BRIA OF FOREST EDGE

8001 SOUTH WESTERN AVENUE, CHICAGO, IL 60620 (773) 436-6600
For profit - Limited Liability company 328 Beds BRIA HEALTH SERVICES Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#472 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

BRIA OF FOREST EDGE has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the care provided. It ranks #472 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the bottom half of the state, and #153 out of 201 in Cook County, meaning there are many better options nearby. While the facility is trending towards improvement, having reduced its issues from 25 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025, it still faces serious challenges, including $407,863 in fines, which is higher than 75% of Illinois facilities. Staffing is relatively stable, with a turnover rate of 33%, which is lower than the state average, but the overall staffing rating is poor. Specific incidents of concern include a resident being hospitalized due to unsafe temperature levels in the facility and another resident suffering multiple injuries after an attack by a fellow resident, indicating serious safety and care issues that families should consider carefully.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Illinois
#472/665
Bottom 30%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
25 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
33% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
○ Average
$407,863 in fines. Higher than 59% of Illinois facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 26 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
73 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 25 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (33%)

    15 points below Illinois average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 33%

13pts below Illinois avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $407,863

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: BRIA HEALTH SERVICES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 73 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening 6 actual harm
Apr 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (R7, R10) of five reviewed remained free from ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (R7, R10) of five reviewed remained free from abuse in a total sample of 14. This failure resulted in R7 and R10 physically abusing each other. Findings include: R7's current face sheet documents R7's medical diagnosis to include but not limited to schizophrenia, unspecified, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified, major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified, generalized anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus, delusional disorders. R7's MDS (Minimum Data Set) section C dated [DATE], documents R7's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as 15/15 indicating R7 has intact cognitive function. On 04/03/2025, at 11:47 AM, R7 was observed in his room sitting on his bed and was observed to be paranoid. R7 stated he does not have mental health issues and he should not be in this facility. R7 stated on 4/1/2025, R10 was roaming on the units and entering residents' rooms. R10 went to R7's room and was stealing R7's food which included crackers that were on top of R7's bedside drawer. R7 pointed where he had kept his food items. R7 stated R10 hit him on the head when he (R7) asked him (R10) to stop taking his food without permission. R7 stated, All bets were off, and he defended himself. R7 started punching R10 on the head and after punching R10 several times, R7 controlled himself and left his room because he did not want to hurt R10 anymore because they used to be friends. R7 stated there were no staff near to witness or monitor residents who wonder and enter other residents' rooms at that time. R7 stated he told staff what had happened. R7 then went back to his room and punched the TV with his right hand because he was so upset that staff did not prevent R10 from going into his room and eating/stealing his food. R7 was observed with several small cuts on the back his right fist which were healing and stated he sustained them after punching the TV; staff did not do anything about it. R7 stated he does not feel safe at the facility because staff do not round the units and there is no security on each floor, but he can defend himself. R7 stated he wanted to be discharged because he does not have a mental health issue to be living in the facility. R10 current face sheet documents R10's medical diagnosis to include but not limited to: schizoaffective disorder, unspecified, bipolar disorder, unspecified, major depressive disorder, single episode, unspecified, and insomnia due to medical condition. R10's MDS (Minimum Data Set) section C [DATE]dated documents R's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as 15/15 indicating R10 has intact cognitive function. R10's MDS (Minimum Data Set) section C dated [DATE], documents R10's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as 15/15 indicating R10 has intact cognitive function. On 04/03/2025, at 12:05 PM, R10 was observed walking into his room. R10 was alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation. R10 stated he and R7 were friends and on 4/1/2025 R7 told R10 that he can have some crackers that were on top of R7's drawer. R10 stated as he went to get the crackers, R7 punched R10 on the right side of his face. R10 defended himself and punched R7 on the head then R7 walked away. R10 pointed to his right side of his face and stated he did not sustain injuries and stated he did not want to talk about the incident anymore. On 04/03/2025, at 1:55 PM, V5 (Psychosocial Rehabilitative Services Director) stated on 4/1/2025, before 12:00 PM, he heard on the intercom that security was needed on the third floor. V5 rushed to the floor to see what was going on and when he got there, V5 observed R10 going into his room. Two or three staff (V5 cannot remember who) were standing outside of R7's room. V5 stated when he asked the staff what was going on, they just pointed to R7's room and did not tell R7 what was happening. V5 stated he went and spoke to R7 who stated R10 was going into R7's room and R7 asked R10 to get out of his room. V5 stated spoke to V10 who stated R7 told him (R10) to leave his room because R7 thought R10 was FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation). V5 stated he counseled R10 not to go into other residents' rooms uninvited. V5 stated V1 (administrator) is the abuse coordinator, and all abuse allegations are reported to V1 for further investigations. V5 stated any form of abuse should be reported to V1 immediately so that it can be investigated. V5 stated he did not report to V1 or investigate further what happened because he did not witness anything and the staff who were present just pointed to R7's room. On 04/03/2025, at 3:08 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated resident to resident physical or verbal altercation is a form of abuse and residents should not verbally or physically abuse each other. V1 stated if a resident report being hit by another resident, that is a form of abuse and should be investigated and reported to IDPH (Illinois Department of Health), regardless if it happened or not, because the investigation determines what really happened. V1 stated if R7 and R10's alleged altercation had been reported to him, he would have investigated the allegation to determine what happened. R7's Social Service Note dated 4/1/2025, documents V5 was notified R10 had verbal disagreement with a male peer (R10) on his unit. Staff intervened, redirected, and counseled resident (R7) to seek staff for his concerns while making use of his coping skills. Care plan dated 02/05/2025, document's R7 displays manipulative behavior that is disruptive, insensitive, and disrespectful to staff and peers. This behavior is related to poor self-esteem, diminished self-worth, and long-standing personality (disorder) traits. R10's Social Service Note dated 4/1/2025, documents V5 was notified R10 had verbal disagreement with a male peer (R7) on his unit. Staff intervened, redirected, and counseled resident (R10) on respecting personal social boundaries with peers, to also refrain from going into peers' rooms uninvited. R10's Social Service Note dated 4/4/2025, documents R10 was observed going into another resident's belongings and took his snacks. Staff (V5) met with resident R10) to counsel him (R10) on maintaining appropriate boundaries with peers and being respectful of peer's personal space/belongings. Resident (R10) was not receptive to counsel given at this time. R10's care plan dated 8/5/2024 documents R10 is at risk for abuse due to his diagnoses, and R10 will be free from every form of abuse through the next review date of 7/27/2025. Abuse policy dated 9-2017 documents: -Physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment.
Nov 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures to ensure (a) signag...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures to ensure (a) signage outside of the resident's room indicating Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) was posted; (b) PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was made available and accessible outside of the resident's room; (c) Position a trash can inside R2's room and near the exit for discarding PPE after removal and (d) proper PPE were worn by staff when providing high contact resident care activities to 1 (R2) resident. These failures have the potential for cross contamination to 48 residents residing on the 4th floor as of census 11/6/24 reviewed for improper nursing care. The findings include: R2's admission record showed admission date on 10/9/2024 with diagnoses not limited to Metabolic encephalopathy, Sudden visual loss, Dysphagia, Colostomy status, Hypotension, Unspecified kidney failure, Unspecified abdominal pain, Gastrostomy status. On 11/6/24 at 10:48 AM Observed R2 sitting up on wheelchair, alert and verbally responsive with confusion. V12 donned gloves and opened R2's G-tube dressing. V12 did not wear gown while providing care or use of feeding tube. No EBP signage by R2's door or wall outside of the room. Did not observe PPE supplies outside of R2's room, no trash can near the exit of the room for discarding PPE after removal. At 12:59 PM Observed V12 donned gloves and brought Jevity 1.5 8 fluid oz (ounce) and water to R2's room. V12 checked g-tube patency by auscultation. V12 checked gastric residual and aspirated a total of 360ml yellowish gastric contents. Observed V12 administered medications. V12 stated if gastric residual is more than 100ml to hold G-tube feeding. R2's G-tube feeding was not given. V12 administered 360ml gastric residual via G-tube by gravity and flushed G-tube with 135cc water. V12 was not wearing proper PPE (gown) during the whole process. At 1:12 PM V15 (Certified Nursing Assistant / CNA) stated she is working or assigned to R2 who is incontinent of bladder, requires extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). V15 stated she provided incontinence care, hygiene, dressing to R2 today and donned gloves but did not wear gown because R2 is not on isolation. On 11/7/24 at 9:37 AM V24 (IP / Infection Preventionist nurse) stated V24 has been working in the facility for 4 years and as IP nurse for 2 years. V24 said Enhance Barrier Precautions / EBP is applicable for those residents with medical indwelling devices such as G-tube. It's important to make sure infection control / prevention policy and procedures are being followed by staff. V24 said for EBP there should be an order, care plan, signage on the door, and PPE supplies accessible to staff every 1-2 rooms. Staff should wear proper PPE such as gloves, gown when providing high care activities such as incontinence care, dressing, toileting, giving medications / feeding / flushing via G-tube or any hands-on activity. V24 said if staff is not wearing proper PPE during high care activities could potentially contaminate or transmit infection to other residents. EBP should have a Care plan to serve as a guidance for staff on how to care for the resident on EBP. At 10:07 AM V3 (DON / Director of Nursing / DON) stated V3 has been working in the facility for more than 2 years. V3 stated EBP should be observed for residents with G-tube. Staff is expected to wear proper PPE such as gloves and gown when providing high care activities such as Bathing, incontinence care, g-tube administration. Wearing proper PPE will protect the patient and staff, prevent cross contamination. V3 said signage indicating EBP should also be posted by resident's door as a form of communication for the staff / visitor and provide instructions to the staff regarding proper use of PPE. EBP should have a care plan and order in resident's record. PPE supplies can be placed between 1-2 rooms or accessible to staff. V3 said there are 2 nurses working on the 4th floor and if another nurse is on break the remaining nurse should cover the unit and attend to resident's needs or care. MDS dated [DATE] showed R2 was rarely or never understood. She needed substantial / maximal assistance with oral, toileting and personal hygiene, shower / bathe self, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, chair/bed and toilet transfer. Always incontinent of bowel and bladder. MDS showed feeding tube. Reviewed R2's health record did not show care plan for EBP and no order for EBP found. Facility's census dated 11/6/24 showed 48 residents residing on the 4th floor. Facility's 4th floor assignment sheet dated 11/6/24 showed 2 nurses on 1st shift. Facility's policy for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) dated 10/16/23 documented in part: Our facility employs the use of EBP to reduce transmission of MDROs to staff hands and clothing that employs targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities. EBP are indicated (when contact precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with any of the following: an indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO status. Staff utilize gown and gloves for high-contact resident care activities when residents require EBP; high contact activities may include dressing, bathing / showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing briefs or assisting with toileting. Device care or use: feeding tube. Post EBP signage on the door or wall outside of the resident room indicating the type of precautions and required PPE and listing high-contact resident care activities. Ensure PPE, including gowns and gloves, are available outside of the resident room. Position a trash can inside the resident room and near the exit for discarding PPE after removal.
Oct 2024 13 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a resident (R194) who is high risk ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a resident (R194) who is high risk for falls. This failure resulted in R194 sustaining a fall which required R194 to go to the local hospital due to sustaining a laceration above R194's left eyebrow, an acute interior column fracture of the C6 vertebrae without significant displacement and R194 to wear a neck brace for 8 weeks. Findings include: The facility's Initial Report to local State Agency dated 08/26/24 at 8:12 am, documents, in part R1 sustained a fall with a cut to the upper left eyebrow requiring staples. The facility's Final Report to local State Agency dated 09/02/24 at 6:46 pm, documents, in part R194 was transferred to the local hospital. R1 sustained a laceration to left eyebrow when R194 fell and hit her head on a chair in the dining room area. R194 readmitted from the local hospital with 8 stitches above the eyebrow. R194 was also diagnosed with acute interior column fracture of the C6 vertebrae without significant displacement . R194 was discharged with instructions to wear neck braces to reduce movement of the vertebrae. R194's hospital record dated 08/25/24 at 4:45 pm, documents, in part: History of Present Illness: R194 is a [AGE] year-old with history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, transferred after a fall. Patient fell off a chair and laceration on left eyebrow and struck her (R194) head . Imaging: MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Cervical Spine without contrast final result: Acute oblique-horizontal fracture of the C6 (Cervical) vertebral body extending to the ossified anterior longitudinal ligament and adjacent bridging osteophytes at C6 and C6-C7 with minimal displacement. Suspected fracture extension to the adjacent discs at C5-C6-and C6-C7 with annular tears. Wound: Musculoskeletal Immobilization Hard Collar Neck. Wound forehead right. R194's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 09/12/24 shows R194 has no BIMS score and indicates R194 has memory problems. R194's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R194 requires substantial/maximal assistance for sit to stand and Supervision or touching assistance for walking. R194's Face sheet documents R194 admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged from the facility 09/12/24 and has a diagnosis which include but not limited to nondisplaced fracture of sixth cervical vertebra subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing and schizoaffective disorder and bipolar type. R194 no longer resides at the facility and surveyor was unable to interview R194. On 09/30/24 at 12:40 pm, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) stated on 08/25/24 around 6:00 am, V16 was passing medication to residents on the sixth floor and observed V24 (Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA) ambulating R194 to the sixth-floor dining room. V16 explained V16 assumed V24 sat R194 down in the sixth-floor dining room. However, shortly after V24 left R194 in the dining room, V16 saw R194 walking from the dining room. V16 redirected R194 back to the dining room and sat R194 in a chair in the sixth-floor dining room. V16 then explained V16 continued to administer medications to residents on the sixth floor. V16 then was standing at V16 medication cart in the sixth-floor hallway slightly down from dining room area, with V16's back to the dining room area when V16 heard a loud noise. V16 stated V16 turned around and looked across the hallway and saw R194 laying on the floor in the entry way of the dining room with R194's head against the wall and the leg of another residents chair. V16 stated V16 went to assess R194 after R194's fall in the dining room and observed a laceration to R194's left eyebrow. V16 stated R194 always has a staff member walk with R194. R194 is a resident who walks fast with an unsteady gait on her (R194) toes and requires assistance from staff for safe ambulation. V16 explained on 08/25/24 prior to R194's fall, R194 was not wearing shoes when V24 (CNA) ambulated R194 to the dining room or when V16 redirected R194 to the dining room prior to R194's fall on 08/25/24. V16 stated, We try our hardest to sit and monitor the dining room but this particular day it was chaotic. I (V16) still had two people to pass medication to, so I (V16) was at my cart (referring to the medication cart) and didn't see R194 in the dining room get up. I (V16) just turned around and looked over to the dining room and saw R194 had fallen on the floor. V16 explained R194's left eye was bleeding. V16 applied a cold wet towel to R194's eye, called R194's physician (who gave orders to send R194 to the local hospital), R194's family, and V2 (Director of Nursing, DON). V16 denied R194 had lost consciousness when R194 sustained a fall on 08/25/24. V16 stated there was no staff to monitor the dining room during R194's fall and all staff was providing care to other residents. V16 explained V16 would have monitored the dining room however V16 remembered V16 still had to administer medication to other residents. When V16 was asked regarding what can happen if residents who are high risk for falls are in the dining room without any staff supervision and V16 stated, Falls and incidents can occur. On 09/30/24 at 1:03 pm, V24 (Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA) stated on 08/25/24 around 5:30 am, V24 gave R194 a bed bath, got R194 dressed and took R194 to the dining room. V24 explained V24 then sat R194 in the dining room and went to take care of another resident. When V24 was asked regarding R194's mobility, V24 explained R194 does not use any assistive devices for ambulation. V24 stated, Someone always walks with R194 to make sure R194 doesn't fall. About 15 minutes after R194 was in the dining room. I (V24) heard a loud bang noise like something hit the wall and someone fell from the dining room. V24 stated V24 rushed into the dining room and saw R194 laying on the floor and V16 (LPN) attending to R194. V24 explained V24 and V16 assisted R194 to a chair and V16 asked V24 to hold pressure to R194's eyebrow until the ambulance arrived. V24 stated R194 was not wearing shoes and R194 was wearing friction socks. When V24 was asked regarding what staff was monitoring the dining room when V24 left R194 in the dining room prior to R194's fall on 08/25/24 and V24 stated, Everyone was working at that time. I (V24) don't remember any staff in the dining room. No staff was assigned to the dining room. My (V24) job is to get up the residents and give them showers. On 10/01/24 at 10:49 am, V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) stated R194 is a resident with dementia, confused and alert to self. V2 stated R194 is to be monitored when placed in the dining room. V2 explained V2 requires staff to ambulate with R194 due to R194's leg (V2 was unable to remember which leg) is not very strong for R194's safety. On 08/25/24 V2 stated V2 received a call from V16 (LPN) that R194 stood up and started to walk and sustained a fall before the nurse could intervene. V2 explained V16 stated R194 tripped over another resident, fell, and cut R194's eye. V2 stated V2 instructed V16 to call V37 (R194's Physician) and send R194 to the hospital. V2 stated the local hospital applied sterile strips to R194's eyebrow and R194 had a X-ray showed a fracture of C6 (Cervical 6). V2 explained R194 was placed in a neck collar with orders to follow up with orthopedic surgeon in 8 weeks. V2 explained staff should be monitoring the dining room at all times when a resident who is high risk for falls is in the dining room. When V2 was asked regarding what staff was assigned to monitor the dining room on 08/25/24 during the time of R194's fall and V2 stated, I (V2) really don't know. Staff should be in the dining room to monitor the residents safety. When V2 was asked regarding what could happen if a resident who is high risk for falls is not supervised by staff in the dining room and V2 stated, There could be a fall with injury, a patient can touch another resident, residents can wander, and staff won't be able to prevent falls. When V2 was asked regarding the importance of supervising residents who are high risk for falls and V2 stated, To prevent the resident from falls and injury. On 10/01/24 at 11:05 am, V37 (R194's Physician) stated, I (V37) don't recall R194's fall on 08/25/24 but I (V37) saw her (R194) at the hospital. V37 stated V37 recalls R194 admitting to the hospital with a hairline fracture of the spine with a C (Collar) applied. When V37 was asked regarding R194's functional status and care needs at the facility, V37 explained V37 recalls R194 was not really alert with cognitive impairments and not redirectable. When V37 was asked regarding what assistance R194 required at the facility V37 stated, I (V37) don't recall how much assistance she (R194) needed. Whatever the notes reflect in her (R194's) chart is what she (R194) needs. When V37 was asked what could happen if a resident who is high risk for fall is left unsupervised and V37 stated, High risk for falls residents are going to fall. They (referring to the residents) can fall if they (referring to the residents) have an unsteady gait and an injury can be caused if they (referring to the resident) fall. R194's progress note dated 08/25/24 at 7:07 am, and authored by V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) documents, in part: R194 walked past the writer (V16) and fell. R194 hit her (194) head on the lower part of a chair another patient was in. The writer (V26) notified ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) DON (Director of Nursing) and left a message or the patient POA (Power of Attorney) to call the facility. The writer (V16) called 911 and set the patient out to the local hospital due to the ambulance service stating it will be a two hour wait. R194's progress note dated 08/28/24 at 11:49 am and authored by V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) documents, in part: R194 admitted back to from the local hospital into facility accompanied by 2 EMT's (Emergency Medical Technicians) . R194 with a C (Cervical) collar brace around neck. Collar to remain in place for 8 weeks. Resident (R194) has sterile strips on laceration to tope of left eyebrow. R194's incident report dated 08/25/24 at 6:30 am, authored by V16 (LPN) documents, in part: R194 was walking and when she (R194) was behind the writer (V16). She (R194) fell hitting her (R194) head on the lower part of a chair a patient was sitting in injuring herself . Notes: R194 ambulates without any assistive device and with unsteady gait. R194 requires staff assistance to total assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). R194 was walking when she fell hitting her head on the lower part of a chair. Staff to provide morning ADL care and closely monitor resident ambulation on unit. R194's Fall Risk Assessment Evaluation dated 04/01/24 shows R194 has a Falls risk score of 19 which indicates R194 is high risk for falls. R194's Fall Risk Assessment Evaluation dated 08/27/24 shows R194 has a Falls risk score of 16 which indicates R194 is high risk for falls. R194's Fall Risk Assessment Evaluation dated 08/28/24 shows R194 has a Falls risk score of 19 which indicates R194 is high risk for falls. R194's care plan dated 08/28/24 document, in part: Focus: R194 requires the use of C collar brace to related to fracture. R194's care plan dated 10/17/23 document, in part: Focus: R194 is a high risk for falls. Interventions: R194 Velcro shoes was provided to the resident . Provide proper well-maintained footwear. The facility's document dated 08/2024 and titled Fall Prevention and Management documents, in part: General: This facility is committed to maximizing each resident's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. While preventing all falls is not possible, the facility will identify and evaluate those residents at risk for falls, plan for preventative strategies, and facilitate as safe an environment as possible. The facility's policy dated 09/2023 and titled Hazards and Supervision documents, in part: Policy: The facility shall establish and utilize a systemic approach to address resident risk and environmental hazards to minimize the likelihood of accidents .4. Monitoring and Modification - Monitoring and modification processes include: a. Ensuring interventions are implemented correctly and consistently . 5. Supervision- Supervision is an intervention and a means of mitigating accident risk. The facility will provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. The facility's job description titled Certified Nurse's Aide documents, in part: Basic function: To provide assigned residents with routine daily nursing care in accordance with established nursing care procedures, state and federal guidelines, and as directed by your supervisor. Essential Duties: 25. Follow established safety precautions in performance of all duties. The facility's job description titled Registered Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse documents, in part: Basic Function: Under the direction of the physician, is responsible for total nursing care to all residents on assigned unit during the assigned shift including responsibility for delegation of duties, resident nursing care, staff performance and adherence by staff members to facility policies and procedures. Essential Duties: 12. Adhere to all facility and department safety policies and procedures.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0552 (Tag F0552)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for psychotropic medication prior to administering the medication. This failure affects 1 resident (R103) in a samp...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for psychotropic medication prior to administering the medication. This failure affects 1 resident (R103) in a sample of 77. Findings include: R103's admission record documents in part, the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder, recurrent and anxiety disorder. R103's Minimum Data Set (dated 8/1/2024) documents in part a brief interview of mental status summary score of 15, indicating R103 is cognitively intact. R103's order audit report documents in part, bupropion HCl Oral Tablet 150 MG (Bupropion HCl) (antidepressant Medication) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to anxiety was ordered on 5/3/2023. The dose was decreased to 100 mg on 10/1/2024. R103's order summary report documents in part, R103 has an active order for Sertraline HCl Oral Tablet 50 MG (Sertraline HCl) (antidepressant medication) Give 37.5 mg by mouth one time a day for Anxiety, with a start date of 5/18/2024. R103's PSYCH: Consent for Psychotropic Medications (dated 5/3/2024) documents in part R103 consented to take Sertraline HCl 50 mg, QD (every day), Antidepressant (current dose of sertraline is 37.5 mg). Bupropion is not listed on the consent form. R103's medication administration record documents in part R103 received both sertraline 37.5 mg and bupropion 150 mg daily since 5/18/2024. On 10/1/2024 at 9:46 AM, R103 stated R103 was unaware R103 was taking Bupropion. R103 stated, I (R103) thought I was taking only one antidepressant medication, sertraline. I was not aware I am taking this bupropion medication. I take 2 antidepressants?. R103 affirmed R103 was not explained the risks and benefits of the medication and could not recall if anyone had ever asked for R103's consent to administer the medication. On 10/1/2024 at 9:57 AM, V3 (Psychotropic Nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse) stated residents receive psychotropic medications must consent to the medication prior to the medication being administered. V3 stated informed consent is important because the medication can change how a resident thinks. V3 affirmed Bupropion is a psychotropic antidepressant medication. V3 reviewed R103's electronic health record, active physician orders and psychotropic medication consents. V3 confirmed R103 did not consent to receiving bupropion. V3 stated R103 should have been informed of the risks and benefits of the psychotropic medication. Facility policy titled, PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION PROGRAM (reviewed 10/23), documents in part, GENERAL: The purpose is to promote safe and effective use of psychotropic medications .The second purpose of this process is to ensure the resident is evaluated and the indication for the medication is documented within the medical record . Also, the resident and representative are aware of the potential side effects and the facility obtains informed consent for the use of the psychotropic medication . 9. If a new order for a psychotropic medication is obtained, the resident, residents representative or POA must be informed of the risks and benefits of the medication. The facility must obtain informed consent. If the family or resident's representative is not able to sign the consent at the time of the order, a verbal consent will be obtained by the nurse and documented on a psychotropic consent form until written consent can be obtained. This form will be part of the medical record .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 1 resident (R136) out of 77 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 1 resident (R136) out of 77 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: On 9/29/2024 at 11:53am observed R136 lying in the bed watching television, alert and oriented. Surveyor asked R136 Where is your call light pull string located? R136 stated, I don't know where my call light string is at, it's a little green string. On 9/29/2024 at 11:55am observed R136's call light string (a little green string with a clip attached on the end) hanging on top of the light fixture located above the head of R136's bed. On 9/29/2024 at 11:57am surveyor asked V4(LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) to come into R136's room. V4 was asked, Where is R136's call light string? V4 stated the call light string is located on top of the light above R136's bed. V4 stated the call light is supposed to be within reach of the resident. On 9/29/2024 at 12:00pm surveyor observed V4(LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) take the call light string from the top of the light fixture and clip the call light string to the right shoulder area of R136's gown. On 10/01/2024 at 11:16am V2(DON/Director of Nursing) stated the resident's call light should be in the room, within reach of the resident. V2 stated the purpose of the call light is so that the resident can signal the staff for help. R136's diagnosis includes, but are not limited to, cerebral infarction, unspecified, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, and paraplegia. R136 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 09/05/2024 which documents that R136 has a BIMS score of 14, indicating R136's cognition is intact. The facility's policy titled Call Light Response dated 2/2017(revision date of 9?2022) documents, in part, 3. Ensure call light is within resident's reach at all times.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff protected one resident (R394) (out of three residents who were screened at risk for abuse) from employee to resident physical a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff protected one resident (R394) (out of three residents who were screened at risk for abuse) from employee to resident physical abuse. Findings include: R394's diagnosis includes but are not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, unspecified asthma, uncomplicated, anxiety disorder, unspecified, shortness of breath, bipolar disorder, unspecified, schizophrenia, unspecified, and dyspnea, unspecified. R394's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/19/2024 indicates a Brief Interview for Mental Status was not completed. Staff Assessment of Mental Status documents in part, C0700. Short-term Memory OK 0. Memory OK. C1000. Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making 0. Independent-decisions consistent/reasonable. R116's diagnosis includes but are not limited to schizophrenia, unspecified, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified, other migraine, not intractable, with status migrainosus, and idiopathic progressive neuropathy. R116's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 7/31/2024 documents R116 has a BIMS score of 15 which indicates R116's cognition is intact. On 10/03/2024 at 12:38 pm surveyor met R394 on the third floor in the hallway near the elevator. R394 alert and oriented. Surveyor and R394 went to R394's room to discuss the allegations. R394 stated, Me and my ex-roommate (R116) had a disagreement on 9/19/2024 at about 1:30pm. I owed R116 two dollars. On that day I had dropped my cellphone in the toilet, and I could not make any phone calls, so I was upset. I was trying to tell R116 about my phone situation and I would give him (R116) the two dollars later. R116 pushed me, and I fell to the floor. When I got up from the floor R116 hit me again. I picked up a chair and hit R116 with the chair. There were no witnesses to this, it was just me and R116. Staff did hear the commotion in my room from the hallway and that is when staff came into my room. Staff separated me and R116. I was told to go into the dining room on the third floor by staff. Staff escorted me into the dining room. I do not remember what staff person escorted me to the dining room. When I got to the dining room V44 (former Social Service Director) asked me to sit down. I sat down in the chair, but I wanted to ask V44 a question, so I got up out of the chair. When I got up out of the chair, V44 pushed me down to the floor and took his hand and mashed my head against the floor. I could not get V44 off me. Another manager came to pull V44 off me. This same manager pulled me up from the floor and asked me if I was okay. V44 was escorted off the third floor by another manager. The police came to the facility at about 5:30pm that day and spoke with me. The police made it clear to me that I was not in any trouble. I was shaken up bad. The police told me if I wanted to press charges it would be a civil matter. There were no residents around during the incident because the residents were told by staff to go into their rooms. I don't know if any other resident saw the incident. On 10/03/2024 at 4:38pm R48 stated on 9/19/2024 at about 1:30pm all residents in the hallways on the third floor were told to go into their rooms and remain there. R48 stated, I heard the confusion in the third-floor dining area; but I did see what was going on. On 10/03/2024 at 2:01pm V45 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated V45 is familiar with R394. V45 stated on 9/19/2024 at about 1:30pm R394 was observed being verbally abusive towards staff on the third floor in the dining room area. V45 stated V44 (former SSD/Social Service Director) was trying to redirect R394. V45 stated R394 was not redirectable at that time. V45 stated R394 hit V44 in the face. V45 stated V44 grabbed R394 by both arms, holding both of R394's arms to the side of R394's body. V45 stated V44 and R394 were struggling and both V44 and R394 went down to the floor. V45 stated V44 was trying to do CPI (Crisis Prevention Intervention) on R394. V45 stated R394 was trying to fight V44 back and trying to get up off the floor. V45 stated R394 was able to get up from the floor and sit back in the chair in the dining room. V45 stated it did not get physical again with V44 and R394. On 10/03/2024 at 2:30pm V8 (PRSC/Psychiatric Rehab Service Coordinator) stated V8 is familiar with R394. V8 stated, I was at a care plan meeting on the second floor when the incident happened with R394 on the third floor on 09/19/2024 at about 1:30pm. When I did return to the third floor, because I am the PRSC assigned to the third floor, it seemed that things had calmed down. The nurse on the third floor informed me that R394 was yelling, screaming, and cursing at the staff. When I was able to verbally speak with R394, R394 was hard to redirect, and I could not make out what R394 was saying to me. I am trained to use CPI (Crisis Prevention Intervention) and usually we do not get to the point where we are physically touching a resident. The staff should talk with the resident to deescalate the situation first. R394 did talk with the police regarding the incident and a police report was made. R394 was sent to the hospital for evaluation. On 10/03/2024 at 3:00pm V46 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated, I am familiar with R394. I was behind the third-floor nurse's station on 9/19/2024 between 1pm-2pm when the incident occurred with R394. R394 was being verbally aggressive and would not calm down. A Code Yellow was called by third floor staff. A Code Yellow is called when we need more staff on the floor to assist with calming down a resident. V44 (former social service director) was the first to arrive on the third floor. V44 told R394 to have a seat in the third-floor dining room. R394 did not sit down and got into V44's face and R394 hit V44 in the face. After V44 was hit in the face by R394, V44 grabbed R394's arms to hold R394's arms to the side of R394's body. R394 continued tossing his body, trying to get away from V44. At that time both R394 and V44 fell to the floor, and V44 was still holding R394's arms trying to get R394 to calm down. Next both R394 and V44 got up from the floor. It did not get physical between R394 and V44 again. R394 was still being verbally aggressive. I would not put my hands on the resident who is being verbally aggressive, I would try talk with the resident first. I was in-serviced regarding abuse on 9/20/2024, the day after the incident. On 10/03/2024 at 4:10pm V40 (Assistant Administrator) stated the incident regarding R394 occurred on 9/19/2024 in the afternoon, V40 didn't remember the exact time. V40 stated, A code yellow was called, and staff rushed to the third floor. A code yellow is called when a resident is having behaviors. I witnessed R394 displaying verbal outbursts near the nurse's station. I did not witness staff to resident physical assault. R394 did report an allegation of physical assault to me, and an investigation was started. While doing the investigation I found out V44 (former Social Services Director) tried to use CPI (Crisis Prevention Intervention) to deescalate the verbally aggression with R394. V44 did get physical with R394 I prefer staff to verbally deescalate the situation, instead of being physically aggressive. The situation between V44 and R394 could have been handled better by V44. The police were called regarding this incident and a police report was made out. On 10/03/2024 at 4:53am V1 (Administrator) stated the incident with R394 was on 9/19/2024 around 2pm. V1 stated, I was in the facility and went up to the third floor. I did not witness R394 being physically abused. R394 was stating V44(former social service director) hit me and hit R394's head against the wall. The third-floor staff told me V44 was trying to use CPI (Crisis Prevention Intervention) to deescalate V394's behaviors by holding R394's arms down by his side and this eventually led to both R394 and V44 falling to the floor. CPI skills do not require for staff to put a resident on the floor. The staff should try to verbally deescalate the situation first. Sometimes the de-escalation process can get physical, but this should be the last resort. That is why I had a problem with the way V44 did CPI. V44 should have not placed hands on R394. R394 went to the hospital for evaluation. Reviewed R394's care plan dated 10/02/2024 which documents in part, Focus: R394 Risk for Abuse, Goal: R394 will remain free from abuse through the next quarter. Facility's Abuse Prevention Program Policy dated 02/07/2017(with a revision dated of 01/30/24) documents in part, Policy: The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property or mistreatment. The Residents' Rights for People in Long-term Care Facilities policy presented by the facility documents in part, you have the right to safety and good care. You must not be abused by anyone-physically, verbally, financially, or sexually. Reviewed R44's (former Social Service Director) Employee Report which documents in part, on 9/19/2024 employee was discharged for improper use of CPI (Crisis Prevention Intervention).
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

R103's admission record documents in part a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, recurrent (onset date 5/9/2023) and anxiety disorder (onset date 5/3/2023). R103's order summary report documents i...

Read full inspector narrative →
R103's admission record documents in part a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, recurrent (onset date 5/9/2023) and anxiety disorder (onset date 5/3/2023). R103's order summary report documents in part, R103 has active orders for bupropion HCl Oral Tablet 150 MG (Bupropion HCl) (antidepressant Medication) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to anxiety and Sertraline HCl Oral Tablet 50 MG (Sertraline HCl) (antidepressant medication) Give 37.5 mg by mouth one time a day for Anxiety. R103's Level I PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) dated 5/3/2023, documents in part, no mental health diagnosis is known or suspected for R103 and R103 does not take any mental health medications. On 10/1/2024 at 12:05 PM, V40 (Assistant Administrator) stated the social services director normally completes that PASRR assessments but the social services director is on vacation so V40 is covering. V40 affirmed V40 is familiar with the Illinois process and standards for PASRR completion. V40 reviewed R103's electronic health record and acknowledged R103 has a diagnosis of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. V40 reviewed R103's last PASRR (5/3/2024) and affirmed the PASRR does not identify R103's mental health diagnoses or medication use. V40 stated R130's PASRR should accurately reflect R103's health status and a new PASRR should have been completed. V40 stated PASRR assessments are important because they identify services a resident might need that is diagnosed with mental illness. Facility policy titled PASARR (effective date 4/2020), documents in part, . 7. Should the resident require a PASARR update after admissions, the facility will contact the state agency to update the PASARR . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer two residents R34 and R103 to the appropriate state designated authority for a new Level I PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review) evaluation and determination after R34 was admitted to facility without Mental Diagnosis disclosure on the Level I PASARR and R103 diagnosed with a new mental disorder. This deficient practice affected two residents (R34 and R103) in a total sample size of 77 residents. Findings include: R34's PASSAR dated 06/28/24 documents in part, PASRR Level I Determination: No Level II Required - No SMI (Serious Mental Illness)/ID (Intellectual Disability)/RC (Related Condition). R34's admission date to the facility is 06/28/24. R34's medical diagnosis includes but are not limited to Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Brief Psychotic Disorder, Depression, Impulsiveness. Facility's policy titled PASARR dated 04/2020 documents in part, General: The PASARR screening with be provided to the facility prior to admission so that the facility can make appropriate decisions regarding care and placement .Process: 1. Nursing and medical needs of individuals with mental disorders or intellectual disabilities will be determined by coordination with the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review program (PASARR) to the extent practicable .7. Should the resident require a PASARR update after admission, the facility will contact the state agency to update the PASARR. On 10/01/24 at 12:11pm V40 (Assistant Administrator, AA) stated, PASRR guides us (facility) with resident centered care using the diagnosis. PASARR is required to make sure that we (facility) are able to meet the needs of the residents. I (V40) am familiar with R34. R34 has mental diagnosis' and only has a level 1 PASARR. Even if the PASRR is done at the hospital, we (facility) should follow up on the accuracy of it.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer one resident (R178) to the state agency for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for rescreening before R178's Short Ter...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer one resident (R178) to the state agency for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for rescreening before R178's Short Term Approval without Specialized Services determination's expiration date. This deficient practice affected one resident (R178) in a total sample size of 77 residents. Findings include: R178's PASRR dated 11/06/23 documents in part, PASRR Determination: Short Term Approval without Specialized Services .Date Short Term Approval Ends: February 4, 2020 .This determination allows you a limited number of days in a Medicaid-certified nursing facility .If you or your care provider thinks you need you stay after that date, a nursing facility staff member must submit a new Level I screen .The new Level I screen must be submitted no later than 10 days before the Date Short Term Approval Ends. R178's PASRR Level I rescreen dated 06/07/24. R178's medical diagnosis' include Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Asthma, Unspecified Psychosis Not Due to A Substance or Known Physiological Condition, Depression. On 10/01/24 at 12:11pm V40 Assistant Administrator (AA) stated, R178 PASRR was not resubmitted timely, R178 was here 4 months without the proper plan of care. Facility's policy titled PASARR dated 4/2020 documents in part, Process: 7. Should the resident require a PASARR update after admissions, the facility will contact the state agency to update the PASARR.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that wound care treatment was completed and documented in a timely manner for one resident (R87) in a total sample si...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that wound care treatment was completed and documented in a timely manner for one resident (R87) in a total sample size of 77 reviewed for wound care. Findings include: R87's admission diagnoses include but not limited to hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and furuncle unspecified. R87's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 07/29/24 shows R87 has a BIMS score of 14 which indicates that R87 is cognitively intact. On 9/29/24 at 11:10 am, R87 observed in room lying in bed with a soiled undated dressing noted to the left side of R87's neck. There was a dark color drainage noted on the dressing. R87 stated that the dressing had not been changed in about three days. On 9/30/24 at 2:55 pm, surveyor observed R87 in room with same soiled dressing noted on the left side of R87's neck. R87 stated the dressing had not been changed and is the same dressing from yesterday. Surveyor requested for V26 (Wound Care Nurse) to look at R87's dressing and inquired about R87's dressing change. V26 looked at R87's dressing and stated, R87 has a cyst that drains. The dressing needs to be changed I will change it now. Surveyor inquired to V26 when was the last time it was changed because it's not dated. V26 stated, I do not date my dressing changes, it's not in the policy and the staff can look in the computer to see when the dressing was changed. R87's (Active Orders as of 10/1/24) Order summary Report documented in part, cleanse open area on left shoulder with normal saline solution and cover with a dry dressing, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and prn (as needed) until resolved . To promote wound healing. R87's TAR Treatment Administration Record documented in part, treatment administered on 9/25/24 (Wednesday), 9/27/24 (Friday) and 9/30/24 (Monday) all dates were signed that treatment was completed. R87's Medication and Treatment Administration Audit Report documented in part, Schedule Date 9/25/24 (Wednesday) for wound care shows administration time 9/30/24 at 3:01 pm, and documented time 9/30/24 at 3:01 pm. Wound Care treatment for 9/27/24 (Friday) shows administration time 9/30/24 at 3:01 pm, and documented time 9/30/24 at 3:01 pm. On 10/1/24 at 11:02 V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated that wound care dressing should be changed according to the doctor's order and as needed. If a dressing is soiled it should be changed to prevent infections. On 10/1/24 at 1:00 pm, Surveyor inquired to V26 (Wound Care Nurse) why was the wound care treatment on 9/25/24 and 9/27/24 not documented until 9/30/24. V26 (Wound Care Nurse) stated, I (V26) usually document after I finish the treatment. I thought I had documented on those treatments. When I went in to document the treatment for Monday, I saw that I did not document on Wednesday and Friday. I should document at the time I do the treatments and dressing changes. R87's dressing needed to be change because it was soiled and due to be changed. Surveyor inquired to V26 what could happen when a soiled dressing is not change. V26 stated that it could cause an infection. R87's (9/24/24) care plan documents in part, Focus: Has an abscess to left side of neck. Goal: area to left side of neck will remain stable/heal throughout next review. Interventions: Educate resident on the risks of infection and poor healing related to non-compliance. Facility's policy titled Dressing Application review date 9/2017, documents in part, General: Dressings are changed as ordered by the Physician or Nurse Practitioner and PRN (As Needed). Facility's job description titled (Wound Care Nurse) documents in part, Basic function: The primary purpose of Wound Care Nurse is to provide for the day-to-day care needs of the residents in a Skilled Nursing Facility Environment. Essential Duties: 18. Document nursing care rendered, resident response, and all other pertinent and necessary data as outlined in facility's policies and procedures.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nebulizer mask and oxygen tubing was contained. These failures affected 2 residents (R6 and R88) reviewed for respi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nebulizer mask and oxygen tubing was contained. These failures affected 2 residents (R6 and R88) reviewed for respiratory care in the sample size of 77 residents. Findings include: R88's admission diagnoses include but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic congestive heart failure, pacemaker, and atrial fibrillation. R88's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 7/29/24 shows R88 has a BIMS score of 05 which indicates that R88 has severe cognitive impairment. On 9/29/24 at 11:45 am, R88's nebulizer mask was on top of a plastic bin in R88's room not contained. On 9/30/24 at 2:40 pm, R88's nebulizer mask was on top of R88 bed side table not contained. On 9/30/24 at 2:43 pm, this observation was pointed out to V9 License Practical Nurse (LPN). V9 stated that the mask should be in bag because it could get contaminated if not in a bag. It is not proper practice to have a respiratory mask laying on a bin not covered when not being use. On 10/1/24 at 11:02 V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated, The respiratory mask should be in a plastic bag to prevent dust and contamination. It is also an infection control issue as well. It is not proper practice to have the respiratory mask or tubing to not be in a plastic bag when not being used. R88's (Active orders as of 9/30/24) Order summary Report documented, in part Measure and record oxygen saturation. It < (less than) 90% start oxygen at 2 liters/minute per mask an notify the physician . R88's Care plan dated 2/12/24, documents in part, focus: respiratory has potential for difficulty in breathing related to COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) Interventions administer oxygen as ordered. Facility's job description titled Registered Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse documents in part, Essential duties: 3. Administer prescribed medications and treatments according to policy and procedures. On 9/29/2024 at 12:11pm observed R6 with an oxygen concentrator machine located next to R6's bed, the oxygen tubing/nasal cannula attached to the oxygen concentrator machine was sitting on top of the machine, not contained in a plastic bag while not in use by the resident. On 9/29/2024 at 12:36pm surveyor brought the observation to V4's (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) attention. V4 stated the oxygen tubing/nasal cannula should be contained in a plastic bag when not in use by the resident. V4 stated the reason for placing the oxygen tubing/nasal cannula in the bag is to keep it from all the debris. On 10/01/2024 at 12:36pm V2(DON/Director of Nursing) stated the oxygen tubing/nasal cannula should be contained when not in use by the resident to prevent contamination; it is an infection control issue. R6's face sheet indicates that R6 has diagnosis which includes but are not limited, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, and conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions. R6's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 07/29/2024 documents R6 has a BIMS score of 11, which indicates R6's cognition is moderately impaired. R6's Physician Order Sheet (POS) with active orders as of 9/30/2024 documents in part, oxygen 2L(liters) via NC (nasal cannula) for hypoxia every 6 hours as needed for Hypoxia.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0914 (Tag F0914)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a residents had a privacy curtain which extended around the bed. This failure affected one resident (R62), out 77 resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a residents had a privacy curtain which extended around the bed. This failure affected one resident (R62), out 77 residents in the total sample. Findings include: R62's Face sheet documents R62 has a diagnosis which include but not limited to versus complete obstruction, prediabetes, alcohol abuse with alcohol- induced psychotic disorder, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, essential hypertension, and presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage device. R62's Brief Mental Status Interview (BIMS) dated 09/23/24 documents R62 has a BIMS score of 15 which indicates R62 is cognitively intact. On 09/29/24 at 11:35 am, Surveyor observed R62's room without a privacy curtain. R62 stated, I (R62) have been at this facility for six months and I (R2) have never had a privacy curtain. I (R2) would like a privacy curtain for my (R62) privacy and especially when I (R62) am sleeping. On 09/29/24 at 11:38 am, Surveyor questioned V15 (Housekeeper) regarding R62's missing privacy curtain and V15 stated, I (V15) don't know where it is. There is some (referring to privacy curtains) in laundry, but we can't hang them up because there are no hooks to hang them (referring to privacy curtains) on. V15 then pointed to the privacy curtain track above R62'S bed to show surveyor there were no hooks on the privacy curtain track in R62's room. When V15 was asked regarding the importance of residents having a privacy curtain V15 stated, So the resident can have privacy from their roommate or when the resident is changing their clothes. On 09/30/24 at 2:30 pm, V36 (Account Manager, Housekeeping Supervisor) was asked regarding privacy curtains for residents and V36 stated the floor technicians at the facility are responsible for ensuring every resident has a privacy curtain and all residents should have a privacy curtain to provide privacy for the resident and the residents roommate. V36 stated privacy curtains help to keep the room separate from roommates sharing space. When V36 was asked regarding the importance of privacy curtains and V36 stated, So the residents privacy will not be invaded. The facility's document dated 10/2023 and titled, Residents Rights - Accommodation of needs and Preferences and Homelike Environment Policy documents, in part: General: the objective of accommodation of resident needs and preferences is to create an individualized, home like environment to maintain and or achieve independent functioning, dignity, and well-being to the extent possible in accordance with the residents all needs and preference.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' ceiling was not leaking, failed to ensure the closet door was not broken, and failed to ensure the resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' ceiling was not leaking, failed to ensure the closet door was not broken, and failed to ensure the residents' bathroom has no missing ceramic tiles in effort to provide a homelike environment. These failures affected 5 (R21, R32, R50, R85, and R224) residents reviewed for homelike environment in the total sample of 77 residents. Findings include: On 09/29/2024 at 11:45am, R21, R50, and R85's ceiling was leaking. There was a big trash can used as a catch bin. On 09/29/24 at 11:46am, V8 (PRSC (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) stated there is a leak coming from the ceiling and there is a garbage bin that is used as a catch basin. There are 3 residents living in this room (R21), (R50), and (R85). On 09/29/2024 at 11:48am, R85 stated, It has been like that since Friday. I (R85) don't know what to say. I (R85) don't expect my (R85) room to be with a leaking ceiling. On 09/29/24 at 11:50am, V5 (Maintenance Director) stated, I (V5) am not sure at this moment what is going on inside the room. My Assistant Maintenance (V10) put the garbage can to catch the water leak. On 10/01/2024 at 10:55am, inside R21, R50, and R85's room, the ceiling was covered with a plastic, secured with blue tape. On 10/01/2024 at 10:58am, V12 (Licensed Practice Nurse) stated there was a leak on the ceiling and they covered the ceiling with a plastic. Maintenance is supposed to fix the leak. On 10/01/2024 at 11:00am, V3 (Psych Nurse/LPN) stated we have system called TELS where we log repairs for the Maintenance Department. It is like an eMaintenance Log. This surveyor requested to print the electronic Maintenance Log. On 10/01/2024 at 11:08am, V3 presented this surveyor the eMaintenance Log and inquired if there was a work order for R21, R50, and R85's room. V3 stated there is nothing specific for R21, R50, and R85's room. On 10/01/2024 at 11:18am, V10 (Assistant Maintenance) stated, The ceiling in the room had a leak. I (V10) don't know where the leak was coming from. The CNA told me Sunday morning. I (V10) checked 4th floor to assess where the leak was coming from. Nothing was going on in 4th floor that would cause a leak to the room. Instead of busting the ceiling open, I (V10) put a garbage can to catch the water. On 10/01/2024 at 11:25am with V10 inside R21, R50, and R85's room, R85 stated, The leak started when they cleaned the vent on Friday. I (R85) don't know who these people are. On 10/01/2024 at 11:30am on the smoking area with V10, R21 stated, The ceiling in my room was leaking. I (R21) don't remember when it started leaking. On 10/01/2024 at 11:32am on the smoking area with V10, R50 stated, I (R50) think the leak started on Friday. I (R50) was not in the room when it happened, when I (R50) went up in my room, the ceiling was leaking. On 10/01/2024 at 10:12am, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, It is not expected to have a leak on the ceiling. It is not providing a homelike environment if the ceiling is leaking. Things like that may happen but it should be fixed immediately. The staff are expected to notify the Maintenance Department, Administrator, and DON. I (V2) am not aware of the issue verbally or through a work order. If the leak was observed on Friday, the leak should be fixed already by Sunday. The leak should be fixed immediately or as soon as possible but not for days. R21's (07/23/2024) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for mental status) Summary Score: 15. Indicating R21's mental status as cognitively intact. R50's (08/22/2024) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for mental status) Summary Score: 15. Indicating R50's mental status as cognitively intact. R85's (08/29/2024) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for mental status) Summary Score: 15. Indicating R85's mental status as cognitively intact. The (03/2024 - 10/01/2024) Work Order was reviewed; no work order for R21, R50, and R85's room. Sink in room leaking dated 09/29/2024 was for another room. The (09/29/2024) Work Order 2577 was in the common area on another floor and not in R21, R50, and R85's room. The (undated) Nursing Home Residents' Rights documented, in part Residents of nursing homes have right that are guaranteed by the federal Nursing Home Reform Law. The Law requires nursing home to promote and protect the rights of each resident and stresses individual dignity and self-determination. Right to a Dignified Existence. A homelike environment. The (undated) Resident Rights: Accommodation of Needs and Preferences and homelike Environment Policy documented, in part Policy: It is the policy of the facility to identify and provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents. The facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Objective. The objective of the accommodation of resident needs and preferences is to create an individualized, home-like environment to maintain and/or achieve independent functioning, dignity, and well-being to the extent possible in accordance with the resident's own needs and preference. Procedure: 7. The resident's environment will be maintained in a homelike manner. On 9/29/2024 at 11:00 surveyor observed a missing ceramic tile in the bathroom under the sink joining 2 rooms and R32's closet door missing the entire top half of the door. On 9/29/2024 at 11:41am R224 stated there are mice in the bathroom and they may be coming out of the hole where the tile is missing under the sink. On 9/29/2024 at 11:42am R32 said, Yes we do have mice and he reported the broken door to the CNAs who said they would let the nurse know but the door has been broken for about a week now. On 9/30/2024 at 12:35pm surveyor reviewed facility's pest control binder and on 9/23/2024 it was documented that there was a dead rodent discovered on two mice trips. On 9/30/2024 at 2:38pm V4 (Maintenance Director) stated, No the tile should not be missing, and I see a hole where their tile is missing, and the grout is dry rotted. Absolutely it is possible that mice can come in through that hole. V4 stated that there is a hole in the south wall by R224's bed that a mouse could squeeze through it. On 9/30/2024 at 2:46pm V4 stated, off the top of his head he doesn't recall being notified about the missing tile or broken door in the TELS app for maintenance issues. V4 pulled up his reports for the last 2 months so that surveyor can see that he had not received anything. V4 stated staff will also write it in the work order book. ON 9/30/2024 at 2:48pm surveyor reviewed work order book for the third floor and did not find any work order for the missing tile or broken door. On 9/30/2024 at 2:55pm V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, no she (V12) was not made aware of R32's door being broken. Preventive Maintenance Plan dated 1/2019 documents, in part, 9. Repair all ceramic tiles. Including loose or missing grout. Repair/replace as needed. Undated Job description titled Maintenance Director documents, in part, repair facility/resident property as necessary and ensure that equipment, etc. are maintained to provide safe and comfortable environment.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure administration of controlled medication was documented and failed to ensure the incoming and outgoing nurses signed ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure administration of controlled medication was documented and failed to ensure the incoming and outgoing nurses signed the Shift Change Accountability Record for Controlled Substances Forms. These failures affected R43 and all residents taking controlled medications on the 3rd floor, 4th floor B-wing, and the 6th floor B-wing. Findings include: On 09/30/2024 at 10:45am during the reconciliation of controlled medications task with V13 (Registered Nurse), R43's Controlled Drug Receipt Record/Disposition form for Tramadol 50 mg dispensed on 9/25 at 9A has a missing signature. This was pointed out to V13. V13 stated the nurse who gave the medication should signed (R43)'s form right after giving the medication to document the medication was given. On 09/29/24 at 11:37am during the Medication Storage and Labeling task with V6 (Licensed Practice Nurse) of the 3rd floor Medication Cart, there were missing signatures on 3rd floor Shift Change Accountability Record for Controlled Substances Form. This was pointed out to V6. V6 stated there are spaces in the sign in and out sheet. The incoming and outgoing nurses are supposed to sign after counting the controlled medications, so you know you handed over the correct count to the next nurse. On 09/29/2024 at 12:47pm during the Medication Storage and Labeling task with V3 (Psych Nurse/LPN) of the 6th floor B-wing medication cart, there were missing signatures on the 6th floor B-wing Shift Change Accountability Record for Controlled Substances Form. This was pointed out to V3. V3 stated there are couple of missing signatures on the sheet. The expectation is, when the outgoing and incoming nurses do the count, they are supposed to sign the accountability sheet for record keeping and tracking the reconciled medications properly. On 09/30/2024 at 10:23 am during the Medication Storage and Labeling task with V9 (Licensed Practice Nurse) of the 4th Floor B-wing medication cart, there was a missing signature on the 4th floor B-wing Shift Change Accountability Record for Controlled Substances Form. This observation was pointed out to V9 (Licensed Practice Nurse). V9 stated there is a missing signature on day 29. The outgoing nurse did not sign out. It is expected of the nurses to sign the Sheet after counting to document the count is correct. On 10/01/2024 at 10:17am, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, I (V2) expect the staff to sign the Shift Change Accountability Record for Controlled Substances Form soon after the 2 nurses counted the controlled medications. The purpose of the accountability sheet is to ensure the controlled medications count is correct. To make sure the incoming nurse receive the correct count of the controlled medications from the outgoing nurse. On 10/01/2024 at 10:20am, V2 stated I (V2) expect the nurse to document administration of controlled medication right after the administration. The nurse is expected to sign, write how many was taken and how many medications are left in the cart. R43's (Active Order as of: 09/30/2024) Order Summary Report documented, in part Tramadol 25mg. give 25mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Start Date: 05/20/2024. R43's (received 5/29/2024) Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form for Tramadol 50mg 1/2 tab has a missing signature on 9/25, 9A(am). The (undated) List of Residents on Narcotics presented to this surveyor by V2 on 10/01/2024 at 12:48pm documented there were 4 residents on 3rd floor, 4 residents on the 4th floor, and 3 residents on the 6th floor. The (09/2024) 3rd floor Shift Change Accountability Record for Controlled Substance has missing signatures on Day: 18. Shift: 2nd. Nurses initial on; Day: 18. Shift: 3rd. Nurses initial Off; Day: 22. Shift: 1st. Nurses initial On and Off; Day: 22 Shift: 2nd. Nurses initial Off; Day: 23. Shift: 1st. Nurses initial on; Day: 23. Shift: 2nd. Nurses initial Off; Day: 24 Shift: 1st. Nurses initial on; Day: 24 Shift: 2nd. Nurses initial Off; Day: 25. Shift: 1st. Nurses initial on; and Day: 25. Shift: 2nd. Nurses initial Off. The (09/2024) 4Th Floor Shift Change Accountability Record for Controlled Substance on B-Wing has a missing signature on Day: 29. Shift: 2nd. Nurses initial Off. The (09/2024) 6th Shift Change Accountability Record for Controlled Substance on B-Wing has missing signatures on Day: 22. Shift: 3rd. Nurses initial on; Day: 23 Shift: 1st. Nurses initial Off; Day: 26. Shift: 1st. Nurses initial on; Day: 26 Shift: 2nd. Nurses initial on; Day: 26 Shift: 2nd. Nurses initial Off; Day: 26. Shift: 3rd. Nurses initial Off. The (1/2024) Controlled Substance policy and procedure documented, in part General: Medications classified by the FDA (Food and Drug Administrator) as controlled substances have high abuse potential and may be subject to special handling, storage, and record keeping. Policy: 10. Controlled Substances Count Sheet. c. Signature (which includes minimum of first initial, last name and title) of nurse who administered dose. 11. All schedule II controlled substances (and other schedules if facility policy so dictates) will be counted each shift or whenever there is an exchange of keys between off-going and on-coming licensed nurses. The two nurses will: d. Both nurses will sign the Shift/Shift Controlled Substance Count Sheet acknowledging that the actual count of the controlled substances and count sheet matches the quantity documented.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow Pharmacy recommendation for medication storage and failed to ensure the refrigerators were within the required tempe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow Pharmacy recommendation for medication storage and failed to ensure the refrigerators were within the required temperature for proper storage of medications. These failures affected 2 (R84 and R100) residents and have the potential to affect all the residents on the 3rd and 6th floors. Findings include: On 09/29/2024 at 11:20 am during the Medication Storage and Labeling task with V6 (Licensed Practice Nurse), R84's Latanoprost eye drop was in a brown bag with sticker 'Refrigerate'. V6 checked if the bottle had been opened and stated the bottle was unopened. V6 stated the bag says 'refrigerate'. This medication should not be in the cart. It should be refrigerated to preserve the potency. On 09/29/2024 at 11:21am, R100's Latanoprost eye drop was in a brown bag. V6 checked if the bottle had been opened and stated the vial was unopened. On 09/29/2024 at 12:51pm during the 6th floor medication storage task with V4 (Licensed Practice Nurse), V4 opened the 6th floor medication room. This surveyor requested V4 to open the medication refrigerator and to check for the temperature registered on the thermometer. V4 checked the thermometer and stated temperature at 60F. There was an ice buildup on the small freezer inside of the 6th floor refrigerator. V4 stated the facility keep our unopened insulin in the refrigerator. On 09/30/2024 at 10:27 am during the Medication Storage Task with V11 (Licensed Practice Nurse) of the 4th Floor Medication Storage Room. This surveyor requested V11 to open the small refrigerator and to check the thermometer for the temperature. V11 stated the temperature is 48F. This surveyor requested to see the 4th floor refrigerator temperature log. The log documented temperature on 09/29 and 09/30 at 48F. V11 stated the facility keeps unopened insulin inside the refrigerator. The night shift checks the refrigerator daily to clean it and to check the temperature. On 10/01/2024 at 10:24am, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, The refrigerator temperature should be within 36F to 46F. If above, staff are supposed to let maintenance know so it can be repaired. May be needing to adjust the setting. The purpose of keeping the medication storage within the required range is to keep the medications in a stable state; to keep the potency of drug in stable condition. There could be an ice buildup that is why it has to be checked to defrost the freezer. Temperature checking is daily to make sure the refrigerator in stable condition or functioning properly. On 10/01/2024 at 10:33am, V2 stated the instruction on the bag of Latanoprost from the Pharmacy to refrigerate the medication if not opened should be followed; the medication should be refrigerated for the same purpose. To follow the manufacturer's instruction which was passed on to the pharmacy for proper storage of medication. The medication will lose its potency. That is why it has to be refrigerated if not opened. R84's (Active Orders as of: 09/30/2024) Order Summary report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) essential hypertension. Latanoprost instill 1 drop in both eyes one time a day. Start Date: 07/10/2024. R100's (Active Orders as of: 09/30/2024) Order Summary report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) Glaucoma. Latanoprost instill 1 drop in both eyes at bedtime. Start Date: 02/20/2024. The (2024) 4th Floor Refrigerator Temp Log documented that on Days 29 and 30 the temperature was at 48F. The (undated) Facility provided Latanoprost Package insert documented, in part, Storage: Store unopened bottle under refrigeration at 36F to 46F. Once opened for use, it may be stored at room temperature up to 77F for 6 weeks. The (9/2022) Storage of Medications policy and procedure documented, in part, General: to provide the staff with guidance on the proper storage of medications. Storage of Medications: 9. Medications requiring refrigeration or temperature between 36F and 46F are kept in a refrigerator with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring. Medications requiring storage in a cool place are refrigerated unless otherwise directed on the label.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster lids were closed and free from overflowing trash. These failures have the potential to affect all 194 resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster lids were closed and free from overflowing trash. These failures have the potential to affect all 194 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: The (9/29/2024) facility census was 194 residents. On 9/29/2024 at 9:34 AM, surveyor observed the singular metal lid open for the trash compactor and 2 lids for the dumpster open. Bags of garbage, boxes, and food waste products were observed inside the dumpster and compactor. Flying insects were observed flying in the vicinity of the open compactor and dumpster. On 9/29/2024 at 9:41 AM, V19 (Regional Dietary Manager) stated the dumpster lids should be closed to prevent pests from entering the trash. V19 affirmed the trash compactor lid was broken and a work order had been completed. V19 stated the lid had been broken for about a month. V19 demonstrated the trash compactor lid was able to be shut/closed but did not latch. V19 affirmed the dumpster lids were not broken and should have been closed over the dumpster. Record review of work order dated 9/19/24 completed by V5 (Maintenance Director) documents in part dietary staff reported the trash compactor isn't latching properly. Maintenance staff called trash company for service. Record review of work order dated 9/30/24 completed by V5 documents in part the latch needs to be replaced on the garbage can (trash compactor) outside and asking for them to replace the current one we have. Call has been put out and they will be here 9/30/24. This work order was assigned the Critical priority. On 10/1/24 at 9:37 AM, surveyor observed the lid to the dumpsters open with trash and boxes preventing the lids from being closed. A large stone was observed on top of the trash compactor which adequately kept the lid to the compactor closed. V5 (Maintenance Director) stated the trash can lids should be closed at all times and staff should be putting garbage in the dumpster in a way so the lids can close properly. V5 arranged the garbage so the lids could close. V5 stated the garbage company came yesterday and stated they trash compactor couldn't be fixed and a new compactor was needed. V5 did not know when a new trash compactor would be delivered. V5 stated covering the dumpsters was important so pests do not get inside and so other objects from people in the community are not placed in the dumpsters. Facility provided policy titled, Dispose of Garbage and Refuse documents in part, .All garbage and refuse will be collected and disposed of in a safe and efficient manner .
Sept 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a diagnostic appointment was scheduled for one resident (R5)...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a diagnostic appointment was scheduled for one resident (R5), who had an abnormal mammogram and doctor's order for a follow-up appointment. This failure affected one of three residents reviewed for nursing care. Findings include: R5 is a [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, unspecified asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation and essential hypertension. R5's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score is 15, which indicates cognitively intact. During investigation on 09/10/2024 at 11:31 AM R5 said, I had a mammogram done in February (2024) that came back abnormal. I was supposed to return for a follow-up appointment and the appointment was never made. I have mentioned it a couple of times to several nurses. I don't know what is going on with my breast and I am concerned. On 09/11/2024 at 12:15 PM V3 (DON/Director of Nursing) said, I thought that R5's follow-up appointment was made, but I see that the appointment was not made. Surveyor inquired about the importance of follow-up appointments. At that time, V3 (DON) said, It is important to follow-up an abnormal mammogram because the situation can get worse. It is better to catch the issue early so that it may be treated. On 09/11/2024 at 1:30 PM, V9 APN (Advanced Practice Nurse) said, I am familiar with R5. I assessed her after her abnormal mammogram and noted that there were recommendations that she (R5) have a diagnostic mammogram and ultrasound scheduled. I did try to touch base with the scheduler to make the appointment. The order to schedule R5's appointment was entered into R5's orders. I was not aware that she (R5) did not have that appointment as of now. The importance of the diagnostic mammogram and ultrasound would be to make sure that there is not a delay in care or a delay in treatment should there be any life-threatening issues. R5's Mammogram report dated 02/02/2024 documents, bilateral focal asymmetries; recommend bilateral diagnostic mammogram and possible ultrasound. Facility document titled Hospital Radiology Department dated 02/02/2024 documents, R5 needs order for a bilateral diagnostic mammogram and bilateral breast ultrasound. Provider progress notes dated 02/19/2024, 03/18/2024, and 04/19/2024 written by V9 (APN) documents, R5 is concerned about her most recent mammogram and is requesting follow-up appointment. R5's Physician Order Sheet dated 09/09/2024 documents the following active order entered on 02/19/2024; bilateral diagnostic mammogram with ultrasound for diagnosis of abnormal mammogram. Facility policy titled Physician Orders documents, physician orders are followed as written; if there is a question about the order, contact physician for clarification; follow through with orders by making appropriate contact or notification. Facility policy titled Appointments documents, staff nurse or designee will call the place of the appointment to verify date, time and location.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0557 (Tag F0557)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (R2) had clothes that fit properly...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (R2) had clothes that fit properly. Facility failed to keep inventory of four resident's personal belongings. (R2, R3, R4 and R5). This failure affected four of four residents reviewed for personal property and has the potential to affect 196 additional residents have personal belongings in the facility. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, morbid (severe) obesity, congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, and moderate persistent asthma with acute exacerbation. R3 is a [AGE] year old with diagnosis of essential hypertension. R3's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score is 15, indicating cognitively intact. R4 is [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Essential hypertension, other asthma, and pain in unspecified joint, and iron deficiency anemia. R4's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score is 15, which indicates cognitively intact. R5 is a [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, unspecified asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation and essential hypertension. R5's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score is 15, which indicates cognitively intact. During investigation on 09/09/2024 at 10:50 AM, V6 (CNA/ Certified Nurse Assistant) was observed in R2's room. At time, surveyor noted several miscellaneous items such as: neck scarfs, size small pants, a medium size jacket, a coat and two medium size skirts in R2's closet and dresser drawers; all items were not labeled with a name on them. Surveyor inquired about R2's belongings. On 09/09/2024 at 10:50 AM, V6 (CNA) said, I just found the clothes R2 has on today. R2 don't have many clothes. When the facility flooded and closed down, a lot of resident's clothes got misplaced. On 09/09/2024 at 10:50 AM, R2 said, My niece (V13) bought me some clothes and put my name on them. I can't find any of my clothes. I have to find clothes to wear every day. On 9/10/24 AT 10:05 AM, V13 (R2's family) said, Me and my sister help to buy clothes for my aunt (R2). R2 is a big woman and it's hard to find clothes for her sometimes. I bought several outfits she can fit. I've also bought underwear several times as well and all of her items are missing. Her tops were all 3X- 4X and her pants were 5X. I sent an email to the social worker (V11) of the actual photos of the items I purchased for R2 because this is an on-going issue with her missing clothes. I sent pictures of: six pairs of underwear, five pairs of pants and five shirts. I sent this email on 06/18/2024. Prior to the June email, R2 always had clothes came up missing. I would bring in items and the staff would tell me they cannot locate an inventory list to inventory her items. They also say they don't have a marker to label her clothes. I have to label them myself. Every time I go to visit, I am arguing about her clothes. I have spoken with V4 (SSD/Social Service Director) several times about her clothes. I didn't like when he (V4) suggested my family should wash R2's clothes so they don't come up missing. He (V4) told me the facility would replace R2's items but they have not been replaced yet. On 9/10/2024 at 10:30 AM, V4 (SSD) said, I told R2's niece (V13) if she gives me a receipt for R2's clothes, then we can reimburse her. V13 never brought a receipt. Surveyor inquired about inventory lists for R2, R3, R4 and R5. V4 (SSD) said, I don't have an inventory list for R2, R3, R4 or R5. I can't locate any inventory list for them. Surveyor inquired about the process and purpose of resident's inventory. On 9/10/2024 at 10:30 AM, V4 (SSD) said, Social Services is responsible for keeping inventory of resident's clothes and labeling them upon admission and whenever new items are brought to the facility. The purpose of keeping inventory of resident's items is to make sure we keep track of resident's personal belongings. On 9/9/24 at 11:20 AM, R3 said, The building got shut down and most of my belongings came up missing. I was given the run around about getting my belongings replaced, but they still only replaced about half of my items. They don't inventory or document everything, which is the problem. I'm not even sure what all is missing still. On 9/9/24 at 11:22 AM R4 said, I am still missing about a week work of clothes that have not been replaced as of today. I have never seen or signed any inventory list here. On 9/9/24 at 11:31 AM, R5 said, I had two loads of laundry that were lost back in December or January and never returned back to me. I complained to social services and my clothes are still missing. I don't recall signing an inventory list. On 9/10/2024 at 11:30 AM, V10 (Laundry Supervisor) said, We wash personal clothes in-house and the linen are sent out to another company to be cleaned. The issue with the laundry is a lot of times, clothes are sent down to the laundry room without names on them. When that happens, it is hard for us to determine who the clothes belong to. We just keep the unlabeled clothes in a bin for residents come to look for lost clothes. Laundry does not keep inventory or label clothes. I believe Social Services does. Surveyor noted a large bin filled with clothes. The clothes in the bin were not labeled with names on them. Surveyor asked if R2 had any clothes in the laundry room. On 9/10/2024 at 11:30 AM, V10 (Laundry Supervisor) said, R2 doesn't have any clothes down here that I know of, unless they are in the bin of un-labeled clothes. On 9/10/2024 at 1:30 PM V11 (PRSC/ Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) said, I came to the facility in 2023, so I was not here when R2 was admitted . I am not sure what clothing items R2 had prior to the items her niece (V13) sent via email. As far as I know the only inventory list for R2 is the list I did on 04/05/2024. V13 had stated R2 had missing items in the past and sent me an email of the items were missing. The facility replaced the items and inventoried them. I am not able to locate any other inventory list for R2 besides the one for 04/05/2024. On 09/11/2024 at 12:20 PM, Surveyor observed R2 lying in bed with pants were too small and a portion of R2's buttocks were exposed. V12 (CNA/ Certified Nurse Assistant) conducted inventory of R2's belongings and was unable to locate any of the items listed in V13's email sent to V11 (PRSC). Surveyor noted several miscellaneous items such as: neck scarfs, size small pants, a medium size jacket, a coat and two medium size skirts; all items were not labeled with a name on them; all items were too small for R2 to wear. On 09/11/2024 at 12:25 PM, V6 (CNA) entered the room and said, All of R2's clothes were sent back up from laundry yesterday. Everything is in her room is what she has. On 09/11/2024 at 2:15 PM, V10 (Laundry Supervisor) said, All of the clothes from the sixth floor were washed and returned yesterday. R2's Personal belonging list dated 04/05/2024 documents: one 3x black blouse, one 3x peach blouse, one 6x black jogger and a six pack of underwear. Facility email dated 06/18/2024 from V13 (R2's family) documents, six shirts, eleven pairs of underwear and four pair of pants. Facility Census Report dated 09/09/2024 documents 200 residents in the facility. Facility policy titled Personal Belongings- Inventory documents, to record belongings brought to the facility by or for the resident; check and record all belongings brought to the facility on admission; have the resident or responsible party sign the inventory form on admission. Facility policy titled Resident Rights documents, residents have the right to retain and use personal possessions to promote a homelike environment and to support each resident in maintaining their independence.
Sept 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report and investigate mental abuse for one (R2) of three residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report and investigate mental abuse for one (R2) of three residents reviewed for mental abuse. Findings include: On 08/29/2024 at 10:51AM, R2 stated on the day of the altercation he was standing in the medication line to receive his medication. R2 stated the nurse (identified as V7/LPN) gave R2 his medication and noticed a pill was missing so R2 let V7 know. R2 stated V7 works at the facility periodically and V7 forgets his pill often. R2 stated this particular time after R2 reminded V7 to give him his pill, V7 told R2, I'm going to beat the $h!+ out of you. R2 stated he reported this to V5 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Service Coordinator/PRSC) the next day. R2 stated he reported to V5 that V7 was being ignorant with him, giving him a hard time, and that V7 threatened to beat the $h!+ out of R2. On 08/29/2024 at 11:10AM, V5 (PRSC) stated R2 reported to her that V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) yelled at him, V7 does not give R2 his medication, and R2 does not like getting his medication from V7. V5 stated R2 reported this to her last week sometime and she has been out of the facility for the last four days and just returned back to work today. V5 stated R2 did not report anything else to her but she cannot be certain of this. V5 stated the day R2 reported to her, V5 was located on the third floor of the facility at the end of the hallway by the stairs. V5 stated she was about to leave the facility and was on her way home for the day. V5 stated it is a possibility that R2 reported to her that V7 threatened R2 but V5 stated the only thing she remembers is R2 telling her that V7 yells at R2 and doesn't give R2 all of his medication. V5 reported this to her supervisor (identified as V6/Psychiatric Rehabilitation Service Director/PRSD). V5 stated she only reported to V6 what she remembered hearing, which is, that R2 does not feel comfortable receiving his medication from V7. V5 stated since she was leaving the facility for the day, it's possible that she did not comprehend what R2 was reporting to her. V5 stated she was in-serviced on abuse about 1.5 weeks ago and is able to verbalize different forms of abuse and who to report abuse to. V5 stated the importance of reporting abuse is to keep the residents safe and to protect them. V5 stated her conversation with R2 was very quick and it is a possibility that R2 reported abuse to her but V5 was not paying attention. V5 stated if abuse allegations are not addressed then R2 is at risk for experiencing more emotional abuse which could cause trauma and mental abuse because R2 was still in the presence of the V7 (LPN) and had to receive his medications from V7. V5 stated she has seen R1 receive his medication from V7 without any concerns. V5 stated she has never heard any complaints of V7 mistreating or abusing any of the residents in the facility. On 08/29/2024 at 1:03PM, V6 (PRSD) stated he has never had a conversation with V5 (PRSC) about anything pertaining to R2 and V7 (Nurse). V6 stated V5 did not report anything to him and a conversation with V5 about R2 and V7 never happened. V6 stated if anything is reported to him, then V6 documents it and then acts and does something about it. On 08/29/2024 at 3:17PM, V1 (Administrator) stated he has been the abuse coordinator since he started working at the facility about 3 months ago. V1 stated he is in charge of any abuse that is reported, and it is V1's responsibility to investigate every allegation that is brought to his attention. V1 stated he follows the abuse policies and protocols for reporting to the state agency. V1 stated he reports to the state agency within 2 hours of receiving an allegation and submits his final report within 5 days. V1 stated he has not received any allegations of abuse regarding R2. V1 stated this is the first time he is hearing of this. V1 stated if he had received a report of abuse, he would immediately follow the abuse investigating and reporting process. V1 stated he held an abuse in-service at the facility approximately 1 week ago. V1 stated the facility in-services address things such as the types of abuse, staff responsibilities regarding abuse, and who to report abuse to. V1 stated he reiterated to all of his staff that he is the abuse coordinator at the facility and all staff should report abuse to him. V1 stated it is his responsibility to remove a staff member from the facility pending an investigation if they are accused of abuse. V1 stated now that he is aware of R2's abuse allegations, he will start an investigation and report it to the state agency. R2's Face Sheet documents that R2 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses not limited to: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety, Delusional Disorders, Hypertension, and Epilepsy. R2's Minimum Data Set/MDS dated [DATE] documents that R2 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS of 15/15, indicating that R2 is cognitively intact. Facility incident reports reviewed for the past three months and does not document any allegation of abuse regarding R2. Facility in-service dated 08/21/2024 titled Abuse policy and procedure documents V5 (PRSC) was in-served on abuse. Facility policy dated 02/07/2017 documents in part, Employees are required to report any incident, allegation, or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately, to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator or to a compliance hotline or compliance officer.
Aug 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to affirm the right of the resident to be free from physical abuse. Th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to affirm the right of the resident to be free from physical abuse. This failure has affected 1 (R6) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings Include: On 8/13/24 at 10:52 AM, R6 stated about a month ago R10 punched R6 in the face because R6 entered R10's bathroom without knocking while R10 was inside the bathroom. R6 stated R6 did not sustain any injury, but R6 was moved to another room and R10 was moved to the 3rd floor because of the incident. R6 told V18 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA)) and V36 (R6's Complainant) R6 was punched in the face by R10. R6 stated R6 has seen R10 since the incident, and R10 has threatened R6 with R10's walking cane. R10 stated R10 was transferred to the 3rd floor because of R6, but R6 always ignores R10, and R6 did not tell anyone. On 8/13/24 at 11:10 AM, V11 (Social Worker) stated the administrator is the abuse coordinator; therefore, V11 will report any abuse to the administrator immediately. The incident between R6 and R10 was not reported to V11, and there are several forms of abuse: physical, sexual, theft, and mental. Punching in the face is a form of physical abuse. On 8/13/24 at 11:35 AM, R10 stated R10 punched R6 in the face when R6 opened the washroom without knocking at the door when R10 was in the washroom. Surveyor asked if R10 has been threatening R6 with R10's walking cane. R10 denied threatening R6 with R10's cane. On 8/13/24 at 12:43 PM, surveyor notified V1 (Administrator) of R6's abuse allegation of being punched in the face by R10, and R10 has been threatening R6 with R10's cane. V1 stated V1 was not made aware of abuse allegation between R6 and R10 last month or that R10 has been threatening R6 since the incident. V1 stated V1 will investigate and follow up per policy and safety guidelines and in-service staff immediately. V1 stated it is V1's expectation staff would be reporting any abuse to V1 immediately for further investigation, and V1's phone number is available for all staff to call V1 24 hours 7 days a week to report any abuse or suspicion of potential abuse. On 8/14/24 at 12:28 PM, V18 (Rehab Aide/Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated V18 worked with R6 on 7/20/24. R6 told V18 R6 was punched in the face by R10. V18 asked if R6 told the nurse. R6 stated R6 told the nurse and that was why R6 was moved to another room. V18 told V44 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) on duty to make sure V44 was aware. V18 did not ask R6 why R6 was punched by R10. On 8/14/24 at 2:29 PM, through a telephone interview, V36 (R6's Complainant) stated R6 told V36 R6 was punched in the face by R10. V36 did not tell any staff but called the 1-800 number to report the incident, even though the incident happened a month before R6 told V36. V36 is obligated to report the incident. On 8/14/24 at 3:29 PM, V44 (LPN) stated V44 has been in this facility for one year. V44 worked on 7/20/24, 3-11 shift with R6 and R10, but no one reported to V44 of any physical assault between R6 and R10. V44 stated if it was reported to V44, V44 would have reported to the administrator immediately, and document in the nurses' note. V5 (SSD), V14 (Registered Nurse/RN), V34 (Social Worker), V37 (CNA), V39 (LPN), V40 (Infection Preventionist Nurse/IP), V47 (CNA), and V48 (Activity Aide), all stated punching is a form of physical abuse. Survey team reviewed R3, R4, R5, R6, R10, R11, and R13's Face Sheet and Section C of MDS. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R6 was cognitively intact. Social Service progress note on 7/3/24 documents in part: R10 displayed socially inappropriate behavior as evidenced by being physically aggressive. A review of R10's social service care plan revision dated 02/13/24, R10 has a history of aggressive, and inappropriate behavior. The Facility's Abuse Policy dated 9/2017 reads in part: The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property and mistreatment of residents. The facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy and procedure to ensure abuse allegation was reported to the abuse coordinator and to ensure abuse allegation w...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy and procedure to ensure abuse allegation was reported to the abuse coordinator and to ensure abuse allegation was reported no later than two hours to the State Agency (SA) for 2 (R6, R10) out of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings Include: On 8/13/24 at 10:52 AM, R6 stated about a month ago R10 punched R6 in the face because R6 entered R10's bathroom without knocking while R10 was inside the bathroom. R6 did not sustain any injury but R6 was moved to another room and R10 moved to the 3rd floor because of the incident. R6 told V18 (Rehab Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA)) and V36 (R6's Complainant) R6 was punched in the face by R10. R6 stated R6 has seen R10 since the incident, and R10 has threatened R6 with R10's walking cane. R10 stated R10 was transferred to the 3rd floor because of R6, but R6 always ignore R10, and R6 did not tell anyone. On 8/13/24 at 11:35 AM, R10 stated R10 punched R6 in the face when R6 opened the washroom without knocking at the door when R10 was in the washroom. Surveyor asked if R10 has been threatening R6 with R10's walking cane. R10 denied threatening R6 with R10's cane. On 8/13/24 at 12:43 PM, surveyor notified V1 (Administrator) of R6's abuse allegation of being punched in the face by R10 and that R10 has been threatening R6 with R10's cane. V1 stated V1 was not made aware of R6's allegation. V1 stated V1 will investigate and follow up per policy and safety guidelines and in-service staff immediately. V1 stated it is V1's expectation staff would be reporting any abuse to V1 immediately for further investigation, V1 stated V1's phone number is available for all staff to call V1 24 hours 7 days a week to report any abuse or suspicion of potential abuse. Surveyor reviewed with V1 the facility reportable dated from 01/05/24 to 6/6/24, there was no report of R6's allegation. On 8/14/24 at 12:28 PM, V18 (Restorative Aide/Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated V18 worked with R6 on 7/20/24 and R6 told V18 R6 was punched in the face by R10. V18 asked if R6 told the nurse. R6 stated R6 told the nurse and that was why R6 was moved to another room. V18 told V44 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) on duty to make sure V44 was aware. V18 did not ask R6 why R6 was punched by R10. On 8/14/24 at 3:29 PM, V44 (LPN) stated V44 has been in this facility for one year. V44 worked on 7/20/24, 3-11 shift with R6 and R10, but no one reported to V44 of any physical assault between R6 and R10. V44 stated if it was reported to V44, V44 would have reported to the administrator immediately, and document in the nurses' note. On 08/15/24 at 11:55 AM, Surveyor requested V1 to provide the initial report submitted to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) for R6's allegation discussed with V1 on 8/13/24 at 12:43 PM. In-service on Abuse Policy dated 8/13/24. The Facility's Abuse Policy dated 9/2017 reads in part: V. Internal Reporting Requirements and Identification of Allegations. Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately, to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator or to a compliance hotline or compliance officer.
Jul 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0569 (Tag F0569)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify residents of their trust fund balances before they exceeded the $2000.00 resource limit for Social Security Administration (SSI) for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify residents of their trust fund balances before they exceeded the $2000.00 resource limit for Social Security Administration (SSI) for an individual for 17 of 17 residents (R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, and R20) who were reviewed for trust fund in the sample. This failure has the potential to affect the Medicaid and SSI eligibility for R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, and R20 listed as having trust fund over the $2000 limit and has the potential to affect all the 189 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 06/25/24 review of the facility Resident Fund Management Service Trial Balance dated 06/25/24 showed the following resident trust fund balances: R4 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$3752.49 R5 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 = $14,942.58 R6 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2036.95 R7 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2074.04 R8 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$3319.71 R9 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2303.29 R10 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2461.08 R11 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2698.50 R12 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2071.16 R13 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2872.20 R14 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$3849.29 R15 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2524.73 R16 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2807.09 R17 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$4018.24 R18 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2287.66 R19 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2465.74 R20 Trust fund balance as at 06/25/23 =$2392.86 As of 06/26/24 at 4:30pm, the facility was unable to present the quarterly notification/ any notification that the residents were notified of their balances. On 06/26/24 at 9:20am, V3 (Business Office Manager) stated the requirement has changed from $2000.00 for individuals. V3 stated now the residents are allowed to have up to $17,500.00 in their trust fund account and will not lose their eligibility. V3 stated trust funds are distributed to residents whose trust funds are being managed by the facility. V3 stated based on a letter from All Assistance Program Providers that documented in part that this notice informs all Medical Assistance Program providers that the customer resource (also known as asset) limit has been changed from $2000 for an individual and $3000.00 for couple to $17,500. V3 stated in part due to this letter the facility did not send the family or the resident any notice because the individual balances did not exceed $17,500. V3 stated some of the residents are being assisted in getting funeral arrangement plans. V3 stated the facility residents are on Medicaid benefit. V3 stated R5 funds came on 06/24/24 and that will be sorted out to know exactly how much money will be left in the trust fund but R5 is still not over the $17,500 amount. The SS (Social Security) spotlight on Resources 2024 edition documents to get benefits the account resources must not be worth more than $2000 for an individual or $3000 per couple. This is described as the resource limit. Federal regulations documents in part, when the amount in the resident's account reaches $200 less than the SSI resource limit for one person and if the amount in the account, in addition to the value of the resident's other nonexempt resources, reaches the SSI resource limit for one person, the resident may lose eligibility for Medicaid or SSI. The facility Resident Trust Fund Policy and Procedure with no date, documented that residents shall not have more than $17,500.00 in their trust fund account.
May 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to follow medication administration policy on documentin...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to follow medication administration policy on documenting inhaler medication ordered by physician; failed to observe proper time in administering inhaler medication; and failed to follow respiratory care plan to administer medication as ordered by physician. These failures apply to 1 out of 3 residents (R2) for a total sample of 3 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. Potential effect of these failures involved 1 resident (R2) diagnosed with COPD that needs inhaler medication to address symptoms of disease. Findings include: R2 is [AGE] years old, admitted initially on 03/03/2023. R2's primary diagnosis dated 3/6/2023 is chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Per CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) prevents airflow to the lungs, causing breathing problems. It is a leading cause of death in the United States. On 5/14/2024 at 11:40 AM, R2 was seen lying on his bed, alert and able to express thoughts within topic. R2 was asked if he receives his inhaler multiple times. R2 replied, I received it one time every day. Per physician order dated 2/12/2024, R2 was ordered to received Albuterol Sulfate HFA Inhalation Aerosol Solution 108 (90 Base) MCG per ACT two puffs inhale orally every four (4) hours related to COPD. Medication Administration Record (MAR) for R2 for the months of March, April and May 2024 show multiple days were not recorded as medication being administered. On 5/15/2024 at 12:40 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated during medication administration nurses must observe the five rights of the patient including right medication, right time, and right dose. V2 said, nurses should document on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) every time a medication is administered. Nurses should sign the MAR and document every time they give medication. V2 said there must be a sign or a number code to determine if the medication is given or not. If there is no sign or code, the facility cannot determine if the medication was given, or if it was refused. On 5/15/2024 at 12:56 PM, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was informed that medication administration of R2's inhaler scheduled at 2:00 PM will be reviewed. V6 stated she already gave the medication for 2:00 PM. When asked why she (V6) gave it earlier that an hour before, V6 said that it was a few minutes before it 1:00 PM and she should have waited. V6 was asked what time she gave the morning schedule for R2's inhaler. V6 replied, I gave it at 8:00 AM. V6 was asked why she gave it 2 hours earlier than scheduled. V6 replied that she thought the schedule was 9:00 AM. V6 then checked electronic medication administration record (eMAR) for the schedule. V6 said, I was wrong, it is scheduled at 10:00 AM not 9:00 AM. I will inform the doctor. V2 stated that the facility follows one hour before, and one hour after rule in administering medication. Plan of care for R2 on respiratory care dated 2/12/2024 reads: R2 has potential for difficulty in breathing related to COPD. Interventions include administer medication or treatment as ordered. Facility policy on Medication Administration dated 4/2024, reads: All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. Verify that medication is being administered at the proper time, in the prescribed dose, and the correct route. Document as each medication is prepared on the MAR (Medication Administration Record). If the medication is not given as ordered, document the reason on the MAR (Medication Administration Record).
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interviews, and review of the facility failed to maintain dishwasher equipment in clean condition; failed to maintain testing strips used to determine concentration of solution i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and review of the facility failed to maintain dishwasher equipment in clean condition; failed to maintain testing strips used to determine concentration of solution in the three-compartment sink. Dishwasher and three-compartment sinks are used to sanitize dishes and utensils used by residents during mealtime. Failures have the potential to affect all 190 residents that are taking food by mouth. Findings include: On 5/14/2024 at 1:06 PM, V3 (Dietary Manager) was asked what the kitchen staff used to determine concentration of solution when cleaning or sanitizing dishes and utensils used by residents. V3 replied, We have strips to determine solution concentration. V3 then reached up on the top of the shelf-like structure above the three-compartment sink and grabbed a cylindrical clear plastic container. Inside were strips within a paper that showed labels had expiration date of 04/01/2022. V3 was informed that the strips are expired more than two years ago. V3 stated that he did not know that the strips were expired. V3 stated that kitchen staff cannot use an expired strip that had expired two years ago. V3 said, I understand what you mean. This strip is available for kitchen staff to use and is expired. I will make sure to get a new strip that is not expired. V3 stated he may have a strip that are not expired in his office. V3 said, But he understands that it should not be used by staff because it was expired. At the dishwasher area, metal surface of the dishwasher was seen with accumulation of whitish grey dirt dried up all over the metal surrounding the dishwasher machine. V3 was asked when the last time dishwasher was cleaned. V3 stated that an outside vendor comes to do maintenance every other month. V3 stated that he does not know if there was deep cleaning or regular cleaning done but that dishwasher needs to be clean on a daily basis by kitchen staff. V3 then asked another kitchen staff to clean the dishwasher. V1 (Assistant Administrator) was informed that per V3 outside vendor comes to do maintenance every other month. There was no cleaning schedule established for cleaning equipment including dishwasher. V1 stated that he will take care and clean dishwasher today. Per facility currently one resident does not take food by mouth. Facility policy on equipment dated 9/2017 reads: As a policy all foodservice equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order. Under procedure, all equipment will be routinely cleaned and maintained in accordance with manufacturer's direction and training materials.
Apr 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff arrive timely to work, failed to ensure medications are dispensed for one resident at a time, failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff arrive timely to work, failed to ensure medications are dispensed for one resident at a time, failed to ensure that dispensed medications are discarded if not administered, failed to ensure medication administration is documented, failed to ensure medications are not left at the bedside, failed to administer (R1, R3, R4) medications (as prescribed) and failed to ensure staff administer medications within regulatory requirements for 37 of 37 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, R35, R36, R37) in the sample reviewed for medication administration. These failures have the potential to affect 45 (6th floor) residents. Findings include: On 3/21/24, IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) received allegations that R1's medications were not administered. R1, R2, R3 and R4 reside on 6th floor. The (3/27/24) census includes 45 (6th floor) residents. On 3/27/24 at 10:04am, surveyor observed V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) passing medications on 6th floor. Surveyor inquired when AM medications are scheduled for administration. V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, It's scheduled from 7 to 9 (am). V5 continued passing medication. Surveyor inquired which (6th floor) residents had not yet received 9am medications. V5 advised she (V5) was passing medications to residents in the hallway as they approach the medication cart and going from room to room however did not answer the question. Surveyor inquired if V5 had a list of residents who received or did not receive 9am medications, V5 responded No. Surveyor inquired why several (6th floor) resident names were highlighted red (indicating overdue) on the EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record), V5 replied Some are like vitals and weight not done. R4's name was highlighted red on the EMAR. V5 accessed R4's EMAR (as requested) and affirmed that Nuedexta (scheduled for 9am administration) was not documented. Surveyor inquired why R4's (3/27/24) Nuedexta was not documented. V5 replied, I left it open as a reminder to myself to reorder. Two (unlabeled) medication cups (containing several medications) and unopened packaged medications (for another resident) were noted atop of the medication cart at this time. Surveyor inquired why several residents dispensed medications were atop of the medication cart. V5 discarded the unlabeled medications after inquiry. On 3/27/24 at 10:21am, V5 administered R2's (9am) medications (Amlodipine, Ergocalciferol, Risperdal, Timolol, Ferrous Sulfate) however this was after 10am therefore not administered on time. On 3/27/24 at 10:25am, V5 accessed the (6th floor) EMAR a total of 37 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, R35, R36, R37) were highlighted red and 283 overdue medications was observed on the computer screen. Surveyor inquired how many medications were overdue at this time V5 stated, It says 283. Surveyor inquired why 283 scheduled medications are overdue, V5 stated, Like what I told you the blood sugar, medication, the vitals I didn't enter them. Surveyor inquired what time V5 arrived at the facility today V5 responded, I got here at 7:30(am). Surveyor inquired what time V5's shift started. V5 replied, at 7 (am), therefore V5 arrived 30 minutes late. On 3/27/24 at 10:28am, V4 (Assistant Director of Nursing) approached V5 and stated, You cannot pass anymore medications until you call the doctor. Surveyor inquired why V4 instructed V5 to stop passing medication. V4 responded, It's past time you know, and she (V5) needs to let the doctor know, so she can get an order from the doctor. Surveyor inquired about the regulatory requirement for medication administration. V4 replied, An hour before or hour after. Surveyor inquired if medications are scheduled for 9am administration what's the required time to complete the medication pass. V4 stated, 10am. Surveyor advised that the EMAR states, 283 overdue medications at this time. V4 responded, It says medications are not given however I know she (V5) must have given the medication. Surveyor inquired if the (9am) medications for residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, R35, R36, R37) highlighted red on the EMAR were documented as administered V5 replied, It should have been. On 3/27/24 at 10:35am, R3's name was highlighted red on the EMAR, surveyor inquired if R3 received today's (9am) medications. V5 stated, No, he hasn't. R3's EMAR affirmed the following medications were prescribed for (9am) administration: Amiodarone, Ferrous Sulfate, Furosemide, Asper cream, Bupropion, Calcium, Apixaban, Gabapentin, Lidocaine patch, Metoprolol, and Sertraline. On 3/27/24 at 10:36am, surveyor inquired if R1 received prescribed (9am) medications today. V5 stated, Yes she did. However, R1's name was highlighted red on the EMAR. V5 accessed R1's EMAR (as requested) and affirmed all (9am) medications were not documented as warranted. Surveyor inquired why R1's (9am) medications were not documented if they were administered. V5 responded, I thought I did. Surveyor inquired about the regulatory requirement for medication administration. V5 replied, You sign, you document it after resident has taken the medication. V5 subsequently opened the medication cart and an (unlabeled) cup of pills were observed in the top drawer. Surveyor inquired about the cup of dispensed pills in the medication cart. V5 replied, The medication for the resident, he was not in the room that was (R36's name). [At 10:21am, R36 was observed by V5 and surveyor in his room]. __ R3's (1/30/24) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 15 (cognitively intact). On 2/27/24 at 10:48am, R3 affirmed he did not receive 9am medications today. Surveyor inquired when AM medications are administered at the facility. R3 stated, From 8 in the morning till 10:30 or so. Sometimes they have a tendency to run out of sh** and I have to wait till it's reordered and restocked. A couple months ago they ran out of my blood thinner. R3's POS (Physician Order Sheets) include the following active orders as of 3/27/24: Amiodarone, Apixaban (Anticoagulant), Lidocaine Patch to left shoulder, Bupropion, Calcium + Vitamin D, Ferrous Sulfate, Furosemide, Gabapentin, Metoprolol Tartrate, and Sertraline which are scheduled for 9am administration. R3's (March 2024) MAR (Medication Administration Record) affirms the Lidocaine patch was not documented on 3/14/24 (blank space). Levothyroxine was not documented on 3/14/24 and 3/22/24 (blank space). __ R1's (2/13/24) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 12 (moderate impairment). On 3/27/24 at 10:50am, surveyor inquired about concerns at the facility. R1 stated, The other day, I didn't get my medication. I got my meds (medications) today, but the two vitamin D were not the same, so I spit em out, they in the trash. R1 removed the 2 white pills from the trash at this time. Surveyor inquired if V5 left the medications at bedside. R1 responded, She (V5) just set the cup down and walked away. R1's POS includes the following active orders as of 3/27/24: Cymbalta, Ferrous Sulfate, Gabapentin, Hydrochlorothiazide, Losartan Potassium, Meloxicam, Topiramate, and Vitamin D scheduled for 9am administration. R1's (March 2024) MAR (Medication Administration Record) affirms all (9am) medications were not documented on 3/23/24 (blank space). __ R4's POS includes the following includes the following active orders as of 3/27/24: Aspirin, Cyanocobalamin, Folic Acid, Levothyroxine, Protonix, and Vitamin B1 scheduled for 6am administration. Humalog (Insulin) per sliding scale scheduled for 7:30am and 11:30am administration and Amlodipine Besylate (Antianginal), Ferrous Sulfate, Metformin, Nuedexta for PBA scheduled for 9am administration. R4's (March 2024) MAR affirms the following: On 3/14/24 all (6am) medications were not documented (blank spaces). On 3/23/24 all (9am) medications were not documented (blank space). On 3/23/24 the 7:30am Humalog was not documented (blank space). On 3/22/24 and 3/23/24 the 11:30am Humalog was not documented (blank space). On 3/27/24 at 2:53pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) reviewed R1, R3, and R4's (March 2024) MAR and affirmed (aforementioned) blank spaces were noted. Surveyor inquired what a blank space on the MAR indicates. V2 stated, It means the nurse did not indicate what happened if he's (resident) refusing or out for appointment. There's a code for that, they (staff) are supposed to use a code. The Medication Administration policy (revised 5/2017) states verify that the medication is being administered at the proper time. If medication is not given as ordered, document the reason on the MAR and notify the Health Care Provider if required. If the physician's order cannot be followed for any reason, the physician should be notified in a timely manner, and a note should reflect the situation in the resident's medical record.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered and failed to ensure that four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered and failed to ensure that four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for medication administration remained free from significant medication errors. Findings include: On 3/21/24, IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) received allegations that pain, blood pressure and neurological medications were not administered to R1. On 3/27/24 at 10:36am, surveyor inquired if R1 received prescribed (9am) medications today. V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, Yes she did. However, R1's name was highlighted red (indicating late administration) on the EMAR (Electronic Medical Record). V5 accessed R1's EMAR (as requested) and affirmed all (9am) medications were not documented as warranted. Surveyor inquired why R1's (9am) medications were not documented if they were administered. V5 responded, I thought I did. Surveyor inquired about the regulatory requirement for medication administration. V5 replied, You sign, you document it after resident has taken the medication. R1's (2/13/24) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 12 (moderate impairment). On 3/27/24 at 10:50am, surveyor inquired about concerns at the facility R1 stated, The other day, I didn't get my medication. R1's MAR (Medication Administration Record) affirms all (9am) medications were not documented (4 days prior) on 3/23/24 (blank space). R1's POS (Physician Order Sheets) include the following significant medications scheduled for 9am administration: (9/20/23) Cymbalta (Antidepressant), (2/8/23) Gabapentin (Anticonvulsant), (2/8/23) Hydrochlorothiazide (Antihypertensive), (2/8/23) Losartan Potassium (Antihypertensive), (3/7/23) Meloxicam (Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory) for pain, and (5/15/23) Topiramate for headaches. __ R4's POS includes the following significant medications: (11/30/23) Levothyroxine (Thyroid Hormone) scheduled for 6am administration. (11/7/23) Humalog (Insulin) per sliding scale scheduled for 7:30am and 11:30am administration and (11/6/23) Amlodipine Besylate (Antianginal), (11/30/23) Metformin (Hypoglycemic), (11/6/23) Nuedexta for PBA (Pseudobulbar Affect/Neurological Condition) scheduled for 9am administration. R4's MAR affirms the following: On 3/14/24 all (6am) medications were not documented (blank spaces). On 3/23/24 all (9am) medications were not documented (blank space). On 3/23/24 the 7:30am Humalog was not documented (blank space). On 3/22/24 and 3/23/24 the 11:30am Humalog was not documented (blank space). On 3/27/24 at 10:04am, R4's name was highlighted red on the EMAR. V5 accessed R4's EMAR (as requested) and affirmed that Nuedexta (scheduled for 9am administration) was not documented. Surveyor inquired why R4's (3/27/24) Nuedexta was not documented. V5 replied, I left it open as a reminder to myself to reorder. __ On 3/27/24 at 10:35am, R3's name was highlighted red on the EMAR. Surveyor inquired if R3 received today's (9am) medications. V5 stated, No, he hasn't. R3's EMAR affirmed the following significant medications were prescribed for (9am) administration: Amiodarone (Antiarrhythmic), Furosemide (Diuretic), Bupropion (Antidepressant), Apixaban (Anticoagulant), Gabapentin (Anticonvulsant), Lidocaine (Anesthetic) patch, Metoprolol (Antihypertensive), and Sertraline (Antidepressant). R3's (1/30/24) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 15 (cognitively intact). On 2/27/24 at 10:48am, R3 affirmed he did not receive 9am medications today (as stated). R3 stated, Sometimes they (facility) have a tendency to run out of sh** and I (R3) have to wait till its reordered and restocked. R3's POS (Physician Order Sheets) include but not limited to (2/1/24) Lidocaine Patch to left shoulder for pain. (2/29/24) Levothyroxine related to hypothyroidism. R3's (March 2024) MAR (Medication Administration Record) affirms the Lidocaine patch was not documented on 3/14/24 (blank space). Levothyroxine was not documented on 3/14/24 and 3/22/24 (blank space). __ On 3/27/24 at 10:21am, V5 administered R2's (9am) medications however it was after 10am therefore administered late per regulatory requirements (within 1 hour). R2's EMAR affirmed the following significant medications were prescribed for (9am) administration: Amlodipine (Calcium Channel Blocker to prevent angina) and Risperdal (Antipsychotic). On 3/27/24 at 2:53pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) reviewed R1, R3, and R4's (March 2024) MAR and affirmed (aforementioned) blank spaces were noted. Surveyor inquired what a blank space on the MAR indicates. V2 stated, It mean the Nurse did not indicate what happened if he's (resident) refusing or out for appointment. There's a code for that, they (staff) are supposed to use a code. The Medication Administration policy (revised 5/2017) states verify that the medication is being administered at the proper time. If medication is not given as ordered, document the reason on the MAR and notify the Health Care Provider if required.
Feb 2024 1 deficiency 1 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, records review and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe and home like environment by not maint...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, records review and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe and home like environment by not maintaining comfortable and safe temperature levels in the entire premises of the facility. This failure affected all 258 residents residing in the facility, who were all subjected to hazardous temperatures and one resident (R8) who was sent to the hospital and admitted due to hypothermia. This was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy which began on 1/16/24 at 10:30 am per (1/16/24) facility temperature log which documents a residents' rooms temperature range of 53F (Fahrenheit) to 63F. On 1/19/24 at 09:16 am V1 (Administrator) was notified of the immediate jeopardy. The facility presented a final removal plan on 1/22/24 at 4:49 am which was not approved. The facility presented a revised final removal plan on 1/23/24 at 04:59 pm which was not approved. The facility presented another revised final removal plan on 1/24/21 at 1:36 pm which was accepted/approved on 1/25/24 at 5:08 pm. The surveyor conducted additional interviews and record reviews on 1/26/24 to 1/31/24 verify the plan was implemented. The immediate jeopardy was removed on (1/24/24) based on actions from the removal plan. Findings include: On 01/16/24 at 04:00 pm surveyor arrived at the facility and noticed that there were 2 charter buses in front of the facility and in the entrance hall there were more than 15 people distributed between the reception, entrance and corridor leading onto the elevators. Everyone was wearing winter coats and jackets; some were wearing winter hats and gloves and scarfs. The temperature inside was very cold. There was a line of people coming from the elevator. After speaking with V1 (Administrator), surveyor learned that those people were residents being transferred to other facilities and staff were there to help with the transfer process. On 1/16/24 at 04:15 pm surveyor observed residents had been in process of being discharged to two other facilities due to inadequate heating. The weather forecast on 1/15/24 was 4 degrees Fahrenheit (F) with wind chills of minus 9 F. Temperatures on 1/16/24 was 5 degrees with wind chills of -5 degrees according to the weather forecast. On 1/16 24 at 04:15 pm V1 (administrator), said that on 01/15/24, around 8:30 am, it was noticed the temperature inside the building was dropping. The lack of heating was affecting all floors. The facility called a company to check the boiler and it was noticed the boiler temperature was at 130 instead of 160. V1 said the boiler malfunctioning was fixed, and the heating was restored for a while but then one of the radiator pipes burst. A plumbing company was called. The plumbing company arrived around 11am on 1/15/24, repaired the plumbing, but while they were working, other pipes burst and continued to burst because they were frozen due to the intense cold weather. V1 said, The plumbing company told me the problem would continue to occur even though they were trying to contain it. That's why I decided to evacuate all residents to other facilities. V1 said two facilities confirmed to receive residents. V1 said the census is 258 and all residents will be transferred and at this point to 2 facilities have that accepted their residents. V1 stated these two facilities will provide 150 beds to accommodate the residents. On 1/16/24 at 04:20 pm V1 said offices are located on the 1st floor; 2nd, 3rd, 4th floor is mix of skilled and non-skilled residents, but mostly skilled residents, need more assistance; 5th floor they are little more independent; 6th and 7th floor residents are independent, ambulatory and need less assistance. Copy of the census received and shows total of 258 residents. On 1/16/24 at 04:30 pm V3 (Assistant Administrator) said, The pipe burst happened initially on the second floor on (1/15/24) which caused flooding to both 2nd floor, and 1st floor. We have over 100 portable heaters that were brought in to help and they had been placed on residents' rooms to keep it warm until the heating system be repaired. The facility has also bought forced heaters and they have been placed on the floors. During facility tour surveyor noted some room did not have a portable heater in place, some other rooms had a portable heater placed in the floor unplugged. On 1/16/24 at 04:35 pm V2 (Regional Director of Operations) stated, We are implementing phase one of our emergency plan, which is to evacuate the most mobile/ independently residents first and then evacuate the ones who need more assistance, the ones on wheelchair, or not able to be transferred by bus and requires a wheelchair van for transportation. While we are doing this, I have my Chief Operating Officer (COO - V4) calling other facilities checking their availability to receive our residents. On 1/16/24 at 05:02 pm observation conducted on 2nd floor. Noticed a portable heater placed in the hallway and another one close to the nursing station. Surveyor observed water on the floor of 4 rooms. No residents observed in these rooms. At the top of the staircase that leads to the second floor, there were several black bags with debris, debris on the floor and signs of flooding. The pipe was uncovered and broken and according to the building's maintenance director V7, was where the leak started, and they had to isolate the pipe to fix it. On 1/16/24 at 5:10 pm on 3rd floor several residents observed in wheelchairs sitting in the hallway, or grouped in a room called the day room located in front of the nursing station. The residents were wearing winter clothing, such as coats, jackets, gloves, and hats. According to nurse (V6), the floor census is 47 residents. One nurse and one CNA observed working in the floor. On 1/16/24 at 05:12 pm R3 observed inside her room, sitting in a wheelchair, and noted to be wearing multiple layers. R3 stated, It's cold here and there is no heating. There is no portable heater in R3's room. Surveyor asked V6 to check R3's room to verify if there is a portable heater inside the room. V6 stated, I don't see one. On 1/16/24 at 05:15 pm noticed R4's room without a light on. R4 was in bed without a blanket, covered from the chest to the lower extremities with just a sheet. R4 kept saying, Help, help, help, black, black, back, back. R4 noted to be shivering and hunching his shoulders. R4 said he was cold, and then pointed to a wheelchair. The room was dark and cold. The room has 4 beds. A portable heater has been placed next to the R4's bed, but is not plugged in. Another portable heater found next to second bed D is plugged in. Surveyor asked V6 why the room is dark and cold and why the heater next to R4's bed is unplugged. V6 tried to plug the heater in, but the outlet was too far from the bed. V6 checked the headboard's light for all 4 beds and none of them worked. V6 said she heard that if the portable heater is plugged in, the lights above the headboard won't work properly. V3 (AADM) tried to plug in the portable heater placed close to R4's bed but was not able to. V3 stated, These are the things we have not planned. V6 unplugged the portable heater that was placed close to another bed and the lights came on. V6 said she will transfer R4 to the wheelchair but does not provide a blanket to resident. On 1/16/24 at 05:25 pm R9 was laying down in bed, wearing several layers of clothing and covered by a blanket. R9 has no roommate. Noted a portable heater placed on top of the nightstand. R9 said her son bought the heater for her yesterday because it was too cold and there is no heating in the room. R9 said the facility bought the portable heater today around 12 pm. The heater provided by facility is plugged in and placed on the top of the dresser. R9 said no one told her she will be transferred to another facility. On 1/16/24 at 05:28 pm R10 stated, They just brought the portable heater now. The heating went out during the weekend, and they should have moved us during the weekend. On 1/16/24 at 05:30 pm R5 said, They just brought this heater a few minutes ago. I'm freezing here. The heat stopped yesterday evening. I need more blankets. I've asked them, but they don't bring it. R5 was wearing 4 layers of clothing including a sweater and has one sheet and one blanket on top of her and said, and I'm still cold. On 1/16/24 at 06:00 pm there is no heating in the dining room, reception, lobby, therapy room and offices, all located on the 1st floor. Surveyor worked wearing a full set of winter clothes (heavy coat, hat, scarf). Facility's staff noted to be wearing a full set of winter clothing gloves and some of them using scarfs as well. There is no heating inside the elevators. Copy of the census received and shows total of 258 residents. On 1/16/24 the facility temperature log indicates temperatures were checked in residents' rooms, nursing station (NS), basement, Physical Therapy room, offices and dining room (PT & SO & IDNE). The temperature log shows rooms temperature were checked on intervals of about 1 hour and reflects the following: At 08:30 am temperature on rooms 702, NS and 721 were respectively 55F, 59F and 54F ; 602, NS, 620 - 55F, 57F 55F; 502, NS, 521 - 54F, 57F, 55F; 401, NS , 420 - 55F, 60F, 54F; 302, NS, 321 55F, 55F, 54F; 201,NS, 220 - 54F, 53F, 55F. At 09:40 am the temperature ranged from 59.7F on the 6th floor to 53F on 2nd floor. At 10:30 am the log reflects temperature of the following: 701 - 63F/ 720- 60F; 602- 59F/ 621- 54F; 501- 56F /520-54F; 402- 53F /419-53F; 302- 54F/ 320-53F; 202- 53 F/ 220-53 F; PT&SO& DINE (1ST floor) 51F - 52F. Facility's temperature log sheet dated 1/16/24 completed on interval of 30 minutes starting at 5 pm does not documents residents' rooms temperature, instead documents one temperature per floor (6th, 5th and 4th floor) where the residents were. The temp log reflects the following: At 5 pm 5th floor- 67.3F; 4th floor 66.1F. At 05:30 pm 5th floor - 66.4F; 4th floor 67.2F. At 6 pm 5th floor 66F; 4th floor 67.2F. At 6:30 pm 7th floor 64.1F; 6th floor 65.4F; 5th floor 66.5F. At 7 pm 7th floor 65.1F; 6th floor 68.1F; 5th floor 67.2F; 4th floor 67.9F. At 7:30 pm 6th floor 68.9 F; 5th floor 67.5F ; 4th 67.9F . The highest temperature recorded from 8 pm on 1/16/24 to 3 am on 1/17/24 on the 4th floor 71.1F. At 8 pm and 8:30 on 1/16/24 the 4th floor temperature was 61F. On 1/16/24 at 18:05 pm, noticed a crew member bringing another equipment into the facility. According to V1, it is to be installed to provide heat, because we still have to keep the building's temperature up. On 1/17/24 at 09:30 am noted 120 residents, according with census, remained at the facility with the heating system still not functionally operating. On 1/17/24 at 10:47 am 4th floor hallway north temp 57.3 degrees. At 11:08 am one resident's room on 4th floor temp was 56.6. degrees. On 1/17/24 at 01:50 pm V5 (Regional Maintenance Director) stated, The boiler malfunctioning affected the air handle system and the radiator system. The upstairs units were working at 75% capacity and warming the 7th, 6th, 5th and 4th floor. The air handles in the basement cover basement, 1st, 2nd and 3rd floor. The big units we are getting will fix the problem and they will be heating the building in 2 to 3 hours. The standing heater covers 750 square feet and we got 20 of those. The machine pumps up 80 degrees, but that does mean the rooms are 80 degrees. Forced heaters that covers 300 square feet, those are the best ones, and we have 3 of those per hall. We should have the standing heating unit, the portable heaters and the diesel fuel commercial make up air units, all working to provide heating the building so in 1:30 and 2 hours we should have everything done. On 01/17/24 at 09:40 am V1 said the heating is working on all floors, but after inspection with V7 (Maintenance Director) surveyor noted the temperature was below 71 degrees on the 4th floor. Temperature in the north corridor of the 4th floor was 57.3 degrees at 10:47 am on 01/17/24. At 11:08 a.m., the temperature in one resident's room was 56.6. degrees. On 1/17/24 at 03:02 pm Surveyor made rounds with V7 (Facility Maintenance Director). Despite all equipment brought to facility to heat up the building the temperature in residents' rooms still under the temperature required. Room temperatures were 64.9, 59.3, 63.3 63.8, 56.3, 61.9 in resident's rooms and 64.3 in the day room [ROOM NUMBER]th floor temp. The day room has one standing heating unit and two forced heaters in place. Facility entrance area temp 46.5. On 1/17/24 at 06:05 pm V1 said they were transferring residents from the 6th floor to another facility. V1 said, the boiler is working, it's just that the temperature was not holding up because the pipes burst. V1 stated, It reduced the power to keep the heat up. On 01/17/24 at 06:56 pm temperatures were 61.4, 62.8, 66.4, 60.2 degrees respectively in 4th floor residents' rooms and 68 degrees at Nursing station. On 1/18/24 at 10:47 am room's temperature checked randomly and were the following: 5th floor rooms 68.3 F, 68.1 F, 62F, 60 F, 70 F, 69.8F. 6th floor rooms 68.6F, 67.2F, 65.1F, 64.4F. On 1/18/24 progress notes documents R8 was sent to the hospital. Hospital records documents: 66.y male present to Emergency Department for evaluation. Patient brought by EMS for possible low oxygen saturation at nursing home. Per EMs the nursing home had a pipe burst and had patient was in a wheelchair sitting in the hallway. On initial assessment patient noted to be hypotensive and bradycardic. Physical exam reads: blood pressure 110/68; pulse 66' temperature 91.8 degrees. Medical decision making patient noted to be hypothermic, hypotensive, and bradycardic. Will give antibiotic and lab work. Patient placed in warming blanket. On 1/19/24 at 09:45 am R6 was in a wheelchair, fully dressed, wearing winter clothes. R6 stated, I was on the 4th floor on Monday (1/15/24), and it was cold. Cold enough to make me uncomfortable. There was no heating coming from the radiator or from the ceiling. It was very cold! I used my own blanket. On Tuesday (1/16/24) afternoon they brought the portable heater to other rooms, but never to our room. I asked V7 (maintenance director) for a heater, but he never brought one. For four days they are talking we are going to leave to another facility, and we are still here. On Tuesday (1/16/24) they put me in the room on the 6th floor that was cold and had water on the floor. I said if I am going to be in another cold room, I would prefer to stay in my room. They took me back to the 4th floor. I did not get any medicine last night. I did not get my insulin and the Keppra. I take Keppra because I have seizures. They did not check my blood sugar this morning. The nurse said she did not have the equipment to do it. They said the nurse on duty did not know where the medication was. They said they had packed the medication because we were about to leave, and the nurse didn't know where they put it. On 1/19/24 at 09:50 am R7 stated, They transferred me to 6th floor on Wednesday (1/17/24). On 1/15 and 1/16/24 the 4th floor was cold. I was fully dressed, with coat and I had to cover my head with the blanket. That's how cold it was. Everybody was wearing coat, gloves, boots and hats. It really started on Monday afternoon. The temperature was dropping. It came back a little bit and then was cut off. They told us the furnace was broken and they will bring a new one. On Tuesday they said they will transfer us. But my question is, why the let people who can walk go and left us on a wheelchair, behind? From Monday to Wednesday, when they started bringing the heating units here, we had no heating. I was transferred to this floor (6th) on Wednesday. I did not receive my medication last night. On 1/23/24 at 10:57 am V1 stated, Right now we have our residents on 6th floor, temps are between 71 and 81 F. It was checked 30 minutes ago. We are checking every 30 minutes. No residents have been sent to hospital since Friday. The resident sent to the hospital is still at the hospital. After we are able to get the entire building complete and any water damage fixed we will bring the residents back. The equipment going to ceiling through plastic tubes is to eliminate moister. We will have a meeting to discuss the progress of the work that is being done and learned about the time frame for the completion of it. On 1/23/24 at 01:30 pm surveyor made rounds with V22 (Maintenance). Random temperatures were taken on the 6th floor where 46 residents remained were 81.7 F, 83.1F, 84.4F, 85.3F, 84.9F, and 84.6F. The South hallway was 85.1F; Room in front of the nursing station (day room) north wall was 87.3 F and Nursing station was 87.3F. Residents noted to be wearing light clothes and were complaining the temperatures were now too hot. Staff no longer wearing winter clothes. Nurses and CNAs noted to be wearing scrubs only. On 01/23/24 at 3:29 pm V5 (Regional Maintenance Director) stated, The purpose of the generator that was brought into the facility (placed outside the facility) was to supply hot water that will flow to the radiator pipes and fans to create heat. The radiator's heat goes to the air coils which will push hot air through ductwork throughout the building while the pipes and coils are being repaired. V5 said the boiler was repaired, but the pipes froze, and the dampers and controls were damaged due to the cold. V5 stated the coils weren't working yet, so the 4th floor was cold. It should be done by tomorrow afternoon. The patching of the air handles should be done by Friday. Hopefully, and in the worst case, Monday. I turned off the heating as it was getting very hot on the upper floors as there is now some heat coming from the radiators as well. On 1/30/24 at 01:34 pm V15 (Attending physician) stated, I don't think this is predictable. It depends on whether the person is exposed to lower temperatures. Was the resident outside the facility? Yes, lower temperature can cause bradycardia. A body temperature of 91.8F is considered hypothermia and the resident has go to the hospital. The nursing home may provide a blanket and provide hot liquids, but this needs to be closely monitored. If the resident develops septic condition and requires treatment with antibiotics. The following corrective actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy were taken: 6TH FLOOR TEMPERATURE: A. Temperatures are being checked in the resident rooms and resident areas on the 6th floor every 30 minutes. B. The temperatures on the 6th floor are maintained between 71°F to 81°F. HEATING SYSTEM: A. On 1/15/2024, the boiler is functional and was validated by the HVAC company. B. Per HVAC company report, the boiler supplies heat to radiators at all exterior walls in stairwells and patient rooms. The boiler also supplies heat to coils in the two air handlers. The Air handler number #1 which is located in the basement of the facility covers floors 1, 2 and 3. Air handler #2 also provided heat from the boiler is located on the 7th floor penthouse and covers floors 4,5,6 and 7. Air handler #2 also has two sets of coils. Dampers were closed to try and conserve heat and push through floors 4,5,6 and 7. C. The facility contracted HVAC company to get two (2) make up air units to pump heat to air handler #1 to push hot air into floors 1, 2 and 3. D. The facility has also procured temporary heating units on 1/15/2024. The facility took the following immediate actions to address the citation and prevent any additional residents from suffering an adverse outcome. A. On 1/19/2024, at 1:15pm, the QAPI team (which includes the Administrator, DON - director of nursing, Assistant Administrator, Maintenance), and members of the executive management team (which includes, VP of Operations, VP of Physical Plant, Chief Regulatory Compliance & Clinical Officer, VP of Policy & Education and VP of Regulatory Compliance & Clinical Services) conducted an Ad-Hoc QAPI meeting to discuss the alleged deficiency and corrective actions. The Medical Director was not able to attend the meeting in person, therefore, the Administrator notified Medical Director of the Ad-Hoc QAPI meeting minutes via telephone on 1/19/2024, at 3:15pm. B. During the Ad-Hoc QAPI meeting, the QAPI team, members of the executive management team, and the VP of Physical Plant also discussed the Heating System Mitigation Plan which was developed for the facility in response to the extreme cold outside temperatures. C. The VP of Policy and Education will provide training to the Senior Leadership of the facility, which includes the Administrator, DON and Maintenance Director. The training will include but not be limited to: 1) The responsibility of the administrator to report all incidents to IDPH in a timely manner. 2) The responsibility of the Administration to provide a safe and homelike environment to all residents. 3) Emergency Management Plan focusing extreme temperatures and facility response. 4) Preventive maintenance related to the boiler and facility heating system. This training started on 1/19/23 and was completed on 1/23/2024. To validate retention of knowledge, posttests will also be used, and the acceptable score is 100%. If the score is less than 100%, a retraining will be completed. D. Nursing Staff Education. The DON/ADON will provide training to all nurses about symptoms of hypothermia. The training will be completed on or before 1/19/2024. E. All Staff Education. After training, the Administrator, Maintenance Director, DON, ADON will also provide training to all staff about extreme cold weather protocols. The training will also include posttests and the acceptable score is 100%. Any staff who did not achieve 100% test results was provided with additional retraining from the Administrator, Maintenance Director, DON, ADON. Training on the execution of the facility's emergency evacuation plan The training started on 1/19/2024 and completed on 1/23/2024. F. All staff members who are not available and/or currently on vacation will also receive the same education upon their return to work. The Administrator/DON/ADON will provide the same training. G. Agency staff. The facility is not using agency staff at this time. If agency staff are used in the future, the facility will utilize the same process of providing the education to ensure that they (agency staff) will receive the same training as the facility staff. H. In the future, when agency is used, the Administrator/ DON/ ADON will provide similar training prior to the start of their shifts. I. An agency staff will not start the shift without finishing the training first. J. Boiler. The Administrator will review the preventive maintenance schedule with the maintenance director, focusing on boiler maintenance. The Administrator will also provide training to the maintenance director to notify the Administrator, VP of Physical Plan and VP of Operations of any concern identified with the boiler. The training will be completed on or before 1/19/2024. K. The DON/ADON/charge nurses will conduct resident assessments every two (2) hours to ensure that residents are not experiencing any sign of hypothermia. The DON/ADON/charge nurses will notify the attending physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) of any identified concern. This started on 1/15/2024, 9:00am. L. The Maintenance Director/designee will continue to conduct temperature checks of all rooms on the 6th floor every 30 minutes until the QAPI team decides to change the frequency of temperature checks. M. The Maintenance Director/designee will continue to conduct temperature checks of all rooms in floors, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 7th floor every hour until the QAPI team decides to change the frequency of temperature checks. N. The residents who have been evacuated will be allowed return to the facility once the facility stabilizes the temperature in all floors between 71°F to 81°F for at least 24 hours. This will be discussed during an Ad-Hoc QAPI meeting. O. All results of the temperature checks, unit rounds and resident assessments will be reported to the QAPI committee. P. An Ad-hoc QAPI meeting will be held weekly to determine if additional interventions are necessary to ensure compliance. Q. The Administrator will monitor completion of this plan of removal.
Sept 2023 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide supervision and failed to ensure one of four residents (R2) reviewed for abuse remained free from abuse. As a result of this failure...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide supervision and failed to ensure one of four residents (R2) reviewed for abuse remained free from abuse. As a result of this failure, R2 was struck in the head (with a chair) sustained a laceration to left eyebrow and subdural hematoma due to trauma. Findings include: On 9/15/23, IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) received allegations R2 was hit in the head a few times by an unknown resident weeks ago and has a brain bleed. R2's (7/25/23) progress notes states writer was informed resident R2 was engaged in verbal argument with peer which led to physical altercation. Resident R2 has cut on his upper eyebrow. On 9/20/23 at 2:44pm, surveyor inquired about the (7/25/23) incident. V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, I was in the washroom when I heard commotion in the dayroom. The residents were playing cards around 1:00 am. The CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) told me he (V19/CNA) was making rounds when it happened and the other CNA was on break. He (V19/CNA) told me that he heard a commotion and rushed down. (R2) and (R6) had a verbal altercation that led to physical altercation. (R2) had a laceration on his upper eyebrow so I cleaned it, took his vitals, and gave him pain pill because he was having a little bit of pain. V5 affirmed she did not witness the (7/25/23) incident. On 9/20/23 at 3:15pm, surveyor inquired about the (7/25/23) incident. V19 (CNA) stated, That night, I had them (residents) play cards. They (residents) were in good mood. (R2) was not there at that time. He (R2) joined them (residents) later. After an hour, it was time to do my rounds. I was on the north side of the building (far end) where they (residents) watch the TV. Surveyor inquired if V19 witnessed the (7/25/23) incident. V19 responded, I heard a commotion. (R6) had already thrown the chair on (R2). He (R6) was aggressive. He (R6) was cussing about you (R2) talk about my mom. He (R6) was difficult to calm down. (R2) got a cut on his upper eye that was bleeding. I called the nurse she came to help me. Surveyor inquired if any staff witnessed the (7/25/23) incident. V19 replied, The Nurse was in the washroom and the CNA went on a 15-minute break. It was only me on the floor at that time. R2's (9/15/23) history & physical states patient alert, oriented to place and person, able to provide history that he was hit on the head with a chair a couple weeks ago. R2's (9/15/23) head CT (Computed Tomography) affirms subdural hematomas in multiple locations. Acute/subacute bilateral subdural hematoma likely traumatic. On 9/21/23 at 1:03pm, surveyor inquired about potential harm to an (unsupervised) resident hit in the head with a chair. V22 (Medical Director) stated, There is potential for harm. There's potential for bleeding on the inside of the brain or skull fracture. Those would be the 2 things that are concerning. The (10/2022) abuse policy and prevention program states this facility desires to prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, deprivation of goods and services by staff and misappropriation of resident property by establishing a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. This will be accomplished by a comprehensive quality management approach involving the following: staff supervision.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to report accurate information to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) and failed to substantiate physical abuse resulting in serious ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to report accurate information to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) and failed to substantiate physical abuse resulting in serious injuries (laceration, subdural hematoma) for one of four residents (R2) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 9/15/23, IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) received allegations that (R2) was hit in the head a few times by an unknown resident weeks ago and has a brain bleed. On 8/19/23 at 10:23 am, V1 (Administrator) presented the (July-September 2023) abuse binder as requested however R2's abuse incident was excluded. Surveyor inquired if R2 was abused by another resident in the facility. V1 affirmed she was unaware of the allegation. On 9/19/23 at 11:09 am, surveyor inquired if R2 was involved in a physical altercation with another resident. V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated, He had an incident about 2 months ago with another resident. I believe it was reported to (V1) so she will have the details. Surveyor advised that the (July-September 2023) abuse binder was received however the incident involving R2 was excluded. V3 responded, It may not be an abuse; it may be just physical aggression however physical aggression is in fact abuse. R2's (7/25/23) progress notes state writer was informed R2 was engaged in verbal argument with peer which led to physical altercation. R2 has cut on his upper eyebrow. On 9/20/23 at 2:44 pm, surveyor inquired about the 7/25/23 incident V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, I was in the washroom when I heard commotion in the dayroom. The residents were playing cards around 1:00 am, the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) told me he was making rounds when it happened, and the other CNA was on break. He (V19/CNA) told me that he heard a commotion and rushed down (R2) and (R6) had verbal altercation that led to physical altercation too. (R2) had a laceration on his upper eyebrow so I cleaned it, took his vitals, and gave him pain pill because he was having a little bit of pain. I informed the ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). On 9/20/23 at 3:15pm, surveyor inquired about the (7/25/23) incident V19 (CNA) stated, I heard a commotion (R6) had already thrown the chair on (R2). He (R6) was aggressive he was cussing you talk about my mom and was difficult to calm down. (R2) got a cut on his upper eye that was bleeding. The (7/25/23) initial incident report states resident allegedly abused or neglected: (R2). Alleged perpetrator: (R6). Allegation type: Other reason for submitting this report was selected which states resident to resident altercation [Abuse was not selected as warranted]. It was reported that both residents were involved in an altercation. (R2) sustained a cut to his upper eyebrow and was sent to the hospital for evaluation. The (7/25/23) follow-up investigation states (R2) stated, We were playing cards when it happened, there were words between us, that was it. (R6) stated he was having words with (R2) when (R2) grabbed a pen, it looked like (R2) was about to attack him so (R6) tried to defend himself and accidentally hit him above his eye. (R6) stated he did not mean to hurt (R2). Resident statements affirm: (R2) & (R6) were having an argument. (R2) made a statement about (R6) mother. (R6) became physically aggressive towards (R2). V19 was also interviewed however nothing was documented about the chair involved in the incident. R2's (9/15/23) history & physical states patient alert, oriented to place and person, able to provide history he was hit on the head with a chair a couple weeks ago. R2's (9/15/23) head CT (Computed Tomography) affirms subdural hematomas in multiple locations. Acute/subacute bilateral subdural hematoma likely traumatic. On 9/20/23 at 3:31pm, V1 (Administrator) affirmed she's the abuse coordinator. Surveyor inquired about the regulatory requirements for abuse. V1 (Administrator) stated, The requirement for abuse is, once it's brought to my attention, I have to report it (to IDPH) within 24 hours, if there's an injury involved, we have to report it within 2 hours. An investigation is initiated and then we inform the doctor, family and of course we inform the State and law enforcement if there was an injury. Surveyor inquired if the Police were notified (7/25/25). V1 responded, Yes. Surveyor inquired why because abuse was not marked on the (7/25/23) initial report submitted to IDPH. V1 responded, That was an honest omission. It wasn't intentional to do that and affirmed other was marked. Surveyor inquired why the (7/25/23) follow-up investigation was marked Unsubstantiated if R6 was physically aggressive towards R2 and R2 sustained a reportable injury. V1 replied, Because the other (R6's name) was not an intentional behavior he (R6) did not intend to hurt him (R2). It was poor impulse control. The (10/2022) abuse policy and prevention program states the facility affirms the right to our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This will be done by filing accurate and timely investigative reports. When an allegation of abuse, exploitation, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property has been made, the administrator or designee, shall notify Department of Public Health's regional office. The report shall include the following information, if known at the time of the report: Type of abuse reported (physical, verbal, or mental abuse). The final investigation report shall contain the following: the original allegation (note the specific allegation). Conclusion of the investigation based on known facts.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL (Activity of Daily Living) care to three of four dependent residents (R5, R10, R11) reviewed for ADL care. Finding...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL (Activity of Daily Living) care to three of four dependent residents (R5, R10, R11) reviewed for ADL care. Findings include: 1. R5's diagnoses include history of traumatic brain injury, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right side. R5's (8/9/23) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 14 (cognitively intact). R5's (8/9/23) functional assessment affirms (2 person) physical assist is required for toilet use. On 9/19/23 at 1:40 pm, surveyor observed an incontinence brief and soiled saturated washcloth lying on the bed next to R5. Surveyor inquired when R5's incontinence brief was last changed. R5 stated, This morning on the night shift. Surveyor inquired what was lying next to R5. V12 (Registered Nurse) stated, It's a diaper, I can ask the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) taking care of him to come. Surveyor inquired why a soiled wet washcloth was also on R5's bed. V12 responded, I know it's bad, but I need to check to see, this should not be there definitely not. R5's Care Plan dated 8/9/2023 documents, in part, R5 will have support and/or resources, gather and provide necessary materials/equipment. 2. R10's diagnoses include history of seizures, malaise, failure to thrive and intellectual disabilities. R10's (6/26/23) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined resident is rarely/never understood. R10's (6/26/23) functional assessment affirms (2 person) physical assist is required for toilet use. On 9/19/23 at 11:40 am, R10's incontinence brief was saturated with urine and stool. The pad beneath R10 was also soiled with stool. V13 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) affirmed she is assigned to R10. V13 stated, I got to work late today, around 8:30am, so I started passing breakfast trays and feeding residents. I have not done rounds today because I have not had time to do rounds. V13 affirmed rounds are supposed to be done every 2 hours. R10's Care Plan, dated (6/27/23), documents, in part, Focus: ADL (Activity of Daily Living) R10 requires total staff assist x1 with daily care needs related to Seizures, noted to have weakness to all extremities. Interventions: keep clean and dry after each incontinent episode. Focus: Check and Change; R3 is at risk for complications related to incontinence. Interventions: Check and Change incontinence pad at frequent intervals throughout the shift. 3. R11's diagnoses include history of diabetes, dementia, Alzheimer disease rheumatoid arthritis and chronic kidney disease. R11's (9/7/23) BIMS determined a score of 9 (moderate impairment). R11's (9/7/23) functional assessment affirms (1 person) physical assist is required for toilet use. On 9/19/23 at 11:45am, R11 stated, I'm wet, I need to be changed. Surveyor and V13 inspected R11's incontinence brief which was saturated with urine. Surveyor inquired when R11 was last checked and/or changed. R11 responded, It's been a while. On 9/19/23 at 1:45pm, V3 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated, residents are checked every 2 hours and PRN (as needed). V3 stated, residents are checked to see if they are wet, their wellbeing, makes sure they are Ok, and if they need anything. It is not okay for a resident to sit in a soiled diaper for an extended period of time. On 9/20/23 at 3:45pm V1 Administrator stated, incontinent care should be done every 2 hours or as needed. If a staff member did not do rounds, they (staff) should tell someone they cannot do it. It is not acceptable for a resident to have a saturated incontinent brief with stool or urine. R11's Care Plan, dated (5/27/22), documents, in part, Focus ADL, R11 requires staff extensive assistance with daily care needs related Rheumatoid Arthritis, Dementia, Alzheimer. Goal: Staff will anticipate and meet all of residents needs on a daily basis through next review, such as clean, dry, groomed . Interventions: keep clean and dry after each incontinent episode. Facility policy dated 11/2022 titled Incontinence Care documents in part, General: Incontinence care is provided to keep residents as dry, comfortable and odor free as possible. It also helps in preventing skin breakdown. Guideline: 1. Incontinent residents are evaluated for a bowel and bladder program and placed on one if appropriate. 4. Remove soiled clothing and linen.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the staffing policy, failed to ensure that nursing staff arrive on time and/or as scheduled, and failed to ensure tha...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the staffing policy, failed to ensure that nursing staff arrive on time and/or as scheduled, and failed to ensure that sufficient nursing staff were available to meet the needs for three of four dependent residents (R5, R10, R11) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. These failures have the potential to affect 251 residents. Findings include: On 9/7/23, 9/15/23 and 9/18/23 IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) received allegations regarding facility lack of staff. The (9/19/23) census includes 251 residents. R10 resides on 2nd floor. R10's (6/26/23) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined resident is rarely/never understood. R10's (6/26/23) functional assessment affirms (2 person) physical assist is required for toilet use. On 9/19/23 at 11:40 am, R10's incontinence brief was saturated with urine and stool. The pad beneath R10 was also soiled with stool. V13 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) affirmed she is assigned to R10. V13 stated, I got to work late today, around 8:30am, so I started passing breakfast trays and feeding residents. I have not done rounds today because I have not had time to do rounds. V13 affirmed rounds are supposed to be done every 2 hours. R11 resides on 2nd floor. R11's (9/7/23) BIMS determined a score of 9 (moderate impairment). R11's (9/7/23) functional assessment affirms (1 person) physical assist is required for toilet use. On 9/19/23 at 11:45am, R11 stated, I'm wet, I need to be changed. V13 inspected R11's incontinence brief which was saturated with urine. Surveyor inquired when R11 was last checked and/or changed R11 responded, It's been a while. On 9/19/23 at 1:51pm, surveyor inquired about the current (2nd floor) staffing. V13 stated, It's one (1) Nurse and two (2) CNAs for 36 residents and affirmed roughly 12 residents are total care. On 9/19/23 at 1:00pm, surveyor inquired about the current (7th floor) staffing V6 (CNA) stated we have 2 CNA's and 1 Nurse for 26 residents. However, the (9/19/23) 7th floor schedule affirms V6, V7 (TNA/Training Nurse Assistant) and V8 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) were assigned, therefore only 1 CNA was scheduled. Surveyor inquired about the facility weekend staffing V6 responded, If they (facility) short of staff they'll pull from this floor to the skilled floor (leaving only 1 CNA on 7th floor). On 9/19/23 at 1:04 pm, surveyor inquired about facility weekend staffing. V7 (TNA) stated, It's fair. On 9/19/23 at 1:08pm, surveyor inquired about the current (7th floor) staffing. V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, There's 1 Nurse and 2 CNA's. Surveyor inquired if one of the CNA's (V8) was referring to is V7 (TNA) therefore not certified. V8 responded Well, TNA yes. On 9/19/23 at 1:34 pm, surveyor inquired about the current (3rd floor) staffing. V11 (CNA) stated, It's 2 Nurses and 4 CNA's. If somebody don't come in, they'll (staff) just split the set. V11 affirmed, staff who call off are not replaced. R5 resides on 3rd floor. R5's diagnoses include history of traumatic brain injury, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right side. R5's (8/9/23) BIMS determined a score of 14 (cognitively intact). R5's (8/9/23) functional assessment affirms (2 person) physical assist is required for toilet use. On 9/19/23 at 1:40pm, an incontinence brief and soiled saturated washcloth were lying on the bed next to R5. Surveyor inquired when R5's incontinence brief was last changed R5 stated, This morning on the night shift. Surveyor inquired what was lying next to R5 V12 (Registered Nurse) stated, It's a diaper, I can ask the CNA taking care of him to come. Surveyor inquired why a soiled wet washcloth was also on R5's bed V12 responded, I know it's bad, but I need to check to see, this should not be there definitely not. Multiple call offs and/or NCNS (No Call No Show) were documented almost daily on the (8/19/23-9/17/23) nursing schedule. The (8/19/23) schedule affirms five (5) CNAs called off on 2nd shift and one (1) CNA arrived late, however none of the staff were replaced per the schedule. The (9/3/23) schedule affirms three (3) LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurses) called off on 1st shift, however none of the staff were replaced per the schedule. On 9/21/23 at 10:23 am, surveyor inquired about the regulatory requirement for staffing. V21 (Staffing Coordinator) stated, We have to have 1 RN within a 24-hour period, 7 days a week for 8-hour shifts. However, staffing based on census and/or resident needs was excluded. Surveyor inquired about current facility staffing. V21 responded, Third and 4th floor get 2 Nurses with 3-4 CNAs on day/evening shifts. On night shift there's 1 Nurse and 3-4 CNA's. For the other floors (2nd, 5th, 6th, and 7th) we have 1 Nurse, 2 CNA's and 1 restorative CNA. Surveyor inquired about the 8/19/23 (evening shift) call offs. V21 replied, The weekends for some reason here is quite short. We had 5 CNAs called off on 2nd shift. We had quite a few agency people scheduled that day. Our call offs are out the window and getting out of hand especially on the payday weekend. We're hiring new people to weed out the call off people. Surveyor inquired if any of the CNAs that called off (8/19/23) were replaced by other staff. V21 stated, No, cause I should have at least 2 aides on the floor. There were 2 aides on the floor but one on each called off leaving only one aide on the floor (referring to the 5th, 6th, and 7th floors). Surveyor inquired about the 9/3/23 (day shift) where there were 3 nurse call offs. V21 responded, All agency who were assigned to work didn't show up. Surveyor inquired if any of the 3 (day shift) Nurses scheduled (9/3/23) were replaced. V21 replied, I couldn't get a replacement for 1 of the 3 Nurses but the other 2 were picked up. The staffing policy (reviewed 11/2022) states staffing is based on the IDPH formula for determining numbers and levels of staff. Staffing is then increased based on the needs of the resident population. Staffing is supplemented as needed by outside agencies. It is the staff members' responsibility to be at work when they are scheduled.
Sept 2023 17 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of residents by not monitoring and preventing a r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of residents by not monitoring and preventing a resident (R412) from receiving and using an illegal drug for 1 (R412) out of 1 resident reviewed for incidents and accidents. This failure resulted in R412 overdosing on heroin, requiring transfer and treatment at acute hospital for treatment. Findings Include: R412's medical records show an admission date of 7/5/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, and Epileptic Seizures. R412's progress notes dated 7/5/23 at 7:24 PM written by V3 (Director of Nursing) shows R412 was admitted in the facility from an acute hospital with history of alcohol and drug abuse. R412's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R412 was cognitively intact and required supervision with locomotion on and off unit. R412's care plan with date initiated on 7/6/23 shows R412 has a history of substance abuse/chemical dependency with one intervention reads to provide leisure counseling. Facility did not provide documentation R412 attended counseling. Progress notes dated 7/27/2023 at 9:36 PM written by V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) documents in part: [R412] noted in bed lethargic unresponsive. [R412's] pupils pin point. [R412's] speech slurred and altered mental status V/S B/P 166/125, pulse 103 Temp., 98.7, O2 98, B/G 126. ADON and [V40- R412's Medical Doctor] made aware. [V40] order writer to transferred resident to (Acute) Hospital order carried out immediately. Progress notes dated 7/28/23 at 5:11 AM documents R412 was transferred to the acute hospital and was evaluated with a diagnosis of Opioid overdose. R412's hospital records dated 7/27/23 under Patient Care Report Narrative, documents in part, [R412] admitted to snorting heroin [R412] acquired in the nursing home at 2000 hours. Emergency Department Attending Note documents in part, [R412] is a 27 y.o. male who presents to the ED for presumed heroin overdose. Per EMS patient has had similar presentation in the past, went to the top floor of his nursing facility and reportedly snorted heroin. R412's AFTER VISIT SUMMARY dated 7/27/23 shows R412's diagnosis was Opiate overdose and R412 received three doses of Narcan (reverses an opioid overdose). On 8/29/23 at 11:18 AM, V8 (LPN) stated V8 was the nurse in charge for R412 the night of the incident. V8 stated R412 went down to smoke after dinner around 6:30 PM. V8 stated R412 came back on the 2nd floor (V8 does not remember the exact time). V8 noticed R412 uncomfortable, having slurred speech, and feeling weak. V8 stated V40 ordered R412 to be sent out to the hospital. V8 stated V8 does not remember if R412 went down to smoke by himself. V8 stated R412 goes down to smoke independently. At 1:07 PM, V10 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) stated smoking schedules are after breakfast, after lunch, and after supper and staff are supposed to be always watching the residents smoke. On 8/30/23 at 9:29 AM, V12 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director) stated R412 did not have an independent pass and R412 was a smoker and needed supervision when smoking. At 11:29 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated R412 did not go out the evening of 7/27/23 but we have other residents go out, so I'm thinking maybe other resident got the drugs for [R412]. V3 stated if a resident has a history of drug overdose the staff should be doing an enhanced observation, meaning checking on them at least every hour. At 11:40 AM, V12 stated R412 was supposed to be placed for a Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) therapy sessions but did not get to start because R412 was only in the facility for a short period of time. V12 stated R412 had history of drug abuse and staff supposed to check on R412 at least every two hours to make sure R412 is okay. At 1:03 PM, V28 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated V28 was the CNA in charge for R412 on 7/27/23 evening shift. V28 stated R412 was fine all day until that evening. V28 stated R412 was going up and down the elevator that night. V28 stated R412 ate dinner around 5:00 to 6:00 PM. V28 stated R412 left the floor around 6:30 PM and took the elevator by himself. V28 stated V28 did not see if R412 went down or up. V28 stated (R412) probably went to smoke and after that went to the 7th floor. V28 stated around 9:00 PM, R412 came back from the 7th floor and R412 was red, dizzy, and was out of it. V28 stated R412 told V8 that R412 came from the 7th floor. At 1:17 PM, V27 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Assistant) stated V27 worked on 7/27/23 evening shift and does not remember watching R412 smoke for the evening smoke break. V27 stated there are staff watching residents smoke outside the patio but that does not last for more than one hour. V27 stated after residents' smoke, they either stay in the 1st floor dining room to play games or they go back to their floors on their own. V27 stated staff used to pick the residents up from each floor to bring downstairs to smoke but staff stopped doing after 4th of July. At 3:48 PM, V29 (R412's Family Member) stated during a phone interview R412 did not mention where R412 got the drugs. V29 stated whenever they visit R412 in the facility there are no staff that search the items they bring inside the facility. At 4:06 PM, V30 (Resident Services Assistant) stated during a phone interview V30 worked on 7/27/23 evening shift and did not see R412 went down for smoke break after dinner. V30 stated V8 called V30 to go to the 2nd floor (V30 does not remember the exact time). V30 stated when V30 went up to the 2nd floor and saw R412, R412 was not in his usual self. R412 was not feeling well, kept standing up, and falling off. V30 stated R412 could not speak clearly and looked tired and drowsy. V30 stated when residents go for smoke break, they go down and go back up on their own. The facility's policy titled; RESIDENTS' RIGHTS & RESIDENTS' SAFETY Enhanced Supervision Guidelines dated 7/8/2020 reads in part: Purpose: These guidelines emphasize a proactive intervention promoting enhanced physical, psychosocial well-being and person-centered care while promoting resident/resident representative care participation. The facility recognizes there may be occasions in which standard approaches of Q2 hour rounds may need to be increased to more frequent, enhanced observation. Types of enhanced supervision that could be used: Q15-minute, Q30-minute, hourly checks - the staff will check observe the resident's status/whereabouts every 15 or 30 minutes, or hourly.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility; (A) Failed to recognize, evaluate, and address weight loss; and (B) failed to...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility; (A) Failed to recognize, evaluate, and address weight loss; and (B) failed to consistently implement interventions, monitor the effectiveness of interventions and revise them as necessary. This resulted in a significant weight loss [ >10% change over 6 months] for 1 [R79] of 5 [R12, R36, R70, R109] residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 35. Findings included: R79's clinical record indicates in part: R79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, vitamin D deficiency, anxiety disorder, Parkinson's Disease, essential hypertension, and human immunodeficiency virus. Minimum data set [MDS] dated 7/1/23 indicates R79 scored 15 on brief interview for mental status indicating R79 is cognitively intact. MDS section K dated 7/1/23, indicates R79 did not have a swallowing disorder, or dental concerns. Section K dated 7/1/23- R79 loss more than 5% or more in the past 30 days and loss 10% or more in the past 6 months. R79 was not on a physician prescribed weight loss regimen. R79's on 12/29/22 weight was 222 pounds and on 8/3/23 186 pounds. R79's physician orders: [1] Dated 5/4/23 Ensure one time per day to possibly slow weight loss progression, offer at breakfast. [2] Dated 5/4/23 House supplement one time per day - Mighty Shake with dinner. [3] Dated 8/7/23- Ensure two times a day for prevent further weight loss, offer at breakfast and lunch. R79's progress notes indicate in part: 5/4/23 at 8:35 PM, V42 [Dietitian] Note- Sig [Significant] Wt. [ weight] Change Note: -9% in 90 days (April). R79 triggered for significant weight loss. Recommended ensure shake at breakfast and mighty shake at dinner to slow weight progression. 5/24/23 at 4:38 PM V43 Note - Significant weight loss -7.6% in 30 days. R79 continued to trigger for significant weigh loss. Recommend weekly weights for four weeks due to seven-pound weight loss in 30 days. Recommend continuing ensure daily. (Interventions were the same as 5/4/23) 6/26/23 at 12:20 AM, V43 [Dietitian] Note - Weight Warning: -10% weight loss over 180 days. R79's weights reviewed in the past six months - 6 months = weight loss of 31 pound (14%), 3 months = weight loss of 20 pounds (9.5%). R79 can feed self with supervision. No swallowing or chewing problems. Recommend ensure at breakfast and mighty shake at dinner. (Interventions were the same as 5/4/23) 7/17/23 at 10:15 PM, V43 Note - Weight Warning. Weight 190 pounds. -10% weight loss over 180 days. Significant weight loss in 6 months loss 28 pounds (-12.8%) recommend ensure with breakfast, might shake at dinner. (Interventions were the same as 5/4/23 dietician note) 8/7/23 at 4:46 PM V44 [Dietitian] Note- Weight Warning. Weight 186 pounds. -10% weight loss over 180 days, compared to 2/2/23 weight of 215 pounds (-13.5%) of 29-pound weight loss. Currently, ensure at breakfast and mighty shake at dinner. Increase ensure supplement to twice a day to promote weight maintenance. R79's electron medication administration record dated 8/1/23 thru 8/31/23, documents in part: Dated 8/7/23- Ensure two times a day for prevent further weight loss offer at breakfast and lunch. -Missing administration of prescribed ensure on the following dates 8/7/23 at 12 PM 8/8/23 at 8 AM and 12 PM 8/9/23 at 8 AM and 12 PM 8/10/23 at 8 AM and 12 PM 8/11/23 at 8 AM and 12 PM R79's weight record indicates the weeks of 6/9/23, 6/16/23, and 6/23/23 no weekly weights were obtained. On 8/29/23 at 10:29 AM observed R79 resting in bed. R79 stated, I'm not doing well. I keep shaking and keep losing weight. The doctors and nurses are not doing anything about it. I have no idea how much I weigh. On 8/29/23 at 10:46 AM, surveyor requested V50 [Licensed Practical Nurse] for R79 to be weighed with surveyor present. V50 stated, We can weigh (R79) at 1PM. On 8/29/23 at 12:50 PM, surveyor reported to nursing floor. V50 stated, R79 just left the faciity on his way to the hospital due to tremors. R79 was able to feed himself, without any assistance. R79 hands would shake, but he could feed himself. On 8/30/23 at 8:35 AM, V41 [R79's Family Member] stated, R79 has been losing weight because the facility stared him on some medication and R79 began to have tremors really bad. To the point R79 had difficulty feeding himself. The food would shake off the fork or spoon not getting into his mouth. I kept telling the nurse that R79 needs feeding assistance, but they will not listen. R79 will call me and tell me they would not help him eat. The facility has not told me that R79 loss any weight, but I can tell because his clothes is falling off. The medication that was causing the tremors was discontinued. R79 was sent to the hospital due to his tremors. On 8/30/23 at 11:17 AM, V3 [Director of Nursing] stated, The dietitian makes recommendations for weekly weights. The order is placed in vital signs and the weight is completed weekly. The reason for weekly weight is to closely monitor a resident's weight loss and to prevent a significant weight loss that can occur within 30 days. If a physician's order is not signed out on the electronic medication administration record, then the medication or supplement was not given. If a resident does not receive a prescribed nutritional supplement, the resident could potentially have more weight loss. The nurse should notify the family of the weight loss. I do not have (V42) or (V43) phone numbers. They worked here through a contracted agency. On 8/31/23 at 1:15 PM, V44 [Dietitian] stated, I been working at this facility since 8/1/23 through a consultant company. R79's last weight was 186 pounds. -10% weight loss over 180 days, compared to 2/2/23 weight of 215 pounds, total of 29-pound weight loss. I increased ensure supplement to twice a day to promote weight maintenance. R79 will be re-evaluated upon return from the hospital. R79's weigh loss is probably from the progression of Parkinson's disease, which require more calorie intake due to all the involuntary movements. I have not observed R79 eat and have not received reports that he needs assistance due to shaking. The beginning of August was my first time looking over his record, I will observe R79 eating once he return from the hospital. R79's weight loss was not desired or planned. Weekly weights are ordered to develop a baseline and to prevent an accumulative weight loss that may happen in 30 days. If weekly weights are not completed it could potentially cause the resident to have a higher weight loss, because interventions were not in place to slow weight loss. The weekly weight helps the dietitian to monitor the resident closely. If a resident continues to lose weight with dietary interventions in place; the weight loss dietary interventions should be monitored, evaluated, and adjusted as necessary to prevent further weight loss and stabilize a resident weight. On 8/7/23, I increased R79's ensure supplement to twice per day. If R79 misses the prescribed ensure, he could potentially loss more weight. I do not notify family of a residents weight loss; the facility is responsible for notification. On 8/31/22 at 2:05 PM V45 [ R79's Primary Care Physician] stated, I was told about R79's weight loss two months ago and recommended for R79 to see dietitian. I do not document every single thing in my notes. I verbally tell the nursing staff. I ordered blood work but I think R79 refused. I did not document R79 refused blood work. If R79 continues to lose weight, I will order blood work and CT scan. R79 should've been placed on a calorie count to be closely monitored. I believe R79's weight loss came from contracting Covid19 earlier this year in January. If R79 is not receiving his recommended shake supplements, R79 could potentially loss more weight the supplement would not be effective. R79 weight loss was not planned. If weekly weights were ordered for R79, the facility should have taken R79's weight as ordered so the dietitian could monitor R79 weight closely, if not it could potentially cause more weight loss. R79 is under infection disease physician. R79's HIV has not progressed. The antiviral medication has been working well. I did not notify the family of R79's weight change, the nurses should complete family notification. Policy: Documented in part: Weight Change Policy dated 1/2023; -It is the policy of this facility to monitor the nutritional status of all residents, including all significant or trending patterns of weight change. -Review weights and vital dashboard for significant weight changes. -Upon identification of a newly significant weight change, the dietician, physician, and resident representative will be notified.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based n interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (R4) resident had an order for the Code Status/Advance Direc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based n interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (R4) resident had an order for the Code Status/Advance Directive that is documented on the POLST (Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment) as DNAR (Do Not Attempt Resuscitate) in a sample of 35. Findings Include: R4 has diagnosis not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With (Acute) Exacerbation, Hyperlipidemia, Nicotine Dependence, Schizoaffective Disorder, Depressive Type, Simple Chronic Bronchitis, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Peptic Ulcer, Hypothyroidism, Major Depressive Disorder, Overactive Bladder, Primary Generalized (Osteo) Arthritis, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Other Disorders of Brain in Diseases Classified Elsewhere and Retention of Urine. Review of R4 Order Summary Report dated [DATE] has no documented Code Status/Advance Directives. Care Plan documents in part: Advance Directive: R4 has chosen to have no advanced directive. R4 is a full code. Date initiated [DATE]. Goal: R4 is a full whole status as specified in their advance directive documents will be honored and clearly delineated in the medical record in compliance with state law. POLST (Physician Order Life Sustaining Treatment) dated [DATE] document in part: No CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Do Not Attempt Resuscitation. Comfort-Focused Treatment: Do Not Hospitalize. No artificial nutrition overhydration desire. On [DATE] at 09:49 AM V3 Director of Nursing) stated, The Care plan and MDS (Minimum Data Set) coordinator update the care plan and depending on which department they will update the care plan. Social Service is responsible for updating the code status. The purpose of the care plan is to know if the resident is a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) or full code so that you do not perform any medical treatment that the resident does not want. R4 is a DNR and on Hospice. R4 DNR went into effect on [DATE]. If a resident is found unresponsive, we call a code blue, start CPR Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, call the doctor, and send the resident to the hospital. Every resident should have a physician order for the code status. If the resident does not have a code status, we would call a code blue, but we don't immediately start CPR. If the CPR is started on a resident that does not have an order but is a DNR the CPR would be started in error. If I find out that the resident is a DNR I should stop doing CPR. On [DATE] at 09:37 AM V12 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) stated The social worker from the hospital only requested proof that we reported the allegation to the State. I got it from the administrator last week and emailed it to the social worker. Policy: Titled Advance Directives and DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) review date 09/21 document in part: General: when a resident is admitted to the facility, a decision of advanced directives will take place between the resident and family if the resident is unable to make decisions. This enables the staff to readily and clearly ascertain how to treat the resident in advance of an emergency. Advance Directives: 1. Under state and federal law, people have the right to make decisions regarding health care treatment. This includes their right to determine in advance what life-sustaining treatment will be provided, if any, in the future if they are unable to communicate those desires themselves. 2. Life sustaining treatments are the measures we take to sustain an individual 's life and health. 3. Individuals have the right to provide written instructions to their physician and family about their desire for treatments in the future including life-sustaining treatment. If a desires to limit some or all of these life sustaining procedures they can inform their doctor, Social Services, or the nursing supervisor. These instructions are called Advance Directives. Guidelines: 1. It is the policy of this facility to follow an individual 's physician order made in accordance with state law regarding advanced directives limiting life-sustaining treatment. 2. A DNR order is valid with a POLST or IDPH uniform DNR form completed and/or a physician order is completed. 3. A Full Code/DNR order will be noted in the resident's medical record. 6. If changes are needed to the Advanced Directive, then write VOID across the old form, and initiate a new form with the appropriate information. 7. If a resident is discharged home from the facility and then later readmitted the facility will review the resident's advanced directives with the resident or surrogate. If the resident would like to be a DNR, then a new Advanced Directive form is completed. Titled Comprehensive Care plan review date 03/23 documenting part: General: The facility must develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. Policy: 2. The care plan will include a focus, measurable goal, and intervention specific to the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. 3. The comprehensive care plan should drive the care and services provided for the resident and allow for the highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial function based on the comprehensive MDS assessment. 5. The comprehensive care plan is reviewed quarterly, annually, and with any significant change.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based n observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect private health information for 1 (R76) resident by leaving confidential medical information unattended in an area access...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based n observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect private health information for 1 (R76) resident by leaving confidential medical information unattended in an area accessible to the public on 1 medication cart during medication administration. The facility also failed to knock on the door before entering in 1 (R76) resident's room in a sample of 35. Findings Include: R76 has diagnosis not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications, Extrapyramidal And Movement Disorder, Mixed Hyperlipidemia, Hypertensive Heart Disease Without Heart Failure, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease Of Native Coronary Artery, Major Depressive Disorder, Conversion Disorder With Seizures or Convulsions, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Personal History Of Covid-19, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With (Acute) Exacerbation, Encephalopathy, Pneumonitis Due To Inhalation Of Other Solids And Liquids, Gastrostomy Status, Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Muscle Weakness, Dysphagia and Lack Of Coordination. On 08/30/23 at 08:11 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) left the medication cart to find a pill crusher leaving the computer screen open with R76's information visible. On 08/30 23 at 08/12 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart, went down the hallway to find a stethoscope to check R76's gastric tube placement leaving the computer screen open with R76's information visible. On 08/30/23 at 08:17 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) reentered R76's room without knocking to reposition R76 in the bed. V19 reentered R76's room without knocking, leaving the computer screen open with R76's information visible. On 08/30/23 at 08:22 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) reentered R76's room without knocking leaving the computer screen open with R76's information visible. V19 exited the room and returned to the medication cart. On 08/30/23 at 08:26 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) reentered R76's room without knocking to administer the medication leaving the computer screen open with R76's information visible. On 08/30/23 at 08:36 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R76's next medication, reentered R76's room without knocking leaving the computer screen open with R76's information visible. On 08/30/23 at 08:38 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) reentered R76 room without knocking, leaving the computer screen open with R76 information visible. On 08/30/23 at 08:45 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R76 next medication using the piston syringe to mix the medication in a medication cup, then reentered R76's room without knocking to administer the medication. On 08/30/23 at 08:47 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart, prepared R76's next medication, reentered R76's room without knocking and administered the medication leaving the computer screen open with R76's information visible. On 08/30/23 at 08:54 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) reentered R76's room without knocking and administered the medication leaving the computer screen open with R76 information visible. On 08/30/23 at 08:58 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) reentered R76's room without knocking and administered the medication leaving the computer screen open with R76's information visible. On 08/30/23 at 09:00 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) reentered R76's room without knocking and administered the medication leaving the computer screen open with R76's information visible. On 08/30/23 at 09:10 AM when asked what should be done before entering a residents' room, V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) responded, I should have knocked on the door and announced myself. You should get the resident permission to enter the residents' room because this is their home. On 08/31/23 at 09:49 AM V3 Director of Nursing) stated, When the nurse walks away from the computer screen, they should minimize the resident's information because you don't want anyone to see the information and so it is not displayed on the monitor. This is an issue of privacy. This is their home; you must knock and announce yourself before entering the resident room. Document titled Residents' Rights for People in Long Term Care Facilities document in part: facility staff must knock before entering your room.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to report an incident/unusual o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to report an incident/unusual occurrence that resulted in a serious harm within twenty-four hours to the State Survey Agency (SA) for 1 (R412) out of 1 resident in a sample of 35 reviewed for incidents and accidents. Findings Include: R412's medical records show an admission date of 7/5/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, and Epileptic Seizures. R412's progress notes dated 7/5/23 at 7:24 PM written by V3 (Director of Nursing) shows R412 was admitted in the facility from an acute hospital with history of alcohol and drug abuse. R412's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R412 was cognitively intact and required supervision with locomotion on and off unit. Progress notes dated 7/27/2023 at 9:36 PM written by V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) documents in part: [R412] noted in bed lethargic unresponsive. [R412's] pupils pin point. [R412's] speech slurred and altered mental status V/S B/P 166/125, pulse 103, Temp., 98.7, O2 98, B/G 126 ADON and [V40- R412's Medical Doctor] made aware. [V40] order writer to transferred resident to (Acute) Hospital order carried out immediately. Progress notes dated 7/28/23 at 5:11 AM documents R412 was transferred to the acute hospital and was evaluated with a diagnosis of Opioid overdose. R412's hospital records dated 7/27/23 under Patient Care Report Narrative, documents in part, [R412] admitted to snorting heroin [R412] acquired in the nursing home at 2000 hours. Emergency Department Attending Note documents in part, [R412] is a 27 y.o. male who presents to the ED for presumed heroin overdose. Per EMS patient has had similar presentation in the past, went to the top floor of his nursing facility and reportedly snorted heroin. R412's AFTER VISIT SUMMARY dated 7/27/23 shows R412's diagnosis was Opiate overdose and R412 received three doses of Narcan (reverses an opioid overdose). On 8/29/23 at 11:18 AM, V8 (LPN) stated V8 was the nurse in charge for R412 the night of the incident. V8 stated R412 went down to smoke after dinner around 6:30 PM. V8 stated R412 came back on the 2nd floor (V8 does not remember the exact time). V8 noticed R412 uncomfortable, having slurred speech, and feeling weak. V8 stated V40 ordered R412 to be sent out to the hospital. V8 stated V8 does not remember if R412 went down to smoke by himself. V8 stated R412 goes down to smoke independently. On 8/30/23 at 11:07 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the incident happened with R412 was discussed the next day in the morning meeting and V1 tried to find out what happen. V1 stated V1 did not get the chance to speak with R412 because R412 transferred to a different nursing home on 7/28/23. V1 statedV1 spoke to V3 (Director of Nursing) to find out what happen. V1 stated V1 can't remember who else V1 talked to about the incident. V1 stated V1 does not know how R412 got the illegal drugs. V1 stated V1 does not know what R412 overdosed on. V1 stated V1 does not remember what was concluded in the investigation. V1 stated V1 does not have anything written down regarding the investigation. V1 stated there were so many things going on in the building at that time and V1 did not have the chance to document anything. V1 stated V1 did not report the incident to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH). At 11:29 AM, V3 stated V3 did not do any investigation of what happened in R412's incident. V3 stated V3 does not know exactly what happened to R412. V3 stated V3 did not report R412's incident to IDPH. The facility's policy titled; INCIDENTS/ACCIDENTS/UNUSUAL OCCURENCES dated 9/2022 reads in part: GUIDELINE: 1. All unusual incidents/occurrences will be recorded in the Risk Management Portal of the HER. 7. The DON and Administrator will review all incidents. 8. If the incident report is serious, by which there is serious harm or injury to the resident it will be reported to IDPH within 24 hours and a final summary completed in 7 days. The facility's policy titled; ABUSE POLICY AND PREVENTION PROGRAM 2022 dated 10/2022 reads in part: Any allegation of abuse or any incident that result in serious bodily injury will be reported to the Illinois Department of Public Health immediately, but not more than two hours after the allegation of abuse. Any incident that does not involve abuse and does not result in serious bodily injury shall be reported within 24 hours.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident's incident of drug overdose for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident's incident of drug overdose for 1 (R412) out of 1 resident in a sample of 35 reviewed for incidents and accidents. Findings Include: R412's medical records show an admission date of 7/5/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, and Epileptic Seizures. R412's progress notes dated 7/5/23 at 7:24 PM written by V3 (Director of Nursing) shows R412 was admitted in the facility from an acute hospital with history of alcohol and drug abuse. R412's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R412 was cognitively intact and required supervision with locomotion on and off unit. Progress notes dated 7/27/2023 at 9:36 PM written by V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) documents in part: [R412] noted in bed lethargic unresponsive. [R412's] pupils pin point. [R412's] speech slurred and altered mental status V/S B/P 166/125, pulse 103, Temp., 98.7, O2 98, B/G 126 ADON and [V40- R412's Medical Doctor] made aware. [V40] order writer to transferred resident to (Acute) Hospital order carried out immediately. Progress notes dated 7/28/23 at 5:11 AM documents R412 was transferred to the acute hospital and was evaluated with a diagnosis of Opioid overdose. R412's hospital records dated 7/27/23 under Patient Care Report Narrative, documents in part, [R412] admitted to snorting heroin [R412] acquired in the nursing home at 2000 hours. Emergency Department Attending Note documents in part, [R412] is a 27 y.o. male who presents to the ED for presumed heroin overdose. Per EMS patient has had similar presentation in the past, went to the top floor of his nursing facility and reportedly snorted heroin. R412's AFTER VISIT SUMMARY dated 7/27/23 shows R412's diagnosis was Opiate overdose and R412 received three doses of Narcan (reverses an opioid overdose). On 8/29/23 at 11:18 AM, V8 (LPN) stated V8 was the nurse in charge for R412 the night of the incident. V8 stated R412 went down to smoke after dinner around 6:30 PM. V8 stated R412 came back on the 2nd floor (V8 does not remember the exact time). V8 noticed R412 uncomfortable, having slurred speech, and feeling weak. V8 stated V40 ordered R412 to be sent out to the hospital. V8 stated V8 does not remember if R412 went down to smoke by himself. V8 stated R412 goes down to smoke independently. On 8/30/23 at 11:07 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the incident that happened with R412 was discussed the next day in the morning meeting and V1 tried to find out what happen. V1 stated V1 did not get the chance to speak with R412 because R412 transferred to a different nursing home on 7/28/23. V1 stated V1 spoke to V3 (Director of Nursing) to find out what happen. V1 stated V1 can't remember who else V1 talked to about the incident. V1 stated V1 does not know how R412 got the illegal drugs. V1 stated V1 does not know what R412 overdosed on. V1 stated V1 does not remember what was concluded in the investigation. V1 stated V1 does not have anything written down regarding the investigation. V1 stated that there were so many things going on in the building that time and did not have the chance to document anything. At 11:29 AM, V3 stated that V3 did not do any investigation of what happened to R412's incident. V3 stated V3 does not know exactly what happened to R412. V3 stated that V3 spoke with R412 when R412 came back in the facility and R412 would not answer where R412 got the illegal drugs. The facility's policy titled; INCIDENTS/ACCIDENTS/UNUSUAL OCCURENCES dated 9/2022 reads in part: GUIDELINE: 1. All unusual incidents/occurrences will be recorded in the Risk Management Portal of the HER. 7. The DON and Administrator will review all incidents. The facility's policy titled; ABUSE POLICY AND PREVENTION PROGRAM 2022 dated 10/2022 reads in part: VII. Internal Investigation 1. All incidents will be documented, whether or not abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property occurred, was alleged or suspected. 2. Any incident or allegation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property will result in an investigation.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Assessments (Tag F0636)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 8/29/23 at 11:34 AM, R156 stated R156 smokes three times a day outside the patio. R156 stated facility staff keeps the reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 8/29/23 at 11:34 AM, R156 stated R156 smokes three times a day outside the patio. R156 stated facility staff keeps the residents' cigarettes for safety. R156's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R156 is cognitively intact. R156's electronic medical records (EMR) show the last smoking assessment was completed on 12/1/22. Facility provided a printed copy of R156's smoking assessment dated [DATE]. On 8/30/23 at 9:29 AM, V12 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director) stated smoking assessments should be completed upon admission, quarterly, annually, or as needed. V12 stated smoking assessment is needed to assess the resident's smoking risks and to determine if a resident is safe to smoke or not. V12 state that residents' smoking assessments are found in the residents' EMR. Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their Smoking Policy by not conducting smoking assessments quarterly for two (R146, R156) residents out of a total sample of 35 residents. Findings include: On 8/29/2023 at 12:22 PM, R146 stated R146 is smoking three cigarettes a day. R146's last SS [Social Service]: Safe Smoking Risk Assessment was on 5/9/2023. The previous assessment was from 11/9/2022. R146's MDS [Minimum Data Set] Assessments document in part quarterly assessments from 8/8/2023, 5/8/2023, and 2/6/2023. No smoking assessment related to 8/8/2023 and 2/6/2023 quarter. Later in the survey, facility provided Safe Smoking Risk Assessments 8/8/2023 and 2/6/2023 but they were not completed and signed until 8/30/2023, the time of the survey. Facility's Smoking Policy, last revised 9/2022, documents in part: Residents will be educated upon admission about the smoking policy and those that smoke will be assessed not only upon admission (within the first 72 hours of admittance), but quarterly, annually, as well as if unsafe smoking behaviors/cognitive decline that affects smoking behaviors occur, to determine their ability to comply with safety rules.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update the care plan for 1 (R4) to accurately reflect the code statu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update the care plan for 1 (R4) to accurately reflect the code status as documented on the POLST (Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment) form as DNAR (Do Not Attempt Resuscitate) in a sample of 35. Findings Include: R4 was admitted to Hospice on [DATE] with a diagnosis not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With (Acute) Exacerbation, Hyperlipidemia, Nicotine Dependence, Schizoaffective Disorder, Depressive Type, Simple Chronic Bronchitis, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Peptic Ulcer, Hypothyroidism, Major Depressive Disorder, Overactive Bladder, Primary Generalized (Osteo) Arthritis, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Other Disorders of Brain in Diseases Classified Elsewhere and Retention of Urine. Review of R4 Order Summary Report dated [DATE] has no documented Code Status/Advance Directives. Care Plan document in part: Advance Directive: R4 has chosen to have no advanced directive. R4 is a full code. Date initiated [DATE]. Goal: R4 is a full whole status as specified in their advance directive documents will be honored and clearly delineated in the medical record in compliance with state law. POLST (Physician Order Life Sustaining Treatment) dated [DATE] document in part: No CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Do Not Attempt Resuscitation. Comfort-Focused Treatment: Do Not Hospitalize. No artificial nutrition overhydration desire. On [DATE] at 09:49 AM V3 Director of Nursing) stated, The Care plan and MDS (Minimum Data Set) coordinator updated the care plan and depending on which department they will update the care plan. Social Service is responsible for updating the code status. The purpose of the care plan is to know if the resident is a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate or full code so that you do not perform any medical treatment that the resident does not want. R4 is a DNR and on Hospice. R4 DNR went into effect on [DATE]. If a resident is found unresponsive, we call a code blue, start CPR Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, call the doctor, and send the resident to the hospital. Every resident should have a physician order for the code status. If the resident does not have a code status, we would call a code blue, but we don't immediately start CPR. If the CPR is started on a resident that does not have an order but is a DNR the CPR would be started in error. If I find out that the resident is a DNR I should stop doing CPR. On [DATE] at 09:37 AM V12 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) stated the social worker from the hospital only requested proof that we reported R183 allegation to the State. I got it from the administrator last week and emailed it to the social worker. Policy: Titled Comprehensive Care plan review date 03/23 documenting part: General: The facility must develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. Policy: 2. The care plan will include a focus, measurable goal, and intervention specific to the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. 3. The comprehensive care plan should drive the care and services provided for the resident and allow for the highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial function based on the comprehensive MDS assessment. 5. The comprehensive care plan is reviewed quarterly, annually, and with any significant change.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policies and protocol by not documenting attempts to contact the resident or representative, not contacting local law enforc...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policies and protocol by not documenting attempts to contact the resident or representative, not contacting local law enforcement, and immediately notifying the physician when the resident failed to return to the facility for one out of three closed records in a sample of 35 residents. Findings include: R260's census report and face sheet document in part a discharge date of 6/27/2023. V21's (Nurse) progress note dated 6/27/2023 1:03 PM documents in part that R260 left out on pass with family. R260 was scheduled to return the evening of 6/30/2023. The subsequent progress notes document in part that R260 remained out on pass. The last progress note was from 7/27/2023. No further update charted. R260's physician order sheets did not contain a discharge order. On 8/31/2023 at 9:38 AM, V31 (Social Service Director) stated R260 was not discharged . V31 stated family picked up R260 for out on pass but did not return to the facility during scheduled date. V31 stated no calls were going through with attempts to contact R260 or family. V31 stated the facility called a few other times and when they finally were able to reach the family, the family stated R260 would not be returning to the facility. Surveyor requested documentation of all attempts to reach R260 and family. V31 stated facility only had the pass that R260 signed. V31 provided a copy of R260's Request for an Extended Overnight Pass. The date and time departing were 6/27/23 12:00 PM. The date and time returning were 6/29/2023 6:00 PM. At the bottom of the form, it documents in part: Staff was informed resident relocated to Mexico and will not be returning back to the facility. DON [Director of Nursing] and Nurse Practitioner notified. Facility staff signed it on 7/29/2023. On 8/31/2023 at 11:23 AM, V3 (DON) stated if a resident does not come back from out on pass, staff are to call the resident and their family. Facility must find out if the resident is okay and check if something happened. Staff must call the doctor and do a medical discharge if necessary. On 8/31/2023 at 11:36 AM, V2 (Assistant Administrator) stated if a resident doesn't return from out on pass, the staff are supposed to call the resident or family and see what's going on. Staff must see if the resident is okay. On 8/31/2023 at 12:49 PM, V21 stated if a resident doesn't come back from out on pass, the nurse notifies social services or V3. V21 stated did not do any other steps to follow-up with R260. On 8/31/2023 at 1:56 PM, V51 (Social Services) stated if a resident doesn't come back from pass, staff must do a report and document it in the progress notes. V51 stated if the resident or family representatives do not answer the phone, the staff must contact local law enforcement. On 8/31/2023 at 2:05 PM, V12 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director) stated if a resident does not return from pass, the staff must attempt to follow-up with the resident or family representative and document it. If the facility cannot contact the resident or family representative, the facility will send a certified letter to contact the resident. Facility did not provide proof that they sent a certified letter to R260. On 8/31/2023 at 2:29 PM, V31 stated the policy is if a resident doesn't come back and the facility does not know where they are, then the facility will get contact local law enforcement and treat it like a missing person case. V3 and V31 stated R260 was discharged with family; however, when asked if they knew where R260 was or if R260 was okay during the scheduled date to return to the facility both could not answer. Both stated the facility could not reach R260 and the family representatives. Both stated they did not receive an update on R260 until a month later. Facility's Leave of Absence policy, last reviewed 1/2023, documents in part: If the resident does not return by the anticipated time, the staff will try to contact the resident or their responsible party. If the resident or responsible party does not return the resident to the facility as planned, the resident is considered AMA and the physician is notified. The above will be documented in the progress note. Facility's AMA Release (Leaving Against Medical Advice) policy, last reviewed 1/2023, documents in part: Documentation should include a description of the circumstances regarding the resident's decision to leave AMA, that the resident/legal representative received and understood information regarding the risks involved in leaving AMA.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure low air loss mattress device was in the correc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure low air loss mattress device was in the correct setting for a dependent resident with a current pressure ulcer. This failure has the potential to affect 1 (R177) of 4 residents in a sample of 35 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings Include: On 8/29/23 at 10:44 AM, R177 sleeping in bed and noted on a low air loss mattress with the dial set to 180 pounds (lbs.). At 10:56 AM, V13 (Wound Care Nurse) stated R177 has stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer and dressing changes on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. R177 stated skin assessments are done weekly. V13 stated R177 is on the low air loss mattress to help release some of the pressure on R177's wound. V13 stated the purpose of the low air loss mattress is to help prevent the wound to get worse and develop more wounds. V13 stated the low air loss mattress should be set based on the resident's weight. V13 stated if the setting is incorrect then the mattress would not deliver the correct pressure, and the wound could possibly get worse or would not heal. V13 stated all staff in the building can monitor the low air loss mattress to make sure they're in the right setting. On 8/30/23 at 10:03 AM, a wound care observation was conducted with V13 and V14 (Wound Care Assistant) and noted R177 still has the stage 4 pressure ulcer on the right buttock. R177's clinical records show R177 has listed diagnoses not limited to Dementia, Essential Hypertension, Rhabdomyolysis, and Anemia. R177's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R177 is cognitively impaired and requires extensive two staff assist with bed mobility and transfer. R177's skin assessment dated [DATE] shows R177 has stage 4 right buttock pressure ulcer. R177's weight records show R177 weighs 145 lbs. dated 8/25/23. The facility's policy titled; SKIN CARE PREVENTION dated 1/23 shows that all residents will receive appropriate care to decrease the risk of skin breakdown.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0694 (Tag F0694)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an intravenous catheter dressing was sealed to prevent the potential for contamination for 1 (R512) resident reviewed fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an intravenous catheter dressing was sealed to prevent the potential for contamination for 1 (R512) resident reviewed for intravenous catheter care in a sample of 35. Findings Include: On 08/30/23 at 09:19 AM V3 (Director of Nursing) donned gloves then entered R512 room and asked R215 to let him (V3) check her (R512) line, V3 then exited the room. On 08/30/23 at 09:24 AM V3 (Director of Nursing) said to R512, I will have them come and change your dressing. V3 was referring to R512 right arm single lumen PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line dressing that was observed to be unsealed at the lower end of the dressing and undated. Signage was observed on R76 door indicating Enhance Barrier Precautions. Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff Must Also: wear gloves and a gown for the following Device care or use: central line. V3 did not put on an isolation gown. On 08/30/23 at 09:28 AM V3 (Director of Nursing) prepared R512 IVPB (Intravenous Piggyback), removed the gloves and put on another pair of gloves and connected the IV (Intravenous) tubing to R512 PICC line then exited the room. When asked if V3 knew that R512 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions V3 responded, You're right I did not pay attention. You are supposed to wear gloves and a gown to protect yourself and the resident. When asked about R512's PICC line dressing V3 responded, There is no date on the dressing and the tape unstuck that is why they are going to change it right now. On 08/31/23 at 09:49 AM V3 Director of Nursing) stated, If the PICC line dressing is not intact/sealed, the catheter can potentially be dislodged. It is no longer sterile if it is open/unsealed and that is the reason it was changed before the due date. The PICC line dressing is changed weekly and PRN (as needed). Policy: Titled Infusion Therapy revised 01/12 document in part: Knowledge Base: Licensed nurses caring for residents receiving infusion therapy are expected to follow infection control and safety compliance procedures. Titled Infusion Therapy revised 01/12 documented part: dressing change, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Knowledge base: the catheter insertion site is a potential entry site for bacteria that can cause a catheter related infection. A transparent dressing is the preferred dressing. Process: dressing changes using transparent dressings are performed: 2. Every 7 days thereafter. 3. If the integrity of the dressing has become compromised wet loose or soiled. Procedure: 21. label dressing with: 21.1 date and time. 21.2 nurses initials.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to a.) obtain an order for oxygen administration, and b.) failed to change the oxygen humidity bottle, label, and date the nasal c...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to a.) obtain an order for oxygen administration, and b.) failed to change the oxygen humidity bottle, label, and date the nasal cannula per the Physician orders and per the facility policy for 1 (R247) resident in a sample of 35. Findings Include: R247 has diagnosis not limited to Hyperlipidemia, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Anorexia, Anemia, Chronic Viral Hepatitis, Chronic Combined Systolic (Congestive) And Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Order Summary Report dated 08/30/23 documents in part: change end date oxygen tubing, nasal cannula and humidifier every night shift, every Sunday for prophylaxis. Progress note dated 08/28/23 12:16 document in part: Nurses Note Text: Resident on Doctor Appointment. Writer received a call that resident vitals need urgent attention Blood pressure 61/42, Heart rate 45, oxygen saturation 81 despite being on 02 (oxygen) 2 liters. On 08/29/23 at 11:53 AM R247 was observed lying in bed with oxygen at 4 liters per nasal cannula in use. The oxygen humidifier bottle was dated 07/17/23. R247 stated, The oxygen should be on 2 liters. On 08/29/23 at 12:06 PM surveyor asked V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) when she was standing in the hallway at the medication cart how many liters of oxygen R247 on. V18 looked in the computer and responded, R247 is on 2 liters of oxygen. V18 entered R247's room with the surveyor. V18 looked at the oxygen concentrator and said, It is on 4 liters, it should be on 2 liters. V18 then adjusted the oxygen concentrator dial to 2 liters. V18 said, The humidity bottle is dated 07/17/23. V18 returned to the medication cart and asked V18 if there was an order for R247 oxygen. V18 could not find an oxygen order under the Physician order tab. On 08/29/23 at 03:00 PM an order was entered for R247 for continuous oxygen via nasal cannula at 2-4 liters. On 08/31/23 at 09:49 AM V3 Director of Nursing) stated, If a resident is on oxygen, they are supposed to have an order. In case of an emergency, they can put a resident on oxygen at 2 liters and get an order. R247 had an oxygen order before he went to the hospital so they must not have transcribed the order when R247 was received back in the facility. On 08/31/23 at 11:15 AM V3 Director of Nursing) stated, The oxygen tubing and humidity bottle is changed weekly and prn. Policy: Titled Oxygen Therapy review dated 09/22 document in part: General: oxygen therapy may be provided through various type of supply and delivery systems. Equipment may include the provision of oxygen through nasal cannulas, trans-tracheal oxygen catheters, oxygen canisters, cylinders, or concentrators. Guideline: one. Residents who require oxygen therapy may have a physician order in their medical record which includes amount of 02 to be administered, route of administration, and indication of use.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a resident's wheelchair in a safe operating condition for 1 (R42) resident reviewed for equipment safety in a sample of 35. Findings...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a resident's wheelchair in a safe operating condition for 1 (R42) resident reviewed for equipment safety in a sample of 35. Findings Include: R42 was observed sitting in a wheelchair that appeared to be too small with no arm rest at the end of the hallway. The wheelchair seat was observed leaning to the right. When R42 was asked if that was his wheelchair R42 stated, I need another one because it is leaning to the right. On 08/30/23 at 11:44 AM V25 (Rehabilitation Director) pointed to a wheelchair and stated, This is the wheelchair that (R42) had, and we gave (R42) another wheelchair yesterday. The back of the wheelchair is torn and that is the only thing that is wrong with it. It was brought to my knowledge yesterday. I told (V24) (Rehabilitation Certified Nurse Assistant) to get (R42) another wheelchair. On 08/30/23 at 11:51 AM Resident # 42 stated, I let them know that the wheelchair was leaning. 08/30/23 at 11:56 AM V24 (Rehabilitation Certified Nurse Assistant) stated, I changed (R42's) wheelchair yesterday because (R42) told me that one side of the wheelchair was leaning. The back of the wheelchair was ripped. I went to get (R42) another chair to make him comfortable. On 08/31/23 at 09:49 AM V3 Director of Nursing) stated, Maintenance of the DME (Durable Medical Equipment) equipment: we have a maintenance guy. If the back of (R42's) wheelchair was torn ant it was leaning, there is a potential for skin irritation or a fall. Multiple requests were made for the DME durable medical equipment maintenance policy with no policy provided. V1 (Administrator) sent an e-mail on 09/01/23 documenting: We have a preventative maintenance policy which covers most of our mechanical equipment but does not include durable medical equipment. When daily rounds are completed by unit managers, faulty equipment is reported to maintenance for repairs.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a.) ensure medications were labeled and dated in 2 of 4 medication carts, b.) properly store insulin pens in 1 of 3 medication...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a.) ensure medications were labeled and dated in 2 of 4 medication carts, b.) properly store insulin pens in 1 of 3 medication rooms reviewed and c.) ensure the medication carts were locked during medication administration in a sample of 35 residents. Findings Include: On 08/29/23 09:56 AM V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R122 medications then entered R122's room and administered the oral medications leaving the medication cart unlocked. V18 returned to the medication cart, retrieved R122's eye drops, put on a pair of gloves, entered R122's room leaving the medication cart unlocked and administered the eye drops. On 08/29/23 10:06 AM V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) entered R151's room leaving the medication cart unlocked then realized R151 was not in the room. On 08/29/23 10:11 AM V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) entered R133's room leaving the medication cart unlocked and administered R133's medications. On 08/23/23 10:16 AM V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) continued passing medications and entered R243's room without locking the medication cart. On 08/23/23 10:19 AM V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the medication art then proceeded down the hallway to the nurse station leaving the medication cart unlocked. On 08/23/23 10:22 AM V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart, then entered R178's room leaving the medication cart unlocked. On 08/23/23 10:29 AM V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) entered R247's room without locking the medication cart. V18 stated, I am supposed to lock the medication cart. The medication cart key is attached to the storage room key, and I don't want to be going back and forth. Maybe I should have detached the key. This is the medication cart that the key is missing, that's why I did not lock it. The medication cart should be locked or a resident or someone passing by can open it and take medications. On 08/30/23 at 08:22 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) entered R76's room leaving the medication cart unlocked. On 08/30/23 at 08:36 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R76's medication, reentered R76's room leaving the medication cart unlocked. On 08/30/23 at 08:38 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart, prepared R76's next medication mixing it in a medication cup. V19 reentered R76's room leaving the medication cart unlocked. On 08/30/23 at 08:47 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart and prepared R76's next medication. V19 reentered R76's room leaving the medication cart unlocked. 08/30/23 at 08:54 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R76's next medication then reentered R76's room leaving the medication cart unlocked. On 08/30/23 at 08:58 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R76's next medication and reentered R76's room leaving the medication cart unlocked. On 08/30/23 at 09:00 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R76's next medication and reentered R76's room leaving the medication cart unlocked. On 08/30/23 at 09:10 AM surveyor asked V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, Each time that I leave the medication cart I should lock it and have the keys on me at all times because someone could go into the medication cart and take medications or take the keys and get the narcotics. On 08/30/23 at 09:56 AM the fifth-floor medication cart was checked with V21 (Licensed Practical Nurse). R24 Ventolin HFA Aerosol Solution 108 (90 Base) MCG/ACT (Microgram/Activated clotting time) (Albuterol Sulfate HFA) and R63 Albuterol Sulfate Inhaler 108 (90 Base) was observed in the medication cart with no open date. V21 stated, The albuterol definitely should have an open date on them. Incuse Ellipta (umeclidinium inhalation powder) 62.5 mcg (Microgram) was observed in the medication cart with no name and undated. V21 stated, I don't know who that belongs to. I will toss it. On 08/30/23 at 10:14 AM the sixth-floor medication cart was checked with V22 (Licensed Practical Nurse). Proair was observed in the medication cart unlabeled. V22 stated, I don't know why it is up there. It should have a name and the date opened. Albuterol Sulfate 90 MCG was observed in the medication cart with no name and not stored in a bag R137 Ventolin HFA Aerosol Solution 108 (90 Base) MCG/ACT (Albuterol HFA) was observed in the medication cart with no open date. On 08/30/23 at 10:22 AM the sixth-floor medication room was checked with V22 (Licensed Practical Nurse). There was a blue tray with blood glucose supplies and insulin pens in it observed on the counter. There were four insulin pens stored together in a Zip lock bag belonging to R165; Insulin Glargine Solution 100 UNIT/ML (milliliter) Inject 10 unit subcutaneously, R70 Basaglar Kwik Pen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML, R17 Humalog Solution (Insulin Lispro) and R146 Lantus Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine). V22 stated, They are supposed to be in separate bag so that you will know who they belong to, don't give the wrong person medication and because of cross contamination. 08/31/23 at 09:49 AM V3 Director of Nursing) stated, My expectation is that the nurse is to lock the medication cart if they walk away from it. The med cart key should always be with the nurse. There is a potential that is not the policy. It is an assumption that someone can enter the cart or take the keys. Storage of the insulin pens should be stored in a plastic bag that was used to deliver them. Once opened they are labeled and put in individual storage bags. Even if you put the insulin pens together, I am not supporting that. The best practice is the insulin pens should be in individual bag to prevent contamination. Once an inhaler is opened it should be dated because you want to discard it after the manufacture recommendation. If used beyond the manufacturer recommendation it may not be affective. It should be stored in individual bags to prevent cross contamination. Policy: Titled Storage of Medication revised 09/22 document in part: General: to provide the staff with guidance on the proper storage of medications. Storage of medications: 1. Medication and biologicals must be stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturers recommendation or those of the supplier. The medication supply should only be accessible to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. 3. Medication rooms, carts and medication supplies are locked or attended by person with authorized access. Storage of medication carts: 2. During the time medications are not being passed, the medication cart and treatment cart should be locked. Medication keys; 1. Keys for medication cards and treatment cards, as well as the keys for their medication room and storage areas are the responsibility of the nurse assigned to the unit. 2. The nurse will keep the medication keys at all times. they will never be loved in the door of the medication room on medication cart or other counters. Titled Medication Administration review date 03/23 documenting part: Guideline: 28. Never leave the medication cart open and unattended.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly defrost meat, discard expired food from the refrigerator and failed to store dish racks off the floor. This fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly defrost meat, discard expired food from the refrigerator and failed to store dish racks off the floor. This failure affected 248 residents residing in the facility. Findings include, On 8/29/23 at 10:40 AM during the initial kitchen tour with V4 (Dietary Manager) the following were observed: 4 boxes of yogurt with expiration date of 8/7/23. V4 said, the yogurt should have been discarded by the expiration date. On top of the sink, there was a plastic bin with defrosting rolls of ground beef. V4 said the proper way to defrost is to have running water on the beef rolls and not to have them defrosting on top of the sink. Further observed, 7 dish racks were stored on the floor. V4 said no items should be on the floor and always 6 to 12 inches above the floor the floor. Facility did not provide as requested a policy that addressed timely removing of expired food from the refrigerator and storing items off the floor. Facility's policy Food: Preparation documents in part: 5. The cook thaws frozen items that requires defrosting prior to preparation using one of the following methods: Completely submerging the item under cold water that is running fast enough to agitate and float off loose ice particles.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility: 1. Failed to ensure door signage for Enhanced Barrier Precautions was available for 1 (R512) resident. 2. Failed to ensure staff wore an...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility: 1. Failed to ensure door signage for Enhanced Barrier Precautions was available for 1 (R512) resident. 2. Failed to ensure staff wore and discarded proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) while caring for 3 (R11, R76, R512) of 3 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. 3. Failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene before donning gloves for resident on Enhanced Barrier Precaution for 1 (R11) resident and during medication administration. 4. Failed to ensure soiled linens were properly placed inside a clear plastic bag. These failures can potentially affect 123 residents residing on the 2nd, 3rd and 6th floor as of facility roster dated 8/29/23 reviewed for infection control. The findings include: R11's health record documented admission date of 3/23/10 with diagnoses not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Chronic bronchitis, Metabolic encephalopathy, Hyperlipidemia, Nicotine dependence, Generalized osteoarthritis, Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Hypothyroidism, Schizoaffective disorder, Major depressive disorder, Overactive bladder. On 8/29/23 at 10:26 am Observed R11's room with door signage Enhanced Barrier Precautions, isolation cart with PPEs available by room entrance. Observed R11 lying in bed, alert and verbally responsive. Observed with bilateral heel protectors kept at bedside by R11's wheelchair. R11 stated he (R11) is using bilateral heel protectors when in bed. R11 activated the call light and V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant / CNA) responded. V7 stated she has been working in the facility for 12 years. V7 stated she is not assigned to R11, but she (V7) can help as they have been working as team on the floor. R11 requested V7 to put on his (R11) bilateral heel protectors. Observed V7 with mask on, with no gloves open R11's blanket. V7 stated she will put on gloves first. V7 observed putting on gloves, hand hygiene was not performed. Observed V7 place bilateral heel protectors to R11's feet. Observed R11's left ankle with wound dressing. V7 did not wear a gown while providing direct care to R11. R512's health record documented admission date of 8/19/23 with diagnoses not limited to Displaced fracture of medial condyle of right tibia, Obesity, Bipolar disorder, Local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. At 11:35 am Observed isolation cart with PPE supplies by R512's room entrance with no door signage. V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN) requested to R512's room entrance and stated R512's room is not on isolation. V17 stated maybe isolation cart was not moved out from room. V17 later confirmed R512's room is on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. V17 stated there is only 1 nurse with 2 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) working on the 2nd floor. On 8/30/23 at 10:07 am V6 (Infection Preventionist / IP, Licensed Practical Nurse) stated resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions should have a door signage, isolation cart with PPEs. V6 confirmed R512 is on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to right leg wound and PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line. V6 stated door signage should be available by R512's room entrance. V6 stated if there is no door signage, staff will not be able to carry out proper precautions can cause contamination and possible spread of infection. V6 confirmed R11 is on Enhanced Barrier Precaution due to wound. V6 stated staff is expected to perform hand hygiene before donning and after removing gloves, wear gown if providing direct care like placing bilateral heel protectors to R11. V6 stated potential contamination or possible spread of infection can occur if proper PPEs are not worn or hand hygiene is not performed. On 8/31/23 at 11:20 am V36 (Assistant housekeeping director) and V37 (District Manager) stated housekeeping director is not available due to emergency. V36 and V37 stated soiled linens are washed outside the facility by contracted company. V36 stated facility does not have a laundry chute. V36 stated soiled linens are kept in a bag by CNA and placed in a hamper on every floor and picked up by laundry staff 3x per day. V36 stated every floor has a hamper for soiled linens. Rounded 6th floor with V36 and V37, observed hamper with soiled linens, towels, sheet, pillowcases, face towels not placed inside a bag. V36 stated CNA should keep all soiled linens inside a clear plastic bag before putting it in the hamper to prevent contamination. Observed a soiled linens inside a clear bag placed directly on the floor. Observed V36 placed the clear plastic bag inside the hamper. Facility's roster dated 8/29/23 showed 32 residents residing on the 2nd floor, 45 residents on 3rd floor and 46 residents on 6th floor. Facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage documented in part: - Clean hands including before entering and when leaving the room. - Wear gloves and a gown for the following high-contact resident care activities. Facility's policy for hand hygiene dated 9/2022 documented in part: - Proper hand hygiene is necessary for the prevention and transmission of infectious diseases. - Hand hygiene is done before and after resident contact. - Hand hygiene with a waterless system is appropriate any time hand hygiene should be done. Facility's linen handling policy dated 3/2023 documented in part: - The facility promotes the control of infection through the use of standard precautions while handling linen. - Double bagging linen is recommended only if the outside of the bag is visibly contaminated. Facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy dated 7/15/22 documented in part: - Expand the use of PPE and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs (Multiple Drug Resistant Organism) to staff hands and clothing. On 08/29/23 09:56 AM V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R122 medications then entered R122's room and administered the oral medication. V18 returned to the medication cart, retrieved R122's eye drops, put on a pair of gloves, entered R122's room and administered the eye drops. V18 returned to the medication cart, removed the gloves then began preparing R151's medications without performing hand hygiene. On 08/23/23 10:29 AM V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, I should have washed or sanitized my hands after giving R122 medication. There is a potential to spread germs and infections. On 08/30/23 at 8:04 AM During medication administration observation V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed standing at the medication cart. Signage was observed on R76's door indicating Enhance Barrier Precautions. Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff Must Also: wear gloves and a gown for the following Device care or use: central line, feeding tube. Do not wear the same gown and gloves for the care of more than one person. V19 retrieved and put on an isolation gown and gloves then entered R76's room to take R76's blood pressure. On 08/30/23 at 08:11 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) removed the gloves and gown without performing hand hygiene, then left the medication cart to find a pill crusher. On 08/30 23 at 08/12 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart, retrieved another isolation gown, placed it on top of the medication cart then went down the hallway to find a stethoscope. On 08/30/23 at 08:17 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart, retrieved, and put on the isolation gown and gloves. V19 reentered R76's room and reposition R76 in the bed. V19 retrieved R76's gastric tube flush kit, entered the bathroom to put water in the flush kit container. V19 returned to the medication cart, removed the gloves, placed the gastric tube flush container on top of the medication cart, removed the aspirin from the medication cart, crushed and mixed it in a medication cup with water without performing hand hygiene or removing the isolation gown. V19 said, I am going to turn the medication cart around so that I do not have to take off my gown, put on my gown, take off my gown. On 08/30/23 at 08:22 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) reentered R76's room. V19 checked the placement of R76's gastric tube and administered R76's medication through the gastric tube using the flush kit piston syringe. V19 exited the room and returned to the medication cart with the flush kit piston syringe and container with water then placed it on top of the medication cart and removed the gloves. On 08/30/23 at 08:26 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepare R76's next medication without performing hand hygiene. V19 mixed the medication in a medication cup using the piston syringe then reentered R76's room. On 08/30/23 at 08:30 AM when administering the medication through the gastric tube with the piston syringe the gastric tube became clogged. V19 removed the syringe and placed it on R76's bed. V19 unclogged the gastric tube and returned to the medication cart, placed the piston syringe on top of the medication cart, removed the gloves, and did not perform hand hygiene. On 08/30/23 at 08:36 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R76's next medication, reentered R76's room. On 08/30/23 at 08:38 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart and placed the piston syringe on top of the medication cart, removed the gloves, prepared R76's next medication mixing it in a medication cup without performing hand hygiene. V19 reentered R76's room and administered R76's medication using the piston syringe. On 08/30/23 at 08:45 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R76's next medication using the piston syringe to mix the medication in a medication cup, then reentered R76's room. On 08/30/23 at 08:47 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart, removed the gloves, did not perform hand hygiene and prepared R76's next medication using the piston syringe to mix it in a medication cup. V19 reentered R76's room. On 08/30/23 at 08:54 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R76's next medication using the piston syringe to mix the medication in the medication cup. V19 reentered R76's room and administered R76's medication using the piston syringe then returned to the medication cart. V19 placed the piston syringe on top of the medication cart, removed the gloves and did not perform hand hygiene. On 08/30/23 at 08:58 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R76's next medication using the piston syringe to mix the medication in the medication cup. V19 reentered R76's room and administered R76's medication using the piston syringe then returned to the medication cart. V19 placed the piston syringe on top of the medication cart, removed the gloves and did not perform hand hygiene. On 08/30/23 at 09:00 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R76's next medication using the piston syringe to mix the medication in the medication cup. V19 reentered R76's room and administered R76's medication using the piston syringe then returned to the medication cart, removed the gloves, and did not perform hand hygiene. On 08/30/23 at 09:02 AM V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart, removed the gown and gloves, and did not perform hand hygiene. On 08/30/23 at 09:10 AM surveyor asked V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) their policy regarding hand hygiene. V19 responded, To my understanding, you do hand hygiene between residents. That is an issue of infection control. Each time I remove my gloves I should do hand hygiene. On 08/30/23 at 09:19 AM V3 (Director of Nursing) donned gloves then entered R512's room and asked R512 to let me check you line, V3 then exited the room. On 08/30/23 at 09:24 AM Signage was observed on R512's door indicating Enhance Barrier Precautions. Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff Must Also: wear gloves and a gown for the following Device care or use: central line. During the medication administration observation V3 did not put on an isolation gown. On 08/30/23 at 09:28 AM V3 (Director of Nursing) prepared R512's IVPB (Intravenous Piggyback), removed the gloves and put on another pair of gloves and connected the IV (Intravenous) tubing to R512's PICC line then exited the room. When asked if V3 knew that R512's was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions V3 responded, You're right I did not pay attention. You are supposed to wear gloves and a gown to protect yourself and the resident. On 08/31/23 at 09:49 AM V3 Director of Nursing) stated, My expectation is that the nurse is to lock the medication cart if they walk away from it. The med cart key should always be with the nurse. There is a potential that is not the policy. It is an assumption that someone can enter the cart or take the keys. Storage of the insulin pens should be stored in a plastic bag that was used to deliver them. Once opened they are labeled and put in individual storage bags. Even if you put the insulin pens together, I am not supporting that. The best practice is the insulin pens should be in individual bag to prevent contamination. Once an inhaler is opened it should be dated because you want to discard it after the manufacture recommendation. If used beyond the manufacturer recommendation it may not be affective. It should be stored in individual bags to prevent cross contamination. Hands should be washed once you touch a resident and before going to the next resident to prevent cross contamination. You cannot come back to the cart with the same isolation gown on. V19 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) should have change the gown to prevent cross contamination. The gastric tube syringe should have not be taken out of the resident's room. Hand hygiene should be done after removing the gloves. I did not notice the Enhance Barrier Precaution sign on R512's door. I was concerned about giving R512's medication because it was running late. Since R512's was on enhanced barrier precautions I should have put on a gown to protect the resident and myself. Policy: Titled Medication Administration review date 03/23 documenting part: general: all medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. Guidelines; 3. Hand hygiene must be performed before and after the; The administration of all topical, ophthalmic, optic, parental, enteral, rectal, and vaginal medication. Administering medication to a resident on isolation or other precautions.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policy of Pneumococcal vaccination: 1. Failed to provide el...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policy of Pneumococcal vaccination: 1. Failed to provide eligible residents and/or resident representatives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of all available pneumococcal vaccinations for 7 (R4, R11, R88, R98, R124, R178, R257) residents. 2. Failed to screen or assess eligibility and offer pneumococcal vaccinations for 7 (R4, R11, R88, R98, R124, R178, R257) residents. 3. Failed to administer dose of PCV15 (Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine) or PCV20 at least 1 year after the most recent PPSV23 (Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine) for 2 (R4 and R257) residents. These failures could potentially affect 7 (R4, R11, R88, R98, R124, R178, R257) residents eligible to receive the Pneumococcal vaccinations in a sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R4's health record documented admission date of 3/17/15, [AGE] years of age with diagnoses not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Chronic bronchitis, Metabolic encephalopathy, Hyperlipidemia, Nicotine dependence, Generalized osteoarthritis, Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Hypothyroidism, Schizoaffective disorder, Major depressive disorder, Overactive bladder. 2. R11's health record documented admission date of 3/23/10, [AGE] years of age with diagnoses not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Chronic bronchitis, Metabolic encephalopathy, Hyperlipidemia, Nicotine dependence, Generalized osteoarthritis, Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Hypothyroidism, Schizoaffective disorder, Major depressive disorder, Overactive bladder. 3. R88's health record documented admission date of 7/17/23, [AGE] years of age with diagnoses not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Cerebral palsy, Asthma, Major depressive disorder, Anemia, Essential hypertension, prostatic hyperplasia, Schizoaffective disorder, Gastro esophageal reflux disease. 4. R98's health record documented admission date of 1/9/21, [AGE] years of age with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Other cerebrovascular disease, Gastro esophageal reflux disease, Atherosclerotic heart disease, Schizoaffective disorder, Major depressive disorder, Hypertensive heart disease, Generalized osteoarthritis, Hyperlipidemia. 5. R124's health record documented admission date of 8/28/19, [AGE] years of age with diagnoses not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Essential hypertension, Anemia, Hyperlipidemia, Schizoaffective disorder, Major depressive, Gastro esophageal reflux disease. 6. R178's health record documented admission date of 3/12/18, [AGE] years of age with diagnoses not limited to Unspecified dementia, Vitamin D deficiency, Essential hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Schizophrenia. 7. R257's health record documented admission date of 7/26/23, [AGE] years of age with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Other pulmonary embolism, Essential hypertension, Gastro esophageal reflux disease, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Asthma. On 8/30/23 at 10:07 am V6 (Infection Preventionist / IP, Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that residents should be screened, and Pneumonia vaccine should be offered in a yearly basis for eligible residents. V6 stated education is provided to resident / representative regarding pneumonia vaccination. V6 stated Pneumonia vaccine is important to elderly residents to prevent serious lung infection / pneumonia and complications. Reviewed residents' electronic health record (EHR) with V6: 1. R4's immunization record documented Pneumovax 23 was administered on 1/8/21. V6 stated that no further pneumococcal vaccination was given, and no education was provided to R4. 2. R11's immunization record documented Pneumovax 23 was refused, and education was provided on 1/8/21. V6 stated that no further education or screening provided to R11. 3. R88's immunization record documented Prevnar 13 was refused, and education was provided on 1/7/21. V6 stated that no further education or screening provided to R88. 4. R98's immunization record documented Pneumovax 23 was refused, and education was provided on 1/8/21. V6 stated that no further education or screening provided to R98. 5. R124's immunization record documented pneumonia vaccine was administered on 5/12/14. V6 stated that education was provided on 4/13/17. V6 stated that no further education or screening provided to R124. 6. R178's immunization record documented Pneumovax 23 was refused, and education was provided on 1/8/21. V6 stated that no further education or screening provided to R178. 7. R257's immunization record documented Pneumovax 23 was administered on 9/27/18. V6 stated that no further pneumococcal vaccination was given, and no education was provided to R257. On 8/31/23 at 2:07 pm V3 (Director of Nursing / DON) interviewed regarding how nurses are getting resident's vaccination record and / or education to resident. V3 stated, Refer to IP nurse for information. Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed R4's pneumococcal vaccination status was up to date. However, according to the CDC's current Adult Immunization Schedule R4 was eligible to receive one dose of the Pneumococcal 15-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PVC15) or the Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PVC20) one year after receiving the PPSV23 to complete the pneumococcal vaccinations. MDS dated [DATE] showed R11's pneumococcal vaccination status was offered and declined . MDS dated [DATE] showed R88's pneumococcal vaccination status was not offered . MDS dated [DATE] showed R98's pneumococcal vaccination status was not offered . MDS dated [DATE] showed R178's pneumococcal vaccination status was not offered . MDS dated [DATE] showed R257's pneumococcal vaccination status was not offered . Facility's Pneumococcal vaccination policy dated 3/2023 documented in part: - Pneumococcal disease is caused by bacterial (streptococcus pneumonia) that can attack different parts of the body. The bacteria can cause serious infections of the lung (pneumonia). Everyone [AGE] years of age and older should get the pneumococcal vaccine as well as younger people with certain qualifiers. - All residents will be offered the pneumococcal vaccine per center for disease control guidelines recommendations. - All current residents or the resident's responsible party will be screened yearly and offered the Pneumovax PPSV23 and / or PCV13, PCV15 and PCV20. - Adults 65 and older who received an earlier vaccine (PPSV23): Give 1 dose of PCV15 or PCV20. The PCV15 or PCV20 dose should be administered at least 1 year after the most recent PPSV23 vaccination. - For adults 65 years or older who have received PCV13 at any age and PPSV23 before age [AGE] years, either: Give 1 dose of PCV20 at least 5 years after the last.
Aug 2023 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (R7) of five residents reviewed remain...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (R7) of five residents reviewed remained free from abuse. This failure resulted in R7 being verbally abused. Findings include: R7 is a [AGE] year-old individual admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R7's medical diagnosis includes but not limited to: dysphagia following cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified, cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, unspecified lack of coordination. R7's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) section C documents R7's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated Wed [DATE], as 14/15, and his Functional Abilities and Goals dated Thu [DATE], document R7 as: Dependent for all ADLS (Activities of Daily Living) such as eating, toileting, bathing, oral hygiene, seating, lying. MDS section G dated 8/10/2023, documents R7 is extensive assist, two plus person assist for ADL care on bed mobility, transfer, locomotion on/ off unit, dressing assistance, eating, toilet use, personal hygiene, and total dependent requiring one person assist for bathing. On 8/15/2023 11:45am, two surveyors were on the floor during residents' observations, when they observed and heard V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) standing over R7 aggressively pointing a finger at R7 and shouting at him. R7 was on laying on a Geri chair which was inclined at about 30 degrees. R7 was trying to get V5's attention. V5 was shouting at R7 and telling him (R7) to wait and not to interrupt V5 because she (V5) was talking to her coworkers. On 8/15/2023 at 11:47am, V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) said, I should not have shouted at R7. It's wrong to shout at him. It's considered abuse if you shout at residents. On 8/17/2023 at 11:11am, R7 was observed seating in his Geri chair in his room. When asked if staff treats R7 well, R7 said, they shout at me. R7 did not provide names of staff who shout at R7. On 8/15/2023 at 12:50pm, V1(Administrator) was informed by surveyor that V5 was observed and heard shouting at R7 when R7 requested V5's attention. V1 said staff to resident abuse is not acceptable and staff should not be talking to each other while residents are requesting their attention. V1 said if R7 was asking for a cookie, then he should have been given a cookie or told to wait but in a calm respectful tone of voice. V1 stated if any staff member sees or suspects abuse, they are supposed to report to V1 immediately because V1 is the abuse coordinator. V1 said staff are in-serviced on abuse upon hire and V1 goes through abuse training and selectivity training after any allegations. Staff are staff are in-serviced and annually. On 8/15/2023 at 3:25PM, V1 said staff member should not stand over a resident and shout at the resident while pointing at the resident, even if the resident was shouting at the staff member. V1 said shouting at the resident is inappropriate and no staff should talk to residents like that even if the resident is shouting at the staff. On 8/15/2023 at 1:21pm, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN), said R7 was asking for a cookie from V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA), and V5 told R7 that he (R7) got a cookie earlier and had thrown it to the floor, therefore R7 could not have another cookie. V6 was observed and heard by two surveyors asking V5 to calm down. V6 said he asked V5 to calm down because V5 was speaking loudly to R7 and V5 was not calm. V6 said he did not like the way V5 was talking to R7. R7's care plan dated 8/9/2023 documents: -R7 will remain free from abuse. Interventions-Assure R7 that he is in a safe and secure environment with caring professionals. Policy titled ABUSE POLICY, dated 10-2022 documents: - This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents. - Verbal Abuse is the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of an individuals' age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of verbal abuse include, but are not limited to, threats of harm, saying things to frighten a resident, such as telling a resident that he/she will never to be able to see his/her family again.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ordered antibiotic medication to 1 (R5) resident of 3 resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ordered antibiotic medication to 1 (R5) resident of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 8/16/23 at 3:00 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated R5 was ordered Ceftriaxone 2GM and Amoxicillin 500MG. According to the MAR (Medication Administration Record) and the progress notes, R5 Ceftriaxone and Amoxicillin was not given on 6/15/2023 because the medication was not available. The note dated 6/16/2023 does not indicate the medication was administered. V2 stated, If it is not written it was not done. V2 stated the pharmacy delivers twice a day, in the AM and PM. If a medication is not available, we call the pharmacy and order. Pharmacy should get the medication to the facility the same day or the next day. We have an emergency medication box. The box is refilled right away. The two medications R5 did not receive are antibiotics. Antibiotics are given for infection or prophylactically to prevent infection. Medications should be administered as prescribed by the physician. On 8/17/23 at 12:30 PM, V24 (Infection Prevention Nurse) stated R5 was admitted from the hospital with antibiotic medication orders. R5's orders included Ceftriaxone 2GR IV every 24 hours for infection, and Amoxicillin 500MG 1 capsule per day for dental procedure. V24 said R5 came in with a surgical wound infected with E. Coli. That's what the Ceftriaxone was for. V24 said the medication was not received immediately from the pharmacy. Pharmacy runs every day. V24 said there is an emergency box for when we don't have a medication from the pharmacy. V24 said V24 was not sure if those medications are in the emergency box. V24 said if a resident does not receive ordered antibiotics, the infection could get worse, and it could be serious for the resident. V24 said it is important to keep antibiotics in the emergency box. On 8/17/23 at 2:05 PM, V33 (Nurse Practitioner) stated antibiotics are prescribed for infection and prophylaxis after a surgery to prevent infection. The infection could get worse if the antibiotic is not given. Hospital discharge papers, 6/14/2023, documents in part: Post-Discharge Medications Amoxicillin 500 MG capsule, Ceftriaxone 2-gram solution Nurse Practitioner note 6/15/2023 04:06 reads in part: Patient is a [AGE] year-old female who is being consulted by ID at the Facility's request for acute PJI. According to the National Library of Medicine at web address https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3601222/, PJI stands for periprosthetic joint infection. R5 Order Summary Report indicates R5 has orders for Ceftriaxone Sodium Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 2 GM use 2 gram intravenously every 24 hours for infection, start date 6/14/2023; Amoxicillin Oral Capsule 500 MG give 1 capsule by mouth one time only for dental procedure for 1 day take 1 capsule by mouth once as needed for dental procedure, start date 6/15/2023. R5 MAR (Medication Administration Record) for June 2023 indicates the ordered antibiotic medications were not given on 6/15/2023 or 6/16/2023. R5 eMAR-Medication Administration Note, 6/15/2023 11:31 documents in part: Medication not available pharmacy informed; 6/15/2023 21:37 Medication not available. Medication list in the Cubex indicates emergency stock of Amoxicillin cap 500MG and Ceftriaxone/INJ DEX 2 GM are available in the Cubex. Facility policy Medication Administration, date 3/2023, documents in part: All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. If medication is ordered, but not present, check to see if it was misplaced and then call the pharmacy to obtain the medication. If available, obtain from the contingency or convenience box.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure complete Treatment Administration Records (TAR) for 2 (R4, R9) of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. Findings include: R4's face she...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure complete Treatment Administration Records (TAR) for 2 (R4, R9) of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. Findings include: R4's face sheet and Physician Order Sheets (POS) document in part that R4 had pressure ulcers to sacrum and bilateral ischium. R4's June TAR documents in part to cleanse sacrum wound with wound cleanser, apply leptospermum, and cover with dry dressing every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and as needed until resolved to promote wound healing. Start date was 5/29/2023. Discontinued date was 6/13/2023. No documentation for 6/9/2023 and 6/12/2023. R4's June TAR documents in part to apply Dakin's solution 1/4 strength wet to moist packing to left ischium and cover with dry dressing daily and as needed until resolved to promote wound healing. Start date was 6/17/2023. Discontinued 7/3/2023. No documentation from 6/17/2023-6/21/2023, 6/24/2023, and 6/27/2023. R4's June TAR also documents in part to apply Dakin's solution 1/4 strength wet to moist packing to right ischium and cover with dry dressing daily and as needed until resolved to promote would healing. Start date was 6/17/2023. Discontinued 7/3/2023. No documentation on 6/18/2023, 6/24/2023, and 6/27/2023. R9's face sheet and POS document in part pressure ulcers. R9's July TAR documents in part to cleanse the sacral pressure ulcer with wound cleanser, apply leptospermum and cover with dry dressing daily and as needed to promote wound healing. Start date was 6/14/2023. Discontinued 7/21/2023. No documentation on 7/1/2023, 7/2/2023, 7/5/2023, 7/8/2023, 7/9/2023, 7/14/2023, and 7/15/2023. On 8/16/2023 at 1:25 PM, V10 (Wound Care Nurse) stated working Monday through Friday and some weekends to do residents' wound care. V10 stated V10 can't explain why wound care for the weekdays are not charted for R4 or R9. V10 stated R4 would refuse at times but nurses are to document refusals on the TAR as well. V10 stated if V10 is not present or if residents refuse wound care in the day shift, floor nurses are to perform the wound care. On 8/17/2023 at 9:59 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated nurses are supposed to document any care rendered or refused by the residents. On 8/17/2023 at 11:34 AM, V23 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated V23 has performed R9's wound care before. V23 stated V23 could not recall 7/9/2023. V23 stated, Maybe I missed it. V23 stated nurses are supposed to sign the TAR and document the wound care as soon as it is complete. On 8/17/23 at 12:06 PM, V30 (Nurse) stated V30 does not know why the TARs are blank. V30 stated nurses are supposed to document as soon as wound care is done. Attempted telephone interviews with multiple nurses (including but not limited to V25, V27, V28, V29) that were assigned to R4 and R9 during the days with missing/blank charting; however, no answer was given. Facility's Skin Care Prevention policy, last revised 5/2021, and Electronic Medical Records policy, last revised 9/2022, do not document in part residents' rights of complete and accurate medical records. State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities (Revision 211, 2/3/2023) documents in part: In accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented. The medical record must contain the comprehensive plan of care and services provided.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This failure has the potential of affecting all 256 residents residing at the f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This failure has the potential of affecting all 256 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 8/15/2023 at 10:34am, R3 was observed in his room, seated on his bed. R3 said there are roaches in his room and he killed one this morning by stomping on it with his foot. R3 said he does not like bugs in his room and when the facility sprays the bugs, the roaches are still there. On 8/15/2023 at 10:39am, R10 was observed lying in his bed. A black mouse trap was on the floor near R10's window. R10 said there are roaches and bugs running around in his room and he does not like bugs. R10 said R10 is constantly cleaning his windowsill and his bathroom, then housekeeping comes to go over his cleaning after he has cleaned. V10 said he has seen roaches in the hallways and in the elevator and hears mice running around especially at night. R10 said he tells staff (no name provided) when he sees bugs and mice and that is why there is a trap in his room to try and catch the mice. On 8/15/2023 at 12:14pm, R11 said there are roaches in his room and he did not like that his room has bugs. R11 further commented that and even after the bugs are treated, there are still many in his room, especially at night. On 8/17/2023 at 11:05am, R12 said she sees roaches all the time and this morning R12 saw a roach in the hallway as she was going towards the nursing station. R12 said she has not seen pest control come to provide services. R12 said she doesn't like bugs. On 8/15/2023 at 10:07am a live cockroach was observed by a surveyor crawling along the wall near the elevator and next staff bathroom in the basement. On 8/15/2023 at 10:59am, V3 (Registered Nurse-RN) said she has seen bugs in the facility and last Friday she saw a water bug and roaches on the 4th floor in the dining room and resident bathrooms. V3 said she has not seen pest control come to the facility, on the days she works, which are Tuesdays and Thursdays. On 8/16/2023 at 1:12pm, V13 (Director of maintenance) said he just started working at the facility in December 2022, and since he started working at the facility, he has seen bugs throughout the facility, including but not limited to in elevators, in various resident rooms and in the basement. V13 said he has seen bugs such as water bugs, German roaches, and fruit flies. V13 further commented that V15 (Director of housekeeping) oversees pest control in the facility, and he (V15) is on vacation. V13 said before V15 left on vacation, there was no hand over meeting regarding pest control management between V13 and V15, therefore V13 does not know what is currently going on in the facility regarding pest control. V13 stated he knows the pest control company comes to treat the pests, but V13 does not follow up unless he is informed there are pest sightings in the building, because pest control is not under him (V13) or his department. On 8/15/2023 at 3:12pm, V11 (Restorative Manager) and V12 (Restorative Director) said residents come to the basement for Rehabilitation therapy on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Fridays at 11am. On 8/16/2023 at 1:36pm, V1 (Administrator) said the pest control company comes to the facility weekly to provide pest control services and this pest control company has been providing pest control services to the facility since V1 started working at the facility, about four years ago. V1 said, The services the current pest control company are providing are not effective enough because we still have pests' issues in the facility. V1 said the facility is working on finding a different pest control company to provide better pest control services. V1 said pests can make residents uncomfortable and it's not a homelike environment when there are bugs/pests in the facility and pests can spread diseases. V1 said every unit is supposed to have a pest sighting log where pest sightings are logged so that the house keeping director can follow up, but she cannot find the pest control logs in the units. V1 said there are empty pest control logs which were just placed in the units last week. V1 said it is important to log where pests/bugs are sighted so that treatment can be applied. Policy titled Pest Control, dated 10/2022 documents: - Facility shall maintain an effective pest control program - This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Policy titled RESIDENT RIGHTS- Accommodation of Needs and Preferences and Homelike Environment Policy, dated 9/2022 documents: - The objective of the accommodation of resident needs and preferences is to create an individualized, home-like environment to maintain and/or achieve independent functioning, dignity, and well-being to the extent possible in accordance with the president's own needs and preference. -It is the policy of the facility to identify and provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents. Residents have the right to retain and use personal possessions to promote a homelike environment and to support each resident in maintaining their independence. The facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible.
Jul 2023 4 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** There are two Deficiency Practice Statements: 1) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** There are two Deficiency Practice Statements: 1) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident from being physically abused. This affects two of six sampled residents (R6 and R10) reviewed. As a result of this failure, R10 attacked R6, a cognitive impaired resident. R6 sustained multiple injuries (black eyes, bruising, facial soft tissue swelling, and distorted nasal bones). This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy which began 5/25/2023 when R6 was attacked by R10 with no immediate intervention from staff. V1 (administrator) was informed of the immediate jeopardy and a template was presented on 6/29/2023. On 7/11/2023 an acceptable removal plan was received. On 07/12/2023 the surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review removal plan was initiated, and immediate jeopardy was removed on 6/30/2023. However, the non-compliance remains at a level two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. Findings include: R6's admission record showed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with listed diagnosis includes but not limited to schizoaffective disorder unspecified, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, Unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known physiological condition, syncope and collapse, unspecified injury of face, initial encounter. R6 's MDS (Minimum Data Set) an assessment tool in assessing facility resident dated 05/10/2023, scored BIMS as 08 showing R6 has an impaired cognition. R6's care plan on abuse with last revision date of 06/24/2020 on conflict with other persons, documented interventions include staff will assure safety and provide environment with caring professionals with a revision date of 03/25/2020. R6's is care planned for monitoring for negative behavior. R6 care plan did not have specific monitoring documentation. R10's medical record listed diagnosis includes but not limited to Schizophrenia, seizures, unspecified Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypothyroidism, and unspecified Lack of Coordination. R10's MDS dated [DATE] coded BIMS as 15 showing R10 is cognitively intact. R10's plan of care did not have individualized interventions revision documented for aggressive behavior even after the incident of 5/25/23. The facility's incident report of 5/25/2023 indicated: R10 physically attacked R6, punching and hitting R6 multiple times while R6 was lying in bed. R6 was sent to the hospital and was admitted with multiple injuries including bilateral black eyes, multiple bruising on legs and arms facial soft tissue swelling and distorted nasal bones. On 06/15/23 at 12:30pm, interview with R6 regarding physical abuse, R6 stated in part, the roommate (identified as R10) jumped on her and started hitting her for no reason. R6 stated she did nothing to (R10). On 6/15/23 at 12:31pm V4 (Social Services Director) stated, R6 and R10 have been cohabiting for a long time without any incident. R6 is the victim and there is no need to revise R6's care plan. On 6/22/23 at 11:30am, V23 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, Yes, I'm familiar with both residents. V23 stated that on 5/25/23, (R10) was walking around on the floor looking to get a dollar, asking staff and peers. Everyone told her (R10) they didn't have a dollar they could give to her (R10). V23 stated, R10 started getting upset, walking back and forth the hallway and going down to another floor and the security desk. V63 (Residential Services (security)) asked R10 to go to her room and sleep but R10 would not go to her room. Later, R10 went to her room and slammed the door. The surveyor asked whether V23 checked on the roommate so see what's going on. V23 stated, No because I was busy with another resident. V23 stated, after R10 went to the room, R16 came out of the room by the doorway yelling that R10 was hitting R6. R16 said R10 was hitting R6 in the face while in R6 was in bed. V23 called security to the floor. V23 stated the CNA (Certified Nurse's Aide) was on another floor (6th floor) giving a shower to some resident. V23 stated, I was by myself and as I ran hallway to R10's room, R16 started yelling again that R10 will injure R6. Then the security guard came and ran down the hall with me. The security guard separated them and R10 was taken to the dining area by the nurse's station. V23 stated, R6 said there was no pain but said R10 hit her. V23 said, I assessed R6 and she was okay. R6 refused to go to the hospital. When R10 was asked what happened, R10 started yelling R6 would not shut up. V23 stated, R6 talks to herself all the time, sometimes it makes no sense what she is saying. When V23 was asked about the staffing, V23 stated, It was just me and the CNA, we have been short staff lately. Normally we should have at least three staff, one nurse and two CNAs. V23 stated, Once I was aware of the situation, I assessed the resident took the vital signs and I called the managers and the NP (Nurse Practitioner) (identified as V55) who did not answer at the time. V23 stated R10 was not assessed because R10 was the one doing the hitting. V23 stated, R6 had redness around both eyes and eyeballs, they were dark red, and a purplish red color was starting to form around the eye. V23 stated, after V23 called the ADON (Assistant Director of Nurses) V42, V42 said V23 should send both R6 and R10 out, but they refused. V23 stated, the ambulance said they didn't have a car to take them out. The surveyor asked whether that was the only ambulance company the facility calls in emergency cases. V23 stated, V23 did not call another ambulance company because the only ambulance company the facility uses. At around 7:30am V23 stated she called the ambulance company again and they arrived within one hour of the call and took them (R6, R10) to the local hospital for evaluation. On 6/22/23 at 12:10pm, R10 stated in part she hit R6 because R6 kept talking and would not shut up. On 6/26/23 at 12:23pm, V4 stated an abuse is an inappropriate act toward self or others and it can be physical, sexual, verbal, or psychological. V4 stated, or putting a resident on social media, financial exploitation, and seclusion can be a form of abuse. Hitting is a form of physical abuse. When asked whether R10 hitting R6 is a form of abuse, V4 stated Absolutely. On 06/26/23 at 3:26pm, interview with R16 (roommate) regarding what R16 witnessed on 05/25/23. R16 stated R10 was hitting on R6 in bed telling R6 to shut up, R6 was shouting and screaming and R10 kept punching R6 in the face and her eyes. I was shouting for help and when no one came I went to the desk (Nurses station) to call the nurse. The nurse came and got R6 up in the chair. R16 stated R6 talks to herself often and it may annoy others at times, but there's not much that can be done about it. 06/26/2023 at 3:35pm R14 (Roommate) stated, R10 did a number on R6, R10 kept hitting R6 on her face everywhere telling her to shut up, shut up. R14 stated R6 was shouting, R10 kept hitting her R6. R10 nearly killed R6. R14 stated, We (referring to self R14 and R16) kept on shouting for help. When no one came, (referring to staff). R16 ran out of the room shouting for the (staff). R14 stated, R6 was red in the face, the neck the hands and everywhere. R14 stated, I could not help her cause I'm afraid she (R10) will attack me (R14) too. R14 stated it took staff about five to ten minutes to separate R10 and R6. R14 stated R6 was talking to herself like she normally does day and night, it can be annoying but it does not mean anyone should put their hands on R6. At 3:37 pm, the surveyor asked whether they have reported this to anyone (referring to facility staff). Both R14 and R16 stated, Yes. R14 stated staff will tell you there's no other room but staff knows R6 talks to herself. R16 stated, But I will not punch her (R6). R6's emergency record history and physical dated 05/26/23 timed 1:05am documented, R6 notably at baseline is A&O (alert and oriented). 1. Frequently talks to herself and has bruises thought to be self-inflicted. R6 was speaking loud in her room and roommate (who was identified as R10) began hitting the patient's face/neck until physically separated by staff. R6 did not lose consciousness during altercation and appeared to remain at baseline, however had significant ecchymosis and conjunctival injection in both eyes. CT facial bones without contrast dated 05/25/23 showed under impression, No clear evidence of facial fracture. Soft tissue swelling as described, distorted nasal bones and frontal processes left greater than right however acute on chronic fracture cannot be excluded on this exam. Correlate with physical exam. There is facial soft tissue swelling in this region. On 06/22/23 at 11:36A surveyor asked V23 (nurse) what should be done if an injured resident in such a situation refused to go to the hospital. V23 stated if an injured resident refused to be sent out for evaluation and treatment the resident will be petitioned out. V23 stated, Yeah (R6) should have been petitioned out to the hospital. When asked about R10 being sent to the hospital with petition for involuntary admission, V23 stated in part V23 did not send R10 with petition stating, No, I did not, I'm a new nurse. The facility policy on Comprehensive Care Plan dated 10/2021 with review date 3/2023 documented in general, the facility must develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. Responsible party listed as all staff. The policy documented in part all care plans will include a focus, measurable goal, and interventions specific to the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. The comprehensive care plan should be reviewed with the resident and changes made as appropriate and it should be reviewed quarterly, annually, and when there are any significant changes. The facility abuse policy defined abuse as any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon resident other than by accidental means. Physical abuse includes but not limited to hitting slapping. Sexual abuse includes but not limited to sexual assault, or sexual coercion non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Mental abuse includes but is not limited to humiliation. The facility policy on abuse documented in part the facility affirms the right of the facility residents to be free from abuse therefore prohibits abuse. The purpose of the policy is to assure the facility is doing all within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse includes mistreatment of residents. On 7/12/2023, the surveyor made observations, conducted interviews, and reviewed documentation to confirm the following removal plan was initiated: 1) The affected residents R6 and R10 are not residing in the facility currently. Both R6 and R10 will not return to the facility due to family preference. 2) Social Services completed an Abuse Risk Assessment on 06/30/23. All residents were identified as being at risk for abuse and the resident care plans were updated. 3) Social Services completed a Screening Assessments for indicators of aggressive and/or harmful behaviors on 06/30/23. Six (6) residents R17, R18, R19, R20, R21 and R22 were identified as being at risk for presence of aggressive/harmful behavior. Their resident care plans were updated. 4) R17, R18, R19, R20, R21 and R22 were placed in individual rooms. 5) R17, R18, R19, R20, R21 and R22 were placed on hourly enhanced supervision rounds to observe for any new or worsening behaviors of aggression or violent behavior. This was completed on 06/30/23. 6) V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing) and Social Services staff will conduct audits of five (5) residents weekly to ensure compliance of the Abuse Risk, and Screening Assessments for indicators of aggressive and/or harmful behaviors, care plans, and appropriateness of room placement. This was initiated on 6/30/23. 7) In-services were done by V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing) and Social Services staff for Nurses, CNAs, Housekeeping, Activity Aides, Social Services, Dietary, Residential Services, Receptionists and Maintenance staff on how to identify vulnerable residents at risk for abuse. This was completed on 06/30/23. Agency staff and other staff not available at the time of the training are to be trained upon their return prior to the start of their first shift. 8) Facility Policy was initiated on 06/30/23 to monitor vulnerable residents are at risk for abuse. 9) Facility Policy was implemented on 06/30/23 to ensure residents with aggressive behavior are not placed in a room with vulnerable residents. 10) In-service by V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) to V4 (Social Services Director), PRSD and Nursing Manager on room placements/ changes of residents with aggressive or violent behavior. 11) The Clinical Managers/ Charge Nurses to conduct unit rounds to observe for any new or worsening behaviors at least every two hours during the week and to report the behaviors to the attending physician and/or psychiatrist and notify V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) for additional interventions. This was initiated on 06/30/23 12) The MOD's Managers on Duty and /or Charge Nurse to conduct unit rounds to observe for any new or worsening behaviors at least every two hours during the weekends and to report the behaviors to the attending physician and/or psychiatrist and notify V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) for additional interventions. This was initiated on 06/30/23 13) Concerns identified and non-compliance during the monitoring activities shall be addressed immediately and discussed during QAPI meeting. The facility presented a plan of removal for the immediacy on 6/29/23. The survey team reviewed the plan of removal and was unable to accept the plan to remove the immediacy. The plan of removal was returned to the facility for revisions. The facility presented a revised plan of removal on 07/06/23, 07/09/23, 07/11/23 at 8:32am and 07/11/23 at 1:12pm. The survey team accepted the plan of removal on 07/11/23. 2) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one resident (R4) from sexual abuse. This failure affected one (R4) out of six residents reviewed. R4 was sexually abused by another resident R5. Findings include: R4's electronic medical record, admission record showed R4 is a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility 12/13/2018 with listed diagnosis information includes Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type, Bipolar Disorder unspecified, Chronic fatigue unspecified and anxiety disorder. R4's hospital record dated 5/25/2023 timed 5:41pm, showed documentation R4 was admitted for evaluation after sexual assault. (R4) reported in ER (Emergency Room) she was sexually assaulted at the facility. Police report was filed at the ER and Rape hotline called. On 06/15/23 at 11:50am, when asked about the incident of 5/25/23, R4 was reluctant in talking to the surveyor without any one in the room. R4 stated, I cannot trust any-one especially the opposite sex. R4 stated about one month prior 5/25/23, What happened is not so good. I still have problem having trust to talk to any male in here (referring to the facility). It is so not good at all; I was embarrassed because other roommate was in the room and to realized they know what happened to me is still embarrassing and shameful to me. I have not been the same since then. When asked what happened, R4 stated, I was in his (R5's) room watching TV and (R5) pushed me on to his (R5) bed and forced himself on me having sex with me. I could not scream because there were other people (referring to roommates) in the room, and I didn't want them to know. R4's plan of care with initiated date of 12/10/19 documented R4 is at risk for abuse due to diagnosis including bipolar disorder and poor judgement. Last revision date documented as 08/13/2020. V4 (Social Services Director), documented another intervention added with initiated date 5/25/23 and created date 05/26/2023 to document and have witness for each conversation with R4, which is not a measurable abuse preventive measure. R4 stated, I told him (R5) several times, No but he (R5) just did his thing (referring to sexual act penetration). I did not say anything right away because I was embarrassed and ashamed of what had happened to me. R4 stated, I was sent to the hospital, but I still need someone to talk to. R4 was unable to mention R5's name when talking about the alleged incident. Noted R4 finger shaking. When asked why R4 was shaking, R4 stated, I don't want to mention his name (referring to R5). On 06/15/23 at 12:06pm, R5 stated he (R5) knows who R4 is. R5 stated, I was in my room on the second floor, she (R4) came to my room to watch TV. Then we had sex. She (R4) kept coming to my room. When asked whether R4 said no to having sex with R5, R5 stated, It happened only one time, and then she (R4) said she was eight months pregnant. Then I said she can't come to my room anymore. R5 was asked again whether R4 said no to R5 regarding that one time. R5 stated, Yes, maybe. R5 kept looking out of the room. When asked about the reason for change in demeanor, R5 stated, I am just making sure V42 ADON (Assistant Director of Nurse's) (who was outside the room and by the door) could not hear all the conversation. When asked why, R5 shook his head and did not reply to the surveyor. R5's plan of care initiated 10/27/22 and with last revision date of 12/2022 showed R5 has a history of criminal behavior. Goal listed is R5 will behave in a safe manner consistent with resident conduct policies through the next review. Listed interventions with revision date 10/27/2022 includes but not limited to promoting safety, intervene when inappropriate behavior is observed. Teach impulse control strategies and communicate the resident is responsible for all actions/ behavior and must exercise control over impulses and behavior. R5's medical record progress note dated 5/25/23 timed 2:20pm (14:20) documented R5 was petitioned to the hospital for inappropriate behavior According to the facility investigation presented, R4 wrote in part, R5 forced himself on me I was watching TV (Television) in (R5)'s room. He (R5) took me against my will. I (R4) know this is partly my fault because I was in his room, but I had no idea he would do this sort of thing. Ever since this incident (R5) has been very disrespectful to me. R4's signed facility investigation statement presented documented the incident happened about one month ago. On 6/21/23 at 2:39pm to 2:45pm, V40 PRSC stated she (V40) is familiar with R4 and R5, but they are not on V40's caseload. V40 stated. I only do wellness check on the residents even if they are not on my caseload. V40 stated, R4 told me about being raped and I told my supervisor (V29 - PRSC Supervisor), who said the facility is investigating it. V40 stated on 05/29/23, V40 did a follow up on R4. V40 stated, (R4) would not want to talk about it because of her feelings about the incident. Surveyor asked what V40 meant by R4 not wanting to talk about it, V40 stated R4 will not talk about it (referring to the sexual abuse). V40 stated, R4 stated she feels safe in the facility. The surveyor asked, if forcing sexual acts on others is a form of sexual abuse. V40 stated, Yes, a 'No' is a 'No'. On 6/21/23 at 3:13pm, V29 stated V29 is familiar with R4, R4 is alert, oriented X3. V29 stated, When things don't go her (R4) way, she became agitated with false accusations. V29 stated V29 heard about the alleged sexual abuse from the staff. V29 stated, When I asked R4 about it, she said she will rather deal with a female staff. Surveyor asked about abuse protocol and whether forcing sexual acts on others is a form of abuse, V29 stated yes. On 6/21/23 at 3:27pm, V43 ADON (Assistant Administrator) stated V43 was not made aware of any abuse. V43 stated, (V1 Administrator) told me about the alleged abuse, and I called the family (R4's Mother) and told her about the incident. Surveyor asked if sexual assault is a form of abuse. V43 stated, Yes and it should be reported immediately. On 6/22/23 at 3:31pm, V50 PRSC (Psychiatrist Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) when asked whether familiar with R4, stated she (V50) really doesn't know much about R4. V50 stated R4 called the police that she was raped and then came to V50 to make V50 aware R4 had called the police. V50 stated V4 said, They (police) are on their way to the facility and asked me to go with her. That is when she (R4) said she called because she was raped. I asked her (R4) why she did not tell me sooner before the call to the police. She (R4) then said, I told someone else, the administrator. The police came and R4 then stepped outside with the police officer, I really don't know what she told the police, but the police spoke with the assistant administrator. V50 stated a police report was taken and R4 was monitored to make sure she was safe. V50 stated, R4 told (V3) Assistant Administrator that it happened about a month ago in (R5)'s room. V50 stated R4 said she was ashamed and embarrassed to talk about it because she went into R5's room not knowing she would be raped. On 6/22/23 at 3:58pm, V3 (Assistant Administrator) stated, Yes, I'm familiar with R4 and R6. I was not present when (R4) called the police department but I was made aware when the police got to the facility. I saw her (R4) talking to the police officer. The police officer informed me (R4) called alleging she was sexually abused. A report number (#JG274566) was given to me, and they said an investigator will come to the facility to investigate. V3 stated the investigator has not come yet to investigate. V3 stated R4 said it happened about a month ago on the 2nd floor between herself and (R5). V3 stated V3 believes R4 told V50 (PRSC (Psychiatrist Rehabilitation service coordinator) just before the police came. V3 stated, prior to that day V3 was not aware of the abuse and that immediately the facility investigation started and was reported to IDPH. V3 stated R4 was sent to the local hospital for treatment and was admitted . The facility abuse policy defined abuse as any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon resident other than by accidental means. Physical abuse includes but not limited to hitting slapping. Sexual abuse includes but not limited to sexual assault, or sexual coercion non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Mental abuse includes but is not limited to humiliation. The facility policy on abuse documented in part the facility affirms the right of the facility residents to be free from abuse therefore prohibits abuse. The purpose of the policy is to assure the facility is doing all within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse includes mistreatment of residents.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to monitor residents with aggressive be...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to monitor residents with aggressive behavior and those residents at risk for being abused. This affects two of six sampled residents (R6 and R10) reviewed for supervision. As a result of this failure, R10 attacked R6, a cognitive impaired resident. R6 sustained multiple injuries (black eyes, bruising, facial soft tissue swelling, and distorted nasal bones). This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy which began 5/25/2023 when R6 was attacked by R10 with no immediate intervention from staff. V1 (administrator) was informed of the immediate jeopardy and a template was presented on 6/29/2023. On 7/11/2023 an acceptable removal plan was received. On 07/12/2023 the surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review removal plan was initiated, and immediate jeopardy was removed on 6/30/2023. However, the non-compliance remains at a level two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. Findings include: R6's admission record showed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with listed diagnosis includes but not limited to schizoaffective disorder unspecified, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, Unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known physiological condition, syncope and collapse, unspecified injury of face, initial encounter. R10's medical record listed diagnosis includes but not limited to Schizophrenia, seizures, unspecified Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypothyroidism, and unspecified Lack of Coordination. According to the facility abuse log report, on 05/25/23 R10 physically abused R6 by hitting R6. R6's medical record showed that R6 was sent to the local hospital. R6 sustained multiple injuries that includes the soft tissue swelling, distorted nasal bones and frontal processes left greater than right however acute on chronic fracture cannot be excluded on this exam. Correlate with physical exam. During the investigation, V23 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she (V23) was the only staff on the floor at the time of incident resulting in a delay in responding immediately to prevent R10 from physically attacking R6 who is vulnerable and cognitively impaired and known to talk to self. R10 physically assaulted R6 because R6 did not stop talking. R6 's MDS (Minimum Data Set) an assessment tool in assessing facility resident dated 05/10/2023 scored BIMS as 08 showing that R6 has an impaired cognition. R6's care plan on abuse with last revision date of 06/24/2020 on conflict with other persons, documented interventions include staff will assure safety and provide environment with caring professionals with a revision date of 03/25/2020. R6's is care planned for monitoring for negative behavior. R6 care plan did not have specific monitoring documentation. On 6/15/23 at 12:31pm V4 (Social Services Director) stated, R6 and R10 have been cohabiting for a long time without any incident. R6 is the victim and there is no need to revise R6's care plan. On 6/21/23 at 2:41pm, V4 (SSD) stated in part that all 258 the residents residing in the facility are at risk for abuse and they should be care planned and monitored for abuse. V4 stated R6 has this behavior of blabbing (talking) to self and that is R6 baseline. R10's MDS dated [DATE] coded BIMS as 15 showing that R10 is cognitively intact. R10's medical record progress note dated 05/25/2023 timed 00:57am (12:57am), V23 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) documented, client (referring to R10) physically attacked roommate (referring to R6). She (R10) stated her (R6) roommate would not shut up and proceeded to attack her roommate (R6). The client (R6) has been removed from the room and placed in the dining room. She (R10) was moved to the second floor in room (***) for the remainder of the night. According to R10 medical record, R10 who has a diagnosis of Schizophrenia was not immediately sent out for enhance monitor/supervision to prevent other vulnerable resident from abuse. No supervision was documented put in place beyond what is expected for any resident. R10 with violent behavior was left with no specific supervisor after assaulting R6 on 5/25/23. R10's medical record progress note showed on 5/25/2023, V23 documentation timed 08:41am, R10 is being sent to a local hospital for psychiatric evaluation eight hours after the physically assaulting R6. R10 who has violent behavior was left with no specific supervision after assaulting R6 on 05/25/23 for approximately eight hours. R10 was not removed immediately from the facility and no documentation that supervision was put in place beyond what is expected for any resident after assaulting R6 on 05/25/23.This documentation did not show that any specific supervision was after assaulting R6 beyond what is expected for any resident. The violent attack was sent on petition to the hospital. R10 hospital ED provider Report dated 5/25/23 timed 11:34am documented, patient sent here without a partition (Petition) suggestive of any recent Acute Psychiatric issue. ER record documented R10 arrival date 5/25/23 timed 9:55am (09:55). R10's plan of care for aggression created 11/19/2021 and last interventions revised 07/23/2022. After the incident of 05/25/23 intervention added documented to refer the resident to a mental health professional including a consulting psychiatrist for evaluation if the resident's symptoms warrant further assessment or ongoing management with initiated date 05/25/2023 and created 05/26/2023. R10's mal-adaptive behavioral symptoms initial date 02/10/2022 last revised 07/23/2022. R10's plan of care did not show any documented plan of care for being at risk for abuse. R10's Screening Assessment for Indicators of Aggressive And/or Harmful Behavior dated 05/25/2023 timed 9:17pm (21:17) showed, R10 was scored at 8 indicating that R10 is at risk of aggressive behavior at this time, because R10 displayed aggressive behavior by not following the facility smoking policy. On 6/21/23 at 2:41pm, V4 (SSD) stated in part that all 258 the residents residing in the facility are at risk for abuse and they should be care planned and monitored for abuse. According to the facility Reported Incident form the incident was categorized as physical abuse, resident to resident altercation and dated 05/25/23 12:30am, documented R6 was noted with injury to her face. The report documented a review of clinical records indicated that R10 has a history of moods and behaviors that includes but not limited to poor boundary issues, attention seeking behavior, anxiety behaviors, aggression, and other socially inappropriate behaviors. Care plans and interventions have been put in place to address these behaviors. The facility concluded the allegation was not verified, unsubstantiated documenting that based on facts gathered during the investigation, staff interviews, resident interviews, and a review of R10 medical records, abuse cannot be substantiated at this time secondary to her diagnosis of severe mental illness. R10 appeared to be responding to internal stimuli as R10 believed R6 was verbally attacking her (R10). V1 (Administrator) stated during the facility investigation R6 stated that (R10) her roommate physically attacked her while in the bed. On 06/26/23 at 3:26pm, interview with R16 (roommate) regarding what R16 witnessed on 05/25/23. R16 stated R10 was hitting on R6 in bed telling R6 to shut up, R6 was shouting and screaming and R10 kept punching R6 in the face and her eyes. I was shouting for help and when no one came I went to the desk (Nurses station) to call the nurse. The nurse came and got R6 up in the chair. R16 stated R6 talk to self all the time it can gets to you when you but what can you do. 06/26/2023 at 3:35pm R14 (Roommate) stated, R10 did a number on R6, R10 kept hitting R6 on her face everywhere telling her to shut up, shut up. R14 stated R6 was shouting, R10 kept hitting her R6. R10 nearly killed R6. R14 stated, We (referring to self R14 and R16) kept on shouting for help. When no one came, (referring to staff). R16 ran out of the room shouting for the (staff). R14 stated, R6 was red in the face, the neck the hands and everywhere. R14 stated, I could not help her cause I'm afraid she (R10) will attack me (R14) too. R14 stated it took staff about five to ten minutes to separate R10 and R6. R14 stated R6 was talking to herself like she normally does day and night, it can be annoying but it does not mean anyone should put their hands on R6. At 3:37 pm, the surveyor asked whether they have reported this to anyone (referring to facility staff). Both R14 and R16 stated, Yes. R14 stated staff will tell you there's no other room but staff knows R6 talks to herself. R16 stated, But I will not punch her (R6). On 06/29/23 at 1:18pm, interview with V4 and V51 PRSD (Psychiatrist Rehabilitation Services Director) present, the surveyor asked who is responsible for making the decision on which resident can co-habit in the same room and how the resident is evaluated in making the decision. V4 stated the compatibility is based on behavior during admission assessment, taking into consideration history by reading through the admission referrals and present behaviors. V4 stated prior to this incident on 05/25/23, both R10 and R6 lived together without an incident, R6 has this baseline behavior of talking to self and that is normal for R6. The surveyor then asked both V4 and V51 that in their professional opinion with R6 behavior, BIMs of 8, is it appropriate for both R6 and R10 to co-habit in the same room. V51 stated if the resident does not come and complain there is no way to know. The surveyor asked whether with this identified baseline behavior can this make R6 susceptible to abuse. Both V4 and V51 stated Yes. Surveyor asked if R6 being physically assaulted by R10 is a form of abuse. V4 stated, Absolutely it is an abuse. V4 stated all the residents in this facility with psych diagnosis are susceptible to abuse. V4 stated that R6 's care does not need to be reviewed because R6 is the victim of physical aggression from R10 so R10's care plan was reviewed and the intervention was to review the care plan annually, quarterly, and as needed. The surveyor then showed V4 the dates on the plan of care interventions, V4 stated the intervention were not reviewed to individualize the care interventions because he (V4) did not know or think the review or revised date should be changed because both resident R6 and R10 have co-habituated in the same room without any incident. As at 07/06/23 at 4:30pm, the facility was unable to present any behavior monitoring documentation from the facility staff. The facility lacks a system to supervise / monitor residents at risk of aggressive behaviors on how often and how the facility will monitor behavior. On 7/19/23 at 10:48am, V55 NP (Nurse Practitioner) stated for any of the resident to be considered for any psych evaluation at the hospital there must be a reason and the reason is stated in the petition. If a petition paper (Petition for Involuntary/Judicial Admission) is not sent with the resident from the nursing home, there is a possibility the resident will be sent back to the facility without care because there will be no documented reason for admission. Reasons for petition can be for agitation, restlessness, safety for self and others, unstable mood, poor direction, and judgement. V55 stated R10 should have been sent to the hospital with petition on 5/25/23. When asked V55's professional opinion about the facility staffing having adequate supervision on 5/25/23 11pm to 7am shift, V55 stated the staffing for the kind of population being cared for in the facility is not adequate. The facility policy on Comprehensive Care Plan dated 10/2021 with review date 3/2023 documented in general that the facility must develop a comprehensive person - centered care plan for each resident. Responsible party listed as all staff. The policy documented in part that all care plans will include a focus, measurable goal, and interventions specific to the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs, the comprehensive care plan should be reviewed with the resident and changes made as appropriate and it should be reviewed quarterly, annually, and with any significant changes. The facility Job Description for PRS/SSD (Psychiatrist Rehabilitation services Director/Social Services Director) presented statement of purpose documented in part that the social service worker will work with residents in the skilled nursing facility by identifying their psychosocial, mental, and emotional needs along with providing, developing and /or aiding in the access of services to meet those needs. The facility PRSC (Psychiatrist Rehabilitation Coordinator) Job Description presented documented in part that the purpose of this position is to provide group and individual psychiatric rehabilitative and case management services to adults with a history of multiple psychiatric hospitalizations and in need of long-term care stabilization: to participate with the interdisciplinary team in developing, implementing, and evaluating effective therapeutic services via facility programming. Qualification listed includes obtaining CPI certification after hire. The facility policy on Staffing with review date 9/2022 documented in part that the facility is generally to have appropriate number of staff available to meet the needs of the residents. Listed guideline includes but not limited to staff is required to review their schedule and discuss any problems regarding their schedule with their supervisor. Staffing is then increased based on the needs of the resident population. Staffing is supplemented as needed by outside agencies. The facility policy guideline titled Behavior Management with review date 9/2022 documented in part that it is the policy of the facility to manage unruly behavior of a resident in the least restrictive manor that ensures the safety of residents, employees, and family members. On 7/12/2023, the surveyor made observations, conducted interviews, and reviewed documentation to confirm the following removal plan was initiated: 1) The affected residents, R6 and R10, are not residing in the facility currently. Both R6 and R10 will not return to the facility due to family preference. 2) Social Services completed an Abuse Risk Assessment on 06/30/23. All residents were identified as being at risk for abuse and the resident care plans were updated. 3) Social Services completed a Screening Assessments for indicators of aggressive and/or harmful behaviors on 06/30/23. Six (6) residents R17, R18, R19, R20, R21 and R22 were identified as being at risk for presence of aggressive/harmful behavior. Their resident care plans were updated. 4) R17, R18, R19, R20, R21 and R22 were placed in individual rooms. 5) R17, R18, R19, R20, R21 and R22 were placed on hourly enhanced supervision rounds to observe for any new or worsening behaviors of aggression or violent behavior. This was completed on 06/30/23. 6) V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing) and Social Services staff will conduct audits of five (5) residents weekly to ensure compliance of the Abuse Risk, and Screening Assessments for indicators of aggressive and/or harmful behaviors, care plans, and appropriateness of room placement. This was initiated on 6/30/23. 7) In-services were done by V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing) and Social Services staff for Nurses, CNAs, Housekeeping, Activity Aides, Social Services, Dietary, Residential Services, Receptionists and Maintenance staff on how to identify vulnerable residents at risk for abuse. This was completed on 06/30/23. Agency staff and other staff not available at the time of the training are to be trained upon their return prior to the start of their first shift. 8) Facility Policy was initiated on 06/30/23 to monitor vulnerable residents that are at risk for abuse. 9) Facility Policy was implemented on 06/30/23 to ensure residents with aggressive behavior are not placed in a room with vulnerable residents. 10) The Clinical Managers/ Charge Nurses to conduct unit rounds to observe for any new or worsening behaviors at least every two hours during the week and to report the behaviors to the attending physician and/or psychiatrist and notify V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) for additional interventions. This was initiated on 06/30/23 11) The MOD's Managers on Duty and /or Charge Nurse to conduct unit rounds to observe for any new or worsening behaviors at least every two hours during the weekends and to report the behaviors to the attending physician and/or psychiatrist and notify V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) for additional interventions. This was initiated on 06/30/23 12) In-service by V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) to V4 (Social Services Director), PRSD and Nursing Manager on room placements/ changes of residents with aggressive or violent behavior. 13) In-service of nurses and social services staff on the process of involuntary admission. Initiated on 06/30/23 14) In-service to nurses, CNAs, Housekeeping, Activity Aides, Social Services, Dietary, Residential Services, Receptionists and Maintenance staff on the facility's aggressive behavior response code Code Yellow to ensure that all resident's aggressive behavior occurrences are responded to in a timely manner. 15) Social services and residential services staff CPI trained to understand techniques for de-escalating violent and aggressive behaviors. Completed on 06/30/23. CPI training program to include Nurses, CNAs and Activity Aides initiated on 06/30/23. 16) Concerns identified and non-compliance during the monitoring activities shall be addressed immediately and discussed during QAPI meeting. The facility presented a plan of removal for the immediacy on 6/29/23. The survey team reviewed the plan of removal and was unable to accept the plan to remove the immediacy. The plan of removal was returned to the facility for revisions. The facility presented a revised plan of removal on 07/06/23, 07/09/23, 07/11/23 at 2:11am and 07/11/23 at 1:12pm. The survey team accepted the plan of removal on 07/11/23.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff to meet residents' needs. This failu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff to meet residents' needs. This failure affected one sampled resident R6 reviewed for supervision. As a result, R10 attacked R6, a cognitive impaired resident, and R6 sustaining multiple injuries (black eyes, bruising, facial soft tissue swelling, and distorted nasal bones). This has the potential to affect all the resident residing on the 5th floor and all 258-resident residing at the facility. Findings include: R6's admission record showed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with listed diagnosis includes but not limited to schizoaffective disorder unspecified, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, Unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known physiological condition, syncope and collapse, unspecified injury of face, initial encounter. R6 's MDS dated [DATE] scored BIMS 08 showing R6 has an impaired cognition. R6's abuse plan of care with last revision date of 06/24/2020 on conflict with other persons documented, interventions includes staff will assure safety and provide environment with caring professionals with last revision date of 03/25/2020. R10's MDS dated [DATE] coded BIMS as 15 showing R10 is cognitively intact. R10's medical record listed diagnosis includes but not limited to Schizophrenia, seizures, unspecified Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypothyroidism, and unspecified Lack of Coordination. R10's medical record progress note dated 05/25/2023 timed 00:57am (12:57am), V23 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) documented, client (R10) physically attacked roommate (R6). She (R10) stated her (R6) roommate would not shut up and proceeded to attack her roommate (R6). The client (R6) has been removed from the room and placed in the dining room. She (R10) was moved to the second floor in room (***) for the remainder of the night. On 6/20/23 at 2:00pm, V30 (staffing Coordinator) stated the staffing on the 5th floor at night shift (11pm to7am) should be one nurse and two aides (referring to Certified Nurse's aide). On 6/22/23 at 11:35am, V23 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) who was on duty on 5/25/23 stated there is usually three nursing staff, one nurse and two CNAs (Certified Nurse's aide) scheduled on the 5th floor of the facility but lately only two staff, one nurse and one nurse's aide are working. V23 stated it is difficult for one nurse and an aide (referring to CNA) to be by themselves on the floor. When asked whether these concerns have been made known to the supervisors and the administrator, V23 stated they are in-charge of the staffing. I (V23) guess they know and they are also made aware. V23 stated it was just me and a CNA so when the incident with R6 and R10 happened, I was busy doing something else and I had to wait for security to come up to help because at the time V49 (CNA) was not on the floor. V49 was busy helping to shower other residents on another floor. On 6/22/23 at 3:58pm, V1 (Administrator) stated in part the staffing on the 5th floor should be two aides and one nurse but lately the facility has been having problems with staffing. V1 stated the facility have agency staff that can be called or have other CNA work over-time but will get back to the surveyor on what really happened with staffing. V1 was asked what could happen to the residents without adequate supervision, V1 stated in part the residents' needs might not be met. In the case of fighting the resident can be injured. The facility daily schedule presented showed only one Nurse and one CNA were scheduled on 05/25/23 at 11pm to 7am and one resident services (security) staff was scheduled for the facility on 11pm to 7am shift. On 6/26/23 at 11:23am, V24 (Resident Service Director), V24 stated in part there are 9 facility security staff. On 7am to 3pm shift there are 5 scheduled, 3pm -11pm 4 are scheduled, and on nights 11pm to 7am shift 2 (two) are scheduled. Rounds are made every 30 minutes on all the floors and facility surroundings. In case there is an incident on the floor the staff, nursing staff page for security to floor. If there is a physical fight between residents, they are separated by the security. All the security staff are trained in CPI. On 6/26/23 at 11:40am, V2 DON (Director of Nurse's) stated the facility normally has three staff scheduled on the 5th floor but was not sure what happened on that day (referring to 5/25/23). V2 stated would back to surveyor on that. When asked what can happen to the resident when there is not enough staff to monitor or supervise them. V2 stated there can be incidents and residents' needs not met. On 6/22/23 at 3:01pm, V49 (CNA) stated in part, she (V49) is familiar with both resident R6 and R10. V49 stated, Yes, I was the only CNA on the floor on 5/25/23. V49 stated in part, I came in at 11:00pm (referring to resuming duty), made my rounds to make sure all the residents on the floor were okay, they were all okay. V49 stated in part, at around 12:15am, I (V49) took some of my residents to the 6th floor to take their showers. V49 stated, she stayed on the 6th floor for almost one and half hours. When V49 got back on the floor, the floor nurse on the floor (V23) LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) told V49 there was an incident between R6 and R10. R10 has to be moved to another floor, on the 6th floor. V49 stated in part she (V49) did not see R10 physically assault R6, the nurse (V23) told V49 about it. V49 stated in part she (V49) was the only aide. V19 stated, there were supposed to be two nurse's aides on the floor and they usually have two but that day (referring to 5/25/23) it was only one nurse and one CNA. On 6/22/23 at 3:58pm, V1 (Administrator) stated in part the staffing on the 5th floor should be two aides and one nurse but lately the facility has been having problems with staffing. V1 stated the facility have agency staff can be called or have other CNA work over-time but will get back to the surveyor on what really happened with staffing. On 6/26/23 At 2:09pm V24 (Residential Services Director) stated, I thought there were two security staff (Residential Services Staff) on duty on 05/25/23 but it was only one staff. On 6/26/23 at 2:53pm, V63 (Residential Services) stated in part, I (V63) was the security staff on duty at the time on 11pm to 7am shift. I (V63) was working alone that night. On 7/12/23 at 8:50am, surveyor asked about staffing and what could happen if the facility is short staffed. V4 SSD (Social Services Director) stated in part, there will be no good supervision in case any thing happened. On 7/19/23 at 8:55am, V4 stated the floors (referring to residents residing floors) should be adequately staffed to meet residents' needs, for safety in case of resident-to-resident altercations, also not to overwhelm the staff. The surveyor asked whether the 5th floor was adequately staffed on 5/25/25 at the time R10 attacked R6. V4 stated, I (V4) just believe we (referring to the facility) can do better, that's all I am going to say about . No resident should be physically or sexually abused. Abuse is a No-No situation. On 7/19/23 at 10:03am, V3 (Assistant Administrator) stated in part, regarding staffing on 5/25/23, we (referring to the facility) can do better; we are working on it, getting adequate staffing on each floor. When asked about what can happen to residents if the facility/floor is not adequately staffed regarding resident's needs and services, V3 stated, I'm not sure on how to answer. On 7/19/23 at 10:18am, V55 NP (Nurse Practitioner) was asked whether in his (V55) professional opinion if the facility staffing on 5/25/23, 11pm to 7am shift of one nurse (V23), one CNA (V49) on the floor and only one residential services staff for the entire facility population cared for is appropriate. V55 stated, No, but that's for the management (facility management), I don't think that is an okay staffing. On 7/19/23 at 11:52am, when V1 (Administrator) was asked about staffing adequacy on 5/25/23 and about what can happen with inadequate staffing. V1 stated in part, there would be no adequate supervision for the residents and possibly the residents' needs may not be met. V1 stated, there can be increase in negative behavior with unresolved altercations and behaviors can result in injuries to themselves and others (referring to residents and staff). V1 stated on 5/25/23, I believe we had adequate staff. Then the surveyor asked if it is appropriate to have only one nurse (V23) and one CNA (V49) staff on the floor on 5/25/23. V1 stated for the facility 5th floor, it is not appropriate but depending on the census. The facility policy on Staffing with review date 9/2022 documented in part the facility is generally to have appropriate number of staff available to meet the needs of the residents. Listed guideline includes but not limited to staff is required to review their schedule and discuss any problems regarding their schedule with their supervisor. Staffing is then increased based on the needs of the resident population. Staffing is supplemented as needed by outside agencies. The facility policy guideline titled Behavior Management with review date 9/2022 documented in part it is the policy of the facility to manage unruly behavior of a resident in the least restrictive manor ensures the safety of residents, employees, and family members.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the proper food temperature to prevent food borne illnesses. This failure affected all residents receiving oral nutrit...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the proper food temperature to prevent food borne illnesses. This failure affected all residents receiving oral nutrition residing in the facility. Findings include: On 6/15/2023 at 12:02pm R2 stated that the food is cold. On 6/15/2023 at noon R1 stated the food is not warm enough, and there have been times when the hot food has been cold. On 6/20/2023 at about 10:00am surveyor viewed residential Council Monthly Meeting minutes that documents food cold. On 6/21/2023 at 12:23pm surveyor observed V38 (Dietary Aide) test the temperatures of the food items being served for lunch on the steam table in the kitchen. The roast beef with gravy tested at 169 degrees, Squash melody tested at 180 degrees, baked potato tested at 145 degrees, mashed potato tested at 160 degrees, mechanical meat tested at 174 degrees and the pureed meat tested at 140 degrees which all were at the correct temperature or higher. On 6/202/2023 V32 (Dietary Manager) stated that plated food carts go to the 2nd floor first and the 7th floor is the last floor to be served. V39 stated that food items temperatures are tested right before food plating is done. On 6/21/2023 at 2:07pm surveyor observed V39 (Dietary Aide) test the temperatures of the food items on the test tray on the last floor (7th floor) to be served lunch and the temperatures of the food items were below 135 degrees. The roast beef tested at 110 degrees, the carrots tested at 100 degrees, baked potato tested at 120 degrees, mashed potato tested at 104 degrees, mechanical meat tested at 100 degrees, pureed meat tested at 90 degrees and the pureed vegetables tested at 110 degrees. On 6/21/2023 at 2:19pm V32 stated that the food items should be at least 165 degrees and no lower than 145-150 degrees. Policy titled Food Preparation with a revised date of 9/2017 documents, in part, the Dining Services Director/Cook(s) will be responsible for food preparation techniques which minimize all foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 degree F (Fahrenheit) or per state regulation, all foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 degree F (or as state regulations requires) for hot holding and when hot pureed, ground, or diced food drop into the danger zone (below 135 degrees) the mechanically altered food must be reheated to 165 degrees for 15 seconds if holding for hot service.
Apr 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care addressing the PT/...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care addressing the PT/OT/ST (Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy) and restorative care that meets resident's care needs to prevent contracture; failed to ensure that hand splint and other therapeutic devices were ordered and applied to one resident (R2) to prevent/treat contracture. This failure affected R2 who was admitted for therapy. Findings include: On 4/18/23 at 12:01pm, R2 was observed in the room sitting in the wheelchair, noted with contracture of left upper arm extending to the left-hand wrist without any therapeutic restorative device, splint, sling or finger rolls in use. R2 stated that I (R2) need therapy and they (referring to the facility) are not giving me therapy. The surveyor observed R2 using the right hand to lift the left hand to move the left hand so the surveyor can see the long nails already digging into the left 2nd finger. R2's admission record showed that R2 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease unspecified, Unspecified lack of Coordination, Major Depressive Disorder, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, and Cerebrovascular disease. R2's electronic medical record POS (Physician Order Sheet) showed R2 has an order with start date 03/27/23 PT (Physical Therapy) / OT (Occupational Therapy) / ST (speech Therapy) evaluation and treatment. This order was not followed up. On 04/18/23 at 12:16pm, interview with V14 OCT (Occupational-Therapy Technician) regarding R2's OT and what is being done for R2 to prevent the contracture from worsening. V14 stated in part that R2 is supposed to have a splint and it is to be used daily for the operational management of R2's joints. V14 stated, Right now, the left wrist of the left hand is in a flexion position. R2 can benefit from the use of splint because the resting hand splint supports the wrist joint in a neutral position. This will help in managing the joint in preventing further deterioration. I (V14) do not know why the splint is not in use. I am not sure what kind of splint R2 supposed to have. During the same interview V13 (Therapy Manager), who was present during the interview stated, We (referring to self and V14) will go and look in the record and let you (surveyor) know what the splint type should be. On 04/18/23 at 2:47 pm, during interview regarding R2's therapy PT, V13 stated the admission nurse on 03/27/23 did not inform the therapy department of the renewal of the PT/OT/ST order. V13 stated in part that R2 received six sessions of PT that was allowed by the insurance company because R2 was a Medicaid resident. V13 stated if we would have known we would have resubmitted the order and continued with the treatment because R2 needs more than six sessions. V13 stated after the six sessions originally ordered PT discharged R2 to restorative department for maintenance. V13 stated looking through R2's documentation there was no order for a splint, because OT only add one session with R2 on 03/16/22 and then R2 went to the hospital on 3/20/23 to 03/27/22. V13 stated the OT department could have picked up R2 after coming back from the hospital because R2 should have six sessions. V13 stated R2 could benefit from the use of splint because the hand is flaccid and R2 is a high functioning stroke resident. V13 stated there was no documentation that the splint was ordered. V13 stated there is no occupational therapy on duty today (04/18/23) but there will be one coming on 04/19/23 to further explain (referring to devices use). On 04/19/23 at 11:17 am, V19 OT (Occupation Therapy) was in the room with R2. V19 stated when R2 came back from the hospital, the admitting nurse should have let the therapy department know that R2 was back in the facility. V2 stated the OT department was not aware R2 came back to the facility, so R2 was not picked up for OT services. During the same observation R2 was noted with a blue splint. When the surveyor asked when the blue splint was ordered, V19 stated that the blue splint was not ordered. (V19) stated that the blue splint in use right now is not good for R2. V19 stated, I will have to change to a shoulder sling for stability. R2's record showed that at 11:42 am on 04/19/23 an order placed for left resting hand splint to be on at night and off during the day to prevent contractures. On 04/19/23 at 12:35pm, interview conducted with V17 (Rehabilitation Manager) regarding plan of care for restorative care and therapeutic devices to prevent contracture and further decline or worsen contracture. V17 stated in part that the care plan initiated yesterday (04/18/23) was an oversight. V17 stated the facility has a restorative aide on the floor that was supposed to apply the splint for resident (R2) as ordered. The surveyor asked V17 how it is determined which resident should have a splint. V17 stated in part that it is done during assessment on admission depending on the MDS (Minimum Data Set), sometimes is done yearly or quarterly. V17 stated that for R2 there was no recommendation for a splint from therapy before today. When the surveyor asked for the order to apply a splint V17 stated, I (V17) must go and check for the written order because V13 (Therapy Manager) just called me on the telephone to tell me about it. The surveyor asked V17 in your professional opinion can R2 benefit from the use of splint? V17 stated, Yes, R2 can benefit from the splint use. With a contracture it can prevent it from getting worse. The splint is used to prevent contracture from getting worse. The facility policy on Restorative Nursing Program presented with review date of 10/2022 documented that the policy is to promote each resident's ability to maintain or regain the highest degree of independence as safely as possible. Responsible party listed nursing and restorative (staff).
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication was locked up safely when not i...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication was locked up safely when not in visual proximity of the nurse and not in use to prevent tampering and accidental hazards for one resident (R1) in the sample reviewed for hazards. This failure affected R1 has medication stored on the over bed side table visible to the hallway and has the potential to affect all 42 residents residing on the 4th floor of the facility. Findings include: R1's medical record admission records documented date of admission as [DATE] with diagnoses that includes but not limited to Displaced Fracture of Lateral Condyle of Right Femur, initial encounter for Closed Fracture, unspecified Lack of coordination, Schizoaffective Disorder, History of falling, Other Fracture of upper and Lower End of Left Fibula, initial encounter open fracture type I or II, and Heart Failure. On [DATE] at 11:32am, R1 noted in the bed, observed on the overbed side table Afrin pump mist nasal solution 0.05% bottle with no name no label and not in manufacturer's package, Clear eyes cooling comfort ophthalmic solution 0.5-0.03% drops with no name no label and not in manufacturer's package, and Albuterol sulfate HFA inhaler aerosol with no name, no label with expiration date of 10/22 and not in manufacturer's package. Medications were visible to the hallway. R1 stated, I use them, I used the Afrin already this morning because I could not breath then I used the Albuterol. The nurses know I could not breath. At 11:34am, these medications were shown to V5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) assigned to R1. The surveyor asked about the facility policy on medication pass and medication left at bedside. V5 (LPN) stated, (R1) does not have orders to keep these medications at bed side and should not be using them (self-medicate). I will also see whether R1 has an order for all these medicines. If there is no order, I (V5) will call the doctor because no medicine should be kept at bedside without doctor's order. The surveyor then asked V15 who is responsible for supervising residents and making sure medications are labeled and stored correctly, safely, and not accessible to another resident. V5 stated that all the staff, including nursing staff, generally are responsible. On [DATE] at 11:40 am, showed that R1 did not have an order for Afrin, clear eye drops and Albuterol sulfate inhaler. V5 stated in part that a telephone call has been placed to the physician for R1. On [DATE] at 12:45 pm, interview conducted with V2 DON (Director of Nurse's) regarding the facility policy on medication pass, self- administration and medication left at bed side. V2 stated that any medication left at the bedside should have a doctor's order (physician order). V2 stated family members may have brought the medication for (R1), we (facility) do not encourage it. Self-medication must be ordered by the physician and the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) must approve return demonstration because resident could over self- medicate. On [DATE] at 3:20 pm, V2 stated that Afrin and clear eye drops were ordered by the physician, but the Albuterol sulfate could not be ordered because the physician stated that R1 did not have diagnosis for the medication. On [DATE] at 9:45 am, review of R1's MAR (Medication Administration Record) and POS (Physician Order Sheet) showed that Albuterol sulfate was not ordered, Afrin pump mist nasal solution and the clear eye drops was first ordered on [DATE] at 11:41am. The facility policy titled Medication Storage in the facility, dated [DATE], documented in part that medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer or supplier recommendations. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. The facility Certified Nurse's aide job description listed essential duties includes but not limited to reporting all hazardous conditions. Review of care plans daily to ensure provision of appropriate care. The facility policy on Self-Administration of Medications and Treatments with revision date 12/2022 documented in part that self-administration of medications and treatments are done to prepare a resident for discharge and to help the resident maintain their independence. The decision for self-administration is done by the interdisciplinary team. Responsible party listed includes RN (Registered Nurse), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), Therapy and Physician. Listed guidelines include self-administration of medications and treatments is determined by an order after determining that the resident can self-administer. Facility policy on Medication Administration with review date of 3/2022 documented in part that all medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. Listed guidelines includes an order is required for administration of all medication. Medications are administered by licensed personnel only. Verify that the medication has not expired.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident medication was ordered by physicia...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident medication was ordered by physician to prevent unnecessary use of medication for one of four residents (R1) in the sample reviewed for unnecessary medication. This failure affected R1 who was self-medicating Albuterol sulfate HFA inhaler aerosol without physician order and has the potential to affect all 252-resident residing in the facility. Findings include: On [DATE] at 11:32am, R1 noted in the bed, observed on the overbed side table Afrin pump mist nasal solution 0.05% bottle with no name no label and not in manufacturer's package, Clear eyes cooling comfort ophthalmic solution 0.5-0.03% drops with no name no label and not in manufacturer's package, and Albuterol sulfate HFA inhaler aerosol with no name, no label with expiration date of 10/22 and not in manufacturer's package. Medications were visible to the hallway. R1 stated, I use them, I used the Afrin already this morning because I could not breath then I used the Albuterol. The nurses know I could not breath. At 11:34am, these medications were shown to V5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) assigned to R1. The surveyor asked about the facility policy on medication pass and medication left at bedside. V5 (LPN) stated in part that (R1) does not have orders (referring to physician order) to keep the medication (Albuterol Sulfate inhaler) at bed side and should not be using them (self- medicate). I will also see whether R1 has an order for all these medicines. If there is no order, I (V5) will call the doctor because no medicine should be kept at bedside without doctor's order. R1's medical record admission records documented date of admission as [DATE] with diagnoses that includes but not limited to Displaced Fracture of Lateral Condyle of Right Femur, initial encounter for Closed Fracture, unspecified Lack of coordination, Schizoaffective Disorder, History of falling, Other Fracture of upper and Lower End of Left Fibula, initial encounter open fracture type I or II, and Heart Failure. On [DATE] at 3:20 pm, V2 stated that Afrin and clear eye drops were ordered by the physician, but the Albuterol sulfate could not be ordered because the physician stated that R1 did not have diagnosis for the medication. On [DATE] at 9:45 am, review of R1's MAR (Medication Administration Record) and POS (Physician Order Sheet) showed that Albuterol sulfate was not ordered, Afrin pump mist nasal solution and the clear eye drops was first ordered on [DATE] at 11:41am. Facility policy on Medication Administration with review date of 3/2022 documented in part that all medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. Listed guidelines includes an order is required for administration of all medication. Medications are administered by licensed personnel only. Verify that the medication has not expired. The facility policy presented titled Medication Storage in the facility dated [DATE] documented in part that medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer or supplier recommendations. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications.
Jan 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy on medication administration and Accucheck (blood glucose monitoring) for on resident (R1) of three res...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy on medication administration and Accucheck (blood glucose monitoring) for on resident (R1) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: On 1/21/2023 at 10:07am, R1 was observed in R1 room sitting by the big screen TV reading/writing emails. R1's breakfast tray was observed near R1. R1 said R1 was done eating breakfast about 30-45 minutes ago. R1 said R1 has not received morning medications yet. R1 said Medications are always late, or you receive the wrong medications or none at all. On 1/21/2023 at 10:40am, V1(Director of nursing) was observed giving medications to R1: Allopurinol 300mg Aspirin 81mg Digoxin 0.125 mcg Eliquis 5 mg-(R1 had to ask for it) Furosemide -40mg-BP-182/118, Pulse- 84 On 1/21/2023 at 10:35am, V5 (Certified Nurses' Assistant-CNA) was asked by V1(Director of Nursing-DON) for R1's blood glucose levels. V5 said V5 did not take any blood glucose levels for any residents on the second floor today. V5 further commented that the nurse on the floor is supposed to give the CNA a list of residents who need blood sugar checks (Accuchecks). V5 told V1that V1 did not give V5 the list if residents to do Accuchecks on, therefore V5 did not do any Accucheck and did not check R1's blood sugars this morning 11:05am, R1's Blood sugar was checked. R1's blood sugar reading was 391mg/Dl. R1 was given 7 units of insulin Humalog. On 1/21/23 at 1:43pm V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) said R1 medications were late because R1 was the last person to receive medications. V1 said R1 asked a lot of questions during medication pass and that is why V2 wanted to give R1 medication last. V2 said if insulin is not given on time, a resident might experience high blood sugars, and that is why R1's Accuchecks were high today at 391mg/DL. V2 said medication administration should be given one hour before the prescribed time and one hour after. V2 said administering the medication after that means the medication was given late. V2 said administering medications late can have adverse effects on resident health. Facility policy titled: Medication administration, dated 11/2022 documents: -Check medication administration record prior to administering medication for the right medication, dose, route, patient/resident, and time. -Verify that the medication is being administered at the proper time. Facility policy titled: Timely Administration of Insulin, dated 11/2022, documents: -All insulin will be administered in accordance with physician's orders. - Administer insulin at appropriate times. - Insulin administration will be coordinated with mealtimes and bedtime snacks unless otherwise specified in the physician order. R1's medical records POS (Physician Order Sheet) Documents: 10/19/2022 -Eliquis Tablet 5 MG (Apixaban) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for DVT PROPHYLAXIS-Active 10/19/2022-HumaLOG Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) Inject 7 unit subcutaneously three times a day for INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS Give after meals-Active 10/19/2022 -Furosemide Tablet 40 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE- Active
Dec 2022 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1) was free from physical abuse ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1) was free from physical abuse in a sample of three residents reviewed for abuse. This failure to prevent abuse caused R1to have a cut on R1 face near R1's nose. Findings include: On 12/10/2022 at 12:07 pm, R1 was observed in R1's room sitting in R1's wheel chair. R1 said, on 11/26/2022, R1 went to the nursing station to get R1's medication for R1's spasms from V10 (LPN). R1 said that V10 was not happy and told R1 that R1 would get R1's medications latter. R1 said that as R1 was attempting to get into the elevator, V10 came and started pulling R1 from the elevator. R1 said V10 then balled V10 fist and hit R1 in R1's face. R1 said R1 started bleeding on the nose where R1 had a cut. R1 said a CNA saw what happened and came and separated R1 from V10 and took R1 downstairs to the social services office. R1 said R1 called the police and the police came and saw that R1 had a cut on R1 face near R1's nose. R1 said the police gave R1 a police report number. R1 is a [AGE] year-old individual with initial admission date of 10/21/2022. R1's Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMS) dated 11/1/2022 documents: R1's score is 15/15 (meaning no cognitive deficits). R1's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) assistance document R1 needed Limited assistance, one-person physical assist with bed mobility, transfer, locomotion on and off unit, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and supervision, setup help only with eating. R1 uses a manual wheelchair. R1's medical diagnosis include but not limited to: Paraplegia, unspecified, personal history of traumatic brain injury, other, muscle spasm. On 12/10/2022 at 2:13pm, V12 (Assistant Administrator) said R1 was trying to get on the freight elevator which is for staff, outside venders and ambulance use only. V12 said staff heard somebody moving food carts by the elevator. V10 (LPN) went to the elevator to see what was going on. V12 said V10 held R1 to prevent R1 from going into the elevator. V12 said instead of V10 holding R1's hands, V10 should have walked away and called another staff member to come assist with R1 since R1 was already upset with V10. V12 said, We had that conversation and we talked to V10 what V10 could have done differently, V12 said V10 should not have held R1's hands to try to prevent R1 from hitting V10. On 12/10/2022 at 2:48pm V13 (Certified Nurses Assistant/CNA) said that she (V13) heard a commotion by the freight elevator and went to see what was going on. V13 said V13 found R1 and V10 in a lock hold. V13 pulled them (V10 and R1) apart. V13 said V10 had a bad attitude that morning since V10 got to work. V13 said R1 had rolled up to the nursing station and asked V10 for medicine. V13 said V10 was yelling at R1 saying, I just got here. V13 said R1 then rolled R1's wheel chair towards the elevator. V10 followed R1 and tried to pull R1 from the elevator doors, when R1 resisted, V10 physically grabbed R1. R1 started using R1's leg to kick V10 so that V10 would let R1 free. V13 said V13 pulled R1 from V10 and V13 took R1 to R1's room, before escorting R1 downstairs. V13 said she (V13) changed V13's statement during facility internal investigation because V13 was afraid of retaliation by the facility for telling the truth. V6 (DON) who was present during this surveyor's interview asked V13, Which one is your statement, you keep changing your statement. V13 said You see, this is the intimidation I am talking about and I might lose my job for telling the truth. This surveyor asked V6 to let this surveyor complete the interview with V13 without interrupting the interview. V13 said after V13 took R2 downstairs V13 told V14 (Director of staffing) that V13 had seen V10 hit R1 on the face. V13 said R1 had a scratch on R1's nose, and the scratch was bleeding. On 12/10/2022 at 3:09pm, V14 (Director of staffing/CNA) said R1 and V10 had an incident. V14 stated she was acting as receptionist at the front entrance desk that morning of the incident (11/26/22). V14 said R1 was wheeled by V13 (CNA) to the reception area and R1 told V14 that V10 punched R1 on the face. V14 said she (V14) asked R1 to take off R1's mask. V14 said V14 saw fresh blood dripping down R1's nose. V14 said R1 said to her (V14), I asked V10 for my medicine and V10 threw her hands up and yelled at me and said, I just got here. R1 said after V10 yelled at him (R1), R1 rolled herself away towards the freight elevator. R1 said, V10 ran behind R1 and began pulling R1's wheel chair away from the freight elevator. R1 said she (R1) told V10 to stop pulling R1's wheelchair and R1 said that is when V10 punched R1 on the nose. On 12/10/2022 at 3:09pm, V14 stated she called V20 (Administrator) to inform V20 there was an allegation about physical abuse to R1 by V10 (LPN). V14 said V14 then called the unit to speak to V10 to find out what happened. V14 asked V10 what happened. V14 commented that V10 was rude. V14 said that V10 said, Like what? V14 said she was on the phone with V20 as she (V14) spoke to V10. Social Services notes dated 11/26/2022 documents that R1 said, V10 was aggressive to R1 when R1 tried to use the freight elevator. R1 called the police with report number JF488143. Doctor was notified. V2 (Nurse) nurses note assessment dated [DATE] documents, small cut on nose, offered R1 pain medication but R1 refused. On 12/10/22 at approximate 2:00pm, V2 said he was called to social services to perform an assessment on R1. V2 stated the local police were present in social services office taking report from R1. Facility abuse policy, no titled Policy, no date, documents; This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property and mistreatment of residents. Physical Abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R3) received medications as order...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R3) received medications as ordered in a sample of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 12/10/2022 at 10:55 am, R3 said that today, R3 has not received R3's morning medications. R3 said this happens a lot. R3 was alert and oriented to person, place and time. R3 is a [AGE] year-old individual admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C document R3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) completed on [DATE] at 11:56:27 AM documents R3 has a BIMS score of 15/15. R3's MDS section G document R3's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance dated [DATE] as needing set up only, limited assistance or supervision. R3's medical conditions include but not limited to: ESSENTIAL (PRIMARY) HYPERTENSION, TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITH FOOT ULCER, HEART FAILURE, UNSPECIFIED, DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY, ISCHEMIC CARDIOMYOPATHY. On 12/10/2022 at 11:22am V2(Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) said that R3 did not take R3's medications this morning. V2 said V2 went to give R3 morning medications and R3 waved R3's hand and told V2 to leave R3's medication on R3's bedside table. V2 said V2 did not leave the medications on R3's bed side table. V2 said V2 kept the opened medications in the medications cart. V2 showed surveyor the opened medications for R3 in un marked cup. At this time, V2 said the medications per MAR asV2 read are: Eliquis Tablet 5 MG (Apixaban), -Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet 100 MG -Digoxin Tablet 125 MCG (Digoxin) -Aspirin Capsule 81 MG -Ferrous Sulfate Tablet (Ferrous Sulfate) -Allopurinol Tablet 300 MG -Losartan Potassium Tablet 50 MG V2 and Surveyor reviewed R3's medication administration record. All R3's morning medications were marked as given. However, V2 said V2 marked the medication as given as V2 was preparing the medications to give to R3. V3 said the medications should not be marked as given since R3 did not take the medications. V2 said V2 should have marked the medications as refused or not given so that the nursing staff can monitor R3. On 12/10/2022 at 12:50pm, V6(Director of Nursing -DON) said that nurses should give medications as prescribed following the five rights of medication administration. V6 said nurses cannot sign medication as given before the medication is given because the resident might refuse the medication. V6 said if a resident refuses to take the medication as ordered, the medication should be marked as refused. On 12/11/22 at 11:13am, V6 said if the medication is not given at the right time, one hour before and one hour after the prescribed time, the nurse should document as not given. V6 said the nurse cannot mark as given if the medication is not given because this is falsifying documentation. V6 said the nurse, V2 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) should have waited until R3 took R3 medications to mark the medication as given. V6 said for critical medications such as heart medications, blood pressure medications, if the resident refuses to take medication at the prescribed time, the nurse should call the doctor and inform the doctor that the resident refused the medication so that the doctor can give a new order for a one time administration of that medication, then resume the previous ordered time. On 12/10/2022 at 2:13pm, V12 said the facility did not have a policy on documentation. Facility Policy titled Medication administration dated 3/22 documents: If the medication is not given as ordered, document the reason on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) and notify the Health Care Provider.
Oct 2022 12 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident indwelling catheter drainage bag is covered for dignity. This failure affected 1 (R45) resident reviewed for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident indwelling catheter drainage bag is covered for dignity. This failure affected 1 (R45) resident reviewed for dignity in the total sample of 98 residents. Findings include: On 10/16/2022 at 12:55pm, R45's indwelling catheter drainage bag has no cover. On 10/16/2022 at 1:06pm, surveyor inquired about R45's indwelling catheter drainage bag. V4 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated, It is not in a privacy bag. On 10/18/2022 at 9:51am, during wound care observation with V25 (Wound Care Nurse/LPN), R45's indwelling catheter drainage bag was still not covered. On 10/18/2022 at 9:53am, surveyor inquired about R45's indwelling catheter drainage bag. V25 (Wound Care Nurse/LPN) stated, It is not covered. It is supposedly covered for privacy. On 10/18/2022 at 10:14am, surveyor inquired, again, about R45's indwelling catheter drainage bag. V4 stated, (R45) needs the privacy bag only if (R45) is on (R45)'s wheelchair. On 10/18/2022 at 10:15am, V25 stated, (R45) has a roommate. On 10/18/2022 at 12:27pm, surveyor inquired about privacy for the indwelling catheter drainage bag. V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, Resident with indwelling catheter drainage bag should be provided with privacy. We are supposed to provide privacy bag inside and outside of the resident's room, whether on bed or wheelchair. R45's (08/01/2022) Resident Assessment Instrument documented, in part Section C. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 12. Indicating R45's mental status was moderately impaired. Section G. A. Bed mobility - how resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture: 3/3 coding Extensive assistance/Two+ persons physical assist. I. Toilet use - how resident uses the toilet room, commode, bedpan, or urinal; transfer on/off toilet; cleanses self after elimination; changes pad; manages ostomy or catheter; and adjusts clothes: 3/3 coding Extensive assistance/Two+ persons physical assist. Section H. H0100. Appliances. Check mark on A. Indwelling catheter. R45's (Active Orders as Of: 10/17/2022) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: pressure ulcer of right buttock stage 4, pressure ulcer of left buttock, pressure ulcer of sacral region unstageable. Order summary. Change urinary catheter bag and tubing as needed. The (10/19/2022) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented that the facility did not have Dignity and Privacy policy in reference to the indwelling catheter drainage bag. The (undated) Assistant Director of Nursing Job Summary documented, in part The primary purpose is to assist the DON (Director of Nursing) in planning, organizing, and directing the day to day functions of the Nursing Department to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times, as directed by the Administrator or the Director of Nursing . Job Duties & Responsibilities. Assist in nursing education. 1. Provide in-service training in the following areas for all CNAs on a monthly basis. a. Catheter Care . Make daily rounds to ensure that all nursing personnel are performing their work assignments. 1. At least twice per day on your floor looking for the following. a. Proper catheter bag placement. The (9/2022) Resident's right - accommodation of needs and preferences and Homelike environment Policy documented, in part General: The objective of the accommodation of resident needs and preferences is to create an individualized home like environment to maintain and/or achieve independent functioning, dignity, and well-being to the extent possible in accordance with the resident's own needs and preference. The (Rev. 207, 9/30/2022) State Operations Manual documented, in part (Rev. 173, Issued: 11-22-17, Effective: 11-28-17, Implementation: 11-28-17) §483.10(a) Resident Rights. §483.10(a)(1) A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident . GUIDANCE §483.10(a)-(b)(1)&(2) Examples of treating residents with dignity and respect include, but are not limited to: o Refraining from practices demeaning to residents such as leaving urinary catheter bags uncovered .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call light string was within reach for one dependent resident (R111) and failed to ensure that there was a cal...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call light string was within reach for one dependent resident (R111) and failed to ensure that there was a call light string attached to the call system for another dependent resident (R181) in the sample of 98 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: On 10/16/22 at 10:57 AM, R111's call light string was observed on the floor on the right side of R111's bed. R111 stated that he (R111) cannot reach it. On 10/16/22 at 11:03 AM, this observation was brought to the attention of V18 (CNA/Certified Nursing Aide) who stated that the call light is, Right here on the floor. V18 added that the call light should be, Within reach. R111's 8/27/22 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) determined a score of 7, indicating R111's cognition is moderately impaired. R111's admission Record documents diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, glaucoma, abnormal posture and bipolar disorder. R111's 10/14/22 care plan documents, in part, Focus: FALL: (R111) is at risk for falls related to use of psychotropic medication. Interventions include but are not limited to Keep frequently used items within reach. On 10/16/22 at 11:24 AM, R181 was observed lying in bed. A string for the wall lamp was observed but no call light was seen by the surveyor. On 10/16/22 at 11:27 AM, the surveyor inquired where R181's call light is located. V21 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, I'm looking for her (R181) call light. I don't see one. V21 pulled back the curtain and located the light switch that had a white cord attached to it which belonged to R181's roommate. V21 stated, She (R181) doesn't have the string to turn it on. V21 added that the light switch should have another cord which R181 can pull to activate the call light. The surveyor inquired what the risk is of a resident not having a call light. V21 replied. She (R181) can fall and, If she (R181) need help, she (R181) can't get us to respond to her. On 10/18/22 at 1:19 PM, R181 stated that no one has come to fix the call light yet. This observation was brought to the attention of V41 (RN/Registered Nurse). The surveyor inquired how staff gets hold of maintenance. V41 stated that staff can call maintenance on the phone if it's something that needs to be addressed right away. Otherwise, V41 stated that there is an app on their (staff) computer that they (staff) can put in a work order and then maintenance would come out the next day. The surveyor inquired if a resident does not have a call light if that would be considered an emergent issue. V41 responded, Oh, yes absolutely. The surveyor inquired why it's important for a resident to have a call light. V41 responded, A resident can fall, have a seizure, or low blood sugar so it's important for the resident to have access to call for help. R181's 9/25/22 BIMS determined a score of 7, indicating R181's cognition is moderately impaired. R181's admission Record documents diagnoses including but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, lack of coordination and primary osteoarthritis of left hip. R181's 9/27/22 care plan documents, in part, Focus: Fall: (R181) is at risk for falls related to poor balance, use of diuretics, use of psychotropic medication. Interventions include but are not limited to Keep frequently used items within reach. On 10/18/22 at 12:36 PM, V3 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated that the Call light should be placed within reach. V3 added that whenever staff goes to the room, during rounds or during any contact with the resident, staff should be checking that the call light is within reach. According to V3, for some residents, that (using the call light) is the only way they (residents) can communicate to the people that are not in the room, so It's very important to have the call light available for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) needs, pain and safety. The revised 9/2022 Call Light Response guideline documents, in part, General: To provide staff with guidance on responding to resident's request and needs. Protocol: . 5. When the patient or resident is in bed or confined to bed or chair, provide the call light within easy reach of the patient or resident. 6. Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor or maintenance director promptly.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the cleanliness of one resident's (R111) personal wheelchair in the sample of 98 residents reviewed for a home-like env...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the cleanliness of one resident's (R111) personal wheelchair in the sample of 98 residents reviewed for a home-like environment. Findings include: On 10/16/22 at 11:01 AM, R111's wheelchair at the bedside was observed soiled with crumbs/debris on the cushion and a large stain in the middle of the cushion. At 11:03 AM, the surveyor inquired if the wheelchair appears clean. V18 (CNA/Certified Nursing Aide) replied, No it doesn't. V18 stated that housekeeping would be responsible for cleaning the wheelchair. When asked who gets R111 up into the wheelchair, V18 stated, We (CNAs) do. So, the surveyor inquired if she (V18) would place the R111 in a soiled wheelchair. V18 replied, No, I'd wipe it. On 10/18/22 at 12:27 AM, V3 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated that the nursing staff should maintain the cleanliness of the wheelchair. V3 added that the wheelchair is part of the resident's environment. R111's admission Record documents diagnosis including but not limited to cerebral infarction, abnormal posture, and arthropathy. R111's 08/27/22 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) determined that R111 scored a 7 indicating R111's cognition is moderately impaired. R111's 08/27/22 MDS (Minimum Data Set) section G for functional status documents that a wheelchair was the mobility device normally used. The undated policy titled Resident Rights: Accommodation of Needs and Preferences and Homelike Environment Policy documents, in part, It is the policy of the facility to identify and provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents. Residents have the right to retain and use personal possessions to promote a homelike environment and to support each resident in maintaining their independence. The facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Assessments (Tag F0636)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely submit a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment after a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely submit a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment after a resident was discharged which affected one resident (R3) of three residents (R3, R90, R269) reviewed for resident assessments. Findings include: R3's admission Record documents, in part, that R3's initial admission date to the facility was 6/3/22, and R3's date of discharge was 7/10/22. R3's Census List documents, in part, that R3's active status starting 6/3/22 until 7/10/22 when action code of discharge date is documented. On 7/9/22 at 3:35 pm, V49 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) documented, in part, Staff followed up with (R3) in regard to (R3's) interest in discharging back to (R3's) home in the community with family. (R3) stated that (V52, R3's Family Member) will be picking up (R3) tomorrow (7/10/22). R3'S MDS Assessment, dated 6/3/22 and titled Minimum Data Set (MDS) - Version 3.0, Resident Assessment and Care Screening, Nursing Home and Swing Bed Tracking (NT/ST) Item Set, documents, in part, that the Type of Assessment for entry/discharge reporting is coded as 1 which indicates a Entry tracking record. R3'S MDS Assessment, dated 6/13/22 and titled Minimum Data Set (MDS) - Version 3.0, Resident Assessment and Care Screening, Nursing Home Comprehensive (NC) Item Set, documents, in part, that the Type of Assessment is coded as 1 which indicates a admission assessment (required by day 14). On 10/18/22 at 12:31 pm, V34 (MDS Nurse) stated that V34 is responsible for the MDS assessments for residents. V34 stated that V34 will keep MDSs on track to fulfill the obligation of OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act). V34 stated that if a resident has a planned discharge from the facility, then V34 will complete an MDS assessment coded as Discharge, Return Not Anticipated. Asked V34 how V34 is made aware of residents with a planned discharge, V34 stated that V34 is informed during the interdisciplinary morning meeting and that social services staff will inform V34. V34 stated that there is a past due warning when the MDS system pulls assessments. This surveyor then showed V34 the planned discharge progress notes for R3, dated 7/9/22 and R3's census showing that R3 was discharged on 7/10/22. This survey next showed V34 in the electronic medical record (EMR) that no discharge MDS was present for R3's discharge on [DATE]. This surveyor read the verbiage in R3's EMR in the MDS section, in red ink, Discharge - ARD (Assessment Reference Date): 7/10/22. 86 days overdue, and V34 stated, Yes, that's it. It was alerted due but was missed. R3's MDS page in the EMR documents, in part, Next Trckng/Dschrg (Tracking/Discharge): Discharge - ARD: 7/10/22. 86 days overdue. Facility policy dated September 2017 and titled MDS, documents, in part, General: An MDS is completed on each new admission, quarterly, annually, discharge, significant change of condition and PPS (Prospective Payment System) per the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual. Responsible Party: Care Plan/MDS Coordinator, Social Services, Dietary, Activities, Rehabilitation, Nursing (Interdisciplinary Team). Policy: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) form is used to record information. 2. The MDS form is completed per the RAI manual . 7. For the Initial, Quarterly, and Significant Change in Condition Care Plan Conference, the Interdisciplinary Team completes the MDS review.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0638 (Tag F0638)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely submit a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment as required at least every 92 days and no later than 14 days after the Assessme...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely submit a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment as required at least every 92 days and no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) which affected one resident (R2) of three residents (R2, R10, R103) reviewed for resident assessments. Findings include: R2's admission Record documents, in part, that R2's initial admission date to the facility was 12/2/21. R2's Census List documents, in part, that R2's only transfer out to hospital was 3/15/22, and transfer in from hospital was 3/21/22. R2'S MDS Assessment, dated 6/13/22 and titled Minimum Data Set (MDS) - Version 3.0, Resident Assessment and Care Screening, Nursing Home Comprehensive Quarterly (NCQ) Item Set, documents, in part, that the Type of Assessment for Federal OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) reason for assessment is coded as 2 which indicates a Quarterly review assessment. R2'S MDS Assessment, dated 10/12/22 and titled Minimum Data Set (MDS) - Version 3.0, Resident Assessment and Care Screening, Nursing Home Comprehensive (NC) Item Set, documents, in part, that the Type of Assessment for Federal OBRA reason for assessment is coded as 3 which indicates a Annual assessment. On 10/18/22 at 12:31 pm, V34 (MDS Nurse) stated that V34 is responsible for the MDS assessments for residents quarterly, annually, and with a significant change. V34 stated that annual MDS assessments are done once every year and that quarterly MDS assessments are done every 3 months or equivalent to every 92 days. V34 stated that V34 will keep MDSs on track to fulfill the obligation of OBRA. When asked about how often MDS assessments are done in between quarterly assessments to annual assessments, V34 stated, 92 days from the previous assessment. V34 stated that V49 (MDS Nurse) is responsible for electronically submitting the MDS assessments to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). V34 stated that there is a past due warning when the MDS system pulls assessments. V34 stated that if a comprehensive assessment is coming due and a resident is out of the facility in the hospital, the MDS system will pick up the due assessment, and V34 will check and complete the overdue MDS assessment when the resident returns from the hospital. This surveyor showed V34 the MDS comprehensive assessments for R2 of 6/13/22 (quarterly) and 10/12/22 (annual) along with R2's census list indicating that R2 remained active in the facility during this time frame. V34 was asked about why a comprehensive assessment was done on 10/12/22, almost 4 months after the previous quarterly MDS assessment on 6/13/22, and V34 stated, That was missed. Facility policy dated September 2017 and titled MDS, documents, in part, General: An MDS is completed on each new admission, quarterly, annually, discharge, significant change of condition and PPS (Prospective Payment System) per the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual. Responsible Party: Care Plan/MDS Coordinator, Social Services, Dietary, Activities, Rehabilitation, Nursing (Interdisciplinary Team). Policy: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) form is used to record information. 2. The MDS form is completed per the RAI manual . 7. For the Initial, Quarterly, and Significant Change in Condition Care Plan Conference, the Interdisciplinary Team completes the MDS review.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that enteral tube medications were administered according to the physician order and according to professional standard...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that enteral tube medications were administered according to the physician order and according to professional standards of quality for one resident (R116) out of 5 residents reviewed in the total sample of 98 residents. These failures affected R116 and have the potential to affect all 3 residents on the 4th floor receiving medications via an enteral tube. Findings include: On 10/17/22 at 9:10 AM, while preparing R116's morning medications for enteral tube administration, V24 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) pulled a bottle of Colace (docusate sodium) out of the medication cart and explained to the surveyor that because it's a capsule, it cannot be crushed. Instead, V24 pulled out a bottle of Geri-kot (constipation treatment) and stated, I'm not supposed to change it, but she needs a stool softener. The surveyor inquired if V24 can give a medication that is not ordered by a physician. V24 replied. No. I should call the doctor. V24 proceeded to put the Geri-kot away thus omitting the dose. On 10/17/22 at 9:23 AM, V24 did not have any individual plastic medication pouches used with the medication crusher on the medication cart. Therefore, V24 placed the following medications Diltiazem HCl 30 mg tablet, Amiodarone HCl 300 mg tablet, Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg tablet and a Multivitamin 1 tablet in an approximately 2-ounce white paper medicine cup. V24 folded the edges of the medicine cup together and held the cup while crushing all the medications together in the cup. V24 proceeded to transfer the crushed medication into a clear plastic cup, filled the cup approximately half-way with water and mixed all the medication together. V24 checked the placement of the G-tube and flushed it with 30 milliliters of water. V24 then used a piston syringe to draw up the medications mixed with water, removed the back of the syringe, attached the syringe to R116's G-tube and poured the medications into the syringe allowing the medications to infuse into the G-tube by gravity. V24 then flushed the G-tube with another 30 milliliters of water. On 10/18/22 at 12:36 PM, V3 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated that when administering G-tube medications, the nurse must Give each medications separate. You cannot combine the medication. The surveyor inquired how might mixing all the medication together affect the resident. V3 responded, It's a technical thing. It's not a risk that is going to affect the patient. There's no harm to the patient when you do that. Regarding crushing medications, V3 stated that if a medication says do not crush then you should not crush it because it's usually a delayed release, which might cause an immediate reaction. V3 added that nurses are supposed to call the doctor or the nurse practitioner to change the medication order to liquid if it cannot be crushed. Additionally, V3 stated that there needs to be a physician order to give a different medication. R116's admission Record documents diagnoses including but not limited to gastrostomy, chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, anemia, atrial fibrillation, obstructive and reflux uropathy and essential hypertension. R116's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) determined a score of 13, indicating R116's cognition is intact. R116's Order Summary Report documents active orders dated 7/13/22 for Docusate Sodium Liquid 50 mg/5ml, give 10 ml via G-tube (Gastrostomy tube) two times a day for constipation; Ferrous sulfate liquid Give 325 mg via G-tube one time a day for anemia; and Multi-vite Liquid (Multiple vitamins-minerals) Give 10 ml via g-tube one time a day for supplement. The revised 5/2017 Medication Administration guideline documents, in part, General: All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. Guideline: 1. An order is required for administration of all medication. The 6/2015 Physician Orders policy documents, in part, General: Drugs will be administered only upon a clean, complete and signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe. The 04/2018 Enteral Tube Medication Administration policy documents, in part, The facility assures the safe and effective administration of enteral formulas, route and methods of administration and the decision to administer medications via enteral tubes are based on nursing assessment of the resident's condition and approval by the physician. Procedure: . 7. Prior to crushing tablets for administration through the enteral tube, the Crushing Guidelines and list are consulted. Guidelines for administering oral medications through an enteral feeding tube: a. Use liquid form of medication whenever possible. b. Check with pharmacy if in doubt about availability of medication in liquid form or whether tablets are crushable .d. Do not crush enteric-coated or timed-release tablets or capsules. e. Do not mix medications together. The National Library of Medicine online article titled Preventing Errors When Drugs are Given Via Enteral Feeding Tubes documents, in part, Health care practitioners should not assume that a medication intended to be taken by mouth can be safely administered through a feeding tube. The drug's physical and chemical properties control its release and subsequent absorption. These specific delivery mechanisms may be altered or destroyed if the drug is given through a feeding tube, reducing its effectiveness, or increasing the risk of toxicity .Incompatibility between drugs being given together can also be a problem, particularly if two or more drugs are crushed and mixed together before they are administered. Mixing two or more drugs together, whether in solid or liquid forms, creates a brand-new, unknown entity with an unpredictable mechanism of release and bioavailability. Proper flushing of the tube before, during, and after each drug administration can help prevent problems. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3875244/) The Medline Plus online article titled Iron Supplements documents, in part, Iron supplements (ferrous fumarate, ferrous gluconate, ferrous sulfate) come as regular, film-coated, and extended-release (long acting) tablets; capsules, and an oral liquid (drops and elixir). Swallow the tablets, film-coated tablets, and extended-release tablets whole; do not split, chew, or crush them. (https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a682778.html) The facility Registered Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description documents, in part, Basic Function: Under the direction of the physician, is responsible for total nursing care to all residents on assigned unit during the assigned shift including responsibility for delegation of duties, resident nursing care, staff performance and adherence by staff members to facility policies and procedures. Essential duties: . 3. Administer prescribed medications and treatments according to policy and procedures.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care related to grooming and nail care for two residents (R12 and R181) in the sample...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care related to grooming and nail care for two residents (R12 and R181) in the sample of 98 residents reviewed for ADL care. These failures affected R12 and R181 and have the potential to affect all dependent residents residing on the 4th floor. Findings include: On 10/16/22 at 11:22 AM, the surveyor observed R181 with grey and black facial hair about a quarter-inch long on R181's chin. When the surveyor inquired if R181 would like to be shaved, R181 stated, Yes. On 10/16/22 at 11:29 AM, this observation was brought to the attention of V21 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) who stated that R181 has hair on her chin. V21 added that the CNAs (Certified Nursing Aide) are responsible for shaving residents when they are bathed. The surveyor inquired why it's important to make sure a female resident does not have facial hair. V21 replied, What she just said .you don't want to mistake her for a man. R181's 9/25/22 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) determined a score of 7, indicating R181's cognition is moderately impaired. R181's 9/25/22 MDS (Minimum Data Set) section G for functional status determined that for the ADL of personal hygiene, R181 coded a 3. Extensive assistance for ADL self-performance and coded a 2. One-person physical assist for ADL support provided. R181's 9/27/22 care plan documents, in part, Focus: ADL: (R181) requires assistance with daily care needs r/t (related to) COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Type 2 diabetes, HTN (hypertension), localized edema, osteoarthritis. Interventions include but are not limited to Assist resident with ADLs. On 10/17/22 at 9:35 AM, R12's nails were noted to be varying lengths with the longest approximately an inch long and starting to curl. R12's nails were also visibly dirty with a black substance noted on the underside of the nail. This observation was brought to the attention of V24 (LPN) who stated that this is the first time she (V24) is seeing her (R12's) nails because she (R12) is usually tucked under the covers. The surveyor asked V24 to describe R12 nails. V24 replied, It's long and needs to be trimmed. The surveyor inquired if R12's nails appear dirty. V24 replied, I think it's thickened. When the surveyor asked who is responsible for nail care, V24 stated that someone from the outside comes in to cut the nails and toenails and that she (V24) will make sure to put R12 on the list. The surveyor inquired why it's important to make sure the nails are clean and trimmed. V24 replied, Because that's part of the hygiene. V24 added that there's a risk of R12 scratching herself. R12's 7/13/22 BIMS determined a score of 3, indicating R12 cognition is severely impaired. R12's admission Record documents diagnoses including but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis, dementia, and legal blindness. R12's 7/13/22 MDS section G for functional status determined that for the ADL of personal hygiene, R12 coded a 3. Extensive assistance for ADL self-performance and coded a 2. One-person physical assist for ADL support provided. R12's 10/13/22 care plan documents, in part, Focus: The resident has an ADL Self Care Performance deficit r/t (related to) weakness and limited ROM (Range of Motion) d/t (due to) dx (diagnosis) of dementia and OA (osteoarthritis). On 10/18/22 at 12:27 PM, the surveyor inquired about the staff expectation with providing ADL care related to personal hygiene. V3 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated that each resident should be checked head to toe during shower time so if any concern is identified such as long facial hair, then it should be taken care of by nursing staff as long as the resident acknowledges that he or she wants to be shaved, for example. Regarding nail care, V3 stated, We (nursing staff) can provide nail care as long as the resident is not diabetic. Otherwise, V3 stated that the resident has to be referred to the podiatrist to get their nails trimmed. V3 added that making sure the nails are clean is part of the ADL care when a resident is showered. The revised 11/10/21 ADL Nail Care guideline documents, in part, General: to provide care and maintain hygiene to the resident's nails. Guideline: . 3. Remove dirt from underneath fingernails .6. Nail care is offered and performed on the resident's shower day and as needed. 7. Notify the nurse if the resident refuses nail care and when nail care is unable to be performed due to the resident's condition. The revised 9/2022 Shaving guideline documents, in part, General: To provide direction for the staff on how to shave a resident. Procedure: . 7. Shaving can be done at any time of the day. The facility Certified Nurse Aide Job Description documents, in part, Basic function: To provide assigned residents with routine daily nursing care in accordance with established nursing care procedures, state and federal guidelines, and as directed by your supervisor. Essential duties: . 8. Shave male patients daily and female residents as needed. 9. Keep resident's finger and toenails clean and trimmed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a five percent or lower medication error rate. There were 7 medication errors out of 28 medication opportunities, resulti...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a five percent or lower medication error rate. There were 7 medication errors out of 28 medication opportunities, resulting in a 25% medication error rate and affected two residents (R66 and R116) out of 5 residents reviewed for medication pass. Findings include: On 10/17/22 at 8:46 AM, the surveyor observed V23 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) prepare and administer medications for R66 residing on the 3rd floor. After medicine reconciliation was completed, the following medication errors were determined: 1. Wrong medication given: Geri-kot (Senokot) 8.6 mg 1 tablet was administered while the physician order dated 05/19/2021 was for Senna S (Sennosides-Docusate Sodium) tablet 8.6-50 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for constipation. 2. Omission error: Multi-Vitamin/Minerals tablet (Multiple Vitamins-Minerals) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day was the physician order. However, there was none stocked in V23's medication cart. At 9:03 AM, V23 checked the medication storage room and brought back a bottle labeled Multivitamin with iron. V23 opened it and was about to pour a tablet into the medication cup but realized that it was not the medication ordered. V23 stated, This is not the right one. It has iron. Per R66's MAAR (Medication Administration Audit Report) the administration time was documented as 9:09 AM for the multivitamin, however the surveyor did not observe the medication given because V23 realized it was the wrong medication and therefore did not administer it. The surveyor recorded a time of 9:10 AM for when the medications were given to R66. R66's admission Record documents diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver and schizophrenia. On 10/17/22 at 9:10 AM, The surveyor observed V24 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) prepare and administer Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) medications for R116 on the 4th floor. The following administration medication errors were observed and determined following medication reconciliation: 3. Attempt to substitute a medication without a physician order/omission error: While preparing R116's medications, V24 stated that R116 is supposed to get Colace but because it's a capsule, it cannot be crushed so instead, V24 pulled out a bottle of Geri-kot and stated, I'm not supposed to change it, but she needs a stool softener. The surveyor inquired if V24 can give a medication that is not ordered. V24 replied. No. I should call the doctor. V24 proceeded to put the Geri-kot away thus not administering any stool softener. The physician order dated 7/13/22 was for Docusate Sodium Liquid 50 mg/5ml, give 10 ml via G-tube tow times a day for constipation. Administration process error for the following medications: 4. Diltiazem HCl 30 mg tablet 5. Amiodarone HCl 300 mg tablet 6. Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg tablet 7. Multivitamin 1 tablet On 10/17/22 at 9:23 AM, V24 did not have any individual plastic medication pouches used with the medication crusher so V24 took the paper medicine cup containing the medication listed above and crushed them all together in the paper medicine cup. V24 proceeded to transfer the crushed medication into a clear plastic cup, filled the cup approximately half-way with water and mixed all the medication together. V24 then used a piston syringe to draw up the medications mixed with water, removed the back of the syringe, attached the syringe to R116's G-tube and poured the medications into the syringe allowing the medications to infuse into the G-tube by gravity. On 10/18/22 at 12:36 PM, V3 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated that when administering G-tube medications, the nurse must Give each medications separate. You cannot combine the medication. The surveyor inquired how might mixing all the medication together affect the resident. V3 responded, It's a technical thing. It's not a risk that is going to affect the patient. There's no harm to the patient when you do that. Regarding crushing medications, V3 stated that if a medication says do not crush then you should not crush it because it's usually a delayed release, which might cause an immediate reaction. V3 added that nurses are supposed to call the doctor or the nurse practitioner to change the medication order to liquid if it cannot be crushed. Additionally, V3 stated that there needs to be a physician order to give a different medication. R116's admission Record documents diagnoses including but not limited to gastrostomy, chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, anemia, atrial fibrillation, obstructive and reflux uropathy and essential hypertension. R116's Order Summary Report documents active orders dated 7/13/22 for Docusate Sodium Liquid 50 mg/5ml, give 10 ml via G-tube (Gastrostomy tube) two times a day for constipation; Ferrous sulfate liquid Give 325 mg via G-tube one time a day for anemia; and Multi-vite Liquid (Multiple vitamins-minerals) Give 10 ml via g-tube one time a day for supplement. The revised 5/2017 Medication Administration guideline documents, in part, General: All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. Guideline: 1. An order is required for administration of all medication .6. Check medication administration record prior to administering medication for the right medication, dose, route, patient/resident, and time .13. Verify that the medication is being administered at the proper time, in the prescribed dose, and by the correct route. The 04/2018 Enteral Tube Medication Administration policy documents, in part, The facility assures the safe and effective administration of enteral formulas, route and methods of administration and the decision to administer medications via enteral tubes are based on nursing assessment of the resident's condition and approval by the physician. Procedure: . 7. Prior to crushing tablets for administration through the enteral tube, the Crushing Guidelines and list are consulted. Guidelines for administering oral medications through an enteral feeding tube: a. Use liquid form of medication whenever possible. b. Check with pharmacy if in doubt about availability of medication in liquid form or whether tablets are crushable .d. Do not crush enteric-coated or timed-release tablets or capsules. e. Do not mix medications together. The Medline Plus online article titled Iron Supplements documents, in part, Iron supplements (ferrous fumarate, ferrous gluconate, ferrous sulfate) come as regular, film-coated, and extended-release (long acting) tablets; capsules, and an oral liquid (drops and elixir). Swallow the tablets, film-coated tablets, and extended-release tablets whole; do not split, chew, or crush them. (https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a682778.html)
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

On 10/16/22 at 12:04 PM, R204 was observed lying on low air loss mattress. The knob on the settings was turned to level 8, which written on the machine is equivalent to 350 pounds. At 12:10 PM, V21 (L...

Read full inspector narrative →
On 10/16/22 at 12:04 PM, R204 was observed lying on low air loss mattress. The knob on the settings was turned to level 8, which written on the machine is equivalent to 350 pounds. At 12:10 PM, V21 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) verified R204's low air loss mattress settings and stated that the wound care nurse is in charge of settings. R204's admission Record documents diagnoses including but not limited to encephalopathy, anemia, unspecified dementia, and rhabdomyolysis. R204's 9/25/22 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) determined that R204 is unable to complete the assessment and coded a 1. Memory Problem for both short term and long-term memory. R204's weight was documented as 146 pounds on 10/17/2022. R204's 9/25/22 MDS (Minimum Data Set) Section G for Functional Status documents that for bed mobility R204 coded a 3. Extensive assistance ADL (Activities of Daily Living Self-Performance) and a 3. Two (plus) person physical assist for ADL support provided. R204's 9/18/22 Braden scale risk assessment documented a score of 9 which is equivalent to High Risk for developing a pressure sore. On 10/18/22 at 10:50 AM, V25 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse/Wound Care Nurse) stated that R204 has no wounds but is on a low air loss mattress as a preventative measure. The surveyor inquired what the low air loss mattress settings are based on. V25 replied, The settings are based on weight. V25 added that the purpose of the low air loss mattress is To prevent breakdown and prevent further injury if they already have one (pressure ulcer). The surveyor inquired if the low air loss settings are set above a resident's current weight, how does that affect the resident. V25 replied, It makes the mattress hard. It's ineffective. V25 added that everybody is supposed to check them, referring to making sure the settings are correct. The revised 5/2021 Skin Care Prevention policy documents, in part, General: All residents will receive appropriate care to decrease the risk of skin breakdown. Guideline: . 15. For residents who are bed or chair bound, provide a chair cushion and pressure reducing mattress. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Low Air Loss Mattresses were set at the recommended settings, failed to ensure the Low Air Loss Mattresses were not layered with multiple linens and padding, failed to ensure the Low Air Loss Mattress was inflated before use and failed to ensure a resident at risk for pressure ulcer/injury was not lying on a Hoyer lift sling while on Low Air Loss Mattress. These failures affected 5 (R6, R37, R45, R188, and R204) residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury prevention and treatment in the total sample of 98 residents. Findings include: On 10/16/22 at 11:12 AM, there was a low air loss mattress on R188's bed with setting between 320 and 350. On 10/16/22 at 11:17AM, this surveyor inquired about R188's Low Air Loss Mattress. V8 (Licensed Practice Nurse) stated, R188's Low Air Loss Mattress is to prevent pressure wounds. V8 then checked the setting of R188's Low Air Loss Mattress, per this surveyor's request and stated, Setting at 330lbs, low pressure. Setting of the Low Air Loss Mattress is based on the resident's weight. On 10/16/22 at 11:29 AM, R6 was lying on a deflated low air loss mattress. There was a Hoyer lift sling between R6 and the Low Air Loss Mattress. On 10/16/22 at 11:34 AM, V8 checked if R6 Low Air Loss Mattress was working, per this surveyor's request, and stated, It is not on. Surveyor inquired about the blue Hoyer lift sling that was underneath R6, and stated, Hoyer lift pad (sling) is for get up. I (V8) believe (R6) is supposed to get up this morning at 9AM but the Hoyer lift has issue, it is a charging problem. That is what the CNA told me. (R6) is not supposed to lie down on a Hoyer lift pad (sling). Let me check if the mattress is plugged. V8 checked the plugged and stated, It (Low Air Loss Mattress) is plugged but I (V8) don't know why it is deflated. On 10/16/22 at 11:40 AM, R6 stated, I don't know how long it's been deflated. On 10/16/22 at 11:54 AM, R37 was lying on a Low Air Loss Mattress with setting between 180lbs and 250lbs, pressure knob close to 250lbs. On 10/16/22 at 11:56 AM, V8 checked the setting of R37's Low Air Loss Mattress, per this surveyor's request and stated, It is about 220lbs. On 10/16/2022 at 11:57am, V8 checked layers of linens between the Low Air Loss Mattress and R37 and stated, (R37) is using a flat sheet, incontinence pad and incontinence brief, cream color. On 10/16/2022 at 12:55pm, R45 was lying on a low air loss mattress brand name MedaCure Oasis. Setting was at 350lbs MAX. ON 10/16/2022 at 1:05pm, V4 (Assistant Director of Nursing) checked the setting of R45's Low Air loss mattress, per this surveyor's request and stated, It's at 350lbs Max. On 10/18/2022 at 10:55am, surveyor inquired about the purpose of the Low Air Loss Mattress. V25 (Wound Care Nurse/LPN) stated, The purpose of the Low Air Loss Mattress is to prevent wounds, comfort to the resident and if the resident has wound, wound will not progress. On 10/18/2022 at 10:56am, surveyor inquired about the recommended setting for the Low Air Loss Mattress. V25 stated, Setting is based on the weight of the resident. This is the pressure of the resident on the bed. If a resident weighs 120 lbs and set the Low Air Loss Mattress on 200lbs, it makes it hard, hence the pressure on the bed. It defeats the purpose of the Low Air Loss Mattress. On 10/18/2022 at 10:57am, surveyor inquired about layering of linens for residents using Low Air Loss Mattress. V25 stated, Layering, normally, nothing but the incontinence pad or a draw sheet. It should be nothing but the pad, if you move the resident, then remove the draw sheet once done moving the resident. On 10/18/2022 at 10:58am, surveyor inquired about deflated Low Air Loss Mattress and Hoyer lift sling underneath a resident. V25 stated, The Low Air Loss Mattress should be inflated for it to work. If will be like sleeping on a bed frame. There is a possibility for resident to have a break on the skin. If staff are going to put the resident back on bed with a Hoyer lift, as soon as the resident is on bed, the Hoyer lift pad (sling) should be removed. It is another irritant beneath the resident. It makes the Low Air Loss Mattress ineffective. On 10/18/2022 at 10:59am, surveyor inquired about the purpose of layering the Low Air Loss Mattress with just a flat sheet. V25 stated, Layering the Low Air Loss Mattress with multiple linens will render the Low Air Loss Mattress ineffective. R188's (printed: 10/18/2022) Weights and Vital Summary documented that on 10/04/2022 R188 weighed 187lbs. R188's (09/21/2022) Resident Assessment Instrument documented, in part Section C. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 12. Indicating R188's mental status was moderately impaired. Section G. A. Bed mobility - how resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture: 4/3 coding total dependence/ Two+ persons physical assist. Section M. M0150. Risk for Pressure Ulcers/Injuries. Is this resident at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries? Code 1 for Yes. M1200. Skin and Ulcer/injury treatments. B. Pressure reducing device for bed. R188's (Target Date: 12/20/2022) Care plan documented, in part Focus: is at risk for skin complications. Goals: will remain free of further skin complications. Interventions: Therapeutic mattress in bed and cushion in chair as appropriate. R6's (Printed Date: 10/18/2022) Weights and Vitals Summary documented that on 10/04/2022, R6 weighed 216lbs. R6's (Active Orders As Of: 10/17/2022) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: syncope and collapse, sequel of cerebrovascular disease. R6's (10/10/2022) Resident Assessment Instrument documented, in part Section C. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 12. Indicating R6's mental status was moderately impaired. Section G. A. Bed mobility - how resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture: 3/3 coding Extensive assistance/Two+ persons physical assist. Section M. M0150. Risk of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries. Is this resident at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries? Code 1 for Yes. R6's (Revision on: 09/29/2022) Care plan documented, in part Focus: At risk for skin complications. Goals: will maintain adequate skin integrity. Interventions: therapeutic mattress in bed and cushion in chair as appropriate. R37's (Printed Date: 10/18/2022) Weights and Vital summary documented that on 10/04/2022, R37 weighed 85lbs. R37's (07/22/2022) Resident Assessment Instrument documented, in part Section C. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 00. Indicating that R37's mental status was severely impaired. Section G. A. Bed mobility - how resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture: 4/3 coding total dependence/Two+ persons physical assist. Section M. M0150. Risk of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries. Is this resident at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries? Code 1 for Yes. M1200. Skin and Ulcer /Injury Treatments. B. pressure reducing device for bed. R37's (Revision on 02/25/2022) Care plan documented, in part Focus: is at risk for skin complications r/t decreased mobility. Goals: will maintain adequate skin integrity. Interventions: Therapeutic mattress in bed and cushion in chair as appropriate. Diagnosis: generalized (Osteo) arthritism. R45's (Printed Date: 10/18/2022) Weights and Vitals Summary documented that on 10/17/2022 R45 weighed 113lbs. R45's (08/01/2022) Resident Assessment Instrument documented, in part Section C. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 12. Indicating R45's mental status was moderately impaired. Section G. A. Bed mobility - how resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture: 3/3 coding Extensive assistance/Two+ persons physical assist. I. Toilet use - how resident uses the toilet room, commode, bedpan, or urinal; transfer on/off toilet; cleanses self after elimination; changes pad; manages ostomy or catheter; and adjusts clothes: 3/3 coding Extensive assistance/Two+ persons physical assist. Section M. M0150. Risk of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries. Is this resident at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries? Code 1 for Yes. M0210. Unhealed Pressure Ulcers/Injuries. Code 1 for Yes. M0300. Current Number of Unhealed Pressure Ulcers/Injuries. B. Stage 2. Code 1. D. Stage 4. Code 3. M1200. Skin and Ulcer/Injury Treatments. B. Pressure reducing device for bed. R45's (07/22/2022) Care plan documented, in part Focus: is at high risk for skin complications r/t (related to) admitted to facility with pressure ulcers to right and left ischial, right lateral side of back and sacrum. Goals: all areas will remain stable. Interventions: Therapeutic mattress in bed and cushion in chair. R45's (Active Orders As Of: 10/17/2022) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: pressure ulcer of right buttock stage 4, pressure ulcer of left buttock, pressure ulcer of sacral region unstageable. The (10/19/2022) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented that the facility did not have the manufacturer's recommendation for Low Air Loss Mattress. The (copyright 2019) MedaCure Oasis manufacturer's manual from https://www.rehabmart.com/pdfs/oasis_os200-c_-_im.pdf documented, in part INTENDED USE. The OASIS mattress is designed for bed sore and wound care therapy treatment and prevention, which may occur during an extended hospital stay and nursing home /long term care environment. INSTALLATION. 1. Place the mattress on the bed frame with the air hose connectors facing toward the footboard. 2. Hang the pump with the hooks on back of the pump on the footboard or place on a flat surface. 3. Connect the air hose connectors from the air mattress to the pump unit. Ensure the air hoses are not kinked or tucked under mattress. 4. Plug the power cord into the electrical outlet. 5. Turn the switch ON. Product Functions: (1) Pressure Adjust Valve: Adjust the valve to increase or decrease the pressure for a softer or firmer selling (setting) between 1-8 range or by patient's weight as noted on the panel.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that unopened insulin was refrigerated for one resident (R196), failed to properly store insulin and lancets when not i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that unopened insulin was refrigerated for one resident (R196), failed to properly store insulin and lancets when not in use, failed to ensure a medication cart was locked when unattended, failed to discard expired medication and medication for one resident (R369) who expired that were stored in the medication refrigerator, and failed to ensure that two opened and expired emergency medication kits were removed from the facility once a new emergency medicine dispensing machine was implemented. Findings include: On 10/17/22 at 9:03 AM, V23 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed entering the medication storage room while leaving a plastic caddie containing insulin pens and blood sugar checking supplies including lancets on the medication cart next to the nurse's station on the 3rd floor. The surveyor inquired if medications should be left unattended. V23 replied, No. On 10/17/22 at 9:23 AM, the surveyor observed V24 (LPN) enter R116's room on the 4th floor. The medication cart was left in the doorway of R116's room. A plastic caddie containing insulin pens/vials and blood sugar checking supplies including lancets was left unattended on top of the medication cart behind the laptop. At 9:44 AM, upon return to the med cart, the surveyor inquired if the insulin and supplies should be left unattended. V24 replied, No. It shouldn't, because They (residents) can grab anything they want to. On 10/17/22 at 10:02 AM, V25 (LPN/Wound Care Nurse) was observed walking into R97's room to administer medications. The medication cart was left unlocked in R97's doorway with the drawers facing the inside of R97's room. V25 was facing R97 while administering the medications and had her (V25's) back facing the doorway. The surveyor inquired if the med cart should be locked when unattended. V25 replied, Yes, usually I lock it even if it's facing the doorway. On 10/17/22 at 12:07 PM, the surveyor reviewed the 4th floor medication cart labeled as Cart B serving residents in rooms 413-421 with V24 LPN. In the 5th drawer from the top, two blue medication bottles containing unopened vials of Levemir belonging to R196 were observed. A blue sticker on the side of the blue medication bottle read Refrigerate until opened. The surveyor inquired why unopened vials of insulin should be stored in the refrigerator. V24 replied, I'm not sure. R196's admission Record documents a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. R196's Order Summary Report documents an active order for insulin detemir (Levemir) 100 unit/ml, inject 30 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for diabetes. On 10/17/22 at 12:19 PM the surveyor entered the 4th floor medication (med) storage room with V24. On the inside door of the medication refrigerator, a white foam cup contained 14 bisacodyl 10 mg suppositories with an expiration date of 05/22. V24 stated that they don't use anything that's expired and are supposed to make an order for a new supply. V24 removed a black plastic bag containing what felt like a plastic plate and a bottle of diet iced tea out of the refrigerator. V24 explained, Sometimes residents want us to keep food for them. The surveyor inquired how V24 knows whom the food belongs to. V24 replied, I don't know. There is no label. In the middle shelf of the refrigerator, the surveyor observed a cardboard box about 10 inches long. V24 was able to remove the box after much effort due to a large piece of ice that was attached to it. The box was labeled Symptom kit and was dispensed on 9/8/22 for R369. Instructions on the box were: Call hospice nurse to reorder. The surveyor was unable to open the box to see what was inside because it was frozen. V24 placed the medication in the sink to thaw and stated that she (V24) will discard it. At 12:49 PM, the box was shown to V3 (DON/Director of Nursing) who stated, This lady expired. They (pharmacy) supposed to pick up the medication. R369's admission Record documents the Date of discharge 9/10/2022 and discharged to: expired. On 10/17/22 at 12:32 PM, On the right side of the med room, at the end of the counter, a green tacklebox was observed with the lid partially opened. The surveyor inquired what the tacklebox was used for. V24 responded that she (V24) didn't know. A blue plastic zip-tie lock was observed broken and lying on the counter next to the tacklebox. The tacklebox was labeled IV Injectable kit and Box 366. A plastic insert on the front of the box contained a card reading, Pharmacist signature below signifies that the contents of this medication kit have been checked and quantities verified. There were three columns on the card: one for date, signature and exp (expiration). The last date noted was 08/14/20 with an expiration of 11/20. The surveyor glanced at a few medications on the top drawer of the tacklebox and all were noted to be expired including dextrose 50% 50 ml syringe, gentamycin 80 mg/2 ml vials, and epinephrine 1 mg/ml vials. A laminated card titled IV/Injectable Emergency Kit listed 45 different medications stored in the tackle box. On 10/17/22 at 12:40 PM, this observation was brought to the attention of V3 (DON/Director of Nursing). V3 stated that the tacklebox is our emergency med kit in case a med is not on hand. The surveyor inquired if the kit should be locked. V3 found the zip-tie lock and stated, Yes, it's supposed to be locked. V3 added, They just opened it. The surveyor asked V2 to read the expiration date on the card on the front of the box. V2 read, Eleven .wow. V3 stated that the box is supposed to be picked up by the pharmacy. The surveyor inquired what the risk of having expired medications available in the unlocked emergency kit. V3 responded, If the med room is locked then there is no risk because the only access is the nurse. V2 added that as a nurse, you're supposed to check the medication expiration date before you give a medication. At 12:45 PM, V4 (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) arrived at the 4th floor and stated, Wed don't use it (emergency kit) at all. V4 added that the facility switched to using a (medication dispensing device) located on the 2nd floor that contains all the emergency medications. On 10/17/22 at 12:52 PM, as the surveyor was leaving the 4th floor med room, the caddie with the insulin pens and supplies was noted sitting on the nurse's station desk. The surveyor inquired if medications should be left out in the open. V3 stated, No, after they use it, they should take it back to the med room. On 10/17/22 at 1:43 PM, the surveyor observed the 5th floor medication storage room with V31 LPN. Another green tacklebox was labeled Box 326 IV/Injectable Emergency Kit. V31 was able to pull the tacklebox open and stated that it's usually locked. V31 added that they (nursing) used to use it (emergency kit) for IV's and that pharmacy is supposed to pick it up to replace it. The surveyor asked V31 to read the expiration date on the front of the box. V31 stated, Oh wow, I need to pay more attention. The last documented expiration date was 10/20. On 10/17/22 at 1:51 PM, as the surveyor was leaving the 5th floor med room, an insulin caddie containing insulin pens and supplies was noted sitting under the ledge of the counter at the nurse's station desk. V31 stated, Normally, I put them in the med room and lock the door. On 10/18/22 at 12:36 PM, V3 (DON) stated that no outside food should be stored in the medication refrigerator. Regarding the insulin caddies, V3 stated that the nurse should put the insulin caddie in the medication cart or in the medication room if she/he is going to walk away from it (insulin caddie) because anybody can take it. V3 added that if there is insulin that has a label from pharmacy to refrigerate then it needs to be refrigerated until opened. The 12/2016 Medication Storage in the Facility policy documents, in part, General: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer or supplier recommendations. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications .Procedure: .3. Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked or attended by person with authorized access .11. Medications requiring refrigeration or temperatures between 36 degrees Fahrenheit and 46 degrees Fahrenheit are kept in a refrigerator .13. Refrigerated medications are to be stored separate from fruit juices, applesauce, and other foods used in administering medications. Other foods (e.g., employee lunches, activity department refreshments) should not be stored in this refrigerator. 14. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated drugs and those in containers which are cracked, soiled or without secure closures will be immediately withdrawn from stock by the facility. They will be disposed of according to drug disposal procedures and reordered from the pharmacy if a current order exists. The revised 5/2017 Medication Administration guideline documents, in part, .28. Never leave the medication cart open and unattended.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label with date food items in the freezer and dry storage room, failed to ensure staff's water bottles were not stored in the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label with date food items in the freezer and dry storage room, failed to ensure staff's water bottles were not stored in the kitchen's freezer, failed to ensure food were discarded by use by date to prevent foodborne illnesses. These failures have the potential to affect all 258 residents taking oral nutrition in the facility. Findings include: The (10/16/2022) resident census was 261. The (undated) list of NPO (nothing by mouth) residents include 3 residents. On 10/16/2022 at 9:46 am, during the initial tour of the kitchen, there were 2 water bottles (Aquafina and Ice Mountain) inside the kitchen freezer. V26 (Lead Dietary Aide) stated, The staff are not supposed to keep these in the freezer. There were boxes of chicken and potato crunch not labeled with dates. V26 stated These should be dated. Everything that goes in the freezer should be dated. On 10/16/2022 at 9:54am, on the spice racks, the bottle of salt, chili powder, ground cinnamon, Dijon mustard, Worcestershire sauce and picante sauce were not labeled with dates. Surveyor inquired about the importance of labeling these items. V26 stated, To make sure they don't go old and to know when to toss them. ON 10/16/2022 at 9:57am, the oatmeal container has a log that had a use by date 8-31-22, the sugar container has a log that has a use by date 9-29-22, and the rice container has no log at all. On 10/16/2022 at 10:10am, on the dry storage area, there were containers of egg noodles, mayonnaise, Tangy BBQ sauce, and glacier distilled water not labeled with dates. V26 (Lead Dietary Aide) stated, These should be dated with the date these got here or delivered. This is what happens when the staff rush to leave the facility. The stock person works 7am-3pm. Our stocks come in late around 2:30pm, and the staff is rushing to get out of here and forget to label these. On 10/18/2022 at 10:36am, surveyor inquired about the use by date log on the oatmeal and sugar bin. V29 (District Manager) stated, We follow FIFO - first in, first out. So we don't have expired food items on the shelf and so we are not serving expired food items to the residents. The (undated) SUGAR LOG documented the last entry for Use By Date as 9-29-22. The (undated) OATMEAL LOG documented the last entry for Use By Date as 8-31-22. The (Revised: 4/2018) Food Storage: Cold Foods documented, in part Policy Statement. All Time/Temperature Control for Safety food, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code. Procedures. 5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. The (Review Date: 12/2021) Personal Food - Outside Food) documented, in part General: To provide guidance regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption. GUIDELINE: 7. The facility will provide storage for food that is separate from the facility food or easily distinguishable from facility food. The (Revised 9/2017) Food Storage: Dry Goods documented, in part Policy Statement. All dry good will be appropriately stored in accordance with the FDA Food Code. Procedures. 6. Storage area will be neat, arranged for easy identification and date marked as appropriately. The (Revised: 9/2017) Receiving documented, in part Policy statement. Safe food handling procedures for time and temperature control will be practiced in the transportation, delivery, and subsequent storage of all food items. Procedures. 5. All food items will be appropriately labeled and dated either through manufacturer packaging or staff notation. 6. All food items will be stored in a manner that ensures appropriate and timely utilization based on the principles of first in - first out (FIFO) inventory management.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

On 10/16/2022 at 10:02 am, the outside dumpster was observed to have lid open. This surveyor pointed this out to V27 (Dietary Aide) who stated, It should not be open because pest, bees, bugs and stuff...

Read full inspector narrative →
On 10/16/2022 at 10:02 am, the outside dumpster was observed to have lid open. This surveyor pointed this out to V27 (Dietary Aide) who stated, It should not be open because pest, bees, bugs and stuff would go in the dumpster. Pests go away if the dumpster lid is close. On 10/16/2022 at 10:06am, the Main Back Door was missing a portion of the gasket and gaps were evident upon closing the door. This surveyor pointed this out to V27. V27 stated, It should not be like that. Once again, it is a pest control issue. Pest can go inside the facility. On 10/16/22 at 12:26 PM, there were flies in R248's room. R248 stated, They are all right here. V12 (Maintenance) was in the room during this conversation with R248. V12 stated, Supposedly, there should be no flies in the room. It is not a home like environment. On 10/18/2022 at 10:28 am, this surveyor pointed out to V12 (Maintenance) the gap between the main back door and the main back door frame. V12 stated, We are going to replace the gasket today. (V26) just told me (V12) the issue this morning. This happened because during delivery, the boxes scratch the gasket. On 10/18/2022 at 10:30a m, surveyor inquired what could have happened if there's a gap on the main back door. V12 shrugged V12's shoulder and did not answer the question. This surveyor then inquired if mice could fit onto the gap. V12 then stated, If you say so. On 10/18/2022 at 10:33 am, the outside dumpster was open again. Surveyor inquired about the dumpster. V12 stated, It should stay closed always, for safety and to prevent flies and mice going inside. R248's (10/04/2022) Resident Assessment Instrument documented, in part Section C. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 10. Indicating R248's mental status was moderately impaired. Section G. A. Bed mobility - how resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture: 4/3 coding Total dependence/Two+ persons physical assist. The (Revision Date: 10/2022) Disposal of Garbage and Refuse documented, in part Definition/General: The facility will dispose of garbage and refuse properly and in a timely manner. Guideline: all garbage and refuse containers will be maintained properly and in a timely manner. Procedure: 1. The facility will assure all garbage and refuse containers are in good conditions and waste is properly contained in dumpsters or compactors with lids and covered. 4. Garbage receptacles will be covered when being removed from the kitchen area to the dumpster. The (12/2021) Pest Control documented, in part General: Facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent rodents from entering one residents room (R22), failed to prevent insects from entering the building and failed to prevent flies from entering in one resident's room (R248) by not maintaining the area. This failure has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings: On 10/16/2022 at 12:11pm surveyor observed an insect/rodent sticky board attached to the baseboard behind R22's bed. R22 stated that there is a hole in the wall and the sticky board is there to prevent mice from coming through the hole. R22 stated that she has seen mice running around in her room. On 10/18/2022 at 12:24pm V43 (Housekeeper/Floor Tech) stated that he does put down rodent/insect sticky board if the residents complain of seeing mice or bugs in their rooms. V43 stated that he was not aware that there was a hole in the wall in R22's room and that sticky board should be laid on the floor and not stuck to the wall. Surveyor asked V43 to remove the sticky board from the baseboard behind R22's bed and tell what he saw. V43 stated that there is a hole in the wall and in the baseboard and that the sticky board was covering the hole and holding up the baseboard. V43 stated that he would let housekeeping and maintenance know about the hole. On 10/18/2022 at 1:32pm V46 (Housekeeping Director) stated that insect/rodent sticky boards are to be placed flat on the floor, and not be stuck to the wall. V46 stated to keep the risks down for rodents to enter the rooms and the building we have to work on the problems that the Pest Control company list as recommendations. On 10/18/2022 at 2:35pm surveyor observed a long black bug that was about 1.5 inches long crawling in the entryway by the administrative offices in the back on the first floor. On 10/18/2022 at 2:40pm V46 stated that the long black bug was a water bug, and that the pest control company has sprayed down in this area too. On 10/18/2022 at 3:32pm surveyor observed the hole in the wall behind R22's bed had been patched up with some type of substance to seal the hole. V12 (Maintenance Director) stated that V43 let him know about the hole in the wall and baseboard behind R22's bed today. Surveyor inquired whether mice could enter through the hole and V43 said, I don't know. V43 stated that he was waiting for the substance to dry before he replaced the baseboard behind R22's bed. Service Inspection Report dated 10/17/2022 indicates activity and pest findings of German roaches and mice by the administrative office and elevator. Service Inspection Report dated 10/13/2022 indicates, rooms still need maintenance work done on baseboards in resident rooms, hole in bathroom baseboard and No repairs have been done on baseboards; holes, cracks, crevices, baseboards, etc. must be fixed to prevent activity from traveling and methods to work properly all services rendered. Policy titled Pest Control with a review date of 10/2022 states, in part, this facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 33% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 3 life-threatening violation(s), 6 harm violation(s), $407,863 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 73 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $407,863 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Bria Of Forest Edge's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns BRIA OF FOREST EDGE an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Bria Of Forest Edge Staffed?

CMS rates BRIA OF FOREST EDGE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 33%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Bria Of Forest Edge?

State health inspectors documented 73 deficiencies at BRIA OF FOREST EDGE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 6 that caused actual resident harm, and 64 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Bria Of Forest Edge?

BRIA OF FOREST EDGE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by BRIA HEALTH SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 328 certified beds and approximately 199 residents (about 61% occupancy), it is a large facility located in CHICAGO, Illinois.

How Does Bria Of Forest Edge Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, BRIA OF FOREST EDGE's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (33%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bria Of Forest Edge?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Bria Of Forest Edge Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, BRIA OF FOREST EDGE has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Bria Of Forest Edge Stick Around?

BRIA OF FOREST EDGE has a staff turnover rate of 33%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Bria Of Forest Edge Ever Fined?

BRIA OF FOREST EDGE has been fined $407,863 across 3 penalty actions. This is 11.0x the Illinois average of $37,158. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Bria Of Forest Edge on Any Federal Watch List?

BRIA OF FOREST EDGE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.