ARCADIA CARE BLOOMINGTON

1509 NORTH CALHOUN STREET, BLOOMINGTON, IL 61701 (309) 827-6046
For profit - Limited Liability company 115 Beds ARCADIA CARE Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
0/100
#442 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: April 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Arcadia Care Bloomington has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality of care. They rank #442 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois, placing them in the bottom half of facilities statewide, and #6 out of 7 in McLean County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility's performance is worsening, with issues increasing from 7 in 2024 to 11 in 2025. Staffing is a weakness, with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 56%, which is higher than the state average. Additionally, there are concerning incidents, such as a failure to administer a resident's insulin, leading to a serious health risk, and another resident being left in a soiled state, indicating inadequate personal care. Overall, while the facility does have some average quality measures, the significant issues and critical incidents raise serious red flags for families considering this nursing home.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Illinois
#442/665
Bottom 34%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
7 → 11 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$236,220 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 16 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
62 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 7 issues
2025: 11 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 56%

10pts above Illinois avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $236,220

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: ARCADIA CARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (56%)

8 points above Illinois average of 48%

The Ugly 62 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 9 actual harm
Aug 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe home like comfortable environment for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe home like comfortable environment for three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for safe homelike environment in a sample list of three residents.Findings Include:R1's current diagnosis list includes the following diagnoses: Chronic Neuropathy, Anxiety, and Major Depression.MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/30/25 documents R1 is cognitively intact.On 8/19/25 at 11:15 AM, R1 was in her bed watching TV. The windowsill was covered in dust, dead spiders, and ants. The edge of the baseboard in R1's bathroom was crusted with brown debris and there was an odor of urine present. R1 stated there had been no toilet paper for several days last week. R1 stated I had to get family to bring me toilet paper, or I would have been without toilet paper. R1 stated there are ants in here all the time they crawl on the walls and the window.R2's current diagnosis list includes the following diagnosis: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, Diabetes, Anxiety, and Depression.R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/19/25 documents R2 is cognitively intact.On 8/19/25 at 11:28 AM, R2 was sitting up in his room in a wheelchair. The windowsills in R2's room were covered with dust and dead insects. The baseboards in R2's bathroom was crusted with yellow brown matter and there was a distinct odor of urine. Paint was peeling and several places from the wall of R2's room. R2 stated there are ants in here all the time. They just crawl all over the wall by the window. I take my meals in here and I've had ants get in my food. Regarding the toilet paper supply in the facility R3 stated They have been out of toilet paper more than once I keep some extra. R2 had two rolls of toilet paper in his drawer. When showing the toilet paper R2 keeps in the drawer, R2 pulled a sandwich out of the drawer in a plastic bag. The bread looked hard, and the meat was dry. R2 stated I've had this for a couple of days. I hate the food, so I keep stuff in here if I get hungry.R3's current diagnosis list includes the following diagnosis: Multiple Myeloma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Depression, and Anxiety.R 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3 is cognitively intact.On 8/19/25 at 11:35 AM, numerous chipped areas in the paint in R3's room were observed. There was an empty bed on the opposite side of R3's room with no mattress or linens with springs exposed.On 8/19/25 at 11:35 AM, R3 stated we ran out of toilet paper last week. We had to use whatever we had like napkins and tissues. We went days like that. It just made me feel disrespected and ignored. Regarding the insects, R3 stated I have seen ants and spiders in here but not for a while.On 8/20/25 at 11:30 AM, V6 and V5 certified nursing assistants (CNAs) stated there are ants in the rooms and V5 stated I have even seen them on residents which is bad for residents who can't brush them off. V5 and V6 verified there was a shortage of toilet paper a couple of days last week the facility sent someone out and bought some.On 8/20/25 at 11:45 AM, V1 Administrator stated, I became aware we were out of toilet paper on the floor last week and I went to (a local big box store) and purchased some toilet paper. A receipt was provided supporting this by the facility from a local big box store.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, Interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate pest control when ants were observed for one (R1) of three reviewed for pest control on the total sample of f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, Interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate pest control when ants were observed for one (R1) of three reviewed for pest control on the total sample of five. Findings include:The facility census report dated 8/19/25 documents 92 residents reside at the facility.R1's current diagnosis list includes the following diagnoses: Chronic Neuropathy, Anxiety, and Major Depression.MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/30/25 documents R1 is cognitively intact.On 8/19/25 at 11:15 AM, R1 was in her bed watching TV. The windowsill was covered in dust, dead spiders, and ants. R1 stated there are ants in here all the time they crawl on the walls and the window.R2's current diagnosis list includes the following diagnosis: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, Diabetes, Anxiety, and Depression.R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/19/25 documents R2 is cognitively intact.On 8/19/25 at 11:28 AM, R2 was sitting up in his room in a wheelchair. The windowsills in R2's room were covered with dust and dead insects. R2 stated there are ants in here all the time. They just crawl all over the wall by the window. I take my meals in here and I've had ants get in my food. On 8/20/25 at 11:30 AM, V6 and V5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) stated there are ants in the rooms and V5 stated I have even seen them on residents which is bad for residents who can't brush them off.On 8/20/25, V1 Administrator verified she was aware there had been a problem with ants and she was planning to call the exterminator (the facility) has a contract with.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, Interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, comfortable environment by providing inadequate supplies of toilet paper for residents and failing ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, Interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, comfortable environment by providing inadequate supplies of toilet paper for residents and failing to maintain communal shower floors in a safe sanitary manner. This failure has the potential to affect all 92 residents who reside in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's daily census dated 8/19/25 documents 92 residents reside at the facility.On 8/19/25 at 11:28AM, R2 stated They have been out of toilet paper more than once. I keep some extra, so I have some. R2 had two rolls of toilet paper in his drawer. On 8/19/25 at 11:15AM, R1 stated for several days last week I had to have family members bring me some (toilet paper) or I would have been without toilet paper. On 8/19/25 at 11:35AM, R3 stated we ran out of toilet paper last week. We had to use whatever we could like napkins and tissues. We went days like that. It just made me feel disrespected and ignored. On 8/20/25 at 12:30PM, V5 (CNA) Certified Nurse's Aide and V6 CNA verified there was a shortage of toilet paper a couple of days last week. The facility sent someone out and bought some. On 8/20/25 at 11:45 AM, V1 Administrator stated, I became aware we were out of toilet paper on the floor last week and I went to (a local big box store) and purchased some toilet paper. The facility provided a receipt dated 8/8/25 from a local big box store to support the facility purchased a supply of toilet paper to rectify the shortage.On 8/19/25 at 11:40AM, The main shower room on 100 hall was observed to have several missing ceramic tiles in the shower. Several other tiles were cracked and loose creating an uneven, unstable surface where the shower chair is placed when giving a dependent resident a shower. On 8/19/25 at 2:58PM, V1 Administrator stated, I am aware of the broken tiles in the big shower, and I have a contractor coming to fix that.
May 2025 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to apply a vehicle safety restraint during transportation in the facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to apply a vehicle safety restraint during transportation in the facility van for one of three (R1) residents reviewed for falls on the sample list of three. This failure resulted in R1's wheelchair flipping backwards in the facility van during transport and R1 sustained a left side rib fracture. Findings Include: The Motor Vehicle Safety Program dated January 2025 documents seat belts and shoulder harnesses (occupant restraint systems) must be worn or used whenever the vehicle is in operation. The vehicle may not move until all passengers have fastened their restraints. R1's Fall Follow-up Note dated 5/15/25 documents R1 fell from his wheelchair while in the facility van. R1 was being transported back to the facility and his wheelchair was not properly secured. The root cause of the fall was determined to be the wheelchair was not properly secured. R1's Incident Note dated 5/12/25 documents R1 sustained a fall at 6:20 PM in the facility van. R1 is alert and orientated to person, place, time, and situation. R1 is rating new onset pain at a 5/10. R1's Progress Note dated 5/13/25 documents V5 Nurse Practitioner was called to evaluate R1 due to accident the day before. R1 was sitting at the nurses' station in his wheelchair complaining of pain in the neck and upper back radiating to the rib area. R1 stated the pain was not controlled by Acetaminophen. V5 requested R1 to be sent to the emergency room for evaluation. R1's Progress Notes document multiple requests for pain medication due to rib pain after the accident on 5/12/25. R1's Progress Note written by V5 Nurse Practitioner dated 5/13/25 documents V5 assessed R1 after a fall with a head strike. R1 complained of neck pain, headache, bilateral eye redness, and rib/chest wall pain. R1 was alert and orientated. R1 indicated when he fell backwards in the van in his wheelchair, he struck his head and blacked out. R1 reported having to deal with a headache and neck pain since the accident. R1 described the pain as bad and throbbing. V5 sent R1 to the emergency room. R1's emergency room documentation dated 5/13/25 documents R1 had a fall in his wheelchair which resulted in a closed head injury and closed left side rib fracture. On 5/12/25 R1 was loaded into the facility van in his wheelchair for transport. The facility driver did not strap in R1's wheelchair. When the driver hit the gas R1's wheelchair flipped backwards causing him to fall from his wheelchair. R1 woke up on 5/13/25 with continued chest wall pain and head and neck pain. The documented clinical assessment documents chest wall tenderness is present which correlates with the radiology report. R1's Radiology Report of the Chest dated 5/13/25 documents R1 sustained a possible non-displaced acute fracture of the left lateral rib number six and clinical correlation is advised. R1's Medical Diagnoses list dated May 2025 documents R1 is diagnosed with Dementia, Major Depression, and Obesity. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 is mildly cognitively impaired, requires supervision/touching assistance from staff to safely transfer from a seated position, and requires the use of a manual wheelchair for mobility. R1's Medication Administration Records for May 2025 documents prior to the accident on 5/12/25, R1 did not request any as needed pain medication. After R1's wheelchair flipped backwards in the van when being transported, R1 requested pain medication (Tylenol) daily. A new as needed pain medication (Tramadol 50 milligrams) was also added for R1's rib pain on 5/14/25 and then the frequency was increased from every six hours to every eight hours on 5/20/25. R1 has been taking pain medication regularly since the accident. On 5/24/25 at 12:55 PM R1 stated two staff members (V7 Certified Nurse's Assistant) and (V8 Licensed Practical Nurse) came to pick him up from the hospital. R1 stated V7 loaded him in his wheelchair into the facility van. R1 stated she did not provide him with a seatbelt or strap his wheelchair in with the van safety strap system. R1 stated they began to drive and stopped at a stop light. R1 stated as R1 took off from the red light, R1's wheelchair flipped backwards, and he fell back and hit his head. R1 stated the fall hurt his head, neck, and he felt it all through his body. R1 stated he has been having pain ever since the accident and for the first two days it was hard for him to get out of bed. R1 stated he has had chest wall pain on both sides, but it often hurts more on the right side. R1 stated he was sent to the emergency room the day after the accident, and they told him he had a fractured rib. R1 stated before the accident he rarely had pain but since the accident he has had pain every day mostly in his chest when he breaths more deeply. R1 stated he went from not taking any pain medication to taking pain medication every day. On 5/24/25 at 1:04 PM V8 Licensed Practical Nurse stated she went with V7 Certified Nurses Assistant (CNA) in the facility van to go pick up R1 from the hospital. V8 stated when V7 started driving after stopping at a red light, R1's wheelchair flipped backwards and R1 was on his back. V8 stated her and V7 helped get R1 back in his wheelchair in the van and they took him back to the facility. V8 stated R1 complained of a headache at the time. V8 stated she was never trained on how to properly secure a resident in the van for transport. On 5/24/25 at 1:31 PM V7 Certified Nurses Assistant (CNA) stated she was asked to pick up R1 from the hospital on 5/12/25. V7 stated she had transported residents before however V7 stated she had never been trained on how to properly secure residents in wheelchairs in the facility van. V7 stated as she drove back to the facility, R1's wheelchair flipped backwards, and he was on his back on the floor of the van. V7 stated she went back to check on R1 and he stated he felt like he was having a heart attack, his neck, head, and chest hurt. V8 helped get R1 back into the wheelchair and they returned to the facility. V7 stated the accident happened about 6:20 PM and R1 continued to complain of chest wall, head, and neck pain for the rest of her shift which ended at 10:00 PM. On 5/24/25 at 3:45 PM V2 Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed V7 and V8 failed to properly secure R1 in the wheelchair during transport in the facility van on 5/12/25. V2 confirmed this caused R1's wheelchair to flip backwards during transport. V2 confirmed R1 has had pain on his chest wall since the accident and the radiology scan completed on 5/13/25 documents R1 sustained a possibly acute left sixth rib fracture.
Mar 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment in the dining room for 13 of 18 residents (R1, R3 and R8-R18) reviewed for a homelike environmen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment in the dining room for 13 of 18 residents (R1, R3 and R8-R18) reviewed for a homelike environment on the sample list of 18. Findings include: The Facility's Resident Council Minutes dated 3/12/24, document one unknown resident complained that she does not think her room is being mopped or swept daily. On 3/24/25 at 11:38 AM, the garbage can in the small dining room on the 300 hall contained a dirty adult brief, and staff items such as a drinking cup and back pack were on the dining room table. On 3/24/24 at 11:36 AM, V4 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated they normally take the residents (300 Hall Residents) to the small dining room to eat, but it hasn't been cleaned because housekeeping is short on staff, so the residents are eating in their rooms. V4 further stated the 300 hall normally has a housekeeper clean once a week due to lack of housekeeping staff. On 3/24/25 at 1:25 PM, V9 Certified Nursing assistant stated the residents can only use the small dining room (300 Hall) maybe once a week because they never have staff to clean. V9 stated they have to ask housekeeping to clean it or it does not get done. On 3/25/25 at 8:54 AM, V17 Maintenance/ Housekeeping Director stated he has two house keepers that have been employed at the facility long term and two new employees that are in orientation. V17 stated the facility has been short staffed in housekeeping, and they are trying to hire more staff. V17 stated he is aware that the facility is not being cleaned appropriately. The Resident Roster dated 3/25/25 documents R1, R3, and R8-R18 reside on the 300 hall of the facility.
Mar 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free of physical abuse by anothe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free of physical abuse by another resident for two of five residents (R3, R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of nine. Findings include: R3's Facility Census documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses, Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder and Alcohol Abuse. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score no score due to R3 having severe cognitive impairment and not being able to participate in the interview. R3's Incident Note dated 2/21/25 at 12:05pm documents Staff alleged a physical altercation occurred between R3 and R4. Medical Doctor, R3 and R4's Power of Attorneys, and Ombudsman were notified. R4's Facility Census documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses, Wernicke's Encephalopathy, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score no score due to R4 having severe cognitive impairment and not being able to participate in the interview. R4's Incident Note dated 2/21/25 at 12:05pm documents Staff alleged a physical altercation occurred between R3 and R4. Medical Doctor, R3 and R4's Power of Attorneys, and Ombudsman were notified. On 3/1/25 at 10:39am V7 Certified Nursing Assistant stated that on 2/10/25 V7 was working the 2:00pm - 10:00pm shift on the 300 hall. V7 stated that at 8:00pm, R4 was walking towards R3 who was sitting in R3's wheelchair in front of R3's room. V7 stated as R4 approached R3, R4 attempted to grab R3's hat that was on R3's head. V7 stated that R3 then got up from R3's wheelchair and punched R4 with a closed left fist and struck R4 in the right side of R4's head by R4's eye. On 3/1/25 at 10:56am V1 Administrator stated on 2/10/25 at 8:00pm an incident had occurred between R3 and R4. V1 stated, as soon as V1 was informed of the incident V1 reported it to Illinois Department of Public health and informed R3 and R4's Power of Attorney's, Medical Doctor, Police and Ombudsman. V1 stated V1 investigated the incident and interviewed V7 who was the only staff that witnessed the incident. V1 stated that V7 informed V1 that on 2/10/25 V7 was working the 300 hall and at 8:00pm, R4 tried to grab R3's hat and R3 got up from R3's wheelchair and hit R4 in R4's right side of R4's head near R4's eye. The Facility's Abuse Prevention Policy dated 9/24 documents: Guidelines: This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for two of three residents (R3, R4) reviewed for Abuse in the sample of eight....

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for two of three residents (R3, R4) reviewed for Abuse in the sample of eight. Findings include: R3's Incident Note dated 2/21/25 at 12:05pm documents Staff alleged a physical altercation occurred between R3 and R4. Medical Doctor, R3 and R4's Power of Attorneys, and Ombudsman were notified. R4's Incident Note dated 2/21/25 at 12:05pm documents Staff alleged a physical altercation occurred between R3 and R4. Medical Doctor, R3 and R4's Power of Attorneys, and Ombudsman were notified. The facility's Abuse Investigations and R3 and R4's Electronic Medical Record dated 2-10-25 through 2-20-25 were reviewed and do not include evidence of R4's abuse allegation, that was reported to V8 Previous Administrator on 2/10/25, being reported to the State Agency. The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy dated September 2024 documents, Internal Investigation: Any allegation of abuse or any incident that results in serious bodily injury will be reported to the Illinois Department of Public Health immediately, but not more than two hours of the allegation of abuse. On 3/1/25 at 10:39am V7 Certified Nursing Assistant stated that on 2/10/25 V7 was working the 2:00pm - 10:00pm shift on the 300 hall. V7 stated that at 8:00pm, R4 was walking towards R3 who was sitting in R3's wheelchair in front of R3's room. V7 stated as R4 approached R3, R4 attempted to grab R3's hat that was on R3's head. V7 stated that R3 then got up from R3's wheelchair and punched R4 with a closed left fist and struck R4 in the right side of R4's head by R4's eye. V7 stated, V7 did notify V8 Previous Administrator and later learned that V8 never reported the incident. On 3/1/25 at 10:56am V1 Administrator stated on 2/21/25 V1 started working back at the facility as the Administrator. V1 stated staff brought it to V1's attention that on 2/10/25 at 8:00pm an incident occurred between R3 and R4. V1 stated, V7 Certified Nursing Assistant did report the incident on that day to V8 Previous Administrator who did not report the incident to Illinois Department of Public Health. V1 stated V1 investigated and interviewed V7 who was the only staff that witnessed the incident. V1 stated that V7 informed V1 that on 2/10/25 V7 was working the 300 hall and at 8:00pm, R4 tried to grab R3's hat and R3 got up from R3's wheelchair and hit R4 in R4's right side of R4's head near R4's eye. V1 stated that V7 notified V8 Previous Administrator who did not report the incident to Illinois Department of Public Health as required.
Feb 2025 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from mental and emotional ab...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from mental and emotional abuse. This failure affects one (R1) resident out of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 43. Findings include: The facilities Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy effective 9/2024 documents mental abuse is the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes, or has the potential to cause, the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation. When an allegation of abuse, exploitation, neglect, or mistreatment has occurred the Department of Public Health shall be informed by telephone or fax. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 is cognitively impaired. R1 was unable to complete a brief interview for mental status and required a staff assessment indicating R1 experiences inattention and disorganized thinking, long term and short term memory problems, unable to recall staff faces, location of R1's room and the seasons. R1's Comprehensive Incident Fall assessment dated [DATE] at 10:30 PM documents R1 sustained a witnessed fall coming out of the shower room into the hallway. On 2/13/25 at 1:40 PM, V8 Licensed Practical Nurse, stated (on 1/28/25) she saw R1 stumbling backwards out of the shower room door into the hallway attempting to reach the grab bar on the hallway wall and fell on the floor. V8 stated V12, Certified Nursing Assistant, was standing in hallway watching R1 and was laughing hysterically. V8 further stated V12 did not attempt to stop R1 from falling or help R1 after he fell. On 2/18/25 at 10:30 AM, V2, Director of Nursing, stated that on 1/29/25 V2 came to work and witness statements from R1's fall on 1/28/25 were on her desk. V2 stated she read the statements from V12 and V13, Certified Nursing Assistants and felt like this incident needed to be investigated. V2 stated V1, Administrator, was able to pull up camera footage from the camera in hallway facing the shower room. V2 stated she observed V12 and V13 open the shower room door and go inside. V12 came out of the shower room door and stood in the hallway looking into the shower room laughing. V2 further stated V12 then continued laughing very hard and moved out of the way of the shower room door. V2 stated she then observed R1 quickly stumbling out of the shower room and grabbed the side rail on the wall on other side of hallway and then fell on floor. V2 stated V12 continued laughing and didn't attempt to stop R1 from falling or help R1 after he fell. V2 stated we did an inappropriate fall investigation, and determined V12 and V13 would not return to work for inappropriate care of residents and not reporting a fall. V2 further stated laughing at a resident for falling is abuse and I don't tolerate it. On 2/18/25 1:13 PM, V9, Registered Nurse/ Minimum Data Set Nurse, stated she watched the video of R1 falling with V2 and V1 at the facility. V9 stated she could only see R1 coming out of shower room. V9 stated because of the angle of the camera V9 was unable to see inside the door of the shower room. V9 stated she observed R1 stumble fast out of the shower room and V12 moved to the side and was laughing. V9 stated V12 did not try to stop the fall or help R1 after he fell. On 2/18/25 at 12:00 PM, V5, Family Member, stated prior to R1's cognitive decline if R1 had fallen and someone laughed, R1 would have been hurt and humiliated.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of mental abuse for one (R1) of three residents r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of mental abuse for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of a sample list of 43. Findings include: The facilities Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy effective 9/2024 documents mental abuse is the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes, or has the potential to cause, the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation. When an allegation of abuse, exploitation, neglect, or mistreatment has occurred the Department of Public Health shall be informed by telephone or fax. R1's Comprehensive Incident Fall assessment dated [DATE] at 10:30 PM, documents R1 sustained a witnessed fall coming out of the shower room into the hallway. The Assessment further documents R1 was walking out of the shower room and R1 attempted to grab V13 Certified Nursing Assistant by the neck, V13 blocked R1's hand then R1 tried to grab V13's arm, V13 pulled her arm back and R1 then stumbled into the hallway trying to reach the grab bar in hallway and fell. On 2/18/25 at 10:30 AM, V2 Director of Nursing stated that on 1/29/25, V2 came to work and the witness statements from the fall on 1/28/25 were on her desk. V2 stated after reviewing the statements she felt the incident needed further investigation and went to V1 Administrator immediately to report concerns. On 2/13/25 at 12:25 PM, V1 Administrator stated there was an abuse allegation that a staff member hit/pushed R1 on 1/28/25 resulting in a fall. V1 stated she investigated the allegation and there was no evidence anything happened, so it wasn't reported.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to wait for a licensed nurse assessment before standing a reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to wait for a licensed nurse assessment before standing a resident up after a witnessed fall. This failure affects one resident (R1) out of three reviewed for abuse allegations on the sample of 43. Findings include: The Facility's Fall Prevention Program policy revised 5/2022 documents a Fall Assessment will be completed after any fall. R1's Comprehensive Incident Fall assessment dated [DATE] at 10:30 PM documents R1 sustained a witnessed fall coming out of shower room into the hallway. On 2/13/25 at 1:40 PM, V8 Licensed Practical Nurse stated she walked onto the unit as R1 was falling onto the hallway floor. V8 stated that she told V12 and V13 Certified Nursing Assistants that she would be back to assess R1 and to stay with him until she was finished providing care for another resident. V8 stated when she came out into the hallway R1 was no longer laying on the floor and V13 told her that they put R1 to bed and he was fine. V8 further stated when she went into R1's room to assess him R1 was complaining of pain and wouldn't move. On 2/18/25 at 11:22 AM, V12 Certified Nursing Assistant stated she didn't want to get R1 up from the floor because R1 was complaining of pain after he fell, stating his back was hurting. V12 further stated the V13 Certified Nursing Assistant and another resident tried to stand R1 up and R1 was complaining of pain. V12 stated she got a wheelchair and sat R1 in it and V13 took R1 to his room. On 2/18/25 at 10:30 AM, V2 Director of Nursing stated we did an inappropriate fall investigation, and V12 and V13 should have not got R1 up off the floor without nurse, R1 could have been hurt worse.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, homelike, and comfortable environment in, shower rooms, resident rooms, and a dining room. These failure...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, homelike, and comfortable environment in, shower rooms, resident rooms, and a dining room. These failures affect thirteen residents (R2, R8, R11, and R19 through R28) utilizing the shower room on the 100 Hall, nineteen residents (R4, R6, R7, R10, R12, and R29 through R42) utilizing the shower room on the 300 Hall Dementia Unit, seven residents (R3 and R13 through R18) who usually have meals in the small dining room, one resident (R6) with a hole in the drywall and missing paint in her room, and one resident (R12) with a padded floor mat adhered to the floor by food debris next to her bed. all from a total facility census of 83. Findings include: 1. On 2/18/25 at 2:25 PM, R6's room had an outside corner adjacent to the bathroom door which was missing paint in an area two inches wide by four feet high on both sides of the corner where there had previously been a plastic corner protector, along with a patch of missing paint approximately one foot vertical by seven inches horizontal, obviously torn away from the wall in the process of the corner protector being removed from the wall. There was a one and one quarter inch diameter hole in the wall next to the roommate's unoccupied bed. The roommate's bed was missing the mattress. There was an area on the wall next to the roommate's bed approximately three feet by three feet which had deep scratches of missing paint and exposed drywall which appeared to be caused by the bed being raised and lowered over time. R6 stated she had spoken to a state guy last week (Ombudsman) who was trying to arrange for a different facility to live in because of the multiple problems in her room. On 2/19/25 at 2:45 PM, V16, Maintenance Director, stated he had accompanied a bank appraiser on a comprehensive tour of the facility and had knowledge of many area of the facility that are missing paint and had black wheelchair scuff marks on the walls and doors in the hallways and resident rooms. V16 further stated he tried to keep up with the smaller maintenance items and does get some extra stuff done. V16 stated the facility was waiting to hear back from the bank and to get some corporate direction on fixing more of the problems. V16 continued to say that the building is in mostly original construction and there was a whole lot with this building that needs fixed. 2. On 2/18/25 at 2:50 PM, the common shower room on the 300 Hall was notably cold and had a continuous stream of water emitting from the shower head. The floor to wall junction of the shower stall area had a blackened substance along the junction and on the wall portions approximately eighteen inches up from the floor in the corner and sloping downwards extending out to a point approximately seven feet from the inner corner of the shower stall area into the shower room proper behind the tub fixture. There was blackened substance and reddish pink gelatinous slimy substance along the plastic shower chair legs and cross bars between the legs. On 2/19/25 at 1:15 PM, R10 beckoned (surveyor) to come look at the 300 Hall shower room. R10 was pointing to the blackened areas in the shower stall area and said, Look at all that black stuff on the walls, I have asked them many times to get rid of that but it isn't gone, this is an atrocity, this is mildew, do you know what that can do to people? On 2/19/25 at 2:45 PM, V16 stated he was aware of the condition of the shower rooms in the facility. V16 stated he had one of the Housekeepers (V20) scrub the 300 Hall shower room wall in the shower stall area and a lot of it had been cleaned just prior to this tour and interview. V16 stated what was left he would probably have to go in and clean himself. V16 reached down to scrape at one of the remaining blackened areas and stated he thought it was soap scum. V16 stated he was familiar with the pink slimy gelatinous substance as he had previously encountered it in some plastic tubing from a drain. The facility's Resident Roster dated 2/13/25 documents R4, R6, R7, R10, R12 and R29 through R42 reside on the facility's 300 Hall and utilize the shower room on this hallway. 3. On 2/19/25 at 1:07 PM, the common shower room on the 100 Hall had a constant dripping of water from the shower head. There was a crack in the tile grout approximately one-quarter inch wide in the corner of the shower stall area from the floor upwards approximately four feet vertical, allowing water to penetrate behind the wall. On 2/19/25 at 2:45 PM, V16 stated the 100 Hall shower room could not be examined due to a resident being in the shower at that time. V16 stated he had seen the very wide area of caulking in the corner of the 300 Hall shower room, in the exact position as the crack in the 100 Hall shower room, so he could picture where the crack would be for the 100 Hall shower room. The facility Resident Roster dated 2/13/25 documents R2, R8, R11 and R19 through R28 reside on the facility's 100 Hall and utilize the shower room on this hallway. 4. On 2/18/25 at 10:25 AM, the small dining room directly across the hall from the central nursing station was notably cold and there was food crumb debris on the tables and floor, as well as small areas of dried food smears on the floor. There were three bath blankets folded and placed along the window sills. 2:45 PM, V16 stated he was aware of the cold temperature in the small dining room. V16 extended a hand to the lower portions of the window sill and stated there was a draft coming in along the sill. V16 explained that someone in the past had placed a wide (approximately six inches wide) sticky tape to seal out the draft, but over time the tape had lost stickiness and was no longer effective. V16 stated the staff had placed the bath blankets along the sill in an attempt to block out some of the draft. On 2/19/25 at 3:30 PM, using a Public Health automatic calibration digital thermometer, the small dining room measured in the 55 to 56 degree Fahrenheit range along the window sill. Using the same thermometer, the entrance doorway to this small dining room, approximately twelve feet away from the window, measured in the 65 to 66 degree Fahrenheit range. On 2/20/25 at 11:30 AM, V3, Licensed Practical Nurse, identified the residents who usually eat in the small dining room as R3, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, and R18. V3 stated these residents did not want to continue to eat in the small dining room because of the cold temperature and had been eating in their rooms. V3 stated each of these residents required verbal cues and supervision during meals. V3 stated there had been some plastic placed over the window in the small dining room last year but had not been placed this year. On 2/20/25 at 12:50 PM, R11, speaking with V18, Social Services Director, stated he thought it was good that there weren't any residents eating in the small dining room because it was very cold. V18 concurred and said she could feel the cold just walking by the small dining room. Throughout the course of the survey on 2/13/25, 2/18/25, 2/19/25, and 2/20/25 approximately half of the direct care staff were wearing long sleeve jackets or coats, and two employees were wearing ear muffs and making complaints about the cold temperature in the hallways. The conference room occupied by (survey team) also measured in the 65 to 66 degree Fahrenheit range. V16 was observed at various locations in the hallways and the conference room using an infrared thermometer to check temperatures at heating outlets and making statements such as this one is just blowing cool return air. On 2/20/25 at 1:15 PM, V16 stated he had found a large piece of material against the surface of the heating unit on the roof which supplies heat to the conference room. The measured temperature did not change in the conference room. 5. On 2/18/25 at 2:40 PM, there was a padded floor mat next to the bed of R12. This floor mat was adhered to the floor and took a considerable amount of effort to lift a corner of the mat. There was dried food debris and smears under the mat. On 2/18/25 at 2:45 PM, V20, Housekeeper, stated she had not noticed the floor mat was stuck in place and had not been trained to clean underneath mats. On 2/19/25 at 2:45 PM, V16 stated he had just become aware of the mat in R12's room being stuck on the floor. On 2/20/25 at 2:08 PM, V16 was in process of replacing twelve vinyl one foot square tiles on the floor next to R12's bed. V16 stated that pulling up the floor mat had damaged the tiles so that they needed to be replaced.
Sept 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient Registered Nursing (RN) hours on two of fifteen days reviewed for RN staffing. This failure has the potential to affect ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient Registered Nursing (RN) hours on two of fifteen days reviewed for RN staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 84 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility Nursing Daily Schedule (August 21, 2024 through September 4, 2024) document on Wednesday 8/21/24 and Wednesday 8/28/24, the facility scheduled zero (0) hours of RN coverage for a 24 hour period. On 9/4/24 at 1:45pm, V2 Director of Nursing confirmed the hours listed on the facility nursing daily schedule were correct and the facility failed to have RN coverage on 8/21/24 and 8/28/24. The facility Resident Midnight Census dated 9/4/24 documents 84 residents reside in the facility.
Aug 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident (R3) with a mechanical lift with two people for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident (R3) with a mechanical lift with two people for one of three residents reviewed for falls in the sample list of three. Findings include: R3's Diagnosis list dated 7/31/24, documents R3's diagnoses as: Muscle Weakness, other abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Difficulty Walking not elsewhere classified, Weakness, Osteoarthritis, unspecified site, and Morbid (severe) Obesity due to excess calories. R3's Clinical Summary dated 3/22/24, documents R3 has unsteady gait requiring supervision, requires substantial/maximal assist of a mechanical lift, and is dependent for chair/bed to chair transfers. R3's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], documents R3 has had 1-2 falls in the past three months, is chair bound, and not able to perform gait/balance assessment. R3's Care Plan dated 3/22/24, documents R3 requires a mechanical lift with two person assist to transfer between surfaces. R3's Witness Fall Report dated 5/18/24, documents: R3 attempted self-transfer, R3 lowered to ground by V5 Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) when R3's knees gave out; R3 refused mechanical lift and and told V5, who is not familiar with R3, that R3 did not need to use a mechanical lift. V5's statement on this fall report documents per V5: I (V5) do not work on 200 hall, V5 is always on 300 hall; V5 was assisting staff on 200 hall by answering R3's call light; R3 asked V5 to get R3 up from the bed; V5 sat R3 on the edge of the bed and got R3 dressed; when it was time to transfer R3 yelled R3 did not need to use a mechanical lift; V5 documented V5 has never worked with R3 before and V5 believed R3 not needing a mechanical lift to transfer; R3 refused a walker; V5 went to transfer R3 by letting R3 stand with V5's assist and R3's knees gave out and V5 lowered R3 to the floor. On 8/1/24 at 2:00 PM, V4 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated V5 CNA should have known how to care for R3 when answering R3's call light. V4 stated one cannot always believe what the resident's are telling the staff. V4 stated V5 should have used the mechanical lift for R3 because R3 is not supposed to be transferred without a mechanical lift. On 8/1/24 at 2:14 PM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated V5 CNA is the primary CNA on hall 300 and was helping on hall 200. V2 stated V5 should have looked up what type of transfer R3 was supposed to be using. V2 stated V5 did not know R3,was not familiar with R3 and not aware of how to transfer R3. The facility's CNA job description dated Revised 7/2023, documents the primary purpose of a CNA is to provide residents with nursing and personal care to safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of all residents in accordance with the facility's established policies and procedures. The facility's Fall Prevention Program policy dated Revised 5/2022, documents this policy is to ensure the safety of all residents in the facility which includes assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices utilized as necessary.
Mar 2024 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2.) R8's undated Medical Diagnosis List documents R8's medical diagnoses of Dementia, Delusional Disorders and Heart Failure. R8...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2.) R8's undated Medical Diagnosis List documents R8's medical diagnoses of Dementia, Delusional Disorders and Heart Failure. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R8 as severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R8 requires maximum assistance with toileting, bathing, lower body dressing and moderate assistance with personal hygiene. R8's Care Plan interventions dated 8/17/23 document R8 requires one person assistance with personal hygiene, toileting, dressing and bathing. On 3/24/24 at 9:35 AM R8 was sitting in his wheelchair with bedside table in front of him. R8's breakfast plate, personal items and can of shaving cream was sitting on R8's bedside table. R8's hands, bedside table and breakfast plate were all covered with small mounds of smeared shaving cream. The lid to the can of shaving cream was sitting on the floor. R8's incontinence brief completely saturated hanging down exposing the front of R8's perineal area. R8 was not wearing pants. R8 stated 'I wanted to wear pants but they (staff) were too busy. I'm a mess and I am cold. Can you put those pants on me?'. On 3/24/24 at 9:40 AM V6 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated R8 should not be left with shaving cream. V13 stated (R8) always makes a mess with it. (R8) doesn't shave himself so he really doesn't need that shaving cream anyway. I will make sure he gets cleaned up before he eats any of it. B. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the dignity for three residents (R11, R33, R55) affected negatively by another resident's (R289) yelling and cussing outbursts. This failure affects four (R11, R33, R55, R289) residents out of six residents reviewed for dignity in a sample list of 39 residents. Findings include: 1.) R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R11 as cognitively intact. R11's Care Plan intervention dated 9/14/22 instructs staff to provide a safe and secure environment for R11. On 3/24/24 at 1:05 PM R11 stated (R289) needs to move somewhere else. (R289) yells and hollers out all kinds of curse words right in front of me. I told (V1) about it last week but nothing gets done. (R289) was out of control last night (3/23/24) at supper. (R289) was yelling the 'f' (expletive) word and calling people names. I couldn't tell if (R289) was yelling at staff or residents but he was yelling loud enough everyone in the dining room could hear and the dining room was full. I was getting ready to call the cops on (R289) because he scared me because he was so out of control. The staff walked him (R289) to his room but then he came right back and started yelling again. I don't know why (R289) gets so mad but they ought to do something to control him before he hurts someone. (R289's) face gets so red and he yells so loud. You can tell (R289) is about to explode. That is why I wanted to call the cops. 2.) R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R33 as cognitively intact. R33's Care Plan intervention dated 12/27/23 documents R33 as a moderate risk for abuse. On 3/24/24 at 1:10 PM R33 stated (R289) yells and cusses in front of everyone. (R289) was in the hallway this morning at 5:00 AM yelling at the staff to get their 'head out of their a** (expletive)'. I heard every word of it. The whole hall could hear (R289) yelling. I don't like it at all. I don't talk to people like that and I don't like it when people talk to me like that. 3.) R55's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R55 as moderately cognitively impaired. R55's Care Plan initiated 1/7/24 documents R55 is at moderate risk of being abused. On 3/25/24 at 1:30 PM R55 stated (R289) yells and cusses all the time. (R289) screams out the 'f' (expletive) word and so much worse in the halls, the dining room during meal time, during the day, during the night. (R289) woke me up the other morning when he was screaming obscenities in the hall. I told the nurse to make him be quiet. I was afraid (R289) would come into my room. (R289's) room is not too far away. (R289) rolls around here (facility) scaring people and they (facility) won't do anything about him. (R289) is so intimidating because of his size and how he gets so angry when he yells. R289's undated Face Sheet documents R289 admitted to facility on 3/15/24. R289's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents R289's medical diagnoses as Developmental Delay, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD) and Heart Failure. R289's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 3/19/24 documents R289 as cognitively intact. R289's Care Plan does not include a focus area, goal nor interventions for behaviors. R289's Nurse Progress Note dated 3/19/24 at 4:59 PM documents Kitchen staff notified (V6) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) that (R289) was in the dining room yelling at other staff members and residents. (R289) has been noted to have this behavior continuously. (R289) was removed from dining room and escorted to his room to prevent any further altercations. On 3/24/24 at 12:55 PM V4 [NAME] stated (R289) acts up all the time in the dining room during mealtime. (R289) was yelling you are a f******* (expletive) b**** (expletive)' and 'get your f****** (expletive) a** (expletive) over here'. (R289) yells things like that all the time. (R289) was doing it last night during supper. There are a lot of other residents around. On 3/24/24 at 1:00 PM V5 Dietary Aide stated (R289) is out of control in the dining room. At lunch today (R289) was yelling at the staff 'you f****** (expletive) b**** (expletive)' and 'this food s**** (expletive)' and 'you f****** (expletive) stupid b**** (expletive)'. I went over to talk to (R289) and he just kept yelling so loud. (R289) does that about every meal. I don't know why they (facility) doesn't control that somehow. Other residents don't like it at all. On 3/25/24 at 11:50 AM R289 stated I get angry sometimes. I yell and scream at other residents when they say mean things to me. The other night one lady (unknown resident) told me to 'Shut up' and it made me mad so I yelled at her back. Yesterday (3/24/24) I yelled really loud in the dining room. There were a lot of people in there but I don't care. Somebody told me to shut up because I was mad at one of the kitchen staff so I yelled at all of them. They can't tell me what to do. Then they made me go to my room but I was so mad I went back to the dining room. On 3/26/24 at 8:00 AM V1 Administrator stated R289's careplan was entered on 3/24/24. V1 stated R289 did not have a behavioral careplan prior to 3/24/24. V1 Administrator stated R289 yells out in the dining room during mealtime all the time. V1 Administrator stated On 3/19/24 during supper time (R289) was yelling in the dining room. (R289) was yelling 'you f****** (expletive) b**** (expletive) ' and 'f****** (expletive) stupid b******* (expletive)' at the staff in front of a dining room full of people. V1 Administrator stated other residents are upset by (R289's) behaviors and outbursts. V1 stated We (facility) are working on a behavioral plan for (R289) to make it a better environment for everyone. The facility policy titled 'Dignity' effective March 2024 documents the facility shall promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality. The facility shall consider the resident's lifestyle and personal choices identified through the assessment processes to obtain a picture of his/her individual needs and preferences. Staff shall carry out activities in a manner which assists the resident to maintain and enhance his/her self-esteem and self-worth. Maintaining a resident's dignity should include promoting resident independence and dignity while dining, protecting resident's private space, including residents in conversations during activities or when care is provided and refraining from practices demeaning to residents. Failures at this level required more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote residents' dignity by failing to care for and treat them with respect and in a manner that promotes their quality of life and individualized needs. This failure affects two of six residents (R8, R52) reviewed for dignity in the sample list of 39. This failure resulted in emotional distress and a significant increase in anxiety for one resident (R52). Findings Include: The facility policy titled 'Dignity' effective March 2024 documents the facility shall promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality. The facility shall consider the resident's lifestyle and personal choices identified through the assessment processes to obtain a picture of his/her individual needs and preferences. Staff shall carry out activities in a manner which assists the resident to maintain and enhance his/her self-esteem and self-worth. Maintaining a resident's dignity should include promoting resident independence and dignity while dining, protecting resident's private space, including residents in conversations during activities or when care is provided and refraining from practices demeaning to residents. 1.) R52's Diagnoses List dated March 2024 documents R52 is diagnosed with Dependency on Renal Dialysis, Anxiety, Depression, Legal Blindness, Homelessness, and Bipolar Disorder. R52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R52 is cognitively intact. R52's Care Plan dated 12/27/23 documents R52 requires assistance bathing, transfers, mobility, and eating. R52 has issues with anxiety and depression and takes psychotropic medications. R52 has had episodes of suicidal ideations and suicidal attempts due to his current level of care and mental health diagnoses. R52 is at risk for abuse and neglect. R52 has impaired vision and is legally blind. R52 requires staff to verbalize things when they are taking care of him. Staff need to verbalize when they are approaching R52 and inform him of who they are and their role. Staff need to inform R52 of where they are places items he needs and and be consistent. On 3/24/24 at 10:30 AM R52 stated often staff enter his room without knocking or introducing themselves. R52 stated staff will wait until they are right beside his bed to say anything and because he is blind, this startles him and causes him anxiety. R52 stated staff also often bring in his food tray and set it on his bedside table without making sure he knows it is there. By the time he realizes it is there, the food is cold and he does not even know what food is on his tray. R52 states he feels staff should be telling him they are bringing his food tray and letting him know what is on the plate for him to eat and assisting him in setting up his meals if needed. On 3/25/24 at 1:45 PM R52 stated the Transportation Driver (V23) often comes up behind him and wraps his arm around R52 (upper chest, shoulder neck area) and startles him. R52 stated V23 also sneaks into his room and shake his bed and yells his name to startle him. R52 also stated V23 has tipped his wheelchair backward as if he was falling during times V23 has transported R52. R52 stated V23 has caused him a significant increase in anxiety and emotional stress which is something he struggles with already. R52 stated he has repeatedly asked V23 to stop and he just keeps on doing these things. R52 stated he has told other residents and some staff members about V23's behavior but it continues. R52 stated he is fed up with it and he doesn't want to be around V23 Transportation Driver. On 3/25/24 at 3:30 PM V20 Activity Aide confirmed R52 has mentioned V23 makes him uncomfortable with the way he treats him and the disregard for his (R52) vulnerabilities (blindness). On 3/25/24 at 3:00 PM V1 Administrator confirmed it would be inappropriate and unprofessional for any staff member to try to startle or scare R52 in any way, and staff need to be cognizant of R52's vulnerabilities (blindness) and individualize his care accordingly. V23 was away from the facility and unable to be reached during this time. On 3/25/24 at 4:08 PM V22 Certified Nurses Assistant stated R52 has complained to her on multiple occasions about staff not introducing themselves when they enter his room, about staff not telling him they are delivering his food tray or informing him what is on the tray, and about V23 Driver making R52 feel uncomfortable by purposefully scaring him and startling him even after R52 has asked him to stop. On 3/27/24 at 10:15 AM V2 Director of Nurses confirmed staff need to be sensitive to R52's medical conditions, specifically being blind. Staff need to knock upon entry to his room and announce who they are and what their role is. They need to tell him what they are going to be doing and if they deliver food, they need to make sure R52 knows what he has on his tray to eat. V2 stated V23 Driver should not be purposefully startling or scaring R52 and his actions are inappropriate and unprofessional. V2 confirmed if R52 had asked V23 to stop and he continued to startle and do things to scare R52, it is understandable that R52's anxiety would increase.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document resident advance directives in the resident's medical record. This failure has the potential to affect one resident (R5...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document resident advance directives in the resident's medical record. This failure has the potential to affect one resident (R53) of 24 residents reviewed for advance directives on the sample list of 39. Findings include: R53's Uniform Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form was signed by R53's legal guardian on 2/5/2024 and documents R53 does want to be resuscitated during a medical emergency. R53's Care Plan (2/1/2024) documents R53's code status as Full Code. R53's Physician Orders (3/21/2024) document R53's code status as DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). On 3/25/24 at 12:04pm, V9 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated staff look in a resident's electronic medical record under Advanced Directives to view the resident's POLST in order to check code status. On 3/25/24 at 1:03pm, V11 MDS Coordinator stated R53's care plan has not been updated to reflect R53's change of code status. The facility's Advance Directives policy (3/2024) documents copies of the resident's Advanced Directive shall be made and maintained in the resident's clinical record. Advanced Directive(s) shall be included in the resident's plan of care, and will be reviewed during the care plan meeting with the resident and/or the resident's legal representative when present.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete resident comprehensive assessments. This failur...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete resident comprehensive assessments. This failure affects one resident (R31) of 24 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments on the sample list of 39. Findings include: R31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R31's weight as 182 lbs (pounds). R31's MDS dated [DATE] documents R31's weight as 164 lbs. This same record further documents, Yes, not on a prescribed weight-loss regimen under weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months. R31's MDS dated [DATE] documents documents R31's weight as 164 lbs. This same record further documents, Yes, not on a prescribed weight-loss regimen under weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months. R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents R31's weights as follows: 9/1/23 - 166 lbs; 12/1/23 - 164 lbs; 3/1/24 - 168.5 lbs. On 3/25/24 at 3:44pm, V12 Dietary Manager stated V12 obtained R31's weights from R31's EMR to input the data into R31's MDS's. V12 reviewed R31's above weights and MDS's and V12 stated, they must have changed them (R31's weights), I'm not sure. V12 stated R31's weight has been stable since July 2023.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify and report significant weight loss to the family and physic...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify and report significant weight loss to the family and physician for one (R74) of four residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample list of 39. Findings include: R74's Facility Census documents R74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses: Non-Surgical Spiral Fracture of Shaft of Humerus Left Arm, Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Spondylosis, Acute Cystitis with Hematuria, Abnormalities of Gait and Balance, Lack of Coordination, Weakness, Difficulty in Walking, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Visual Hallucinations, Overactive Bladder, Major Depressive Disorder, Urinary Tract Infection, HTN, Hyperlipidemia, Repeated Falls, and Homicidal Ideations. R74's Care Plan dated 2/7/24 documents the following: R74 is at increased nutritional risk for nutritional risk related to Depression, Hypertension, Type 2 diabetes, and dementia. Goal: Tolerate diet as ordered. Maintain current weight +/- 5% by next review date. R74's admission weight on 2/5/24 documents R74 weighed 158.0 pounds. R74's Monthly weight on 3/2/24 documents R74 weighed 142.4 pounds, a 9.87% weight loss. R74's Progress Notes dated 2/5/24 to 3/2/24 does not document that R74's Power of Attorney, or R74's Physician were notified of the significant weight loss. On 3/26/24 at 10:20am V2 Director of Nursing said, R74 has had a significant weight loss while in the facility. V2 said, R74's Power of Attorney and R74's Physician should have been notified of the weight loss and should been documented in R74's chart. V2 acknowledge that there was no documentation that R74's Power of Attorney or Physician were notified of R74's significant weight loss. The facility's Weight Gain or Loss Policy dated 2/2024 documents; Purpose: To ensure that insidious/significant weight gain or loss will be identified so that nutritional needs can be evaluated, and appropriate intervention provided. Standards: If weight loss noted: family and resident will be notified in addition to physician. Facilities Weight Gain or Loss Policy dated 2/2024 documents; Purpose: To ensure that insidious/significant weight gain or loss will be identified so that nutritional needs can be evaluated, and appropriate intervention provided. Standards: If weight loss noted: family and resident will be notified in addition to physician.
Feb 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse by another resident....

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse by another resident. This failure affects two of three residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of eight. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting - Illinois with a review date of August, 2024 documents, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. The facility's Final Abuse Investigation Report dated 2/1/24 documents the Conclusion and Action Taken as V7 Licensed Practical Nurse was notified of an alleged physical altercation between R1 and R2. R2 reported that R1 thought R2 was making fun of R1 and R1 touched R2's arm. R2 stated that R2 touched R1 on the arm also. R1 denied making any physical contact with R2 but stated that R2 touched R1's upper arm R1's Care Plan printed on 2/13/24 documents diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease with Early Onset, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Unspecified Dementia, Age Related Nuclear Cataract and Unqualified Visual Loss of Right Eye and Normal Vision Left Eye. This Care Plan documents R1 has a behavior problem of false accusations related to R1 stating false accusations against other staff and or residents dated 9/6/2023. This Care Plan documents interventions as if reasonable, discuss the resident's behavior, explain/reinforce why behavior is inappropriate and/or unacceptable to the resident dated 4/27/2021. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 has moderately impaired cognition. R2's Care Plan printed on 2/13/24 documents diagnoses including Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations, Schizoaffective Disorder, Mild Intellectual Disabilities, Agoraphobia with Panic Disorder, Bipolar, Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder Severe with Psychotic Symptoms. This Care Plan documents R2 has a behavior problem of getting involved in other people's conversations and trying to solve problems of others with an intervention to assist the resident with a more appropriate method of coping and interacting. R2's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents that R1 is cognitively intact. On 2/13/24 at 11:00 AM, R1 stated that R2 hit her (R1) and then she (R1) ignored R2. On 2/13/24 at 11:19 AM, R2 stated on 1/28/24 R1 hit her (R2) but she (R1) doesn't know why. R2 confirmed that R2 hit R1 back. R2 confirmed that R1 hit R2 with a closed fist and R2 hit R1 back with a closed fist on R2's arm. On 2/13/24 at 2:47 PM, V7 Licensed Practical Nurse stated that on 1/28/24 around 7:45 PM V10 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported to her that R1 said R2 hit R1. V7 stated that they separated the two residents and she immediately called V1 Administrator. V7 stated that she completed skin assessments on both residents and R1 had a red area on the left upper arm from the altercation. On 2/13/24 at 3:38 PM, V10 CNA stated that she did not witness the altercation but R1 reported to her that R2 hit R1 and V10 reported it to V7 immediately. R1's Nurse Practitioner visit dated 1/29/24 at 3:00 PM by V11 Advance Practice Nurse documents the date of service as 1/29/24 and reason for visit was a resident to resident altercation with a new skin concern of a bruise. This note documents the nurse requested R1 be seen due to a resident conflict the day before. V11 documents the area on the left upper arm measuring 8 cm (centimeters) x (by) 6 cm. R1 denied pain but was unable to recall the events due to advanced Dementia.
Dec 2023 5 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement fall interventions, provide supervision to p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement fall interventions, provide supervision to prevent a fall, provide safe transfer assistance, and thoroughly investigate falls to identify root cause and develop post fall interventions for three (R1, R2, R3) of three residents reviewed for falls in the sample list of nine. These failures resulted in R1 falling and sustaining a subdural hematoma and R3 falling and sustaining a scalp laceration that required sutures. Findings include: 1.) R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 10/16/23 documents R1 has moderate cognitive impairment, has upper/lower extremity range of motion impairment, and requires substantial/maximal assistance for chair/bed transfers. R1's Care Plan revised on 5/1/23 documents R1 transfers with extensive assistance of two staff. R1's Care Plan revised on 5/4/23 documents R1 has decreased ability to self transfer due to Parkinson's Disease and spastic movements/tremors. R1's Care Plan revised 11/28/23 documents R1 is at risk for falls and continues to self transfer even after being educated to call for assistance and includes an intervention dated 6/12/23 to offer to lay R1 down after meals. R1's November 2023 Medication Administration Record documents R1 receives Plavix (antiplatelet, blood thinning medication) 75 milligrams by mouth daily. The facility's Report to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Regional Office dated 11/29/23 documents R1 fell on [DATE] at 6:21 PM while attempting to self transfer from the wheelchair to the bed and R1's head hit the floor. R1 was found on the floor with a laceration and hematoma (bruising/swelling) to the right side of R1's head. R1 was transferred to the local emergency room and was diagnosed with a subdural hemorrhage (brain bleed). R1's Fall Investigation for 11/22/23 6:21 PM fall, provided by V2 Director of Nursing, documents V3 Licensed Practical Nurse's (LPN) incident description that R1 self propelled R1 to R1's room, attempted to self transfer into the low bed, and R1 fell to the floor hitting R1's head which caused a laceration and hematoma. V5 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) interview is the only documented interview as part of this investigation. V5's statement dated 11/22/23 documents V5 walked past R1's room and found R1 partway on the low bed and partway on the floor. R1's call light had not been activated, R1 was wearing nonskid socks, and R1's wheelchair lap cushion had been in place when V5 last saw R1 at 6:15 PM in the hallway. There is no documented interviews with staff to determine when staff last observed R1 prior to the fall, what R1 was doing at that time, if any staff had offered to lay R1 down after supper, or if R1 had requested to lay down prior to the fall. R1's Hospital Emergency Department Notes dated 11/22/23 at 6:58 PM, recorded by V6 Advanced Practice Registered Nurse, documents R1 presented to the emergency room for complaints of a fall and R1 hitting R1's head. This note documents R1 has a hematoma to the right scalp, R1 takes Plavix, and a head CT (computed tomography ) was ordered. R1's Head CT without Intravenous Contrast dated 11/22/23 at 7:17 PM documents the indication for this test was fall- on Plavix and there was a small left anterior frontal subdural hemorrhage with a depth of up to 7 millimeters. R1 was transferred to another hospital for further treatment. R1's Hospital Emergency Department Note dated 11/22/23 at 10:33 PM document R1 had an unwitnessed ground level fall with the following injuries - right frontal subdural hemorrhage, right scalp laceration, and hematoma. R1 was admitted with principal diagnoses of Trauma and Subdural Hemorrhage. On 12/11/23 at 10:37 AM R1 was next to the dining room sitting in a wheelchair. R1 had bruising to R1's right forehead. R1 stated R1 recalls falling recently and R1 was hurt bad. R1 was unable to recall any additional details of R1's fall. On 12/7/23 at 12:14 PM V7 LPN stated V7 was not assigned to R1's care the day R1 fell. V7 stated it was R1's norm to go back to R1's room and lie down after supper, R1 had not asked to lay down, and R1's call light was not on when R1 fell. V7 stated R1 doesn't always call for help and R1 is very impulsive with transfers. On 12/11/23 at 10:48 AM V3 LPN stated V3 last saw R1 in the dining room prior to R1's fall, R1 had finished eating and had made R1's way to R1's room. V3 stated that's (R1's) norm. V3 stated R1 did not mention that R1 wanted to lay down and V3 did not offer to lay R1 down after supper. V3 stated R1 does not have a routine bedtime. V3 stated R1 was found partway on the floor and partway on the bed with a bleeding head laceration. V3 stated V3 was unsure what R1 hit R1's head on as R1 has a lot of items in R1's room including totes and an overbed table. V3 stated R1 told V3 that R1 was trying to go to bed and attempted to self transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. V3 stated R1 usually tells staff when R1 wants to lay down. On 12/11/23 at 10:57 AM V5 CNA stated V5 was R1's assigned CNA on the evening of 11/22/23. V5 stated V5 did not witness R1's fall and V5 was walking past R1's room and found R1 with R1's upper body on the bed in low position and R1's legs on the floor. R1 had a bump and a bleeding cut to R1's right forehead. V5 stated V5 last saw R1 around 6:15 PM when V5 washed R1's face as R1 was leaving the dining room. V5 stated V5 did not recall if V5 offered to lay R1 down that day, after R1 was finished with supper. V5 stated R1 does not have a routine bed time and R1 attempts to self transfer at times. On 12/7/23 at 10:43 AM V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated R1's fall investigation includes interviews that were conducted, and V3 LPN and V5 CNAs were the only staff interviewed as part of the investigation. On 12/11/23 at 12:17 PM V2 stated R1 doesn't like to stay put and we are unable to restrain R1. V2 stated V2 was told R1 removed R1's wheelchair lap cushion and attempted to self transfer for R1's fall on 11/22/23. V2 stated we try to keep R1 in the hallway to keep eyes on R1. V2 stated V1 Administrator, V2 and V8 Assistant DON conducted R1's fall investigation. V2 confirmed R1's head hematoma and laceration were injuries from R1's fall. V2 stated the root cause of the fall was R1's attempt to self transfer after removing the lap cushion. V2 stated V2 inquired with V1 for the post fall intervention, and was told the intervention was that R1 was sent to the emergency room. V2 confirmed staff interviews for R1's fall investigation do not document what R1 was last observed doing, if staff had offered to lay R1 down, or if R1 had requested to lay down prior to the fall. V2 stated V2 expects staff to follow the interventions listed on the resident's care plan. 2.) R3's MDS dated [DATE] documents R3 has short/long term memory loss and requires extensive assistance of two staff for transfers/ambulation. R3's cumulative diagnoses list documents R3 has Alzheimer's Disease and Severe Dementia with Agitation. R3 has impaired balance with standing/walking/transfers and requires staff assistance to stabilize balance. R3's Care Plan revised 9/21/23 documents R3 requires extensive assistance of two or more staff for transfers/walking. R3's Care Plan dated 10/14/22 documents R3 is at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems, history of falls, poor safety awareness, and wandering. This care plan includes interventions to follow up with hospice that R3 is still not resting during the night (11/28/23), review information on past falls to attempt to determine the cause and educate R3/family/caregivers/interdisciplinary team as to cause as needed. R3's Report to IDPH Regional Office dated 11/21/23 documents R3 was found lying on the floor of another unidentified resident room on 11/13/23. R3 had moderate bleeding from the back of R3's head, R3 was transferred to the emergency room and received staple closure of the laceration. This report documents R3's medications were reviewed by hospice and adjustments were made to ensure better sleep to avoid daytime exhaustion/weakness. R3's Fall Investigation, provided by V2, documents R3 had an unwitnessed fall on 11/13/23 at 10:15 AM. V10's (LPN) incident description documents a CNA (V11) reported that R3 was on the floor and V10 found R3 lying on the floor on R3's right side with a head laceration and blood noted on the floor near. R3 was not able to explain what happened. This investigation does not contain interviews with V11, V10, or any other staff to determine when R3 was last observed prior to the fall and what R3 was doing when R3 was last observed. R3's Hospital After Visit Summary dated 11/13/23 documents fall as R3's reason for hospital visit, R3 was diagnosed with a scalp laceration, and R3 required laceration repair. This summary documents to remove R3's staples in 7-10 days. R3's Nursing Note dated 11/13/2023 at 4:31 PM documents R3 returned from the emergency room with two staples to the back of R3's head. R3's Fall Investigation, provided by V2, documents R3 had an unwitnessed fall on 11/25/23 at 7:57 AM. V12 Registered Nurse (RN) incident description documents R3 was found lying on R3's right side in the common bathroom/shower room. R3 was unable to give a description of the fall. R3's Fall Follow Up Note dated 11/28/23 at 10:01 AM documents the interdisciplinary team reviewed R3's fall, R3 wandering the unit was the root cause, and a code lock for the shower room door was the intervention. There are no documented interviews conducted with staff in regards to this fall. This fall investigation does not identify the last time R3 was observed prior to R3's fall and what R3 was doing at that time. R3's Fall Investigation, provided by V2, documents R3 had an unwitnessed fall on 11/28/23 at 5:40 AM. V13 LPN incident description documents R3 was walking back and forth in the hallway, became unsteady, and fell. R3 was then assisted to R3's reclining geriatric chair. V14's (CNA) interview is the only documented interview in this investigation. V14's interview dated 11/28/23 documents V14 was assisting other residents with morning cares, R3 was wandering in the hallway, and many attempts were made to have R3 sit in a chair. This note documents R3 got R3's self up and began wandering the hallway, and as V14 left an unidentified resident room V14 found R3 lying on the floor. R3's Fall Follow up Note dated 11/28/23 at 10:17 AM documents the interdisciplinary team reviewed R3's fall, R3 was observed walking in the hallway after early morning medication pass, and R3 fell. This note documents the root cause as R3 fell in the hallway and the intervention was for hospice to review medications to ensure sleep at night and prevent drowsiness during the day. There is no documentation in R3's medical record that hospice reviewed R3's medications or that any new medication changes were made after R3's fall on 11/28/23. On 12/7/23 at 2:22 PM V11 CNA stated V11, V15, and V16 were the CNAs on R3's unit (on 11/21/23), V16 had went on break, leaving V11 and V15 on the unit. V11 stated V15 was in another resident's room. V11 stated V11 was in another resident's room when R9 came to report that R3 had fallen in R9's room. V11 stated V11 had just observed R3 walking in the hallway a few minutes prior to the fall, R3 was able to walk independently, staff did not have to provide walking assistance just monitor R3 and direct R3 out of other resident rooms. V11 stated V11 had to leave the hallway where R3 was walking, to assist another resident who was up by herself and was a high fall risk. On 12/11/23 at 10:19 AM V3 LPN stated R3 has not been a walker and one day R3 just got up and started walking. V3 stated R3 is very hard to re-direct when R3 is up walking so staff will walk with R3. On 12/11/23 at 12:17 PM V2 DON stated R3 ambulates/wanders constantly, R3 can get R3's self up, R3 needs staff assistance to safely transfer. V2 stated once R3 is up, R3 can ambulate on R3's own with visual supervision/monitoring of staff. V2 stated staff should redirect R3 out of other resident rooms. V2 stated R3 had an unwitnessed fall on 11/13/23, R3 was wandering, and R3 was found on the floor of another resident's room. V2 stated staff applied a towel to the back of R3's head to stop bleeding from the laceration that was believed to be caused by hitting the base of the bedside table. V2 stated V10 and V11 were interviewed, they were in the next room, and they heard R3 fall. V3 stated the root cause of the fall was R3's confusion and weakness due to lack of sleep. V2 confirmed the fall investigation does not document staff were interviewed to determined when R3 was last observed prior to the fall and what R3 was doing at that time. V2 stated R3 had an unwitnessed fall on 11/25/23 where R3 fell in the shower room and a code lock was then installed on the shower room door. V2 confirmed there are no documented staff interviews as part of this fall investigation to determine when R3 was last observed prior to the fall. V2 stated R3 had an unwitnessed fall in the hallway on 11/28/23. V2 stated V2 viewed video surveillance that showed the nurse V13 was administering medications while R3 was walking in the hallway, there were no other staff present in the hallway, V13 went into another resident room, and R3 just fell down. V2 confirmed the investigation documents the CNAs were in resident rooms providing care at the time of R3's fall. V2 stated R3 almost needs a buddy to walk with R3 at all times and during the mornings R3 just wants to walk. V2 stated the root cause of the fall was that R3 fell in the hallway and the intervention was a medication review by hospice requesting medication to help R3 sleep through the night. V2 stated Trazodone was ordered by hospice following R3's fall, and on 12/4/23 or 12/5/23 an unidentified hospice nurse reported the Trazodone order to V2. V2 stated hospice verbally gives orders to the floor nurses and V2 did not implement this order. V2 stated V2 thought hospice enters their own orders into the resident's electronic medical record. V2 confirmed R3's current orders do not include Trazodone. At 2:33 PM V2 stated V2 was unable to locate documentation of R3's Trazodone order and hospice visit note/medication review. V2 stated hospice provides a form after their visit that includes new orders, and V2 is awaiting a call back from hospice to request this documentation. 3.) R2's MDS dated [DATE] documents R2 is cognitively intact, R2 uses a walker and wheelchair, and R2 requires substantial/maximal assistance of staff for transfers. R2's Care Plan dated 10/25/22 documents an intervention with a revised date of 9/20/23 for extensive physical assistance of one staff person for transfers. R2's Fall Investigation, provided by V2, documents R2 fell on [DATE] at 12:00 PM while V9 CNA assisted R2 in transferring. R2 lost R2's balance and fell face first onto the floor. R2 stated R2 lost balance and fell forward. R2 had a small laceration under the left eye, bleeding bleeding skin tear to middle and fourth right finger knuckles, and bruising to the right middle finger. R2 was transferred to the emergency room for evaluation. This investigation documents interviews were conducted with V17 LPN and V9 CNA. V17's interview dated 11/29/23 documents V9 was transferring R2 and R2 was not wearing any footwear. V9's interview dated 11/29/23 documents V9 was transferring R2, R2 lost balance, R2 fell forward, and V9 was unable to stop R2 from falling. This interview does not document if R9 was wearing footwear. These interviews do not document whether a walker and gait belt were used for R2's transfer. The Fall Follow Up note dated 11/30/23 documents at 12:49 PM the interdisciplinary team reviewed R2's fall, R2 was not wearing appropriate footwear and the intervention was to apply nonskid socks for transfers. On 12/7/23 at 11:57 AM R2 was sitting in a wheelchair in R2's room. R2 had faded bruising below R2's left eye. R2 stated R2 fell about a week ago while V9 CNA transferred R2 from the wheelchair to the bed. R2 stated staff do not use a gait belt for R2's transfers and one was not used that day. R2 stated V9 applied nonskid socks prior to R2's transfer. R2 stated I think my leg just gave out and that has happened before. R2 stated R2 had hit R2's eye on the bottom of the overbed table during the fall and the whole right side of R2's head had turned purple/bruised. At 2:11 PM R2's wheeled walker was folded beside R2's dresser. On 12/7/23 at 12:06 PM V9 stated V9 had applied R2's gripper socks prior to R2's transfer on 11/29/23 and R2 got dizzy when R2 stood causing R2 to fall forward. V9 stated R2 tried to grab R2's incontinence brief during the fall, and a gait belt was not used during the transfer. V9 stated R2 hit R2's eye on either the overbed table or dresser, and R2 was transferred to the emergency room. V9 stated R2 had been in bed bad with COVID-19 for a few days prior to R2's fall. At 2:09 PM V9 stated a walker was not used during R2's transfer and R2 has never used a walker. On 12/7/23 at 2:01 PM V18 Physical Therapy Assistant stated R2 has been on therapy prior to R2's fall, R2 had COVID-19 about a week prior to R2's fall, and R2 transferred with a wheeled walker and standby/contact guard assist. V18 stated R2 has had balance issues. R2 has a history of R2's legs giving out, and R2 doesn't have good standing tolerance. V18 stated staff should be using a gait belt and R2's wheeled walker for R2's transfers. V18 stated the walker would have helped stabilize R2's upper body during the transfer. On 12/7/23 at 12:17 PM V2 DON stated R2 fell while transferring from the bed to wheelchair and R2 is a stand/pivot transfer. V2 stated V9 reported that R2 lost balance and fell forward during R2's transfer, the root cause was that R2 was not wearing nonskid socks during the transfer, and nonskid socks were provided as the intervention. V2 stated V2 just went by what the nurse had reported, that R2 did not have on nonskid socks. V2 confirmed V9's interview does not document if R2's footwear at the time of the fall and R2 was not interviewed about R2's footwear. V2 stated staff should use a gait belt for residents who require extensive assistance for transfers and ambulation. V2 stated V2 was not aware that a walker and gait belt was not used during R2's transfer. The facility's Fall Prevention Program revised May 2022 documents nursing personnel are responsible for ensuring the ongoing use of fall precautions, the interdisciplinary team reviews the falls to determine possible safety interventions, and the Director of Nursing/Designee is responsible for monitoring the Fall Prevention Program and providing further staff education. This policy documents fall interventions are documented on the resident's care plan, and fall interventions may include using assistive devices and transferring residents in accordance with their plan of care and monitor resident's gait for balance and fatigue. The facility's Transfers-Manual Gait Belt and Mechanical Lifts dated as revised August 2023 documents resident transfer needs are designated into categories including using a gait belt for a one person transfer that requires 25% or less assistance from the caregiver, and the use of a gait belt is mandatory in all physical assist transfers, and failure to comply with lifting guidelines may result in disciplinary action. This policy documents the resident's transfer needs are documented on the resident's care plan.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report a resident fall to the resident's representative for one (R3)...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report a resident fall to the resident's representative for one (R3) of three residents reviewed for falls in the sample list of nine. Findings include: R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R3 has short and long term memory impairment. R3's Nursing Note dated 11/25/23 at 8:00 AM documents R3 was found on the floor of the common bathroom and R3's physician was notified. There is no documentation in R3's medical record that R3's Power of Attorney (V4) was notified of the fall. R3's Fall Investigation for fall on 11/25/23 at 7:57 AM, provided by V2 Director of Nursing, does not document V4 was notified of the fall. On 12/11/23 at 12:17 PM V2 stated the nurse is responsible for notifying the physician and resident's family of falls, and this should be documented in a progress note and/or the incident report. V2 confirmed there is no documentation V4 was notified of R3's fall on 11/25/23. The facility's Physician-Family Notification-Change in Condition policy revised November 2018 documents the facility will notify the resident's representative of accidents that result in injury and has the potential for requiring physician intervention and significant changes in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition. .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include antiplatelet medication...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include antiplatelet medication use and monitoring for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls in the sample list of nine. Findings include: R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 receives an antiplatelet. R1's November 2023 Medication Administration Record documents R1 receives Plavix (antiplatelet, blood thinning medication) 75 Milligrams by mouth once daily as of 10/11/22. R1's Care Plan revised on 11/28/23 does not document Plavix use and interventions for monitoring for side effects/complications of this medication. On 12/11/23 at 1:26 PM V2 Director of Nursing stated blood thinning medications should be care planned with interventions of monitoring for side effects. V2 confirmed R1's care plan does not address Plavix use and interventions for monitoring.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify, document/assess, address, and report a change in condition...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify, document/assess, address, and report a change in condition for one (R5) of three residents reviewed for death in the sample list of nine. Findings include: On [DATE] at 12:06 PM V9 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated V9 remembers R5 was doing a lot of mumbling before R5 passed, and when R5 admitted to the facility R5 was talking clearly. On [DATE] at 11:59 AM V9 stated V9 noticed R5's speech changes while in the dining room with R5. V9 stated V9 talked to other unidentified CNAs and nurses who were aware of the changes in R5's speech. On [DATE] at 2:36 PM V22 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated V22 recalls R5, R5 was alert and oriented, and V22 last saw R5 two days prior to R5's death. V22 described R5 as being fine that day and was shocked to hear of R5's passing. On [DATE] at 2:53 PM V23 Registered Nurse stated V23 had taken care of R5, R5 was staying in bed a lot and R5 had two falls. V23 stated the week prior to R5's death, V23 had to crush R5's medications and administer in applesauce which was unusual for R5. V23 described R5 as being different after R5's falls, R5 was tired and spending more time in bed. V23 stated there wasn't anything passed on that R5 was sick when V23 received shift report the day before R5 died and V23 administered R5's medications that night. V23 stated the next morning V23 walked passed R5's room, found R5 unresponsive, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated. On [DATE] at 11:09 AM V23 stated V23 did not report V23's observed changes in R5 to R5's physician since the other nurses and CNAs were aware and V23 was told R5's condition was already reported to R5's physician. On [DATE] at 10:48 AM V3 LPN stated R5 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time when R5 admitted to the facility. On [DATE] at 11:28 AM V13 LPN stated that day ([DATE]) an unidentified CNA said R5 was eating a lit cigarette, we swept R5's mouth, removed the cigarette, and V13 did not think R5 ate any of the cigarette. V13 stated V13 did not assess R5 after the incident or report the incident to R5's physician, since V13 reported the incident to R5's unidentified assigned nurse. V13 stated vital signs and assessments are completed and documented when changes in condition are noted. V13 stated V13 was not aware that R5 had exhibited this behavior previously. R5's Census documents on [DATE] R5 admitted with the following diagnoses: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Fibromyalgia, Essential Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, vision loss, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. R5's admission assessment dated [DATE] documents R5 was alert and oriented to person, place, and situation, and is able to communicate appropriately. R5's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R5 is cognitively intact. R5's Smoking Safety Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R5 has no impairment with general awareness and the ability to understand the facility's smoking policy, no problems with general behavior and interpersonal interaction, no problems with potential injury to self or others, and minimal problem with history of hazardous smoking behavior. This assessment does not identify R5's specific hazardous smoking behavior and there are no documented behaviors in R5's medical record prior to [DATE]. There is no documentation in R5's medical record that R5 had changes in R5's cognition and speech, that R5 was sleeping more, or that R5 was having difficulty swallowing medications requiring medications to be crushed for administration. There is no documentation that R5's physician was notified of these changes in R5's health. R5's Progress Note recorded by V19 Nurse Practitioner dated [DATE] at 11:00 AM documents R5 was evaluated/assessed and R5 had complaints of pain following two recent falls last week. R5 was in no acute distress, appeared stable, and denied pain with most recent assessment. R5 had negative imaging completed in the emergency room prior to R5's return two days ago. R5 reported that R5 has an appointment with R5's Primary Physician V21 on Thursday ([DATE]). There are no documented assessments in R5's medical record after this note. The next nursing note in R5's medical record is the behavior note dated [DATE] at 6:44 PM. R5's Behavior Note dated [DATE] at 6:44 PM documents R5 was outside for 6:00 PM smoke break and the unidentified CNA with R5 reported that R5 was seen eating a whole, lit cigarette. This note documents the remaining part of the cigarette was removed from R5's mouth and R5 was brought inside. There is no documentation in R5's medical record that R5 has a history of this behavior. There is no documentation that R5 was assessed after this incident or that R5's physician was notified. The next recorded nursing note is dated [DATE] at 7:36 AM when R5 was found unresponsive, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated and emergency medical technicians took over CPR once on site. R5 remained without pulse until the end of CPR and R5 was declared dead at 6:27 AM. R5's Death Certificate dated [DATE] signed by V19 Nurse Practitioner, documents Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 and complications related to obesity were the cause of R5's death, and an autopsy was not performed. On [DATE] at 12:17 PM V2 Director of Nursing stated if a resident has a change from their baseline, the staff should assess the resident, document the assessment, and notify the physician. V2 stated residents should be sent to the emergency room for any neurological symptoms that are outside of the resident's baseline. V2 confirmed a cognitively intact resident attempting to eat a cigarette, would be a change in condition. V2 stated I see the concern in regards to R5's change in condition not being identified/addressed and reported to R5's physician. V2 stated V2 has educated the staff to document when changes occur and document what they did about it. V2 confirmed resident change in condition and physician notification should be documented in a nursing note. The facility's Physician-Family Notification-Change in Condition policy dated as revised [DATE] documents the resident's physician and family will be notified when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition. Recurrent periods of delirium and life-threatening conditions such as heart attack and stroke are listed as examples of life threatening conditions and clinical complications.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer a seizure medication as ordered resulting in a significan...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer a seizure medication as ordered resulting in a significant medication error for one (R4) of three residents reviewed for medications in the sample list of nine. Findings include: R4's Hospital After Visit Summary dated 2/2/23 includes an order for Phenytoin (seizure medication) Extended Release 200 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily. R4's Hospital Records dated 2/2/23 at 2:04 PM documents one dose of Phenytoin was administered on 2/2/23. R4's admission assessment dated [DATE] documents R4 admitted to the facility at 4:45 PM. R4's February 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) does not document Phenytoin was initiated until 2/3/23. There is no documentation that R4 received the evening dose of Phenytoin or that the facility communicated with the physician, hospital, or pharmacy regarding this dose. On 12/11/23 at 12:17 PM V2 Director of Nursing stated the hospital sends a referral packet prior to the resident's admission. V2 stated if the resident admits from the hospital, then their medications come from the pharmacy or are pulled from the emergency medication supply system. V2 stated if the facility does not have the medication to give then the staff needs to contact the pharmacy to order the medication. V2 stated if we know a medication is necessary then we can ask to hold off on the discharge or have the hospital give the medication prior to discharge. V2 stated the nurses should have initiated a STAT (immediate) delivery from pharmacy in that situation (referring to R1's Phenytoin). V2 confirmed a checkmark on the MAR indicates the medication was administered. V2 stated if there is no checkmark then the nurse has to document the reason in a progress note. V2 confirmed R4's Phenytoin should have been given at bedtime and the physician should have been notified of the missed dose. The facility's Medication Administration Policy dated as revised January 2015 documents medications will be administered per physician's orders, medication administration is recorded on the MAR with the date/time, and medication errors will be reported to the physician.
Nov 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete weekly wound assessments and obtain a physician order for w...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete weekly wound assessments and obtain a physician order for wound treatment for one (R1) resident out of three residents reviewed for wounds in a sample list of three residents. Findings include: R1's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes Mellitus Type II , Atherosclerosis of Left Leg Native Arteries, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Non-Dominant side, Essential Hypertension, Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Repeated Falls, Neuralgia and Neuritis. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 as having moderately impaired cognition. This same MDS documents R1 as requiring substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, moderate assistance for bed mobility and that R1 uses a wheelchair for mobility. R1's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated November 2023 documents physician orders starting 10/23/23 to cleanse R1's Left Great Toe skin tear every shift. This same POS documents a physician order for R1's Left Second Toe to apply Triple Antibiotic Ointment and dry dressing daily starting 11/5/23, Cleanse Left Lower Extremity with soap and water, apply Antibiotic Ointment to open areas daily starting 10/14/23, Cleanse Left ankle skin tear and apply dry dressing daily starting 11/5/23. This same POS does not include a physician order to treat R1's Left Third Toe skin tear. R1's Skin Observation dated 10/23/23 documents R1 obtained an abrasion to the Left Great Toe that was unable to be measured. This same skin observation documents R1 obtained a skin tear to the Left Second Toe. R1's Fall Investigation dated 11/6/23 documents R1 obtained a skin tear on R1's Left Third Toe. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) does not document a treatment order for R1's Left Third Toe. This same EMR does not document weekly assessment including odor, drainage, signs of infection, measurements nor pain for R1's Left Great Toe skin tear, Left Second Toe skin tear, Left Lower Extremity open areas, nor Left Ankle skin tear. R1's Nurse Practitioner (V7) Progress Note dated 11/6/23 at 6:02 AM documents Left Food edema 1+, non-pitting, baseline per (R1). Extremities normal, no edema to all other extremities. Residual weakness on Left side, baseline, no acute changes. Some scabbing noted to superficial abrasions on first and second Left Great Toe. Skin color, texture, turgor normal. This same note instructs facility staff to Monitor abrasions and scabbing to Left Great Toe and Left Second Digit for acute changes, updated concerns to provider. (V3) Facility wound nurse to manage Left Great Toe and Left Second Digit abrasions. R1's Hospital records dated 11/12/23 document R1's chief complaint in the emergency room as chest pain. This same hospital record documents R1 was treated in the emergency room and then admitted to hospital with medical problems including Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD), Gangrene of foot, Bacteremia, Sepsis, Type II Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy and Vascular Dementia. The Summary of Hospital Course documents (R1) was admitted with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD), Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Diabetes coming into the hospital for Left Foot pain. The Summary documents R1 was noted to have Left Leg Cellulitis and Gangrene and that sepsis present on admission had improved with treatment and the likely source was Left Foot Gangrene and skin breakdown. The Summary documents R1 had positive blood cultures and final recommendations were Intravenous antibiotics for six weeks. The Summary documents a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line was placed and Computerized Tomography (CT) scan shows leukocyte activity at the lateral aspect of the Left Great Toe suspicious for Osteomyelitis. This same hospital record documents. Sloughing skin with areas of necrosis over Left first through third toes, malodorous scent of the Left Third through Left First Toes. Multiple blisters throughout Left Lower Extremity beginning at the level of the Knee. Entire Distal Left Foot is blister with Gangrenous toes. Limited movement of the Left Lower Leg. However able to move the toes slightly. On 11/28/23 at 2:05 PM V3 Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON)/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Wound Nurse stated the facility does complete initial assessments but does not continue with weekly assessments of non-pressure wounds such as skin tears, abrasions, stasis ulcers and bruises. V3 Wound Nurse stated R1 was scheduled to be seen by V18 Wound Physician but was not able to be seen due to R1 was sent to emergency room each time V18 was at facility to see R1. V3 Wound Nurse stated the facility should have been assessing (R1's) Left Lower Extremity open areas since 10/9/23 and Left Great toe and Left Second Toe since 10/23. V3 stated facility staff should have obtained treatment orders for R1's Left Second Toe on 10/23/23 instead of waiting until 11/5/23. V3 stated there is no documentation that R1's Left Third Toe ever had a treatment order. V3 stated The nurses check off on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) or Treatment Administration Record (TAR) when they complete the weekly skin checks. There is no documentation that shows if R1's wounds were improving, stable or deteriorating. I don't believe (R1's) wounds were that bad but the hospital record is very damaging. I will be training the nurses on how to complete and document a thorough weekly skin assessment. The facility policy titled 'Skin Condition Assessment and Monitoring-Pressure and Non-Pressure' revised 6/2018 documents Pressure and other ulcers (Diabetic, Arterial, Venous) will be assessed and measured at least weekly by licensed nurse and documented in the resident's clinical record. Non-pressure skin conditions (bruises/contusions, abrasions, lacerations, rashes, skin tears, surgical wounds, etc.) will be assessed for healing progress and signs of complications or infection weekly. A licensed nurse shall observe condition of wound incision daily, or with dressing changes as ordered. Observations such as drainage, dehiscence, redness, swelling, or pain will be documented in the nurses's notes. If observations are acute, physician and responsible party will be notified by charge nurse. Notification will be documented in the residents clinical record. The attending physician shall be notified within seven to fourteen days of the resident lack of response to treatment.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent potential cross contamination during wound care...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent potential cross contamination during wound care for one (R2) resident out of three residents reviewed for wound care in a sample list of three residents. Findings include: R2's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Disease, Vascular Dementia, Anemia, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Palliative Care, and Wound on Right Hip. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 as severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R2 as dependent on staff for assistance with toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and bed mobility. R2's Care Plan instructs staff to use two people to assist R2 in bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. R2's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated November 2023 documents a physician order starting 9/19/23 to cleanse R2's Right Hip wound with wound cleanser, apply half strength bleach solution soaked gauze and apply bordered foam daily and as needed. On 11/28/23 at 12:25 PM V5 Registered Nurse (RN) prepared to completed wound care for R2's right hip wound. V5 RN placed the community treatment cart inside R2's room between R2's bed and R2's roommate's bed. V5 RN removed R2's dressing which was soiled with a moderate amount of yellow and pink drainage and without removing V5's soiled gloves and completing hand hygiene, V5 reached into V5's pocket removed scissors and then use the contaminated scissors to cut R2's dressing to fit R2's hip wound. V5 then applied the cut dressing to R2's hip wound still wearing the same contaminated gloves. On 11/28/23 at 2:00 PM V3 Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON)/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Wound Nurse stated cross contamination during wound care can put the resident at risk of infection. V3 stated nursing staff should know to wash their hands at the correct times during a dressing change. V3 stated I am sure V5 RN was probably nervous but she should have washed her hands and not put her gloved hands in her pockets to then use her scissors on a dressing that was applied to (R2). I will educate (V5) on Infection Control Procedures. The facility policy titled 'Dressing Change-Clean Non-Sterile' revised 11/22 documents the treatment cart may NOT be taken into room. The treatment cart should remain in line of vision of the treatment nurse or be locked when not in view. Apply gloves, Remove soiled dressing and pace in plastic trash bag, remove soiled gloves and place in plastic trash bag, wash hands or if hands are not visible soiled, and alcohol based hand gel may be used to decontaminate the hands, apply clean gloves, clean wound, apply prescribed dressing per doctor order, remove gloves and discard in plastic bag.
Oct 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident. This failure affects one resident (R4) out of four reviewed for abuse on the sample of 22. Findings include: The facility's Preliminary 24 hour Abuse Investigation Report (Initial Report) to The Illinois Department of Public Health dated 10/12/23 documents an allegation of physical abuse with R5 as the alleged aggressor and R4 as the alleged victim. R5's Census Detail dated 10/18/23 documents R5 was admitted to the facility 5/22/17. R5's Diagnoses List dated 10/18/23 documents R5 experiences conditions including Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type, Anxiety, Major Recurrent Depression, and a history of Traumatic Brain Injury. R5's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R5 received a score of 8 out of a possible 15 for a Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating moderate cognitive impairment for R5. R5's Nurses Notes of various dates reviewed for the 6 months prior to the survey (4/25/23 through 10/16/23), document near daily episodes of R5 being mobile in a wheelchair, yelling at staff and other residents at all hours of the day and night, being physically aggressive banging on doors with items, throwing items like urinals and medications, going into other resident rooms at all hours and demanding services, smoking inside the facility on multiple occasions, admitting to marijuana use when he was about to be tested, stealing items such as nursing staff house and car keys from behind the nurse's station, and physically grabbing at staff, among other behaviors. R4's Census Detail dated 10/17/23 documents R4 was admitted to the facility 9/7/23. R4's Diagnoses List dated 10/17/23 documents R4 experiences conditions including Encephalopathy, Cerebral Infarction, Alcohol Dependence, and Seizures. R4's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R4 was unable to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status and required staff assessment to determine R4 had short-term and long-term memory problems, could not recall the current season, the location of her room, staff names or faces, or that she was in a nursing home. This staff assessment documented R4 had moderately impaired decision making, fluctuating inattention, disorganized thinking, and evidence of an acute change in mental status. On 10/13/23 at 2:35 PM, V10, Registered Nurse, stated, I did hear about the incident yesterday between (R4) and (R5). I assessed (R4) this morning and she did complain of some mild soreness around the left breast, and there was some faint bruising there. On 10/13/23 at 2:40 PM, R4 stated, It does hurt a little bit around my left breast but I haven't really seen any bruising. R4 did have some faint redness on the center side and just above the left breast. R4 continued, Well my son came here yesterday to take me out to see my mother, and when I got back I was 2 doors up the hall talking with (R8). Then (R5) was out in the hall making fun of (V11) the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and calling (V11) (derogatory names related to sexual orientation). R4 further stated, I told (R5) that I have grandkids (V11's) age and I thought (R5) needed to apologize to (V11) for saying that. R4 then stated, (R5) made a fist and punched me like [NAME], [NAME], [NAME], in the left (breast) and told me my (breasts) were too small and I wasn't his kind of woman. R4 concluded by stating, I didn't go into a depression about it, I got very angry but I am totally against violence and I didn't want to hit him back so I went and took a time out in my room and watched the television. On 10/17/23 at 2:45 PM, V11, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated, I was working with another resident out in the hallway, (R5) was interfering with me and calling me names, like derogatory stuff. (R4) was there and told (R5) he wasn't being nice, then (R5) made a fist and hit (R4) in the (breast) 3 times. He swung at (R4) kind of backfist like boom, boom, boom. V11 concluded by stating, There is no way that was accidental, it was intentional.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse for eight consecutive hours seven days per week. This failure has the potential to...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse for eight consecutive hours seven days per week. This failure has the potential to affect all 84 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 10/13/23, 10/17/23, and 10/18/23, there were 24 residents residing on the facility's 300 hall memory care unit, requiring a high level of supervision. There were three residents placed on transmission based precautions requiring nursing management. There were two residents who received dialysis treatments also requiring nursing management. The facility's Daily Nurse Staffing Schedule, dated from 9/24/23 through 10/17/23 documented six days when the registered nurse hours did not meet the requirement for eight consecutive hours seven days per week. On 9/25/23 the registered nurse worked a total of five hours from 7:00 PM until midnight. On 9/26/23 there was one registered nurse working seven hours from midnight until 7:00 AM, and one registered nurse working another five hours from 7:00 PM until midnight, but non-consecutive. On 9/29/23 there was one registered nurse working five hours from 7:00 PM until midnight. On 10/3/23 the registered nurse worked five hours from 7:00 PM until midnight. On 10/5/23 the registered nurse worked seven hours from midnight until 7:00 AM. On 10/11/23 the registered nurse worked five hours from 7:00 PM until midnight. The facility's form 802 Resident Matrix dated 10/13/23 documented a total of 31 residents diagnosed with dementia requiring a high level of supervision, two residents receiving dialysis treatment, three residents placed with transmission based precautions, and 19 residents who experienced falls, three of whom had major injury. The facility's Resident Roster dated 10/13/23 documents 85 residents reside in the facility. On 10/13/23 at 9:07 AM, V1, Administrator, stated, We had one resident go out last night so the census is 84.
Aug 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post signage to indicate isolation precautions and failed to use appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for one of th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post signage to indicate isolation precautions and failed to use appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for one of three residents (R5) reviewed for COVID 19 (Human Coronavirus SARS CoV2) in a sample list of six residents. Findings Include: The facility's infection control policy states Residents with suspected or confirmed COVID 19 infection: Health Care Personnel who enter the room of a resident with suspected or confirmed SARS CoV2 infection should adhere to standard precautions and use a NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) approved particulate respirator with N95 filters or higher, gown, gloves, and eye protection (i.e. goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face). R5's progress note dated 7/30/2023 at 5:33PM document rapid COVID test done with positive result DON (Director of Nursing) and son notified. On 8/1/23 at 10:00AM V6 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was at the nurse's station. R5's door was closed, but there were no signs in place to indicate Contact Droplet precautions. There was not supply cart outside the door to R5's room V6, LPN stated (R5) is on contact droplet precautions for COVID. She should have a sign on her door and a cart outside the door. I'll take care of that. On 8/1/23 at 2:39PM R5's door was closed. There was no sign on R5's door to indicate Contact Droplet Precautions. V7, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) was observed entering R5's room without donning Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). On 8/1/23 at 2:47PM V7, CNA was in the hall outside R5's door. V7 stated I am on orientation, but I know to look for a sign on the door to see if the resident is on isolation. There is no sign on (R5's) door so I know I just need to use standard precautions to go in the room. V8, CNA is training me. On 8/1/23 at 2:50PM V8 stated (R5) is on isolation for COVID. There is not a sign on the door and I came back yesterday after being off and I went in and out of that room several times without PPE before I was told. On 8/2/23 at 10:00 AM V2, Director of Nursing (DON) verified R5 is positive for COVID 19 and Contact Droplet Precautions should be in place.
Mar 2023 2 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a physician of a change in condition, failed to implement physician's orders timely and failed to document a thorough assessment for...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a physician of a change in condition, failed to implement physician's orders timely and failed to document a thorough assessment for multiple days after a resident's fall, for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls on the sample of five. These failures resulted in R1's left leg/hip pain progressively worsening with R1's range of motion declining to the left leg and R1's decline in bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. These failures also caused a delay in repair of R1's left femoral/hip fracture. Findings include: The fall investigation for R1's fall on 2/15/23 at 4:45 AM documents a final report to the State Survey Agency dated 2/23/23 with a summary as follows: On 2/15/23 R1 was observed on the floor of R1's room per witness statement. R1 was assessed with no changes noted. Later assessment reveals increased signs and symptoms of pain and that V9 (R1's Physician) was notified with a new order received to get a STAT x-ray of the left hip and leg. This report states the portable in-house x-ray documented an Acute Non-displaced Left Intertrochanteric Femoral/Hip Fracture with mild varus angulation of the fracture site. V9 (Physician) was made aware of the results and R1 was sent to the emergency room and admitted to the hospital for surgical intervention to the left hip. R1's Progress Notes dated as follows document: 2/15/23 at 4:48am - R1 has a new skin concern, a Hematoma, located to R1's rear Left Iliac Crest. Monitor R1's Hematoma to the left iliac crest and R1 complains of pain. There is no documentation of a description/details of circumstances of R1's Fall on 2/15/23 in R1's Progress Notes. 2/15/23 at 7:54am - R1's follow up assessment post-fall. This note documents R1 is alert and oriented. No changes in Range of Motion (ROM), No pain. 2/16/23 at 4:36pm - R1 is alert and oriented, intermittent confusion, with rating pain 4/10 to R1's left hip. This note documents swelling observed at site. Reddish-purple bruising noted. There is no documentation V9 (R1's Physician) was notified of these observations. 2/17/23 at 8:22am - Follow up assessment of Hematoma. R1 is alert and disoriented per usual baseline. R1 having pain at a 3/10 on the pain scale and not of new onset. This note documents no changes in range of motion and that R1 has swelling and deep purple bruising to the site. 2/17/23 at 1:03pm - Follow up assessment post-fall. Follow-up assessment of Hematoma. This note documents new injury noted on assessment, Hematoma on left hip with pain 3/10 on the pain scale and that V9 (R1's Physician) notified of new pain onset. This note documents R1 also has a new onset of limitation in ROM. There is no documentation of the location of limitation of ROM or that V9 was notified of R1's limitation in ROM. This note documents swelling was observed with deep purple bruising noted. There are no Progress Notes from 2/17/23 at 1:03pm until 2/19/23 at 7:03am documenting at 9:00pm (on 2/18/23), an unidentified Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported change in condition advising that R1 has been in bed unable to walk or move for three days. This note documents on assessment, R1 unable to perform baseline ROM, with 2+ edema noted to the left distal ankle with grimacing noted. This note also documents, Per (V9), stat X-ray processed. There is no documentation of when the facility's Mobile X-ray company was notified of the STAT X-ray order for R1. R1's Medication Administration Record dated February 2023 documents R1's administration of Acetaminophen 650mg by mouth twice daily scheduled with a pain level as follows: 2/15/23 evening/dinnertime 4/10 2/16/23 day/breakfast and evening/dinner time 0 2/17/23 day/breakfast 0 and evening/dinner time 2/10 2/18/23 day/breakfast and evening/dinner time both 3/10 2/19/23 day/breakfast NA (not applicable) and evening/dinnertime 4/10. This record also documents R1's pain on 2/17/23 at 8:47pm as pain rating of 10/10 and on 2/18/23 at 8:08pm as pain rating of 5/10 with Acetaminophen (Analgesic) 650mg administered. R1's Progress Notes dated as follows document: 2/19/23 at 1:07pm the facility's Mobile Radiology company arrived at 12:00pm and completed X-ray to R1's hip, leg and ankle. 2/19/23 1:09pm, R1 with increased pain in the left hip, waiting on X-ray results, called V9 about stronger pain medication. There is no documentation of a response, orders received from V9 or a follow-up with V9 related to the request for stronger pain medication for R1's increased left hip pain. 2/19/23 at 2:34pm, R1 skin concern bruising to the left trochanter (hip) with swelling and slight bruising. R1 complains of pain, has facial grimacing with complaints of pain in left hip with difficulty with changing positions. 2/19/23 at 2:51pm documents V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) notified of R1's X-ray results of fractured hip. 2/19/23 at 3:55pm, R1 sent to the local emergency room for evaluation and treatment due to left hip fracture. R1's Radiology Results Report dated 2/19/23 documents R1's Left Hip and Pelvis X-ray was performed on 2/19/23 at 12:31pm and reported date of 2/19/23 at 1:58pm. This report documents R1 has an Acute Non-displaced Left Intertrochanteric Femoral/Hip Fracture with mild varus angulation of the fracture site. R1's hospital History and Physical (H&P) dated 2/19/23 documents R1 with likely memory difficulty/undiagnosed Dementia, presented to the local emergency room for left hip pain and reportedly suffered from a fall 3 days ago, had X-rays done, notable for left hip fracture and (R1) was subsequently sent to ED (Emergency Department). This H&P documents R1 has a history of Alcohol Abuse and Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) and that R1 has been taking Enteric Coated Aspirin 81mg (milligrams) (Antiplatelet Agent), one tablet by mouth daily and Clopidogrel (Antiplatelet Agent) 75 mg, one tablet by mouth daily. This H&P also documents R1's physical assessment at the hospital including R1 had tenderness (left hip/groin) with left leg externally rotated and shortened. R1's H&P documents R1's results of X-rays of the pelvis and left femur performed at the hospital as a Comminuted Displaced Left Intertrochanteric Fracture. On 3/20/23 at 1:57pm, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated on 2/18/23, R1 was in quite a bit of pain and V12 told V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) because V14 had come to the unit to check in. V12 (CNA) stated V13 (CNA) and V12 told V14 that something was wrong/different with R1. V12 stated R1 had stayed in bed all day, which is not normal for R1. V12 stated R1 is usually independent for transferring, ambulation and toileting. V12 stated earlier in the day on 2/18/23, V12 mentioned to V15 (LPN) that something was going on with R1 and that R1 was not R1's self. V12 stated it wasn't until V14 was notified of R1's pain and not getting out of bed that the facility got orders for testing. V12 stated R1 just progressively worsened until R1 was sent out on 2/19/23 after receiving the results from R1's X-ray that R1 had a hip fracture. V12 stated after R1's fall, V12 noticed someone had given R1 a urinal and R1 was using that instead of independently ambulating to use the restroom. V12 stated R1 having a urinal threw (V12) off because R1 had never used one before. R1 did not get out of bed on 2/18/23 during V12's shift. V12 stated R1 was in a lot of pain, making sounds and grimacing in pain when staff would assist R1 with bed mobility/cares. On 3/22/23 at 11:45am, V11 (R1's family) stated V11 was notified of R1's fall on 2/15/23 but was told (R1) was okay. V11 stated the facility did not notify V11 of R1's hematoma/bruising to the left hip nor that R1 was having pain. V11 stated the facility should have never let R1 sit in pain and with the swelling and bruising of R1's left hip area for over three days before getting an order to x-ray the hip. V11 stated the facility told V11 that R1 had been assessed when they initially reported the fall and V11 was not notified of the additional details of injury nor that an x-ray to assess the hip had not been done. V11 stated V11 assumed an X-ray would have been done to assess to make sure there were no injuries after the fall or at least with the signs of the injury to the left hip. V11 stated the facility should have identified there were problems/potential internal injuries and if they would have assessed R1 thoroughly, the facility would have found the fracture sooner and R1 would not have had to lay in bed in pain and declining. V11 stated V11 came to the facility on 2/19/23 and R1 could not get out of bed and was complaining of pain to the left hip area. V11 stated R1 has a history of drug abuse and does not want narcotics so many times does not notify the facility of pain unless R1 is asked. In the morning of 2/19/23, the facility called V11 to notify V11 that R1 was not getting out of bed and was concerned for injury, so the facility was going to obtain x-rays. On 3/23/23 at 1:34pm, V2 (DON) stated on 2/15/23 at 4:45am when R1 fell, V2 was the nurse on hall. R1 was found sitting on R1's buttocks with R1's right side against the wall by R1's closet. V2 stated at that time, R1 was not complaining of pain. The facility assisted R1 back into bed. R1 had no facial grimacing or signs of pain. When asked about R1's range of motion (ROM), V2 stated R1 was asked to pick leg up and out and could but this is not documented in R1's progress notes. V2 stated R1's skin to R1's thigh area was raised but not discolored, and R1 stated R1's left hip/thigh hurts when it is pushed on and stated ouch, but nothing indicating severe pain. V2 stated V2 would not have expected the facility to notify V9 (R1's Physician) of the new bruising because there was already injury so bruising would be expected. V2 stated the facility was not measuring the raised area or bruising and there is no documentation of measurements of the raised area or size of the bruising. V2 stated V2 would have assumed V15 (LPN) would have told V9 R1 had new findings of limitation of range of motion. V2 stated V2 expects an X-ray ordered STAT should be completed within 4 hours. V2 stated if there is a delay, the facility should call the physician and follow up for further orders if X-ray cannot get here timely to complete testing as ordered. The facility's Physician-Family Notification-Change in Condition policy dated November 2018 documents the purpose of the policy is to ensure that medical care problems are communicated to the attending physician or authorized designee and family/responsible party in a timely, efficient and effective manner. This policy documents the facility will inform the resident, consult with the physician and if known, notify the residents legal representative or an interested family member when there is an accident involving the resident which results in injury and has the potential for requiring physician intervention, a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status, or a need to alter a treatment significantly.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete and document thorough investigations to determine root caus...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete and document thorough investigations to determine root cause of falls and failed to maintain a wheelchair in safe condition for two of three residents (R1, R4) reviewed for falls on the sample of five. Failing to maintain R4's wheelchair resulted in R4 sustaining a puncture/laceration wound to the right thigh requiring six sutures when R4 fell onto an uncovered wheelchair hand break while attempting to self-transfer from the bed to the wheelchair. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention Program dated May 2022 documents the Fall Prevention Program includes methods to identify risk factors, methods to identify residents at risk for falls, assessment time frames, use and implementation of professional standards of practice, notification of physician, communication with direct care staff members, documentation requirements, care plan incorporates identification of fall risk, addresses each fall, and preventative measures. This policy documents a fall risk assessment will be performed on admission, quarterly and with each significant change in mental or functional status and after any fall incident. Accident/Incident reports involving falls will be reviewed by the Interdisciplinary team to ensure appropriate care and services were provided and determine possible safety interventions. The facility's Incident and Accidents policy dated May 2022 documents an incident/accident report is to be completed by a licensed nurse and is to include the date and time of the incident/accident, a full written statement and possible cause of incident, physical assessment, injuries noted, treatment rendered and notification of appropriate parties. Documentation in nurses' notes is to include a description of the occurrence, the extent of injury (if any), assessment of the resident including vital signs, treatment rendered and parties notified. Mental and physical state, follow-up, tests, procedures, and findings are to be documented. 1. R4's admission Record dated 3/23/23 documents R4's diagnoses including Laceration of muscle, Fascia and Tendon of the Posterior Muscle Group on Right Thigh, Repeated Falls, Cerebral Infarction, Alzheimer's Disease and Anxiety. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 requires extensive assistance of staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toilet use. This MDS documents R4 is not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance when moving from seated to standing position, moving on and off toilet and surface to surface transfer. R4's Care Plans with a revision date of 2/28/23 document R4 has alteration in urinary elimination as evidenced by urinary incontinence/stress incontinence. Interventions for this plan of care include toilet upon rising, before and after meals, in the evening and as needed. R4's Progress Notes dated as follows documents: 2/18/23 at 4:07am document R4 has a new skin concern of a puncture wound to the right rear thigh. This note documents R4 complains of pain from injury, the physician was notified and R4's care plan was reviewed. This note does not document how R4 got the laceration. 2/18/23 at 11:07am - attempt to notify emergency contact and unable to reach by phone. There is no documentation of reason for attempting to notify R4's emergency contact or who that contact is. 2/18/23 at 12:33pm - R4 continues on fall vitals. There is no documentation in R4's Progress Notes dated 2/1/23-2/18/23 documenting R4 had a recent fall. 2/18/23 at 4:56pm - R4 returned from the local hospital on 2/18/23 at 1:50pm. R4 has a laceration to the right inner thigh with 6 sutures measuring 7cm (centimeters) long. R4's dressing to the thigh was noted to have a moderate amount of bloody drainage and was changed as well as pressure applied to the wound. R4's hospital After Visit Summary (AVS) dated 2/18/23 documents R4's diagnoses including laceration of the right thigh and Hematoma. This AVS documents there are 6 sutures that were placed to the laceration and that there is a hematoma in the area of the wound. The facility's Final Report to the State Survey Agency dated 2/23/23 documents R4 was observed on the floor of R4's bedroom with a laceration to the right inner leg on 2/18/23 at 3:30am. This report documents R4 was seen in the emergency room and received 6 sutures to the right inner leg laceration. This report documents R4 returned to the facility on 2/18/23 from the hospital. The facility's investigation for R4's fall on 2/18/23 documents witness statements including V18 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated V18 was on another hall when R4's call light came on. V18 stated V18 answered the call light and observed R4 and V19 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) sitting on the ground with blood present, due to R4's leg being cut. This statement documents R4 said (R4) slipped and cut it on the brake. This typed statement documents there were no jagged edges to brake but does not document what time V18 responded to the call light being on. This investigation also documents V19's (LPN) statement. V19's typed statement documents R4 was last seen laying in R4's bed around 2:00am and R4 was wearing a pajama top and pull up brief. This statement documents V19 observed R4 on the floor laying on R4's back between the bed and the wheelchair with R4's knees up but does not document what time V19 observed/found R4. R4 stated R4 was trying to go to the bathroom and had forgotten to put R4's shoes on. R4 was not wearing shoes at the time of this fall. This investigation does not document when R4 was last toileted/offered toileting assistance. This investigation does not document how long R4's call light was sounding or the position of R4's wheelchair in relation to R4's position on the floor at the time of the fall. There is no documentation in this investigation if R4 had been incontinent at the time of the fall. On 3/23/23 at 1:34pm, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated R4 fell onto R4's wheelchair and received a laceration to R4's right medial/posterior thigh. The facility reported the fall to V2 and told V2 that R4's wheelchair had gone into R4's leg, making a puncture wound. V2 stated V2 had the staff remove R4's wheelchair and replace R4's wheelchair with a different one after noticing R4's wheelchair brake did not have the silicone cover over the brake. V2 stated the facility looked at R4's wheelchair wheels and wheelchair brakes. R4's wheelchair was missing the handle cover for the brake that punctured R4's thigh. V2 stated R4 stated R4 was trying to go to the bathroom and fell. V2 stated V2 knows V19 (LPN) saw R4 last at 2:00am and R4 was asleep at that time. V2 was unsure of which CNA was assigned to care for R4 on 2/18/23 at the time of R4's fall. V2 stated V2 did not talk to anyone else/other staff regarding R4's fall or cares provided on 2/18/23 prior to R4's fall. V2 stated V2 did not ask staff about when R4 was last assisted with toileting. V2 stated R4 did not have shoes on and R4 stated R4 forgot to put them on. V2 stated V2 does not recall asking about where R4's shoes were at the time of R4's fall on 2/18/23. V2 stated the root cause of R4's fall on 2/18/23 was that R4 slipped trying to get out of bed to use the toilet because R4 did not have shoes on. V2 stated R4 tries to toilet (R4's) self frequently and has a history of falling due to that reason. 2. The facility's investigation documents R1 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 2/15/23 at 4:45am. This investigation documents a final report to the State Survey Agency. This final report documents a summary as follows: On 2/15/23 R1 was observed on the floor of R1's room per witness statement. R1 was assessed with no changes noted. Later assessment reveals increased signs and symptoms of pain and that V9 (R1's Physician) was notified with a new order received to get a STAT x-ray of the left hip and leg. Portable in-house x-ray revealed acute non-displaced left intertrochanteric femoral/hip fracture with mild varus angulation of the fracture site. This investigation does not document a statement from the Certified Nursing Assistant caring for R1 at the time of this fall. R1's Progress Notes dated as follows document: 2/15/23 at 4:48am - R1 has a new skin concern, a Hematoma, located to R1's rear Left Iliac Crest. Monitor R1's Hematoma to the left iliac crest and R1 complains of pain. There is no documentation of a description/details of circumstances of R1's Fall on 2/15/23 in R1's Progress Notes. R1's Incident Report dated 3/13/23 at 9:22am documents V10 (LPN) was called to R1's room where R1 was noted to be lying on the floor next to R1's bed. R1 had been using the trash can for a toilet and lost R1's balance and was on the floor. This report documents R1 did not have any injuries observed. R1 was sent to the local emergency department for evaluation. This report does not document R1's mental status at the time of this fall. There is no documentation in the investigation of fall prevention interventions that were in place at the time of this fall. Pre-disposing Physiological factors, decline in cognitive skills is marked, but no additional details documented. This report documents predisposing situation factors including behavior symptoms. This report documents no witnesses found. There is no documentation of interviews with staff who were responsible for R1's care/supervision on 3/13/23. On 3/23/23 at 1:34pm, V2 (DON) stated V2 could not remember who the CNA was taking care of R1 at the time of R1's fall on 2/15/23. V2 stated the only witness statement obtained was from V8 (CNA) although V8 was not working at the time of R1's fall on 2/15/23. V2 stated all interventions would have been in place at the time of R1's fall on 3/13/23, but V2 did not detail what the fall interventions were for R1. V2 stated family requested toileting after meals. V2 stated V2 did not interview the CNA responsible for caring for R1 on 3/13/23. V2 stated V2 reviews the nurses notes and counts that as the nurse's statement.
Feb 2023 10 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess for the ability to self-administer medications ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess for the ability to self-administer medications for two of two residents (R58, R335) reviewed for self-administration of medications on the sample list of 33. Findings include: 1. On 02/05/23 at 8:26 AM there was a medicine cup containing a white cream on R58's dresser. R58 stated the cream was for R58's eczema on R58's elbows. R58's Physician's Orders dated 2/6/23 documents an order for {Name Brand} 1 % cream apply topically for eczema to affected areas twice daily. There are no orders for R58 to self-administer this medication and keep at bedside. R58's Medication Self-Administration assessment dated [DATE] documents R58 is able to self-administer and keep {Name Brand} Nebulizer and inhaler at the bedside. This assessment does not document R58 is able to self-administer topical creams and keep at the bedside. 2. On 2/05/23 at 9:08 AM R335's respiratory inhaler 250-50 mcg (micrograms)/act (per actuation) inhaler was on R335's over-bed table in R335's room. R335 stated R335 uses the inhaler twice daily. R335's Physician's Orders dated 2/27/23 document an order for respiratory inhaler 250-50 mcg/act inhale one puff twice daily in the morning and at bedtime. There are no orders for R335 to self-administer R335's respiratory inhaler and keep at bedside. There are no assessments in R335's medical record for the ability to self-administer and keep respiratory inhaler at bedside. On 2/06/23 09:31 AM V26 (Registered Nurse) stated, I (V26) don't believe there are any residents down here (R58's/R335's hallway) that can have medications at the bedside. V26 stated there has to be a physician's order for medications to be self-administered and kept at the bedside. On 2/7/23 at 12:14 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated R58 is the only resident who is allowed to self-administer medication and keep the medication at the bedside, and R58 is only approved to have R58's nebulizer medication kept in R58's room. V2 stated there would be an assessment for the ability to self-administer medications and the medication should be kept in a lock box in the resident's room. The facility's undated Self-Administration of Medications Procedure documents residents who request to self-administer medications will be assessed for the ability to self-administer the medication and safely store the medication at the bedside, and a physician order will be obtained to self-administer the medication.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean, sanitary and orderly for two of thirty residents (R21, R75) reviewed for clean homelike environment on the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean, sanitary and orderly for two of thirty residents (R21, R75) reviewed for clean homelike environment on the sample list of 33. Findings include: On 2/05/23 at 10:30 AM, R21 and R75's bedroom floor had debris and dark sticky spots all over the floor. R75 stated, Those drips are from me; I'm shaky and spill my coffee. Their bathroom had no paper towels and their had a thick layer of a sticky substance with dust particles on the ridge of the sink. R21 stated R21 and R75's room is dirty. R21 stated, Staff don't pull stuff out and clean behind anything. Up under my (R21) bed is very dirty and full of debris. R21 stated staff always say they will be in to deep clean but don't come in. R21 also stated, We (R21 and R75) share a bathroom with the other room and I (R21) think it should be cleansed at least daily and sometimes it's every 2-3 days. R75 stated R75 has the same concerns that R21 has with the cleanliness of the room. On 2/06/23 at 8:26 AM, R21 asked an unidentified staff person to get paper towels for R21's bathroom since they had been out since 2/5/2023. On 2/06/23 at 8:37 AM, R21 stated V15 (Housekeeping Supervisor) is who R21 asked for paper towels and explained that R21 had asked V15 for them yesterday (2/5/23) too and they were never brought down. R21 also stated R21's floors, bathroom and room still hasn't been cleaned. R21 and R75's room continued to have debris and sticky spots all over the floor. At this time, R21 pulled R21's mattress up off the bed frame to reveal debris and spider webs covered in dust under the bed and on the floor. R21 stated, This is what I'm talking about. That has been there awhile. The webs are even dusty. R21 and R75's bathroom sink remained sticky with dust particles, and no paper towels. R21 stated nobody came in to clean yesterday or today yet. On 2/06/23 at 2:20 PM, R21 and R75's room floor remained with sticky dark spots and the bathroom sink remained with dusty debris. On 2/06/23 at 2:30 PM, V15 (Housekeeping Supervisor) stated there is 2+ housekeepers in the facility daily. V15 explained the housekeepers are to keep the common areas, public restrooms, and nurses' station cleaned, as well as being responsible for all resident rooms/restrooms being cleaned daily. V15 stated with the daily cleaning, housekeepers are to sweep the floors moving the bed and dressers out to get behind things daily, then mop, along with wiping down all horizontal surfaces, bedside tables, high touch surfaces, call lights, remotes, blinds, etc. V15 stated V16 (Housekeeper) was assigned to the hall were R21 and R75 reside on 2/5/23 and again today. On 2/06/23 at 3:55 PM, V16 (Housekeeper) with V15 present stated on Sunday 2/5/23, V15 was assigned to R21 and R75's hall but did not clean their room/bathroom as V15 came into work late, plus had a room move to get completed. V16 explained V16 asked V15 to have another housekeeper clean R21 and R75's hall because V16 was not going to have time. V15 confirmed V16 had asked V15 but that V15 didn't remember to have someone else go down that hall. V16 confirmed that when rooms are cleaned, beds and dressers are to be pulled out and cleaned behind and under but doesn't know when R21 and R75's room was last cleaned as V16 isn't normally scheduled on their hall.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency for two of five residents (R29, R58) reviewed for abuse on the sample list o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency for two of five residents (R29, R58) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of 33. Findings include: On 2/05/23 at 8:26 AM R58 stated R29 has touched several unidentified female residents on R58's hallway. R58 stated the unidentified residents had told R58 in passing within the last month, and R58 was unable to recall who the residents were. R58 stated R58 has not witnessed R29 touch female residents inappropriately, and R58 has not reported R58's concern with R29 to anyone. On 2/05/23 at 9:53 AM V1 (Administrator) stated the only abuse allegation involving R29 was reported on 12/27/22. V1 stated since then (12/27/22) the facility has been asking residents about abuse daily between Monday and Friday, and no residents have reported abuse or being touched inappropriately. At this time R58's allegation was reported to V1. On 2/06/23 at 11:36 AM V22 (Social Services Director) stated V22 interviewed R58 on 2/5/23, and R58 reported that during smoke breaks unidentified female residents discussed that R29 had touched women in the past, but R58 was not able to give specific details. On 2/6/23 at 12:05 PM V1 (Administrator) stated R58's abuse allegation was not reported to the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) since there was no victim identified. V1 stated all female residents were interviewed yesterday and all denied being touched sexually by a male resident. On 2/07/23 at 11:11 AM V1 stated allegations of abuse are reported within two hours to IDPH. V1 stated V1 did not report R58's allegation since it was based on R58 hearing rumors that female residents had been sexually touched by R29. V1 stated V1 has two hours to follow up and determine if the report is an actual abuse allegation that needs to be reported. The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting-Illinois policy dated as revised October 2022 documents: Any allegation of abuse or any incident that results in serious bodily injury will be reported to the Department of Public Health immediately, but not more than two hours after the allegation of abuse.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a Bed Hold Policy for one (R9) resident out of two residents reviewed for Hospitalizations on the sample list of 33. Findings inclu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a Bed Hold Policy for one (R9) resident out of two residents reviewed for Hospitalizations on the sample list of 33. Findings include: R9's undated Face Sheet documents an admission date of 9/17/2020. R9's Census Record documents R9 as unpaid Hospital Leave on 1/31/23. R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) does not document a Bed Hold Policy being provided by facility when sent to the emergency room on 1/31/23. R9's Nurse Progress Note dated 1/31/22 at 7:35 PM documents R9 was sent to emergency room. On 2/7/23 at 10:15 AM V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) stated, We (staff) normally provide a packet of information to the resident as they leave for the hospital. It should include the Bed Hold Policy, the resident face sheet, resident Physician Order Sheet (POS), Transfer Agreement and Advanced Directives. We (facility) do not make copies of that information to scan into the resident's Electronic Medical Record (EMR). We (staff) just send it with the resident. For (R9), (V13) (Registered Nurse) should have sent the packet including the Bed Hold Policy but since it is not documented, we (facility) cannot prove that it was provided. On 2/07/23 at 11:05 AM V24 (R9's Emergency contact) stated, They (facility) called and told me that (R9) had a high temperature and was sick so they (facility) were sending (R9) to the hospital. I said 'ok' and that was it. They (facility) did not say anything about a 10 day Bed Hold and I have not received anything in the mail about that. The facility 'Bed Hold and Return to Facility' policy effective December 2022 documents the following: The facilities bed hold policy applies to all residents. At the time of the transfer from facility in cases of emergency transfer, the notice 'at the time of transfer' means that the family, surrogate or representative are provided with written notification within 24 hours of the transfer. The requirement is met if the resident copy of the notice is sent with other papers accompanying the resident to the hospital.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) scre...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening process for one of two residents (R19) reviewed for PASARRs on the sample list of 33. Findings include: The facility's Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) policy dated December 2022 documents as part of the preadmission process, the facility participates in the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening process (Level I) for all new and readmissions per requirement to determine if the individual meets the criterion for mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related condition. Based upon the Level I screen, the facility will not admit an individual with a mental disorder or intellectual disability until the Level II screening process had been requested. The facility will coordinate with the State PASARR representative related to the individual needs of the resident as indicated. Annually and with any significant change of status, the facility will complete the PASARR Level I screen for those individuals identified per the Level II screen requiring specialized services. The objective of the PASARR policy is to ensure that individuals with mental illness and intellectual disabilities receive the care and services that they need in the most appropriate setting. The PASARR will be evaluated annually and upon any significant change for those individuals identified. R19's Face Sheet dated 2/7/23 documents R19's Initial admission Date is 09/10/2018 and R19 was re-admitted on [DATE]. R19's 09/10/2018 admission Diagnoses include Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type and Major Depressive Disorder, and R19's 05/14/2022 admission Diagnoses include Generalized Anxiety. R19 did not have a Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) completed for her prior to her 09/10/2018 admission or at any other time since. On 2/7/23 at 10:30 AM V1 (Administrator) confirmed a PASARR assessment should have been completed when R19 was admitted on [DATE]. V1 also confirmed that if a current resident is newly diagnosed with a mental illness, the PASARR should be completed for that individual to assess if specialized services are now needed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure ordered pain medications were available to be given for one of two residents (R62) reviewed for pain on the sample list of 33. Findi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure ordered pain medications were available to be given for one of two residents (R62) reviewed for pain on the sample list of 33. Findings include: On 2/6/23 at 1:29 PM R62 stated R62 has been out of Tramadol for several days and R62 is used to taking it a couple times per day. R62 stated R62 has had to take Tylenol and Ibuprofen since the Tramadol has not been available, and the Tylenol/Ibuprofen does not take all of the pain away. R62 has arthritis in R62's hip and being without the Tramadol makes R62 feel stressed and anxious. R62's Physician's Orders dated 2/6/23 documents an order for Tramadol 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 8 hours as needed. R62's January and February 2023 Medication Administration Records document the following: Acetaminophen 650 mg was given on 1/22, 1/31, 2/4, and 2/5. Acetaminophen 1000 mg was given on 1/4, 1/5, 1/21, 1/25, 2/4, and 2/5. Ibuprofen 800 mg was given on 1/12, 1/22, 1/288, and 2/4. Tramadol was administered 16 times between 1/5 and 1/28/23. Tramadol has not been administered after 1/28/23. R62's pain assessment documents R62's pain ranges from 0-7 on a 1 to 10 pain scale. R62's Tramadol 50 mg Controlled Substance form documents 27 tablets were dispensed on 1/10/23 and the last tablet was signed out on 1/29/23 at 5:00 PM. 1/17/23 is the documented estimated refill date. R62's Nursing Notes dated 1/28/23-2/6/23 do not document that the pharmacy was contacted to refill R62's Tramadol prior to 2/6/23. On 2/06/23 at 2:05 PM V26 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated R62 is out of Tramadol. V26 stated the facility has had issues with the pharmacy not delivering medications and the facility has been working with the pharmacy to correct the problems. On 2/7/23 at 9:30 AM V29 (Pharmacy Contact) stated, R62's Tramadol was initially ordered in November 2022. A new script was received on 1/19/23 and 27 tablets were dispensed on 1/10/23. A facility nurse contacted the pharmacy to reorder R62's Tramadol on 2/5/23 and a prior authorization (PA) form was issued for the facility to take action because R62's Tramadol was not covered by R62's insurance. The facility needs to complete the PA form and submit it to the pharmacy. No additional Tramadol has been dispensed for R62 since 1/10/23. On 2/7/23 at 12:14 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, PA forms from the pharmacy are sent to corporate staff to complete. R62's insurance will not cover R62's Tramadol and the facility has been covering the cost of the medication. On 2/7/23 at 02:45 PM V25 (Corporate Clinical Nurse Consultant) stated the facility has been covering the cost of R62's Tramadol, and it is the facility's policy that the clinical nurse is notified to approve to cover the cost of the medication or to complete the PA form. V25 was notified on 2/5/23 that an approval was needed for R62's Tramadol, and V25 sent the approval to refill the Tramadol and bill the facility to the pharmacy on 2/6/23. The facility's Ordering and Receiving Non-Controlled Medications policy revised August 2020 documents: Medication refill requests can be called in, faxed or sent electronically to the pharmacy. Pharmacy reorder labels can also be pulled and sent to the pharmacy. The pharmacy delivers the medications based on the delivery schedule and medication quantities vary based on payor status, insurance, and law. Medications should be reordered based on the estimated refill date or at least three days prior to the depletion in order to ensure an adequate supply is available. Medications that require a special processing should be ordered in advance within seven days. Emergency medication orders can be called in to the pharmacy during regular hours to request an emergency delivery, and initial doses of some medications can be obtained from the facility's emergency medication kit.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn by staff and PPE was changed and disinfected appropriately for...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn by staff and PPE was changed and disinfected appropriately for one of one resident (R33) reviewed for transmission-based precautions in the sample list of 33. Findings include: R33's Care Plan revised on 2/5/23 documents R33 receives oxygen continuously via a humidified tracheostomy collar at 6 liters per minute. This Care Plan documents to keep R33's door closed due to continuous humidification. R33's Physician's Orders dated 2/6/23 documents orders to administer humidified oxygen at 6 liters per minute via a tracheostomy collar, and to suction R33's tracheal stoma every 2 hours and as needed. On 2/5/23 at 8:05 AM there was a sign posted on the door at the main entrance of the facility that documented the community transmission level for COVID-19 (Human Coronavirus Infection) was high. On 2/5/23 at 9:37 AM R33 was lying in bed and R33's humidification and oxygen was administered via a tracheostomy collar near R33's tracheal stoma. On 2/05/23 at 8:17 AM there was an isolation cart containing PPE located in the hallway outside of R33's room. R33's door contained a sign indicating aerosol generating procedure, and to wear PPE including gown, gloves, N95 and eye protection. On 2/05/23 at 8:59 AM V27 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V28 (CNA) were in R33's room and were not wearing gowns. R33 was lying in bed with humidified oxygen administered via R33's tracheostomy mask. On 2/5/23 at 9:14 AM R33 was lying in bed. V13 (Registered Nurse/RN) was in R33's room wearing an N95 mask and eye protection. V13 was not wearing gown or gloves and was touching R33's bed. V13 stated there is no need to wear additional PPE (gown/gloves) because R33 has no unusual organisms. On 2/05/23 at 12:26 PM V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) and V28 (CNA) applied gown, gloves, N95 mask, and eye protection to enter R33's room. V2 stated R33 is on transmission-based precautions due to R33's tracheal humidified oxygen. V2 confirmed staff should be wearing full PPE including N95 mask, gown, gloves, and eye protection when in R33's room. On 2/06/23 at 10:10 AM V26 (RN) suctioned R33's tracheal stoma and removed green mucous. V26 was wearing a surgical mask (not an N95 mask), gown, gloves and eye protection. V26 did not discard or change V26's surgical mask upon leaving R33's room. On 2/06/23 at 9:57 AM V6 (CNA) was in R33's room wearing a gown, eye protection and a surgical mask. V6 was not wearing gloves or an N95 mask. R33 was lying in bed. V6 touched an emesis basin that contained R33's toothbrush and R33's toothpaste. V6 left R33's room and did not change V6's surgical mask or disinfect V6's eye protection. On 2/06/23 at 1:03 PM V6 stated an N95 mask, gown, gloves, and eye protection should be worn in R33's room. The mask, gown and gloves should be changed when leaving R33's room, and eye protection should be disinfected when leaving R33's room. V6 stated V6 uses an alcohol-based hand sanitizer to disinfect V6's eye protection. V6 confirmed V6 was not wearing an N95 mask and gloves while in R33's room, and V6 did not change or disinfect V6's eye protection when V6 left R33's room. V6 stated, Sometimes I (V6) just get in a hurry. On 2/06/23 at 1:26 PM V26 (RN) stated V26 did not wear an N95 mask in R33's room, and V26 questioned whether or not an N95 should be worn. V26 stated the sign on the PPE cart did not specify that an N95 mask be worn, and V26 confirmed the sign on R33's door documents to wear an N95 mask. V26 confirmed V26 did not discard/change V26's surgical mask after leaving R33's room. On 2/7/23 at 12:14 PM V2 (DON) stated the facility utilizes Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance for PPE. V2 stated R33 is not considered to be in the yellow zone but is on Transmission-Based Precautions for R33's aerosol generating procedure. V2 confirmed staff should change their mask when leaving R33's room. V2 stated bleach wipes should be used to disinfect eye protection and not alcohol. The facility's Infection Control - Interim COVID-19 Policy dated as revised October 2022 documents: Aerosol Generating Procedures: When community transmission levels are HIGH, staff should wear full PPE including N95 respirator, eye protection, gown and gloves during aerosol generating procedures. PPE Use in Red & Yellow Zone: PPE including N95 should be discarded and new applied between each resident encounter. Non-disposable eye protection should be sanitized between each resident; if disposable eye protection is used, may sanitize or dispose of the eye protection and apply new. The CDC's Strategies for Optimizing the Supply of Eye Protection updated on 9/13/21 documents: Eye protection is used to protect from splashes, sprays, splatter and respiratory secretions. Eye protection should be removed and discarded after use, and reusable eye protection should be cleaned and disinfected after each patient encounter for conventional capacity strategies. Eye protection dedicated to one healthcare personnel should be cleaned and disinfected when visibly soiled and when leaving isolation areas for contingency capacity strategies.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. R24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R24 as cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R24 as requiring exten...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. R24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R24 as cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R24 as requiring extensive assistance of one person for dressing and limited assistance of one person for personal hygiene. R24's Physician Order Set (POS) dated February 1-28, 2023 documents a physician order dated 2/11/22 of Please place oxygen concentrator at the bedside. (R24) needs to be on oxygen at Two Liters Nasal Cannula as needed during sleep and naps. This same POS documents Change Oxygen Weekly and as needed dated 2/6/22. This same POS documents R24's medical diagnoses of Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen, Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances. On 02/05/23 at 08:47 AM R24's nasal cannula tubing was laying on floor. Nasal prongs on R24's nasal cannula were directly touching the floor. R24's floor was covered with small debris and several small areas that liquids had been spilled and not cleaned up. R24's oxygen humidifier bottle was connected to R24's Oxygen concentrator. R24's oxygen humidifier bottle was half full and dated 1/22/23. On 02/05/23 at 09:15 AM V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) confirmed R24's oxygen humidifier bottle was dated 1/22/23. V9 stated, (R24) uses his oxygen daily. (R24) will sometimes take off his own nasal cannula, but our staff should get it picked up. It should be placed in a bag to help prevent bacteria from getting all over the tubing. We (facility) are supposed to change the entire set up of nasal cannula, humidifier bottle or any other oxygen supplies every week. That obviously has not been done. 5. R70's MDS dated [DATE] documents R70 as moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R70 requires limited assistance of one person for dressing and personal hygiene. R70's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated February 1-28, 2023 documents a physician order dated 7/11/22 for oxygen at one to two liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed with goal saturation 90-92%. This same POS documents Change Oxygen tubing weekly and as needed, dated 7/17/22. This same POS documents R70's medical diagnoses of Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Morbid Obesity. On 02/05/23 at 11:54 AM R70's humidifier bottle was half full and attached to an oxygen concentrator that was dated '9/23 JW'. R70's nasal cannula was curled in circles on floor with nose piece directly touching floor. R70's floor appeared unkempt with scattered debris and several areas of what appeared to be liquid spilled and dried on floor under nasal cannula tubing. On 02/05/23 at 09:20 AM V9 (LPN) confirmed R70's oxygen humidifier bottle was dated 'JW 9/23'. V9 stated, Why would someone write '9/23?' That does not even make sense. This is only February the fifth so it had to have been '1/23' which is still too long. (R70) uses his oxygen every day. (R70) will sometimes take off his own nasal cannula but our staff should get it picked up. It should be placed in a bag to help prevent bacteria from getting all over the tubing. Since there is no bag to put the tubing in, it (tubing) just gets thrown on the floor. We (facility) are supposed to change the entire set up of nasal cannula, humidifier bottle or any other oxygen supplies every week. That obviously has not been done. The facility 'Oxygen and Respiratory Equipment-Changing/Cleaning' policy revised January 2019 documents Nasal cannulas are to be changed once a week and as needed. A clean plastic bag with a zip loc or draw string, etc. will be provided to store the cannula when it is not in use. It will be dated with the date the tubing was changed. Oxygen humidifiers should be changed weekly or as needed and will be dated when changed. A Hand held nubulizer shoud be changed weekly and as needed. A clean plastic bag with a zip loc or draw strings will be provided with each new set up and will be marked with the date the set up was changed. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change oxygen and nebulizer tubing, store oxygen and nebulizer tubing to prevent contamination, empty a tracheal secretion canister, and administer oxygen as ordered for residents. These failures affect five of six residents (R33, R58, R71, R24, R70) reviewed for respiratory care on the sample list of 33. Findings include: 1. On 2/5/23 at 9:37 AM R33 was lying in bed. R33's oxygen was administered at 5 liters/minute (l/min.) via a tracheostomy mask. There was approximately 600 ml (milliliters) of clear yellow fluid in R33's tracheostomy suction canister. At 12:02 PM there was approximately 600 ml of fluid in R33's suction canister. On 2/06/23 at 9:15 AM, 9:47 AM, and 12:53 PM there was approximately 300 ml of clear liquid in R33's suction canister. At 10:10 AM V26 (Registered Nurse/RN) suctioned R33's tracheal stoma to remove green colored mucous. V26 did not empty the suction canister after suctioning R33. R33's tracheostomy mask was administering oxygen at 5 l/min. R33's Physician's Orders dated 2/6/23 documents an order to administer oxygen at 6 l/min via a humidified tracheostomy collar. R33's January and February 2023 Medication Administration Records (MARs) document R33's tracheal stoma is suctioned every two hours and as needed. On 2/06/23 at 1:21 PM V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated R33 usually has an oxygen concentrator that goes up to 10 l/min. V2 confirmed R33's oxygen order is for 6 l/min. On 2/7/23 at 12:14 PM V2 stated the suction canister should be changed weekly and confirmed the facility's policy does not document how often the suction canister should be emptied. V2 stated, My (V2's) opinion is they (staff) should be dumping the canister after suctioning. The facility's Tracheostomy Care policy revised October 2022 documents the disposable suction canister/contents are discarded in the biohazardous waste when the canister is discarded/emptied. This policy does not document the frequency that this canister should be emptied. The facility's Oxygen & Respiratory Equipment- Changing/Cleaning policy dated as revised January 2019 documents suction canisters will be changed weekly/as needed and the canister may be emptied/rinsed between the weekly changes. This policy does not document how often to empty/rinse the suction canister. 2. On 2/05/23 at 8:26 AM R58's nebulizer chamber/mouthpiece and tubing was dated 1/22/23 and was on R58's dresser uncovered. R58 stated prior to 1/22/23, R58's nebulizer tubing was last changed in October. R58 stated the tubing is supposed to be changed weekly on Sundays. R58's Physician's Orders dated 2/6/23 documents an order to change oxygen and nebulizer tubing weekly. R33's January and February 2023 MARs document R58's {Name Brand} 0.5-2.5 (3) mg/ml 3 ml nebulizer treatments are administered three times daily. On 2/06/23 at 2:18 PM V26 (RN) stated oxygen and nebulizer tubing is supposed to be changed weekly and should be stored in a plastic bag when not in use. 3. On 2/05/23 at 8:23 AM R71 was lying in bed wearing oxygen at 3 l/min per nasal cannula. The humidifier bottle and tubing was dated 1/15/23. R71 stated the tubing is supposed to be changed weekly on night shift, and it had not been changed in 3 weeks. R71 stated R71 wears oxygen, and the setting should be 1.5 l/min. On 2/06/23 at 9:17 AM R71's oxygen tubing was dated 1/15/23, and the humidifier bottle was dated 2/5/23. R71 was wearing oxygen at 1.5 l/min. R71 stated staff had changed R71's oxygen humidifier bottle last night but not the oxygen tubing. R71's Physician's Orders dated 2/7/23 documents orders to change R71's oxygen tubing weekly and as needed and for continuous oxygen administered at 2 l/min. On 2/7/23 at 12:14 PM V2 (DON) confirmed oxygen and nebulizer tubing should be changed weekly. V2 confirmed R71's oxygen order is for 2 l/min.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper food storage, cleanliness of the kitchen freezer, and sanitation of food preparation equipment to prevent potenti...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper food storage, cleanliness of the kitchen freezer, and sanitation of food preparation equipment to prevent potential food borne illnesses to residents. The facility also failed to store ready to use sanitization mixtures and cleaning items separately away from food to prevent potential contamination. These failures have the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 2/05/23 between 8:15 AM - 8:25 AM the following was observed: The kitchen freezer had a pink sticky substance spilled on the bottom two racks, bottom of the freezer and on cases of strawberry and vanilla shakes that were on the bottom of the freezer. The storage room had a large tote of thickener dated 1/3/23 with a scoop/cup in it and the lid was not sealed shut. There were five cases of fruit stacked on top of each other, and a case of chili-con-carne with other boxes of food, including biscuit mix and corn starch, stacked on top of it in the middle of the storage room floor. A vanilla cream icing dated 1/4/23 was on the storage room shelf with the lid not sealed, and four individual cups of peanut butter not dated. The walk-in cooler had a pitcher of a yellow liquid that was not dated. The food prep table had a large canister labeled bread crumbs dated 11/18/22, flour dated 4/10 without a year and the lid was not sealed, and brown sugar dated 2/1/23, all sitting on bottom shelf next to a green bucket of liquid with a rag in it. Next to the green bucket was a large blue plastic bowl with lemon juice and a scrubber in it and the inside of the bowl was covered in a black residue. On 2/5/23 at 8:28 am, V18 (Cook) stated the green bucket is a sanitizer mixture to wipe down counters. V18 stated, This is just where they keep it, but I can move it. V18 also stated the blue plastic bowl is used to clean off the griddle, and the black substance is grease. On 2/05/23 at 12:06 PM, V8 (Dietary Manager) stated food should be stored up off the floor, lids should be on and sealed, all open food/drinks should be labeled and dated, and the scoops for the products should not be left in the storage containers due to the possibility of contaminating the contents of the container. V8 explained the delivery truck was at the facility on 2/4/23, and staff just didn't have time to put the food onto the shelves and that it why is was stacked on the floor in the middle of the storage room. V8 also stated the cleaning bucket and blue plastic bowl should not be stored with food, as it was previously, and explained the cleaning bucket should be stored in cleaning area with other chemicals but was not sure where or how to store the blue cleaning bucket because it is a greasy mess. At this time, V8 uncovered the meat slicer to reveal food residue on the blade and base. V8 stated, It's not as clean as it should be; and Some staff don't know how to re-assemble it, so they don't take it apart to clean it. On 2/06/23 at 11:25 AM, V19 (Cook) was serving food from the steam stable. The walls behind and to the side of the steam table had red and brown splatters on them and the shelf above the steam table had a red dried substance hanging down from the shelf. The worktable to the side of the steam table had a lower shelf with pans stored right side up. The shelf was covered in a white granular substance and food debris. At this time, V8 (DM) stated the red substance was the sauce from the tortellini served the day before and that the pans on the worktable are older steam table pans that should be stored upside down, not right side up. At this time, sprinkler pipes above the stove top and range hood were covered in shiny substance with dust/debris hanging off the pipes. V8 (DM) and V10 (Maintenance Director) both stated the facility uses a company that comes out to the facility every six month to clean the hood, and they were last at the facility in November 2022. V8 stated they are supposed to take the vent hood apart and power wash it but it doesn't look like it was done. It shouldn't have accumulated that much debris in such a short time. V8 also stated that wiping the sprinkler pipes and vent hood down are not part of the kitchen cleaning schedule. The facility Dietary Manual Source Tech dated February 2022 documents food will be received fresh and transferred to proper storage as quickly as possible, equipment and surfaces will be clean and sanitary, food service equipment will be cleaned, rinsed, and sanitized after each use, The facility Kitchen Sanitation Manual dated February 2022 documents all utensils, pots, pans, etc will be properly washed, rinsed and sanitized after each use, work surfaces will be kept neat and clean during food preparation and service. The department philosophy is clean as you go. Serving utensils will not be left in food containers while in storage, and chemicals/other poisonous materials will be stored separately/away from food in a locked closet or storage cabinet. The Residents Census and Conditions of Residents Form dated 2/5/23 documents there are 85 residents residing at the facility.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0801 (Tag F0801)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This failure has the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facil...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This failure has the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 2/05/23 at 12:06 PM, V8 (Dietary Manager/DM) stated V8 took over the DM position in June 2021 but was not able to provide a certificate for being a CDM (Certified Dietary Manager). V8 stated V8 does not have V8's certificate yet but has completed all of the classes of the pre-certification course and is scheduled to take the CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) test in February 2023. The Residents Census and Conditions of Residents Form dated 2/5/23 documents there are 85 residents residing at the facility.
Jan 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent episodes of physical aggressive behaviors resulting in R1 kicking R2 and R2 subsequently hitting R1 in the face, R4 gra...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent episodes of physical aggressive behaviors resulting in R1 kicking R2 and R2 subsequently hitting R1 in the face, R4 grabbing R1's arm, R9 shoving R11 and R6 pushing over a bedside table towards R5, hitting R5 in the face causing lacerations to R5's right side facial area, resulting in an emergency room visit due to right sided periorbital edema resulting in a closed fracture of the nasal bone. These failures affect seven of 14 residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, R9 and R11) reviewed for abuse on the total sample list of 14. Findings include: The facility's Abuse policy, with a revision date of April 2022, documents, Guidelines: The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. Definitions: Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes: verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. 1. On 1/24/23 at 11:55 AM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated, On 1/9/23 I was down on another hallway with V23 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA). V23 thought she heard some yelling. We listened and saw R6 in the hallway, who was yelling 'you better get down here and get this (explicit language)' and R6 headed back to room. We headed down the hallway and heard shouting. I walked into the room and R5 and R6 were arguing over the TV (television) being on. R5 was lying in bed, R6 stood up and pushed the bedside table into R5's face. I took R5 to the nurses' station, applied compression to nose as it was bleeding and strips to lacerations. The nurse on the next shift sent R5 to be checked out, because eye was swelling. R5's medical record documents on 1/9/2023 at 3:29 AM Incident Note by V8 (LPN) reports V8 heard yelling and cursing coming from the Hall; upon further investigation as I was walking to room, I got to the doorway, and I noticed R6 was standing over R5, cursing at R5 telling R5 to shut the television off. R6 pushed bedside table into the R5 at which time I ran and got in between both residents to separate. R5 was noted to have blood coming from R5's face. R5's medical record documents on 1/9/2023, Resident has a new skin concern. Type of skin concern: Laceration. Located to Face - right side of face - Laceration, Other (specify) - Right eye lid - Laceration. Treatments include Cleansed lacerations and steri strips applied. Resident complains of pain, aching. R5's medical record documents, 1/9/2023 at 4:22 PM, Resident sent out to Emergency Department for evaluation and possible treatment. The facility's abuse investigation files note On 1/9/23 at 6:15 PM V22 (Licensed Practical Nurse) notified V1 (Administrator), (R5's) eye was almost completely swollen shut and needs to be assessed. V22 sent R5 to the emergency room for evaluation. R5's emergency room After Visit Summary dated 1/9/23 documents, Reason for visit: Facial Pain, Facial Swelling. Diagnosis: Closed fracture of nasal bone. CT of facial bones without contrast: Clinical Impression: Blunt Facial Trauma. Findings: there is soft tissue swelling in the infraorbital, perinasal and peri-maxillary regions. There is an acute appearing fracture at the base of the right nasal bone with slight depression. Nasal septum is deviated to the right inferiorly. Impression: 1- Acute Right Base Nasal Bone Fracture. On 1/24/23 at 2:00 PM, R5 had a maroon/dark purple discoloration to R5's right cheek bone area. There was mild edema to the bridge of R5's nose on the right side. R5 stated, I was watching TV that night in my bed. R6 woke up and told me I needed to turn the TV off. I didn't even have the volume on, it was on mute. We started having words about it and R6 shoved the table into my face. On 1/25/23 at 1:30 PM R6 stated, It was around 2 AM; I woke up to the sound of the television on. I told R5 to shut it off. I got up and turned off the television, laid back down in bed, and R5 turned it back on again. I told R5 again to turn it off. R5 said something smart to me, and I said something smart back. I turned on the light and went down the hallway yelling for someone to come down to the room. I laid back down and R5 turned it on again, but this time had it muted. I stood up out of the bed again to go towards the television and at the same time R5 must have been starting to sit up in bed. I pushed the over the bed table that was towards the end of the bed over towards R5's side of the room and it hit R5 in the face. On 1/25/23 at 2:15 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, R5 and R6 had just got placed in same room on Friday (1-6-23). That night (1-9-23) R5 was watching tv on mute, woke R6 up, R6 asked R5 to turn off the tv, R5 had the remote and R6 kept turning it off at the television. They had a verbal exchange. R5 stayed in bed, continued going back and forth, then V8 (LPN) heard raised voices. V8 saw R6 in the hallway, then R6 went back into room. V8 saw R6 push the tray table towards the other side of the room (R5's area); it hit R5 in right cheek area. R5 had lacerations and bruising to the face. Next day later in the day, R5 was sent out to ER. R5 had a Nasal Bone Fracture. The Facility's Abuse Investigation File documents, Initial report: 1/9/23. Conclusion and Action taken: R5 and R6 shared a room, R5 and R6 had a disagreement regarding the television. R6 voices R6 was getting up to go to the nurse's station and pushed that tray table away from him, inadvertantly pushed the tray table hitting R5 in the face. R5 was sent to the emergency department for evaluation and returned with a diagnosis of closed fracture of the nasal bone. 2. R1's medical record documents, 12/31/2022 at 2:45 PM, V22 (LPN) reported an alleged physical altercation between R1 and another resident. R2's medical record documents, 12/31/2022 at 2:46 PM, V22 (LPN) reported an alleged physical altercation between R2 and another resident. The Facility's Abuse investigation file documents, Initial report: 12/31/22, Conclusion and Action taken: Based on the results of the investigation, the facility has determined R1 and R2 were involved in a physical altercation. On 1/24/23 at 2:10 PM V5 (CNA) stated, On 12/31/22 I was sitting on the hallway with another resident. R2 was walking towards the door to look out the window, because that is what R2 does. R1 was coming back down the hallway. R2 said something; I could not make it out to R1. R1 turned around and kicked R2 in the back of the leg, and R2 then smacked R1 in the face. On 1/25/23 at 2:15 PM V1 (Administrator) confirmed, On 12/31/22 R1 kicked R2 in the leg and then R2 smacked R1. 3. R4's medical record documents, 1/5/2023 Incident Note: V7 (Activities Director) reported an allegation of a physical altercation between R4 and another resident. R1's medical record documents, 1/5/2023 Incident Note: V7 (Activities Director) reported an allegation of a physical altercation between R1 and another resident. The Facility's Abuse Investigation file documents, Initial report: 1/5/23. Conclusion and Action taken: Staff report R1 took (R4's) soda and R4 held (R1's) arms to get the soda back. On 1/25/23 at 9:10 AM, V6 (CNA) stated, I was in the hallway, and I heard R4 say 'give that back you (explicit language).' R4 had a hold of R1's upper arm, trying to reach in and grab soda R1 had under R1's arm pit area. I got to them, and I told R4 I would get it. R4 stepped away. On 1/25/23 at 2:15 PM V1 (Administrator) stated, R1 went into R4's room and took R4's soda. R4 came out to hallway and tried to get soda back from R1. Staff didn't get to R1 soon enough and saw R4 reaching and grabbing R1's arm to get the soda back from R1. 4. R9's medical record documents, 1/17/23 Behavior, resident to resident altercation noted. R11's medical record documents, 1/17/23 V21 (LPN) reported an allegation of a physical altercation between R11 and another resident. The Facility's Abuse Investigation file documents, Initial Report: 1/17/23. Conclusion and Action taken: R9 and R14 share a room. R11 entered (R9 and R14's) room. R11 approached R14's bed and sat in R14's wheelchair. R9 called for assistance. R9 pushed R11 to the hall while R11 was sitting in R14's wheelchair. On 1/25/23 at 9:30 AM, V26 (CNA) stated, On 1/17/23 I had just came on shift, and I saw a call light on to R9's room. Then I heard yelling 'get this (explicit language) out of here.' I got down to the room. R11 was in R9's doorway. R9 tried to push R11 in the wheelchair out of the room and it didn't go out all the way. Then R9 pushed on R11's shoulders to get R11 and the wheelchair out of R9's room. On 1/25/23 at 2:15 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, R11 had only been here a few days. R11 was a little more confused than when here for a prior stay. R9 and R14 were roommates. R14 said R11 had come in room. R11 had tried to sit on R14's bed. R14 told R11 that R11 wasn't supposed to be in there. R14 turned on the call light. R11sat in R14's wheelchair beside the bed. R14 yelled for help. R9 then went around to R14's side of the room and pushed R11 in R14's wheelchair out of the room. The CNA said she saw R9 push on R11's shoulders to get R11 out of the room.
Jan 2023 7 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer Lantus Insulin 85 units for one (R3) residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer Lantus Insulin 85 units for one (R3) resident for a total of 25 days due to facility did not follow their own policy when reviewing a Physician order. This failure affects one (R3) of three residents reviewed for medication in the sample of 17. This failure caused R3 to experience a significant increase in R3's blood glucose levels resulting in R3 developing cellulitis requiring additional antibiotic therapy, with a potential for sustained elevated blood glucose levels resulting in diabetic coma and/or death. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] when R3 was initially not administered 85 units of Lantus Insulin. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 1:28 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but noncompliance remains at a severity level two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. Findings include: R3's Medical diagnoses include Type II Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications, Essential Hypertension, Respiratory Failure, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances, Chronic Congestive Heart Failure, Venous Insufficiency, Difficulty in Walking and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3 as moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R3 as requiring extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and extensive assistance of two people for transfers. R3's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated [DATE]-30,2022 documents a physician order for Lantus Insulin 85 units to be self-administered unsupervised daily in the morning from [DATE]-[DATE]. This same POS documents an increase in R3's Humalog insulin to be administered subcutaneously with each meal on [DATE] from 4 units to 6 units. R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated [DATE]-30, 2022 documents R3's Lantus Insulin was signed out as unsupervised self-administration (U-SA) for [DATE]-[DATE]. This same MAR documents R3's blood glucose levels from [DATE]-[DATE] as ranging from mid 100's to high 200's and [DATE]-[DATE] as high 200's to high 300's with four entries in the low 400's. R3's POS dated [DATE]-31, 2022 documents a physician order for Lantus Insulin 85 units to be self-administered unsupervised daily in the morning from [DATE]-[DATE]. This same POS documents physician orders for Cephalexin 500 milligrams (mg) twice daily for Cellulitis starting [DATE] through [DATE]. R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated [DATE]-31, 2022 documents R3's Lantus Insulin was signed out as unsupervised self-administration (U-SA) for [DATE]-[DATE]. This same MAR documents R3's blood glucose levels range from [DATE]-[DATE] as mid 200's to mid 300's and [DATE]-[DATE] as high 100's to mid 200's. On [DATE] at 11:15 AM Surveyor observed R3 did not have any Humalog Insulin on medication cart nor in nurses' storage refrigerator. On [DATE] at 11:20 AM V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) confirmed R3 did not have any Humalog insulin in the medication cart nor nursing storage refrigerator. V9 (LPN) stated We (staff) have been using (R6's) Humalog since we are out. (R3) has been getting the insulin, just not from (R3's) own bottle. I will get it ordered today. On [DATE] at 2:00 PM V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) stated V2 was not aware that (R3's) Humalog Insulin was not in facility. V2 stated All residents should have their own medication. The nurses should never borrow one resident's medication to give to another resident. On [DATE] at 2:30 PM V2 (DON) stated The previous Nurse Practitioner (V8) ordered (R3's) Lantus Insulin 85 units every morning on [DATE]. (V8) entered (R3's) Lantus order incorrectly. (V8) entered an order that read (R3) would self-administer the Lantus unsupervised. This was a mistake on (V8's) part. (R3) cannot safely self-administer any medications. Because of that, (R3) never received that medication from [DATE]-[DATE]. V2 stated when the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) 'reads' that order, it is not digitally sent to the Medication Administration Record (MAR) that the nurse sees on their computer. So the nurses would never have seen that (R3) was supposed to be getting the 85 units of Lantus every morning. (V10) (LPN) reviewed and confirmed the order, but I am sure (V10) did not question the order since (V8) entered it. On [DATE] at 8:30 AM R3 stated I did not have to go to the hospital or anything, but I sure didn't feel good most of those days. On [DATE] at 9:55 AM V8 (previous NP) stated (R3) is a long time diabetic patient. I did enter an order for (R3's) Lantus 85 units daily to be administered in the morning on [DATE]-[DATE]. I wrote that order for one month due to R3 has had multiple changes in (R3's) Insulin regimen. I did enter the Lantus order to be self-administered unsupervised. (R3) is not cleared to self-administer medications due to poor cognition. The facility policy was for the nurses to review all physician orders. (V2) (DON) called me on [DATE] to report the error. I told (V2) then to complete a medication error report. The original error in entering the order was my fault, but if the facility would have followed the facility policy to review the orders, (R3) would have only missed possibly one dose, not a month's worth of insulin. For (R3), not getting the insulin that was prescribed more than likely caused (R3) to have to take antibiotics for bilateral lower leg cellulitis. (R3's) elevated blood sugars would have prevented healing. If (R3's) blood sugars had been better controlled with insulin, more than likely (R3) would not have been on those extra antibiotics. (R3) could have gone into a Diabetic coma due to dangerously elevated blood sugar levels. (R3) could have died. That is how serious this is. On [DATE] at 1:10 PM V20 (Medical Director) stated I was unaware of any medication error concerning (R3). (R3) is a chronic diabetic patient that requires a significant amount of insulin in order to maintain consistent blood sugars. It sounds like (V8) Nurse Practitioner entered the Lantus Insulin order incorrectly and the facility also did not review the order to ensure (R3) would have the insulin administered by a nurse. (R3) was previously getting 84 units of Lantus daily, so I don't understand why the facility did not recognize that (R3) was not getting (R3's) daily insulin. (R3) could have had severe consequences from not getting the Lantus for 25 days. The ill effects show in (R3's) elevated blood glucose levels and having to be prescribed antibiotics for the cellulitis. The facility policy titled 'Physician Orders-Entering and Processing' revised [DATE] documents the following: To provide general guidelines when receiving, entering and confirming physician or prescriber orders. (A prescriber is noted as Physician, Nurse Practitioner or Physician's Assistant). Following a physician visit, a licensed nurse will check for any orders that require confirmation. The orders will be confirmed by the nurse and the instructions for the order will be completed. The Immediate Jeopardy that began on [DATE] was removed on [DATE] when the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy. The surveyor confirmed through observation, interview and record review the facility took the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: 1. V2 (DON) confirmed R3 was assessed on [DATE] with no new findings and R3's Physician and Power of Attorney (POA) were notified of medication error and assessment with no new findings. 2. V2 confirmed facility house wide medication self-administration report was completed on [DATE] with three (R11, R12, R13) residents noted to have self-administration of medication orders. 3. V2 confirmed R11, R12 and R13 were assessed for self-administration on [DATE]. V2 stated R12 and R13 were deemed to be inappropriate for self-administration of medications and orders were adjusted to reflect medications should be administered by clinician. 4. V2 confirmed that all nursing staff was inserviced on [DATE] on when and how to review orders. 5. V4 (Regional Clinical Nurse) confirmed that V2 was inserviced on [DATE] on when and how to review orders. 6.a. V2 confirmed all medication carts were audited by facility on [DATE]. 6.b. V23 (Consultant Pharmacist) confirmed all medication carts were audited by pharmacist on [DATE]. 7. V1 (Administrator) confirmed that ad-[NAME] QAPI meeting was held on [DATE] with all members in attendance and that pharmacy was notified of all concerns. 8. V1 confirmed next QAPI meeting will be held on [DATE] and will include discussion of all survey concerns, med errors, citations and trends. 9. V24 (Regional Clinical Informatics Nurse) confirmed request for unsupervised self-administration option was not offered at facility level. V24 stated PCC denied request but allowed V24 to complete an 'enhancement' which is a formal request. 10. V1 confirmed IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) began discussing deficiency concerns, medication errors and trends on [DATE]. V1 stated IDT met again on 1/9 and 1/10 to discuss same concerns. V1 stated no new concerns have been identified.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This deficiency requires two deficient practice statements. A. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtai...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This deficiency requires two deficient practice statements. A. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory values, failed to report critical level laboratory values to Physician and failed to report a change in condition timely to Physician for one (R2) resident out of three residents reviewed for change of condition on the sample of 17. These failures resulted in R2 experiencing poor fluid intake, delayed medical testing, experiencing critical labs then subsequently being hospitalized with lower leg cellulitis and pneumonia. B. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely pain medication for a resident by not maintaining supply of R4's prescribed narcotic pain medication. This failure affects one (R4) resident out of three residents reviewed for change of condition on the sample of 17. R4 experienced severe unrelieved pain causing R4 to call for emergency services. Findings include: A. R2's Medical diagnoses include Right Lower Extremity (RLE) Cellulitis, Aspiration Pneumonia, Right Lower Leg (RLL) Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), COVID-19, Acute Lower Respiratory Infection, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Down Syndrome, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Morbid Obesity due to excess calories, Dysphagia and Difficulty Walking. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 was moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R2 required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, dressing, eating, extensive assistance of two people for transfers and total assistance of one person for toileting and personal hygiene. R2's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated November 1-30, 2022 documents a physician order dated 11/23/22 of Please monitor over next 24 hours and encourage oral fluids at meals. If no improvement in oral fluid intake or increase in urinary output, please send to emergency department (ED) for further evaluation/treatment. This same POS documents a physician order dated 11/22/22 to obtain Complete Blood Count (CBC) with Differential (diff), Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) or D-Dimer on 11/22/22. One time only. This same POS does not document a physician order for lab work on 11/29/22. R2's Documentation Survey Report dated November 1-30, 2022 documents intakes of: -11/23/22 R2 refused all food and fluids for breakfast, refused all food and drank 50 milliliters (ml) for lunch and refused all food and drank 480 ml for supper. -11/24/22 R2 refused all food and fluids for breakfast and lunch and refused all food for supper and drank 760 ml fluids. -11/25/22 R2 refused all food and fluids for breakfast and lunch and there were no entries documented for supper meal. -11/26/22 R2 refused all food and fluids for breakfast, there were no entries for lunch meal and refused all food and drank 120 ml for supper meal. R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) does not document notification to (V20) physician of intakes from 11/23/22-11/26/22. R2's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated December 1-31, 2022 documents a physician order dated 12/2/22 of Please get labs as previously ordered stat. CBC with diff, CMP, D-dimer STAT. R2's EMR documents R2's weight as 148.5 pounds (lbs) on 11/2/22 and 139.0 lbs on 12/2/22. R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) does not document laboratory results for physician ordered Complete Blood Count (CBC), Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) or D-Dimer for 11/22/22 or 11/29/22. R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents the same labs were ordered STAT (immediately) on 12/2/22. R2's laboratory requisition dated 12/2/22 documents can't get as results of labs not obtained. R2's Laboratory Report dated specimen was obtained on 12/5/22. This same report documents R2's Complete Blood Count (CBC), Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) and D-Dimer results as follows: White Blood Cell (WBC) count result of 25.56 (high) with reference range of 4.0-12.0 10(3) cubic milliliter (mcL) of blood. D-Dimer result as >=20.00 (high) with a reference range of 0.50 micrograms (mg)/milliliter (ml) Fibrinogen Equivalent Unit (FEU). Nurse Progress Notes document: -11/26/22 at 2:45 pm documents Impaired balance noted. Weakness noted. Decreased sensation noted. (R2) has shortness of breath with exertion. (R2) has shortness of breath or difficulty breathing when lying flat. -11/27/22 at 6:45 AM documents (R2) has evidence of an acute change in mental status from (R2's) baseline noted. Decreased sensation noted. -11/29/22 at 3:05 PM V8 (Nurse Practitioner/NP) documents NEXT LABS PENDING: Will reorder missing labs for 12/2/22 - CBC, CMP, D-dimer. -11/30/22 at 6:40 AM documents (R2) has shortness of breath with exertion. (R2) has shortness of breath or difficulty breathing when sitting or at rest. Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing when lying flat. (R2's) Lung sounds diminished. -12/1/22 at 11:07 AM documents (R2) has shortness of breath with exertion. (R2) has shortness of breath or difficulty breathing when lying flat. -12/2/22 at 9:05 AM document (R2) has shortness of breath with exertion. (R2) has shortness of breath or difficulty breathing when lying flat. -12/3/22 at 9:05 AM documents (R2) has shortness of breath with exertion. (R2) has shortness of breath or difficulty breathing when lying flat. (R2) lung sounds diminished. -12/4/22 at 9:05 AM documents (R2) has shortness of breath with exertion. (R2) has shortness of breath or difficulty breathing when lying flat. (R2) lung sounds diminished R2's Hospital Laboratory Report documents R2's 12/5/22 D-Dimer results were called, results acknowledged and read back. R2's EMR does not document receipt of abnormal lab values on 12/5/22 or 12/6/22. R2's Nurse Progress Note dated 12/7/22 at 1:45 PM documents Resident noted to have a WBC of 25.56. (V8) NP ordered resident out to emergency room (ER) for evaluation. R2's Nurse Progress Note dated 12/7/22 at 2:04 PM (V8) NP documents New Right Leg redness, swelling, post COVID-19. Onset-acute, first noticed one to two days ago, location Right Lower Extremity (RLE). (R2's) EMR shows nine pound weight loss within one month. Right Lower Leg edematous, erythematous, non-tender. Assessment/Plan: RLE redness, swelling; Leukocytosis, abnormal weight loss, send to emergency room for further evaluation to rule out Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), Leukocytosis. R2's hospital records dated 12/7/22 document admitting diagnoses as Right Lower Extremity (RLE) Cellulitis and Aspiration Pneumonia. R2's Ultrasound Right Duplex Lower Extremity Veins Result dated 12/8/22 documents Impression: Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in the visualized Common Femoral, Femoral, Popliteal, Posterior Tibial and Peroneal Veins. R2's Chest X-Ray Report dated 12/7/22 documents Impression: Patchy opacity suspected at Left Lung base. R2's Ambulance Report dated 12/7/22 documents Staff wanted (R2) evaluated in emergency room due to elevated [NAME] Blood Cell (WBC) count. Assessment revealed with vitals as documented with (R2) having redness in Right Lower Leg. On 1/5/23 at 10:35 AM V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated the laboratory levels were never drawn on 11/22/22 or on 11/29/22. V2 stated the physician should have been notified but was not. The laboratory technician did come to facility on 12/2/22 but was unable to get blood collected due to R2 was not compliant. V2 stated the labs were finally obtained on 12/5/22 and physician was notified of the results on 12/7/22. V2 stated R2 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] for a decline in condition. On 1/6/23 at 11:00 AM V8 (previous NP) stated (R2) had a productive cough with thick green mucous and generally did not look like he felt well. V8 stated (R2) was not eating or drinking very well so on 11/23/22 I ordered the staff to monitor (R2's) fluid intake for 24 hours and send to the emergency room if not any better. They (staff) did not notify me of any changes in (R2's) condition including poor fluid intake, or I would have sent (R2) into the emergency room that day (11/24/22). V8 stated attempted to review the labs that were ordered on 11/22/22 but the labs had not been completed. V8 stated No one could tell me why the labs I ordered on 11/22/22 were not completed, but I was told that they would be completed and I would be notified of any abnormal values. I ordered the D-Dimer to rule out a possible Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) due to many patients I have seen with COVID-19 end up with DVTs. I saw (R2) again on 11/29/22 and realized then that the labs had not yet been drawn. I re-ordered them on 11/29/22. On 12/2/22 I ordered the labs to be drawn STAT due to the facility still had not obtained the labs that originally ordered on 11/22/22. (R2) refused to have blood drawn on 12/2/22 so I reordered them again for 12/5/22. On 12/7/22 I was able to review the lab results and saw that (R2) had a D-Dimer over 20 which is a critical level, and also the highest I have ever seen. (R2's) [NAME] Blood Cell (WBC) count was also at a critical level so at that point I gave the order to send (R2) to the emergency room. No one from the facility notified me of (R2's) critical lab values. On 1/6/23 at 2:15 PM V21 (Laboratory (lab) Resolution Specialist) stated R2's CBC with Differential, CMP and D-Dimer were collected, received and processed on 12/5/22. V21 stated it is the policy of the laboratory to call the critical laboratory values to the facility as soon as they are realized by the lab. V21 stated We (lab staff) called the abnormal values, especially the critical lab values such as in (R2's) case as soon as possible on 12/5/22. We (lab staff) call the lab values directly to the facility and ask for the nurse in charge of that patient. From there, I do not know what happens, but we (lab) call the labs to the patient's nurse, not the Physician. On 1/6/23 at 1:00 PM V20 (Medical Director) stated resident laboratory values should be reported to Nurse Practitioner (NP) or Physician (MD) when they are received. V20 stated critical labs should always be reported immediately. V20 stated In this case (R2) was hospitalized for something we could have treated more aggressively in the facility initially or have sent (R2) to the emergency room if applicable, but because the lab work was not done and then not reported (R2) subsequently ended up in the hospital. V20 stated V20 was made aware of R2's abnormal lab values on 1/6/23. The facility policy titled 'Physician Notification of Laboratory/Radiology/Diagnostic Results' revised November 2019 documents the following: Purpose: To assure physician ordered diagnostic tests are performed, and to assure test results are reported to the physician, so that prompt appropriate action may be taken if indicated for the resident's care. A requisition is to be completed and lab to be drawn on the next scheduled lab day unless STAT is ordered. A nurse is responsible for monitoring the receipt of test results. Test results should be reported to the physician or other practitioner who ordered them. All critical lab values unless other parameters are ordered by physician: [NAME] Blood Cell greater than 12000. The licensed nurse is responsible for documenting the results in the clinical record. B. R4's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Dysphagia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Congestive Heart Failure and Spondylosis Without Myopathy of Lumbar Region. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R4 as requiring extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and total dependence of two people for transfers. R4's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated January 1-31, 2023 documents a physician order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Norco) 10-325 mg one tablet every four hours as needed for pain starting 12/6/22 and Norco 5-325 mg two tablets every four hours as needed for back pain starting 1/2/23. R4's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated January 1-31, 2023 documents Norco 10-325 mg was administered on 1/1/23 at 4:23 AM, 1/1/23 at 2:10 PM and 1/1/23 at 10:40 PM. This same MAR documents Norco 5-325 mg was administered on 1/2/23 at 2:31 PM. On 1/3/23 at 11:00 AM surveyor observed R4 laying in bed with tears in eyes. R4 stated They (facility) let me go hours without my pain medication. I had to just lay here in bed for hours in pain. I was crying it hurt so bad. I asked to go to the emergency room and was told I had to wait because they (staff) were trying to get my pain medication. I got tired of waiting in pain so I sent myself to the emergency room [DATE]) for pain because they (facility) would not send me. The emergency room gave me some pain medication and a new prescription, but the facility still did not give me any until later that day (1/2/23). On 1/3/23 at 1:30 PM V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) stated R4 is an established patient at the local pain clinic. V2 stated R4 does have back pain and that is why R4 sees the pain clinic. V2 stated R4 can be 'very demanding' and have 'unreasonable expectations' of staff. V2 stated the pain clinic will send a prescription electronically (e-scribe) to the facility, the facility enters the order and then the pharmacy will send the new prescription. V2 stated In the case of (R4), the pain clinic never sent the prescription. We (facility) should have followed up with that but did not. That is when we (facility) called the pain clinic and were told that they (pain clinic) never sent the prescription to our facility. So, that is why the pharmacy never sent any more Norco for (R4). (R4) asked me if we (facility) could send (R4) to the emergency room and I told him 'you have the right to go to the emergency room but we (facility) are working on getting you more pain medication. You just have to be patient.' I did not call 911 for (R4). (R4) could not wait for us (staff) to get his pain medication figured out so he called 911 himself. The hospital gave (R4) some pain medication and a new prescription for Norco 5-325 mg two tablets every four hours as needed. (R4) may have went a total of 8 or 10 hours without any pain medication. I did not know until today that the pain clinic sent (R4's) Norco prescription to a local chain pharmacy. On 1/3/23 at 2:45 PM V12 (Pain Clinic Nurse Practitioner/NP) stated R4 is an established patient at local pain clinic. V12 stated R4 was given a computer tablet to enter any updated information on when R4 arrived at pain clinic appointment on 12/9/22. V12 stated R4 is alert and oriented and independently chose an outside pharmacy so that is where the Norco prescription was sent. V12 (NP) stated The facility got (R4) to the appointment and we (pain clinic) got (R4) the medication needed. The facility should have asked (R4) about any new orders or called the pain clinic to inquire. I personally tried to call the facility multiple times because I knew (R4) lived in a long-term care setting and most of those use their own pharmacies. I could not get anyone to respond so we (pain clinic) sent the prescription to the local chain pharmacy that was listed in (R4's) chart. On 1/4/23 at 10:05 AM V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated January 2, 2023 was the day we realized (R4) did not have any more Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 milligrams (mg). I began calling the pharmacy. When I called the pharmacy, they said the order had been discontinued and would not be filled until a new prescription was obtained. So, that is when I called the pain clinic. I could not get ahold of them right away so (R4) decided to send himself to the hospital to get a new prescription. (R4) did not want to wait on us (facility). The facility policy titled 'Physician Orders-Entering and Processing' revised January 2018 documents the following: Purpose: To provide general guidelines when receiving, entering and confirming physician or prescriber's orders (a prescriber is noted as a physician, nurse practitioner, and a physician's assistant). Following a physician visit, a licensed nurse will check for any orders that require confirmation. The orders will be confirmed by the nurse and the instructions for the order will be completed.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one resident (R4) during incontinence care out...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one resident (R4) during incontinence care out of three residents reviewed for dignity on the sample of 17. Findings include: R4's Medical diagnoses include Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Dysphagia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Congestive Heart Failure and Spondylosis Without Myopathy of Lumbar Region. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R4 as requiring extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and total dependence of two people for transfers. On 1/4/23 at 9:05 AM V15 (Receptionist) knocked on outside of R4's closed room door. V15 entered R4's room without waiting for a response. V13 and V14 (Certified Nurse Aides/CNAs) were in the process of incontinence care for R4. R4 was laying in bed on back with gown pulled up to waist. R4's incontinence brief had already been removed. R4's front perineal area was fully exposed. V15 entered R4's room, walked to middle of R4's room, looked directly at R4's exposed perineal area and asked V13 and V14 if the wheelchair sitting in R4's room belonged to R4. V15 then exited R4's room. On 1/4/23 at 9:25 AM R4 stated that staff regularly 'barge into my room.' R4 stated How would you like to be laying naked and some stranger just waltz in? That was embarrassing. They (staff) do not have any idea what they are even doing. On 1/4/23 at 9:40 AM V15 (Receptionist) stated anytime a staff member enters a resident room the staff member should introduce themselves. I knocked and no one answered so I just came in. I didn't know what was going on, so I opened the door. When I saw that they (V13, V14) were just changing (R4) I thought it would be ok to ask about the wheelchair. On 1/4/23 at 9:45 AM V13 (CNA) stated (V15) should not have just barged into (R4's) room like that. That kind of thing happens all the time here. (V15) is a receptionist. There is no reason for (V15) to see (R4) while we (staff) are changing (R4). The facility policy titled 'Dignity' revised April 2018 documents the following: The facility shall promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality. Maintaining a resident's dignity should include protecting and valuing residents' private space (for example knocking on doors and requesting permission before entering).
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during incontinence care fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during incontinence care for one (R4) resident out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care on the sample of 17. Findings include: R4's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Dysphagia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Congestive Heart Failure and Spondylosis Without Myopathy of Lumbar Region. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R4 as requiring extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and total dependence of two people for transfers. On 1/4/23 at 9:00 AM V13 and V14 (Certified Nurse Aides/CNAs) completed incontinence care for R4. V13 (CNA) nor V14 (CNA) washed hands, used hand sanitizer nor changed gloves during entire procedure. V13 placed clean wet washcloth directly on R4's contaminated bed linen then used contaminated washcloth to cleanse R4's front perineal area. V13 did not use soap or a no rinse product when cleansing R4's entire perineal area. V15 (Receptionist) entered R4's room, handed V13 an incontinence brief laying on a spare bed without washing hands or wearing gloves. V13 placed a contaminated incontinence brief on R4. V13 (CNA) did not apply barrier cream to R4's buttocks after incontinence care. On 1/4/23 at 9:20 AM V13 (CNA) stated handwashing is a good way to help prevent infections. V13 stated We (V13, V14) should have washed our hands and not put the clean towels directly on the bed. I should have made sure there was soap on the towel. On 1/4/23 at 9:25 AM V14 (CNA) stated I normally wash my hands after I take the dirty linen to the soiled utility room. I don't need to wash them any more than that as long as I wear my gloves. V14 stated It would probably have been better to use a bag to put all the soiled linen in so it did not touch my shirt when I carried it to the soiled utility room. On 1/5/23 at 9:10 AM V2 (Director of Nurses) stated staff should wash hands whenever their gloves may be contaminated. V2 stated V13 and V14 (CNAs) should have set up a clean field, kept the clean items separate from the contaminated ones and used a garbage bag to place all of the soiled linens in. V2 stated Soap is a necessary item to use when cleansing a resident who was incontinent. I am not sure why it wasn't used but will definitely be doing some education with our staff. The facility policy titled 'Incontinence Care' revised April 2021 documents the following: Procedure: Soap one cloth at a time to wash genitalia using a clean part of the cloth for each swipe. Rinse with remaining cloth using clean surfaces. Do not place soiled soapy cloths back in clean basin water until procedure is completed. May drape soiled cloths over the side of the wash basin or place directly in soiled linen plastic bag. Gently pat dry with a towel from anterior to posterior. Change gloves and perform hand hygiene. Apply clean incontinence brief or pad. Place soiled cloths in linen plastic bag. CNA may apply moisture barrier cream to intact skin.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Norco) narcot...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Norco) narcotic pain medication for four (R4, R6, R14, R15) residents out of six residents reviewed for abuse on the sample of 17. Findings include: 1. R14's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses of Osteoarthritis, Morbid Obesity, Difficulty Walking, Cystitis and Muscle Weakness. R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R14 as cognitively intact. R14's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated January 1-31, 2023 documents a physician order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams (mg) every evening at bedtime for Osteoarthritis starting 10/11/22. R14's Controlled Drug Administration Record dated 1/2/23 documents at 8:00 AM Norco 5-325 mg one tablet was dropped. This same Record entry was signed by V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) and witnessed by V9 (LPN). Facility witness statement form for R14's investigation, dated 1/5/23, documents Have you ever seen a nurse take narcotics for another resident? This same statement document V9's response as Yes, when (V10) gave (R4) Norco from (R14). R14's Final Incident Report to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) dated 1/6/23 documents (V10) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) signed statement on 1/5/23 at 9:20 AM documents I did take medications from other residents (R6, R14, R15) to use for (R4). It was between 1/1/23 and 1/2/23 and I knew it was wrong. I was doing it because (R4) would have had a fit if I did not and I was trying to prevent (R4) from calling IDPH. On 1/1/23 I took two tablets from (R6) and used them for (R4). (V27) LPN cosigned with me and (V27) knew what I was using them for. I was using them for (R4's) 12:00 PM and 4:00 PM doses. On 1/1/23 I took one tablet from (R15) and used it for the 8:00 AM dose for (R4). (V29) Registered Nurse (RN) signed with me and (V29) knew what I was using the medication for. On 1/2/23 when (R4) came back from the hospital, (R4) came back with a new order for Hydrocodone 5-325 milligrams (mg) two tablets. There were three (Norco) in the back up narcotic supply cart. I used two for the first dose that I have for (R4) when (R4) came back and then there was only one more left. When it was time for the next dose I used the last one from the back up cart and then I took one from (R14) and used that to make (R4's) full dose. (V9) LPN was the nurse on that cart and I went in and took the med. (V9) signed it off with me. (V9) knew that I was using the medication for. (V2) (Director of Nursing/DON) was not aware that we were taking the medications for someone else. V10's Corrective Action Form dated 1/6/23 documents Violation of Conduct or Work Rule as checked. This same Form documents Describe what happens: Final written warning. Misappropriation of resident medication. While V10's intention was not harmful and no harm resulted from (V10's) action, the misappropriation was a violation of policy. Dates of Prior Warning and Action Taken 12/2/22 Violation of Policy. This same Form was signed on 1/6/23 by Employee V10 LPN, Supervisor V2 Director of Nurses (DON) and witness V1 Administrator. On 1/11/23 at 12:45 PM V29 (RN) stated On 1/1/23 (V10) let me know that (R4) was out of (R4's) Norco. I said 'How is that since it is scheduled?'. (V10) told me that (V10) had called the pharmacy already and was waiting on a prescription but (R4) was out and had no current prescription. I signed out (R15's) Controlled Drug Administration Record form on 1/1/23 at 6:13 AM with (V10). I did not report this to anyone because I did not know that it was going to be any trouble. I did not know that we (staff) could not share medications with residents until (V4) Clinical Regional Nurse told me that on 1/5/23 to educate me. 2. R6's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses of Chronic Pain Syndrome, Lymphedema, Anxiety and Neuropathy. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R6 as cognitively intact. R6's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated January 1-31, 2023 documents a physician order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed for Chronic Pain Syndrome starting 12/2/2021. R6's Controlled Drug Administration Record dated 1/1/23 documents an entry with no time listed of Norco 10-325 mg two tablets as wasted. This same Record entry was signed by V10 (LPN) and witnessed by V27 (LPN). Facility witness statement form for R14's investigation, dated 1/5/23 at 9:46AM, documents Have you ever seen a nurse take narcotics for another resident? This same statement documents V7's response as Yes, on 1/1 I gave Norco that (V10) had prepared for (R4) at approximately 10:00 PM. (V10) told me one pill came from somewhere I can't remember and the other from the narcotic supply cart. Facility witness statement form for R14's investigation, dated 1/5/23, documents Have you ever seen a nurse take narcotics for another resident? This same statement documents V27's response as Yes, I signed out one Norco with (V10) from (R6) to give to (R4). On 1/12/23 at 10:40 AM R6 stated I am in constant pain. There is nothing else the doctors can do but give me pain pills. The pain is in my spine. I am supposed to get Norco when I ask for it. I just can't go without it or the pain gets unbearable. 3. R15's undated Face Sheet documents Cellulitis of Right Lower Limb, Osteomyelitis, Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer of Sacrum, Unspecified Injury of T2-T6 level of Thoracic Spinal Cord and Anxiety. R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R15 as cognitively intact. R15's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated January 1-31, 2023 documents a physician order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 milligrams (mg) four times per day starting 6/1/2021 for Stage 3 Sacral Pressure Ulcer. R15's Controlled Drug Administration Record dated 1/1/23 documents an entry at 6:13 AM Norco 10-325 mg one tablet was wasted. This same Record entry was signed by V10 (LPN) and witnessed by V27 (LPN). Facility witness statement form for R15's investigation, dated 1/5/23, documents Have you ever seen a nurse take narcotics for another resident? This same statement documents V29's response as Yes, (V10) asked to waste a narcotic from (R15) to give to (R4) because (R4) was out. On 1/12/23 at 11:00 AM R15 stated I have terrible pain in my back and from my bedsore. I have to have my Norco to help control my pain. I was in an accident 30 years ago and have been on it since then. My dose of Norco has gradually gone up over the years and now I have it scheduled four times a day. If I miss a dose I would be in agony. On 1/11/23 at 12:05 PM V1 (Administrator) stated V10 (LPN) was previously disciplined on 12/2/22 for signing out narcotic medications prior to administering those narcotic medications. V1 stated V10 (LPN) was issued a final warning on 1/6/23 due to V10 took narcotic pain medications from three separate residents (R6, R14, R15) to give to a fourth resident (R4). V1 stated (V10) was honest about taking the Norco from (R6, R14 and R15). (V10) stated she felt bad about it and was just trying to keep (R4) happy. Because (V10) did not have any intention of harming any resident and no residents were harmed by (V10's) actions, we (facility) allowed (V10) to be disciplined and return to work. The facility policy titled 'Abuse Policy' revised April 2022 documents The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation or mistreatment they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately or to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the Administrator. In the absence of the Administrator, reporting can be made to an individual who has been designated to act as Administrator in the Administrator's absence. Employees of this facility who have been accused of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property will be removed from the resident contact immediately until the results of the investigation have been reviewed by the Administrator.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow their abuse prohibition policy by not removing alleged perpetrators involved with misappropriation of residents' medication. This fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow their abuse prohibition policy by not removing alleged perpetrators involved with misappropriation of residents' medication. This failure affects four (R4, R6, R14, R15) residents out of six residents reviewed for abuse on the sample of 17. Findings include: The facility policy titled 'Abuse Policy' revised April 2022 documents The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation or mistreatment they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately or to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the Administrator. In the absence of the Administrator, reporting can be made to an individual who has been designated to act as Administrator in the Administrator's absence. Employees of this facility who have been accused of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property will be removed from the resident contact immediately until the results of the investigation have been reviewed by the Administrator. 1. R14's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses of Osteoarthritis, Morbid Obesity, Difficulty Walking, Cystitis and Muscle Weakness. R14's Controlled Drug Administration Record dated 1/2/23 documents at 8:00 AM Norco 5-325 mg one tablet was dropped. This same Record entry was signed by V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) and witnessed by V9 (LPN). Facility witness statement form, for R14's investigation, dated 1/5/23 at 9:46AM documents Have you ever seen a nurse take narcotics for another resident? This same statement documents V7's response as Yes, on 1/1 I gave Norco that (V10) had prepared to give (R4) at approximately 10:00 PM. (V10) told me one pill came from somewhere I can't remember and the other from the narcotic supply cart. R14's Final Incident Report to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) dated 1/6/23 documents (V10) (LPN) signed statement on 1/5/23 at 9:20 AM documents I did take medications from other residents (R6, R14, R15) to use for (R4). It was between 1/1/23 and 1/2/23 and I knew it was wrong. I was doing it because (R4) would have had a fit if I did not and I was trying to prevent (R4) from calling IDPH. On 1/1/23 I took two tablets from (R6) and used them for (R4). (V27) (LPN) cosigned with me and (V27) knew what I was using them for. I was using them for (R4's) 12:00 PM and 4:00 PM doses. On 1/1/23 I took one tablet from (R15) and used it for the 8:00 AM dose for (R4). (V29) (Registered Nurse/RN) signed with me and (V29) knew what I was using the medication for. On 1/2/23 when (R4) came back from the hospital, (R4) came back with a new order for Hydrocodone 5-325 milligrams (mg) two tablets. There were three (Norco) in the back up narcotic supply cart. I used two for the first dose that I gave (R4) when (R4) came back and then there was only one more left. When it was time for the next dose I used the last one from the back up cart and then I took one from (R14) and used that to make (R4's) full dose. (V9) (LPN) was the nurse on that cart and I went in and took the med. (V9) signed it off with me. (V9) knew that I was using the medication for. (V2) (Director of Nursing/DON) was not aware that we were taking the medications for someone else. 2. R6's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses of Chronic Pain Syndrome, Lymphedema, Anxiety and Neuropathy. R6's Controlled Drug Administration Record dated 1/1/23 documents an entry with no time listed of Norco 10-325 mg two tablets as wasted. This same Record entry was signed by V10 (LPN) and witnessed by V27 (LPN). Facility witness statement form for R14's investigation, dated 1/5/23, documents Have you ever seen a nurse take narcotics for another resident? This same statement documents V27's response as Yes, I signed out one Norco with (V10) from (R6) to give to (R4). 3. R15's undated Face Sheet documents Cellulitis of Right Lower Limb, Osteomyelitis, Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer of Sacrum, Unspecified Injury of T2-T6 level of Thoracic Spinal Cord and Anxiety. R15's Controlled Drug Administration Record dated 1/1/23 documents an entry at 6:13 AM Norco 10-325 mg one tablet was wasted. This same Record entry was signed by V10 (LPN) and witnessed by V27 (LPN). Facility witness statement form for R14's investigation, dated 1/5/23, documents Have you ever seen a nurse take narcotics for another resident? This same statement documents V29's response as Yes, (V10) asked to waste a narcotic from (R15) to give to (R4) because (R4) was out. On 1/11/23 at 12:45 PM V29 (RN) stated I signed out (R15's) Controlled Drug Administration Record form on 1/1/23 at 6:13 AM with (V10). I did not report this to anyone because I did not know that it was going to be any trouble. I did not know that we (staff) could not share medications with residents until (V4) Clinical Regional Nurse told me that on 1/5/23 to educate me. I was never suspended or disciplined for helping (V10). On 1/12/23 at 3:00 PM V1 (Administrator) stated (V10) (LPN) was suspended pending investigation for this matter. V1 stated V10 (LPN) was allowed to return to work after the investigation was completed with a discipline. V1 stated (V7 LPN, V9 LPN, V27 LPN and V29 RN) were not suspended nor disciplined. V1 confirmed facility did not follow abuse policy due to (V7, V9, V27, V29) were not also suspended during investigation. V1 stated Looking back I see that all of the nurses had knowledge of the situation and did not report anything. Even if they (V7, V9, V27, V29) did not actually take the Norco's, they all knew about it and should have reported it as misappropriation.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report misappropriation of resident property to abuse coordinator for four (R4, R6, R14, R15) of six residents reviewed for abuse on the sam...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report misappropriation of resident property to abuse coordinator for four (R4, R6, R14, R15) of six residents reviewed for abuse on the sample of 17. Findings include: The facility policy titled 'Abuse Policy' revised April 2022 documents The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation or mistreatment they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately or to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the Administrator. In the absence of the Administrator, reporting can be made to an individual who has been designated to act as Administrator in the Administrator's absence. Employees of this facility who have been accused of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property will be removed from the resident contact immediately until the results of the investigation have been reviewed by the Administrator. R14's Final Incident Report to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) dated 1/6/23 documents (V10's) (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) signed statement on 1/5/23 at 9:20 AM documents I did take medications from other residents (R6, R14, R15) to use for (R4). It was between 1/1/23 and 1/2/23 and I knew it was wrong. I was doing it because (R4) would have had a fit if I did not and I was trying to prevent (R4) from calling IDPH. On 1/1/23 I took two tablets from (R6) and used them for (R4). (V27) (LPN) cosigned with me and (V27) knew what I was using them for. I was using them for (R4's) 12:00 PM and 4:00 PM doses. On 1/1/23 I took one tablet from (R15) and used it for the 8:00 AM dose for (R4). (V29) (Registered Nurse/RN) signed with me and (V29) knew what I was using the medication for. On 1/2/23 when (R4) came back from the hospital, (R4) came back with a new order for Hydrocodone 5-325 milligrams (mg) two tablets. There were three (Norco) in the back up narcotic supply cart. I used two for the first dose that I gave (R4) when (R4) came back and then there was only one more left. When it was time for the next dose I used the last one from the back up cart and then I took one from (R14) and used that to make (R4's) full dose. (V9) (LPN) was the nurse on that cart and I went in and took the med. (V9) signed it off with me. (V9) knew that I was using the medication for. (V2) (Director of Nursing/DON) was not aware that we were taking the medications for someone else. R14's Controlled Drug Administration Record dated 1/2/23 documents at 8:00 AM Norco 5-325 mg one tablet was dropped. This same Record entry was signed by V10 (LPN) and witnessed by V9 (LPN). On 1/11/23 at 12:45 PM V29 (RN) stated I signed out (R15's) Controlled Drug Administration Record form on 1/1/23 at 6:13 AM with (V10). I did not report this to anyone because I did not know that it was going to be any trouble. I did not know that we (staff) could not share medications with residents until (V4) Clinical Regional Nurse told me that on 1/5/23 to educate me. I was never suspended or disciplined for helping (V10). R6's Controlled Drug Administration Record dated 1/1/23 documents an entry with no time listed of Norco 10-325 mg two tablets as wasted. This same Record entry was signed by V10 (LPN) and witnessed by V27 (LPN). R14's Witness Statement dated 1/5/23 documents Have you ever seen a nurse take narcotics for another resident? This same statement documents V27's response as Yes, I signed out one Norco with (V10) from (R6) to give to (R4). R15's Controlled Drug Administration Record dated 1/1/23 documents an entry at 6:13 AM Norco 10-325 mg one tablet was wasted. This same Record entry was signed by V10 (LPN) and witnessed by V27 (LPN). R14's Witness Statement dated 1/5/23 documents Have you ever seen a nurse take narcotics for another resident? This same statement documents V29's response as Yes, (V10) asked to waste a narcotic from (R15) to give to (R4) because (R4) was out. On 1/12/23 at 3:00 PM V1 (Administrator) stated (V7 LPN, V9 LPN, V27 LPN and V29 RN) were not suspended nor disciplined. V1 confirmed facility did not follow abuse policy due to (V7, V9, V27, V29) did not report misappropriation of resident property to the abuse coordinator or designee. V1 stated Looking back I see that all of the nurses had knowledge of the situation and did not report anything. Even if they (V7, V9, V27, V29) did not actually take the Norco's, they all knew about it and should have reported it as misappropriation.
Dec 2022 8 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident by failing to prevent further abuse for one of three residents (R3) reviewed for abuse allegations on the sample of seve...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident by failing to prevent further abuse for one of three residents (R3) reviewed for abuse allegations on the sample of seven. The facility failed to remove staff who were observed physically restraining a resident by the hands/arms to prevent the resident from stopping staff from performing COVID testing which R3 had refused. This failure resulted in the staff continuing to work at the facility for the rest of their shift, coming in to contact with R3 a second time, causing a reaction by R3 with aggressive physical behaviors toward the staff resulting in R3 sustaining a laceration to R3's right hand forefinger. Findings include: The facility's Final Abuse Investigation Report dated 11/30/22 documents R3's diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Hemiparesis, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Vascular Dementia. On 11/22/22 at 7:55am, R3 reported V4, V5 and V6, CNA's and V7, Activity Director for physical abuse. R3 was assessed and noted to have an alteration in skin integrity to the right finger. R3 reported V4 and V5, CNA's were physically aggressive when performing COVID testing. R3 reported staff held R3's arms and tested R3. R3 also reported later that night, V4, CNA came in and took R3's white board from R3. When R3 took the whiteboard back it resulted in an alteration in skin integrity to R3's right finger. The investigation report documents V7 stated R3 refused testing and later approached R3 again with V5, CNA. V7 stated R3 was attempting to throw the remote control at staff, jerking/tossing R3's communication board and pushing the intravenous pole toward staff. V7 stated V7 and V5 attempted to hold R3's hands to keep him from hitting staff. The investigation documents R3 reported V4, V5 and V7 held R3's arms and made R3 take the COVID test. There is no documentation of the staff participating in/observing the physical restraint of R3 being immediately suspended. The Time Card Reports for the following staff document these staff involved in the physical restraint of R3 were not immediately suspended and allowed to work until the end of their shift on 11/21/22: V4, CNA worked from 1:58pm to 10:23pm V5, CNA worked from 2:03pm to 10:24pm V6, CNA worked from 1:51pm to 10:19pm On 12/19/22 at 2:00pm, V1, Administrator stated V4, V5 and V6 should have been sent home and would have if V1 was aware. V1 stated V4, V5, and V6 did not recognize the incidents as abuse so V1 was not notified and V4, V5 and V6 were not sent home/suspended until 11/22/22 after V1 spoke with R3. The facility's Abuse Policy dated April 2022 documents the resident has the right to be free from abuse including physical restraint.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete post fall investigations to determine a root cause and fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete post fall investigations to determine a root cause and failed to implement post fall interventions to prevent further falls. These failures affect three of three residents (R2, R5, R6) reviewed for falls on the sample of seven. These failures contributed to R5 going without a post-seizure/post fall neurology follow-up appointment for a month. R5 was found on the floor again exhibiting seizure like activity and sustaining a second head injury with laceration requiring sutures and being hospitalized and started on Anti-seizure medication. Findings include: 1. R5's Progress Notes dated as follows document: 10/8/22 at 2:59am, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) (unidentified) called for assistance to R5's room. 1st responding nurse (unidentified) observed R5 lying face down. R5 was placed on R5's side noted snoring with jerking movements. There was evidence of bleeding noted on the floor but unable to observe where it was coming from. R5 was transferred out to the local emergency room for evaluation. 10/8/22 at 12:42pm, R5 returned from the hospital via ambulance at 1240pm. No new medication orders. Discharge instructions say to follow-up with primary Dr. and Neurologist. There is no documentation of a follow-up appointment with V22, Neurologist. R5's emergency room After Visit Summary (AVS) dated 10/8/22 documents R5 was seen for Seizures and an unwitnessed fall. This AVS documents R5 is to follow up with V22, Neurologist in 2 days. There is no documentation R5 was scheduled for the neurologist follow-up or that R5 followed up with V22 as per physician's orders upon discharge from the emergency room on [DATE]. The facility's October 2022 Fall Log does not document R5's fall on 10/8/22. The facility did not provide a fall investigation for R5's fall on 10/8/22. R5's Progress Notes dated as follows document: 10/10/22 at 7:15pm, R5 was seen on 10/8/22 after being found on floor lying face down and making jerking movements. R5's work-up was negative for acute pathology. R5's diagnosis was Seizure. (R5) is to follow-up with Neurologist. ASSESSMENT/PLAN: Seizure, ground level fall- Neurology consult. Continue facility fall precautions. R5's Fall Investigation documents an initial report documenting on 11/10/22 at 3:15pm, R5 was observed on the floor of R5's room displaying seizure like activity. R5 was found to have a laceration to the forehead and was sent to the emergency room. This sheet documents R5's hospital diagnosis of soft tissue contusion of the right forehead with a superficial laceration of the supra orbital ridge requiring sutures. This fall investigation is incomplete. There is no documentation of which Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was assigned to care for R5 at the time of the fall or when or where R5 was last observed. R5's Progress Notes dated as below document: 11/9/22 9:20am, History of fall with seizure. R5 was seen at the local hospital on [DATE] after being found on floor lying face down and making jerking movements. R5 is to follow-up with Neurologist. To date (R5) has not yet been seen by neurology. R5 has had no additional falls or suspected seizure activity. ASSESSMENT/PLAN: Seizures -New onset -Neurology consult pending. 11/10/22 at 3:15pm, R5 found lying on R5's right side on the floor in R5's room next to R5's bed. R5's head was towards the bathroom and legs towards wall. An unidentified nurse stated R5 was exhibiting seizure activity. Laceration was noted to R5's right eyebrow and pressure was applied to stop the bleeding. Resident was initially not responding to unidentified nurse. R5 was sent to the emergency room. 11/10/22 at 6:21pm, Call placed to the hospital and was notified sutures were placed to R5's laceration. R5 is being admitted to hospital due to seizure like activity and is to see neurology. 11/11/22 at 1:32pm, R5 readmitted to the facility from the hospital. 11/15/22 at 2:22pm, R5 was hospitalized [DATE]-[DATE], for seizure (convulsive epilepsy), initially presenting after fall with head injury while at the facility. Hospital stay complications include lactic acidosis 2/2 seizure, right eyebrow laceration from falling . R5 was started on Keppra (Anti-seizure) 500 mg (milligrams) twice daily. ASSESSMENT/PLAN: Seizures -Chronic. Apparently, R5 has had convulsive epilepsy since 5/18/2011 per hospital records, now on Levetiracetam which facility will continue. Will have nursing make follow-up appointment with Neurology that R5 seen in hospital (V22). Ground Level Fall with head injury, 2/2 convulsions and eyebrow laceration with sutures. There is no documentation in R5's medical records of attempts to make an appointment for R5 to see V22, Neurologist for a week until 11/17/22. 11/17/22 at 8:49am, Facility has reached out to V22's Neurology Doctors office multiple times, and sent a referral for a new (unidentified) doctor to look at. Waiting for a response from R5's doctor's office. 11/18/22 9:13pm, Followed up with V22's office today, 11/18/2022 and they've asked to re-fax it to another fax machine due to it having lines through the fax they received and not being able to read it due to a receiving issue on their end. There is no documentation of facility follow up or appointment after 11/18/22 at 9:13pm in R5's Progress Notes until 12/6/22 at 1:32pm. On 12/19/22 at 2:00pm, V2, Director of Nursing (DON) stated V2 thinks R5 was admitted for the seizure like activity not the fall or laceration on 11/10/22. V2 stated V2 would have been made aware of a fall for R5 if there would have been one on 10/8/22. V2 stated V2 was aware of R5's seizure on 10/8/22 but was not aware R5 was found on the floor and that a fall investigation was not completed for 10/8/22. V2 stated V2 believed the facility attempted to schedule an appointment with Neurology for R5 October 8th or later, but V2 does not make the appointments so V2 was unsure. V2 stated attempts to make an appointment and appointments that are scheduled would be documented in the progress notes. V2 stated V2 did not see documentation of an attempt to schedule an appointment or that an appointment had been scheduled for R5 with a Neurologist between 10/8/22 and 11/17/22. V2 was unsure of which staff were taking care of R5 on 11/10/22 at 3:15pm. R5 usually walks up and down halls all hours of the day so staff may not have known where R5 was just before the fall. 2. The facility's Fall Investigation documents a report dated 11/12/22 at 4:10pm documenting a 2nd shift CNA (unidentified) reported R2 was on the floor to V19, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). R2 was sitting up against the side of R2's bed. R2 told V19 that R2 was trying to get up to use the bathroom. R2 had a hematoma with blood to the back of R2's head. R2 was sent to the hospital for a head injury. R2 was educated on the use of R2's call light to transfer with assistance. This investigation does not document a completed/final investigation report. There is no documentation of interviews with additional staff who were working at the time of R2's fall. This investigation does not document when R2 had last been observed, what R2 was observed doing prior to R2's fall or when R2 had last been offered assistance with toileting. This investigation also documents R2 has a gait imbalance, depression, forgets to use call light and needed to go to the bathroom. This investigation is incomplete and does not document when and where R2 was last observed or when R2 had last been toileted. There is no documentation of interviews with additional staff working with R2 at the facility during this fall. There is no documentation of a root cause of R2's fall on 11/12/22 in this investigation. R2's Progress Notes document: R2's Fall Investigation report dated 11/13/22 documents V19, LPN was informed by an unidentified CNA that R2 had fallen from R2's bed to the floor on R2's knees trying to transfer R2's self in to R2's wheelchair on 11/13/22 at 10:00am. This report documents R2 stated R2 tried to get up. This report documents R2 was not having pain and non-skid socks were placed on R2 and put her on 1:1 for the day to prevent any future falls/injuries. This report documents fracture before fall and predisposing factors including recent change in cognition, improper footwear and increased agitation. This report documents R2 is non-compliant with using the call light/asking for help when transferring. There is no documentation of a witness statement from the CNA (unidentified) who found R2. There is no documentation of when R2 was last offered to be toileted or seen or where R2 was last observed. There is no documentation as to if R2's call light was within reach. There is no documentation of a root cause of this fall. R2's Progress Notes document: 11/14/2022 11:59am Fall Follow Up, IDT note: IDT team met regarding recent falls. On 11/12 resident fell transferring herself to the bathroom but does not document when R2 was last toileted or last observed. Intervention will be to re-educate to use the call light for assistance to the bathroom. On 11/13/22, R2 fell again transferring from the bed to the wheelchair. There is no documentation of why R2 was trying to get up when R2 transferred R2's self on 11/13/22. 11/14/22 at 5:05pm, R2's Knee immobilizer to the right lower extremity with weight bearing as tolerated for closed fracture of right fibula. R2 reports some continued discomfort in right leg starting from the knee down. R2 is currently in wheelchair and is weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT). R2's Fall investigation report documents R2 had a fall on 11/15/22 at 1:20pm. This report documents V13, LPN was called to R2's room by an unidentified CNA stating R2 had fallen. R2 was observed laying on R2's right side near the dresser/closet. R2 stated R2 hit R2's head. R2's immobilizer to the right lower extremity was in place. R2's wheelchair was near the window. R2 stated R2 was leaning over the chair and fell, hitting R2's head on the dresser. R2 then stated R2 hit R2's head on the floor. There is no documentation as to why R2 was leaning over the chair. This report documents sutures intact to laceration on posterior head from previous incident. Floor mat placed next to R2's bed. Re-educated to use call light for staff assistance. This report documents R2 has poor safety awareness and exhibits balance and impulsive behavior impairments. This report documents R2 forgets to use the call light and fracture before the fall and R2 requires frequent reminders to sit upright in the wheelchair. This report documents V23, CNA stated V23 had been in R2's room a few minutes prior to the fall but does not document why V23 was in R2's room nor when R2 was last offered/provided with toileting. V23 stated V23 was alerted by another resident (unidentified) that R2 was on the floor. There is no documentation of a root cause of R2's fall on 11/15/22. R2's Progress Notes document: 11/17/2022 11:28 Fall Follow Up: It was discussed with R2, R2's disbelief in requesting assistance of staff for transfers. R2 stated R2 wishes to continue as much independence as possible. R2 was informed that there were high risks to this decision including severe head trauma, increased risk for another fracture, and possible death. R2 verbalized understanding and continues to state R2's wishes. This note documents R2 is cognitively intact. There is no documentation of the facility's attempts to provide preventative oversight to check on R2 regarding toileting, etc. 12/6/2022 11:10am Appointment note, Facility has tried to schedule hospital follow up, will continue to call and try and schedule. There is no documentation of previous attempts to attempt to schedule hospital follow-up or with which physician this progress note refers to. On 12/19/22 at 2:00pm, V2 stated V2 is unsure of the unidentified staff for R2's fall investigations. V2 stated V2 was unsure of why R2 was leaning over R2's chair. V2 stated V2 was unsure of toileting offering for R2. 3. R6's Fall Investigation Report documents R6 had a fall on 11/22/22 at 9:00pm. This report documents R6 was found lying on the floor on R6's left side. At this time R6 stated R6 slipped out of R6's bed on to the floor because R6 was trying to get up. This investigation does not document R6's use of narcotic, anticoagulation, antihypertensive, Antipsychotic, antidepressant or diuretic medication use. This fall investigation report does not document a thorough investigation as to why R6 was attempting to get up, if call light was within reach or if the call light had been activated. There is not a statement from staff as to when R6 was last observed, was last provided with incontinence care or a root cause of R6's fall. R6's Progress Notes do not document R6's details on R6's fall on 11/22/22 at 9:00pm. R6's Progress Notes document: 11/23/2022 at 9:58am, the Interdisciplinary Team met to discuss recent fall. R6 has an acute infection, COVID 19, and has increased weakness. New intervention is to apply bolsters. Will reevaluate with resident returns to baseline strength. 11/23/22 at 4:02pm, Recent fall (2 days ago), no injury. Trying to get a cat. No cat in room according to staff. R6 does not recall this. R6 remembers climbing out of bed but denies seeing cat. Second bed placed up against R6's bed per staff to prevent falling out of bed. There is no documentation of an investigation with intervention of a second bed being placed or a fall with documentation of hallucinations. On 12/13/22 at 2:57pm, R6 stated R6 had a fall recently (unable to recall date/time) in the facility due to R6's bed being slippery. R6 stated R6 doesn't remember exactly what was happening, but R6 slipped off R6's bed on to the floor. R6 said if R6 wears pants/clothes in R6's bed, R6 slides all over because the mattress is slippery. R6 stated R6 was not hurt when the fall happened. On 12/19/22 at 2:00pm, V2 stated V2 did not complete the fall investigation for R6's fall on 11/22/22. V2 stated V2 did not see a root cause documented in the investigation for V2's fall on 11/22/22. On 12/19/22 at 3:00pm, the facility's policies and procedures regarding Falls/Fall Investigations/Prevention of Falls was requested from V2, Director of Nursing (DON). As of 12/19/22 at 5:52pm, this policy had not been provided by V2 or the facility.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment with respect and dignity for one (R4) of three residents reviewed for abuse on the sample list of seven. Findings include...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment with respect and dignity for one (R4) of three residents reviewed for abuse on the sample list of seven. Findings include: The facility's final abuse investigation report dated 12/09/22 documents there was an allegation of abuse made on 12/4/22 at 8:15 PM. This report documents V6 Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) reported an allegation that V28 (CNA) was verbally abusive to R4 during cares. On 12/19/22 at 10:33 AM, V6 stated V6 did report an allegation of verbal abuse. V6 stated on the evening of 12/4/22, V6 and V28 were assisting R4 with care. V28 told R4 that R4 needed to be a mechanical lift because R4 couldn't do anything with her legs. V28 then told R4, I'm going to knock you out and knock some sense into you. V6 stated V28 also told R4 that R4 needed to clean her teeth because they were nasty. On 12/19/22 at 11:00 AM, R4 stated she remembers the incident with V28. R4 stated V28 is a newer CNA to the facility. R4 stated V28 was helping R4 with care and was saying things that were inappropriate. R4 stated V28 said to her, You can't even walk and You can't do anything. R4 stated R4 refused to let V28 take out R4's teeth and V28 told R4, that is nasty, your teeth are dirty. R4 stated V6 heard V28 saying those things so V6 told V28 to leave the room and that V28 was upsetting R4. R4 stated then V28 left and came back and tried to apologize but R4 was mad and didn't want to hear it. R4 stated she hasn't seen her since. R4 stated she felt like she was being disrespectful and abusive. R4 denied hearing V28 saying, I'm going to knock you out and knock some sense into you. R4's Incident note dated 12/9/2022 at 9:00 AM documents, (Interdisciplinary Team) met to discuss allegation of verbal abuse to (R4) by CNA. The investigation concluded no threats were made to (R4) but she did receive poor customer services by the CNA. On 12/19/22 at 10:10 AM, V1 Administrator stated she investigated the allegation of abuse of R4 by V28. V1 stated R4 denied ever hearing V28 say V28 was going to knock her out. V1 stated R4 gets very sensitive about R4's physical capabilities. V1 stated R4 was upset because V28 was going to make R4 use the mechanical lift and made comments about not being able to do things. V1 stated the result of the investigation was that V28 provided R4 with poor customer service and was given a verbal write up.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility denied a resident the right to refuse medical testing by staff physically attempting to obtain a nasal swab sample from the resident. This failure af...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility denied a resident the right to refuse medical testing by staff physically attempting to obtain a nasal swab sample from the resident. This failure affects one of three residents (R3) reviewed for abuse allegations on the sample of seven. Findings include: The facility's Resident Rights policy dated December 2022 documents the purpose of the policy is to promote the exercise of rights for each resident. These rights include the resident's right to exercise his or her rights, choose a treatment and participate in decisions and care planning. This policy documents, exercising rights means that residents have autonomy and choice, to the maximum extent possible, about how they wish to live their everyday lives and receive care, subject to the facility's rules, as long as those rules do not violate a regulatory requirement. The facility's Final Abuse Investigation Report dated 11/30/22 documents R3's diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Hemiparesis, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Vascular Dementia. On 11/22/22 at 7:55am, R3 reported V4 and V5, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) were physically aggressive when performing COVID-19 nasal swab testing. R3 reported staff held R3's arms and tested R3. This investigation report documents V7, Activity Director stated R3 refused testing and that V7 later approached R3 again with V5, CNA. V7 stated V7 and V5 were attempting to hold R3's hands to keep him from hitting staff. This investigation documents R3 reported that V4, V5 and V7 held R3's arms and made R3 take the COVID test. R3 had refused the COVID test. This report documents V5, CNA stated R3 had refused to have COVID-19 testing performed and V5 and V7 attempted to have R3 perform the swabbing collection for the sample R3's self but R3 threw the swab on the floor. The facility's investigation for R3 refusing to have a nasal swab sample obtained for COVID-19 testing documents the following interviews: 11/22/22, R3's Abuse Allegation Interview sheet documents, The CNA's made (R3) take the COVID test. The CNA's held (R3's) arms. This sheet documents R3 reported two CNA's held R3's arms and another staff member tried to swab R3's nose. This sheet documents V5 and V6 held R3's hand/arm to try to get the test while V7 tried to swab R3's nose to collect the sample for the test. 11/22/22, V7, Activity Director Staff Interview sheet documents, V7 was assisting with COVID-19 testing on 11/21/22 at 4:30pm when V7 when tried to perform a test on R3 and R3 said no. This sheet documents V7, Activity Director notified V17, Registered Nurse (RN) who told V7, (R3) can't refuse because too many people are sick. This sheet also documents V7 stated V7 did not think V5, V6 CNA's or V7 did anything wrong since V17 stated R3 could not refuse to be tested. 11/22/22, V5, CNA Staff Interview sheet documents V5 stated, on 11/21/22 at 4:30pm, V5 was asked to assist with COVID-19 testing by V7, Activity Director. V5 explained why R3 needed the test and R3 said no. V5's interview sheet documents R3 was offered to complete the swab specimen collection by R3's self and R3 threw the swab on the floor. This sheet documents V5 stated V17, Registered Nurse (RN) stated residents can't refuse to test. This sheet documents R3 became physically aggressive with staff and V6, CNA was asked to assist. This sheet documents V5 and V6 held (R3's) hands to avoid being hit. R3 was shaking R3's head and the staff couldn't get the swab and staff left the room. V5's statement documents V5 notified V1, Administrator that R3 refused to have COVID-19 testing. 11/22/22 V17, RN's Staff Interview sheet documents V17 stated V17 would have told staff R3 could not refuse to have COVID-19 sample collection completed. This sheet documents R3 was mad at having to COVID test. 11/23/22, V6, CNA Staff Interview sheet documents V6 stated on 11/21/22 at 4:30pm V5 and V6, CNA's were assisting with COVID-19 specimen collection/testing. R3 said no and V5 told V6 that V17, Registered Nurse said R3 had to test. This interview sheet documents R3 was trying to hit staff and V6 held R3's hand in V6's hand and R3 was shaking (R3's) head. This sheet documents V7, Activities Director tried to swab R3 but did not get (the swab collection device) in R3's nose all the way. This sheet documents staff were doing what they were supposed to. On 12/19/22 at 1:30pm, V1, Administrator stated R3 has the right to refuse COVID-19 testing and should have been allowed to do so. V1 stated V7 was unaware R3 was able to refuse testing and that is why V7 continued to collect a sample from R3 to test. The facility's Interim COVID-19 Testing - Residents and Staff dated October 2022 documents informed consent for resident testing may be verbally obtained from the resident. This policy documents residents (or resident representatives) may exercise their right to decline COVID-19 testing.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical restraints by staff physically holding the resident to obtain a nasal swab for COVID testing. This...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical restraints by staff physically holding the resident to obtain a nasal swab for COVID testing. This failure affects one of three residents (R3) reviewed for abuse allegations on the sample of seven. Findings include: The facility's Final Abuse Investigation Report dated 11/30/22 documents R3's diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Hemiparesis, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Vascular Dementia. On 11/22/22 at 7:55am, R3 reported allegations of physical abuse by V5, V6 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) and V7, Activity Director. R3 reported staff held R3's arms and tested R3 (for COVID). This investigation report documents V7, Activity Director stated R3 refused testing and that V7 later approached R3 again with V5, CNA. V7 stated V7 and V5 were attempting to hold R3's hands to keep him from hitting staff while a sample was being collected. This investigation documents R3 reported that V5, V6 and V7 held R3's arms and made R3 COVID test after R3 had continued to refuse the COVID test. This report documents V5, CNA stated R3 had refused to have COVID-19 testing performed. The facility's Abuse Allegation Investigation for R3 being physically restrained while refusing to have a nasal swab sample obtained for COVID-19 testing documents the following interviews: 11/22/22, R3's Abuse Allegation Interview sheet documents, The CNA's made (R3) COVID test. The CNA's held (R3's) arms. This sheet documents R3 reported two CNA's held R3's arms and another staff member tried to swab R3's nose. This sheet documents V5 and V6 held R3's hand/arm to try to get the test while V7 tried to swab R3's nose to collect the sample for the test. 11/22/22, V7, Activity Director Staff Interview sheet documents V7 was assisting with COVID-19 testing on 11/21/22 at 4:30pm when V7 when to perform a test on R3 and R3 said no. This sheet documents V7, Activity Director notified V17, Registered Nurse (RN) who told V7 (R3) can't refuse because too many people are sick. This sheet also documents V7 stated V7 did not think V5, V6 CNA's or V7 did anything wrong since V17 stated R3 could not refuse to be tested. 11/22/22, V5, CNA Staff Interview sheet documents V5 stated that on 11/21/22 at 4:30pm, V5 was asked to assist with COVID-19 testing by V7, Activity Director. V5 explained why R3 needed the test and R3 said no. V5's interview sheet documents R3 was offered to complete the swab specimen collection per R3's self and R3 threw the swab on the floor. This sheet documents V5 stated V17, Registered Nurse (RN) stated residents can't refuse to test. This sheet documents R3 became physically aggressive with staff and V6, CNA was asked to assist. This sheet documents V5 and V6 held (R3's) hands to avoid being hit. R3 was shaking R3's head and the staff couldn't get the swab and staff left the room. 11/22/22 V17, RN's Staff Interview sheet documents V17 stated V17 would have told staff R3 could not refuse to have COVID-19 sample collection completed. This sheet documents R3 was mad at having to COVID test. 11/23/22, V6, CNA Staff Interview sheet documents V6 stated on 11/21/22 at 4:30pm V5 and V6, CNA's were assisting with COVID-19 specimen collection/testing. R3 said no and V5 told V6 that V17, Registered Nurse said R3 had to test. This interview sheet documents R3 was trying to hit staff and V6 held R3's hand in V6's hand and R3 was shaking (R3's) head. This sheet documents V7, Activities Director tried to swab R3 but did not get (the swab collection device) in R3's nose all the way. This sheet documents staff were doing what they were supposed to. On 12/19/22 at 12:35 PM, when asked if R3 felt abused when being held down for the COVID testing R3 nodded yes. On 12/19/22 at 3:58pm, V1, Administrator stated the facility V5 and V6, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and V7, Activities Director did not recognize holding R3's hands to keep staff from getting hit was considered abuse. V1 stated V1 educated V5, V6 and V7 on resident rights and what types of incidents are considered abuse. The facility's Abuse Policy dated April 2022 documents the resident has the right to be free from abuse including physical restraint.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report incident of physical abuse to Administrator and failed to report incident to State Survey Agency within 2 hours of the i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report incident of physical abuse to Administrator and failed to report incident to State Survey Agency within 2 hours of the incident. These failures affect one of three residents (R3) reviewed for abuse allegations on the sample of seven. Findings include: The facility's Final Abuse Investigation Report dated 11/30/22 documents R3's diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Hemiparesis, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Vascular Dementia. On 11/22/22 at 7:55am, R3 reported to V1, Administrator an allegation of physical abuse by V4, V5 and V6, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA's) and V7, Activity Director. R3 was assessed and noted to have an alteration in skin integrity to the right finger, requiring R3 to be sent to the emergency room where R3 received two sutures to close the laceration to R3's finger on R3's right hand. R3 reported V4 and V5, CNA's were physically aggressive when performing COVID testing. R3 reported staff held R3's arms and tested R3. R3 also reported later that night, V4, CNA came in and took R3's white board from R3 and R3 took it back resulting in an alteration in skin integrity to R3's right forefinger. This investigation report documents V7 stated R3 refused testing and later approached R3 again with V5, CNA. V7 stated R3 was attempting to throw the remote control at staff and jerking/tossing R3's communication board and pushing the intravenous (IV) pole toward staff. V7 stated V7 and V5 attempting to hold R3's hands to keep him from hitting staff. This investigation documents R3 reported that V4, V5 and V7 held R3's arms and made R3 COVID test. The facility's investigation documents the following interviews: 11/22/22, R3's interview sheet documents R3 stated the CNA's held R3's arms and made R3 COVID test. R3 stated two CNA's (V5 and V6) held R3's arm and another person (V7, Activity Director) tried to swab R3's nose. This sheet documents later that day V4 went in to R3's room and took R3's communication board out of R3's hand and R3 took it back and R3's finger got cut. 11/22/22, V5, CNA interview sheet documents on 11/21/22 at 4:30pm, V5 was asked to assist with attempting to perform a COVID test on R3. R3 refused and was offered to collect the sample with the swab on R3's own and R3 threw the swab on the floor. R3 became physically aggressive and V6, CNA was asked to assist. This sheet documents V5 and V6, CNA held (R3's) hands to avoid being hit. This sheet documents at 7:00pm, V5 was observing R3's room from the hall due to earlier incident when V4 and V6 went in to R3's room to change R3. This interview documents V4 asked R3 for R3's white board (communication board) and R3 refused to give it to V4. V4 took the white board and R3 pulled it back from V4. This interview documents V5 did not think V5 holding R3's hands was abuse because V5 held R4's hands to avoid being hit. This interview documents everyone thought they were doing the right thing since V17, Registered Nurse (RN) told staff R3 could not refuse to have testing completed. 11/22/22, V4, CNA interview sheet documents R3 was upset with staff due to the COVID swab earlier in the day. This sheet documents V4 and V6, CNA's went to R3's room to change R3 and V4 asked V6 to take R3's communication board as a precaution due to R3 swinging and trying to hit staff with the board previously. V6 attempted to move the board but R3 took the board and swung it back like R3 was going to hit V4 and V6. This sheet documents V4 stated V4 picked it back up and R3 grabbed it again and tried to hit V4 with the board. This interview documents, R3 cut R3's finger when V4 tried to remove the communication from R3. This sheet documents this incident with R3's communication board happened on 11/21/22 at 7:00pm. 11/23/22, V6, CNA interview sheet documents on 11/21/22 at 4:30pm, V5 and V6, CNA's were assisting with COVID testing and R3 said, no to having a sample collected to test for COVID. This sheet documents V6 said V6 held R3's hand in V6's hand to avoid getting hit by R3 and that R3 was shaking R3's head. This sheet documents on 11/21/22 at 7:00pm, V4 and V6 went in to R3's room to change R3 and V4 had asked V6 to move R3's communication board and R3 would not give it to V6. R3 swung the board and V4 took the board. V6 stated V6 did not report the incidents as V6 didn't think any abuse happened. 11/23/22, V12, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) interview sheet documents V4, CNA told V12 that R3 was bleeding. V12 tried to get the bleeding to stop when V4, CNA came in to help. This sheet documents when V4 came in to help with R3, R3 became upset so V12 had V4 leave R3's room and had another unidentified staff member come to assist V12 with R4. The facility's email documenting State Survey Agency notification was on 11/22/22 at 9:17am, the morning after of both incidents had occurred (11/21/22 at 4:30pm and 11/21/22 at 7:00pm). On 12/19/22 at 2:00pm, V1, Administrator stated V1 expects any staff witnessing physical restraint or abuse of a resident to report it immediately to V1. V1 stated V5, V6 and V7 did not recognize the incident as abuse so that is why it was not reported to V1. The facility's Abuse Policy dated April 2022 documents the residents have the right to be free from abuse, including physical restraint and physical abuse. This policy documents employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse or mistreatment they observe, hear about or suspect to the Administrator immediately or to an immediate supervisor who must then report it to the facility Administrator of Administrator designee in the absence of the Administrator. Employees may also independently report allegations of abuse or mistreatment to the State Survey Agency. This policy documents all allegations involving abuse or mistreatment are reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Drug Regimen Review (Tag F0756)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on pharmacy alerts for potential severe drug to drug interactions for one of three residents (R5) reviewed for falls on the sampl...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on pharmacy alerts for potential severe drug to drug interactions for one of three residents (R5) reviewed for falls on the sample of seven. Findings include: R5's Physician's Orders dated 10/7/22 document medication orders including Buspirone (Antianxiety) 15mg (milligrams) three times daily for a diagnosis of Anxiety and Escitalopram Oxalate (Antidepressant) 20mg by mouth daily for a diagnosis of Depressive Disorder. R5's Progress Notes dated 10/7/22 document two potential severe drug to drug interactions with two medications including Buspirone HCl Tablet 15 MG (milligrams) and Escitalopram Oxalate Tablet 20 MG. These notes document the potential severe drug interaction of additive serotonergic effects may occur during coadministration of Buspirone and Escitalopram Oxalate Tablet 20MG, and the risk of developing serotonin syndrome may be increased. There is no documentation of follow up with V27, R5's Physician for this potential severe drug interaction alert. On 12/19/22 at 3:15pm, V2, Director of Nursing stated R5 has a progress note dated 10/10/22 to continue current medications, but there is no documentation of a follow up related specifically to the medication alert from 10/7/22 between Buspirone and Escitalopram. V2 stated V2 is unsure of who is responsible for following up on pharmacy drug to drug potential interaction alerts.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enough nurse staffing were working. These failu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enough nurse staffing were working. These failures have the potential to affect all 81 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: On 12/4/22, the facility's Nursing Daily Schedule documents V9, LPN worked 7:00am to 11:00pm, V12, LPN worked 7:00pm to 7:00am and V10, LPN worked from 7:00pm to 7:00am. V9, LPN's Time Card Report documents V9 worked on 12/4/22 from 6:50am to 11:15pm. V10's Time Card Report documents V10 worked on 12/4/22 from 8:38pm to 12/5/22 at 8:48am. V11, LPN's Time Card Report documents V11 worked on 12/4/22 from 3:14pm to 7:29pm. There is no documentation there was a nurse in addition to V9, LPN who worked on 12/4/22 at 7:29pm to 12/4/22 at 8:38pm when V10, LPN came in to work, leaving V9 the only nurse caring for the facility for over an hour. V12, LPN's Time Card Report does not document V12 worked on 12/4/22 7:00pm to 7:00am as listed on the facility's Nursing Daily Schedule, leaving V10, LPN the only nurse for the entire facility for over seven hours from 11:15pm when V9 left until 6:46am when V3 and V13, LPN's Time Cards document they came in to work on 12/5/22. Per V3, V14 and V12's Time Card Reports, on 12/6/22 V3, LPN worked from 6:47am-11:17pm. On 12/6/22, V14, LPN worked 6:08pm to 8:54pm. V12, LPN worked 11:04pm - 7:17am. There was only one nurse, V3, LPN from 8:54pm until 11:04pm when V12 came in to work, leaving one nurse for the entire facility for 2 hours. The facility Time Card Reports dated 12/11/22 documents V9, LPN was the only nurse to be working at the facility on 12/11/22 from 11:13pm to 12/12/22 at 6:47am when V17, Registered Nurse (RN) came in to work. On 12/13/22 at 2:25pm, V1, Administrator stated the following: V12, LPN worked in the facility as the only nurse for a few hours on 12/6/22, V12 was the only nurse working in the facility on 12/8/22 from 2am to 7am On 12/13/22 at 2:39pm, V1, Administrator stated V12, LPN was a No call/No show and did not work on 12/4/22. On 12/12/22 at 2:05pm, V1, Administrator stated V8, Registered Nurse (RN) was supposed to come in at 3:00am on 12/12/22 but called off. V1 stated the facility forgot to document this on the facility's Nursing Daily Schedule. On 12/13/22 at 11:10am, V1, Administrator stated the facility has had a couple of no call/no shows occur, but just this weekend. V1 stated there are multiple staff that should be clocking in while working but V1 would have to check on it. V1 stated V24, Human Resources enters extra hours of staff who are salaried if they work the floor in addition to their salaried hours. V1, Administrator stated V25 and V26, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) should be clocking in. V26 was a no call/no show on 12/4/22 even though V26 had picked the shift up. V12, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) has called off sick several days. V11, LPN who was the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stepped down effective 12/1. V2, Director of Nursing (DON) had COVID-19 and was off work. V1, Administrator stated V1 posts for agency, sometimes there are pickups, others not. V1 stated the approval was just completed for two additional agency company's. V1 stated the facility is offering sign on bonuses, for nurse management, nurses and CNA's. V1 stated on 12/8/22 evening/night shift, there was one nurse, V12, LPN was left to care for all residents in the facility for around 3 hours. On 12/10/22 V12, LPN told V1 that V12 was doing cares and passing medications on 12/8/22, trying to help the CNA's. V1 stated on 12/11/22 V9, LPN was only nurse for about eight hours overnight until the next morning (12/12/22) when day shift staff came in due to V8, RN calling off. On 12/13/22 at 3:00pm, V4, CNA stated staffing for night shift is bad right now. V4 stated V4 had multiple complaints from residents, including R1 that were brought to V4 from over the past weekend regarding the facility not having enough staff including nurses, especially evenings and night shifts. On 12/13/22 at 3:10pm, R1 stated the residents must wait long times for cares to be completed due to not enough staff. R1 stated sometimes up to an hour to hour and a half wait times, especially on night shift. R1 also stated there are often times where there is only one nurse to provide care for all of the residents residing in the facility and R1 has to wait for the nurse for certain needs. On 12/13/22 at 3:30pm, V11, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated it is not safe for one nurse to be working taking care of over 80 residents in the facility. V11 stated only having one nurse to care for the special needs physically and behaviorally the residents require and heavy care is not safe. The facility's Facility assessment dated [DATE], documents the average daily census of the facility as 84 residents. This assessment documents the common diagnoses of residents of the facility including Psychosis, Impaired Cognition, Mental Disorder, Depression, Bipolar Disorders, as well as residents with behaviors that need intervention. This assessment also documents multiple other comorbidities requiring cares for residents including Neurological System, Musculoskeletal, Respiratory and Infectious Disease. This assessment documents the range of residents requiring Behavioral Healthcare Needs to be 20-30 residents and types of cares including fall prevention. This assessment documents the facility's staffing plan including the needs may change based on census and the acuity of care the residents require. The assessment documents the range of Licensed nurses providing direct care to be 3 to 4 nurses on day shift and 1 to 2 nurses on night shift. The facility's email dated 12/19/22 at 3:44pm documents the facility census on 12/12/22 of 81 residents in the facility.
Nov 2022 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their Abuse Prohibition Prevention Policy by failing to document past employment reference checks were initiated prior to a prosp...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their Abuse Prohibition Prevention Policy by failing to document past employment reference checks were initiated prior to a prospective employee starting a work schedule. This failure affects R1 and R2, two of eighteen residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 28. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Policy dated April 2022 documents the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This policy documents the facility will conduct pre-employment screening of potential employees and that the facility will initiate a reference check from previous employers prior to a new employee starting a work schedule. The facility's Preliminary 24 hour Abuse Investigation Report documents on 10/27/22 at 11:30am, V5, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) reported an allegation of physical and verbal abuse between staff members V3 and V4, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) and R1. The facility's Preliminary 24 hour Abuse Investigation Report dated 10/29/22 documents at approximately 12:05pm, V7, Activities Director reported an allegation of verbal abuse by a staff member (V6, CNA) towards R2. The facility's Verbal Abuse Investigation for the verbal abuse allegation documents a statement dated 10/31/22 by V6, Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) written interview sheet documents V6 was working a different hall than R2 resides on. V6 was taking the garbage out and heard yelling. V6 stated R2 was getting loud with V8, Laundry Aide. V6 stated V6 touched R2's shoulder and R2 flinched like (R2) was going to hit (V6). V6 told R2 if R2 did not calm down, V6 would have to call the police. V6 stated R2 was calling V6 a (expletive). V6 stated V6 told R2 try that with police and that V6 was talking about the police, not R2 when V6 was saying don't get beat up. There is no documentation in V3, V4 or V6's Employee files documenting at the time of hire, the facility initiated reference checks with previous employers. On 11/22/22 at 4:10pm, V1, Administrator stated V1 was unsure of who is responsible for completing reference checks with previous employers upon hire, but thinks V19, Human Resources (HR) completes them. V1 stated V1 is unsure of where the facility documents the initiation of reference checks with previous employers and would check with V19 and if found would provide the documentation. The facility was unable to provide the documentation of the initiation of the reference checks. V1 stated staff help out throughout the facility as needed.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure R2 was free from mental abuse by an employee and R3 was not subjected to verbal abuse by R2. R2 and R3 are two of eighteen residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure R2 was free from mental abuse by an employee and R3 was not subjected to verbal abuse by R2. R2 and R3 are two of eighteen residents (R2, R3, R15, R17) reviewed for abuse allegations on the sample of 28. Findings include: 1.) The facility's Preliminary 24 hour Abuse Investigation Report dated 10/29/22 documents at approximately 12:05pm, V7, Activities Director reported an allegation of mental abuse by a staff member (V6) towards R2. This report documents R2 is cognitively intact with diagnoses including Intermittent Explosive Disorder. The investigation for the Verbal Abuse Allegation for R2 and V6 documents staff interviews as follows: 10/31/22 - V8, Laundry Aide stated V8 had been looking for a blanket that belonged to another (unidentified) resident. V8 stated V8 saw the blanket on (R2) & took it. R2 was calling V8 a (expletive) and V6, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) curse words. R2 stood up to V9, Housekeeper and told V9 R2 would knock (V9's) (expletive) out. V6 told R2 if R2 hit V6, V6 was calling the police. 10/31/22 V9, Housekeeper stated V8, Laundry Aide took a blanket from R2 because it was not R2's. R2 snatched the blanket. R2 called V8 a (expletive) and R2 stood up and squared up with V9. V9 had told R2 to not go in to the room due to spilled bleach and told R2 to sit back down in R2's wheelchair and R2 did. V9 stated V6, CNA told R2, Don't get beat up; Don't get beat up; Don't get beat up and threatened to call the police twice. R2 began yelling again. This staff interview documents V6 was never involved until (V6) came down the hallway. 10/31/22 V7, Activity Director documents V7 overheard V6 say to R2, don't get beat up, you don't want to get beat up as well as I will call the cops. 10/31/22 V10, CNA's written interview documents V6 told R2 to sit down or R2 would get beat up and V6 threatened to call the cops on R2. V10's written statement documents the comments provoked R2 and that R2 is usually pretty calm. 10/31/22 V11, Housekeeper's written staff interview documents V6 walked down and said to R2, don't get beat up, don't get beat up. 10/31/22 V6, CNA's written interview sheet documents V6 was working a different hall than R2 resides on. V6 stated V6 took the garbage out and heard yelling. V6 stated R2 was getting loud with V8, Laundry Aide and V6 tried to help calm R2 down. V6 stated V6 touched R2's shoulder and R2 flinched like (R2) was going to hit (V6). V6 told R2 if R2 did not calm down, V6 would have to call the police. V6 stated R2 was calling V6 a (expletive). V6 stated V6 told R2 try that with police and that V6 was talking about the police, not R2 when V6 was saying don't get beat up. 10/31/22 R2's interview documents R2 was going back to R2's room. V8 took R2's blanket saying it belonged to someone else. R2 told V8 to get R2 another blanket and make R2's bed. V8 stated to R2 that V8 did not make beds. V9 was in R2's room due to spilled bleach. R2 stood up and showed R2 could fight if R2 had to. V6 came by and told R2, don't get beat up and threatened to call the police. The facility's email documenting the final report for the verbal abuse allegation between V6 and R2 documents the facility emailed the report to the State Survey Agency on 11/4/22 at 5:30pm. This report documents conclusion and actions taken including R2 reported an allegation of verbal abuse by V6, CNA. This report documents staff that were interviewed indicated V6 was escalating R2 as R2 was having an explosive outburst instead of using appropriate de-escalation techniques or leaving the situation. V6 was suspended and then terminated by the facility. On 11/22/22 at 2:30pm, R2 stated V8 and R2 were in the middle of discussing a blanket R2 had been using and R2 was upset. R2 stated R2 told V8 it was not cool that V8 was taking the blanket from R2. R2 stated R2 asked V8 to get R2 another blanket and R2 was getting frustrated and stood up to another staff member due to them making a comment you're lucky you're in that chair old man. R2 stated V6, CNA then came down the hall where this incident was occurring and kept repeating and taunting R2, don't get beat up and threatened multiple times to call the police on R2. On 11/22/22 at 4:10pm V1, Administrator stated V6, CNA stated V6 reported to V1 that V6 was trying to help de-escalate R2 by commenting multiple times don't get beat up and threatening to call the police on R2, but what V6 was repeatedly saying was inappropriate and escalated R2. V1 stated the verbal abuse incident did occur between V6 and R2 as there were multiple witnesses to the incident and that V6 was terminated. 2.) The facility's Preliminary 24-Hour Abuse Investigation Report documents on 11/7/22 at 8:30am, R2 and R3 were involved in a verbal abuse altercation. The facility's verbal abuse allegation investigation between R2 and R3 documents interviews as follows: 11/11/22- V12, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated V12 heard R2 yelling but did not hear what R2 was saying. R3 was standing by the kitchen and V12 asked R3 what was wrong and R3 replied (R2) but did not report any details. 11/11/22 V13, Cook's interview documents V13 heard R2 talking loudly but could not hear what R2 said. V13 went and got V14, CNA to assist. V13 was unsure if it (incident) was a reportable or not since V13 could not hear what R2 said. 11/10/22 V14, CNA - V14's interview documents someone from the kitchen came to get V14 (V12) or (V13) to assist with R2 who was yelling in the dining room. V14 did not know what upset R2, but R3 said something to R2 and R2 called R3 a (expletive). V14 attempted to remove R2, but R2 refused to move and grabbed the wall. V14 sat with R2 while R2 ate to ensure there were no more problems. V14 told R3 to not engage with R2. After the meal, R2 went to R2's room. Residents: 11/11/22 - R15's interview sheet documents R15 heard R2 yelling and cursing but did not know who R2 was yelling and cursing at. 11/11/22 - R17's interview sheet documents R2 was upset because R17 was sitting in R2's place or a friends place. R3 said something and R2 called R3 a (expletive). This sheet documents CNA (unidentified) came and took care of it. 11/7/22 - R2's Interview sheet documents R2 stated R2 was talking to a staff member and R3 interrupted. R2 stated R2 told R3 that R3 was not in the conversation and called R3 a (expletive). R2 stated R2 apologized to R3 later. R2's sheet documents R2 stated staff was there when this incident occurred. R2 stated R3 always gets in other people's business. 11/7/22 - R3's Interview sheet documents R17, a new resident sat at R2's table and R2 did not want R17 sitting there. R3 told R2 there are no assigned seats and R17 could sit where R17 was. This sheet documents R3 stated R2 stated to R3, You're not involved, stay out of it (expletive). This sheet documents R3 stated R2 says mean things to people and R3 stays away from R2. On 11/22/22 at 1:45pm, R3 stated R17 was sitting at the dining room table where R2 and R2's friends usually sit. R3 stated R3 told R2 there were no longer assigned seats in the dining room. R3 stated R2 started yelling and called R3 a expletive. R3 stated V14, CNA came and told R2 to be quiet. R3 stated R2 is mean to R3 and bullies everyone. R3 stated R2 eventually apologized to R3, but R3 was not accepting the apology because R3 knows it will keep happening. R3 stated R3 would just try to stay away from R2. On 11/22/22 at 2:30pm, R2 stated R2 and R3 typically get along, but R3 likes to get in other people's business. R2 stated R2 did get into it verbally with R3, but was unable to remember the details.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation of resident property for three residents (R4, R5, R6), failed to report an allegation of resident-to...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation of resident property for three residents (R4, R5, R6), failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident verbal abuse for two residents (R7, R8) and failed to report an allegation of neglect and verbal abuse for one resident (R18) of 18 residents reviewed for abuse on the sample of 28. Findings include: 1.) The facility's Grievance Forms dated as follows document: Date of Report: 9/12/22, R4 reported R4 was missing $30 from the nightstand. There is no documentation R4's report of allegation of misappropriation of R4's money was reported to V1, Administrator or the State Survey Agency. Date of Report: 9/28/22, R4 reported R4 had $5 stored in R4's shoe and R4 noticed $2 was missing. R4 also reported $14 has went missing in past 4 days. There is also no documentation R4's report of allegation of misappropriation of R4's money was reported to V1, Administrator or the State Survey Agency. Date of Report: 10/4/22, R6 reported R6 had $56 in R6's pant pocket, but only had $25 at the time of the report to V1, Administrator. There is no documentation this allegation of misappropriation of R6's money was reported to the State Survey Agency. Date of Report: 10/4/22 documents R5 reported R5 was missing money. This report documents R5 was missing $100. There is no documentation the State Survey Agency was notified of R5's allegation of missing money. Date of Report: 10/31/22, R8 reported R7 knocked R8's items off the side table. R8 reported R7 got very upset after R8 asked if R8 could help R7 and R7 began yelling and screaming at R8. There is no documentation V1, Administrator was notified of this allegation of verbal abuse. There is no documentation the State Survey Agency was notified of this verbal abuse allegation. On 11/21/22 at 11:15am, V1, Administrator stated V1 was unaware of R4's missing money allegation on 9/12/22 or 9/28/22. V1 stated R5 thought R5's roommate had taken it, but that R5 has tendency to say something, and it doesn't line up. V1 stated V1 did not report this allegation to the State Survey Agency. V1 stated V1 did not report the allegation of verbal abuse between R7 and R8 because it was more over an incident and that R7 got upset with R8 for R8 saying something to R7. V1 stated R7 was yelling but was unsure if it was toward/at R8. 2.) On 11/28/22 at 1:10pm, R18 discussed R18's concerns and stated R18 is in pain so many areas of R18's body. R18 stated R18 has an order for Norco (pain medicine) for every four hours as needed. R18 stated R18 tries to write down when R18 last received the pain medication so R18 knows when R18 can have it again. R18 stated R18 feels like V18, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) purposefully delays pain medication administration for R18. R18 stated the facility staff do not want to hear the allegations of abuse and that it was reported to V1, Administrator and V2, Director of Nursing but could not recall when. The facility's Abuse Allegation log provided on 11/21/22 does not document an allegation of neglect for R18 and V18, LPN. On 11/28/22 at 2:25pm, V20, Registered Nurse (RN) was notified of R18's allegation of verbal abuse against V1, Administrator. V1, Administrator walked past V20's office and V20 called V1 into the office to notify V1. V20 was also notified of R18's report of R18 believing that V18, LPN purposefully withholds R18's pain medications/delays administration of them. On 11/30/22 at 2:30pm, V1, Administrator stated the allegation of neglect of R18 by V18, LPN was not reported to the State Survey Agency on 11/28/22 within 2 hours because there were other allegations/events going on, V1 forgot to report the allegation until 11/29/22.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a thorough investigation for verbal abuse, physical abuse, and misappropriation of resident property allegations. The facility als...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a thorough investigation for verbal abuse, physical abuse, and misappropriation of resident property allegations. The facility also failed to prevent potential further abuse by an alleged perpetrator after receiving an allegation of neglect. These failures affect 9 of 18 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R18) reviewed for abuse allegations on the sample of 28. Findings include: 1.) The facility's Grievance Forms dated as follows document: Date of Report: 9/12/22, R4 reported R4 was missing $30 from the nightstand. There is no documentation of an investigation being completed. This form documents R4 was told/encouraged to not leave money in room unless it is locked up. There is no documentation R4's alleged missing money was found. Date of Report: 9/28/22, R4 reported R4 had $5 stored in R4's shoe and R4 noticed $2 was missing. R4 also reported $14 has went missing in past 4 days. This form documents the facility's Social Services Department (SSD) offered to purchase a pouch for R4's waist/wheelchair to keep money with R4 at all times. There is no documentation of an investigation for R4's missing money. There is no documentation R4's alleged missing money was found. Date of Report: 10/4/22, R6 reported R6 had $56 in R6's pant pocket, but only had $25 at the time of the report to V1, Administrator. This report documents an unidentified Power of Attorney (POA) stated R6 was given the money. This form documents unidentified certified nursing assistants and unidentified residents did not see the money. This form also documents, However resident did not spend the money at (facility) believe it fell out (R6's) pocket either going or returning from smoke break. This form documents the facility will replace missing money. There is no documentation of if/when the money was replaced. There is no documentation of an investigation or reviewing camera footage at the facility, or interviews with additional potential staff and resident witnesses who go to smoke or take residents who smoke outside. This form does not identify who the resident and staff were that were asked about R6's money. Date of Report: 10/4/22 documents R5 reported R5 was missing money. This report documents R5 appeared confused and stated R5 was missing $100 but R5 was only given $30 on 9/30/22. This report documents R5 bought stuff from the vending machine but does not document who reported this. R5 stated R5 only had $2 left. The back of this form documents R5 was sitting at a table in the dining room handing out $1 bills for people to get soda and handed out to several residents. There is no documentation of interviews with residents regarding receiving money or investigation into date or time R5 allegedly handed money out to others. Date of Report: 10/31/22, R8 reported R7 knocked R8's items off the side table. R8 reported R7 got very upset after R8 asked if R8 could help R7 and R7 began yelling and screaming at R8. This report documents R7 told R8, I'm sick of you and the way you are acting towards me. R8 stated R8 walked away and went to see the social services department. This report documents R7 admitted R7 said those things due to letting things build up with frustration with R8 and R7 getting sick of R8. This report documents R7 stated R7 would meet with therapy and ask for the social service department and will not speak in this way. There is no documentation of statements from staff/other residents/potential witnesses. On 11/21/22 at 11:15am, V1, Administrator stated V1 would report if there is something definitely happened. V1 stated staff seen money outside but did not elaborate as to if the money was on the ground, or in R6's possession. V1 stated V1 thinks the money fell out of R6's pocket and someone picked it up. V1 stated R6 also gets to snack machines at times. V1 stated V1 was not able to find R6's missing money. V1 stated V1 was unaware of R4's missing money allegation on 9/12/22 or 9/28/22. V1 stated R5 thought a previous roommate of R5 had taken it, but that R5 has tendency to say something and it doesn't line up. V1 stated V1 did not report this allegation to the State Survey Agency. V1 stated R7 was yelling but was unsure if it was toward/at R8. V1 asked at this time if V1 should do a late report on these allegations of missing money and allegation of verbal abuse. 2.) On 11/28/22 at 1:10pm, R18 discussed R18's concerns and stated R18 is in pain in many areas of R18's body. R18 stated R18 has an order for Norco (Analgesic) every four hours as needed. R18 stated R18 tries to write down when R18 last received the pain medication so R18 knows when R18 can have it again. R18 stated R18 feels like V18, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) purposefully delays pain medication administration for R18, sometimes up to an hour. R18 stated the facility staff do not want to hear the allegations of abuse and that it was reported to V1, Administrator and V2, Director of Nursing but could not recall when R18 reported the concerns. The facility's Abuse Allegation log provided on 11/29/22 documents the allegation of neglect for R18 by V18, LPN dated 11/29/22 at 2:25pm with the State Survey Agency being notified on 11/29/22 at 10:59am. The date the facility was notified by the State Survey Agency was on 11/28/22 at 2:25pm. On 11/28/22 at 2:25pm, V20, Registered Nurse (RN) was notified of R18's allegation that V18, LPN purposefully withholds R18's pain medications/delays administration of them. The facility's Time Sheets dated 11/28/22 for V18, LPN document V18 continued to work at the facility until 7:05pm. 3.) The facility's Preliminary 24-hour Abuse Investigation Report documents on 10/27/22 at 11:30am, V5, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) reported an allegation of physical and verbal abuse between staff members V3 and V4, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) and R1. The facility's Final Abuse Investigation Report dated 10/28/22 documents other staff were interviewed and report no concerns with V3 or V4. Other alert and oriented residents were interviewed and reported no concerns with V3 and V4. There is no documentation of what time the incident occurred. There is no documentation of interviews with staff other than V3, V4, and V5, LPN regarding inappropriate interactions with V3 and V4 and residents. There is no documentation in V3 or V4's interview documenting V3 or V4 were asked about making R1 put the brief on when R1 requested to not wear one. On 11/22/22 at 4:10pm, V1, Administrator stated V1 was not in the facility the day of the allegation. V1 stated V1 was unsure of the time the allegation occurred, but thought it happened right before V5, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) V2, Director of Nursing (DON). V1 stated V1 typically interviews staff who at least worked at that time. V1 stated more staff should have been interviewed. 4.) The facility's Preliminary 24-Hour Abuse Investigation Report documents on 11/7/22 at 8:30am, R2 and R3 were involved in a verbal abuse altercation. The facility's investigation does not document the time V1, Administrator was notified of the incident. There is no documentation of time V13, [NAME] went to get V14, CNA to assist with the verbal altercation. On 11/22/22 at 4:10pm, V1 stated V1 did not document when the incident happened/occurred, just when V1 was notified. V1 was unsure of the time the verbal altercation occurred.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents Controlled Drug Administration Records were accurate and up to date. These failures affect 13 residents (R2, R5, R15, R19-...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents Controlled Drug Administration Records were accurate and up to date. These failures affect 13 residents (R2, R5, R15, R19-R28) with orders for controlled substance medications on the sample of 28. Findings include: On 11/28/22 at 2:35pm, the facility's Controlled Drug Administration Records were reviewed. During review of these records, V17, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) made statements out loud at the nurses station including V17 had signed the controlled substances out in advance of the time documented the medications were removed from several residents supply. The following residents Controlled Drug Administration Records documented controlled medications were removed and administered as follows: R2 Hydrocodone-APAP 10-325mg (milligram) tablets, take one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed. This sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 6:00pm. R5 Alprazolam 0.25mg tablets, take one tablet by mouth twice daily for anxiety. This sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. R5 Tramadol 50mg tablets, take one tablet by mouth twice daily. This sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 4:00pm. R15 Tramadol 50mg tablets, take one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed. This sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. R19 Oxycodone IR (Immediate Release) 20mg tablets, take one tablet as needed orally every 4 hours. This sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 4:00pm R20 Clonazepam 0.5mg tablets, take one tablet by mouth twice daily for Anxiety. This sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. R20 Hydrocodone-APAP 5-325mg tablets, take one tablet by mouth three times daily. This sheet documents one tablet was removed on 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. R21 Klonopin 0.5mg tablets, take one tab by mouth three times daily. This sheet documents one tablet was removed on 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. R22 Hydrocodone-APAP 10-325mg tablets, take one tablet by mouth four times daily. This sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 4:00pm. R23 Lorazepam 0.5mg tablets, take 1/2 tablet by mouth three times daily. This sheet documents one dose was removed 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. R24 Hydrocodone-APAP 7.5-325mg tablets, take one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed. This sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. R25 Tramadol 50mg tablets, take one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed. This sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. R26 Tramadol 50mg tablets, take one tablet by mouth three times daily. this sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. R26 Clonazepam 1mg tablets, take one tablet by mouth twice daily. This sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. R27 Pregabalin 50mg capsule, take one capsule by mouth three times daily for Neuropathy. This sheet documents one capsule was removed 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. R28 Tramadol 50mg tablets, take one tablet by mouth twice daily. This sheet documents one tablet was removed 11/28/22 at 5:00pm. These sheets were reviewed 11/28/22 between 2:15pm and 2:35pm and all were documented well before the time that was documented. On 11/30/22 at 2:30pm, V1, Administrator stated the nurses have been educated and know they are keep controlled drug administration records current/accurate. The facility's pharmacy policy for Controlled Substances dated August 2020 documents medications classified as controlled substances by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) are subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record keeping in the facility. Preparation of the dosage form occurs according to the medication administration policy. Accurate inventory of all controlled medications is maintained at all times. The facility's Medication Administration Policy dated January 2015 documents medications must be administered in accordance with a physician's order and may not be prepared in advance. When Class II medications are administered, the medication is accounted for on each resident's individual controlled substance record by a licensed nurse.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient numbers of nurse and nursing personnel staffing. These failures have the potential to affect all 86 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient numbers of nurse and nursing personnel staffing. These failures have the potential to affect all 86 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Facility Assessment Tool dated December 2020 through November 2021 documents the facility assessment should serve as a record for staff and management to understand the reasoning for decisions made regarding staffing and may include the operating budget necessary to carry out facility functions. This assessment does not document the number of residents the facility is licensed to care for. This assessment documents the Average Daily Census of 74 with the number of residents requiring the following activity of daily living assistance: Extensive Assistance Transfer 52 residents Toilet use 68 Bed mobility 60 Dressing 69 Dependent Transferring 12 Bathing 44 This assessment also documents the facility's general staffing plan to meet the needs of the residents at any given time including the following: Licensed Nurses 1:900 ratio days 1:40 ratio nights Direct Care Staff 1:13-15 Days and Evenings 1:25-28 Nights On 11/28/22 at 1:10pm, R18 stated R18 has to wait sometimes 30 minutes to an hour to get assistance, especially with using the bed pan, from staff due to not enough staff working. On 11/29/22 at 2:25am, the facility had V21, Registered Nurse (RN) and V22, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) working at the facility. At this time V21 stated V21 was leaving at 3:00am and there was no replacement to come in to take V21's place, leaving V22 as the only nurse to care for all residents residing in the facility. V22 confirmed the facility had three V23, V24 and V25 CNA's responsible for caring for all the residents in the facility. On 11/29/22 at 3:27am, V23 and V25 confirmed the facility had three CNA's working taking care of over 80 residents residing in the facility. V23, CNA stated it makes it nearly impossible/some nights to provide cares as residents need. Residents go without showers and sometimes staff cannot get to residents to change them timely, so residents have to wait lengthy periods of time to receive incontinence cares. On 11/29/22 at 3:34am, V21, RN left the facility for the night. On 11/29/22 4:00am- V22, LPN stated it is pretty frequent where there is one nurse after the second nurse that had worked earlier in the shift, leaves at 11pm or 3am. V22 stated the safety of the residents is compromised as in the event of an emergency with one resident, that makes the nurse unavailable should an incident or another emergency arises. On 11/30/22 at 11:25am, V14, CNA stated once in a while V14 will stay over to help due to short staffed, but V14 doesn't all the time because it is too much. A couple (unidentified) staff are suspended on evenings, so they are short. Evening and sometimes nights has been an issue. V14 stated residents have been (urine-) soaked when coming in to start day shift and when short, staff are unable to prepare residents that want to be up and ready in am because there are not enough staff to do so. On 11/30/22 at 12:20pm, V18, CNA stated Friday 11/25/22, V18 stayed over because of not having enough staff. V18 stated many residents require mechanical lifts and heavy care. You do need two CNA's in order to provide cares for most the residents in the building. V18 stated there have been times when resident's report not being changed (due to incontinence) all night and you can tell by the amount of urine on the pad/bedding, and the odor/smell. V18 also stated there at times is only one nurse working night shift. On 11/30/22 at 2:30pm, V1, Administrator stated the facility assessment should read licensed nurse ratio of 1:30 for Days and 1:40 for nights and that the nurses work 12-hour shifts. V1 stated COVID-19 had been present in the facility and staffing agencies the facility utilizes has not provided the staff needed. V1 stated there have been a few Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) who have left and one nurse. V1 stated the facility tries to keep staffing at two nurses, however there are times when there is only one nurse working in the facility. V1 stated Direct Care Staff should be 3-4 CNA's typically on nights, but sometimes that is less due to call offs. V1 stated the nurses should be working on attempting to call staff to find replacements unless they are the only nurse on the floor. V1 stated staffing one nurse for over 80 residents is not preferred, but with staffing the way it has been, one nurse has cared for the entire facility for half shifts. The facility's Census sheet with a Census Date of 11/21/22 documents 86 residents reside in the facility.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 life-threatening violation(s), 9 harm violation(s), $236,220 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 62 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $236,220 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Arcadia Care Bloomington's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ARCADIA CARE BLOOMINGTON an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Arcadia Care Bloomington Staffed?

CMS rates ARCADIA CARE BLOOMINGTON's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 56%, which is 10 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Arcadia Care Bloomington?

State health inspectors documented 62 deficiencies at ARCADIA CARE BLOOMINGTON during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 9 that caused actual resident harm, 51 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Arcadia Care Bloomington?

ARCADIA CARE BLOOMINGTON is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ARCADIA CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 115 certified beds and approximately 80 residents (about 70% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in BLOOMINGTON, Illinois.

How Does Arcadia Care Bloomington Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, ARCADIA CARE BLOOMINGTON's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (56%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Arcadia Care Bloomington?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Arcadia Care Bloomington Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ARCADIA CARE BLOOMINGTON has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Arcadia Care Bloomington Stick Around?

Staff turnover at ARCADIA CARE BLOOMINGTON is high. At 56%, the facility is 10 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Arcadia Care Bloomington Ever Fined?

ARCADIA CARE BLOOMINGTON has been fined $236,220 across 4 penalty actions. This is 6.7x the Illinois average of $35,441. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Arcadia Care Bloomington on Any Federal Watch List?

ARCADIA CARE BLOOMINGTON is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.