HEARTHOOD SNF SENIOR LIVING
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Hearthood SNF Senior Living has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. With a state rank of #44 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, they are in the top half, and they rank #14 out of 201 in Cook County, meaning there are only 13 local facilities that are better. However, the trend is concerning as the number of issues reported has worsened, increasing from 4 in 2024 to 5 in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, with a 4 out of 5 rating, a turnover rate of 31%, which is significantly lower than the state average, and they provide more RN coverage than 92% of facilities in Illinois. On the downside, there were 14 concerns noted during inspections, including failing to test water for harmful pathogens and not providing required training for CNAs, as well as issues with food safety in the kitchen.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Illinois
- #44/665
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 31% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 73 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Illinois nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (31%)
17 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
14pts below Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) for residents who require assistance with ADL cares.
This applies 3 of 8 resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide meaningful activities to residents.
This applies to 3 residents (R25, R32, & R33) reviewed for activities in a sample ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were safely secured.
Thi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
4. On 02/20/25 at 10:38 AM V1 (Administrator) said that the facility has never tested the facility's water for Legionella or any other opportunistic waterborne pathogen.
The facility's Water Manageme...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0947
(Tag F0947)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the mandatory 12 hours of annual training to their CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistants).
This applies to all 54 residents in the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident's signed POLST (Practitioner Order for Life-S...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen to a resident as ordered by the physician. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R42) reviewed for oxygen in a sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a narcotic medication was not borrowed fro...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and monitor behaviors and provide diagnosis targeted for a prescribed antipsychotic medication. This applies to 1 of...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall care plan interventions to prevent fur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0694
(Tag F0694)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an IV (intravenous) dressing was changed.
This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R203) reviewed for IV use and maintenance....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess for pain and address pain during wound dressing changes.
This applies to 1of 1 resident (R253) reviewed for pain manag...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. On 7/11/2023, at 3:20 PM, V8 (RN-Registered Nurse) administered an IV (Intravenous) antibiotic to R203. R203 had an implanted...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label/date, seal/store, and remove expired food items and maintain a hazard free kitchen.
This applies to all resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Illinois.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 31% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Hearthood Snf Senior Living's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HEARTHOOD SNF SENIOR LIVING an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Hearthood Snf Senior Living Staffed?
CMS rates HEARTHOOD SNF SENIOR LIVING's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 31%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Hearthood Snf Senior Living?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at HEARTHOOD SNF SENIOR LIVING during 2023 to 2025. These included: 14 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Hearthood Snf Senior Living?
HEARTHOOD SNF SENIOR LIVING is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 54 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BARTLETT, Illinois.
How Does Hearthood Snf Senior Living Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, HEARTHOOD SNF SENIOR LIVING's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (31%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hearthood Snf Senior Living?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Hearthood Snf Senior Living Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HEARTHOOD SNF SENIOR LIVING has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Hearthood Snf Senior Living Stick Around?
HEARTHOOD SNF SENIOR LIVING has a staff turnover rate of 31%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Hearthood Snf Senior Living Ever Fined?
HEARTHOOD SNF SENIOR LIVING has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Hearthood Snf Senior Living on Any Federal Watch List?
HEARTHOOD SNF SENIOR LIVING is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.