MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION

309 N W 9TH AVENUE, ALEDO, IL 61231 (309) 435-0100
For profit - Limited Liability company 92 Beds STERN CONSULTANTS Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
33/100
#265 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: January 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Mercer Manor Rehabilitation has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its operations and care quality. It ranks #265 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the top half, and is the best option in Mercer County, where it ranks #1 out of 2. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 4 in 2024 to 7 in 2025. Staffing is a major concern, with a poor 1/5 star rating and a high turnover rate of 59%, which is above the state average of 46%. Additionally, the facility has accumulated $137,996 in fines, indicating compliance issues that are higher than 79% of Illinois facilities. Strengths include an overall health inspection rating of 4/5 stars and good quality measures, with RN coverage being average. However, there are critical incidents that raise alarms, such as a cognitively impaired resident being able to leave the memory care unit unnoticed, resulting in serious injury. Furthermore, the facility has failed to adequately document infection control measures and provide ongoing activities for residents with cognitive impairments, which are essential for their well-being. While there are some positive aspects, families should weigh these significant weaknesses carefully.

Trust Score
F
33/100
In Illinois
#265/665
Top 39%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
4 → 7 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
59% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$137,996 in fines. Higher than 89% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 38 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 4 issues
2025: 7 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Illinois average (2.5)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 59%

13pts above Illinois avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $137,996

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: STERN CONSULTANTS

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (59%)

11 points above Illinois average of 48%

The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening
Jan 2025 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive assessment for the use of oxygen for one of 17 residents (R33) reviewed for care plans in a sample of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive assessment for the use of oxygen for one of 17 residents (R33) reviewed for care plans in a sample of 17. Findings include: A policy revised on June 25, 2024, and titled Comprehensive Care Plan documents, An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. This policy further states that each resident's comprehensive care plan has been designed to incorporate identified problem areas. R33's Physician Order Sheet dated December 19, 2024, has an order for Oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula for as needed for dyspnea or chest pain. On 01/07/25 at 10:15 AM and 01/08/25 at 9:22 AM R33 was lying in bed with oxygen on via nasal cannula. R33's current comprehensive care plan was reviewed and did not contain information or goals regarding oxygen usage. On 01/08/25 at 2:24 PM V4 (Care Plan Coordinator) confirmed R33's current care plan does not address R33's oxygen need.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to weigh a resident daily and report weights to the doctor as ordered for one resident (R23) of 17 residents reviewed for weight loss or gain i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to weigh a resident daily and report weights to the doctor as ordered for one resident (R23) of 17 residents reviewed for weight loss or gain in a total sample of 33. Findings Include: R23's hospital discharge instructions dated 08/20/24 documents weigh daily with same scale and at the same time of the day if possible. Report weight gain of 3 pounds in one day or 5 pounds in one week to the cardiologist/CHF (Congestive Heart Failure Clinic) (phone number listed) every day shift for cardiac health. R23's MAR (Medication Administration Record) dated 08/20/24-8/31/24 does not document any weight for R23 on 8/22/24,8/23/24,8/24/24.8/25/24,8/27/24, 8/28/24 and 8/30/24. R23's MAR for August 2024 documents her weight on 8/20/24 as 158.2 and her weight on 8/21/24 as 163.5 which would indicate a weight gain of 5.3 pounds in one day. R23's documented weight on 8/26/24 was 160 pounds and her weight on 9/29/24 was 165 pounds which indicates a weight gain of 4 pounds in one week. R23's Medical Record did not contain any documentation of Cardiology/CHF Clinic being notified of those weight fluctuations as ordered. R23's MAR (Medication Administration Record) dated 09/01/-24-09/30/24 does not document any weight for R23 on 09/07/24,09/08/24, 09/24/24,09/26/24, and 09/27/24. R23's MAR for September 2024 documents her weight on 09/05/24 as 165.5 pounds and her weight on 09/06/24 as 168.5 which indicates a 3-pound weight gain in one day. R23's Medical Record did not contain any documentation of Cardiology/CHF (Congestive Heart Failure Clinic) being notified of those weight fluctuations as ordered. R23's MAR dated 09/01/24-09/30/24 documents her weight on 9/23/24 as 146.5 pounds and her weight on 9/29/24 as 160.5 which indicates a 14-pound weight gain in one week. R23's Medical Record did not contain any documentation of Cardiology/CHF Clinic being notified. R23's MAR dated 10/01/24-10/31/24 does not document any weight for R23 on 10/8/24,10/9/24,10/10/24,10/14/24,10/15/24,10/18/24,10/22/24,10/27/24 and 10/30/24. R23's MAR for October 2024 documents her weight on 10/21/24 as 163 pounds and her weight on 10/26/24 as 169.5 which indicates a weight gain of 6.5 pounds in one week. R23's Medical Record did not contain any documentation of Cardiology/CHF Clinic being notified. R23's MAR for 11/1/24-11/30/24 does not document any weight for R23 on 11/1/24,11/5/24,11/6/24,11/9/24,11/12/24,11/14/24,11/15/24,11/17/24 and 11/25/24. R23's MAR for November 2024 documents her weight on 11/10/24 as 163.5 pounds and her weight on 11/16/24 as 169.5 pounds, indicating a 6-pound weight gain in one week. R23's November MAR documents her weight on 11/19/24 as165 pounds and on 11/20/24 as 168.5 pounds, indicating a 3.5-pound weight gain in one day. R23's November 2024 MAR documents R23's weight on 11/26/24 as 168.5 pounds and on 11/27/24 173 pounds, indicating a 5-pound gain in one day. R23's Medical Record did not contain any documentation of Cardiology/CHF clinic being notified. R23's MAR for 12/1/24-12/31/24 does document any weight for R23 on 12/6/24,12/8/24,12/15/24,12/19/24,12/20/24,12/22/24 and 12/26/24. R23's MAR for December 2024 documents that on 12/2/24 R23's weight was 167.5 pounds and on 12/3/24 her weight was 170.5 pounds, indicating a 3-pound weight gain in one day. R23's Medical Record did not contain any documentation of Cardiology/CHF Clinic being notified. On 01/09/24 at 1:00 PM V2 (Registered Nurse/Director of Nursing) confirmed the missing weight documentation on the August, September, October, November, and December Medication Administration Records. V2 acknowledged the order from Cardiology/CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) Clinic. V2 stated They (Cardiology/CHF Clinic) should have been notified per the parameters that the gave on 08/20/24 and they have not been notified of any of these weight changes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly assess and measure a pressure ulcer for one resident (R23) of two residents reviewed for wounds in a total sample o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly assess and measure a pressure ulcer for one resident (R23) of two residents reviewed for wounds in a total sample of 33. Findings Include: The Facility's Skin Prevention, Assessment and Treatment policy dated 11/1/2015 documents that the purpose of the policy is to identify factors that place the residents at risk for the development of pressure ulcers, to implement appropriate interventions to prevent the development of clinically avoidable wounds, to promote a systematic approach and monitoring process for the care of the residents with existing wounds and for those who are at risk for skin breakdown and to promote healing of existing pressure ulcers. The Facility's Skin Prevention, Assessment and Treatment policy dated 11/1/2015 documents Any skin impairments, including pressure ulcers, non-pressure ulcer wounds, surgical wounds, skin tears, abrasions, etc., should be assessed and documented weekly by the Wound Nurse, or designee, in the Medical Record. a) Documentation should cover all pertinent characteristics of existing ulcers, including location, size, depth, maceration, color of the ulcer and surround tissues, and a description of any drainage, eschar, necrosis, odor, tunneling, or undermining. R23's current Physician Order Sheet documents Cleanse area on buttocks with normal saline, pat dry, apply calcium alginate and cover every day and as needed. On 01/08/25 at 1:00 PM R23's coccyx area was noted to be red with areas noted that were approximately 2 centimeters long and less than a half a centimeter wide open area noted directly across her coccyx. There were 4 of these small slit looking areas. R23's Wound Care assessments on 11/22/24,11/27/24,12/6/24,12/11/24, 12/18/24 and 12/26/24 refer to R23's wound as irritant contact dermatitis. The Wound Care assessments document Wound Measurements: not applicable. None of the Wound Care assessments document that there is more than one open area on R23's coccyx. On 01/08/25 at 9:00 AM V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that the facility uses Telehealth wound care doctors that do not come on site or do any hands-on assessments of the wound. V2 reports that she takes a computer tablet and uses the camera function to show the provider the area and then the provider will document an assessment. On 01/09/25 at 11:15 AM V2 (DON) stated that the facility does not measure non pressure ulcers that is why there were no wound measurements done weekly. V2 stated that the wound doctor stated that wound is Moisture Associated Skin Dermatitis therefore not pressure. V2 confirmed that R23's wound is from inability to move and incontinence V2 also confirmed that R23s wound is directly over the pressure point of her coccyx. V2 also confirmed that there is no documentation of how many of the little open areas on R23's coccyx there have been or currently are on R23. CMS website: A pressure ulcer is localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was changed as ordered for one (R33) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care in a total sample...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was changed as ordered for one (R33) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care in a total sample of 33. The findings include: An Oxygen Administration and Storage policy and procedure revised on March 8, 2024 documents a nasal cannula or mask should be changed weekly or when soiled and the humidifier bottle is to be labeled with the date of application and changed weekly if refillable. R33's POS/Physician Order Sheet dated 12/19/24 has orders to change oxygen water bottle on night shift every Sunday night and as needed, date and initial bottle and to change oxygen tubing on Sunday and as needed for infection control. R33's December 2024 TAR/Treatment Administration Record documents Sunday, December 15th 2024 night shift was the last date in December R33's humidification bottle was changed. The two other Sundays (December 22 and December 29, 2024) have no documentation. On 01/07/25 at 10:15 AM, R33 was lying in bed asleep. R33 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula from a concentrator. R33's nasal cannula tubing was dated 12/16/24 and the date on the refillable humidifier bottle was 12/16/24. On 01/08/25 at 9:22 AM, R33's nasal cannula tubing and refillable humidifier bottles were still dated 12/16/24. On 01/08/25 at 1:39 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) confirmed R33's nasal cannula was dated 12 something (day not legible) 24 (2024) and R33's refillable humidity bottle was dated, 12/16/24. V2 confirmed both should be changed weekly.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare medications without cross contaminating the pills for one resident (R23) of four residents observed during a routine m...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare medications without cross contaminating the pills for one resident (R23) of four residents observed during a routine medication pass. Findings Include: The Facility's Standard Precautions policy dated 11/1/2015 documents It is this Facility's policy that Standard Precautions will apply to the care of all residents in all situations regardless of their suspected or confirmed infection disease process. Standard Precautions assume all blood, body fluids and secretions/excretions, non-intact skin and mucous membranes may contain transmissible infectious agents. On 01/08/24 at 10:30 AM V5 (Registered Nurse) had all R23's 9:00 AM medication in a medicine cup that she sat on R23's bed on a clean field while she unclamped and flushed R23's gastric tube. The medicine cup tipped over and spilled two pills directly onto R23's fitted sheet. V5 picked the pills up with her gloved hand and put them back in the cup with the rest of R23s medication. V5 then administered all the medications in the cup via R23's gastric tube. On 01/08/25 at 1:30 PM V5 confirmed that the two pills did roll out of the medicine cup when it tipped over in R23's room. V5 stated I should have thrown those two pills away and got new ones because (R23's) bedsheet would not be considered clean.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities for 15 reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities for 15 residents (R13, R14, R19, R20, R25, R26, R28, R36, R41, R44, R47, R48, R49, R50, R51) that reside on the Memory Care Unit of 33 residents reviewed for activities in the sample of 33. Findings include: Facility Policy/Programming for Resident with Cognitive Impairments dated/revised 11/5/24 documents: It is the Policy of this facility to: Offer meaningful activity programs to residents who display disorientation to time, place and/or person. Promote activity programs to reflect each resident's physical and mental status, and to promote cognitive health. Facility Policy/Activities Programs dated/revised 11/5/25 documents: An ongoing program of activities is designed to meet the needs of each resident. Our activities program consists of individual, and small and large group activities which are designed to meet the needs and interests of each resident. Facility assessment dated [DATE] documents: The facility serves long and short-term residents. It also has a Dementia Unit that is locked. Assessment indicates Services Provided Based on Resident Needs: Provide person-centered/directed care: Psycho/social/spiritual support: Provide opportunities for social activities/life enrichment (individual, small group). Facility Resources Needed to provide Competent Resident Support and Care Daily and During Emergencies: Activities - One Activity Director and 2.5 Activity Assistants. Resident Room Roster dated 1/7/24 indicates there are 15 residents who reside in the locked Memory Care Unit. January 2025 Memory Care Activity Calendar indicates: Tuesday (1/7/25) 7am Breakfast 9am Good Morning 9:30am Greetings 10am Balloon Swat 10:30am Light Tunes 11am Lunch 1pm Spa treatment 2pm Horseshoes 2:30pm Snack cart 3pm Walk with Me 4pm Sensory Dough 5pm Supper 6pm All hands-on deck 6:30pm Sounds of Nature 7pm Snack cart On 1/7/25 at 10:40am V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that activity staff come back on the unit when they can. V6 stated they had not been on the unit that morning and the unit was staffed with one CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and one nurse. On 1/7/25 at 10:45am V6 was monitoring several residents in the dining/common area while the assigned CNA was giving a shower to R14. V6 was attempting to redirect R36 who was dragging a table across the room. R50 and R51 were sitting at a table and staring into space. There was no music or television on at the time. No magazines or other type of table activities were on the tables or nearby. R25, R28 and R48 were in their rooms. R47 was sleeping in a chair by the nurse's station. Wednesday (1/8/25) Memory Unit Activity Calendar 7am Breakfast 9am Good Morning 9:30am Greetings 10am Wednesday Workouts 10:30am Songs of the past 11:30am Lunch 1pm Spa treatment 2pm Crafter's Club 2:30pm Snack cart 3pm Walking Club 4pm Button Sorting 5pm Supper 6pm What's in the bag. 6:30pm Soothing Sounds 7pm Snack cart On 1/8/25 at 2:25pm V7 (Nurse) and V11 (CNA) stated that earlier today, activity staff dropped off a package of craft pieces for the residents to make snowmen. At that time V7 displayed a clear plastic bag full of stick-on eyes, small fabric and paper pieces and multiple other small piece craft supplies. V7 stated We can't do this activity with them. We don't have enough staff to help them with this activity and monitor the other residents too. V7 stated some of the residents would put the pieces in their mouth as that is what happened when activities dropped off some beads for residents to string. V7 stated activities staff expect the nursing staff to do the activities with the residents. V7 stated Otherwise, activity staff doesn't come back here anymore. V11 (CNA) stated my shift started at 2pm and V11 works until 10pm. V11 stated she will be the only CNA assigned to the unit and there is only one nurse for the Memory Care Unit. Thursday (1/9/25) 7am Breakfast 9am Good Morning 9:30am Greetings 10am Parachute Fun 10:30am Morning Melodies 11:30am Lunch 1pm Spa treatment 2pm Kickball 2:30pm Snack cart 3pm Making tracks. 4pm Adult coloring 5pm Supper 6pm Puzzles 6:30pm Mindful melodies 7pm Snack cart On 1/9/25 at 9:25am R50 was noted to be walking down the hallway without any clothes and holding a pillow in front of her naked body. V14 (Nurse) was near the nurse's station passing medications and V8 (CNA) was assisting residents in the dining area. V8 responded and provided assistance to R50 when notified by this surveyor that R50 needed immediate assistance. On 1/9/25 at 9:40am eight residents were sitting in the day area, four of those residents were sleeping. R13 was being redirected from behind the nurse's station by V8 after V8 returned with R50 and assisted her to a table with R51. R50 was noted to be sitting at the table looking down and staring at a blank table. Five residents were in their rooms. On 1/9/25 at 9:50am V8 turned on music in the dining area. Shortly after the music started playing, R51 began tapping her foot to the music. R51's care plan dated 4/4/24 indicates It is very important to me to listen to music. I enjoy reminiscing with others. I enjoy watching comedies, westerns and shows that involve animals. Please turn this on the television. Three days of random observations on the Memory Care Unit - 1/7,1/8, and 1/9/25 found no music playing in the dining area except on 1/9/25 at 9:50am. The television in the same area where the residents sit for most of the day, was not on during any of the observations. No magazines, books or any type of activity materials were accessible to residents in the common/dining area where the majority of the residents spent most of their time. No activity staff arrived on the Memory Care Unit on 1/8/25 at 10am to provide Parachute Fun as listed on the activity calendar for that day. On 1/9/25 at 1:05pm V13 (Activity Aide) was observed painting fingernails for three of the residents R13, R14 and R20. R13 had a busy board in her lap and was intently engaged in working the various objects on the board. V13 stated Yes, (R13) really likes that. I keep it on my cart. I don't leave it back here. I keep my supplies on my cart which I take with me when I leave the unit. On 1/9/25 at 3:30pm V9 (Activity Director) stated V13 only works eight hours per week and V10 (Activity Aide) works full time So, I really only have one other activity employee besides myself. V9 stated Last year there were five of us. V9 stated the expectation is that the CNAs on the unit lead the activities But I know that's not always possible. V9 stated there are totes behind the nurse's station with activity supplies. V9 acknowledged the snowman crafts project was not suitable for most of the residents on the unit and acknowledged some of residents do put the supplies in their mouth. V9 stated that V10 works every other weekend but does not work on the Memory Care Unit at all on the weekends so there are no activities on the weekends for that unit. V9 also stated there are no activities in the Memory Care Unit on alternating Mondays and Fridays because V10 does not work on those days and I am the only one here and can't get back there on those days. V9 acknowledged the Activity Calendar programming often does not get done due to lack of activity staff.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication for use to administer...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication for use to administer antipsychotic medications and failed to identify and document target behaviors for six residents (R25, R26, R36, R48, R50, R51) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications in the sample of 33. Findings include: Facility Policy/Psychotropic Medication Management dated 12/4/24 documents: The medical record documentation must reflect the specific behaviors/symptoms and the resident's response to non-pharmacological interventions to manage the behaviors/symptoms. The physician should evaluate use of antipsychotic medication use if one or more of the following is/are the only indication: Wandering; Poor self-care; Restlessness; Impaired Memory; Anxiety; Depression (without psychotic features); Insomnia; Unsociability; Indifference to surrounding; Fidgeting; Nervousness; Uncooperativeness; Agitated behaviors which do not represent danger to resident or others. 1.) Current Physician Orders Summary Report indicates R25 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses that include Frontotemporal Neurocognitive Disorder, Frontotemporal Dementia, Unspecified Dementia, Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective. Summary Report also indicates R25 has orders to receive Haloperidol (antipsychotic) 0.5mg (milligram) two time per day related to bipolar disorder and Schizophrenia (date initiated 2/2/23) and Quetiapine (antipsychotic) 150mg at bedtime related to bipolar disorder (date initiated 12/24/24). Pharmacy Recommendations dated 9/29/24 indicates (Psych) recently increased Seroquel (Quetiapine) due to hallucinations. Psychiatric Evaluation and Consultation dated 12/17/24 indicates R25 continues to appear confused, is crying and calls her family a lot of times. Evaluation indicates R25 Still sometimes makes up false stories about her family based off the television show however her family can help redirect her through those thoughts. Evaluation indicates R25 is showing signs of increased anxiety and depression; no symptoms of psychosis or mania; no evidence of auditory or visual hallucinations. Evaluation indicates R25 has some exit seeking behaviors, follows the nurses around and has been crying a lot. On 1/9/25 at 10:13am V8 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated she only works in the Memory Care Unit and stated that 25's behaviors are confusion, sometimes tries to elope, cries to leave and go home and is unsteady on her feet. Behavior Monitoring 12/13/24 to 1/8/25 indicates R25 exhibited: Frequent crying 6 times Wandering 8 times Repeats Movement 3 times Rejection of care 2 times Pacing 3 times Disrobe in Public 2 times Current Care Plan indicates R25 is on anti-psychotic therapy related to Schizophrenia. R25's Current Care Plan does not include target behaviors requiring the use of antipsychotic medications. 2) Current Physician Orders Summary Report indicates R26 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses that include Moderate Severity Dementia and Mood (Affective) Disorder. Summary Report indicates R26 receives Risperidone (antipsychotic) 0.5mg two times per day (date initiated 11/18/24) related to Mood (Affective Disorder). On 1/9/25 at 2:45pm V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated R26 has not yet been seen by any psychiatric services. On 1/9/25 at 10:10am V8 (CNA) stated R26's behaviors are wandering and not sleeping at night. Behavior Monitoring 12/13/24 to 1/8/25 indicates R26 exhibited: Wandering 10 times Pacing 2 times Rejection of care once Yelling/screaming/disruptive sounds 2 times Repeats Movement 2 times Current Care Plan indicates R26 is on anti-psychotic therapy related to Affective Disorder. R26's Current Care Plan does not include target behaviors requiring the use of antipsychotic medications. 3) Current Physician Orders Summary Report indicates R36 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses that include Depression, Anxiety, Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance. Summary Report indicates R36 receives Risperidone 0.5mg twice daily related to aggressiveness and irritability (date initiated 10/23/24). Psychiatric Evaluation and Consultation dated 12/24/24 indicates R36 has had no aggressive behaviors, and she is doing well; no anxiety out of the ordinary; no symptoms of psychosis or mania were observed or reported; no evidence of auditory or visual hallucinations. Eval indicates to continue Risperdal for irritability and aggressiveness. On 1/9/24 at 10:12am V8 (CNA) stated R36's behaviors are poor sleep, sometimes not sleeping for two days. Behavior Monitoring 12/1/24 to 1/8/25 indicates R36 exhibited: Kicking/Hitting/Pushing/Grabbing 2 times Yelling/Screaming/Disruptive Sounds/Rejection of Care 6 times Frequent Crying 8 times Wandering 9 times Disrobing in public twice Current Care Plan indicates R36 is on anti-psychotic therapy related to Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Disorder. R36's Current Care Plan does not include target behaviors requiring the use of antipsychotic medications. 4) Current Physician Order Summary Report indicates R48 is [AGE] years old and has the following diagnoses: Unspecified Dementia with Agitation and Behavioral Disturbance. Order Summary indicates R48 receives Risperdal 1mg twice daily related to Unspecified Dementia with Agitation (date initiated 8/23/24). Psychiatric Evaluation and Consultation dated 12/24/24 indicates R48 had no symptoms of psychosis or mania reported or observed; no evidence of auditory or visual hallucinations; no reports of mood instability. On 1/9/24 at 10:10am V8 (CNA) stated R48 has no behaviors other than refuses toileting and/or incontinent care at times. Behavior Monitoring 12/1/24 to 1/9/25 indicates R48 exhibited: Rejection of Care twice. Current Care Plan indicates R48 is on anti-psychotic therapy related to Aggression. Care Plan indicates R48's Target behaviors are: Thinking he is in the military at war, telling staff people are going to shoot through the window, wanting to speak with his sergeant, believing his fire alarm is a camera and he is being watched. These target behaviors were not added to R48's care plan until 1/7/24 (Survey Day 1). 5) Current Physician Orders Summary Report indicates R50 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses that include Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance (3/23/24), Anxiety, Insomnia; Schizoaffective Disorder (12/27/24). Summary Report also indicates R50 has orders to receive Risperidone - 1mg twice daily related to Hallucinations/Aggressive Behavior (date initiated 12/26/24). Psychiatric Evaluation and Consultation dated 12/2424 indicates R50 is hitting people in the face, still hallucinating, and speaking to people who aren't there; believes she is running a business and has to run to meet people. Evaluation indicates R50 is having some auditory and visual hallucinations. Evaluation indicates R50's Risperdal was increased on 12/26/24 from 0.5 mg twice daily to 1mg twice daily. On 1/9/24 at 10:15am V8 (CNA) stated R50's behaviors are that R50 screams at self in mirror, disrobes, is mean to other residents/verbal and physical, paranoid/suspicious. On 1/9/24 at 9:50am R50 was seen coming out of her room naked holding a pillow in front of her. R50 accepted redirection from staff to go back to her room to get dressed. A short time later, R50 was assisted to a table in the dining area and given a snack. R50 also took her scheduled medications when offered by the nurse. Behavior Monitoring 12/1/24 to 1/8/25 indicates R50 exhibited: Rejection of Care once Wandering 3 times Frequent Crying once Current Care Plan indicates R50 is currently on Antipsychotic therapy related to schizoaffective disorder. R50's Current Care Plan does not include target behaviors requiring the use of antipsychotic medications. 6) Current Physician Orders Summary Report indicates R51 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses that include Moderate Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Alzheimer's Disease, Metabolic Encephalopathy. Summary Report also indicates R50 has orders to receive Quetiapine 50mg twice daily related to Dementia. Psychiatric Evaluation and Consultation dated 11/26/24 indicates (R51) has no current significant behavioral issues that needs medication changes. Evaluation indicates R51 has no auditory or visual hallucinations. Progress Note dated 6/11/24 indicates R51 moved from South unit to Memory Care room, has displayed no untoward behaviors this far, continues to wander about in her wheelchair as is her habit. On 1/9/24 at 10:16am V8 (CNA) stated R51's behaviors are She just wants to be left alone. Behavior Monitoring 12/1/24 to 1/8/25 indicates R51 exhibited no behavioral symptoms. Current Care Plan indicates R51 is currently on antipsychotic therapy related to Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance. R51's Current Care Plan does not include target behaviors requiring the use of antipsychotic medications. On 1/9/24 at 10:30am V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that she is responsible for the residents who are on psychotropic medications. V2 stated the residents in the Memory Care Unit have Tele-Health Psychiatric services that started about 2 months ago. V2 stated that the Psychiatric services get the information about the residents from the staff And some of the staff think the answer to behaviors is more medications, so they are part of the problem. V2 stated I think it's gotten out of hand back there - as far as the number of residents receiving antipsychotic medications. V2 stated I knew this was going to happen. I haven't been able to get back there to clean this up. V2 stated the care plans should have target behaviors as part of the reason the psychotropic medications are needed.
Jun 2024 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the memory care unit exit doors and bracelet al...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the memory care unit exit doors and bracelet alarms were loud and widespread enough to alert staff when activated. The facility failed to identify and investigate incidents of elopement, revise a care plan, and implement interventions for a resident who eloped from the facility. The facility failed to follow facility elopement policies and failed to provide adequate supervision for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for elopement in the sample of three. These failures resulted in a cognitively impaired resident (R1) who resides in the facility's locked memory care unit, exiting the facility without staff knowledge and being found soaking wet, laying on the parking lot pavement with facial and head trauma accompanied with excessive bleeding, approximately 50 to 70 feet from the exit doors. R1 was found at approximately 5:45pm and the weather was pouring down rain and cool. R1 was transferred to the local emergency room and later transferred to a tertiary (higher level) hospital where he was admitted to an intensive care unit for treatment of facial and cervical spine fractures. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/10/24 when R1 left the building unsupervised. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 6/4/24 at 9:20 AM. On 6/5/24 the state surveying agency accepted a plan of correction submitted in regard to Elopement management. While the immediacy was removed on 6/5/24, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of their removal plan and quality assurance program. The facility's Wandering and Elopement policy, dated 8/24/20, documents All residents in this facility shall be assessed for risk of elopement/unsafe wandering, utilizing the Elopement Risk Assessment tool. Procedure: Elopement is defined as a wandering resident who is assessed as being cognitively impaired, who is not capable of protecting him/herself from harm who has left the building unsupervised. If the resident is considered to have eloped, the incident must be reported to (the State Agency). This facility will complete assessment upon admission, readmission, quarterly, significant change and upon an attempt of elopement, each resident will be assessed for their risk assessment utilizing the Elopement Risk Assessment tool. This policy also documents An accident/incident report must be done by the charge nurse. All incidents of elopement must be investigated by nursing administration and reported to the facility administrator. The administrator of his designee must report every incident of elopement to the (State Agency). All incidents of elopement must result in comprehensive care plan review/revision. The facility's Fall Reduction policy, dated 11/5/19, documents Purpose: To provide an environment that remains as free of accident hazards as possible. To identify residents who are at risk for falling and to develop appropriate interventions to provide supervision and assistive devices to prevent or minimize fall related injuries. To promotes a systematic approach and monitoring process for the care of residents who have fallen and/or those who are determined to be at risk. R1's current electronic Care Plan, printed on 5/29/24, documents R1 has diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disorder, Anxiety, Epilepsy and recurrent Seizures, Repeated Falls, Muscle Weakness, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Lack of Coordination, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. This care plan documents My current risk for Wandering /Elopement is high risk and my safety will be monitored every shift by all staff. This care plan was implemented on 5/25/23 and has no updated intervention since 2023. This same Care Plan documents I currently have an alteration in my behavior status related to exit seeking, insomnia, aggression towards staff, yelling/screaming, rejection of care. This care plan was last updated/revised on 4/30/24. This same Care Plan documents I am currently a High Risk for falls. Cognitive Deficit, Vision Impairment, Poor balance. This care plan was last updated on 1/25/24. R1's Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 4/12/24, documents R1's mental cognition is severely impaired. R1's Behavior Note, dated 5/10/24 at 1:55 PM, documents Resident reached door to 400 hall, alarm (ankle bracelet) sounded. Staff followed behind and was able to redirect (R1) back inside. (V2 Director of Nursing) aware. R1's Behavior Note, dated 5/14/24 at 8:57 PM, documents (R1 is) antsy, wandering this shift. Becoming slightly aggressive when staff tries to redirect him. Aide was able to get him to the restroom and changed and ready for bed. Currently resting in bed with eyes closed and breathing even and unlabored. R1's Nursing Progress Note, dated 5/24/24 at 6:00 PM, and completed by V2 (Director of Nursing) documents Late Entry: Note Text: Nurse observed resident (R1) on the ground around 5:45 PM, resident noted to have injuries to face, knees, and arms. 911 (Emergency Services) called. Nurse then requested supplies to help stop bleeding. Ambulance arrived and transported resident (R1) to hospital. R1's Wandering/Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 4/4/24, documents R1 was assessed to be at a high risk of elopement. R1's Wandering/Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 5/27/24, documents R1 has No history of escape or elopement. The facility's incident report to the State Agency, dated 5/25/24, documents 5/24/24: (R1) is [AGE] years old with diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia, Severe without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, Anxiety, Muscle wasting and Atrophy, was observed on the ground by nurse. Resident ambulating self without walker. EMS (Emergency Medical Services) called and transferred to the Emergency Room. On 5/29/24 at 10:24 AM, V6 (Local emergency room Registered Nurse) stated I was (R1's) nurse in the emergency room. From my understanding staff saw the resident outside (the facility) and called 911. Emergency Medical Services reported they got the call that (R1) was found outside on the ground with facial trauma. (R1) had an ankle bracelet on and there was a facility staff member (V15 Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) who came with the resident. (V15) told me who he was and that he was a resident in the facility's memory care unit. (R1) had facial injuries but also had further testing and his injuries were pretty significant. (R1) arrived in the emergency room at 6:06 PM and was discharged to (tertiary hospital) at 8:48 PM, due to his injuries. On 5/29/24 at 12:00 PM, V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated (R1) typically is an exit seeker. Especially lately, he didn't want to take his Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) and he would become more anxious. (R1) was aggressive that morning (5/24). We (staff) would sit with him and that would help him stay calm. (R1) required a lot of one-on-one attention. When (R1) would exit seek, he would always go to the end of the hall exit door. That is the exit I believe he used that day (5/24). I am not sure if it alarmed or not. You may not hear it if you were further up the hall because it's not a loud alarm noise. (R1) has gotten outside before this incident. Maybe about a month ago (R1) got out into the facility parking lot. On 5/29/24 at 2:20 PM, V8 (CNA) stated I was working that day (5/24) in (R1's) unit. I had taken him to the bathroom probably 10-15 minutes prior to when he was found. I went to the linen closet and took (R3) into their room. Once I got done in (R3's) room I was going out and the other CNA (V14) was coming back from break, and she notified me of (R1) being outside. I went down to see if they (staff) needed help. Sometimes (R1) does just tend to get up and walk. He uses a walker to get around. When I was in (R3's) room I didn't hear any alarms with the door closed but once I opened the door, I could hear an alarm sounding down the hall. The (ankle bracelet) and the door alarm were all going off. (V7 Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was the nurse for the memory care unit that day, she was also in another room with a resident. On 5/29/24 at 2:40 PM, V13 (CNA) stated I was taking my linen out just before 6:00 PM (on 5/24). I noticed there was an oncoming nurse (V9 LPN) banging on the door outside of the 300 hall exit door. She was hollering for help. (V15 CNA) and I both went to (R1) and then I called (V2 Director of Nursing), (V15) called 911, we both saw (V9) at the same time. Employees enter that way which is how (V9) saw him. (R1) was laying partially on his butt also trying to push himself up. Once he saw help, we had control of him. The weather was pouring down rain that day, not super cold, maybe high 60's (degree Fahrenheit) temperature. To me it looked like (R1) fell face first in the parking lot. That's where he was when we got to him. It would have taken him a good ten minutes at least to get from where he exited the locked unit door to where we found him. There is some grass out there and also pavement. I entered back into the locked unit. I could hear the locked unit alarm going off from outside the doors. I couldn't hear any alarms inside the building from the 300 hall. I do know that (R1) has gotten out before. I am actually the one who found him that time. (R1) was holding onto one of the signs out there. A male was outside mowing and banged on the door (of the 300 hall) from the outside. He was alerting us that we had a resident outside. I can't remember if the alarm was going off that day. I just remember the adrenaline of it all and getting him back inside the building. That time he was maybe 10 feet away from the building, closer than he was this last time (5/24). On 5/30/24 at 11:05 AM, V15 (CNA) walked down the 300 hall and outside to the employee parking lot. V15 pointed to a lined area of parking lot pavement and stated (R1) was lying here in a rain puddle, and you could see his blood mixed in the water. Who knows how long he was laying there or how long before he had fallen once he got out. (V9) was coming into work this way, and she is the one who found him. V9's (LPN) written statement, dated 5/24/24, documents I arrived at (the facility) on May 24th for my 12 hour shift (around 5:45 PM). Upon entering the facility's back parking lot, I saw an individual lying on the ground, in a puddle, unable to get up. I ran to the 300 hall door and knocked for assistance. I requested gauze to apply to the resident's face to stop the bleeding. (R1) was taken by ambulance for injuries. On 6/3/24 at 10:00 AM, V7 (LPN) confirmed she was working in the memory care unit on 5/24/24 when R1 got outside of the building unattended. V7 stated (V14 CNA) was on break. (V8 CNA) was in a resident's room (R3) by the nurse's station with the door closed. I was in another resident's room (R2), trying to get him calmed down. I came out the get (V8) to help me with (R2) and that is when I heard the alarm. At that time there was already several staff outside with the resident and so I started getting paperwork ready to be sent to the hospital. (V8) and I couldn't hear the alarms when in resident rooms. (R1) is a known wanderer and has gotten out from time to time. He is usually re-directable when he is walking. During the time that (R1) was outside it was pouring down rain. On 5/29/24 at 2:19 PM, V1 confirmed the facility did not report R1's elopement on 5/24/24 to the State Agency. V1 stated We reported the fall with injury to (the State Agency). We did not report the elopement because (R1) was still on the property. (R1) was outside but not off property and that is what I was told to do. On 5/30/24 at 10:15 AM, V1 activated the locked memory care unit's ankle bracelet alarm and confirmed that when you are up the hall or if inside a resident's room it may not be audible. V1 then activated the exit door alarm that R1 exited on 5/24/24. The alarm was much louder but only alarmed at the exit doorway. V1 confirmed there is no speaker for this alarm up the hallway, at the nurse's station or anywhere else in the facility outside of the locked memory care unit. V1 confirmed that R1 has had another incident of getting out prior to this one and believes the date was 5/10/24. On 5/30/24 at 11:24 AM, V18 (Social Services Director) stated I do a wandering/elopement assessment in the computer quarterly, annually and with significant change. If there is an incident, we make sure alarms are working, care plan updated and see if assessment needs updated. On May 10th, (R1) breeched the door on 400 hall (in the memory care unit). What was reported to me is that he breeched the door and was brought back in by a CNA. After the 5/10/24 incident of getting out of the building, I reviewed the care plan, and we checked that alarms were sounding. I also checked to make sure they were doing 15-minute checks on (R1) and they were. So, I didn't have any new form or any care plan update to complete. On 6/3/24 at 10:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated Upon further investigating the incident where (R1) was found in the parking lot before the 5/24/24 incident was on 5/10/24. I think the reason it didn't get reported as an elopement is because our maintenance man (V20) was outside mowing, and he saw (R1) and they got him back into the building. So (R1) didn't go far. I didn't know he got outside at all during that incident until last week when you asked. It was never relayed to me. On 6/3/24 at 12:55 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated I was not here that day (5/24), but I went in and made the notes in the resident's record once I read (employee) statements. On 5/10/24 I saw an CNA (V19) walking by quickly and so I followed her into the memory unit and then we went down by the (exit) doors. The alarm was going off, but the aids (V10 and V11 CNAs) were in the 500 hall (past the memory care nurse's station) and they thought it was the other door to go into the facility, due to it not being super loud. So, I went down to the end of the hall and when we went to open the door (V13 CNA) was coming in with (R1). I didn't do an investigation or an incident report. They (V13 and V20) had seen him right around the corner and so I didn't see it as an elopement. (V16 LPN) was the nurse that day and when I went back up the hall, she was behind the nurse's station. (V16) said she was in the medication room and didn't hear the alarm sounding. R1's Emergency Physician Note, dated 5/24/24, documents (R1) was found on the ground bleeding from the mouth. According to staff member at (facility) I spoke to, the Certified Nursing Assistant said she saw (R1) ten minutes prior to him being discovered down. Unknown loss of consciousness. Patient with history of Dementia, unable to contribute to history. Noted facial/mouth bleeding and deformity. Abrasions to bilateral knees. These Physician Notes also document Impression and Plan: Fall, Fracture of Thoracic Spine, Cervical Spine Fracture, Bilateral Mandibular (lower jaw) Fracture, Closed Maxillary (upper jaw) fracture. Transfer to (tertiary hospital) on 5/24/24 at 8:40 PM. R1's (tertiary hospital) emergency room to admission notes, dated 5/25/24, documents R1 was admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care unit on 5/25/24. This note documents R1 underwent a T10-T11 (thoracic spine) Open Reduction Internal Fixation with Percutaneous screws on 5/26/24 and was transferred to the hospital's Neuroscience Critical Care unit on 5/27/24. On 6/3/24 at 2:30 PM, V1 confirmed R1 remains hospitalized . On 6/6/24 the surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy. 1. An audit of the memory care unit's alarms was conducted and determined that all exit alarms are functioning and audible, including behind closed doors. All 17 rooms (100%) were audited on the unit, including the room furthest from the exit. 5/5/24 & 6/4/24 2. All nursing staff present were in-serviced on: May 25, 2024 -Proper monitoring and supervision of residents at risk for elopement -The definition of elopement -Review of the facility's elopement detection and prevention systems -The need to reassess and review a resident's plan of care after an elopement. 5/25/24 3. All residents at high risk for elopement have been reviewed and no instances of exiting the building unattended have been identified. 5/28/24
Mar 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise the care plans for three residents (R13, R16, R5...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise the care plans for three residents (R13, R16, R53) of 14 residents reviewed for care plans in the sample of 25. Findings include: Facility Policy/Comprehensive Care Plan dated 6/25/20 documents: Care plans are revised as changes in the resident's condition dictate. Facility Policy/Psychotropic Medication Management dated 12/4/19 documents: A plan of care will be developed to include precipitating factors, non-pharmacologic interventions, and potential side effects. Residents will receive ongoing evaluation to identify possible causes that may be reduced or eliminated through care plan modification. 1.) On 3/5/24 at 10:15am R13 was sitting in her room with the lights off and did not want the light turned on. R13 appeared confused and was unable to answer simple questions appropriately. Fall Incident Report dated 1/16/24 at 7:45pm indicates R13 was found sitting on the floor next to her recliner chair which was occupied by another resident. Report indicates R13 was not interviewable and unable to give any details regarding the incident. Report indicates intervention implemented was to increase activities for (R13) while still awake. Current Fall Care Plan was not updated with R13's fall on 1/16/24 or with interventions. Current Physician Order Summary Report indicates R13 has orders for Risperidone (antipsychotic) 0.25mg (milligrams) twice daily for Delusional Disorder (date initiated 10/26/23). Current Care Plan dated 3/5/24 indicates R13 is currently on Anti-psychotic therapy for Delusional Disorder. Care Plan does not indicate target behaviors requiring the use of an antipsychotic medication. 2.) Incident Report dated 2/15/24 at 4:50pm indicates R16 was found sitting on the floor in front of a chair in the common area of the Memory Care unit. Incident Report indicates intervention was to place non-skid material in chair of R16's choice when in the common area. Current Care Plan was not updated with R16's fall on 2/15/24 or with interventions. 3.) Current Physician's Order Summary Report indicates R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance. Order Summary includes an order for Seroquel (antipsychotic) 25mg twice daily for Anxiety related to Dementia (date initiated 2/22/24). Current Care Plan indicates R53 is on Anti-psychotic therapy. Care plan does not identify target behaviors for use of an antipsychotic medication. On 3/8/24 at 11:20am V1 (Administrator) stated A fall should automatically get pulled over into the care plan from the incident report. On 3/8/24 at 2:30pm V1 and V2 (Director of Nursing) stated it's been difficult to keep up with the care plans, so the plan is to have the MDS (Minimum Data Set)/Care Plan Coordinator take over the care plans.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide an appropriate indication for use of an antipsy...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide an appropriate indication for use of an antipsychotic medication for two residents (R13, R53) with a diagnosis of Dementia of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 25. Findings include: Facility Policy/Psychotropic Medication Management dated 12/4/19 documents: An assessment must be conducted to identify specific behaviors/symptoms, potential causative factors, and recommendations for managing identified behaviors. The physician should evaluate the use of antipsychotic medication use if one or more of the following are the only indication: Wandering, poor self-care, restlessness, impaired memory, anxiety, depression (without psychotic features), insomnia, unsociability, indifference to surroundings, fidgeting, nervousness, uncooperativeness, or agitated behaviors which do not represent danger to the resident or others. The resident or (resident representative)/responsible party will be advised on the non-pharmacological interventions attempted and the response. The need for psychotropic medication, indication for use and any potential side effects will be presented to assist them in making an informed decision. 1. On 3/5/24 at 10:15am R13 was sitting in her room with the lights off and did not want the light turned on. R13 appeared confused and was unable to answer simple questions appropriately. On 3/8/25 at 10:20am V9 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated that R13 Sometimes talks to people who aren't there and/or sometimes wants to cover her baby up, but there is no baby. V9 stated that R13 did not appear to be distressed when talking to people who aren't there or when she wanted to cover up her baby. V9 stated R13 can be resistive to care at times Last night she slapped away the night CNA's hands. Psychiatric Evaluation and Consultation (obtained via tele-medicine) Note dated 2/6/24 indicates R13 is [AGE] years old is alert, cooperative and of broad affect. R13's mood is okay but looks confused. Note recommends obtaining a urinalysis to rule out a UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). Behavior Monitoring dated 2/1/24 to 3/5/24 indicates R13 is monitored for agitation/restlessness, delusions, exit-seeking, and refusal of care. Monitoring indicates there were five occurrences of refusal of care - all other behaviors did not occur. Current Physician Order Summary Report indicates R13 has orders for Risperidone (antipsychotic) 0.25mg (milligrams) twice daily for Delusional Disorder (date initiated 10/26/23). Psychotropic Medication Consent indicates consent was signed by R13's representative on 8/2/23 for R13 to receive Risperdal 0.25mg for Depressive Disorder. Consent does not include how often Risperdal should be given or specific behaviors exhibited by R13 requiring the use of an antipsychotic medication. R13's Care Plan dated 3/5/24 indicates R13 is currently on Anti-psychotic therapy for Delusional Disorder. Care Plan does not include specific target behaviors. On 3/8/24 at 11:45am V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that R13 has less behaviors than in the past, but still can be resistive to care. 2. On 3/5/24 at various times of the day, R53 was seen in his room and complained of not feeling well. Later during the day R53 asked for some cookies. R53 did present guarded, confused with disorganized thinking. On 3/8/24 at 10:20am V9 (CNA) stated that R53 used to be always trying to go through the exit doors and verbally aggressive toward staff. On 3/8/24 at 11:45am V2 (DON) stated that R53 used to be delusional about being in the war but was never in a war. V2 stated R53 has been aggressive toward staff but not toward residents. Psychiatric Evaluation and Consultation (obtained via tele-medicine) Note dated 2/20/24 indicates R53 is [AGE] years old who was alert and cooperative. Note indicates per nurse R13 yells and tries to throw stuff at the staff before now. Note recommends to Increase Seroquel to 25mg twice daily. Note indicates R53 denies Suicidal Ideation, Homicidal Ideation and Audio-Visual Hallucinations. Behavior Monitoring dated 21/24 to 3/5/24 indicates R53 exhibited yelling, screaming, wandering (8 occurrences), and was also monitored for agitation/restlessness (10 occurrences), delusions (7 occurrences), exit-seeking (12 occurrences), hallucinations (2 occurrences) and physical/verbal aggression (10 occurrences). Monitoring does not include nature/content of delusions or hallucinations. Current Physician's Order Summary Report indicates R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance. Order Summary includes an order for Seroquel (antipsychotic) 25mg twice daily for Anxiety related to Dementia (date initiated 2/22/24). Psychotropic Medication Consent indicates R53's representative signed a consent for R53 to receive Seroquel 25mg by mouth twice daily for Agitation. Consent does not indicate specific behaviors R53 was exhibiting requiring the use on an antipsychotic medication. Current Care Plan indicates R53 is on Anti-psychotic therapy. Care plan does not identify target behaviors for use of an antipsychotic medication. On 3/8/24 at 2:30pm V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) stated they have been auditing the psychotropics during care plan meetings, but were unaware of the consent discrepancies.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy for the Antibiotic Stewardship Program. This failu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy for the Antibiotic Stewardship Program. This failure has the potential to affect all 57 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: Facility Room Resident Room Roster dated 3/5/24 documents 57 residents in the facility. The Facility's Infection Control with Antibiotic Stewardship Policy dated 11/01/2015 documents this policy establishes directives for antibiotic stewardship at this facility in order to develop antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The Facility's Infection Control with Antibiotic Stewardship Policy dated 11/01/2015 documents The Antibiotic Stewardship Committee will: support and promote antibiotic use protocols which include Assessment of residents for infection using standardized tools and criteria. The criteria used by this facility are Mc [NAME] Criteria-see policy. The McGeer Criteria for Long Term Care is defined by the CDC (Center for Disease Control) website as an assessment of infections that considers fever, leukocytosis (high white blood cell count), acute change in mental status or acute functional decline. The Facility's Infection Control Monitoring Logs for December 2023, January and February 2024 did not include any documentation of the use of the standardized tool (McGreer Criteria) for any of the infections listed. On 03/06/2024 V2 (Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist) confirmed there was no documentation of any standardized assessment for any of the facility's known infections. V2 stated I keep telling the nurses they need to fill out the McGreer Data Tool for all of the infections because it gives a bigger picture, I guess I will be telling them again.
Nov 2022 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to avoid contamination of a stage 4 pressure ulcer during a dressing change for one (R6) of three residents reviewed for pressure ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to avoid contamination of a stage 4 pressure ulcer during a dressing change for one (R6) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 23. Findings include: Facility Clean Dressing Change Policy, undated, documents: it is the policy of this Facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross-contamination; loosen the tape and remove the existing dressing, then remove gloves, pulling inside out over the dressing and discard in to the appropriate receptacle, then wash hands and put on clean gloves; cleanse the wound as ordered, then wash hands and put on clean gloves; discard disposable items and gloves into appropriate trash receptacle and wash hands, then return Resident to comfortable position. The Facility Wound Log, dated 11/7/22, documents that R6 has a Left Buttock Pressure Ulcer (measuring 5.0 centimeters/cm by 8.0 cm x 1.0 cm) and is being treated daily with a medicated solution and a dry dressing. On 11/16/22 at 12:01 pm, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) were in R6's room assisting with perineal care and wound care. V4 (CNA) entered R6's room, applied gloves, rolled R6, pulled back the covers, removed R6's urine soiled incontinence brief. V4 (CNA) retrieved clean incontinence wipes from a container that was in R6's bedside table drawer. V4 performed perineal care and disposed of the soiled wipes into the trash receptacle. V4 then placed the clean container of incontinence wipes back into R6's bedside drawer. V5 (LPN) entered the room with a bottle of medicated solution and a bottle of wound cleanser and placed them on R6's bedside table. V5 applied gloves and initiated the removal of R6's soiled pressure ulcer dressing, at the same time, V4 reached over R6 and assisted V5 (LPN) with removing R6's soiled Pressure Ulcer dressing, by peeling back the dressing. As V4 was helping position R6 for V5 to apply the clean dressing, V4's right hand was placed on R6's soiled coccyx and buttock. V5 (LPN) then retrieved the bottle of wound cleanser and cleansed R6's Pressure Ulcer, by spraying the cleanser into R6's wound and wiping with gauze pads. V5 (LPN) then retrieved and applied the medicated solution and covered the coccyx/buttocks pressure ulcer with a clean dry dressing. V4 and V5 did not perform any hand hygiene or glove change during R6's cares. On 11/16/22 at 12:10 pm, V4 (CNA) stated, We only change our gloves or wash our hands if our hands are visibly soiled. On 11/16/22 at 12:35 pm, V4 (CNA) stated, I always try and help the nurses take off the soiled dressings when I can. On 11/16/22 at 12:11 pm, V5 (LPN) stated, We do not have to wash our hands, put new gloves on or use hand sanitizer unless our hands are visibly dirty. On 11/17/22 at 1:30 pm, V1 (Administrator) stated, We will in-service them on handwashing and glove changes. They should be changing their gloves and washing their hands during cares, especially when they are soiled from wound care or incontinence care.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a palm guard for one resident (R26) with bilateral hand contractions of two residents reviewed for mobility in the sam...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a palm guard for one resident (R26) with bilateral hand contractions of two residents reviewed for mobility in the sample of 25 residents. Findings include: On 11/15/22 at 10:30am R26 was in her room, both hands were severely contracted. R26 was wearing cloth arm/hand skin sleeves on both arms. R26 stated that she would like her nails trimmed because they can dig into her skin, but the cloth sleeves help protect her skin. R26 was seen on 11/15/22 and 11/16/22 without palm guards on either hand. PT (Physical Therapy)/OT (Occupational Therapy) Screen Form dated 8/29/22 indicates Reason for Screen: Decline in functional mobility and worsening of contracture of right hand. Screen indicates right hand contracture worse Has bilateral palm guards in order to decrease possible skin irritation. Contractures are worse due to not wearing palm guards during day and removing. Screen indicates Recommend therapy to address device for right hand contracture. Resident Concern Form dated 10/20/22 indicates R26 has missing palm guards and that palm guards were ordered. On 11/16/22 at 3:15pm V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that the concern for R26's palm guards came up at R26's last care conference by R26's family. V2 stated she ordered them and was still waiting for them. On 11/17/22 at 10am V10 (Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant) stated R26 should still being using a palm guard on her left hand. The right is too contracted to get anything in there anymore. I recommended and gave elastic/cloth sleeves to wear to protect R26's skin from her nails. It's all that will fit into her right hand. V10 stated that R26 has had four palm guards and they all ended up missing. V10 stated that R26 can't tolerate anything in her right hand anymore but she will keep the left palm guard in her hand. Nursing is responsible to ensure R26 has a palm guard for her left hand. Current Care Plan did not include R26's bilateral severe hand contractures or interventions including palm guards. On 11/18/22 V1 (Administrator) stated they have no policy for contractures or splints.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and glove changes during incontinence care and wound care for three residents (R6, R12, R43) of five revie...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and glove changes during incontinence care and wound care for three residents (R6, R12, R43) of five reviewed for infection control in a sample of 23. Findings include: Facility Perineal/Incontinence Care Policy and Procedure, revised 11/5/2019, documents: to provide hand hygiene and apply gloves; remove soiled brief/underpad and assure all area affected by incontinence have been cleansed then remove gloves and perform hand hygiene and apply clean gloves; apply protective ointment as a part of incontinence care, remove gloves and perform hand hygiene, discard contaminated items in container, remove gloves and perform hand hygiene then reposition resident. 1.) On 11/16/22 at 12:01 pm, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA), V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) and V6 (CNA) were in R6's room assisting with perineal care and wound care. V4 (CNA) entered R6's room, applied gloves, rolled R6 pulled back the covers, removed R6's urine soiled incontinence brief. V4 (CNA) removed clean incontinence wipes from a container that was retrieved out of R6's bedside table drawer. V4 performed perineal care and disposed of the soiled wipes into the trash receptacle. V4 then placed the clean container of incontinence wipes into R6's bedside drawer. V4 then assisted V5 (LPN) with R6's stage four coccyx/buttock pressure ulcer. V4 peeled back R6's soiled dressing, and as V4 was helping position R6 for V4 to change the dressing, R6's right hand was placed on R6's soiled coccyx and buttock. V4 then applied a new incontinence brief, repositioned R6 and pulled up R6's bed covers. Then V4 (CNA) proceeded to run V4's contaminated gloved hands through R6's hair and rubbed R6's ears and cheeks. V4 adjusted V4's face mask, and then adjusted R6's bed height and removed the contaminated gloves, and exited R6's room. V4 did not perform any hand hygiene or glove change during R6's cares. 2.) R12's Physician Order Sheet, dated 11/17/22, documents that R12 has a skin tear to the right lower leg (ankle) and has a treatment order for a daily dressing. R12's Hospital Microbiology Report, dated 11/2/22, documents that R12 has Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in the right leg (ankle). On 11/16/22 at 12:25 pm, R12 was residing in an isolation room. On 11/16/22 at 12:25 pm, V4 (CNA) and V5 (LPN) were performing wound care to R12. V5 was out of R12's room retrieving wound treatment supplies and V4 (CNA) entered R12's isolation room, and without performing hand hygiene, applied gloves. V4 (CNA) proceeded to attempt to remove R12's right ankle dressing, by inserting three middle fingers inside of R12's wound dressing. V4 then stated, I cannot get that off, I need to get some scissors. V4 (CNA), without V5 (LPN) in the room, then removed R12's infected Left Shin (MRSA) outer dressing, and with the same contaminated gloves, attempted to remove the impacted wound bed dressing and was unsuccessful. Then without performing hand hygiene and/or a glove change, V4 (CNA) proceeded to remove R12's necklace and placed it on R12's bedside table. V4 (CNA) then adjusted R12's blankets and clothing, then caressed/rubbed R12's face and neck. V4 then touched items on R12's bedside table and walker. V4 then adjusted R12's bedroom slippers and walker. V5 (LPN) then entered R12's room and V4 (CNA) then helped position R12. V4 did not perform any hand hygiene or glove change during R12's cares. On 11/16/22 at 12:10 pm, V4 (CNA) stated, We only change our gloves or wash our hands if our hands are visibly soiled. On 11/16/22 at 12:35 pm, V4 (CNA) stated, I always try and help the nurses take off the soiled dressings when I can. On 11/16/22 at 12:11 pm, V5 (LPN) stated, We do not have to wash our hands, put new gloves on or use hand sanitizer unless our hands are visibly dirty. On 11/16/22 at 12:37 pm, V5 (LPN) stated, (R12) is in isolation for MRSA infection in (R12's) left shin. On 11/17/22 at 1:30 pm, V1 (Administrator) stated, We will in-service them on handwashing and glove changes. They should be changing their gloves and washing their hands during cares, especially when they are soiled from wound care or incontinence care. 3.) On 11/16/2022 at 12:00 pm, V4 (CNA) and V6 (CNA) entered R43's room and stated they were there to clean her up and help her lay down for a nap. Neither V4 nor V6 washed their hands upon entering the room. Once in the bed, R43 rolled on her left side, V4 (CNA) washed bowel movement off her buttocks with disposable wipes and V4 then applied skin protectant cream and then took off her right glove. V4 and V6 continued to wash R43's front and back sides, never washing their hands and never changing gloves. V4 (CNA) pulled up R43's covers, clipped her call light on her pillow and pulled her bedside table over across the bed while touching items on the table. V6 (CNA) pushed the electronic lift to the hallway and touched the door and touched roommate's bed with gloves still on from R43's incontinence care. On 11/17/22 V2 (Director of Nursing) stated Staff should always wash their hands before, during and after incontinence care before they touch anything else or leave the room.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify an appropriate indication for use of an antips...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify an appropriate indication for use of an antipsychotic medication. The facility also failed to identify specific target behaviors for administration of an antipsychotic medication for three residents with a diagnosis of dementia (R19, R46, R100) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 25. Findings include: Facility Psychotropic Medication Policy dated 12/4/19 documents: 1. An assessment must be made to identify specific behaviors/symptoms, potential causative factors, and recommendations for managing identified behaviors. 2. The medical record documentation must reflect the specific behaviors/symptoms and the resident's response to non-pharmacological interventions to manage the behaviors/symptoms. 4. The physician should evaluate the use of antipsychotic medications if one or more of the following are the only indication: Wandering Poor self-care Restlessness Impaired Memory Anxiety/ Depression Insomnia, Unsociability Indifference to surroundings Fidgeting/nervousness Uncooperativeness Agitated behaviors which do not represent danger to resident or others. 12. A plan of care will be developed including precipitating factors, non-pharmacologic interventions, and potential side effects. 1.) Facility diagnosis Sheet indicates R19 was admitted to the facility 2/23/17 with diagnosis of Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Delusional Disorder. In 2019 R19 was diagnosed with Schizophrenia and in 2021 diagnosed with Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance and General Anxiety Disorder. Physician Order Sheets indicate Seroquel (antipsychotic) was initiated on admission at 25mg (milligram) at bedtime for Dementia with Lewy Bodies and increased as follows: 10/9/21 Seroquel increased to 25mg twice daily and diagnosis changed to Long Term Usage related to Delusional Disorder. 11/22/21 Seroquel increased to 50mg at bedtime, 25 mg daily and diagnosis changed to Schizophrenia. 12/21/21 Seroquel increased to 50mg twice daily 2/15/22 Seroquel increased to 75mg twice daily 8/5/22 Seroquel increased to 100mg twice daily 10/7/22 Seroquel Increased to 125mg twice daily 11/11/22 Seroquel increased to 150mg twice daily Current Seroquel order (11/11/22) indicates Schizophrenia, Unspecified as diagnosis for Seroquel. Progress Notes dated 10/2022 thru 11/16/22 do not include justifications or documentation of an increase in behaviors other than (R19) continues to hear voices. On 11/17/22 at 1:30pm V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated (R19) has multiple versions of herself and talks to (an alternate R19). V8 stated that they used to argue sometimes, now they just talk. V8 stated R19 also has OCD (obsessive compulsive disorder) and has very ritualistic behaviors at times. V8 stated that R19 has never been violent or aggressive. V8 stated that the residents are seen by a Nurse Practitioner for psychiatry needs thru a Telehealth company. Telehealth Note dated 10/3/22 at 1:30pm indicates (R19) has reported significant symptoms related to dementia and psychosis. (R19) reports talking to voices she refers to as her friends. Note indicates R19 continues to talk under her breath with a voice and states everyone talks to her as they are her friends. Note indicates R19 denies the voices are commanding stating They just talk to me. Note indicates R19 reports difficulty hearing, reports hallucinations, memory loss and dementia; denies depression, no sleep disturbances, no suicidal thoughts, and normal appetite. R19 was observed in the community areas of the memory care unit as well as in her room at various times on 11/15/22 and 11/16/22. R19 was accepting of care, mostly stayed to herself, and ambulated between the dining area and her room with a walker. R19 did seem preoccupied, however was not distressed. Current Care Plan indicates on 2/15/22 R19's Seroquel was increased to 75mg twice daily. No target behaviors, diagnosis or indication for use are identified in the care plan. Care Plan was not updated to reflect the continued increases of Seroquel after 2/15/22. Behavior Tracking Sheets dated 10/1/22 thru 11/16/22 indicate R19 is being monitored for refusing care, insomnia, restlessness, yelling out when anxious related to hallucinations and delusions and talking in third person to her friends. Psychotropic Medication Consent dated 11/11/22 indicates consent was received on that date to increase R19's Seroquel to 150mg BID with Indication for Use: Schizophrenia. Consent dated 10/7/22 indicates Seroquel was increased to 125mg with Indication for Use: Antipsychotic. Consents indicates Antipsychotics are used to treat behavior problems such as combativeness, explosiveness, manic behaviors, and treatment of psychotic disorders. Consent does not indicate specific target behaviors or conditions to justify the use of an antipsychotic medication. Consent also include Black Box Warning: Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotics are at increased risk of death compared to placebo. No consents were found or presented for the increase in Seroquel on 2/15/22 or 8/5/22. 2.) Physician's Order Summary Report (POS) indicates R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic and Mood Disturbance and Anxiety. Physician Order Sheet indicates Seroquel (antipsychotic) 25mg (milligram) every night at bedtime for Unspecified Dementia without behavioral disturbance; Restlessness/Agitation was ordered on 9/11/22. Physician Order Sheet indicates Seroquel 25mg every night at bedtime was revised on 10/27/22 with diagnosis changed to Delusional Disorder. Current Physician Order Sheet indicates Seroquel 25mg was increased to be given twice daily on 11/9/22 for Delusional Disorder. Telehealth Note dated 11/7/22 indicates R46 had increased exit-seeking, wandering into other resident's rooms, yells and refuses care and had been verbally/physically aggressive with staff. Note indicates R46 wanted a gun to kill herself and was sent to the hospital, diagnosed with Cystitis, and started on antibiotics. Note indicates R46 reported feeling better. Telehealth recommendations on 11/7/22 were to increase R46's Seroquel to 25mg twice daily with diagnoses of Conduct Disorder, Restlessness/Agitation, Depressive and Delusional Disorder and Anxiety. Current Care Plan indicates R46 is currently on antipsychotic therapy related to dementia without behavioral disturbance. Care Plan does not include target behaviors, specific indications for use or specify Seroquel as the antipsychotic medication. Psychotropic Medication Consent indicates consent was received on 9/12/22 for Seroquel 25mg at bedtime with Indication for Use: Dementia with Aggression. Psychotropic Medication Consent indicates consent was received on 11/9/22 for Seroquel 25mg twice daily with Indication for Use: Delusional Disorder. Behavior Tracking 10/1/22 to 11/16/22 indicates incomplete monitoring of behaviors identified as exit-seeking and agitation. 3.) Physician's Order Sheet (POS) indicates R100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Anxiety and Alzheimer's Disease. POS indicates Risperdal (antipsychotic) 0.5mg once daily was ordered on 11/10/22 with diagnosis of Dementia with other behavioral disturbance. Psychotropic Medication Consent indicates consent for Risperdal 0.5mg was received on 11/10/22 with Indication for Use: Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance. Progress Notes dated 10/1/22 thru 11/16/22 indicate R100 was having a difficult time adjusting to the locked unit, was exit-seeking and attempting to take screens off windows in empty rooms. Telehealth Note dated 11/8/22 at 2:34pm indicates Recommend starting Risperdal; Diagnosis Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance. Current Care Plan indicates R100 is on an antipsychotic therapy related to Dementia. Care Plan does not identify target behaviors. On 11/15/22 at 10:15am R100 was working on a puzzle with a staff member. R100 was pleasant, smiling and engaged. Several minutes later a hairdresser asked R100 if she wanted a haircut and R100 thanked the hairdresser and allowed her to cut her hair. R100 seemed very happy to be getting her hair cut. On 11/16/22 at 1:15pm R100 was smiling and interacting with staff. At that time V8 (LPN) stated that both R46 and R100 are fairly new and can become very intent on going back home. On 11/17/22 at 1:30pm V1 (Administrator) stated that they are aware the Telehealth practitioners are ordering more antipsychotic medications for residents with dementia than they should and are looking to get a psychiatrist who will come to the facility and be part of the team.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), $137,996 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 15 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $137,996 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (33/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 33/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Mercer Manor Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Mercer Manor Rehabilitation Staffed?

CMS rates MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 59%, which is 13 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Mercer Manor Rehabilitation?

State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 14 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Mercer Manor Rehabilitation?

MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by STERN CONSULTANTS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 92 certified beds and approximately 57 residents (about 62% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ALEDO, Illinois.

How Does Mercer Manor Rehabilitation Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (59%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Mercer Manor Rehabilitation?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Mercer Manor Rehabilitation Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Mercer Manor Rehabilitation Stick Around?

Staff turnover at MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION is high. At 59%, the facility is 13 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Mercer Manor Rehabilitation Ever Fined?

MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION has been fined $137,996 across 1 penalty action. This is 4.0x the Illinois average of $34,459. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Mercer Manor Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?

MERCER MANOR REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.