MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Mercer Manor Rehabilitation has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its operations and care quality. It ranks #265 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the top half, and is the best option in Mercer County, where it ranks #1 out of 2. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 4 in 2024 to 7 in 2025. Staffing is a major concern, with a poor 1/5 star rating and a high turnover rate of 59%, which is above the state average of 46%. Additionally, the facility has accumulated $137,996 in fines, indicating compliance issues that are higher than 79% of Illinois facilities. Strengths include an overall health inspection rating of 4/5 stars and good quality measures, with RN coverage being average. However, there are critical incidents that raise alarms, such as a cognitively impaired resident being able to leave the memory care unit unnoticed, resulting in serious injury. Furthermore, the facility has failed to adequately document infection control measures and provide ongoing activities for residents with cognitive impairments, which are essential for their well-being. While there are some positive aspects, families should weigh these significant weaknesses carefully.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Illinois
- #265/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 59% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $137,996 in fines. Higher than 89% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 38 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois average (2.5)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
13pts above Illinois avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
11 points above Illinois average of 48%
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive assessment for the use of oxygen for one of 17 residents (R33) reviewed for care plans in a sample of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to weigh a resident daily and report weights to the doctor as ordered for one resident (R23) of 17 residents reviewed for weight loss or gain i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly assess and measure a pressure ulcer for one resident (R23) of two residents reviewed for wounds in a total sample o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was changed as ordered for one (R33) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care in a total sample...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare medications without cross contaminating the pills for one resident (R23) of four residents observed during a routine m...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities for 15 reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication for use to administer...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the memory care unit exit doors and bracelet al...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise the care plans for three residents (R13, R16, R5...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide an appropriate indication for use of an antipsy...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy for the Antibiotic Stewardship Program. This failu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to avoid contamination of a stage 4 pressure ulcer during a dressing change for one (R6) of three residents reviewed for pressure ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a palm guard for one resident (R26) with bilateral hand contractions of two residents reviewed for mobility in the sam...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and glove changes during incontinence care and wound care for three residents (R6, R12, R43) of five revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify an appropriate indication for use of an antips...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), $137,996 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 15 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $137,996 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (33/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Mercer Manor Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Mercer Manor Rehabilitation Staffed?
CMS rates MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 59%, which is 13 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Mercer Manor Rehabilitation?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 14 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Mercer Manor Rehabilitation?
MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by STERN CONSULTANTS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 92 certified beds and approximately 57 residents (about 62% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ALEDO, Illinois.
How Does Mercer Manor Rehabilitation Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (59%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Mercer Manor Rehabilitation?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Mercer Manor Rehabilitation Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Mercer Manor Rehabilitation Stick Around?
Staff turnover at MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION is high. At 59%, the facility is 13 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Mercer Manor Rehabilitation Ever Fined?
MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION has been fined $137,996 across 1 penalty action. This is 4.0x the Illinois average of $34,459. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Mercer Manor Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?
MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.