MARSH'S EDGE

111 RENEGAR WAY, SAINT SIMONS ISLAND, GA 31522 (912) 291-2000
For profit - Limited Liability company 20 Beds SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
83/100
#22 of 353 in GA
Last Inspection: May 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Marsh's Edge, located in Saint Simons Island, Georgia, has earned a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #22 out of 353 facilities in Georgia, placing it in the top half, and is the top facility among five in Glynn County. The facility's trend is stable, with only two issues reported in both 2023 and 2025, indicating consistent performance. Staffing is a strong point, receiving a perfect 5/5 rating, although the turnover rate is 57%, which is average for Georgia. However, the facility has faced $4,588 in fines, which is concerning and higher than 85% of Georgia facilities, suggesting some compliance issues. Specific incidents noted by inspectors include failures to discard expired syringes, which could pose a risk of using outdated medical supplies, and not properly labeling or dating food items in storage, potentially affecting all residents on an oral diet. While the facility has excellent RN coverage, more than 90% of Georgia facilities, these weaknesses in compliance should be carefully considered by families researching care options.

Trust Score
B+
83/100
In Georgia
#22/353
Top 6%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Holding Steady
1 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$4,588 in fines. Higher than 94% of Georgia facilities. Major compliance failures.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 133 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Georgia nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 1 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 57%

11pts above Georgia avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $4,588

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (57%)

9 points above Georgia average of 48%

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

May 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, the facilit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, the facility failed to discard expired syringes stored in one of one medication storage rooms. The deficient practices created the potential to use expired syringes. The facility had a census of nine residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage under the Medication Storage section revealed, 3. If the facility has discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items. Under the Medication Labeling section revealed, 2. The medication label includes, at a minimum: medication name (generic and/ or brand; prescribes dose; strength; expiration date, when applicable; resident's name; route of administration; and appropriate instructions and precautions. If medication containers have missing, incomplete, improper or incorrect labels, contact the dispensing pharmacy for instructions regarding or destroying these items. Interview and observation on [DATE] at 1:40 pm of the medication storage room with the Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) revealed a sealed zip lock bag of syringes with expiration date of [DATE]. RNS confirmed the date on the bag was [DATE] and that the syringes were expired. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:34 pm with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the RNS was about to destroy the syringes when she asked what she was doing. She stated that the RNS informed her that the syringes were expired, and she was about to destroy them. DON stated she took the bag and partially opened it and removed the label. DON also stated that the bag of syringes was inside of another bag and the RNS removed it prior to bringing it to her. She stated that she took the bag and contacted the pharmacy for clarification on the expiration date. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 2:00 pm, the DON presented a bag of syringes without a label that was opened on the side. DON insisted that this was the bag observed the day before and that she removed this bag from the original bag and had cleaned up the bag a bit. DON stated that she used the lot number to contact the pharmacy for clarification and had gotten a letter stating the syringes were not expired. During a follow up interview on [DATE] at 2:30 pm with the RNS revealed that she did not in fact remove the syringes from another bag prior to giving it to the DON. RNS admitted that the sealed bag of syringes was handed to the DON as observed the day before. She also stated that she normally check the expiration dates listed on the packages delivered by the pharmacy and would contact them if there was any doubt or if she had questions but had not contacted them about this situation (expired syringes). During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 8:00 pm with the Director of Clinical Services (DCS) for the pharmacy revealed, that she was aware that at some point everything expires and stated that the pharmacy computer generates labels with expiration dates automatically for items especially the ones removed from their original packaging. The DCS stated that she was only given a lot number and was not sure if that was for the item (syringes) in question. The DCS revealed that she contacted the manufacturer about the lot number she was given and that she was still awaiting a response.
Jan 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage the facility failed to ensure that items were labeled and dated in the satellite kitchen r...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage the facility failed to ensure that items were labeled and dated in the satellite kitchen refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage area and in the dry storage area in the main kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 14 of 14 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, revised November 2022 revealed the following: Dry Food Storage: 4. Dry foods that are stored in bins are removed from the original packaging, labeled and dated (use by date). Such foods are rotated using a first in-first out system. Refrigerated/Frozen Storage 1. All food stored in the refrigerator or freezer are covered, labeled, and dated (use by date). 7. Refrigerated foods are labeled, dated, and monitored so that are used by their use-by date, frozen, or discarded. Initial tour on 1/27/2023 at 8:07 a.m. of the satellite kitchen began with dietary staff present. It was reported that the dietary manager had not made it to the facility for the day. The following was observed: 1. In the freezer there was one box containing ice cream sandwiches that was opened but there was no open date or expiration dates on the box or ice cream bars. 2. In the reach in cooler here was one key lime pie that had been opened (partially eaten) that did not have an open or expiration date on it. 3. There was a pound cake wrapped in clear wrap that did not have an open or expiration date. 4. On the shelves behind the steam table there were 19 small boxes of various cereal that did not have an expiration date. 5.There were two partial loaves of bread that did not have an open or expiration date on them. During an interview and observation on 1/27/2023 at 3:13 p.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) AA he reported that he had already removed the pie and from the refrigerator after surveyor's initial tour. CDM AA reported that both items were from the day before. The ice cream sandwich bars remained in the freezer and did not have an open date or an expiration date. The cereal remained on the shelves and CDM AA reported that he put the cereal in the kitchen and rotated them first in and first out. However, there were no dates on the boxes of cereal and he reported that he would have to contact the company to determine when the items expire because they have codes on them. CDM AA confirmed that the loaves of bread did not have an expiration date. A brief tour on 1/27/2023 at 3:37 p.m. of the main kitchen was conducted with CDM AA and the following was observed during the tour: 1. There was one #10 can of sliced jalapenos noted to be dented. 2. There was one #10 can of tomatoes noted to be dented and without an expiration date. 3. There were six cans of sweet potatoes, six cans of dark kidney beans, and 10 cans of roasted red peppers that did not have expiration dates or received date. There were codes on the can, but the CDM AA was not able to identify the expiration date. During an interview on 1/29/2023 at 12:21 p.m. with CDM AA revealed that each staff member is responsible for labeling and dating items on their shift. He acknowledged that he discarded the cereal because they did not have a date on them, and he was the person that had placed them in the satellite kitchen. It was reported that the Director of Dining and CDM were responsible to make sure the use by date is made known to staff. CDM AA reported that the ice cream sandwich bars were taken from the original box and the expiration date was on that box. Lastly, he reported that the bread came from the freezer in the main kitchen and should have had an expiration date when placed in the satellite kitchen. Continued interview with CDM AA also revealed that dented cans were typically identified during delivery and returned to the vendor by the driver. Interview on 1/27/2023 at 1:03 p.m. with the Administrator who acknowledged that an in-service had been provided to staff earlier in January 2023 related to meal service which included labeling and dating items. He reported that this information has not been incorporated into the Quality Assurance Program yet, but they would be meeting soon. The Administrator then provided documentation of education provided to staff on 1/27/2023 related to labeling and dating of items.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Georgia.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • $4,588 in fines. Lower than most Georgia facilities. Relatively clean record.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Marsh'S Edge's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns MARSH'S EDGE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Marsh'S Edge Staffed?

CMS rates MARSH'S EDGE's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 57%, which is 11 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Marsh'S Edge?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at MARSH'S EDGE during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Marsh'S Edge?

MARSH'S EDGE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 20 certified beds and approximately 8 residents (about 40% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SAINT SIMONS ISLAND, Georgia.

How Does Marsh'S Edge Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, MARSH'S EDGE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (57%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Marsh'S Edge?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Marsh'S Edge Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, MARSH'S EDGE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Marsh'S Edge Stick Around?

Staff turnover at MARSH'S EDGE is high. At 57%, the facility is 11 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Marsh'S Edge Ever Fined?

MARSH'S EDGE has been fined $4,588 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Georgia average of $33,125. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Marsh'S Edge on Any Federal Watch List?

MARSH'S EDGE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.