OAK CREEK REHABILITATION CENTER OF KIMBERLY
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center of Kimberly has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns and a poor reputation among nursing homes. It ranks #64 out of 79 facilities in Idaho, which means it is in the bottom half, and #5 out of 5 in Twin Falls County, suggesting there are no better local options available. Although the facility’s trend is improving, with issues decreasing from 8 in 2018 to 2 in 2024, the current staffing situation is troubling, with an 80% turnover rate compared to the state average of 47%, indicating a lack of stability. The facility has received $13,627 in fines, which is concerning and higher than 78% of Idaho facilities, pointing to compliance problems. Specific incidents of concern include a failure to protect a resident from physical and verbal abuse, which placed them in immediate jeopardy, and a lack of proper infection control practices, raising the risk of spreading infections among residents. While there are some quality measures rated good, the overall picture remains troubling due to these significant weaknesses.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Idaho
- #64/79
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 80% turnover. Very high, 32 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $13,627 in fines. Lower than most Idaho facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 39 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Idaho. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Idaho average (3.3)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
33pts above Idaho avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
32 points above Idaho average of 48%
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Jul 2024
2 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, record review, facility investigation review, and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent physic...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, record review, facility investigation review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2018
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' call light...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' urinary car...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a prescription medication label...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure measures were in place to prevent possible cross-contamination a) of dirty to clean areas in the kitchen; b) areas o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview the facility failed ensure the kitchen was free from pests. This affected 14 of 15 (#'s 3-6, 8-11, 14, 16, 18, and 20-22) sampled residents and all residents who dined ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were consistently implemented. This was true for 2 of 15 sampled resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure complaint investigations for the 3 previous years were available for review. This deficient pract...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 10 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $13,627 in fines. Above average for Idaho. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade F (16/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center Of Kimberly's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns OAK CREEK REHABILITATION CENTER OF KIMBERLY an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Idaho, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center Of Kimberly Staffed?
CMS rates OAK CREEK REHABILITATION CENTER OF KIMBERLY's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 80%, which is 33 percentage points above the Idaho average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center Of Kimberly?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at OAK CREEK REHABILITATION CENTER OF KIMBERLY during 2018 to 2024. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, 7 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center Of Kimberly?
OAK CREEK REHABILITATION CENTER OF KIMBERLY is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CASCADES HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 57 certified beds and approximately 36 residents (about 63% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in KIMBERLY, Idaho.
How Does Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center Of Kimberly Compare to Other Idaho Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Idaho, OAK CREEK REHABILITATION CENTER OF KIMBERLY's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.3, staff turnover (80%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center Of Kimberly?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center Of Kimberly Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, OAK CREEK REHABILITATION CENTER OF KIMBERLY has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Idaho. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center Of Kimberly Stick Around?
Staff turnover at OAK CREEK REHABILITATION CENTER OF KIMBERLY is high. At 80%, the facility is 33 percentage points above the Idaho average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center Of Kimberly Ever Fined?
OAK CREEK REHABILITATION CENTER OF KIMBERLY has been fined $13,627 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Idaho average of $33,215. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center Of Kimberly on Any Federal Watch List?
OAK CREEK REHABILITATION CENTER OF KIMBERLY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.