WRIGHTSVILLE MANOR HEALTH AND REHAB
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Wrightsville Manor Health and Rehab has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranked #352 out of 353 facilities in Georgia, this places it in the bottom half of nursing homes statewide, and it is the second out of two facilities in Johnson County, meaning there is only one local option that is better. The facility's performance is worsening, with issues increasing from 4 in 2023 to 9 in 2025. While the staffing turnover rate is relatively low at 39%, which is better than the state average, the facility has concerning fines of $99,469, higher than 96% of Georgia facilities, suggesting repeated compliance problems. Notably, there were two critical incidents involving failure to protect residents from sexual abuse, as well as issues with food safety practices, highlighting both serious weaknesses in resident safety and care standards.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Georgia
- #352/353
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 39% turnover. Near Georgia's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $99,469 in fines. Lower than most Georgia facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 19 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Georgia. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (39%)
9 points below Georgia average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Georgia average (2.6)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near Georgia avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents (R) (R4) w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0628
(Tag F0628)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of facility policy titled Foley Catheter Policy, the facility f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication with the dia...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, review of manufacturer's guidelines, and review of facility policies tit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to document an episode of hypoglycemia (low blood ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications in a manner to prevent cross-contamination for seven of 13 residents (R) (R62, R65, R56, R30, R33, R22...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
2 deficiencies
2 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, the facility Administration failed to prot...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to accurately assess o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, review of facility documentation, and policy review titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program-Governance and Leadership the facility failed to ensure pol...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of the policy titled Glucometer Policy dated 4/20/2020, revealed each individual resident will have their own glucomet...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility policies titled, Food Storage, General HACCP Guidelines for Food Safety, and Cleaning Dishes - Manual Dishwashing the facility fai...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility Care Plan Policy Statement and Behavior Monitoring Policy th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, staff and resident interview, and review of the facility Behavior Monitoring Policy the fac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that it was maintained in a safe, clean and comfortabl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policies titled General Sanitation of Kitchen, Food Safety -Director of Food and Nutrition Services Responsibility, and Production, storage an...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 39% turnover. Below Georgia's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 2 life-threatening violation(s), $99,469 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 17 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $99,469 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Georgia. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Wrightsville Manor Health And Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WRIGHTSVILLE MANOR HEALTH AND REHAB an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Wrightsville Manor Health And Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates WRIGHTSVILLE MANOR HEALTH AND REHAB's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 39%, compared to the Georgia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Wrightsville Manor Health And Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at WRIGHTSVILLE MANOR HEALTH AND REHAB during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 15 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Wrightsville Manor Health And Rehab?
WRIGHTSVILLE MANOR HEALTH AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PEACH HEALTH GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 94 certified beds and approximately 73 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in WRIGHTSVILLE, Georgia.
How Does Wrightsville Manor Health And Rehab Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, WRIGHTSVILLE MANOR HEALTH AND REHAB's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (39%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Wrightsville Manor Health And Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Wrightsville Manor Health And Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WRIGHTSVILLE MANOR HEALTH AND REHAB has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Wrightsville Manor Health And Rehab Stick Around?
WRIGHTSVILLE MANOR HEALTH AND REHAB has a staff turnover rate of 39%, which is about average for Georgia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Wrightsville Manor Health And Rehab Ever Fined?
WRIGHTSVILLE MANOR HEALTH AND REHAB has been fined $99,469 across 3 penalty actions. This is above the Georgia average of $34,074. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Wrightsville Manor Health And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
WRIGHTSVILLE MANOR HEALTH AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.