IDAHO STATE VETERANS HOME - LEWISTON
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
The Idaho State Veterans Home in Lewiston has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some serious concerns. It ranks #8 out of 79 facilities in Idaho, placing it in the top half, and #1 out of 6 in Nez Perce County, meaning it is the best option locally. The facility's trend is stable, with 16 issues reported consistently over the last two years. Staffing is a notable strength, rated 5/5 with only a 33% turnover rate, which is well below the state average, indicating experienced staff. However, the facility has been hit with $186,850 in fines, raising concerns about compliance issues, and there have been critical incidents involving failures to investigate allegations of abuse, putting residents at significant risk. While RN coverage is good, surpassing 97% of state facilities, the serious nature of the abuse incidents highlights a need for improvement in resident safety and care oversight.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Idaho
- #8/79
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 33% turnover. Near Idaho's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $186,850 in fines. Higher than 81% of Idaho facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 97 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Idaho nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (33%)
15 points below Idaho average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
13pts below Idaho avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 18 sampled residents (Resident (R)32) was treated with dignity. R32's catheter bag, attached...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview, review of facility procedure and review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Resident Assessme...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, review of facility procedure and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), the faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
3 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, record review, review of the State Survey Agency's Long Term Care Reporting Portal, and resident and sta...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, record review, review of the the State Agency's Long Term Care Reporting Portal, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, record review, review of the State Survey Agency's Long Term Care Reporting Portal, and staff interview,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were admin...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2019
9 deficiencies
1 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL
(L)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents
⚠️ Facility-wide issue
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, record review, facility policy review, Incident and Accident Report review, Grievance Log review, and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' care plan...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to e...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. The facility's undated policy for Medication Administration and Medication Orders, directed staff to instruct the resident to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure bed rail consents were...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the medication cart and not available for administration to residents. T...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control meas...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure specifi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, record review, policy review, grievance log review, and review of Incident and Accident reports, it wa...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 33% turnover. Below Idaho's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), $186,850 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 16 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $186,850 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Idaho. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade D (46/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Idaho State Veterans Home - Lewiston's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns IDAHO STATE VETERANS HOME - LEWISTON an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Idaho, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Idaho State Veterans Home - Lewiston Staffed?
CMS rates IDAHO STATE VETERANS HOME - LEWISTON's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 33%, compared to the Idaho average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Idaho State Veterans Home - Lewiston?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at IDAHO STATE VETERANS HOME - LEWISTON during 2019 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 14 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Idaho State Veterans Home - Lewiston?
IDAHO STATE VETERANS HOME - LEWISTON is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 66 certified beds and approximately 47 residents (about 71% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LEWISTON, Idaho.
How Does Idaho State Veterans Home - Lewiston Compare to Other Idaho Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Idaho, IDAHO STATE VETERANS HOME - LEWISTON's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.3, staff turnover (33%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Idaho State Veterans Home - Lewiston?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Idaho State Veterans Home - Lewiston Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, IDAHO STATE VETERANS HOME - LEWISTON has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Idaho. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Idaho State Veterans Home - Lewiston Stick Around?
IDAHO STATE VETERANS HOME - LEWISTON has a staff turnover rate of 33%, which is about average for Idaho nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Idaho State Veterans Home - Lewiston Ever Fined?
IDAHO STATE VETERANS HOME - LEWISTON has been fined $186,850 across 1 penalty action. This is 5.3x the Idaho average of $34,947. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Idaho State Veterans Home - Lewiston on Any Federal Watch List?
IDAHO STATE VETERANS HOME - LEWISTON is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.