavior health services after the incident in June 2023 and confirmed R#1 was not seen by behavioral health services after the incident that occurred on 6/30/23.
Jan 2023 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, resident, family and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, resident, family and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, Emergency Policy, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (R)(R#79 and R#92) that were reviewed for facility initiated emergent hospital transfer from a total sample of 33 residents, were provided with written transfer/discharge notice that stated the reason for the transfer, the place of the transfer, and other information regarding the transfer. This failure has the potential to affect R#79 and R#92 and their Resident Representative (RR) by not having the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred, and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Emergency Policy, reviewed 10/11/2021, showed the policy did not address the provision of a written transfer/discharge notice, with the required notice contents, to the Resident and Resident Representative. 1. Review of the admission Record for R#79 from the electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab showed an admission date of 12/02/2021 with medical diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage, heart failure, traumatic brain injury (TBI), hypertension, convulsions, and cardiac arrythmia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, assessment reference date (ARD) 9/28/2022 for R#79 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two out of a possible 15, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. During an interview on 1/04/2023 at 8:53 a.m. with the RR for R#79, they stated that R#79 had not recently gone to the hospital or emergency room. RR#79 stated, She was sent out to hospital in July for her arm after she fell out of bed. When they sent her out, they [facility] called me but did not advise what hospital she was sent to. I had to call around to all the hospitals to find out where she went. When asked if she had received a written notice of transfer with where and why R#79 was transferred to the hospital, RR#79 stated she had not received anything in writing regarding transfer. Review of the EMR Progress Notes tab for R#79 revealed 7/7/2022 01:00 [1:00 a.m.] Nurses Note Text: Resident returned to facility via stretcher per [name] ambulance. In response to a request for evidence, R#79 and RR#79 received a written notice of transfer on 1/04/2023 at 3:08 p.m. The Director of Nursing (DON) provided an E-Interact Transfer Form and stated, A copy was given to R#79 and to the emergency medical technicians (EMTs). When asked if the Ombudsman contact information or the information to appeal the transfer information was given to R#79 or their RR, the DON stated, The ombudsman information is posted in the building, not on this form but is on the admission bed hold agreement [she confirmed that is part of the admission packet.] The form included: the date of transfer, Notice of Bed Hold Policy - Georgia, the emergency contact name and phone number, and health information. Further review of the EMR (Progress Notes tab, Miscellaneous (scanned documents) tab, Assessments tab) did not reveal any documentation that R#79 and/or the RR received the written transfer notice. 2. Review of the admission Record from the EMR Profile tab for R#92 showed an admission date of 6/14/2022, a readmission date of 11/29/2022, with medical diagnoses that included sepsis, type 2 diabetes, protein calorie malnutrition, deep vein thrombosis, Parkinson's disease, urinary tract infection, osteoarthritis, femur fracture, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, ARD 12/05/2022, for R#92, showed a BIMS score of 14 out of 15, indicative of being cognitively intact. Review of the EMR MDS tab for R#92 showed a discharge return anticipated assessment, assessment reference date 11/19/2022 and a reentry MDS assessment ARD 11/29/2022. Review of the EMR Progress Notes for R#92 showed: 1/19/2022 23:35 [11:35 p.m.] Care Plan Note, note text: Resident resting in bed with HOB [head of bed] up 45 degrees and basin under the chin. Alert and oriented . with intermittent confusion.Resident verbalizes severe pain with palpatation [sic] of the upper abd [abdominal] area. Moreover, resident verbalizes burning pain in the groin area. Writer called Doctor on call with no return call at 1815 [6:15 p.m.]. Writer called EMS [emergency services] at 1855 [6:55 p.m.] r/t [related to] worsening condition of resident. EMS transported resident to [name] Hospital around 2000 [8:00 p.m.]. Family member, [name] called around 2005/ [ 8:05 p.m.]. Review of Assessments and Misc tabs in the EMR for R#92 did not reveal evidence a written transfer/discharge notice was provided to R#92 or the RR. During an interview on 1/02/2023 at 2:01 p.m., R#92 stated she had been in the hospital over Thanksgiving. Requested evidence of the provision of a written notice from the DON at 3:20 PM on 1/03/2023. On 01/05/2023 at 7:54 a.m., the DON provided a completed copy of the E-Interact Transfer form. Review of the form did not show Ombudsman contact information or appeal instructions. During an interview on 01/05/2023 at 11:37 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 responded to the query of the process for an emergent transfer stating, I take vital signs, go to the computer and print two profile forms, one goes to the hospital and one to the ambulance driver. I do the covid sheet [clarified, whether positive or negative], medication record, progress sheet for the doctor to write orders on for return, a change in condition form that goes to the doctor at the hospital, and a transfer to hospital form. When asked to clarify who receives that transfer form, LPN2 stated, It is given to the ambulance for the hospital. When asked if any paperwork was given to the resident, LPN2 responded, No paperwork is given to the resident. In a follow-up interview on 1/05/2023 at 11:52 a.m., R#92 was asked if she had received the E-Interact Transfer Form when she went to the hospital. R#92 reviewed the form, then stated, No, I never got these. During an interview on 1/05/2023 at 12:30 p.m. regarding the contents of the transfer form, the DON confirmed the form does not contain a statement of the resident's appeal rights and the information of who/how to contact, or the name, telephone number, address (mail and email) to contact the Long Term Care Ombudsman.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the faci...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to provide timely and accurate resident assessments. These failures effected two of 31 residents (R) (R#107 and R#79) sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to provide accurate discharge coding in the electronic medical record (EMR) for R#107 and failed to accurately identify and code weight loss in an assessment for R#79. Findings Include: 1. Review of the admission Record from the EMR Profile tab for R#79 showed an admission date of 12/02/2021 with medical diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage, heart failure, traumatic brain injury (TBI), hypertension, convulsions, and cardiac arrythmia. Review of the EMR Orders tab for R#79 showed an order on 9/29/2022 for Mechanical Soft / Dysphagia Advanced diet and 12/08/2022 Enteral Feed Order at bedtime for G-tube feeding Jevity 1.5 @ [at] ml [milliliters] 80 /hr [per hour] up @ 7 p.m. and down 7 a.m. Review of the EMR Vital Signs tab, sub tab Weights revealed on 6/24/2022 at 11:45 a.m., R#79 weighed 118.1 pounds, on 5/16/2022 at 9:15 a.m., R#79 weighed 129.4 pounds, and on 3/16/2022 at 12:25 p.m., R#79 weighed 140.2 pounds. Review of the quarterly MDS with an ARD of 3/10/2022 for R#79 showed a weight of 138 pounds, the quarterly MDS with an ARD of 6/10/2022 showed a weight of 140 pounds; and the significant change of status with an ARD of 7/07/2022 showed a weight of 118 pounds, an approximate 16% [percent] weight loss - but was coded for No or unknown weight loss. During an interview on 1/05/2023 at 10:48 a.m., regarding the No or unknown weight loss coding on the 7/07/2022 MDS, the Dietary Manager (DM) reviewed the weights and stated, it's not coded correctly, she [R#79] had a weight loss. The DM stated he used the RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument] Manual for MDS coding. Review of the October 2019 RAI Manual, pages K-4 and K-5 showed: Health-related Quality of Life -Weight loss can result in debility and adversely affect health, safety, and quality of life. -For persons with morbid obesity, controlled and careful weight loss can improve mobility and health status. Coding Instructions Mathematically round weights as described in Section K0200B before completing the weight loss calculation. -Code 0, no or unknown: if the resident has not experienced weight loss of 5% or more in the past 30 days or 10% or more in the last 180 days or if information about prior weight is not available. -Code 2, yes, not on physician-prescribed weight-loss regimen: if the resident has experienced a weight loss of 5% or more in the past 30 days or 10% or more in the last 180 days, and the weight loss was not planned and prescribed by a physician. 2. Review of the Profile Tab of the EMR revealed R#107 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction, atrial fibrillation, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and diabetes type 2. Review of the discharge MDS with an ARD of 10/11/2022, located under the MDS tab of the EMR revealed R#107 is listed to have discharged on 10/11/2022 to an acute hospital. Record review of resident progress notes found in the EMR for R#107 on 1/4/2022 revealed the following: a. 10/06/22 stated, (R#107) and family has elected to return home on next week. She will return to home of daughter. Home health is requested and a wheelchair (w/c). b. 10/11/2022 stated, .resident was medicated as ordered daughter is here to transport her via w/c to home and meds w/o [without] any s/s [sign or symptom] of discomfort. M.D. [Medical Doctor] is aware. Review of the October 2019 RAI Manual, indicated, The RAI process has multiple regulatory requirements. Federal regulations at 42 CFR 483.20 (b)(1)(xviii), (g), and (h) require that (1) the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status. Interview on 1/05/2022 at 11:31 a.m. with the DON, she confirmed that MDS assessments should be accurate.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan Policy, the facility failed to dev...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan Policy, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of 32 sampled residents (R) (R#19, R#97 and R#30) whose care plans were reviewed. Specifically, R#19 did not have a care plan for use of the wander guard, R#97 did not have a care plan for cognitive deficits, and #R30 did not have a care plan for depression and the use of an antipsychotic medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Policy, dated 11/15/2022 and provided by the facility, revealed, Each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs, and strengths that will identify how the facility staff will provide services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. 1.Review of the admission Record in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Demographic tab revealed R#19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia and altered mental status. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/11/2022 in the EMR and under the MDS tab, revealed R#19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 indicating R#19 was unable to complete the interview and had severe cognitive impairment. R#19 exhibited wandering behaviors daily. Review of the Care Plan, dated 11/11/2022 in the EMR and under the Care Plan tab, revealed R#19 had, Problematic manner in which resident acts characterized by ineffective coping, wandering related to cognitive impairment. Res[ident] goes into other resident's rooms, becomes argumentative at times and invades their private areas. The goal was for R19 to wander only within specified boundaries. Interventions in the pertinent part included, offer food as a distraction, provide assistance in locating own room, provide directional cues. The resident did not have a care plan for the wander guard. During an interview on 1/05/23 at 9:05 AM, with the Unit Manager (UM), she stated, R19 did wander throughout the facility but mostly in the common area. She stated he had a wander guard because of his wandering, and it should be on the care plan. 2. Review of the admission Record in the EMR under the Demographic tab revealed R#97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that included other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 10/20/22 in the EMR and under the MDS tab, revealed R#97 had a BIMS score of four indicating R#97 was severely impaired. R#97 was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the Care Plan dated 10/25/2022 in the EMR and under the Care Plan tab, revealed R#97 did not have a care plan for cognition. 3. Review of the admission Record in the EMR under the Demographic tab revealed R#97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that included depressive episodes, hallucinations, and psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 12/07/2022 in the EMR and under the MDS tab, revealed R#30 had a BIMS score of 99 indicating R#30 was unable to complete the interview and had severe cognitive impairment. Staff assessment of resident mood revealed R#30 had little interest or pleasure in doing things and R#30 had no behaviors. Review of the physician's Orders for January 2022 in the EMR under the Resident tab for R#30 revealed Quetiapine (antipsychotic) 25 mg, BID (twice daily) for hallucinations; Zoloft (antidepressant) 25 mg, daily for depression. Review of the Care Plan dated 10/25/2022 in the EMR and under the Care Plan tab, revealed R#30 did not have a care plan for depression, use of an antidepressant or an antipsychotic. During an interview on01/05/2023 at 11:40 a.m., with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) 1 and MDSC 2. MDSC 1 stated that care plans are updated when there was a significant change, a quarterly or annual review, a new occurrence, a new medication, or a new diagnosis. She stated care plans would be updated during the quarterly care plan review. MDSC 1 stated that a care plan was a working document and was designed to help all staff understand what the resident needs and how to care for the resident. She stated that the more information on a care plan, the better for the resident. MDSC 1 and MDSC 2 confirmed that the wander guard for R#19, cognitive deficits for R#97, a diagnoses and symptoms of depressions and the start of an antipsychotic medication for R#30, should be included in their care plan. During an interview on 1/05/2023 at 11:50 a.m. with MDSC 1, MDSC 2 and the Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD stated that she would create a care plan for residents based on her findings from the MDS assessment. She agreed R#97 was unable to complete the cognition interview indicating a 99 on her BIMS and should have a care plan and based on the SSD's mood assessment for R#30, R#30 should have a care plan related to her depression. During an interview on 1/05/2022 at 12:49 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated that care plans are updated quarterly and when there were changes for the resident. The DON confirmed that there should be a care plan for the wander guard for R#19, a care plan for cognition for R#97 and a care plan for depression the start of antipsychotic medication for R#30.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Resident Assessments, the facility failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Resident Assessments, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R)#19 of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, had an assessment that accurately reflected the resident's status. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) for R#19 was completed timely. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessments dated 10/18/2020 and provided by the facility revealed, AIMS assessment will be completed for resident prescribed an antipsychotic medication .at least every six months ongoing until medication(s) are discontinued. Review of the admission Record in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Demographic tab revealed R#19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia and altered mental status. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/11/2022 in the EMR and under the MDS tab, revealed R#19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 indicating R#19 was unable to complete the interview and had severe cognitive impairment. R#19 exhibited difficulty concentrating on things and being fidgety or restless. R#19 exhibited wandering behaviors daily. R#19 required assistance with dressing and toilet use and set-up with all other ADLs. Review of the Care Plan dated 11/11/2202 in the EMR and under the Care Plan tab, revealed R#19, Problematic manner in which resident acts characterized by ineffective coping, wandering related to cognitive impairment. Res[ident] goes into other resident's rooms, becomes argumentative at times and invades their private areas. The goal was for R#19 to wander only within specified boundaries. Interventions in pertinent part included, offer food as a distraction, provide assistance in locating own room, provide directional cues. Review of the physician's Orders for January 2022 in the EMR under the Resident tab revealed R#19 was ordered Quetiapine (antipsychotic) 12.5 mg (milligrams) BID (twice daily) for dementia with behaviors. During an interview on 1/05/2023 at 9:05 a.m., with the Unit Manager (UM), she stated, upon review of the medical record for R#19, there was only one AIMS, completed on 2/15/2022. She stated an AIMS would be completed by R#19's nurse or herself to monitor for signs of tardive dyskinesia (involuntary movements). During an interview on 1/05/2023 at 12:49 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated an AIMS should have been completed for R#19 last August (2022) based on the facility policy. She stated an AIMS was important to identify if a resident showed any symptoms of tardive dyskinesia because of antipsychotic use.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate daily skilled resident asses...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate daily skilled resident assessments for one resident (R)#104 of four residents reviewed for assessment accuracy. Specifically, this failure has the potential for assessments not being conducted as ordered to monitor for daily changes in condition and/or baseline changes. Findings include: Review of the undated Face Sheet found in the Profile Tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R#104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including portal vein thrombosis and unspecified encephalopathy. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/22/2022 revealed R#104 had a gastric tube for tube feedings and required total staff assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). On 1/02/2023 at 3:50 p.m., R#104 was observed in her bed. She was awake but nonverbal. She made eye contact but no attempt to communicate. Continued review of the EMR for R#104 revealed Skilled Evaluations, daily nursing assessments) found in the Progress Notes tab of the EMR, were to be completed daily for new admissions to identify the resident's baselines and monitor for changes. The daily assessments were reviewed for the month of December 2022 and January 2023. It was noted that on 12/10/2022, 12/11/2022, 12/12/2022, 12/14/2022, 12/16/2022, 12/17/2022, 12/23/2022, 12/24/2022, 12/28/2022, 12/29/2022, 12/30/2022, 12/31/2022, and 1/01/2023, the skilled assessments were unchanged including the narrative which contained a typo/error (a sentence out of sequence). This error went unchecked for all of the dates above, raising a concern that the assessments weren't being conducted daily as ordered to monitor for daily changes in condition and/or baseline changes. During an interview on 1/04/2023 at 1:30 p.m. with the Director of Nurses (DON), she was shown the anomaly in the nurse progress notes that repeated itself for 13 different shifts. The DON stated that was not per policy or her expectation. She stated, daily assessments could not be a copy & paste and she would be addressing it with nursing staff.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, record review, staff interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Call Light Policy, the facility failed to ensure two (R) (R#78 and R#89) of 33 residents sampled were p...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Call Light Policy, the facility failed to ensure two (R) (R#78 and R#89) of 33 residents sampled were provided with a call light for use when assistance could possibly be needed. This failure had the potential to adversely affect the timeliness of care or response time in case of an urgent or emergent need. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Call Light Policy, last reviewed 12/11/2021, indicated, Policy Statement - The purpose of the call light is to provide a system for the resident to call for assistance.- Standard of Practice- 1. Bedside call light in functioning order 2. Emergency call light in working order Step 1 Action: Explain the reason and functioning of the call light to the resident. Step 2 Action: Ensure that all residents (even those that are confused) have access to the call light. Obtain a tap bell or pressure sensitive pad call light if the resident cannot use the regular call bell. 1. Review of the admission Record from the electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab for R#89 showed an admission date of 4/20/2022 with medical diagnoses that included traumatic cerebral hemorrhage, type 2 diabetes, post-traumatic stress disorder, seizures, acute kidney failure, sarcopenia, hypertension, and multiple rib fractures. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/27/2022 for R#89 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicative of being cognitively intact. During an interview on 1/02/2302 at 2:10 p.m., R#89 was asked if the call light always functioned and they responded, What's a call light? After an explanation, R#89 was still unsure what a call light was. Observation of the wall call light connection showed two plugs without any call light cords attached. Further observations on 1/03/2023 at 11:03 a.m. and 1/04/2023 at 10:35 a.m. showed no call light cords were available for resident use. During an observation and interview on 1/04/2023 at 10:45 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the call light cord availability, the DON confirmed there were plugs in the call light wall outlet but no call light cords/buttons for resident use. 2. Review of the admission Record from the EMR Profile tab for R#78 showed an admission date of 5/19/2022 with medical diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis, ataxia, type 2 diabetes, affective disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 9/28/2022 for R#78 showed a BIMS score of 12 out of a possible 15, indicative of mild cognitive impairment. On 1/04/2023 at 11:25 a.m., R#78 was up in the common area and asked how he called for assistance when in his room and he responded, I haven't needed any help. During an interview on 1/05/2023 at 12:03 p.m., the Administrator stated each resident should have a call light. R#78 & R#89's call lights were being repaired and had been out for three days.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was an air gap between the drainpipe and the floor drain for the ice machine and the prep sink in the kitc...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was an air gap between the drainpipe and the floor drain for the ice machine and the prep sink in the kitchen. In the event of a sewer line back-up, this failure could cause contamination to the facility water system affecting the ice used for beverages and/or water used in food preparation. The facility census was 107 with 102 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 1/02/2023 at 12:05 p.m. showed the water drainpipe from the ice machine ran under the prep sink to a floor drain that also had the drain from the prep sink; both drainpipes were noted to have the pipe exit below the floor level. The Dietary Manager was present and asked about the drains and confirmed the drainpipes were a little below floor level. Observation of the drainpipes on 1/04/2023 at 12:30 p.m. showed the pipes were still draining below floor level. A policy regarding drain air gaps was requested on 1/04/2023 at 4:20 p.m. from the Director of Nursing, who stated she would call someone to see if there was a policy. No policy was produced. During an interview on 1/05/2023 at 12:05 p.m., the Administrator and Maintenance Director confirmed they did not have a policy regarding drain air gaps. Review of professional reference from Pennsylvania State University College of Agricultural Sciences, Understanding and Preventing Backflow in Your Food Facility is Critical to Ensure Safe Food for Your Customers updated 1/09/2023 and retrieved on 1/09/2023 from https://extension.psu.edu/safe-water-and-your-foodservice-operation, revealed in pertinent part, One of the greatest safety risks to water in an establishment is the creation of cross-connections. A cross-connection is a direct link between safe and unsafe water .Cross-connections are dangerous because they create an opportunity for backflow. Backflow occurs when contaminants from dirty water flow back into the stream of safe water, making it unsafe to use . An air gap is a 100% [percent] sure way to prevent backflow. This is a physical space between a safe water outlet and a source of unsafe water. Review of professional reference from the International Association of Plumbing & Mechanical Officials, Air Gap and Air Break Required retrieved on 1/09/2023 from http://forms.iapmo.org/email_marketing/codespotlight/2017/July13.htm, revealed in pertinent part that for a plumbing air gap the the minimum vertical distance as measured from the lowest point of the indirect waste pipe or the fixture outlet to the flood-level rim of the receptor shall be not less than 1 inch.
May 2021 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, review of the clinical record, and review of the facility policy titled Ab...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, review of the clinical record, and review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy and Mood and Behavior Policy, the facility failed to protect one resident (R#48) from sexual abuse by his roommate, (R#87), who had a history of physical aggression, inappropriate disrobing, and wandering. The sample size was 42 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy, revised 3/01/2018, revealed the standards that residents have the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. The resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Protecting Resident's rights, confidentiality, privacy, and prohibiting Mental Abuse related to photographs and Audio/Video recordings by nursing home staff. The resident has the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and clinical record. The facility has a zero-tolerance Abuse Standard regarding all proven allegations of Verbal, Sexual, Physical, Mental, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, and Involuntary Seclusion. Facility Policy Titled Mood and Behavior Policy revision date of 10/26/2017 revealed the standard of practice to be: The objective of the Mood and Behavior Policy and Procedure is to provide a plan of care that is individualized to the residents needs based upon the comprehensive assessment by the interdisciplinary team. This plan of care will include medically related social services to address mood and behavioral health services to attain the highest practicable well-being. Review of the admission Record for R#87, dated 11/27/2020, revealed the resident was admitted with a chronic infectious virus, chronic kidney failure, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, anemia, aphasia, and hypertension. Review of (R#87) admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of one, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He was assessed with no mood indicators, no hallucinations or delusions, no indication of physical or verbal behaviors toward others, or wandering. Review of Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the BIMS assessment was unchanged, the resident was not assessed with hallucinations, or delusions, the resident was assessed for wandering one-three days and was not assessed for physical behaviors toward others. A review of Behavior Notes dated 1/25/2021 at 6:00 a.m. by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) DD revealed R#87 took his roommate's (R#28) stuffed animal while R#28 was in the bathroom. When R#28 came out of the bath, he took his animal back then R#87 took a swing at R#28 but missed. Review of Behavior Notes dated 2/13/2021 at 5:57 a.m. by LPN DD revealed that R#87 walked out of his room and walked across the hall to another resident's room. R#87 then urinated on the floor of another resident's room. Staff called R#87, but he looked at the staff and refused to move. The resident was told to return to his room but went and sat in a chair in the atrium. A Review of Health Status Notes dated 2/21/2021 at 12:02 p.m. by Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the DON followed-up with the R#87 family member due to the resident testing positive for COVID-19 and was in quarantine. The note indicated the R#87 is constantly attempting to open the door and come out and is redirected back in. The family member suggested letting the resident know she said for him to stay in and close the door. I also spoke with her concerning infection control and the risk of spreading the infection due to cognition impairment and not truly understanding the meaning. Will continue to monitor and follow up. A Review of Psychosocial/Social Service Notes by the Social Service Director Note (SSD) on 3/24/2021 at 10:59 a.m. revealed that the Social Services Director (SSD) and the team discussed challenges with R#87 being inappropriate with voiding and behavior issues. The resident has had several different roommates, and problems continue. Discussion of benefits in a dementia unit. Referral to be made to a few facilities for exploration. Review of a Skilled Evaluation on 3/30/2021 at 9:09 a.m. by Unit Manager (UM) BB revealed that R#87 continues to be a Patient Under Investigation related to post positive COVID-19 precautions, extensive assist with ADL's, and incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident continues to present with behaviors, removing his brief, urinating on the floor in the room and other resident's rooms. The resident is smearing feces on the floor, coming out of his room, and wandering into other resident's room standing over them naked while their sleeping. Staff continues to attempt to redirect resident behavior, will continue to monitor. Review of Nurse's Notes on 4/14/2021 at 12:44 p.m. by LPN CC revealed that staff noted R#87 was in his room with the door closed and was found facing his roommate, with clothes off and penis out close to roommate's bed. The resident was dressed and taken outside with a mask to sit in television (TV) area, reported to the supervisor. During an interview and observation with R#87 on 5/23/2021 at 3:45 p.m. revealed that upon arriving at the doorway and knocking on the door, the UM BB stopped the surveyor from going into the room first, and she went inside to tell R#87 that I was a friend there to visit him. UM BB revealed that this an attempt was not to agitate the resident, and she stated he does not do well with new faces. At this point, R#87 spoke and would laugh when questions were asked and appeared alert but confused. He did carry a conversation with himself and paced back and forth across the room and into the bathroom while carrying and shaking a remote control. After multiple attempts to have a conversation with R#87, he could not respond to questions or give information regarding his care. At that point, an interview was attempted with the roommate, R#48. R#87 began with increased pacing and he started speaking, but the words were unable to be understood except for when he pointed the remote at his roommate and said, Ima a kill mother fucker. At this point, he continued pacing back and forth from the bathroom in front of the roommate's bed, and the sink. An interview on 5/23/2021 at 4:00 p.m., UM BB was notified of the R#87's behavior and the comment regarding his roommate. Observation on 5/24/2021 at 2:30 p.m. revealed R#87 was in the common area, wandering around, talking to himself and walking up to the TV and speaking to the TV. Two CNAs were observed to attempt to redirect R#87 to a dining chair in the common area, but he did not want to sit down and kept walking around the unit. Observation at this time revealed that UM BB was able to redirect the resident to his room by offering a snack. An interview on 5/25/2021 at 1:30 p.m., the DON revealed that R#87 returned from the hospital on 3/9/2021 after treatment for COVID-19. The resident was moved to a four-bed ward on 3/17/2021 for quarantine. The resident had two roommates at that time. The DON further revealed that on 4/2/2021 the resident was moved to another room, closer to the Nurse's Station, and to decrease his roommates. Due to R#87's behaviors such as urinating on the floor and smearing feces and chronic infectious disease they felt this would lessen the possibility of contamination. She revealed being aware of R#87 's changes in mood/behavior and that he was wandering in and out of other resident rooms. The DON revealed she was aware of the incident where R#87 was found standing over his roommate with his pants down, wiggling his penis by using his hips. She stated that she did not feel like his behavior was sexual in nature, nor did she feel like it was abuse, and did not see the need to report the incident to the State Survey Agency (SSA). The DON revealed that she was also aware of the incident when R#87 urinated and smeared feces all over the floors and walls, in the four-bed ward. She further revealed that when R#87 came back from the hospital, they initially noticed a difference in his mood and behavior because he was disrobing and walking around. The DON revealed that the resident does not recognize boundaries, does not do well with new people, and call the resident's family member with any memory or cognition issues. She revealed not being made aware that R#87 had put his roommate's bed in the highest level while the roommate was sleeping. DON revealed he has not gone into other resident rooms and urinated. She expects staff to keep R#87 in close view of the nurse station, do frequent rounds on him, keep him in sight when out in the open, and monitor for effectiveness and side effects of psychiatric medications. She further revealed that staff are expected to document behaviors on R#87 at least once a shift unless there is an issue, and then they should document the specific behavior. She revealed that the care plan should have included these behaviors and had specific interventions put into place. The DON revealed the facility has a morning meeting, and they do discuss R#87 and his behaviors, but there is no documentation of those meetings. An interview on 5/25/2021 at 11:50 a.m. with CNA AA revealed that on 4/14/2021 that R#87's door was closed. The CNA AA walked into his room and saw him standing over his roommate while sleeping. R 87 had his pants down, wiggled his hips with his penis out, and wiggled his penis over his roommate, R#48. The roommate did not wake up, and the CNA AA had R#87 pull his pants up, redirected him out of the room to sit in a chair in the common area. CNA AA revealed that she reported the incident to LPN CC. An interview on 5/25/2021 at 12:20 p.m. with LPN CC concerning documentation in the progress notes on 4/14/2021 and 4/28/2021 regarding the resident's behaviors revealed that she had limited recollection of either incident. LPN CC revealed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) AA witnessed both incidents, and she just documented the information that was shared with her at the time. LPN CC could not give any further details. An interview on 5/25/2021 at 3:45 p.m. with SSD revealed that she does not handle room changes and that admission and nursing are responsible for room changes. The SSD revealed that she is responsible for referrals to other facilities and had sent a referral to a behavior unit for R#87. The documents for referrals were shredded after referrals were made, but she stated several facilities were attempted. The SSD revealed that she makes a request for psychiatric consults but is unaware of the flow process if recommendations are made from psychiatric services since that is a nursing process. An interview on 5/26/2021 at 10:55 a.m. with the facility Medical Director revealed she has access to the facility's electronic medical record (EMR) although she does not have time to review medical records on each visit and occasionally reviews them when she writes her monthly notes. The Medical Director further reported that she expects the facility staff to notify her of anything important and was not aware of the R#87's behaviors. An interview with Nurse Practitioner (NP) with a specialty psychiatry services was conducted on 5/26/2021 at 10:45 a.m. The following entries in the behavioral notes were reviewed with the NP. • 1/25/2021 at 6:01 a.m. Behavior Note: Resident took roommate's stuffed animal while the roommate was in the bathroom. When the roommate came out of the bath, he took his animal back. R#87 swung at the roommate. • 2/13/2021 at 5:57 a.m. Behavior Note: Resident walked out of his room and walked across to room (another resident's room). The resident opens the door to room to the other room, then took out his penis and urinated into the room. Staff called the resident, but he looked at the staff and refused to move. The resident was told to return to the room but went and sat in chairs in the atrium. • 3/23/2021 at 17:50 (5:50 p.m.) Behavior Note: R#87 observed smearing and throwing feces throughout the room. Attempts made to redirect resident, unsuccessful. A resident was observed to be soiled with urine and feces noted on their hands and foot. Staff attempted to clean the resident; the resident refused. I will continue to observe. • 4/14/2021 at 12:44 p.m. Behavior Note: staff noted resident was in the room with the door closed, and he was facing his roommate with clothes off and penis out close to roommate's bed. The resident was dressed and taken outside with a mask on to sit in TV area and reported to the supervisor. • 4/28/2021 at 14:40 (2:40 p.m.) Nurses Note: The resident elevated his roommate's bed to the highest level that the bed would go and put his roommate's shirt in his drawer. The resident noted wandering over the unit. Further review of the medical record revealed the NP only saw the resident on the following dates: 12/29/2020, 3/23/2021, and 4/21/2021. The NP revealed in the interview that she only sees the resident when there is a consult by the facility and there had been no further requests for evaluation. She further revealed only being made aware of one behavior regarding the resident disrobing. The NP revealed that she is dependent upon staff to make her aware of the resident's current behaviors, moods, and changes. She stated that if the behaviors R#87 had been reported to her, she would have ordered alternative placement for behavioral care and in order to ensure safety of other residents. The NP stated that she realized on her visit on 4/21/2021 that medication ordered on 3/30/21 (Risperdal) had not been given as ordered. An interview on 5/26/2021 at 12:48 p.m. with the DON and Administrator, the DON revealed she spoke with the Medical Director sometime after 4:00 p.m. yesterday and was given a verbal order to transfer R#87 to the emergency room (E.R.) for evaluation. The DON revealed discussing with the Physician how the other resident's feel threatened by R#87 and discussed Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (QAPI) concerns with her. The Medical Director was contacted, via telephone, by the DON and Administrator at this time to confirm that she was made aware of the resident's behaviors yesterday and that the Medical Director gave orders to send the resident to the ER for evaluation. Continued interview with the Administrator and DON revealed they do not know why the Medical Director or Psychiatry Services were not notified about the increased and hazardous behaviors of R#87 and both should have been notified.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (SSA) an allegation of sexual abuse relate...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (SSA) an allegation of sexual abuse related to one resident (R)#87 against his roommate, R#48. The sample size was 42 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention revised 11/28/2019, revealed: Reports of allegations or suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation of a resident will be reported immediately to the Facility Abuse Coordinator, Director of Nursing, State Agencies, and Local Ombudsman Office. Review of the Progress Notes related to R#87 revealed: Review of Nurse's Notes on 4/14/2021 at 12:44 p.m. by LPN CC revealed that staff noted R#87 was in his room with the door closed and was found facing his roommate, with clothes off and penis out close to roommate's bed. The resident was dressed and taken outside with a mask to sit in television (TV) area, reported to the supervisor. An interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) AA on 5/25/2021 at 11:50 a.m. revealed that she witnessed the incident on 4/14/2021 related to R#87 and R#48. She stated the door to their room was closed and they like to keep the door opened to the room. When she walked into the room, she saw R#87 standing over his sleeping roommate, R#48, with his pants down, wiggling his hips and exposed penis over his roommate. She stated the roommate did not wake up, so she pulled up R#87's pants, redirected him out of the room, and sat him in a chair in the common area. She stated she reported the incident to his nurse. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/25/2021 at 1:30 p.m. revealed that she was aware of the incident on 4/14/2021 where R#87 was found wiggling his hips and exposed penis over his sleeping roommate, R#48. She revealed that she did not feel like his behavior was sexual in nature nor did she feel like it was abuse and did not see the need to make a report to the State Survey Agency (SSA). During a joint interview with the Director of Nursing and the Administrator on 5/26/2021 at 8:30 a.m. they revealed that they transferred R#87 to the emergency room last evening for evaluation and possible placement in a secure unit. Cross refer to F600
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R) (R #87) of 42 sampled residents received proper services by not moving forward for a PASARR Level II. Findings include: Record review revealed that R#87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but not limited to: encephalopathy, mild cognitive impairment, cognitive communication deficit, chronic infectious virus (CIV) (under treatment), and major depressive disorder. Review of the 4/29/2021 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for R #87 revealed in Section (C) Cognitive Patterns a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not done as the resident is rarely or never understood. Section (D) Mood was not done as the resident is rarely or never understood. Section (E) Behaviors revealed R #87 exhibits other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others (e.g., physical symptoms such as hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts, disrobing in public, throwing or smearing food or bodily waste, or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming, disruptive sounds.) Behaviors of this kind occurred 1 to 3 days. Wandering occurred 1 to 3 days. Section (G) Functional Status revealed R #87 requires supervision/oversight for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Section (N) Medication revealed R #87 receives an antidepressant 7/7 days a week. Review of the Care Plan for R #87 revealed a care plan initiated on 1/27/2021with a focus on problematic manner in which resident acts characterized by ineffective coping; verbal/physical aggression related to: Cognitive impairment does not recognize boundaries of other resident's items with an outcome to ensure safety for resident's and staff. Interventions include: Allow resident time to respond to directions or requests (due to dementia more time is required to absorb instructions), Be cognizant of not invading resident's personal space, do not argue or condemn resident, Do not ask resident to make decisions or ask what is wrong/focus on feelings, Do not express your anger or impatience verbally or with physical movements (ie. CNA shaking head/pointing finger), Document summary of each episode. Note cause and successful interventions, include frequency and duration, monitor for physical aggression. Care plan initiated 1/27/2021 focused on problematic manner in which resident acts characterized by in appropriate behavior: Hoarding and rummaging related to inability to differentiate between personal and other resident's belongings: Takes roommates personal items. Resident has episodes of smearing feces on surfaces around room, revised on 2/9/2021 with an outcome to reduce frequency of rummaging and target behaviors noted to less than daily occurrences thru next review. Interventions include: Do not confront resident with stealing, elicit family input for best approaches to resident, Frequent room checks for cleaning and sanitizing areas when resident smears feces (Revised 2/9/2021). Monitor resident's room daily and return items/belongings to other residents/discard food, Praise/reward resident for demonstrating consistent desired/acceptable. During an interview on 5/26/2021 at 4:30 p.m. with the Social Services Director (SSD) to discuss the process for obtaining a PASARR level two revealed the SSD is not involved with this process, but the Physician, nursing, and the Director of Nursing (DON) handle the diagnosis and admissions sending in paperwork. If a level two PASARR is needed, the information goes to Georgia Compass, and someone from the company comes out to assess the resident. The facility awaits a determination from Georgia Compass, and the Social Worker receives the determination for Georgia Compass and uploads the information into the computer. Review of the referral from the referring hospital dated 11/9/2021 revealed, in part, under Primary Care CIV Documentation Note, R#87 also has a diagnosis of CIV associated neurocognitive disorder with severe cognitive impairment. During an interview with the DON on 5/27/2021 at 10:22 a.m. revealed that R#87 did not have a diagnosis for a PASARR level II. During this time, the facility PASARR policy was reviewed, and the DON revealed that when the Psychiatric Services documented on 4/21/2021 that R#87 was seen for delusions and impulsive behavior there should have been a level II done at that point. Review of the referral from the referring hospital dated 11/9/2020, with the DON, revealed R#87 had a diagnosis of CIV associated neurocognitive disorder with severe cognitive impairment. DON revealed, with that diagnosis, a level II PASARR should have been done on admission if the referring facility did not do one, and she does not know why that diagnosis was missed in the referral on admission to the facility. She revealed Admissions does the Level I and Admissions or the Business Office would send in a level II when prompted to do so by the Social Worker. During an interview on 5/27/2021 (need time) with the Administrator the referral from the referring hospital dated 11/9/2021 was reviewed with her and she revealed when she came to work in the facility 2 months ago, Admissions had been here 5 years and believed they knew what they should be doing. She revealed she does not know why the diagnosis in the referral of CIV associated neurocognitive disorder with severe cognitive impairment was missed but added that this diagnosis would have certainly warranted a PASARR level II. She revealed not only does Admissions review the referral paperwork, but the Social Services Director and Nursing staff do as well, and she has no idea how the diagnosis was missed. Review of the facility policy PASARR Review revised October 12, 2017 revealed the objective of the PASARR policy is to ensure that individuals with mental illness and intellectual disabilities receive the care and services that they need in the most appropriate setting. The PASARR will be evaluated annually and upon any significant change for those individuals identified. An individual is considered to have a serious mental illness (MI) if the individual meets the following requirements on diagnosis, level of impairment and duration of illness: Diagnosis: The individual has a major mental disorder diagnosable under the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition, revised 1987. 1. A schizophrenic, mood, paranoid, panic, or other severe anxiety disorder; somatoform disorder; personality disorder; other psychotic disorder, or another mental disorder that may lead to a chronic disability; but 2. Not a primary diagnosis of dementia, including Alzheimer's disease or a related disorder, or a non-primary diagnosis of dementia unless the primary diagnosis is a major mental disorder. 3. Level of impairment. The disorder results in functional limitations in major life activities within individual typically has at least one of the following characteristics on a continuing or intermittent bases: 4. Interpersonal functioning. The individual has serious difficulty interacting appropriately and communicating effectively with other persons, has a possible history of altercations, evictions, firing, fear of strangers, avoidance of interpersonal relationships and social isolation: 5. Concentration, persistence, and pace. The individual has serious difficulty in sustaining focused attention for a long enough period to permit the completion of tasks commonly found in work settings or in work-like structured activities occurring in school or home settings, manifests difficulties in concentration, inability to complete simple tasks within an established time period, makes frequent errors, or requires assistance in the completion of these tasks; and 6. Adaptation to change. The individual has serious difficulty in adapting to typical changes in circumstances associated with work, school, family, or social interaction, manifests agitation, exacerbated signs and symptoms associated with the illness, or withdrawal from the situation, or requires intervention by the mental health or judicial system. Cross refer to F600
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0646 (Tag F0646)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the Physician and Psychiatric Services of chan...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the Physician and Psychiatric Services of changes and increased behaviors for one resident (R#87) of 42 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the admission Record for R#87, dated 11/27/2020, revealed the resident was admitted with a chronic infectious virus, chronic kidney failure, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, anemia, aphasia, and hypertension. Review of (R#87) admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of one, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He was assessed with no mood indicators, no hallucinations or delusions, no indication of physical or verbal behaviors toward others, or wandering. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R #87 revealed in Section (C) Cognitive Patterns a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not done as the resident is rarely or never understood. Section (D) Mood was not done as the resident is rarely or never understood. Section (E) Behaviors revealed R #87 exhibits other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others (e.g., physical symptoms such as hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts, disrobing in public, throwing or smearing food or bodily waste, or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming, disruptive sounds.) Behaviors of this kind occurred 1 to 3 days. Wandering occurred 1 to 3 days. Section (G) Functional Status revealed R #87 requires supervision/oversight for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Section (N) Medication revealed R #87 receives an antidepressant 7/7 days a week. Review of the Psychiatric Diagnostic Evaluation notes, dated 12/29/2020, revealed the resident was evaluated by the contract Psychiatric services for dementia and anxiety. Psychotropic medications: Citalopram 40 milligrams (mg) one daily. The resident was noted to have disorganized thought process and content, with impaired insight/judgement. Recommendation: Continue current care/treatment and follow up in one to three months. Review of the Psychiatric Subsequent Medication Evaluation, dated 3/23/2021, revealed medical necessity: medication monitoring for health and safety. Presenting problems: Male resident seen in room, sitting up in bed, alert, pleasant mood. Presents with disorganized thoughts, laughs during session, incoherent response to questions. Staff reports that resident is doing ok, eating and sleeping well, no behaviors. Psychotropic Medications: Citalopram 40 mg one daily. Summary: Male resident seen in room, standing up in room, non-verbal, appears preoccupied, wanders, calm. Staff reports that resident disrobes, paces. Recommendations: Risperdal 0.25 mg by mouth twice daily for delusions. Continue to monitor mood and behavior. Follow up in one to three months. Review of the Psychiatric Subsequent Medication Evaluation, dated 4/21/2021, revealed male resident seen today for follow up (f/u) for delusions, impulsive behaviors. Psychotropic medications: Citalopram 40 mg one daily, Depakote 250 mg twice daily. Summary: Male resident is observed up and about unit. Staff reports that the resident is doing better, less impulsive, calm. Continue current psychotropic meds and supportive care. Continue to monitor mood and behavior. Follow up in two to four months. A review of Behavior Notes dated 1/25/2021 at 6:00 a.m. by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) DD revealed R#87 took his roommate's (R#28) stuffed animal while R#28 was in the bathroom. When R#28 came out of the bath, he took his animal back then R#87 took a swing at R#28 but missed. Review of Behavior Notes dated 2/13/2021 at 5:57 a.m. by LPN DD revealed that R#87 walked out of his room and walked across the hall to another resident's room. R#87 then urinated on the floor of another resident's room. Staff called R#87, but he looked at the staff and refused to move. The resident was told to return to his room but went and sat in a chair in the atrium. A Review of Health Status Notes dated 2/21/2021 at 12:02 p.m. by Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the DON followed-up with the R#87 family member due to the resident testing positive for COVID-19 and was in quarantine. The note indicated the R#87 is constantly attempting to open the door and come out and is redirected back in. The family member suggested letting the resident know she said for him to stay in and close the door. I also spoke with her concerning infection control and the risk of spreading the infection due to cognition impairment and not truly understanding the meaning. Will continue to monitor and follow up. A Review of Psychosocial/Social Service Notes by the Social Service Director Note (SSD) on 3/24/2021 at 10:59 a.m. revealed that the Social Services Director (SSD) and the team discussed challenges with R#87 being inappropriate with voiding and behavior issues. The resident has had several different roommates, and problems continue. Discussion of benefits in a dementia unit. Referral to be made to a few facilities for exploration. Review of a Skilled Evaluation on 3/30/2021at 9:09 a.m. by Unit Manager (UM) BB revealed that R#87 continues to be a Patient Under Investigation related to post positive COVID-19 precautions, extensive assist with ADL's, and incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident continues to present with behaviors, removing his brief, urinating on the floor in the room and other resident's rooms. The resident is smearing feces on the floor, coming out of his room, and wandering into other resident's room standing over them naked while their sleeping. Staff continues to attempt to redirect resident behavior, will continue to monitor. Review of Nurse's Notes on 4/14/2021 at 12:44 p.m. by LPN CC revealed that staff noted R#87 was in his room with the door closed and was found facing his roommate, with clothes off and penis out close to roommate's bed. The resident was dressed and taken outside with a mask to sit in television (TV) area, reported to the supervisor. An interview on 5/25/2021 at 11:50 a.m. with CNA AA revealed that on 4/14/2021 that R#87's door was closed. The CNA AA walked into his room and saw him standing over his roommate while sleeping. R 87 had his pants down, wiggled his hips with his penis out, and wiggled his penis over his roommate, R#48. The roommate did not wake up, and the CNA AA had R#87 pull his pants up, redirected him out of the room to sit in a chair in the common area. CNA AA revealed that she reported the incident to LPN CC. An interview on 5/25/2021 at 12:20 p.m. with LPN CC concerning documentation in the progress notes on 4/14/2021 and 4/28/2021 regarding the resident's behaviors revealed that she had limited recollection of either incident. LPN CC revealed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) AA witnessed both incidents, and she just documented the information that was shared with her at the time. LPN CC could not give any further details. An interview on 5/26/2021 at 10:55 a.m. with the facility Medical Director revealed that she expects the facility staff to notify her of anything important and was not made aware of the R#87's behaviors. An interview with Nurse Practitioner (NP) with a specialty psychiatry services was conducted on 5/26/2021 at 10:45 a.m. revealed that the NP had only saw the resident on the following dates: 12/29/2020, 3/23/2021, and 4/21/2021. The NP revealed in the interview that she only sees the resident when there is a consult by the facility and there had been no further requests for evaluation. She further revealed only being made aware of one behavior regarding the resident disrobing. The NP revealed that she is dependent upon staff to make her aware of the resident's current behaviors, moods, and changes. She stated that if the behaviors R#87 had been reported to her, she would have ordered alternative placement for behavioral care and in order to ensure safety of other residents. An interview on 5/26/2021 at 12:48 p.m. with the DON and Administrator, the DON revealed she spoke with the Medical Director sometime after 4:00 p.m. yesterday and was given a verbal order to transfer R#87 to the emergency room (E.R.) for evaluation. The DON revealed discussing with the Physician how the other resident's feel threatened by R#87 and discussed Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (QAPI) concerns with her. The Medical Director was contacted, via telephone, by the DON and Administrator at this time to confirm that she was made aware of the resident's behaviors yesterday and that the Medical Director gave orders to send the resident to the ER for evaluation. Continued interview with the Administrator and DON revealed they do not know why the Medical Director or Psychiatry Services were not notified about the unwanted behaviors of R#87 and both should have been notified. Cross refer to F600
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee that thoroughly and effectively identified concerns related to the management of beha...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee that thoroughly and effectively identified concerns related to the management of behaviors. The census was 106. Findings include: Review of Facility assessment dated 2021 revealed a 'high prevalence' of residents with a psychotic disorder, schizophrenia and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Additionally, the assessment indicates a 'high prevalence' of residents with non-Alzheimer's dementia, psychotic symptoms, behavioral health care needs, behavior that impacted resident care and behavior that impacted others including a 'very high prevalence' of residents who are wanderers. The report indicated the facility has evaluated their staffing sufficiency for their population. Review of the facility Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) book dated 2020/2021 revealed Vision Statement QAPI: To [NAME] a homelike and safe environment during each residents stay, through the use of quality improvement. Mission Statement QAPI: To proactively identify facility issues, eliminate them, and empower a dedicated staff to provide the best patient-centered care known to SNFs. Purpose Statement QAPI: To actively monitor and improve, our facility patient care delivery processes, and our resident's quality of life. Review of the facility QAPI Plan dated 2015 revealed Standard of Practice: It is the intent of this facility to conduct an on-going quality assurance/performance improvement program designed to systematically monitor and evaluate the quality and appropriateness of resident care, pursue opportunities to improve resident care, resolve identified problems and identify opportunities for improvement. Performance improvement supports the overall goals of the facility and examines both outcomes and processes relevant to these outcomes with the objective of improving the organization's overall performance. Procedure: 3. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee is set up to provide structure and direction for the Performance Improvement Program and Risk Management. The Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee is responsible for establishing priorities, approving key quality indicators and assigning project team/s if deemed appropriate. 7. Criteria for selecting aspects of care for improvement are based on the following: a. Facility goals and objectives, mission, c. High Risk - residents/patients are at risk of serious consequences or deprived of substantial benefits if the care is not provided correctly and in a timely fashion or on proper indication. e. Behavior. Continued review of the facility QAPI plan revealed Aspects of Care: . 1. The scope under which each department will choose key aspects of care to evaluate, and monitor will be: Clinical Care: . Clinical services is responsible for . psychosocial intervention . The goal of the service is to assist the resident in attaining and maintaining the maximum physical and psychosocial well-being to ensure quality of life. Additionally, a review of the facility Performance Improvement Calendar Form did not reveal an area related to resident behavior(s). An interview on 5/27/2021 at 11:13 a.m. with the Administrator revealed their process for identifying facility issues includes utilizing information heard from residents, staff, grievances, resident council, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regulations, review of policies and procedures and monthly departmental audits. She reported once an issue is identified they perform a root cause analysis to understand what is going on and how it happened, then create a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), and develop a team to investigate the issue, implement an intervention, audit its effectiveness and bring the report to the team. If the data determines the intervention is ineffective, they will try a new intervention. She further reported they collect and monitor data utilizing audit tools that they create and review weekly to see if there is something they need to change, and adjust if necessary, to ensure they are capturing the data they need, to have an effect on the identified issue. Additionally, she was unable to explain why behaviors were not part of their QAPI program given the information identified in the facility assessment. She reported from what she could see when she arrived, behavioral issues were being managed. She further indicated any identified concerns are discussed in morning report, and R#87 was not discussed. She reported knowing what she now knows, R#87s behavior should have been reported to her and brought to the daily meeting. She indicated when she arrived at this facility, she identified R#87 was a tall strong, intimidating man and perhaps this was not the most appropriate environment for him. She indicated whoever witnesses a behavior is responsible for reporting and communicating this to the team. The team will work together to address the issue. She indicated notifications should follow reporting to their direct supervisor, who will notify the physician and Director of Nursing (DON), and the DON notifies the Administrator. She indicated she was not aware that the physician, and psychiatric services vendor were not notified. Cross refer to F600
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), 4 harm violation(s), $57,064 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 41 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $57,064 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Georgia. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns BONTERRA TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation Staffed?

CMS rates BONTERRA TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 51%, compared to the Georgia average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation?

State health inspectors documented 41 deficiencies at BONTERRA TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION during 2021 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 4 that caused actual resident harm, and 34 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation?

BONTERRA TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 118 certified beds and approximately 112 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in EAST POINT, Georgia.

How Does Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, BONTERRA TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (51%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, BONTERRA TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation Stick Around?

BONTERRA TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 51%, which is about average for Georgia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation Ever Fined?

BONTERRA TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION has been fined $57,064 across 5 penalty actions. This is above the Georgia average of $33,650. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?

BONTERRA TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.