PRUITTHEALTH - SWAINSBORO

856 HIGHWAY 1 SOUTH, SWAINSBORO, GA 30401 (478) 237-7022
For profit - Corporation 103 Beds PRUITTHEALTH Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
83/100
#97 of 353 in GA
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

PruittHealth - Swainsboro has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is recommended and above average compared to other nursing homes. It ranks #97 out of 353 facilities in Georgia, placing it in the top half, and is the best option in Emanuel County. The facility is new, with its first inspection showing a stable trend, and it has a good staffing turnover rate of 25%, significantly lower than the state average. Notably, there have been no fines, and the facility has more registered nurse coverage than 94% of Georgia nursing homes, ensuring better oversight for residents. However, there are some concerns, including expired medications being stored and one resident not being assessed for safe self-administration of medications, which could pose risks. Additionally, another resident did not have their call light within reach, potentially leaving them vulnerable to unmet needs.

Trust Score
B+
83/100
In Georgia
#97/353
Top 27%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Too New
0 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below Georgia's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 43 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Georgia. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
: 0 issues
2025: 3 issues

The Good

  • Low Staff Turnover (25%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (25%)

    23 points below Georgia average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: PRUITTHEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

Mar 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administrat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, the facility failed to assess one of 37 sampled residents (R) (R35) for the ability to safely self-administer medications prior to leaving medications at the bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to place R35 at risk of unsafe medication use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, reviewed 1/6/2025, revealed the Policy Statement stated, Each patient/resident who desires to self-administer medication is permitted to do so if the healthcare center's Licensed Nurse and physician have determined that the practice would be safe for the patient/resident and other patients/residents of the healthcare center. Medication self-administration also applies to family members who wish to administer medication. Review of R35's Face Sheet revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, and hypertension. Review of R35's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section C (Cognitive Pattern) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 (indicating severe cognitive impairment). Review of R35's care plan, dated 2/12/2025, revealed no care area or interventions for medication self-administration. Review of R35's Physician Orders revealed an order dated 8/13/2024 for ipratropium-albuterol solution (a medication used to treat lung diseases) for nebulization (the administration of a solution in the form of a fine mist directly into the lungs), 0.5 milligrams (mg)-3 mg/ 3 milliliters (ml) three times a day. Further review of the orders revealed no order for self-administration of medication. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 2/4/2025 to 3/4/2025 revealed documentation that staff administered the ipratropium-albuterol solution as ordered. Review of the clinical record revealed R35 did not have a self-administration of medication assessment to indicate the resident was capable of medication self-administration. Observation on 3/4/2025 at 10:06 am of R35's nightstand revealed a cup sitting on the nightstand containing nine albuterol solution ampules. In an interview, R35 stated that she self-administered albuterol nebulizer treatments three times daily in the morning, after lunch, and after dinner and would take additional doses as needed when experiencing excessive coughing. Observation on 3/4/2025 at 12:06 pm revealed the albuterol solution ampules remained at the bedside. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/4/2025 at 3:01 pm, Registered Nurse (RN) CC revealed that R35 was not permitted to self-administer breathing treatments or keep albuterol medication in her room. RN CC confirmed the cup containing albuterol ampules on R35's bedside table.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of 37 sampled res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of 37 sampled residents (R) (R72) call light was within reach. This deficient practice had the potential to place R72 at risk of unmet needs and increased risk of injury. Findings include: Review of R72's medical record revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, cognitive communication deficit and impaired mobility. Review of R72's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 (indicating little to no cognitive impairment), and Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) documented R72 required partial to moderate assistance with mobility. Review of R72's care plan, dated 2/10/2025, revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to impaired mobility, received psychotropic medication, and had weakness. Interventions included placing the call light within reach. Observations on 3/4/2025 at 9:49 am and 12:03 pm and 3/5/2025 at 12:57 pm revealed R72 seated in a wheelchair in her room behind a privacy curtain with no call light within reach. In an interview on 3/5/2025 at 1:35 pm, R72 revealed that she was unable to reach her call light on multiple occasions. She stated that staff would sometimes leave it on the bed or in other places out of her reach, leaving her unable to call for help when needed. In an interview on 3/5/2025 at 1:50 pm, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) DD confirmed that the resident's call light was not within her reach and should be within reach at all times. She further stated that R72 would have no way to call for help with the light being out of her reach.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Expired Medication and Medication Storage in the Healthcare Centers, the facility failed to ensure ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Expired Medication and Medication Storage in the Healthcare Centers, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were not stored in one of two medication storage rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk of receiving medications with altered effectiveness. The facility's census was 72. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Expired Medication, reviewed 6/18/2024, revealed the Policy Statement included . Expired medication must be removed from the active medication storage area and disposed of according to Assisted Living Community (ALC) policy. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Healthcare Centers, revised 11/1/2024, revealed the Procedure section included, . 3. Nurses are required to check all medications for deterioration and expiration before administration Observation on 3/5/2025 at 11:00 am of the medication room located at the Back Nurses' Station revealed two vials of naloxone HCL (hydrochloride) injection (a medication used to rapidly reverse an opioid overdose) 0.4 milligram (mg)/ milliliters (ml) with an expiration date of March 1, 2024, on each vial. In a concurrent interview and observation of the medication storage room on 3/5/2025 at 11:05 am, Unit Manager (UM) AA confirmed that the two vials of naloxone injection in the medication room were expired. She stated the expired medications should not be in the medication room and should have been removed before they expired. UM AA stated that if a resident received the expired medication, the medication could be less effective and might not work. In an interview on 3/5/2025 at 12:05 pm, Registered Nurse (RN) BB stated that expired medications should not be in the medication room because the use of expired medications could have adverse effects if administered to a resident. RN BB further stated that expired medications could be less potent and less effective. In an interview on 3/5/2025 at 12:22 pm, the Director of Health Services (DHS) stated her expectation was that expired medications should not be in the medication room. She stated that medications should be removed from the medication room before they expire by the nurse or UM. She further stated that naloxone was administered to counteract a narcotic overdose and that if the medication was expired, it could have a decreased desired effect.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Georgia.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
  • • Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Pruitthealth - Swainsboro's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns PRUITTHEALTH - SWAINSBORO an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Pruitthealth - Swainsboro Staffed?

CMS rates PRUITTHEALTH - SWAINSBORO's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 25%, compared to the Georgia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Pruitthealth - Swainsboro?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at PRUITTHEALTH - SWAINSBORO during 2025. These included: 3 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Pruitthealth - Swainsboro?

PRUITTHEALTH - SWAINSBORO is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PRUITTHEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 103 certified beds and approximately 75 residents (about 73% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in SWAINSBORO, Georgia.

How Does Pruitthealth - Swainsboro Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, PRUITTHEALTH - SWAINSBORO's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (25%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Pruitthealth - Swainsboro?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Pruitthealth - Swainsboro Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, PRUITTHEALTH - SWAINSBORO has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Pruitthealth - Swainsboro Stick Around?

Staff at PRUITTHEALTH - SWAINSBORO tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 25%, the facility is 21 percentage points below the Georgia average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 23%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Pruitthealth - Swainsboro Ever Fined?

PRUITTHEALTH - SWAINSBORO has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Pruitthealth - Swainsboro on Any Federal Watch List?

PRUITTHEALTH - SWAINSBORO is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.