CALIFORNIA TERRACE

2829 SOUTH CALIFORNIA BLVD, CHICAGO, IL 60608 (773) 847-8061
For profit - Limited Liability company 297 Beds SABA HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
0/100
#480 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

California Terrace in Chicago has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality and care. It ranks #480 out of 665 in Illinois, placing it in the bottom half of nursing homes in the state, and #157 out of 201 in Cook County, suggesting limited local options that are better. Despite an improving trend, reducing issues from 36 in 2023 to 12 in 2024, the facility still faces serious concerns, including $413,279 in fines, which is higher than 77% of Illinois facilities. Staffing is a relative strength with a turnover rate of 38%, below the state average, but the overall staffing rating is poor. Specific incidents reported include a resident accessing dangerous items that led to self-harm and another resident being subjected to physical abuse due to inadequate supervision, highlighting both serious safety risks and the need for better care management.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Illinois
#480/665
Bottom 28%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
36 → 12 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
38% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$413,279 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 26 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
92 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 36 issues
2025: 12 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (38%)

    10 points below Illinois average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 38%

Near Illinois avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $413,279

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: SABA HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 92 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 8 actual harm
Sept 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner for four res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner for four residents (R1, R2, R4, R9) and failed to accommodate timely repairs for furnishings for three residents (R1, R3, R4) out of a total sample of 14 residents.Findings include: R1's ‘admission Report' documents in part medical diagnoses of quadriplegia, muscle wasting and atrophy in multiple sites, unsteadiness on feet, need for assistance with personal care, difficulty in walking, lack of coordination, limitation in activities due to disability, left side weakness following a stroke, abnormalities in gait and mobility, and generalized muscle weakness. R1's [DATE] Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documents in part R1 is cognitively intact. It documents R1 has an impairment to one side of upper and lower extremity. It also documents in part R1 is dependent with toileting hygiene and requires substantial to maximal assistance with oral hygiene, bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. On [DATE] at 2:29 PM, R1 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R1 was sitting in a motorized wheelchair in the bedroom. R1 stated staff take a long time to respond to R1's needs. R1 stated at times staff would come in, turn off R1's call light, and be gone for a long time prior to tending to R1's needs. R1 stated staff can take up to an hour before they answer R1's call light. R1 stated asking staff to move a chair out of the bedroom about ten minutes ago, but staff have not done so. R1 stated the chair was in R9's (roommate who is in a wheelchair) way. R1 pushed the call light at 2:35 PM. The light on the call light box turned on. Surveyor remained in the room and continued the interview with the bedroom door closed. At 2:47 PM, R1 stated, They're supposed to be attentive. Someone could have died by now. At 3:07 PM, R1 asked surveyor to get tissue from the bathroom stating [R1's] nose was running. R1 stated [R1] could not go into the bathroom because [R1's] motorized wheelchair was too wide for the door frame. Surveyor explained role and proceeded to wait for staff to answer R1's call light. At 3:12 PM, R1 pressed the button again and stated, I wonder if it makes noise out there if you hit it. Surveyor stepped out into the hallway. The call light indicator outside the door is on the ceiling and it was flashing. There were also call light indicators near the nurses' station and those were flashing. V4 (Nurse) was sitting at the nurses' station. V4 stated the morning CNAs (Certified Nurse Aides) already left and evening CNAs haven't arrived yet. [V4] was waiting for evening nurse to come in for hand off report. At 3:19 PM, V5 (Nurse) walked past R1's room towards the end of the hall without answering the call light. V5 emerged again and walked past R1's room towards the nurses' station. V4 asked V5 to answer R1's call light. V5 entered R1's room at 3:21 PM (46 minutes after R1 turned it on). During this same observation, R1 also mentioned the bedside table was broken. R1's bedside table had a black, plastic siding was peeling off and hanging from the table. The part hanging was greater than the length of surveyor's laptop keyboard (nine inches). R1 stated it's been since July and the facility has not fixed it. R1 stated its rough at the edge where the siding came off. R1's ‘Care Plan Report' documents in part R1 has a self-care deficit (initiated [DATE]) and is at risk for falls (initiated [DATE]). Interventions include to encourage the resident to use the call light for assistance and for staff to respond promptly to all requests for assistance (initiated [DATE]). --- R2's ‘admission Report' documents in part medical diagnoses of muscle wasting and atrophy in multiple sites, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, repeated falls, lack of coordination, and abnormal posture. On [DATE] at 11:59 AM, R2 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R2 stated staff take about an hour to an hour and a half to respond to call lights. R2's ‘Care Plan Report' documents in part R2 has an alteration in musculoskeletal status (revised [DATE]), is frequently incontinent (revised [DATE]), has a self-care deficit (revised [DATE]), and is at risk for falls (revised [DATE]). Interventions include to encourage R2 to use the call light for assistance and for staff to respond promptly to all requests for assistance (initiated [DATE]). --- R3's ‘admission Record' documents in part diagnoses of weakness, other lack of coordination, abnormal posture, muscle wasting and atrophy in multiple sites, repeated falls, need for assistance with personal care, and unsteadiness on the feet. R3's [DATE] Quarterly MDS assessment documents in part R3 has an impairment to one side of upper extremity. It also reads R3 requires partial to moderate assistance with toileting hygiene. R3's [DATE] progress note documents in part R3 has a history of stroke with left side weakness. R3's [DATE] 9:17 AM progress note documents in part R3 has left upper extremity with severe limitation. Facility's Resident Council Minutes document in part during the [DATE] meeting, R3 complained of a broken toilet knob. On [DATE] at 11:17 AM, R3 was oriented to person, place, and time. When asked about meeting minutes from July, R3 stated it was not the toilet knob was broken but rather the toilet handle/grab bar. R3 stated the toilet has a grab bar on one side but the other one fell off and is in the bathtub. R3 stated it's been months and staff have not fixed it. R3 stated [R3] needs both sides to help get on and off the toilet. Surveyor observed the toilet with one grab bar to its left, but the grab bar was supposed to be in between the toilet and sink was in the bathtub. ‘Facility Work Order Sheet' for R3's unit does not document in part a request to fix R3's toilet grab bar. R3's ‘Care Plan Report' documents in part R3 is at risk for falls (revised [DATE]) and has a self-care deficit (revised [DATE]). Interventions include to offer safety reminders with mobility and to use appropriate assistive device (revised [DATE]). --- R4's ‘admission Report' documents in part diagnoses of muscle wasting and atrophy in multiple sites, need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, and abnormal posture. Facility's Resident Council Minutes document in part during the [DATE] meeting, R4 complained of failure of staff answering R4's call light. On [DATE] at 11:41 AM, R4 was oriented to person, place, and time. R4 stated staff do not respond to R4's call lights and when they do, it is hours later. R4 stated staff will cut the light out and say they're busy and will do it later but won't return until hours after. R4 also reported having a broken bedside table. R4's bedside table was missing one wheel. When R4 attempted to push it out of the way, the table did not roll. R4 stated the bedside table has been broken for two to three weeks. R4 stated a staff member said they would bring R4 a new one but have not done it. ‘Facility Work Order Sheet' for R4's unit does not document in part a request to fix R4's bedside table. R4's ‘Care Plan Report' documents in part R4 has a self-care deficit (initiated [DATE]), alteration in musculoskeletal status (revised [DATE]), and is at risk for falls (revised [DATE]). Interventions include for R4 to use the call light for assistance and for staff to respond promptly to all requests for assistance (initiated [DATE]). On [DATE] at 11:06 AM, V7 (Maintenance Supervisor) stated staff are supposed to communicate when resident furnishings are broken. V7 stated does not go into the residents' rooms daily and rely on staff to report any broken items. V7 stated maintenance department can usually fix simple things like bedside tables within a day. V7 stated no reports about R3's toilet grab bar or R1 and R4's bedside tables. On [DATE] at 12:13 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated staff are to either verbally report or write down any maintenance issues. When it comes to call lights, V2 expects staff to answer the residents' call lights in a timely manner. If the staff are available, they are to answer them. Facility's Policy and Procedure Call Light (revised 1/25) documents in part: All call lights will be answered by staff within a reasonable time, depending on the task required. All staff should assist in answering call lights. A non-nursing staff member may seek out nursing staff for further assistance when needed. Staff members may go to the resident's room to respond to the call system and promptly cancel the call light. Procedure: Answer the light (signal) promptly. Facility provided a copy of the ‘Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program - Resident Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities.' It documents in part residents have the right to receive the services and/or items included in the plan of care. Facility's Preventative Maintenance Program (11/2022) documents in part the purpose is to conduct regular environmental tours/safety audits to identify areas of concern within the facility. The Preventative Maintenance Program will review resident equipment are in working order.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a clean and home-like environment for six (R2, R4-R8) out of a total sample of 14 residents with a potential to af...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a clean and home-like environment for six (R2, R4-R8) out of a total sample of 14 residents with a potential to affect multiple residents on the first, second, third, and fourth floors.Findings include: On 9/16/2025 at 11:35 AM, there were multiple brown and dark tan-colored splatter stains on the central walls on the fourth floor including the wall across from the East stairwell. On 9/18/2025 at 11:56 AM, the central walls and wall across from the East stairwell still had brown and dark tan-colored splatter stains. On 9/16/2025 at 11:41 AM, R4 stated facility is slow to fix things. There are brown stains to three ceiling panels by the window, two ceiling panels above bed B, and others by the bathroom. One of the ceiling panels above bed B is curved/bubbled. R4 stated the hallways and dining rooms are also dirty. On 9/16/2025 at 11:53 AM, the third-floor dining room had multiple food particles and other debris (pieces of sugar packets, white paper shreds) on the floor. On the left side of the dining room, there was a table with six dirty/used trays from previous meals. One tray had left over chicken, mashed potatoes, carrots, peas, and bread. The other trays had left over milk and scrambled eggs. At 12:14 PM, facility started serving lunch to the unit. The dining room remained with the used trays and debris on the floor. R6, R7, and R8 were eating lunch in a nearby table to the dirty trays. On 9/16/2025 at 11:59 AM, R2 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R2 stated maintenance was slow to fix things and housekeeping do not do a good job cleaning specifically with sweeping. R2's room had brown stains to two ceiling panels in the back left corner of the bed and there was chipped paint to the corner wall near the bathroom. On 9/16/2025 at 12:26 PM, R5 was in the room when [R5] stated facility maintenance department is slow to fix things. R5 pointed to the ceiling tiles near the window. There were tan and brown stains on some of the ceiling panels. R5 pointed to the wall by the head of R5's bed. R5 stated the floor trimming was peeling off and there was chipped paint on the wall. On 9/18/2025 at 10:15 AM, the second-floor dining room had multiple food particles and other debris on the floor. There was a used brown paper towel on the floor near the window. On a table near the proximal wall to the nurses' station, there were five dirty meal trays. At 11:59 AM, R5 and multiple residents were in the dining room for lunch. The paper towel remained on the floor and the used trays were stacked on top of each other on the same table as earlier. Multiple staff walked by the brown paper towel on the floor without picking it up including V12 (Certified Nurse Aide - CNA) and V22 (CNA). On 9/18/2025 at 10:27 AM, the first-floor dining room had multiple food and other paper products (brown paper towel) on the floor by the vending machines. There was also a dark brown spill stain. There was a clear plastic bag in the middle of the room and a bath towel by the cabinets on the other side. At 12:03 PM, residents were eating in the first-floor dining room, but the paper towel, plastic bag, and bath towel remained on the floor. On 9/17/2025 at 11:06 AM, V7 (Maintenance Supervisor) stated staff are supposed to communicate when there are any environmental issues. V7 stated does not go into the residents' rooms daily and rely on staff to report any issues. V7 stated if there's tan or brown stains to the ceiling panels, V7 needs to check on it right away to check for a leak. V7 stated if there's a leak that's causing the ceiling panel to bubble, then it might fall. V7 was not aware of the ceiling panels in R2, R4, and R5's room. On 9/17/2025 at 1:08 PM, V17 (Housekeeping Supervisor) stated the housekeepers are to clean the dining rooms after each meal. V17 stated the purpose is to get the dining rooms ready for the next meal or for when family and friends visit the residents or for when residents want to hang out in there. V17 stated housekeeping staff are also supposed to clean the hallways and resident rooms daily. Staff are to clean the walls whenever they see a spot or dirt on them. On 9/18/2025 at 12:13 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated housekeeping is to ensure the environment is clean for the residents. V2 stated housekeeping should go in after each meal and clean up any issues so that it is clean and readily available to the residents. Facility provided a copy of the ‘Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program - Resident Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities.' It documents in part that residents have the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Facility's Housekeeping Guidelines (7/14) documents in part that the purpose is to provide guidelines to maintain a safe and sanitary environment for residents, facility staff and visitors. Housekeeping personnel shall adhere to daily cleaning assignments developed so to maintain the facility in a clean and orderly manner. The Administrator and Environmental Services Director will routinely make visual quality control observations to ensure that a high level of sanitation is maintained. Cleaning of curtains, walls, blinds, etc. will be cleaned when dust or soiling is visible. Trash will be removed from all areas of the facility daily and as needed to prevent spillage and odors. Facility's Preventative Maintenance Program (11/2022) documents in part that the purpose is to conduct regular environmental tours/safety audits to identify areas of concern within the facility. The head of maintenance and/or housekeeping are to conduct random rounds to conduct environmental tours/safety audits of the facility. This includes to ensure that all facility areas ae kept clean and in safe condition, paint is free from watermarks and peeling, ceiling tiles are free from watermarks or spots, and wall coverings are intact and free of tears or loose seams.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow a resident's (R2) plan of care and failed to recognize potential accident/hazard in the patio. This has the potenti...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow a resident's (R2) plan of care and failed to recognize potential accident/hazard in the patio. This has the potential to affect all residents who go out to the patio.Findings include: R2's ‘admission Report' documents, in part, muscle wasting and atrophy in multiple sites, repeated falls, need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, left hemiplegia, muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. R2's 6/24/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documents R2 is cognitively intact. R2 has an impairment to one side of lower and upper extremity. R2 is dependent on staff when using the wheelchair. ‘Facility Incident Investigation Report' documents on 7/10/2025 R2 complained of left ankle pain. Facility conducted an x-ray which resulted in closed left ankle fracture. Facility investigation reads R2 believes the injury occurred when left leg fell off the leg rest while propelling in the wheelchair. Facility intervention included to place a leg strap on R2's left leg to keep leg from falling off the leg rest while in the wheelchair. ‘Facility Incident Investigation Report' reads staff and R2 were educated to use the leg rest strap to prevent further injury. R2's ‘Care Plan Report' documents R2 has an alteration in musculoskeletal status related to fracture of the left ankle (initiated 7/11/2025). R2 will utilize an adjustable wheelchair footrest belt strap to maintain support/stability to the ankle when in the wheelchair (initiated 7/18/2025). Intervention includes for staff to ensure the footrest belt strap is in place to maintain support/stability to the left ankle (initiated 7/18/2025). On 9/16/2025 at 12:32 PM, R2 was oriented to person, place, and time. R2 stated R2 cannot move left leg and has minimal feeling to the left leg. R2 stated there has been a few incidents where left leg has fallen out of the footrest while up in the wheelchair. On 9/17/2025 at 11:32 AM, R2 was up in the wheelchair playing bingo in the dining room. R2's left leg was elevated on top of a pillow was on top of the wheelchair's footrest. There was no leg strap. On 9/17/2025 at 11:52 AM, V11 (Nurse) stated R2 is supposed to have a left leg strap when up in the wheelchair but it is missing. V11 was not sure how long it's been missing. On 09/17/2025 at 12:04 PM, V12 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated R2 had a leg strap but it's missing today and don't know when it disappeared. On 9/17/2025 at 1:24 PM, R2 remained up in the wheelchair in the dining room. There was no leg strap to the left leg. R2 stated facility staff could not locate the leg strap. --- On 9/16/2025 at 12:32 PM, R2 mentioned left leg has fallen out of the leg rest while going over the ramp in the patio. R2 stated the bottom of the ramp was uneven and had multiple cracks need to be filled in. On 9/17/2025 at 11:23 AM, V7 (Maintenance Supervisor) and surveyor went out into the patio. There was a cement ramp led from the building to the cement patio. At the end of the ramp there were multiple cracks in the cement. One crack extended past both sides of the railing (V7 measured railing width to be 49 inches). Some of the cracks had 0.5 to 0.75-inch height difference. When the facility opened the smoking patio at 2:02 PM, there were multiple residents in wheelchairs (including R10, R11, R12, and R13) who got caught on the cracks. They had to wiggle or use the handrails to assist them out of the cracks. On 9/17/2025 at 2:13 PM, V19 (Psychosocial Aide) stated roles include to assist residents during smoke breaks. V19 stated the ramp is a hazard because of the multiple cracks. V19 stated asking facility to fix it for almost a year now. V19 stated some residents have a hard time getting over the humps where the cracks are. At 2:18 PM, R14's rollator got caught on a crack. R14 and the rollator started to tip over. V19 caught R14 and assisted [R14] further out into the patio. Interview resumed and V19 stated people can come down the ramp out of control if they hit the cracks the wrong way. V19 stated when going up the ramp, some residents must pull up or lean back to get over the humps. V19 stated it can also cause them to fall back. V19 stated residents can also trip on the cracks or on the loose pieces coming off the cracks. V19 kicked a loose piece of cement was about 4 inches in length out to the dirt. R10-R14's ‘Care Plan Reports' document they are all fall risks. R14's ‘Care Plan Report' documents multiple falls while out in the patio with one resulting from R14 tripping while coming up the patio ramp. On 9/18/2025 at 12:13 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated to prevent accidents staff are to ensure the environment is free from hazard. Facility provided a copy of the ‘Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program - Resident Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities.' It documents residents have the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Facility's ‘Fall Prevention Program' documents: It is the policy of this facility to have a Fall Prevention Program to assure the safety of all residents in the facility, when possible. Facility is to identify risk factors and remove hazards. Facility's Preventative Maintenance Program (11/2022) documents the purpose is to conduct regular environmental tours/safety audits to identify areas of concern within the facility. The head of maintenance and/or housekeeping are to conduct random rounds to conduct environmental tours/safety audits of the facility. This includes to ensure all facility areas ae kept clean and in safe condition.
Aug 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** F600: Abuse:Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent resident to resident physical assault for two (R...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** F600: Abuse:Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent resident to resident physical assault for two (R1, and R2) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted to R1 sustaining a head injury with staples. Findings Include:R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Brief Interview Score/BIMS (14) indicates he is cognitively intact.R2' MDS dated [DATE], BIMs score (15) indicates he is cognitively intact.On 7/30/25 at 10:02 AM, R1 stated he has been in this facility for over a year. R1 stated, on 7/1/25 around 1pm, he was watching a program on his television (TV) and listening to his radio. R1 got up to assist R2 to pick up his lunch tray when R1 accidentally fell on R2. R2 then hit the back/side of R1's head with a dumbbell. R1 stated staff came into his room to attend to his bleeding head. The paramedics picked R1 up to the hospital to treat his bleeding head with two staples. R1 returned to the facility same day, R2 had been moved to another room. R1 had no further contact or interaction with R2 since, and he feels safe in the facility.On 7/30/25 at 10:18 AM, R2 stated that he has been in this facility for over one year. R2 stated he was having verbal altercation with R1 because R1's TV/radio volume was loud. R2 told R1 to lower the volume, but R1 approached him, cursing at him with F word and R2 cursed him back with F word. R2 stated R1 attempted to hit R2 with a food tray but R2 blocked it and hit the back/side of R1's head with a dumbbell. The staff came into the room after the incident to move R2 to another room, R2 did not have contact with R1 since, and he feels safe in the facility.On 7/30/25 at 10:29 AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated she worked 7am-3pm shift on 7/1/25 with R1 and R2, at about 1pm a resident came to the nursing station to alert the staff that there was a commotion going on inside the room between R1 and R2. V4 went into the room immediately, to separate, call 911/code gray (Physical Altercation). V1 (Administrator), V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON), V3 (Social Service Director), and other staff came into the room, R1 was bleeding because of a head injury, V4 applied pressure until the paramedics came to take R1 to the hospital. V4 stated that R2 was moved to another room before R1 returned to the facility same day with 2 staples on the back of his head. V4 attends in-services on how to prevent abuse, and that hitting is a form of resident-to-resident physical abuse.On 7/30/25 at 10:43 AM, V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated she worked on the day of the incident 7/1/25. V5 rounds every two hours and as needed to attend to resident and to prevent abuse. V5 stated that hitting is a form of resident-to-resident physical abuse, and she attended in-service on how to prevent abuse about four weeks ago. On 7/30/25 at 3:20 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated she is the abuse coordinator, it is her expectation that residents are kept safe, free from abuse, and she conducted in-service on how to prevent abuse on 7/2/25. During her investigation, R1 stated that R2 hit him at the back/side of his head with a dumbbell. R2 stated that he told R1 to reduce the volume of his radio/TV, R1 became upset, cursed R2 with F word and he used F word as well. R1 then approached him while lying in bed, and he hit R1 with the dumbbell. V1 stated that R1 is the aggressor because R2 is bed bound. V3 updated the care plan, continues to provide frequent behavioral management counselling in addition with the psych consult. V1 also stated that the dumbbell has been confiscated, locked up, a picture copy, and the police report # JJ316577, BEAT #1032 reviewed.V6 (CNA), V7, V8 (LPNs), V9, and V10 (CNAs). All stated that hitting is a form of resident-to-resident physical abuse and were in-serviced on how to prevent abuse.Documents reviewed but are not limited to the following:R1, R2, and R3's Face Sheet, POS, and Section C of MDS.R1's Hospital Emergency Department (ED) Report dated 7/1/25, documents in part: Assault Victim, Head injury, Laceration of head, and Laceration Repair, return to ED in ten days for staple removal. R1's progress note dated 7/1/25 documents in part, 2 sutures noted to posterior head.R3's written witness statement dated 7/2/25 document in part: R2 got upset, got into the other one's face and R2 hit him (R1) with his weight (Dumbbell).R1 and R2's Assessment for aggressive behaviors.Facility Reported Injury, Initial report dated 7/1/25, and Final Report dated 7/8/25.Abuse in-service dated 01/2025, and 7/2/25.Abuse Policy dated 1/20/25 documents in part: Resident have the right to be free from abuse, and neglect. The facility desires to prevent, prohibits abuse and neglect.Concern/Compliment Forms from 1/6/25 to 6/23/25.Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 1/28/25 to 7/29/25.
Jul 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one resident (R5) out a sample of 3 from verbal and emotional abuse. This failure has the potential to affect one resident (R5) out ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one resident (R5) out a sample of 3 from verbal and emotional abuse. This failure has the potential to affect one resident (R5) out of a sample of 3.Findings include:R1 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation, Primary Insomnia, Major Depressive Disorder, and Paranoid Schizophrenia.R1 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15.R5 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Undifferentiated Schizophrenia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety Disorder, Hypertension, and Syncope and Collapse. R5 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 13.On 7/14/2025 at 12:53 PM, R1 stated on 7/03/2025 he (R1) was yelling, in the dining room, at R5 about continuously taking his stuff.On 7/14/2025 at 1:43 PM, V9 (LPN/Unit Manager) stated R1 was upset with R5 and R1 was ‘pumped up' (mad and aggressive) with R5 on 7/03/2025.On 7/14/2025 at 1:59 PM, R5 stated R1 was yelling at him saying, You took my cigarettes. He said some other things, but I don't recall what he said.R1's progress note dated 07/03/2025 at 7:00 PM, by V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN/Unit Manager), documents, in part, V9 made aware by SS (Social Services) that R1 became verbally aggressive, shouting and screaming. When redirected by staff R1 attempted to strike the other resident (R5).On 7/15/2025 at 1:28 PM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated on 7/03/2025 R1 and R5 were having a verbal disagreement about R5 taking some of R1's cigarettes. R1 lost his temper and began to move closer to R5 while yelling at R5. On 7/15/2025 at 3:10 PM, V28 (LPN) stated, I do recall the incident. There was a commotion in the parlor area. I went to see what it was about; it happened fast. Stated R1 did not tell her that R5 stole his cigarettes. R1 became aggressive with R5 yelling and screaming at R5.On 7/16/2025 at 2:06 PM, V27 (Assistant Director of Nursing) said, No, verbal or any kind of abuse should not happen in the facility.On 7/16/2025 at 3:01 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, No, it (abuse) should not occur in the facility.Supervision and Safety Policy with a date of 3/15 documents, in parts, resident safety and supervision are facility-wide priorities.Job Description Charge Nurse updated 7/2024 documents, in part, detect and correct situations that have a high probability of causing accidents or injuries to residents and/or staff.Policy and Procedure Abuse Prevention Program dated 1/2025 documents, in part, Residents have the right to be free of abuse, the facility prevents abuse and this facility desires to prevent abuse by establishing a resident sensitive and resident secure environment.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to supervise a confused wandering male resident from wandering in femal...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to supervise a confused wandering male resident from wandering in female rooms during smoke times causing resident mental abuse. This failure affected 2 (R2 and R6) residents in a sample of 57. The facility failed to prevent residents from smoking inside the facility (R7, R10) per policy. Findings include: 1. R2 has a diagnosis of but not limited to TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS, MUSCLE WASTING AND ATROPHY, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED, MULTIPLE SITES, DIFFICULTY IN WALKING, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED, OTHER LACK OF COORDINATION, ABNORMAL POSTURE, ACQUIRED ABSENCE OF RIGHT LEG ABOVE KNEE, UNSPECIFIED ASTHMA, UNCOMPLICATED, OSTEOMYELITIS, UNSPECIFIED, SUICIDAL IDEATIONS, MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, RECURRENT.R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) of 15 which is an indication of an intact cognition. R4 has a diagnosis of but not limited to UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, OTHER FORMS OF SCOLIOSIS, LUMBAR REGION, UNSPECIFIED PSYCHOSIS NOT DUE TO A SUBSTANCE OR KNOWN, EPILEPSY, UNSPECIFIED, OTHER PANCYTOPENIA, SYNCOPE AND COLLAPSE, UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITHOUT BEHAVIORALDISTURBANCE, PSYCHOTIC DISTURBANCE, MOOD DISTURBANCE, COGNITIVE COMMUNICATION DEFICIT, NICOTINE DEPENDENCE, UNSPECIFIED, UNCOMPLICATED. R4 has a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) of 10 which is an indication of moderately impaired function. R6 has a diagnosis of but not limited to UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITH OTHER BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCE, DYSPHAGIA, OROPHARYNGEAL PHASE, REPEATED FALLS, ACUTE EMBOLISM AND THROMBOSIS OF UNSPECIFIED DEEP VEINS OF UNSPECIFIED LOWER EXTREMITY, ESSENTIAL (PRIMARY) HYPERTENSION, and HYPO-OSMOLALITY AND HYPONATREMIA.R6 has a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) of 8 which is an indication of moderately impaired function. Surveyor reviewed R2's, R4s, and R6's Face Sheet, Care Plan dated (Abuse Focus) 6/13/2025, IDPH Reportables dated 4/2025 to 6/2025, Concerns/Response 4/2025 to 6/2025, Resident Council Meetings 4/2025 to 6/2025, and Abuse Policy with no concerns noted.Surveyor reviewed Grievance document titled, Opportunity Resolution Form dated 6/25/2025 documents in part, (R4) (male resident) is roaming in R2's room in the afternoon during smoke times and the resolution was to in-service staff regarding escorting resident back and forth to the smoking patio.Surveyor reviewed facility's Sex Offenders list and R4 is not listed. On 7/14/2025 at 1:05 PM, R2 stated R4 has been wandering in her (R2's) room for over 4 months going to the washroom and then laying in an empty bed. R2 stated when she (R2) informs R4 that he is in the wrong room, he (R4) swears at her and makes threatening remarks towards her. R2 showed surveyor a picture on her (R2's) phone with a time stamp of 9:02 AM, that shows R4 being escorted out of a bed diagonally across from R2's bed and a second photo with a time stamp around 6 pm with R4 lying in the bed diagonally across from R2 on 6/25/2025. R2 stated on 7/2/2025, she (R2) noticed R4 was sitting in the Parlor around 11:30 AM, which made her feel unsafe since he has a habit of wandering. R2 stated she (R2) found out that R4's room is directly above her room and that is the reason he (R4) keeps wandering in my room. R2 stated R4 has not wandered in her room since 7/2/2025. R2 stated she hasn't experienced any verbal or physical abuse from staff; there are roaches in the facility; the facility never has enough linen and run out of diapers occasionally; checks and credit cards were missing from her room when she returned from the hospital a long time ago, but no belongings missing recently; and has not heard anything about any overdosing in the facility. 7/14/2025 at 1:35 PM, V5 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated she (V5) is aware of R4 wandering in R2's room. She (V5) stated an in-service on a resolution to R4 wandering in R2's room which was to implement escorting R4 to and from the smoking room to prevent him (R4) from wandering in R2's room. V5 stated R4 has not wandered in R2's room since the staff started following the new intervention and she is unaware of a rape occurring in the facility. On 7/15/2025 at 2:45 PM, V9 (Unit Manager/LPN) stated R2 informed her (V9) that R4 was wandering in and out of her room after smoke times on 6/24/2025. V9 stated R4 suffers from confusion and has wandered to R2's room, so a resolution has been implemented to have staff escort R4 to and from the smoking patio before and after smoking times. V9 stated R4 has not wandered in R2's room since that intervention has been put in place to her knowledge. On 7/16/2025 at 12:07 PM, V25 (Housekeeper) stated she (V25) remembers entering R2's room and noticed R4 (male resident) in a female's room. V25 stated, I told him (R4) to leave the room immediately because males should only be in male rooms. On 7/16/2025 at 2:05 PM, V27 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated R4 wandering in R2's om was brought to V27 during a morning meeting with V1, ‘but I (V27) can't remember the exact date'. V27 stated this is the resident's home and the staff redirects the residents as much as possible considering their disease processes. R27 stated the facility is always having in-services and because R4 wanders, staff have been educated to escort R4 to the smoke patio during and after smoke times. V27 stated he (V27) R4 has not wandered in R2's room since the intervention was implemented. Facility's policy titled Supervision and Safety dated 3/15 documents in part, our policy strives to make the environment as free from hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision are facility-wide priorities. Our facility-orientate approach to safety addresses risks for groups of residents such as wanders, behaviors, aggressiveness, confusion, etc. Resident supervision is a core component to resident safety. Facility's policy titled Behavior Management dated 1/2025 documents in part, It is the policy of the Nursing Department to determine the cause of behaviors when possible and initiate interventions to reduce, control, or prevent identified behaviors. F-Tag Initiation: Supervision for Resident Smoking in Their Rooms2. R7 has a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) of 11 which indicates a moderately impaired cognition. R7's care plan dated 6/4/2025 documents in part, a focus initiated 3/6/2025 for socially inappropriate behavior for smoking in resident rooms, stairwells, hallways, bathrooms, and elevators along with begging, borrowing, stealing, burning clothes and lips. R7 does not have privileges to keep his (R7's) cigarettes in his possession. R7's smoking assessment dated [DATE] documents in part, a history of hazardous behavior of smoking cigarettes in unauthorized areas of the facility. On 7/14/2025 at 1:53 PM, R7 was sitting in the room watching television. Surveyor observed the smell of smoke and smoke in the air in R7's room. R7 verified he (R7) smelled smoke. R8 (R7's roommate) was standing in front of his bed fanning the air. R7 and R8 denied smoking in the room. Surveyor observed a cigarette butt on the floor by the foot of the R7's bed, another cigarette butt on the floor by the R7's dresser and a whole cigarette on the resident's bed. Surveyor stepped out of the room and called V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse) to the room. V12 stated she (V12) smelled cigarette smoke and verified there were 2 cigarette butts on the floor at the foot of R7's bed and by R7's bed. R7 had removed the whole cigarette from his bed and stated he (R7) didn't have a whole cigarette. R7 admitted to smoking in his room this morning to V12. R8 stated he (R8) tells R7 to put the cigarettes out when he (R7) is smoking in the room. V12 stated the residents are not supposed to have cigarettes and lighters in their rooms. V12 informed the nurse manager that R7 was smoking in the room and requested a room search to remove the cigarette and lighter from R7. 3. R10 has a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) of 10 which is an indication of moderately impaired cognition. R10's care plan dated 5/23/2025 documents in part, a focus of a history of smoking in unauthorized areas that was initiated 1/14/2025. R10's smoking assessment dated [DATE] documents in part, a minimal history of smoking (#7) in unauthorized areas and in the comments section (#10) Resident was caught smoking in her room. Counseling and redirection to appropriate behavior provided. Resident requires supervision when smoking. On 7/15/2025 at 1:34 PM, V17 (Certified Nurse Assistant) verified with surveyor there was a smoke smell in the hallway. V17 verified a smog of smoke in the air of the hallway and smelled smoke. V17 and surveyor verified the smoke was coming from R10's room because there was a smog of smoke around her (R10's) bed and a pack of cigarettes on R10's bedside table. R10 stated she was not smoking, and staff need to talk to the residents that are smoking weed and cocaine in the facility. R10 stated, My daughter brought me (R10) the cigarettes a week ago and staff has not complained about it so now all of a sudden y'all got a problem with it. V17 called V3 to the unit. On 7/15/2025 at 1:37 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) arrived on the 3rd floor. As V3 walked towards R10's room, V3 verified with surveyor there was a smog of smoke outside of R10's room and stated, I (V3) know it was her (R10) smoking. V3 asked R10 was she smoking in the room and R10 stated no. V3 and surveyor left the room and V3 called social service to the third floor. On 7/15/2025 at 1:40 PM, V20 (Assistant Social Services Director) arrived on the 3rd floor and walked to R10's room with surveyor. V20 verified a smog of cigarette smoke, and the smell of smoke was in the hallway by R10's room and in R10's room. V20 removed the cigarettes on R10's bedside table and informed her (R10) she does not have privileges to keep cigarettes on her person. R10 became very angry and began to make swearing remarks at V20. V20 stated any resident caught smoking in their room will revoke their safe smoking privilege right to keep their cigarettes otherwise cigarettes are kept locked up until smoking times. V20 stated staff will take residents to the smoking patio once the residents receive their cigarettes from the nurse. Facility policy titled Facility Smoking Safety Policy undated documents in part, R7's care plan dated 6/4/2025 documents in part, a focus initiated 3/6/2025 for socially inappropriate behavior for smoking in resident rooms, stairwells, hallways, bathrooms, and elevators along with begging, borrowing, stealing, burning clothes and lips. R7 does not have privileges to keep his (R7's) cigarettes in his possession.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
Feb 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodations of residents needs by failing to ensure nurse calls are assessable to the residents and answer...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodations of residents needs by failing to ensure nurse calls are assessable to the residents and answered in a timely manner in 7 (R1, R2, R3, R6, R7, R8, R9) of a sample of 20 residents. Findings include: On 2/7/25 at 10:25am R2 was observed in his room in bed. R2 had a strong urine odor. R2's nurse call was on the floor and not in reach. R2 stated they don't answer the nurse calls when I pull it. When they do it takes a long time. This happens on all shifts. I need to be changed now. On 2/7/25 at 10:33AM R3 stated they don't answer the nurse calls. I press the button and it takes a very long time for someone to show up to give me assistance. R3 pushed the nurse call button during the interview. The room light outside the room lit. The light next to the 3rd floor nurses station on the ceiling lit. Two nurses, V3 (Registered Nurse/RN) and V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) were at the nurses station conducting computer and paper work. The nurse call system registers at the nurse station desk phone. A screen on the phone notifies as to what room has been activated for a nurse call. The phone face screen was covered by a sheet of paper and this screen was not visible. Both V3 and V4 were not aware that the nurse call was activated and continued desk duties. No other staff were at the nurses station. At 10:43am no staff had answered the nurse call that R3 activated at 10:33AM. Surveyor notified both V3 and V4 and both were asked why the call had not been answered. Both stated they were not aware that the call was activated. On 2/7/25 at 10:35 V3 (RN) stated I didn't know R3 needed assistance. V3 stated I don't know who put the paper over the phone nurse call activation screen. The phone screen is how we know when the nurse call has been activated and who's room it is. I don't know where the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant) are right now. I think they are in residents rooms providing care. On 2/7/25 at 11:55AM R1 stated they don't answer the calls half the time. Sometimes they answer and say they will be back and never return. I want to get up out of bed and they don't return. A CNA came into my room one time and told me they turned the nurse calls off. On 2/7/25 at 10:15 AM R7 stated they don't answer the nurse call half the time I pull it. On 2/7/25 at 10:35AM R8 stated hell no they don't answer the nurse call. One CNA told me they shut off the nurse call system. so they don't have to answer. On 2/7/25 at 10:45AM R6 stated they never answer the nurse calls. On 2/7/25 at 12:14PM R9 stated they don't answer the nurse call. I have to call the front desk on my cell phone to get a nurse in here. Sometimes they answer my phone sometimes not. On 2/8/25 at 9:45AM V1 (Administrator) stated I am not aware that staff covered the nurse call system phone screen on the 2nd floor. I am not aware that the nurses in the station ignored the nurse call when it was activated. All staff are supposed to answer the call right away. Nurses are supposed to answer the calls if CNAs are not present. We have a call light policy that is supposed to be followed by all staff. Facility policy titled Call Light states including- Purpose: To respond to residents requests and needs in a timely manner. Equipment: Functioning Nurse Call System. Policy: All call lights will be answered by any staff within their scope of practice. Standards: 1.All residents shall have the nurse call light system available and within easy accessibility to the resident at the bedside or other reasonable accessible location. 2. All staff should assist in answering call lights. Nursing staff members shall go to resident room to respond to call system and promptly cancel the call light when the room is entered. 4. Requests shall be responded to in a courteous and professional manner. Procedure: 1 Answer light (signal) promptly. 2.Be courteous when entering room. 3.Turn off call light 4.Listen to residents request. Do not make the resident feel that you are too busy to help.
Jan 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and protect a resident from resident-to-resident physical a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and protect a resident from resident-to-resident physical abuse. This failure affects one (R1) resident out of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 01/25/2025, at 10:23 AM, R1 observed lying in bed inside of his room in a left lateral position. R1 is noted with confusion and unable to give an account of the altercation that occurred. On 01/25/2025, at 10:25 AM, R3 states, I know what happened. R3 then states they were located in the dining room on the second floor and a gray-haired male hit R1 in the face and gave R1 a puffy eye. R3 states he is not sure of the resident's name who hit R1. On 01/25/2025, at 10:57 AM, R2 states he was involved in an altercation with R1 in the dining room on the second floor. R2 states R1 was talking too much and R1 told R2 your mother. R2 states he does not know why R1 said that to him. R2 states he then hit R1 in the face. R2 states he was sent to the hospital after hitting R1 in the face. R2 states when he returned back from the hospital, the facility moved his room to the third floor of the facility. R1s' MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R1 has a BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status of 06/15, indicating that R1 is severely cognitively impaired. R2s' MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R2 has a BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status of 11/15, indicating that R2 is mildly cognitively impaired. R3s' MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R3 has a BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status of 09/15, indicating that R3 is mildly cognitively impaired. On 01/25/2025, at 1:55 PM V4 (Registered Nurse/RN) states she was working on 01/05/25 and was assigned to care for R2. V4 states she was at the second-floor nurses' station when a CNA (certified nursing assistant) staff member informed her that R1 and R2 were fighting in the dining room. V4 states she immediately went to the dining room and when she arrived, R1 and R2 were separated but standing in front of each other. V4 states she assessed R2, and he did not have any bruises on him. V4 states she tried to talk to R2 and ask what happened but R2 told V4 f*** you and started speaking in Spanish. V4 states she tried to redirect R2 but R2 became more aggressive towards her. V4 states V13 (CNA) informed her that R2 punched R1 in the head hard and that the impact of the punch was loudly heard. V4 states she informed the doctor and V1 (Administrator). V4 states the doctor gave orders to send R2 out for psychiatric evaluation. V4 states even when the ambulance arrived, R2 was being aggressive and combative and did not want to go to the hospital. V4 states R2 was very angry, and she did not know why. V4 states R2 was moved to another floor upon returning to the facility from the hospital. On 01/25/2025, at 2:22 PM V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) states she was working on 01/05/25 and was assigned to care for R1. V10 states she was at the second-floor nurses' station when a CNA staff member informed her that R1 and R2 were fighting in the dining room. V10 states she immediately went to the dining room. V10 states when she arrived to the dining room, she saw that staff was trying to redirect R2 and R2 was very aggressive. V10 states she then took R1 to his room and assessed R1. V10 states she observed a laceration next to R1s' right eyebrow. V10 states there was a small scant of blood and the area was open. V10 states she cleaned R1s' wound and applied some steri strips. V10 states she also performed passive range of motion with R1 and assessed R1s' vital signs. V10 states R1 did not verbalize being in pain. V10 states she then called the doctor, and the doctor gave orders to send R1 out to the hospital for medical evaluation. V10 states she asked R1 what happened and R1 told V10 that he did not want to talk about it. V10 states she was informed by V13 (CNA) that R2 hit R1 so hard that V13 was surprised that R1 did not get knocked out. On 01/25/2025, at 3:10 PM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) states she worked on 01/05/25 and was located in the dining room on the second floor. V13 states the staff was passing meal trays for residents to eat their meal. V13 states she observed R1 and R2 passing words to each other in Spanish and staff was trying to redirect them. V13 states that's when R2 punched R1 on the side of his face. V13 states it was a pretty hard punch that R2 gave R1. On 01/25/2025, at 3:41 PM, V1 (Administrator) states she received a phone call informing her that there was an altercation between R1 and R2. V1 states she was informed that R1 and R2 were speaking Spanish and R2 hit R1, and R1 sustained a laceration to the head. V1 states R1 and R2 were both sent out to the hospital. V1 states V4 (RN) informed her that R2 was not redirectable. V1 states she started an initial report and sent it to the state agency the same day on 01/05/25. V1 states she also informed V4 to gather staff statements of what occurred between R1 and R2. V1 states R2s' room was moved to another floor of the facility upon returning from the hospital. R1s' nursing progress note written by V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) documents Staff informed nurse that R1 received physical aggression from peer. Upon entering dayroom writer noted skin tear to R1 eyebrow area. No change in consciousness, speech and vision remained at baseline. Area cleansed with normal saline 2 steri strips applied and well tolerated by R2. When asked what happened R1 stated he was fine & did not want to discuss it. R1 remained ambulatory with assistive device. Speech and vision remained within normal limits. R1s' nursing progress note dated 01/05/25 at 3:55 PM documents Nurse called from the emergency department at hospital to inform that R1 showed signs of multiple infarctions and possible stroke. Nurse also stated that R1 had staggered speech and had impaired mobility. R1s' nursing progress note dated 01/05/25 at 9:26 PM documents R1 admitted to hospital with diagnoses as follows, conjunctivitis right eye, laceration right eyebrow, abnormal brain scan, and head trauma. Bed on 10-day hold and belongings secured within facility. awaiting discharge and return to facility. R2s' Nursing progress note written by V4 (Registered Nurse/RN) on 01/05/2025 at 12:40 PM documents Was told by staff that R2 was physical aggressive with his peer and verbally aggressive with staff. R2 would not answer told nurse to get the f*** out his face. Nurse separated residents from each other. Hard to redirect and ignoring staff members. R2 also speak mostly Spanish when staff asked questions. Nurse called nurse practitioner with incident report given with orders to send R2 to hospital to be evaluated and treated. Order noted and carried. R2s' Nursing progress note dated 01/05/25, at 11:17 PM documents Call placed to hospital emergency department to inquire about R2s' status and was told by the nurse. R2 was admitted with diagnosis Aggression / unsocialized behavior. All R2s' belongings are packed and secured in storage. All departments notified of Rs' transfer. Facility Reported Incident dated 01/05/2025, documents that R1 and R2 were involved in a physical altercation and R2 made physical contact with R2s' temple. R1's hospital records dated 01/06/2025, were reviewed and documents that R1 was examined at the hospital with diagnoses of history of stroke and laceration to right eyebrow with bleeding and swelling. R1s' care plan dated 01/05/2025 documents that R1 was the recipient of physical abuse from a peer. R2s' care plan dated 01/05/2025 documents that R2 is care planned for a history of aggressive behavior. R2's hospital records dated 01/05/2025 were reviewed and documents that R2 was examined at the hospital and presented with violence and bizarre behavior. Ombudsman Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities dated 11/2018 documents in part, You must not be abused, neglected, or exploited by anyone - financially, physically, verbally, mentally, or sexually. Facility policy dated 01/24 titled Abuse Prevention Program documents in part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property or mistreatment.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was functional and failed...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was functional and failed to monitor its call light system. These failures have the potential to affect 121 residents residing on the third and fourth floors of the the facility. Findings include: On 01/25/2025, at 11:01 AM, R8's call light is observed illuminated above his room door, no audible sound is heard. On 01/25/2025, at 11:02 AM, V8 (RN) and V9 (LPN) observed sitting at the third-floor nurse's station. On 01/25/2025, at 11:03 AM, surveyor located at the third-floor nurses' station and observes that R8's call light is not visible from the nurse's station. On 01/25/2025, at 11:05 AM, surveyor asks V8 (Registered Nurse/RN) how does staff know when a resident has activated their call light and need their call light answered. V8 states there is a phone at the nurse's station and when the resident pushes their call light button, the phone displays the resident's room number and makes an audible alert sound. V8 walks over to the call light system phone to demonstrate how the system works and surveyor observes that the call light phone was not plugged in. V8 states it's unplugged then grabs the phone cord and plugs the cord into the call light phone. Surveyor then observes the phone turn on and is now displaying another resident's room number on the screen with no audible sound heard. V8 states the call light phone should not be unplugged. V8 states the call light phone alert sound should be louder and will now call maintenance to report it. On 01/25/2025, at 11:12 AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) states if the facility call light system is not functioning properly, then a resident can experience an emergency, press their call light, and staff would not be able to respond in a timely manner. On 01/25/2025, at 11:15 AM, surveyor located at the fourth-floor nurse's station. Surveyor asks V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) how does staff know when a resident has activated their call light and need their call light answered. V10 states there is a phone at the nurse's station and when the resident pushes their call light button, the phone displays the resident's room number and makes an audible alert sound. Surveyor walks over to the call light system phone and observes that the phone has a black screen and is unplugged. V10 is also made aware that the call light phone is unplugged. V10 grabs the phone cord and plugs the cord into the call light phone. V10 states it's not supposed to be unplugged. Surveyor then observes the phone turn on and displays a residents' room number on the screen with an audible sound heard. On 01/25/2025, at 11:21 AM, V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) states if the facility call light system is not functioning properly, then a resident can experience an emergency or physical altercation, press their call light, and the resident's needs would not be met in time. V12 states she was not aware that the call light phone was not plugged in. V12 states the cord is broken and often comes out of the phone on its own. V12 states she reported this to maintenance. On 01/26/2025, at 9:33 AM, surveyor observes a resident's room number displayed on the call light phone at the first-floor nurse's station. V16 (LPN) states this resident's call light system is broken and continuously illuminates even if the resident does not press the call light. V16 states she just checked on the resident and the resident is okay. V16 states this broken call light has been an ongoing issue and has been reported to maintenance for repair. On 01/26/2025, at 9:41 AM, R7 states the call light response time is full of s*** R7 states a few weeks ago, he was sick and coughing and pressed his call light for assistance from staff. R7 states he waited 45 minutes for staff to answer his call light. R7 states after staff responded to his call light, he had to be sent out to the hospital and was admitted for 3 days. On 01/26/2025, at 9:48 AM, R8 states he often has to wait for long periods of time to have his call light answered. R8 states he often wait two hours before staff responded to his call light. R7s' MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R7 has a BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status of 15/15, indicating that R7 is cognitively intact. R8s' MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R8 has a BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status of 12/15, indicating that R8 is moderately cognitively impaired. On 01/25/2025, at 3:24 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) states when residents press their call light, it alarms and alerts the staff at the nurse's station. V2 states he light above the resident's room also illuminates and stays on until the call light is addressed. V2 states there is a phone at the nurse's station that rings and allows the nurses to communicate with the residents when a call light is activated. V2 states the resident's room number will also display to let staff know which room number is calling. V2 states if the facility call light system is not functioning properly, then staff may not be able to meet the needs of the resident. V2 states this could potentially affect a residents' health and well-being if the resident is experiencing an emergency. V2 states in the past, the facility had issues with the call lights, but she is not aware of any issues related to the call light system. Resident council meeting minutes dated 10/29/24 to 12/31/24 were reviewed and documents that on 12/31/2024, R7 reports that he was choking for 15 minutes, and no one came to check on his call light. Facility census report dated 01/25/25 documents that 60 residents reside on the third floor of the facility and 60 residents reside on the fourth floor of the facility. Facility policy dated 09/19 titled Call Light documents in part, Purpose: To respond to residents' requests and needs in a timely and courteous manner. Equipment: Functioning Nurse Call System. Procedure: 1. Answer light (signal) promptly.
Jan 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the third and fourth floor shower rooms were clean and sanitary. This has the potential to affect all 33 residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the third and fourth floor shower rooms were clean and sanitary. This has the potential to affect all 33 residents residing on the third floor and all 60 residents residing on the fourth floor. Findings include: On 1/06/2025 at 11:53am, during a tour of the fourth floor, surveyor requested the fourth floor housekeeper to unlock the door to the fourth-floor east side shower room. Upon entering the fourth-floor east side shower room, surveyor observed a small circle of a brown colored substance on the floor in front of the shower stall. On 1/06/2025 at 12:15pm, during a tour of the third floor, surveyor requested the third floor staff person to unlock the door to the third-floor east side shower room. Surveyor observed a blue soiled diaper on the floor in the third-floor east side shower room. On 1/08/2025 at 11:55am, R9 stated, I have observed feces on the shower room floor every now and then. On 1/08/2025 at 12:00pm, R2 stated, one day I went into the shower room and there was poop all over the floor and I stopped taking showers. On 1/6/2025 at 11:57am, V8 (Housekeeper) working on the fourth floor was asked, What is this on the shower room floor? V8 stated it looks like feces. V8 stated the floor tech is to clean the centers of the floors, things like the showers and pantry. V8 stated the housekeeper cleans the outsides, the resident's rooms. V8 stated really either one of us can clean anything on the entire floor. V8 stated the nurse or certified nursing assistant would notify me if feces were on the floor and I would come to clean it up. V8 stated the shower rooms are usually cleaned once or twice a day or as needed. On 1/6/2025 at 12:15pm, V11 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated everyone working on this floor (third floor) is responsible for cleaning the shower rooms. V11 stated the housekeeping staff is mainly responsible. V11 stated the soiled diaper should not be sitting on the floor in the shower room. On 1/8/2025 at 1:10pm, V28 (Housekeeping Director/Laundry Supervisor) stated the shower rooms are cleaned two to three times a day and as needed. V28 stated the certified nursing assistants clean the shower rooms some; but the housekeeping staff comes into the shower rooms to disinfect. V28 stated the employee responsible for the cleaning of the showers is called the floor tech; but it falls under the housekeeping job description. V28 stated it is not acceptable for feces and soiled diapers to be on the floors in the resident's shower rooms. V28 stated it is my expectation that the shower rooms and the floors in the shower room are clean for the resident's use. The undated Housekeeper job description documents, in part, the primary purpose of the position is to perform the day-to-day activities of the Housekeeping Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations governing our facility, and as may be directed by the Administrator. Ensure that assigned work areas are maintained in a clean safe, comfortable, and attractive manner. The undated Housekeeping Supervisor job description documents, in part, ensure that assigned work areas are maintained in a clean safe, comfortable, and attractive manner. The Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities policy provided by the facility, documents in part, your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike.
MINOR (C) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the daily nursing staffing and failed to ensure the daily nursing staffing information was complete and accurate. These f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the daily nursing staffing and failed to ensure the daily nursing staffing information was complete and accurate. These failures affected all 230 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Facility census, dated 1/06/25, documents, in part, 230 active residents. On 1/06/25 at 9:30am, upon entrance to the facility, surveyor observed that there was no daily nursing staffing posted. On 1/06/25 at 12:50pm, surveyor observed the daily staffing posted, dated 1/06/25, near the receptionist area. On 1/07/25 at 9:35am, surveyor observed the daily staffing posted, dated 1/07/24 (wrong year), with no census documented. On 1/07/25 at 10:09am, V14 (Staffing Coordinator) said, Yes, I'm (V14) responsible for posting the daily staffing. I (V14) post it in the morning, sometimes the day before if I'm (V14) working that night before I (V14) leave. The information for the daily staffing sheet is obtained from my staffing sheets. When asked why the daily staffing sheet wasn't posted at 9:30am on 1/06/25, V14 replied, I (V14) was coming right behind y'all yesterday to post it. When asked why there is no daily census on the daily staffing posting for 1/07/25, V14 replied, I (V14) missed that, the resident census, sorry. It's 230 or 231. On 1/07/25 at 10:41am, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said, The daily staffing should be posted daily at the beginning of the shift, around sevenish. Should be filled out completely. On 1/08/25 at 11:17am, V1 (Administrator) said, . I (V1) check the daily staffing each day. The overnight shift, the day of, and second shift before I (V1) leave. Expectations for the daily staffing is to be posted at beginning of shift which is 7am . and accurate. Facility document title, (Facility) Daily Nurse Staffing Form, documents, in part, Today's Date 1/7/2024; Today's Resident Census: The year on the daily staffing posting is wrong and there was no census documented. Facility job description titled, Staffing Coordinator, dated 2003, documents, in part, . The primary purpose of your job position is to ensure adequate and appropriate staffing of the facility nursing department to meet the needs of the residents . As Staffing Coordinator, you are delegated the administrative authority, responsibility, and accountability necessary for carrying out your assigned duties . Assist in completion and filing of designated reports in accordance with established procedures . Assist in obtaining nursing care staff information needed for daily posting requirements . Facility job description titled, Director of Nursing, dated 2003, documents, in part, .The primary purpose of your job position is to plan, organize, develop and direct the overall operation of our Nursing Service Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern our facility . to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times . Facility job description titled, Administrator, dated 2003, documents, in part, . The primary purpose of your job position is to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern nursing facilities to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to our residents at all times . Make routine inspections of the facility to assure that established policies and procedures are being implemented and followed . Ensure that appropriate staffing level information is posted on a daily basis .
Nov 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident with documented skin issues (R2) did not ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident with documented skin issues (R2) did not develop maggots in his foot wound. This failure has affected one of three residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: R2 is [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Cellulitis, spinal stenosis, acquired absence of left leg above the knee, weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy. R2's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score is 13, which indicates cognitively intact. On 11/25/2024 at 12:18 PM, R2 was observed lying in bed in his room. R2 said that he informed V5 (Nurse Supervisor) of his painful ingrown toe nail that he had months ago and was told that he (R2) would be assessed by the podiatrist. R2 said that V5 never took off his footie to assess his foot and that when he asked for his soiled wound bandage to be changed, V17 (Wound care nurse/LPN) refused to change his bandage. R2 began to become tearful during interview and said that he was hurt and pissed off that there were maggots coming out of his toe wound prior to having his left leg amputated. On 11/26/2024 at 1:15 PM, V17 said that she was not aware of R2's infected foot and that she was made aware of R2's toe in August when R2's toe was already necrotic. Surveyor inquired about R2's wound care orders. V17 said that the purpose of the betadine is to keep the wound from draining and to aid in wound healing. Surveyor inquired about R2's Hospital wound care recommendations. V17 said, If there are hospital recommendations, there should be notations that he facility Doctor was made aware of the recommendations.Surveyor inquired about R2's PRN (as needed) wound care. V17 said that PRN wound changes were only for when a wound dressing comes off and not for soiled dressing. On 11/26/2024 at 1:55 PM, Surveyor inquired about alleged maggots in R2's wound. V14 (Nurse Practitioner) said, I saw the maggots in his (R2's) wound. If the wound is draining or has too much moisture it could attract flies, which then may drop an egg that cannot be seen by the naked eye. Surveyor inquired about R2's Hospital wound care recommendations of daily betadine. V14 (Nurse Practitioner) said, The recommendations for the daily betadine would be to keep the wound dry and to keep the wound sterile. Moisture will bring in maggots. If it stays wet, it will attract maggots. R2's amputation would have happened sooner or later. R2's progress note dated 08/08/2024 documents, X-ray of the left great toe related to osteomyelitis/ swollen left great toe. R2's Nurse Practitioner note dated 08/13/2024 documents, Cellulitis to the left amputated toe. R2's Nurse Practitioner noted dated 08/28/2024 documents, wound care to follow left great toe wound. R2's Hospital record dated 09/23/2024 documents, R2 presented to the hospital for left necrotic toe; X-ray of foot showing large ulceration and possible osteomyelitis; daily betadine and gauze dressing. R2's Hospital record dated 09/26/2024 documents, daily betadine and gauze dressing; wound care recommendations- cleanse left heel ulcer and apply betadine daily and prn (as needed). R2's Order Recap Report documents the following order for the period of 08/08/2024- 08/23/2024: Left Foot Great Toe- Cleanse with normal saline, apply collagenase ointment and hydrocolloid, and cover with dry dressing once a day and as needed. R2's Order Recap Report documents the following order for the period of 08/23/2024- 09/23/2024: Left Foot Great Toe- Cleanse with Normal saline, apply betadine soaked gauze and cover with dry dressing as needed and on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. R2's Medication Administration Record for the period of 08/01/2024- 08/31/2024 documents, no PRN (as needed) betadine wound care treatments in the month of August. R2's Medication Administration Record for the period of 08/01/2024- 08/30/2024 documents only two betadine wound care treatments administered. R2's Medication Administration Record for the period of 09/01/2024- 09/30/2024 documents, no PRN (as needed) betadine wound care treatments in the month of September. R2's Medication Administration Record for the period of 09/01/2024- 09/30/2024 documents, nine betadine wound care treatments administered. R2's Progress Note authored by V14 (Nurse Practitioner) dated 09/28/2024 documents, R2 was seen on 08/08/2024 because of reported left great toe infection; noted swelling, pain and erythema of the foot; purulent drainage from the toe bed and some bleeding and maggots on the toe. R2's Progress Note authored by V17 (Wound Care Nurse) on 09/30/2024 documents, writer informed residents mother that dressing change is once a week per Doctor; writer educated resident (R2) that his dressing changes being increased will have no effect on his complaints of pain. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) - Skin Conditions section dated June 20, 2024 documents no skin conditions. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) - Skin Conditions section dated August 21, 2024 documents an open lesion on R2's foot. Facility Wound Policy documents, purpose is to promote healing of existing pressure and non-pressure ulcers.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents'common shower room was without debris and dirt on the floor. This failure has the potential to affe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents'common shower room was without debris and dirt on the floor. This failure has the potential to affect all 66 residents that reside on the second floor. Findings include: During investigation on 11/25/2024 at 12:45 PM, Surveyor walked into 2nd floor shower room with V20 (CNA/ Certified Nurse Assistant) to observe the resident shower room. At that time, the resident's shower room was observed with debris and dirt on the floor. Surveyor observed plastic bottles, gloves, paper, plastic bags, clothes and towels on the floor. On 11/25/2024 at 12:50 PM, V5 (Nurse Manager) went with surveyor to observe the condition of the resident's shower room. At that time, V5 said that the shower room was unkempt and that it poses and infection control concern for the residents. On 11/25/2024 at 1:10 PM, V21 (Housekeeping) was observed on the 2nd floor near social service office. Surveyor inquired about the expectations regarding residents' shower rooms. At that time, V21 said, that the shower room should be disinfected after each use for sanitary purposes. On 11/27/2024 at 2:20 PM, V2 (DON/ Director of Nursing) said that the expectations is that the residents' shower room should be cleaned in between use to decrease the spread of infection. Facility census report dated 11/25/24 documents 66 residents residing on the 2nd floor. Facility policy titled Housekeeping Guidelines documents, to provide guidelines to maintain a safe and sanitary environment for residents, facility staff and visitors.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents' rooms were free of cockroaches...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents' rooms were free of cockroaches. This failure has the potential to affect all 66 residents that reside on the 2nd floor. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Cellulitis, spinal stenosis, acquired absence of left leg above the knee, weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy. R2's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score is 13, which indicates cognitively intact. R5 is a [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Gastric ulcer, acute pancreatitis without necrosis or infection, anemia, hypomagnesemia, and periorbital cellulitis. R5's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score is 13, which indicates cognitively intact. R6 is a [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Obstructive sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, essential hypertension, obesity and hyperlipidemia. R6's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score is 12, which indicates moderate cognitive impairment. During investigation on 11/25/2024 at 12:18 R2 was observed lying in bed in his room. R2 complained about having roaches in his room. On 11/25/2024 at 12:40 PM, Surveyor observed a cockroach crawling up the wall near R5's (R2's roommate) bed. R5 said that he sees roaches all of the time in his room and is uncomfortable with the roaches. R6 was sitting on his bed and said that he also sees roaches all of the time in their room. On 11/25/2024 at 12:50 PM, V5 (Nurse Manager) stated that the facility had a roach problem. On 11/27/2024 at 2:20 PM, Surveyor inquired about the expectations regarding pest control. V1 (Administrator) said that she had no comment regarding the facility's pest control. Facility Service Inspection Report dated 10/01/2024 documents that most rooms had problems with cleanliness as well as food being left around that is definitely attracting the pest. Facility Service Inspection Report dated 10/22/2024 documents, V1 (Administrator) reports roaches in resident's rooms, 2nd floor nurses station and the front lobby. Facility Service Inspection Report dated 10/31/2024 documents, V1 reports roaches in residents' rooms and the 2nd floor nurses' station; cleanliness needs to be practices throughout the facility. Facility census report dated 11/25/24 documents 66 residents residing on the 2nd floor. Facility policy titled pest control documents, to prevent or control insects and rodents from spreading disease
Nov 2024 3 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their care plan policy to develop, implement, a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their care plan policy to develop, implement, and supervise a newly admitted resident with self- injurious and suicidal behavioral concerns. These failures resulted in a resident (R3) gaining access to a shaving blade/razor and cutting his right arm; in a separate incident R3 found a spoon in which R3 was able to break in 2 places and use the pieces to cut his arm; and another incident in which R3 punched a picture with a glass frame which resulted in R3 sustaining an injury that required R3 to be sent to the ER (Emergency Room) and receiving 7 sutures to the left hand. The facility's immediate jeopardy began on 05/31/24. On 11/12/24 at 10:17 AM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of the immediate jeopardy. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 11/13/24 at 01:19 PM. However, the deficiency remains at the second level of harm until the facility determine the effectiveness of the implementation of the removal plan. Findings Include: R3 has diagnosis not limited to Schizophrenia, Borderline Personality Disorder, Intellectual Disabilities, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, Major Depressive Disorder, Suicidal Ideations, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Epilepsy, Anemia, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase, Unsteadiness on Feet, Personal History of Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Morbid (Severe) Obesity due to Excess Calories, Constipation, Shortness of Breath, Disorder of Urea Cycle Metabolism, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease with Esophagitis, Hyperlipidemia, Insomnia and Calculus of Kidney. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R3's hospital records provided by the facility dated 03/06/24 document in part: patient admitted for psych. R3 reports plan to cut his wrists and states he had attempted to cut his wrists as a suicide attempt. admitted to hospital for hearing voices, suicidal gestures, and self-inflicted laceration to right arm. (R3 had self-harming history prior to facility admission) R3's Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) provided by the facility dated 03/14/24 document in part: On 02/24 for having thoughts of harming yourself, and verbal and physical anger towards staff and peers at the nursing facility you (R3) were in along with destroying property, during this hospitalization, you (R3) needed regular monitoring and redirection due to self-harming behaviors of punching walls and scratching your arms with forks and spoons.(R3 had self-harming history prior to facility admission) Hospital Record dated 05/31/24 document in part: Reason for admission: Danger to self. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of self-harm from cutting himself. On 06/01/24 the facility failed to prevent R3 from gaining access to a shaving blade/razor. This failure resulted in R3 cutting his right arm with the shaving blade/razor. This incident was not care planned and no interventions in place. On 07/03/24, R3 found a spoon, breaking it in-two and started cutting himself across the arm. This incident was not care planned and no interventions in place. On 09/15/24 R3 sustained an injury to R3's left hand requiring 7 sutures after punching a picture with a glass frame on the facilities wall. This incident was not care planned an no interventions in place. R3 was hospitalized on [DATE], 07/03/24, 07/23/24, 09/15/24, 10/01/24 and 10/15/24 for self-harm/suicidal behaviors that was not care planned and no interventions in place. On 06/01/24 documentation indicates R3 said that he is hearing voices telling him to cut and kill himself. R3 used a shaving stick blade/razor and cut his right arm multiple times. R3 was hospitalized from [DATE] - 06/06/24 with an admitting diagnosis of Schizophrenia. Petition for Involuntary/Judicial admission dated 06/01/24 document in part: R3 cut his arm and states that he is hearing voices to cut himself and killing himself. Cut right forearm with shaving blade. Screening Assessment for Evaluation Self Harm/Suicide Risk dated 06/12/24 document in part: 2. Past History of suicidal ideations. 3. History of psychiatric/mental health problems, major depression and/or personality disorder diagnosis, significant/severe problems. 7. Chronic behavioral symptoms, control problems, behavior management issues, moderate problem. 11. Category score 6. 6-15 = moderate risk. Resident has history of self-harm. R3's progress notes dated 07/03/24, indicates writer made aware by floor staff that R3 is in parlor using spoon R3 had broken to cut his arm. R3 noted with several superficial cuts to right arm. R3 was hospitalized from [DATE] - 07/22/24. Petition for Involuntary/Judicial admission dated 07/03/24 document in part: R3 broke a metal spoon in half and took the broken handle and attempted to cut his throat with it. R3 is continuing to verbalize that he would like to cut my throat. R3 cannot be redirected and is a grave danger to himself. R3's progress notes dated, 07/23/24, indicates R3 became agitated with staff members due to running out of cigarettes, which led to an incident where R3 smashed a glass picture in the hallway near the nursing station. R3 was hospitalized from [DATE] - 08/02/24. Petition for Involuntary/Judicial admission dated 07/23/24 document in part: (R3) intentionally punched the glass mirror in an attempt to get glass to cut himself. (R3) cannot be redirected and has become increasingly aggressive towards staff. R3's progress notes dated 09/15/24 indicates R3 was redirected to leave nurses station and eat lunch. R3 became agitated proceeded to parlor and punched glass picture on wall resulted in open area to left hand. Hand Clean with normal saline, pressure applied, hand wrap tight to decrease bleeding. R3 was sent to the hospital and returned to the facility with 7 sutures to the left hand. State Report incident date 09/15/24 incident time: 1320 (1:20 PM) documented part: brief description of incident: On 09/15/24 assigned nurse observed (R3) punching picture glass on the wall in the parlor that resulted with an open area to left hand. Resident was redirected and the site was cleaned with normal saline, and bleeding controlled at this time. When asked why the behavior, resident stated I'm upset. On call NP (Nurse Practitioner) called, an order given for transfer to hospital emergency room for evaluation and treatment. Resident from hospital with 7 sutures. State Report document in part: Initial date 09/16/24, Final date 09/23/24. (R3) has a BIM's 12 (moderate cognitive impairment). (R3) is A/O (alert and oriented) x2-3 and can verbalize needs. On 9/15/24, (R3) was displaying poor impulse control with suicidal ideation (SI) with a plan to harm self by punching at a painting when redirected during dinner time. (R3) remains hospitalized for SI with a plan and schizoaffective disorder. Resident was treated for injury to left hand and observe with 7 sutures. Upon (R3)'s return from hospital (R3) was still noted with active SI with a plan, unpredictable behavior, aggressiveness, and poor impulse control. On call MD (medical doctor) was called and made aware, an order was given to be sent out for psych evaluation. V4 (1st Floor Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse) Statement Dated 09/15/24 document in part: I nurse (V4) did not witness (R3) punch the wall. I heard a noise. I and my supervisor provided care after incident. Patient hospitalized . V5 (Certified Nurse Assistant) Statement dated 09/15/24 document in part: I did not witness (R3) punch into the wall, but I came present when (R3) was getting attention from the nurse. V6 (Certified Nurse Assistant) Statement dated 09/15/24 document in part: V6 wrote (R3) was pacing back and forth through the hallway stating that if he does not smoke, he is going to walk out or go crazy on his way towards double doors (R3) then punched glass picture. On 09/15/24 2155 resident was sent out for SI with plan-smashing his hand on glass picture again and strangulate himself. Resident was admitted to hospital for schizophrenia. On 09/15/24 documentation indicates R3 demanding to smoke, when R3 was told he couldn't smoke R3 began to punch window, and when he was redirected, he began to run out the front door, resident continued to punch wall and place sheet around his neck. Writer was called to floor for a resident that was hard to redirect smashing his (R3) hand into the wall that he had previously went to hospital for causing it to bleed, then talking about SI (Suicidal Ideations) if he could not smoke. Attempted to place a sheet around his neck. R3 was hospitalized from [DATE] - 09/23/24 with a diagnosis of Schizophrenia. Petition for Involuntary/Judicial admission dated 09/15/24 document in part: smashing wall with fist. attempted to place sheet around his neck. Hard to redirect. Talking about SI (suicidal ideations), noncompliant. On 10/01/24 documentation indicates R3 noted with aggressive behavior, punching walls with his fists, punching pictures on the wall breaking glass frames and threatening staff with physical violence. Being a danger to himself and others. Disruptive behavior threat to self and others slamming throwing hitting caregivers and staff. R3 was hospitalized from [DATE] - 10/07/24 with a diagnosis of Suicidal Ideations. Petition for Involuntary/Judicial admission dated 10/01/24 document in part: (R3) is noncompliant, unable to be redirected. Punching wall, attempting to ram his head into wall. Swinging objects at caregivers and other residents. On 10/14/24 documentation indicates R3 approached nursing station asking for cigarettes. R3 then proceeded to start displaying aggressive behavior, punching walls repeatedly, in the hallway disturbing peers, yelling, screaming, and threatening staff. Resident started walking behind staff member and stated, I will kill that b****. Resident is noncompliant and unable to be redirected at this time. (R3) is attempting to exit the facility, punching walls, and displaying homicidal ideations towards nursing staff threatening to kill us. (R3) attempted to have a physical altercation with nurse, lunging at her clenching his fist. (R3) is disrupting the milieu and unable to be redirected. (R3) is in need of immediate hospitalization as (R3) presents as a threat of harm to himself and others. R3 was hospitalized from [DATE] - 10/21/24 with a diagnosis of Aggressive Behavior. Petition for Involuntary/Judicial admission dated 10/14/24 document in part: (R3) is attempting to exit the facility, punching walls, and displaying homicidal ideations towards nursing staff threatening to kill us. (R3) attempted to have a physical altercation with nurse, lunging at her clinching his fist. (R3) is disrupting the milieu and unable to be redirected. (R3) is in need of immediate hospitalization as he presents as a threat of harm to himself and others. During the facility tour on 10/23/24 twenty-four pictures with glass coverings were observed hanging on the walls throughout the first-floor nursing unit. R3's Care Plan document in part: Focus: (R3) has a history of self-harmful ideation (thoughts) and/or behavior. Date initiated 05/31/24. Interventions: Conduct the appropriate interdisciplinary assessments upon admission. Review transfer records, including screening material to determine any history of self-harm. Date Initiated: 05/31/24. Conduct an initial psychiatric evaluation. Review the person's risk for harm. Date Initiated: 05/31/24. If there is a history of self-harmful behavior assess: what occurred, where it occurred, circumstances surrounding the event(s), precipitants, and any current plan to harm. Establish a safety contract (verbal and/or written) with the resident. Date Initiated: 05/31/24. R3's Care Plan Focus: Safety General. Interventions: Perform safety risk evaluation(s) on admission, as needed and upon changes in condition. Date initiated 07/24/24. R3's Care Plan Focus: The resident demonstrates cognitive impairment related to: Diagnosis of mental illness., Symptoms are manifested by: Poor impulse control., Symptoms are manifested by: Poor ability to control anger and frustration. Date Initiated: 07/24/24. Interventions: If the resident is agitated or becomes agitated during care, back off and try to calm the resident with soothing words. If the resident remains agitated tell him or her that you'll come back when he/she is feeling better. If the resident has a psychiatric disorder verbalize that you will help him/her stay in control. Assure the resident that he/she is safe and protected. Date Initiated: 07/24/24. Focus: (R3) demonstrates behavioral distress related to: Being challenged by mental illness., Problems are manifested by: Verbally abusive behavior when agitated., Problems are manifested by: Physically abusive behavior when agitated. Date Initiated: 07/24/24. Intervention: Ask (R3) to calmly explain what is causing this upsetting behavior. Date Initiated: 07/24/24. R3's Care Plan Focus: The resident expresses maladaptive behavioral symptoms related to: A diagnosis of chronic mental illness. Date Initiated: 07/24/24. Interventions: Review rules/behavior expectations to help the resident improve judgment & self-control. Date Initiated: 07/24/24. Use behavior management techniques to promote & shape the desired behavior such as: Look pro-actively at the behavior. Identify causal factors & work to reduce, minimize and/or treat the causal factors. This stresses prevention. Date Initiated: 07/24/24. Use behavior management techniques to promote & shape the desired behavior such as: Controlling the environment to the degree possible to moderate stress. Date Initiated: 07/24/24. R3's Care Plan Focus: (R3) has a history of self-harmful ideation (thoughts) and/or behavior. This appears related to: Evidence of severe mental illness (i.e., active psychosis, major depression, lack of sound judgment, poor contact w/ reality)., Additional risk factors include Previous self-harmful behavior. Date Initiated: 07/24/24. Interventions: Conduct an initial psychiatric evaluation. Review the person's risk for harm. Date Initiated: 07/24/24 Revision on: 10/22/24. As warranted conduct/carry out: Daily monitoring & supervision of the resident. Date Initiated: 10/22/2024. As warranted conduct a room check/search & remove: Any other objects that (in the opinion of the health care professionals) may pose a threat to safety. Date Initiated: 10/22/24. R3's Care Plan Focus: The resident displays manipulative behavior which is disruptive, insensitive and/or disrespectful to staff and peers. This behavior is related to: Feelings of powerlessness, helplessness, inadequacy, and loss of control., Strengths and Abilities: Date Initiated: 08/06/24. Interventions: Educate the staff on manipulative behavior (what it looks like, why it occurs, what needs the person is communicating), especially as it manifests with this particular individual. Date Initiated: 10/22/24. Focus: Resident has a surgical wound to the left hand. Left 5th Finger Date Initiated: 09/24/24. On 11/12/24 at 08:52 AM Surveyor asked R3 where he got the razor from and if it was given to him at this facility. R3 responded, I asked for the razor to shave myself. A certified nurse assistant gave the razor to me, but I don't remember her name. I gave the razor to the nurse. When asked was the razor given to the nurse after he had cut his arm R3 responded, yes. On 10/22/24 at 02:07 PM V17 (Wound Care Nurse) stated (R3) had some sutures to the left hand from an incident that (R3) punched a picture. Based on (R3) behavior's, I don't think that this is an appropriate setting for him. I think sometimes if (R3) gets upset about certain things and start to raise his voice it is startling to other residents. On 10/22/24 at 02:45 PM R3 stated I got mad at the nurse station and got sent out. I had sutures in the left hand. Two scabbed areas were observed to R3's left hand knuckles. I feel like I am angry. I cut my right arm because I couldn't smoke. I didn't want to wait till the smoke break. On 10/22/24 at 02:53 PM V5 (Certified Nurse Assistant) stated I was here when (R3) punched the picture, but I did not witness it. (R3) has a behavior if he does not get his way, he throws tantrums. (R3) is known for harming himself when he is angry. It is just when (R3) acts out its a danger to himself because (R3) starts to hit the pictures on the wall, when he is mad. On 10/22/24 at 03:01 PM V6 (Certified Nurse Assistant) stated If (R3) wants to smoke after smoke break time, (R3) gets agitated. (R3) is self-harming and (R3) just get to punching stuff trying to hurt himself. Maybe (R3) need to be somewhere where he can smoke all day. On 09/15/24 (R3) wanted to smoke a cigarette and he started punching the walls. (R3) said if I don't get a cigarette now, I am going to get upset. (R3) was pacing back and forth. (R3) was in the parlor and that is when (R3) punched the glass picture on the east wall of the parlor and broke the glass. The glass shattered, (R3) sat in the chair and the nurse attended to (R3)'s hand. (R3) punches walls but that was the first time (R3) punched a picture. On 10/22/24 03:19 PM V4 (1st Floor Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated when (R3) first got here (R3) made scratches to his right arm. It was not bleeding, (R3)'s arm was cleaned, I notified psych and (R3) was put on 1:1 supervision until transport came. On 09/15/24 (R3) was redirected to leave the nurse station. (R3) proceeded to the parlor and punched the glass picture. (R3) gets upset at times when he gets redirected. I did not see (R3) pacing. We wrapped (R3)'s hand because it was bleeding. On 09/15/24 (R3) was able to be redirected but on the 11-7 shift on 09/15/24 (R3) was not able to be redirected. The incident with the sheet around (R3)'s neck happened on the 11-7 shift. I feel that (R3)'s behaviors are escalating. On 10/22/24 at 03:58 PM V23 (Supervisor/Registered Nurse) stated (R3) scratch, pinch self and hit the wall. (R3) hit the glass picture on the north wall in the parlor. There is a risk if (R3) punches those pictures, (R3) will hurt himself. (R3) punches the walls and is attention seeking. Behavior wise, I don't feel (R3) is appropriate for this facility. (R3) hurt himself. (R3) used a broken spoon to cut himself. (R3) will pinch himself then come and show the nurse if we ask (R3) to move from the nurse station. On 10/22/24 at 04:19 PM V18 (Registered Nurse) stated on 09/15/24 they called me, so I ran down to see (R3). I saw (R3) with the sheet around his neck and (R3) said that he was going to kill himself. (R3) was smashing in things, and (R3) had just popped a loose the sutures because he had just gotten back from the hospital. (R3) started running toward the door, banging on the glass in the parlor, the pictures on the wall it was like (R3) was incoherent and could not be redirected. On 10/22/24 at 04:47 PM V15 (Registered Nurse) stated (R3) has behaviors and does this so often because (R3) always want to smoke. (R3) started punching on the window in the parlor. (R3) hit walls, pictures and want to go out the front door. I do not feel this facility is appropriate for (R3). (R3) need more supervision and almost need 1:1 when (R3) gets into that behavior. (R3) strikes out at the walls and windows. On 10/22/24 at 05:00 PM V19 (Registered Nurse) stated at first, (R3) was okay then I noticed (R3) would hit walls, doors a door frames. (R3) already had sutures in his hand, and nothing could stop him. I think that we probably should come up with a better solution because injury on top of injury, it may become harmful and (R3) may hit his hand and not be able to use it. The hitting has not deterred (R3) from hitting the wall. (R3) hit the picture by the elevator, and it tore up. On 10/23/24 at 09:57 AM V20 (Wound Care Nurse) stated (R3) had 4 sutures in his left hand. (R3) is alert and walks around. (R3) came in on readmission and I tried to take the 4 sutures out of his hand. (R3) allowed me to take 2 of the sutures out because (R3) said it was sore. When I did (R3)'s initial admission, I saw old scares on (R3)'s forearm. (R3) was implying that he did it and it was old scaring on (R3)'s arm. On 10/23/24 at 10:07 AM V6 (Certified Nurse Assistant) stated (R3) was asking for a cigarette, I did not see the sheet that was around (R3)'s neck. (R3) did punch the wall. We let the nurse know about (R3)'s behaviors. (R3) is self-harming if punching the walls is considered self-harming, yes, it is. Honestly when (R3) start up with his behaviors, I just report it to the nurse and that's it. On 10/23/24 10:34 AM Per telephone interview V21 (Former Licensed Practical Nurse) stated (R3) is very aggressive, violent, and likes to smoke cigarettes. The first time (R3) put his hand through the vending machine, picture on wall and wondered through the hallway. There were no interventions in place. I only saw them call the doctor and send (R3) out to be evaluated. (R3) was a ticking time bomb. (R3) broke a metal spoon in half, and he was scratching his wrist. (R3)'s wrist wasn't bleeding but there were noticeable scars. I believe the doctor should have been notified if I can't write what actually happened. The picture painting with glass that (R3) punched was located near the nurse station. (R3) was bleeding when he punched the glass, so (R3) got scratched. I didn't do anything with (R3)'s hand, the unit manager and social service treated (R3) once they took over, it is a protocol. On 10/23/24 at 10:49 am V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated A lot of things trigger (R3) based on my opinion. Based on (R3)'s diagnosis if (R3) wants something and does not get it when he wants it (R3) gets upset. As a facility it is about safety. (R3) had 5-7 stitches to his hand. Right now, we have not gotten to the point of taking the pictures off the wall. When (R3) returned to the facility after getting the sutures to his hand (R3) was hitting his head on a glass picture and stated self-strangulation. (R3) was admitted to the hospital, and I never had a chance to interview (R3) when he came back because (R3) did not want to talk about it. (R3) was sent out for suicidal ideations and self-harm. On 10/23/24 at 11:34 AM V27 (Medical Records Director) stated (R3) like to punch things when he gets upset. On 10/23/24 11:38 AM V10 (Registered Nurse) stated (R3) said that he is going to commit suicide, so we sent (R3) out. (R3) was upset, hit the picture and (R3) still has stitches to his left hand. It may be 2 sutures on the knuckles because it has not healed completely. Sometimes it can be hard to deal with (R3). One-time (R3) took and hit the picture on the wall and injured himself, (R3) picked up a chair and threw a chair in the parlor. (R3) displays these behaviors most of the time. (R3) came out and showed his arm, (R3) said he want to kill himself; we sent (R3) out. I can't remember if I saw this shaving stick blade. I think we collected it, but I don't remember. On 10/23/24 11:56 AM Per telephone interview V25 (Former Social Worker) stated if (R3) is unable to smoke (R3) has aggressive behaviors and hit a glass picture in the parlor. I don't think (R3) is appropriate for a skilled nursing facility. (R3) gets angry and aggressive. (R3) had cuts on his hands, need a lot of tender loving care and 1 on 1 supervision. (R3) needs to be monitored at all times if (R3) is angry. On 10/23/24 at 12:46 PM V12 (Social Service Director) stated (R3) tries to cut himself, seek attention most of the time and tries to cut himself with anything he can get his hands on. We do an inventory when the residents are admitted to the facility. I don't think the shaving blade was with (R3) when (R3) came in. (R3) has a history of self-harm. Every staff is responsible to talk to (R3) and come tell us. The glass pictures on the walls are a hazard that (R3) can potentially harm himself again. They could replace or take the glass out of the pictures to prevent (R3) from harming himself by being cut with the glass if (R3) punches the pictures again. If (R3) keeps doing the same thing over and over again maybe there is something that we are not doing. You can tell when (R3) is starting to get in the mood and sometime, we indulge him. On 10/23/24 01:12 PM V29 (Registered Nurse/MDS Coordinator) stated (R3) has a behavioral diagnosis that can escalate where it is hard to redirect him. (R3) has suicidal ideations and when a resident goes out to the hospital, they may not come back with any changes but sometime there will be alterations in the plan of care. The goal for everyone is to have the residents safe in the facility. On 10/23/24 at 01:29 PM V26 (Psychiatrist) stated I saw (R3) a couple of times and (R3) had a recent hospitalization. (R3) has a temper that can't be controlled, has outburst and punching the wall. It was a little unclear what was setting (R3) off and the focus on impulsivity. (R3) has been hospitalized 7 times. No one knows how (R3) got from 0 - 100. On 10/23/24 at 01:56 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated Inventory of belongings is done on admission and (R3) had no belongings. (R3) was unable to tell where he got the shaving blade from. I did not see it and I believe it was discarded. (R3) had another incident shortly after that. (R3 was admitted to the facility without any belongings). V2 (Director of Nursing) also stated We try to ensure the environment and residents are free from abuse. Typically, (R3) behaviors are based on if (R3) can't get his way. (R3) has a history of self-harm. (R3) harmed himself and there was one incident that caused injury. It is hard to put something in place for instant gratification. (R3) punches the walls as you see we have pictures on the wall. (R3) got an injury related to punching the picture and breaking the glass. I understand there are not any interventions addressing (R3) not self-harming himself dated prior to 10/22/24, no ma'am. There is a possibility it could have been something that was not done that we could have done. As we see the behavior is escalating and ongoing. We may have to look for different placement. In general, the behavior (R3) was displaying was so different for the safety of himself and the residents. I was being proactive when (R3) was upset, threatening bodily harm. The main goal is to keep the residents safe and the resident safe from harming themselves. On 10/23/24 at 02:28 PM V14 (Social Worker) stated (R3) is attention seeking, suicidal and (R3) harms himself. On 10/23/24 02:54 PM V1 (Administrator) stated (R3) has attention seeking behaviors and most of them are centered around smoking. If (R3) does not get his way and get a cigarette (R3) will act out, be verbally aggressive with staff, self-injurious, with behaviors of pinching, hitting himself, punch the wall and pictures. (R3) injured himself when he hit the picture and needed sutures. (R3) has the potential to harm himself if (R3) hits the pictures and break the glass and harm himself if he hits the walls as well. On 10/24/24 at 12:34 PM Per telephone interview V30 (Former Psychiatric Rehab Services Coordinator) stated (R3) is the one that was suicidal. The risk assessment is done, it depends quarterly or annually and when they come back from the hospital, they give you a new admission. It is like a return back and social service will do a full assessment. I met (R3) when he returned from the hospital. (R3) is very suicidal, and I think (R3) need to be in a higher level of care. There should be a suicide care plan and it should be updated. The updates would be to redirect and 1:1. (R3) would say I am about to cut myself. (R3) does the same thing over and over seeking attention. (R3) would hit the walls with his fist and break plastic spoons to cut himself. We don't have a 1:1. Since (R3) did that, (R3) had to go to the hospital and should not have come back. (R3) requires one on one and someone to monitor (R3) to eat. They could have changed the picture frames. From (R3)'s admission packet if they knew (R3) was suicidal like that R3 should not have had a shaver blade. On 11/06/24 at 10:43 AM upon V2 (Director of Nursing) reviewing R3's care plan V2 stated it does not appear that the care plan was updated each time (R3) went out to the hospital. On 11/06/24 at 12:47 PM V4 (1st Floor Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated (R3) cuts were superficial, and it looked more like scratches. I was not aware of the shaving stick blade and don't know where (R3) got it from. The issue with the spoon was addressed. It was a metal spoon from the kitchen and somehow (R3) got the top of the spoon off. When (R3) cut himself, I would think something should have been updated. There is no preventative measure in place. On 11/06/24 02:24 PM Per telephone interview V10 (Registered Nurse) stated (R3) came to the nursing station and showed me his arm. I asked what happen and (R3) said that he was hearing voices to tell him to kill himself. I took the blade from (R3). I don't know where (R3) got it from, it was shaving blade, a shaving razor that has 3 blades that the facility supplies. There was no active bleeding, but the skin was broken. (R3) has been trying to hurt himself and we send (R3) to the hospital. I was not aware that (R3) had a history of self-harm when he cut himself with the razor. I don't know where (R3) was when he cut himself, but he came to the nurse station. If a resident has a history of self-harm, I will say no, (R3) should not have a razor. On 11/06/24 03:00 PM V12 (Social Service Director) stated I do not know why (R3) is in this facility besides the fact that (R3) has psych issues. There should have been self-harm preventative measure in place upon admission and care planned. After each incident (R3)'s care plan should have been updated related to the specific behavior that (R3) had. Somebody probably dropped the ball somewhere along the line. We are working short. At 03:48 PM V12 stated R3 should not have had a razor. On 11/06/ 24 at 04:01 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the razor is typically standard, and the color is blue. Since (R3) has a history of self-harm (R3) should not have had a razor. As far as (R3)'s self-harm it should have been care planned and should have included some preventive measures for self-harm. On 11/06/24 at 04:23 PM V34 (Certified Nurse Assistant) stated I remember (R3) seem like he can make a weapon out of anything. (R3) has a lot of outbursts and had taken a piece of wood from the overbed table. I was standing in front of the desk, and I asked (R3) what he has. (R3) whispered I am going to burn this place down. (R3) paces in front of you. The nurse took the broken spoon away from (R3) and threw it in the garbage behind the desk. I remember (R3) holding the broken spoon trying to hide it. (R3) has done that with other things. (R3) will try to harm himself if he wants to go outside and smoke at night. I saw the marks on (R3)'s arm and reported it to the nurse. I see (R3)'s body language shift, pacing back with an angry face, then punching the wall by the elevator and (R3) knocked a picture down before. (R3) will say verbal threats, I'll kill her, I'll kill you b***h when (R3) does not get his way. Sometimes there is not much of a warning. On 11/06/24 at 04:35 PM V1 (Administrator) stated I was aware that (R3) had a history of self-harm. I believe it was cutting of his arms. The care plan should have an intervention for the self-harm of cutting his arms. I am not aware of where (R3) got the razor that (R3) cut his arm. A resid[TRUNCATED]
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a residents' (R2, R11, and R12) right to be free from verbal and physical abuse form another resident (R1) for three out of 13 re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a residents' (R2, R11, and R12) right to be free from verbal and physical abuse form another resident (R1) for three out of 13 residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in staff not providing needed supervision for an aggressive resident causing R1 to get into a verbal altercation with R12, R11 having to physically stop R1 from striking R11 with a cane and R1 punching R2 in the face. Findings include: R1's admission Record, Order Summary Report, and care plan documents in part diagnoses including but not limited to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 9/09/2024 documents in part that R1 was moderately cognitively impaired. R1's care plan documents in part that R1 displays impaired decision-making ability as evidence of inattention, disorganized thought content, and hallucinations (date initiated 3/12/2024). Care plan does not contain a focus for potential/risk for abuse. R1's progress notes document in part that on 9/26/2024, R1 experienced aggressive and noncompliant behaviors. V21's (Former Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) progress note dated 9/26/2024 2:55 AM documents in part: Resident is displaying aggressive and abusive behavior. Resident continues to walk the floor, not easily directed. Resident refused to go to [R1's] room. Resident is trying to fight another resident and stated, 'somebody is going to get hurt.' [R1] continues to verbally abuse [R1's] roommate. Noncompliant behavior continued throughout the day and needed multiple re-direction from staff. Facility sent R1 to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation and returned on 9/27/2024. V10's (Nurse) progress note dated 9/27/2024 2:25 AM documents in part that R1 returned to the unit argumentative and noncompliant. V22's (Nurse) progress note dated 9/27/2024 7:36 AM documents in part: Resident at nurses' station verbally aggressive unable to redirect. Verbally threatening staff and peers. On 10/23/2024 at 11:25 AM, V27 (Medical Records Director) stated during that Friday morning, facility assigned V27 to work as receptionist at the front lobby. R12 ran out the front door in the lobby with shirt off like R12 was getting ready to fight. V27 stated R1 and R12 were having a verbal altercation. R12 was inviting R1 to join R12 outside for a physical altercation. Social services stood outside with R12 to settle R12 down. V27 stated staff directed R1 back to the first-floor nurses' station. V27 described R12 as a resident that 'gets into moods where [R12] can be confrontational.' V27 stated I guess that morning, [R1] was feeling confrontational as well and it spear headed the whole thing. Both showed signs of agitation and when those personalities met, it wasn't good. On 10/23/2024 at 12:25 PM, R12 stated a resident put their fists up to R12 so R12 put their fist up in response. R12 stated (R1) did it first. I was outside. (R1) didn't follow me outside cause (R1) was scared. I said come outside and fight me but (R1) didn't. (R1) was too scared. I had to protect myself then. R12's admission Record, Order Summary Report, and care plan documents in part diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition; schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; anxiety disorder; unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness; and unspecified intellectual disabilities. R12's BIMS dated 8/25/2024 documents in part that R12 was moderately cognitively impaired. R12's care plan documents in part that R12 has impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes related to comorbidities (initiated 5/14/2024). It does not contain a focus for potential/risk for abuse. During same interview with V27 on 10/23/2024 at 11:25 AM, V27 continued with the morning's events. After staff separated R1 and R12, V27 looked outside towards R12 and social services to make sure R12 was doing okay. When V27 turned around towards the first-floor nurses' station, V27 saw R1 having another altercation with R11 fighting over a cane. V27 stated [R1] was trying to attack R11 with the cane. V27 stated R11 had two hands on the cane stopping R1 from striking R11 with it. V27 took the cane, headed back to the front lobby, and staff separated R1 and R11. R11's admission Record, Order Summary Report, and care plan documents in part diagnoses including but not limited to abnormal posture; chronic angle-closure glaucoma, bilateral; blindness, one eye, low vision other eye; abnormalities of gait and mobility; muscle wasting and atrophy; and lack of coordination. R11's BIMS dated 8/25/2024 documents in part that R11 was cognitively intact. R11's care plan documents in part that R11 has history of aggressive behavior towards others. R11 has displayed physical aggression toward staff and peers (initiated 11/21/2023). It does not contain a focus for potential/risk for abuse. During a telephone interview with V21 (Former LPN) on 10/23/2024 at 10:22 AM, V21 stated when V21 arrived for work that morning, R1 was already irate and fighting another resident at first. V21 saw R1 and R11 tussling back and forth over a cane. V21 stated R11 struck R1 twice in the face with a closed fist. V21 stated facility called a code to have additional staff assist with the incident. R11 went back to the bedroom and R1 went into the Parlor. V21 stated leaving the facility afterwards and when V21 returned, staff informed V21 that R1 hit R2 across the face. V21's progress note for R2 dated 9/27/2024 9:30 AM documents in part: Upon arrival nurse was told by the nurse that resident was struck in the face by (R1) peer. The resident noted with facial redness and slight swelling to the left eye. No cuts or scrapes noted. Asked resident was (R2) in pain, resident pointed to [R2's] nose. Resident face was red, and the nose is slightly swollen. Patient was given Tylenol for the pain, and ice pack for the swelling. During a telephone interview with V22 on 10/23/2024 at 1:03 PM, V22 (LPN) stated seeing V21 walk out of the facility. When V22 made it to the front desk, V22 heard staff say, 'Hey they are trying to fight.' V22 went to the first-floor nurses' station where staff informed V22 that R1 got into two altercations. V22 stated separating R1 and R1 went into the Parlor by self. Staff later informed V22 that R1 punched another resident in the face (R2). V22 did not witness it but was told by staff because they saw it through the Parlor's window. V22 stated a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) was looking at the Parlor and said 'hey [R1] just hit [R2].' Staff went to the Parlor and separated the residents. V22 stated R2 was crying and saying that R1 had hit R2 in the eye. R1 was cursing a lot and stated R1 got hit with the cane and that R1's finger was hurting. When V22 interviewed R2, R2 repeatedly stated getting hit in the eye. V22 contacted the provider and received orders for an x-ray of R1's face, which showed no fractures. V22 stated I do believe that [R1] hit [R2]. V22 stated ever since R1 returned from the hospital, R1 has been aggressive and purposely getting into it with other residents. V22's (Nurse) progress note for R1 dated 9/27/2024 8:14 AM documents in part: Resident pacing back fourth throughout unit attempting to go in other peers' room. Resident shouting and pointing finger in staff face. Resident unable to redirect [Social Service] call and administrator [psychiatric service company] made aware PRN (as needed) offer but decline. V22's following progress note (time stamp 8:34 AM) documents in part: Writer made aware by staff resident was walking pass and struck another resident in the face. On 10/22/2024 at 1:11 PM, V9 (CNA) described R1 as being loud and bossy during last days at the facility. R1 would get upset if staff and residents didn't do what R1 told them to do. V9 stated sometimes R1 would get confrontational and exchange words with other residents. V9 stated working during R1 and R2's incident. R1 and R2 were in the Parlor room. V9 stated R1 was already loud and then V9 heard R2 yell '(pronoun/R1) hit me.' When V9 turned to look, R1 was bent over in front of R2 picking something off the floor and R2 was screaming. V9 stated facility assigned V9 to watch the Parlor room but V9 went out to get coffee and did not see the incident. When V9 returned and asked R2 what happened, R2 stated '[pronoun/R1] hit me.' V9's typed and signed statement dated 9/27/2024 documents in part that V9 was at the nurses' station and did not observe the incident. State Report documents in part a reportable incident on 9/27/2024 at 9:00 AM involving R1 and R2 for an alleged peer-to-peer altercation. Under Analysis and Conclusion, it documents in part When [R1] was asked what happened, all [R1] would say is 'I got [pronoun].' [R1] would not elaborate. [R2] was rubbing [R2's] right eye and cursing, not able to be redirected to the questions at hand. R2's admission Record, Order Summary Report, and care plan documents in part diagnoses including but not limited to bipolar disorder; difficulty walking; hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side; muscle weakness; traumatic brain injury; muscle wasting and atrophy; weakness; lack of coordination; and disorder of bone density and structure. R2's BIMS dated 3/17/2024 documents in part that R2 has severe cognitive impairment. R2's care plan documents in part that R2 may be at risk for potential abuse related to physical and/or communication challenge as evidenced by unable to propel wheelchair safely, severely limited range of motion and severe frailty/weakness (initiated 6/06/2023). Goal was for R2 to be free from harm through the next review. Additional focus documents in part that R2 may be at risk for potential abuse related to mental/emotional challenges (initiated 6/06/2023). Goal was for R2 to be free from harm through the next review. Intervention included to assure R2 that they are in a safe and secure environment with caring professionals (initiated 6/06/2023). R2's care plan also documents in part that R2 demonstrates behavioral distress related to ineffective coping mechanisms; poor verbal skills and inability to express self in a more appropriate language; poor self-esteem; feelings of inadequacy; and feeling powerless (initiated 6/06/2023). On 10/23/2024 at 11:00 AM, surveyor interviewed V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) who was in charge during R1's altercations between R2 and R11 per V2 (Director of Nursing) and V21 (Former Nurse). V3 stated [V3] was not involved in the incidents and found out about it during morning meeting. V3 instructed survey team to refer questions to the morning staff and to V1 (Administrator). On 10/23/2024 at 1:52 PM, V2, stated the facility tries to ensure that the environment and residents are safe and free from abuse. If staff can identify early on and be proactive, the facility can get appropriate parties involved to prevent any incident from occurring. If a resident is irate and aggressive, the facility must make sure there is no immediate threat or anything to cause to escalate the situation. Staff must make sure the resident is free from other residents and there is no potential for harm to self and others. Facility will try to give the resident an opportunity for them to voice any concerns and work through it. V2 stated during R1 and R12's incident, after the staff separated the two residents, one staff should have stayed with R1 and another staff with R12. V2 stated staff should have directed R1 to another location such as to the bedroom or the office. V2 stated after R1 and R11's incident, staff should have put R1 on one-to-one monitoring. V2 stated facility has social services or psychiatric services aide to monitor one-to-one while the nurses handle the clinical portion. V2 stated if a resident is experiencing behaviors, then the staff must try the least invasive interventions first. If that doesn't work, then staff must notify the provider to get orders either for an as needed anti-psychotic medication or hospital evaluation. If the resident declines the medication, then staff are to follow-up with the ordering provider to retrieve further instruction. On 10/23/2024 at 2:40 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated staff should have informed V1 regarding R1 and R11's incident and documented it. Staff should have de-escalated the situation and kept R1 under close supervision and monitoring. They should have had the nurse evaluate and the nurse should have documented what they done. V1 stated if a resident is irate, staff needs to try to speak with the resident to try to get them to focus on the issue at hand. Staff need to call social service and nursing to speak with the resident to get clinical perspective. If needed, nursing will then call psychiatrist or primary provider to get further instructions. Facility's Policy & Procedure Supervision Policy (01/24) documents in part: additional supervision may be required in order to meet the specialized needs of residents. Additional supervision may be but not limited to 1:1 supervision, 15-minute checks, 30 minute and so forth. Purpose: to ensure resident safety. Responsibility: All staff. Facility's Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy and Procedure (1/04/2018) documents in part: Abuse is the defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. This facility desires to prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment and misappropriation of resident property by establishing a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. As part of the resident social history evaluation and MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessments, staff will identify residents with increased vulnerability for abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property or who have needs and behaviors that might lead to conflict. Through the care planning process, staff will identify any problems, goals and approaches, which would reduce the chances of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property for these residents. Supervisors will monitor the ability of the staff to meet the needs of residents, including that assigned staff have knowledge of individual resident care needs. Situations such as inappropriate language, insensitive handling or impersonal care will be corrected as they occur.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy by not reporting an allegation of abuse to V1 (Administrator) and reporting it to the (State Agency) for two of R1's ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy by not reporting an allegation of abuse to V1 (Administrator) and reporting it to the (State Agency) for two of R1's incidents. This affected 3 (R1, R11, R12) out of 13 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: During a telephone interview with V21 (Former Nurse) on 10/23/2024 at 10:22 AM, V21 stated when V21 arrived for work one morning, R1 was already irate and fighting another resident at first. V21 saw R1 and R11 tussling back and forth over a cane. V21 stated R11 struck R1 twice in the face with a closed fist. V21 stated facility called a code to have additional staff assist with the incident. V21 stated V1 (Administrator), V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing), V6 (Certified Nurse Aide, CNA), V9 (CNA), and V27 (Medical Records Director) were present that morning. V21 stated V1 came after staff separated R1 and R11. On 10/23/2024 at 11:25 AM, V27 stated during the morning of 9/27/2024, facility assigned V27 to work as receptionist at the front lobby. R12 ran out the front door in the lobby with shirt off like R12 was getting ready to fight. V27 stated R1 and R12 were having a verbal altercation. R12 was inviting R1 to join R12 outside for a physical altercation. Social services stood outside with R12 to settle R12 down. V27 stated staff directed R1 back to the first-floor nurses' station. On 10/23/2024 at 12:25 PM, R12 stated a resident put their fists up to R12 so R12 put their fist up in response. R12 stated (R1) did it first. I was outside. (R1) didn't follow me outside cause (R1) was scared. I said come outside and fight me but (R1) didn't. (R1) was too scared. I had to protect myself then. During same interview with V27 on 10/23/2024 at 11:25 AM, V27 continued with the morning's events. After staff separated R1 and R12, V27 looked outside towards R12 and social services to make sure R12 was doing okay. When V27 turned around towards the first-floor nurses' station, V27 saw R1 having another altercation with R11 fighting over a cane. V27 stated (R1) was trying to attack R11 with the cane. V27 stated R11 had two hands on the cane stopping R1 from striking R11 with it. V27 took the cane and told V1 (Administrator) what happened. During a telephone interview with V22 on 10/23/2024 at 1:03 PM, V22 stated hearing staff say, 'Hey they are trying to fight.' V22 went to the first-floor nurses' station where staff informed V22 that R1 got into two altercations. V22 stated separating R1 and R1 went into the Parlor by self. Surveyor reviewed the facility's abuse reportables to (State Agency) for 2024. No reportable for R1 and R11's incident or R1 and R12's incident. On 10/23/2024 at 11:52 AM, V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) informed surveyor that they did not have reportables for R1 and R11's incident or R1 and R12's incident. V2 stated working remotely from home that day. Staff did not inform V2 of the incidents. V2 stated V3 was onsite and in charge that Friday. V1 stated V27 called informing V1 that (R12) was at it again and standing outside. V1 stated did not know it had anything to do with R1. V1 also stated that V1 was aware of R1 and R11 arguing over a cane but there was no abuse reported. On 10/23/2024 at 1:52 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated for any event suspected of abuse, staff are to notify V1 immediately. V1 needs all the information related to the incident and must report it to (State Agency) within two hours. The facility must do a thorough investigation and send the final report to (State Agency) within five business days. On 10/23/2024 at 2:40 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated staff should have verbally reported R1's incidents to V1 and documented them. Facility's Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy and Procedure (1/04/2018) documents in part: Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about or suspect to the administrator immediately or to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator. Reports should be documented and a record kept of the documentation. Upon learning of the report, the administrator or a designee shall initiate an incident investigation. Incidents will be reviewed, investigated and documented, whether or not abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property occurred, was alleged or suspected. Initial Reporting of Allegations - When an allegation of abuse, exploitation, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property has occurred, the resident's representative and the Department of Public Health's regional office shall be informed by telephone or fax. Public Health shall be informed that an occurrence of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property has been reported and is being investigated.
Oct 2024 11 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nail care is provided for one resident (R75). This failure has the potential to affect all residents in the sample size...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nail care is provided for one resident (R75). This failure has the potential to affect all residents in the sample size of 67. Findings include: R75 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Vascular Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Metabolic Encephalopathy and Lack of Coordination. R75 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 03. A score of 03 indicates severe cognitive impairment. On 10/06/2024 at 11:31am surveyor observed R75's fingernails to have a greyish black substance under the fingernails on both hands. On 10/06/2024 at 11:32am R75 stated he would like his fingernails cleaned. On 10/06/2024 at 11:34am V39 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) stated I would think it (nailcare) should be done daily. On 10/08/2024 at 9:20am V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) stated the nursing staff are responsible for providing nail care when ADL care is done and when showers (twice a week) are given. V2 also stated for independent residents' staff should be offering assistance with grooming. On 10/08/2024 at 9:56am V38 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) stated nailcare is provided as often as needed especially if the fingernails are dirty and or need to be cut. Policy titled Bath and or Showering Unit dated 4/14 documents, in part, to cleanse and refresh the resident and 1. Resident's nails are to be kept short, smooth and clean. Job Description titled Certified Nursing Assistant documents, in part, assist residents with nail care (i.e. clipping, trimming, and cleaning the fingernails/toenails).
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0813 (Tag F0813)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor personal refrigerator temperature logs for two residents (R98 and R174). This failure affected two residents (R98, R17...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor personal refrigerator temperature logs for two residents (R98 and R174). This failure affected two residents (R98, R174) out of 67 residents in the total sample. Findings include: R98 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to dysphagia following cerebral infarction, aphasia, dysphagia, muscle wasting, and mixed hyperlipidemia. R98 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 07/10/24 documents that R98 has a BIMS score of 15 which indicates that R98 is cognitively intact. R174 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus with other specified complication, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, end stage renal disease and essential hypertension. R174 BIMS dated 07/07/24 documents that R174 has a BIMS score of 8 which indicates that R174 has some cognitive impairments. On 10/06/24 at 10:58 am, Surveyor observed R174's personal room refrigerator with a temperature log sheet dated April 2024. R174 was not able to answer surveyor regarding how often R174's personal refrigerator is checked by staff. On 10/06/24 at 11:05 am, Surveyor questioned V18 (Registered Nurse, RN) regarding R174's personal refrigerator log dated April 2024 and V18 stated that the floor nurses are responsible for checking the residents personal refrigerators every shift. V18 explained that the nurses check the personal refrigerator temperatures to ensure the personal refrigerator temperatures are between 36 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 42 degrees (F). V18 also explained that the importance of checking the residents personal refrigerators is to make sure that food is not spoiled and that there is no expired food kept in the residents refrigerator that can harm the resident. On 10/06/24 at 11:10 am, Surveyor observed R98's personal room refrigerator with a temperature log sheet last log dated October 1, 2024. R98 stated They (referring to staff) check my (R98) refrigerator maybe once a week. On 10/06/24 at 11:34 am, Surveyor questioned V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) regarding R98's personal refrigerator log dated October 1, 2024, and V17 stated that the night shift nurses are responsible for checking the residents personal refrigerators every night. V17 explained that the nurses check the personal refrigerator temperatures to ensure the personal refrigerator do not have spoiled or expired food. V17 explained that if a resident eats spoiled or expired food the resident can possibly become sick. On 10/07/24 at 9:07 am, V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) stated that the residents personal refrigerators temperature should be checked by the night shift nurses daily. V2 stated that the purpose of the residents personal refrigerators being checked daily is to make sure no contaminates or potential harm from food is exposed to the residents. V2 also explained that residents personal refrigerators are checked for expired food and for foods to be at the proper temperature. When V2 was asked regarding the importance of residents personal refrigerators being checked daily V2 stated, If a resident refrigerator goes uncheck they may come in contact with food that's not any good and the resident can become ill. The facility's document dated 11/28/16 and titled Food Brought into the facility by Friends/Family/Others (Outside Sources) for Residents Policy documents, in part: . Foods or beverages brought in from the outside will be monitored by nursing staff or spoilage, contamination and safety . 6. All refrigerators in use in the facility have an internal thermometer to monitor temperature. All refrigerators have their internal temps (temperature) recorded daily. Any refrigerators found to have an internal temperature that is outside of the accepted safe parameters the temperature will be immediately addressed by maintenance and will be taken out of service if the internal temperature cannot be corrected within a reasonable time frame to maintain food safety. Any affected food beverages will be discarded. The facility's document dated October and titled Temperature Log shows that R98 has a temperature log for 10/01/24. The facility's document dated April 2024 and titled Temperature Log shows that R174 has a temperature log sheet for April 2024.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident's call device was functioning to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident's call device was functioning to allow resident to call for staff assistance. This failure affected 1 resident (R250) reviewed for functioning resident call device in a total sample of 67 residents. Findings include: On 10/06/24 at 11:07am, this surveyor requested R250 to activate his (R250) call device. R250 stated what for, it does not work anyway. On 10/06/2024 at 11:09am, this surveyor requested V13 (Social Service Director) to activate R250's call device; no light on the box of R250's call device and on overhead call device indicator outside of R250's room were noted. V13 stated it is not working. On 10/07/2024 at 10:54am, R80 stated the call light (referring to R250 call light) has been broken the day I came in this room. I got here 4 months ago. On 10/07/2024 at 10:55am, R250 stated I got here the first week of September and my call light has been broken. On 10/08/2024 at 2:44pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated resident's call light should be functioning. The purpose of the call light is for the resident to let the staff know of their need or that they may have a need for assistance. R80's (09/24/2024) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 13. Indicating R80's mental status as cognitively intact. R80's census list documented that R80 was in his current room since 6/17/24. R250's (10/07/24) Medication Review Report documented that R250's diagnoses include but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and primary hypertension. R250's census list documented that R250 was admitted on [DATE] and was R80's roommate. R250's (09/26/2024) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS Summary Score: 13 Indicating R250's mental status as cognitively intact. R250's (09/05/2024) Careplan documented, in part is at risk for falls R/T (related to) Co-Morbidities. Be sure call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. Staff to respond promptly to all requests for assistance. The (undated) Call light policy and procedure documented, in part Purpose: To respond to residents' requests and needs in a timely and courteous manner. Equipment: Functioning nurse call system. Standards: 1. All residents shall have the nurse call light system available.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

3. On 10/6/2024, this surveyor observed no window curtains in R71, R73, R104 and R179's rooms (R73, R104 and R179 are roommates). On 10/6/24 at 11:11am, R73 replied, This place is tore up. Nothing wo...

Read full inspector narrative →
3. On 10/6/2024, this surveyor observed no window curtains in R71, R73, R104 and R179's rooms (R73, R104 and R179 are roommates). On 10/6/24 at 11:11am, R73 replied, This place is tore up. Nothing works. It's filthy. Be nice to have some curtains cause that light be bright sometimes. Too bright. It's hard to get a nap in. R73's face sheet, documents, in part, medical diagnosis including, but not limited to: schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition and schizophrenia, unspecified. R73's BIMS summary score, dated 9/17/24, is 8 which indicates R73's cognition is moderately impaired. On 10/6/24 at 11:19am, R179 replied, They haven't had curtains since I been here. Not only is there already no privacy with everyone in here but everyone outside can look up and see what we're doing. I told you. I just wanna go home. R179's Face sheet, documents, in part, medical diagnosis including, but not limited to: schizophrenia and unspecified dementia. R179's BIMS summary Score, dated 8/26/24, is 11 which indicates R179's cognition is moderately impaired. R104's face sheet, documents, in part, medical diagnosis including, but not limited to: schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia and major depressive disorder. R104's BIMS summary score, dated 8/18/24, is 8 which indicates R104's cognition is moderately impaired. On 10/06/24 at 11:37am, R71 said They (staff) don't care that we don't have curtains. Wish I had some and maybe this place would look more like bedroom. R71's face sheet, documents, in part, medical diagnosis including, but not limited to: unspecified dementia and suicidal ideations. R71's BIMS summary score, dated 8/20/24, is 12 which indicates R71's cognition is moderately impaired. On 10/7/24 at 11:45am, V24 (Maintenance Director) said, All rooms are supposed to have them (curtains). My department is responsible for replacing. I'm not sure if rooms don't have them because nobody says nothing. Purpose of the curtains are to cover the sun for the residents. On 10/09/24 at 11:11am, V1 (Administrator) said, All residents' rooms should have curtains on the windows. It's for privacy, residents' rights, and dignity. Not sure why there are rooms that do not have them. Facility job description titled, Maintenance Supervisor, dated 2003, documents, in part, The primary purpose of your job position is to assist in supervising the day-to-day activities of the Maintenance Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations governing our facility, and as may be directed by the Director of Maintenance, to assure that our facility is maintained in a safe and comfortable manner . Ensure that assigned work areas are maintained in a safe and attractive manner . Conduct daily inspections of assigned work areas to assure that cleanliness and sani conditions are maintained . Facility job description titled, Administrator, dated 2003, documents, in part, The primary purpose of your job position is to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern nursing facilities to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to our residents at all times . Consult with department directors concerning the operation of their departments to assist in eliminating/correcting problem areas, and/or improvement of services . Ensure that the resident's rights to fair and equitable treatment, selfdetennination, individuality, privacy, property and civil rights, including the right to wage complaints, are well established and maintained at all times. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment to 8 (R71, R73, R104, R172, R178, R179, R193, and R202) residents reviewed for home-like environment in the total sample of 67 residents. Findings include: 1. The (10/06/2024) midnight census documented the following number of residents by floor: 1st floor = 56 residents 2nd floor = 68 residents 3rd floor = 64 residents 4th floor = 65 residents On 10/06/24 at 10:58 AM, R202 stated I shower every day, sometimes I don't get to dry myself because there's no available towel to use. I ask the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) to bring me towels; sometimes they bring me towels and sometimes they don't. They (staff) said because there's none available. The same with the linens; sometimes they do bring them and sometimes they don't because the linens are not available. Of course, it is upsetting if the linens and towels are not available. On 10/06/24 at 11:58 AM, R193 was lying on bed; R193's pillowcase was only covering half of R193's pillow. The pillow and pillowcase had dark brown discoloration where R193 head was resting. R193 stated they do change my sheets but plenty of times, they had none. I told the staff to change my sheets and pillowcase after lunch. My pillow and pillowcase are dirty. On 10/07/2024 at 10:45am, R193's was lying on bed; R193's pillow and pillowcase still noted with dark brown discoloration. R193 stated the staff told me yesterday that they did not have anything available to change my pillowcase. On 10/07/2024 at 10:47am, this surveyor requested V28 , CNA, to check on R193 pillow and pillowcase. On 10/07/2024 at 10:50am, V28 stated he (R193) needed a new pillow and a new pillowcase, these are dirty. On 10/09/2024 at 10:23am, V40, CNA, stated (R193)'s pillowcases are really dirty. (R193)'s pillow is big. (V28) put 2 pillowcases on his pillow. I changed (R193)'s pillowcase with two pillowcases on Monday. On 10/07/2024 at 10:32am inside the laundry room with V27 (Housekeeping/Laundry) the linen racks against the wall had few linens. V27 stated during 1st shift I bring 20 pieces of face towels and big towels, 15 gowns, 12 pads, 10 blankets, 15 flat and 15 fitted sheets on each floor. The floor got more if staff are dropping the soiled linens in the chute right after they changed the linens. Each floor has 30 rooms; some rooms have 4 residents, 3 residents, 2 residents and one resident. I know what I bring to the floor is not enough for the residents. The residents should get more supplies, but I don't have enough to give them. This room (referring to the laundry room) used to be filled with supplies with the previous owner of the facility. But the new owner was cheap. This surveyor inquired if there are documentations of how many linens were brought on the floor. V27 stated we do have a form where we list the number of linens I bring to the floors. The (10/5/24) untitled form documented, in part Floor:2Fl. Washcloths: 20, Towels: 16, Fitted Sheets: 4, Flat Sheets: 14, Pillow cases: 3, Pads: 4, Blankets: 6. Floor: 3Fl. Washcloths: 20, Towels: 8, Fitted Sheets: 9, Flat Sheets: 10, Pillow cases: 0, Pads: 4, Blankets: 6. Floor: 1Fl, Washcloths: 20, Towels: 8, Fitted Sheets: 4, Flat Sheets: 5, Pillow cases: 1, Pads: 2, Blankets: 4. Date: 10/04/24, Floor: 4Fl, Washcloths: 15 + 16, Towels: 6, Fitted Sheets: 4, Flat Sheets: 5+2, Pillow cases: 1, Pads: 2, Blankets: 3+5. The (10/6/24) untitled form documented, in part Time: 4:20am, Floor: 1Fl. Washcloths: 12, Towels: 5, Fitted Sheets: 2, Flat Sheets: 5, Pillow cases: 0, Pads: 3, Blankets: 3. Time: 4:23am, Floor: 3Fl. Washcloths: 12, Towels: 5, Fitted Sheets: 2, Flat Sheets: 6, Pillow cases: 0, Pads: 2, Blankets: 3. Time: 4:32am, Floor: 4Fl, Washcloths: 12, Towels: 5, Fitted Sheets: 3, Flat Sheets: 6, Pillow cases: 0, Pads: 2, Blankets: 3. Floor: 2nd, Washcloths: 12, Towels: 5, Fitted Sheets: 2, Flat Sheets: 5, Pillow cases: 0, Pads: 3, Blankets: 3. The (10/6/24) untitled form documented, in part Floor:2Fl. Washcloths: 24, Towels: 9, Fitted Sheets: 7, Flat Sheets: 9, Pillow cases: 0, Pads: 1, Blankets: 5. Floor: 3Fl. Washcloths: 24, Towels: 10, Fitted Sheets: 9, Flat Sheets: 12, Pillow cases: 1, Pads: 5, Blankets: 7. Floor: 1Fl, Washcloths: 30, Towels: 3, Fitted Sheets: 10, Flat Sheets: 8, Pillow cases: 6, Pads: 6, Blankets: 4. Floor: 4Fl, Washcloths: 30, Towels: (no entry), Fitted Sheets: 12, Flat Sheets: (no entry), Pillow cases: 10, Pads: 6, Blankets: (no entry). The (10/7/24) untitled form documented, in part Time: 4:15am, Floor: 1Fl. Washcloths: 15, Towels: 2, Fitted Sheets: 4, Flat Sheets: 5, Pillow cases: 1, Pads: 3, Blankets: 3. Time: 4:20am, Floor: 2nd, Washcloths: 15, Towels: 2, Fitted Sheets: 5, Flat Sheets: 5, Pillow cases: 1, Pads: 4, Blankets: 3. Time: 4:30am, Floor: 3rd, Washcloths: 15, Towels: 3, Fitted Sheets: 5, Flat Sheets: 5, Pillow cases: 2, Pads: 4, Blankets: 4. Time: 4:35am, Floor: 4th, Washcloths: 15, Towels: 3, Fitted Sheets: 5, Flat Sheets: 4, Pillow cases: 2, Pads: 4, Blankets: 4. The (10/7/24) untitled form documented, in part Time: 7:41am, Floor: 1st. Washcloths: 20, Towels: 15, Fitted Sheets: 9, Flat Sheets: 15, Pillow cases: 8, Pads: 8, Blankets: 6. Time: _, Floor: 2nd, Washcloths: 20, Towels: 15, Fitted Sheets: 8, Flat Sheets: 11, Pillow cases: 2, Pads: 8, Blankets: 6. On 10/08/2024 at 2:26pm, V41 (Housekeeping/Laundry/Floor Tech) stated when I work the Laundry on the first shift, I do 4 trips; one trip on each floor. We have four residents' floors. On 10/07/2024 at 12:37pm, this surveyor showed to V20 (Laundry/Housekeeping Director) the untitled laundry form provided by V27 to this surveyor and inquired if the numbers written on the forms were correct. V20 stated yes these are correct. My staff have to split the linens among the floors. We are supposed to change their pillowcases, flat sheets, fitted sheets, and blankets every day. I know the supplies that we have are not enough for the number of residents we have. We should have enough linens. When I take a shower, I should have at least two washclothes and a towel to dry. That is how I would like to treat myself at home. We are not providing a homelike environment to our residents. On 10/08/2024 at 2:39am, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated we have 60 -67 residents on each floor. This surveyor showed the untitled laundry form that V27 provided this surveyor and inquired if the supplies provided by the laundry department were enough for all the residents at the facility. V2 stated it's not enough for the whole facility. We are not providing a homelike environment to the residents. R193's (10/07/24) Medication Review Report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) neoplasm of testis and weakness. R193's (09/23/2024) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) summary Score: 13 Indicating R193's mental status as cognitively intact. R202's (10/07/2024) medication Review Report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) inflammatory disorder of scrotum and type 2 diabetes mellitus. R202's (08/07/24) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS summary Score: 15. Indicating R202's mental status as cognitively intact. The (undated) Laundry Supervisor Job descriptions documented, in part Purpose of your job position. To assure that our facility is maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner, and that an adequate supply of laundry/linen is on hand at all times to meet the needs of the residents. Equipment and supply functions: ensure that an adequate supply of clean linen is maintained in linen closets. The (5/24) Resident Care Standards documented, in part Policy: the following standards are to be practiced by all nursing employees in the performance of direct and indirect care procedures for or with the resident, whether using equipment for technical procedures or when assisting residents to carry out self-care activities standards will not be repeated again in the individual procedures unless significance warrants repetition. Procedure: Resident environment will be maintained in a manner that protects the resident, is pleasing to the resident, and as much as possible in a home like environment. The (11/18) Residents's Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities documented, in part As a long-term care resident in the State, you are guaranteed certain rights, protections and privileges according to state and federal laws. Your rights to safety. Your facility must be homelike. 2. On 10/06/2024 at 10:58am surveyor observed R172's privacy curtain with a large brown stain on it. On 10/06/2024 at 11:06am surveyor observed that R178 did not have a privacy curtain. R178 stated that he would not mind having a privacy curtain. On 10/08/2024 at 2:29pm V20 (Housekeeping/Laundry Director) stated that a walk through is done of the resident's rooms at least 2-3 times a day to see what needs to be cleaned or replace and he was not aware that R172 was dirty and R178 needed a curtain. If curtains are laundered it normally takes about 2-3 hours for them to be washed, dried and rehung. Undated policy titled Housekeeping Guidelines, documents, in part, to provide guidelines to maintain a safe and sanitary environment for residents and cleaning of curtains will be cleaned when dust or soiling is visible. On 10/06/2024 at 12:04pm V44 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) stated no, we don't have enough towels and linen for the residents and when we run out we have to go down to laundry to get more. Yes, when there is no linen than we have to wait to provide patient care to the resident.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the environment was free from hazards for one resident (R189). This failure has the potential to affect all 64 res...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the environment was free from hazards for one resident (R189). This failure has the potential to affect all 64 residents on the third-floor unit. Findings include: On 10/06/24 V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) presented a facility census of 64 residents on the third-floor unit. R189's face sheet shows that R189 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. R189's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 09/08/24 shows that R189 has a BIMS score of 7 which indicates that R189 has some cognitive impairments. On 10/06/24 at 11:02 am, R189 was observed in bed, awake, with a portable oxygen tank on the floor not in a holder, next to R189 dresser. R189 stated that R189 uses oxygen continuously to help R189 to breathe. R189 stated that R189's portable oxygen tank had been on the floor in R189's room for several days. On 10/06/24 at 11:07 am, Surveyor brought this observation to V18 (Registered Nurse, RN) and V18 stated, (R189) uses his portable oxygen when he leaves his room. The portable oxygen should be on the back of his wheelchair for safety. If it (referring to R189's portable oxygen tank) tips over, It can bust and blow up the place and we (referring to staff and residents on the third floor) can die. On 10/07/24 at 10:08 am, V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) was asked regarding storage of oxygen tanks and V2 stated that oxygen tanks should not be free standing and should be stored in the oxygen room or in a cylinder holder. When V2 was asked regarding the importance of oxygen tanks being stored in a oxygen holder V2 stated, If oxygen is not in holder it has the potential to fall, diffuse, set off and combust. R189 Physician Order Sheet dated 11/07/22 shows that R189 has orders for continuous oxygen 4 liters (L) per NC (Nasal Cannular). R189's care plan documents, in part: Focus: R189 has oxygen therapy (continuous 02 (oxygen) r/t (related to) ineffective gas exchange. Secondary to his diagnosis of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). The facility's document dated 11/2022 and titled Oxygen Administration and Storage documents, in part: Purpose: To ensure staff follow safety guidelines and regulations for storage and use of oxygen. Storage: Oxygen cylinder must be stored in racks with chains, sturdy portable carts and/or approved stands in designated areas: May not be stored in resident's room or living area when not in use: May not be left free standing . Empty and full cylinders must be segregated in the designated storage area. The facility's document undated titled Supervision and Safety documents, in part: Policy: Our policy strives to make the environment as free from hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision are facility wide priorities.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to properly label and date oxygen equipment (humidifier bottled, and nebulizer mask) and failed to properly contain oxygen equ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to properly label and date oxygen equipment (humidifier bottled, and nebulizer mask) and failed to properly contain oxygen equipment (nebulizer mask) per the facility policy. These failures affected four residents (R48, R78, R135 and R205) reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 67 residents. Findings include: 1. R78's diagnoses include but not limited to asthma, atherosclerotic heart disease, and epilepsy. R78's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 9/3/24 shows R78 has a BIMS score of 13, which indicates R78 is cognitively intact. On 10/6/24 at 12:02 pm, surveyor observed R78's nebulizer mask laying on back of the oxygen machine not contained and dated 8/17/24. Humidify bottle dated 6/24/24. R78's (Active orders as of 10/08/24) Order summary Report documents in part, Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution (3) MG/3ML(Milligram/Milliliter) 1 vial inhale orally every 6 hours for short of Breath. R135's diagnoses include but not limited to COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, acute embolism, and thrombosis. R135's BIMS dated 9/3/24 shows R135 has a BIMS score of 12, which indicates R135 has moderately impaired. On 10/6/24 at 12:15 pm, surveyor observed R135's nebulizer mask observed laying over the nebulizer machine touching the wall uncontained. R135's (Active orders as of 10/08/24) Order summary Report documents in part, Albuterol Sulfate Nebulization Solution (2.5 MG/3ML) 0.083% 3 milliliter inhale orally via nebulizer every 6 hours as needed for Shortness of Breath. On 10/6/24 at 1:00 pm V29 Registered Nurse (RN) stated that oxygen tubing and mask is changed weekly. Surveyor inquired to V29 RN, what is the date on R78's mask and humidifier bottle? V29 looked at the humidifier bottle and stated 6/24/24. V29 looked at the mask and stated 8/17/24. V29 stated that R78 does not really use the oxygen. Surveyor inquired to V29 if the oxygen mask and humidifier bottle should still be changed if R78 still have access to use as needed. V29 stated, Yes, it should still be changed. Surveyor inquired to V29 if the oxygen mask should be laying on top of the oxygen machine touching the wall not covered? V29 stated that the oxygen tubing and mask should be covered to prevent the accumulation of dusk and prevent bacteria. Facility policy titled Oxygen Equipment dated 8/14, documents in part, Procedure: 3. Humidifier Bottle: prefilled bottles will be changed and dated when empty. Other bottles will be changed and dated weekly and prn (as needed). 2. On 10/06/2024 at 10:45am observed R48 with an oxygen concentrator machine located next to R48's bed, the humidifier bottle attached to the oxygen concentrator machine did not have a date indicating when the humidifier bottle was last changed. On 10/06/2024 at 11:00am V18, RN, stated the humidifier bottle is changed once a month. V18 sated the humidifier bottle is supposed to be dated, the staff is supposed to use a black marker to place the date on the humidifier bottle when it is changed. V18 stated the humidifier bottle is to be dated with the date and time the bottle was changed. V18 stated the night shift nurse is responsible for changing the humidifier bottle. On 10/08/2024 at 10:07am V2(DON/Director of Nursing) stated the humidifier bottle is changed weekly. V2 stated the humidifier bottle should be dated when it is changed. It is my expectation that the nursing staff are to change the humidifier bottle weekly and date the humidifier bottle with the date when the humidifier bottle was changed. V2 stated there is the possibility that infection can spread if the humidifier bottle is not changed according to policy and procedure. R48's face sheet indicates that R48 has diagnosis which includes but are not limited, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, unspecified, and essential (primary) hypertension. R48's BIMS dated 08/15/2024 documents R48 has a BIMS score of 03, which indicates R48's cognition is severely impaired. R48's Physician Order Sheet (POS) with active orders as of 10/08/2024 documents in part, PRN (as needed) Oxygen at 2 liters/per nasal cannula. R48's care plan documents in part, R48 has Oxygen Therapy related to CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), ineffective gas exchange. Intervention: Administer oxygen per MD (medical doctor's) orders. 3. R205's face sheet shows that R205 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, shortness of breath, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. R205's BIMS dated 09/27/24 shows that R205 has a BIMS score of 14 which indicates that R205 is cognitively intact. 10/06/24 at 11:41 am, R205 was observed in bed resting with an oxygen tank next to R205's bed that had an oxygen nebulizer mask dated 06/10/24 and uncontained. R205 stated that R205's uses R205's oxygen when R205 can't breathe. On 10/06/24 at 11:49 am, this observation was brought to the attention of V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) and V17 stated, That is dated June. Let me change it now. The 11-7 shift nurse is responsible for changing that (referring to oxygen tubing and mask) once a week on Sundays. When V17 was asked regarding the importance of changing and containing oxygen equipment V17 stated, For germs, sanitation, and cleanliness. The mask should be in a bag for the same reason, germs, and sanitation. On 10/07/24 at 10:08 am, V2, DON, stated that the night shift floor nurses are responsible for changing out the oxygen tubing and nebulizer mask every Sunday night at the facility. V2 also explained that if oxygen tubing and mask are not in use it (referring to oxygen tubing and nebulizer mask) should be stored in a bag. When V2 was asked regarding the importance of storing oxygen tubing and mask in a bag V2 stated, For Infection Control. R205's Physicians Order Sheet (POS) dated 9/20/2024 shows that R205 has orders for oxygen 2-3 liters (L) per NC (Nasal Cannular). The facility's policy dated 08/14 and titled Oxygen Equipment documents, in part: Objective: To administer oxygen in conditions in which infection control is maintained . Procedure: 2. Facility will use disposable nasal Cannular and facemask. Equipment will be changed weekly and prn (as needed) on date of facility's choice ad dated . 4. Oxygen tubing /nebulizer masks will be changed and dated weekly and prn. 5. Oxygen tubing/nebulizer masks will be covered when not in use.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate account of the controlled substance record and failed to dispose expired medication. These failures af...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate account of the controlled substance record and failed to dispose expired medication. These failures affected four residents (R165, R202, R203, and 456) reviewed for controlled substance and medication storage in a sample of 67 residents. Findings include: On 10/7/24 at 10:30 am, Surveyor reviewed the 1st floor medication cart for rooms 101-114 with V32 License Practical Nurse (LPN). On 10/7/24 at 10:40 am, R202's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form documents in part, Lorazepam Tablet 1 mg (milligram) document a total of 26 left, but actual count was 25 on the medication dispensing card. On 10/7/24 at 10:50 am, V33 (LPN) reviewed 1st floor medication cart 2 for rooms 115-129. On 10/7/24 at 10:55 am, R203's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form documents in part, Lacosamide tablet 100 mg documents a total of 24 left, but actual count was 23 on the medication dispensing card. On 10/7/24 at 10:56 am, R456's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form for Hydromorphone Tab 4 mg documents a total of 21 left, but actual count was 20 on the medication dispensing card. On 10/7/24 at 11:20 am, Surveyor reviewed 3rd floor medication cart 2 for rooms 316-330 with V31 LPN. On 10/7/24 at 11:22 am R165 had a bottle of Lantus Insulin in the medication cart with an expiration date of 10/01/24. On 10/7/24 at 10:42 am, V21(1st floor manager, LPN) sitting at nurse's station observing V32 count with surveyor. V21 stated that the narcotic accountability sheet should be signed with incoming and outgoing nurses at change of each shift. V21 stated that the nurses should sign out their narcotics when they administer them to the residents. On 10/7/24 at 11:00 am, V33 (LPN) stated, I gave the medications with the morning medications. I didn't sign it out because I rushed to another resident's room that was in pain. Surveyor inquired to V33 when should the medication be signed out. V33 stated, When I give it. On 10/7/24 at 10:45 am, V31 (LPN) stated that insulin should be dated with an open and expiration date when. opened. V31 stated that expired medications should be sent back to pharmacy or discarded. R202's admission diagnoses include but not limited to psychosis, suicidal ideations, and psychoactive substance abuse. R202's physician order set documents in part, Lorazepam 1mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for anxiety. R203's admission diagnoses include but not limited epilepsy. R203's physician order set documents in part, Lacosamide oral Tablet 100 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to epilepsy. R456's admission diagnoses include but not limited Displaced supracondylar fracture without intercondylar fracture of right humerus, multiple fractures of ribs, and hypertension. R456's physician order set documents in part, Hydromorphone 4 mg give four times a day for acute pain related to trauma related to unspecified fracture of lower end of right ulna, closed fracture. R165 admission diagnoses include but not limited diabetes. R165 physician order set documents in part, Insulin Glargine (Lantus) subcutaneous solution 100 units/ml give 45 units subcutaneous in the evening for DM (Diabetes Mellitus). Facility policy titled, Narcotics undated documents in part, Guideline: 2. When a narcotic medication is administered, it should be signed out in the narcotic sign out sheet and MAR (Medication Administration Record). 5. Two nurses must count narcotics at the beginning and end of each shift, initiating the narcotic count record. Two nurses counting should be the incoming and outgoing nurses. Facility policy titled Storage of Medication dated 10/25/24, documents in part, Expiration Dating: F. The nurse will check the expiration date of each medication before administering. G. No expired medications will be administered to a resident. H. All expired medications will be removed from the active supply and destroyed in the facility, regardless of amount remaining. The medication will be destroyed in the usual manner. Facility job description titled Charge Nurse, documented in part, Drug Administration Function: Ensure that narcotic records are accurate for your shift. Dispose of drugs and narcotics as required, and in accordance with established procedures.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

2. On 10/06/24 V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) presented a facility census of 56 residents on the first floor, 68 residents on the second floor and 64 residents on the third-floor unit. R5's face sheet...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. On 10/06/24 V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) presented a facility census of 56 residents on the first floor, 68 residents on the second floor and 64 residents on the third-floor unit. R5's face sheet shows that R5 has diagnosis which include but not limited to obstructive and reflux uropathy and functional quadriplegia. R5's BIMS dated 09/03/24 shows that R5 has a BIMS score of 9 which indicates that R5 has some cognitive impairments. R118's face sheet shows that R118 has diagnosis which include but not limited to pressure ulcer of sacral region and paraplegia. R118's BIMS dated 09/05/24 shows that R118 has a BIMS score of 15 which indicates that R118 is cognitively intact. R174 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to type end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. R174 BIMS dated 07/07/24 documents that R174 has a BIMS score of 8 which indicates that R174 has some cognitive impairments. R556 has a BIMS dated 10/02/24 with a score of 14 which indicates that R556 is cognitively intact. R556 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to partial traumatic amputation at level between knee and ankle, right lower leg, initial encounter, and traumatic amputation at level between knee and ankle, left lower leg, initial encounter On 10/06/24 at 9:52 am, Surveyors toured the facility's first, second, third and fourth floor units and did not observe any Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) bins or EBP signs near or on R5, R118, R174, or R556 doors or rooms on the first, second, or third floor units in the facility. On 10/06/24 at 11:00 am, V18 (Registered Nurse, RN) stated that R174 was not on EBP, has a dialysis site and receives hemodialysis Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturdays. On 10/07/24 at 9:28 am, V21 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) stated that R118 was not on EBP and has a sacral wound that requires a dressing. On 10/07/24 at 9:32 am, V22 (RN) stated that R5 was not on EBP and has an indwelling catheter. On 10/07/24 at 1:50 pm, V3 (Infection Preventionist (IP), RN) stated that R118 and R556 has wounds that require a dressing and are not on EBP. On 10/07/24 at 10:13 am, V3 (IP, RN) was asked regarding residents who require EBP and V3 stated, Everyone (referring to residents) in the building require EBP. When V3 was asked what precautions should staff take for residents who require EBP and V3 stated, EBP means that staff should wash their hands and use hand sanitizer. When V3 was asked if staff should be wearing a gown and gloves when caring for residents who require EBP, V3 then stated, Only residents who are on isolation precautions should be wearing a mask and gown during patient care. EBP residents do not require a gown. On 10/07/24 at 10:15 am, Surveyor requested a list of EBP resident in the facility and V3 stated, All residents in the facility are on EBP. On 10/08/24 at 9:04 am, Surveyor questioned V2 (DON) regarding EBP and V2 stated, EBP is required for high contact resident care or residents with wounds, bathing and a list of things. V2 was asked regarding how staff is made aware of residents who require EBP and V2 stated, A sign that states EBP is placed on the residents room door and staff are required to wear a gown and gloves when doing high risk services. The resident should also have an order for EBP. When V2 was asked regarding what could happen if a resident who requires EBP is not placed on EBP, no sign is placed on the residents room door, no isolation Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is provided for staff and no order for EBP is in the residents orders and V2 stated, There is a risk for staff to spread infections. The facility's document dated 08/15/24 and titled Policy and Procedure Enhanced Barrier Precautions documents, in part: Purpose: reduce the transmission of novel or targeted multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO). Procedure: 1. Enhanced Barrier Precautions EBP require the use of gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities: High contact resident care activities include: Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Providing hygiene, Changing linens, Changing Briefs or assisting with toileting, Device care or use of indwelling medical device such as urinary catheter, feeding tube, central line ((e.g.) example hemodialysis catheter, PICC (peripheral inserted central catheter) line, tracheostomy, or ventilator. Wound Care: Any skin opening requiring a dressing (focusing on wound at high risk of acquiring an MDRO such as: Pressure ulcer diabetic foot ulcers unhealed surgical wounds and chronic wounds such as chronic venous stasis ulcers). Note: Gowns and gloves are the minimum level of PPE. Additional PPE may be required depending on the situation resident. 3. Enhanced barrier precautions apply to residents with a wound or indwelling medical device, even if the resident is known to be infected or colonized with an MDRO (e.g., central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy ventilator). The facility's undated document presented on 10/07/24 and titled Foley (Indwelling Catheter) documents, in part that R5 has and indwelling catheter. The facility's undated document presented on 10/07/24 and titled HD documents, in part that R174 has and hemodialysis catheter. The facility's document dated 09/24/24-10/01/25 presented on 10/07/24 and untitled, documents, in part that R118 has and a wound to R118's sacrum, left ischium, and right ischium area. The facility's undated document presented on 10/07/24 and untitled, documents, in part that R556 has and a wound to R556's right foot amputation, left foot amputation, and left plantar. R556's Physician Order Sheet (POS) presented on 10/07/24 shows that R556 has orders for Right foot Metatarsal amputation. Cleanse with normal saline (NS) wound cleanser, apply xeroform cover with a dry dressing. R556's POS presented on 10/07/24 does not show an orders for R556 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). R556's care plan dated 9/28/24 documents, in part: Focus: Resident has surgical wound to the right foot and left foot. R5's POS dated 09/12/23 shows that R5 has orders for indwelling catheter for a dx (diagnosis) of Obstructive Uropathy. R5's POS dated presented on 10/07/24 does not show an order for R5 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). R5's care plan dated 9/12/23 documents, in part: Focus: R5 has an indwelling catheter related to obstructive uropathy 08/07/24. R174's POS 06/22/22 shows that R174 has orders dialysis: check access site for bruit and thrill, record/report abnormalities immediately. Dialysis: May reinforce dressing to dialysis site as needed. R174's POS dated presented on 10/07/24 does not show an order for R174 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). R174's care plan presented on 10/7/24 documents, in part: Focus: R174 receives dialysis per MD (Medical Doctor) orders. R118's POS dated 09/18/24 shows that R118 has orders sacrum: cleanse with normal saline solution (nss) wound cleanser and apply alginate and cover with a dry dressing. Right ischium: cleanse with nss/ wound cleanser and apply alginate and cover with dressing. Left ischium: cleanse with nss/ wound cleanser and apply alginate and cover with a dry dressing. R118's POS presented on 10/07/24 does not show an order for R118 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). R118's care plan dated 10/3/24 documents, in part: Focus: R118 has an alteration in skin integrity and is at risk for additional and/or worsening of skin integrity issues related to: Incontinence of bladder. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that four residents (R5, R118, R174, and R556) was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP); failed to ensure staff appropriately [NAME] and Doff gloves and change wash clothes during ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for one resident (R61). These failures affected one resident (R61) and has the potential to affect all 56 residents on the first floor, all 68 residents on the second floor and 64 residents on the third-floor unit. Findings include: 1. On 10/08/2024 at 10:13am, V36 (Certified Nursing Assistant) donned gloves. V36 washed and towel dried R61's whole body in sections starting from R61's face, then to R61's torso and lower abdomen, then to R61's bilateral upper extremities, then to R61's bilateral lower extremities and between thighs, then to R61's back and buttock including R61's anus with only one wet wash cloth and one dry washcloth without doffing and donning new gloves. On 10/08/2024 at 10:25am, this surveyor inquired how many times V36 changed her gloves while performing ADL care to R61. V36 stated I put one pair of gloves and that's it. I should have changed my gloves each time I dried his (R61) body to prevent bacteria or germs to pass on to myself or to the resident. On 10/08/2024 at 10:30am, this surveyor inquired how many washclothes she (V36) used to wash and dry R61's body. V36 stated I used one washcloth to wash (R61)'s whole body and one washcloth to dry his whole body. On 10/08/2024 at 2:36pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated I expect the staff to get a new to washcloth to wash other parts of the body to avoid cross contamination. The staff is expected to use one wash cloth for the face then discard; use another washcloth for the upper body then discard; another washcloth for the lower body then discard; use another washcloth for the back then discard; and use another washcloth for the peri area then discard. The purpose of using different washclothes to different sites of the body is to prevent cross contamination. The staff is also expected to use a washcloth to dry the upper body, a different washcloth to dry the lower extremities, and another washcloth to dry the peri area to prevent cross contamination. On 10/08/2024 at 2:38pm, V2 stated I expect the staff to change gloves after washing the face, after washing the upper body, and after washing the peri area to prevent cross contamination. R61's (10/08/2024) Order Summary report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) malignant neoplasm of lower lung and type 2 diabetes mellitus. R61's (08/12/2024) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: (no entry). C0700. Short-Term memory Ok: 1 memory problem. C0800. Long-Term Memory Ok: 1. Memory Problem. Section GG. Functional abilities. GG0130. E. Shoer/bathe self: 1 - Dependent. The (4/14) Bathing or showering Unit documented, in part Equipment: towels and wash clothes. Bed bath. 6. Wash face, neck and ears. Rinse and dry well. 7. Wash upper extremities. Rinse and dry well. 8. Wash chest and abdomen. Rinse and dry well. 9. Wash lower extremities and feet. Rinse and dry well. 10. Turn Resident on his/her face and wash back and buttocks. Rinse and dry well. 10. Wash genitals. Rinse and dry well. The (5/24) Policy and Procedure titled Gloves documented, in part All Employees who may come in contact with blood, body fluids, or potentially infected materials wear gloves as part of standard precautions. Guideline: 1. Wear gloves when it can reasonably anticipate(d) that hands will be in contact with mucous membranes, non -intact skin, any moist body substances (urine, feces or items/surfaces soiled with these substance). 2. Gloves must be changed between contacts with different body sites of the same resident.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the fourth floor resident pantry was clean and sanitary. This has the potential to affect the 65 residents residing on ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the fourth floor resident pantry was clean and sanitary. This has the potential to affect the 65 residents residing on the fourth floor. Findings include: Facility document titled, (Facility) Midnight Census Report 10/6/2024, shows that 65 residents are currently residing on the fourth floor. On 10/6/24 at 11:25am, while on the 4th floor, this surveyor observed the following in the fourth floor resident pantry: 1. There was multiple areas of a brown substance on the base and the walls of the inside of the microwave and multiple areas brown, green and white substances on the walls of the outside of the microwave. 2. The garbage was overflowing with trash and the trash was observed on the floor surrounding the garbage can. 3. Dried brown substances on the walls of the residents' pantry. 4. Dried brown substances on the floor of the residents' pantry. On 10/6/24 at 11:29am, this surveyor inquired about the fourth floor resident pantry and V4 (Nursing Supervisor) said, All the residents on the fourth floor use this room. And the employees too. The residents use the microwave and the vending machines in here. It should be kept clean. Yes, I (V4) see the garbage on the floor and the dirty microwave. It should be kept clean. Let me go get housekeeping to clean this up. It's their responsibility. Not sure how often housekeeping cleans it but it's a few times day. 10/7/24 at 11:18am, V20 (Housekeeping/Laundry Director) said, Fourth floor pantry? We're (housekeeping) in charge of the upkeep of that. We call the residents' pantries, Centers, because they run from one side of the floor to another. It's not supposed to be like. It's supposed to be clean. Outside microwave cleaned in and out. Residents use it. Not supposed to be like that. Purpose is gotta stay clean cause residents use it. They have their food and coffee and tea heat it up. They use the vending machines. It's for their use. We clean it a few times a day. It should never look like that. Facility job description titled, Housekeeper, dated 2003, documents, is part, The primary purpose of your job position is to perform the day-to-day activities of the Housekeeping Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations governing our facility, and as may be directed by the Administrator, and/or the Director of Housekeeping, to assure that our facility is maintained in a clean, safe, and comfortable manner . Ensure that work/cleaning schedules are followed as closely as practical. Coordinate daily housekeeping services with nursing services when performing routine cleaning assignments in resident living and/or recreational areas . Ensure that assigned work areas are maintained in a clean, safe, comfortable, and attractive manner . Dispose of refuse daily in accordance with our established sanitation .Clean/polish furnishings, fixtures, ledges, room heating/cooling units, etc., in resident rooms, recreational areas, etc., daily as instructed. Clean, wash, sanitize, and/or polish bathroom fixtures. Ensure that water marks are removed from fixtures. Clean windows/mirrors in resident rooms, recreational areas, bathrooms, and entrance/exit ways. Clean floors, to include sweeping, dusting, damp/wet mopping, stripping, waxing, buffing, disinfecting, etc. (NOTE: Ensure that appropriate caution/safety signs are properly set up prior to performing such duties.) Clean carpets, to include vacuuming, shampooing, deodorizing, and disinfecting. Clean walls and ceilings by washing, wiping, dusting, spot cleaning, disinfecting, deodorizing, etc. Remove dirt, dust, grease, film, etc., from surfaces using proper cleaning/disinfecting solutions. Clean hallways, stairways, and elevators . Discard waste/trash into proper containers and reline trash receptacle with plastic liner. Clean vacant rooms as assigned. Ensure that work/assignment areas are clean and that equipment, tools, supplies, etc., are properly stored at all times, as well as before leaving such areas for breaks, mealtimes, and end of the work day. (State) Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities, revised date 7/2015, documents, in part, .Program strives to protect and promote the rights and quality of life for those who reside in long-term care facilities.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the temperature of the walk-in cooler and walk in freezer were checked daily, failed to ensure the scoop for dry fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the temperature of the walk-in cooler and walk in freezer were checked daily, failed to ensure the scoop for dry food was contained, failed to ensure Dietary staff wore appropriate beard guard, and failed to ensure facility staff used unexpired test strips in checking the concentration of chemical used to sanitize kitchen utensils in an effort to prevent food borne illnesses. These failures have the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: On 10/06/2024 at 9:18am with V9 (Dietary Aide) during the initial tour of the Kitchen, V9 has a beard and was not wearing a beard guard. On 10/06/2024 at 9:18am, the walk-in freezer and walk in cooler temperature log had missing entries. These were pointed out to V9. V9 stated the temperature for whole day of 10/5 are missing. On 10/06/2024 at 9:25am inside the dry storage room with V9, a scoop was lying on the lid of the OATS bin. V9 stated we use the scoop to get sugar, oats, or breadcrumbs from the bin. The scoop should be by the Chef's area and not touching the lid to prevent cross contamination. On 10/06/2024 at 9:30am, V9 stated I had a beard guard, but I took it off. The purpose of wearing a beard guard is to prevent hair from getting in to the resident's food. On 10/06/2024 at 9:32am, V9 stated we use Quat to sanitize our utensils. This surveyor requested V9 to do the strip test of the 'sanitize sink' of the 3-sink compartment. The test strip did not change color. Further inspection of the container of the test strip, the expiration date was 1/2024. V9 stated I did not notice it was expired. On 10/06/2024 at 9:39am, went to a room inside the Kitchen and searched the room. V9 stated I can't find new testing strips in the Manager's office. On 10/06/2024 at 9:43am, V12 (Dietary Aide) was by the Dish Machine area. V12 has a beard and was not wearing a beard guard. V12 stated I don't have to wear a beard guard if I am on the Dish machine area. On 10/07/2024 at 9:59am, V25 (Consultant Dietary Manager) stated the walk in cooler's and freezer's temperature should be checked daily to make sure the temperatures are not out of range to prevent food borne illness. On 10/07/2024 at 10:01am, V25 stated all hair, including beard, has to be restrained or covered so we don't have foreign objects on the food we serve and to make sure food is safe. All staff who have beard, including staff working on the dish machine area, are expected to wear a beard guard. ON 10/07/2024 at 10:02am, V25 stated scoop should be contained to prevent cross contamination. On 10/07/2024 at10:04am, V25 stated staff are expected to use unexpired testing strips so we know the concentration of the chemical we use to sanitize our utensils is within the range. The (4/2022) Food Safety and Sanitation Policy Three Compartment Sink documented, in part Policy: the facility will clean and sanitize food service equipment, utensils, dishes and tableware using the proper procedure. Procedure: A test kit will be available and used to accurately measure the sanitizer concentrations and water temperature per chemical manufacturer's recommendations. The (4/2022) Food Safety and Sanitation Policy Sanitizing Buckets documented, in part Procedure: Sanitizer concentration will be checked using a test kit. The following sanitizer concentrations are recommended and use of test strips to monitor accuracy of the sanitizer. Quats: Sanitizer concentration range: 150-200ppm (part per million). The (4/2022) Food Safety and Sanitation Policy Storage Of Refrigerated/Frozen Foods documented, in part Policy: the facility will follow safe handling and storage of refrigerated and frozen foods. Procedure: Frozen foods will be maintained at a temperature to keep food frozen solid. Monitoring of food temperatures and functioning of the refrigeration/freezer units will be in place. The (4/2022) Food Safety and Sanitation Policy Storage of Dry Foods/Supplies documented, in part Policy: the facility will follow safe handling and storage of dry foods and supplies. Procedure: Dry foods stored in bins will be removed from the original packaging. Storage bins will be kept clean, labeled, and dated. Scoops will not be stored in the food bins. The (4/2022) Food Safety and Sanitation Policy Employee Health and Personal Hygiene documented, in part Policy: Food Service employees shall maintain good personal hygiene and free from communicable illnesses and infections while working in the facility. Procedure: Hair restraints will be worn at all times. Beards should well-trimmed and covered with an appropriate hair restraint when employees are handling food.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the dumpsters were not overflowing with trash, failed to ensure the dumpster lids were close, and failed to ensure ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the dumpsters were not overflowing with trash, failed to ensure the dumpster lids were close, and failed to ensure there was no gap between the two doors which led to the loading dock of the facility in an effort to maintain an effective pest control program. These failures have the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: On 10/06/2024 at 9:45am with V11 (Dietary Aide) during the initial tour of the dumpster area. Each of the 2 big dumpsters have 3 lids and each of the big dumpsters have one open lid. V11 stated the lids should not be open to prevent the animals from migrating to the dumpsters. On 10/06/2024 at 9:48am on the way back to the Kitchen area and upon closing the door that led to the loading dock noted a gap between the two doors. V11 stated that's maintenance. On 10/07/2024 at 10:21am with V23 (Assistant Maintenance) by the loading dock area, pointed out to V23 the hole between the doors. V23 stated there is a gap on the door. There should be no gap on these two doors. These doors are about 3 years old. On 10/07/2024 at 10:22am by the facility dumpster area, the 2 dumpsters were overflowing with trash and the lids were open. V23 stated housekeeping or whoever is throwing the trash in the dumpster is supposed to close the lids of the dumpsters to prevent animals from going to the dumpster. These people know better. The purpose of making sure the dumpster lids are closed is to prevent migration of mice and cockroach into the dumpster and to prevent them from going inside the facility. Mice and cockroach can enter through the gap on the doors by the loading dock. The (undated) Food and Nutrition Services Sanitation and Safety, Safe Food Handling - Dumpster documented, in part Policy: All food will be handled safely and disposed of in a safe manner. Procedure: Dietary trash will be disposed of in sealed plastic trash bags. The sealed bags will be disposed of in the outside dumpster. The dumpster will be securely covered. The (11/2022) Pest Control policy documented, in part Purpose: To prevent or control insects and rodents from spreading disease. Standards: 8. Outside openings shall be protected against the entrance of insects by tight-fitting self-closing doors. 9. All building openings shall be tight-fitting and free of breaks. 10. The facility shall be kept in such condition and cleaning procedures used to prevent the harborage or feeding of insects or rodents. 11. Floors and wall finishes in the food preparation, storage, and utensil washing areas may be washed and cleaned. 16. Outside dumpsters shall be of sufficient size that the lead can be tightly closed.
Jun 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was not left inside the room of a resident whose ability to safely self-administer medications was not asse...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was not left inside the room of a resident whose ability to safely self-administer medications was not assessed. This failure affected one (R4) resident reviewed for self-administration in the total sample of 7 residents. Findings include: On 06/10/2024 at 11:28am, there were 2 half pills in a med cup by R4's television stand. R4 stated I (R4) don't remember who gave me (R4) medication. I (R4) am not sure if it is the morning shift or the night shift. I (R4) don't remember the name of the nurse. All I (R4) know is that I (R4) took the med cup with meds (medications) from the nurse and the nurse just left them to me. The medication in the med cup is my potassium. I (R4) split it in half because I (R4) cannot swallow the whole pill. On 06/10/2024 at 11:30am, this surveyor requested V8 (Assistant Director of Nursing) to describe the medication in the med cup. V8 stated I (V8) am not going to tell you because I (V8) did not give that pills to her (R4). On 06/10/2024 at 11:30am for the second time, this surveyor requested V8 to describe whatever is in the med cup found inside R4's room. V8 stated I (V8) cannot tell you that. On 06/10/2024 at 11:31am, this surveyor informed V8 even though he (V8) was not the one who gave the medication to R4, this surveyor is just requesting V8 to describe the medication inside the med cup found inside of R4's room. V8 then stated there are white pills in the med cup. And added you can ask her (R4) who gave the meds to her (R4). On 06/10/2024 at 11:31am, R4 stated I (R4) hope I (R4) did not put anyone in trouble. On 06/10/2024 at 11:37am, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the policy is for the nurse who passes the medication, has to ensure the medications are taken by the resident. The nurse should typically wait at bedside to make sure the medication is taken. So, we can ensure the medication is given as prescribed by the doctor. Medication is prescribed for a reason. And we want to make sure it is taken by the resident. I (V2) have to check if she (R4) has self-administration of medication assessment. The (06/11/2024) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented, in part (R4) does not have a care plan for self(-)administration of medication nor a self(-)administration for medication assessment. R4's admission Record documented that R4's diagnoses include but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus and essential hypertension. R4's (04/15/2024) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for mental status) Summary Score: 14. Indicating R4's mental status as cognitively intact. R4's (06/10/2024) Order Listing Report documented, in part Potassium Chloride ER (Extended Release) 20MEQ give I tablet by mouth one time a day. Active 06/10/2024. Of note, there is no order to may self-administer medication. R4's (06/2024) MAR (Medication Administration Record) documented, in part Potassium Chloride ER Tablet Extended Release 20MEQ give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. Start Date: 04/23/2024 0900 (9:00am) with check marks from 06/01/2024 through 06/11/2024. The (1/1/2024) Policy and Procedure Administering Medications documented, in part purpose: to ensure safe and effective administration of medication in accordance with decisions orders and state/ federal regulations. Procedure: 4. Medications may be self-administered by residents who have been assessed and determined to be safe and upon physician order. 16. Self-Administration of drugs is permitted when approved by the attending physician and the interdisciplinary care planning team.
May 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance with inconti...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance with incontinence care received necessary services in a timely when requested for one (R6) resident out of three residents reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample. Findings include: On 05/01/2024 at 11:13 AM, observed V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) take R3's soiled clothes to laundry out of R3's room. On 05/01/2024 at 11:17 AM surveyor informed V12 that R3 states that she is ready to get up from the bed. V12 states that she has assisted R3 on the bedpan already and V12 states that first thing first she must get the dirty clothes and take it to the laundry. V12 states that R3 is going to have to wait. V12 states that she has a resident that she must clean first. V12 states that R6 is the resident that she will change. On 05/01/2024 at 11:24 AM observed V12 take down the dirty linen down the elevator. On 05/01/2024 at 11:28 AM observed V12 stepped outside from the elevator. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R6 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 08 out of 15, indicating R3 has moderately impaired cognitive. R6's care plan dated 4/10/2024 documents in part R6 is incontinent of bowel/bladder .staff will assist R6 with toileting needs throughout the day to minimize episodes of incontinence through next review .keep skin clean and dry. On 05/1/2024 at 11:29 AM R5 Spanish speaking, agreed for surveyor to observe V12 provide care to R5. V12 began to provide perineal care to R5. R5's stool noted dark brown, soft large amount, several stools dried and on R5's skin, and as V12 wiped R5, stool still stuck to skin, sheet visibly soiled. R5 turned to the sides and observed several dry stools to buttocks near hip. Observed V12 rubbing off several times the dry stool off R5's skin. Once V12 completed providing perineal care. Surveyor asked V12 when was the last time V12 saw R5. V12 states that R5 pressed the call button around breakfast time to be changed. V12 states that she was collecting trays and told him that she would come back. V12 states that she has 25 residents assigned to her. V12 states this is the time she came back to him. V12 states that breakfast time is around 9:30am. V12 states that she thinks he pressed the call light around 10:00am and that is when she answered the light and V12 states that is when R5 requested to be changed. On 05/01/2024 at 2:25 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) states the residents should typically wait 5-10 minutes to be changed because it all depends on what supplies the staff need to complete the task. V2 states that if residents wait longer to be changed, that it does have the potential to change their skin and the resident has the potential to feel uncomfortable. V2 states that it can affect their self-esteem related to the incontinence episode. V2 states that the CNA should change the resident prior to collecting trays and taking other residents' soiled linen to the laundry room. Facility document not dated, titled Call Light documents in part Purpose: To respond to residents' requests and needs in a timely and courteous manner.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call light that is accessible to one resident (R7) to allow the residents to call for staff assistance...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call light that is accessible to one resident (R7) to allow the residents to call for staff assistance and failed to provide a specialized call light for one resident (R2) who is unable to use standard call light out of three residents reviewed for call lights in the sample. Findings include: 1. 04/30/2024 at 1:47 PM during hallway observation, surveyor observes outside call light of R7's room blinking with the door closed. 04/30/2024 at 1:50 PM continued to observe R7's room call light blinking outside of the room with door closed. 04/30/2024 at 1:53 PM continued to observe R7's call light blinking outside with door closed. 04/30/2024 at 1:56 PM continued to observe call light blinking, observed V7 (Business office Manager) walk by call light blinking. V7 informed surveyor that the call light is broken. V7 states that she did not know how long the call light was broken for, but she will find out. V7 states that there is no resident in the room and in the restroom. 4/30/24 at 2:15 PM V8 (Registered Nurse) states that maintenance keeps fixing R7's call light and it breaks again. V8 states that there are two residents that reside in the room. V8 states that both residents are alert and oriented x3. V8 states that bed two gets up every day and sits in the day room. V8 states that bed one resident usually is in the room but at this time he was smoking. V8 states that bed two needs assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living) and bed one needs supervision due to having bilateral amputee, V8 states that he needs assistance to get up from the bed, V8 states that once he is sitting on his wheelchair, he can come to the nurse's station to ask for assistance. V8 states that bed one is a fall risk. V8 states that the two residents haven't had a fall for a long time. 04/30/24 at 2:26 PM V17 (Maintenance Supervisor) states that sometimes the call light cord in R7's bathroom is loose. V17 states that he was just notified of it not working today. V17 states that sometimes the cord is loose. 05/01/2024 at 11:06 AM R7 states that the room's call light hasn't been working for about a week. R7 states that the call light working comes and goes. R7 states that staff will come and fix it and R7 states that it will be a couple days before they come back up to fix it again. R7 states that another resident might need the call light to work properly for emergency, but R7 states that he doesn't really need it. Facility document not dated, titled Call Light documents in part Purpose: To respond to residents' requests and needs in a timely and courteous manner .Functioning Nurse Call System. Facility document dated 11/14, titled Maintenance Program Policy documents in part Purpose: to conduct regular environmental tours/safety audits to identify areas of concern within the facility .resident equipment is in working order .the call light system is in working condition. 2. According to R2 facesheet, R2 has diagnoses that include but are not limited to quadriplegia. R2 Minimum Data Set, 3/25/2024, indicates R2 is cognitively intact; R2's upper and lower extremities are impaired on both sides; R2 is dependent for all mobility activities and all self-care activities except eating which requires substantial/maximal assistance; R2 is always incontinent. 4/30/24 at 11:55 AM, V23 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the picture of a lightbulb next to R2's name outside of the room means to monitor R2 every hour because R2 is not able to use the call light. 5/2/24 at 9:45 AM, V30 (Restorative) stated I put R2 on the lightbulb program to let the staff know R2 needs to be frequently monitored, every hour. I personally went to see R2 daily to see if R2 needed anything. We have the pad for quadriplegic to use by bending their neck and pressing the pad with their chin but R2 could not bend at the neck. We don't have the straw to blow. R2 never reported having to yell for assistance and nobody comes. We use sign-off sheets to say that the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) went at least hourly to check on the resident. I don't know how R2 could have called for help in between the hourly rounds. The accommodation for R2 was to be put on the lightbulb program. R2 would not be able to call for help without a call light. It is not the responsibility of R2's roommates to get help for R2. The purpose of the call light is for residents to use to let staff know that they need help. R2 can verbalize needs. According to corporate, the company doesn't use the call light assessment form. They want staff to have knowledge to assess if the resident can use the call light. There is no call light assessment for R2. 5/2/24 at 10:25 AM, V31 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated V31 is familiar with R2. R2 can't use the call light. We know if R2 needs anything by rounding every one to two hours. I did not hear R2 yelling. R2 would call the facility on the telephone. R2's room is too far down the hall from the nursing station to hear R2 yelling. Facility not able to provide a call light assessment for R2. Facility policy Call Light, 9/19, documents in part: All residents shall have the nurse call light system available and within easy accessibility to the resident at the bedside or other reasonable accessible location.
MINOR (C) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with needed supplies for Activities of Daily Living such as linen. This failure affects all 252 residents re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with needed supplies for Activities of Daily Living such as linen. This failure affects all 252 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 04/30/2024 at 12:40pm, R10 stated the facility does not have enough linens and he stated sometimes the beds are not made because of lack of linen. R10 stated he has not had pillowcases for over two weeks now, and he stopped asking staff for them since they are not available. On 04/30/2024 at 11:55am, R11stated there is not enough linens in the facility and because of lack linens, her bed is changed once a week. R11 stated she does not like that her bed is not changed more frequently. On 05/02/2024 at 11:55am, R8 was observed laying on his bed and stated he makes his own bed, and sometimes there is no linen to make his bed, and he has to wait a week to get linen to make his bed. On 04/30/2024 at 12:49am, V11(Certified Nursing Assistant -CNA) stated she has worked at the facility for six months and in the mornings, laundry aides bring a cart of linen up to the units and the CNAs divide the linen up and put it in their clean linen. V11 stated once the clean linens are finished, and the CNAs need more linen for the residents, the CNAs have to go to go to laundry and get more linen, because there is no clean linen in the carts on the units. V11 stated sometimes she has to hind the clean linen in a resident room because other CNAs and residents will take her clean linen and she will not have linen to make residents beds or towels and face towels for her residents to use. V11 and surveyor toured the 2nd floor clean linen closet and observed in the closet was a clean linen cart from laundry with one clean flat sheet, two fitted sheets, one bag of incontinence briefs, one bag of incontinence pads. V11 said the clean linens are not enough for resident care. On 04/30/2024 at 1:22pm, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant -CNA) said there were no clean linen in the units because the CNAs used them up all this morning and if she (V12) had to make any beds or residents need towels to shower or for ADL(Activities of Daily Living), she would have to go to the laundry room in the basement to look for clean supplies, because there is no stock in the units. V12 and surveyor observed on the 4th floor were seven flat sheets, three fitted sheets and six blankets. No clean towels, pillowcases or face towels were observed on the clean linen carts. On 4/30/2024 at approximately 1:30pm, V13 (Central Supplies Manager) stated after the facility was acquired by this new company, his supplies budget was cut significantly, and this has led to him only being able to order a dozen of each item such a bed sheets (flat and fitted), towels and face towels. V13 stated this is not enough supplies for the residents. V13 stated all the clean linens were used up this morning, and there was no clean linen in the units for resident use. On 4/30/2024 at 1:45pm, V22(Certified Nursing Assistant -CNA) said clean linen run out this morning and if a resident wants towels or bedsheets, she has to go downstairs to the laundry room to get the linen, which makes it difficult to take care of residents without enough supplies. During tour of the fourth floor with V22, there were four empty clean linen carts in the clean linen room, and one empty unit linen cart. there were four full diaper bags observed in the clean linen room. On 05/01/2024 at 1:58pm, during tour of the laundry room, V15 (Laundry Aide) was observed in the laundry room and stated she is just starting her shift and she found one washer washing a load of linen. two washers were observed washing residents' clothes, and two washers were off. Observed in the clean linen storage cart were 18 fitted sheets, 10 flat sheets, 8 bath towels, 5 big towels which were observed to be frayed on the sides. V15 stated the facility does not have enough linen for residents and more linen is needed. On 04/30/2024 at 2:02pm, V16 (Laundry Manager) stated the staff in the units do not send the laundry back to the laundry for washing, and this leads to shortage of linen. V16 stated he goes to the units and asks the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) to send the dirty linen down the shoot, but the CNAs don't send the linen to the laundry for washing. V16 stated the frayed towels and torn bed linen should be separated and put in a pile that will not be used by residents. V16 stated other than what is in the units and the laundry room, there is no extra stockpile for residents to use if they requested clean linen. On 4/30/2024 at 1:52pm V1(Administrator) stated there is not enough linen for the residents, even though the line is ordered every month. V1 stated she believed the CNAs are hoarding the clean linen which they are not supposed and are also not throwing the dirty linen down the shoot to laundry for cleaning. V1 stated the facility could use more linen. Facility grievance log dated 02/28/24 documents R8's family member was upset with staff and filed a grievance stating R8's linen was not changed. Dignity policy dated 1/15, documents: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. The facility's resident census sheet dated 4/30/24 documents 252 resident residing in the facility.
Mar 2024 10 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bedside table was accessible when being served lunch in resident's room, which affected one resident (R449) in the s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bedside table was accessible when being served lunch in resident's room, which affected one resident (R449) in the sample of 71 reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: R449's admission diagnoses documents in part, diabetes, wound right foot, osteomyelitis, hypertension, gastro esophageal reflux and schizophrenia. R449's Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMS) score is 14. A BIMS score of 14 indicates R449 is cognitively intact. On 3/11/24 at 12:00 pm, surveyor observed R449 in room sitting next to bed in a wheelchair. V31, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), came into R449's room and put R449's lunch tray on R449's bed and walked out of the room. R449 stated that the staff always put the meal trays on the bed. Surveyor inquired to R449 how R449 feels about the staff putting the meal trays on the bed? R449 stated, I don't have a choice but to eat on the bed because I don't have a table. On 3/12/24 at 2:50 pm, V1 (Administrator) stated that it is not acceptable for staff to put a residents meal tray on a resident's bed. It should be on a bedside table. On 3/13/24 at 12:50 pm, V2, DON (Director of Nursing), stated that it is not an acceptable practice for the staff to place the resident's meal tray on the resident's bed. Surveyor inquired to V2 if the residents should have a bed side table? V2 stated, Yes, residents should have a bedside table, but there is an issue with bedside tables. The bedside tables are on back order. It is not acceptable for a resident to have to eat on their bed. Facility Residents Rights documents in part, Your rights to dignity and respect. You have the right to make your own choices. Your facility must treat you with dignity and respect and must care for you in a manner that promotes your quality of life. Facility policy dated 1/15 and titled, Dignity documents in part, Policy: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Responsibility: All staff, 1. Residents should be treated with dignity and respect at all times; 2. Residents will be assisted in maintaining an enhancing his/her self-esteem and self-worth. Facility job description titled, Charge Nurse documents in part, The primary purpose of your job position is to provide direct nursing care to the residents, and to supervise the day-to day nursing activities, performed by the nursing assistants. Facility job description titled, Certified Nursing Assistant docments in part, Food Service Functions: Prepare residents for meals (that is, position tables, take to/from dining room).
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide clean linen for 2 residents (R27, R175) out of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide clean linen for 2 residents (R27, R175) out of a sample of 71 residents. Findings include: R27 has a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Venous Insufficiency, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Blepharitis [NAME] Upper Eyelid, and Blepharochalasis. R27 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15. R175 has a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis affecting Left Side, Hypertension, Atherosclerosis, Muscle Weakness and Adjustment Disorder. R27 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 11. On 3/11/2024 at 11:20am surveyor observed R27's sheet with a brownish stain on the right side of the foot of the fitted sheet. R27 also had a reddish stain on the left side of the top of the fitted sheet. On 3/11/2024 at 11:25am R27 stated he asked for clean sheets a couple of days ago but was told they did not have any clean sheets to give him. On 3/12/2024 at 10:45am V39 (Laundry Aide) stated that there is not enough laundry to provide for all of the residents. On 3/11/2024 at 12:13pm V13 (Certified Nurses Aide-CNA) stated she does not know about how often bed linen is changed, but stated that is blood on R27's sheet and she will change it. On 3/13/2024 at 12:44pm V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) stated linen should be changed daily and as needed. On 3/13/2024 at 2:56pm V34 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) stated that it is not enough linen when it's brought up from laundry in the morning. V34 stated that she tries to get more from laundry but they don't have it so she has to get more linen from other floors. Job Description titled Certified Nursing Assistant documents, in part, the primary purpose of your job position is to provide each of your assigned residents with routine daily nursing care and change bed linens. Linen Handling Policy with a date of 11/14 documents, in part, Laundry personnel shall be responsible for assuring adequate amounts of clean linen and personal clothing are available on each nursing unit and clean linens shall be applied to each occupied health center bed at least twice each week or as needed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure new skin alteration was reported to the nur...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure new skin alteration was reported to the nurse and failed to ensure the low air loss mattress was set appropriately. These failures affected 1 (R67) resident reviewed for prevention and treatment of pressure ulcer/injury in the total sample of 71 residents. Findings include: On 03/11/24 at 11:41am, R67 was lying on a low air loss mattress (IHE 395 True Low Air Loss). The setting of R67's low air loss mattress was [PHONE NUMBER]lbs, max inflate, static on. On 03/11/24 at 11:44am, this observation was pointed out to V23 (Licensed Practice Nurse). V23 stated the setting of her (R67) mattress is at [PHONE NUMBER] lbs., max inflate, and static on. On 03/11/24 at 11:45 AM, V24 (Certified Nursing Assistant) checked R67's buttocks upon the request of this surveyor and turned R67 to left side. Noted a skin opening on the coccyx area approximately 1inch x 0.4inch with no dressing. V24 stated there is no dressing on the wound. On 03/13/2024 at 10:23am, V9 (Wound Care Nurse/LPN) stated I (V9) am not aware that she (R67) has a wound. If there is a new wound, the nurse has to do 'Risk management, call the doctor and family, and I (V9) will follow up within 24 hours. On 03/13/2024 at 10:27am, V9 checked the setting of R67's low air loss mattress and stated it is set at [PHONE NUMBER]lbs, max inflate. The setting of the low air loss mattress is according to the resident's weight. The low air loss mattress should not be too hard or too soft. V9 set R67's low air loss mattress at 245lbs. On 03/13/2024 at 10:30am, V9 checked R67's buttocks and stated she (R46) has a skin opening on the coccyx. This is already stage 2. On 03/13/2024 at 10:32am on 3rd floor's nurse's station, V9 checked R67's weight and stated she (R67) weighs 168.8lbs. The low air loss mattress can be used as preventive measure for pressure ulcer; to aid in preventing any skin breakdown. On 03/13/2024 at 10:35am, V25 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated, I (V25) changed her (R67) (incontinence brief) this morning. I (V25) saw the opening on her (R67) coccyx area, and I (V25) applied barrier cream. I (V25) did not report it to the nurse because I (V25) did not know it was a new skin opening. I (V25) am supposed to report it to the nurse, but I (V25) did not. R67's (03/01/2024) weight was 168.8lbs. R67's (Active Order As Of: 03/12/2024) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) muscle weakness (generalized), unspecified lack of coordination, and weakness. Of note, no new treatment order for the skin alteration noted on 03/11/2024 by this surveyor and V24. R67's (12/30/2024) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 05. Indicating R67's mental status as severely impaired. Section GG. Functional Abilities and Goals. GG0170. A. Roll left and right: 2 (substantial/maximal assistance). B. Sit to lying: 2 (substantial/maximal assistance). C. Lying to sitting on side of bed: 2 (substantial/maximal assistance). Section M. Skin Conditions. M0100. Determination of Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk. A. Resident has a pressure ulcer/injury. M0150. Risk of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries. Yes. M1200. Skin and Ulcer/ Injury Treatments. B. Pressure reducing device for bed. R67's (3/13/2024) New Skin documented, in part Nursing Description: open red beefy area to coccyx area. Mobility: bedridden. Of note, this New Skin was created 2 days after this surveyor and V24 observed R67's skin. R67's (03/13/2024) Braden Scale documented, in part Braden Score: 13. Braden Category: Moderate risk. R67's (07/08/2021) Care Plan documented, in part Focus: at risk for skin breakdown. Goal: will have no complication. Interventions: Pressure redistribution mattress in place for pressure relief. The (2003) Certified Nursing Assistant Job Description documented, in part Purpose of Your Job Position. The primary purpose of your job position is to provide each of your assigned resident with routine daily nursing care and services in accordance with the resident's assessment and care plan, and as may be directed by your supervisor. Administrative Functions. Report all changes in the resident's condition to the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse as soon as practical. The (undated) facility provided document 'True Low Air Loss Tri-Therapy Mattress replacement system' upon the request of this surveyor for the IHE 395 True Low Air loss mattress manufacturer's guideline documented, in part 1. Comfort Weight Settings Button. The Comfort Setting controls the air pressure output based on the patient's weight. When patient's weight setting is increased, the output pressure will increase. The (undated) Pressure Ulcer Prevention documented, in part Purpose: To prevent and treat pressure. Equipment: Low air loss mattress. Procedure: 2. Inspect the skin several times daily during bathing, hygiene, and repositioning measures. New or worsening skin concerns should be reported immediately to the Resident nurse for follow up treatment. Note: Daily skin checks will be done by CNAs during routine care. The (undated) Pressure Ulcer recommendation Treatment protocols documented, in part All residents with pressure ulcers will be treated with consistent treatment. Stage II. 5. If minimal to moderate exudate. C. Apply hydrocolloid or foam dressing.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the feeding tube was disconnected and flushed after the completion of feeding. This failure affected 1 (R46) reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the feeding tube was disconnected and flushed after the completion of feeding. This failure affected 1 (R46) resident reviewed for tube feeding in the total sample of 71 residents. Finding include: On 03/11/24 at 12:35 PM, R46's tube feeding bag was hanging on a pole. The feeding bag was dated 3/10. The feeding pump was off. The line of the tube feeding from the feeding pump was under R46's blanket. On 03/11/2024 at 11:36am, this surveyor requested V23 (Licensed Practice Nurse) to check R46's feeding tube. The feeding tube was still hooked on R46's gastrostomy tube and feeding formula was still present on the feeding tube. V23 stated I (V23) stopped the feeding this morning. I (V23) will turn it back on at 2pm. On 03/11/2024 at 11:37am, surveyor inquired about flushing and disconnecting of tube feeding after completion of the feeding. V23 stated I (V23) should have done it, but I (V23) did not. On 03/13/2024 at 11:38am, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the expectation of the staff stopping the feeding is to disconnect the feeding tube from the resident's g-tube. The purpose of disconnecting the tube is for the staff to be able to flush the g-tube and give opportunity for the stomach to rest. Once the staff disconnected the feeding bag, best practice is to dispose it off. We don't want anything in it, it is like food at certain time there is a potential to get spoil and harbor germs. R46's (Active Order As Of: 03/12/2024) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) attention to gastrostomy. Enteral Feed Order every shift for Nutritional supplement Enteral feeding: D****e AC 1.2 at rate 65ml/hr, for a duration of 20hours and a total volume of 1300ml. Change tubing with each bottle change. On: 2p (pm). Off: 10a (am). R46's (01/26/2024) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section GG - Functional Abilities and Goals. GG0130. A. Eating: 1 (Dependent). R46's (12/30/2023) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section K - Swallowing/Nutritional Status. K0520 Nutritional approaches. B. Feeding Tube while a resident. R46's (01/02/2024) Care Plan documented, in part Focus: requires tube feeding r/t (related to) dx (diagnoses) dysphagia and CVA (cerebro vascular accident). Goal: will maintain adequate hydration. Interventions: will receive tube feeding and water flushes per physician orders. R46's (01/26/2024) Care Plan documented, in part Focus: has self care deficit. Goal: will improve/maintain highest level of function. Interventions: Total assist with Eating G tube feeding. NPO - Tube feeding. The (03/13/2024) email correspondence with V2 (Director of Nursing) documented, in part It is expected that once a tube feeding is completed it is disconnected from the resident and the g-tube is flushed with water to maintain patency. The (03/14/2024) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) upon request of continuous g-tube feeding policy and procedure documented, in part This is our only policy on G Tube feedings. Of note, the G-tube feeding policy did not include continuous feeding.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0813 (Tag F0813)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly log refrigerator temperatures for two resident's (R98 and R180) personal refrigerators and failed to provide a thermo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly log refrigerator temperatures for two resident's (R98 and R180) personal refrigerators and failed to provide a thermometer in one resident's refrigerator(R180). This failure has the potential to affect all 71 residents in the sample. Findings include: On 3/11/2024 at 11:34am observed a black refrigerator sitting on top of a stand in R98's room. Surveyor observed missing documentation of temperatures on the refrigerator temperature log. Surveyor asked R98 if it was okay to open the refrigerator and R98 responded yes. Surveyor observed 2 cartons of 2% milk, 3 bottles of water and 3 plastic bottles of soda in the refrigerator. On 3/11/2024 at 11:40am observed a white box refrigerator on top of a stand in R180's room, observed R180's refrigerator with no thermometer in the inside of the refrigerator and no refrigerator temperature log affixed to the personal refrigerator. The following foods were located inside the refrigerator at the time of observation: 2 cartons of two percent milk and four plastic bottles of water. On 3/11/2024 at 11:41am V16(Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the certified nursing assistant checks the temperature in the resident's personal refrigerators and documents the temperature on the temperature log. V16 stated if the temperature in the resident's personal refrigerator has not been checked the certified nursing assistant is to let the nurse know. On 3/13/2024 at 9:45am V34(CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the certified nursing assistant is to check the temperature in the resident's personal refrigerator. V34 stated the unit manager is responsible for checking the refrigerator temperature also and making sure that the resident's refrigerator has a thermometer in the inside of the refrigerator. V34 stated R180's personal refrigerator does not have a temperature log to document the daily temperature on. V34 stated R180's personal refrigerator does not have a thermometer inside of the refrigerator. V34 stated if the temperature is not checked daily then the food in the refrigerator could go bad. On 3/13/2024 at 12:51pm V2(DON/Director of Nursing) stated the staff, any staff, is responsible for checking and recording the temperature for a resident's personal refrigerator. V2 stated the temperature in a resident's personal refrigerator is taken daily. V2 stated a thermometer is required for the inside of a resident's personal refrigerator. V2 stated the purpose of taking the temperature for a resident's personal refrigerator is to know if the temperature is appropriate for food storage and making sure the food does not pose a risk for the resident to obtain food borne organisms. On 03/14/2024 reviewed the facility's revised policy dated 11/28/2016 titled Food Brought into the Facility by Friends/Family/Others (Outside Sources) For Residents, which documents underneath Procedure 4. Facility staff will monitor resident rooms, resident personal refrigerators for food and beverage disposal needs for safety. 6. All refrigerators in use in the facility have an internal thermometer to monitor temperature. All refrigerators have their internal temps recorded daily. R98's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 1/10/2024 Section C C0500 documents that R98 has a BIMS score of 15 which indicates that R98 is cognitively intact. R180's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 1/07/2024 Section C C0500 documents that R180 has a BIMS score of 08 which indicates that R180's cognition is moderately impaired.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 4 residents (R7, R25, R175, R299) received nail ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 4 residents (R7, R25, R175, R299) received nail care to preserve their dignity and increase self-esteem. This failure affected 4 out of 71 residents in the sample. Findings include: R7 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Nontraumatic Chronic Subdural Hemorrhage, Weakness, Abnormal Posture, Hypertension, and Dementia. R7's has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 99. R7's care plan focus on self-care dated 2/11/2024 documents, in part, substantial/max assist x 1 (one person) with dressing/grooming tasks. R25 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Sequelae of Cerebrovascular Disease, Lack of Coordination, Flaccid Hemiplegia affecting Right Dominant side, and Abnormal Posture. R25 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 07. R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents, in part, Personal Hygiene: 01. 01 is for dependent: Helper does all of the effort. R25's care plan focus Self Care Deficit dated 2/08/2024 documents, in part, resident is dependent with ADL care, provide total assistance in all aspects of hygiene/dressing. R175 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left dominant side, Hypertension, Muscle Weakness and Lack of Coordination. R175 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 11. R175's care plan focus Self Care Deficit dated 1/05/2024 documents, in part, 1 assist with dressing/hygiene tasks. R299 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Adult Failure to Thrive, Lack of Coordination, Abnormal Posture and Weakness. R299 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 10. R299's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section GG dated 02/08/2024 documents, in part, 01 which indicates R299 is dependent (Helper does all of the effort). R299's care plan focus Self Care Deficit dated 1/05/2024 documents, in part, resident is dependent with ADL care, provide total assistance in all aspects of hygiene/dressing. On 3/11/2024 11:20am surveyor observed R299 with long fingernails on both hands with a brownish gray substance under the nails. R299 nodded no when asked if they cleaned and cut his fingernails and nodded yes to wanting his nails cleaned and trimmed. On 3/11/2024 at 11:34am surveyor observed R7 with long fingernails on both hands with a brownish grey substance under the fingernail. On 3/11/2024 at 11:40am surveyor observed R25 with long fingernails on both hands with a brownish grey substance under the fingernail. On 3/11/2024 11:40am surveyor observed R175 with long fingernails on both hands with a brownish grey substance under the fingernail. On 3/11/2024at 1:30pm V15 (Registered Nurse) stated I can't tell you what that substance is under R25's fingernails and nail care is provided as needed. On 3/11/2024 at 2:32pm V28 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) stated nail care is provided every two weeks and as needed. On 3/13/2024 at 12:44pm V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) stated nail care is completed as needed and is a part of overall care and nail care includes the cleaning and cutting of fingernails. Undated policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) documents, in part, to preserve ADL function, promote independence, and increase self-esteem and dignity and maintaining personal hygiene with face and hands and self manicure (safety awareness with nail care). Job Description titled Charge Nurse documents, in part, the primary purpose of your job position is to provide direct nursing care to the residents and to supervise the day to day nursing activities performed by the nursing assistants and monitor nursing care to ensure that all residents are treated fairly and with kindness, dignity, and respect. Job Description titled Certified Nursing Assistant documents, in part, the primary purpose of your job position is to provide each of your assigned residents with routine daily care and services and assist residents with nail care (i.e. clipping, trimming and cleaning the fingers/fingernails).
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Findings include: On 03/11/24 at 12:04 PM, there were a total of 8 razors on R163's bed pan/basin located on top of R163 bedside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Findings include: On 03/11/24 at 12:04 PM, there were a total of 8 razors on R163's bed pan/basin located on top of R163 bedside dresser and 2 razors on R163's bedside table. This observation was pointed out to V24 (Certified Nursing Assistant). V24 stated two are brand new razors and the rest are used. On 03/11/24 at 12:11 PM, V24 stated if the residents are able to shave on their (residents) own, they can shave themselves, but they need to return the razor to the CNA who gave it to them for safety hazards; they (residents) can cut themselves and other residents. The razors should be thrown in the sharp container attached on each nurse's cart or in soiled utility room. I (V24) did not give him (R163) any razor. R163 stated I (R163) got them 2 days ago from the CNA. I (R163) don't remember the name. On 03/13/2024 at 11:26 V2 (Director of Nursing) stated a resident who has a capability to shave self, request a razor from CNA on duty or from nurses, shave self and return the razor to nurse or CNA for proper disposal in the sharp container attached to the nurse's cart. The importance of returning the razor to the nurse or cna for proper disposal is to ensure the resident's environment is free from potential hazard. The blade inside the razor is a potential hazard. R163's (Active Order As Of: 03/12/2024) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) bipolar disorder, weakness and lack of coordination. R163's (02/25/2024) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 13. Indicating R163's mental status as cognitively intact. The (undated) Shaving Male/Female Residents documented, in part Purpose: To provide cleanliness, comfort, and improved morale. Equipment: Razor. Procedure: 11. Remove and clean equipment and leave resident in comfortable position. Rationale/Amplification. Place disposable safety razor in bio-hazardous sharps container. The (undated) Needle Sharps - Handling and Disposal documented, in part Policy: Safe handling and disposal of needles/sharps will be followed. Policy Interpretation. 1. Caution shall be exercised by all personnel handling use needles, or other sharp objects to reduce the possibility of needle sticks injuries and cuts. 5. Contaminated needles and other sharp objects, must be placed in a puncture-resistant biohazard container. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety for 4 residents (R27, R111, R163, R173) by removing disposable razors from the resident's room and failed to provide supervision for 2 residents (R27 and R131) by leaving oral medicine and eye drops at the resident's bedside. The failure has the potential to affect all 5 residents out of a sample of 71. Findings include: R27 has a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Venous Insufficiency, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Blepharitis [NAME] Upper Eyelid, and Blepharochalasis. R27 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15. R27's Active Orders as of 3/12/2024 documents, in part, Fluorometholone Acetate Suspension 0.1% (eye drops for Blepharochalasis) and Maxitrol Ointment 3.5-10000-0.1 (eye drops for Cellulitis of Left Orbit). R27 has no order to self-administer eye drops. On 3/11/2024 at 11:27am surveyor observed two boxes of eye drops and one disposable razor on R27's dresser. R131 has a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Unilateral Inguinal Hernia, Hypertension, Weakness and Lack of Coordination. R131 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14. On 3/11/2024 at 11:44am surveyor observed a clear cup with 6 different color tablets and 1 capsule sitting on R131's bedside table. R131 has no order to self-administer oral medication. On 3/11/2024 at 11:45am V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) stated No, they (tablets and capsule in clear cup) should not be left in R131's room. On 3/11/2024 at 11:50am V15 (Registered Nurse) stated No, he (R131) does not have an order to self- administer his medication. R131's Active Orders as of 3/12/2024 documents, in part, FerrouSul Oral Tablet 325mg, Gabapentin Capsule 100mg, Isosorbide Dinitrate Oral Tablet 10 mg, Lasix Tablet 20 mg, Metoprolol succinate ER Tablet 25mg, Multi-Mineral-Vitamins Oral Tablet and Vemildly Oral Tablet 25mg. On 3/13/2024 at 12:44pm V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) stated, No, pills or eye drops should not be left at the bed side and the importance to take them is for a specific diagnosis, ordered by doctor and to keep the environment free from hazards. Undated policy titled Self-Administration of Medications Procedure documents, in part, residents have the right to self-administer their medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined the practice is safe for the resident and an order obtained to self-administer. Undated Job description for Charge Nurse documents, in part, prepare and administer medications as ordered by the physician. R111 has a diagnosis of Lack of Coordination, Abnormal Posture, Dysphagia, and Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage. R111 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14. R173 has a diagnosis of Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Reduce Mobility, and Lack of Coordination. R173 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14. On 3/11/2024 at 11:30am surveyor observed 6 disposable razors on R173's dresser. On 3/11/2024 at 12:13 V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) stated certain residents are allowed to shave themselves, but they have to return the razors to CNAs or the nurse's when they are done shaving. On 3/11/2024 at 12:16pm surveyor observed a disposable razor on R111's nightstand. On 3/12/2024 at about 11:45am surveyor observed 6 razors (4 disposable, 2 non-disposable) on R173's dresser. On 3/13/2024 at 12:44pm V2 (DON) stated No, ma'am razors are not to be left at the resident's bedside and once they are used, they are to be collected and discarded into the sharps container by the nursing staff. Undated policy titled Needle Sharps-Handling and Disposal documents, in part, safe handling and disposal of needles/sharps will be followed and contaminated sharp objects, must be placed in a puncture-resistant biohazard container. Undated job description titled Charge Nurse documents, in part, the primary purpose of your job position is to provide direct nursing care to the residents, and to supervise the day-to-day nursing activities and monitor your assigned personnel to ensure that they are following established safety regulations in the use of equipment and supplies.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two licensed personnel conducted a physical inventory of controlled substances at each change of shift. This failure ha...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two licensed personnel conducted a physical inventory of controlled substances at each change of shift. This failure has the potential to affect 3 residents on the 4th Floor Team 2 medication cart who are prescribed controlled substances and 5 residents on the 4th Floor Team 1 medication cart who are prescribed controlled substances. Findings include: On 03/13/2024 at 9:21 am review of the 4th Floor Team 2 medication cart with V11(RN/Registered Nurse) surveyor observed the controlled substances check form for March 2024. The Nurse's Off box was left blank for March 03, 2024 (11pm-7am shift). The Nurse's Off box was left blank for March 04, 2024(3pm-11pm shift). On 03/13/2024 at 9:25pm review of the 4th Floor Team 1 medication cart with V10(LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) surveyor observed the shift change accountability record for controlled substances for March 2024. The Nurse's Initials on box was left blank for March 8, 2024(1st shift). The Nurse's Initials off box was left blank for March 12, 2024(2nd shift). The blank spaces on the facility's-controlled substances check form/shift change accountability record for controlled substances form indicate the controlled substances were not reconciled at the end and beginning of the shift on the specified days. On 3/13/2024 at 9:21am V33(RN/Registered Nurse) stated for the shift change accountability record for controlled substances is used by two nurses (the nurse who is leaving the shift and the nurse who is coming on to the shift). The shift change accountability record for controlled substances is used to verify if the count of the controlled substances in the medication cart is correct. On 3/13/2024 at 9:25am V10(LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated when the nurse comes on the shift, this nurse counts the number of controlled substances in the medication packs and initials the shift change accountability record for controlled substances. V10 stated the nurse going off shift also verifies the count of the controlled substances in the medication packs and initials the shift change accountability record for controlled substances indicating the count of controlled substances is correct. On 03/13/2024 at 12:51 pm V2(DON/Director of Nursing) stated the shift change accountability record for controlled substances is signed at the beginning/end of the shift by the nurses. V2 stated the shift change accountability record for controlled substances is used to identify who took hold of the narcotics for a particular shift. V2 stated I do not expect for there to be any missing initials from the nurses on the shift change accountability record for controlled substances. On 03/14/2024 reviewed the facility's policy titled Receiving Controlled Substances with an effective date of 10/25/2014, which documents in part, Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances and medications classified as controlled substances by state law are subject to special ordering, receipt, and recordkeeping requirements by the facility in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. On 03/14/2024 reviewed the facility's undated Charge Nurse job description which documents in part, underneath Drug Administration Functions: Ensure that narcotics are accurate for your shift.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food items were covered, labeled and dated and failed to ensure staff appropriately wear beard restraints in an eff...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food items were covered, labeled and dated and failed to ensure staff appropriately wear beard restraints in an effort to prevent food borne illness. These failures have the potential to affect all residents receiving oral nutrition at the facility. Findings include: The (03/11/2024) facility census was 251. The (03/14/2024) email correspondence with V2 (Director of Nursing) documented that one resident was not taking oral nutrition at the facility. On 03/11/2024 at 10:06am inside the facility kitchen, V17 (Dietary Supervisor) has a beard and mustache and was not wearing beard restraint. This surveyor inquired about the beard restraint. V17 stated I (V17) am not aware that I (V17) need to wear one. On 03/11/2024 at 10:10am, V19 (Dietary Aide) has a beard and was not wearing beard restraint. On 03/11/2024 at 10:11am, V20 (Dietary Aide) has a beard and was not wearing beard restraint. This surveyor inquired about beard restraint. V20 stated I (V20) am not wearing a beard restraint. On 03/11/2024 at 10:12am, V21 (Dietary Aide) has a beard and was not wearing beard restraint. This surveyor inquired about beard restraint. V21 stated I (V21) am not wearing a beard restraint. On 03/11/2024 at 10:13am, on the right side on the 2nd shelf of the reach-in cooler was a piece of dessert on Styrofoam plate without a cover. V17 stated that's banana pie; we serve banana pie last Friday. It has no label and has no cover. I (V17) am going to throw it away. On 03/11/2024 at 10:14am, there were 2 sandwiches on the 1st shelf right side of the reach in cooler with no label. V17 stated these are Peanut butter and jelly. They are not labeled and dated. On 03/11/2024 at 10:14am, there were 9 fruit cups on the 3rd shelf on the left side of the reach in cooler without cover and without label. V17 stated these are peaches and pears; they are not covered and not labeled. On 03/11/2024 at 10:15am, there were 11 cups of thickened beverages on the 2nd shelf on the left side of the reach in cooler. V17 stated these are thickened milk and thickened orange juice. They are not labeled. On 03/11/2024 at 10:15am, there was a cup of thickened beverage on the 1st shelf on the left side of the reach in cooler. V17 stated that's thickened apple juice. It has no label. On 03/11/2024 at 10:19am inside the walk in freezer, there was an open box of peas with no delivery date. There was an open box of beans with no open date and no delivery date. There were boxes of unopened green peas, cut corns, carrots, mixed vegetable, capri blend, zucchini, devein shrimp without delivery dates. V17 checked these boxes for labels and stated there are no label on the boxes. On 03/13/2024 at 12:07pm, V18 (Dietary Manager) stated all food items should be properly labeled with the date they arrived. To make sure we know when they come in. To make sure we follow the FIFO (first in, first out) and by doing that we have to date the food items when they come in. To make sure to follow the rotation, to make sure we are using fresh product and not having old food items. On 03/13/2024 at 12:13pm, V18 stated it is expected food items to be covered and dated with date it was prepared and expire. The purpose of covering the prepared food items is to make sure nothing falls on the food. If something fell on the food, it could affect a resident that was served the food item. The purpose of dating the food items is to make sure nothing is served that is spoiled to prevent food borne illness. On 03/13/2024 at 12:22pm, V18 the only male dietary aide who does not have a beard is (V36- Dietary Aide). All male Dietary Staff should wear a beard restraint when handling food except for (V36). On 03/13/2024 at 12:24pm, V18 the expectation is for staff to wear a hair restraint and a beard restraint if they have beard and washed their hands so we don't make anybody sick. The (4/2017) Storage of refriderated (refrigerated)/frozen foods documented, in part Policy: The facility will follow safe handling and storage of refrigerated and frozen foods. Procedure: Foods in the refrigerator will be covered, labeled and dated. The (4/2023) Guidelines for labeling unopened and opened food items documented, in part Policy. The foods will be labeled upon delivery to the facility and then labeled with an opened and use by date according to the food storage guidelines or use-by-date on the container once the food has been opened. Purpose: To ensure the staff are using food that has not expired and meets food safety criteria. Procedure: Any items that need to be refrigerated will be kept accordingly based on the food storage chart guidelines or by the containers expiration/use by date (whichever comes first). All foods that are opened are to be wrapped or put in sealed container for storage to prevent contamination. The (4/2020) Employee Health and personal hygiene documented, in part Policy. Food service employees shall maintain good personal hygiene and free from communicable illnesses and infection while working in the facility. Procedure: Hair restraints will be worn at all times. Beards should be well trimmed and covered with an appropriate hair restraint.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the dumpsters were not overflowing with trash, failed to ensure the dumpsters were closed and failed to ensure the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the dumpsters were not overflowing with trash, failed to ensure the dumpsters were closed and failed to ensure the ground surrounding the dumpster was free of trash in an effort to prevent pest and rodents migration to the facility. These failures have the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: On 03/11/2024 at 10:35am, the 2 outside dumpsters were overflowing with trash and the lids were open. The ground surrounding the dumpster were with trash. V18 (Dietary Manager) stated the dumpsters are overflowing with trash that's why the dumpsters are not closing. These is all trash; we don't have recyclables. There is also trash on the grounds. It is everywhere. On 03/11/2024 at 10:38am, there was small gap between the delivery door and door frame. This observation was pointed out to V18. V18 stated the little mice could fit in there. On 03/11/2024 at 10:39am, there was a gap at bottom of the kitchen doors. V18 stated I know what you're pointing out, the mice could go to the kitchen. On 03/11/2024 at 3:25pm, the 2 outside dumpsters remained overflowing with trash and the lids remained open. The surrounding area of the dumpster still with trash. On 03/13/2024 at 12:16pm, V18 stated the outside dumpsters should be closed at all times to prevent rats, mice and raccoons going in the dumpster and then probably inside the building. If the delivery door has an opening, these could come into the facility and could go to the resident's room, they could go all over the place. The (2021) Safe Food Handling - Dumpster documented, in part Policy: All food will be handled safely and disposed of in a safe manner. Procedure: The dumpster will be securely covered. The grounds surrounding the dumpster will be free of trash and debris. The (undated) Pest Control Policy documented, in part Purpose: To prevent or control insects and rodents from spreading disease. Standards: 16. Outside dumpsters shall be sufficient size that the lid can be tightly closed.
Mar 2024 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the abuse prevention policy, failed to implem...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the abuse prevention policy, failed to implement interventions, failed to acknowledge (R4's) behaviors, failed to immediately remove (R4) from resident contact to ensure safety, and failed to ensure that one of four residents (R5) reviewed for abuse remained free from abuse. On (11/25/23) R5 sustained blunt head trauma during physical altercation with (R4) resulting in left frontal scalp contusion/hematoma and age indeterminate mildly displaced right nasal bone fracture. R5 also reported enduring chronic dizziness and headaches subsequent the altercation. Findings include: R4 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses which include bipolar disorder and paranoid schizophrenia. R4 resides on 1st floor. R4's (12/20/23) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) determined a score of 12 (moderate impairment). Inattention and disorganized thinking present, fluctuates. R4's care plan includes (6/14/23) resident may be at risk for potential abuse related to behavior problem as evidenced by history of verbally threatening/obnoxious behaviors, offensive antisocial habits and wandering. Intervention: monitor resident behaviors. (6/27/24) Resident has a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and is at risk for changes in mood, energy, and depression. Intervention: watch for behavior changes such as talking very fast, racing thoughts, easily distracted, overly restless, being impulsive. Notify physician if these changes are seen. R4's progress notes include the following behaviors (6/19/23) resident presented with physical and verbal aggression toward staff and peers stating that he was going to Kill all of the black people. (10/20/23) Resident began threatening nurse saying, I will f*** you up, come on, right here, right now. Resident threw his fist up in the position to fight. (11/25/23) Resident was standing in front of the nurse's station and another resident asked him to stay out of his room. Resident turned and looked at this person and put his face close to this person and this person reacted by putting his hand to resident's upper chest area, that's when resident hit this person with full strength (twice) to the face, knocking this person (who is elderly) to the floor. (2/10/24) Resident is verbally aggressive, calling writer profane words. Resident is delusional, thinking writer said she was going to shoot him. Writer did not say anything to him. Resident has been refusing his medications and his Haldol decanoate this month and is observed to be growing increasingly aggressive and delusional. The (11/25/23) initial state report includes incident time: 12:45am, (R4) was allegedly physically aggressive towards (R5). The (11/25/23) final state report states (R4) befriended a roommate of (R5). (R4) went into (R5's) room later in the evening on 11/24/23. (R5) came to the nursing station a little after midnight to talk to the nurse. As (R5) was talking to the nurse, (R4) came over to the nurse's station. (R5) can be hard to understand as he speaks with a thick accent. (R4) came over to (R5) and leaned in, towards (R5) as if to hear and understand what (R5) was saying. It was in that moment that (R5) pushed (R4) back, in a manner to state you are too close. As a reflex, (R4) hit (R5) and (R5) lost his balance and fell to the floor. This was an isolated event for (R4). (R4) has been with us since June 2023 and has never shown aggression towards residents or staff. The staff have never seen this behavior from (R4) nor was it ever anticipated [R4's progress notes affirm history of verbal and physical aggression towards staff and residents]. Both residents feel safe in the building [R5's subsequent interview affirms otherwise]. On 2/27/24 at 12:01pm, R4 was observed pacing (briskly) in the hallway. Surveyor(s) attempted to speak to R4, he (R4) proceeded to walk by surveyor(s), entered the room and closed the door immediately. Surveyor subsequently knocked on R4's door, R4 did not open the door and/or verbally respond. As surveyor(s) were standing in the hallway (approximately 1 minute later) R4 exited the room, walked (briskly) towards the nurse's station then wandered aimlessly about the unit. [Staff were present however failed to acknowledge R4's behavior at this time]. R5 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses which include Alzheimer's disease and bipolar disorder. R5 resides on 1st floor. R5's care plan includes (7/10/23) Resident has hearing deficit. (7/18/23) Resident presents with moderate to extreme anxiety related to persistent worry that something terrible is about to happen and verbal expressions of distress. Intervention: evaluate the potential causal factors contributing to feelings of anxiety. Work with the resident to eliminate causes whenever possible. R5's Nurse Practitioner progress notes state (11/25/23) seen in room today following a short ER (Emergency Room) visit from blunt head trauma. Patient was hurt by another resident. (12/4/23) Still complaint of residual pain on the left jaw area. X-ray were negative for fracture however R5's (11/25/23) CT (Computed Tomography) scan affirms otherwise. R5's (11/25/23) history & physical states patient here due to being hit in face by resident at the facility. Computerized Tomography (CT) Head: left frontal scalp contusion. CT Maxilofacial: small soft tissue contusion/hematoma anterior to the mandible extending to the left facial soft tissues. There is an age indeterminate mildly displaced right nasal bone fracture. [R5's 10/29/23 facial x-ray states no fractures were identified therefore considering reasonable person concept the fracture likely occurred during 11/25/23 altercation]. R5's (1/13/24) BIMS determined a score of 13 (cognition intact). On 2/27/24 at 12:05pm, surveyor inquired about the (11/25/24) altercation involving R4. R5 stated I got hit and fell down, he (R4) broke my nose. He (R4) came from behind and hit my face. Surveyor inquired if R5 has encountered any problems since the (11/25/24) incident. R5 responded Because of this guy (R4) I'm still not recovery, I have headaches, dizziness I need to see the doctor, it's been more than 3 weeks (months), it's an emergency. Surveyor inquired if R5 feels safe residing in the facility R5 replied It's not safe, I'm scared for my life right now. The guy (R4) who hit me came up behind me (R5), I'm 76 and he's about [AGE] years old [R4 is 32]. Three days ago, he walked in front of me, I can't say nothing cause he gonna hit me. I need to leave from here! On 2/27/24 at 12:12pm, surveyor inquired about the regulatory requirements for abuse V1 (Administrator) stated in part We immediately separate the alleged victim and the alleged aggressor. If it's residents, we involve psych (Psychiatric) and medical doctors immediately. The victim should be assessed by nursing and medical staff and psych to address their needs. The aggressor should be separated from the individual. Surveyor inquired about the current location of R4 and R5 [both reside on 1st floor - in the same hallway]. V1 responded (R5) is in room (room #) at the end of the hall and (R4) is at the other end of the hall. Surveyor inquired why R4 and R5 reside on the same unit if the aggressor (R4) should be separated (from R5) V1 replied Because at the time that this happened after speaking with them and watching the video it seemed as if (R5) instigated it. (R4) acted to be scared and protect himself. It was my belief that there was some misunderstanding between them. There's never been issues in the past with them. Once they calmed down it wasn't like he (R4) came out of nowhere and punched the guy (R5). It was (R5) getting into (R4) face and (R4) trying to get away from him (R5) [documentation affirms otherwise]. Surveyor inquired about R4's behaviors V1 stated He's (R4) much better since we got him (R4), he was erratic in his behavior. According to his (R4) history he's a nursing home hopper. He's (R4) pretty stable right now. Surveyor relayed concerns regarding R4's current behavior (response towards surveyors, rapidly wandering aimlessly about the unit), lack of staff acknowledgement and/or redirection for R4's behaviors V1 responded I'm gonna have nursing call psych right now if he's erratic and not acknowledging that people are speaking to him, that's not his baseline. On 2/27/24 at 12:25pm, R4 yelled down the hallway (while standing at his doorway) at surveyor(s) stating Hey! If you're wanting to talk to me about my apartment, I'll talk to you. If no, skip it then! however staff failed to acknowledge that R4 was yelling. On 3/4/24 at 11:15am, surveyor inquired about the (11/25/23) incident V9 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated I was the 4th floor nurse, and the 1st floor nurse (V8/RN) asked me to come down to assist him (V8). When I (V9) came down he (R5) was rubbing the right side of his face like around the jaw. He (R5) complained of pain, he just said it hurt bad. Surveyor inquired about R4's behaviors V9 responded He's like all over the place, hard to redirect and non-compliant. Surveyor inquired about R5's behaviors V9 replied He's (R5) not aggressive at all. On 3/4/24 at 12:31pm, surveyor inquired about potential harm to a resident that gets hit in the face (twice) and falls to the ground V10 (Medical Director) stated A fracture could happen if someone is hit in the face, a nasal bone fracture, bruising those are the type of things that could happen. Surveyor inquired if R5's x-ray affirmed no nasal fracture a month prior to 11/25/23 incident would you suspect the nasal fracture occurred during the 11/25/23 incident? V10 responded Its possible it could have happened from that. R4's (2/27/24) progress notes state 1:34pm, (after surveyor concerns were reported) resident is intimidating other resident and also provoking other resident in behaviors. Resident cannot be redirected at this time. Order received for resident to be sent out involuntary for psych evaluation. The abuse prevention policy (reviewed 1/4/18) includes IV.) Establishing a Resident Sensitive Environment: this facility desires to prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property by establishing a resident sensitive and secure environment. This will be accomplished by a comprehensive quality management approach involving the following: Resident Assessment: staff will identify residents with increased vulnerability for abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property or who have needs and behaviors that might lead to conflict. Through the care planning process, staff will identify any problems, goals, and approaches, which would reduce the chances of abuse. Staff Supervision: supervisors will monitor the ability of the staff to meet the needs of residents, including that assigned staff have knowledge of individual resident care needs. Situations such as inappropriate language, insensitive handling or impersonal care will be corrected as they occur. VI.) Protection of Residents: the facility will take steps to prevent potential abuse while the investigation is underway. Residents who allegedly abused another resident will be removed from contact with other residents during the course of the investigation. The accused resident's condition shall be immediately evaluated to determine the most suitable therapy, care approaches, and placement, considering his or her safety, as well as the safety of other residents and employees of the facility.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that call lights were accessible for two of four residents (R1, R2) reviewed for call lights. Findings include: 1. R1'...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that call lights were accessible for two of four residents (R1, R2) reviewed for call lights. Findings include: 1. R1's diagnoses include generalized weakness, reduced mobility and lack of coordination. R1's (12/20/23) functional assessment affirms supervision and/or touching assistance is required for transfers. R1's (12/20/23) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 15 (cognition intact). On 2/27/24 at 11:34am, R1 was observed seated in a wheelchair (adjacent the bed), the call light was on the floor (behind the head of bed) and out of reach. Surveyor inquired if R1's able to walk, R1 stated No. Surveyor inquired if residents need help, how do they request for help. R1 responded I gotta go and see em (staff). Surveyor inquired if R1 was lying in bed needing help, how does R1 request help R1 replied It's the same thing. R1's care plan (12/22/23) Resident is able to use call light, intervention: provide frequent monitoring. (12/20/23) Resident is at risk for fall related to co-morbidities, intervention: have commonly used items within reach. On 2/27/24 at 11:39am, surveyors inquired if R1's able to walk V3 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated No. Surveyor inquired about the location of R1's call light V3 searched behind the head of R1's bed, located R1's call light and placed it on the bed. Surveyor inquired where R1's call light was found V3 responded On the floor. Surveyor inquired where R1's call light should have been placed V3 replied It should be within reach. 2. R2's diagnoses include hemiplegia and hemiparesis. R2's (2/5/24) functional assessment affirms (2 persons) staff assistance is required for transfers. R2's care plan includes (1/31/24) resident is at risk for falls, intervention: be sure call light is within reach. R2's (2/5/24) BIMS determined a score of 14 (cognition intact). On 2/27/24 at 11:44am, R2 was observed lying in bed. The call light was on the floor (adjacent the bed) and out of reach. Surveyor inquired if R2's able to walk. R2 stated No, not without help. They (facility) have a sit to stand lift they put me on to get me up, it takes 3 or maybe 2 staff. I've always done stuff for myself but my body's telling me don't get up. My body's tired now. Surveyor inquired about the location of R2's call light. R2 searched for the call light to no avail and responded It might be on the floor (affirmed she has cataracts and can't see). I want what I want now, staff get irritated with me putting the light on all the time. R2's (2/20/24) progress notes state resident was unable to sign due to eyes being affected by cataract. Resident stated I can't see. On 2/27/24 at 11:56am, surveyor inquired if R2's able to walk. V4 (LPN) stated She's total I believe. Surveyor inquired about the location of R2's call light. V4 proceeded to pick up R1's call light (from the floor) and placed it on the bed (without securing it - so it doesn't fall) and stated, It should have been in her hand. Surveyor inquired if R2's call light was secured to the resident and/or linens. V4 affirmed it was not and proceeded to clip it to the sheet (after surveyor inquiry). The (9/19) call light policy states all residents shall have the nurse call light system available and within easy accessibility to the resident at the bedside or other reasonable accessible location.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow the abuse prevention policy, failed to report ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow the abuse prevention policy, failed to report required information, and failed to report accurate information and/or injury to the State Agency for two of four residents (R4, R5) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R4 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses which include bipolar disorder and paranoid schizophrenia. R4's progress notes include the following behaviors (6/19/23) resident presented with physical and verbal aggression toward staff and peers stating that he was going to Kill all of the black people. (10/20/23) Resident began threatening nurse saying, I will f*** you up, come on, right here, right now. Resident threw his fist up in the position to fight. (11/25/23) Resident was standing in front of the nurse's station and another resident asked him to stay out of his room. Resident turned and looked at this person and put his face close to this person and this person reacted by putting his hand to resident's upper chest area, that's when resident hit this person with full strength (twice) to the face, knocking this person (who is elderly) to the floor. The (11/25/23) initial state report states (R4) was allegedly physically aggressive towards (R5) [residents age, diagnoses, and/or mental status were excluded]. The (11/25/23) final state report states (R4) befriended a roommate of (R5). (R4) went into (R5's) room later in the evening on 11/24/23. (R5) came to the nursing station a little after midnight to talk to the nurse. As (R5) was talking to the nurse, (R4) came over to the nurse's station. (R5) can be hard to understand as he speaks with a thick accent. (R4) came over to (R5) and leaned in, towards (R5) as if to hear and understand what (R5) was saying. It was in that moment that (R5) pushed (R4) back, in a manner to state you are too close. As a reflex, (R4) hit (R5) and (R5) lost his balance and fell to the floor [actual injury was excluded]. This was an isolated event for (R4). (R4) has been with us since June 2023 and has never shown aggression towards residents or staff. Staff have never seen this behavior from (R4) nor was it ever anticipated [R4's progress notes affirm history of verbal and physical aggression towards staff and residents]. Both residents feel safe in the building [R5's subsequent interview affirms otherwise]. The allegation of physical abuse is unfounded [evidence affirms that physical contact was made resulting in physical harm]. On 3/4/24 at 11:15am, surveyor inquired about R5's (11/25/23) incident V9 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated I was the 4th floor nurse, and the 1st floor nurse (V8/RN) asked me to come down to assist him (V8). When I (V9) came down he (R5) was rubbing the right side of his face like around the jaw. He (R5) complained of pain, he just said it hurt bad. Surveyor inquired about R4's behaviors V9 responded He's like all over the place, hard to redirect and non-compliant. Surveyor inquired about R5's behaviors V9 replied He's (R5) not aggressive at all. R5 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses which include Alzheimer's disease and bipolar disorder. R5's (1/13/24) BIMS determined a score of 13 (cognition intact). On 2/27/24 at 12:05pm, surveyor inquired about the (11/25/24) altercation involving (R4) R5 stated I got hit and fell down, he (R4) broke my nose. He (R4) came from behind and hit my face. Surveyor inquired if R5 has encountered any problems since the (11/25/24) incident R5 responded Because of this guy (R4) I'm still not recovery, I have headaches, dizziness I need to see the doctor, it's been more than 3 weeks (months), it's an emergency. Surveyor inquired if R5 feels safe residing in the facility R5 replied It's not safe, I'm scared for my life right now. The guy (R4) who hit me came up behind me (R5), I'm 76 and he's about [AGE] years old [R4 is 32]. Three days ago, he walked in front of me, I can't say nothing cause he gonna hit me. I need to leave from here! R5's (11/25/23) history & physical states patient here due to being hit in face by resident at the facility. CT Head: left frontal scalp contusion. CT Maxilofacial: small soft tissue contusion/ hematoma anterior to the mandible extending to the left facial soft tissues. There is an age indeterminate mildly displaced right nasal bone fracture. [R5's 10/29/23 facial x-ray states no fractures were identified therefore considering reasonable person concept the fracture likely occurred during 11/25/23 altercation]. On 2/27/24 at 12:12pm, surveyor inquired about the regulatory requirements for abuse V1 (Administrator) stated Once the allegation is made, I have 2 hours with which to report it to (State Agency) and 5 days to provide a conclusion. R2's (2/19/24) progress notes state writer received a call from (hospital) stating resident made complaints about her healthcare and plan of care [actual concerns were excluded]. Writer assured (caller) that the concerns would be looked into and addressed. On 2/20/24, (State Agency) received allegations that an unknown doctor threatened to send R2 to a mental institution if she did not take all her medications, unknown staff is rough in handling R2, and an unknown resident threatened to stab R2 with an ice pick. The (January-February 2024) abuse reportable binder was reviewed for abuse allegations however R2 was excluded. On 3/4/24 at 2:30pm, surveyor advised that IDPH received several abuse allegations regarding R2. Surveyor inquired if R2 reported that a physician threatened to send her to a mental institution if she did not take all medications and/or concerns regarding prescribed medications V6 (Social Service Director) stated Not that I know. The only thing she complained about is that they (staff) didn't change her on time or didn't move her fast enough, a whole slew of things. Surveyor inquired if R2 reported rough handling while staff provide care V6 responded Yeah, she did mention that a couple of time we (facility) even had it in the care plan meeting. I did get a call from the Social Worker (from the hospital) they said that she was making complaints like they don't move her fast enough, they don't change her pants, they don't bring her food. She has complaints every day. Surveyor inquired if R2 reported that a resident threatened to stab her with an ice pick V6 replied With a ice pick? No. Surveyor inquired what the facility implemented post R2's daily complaints which were allegedly made up V6 replied So basically, I did put in the care plan that she was actually making things up and we did a care plan meeting with the daughter, a sister and some other person that came in. I offered to send her to other facility's but they all denied her [reporting rough handling to IDPH was excluded]. Surveyor inquired about the facility abuse protocol V6 stated I report that to the abuse coordinator. This is the first I'm hearing about this, about the physician and the ice pick, I will go tell the Administrator. On 3/4/24 at 2:49pm, V1 (Administrator) inquired about the dates of said occurrences surveyor relayed that the complaint was received on 2/20/24 however actual dates of occurrences are unknown. On 3/4/24, IDPH was notified by the facility that R2 made a complaint that someone threatened to stab me with an ice pick however allegations regarding staff rough handling, and/or threats to send R2 to a mental institution if she does not take all her medications were excluded. On 3/5/24 at 10:15am, surveyor inquired why R2's (2/20/24) state report only includes threats to stab R2 with an ice pick V1 (Administrator) stated That is all he (V6) told me. I'll be sending an addendum to public health. The abuse prevention policy (reviewed 1/4/18) states VIII.) External Reporting: when an allegation of abuse, exploitation, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property has occurred, the resident's representative and the Department of Public Health of Public Health's regional office shall be informed that an occurrence of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property has been reported and is being investigated. The report shall include the following: name, age, diagnosis and mental status of the resident allegedly abused, type of abuse reported, date, time location and circumstances of the alleged incident, any obvious injuries or complaints of injury, and steps the facility has taken to protect the resident.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the smoking safety policy and failed to provide supervision to one of five residents (R1) reviewed for hazards. These...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the smoking safety policy and failed to provide supervision to one of five residents (R1) reviewed for hazards. These failures have the potential to affect 251 residents. Findings include: The (2/27/24) census includes 251 residents. R1's (12/20/23) smoking risk assessment determined a score of 5, may not be capable of handling/carrying any smoking materials and requires supervision when smoking. On 2/27/24 at 11:34am, surveyor(s) entered R1's room and a strong odor of cigarette smoke was noted. R1 was observed in the room sitting in a wheelchair and a cigarette butt was noted on the dresser in front of R1. A cigarette pack was also observed on R1's bed at this time. On 2/27/24 at 11:39am, surveyors inquired about the odor in R1's room V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated There's a odor, it's kind of musky. Surveyor inquired if cigarettes should be in R1's possession V3 stated No, it should be downstairs with the activity and subsequently removed the cigarette pack from R1's bed at this time. The (5/14) facility smoking safety policy states smoking is only allowed in designated areas established by management. If indoor smoking is prohibited by state or local law the interior of the facility will remain smoke-free at all times. The designated area(s) will be outside in accordance with state/local standards. The facility has the right to enforce a policy prohibiting residents from keeping any smoking materials in his/her possession for health, safety and security reasons. Resident requiring supervision shall receive this monitoring consistent with their assessment and plan of care. If the assessment indicates problems with safety compliance objective documentation explaining the interventions and the resident's response should be recorded.
Jan 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident and provide individualized fall p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident and provide individualized fall prevention interventions, for a cognitively impaired resident, who had four repeated falls. This failure affected one resident (R1) of three residents, reviewed for falls. As a result, R1 was sent to the hospital three times within seven weeks. The last fall incident of R1 resulted in an open fracture of the nasal bone. Findings include: R1's Hospital Records written by V20 (emergency room Physician), dated 12/13/23 at 11:44am documented on page 83 Patient was seen one day ago for concerns of a mechanical fall and had findings for an open fracture of the nasal bones, and was discharged with Augmentin for 7 days. On 1/10/24 at 11:02am, R1 was observed in the dining room sitting in a wheelchair that was not locked, with oxygen nasal cannula prongs on the head, and moving the wheelchair slightly forward and backward. V6 (RN/Registered Nurse/Restorative Nurse) was asked about R1's portable oxygen tank and V6 came to the dining room and put a new portable oxygen tank. At this time, V6 also locked R1's wheelchair, stating that the wheelchair should be locked. On 1/11/24, the following were observed on the fourth floor: At 9:53am, R1 was observed in the wheelchair in the dining room with eight other residents; no staff was present in the dining room to supervise all 9 residents. The surveyor stayed in the dining room for about 10 minutes and then went to the nursing station and asked V15 (RN/Registered Nurse) about who was supposed to be watching the residents in the dining room. V15 stated No one is watching them right now; I will have to call down to see what time Activities will get here. V15 made a phone call and then stated, Someone will come soon. Inquired from V15 what time the activities staff is supposed to get here to watch the residents. V15 stated Activity gets here sometimes at 10am, depending on who. At 10:02am, V6 (RN) also was at the nursing station, and the surveyor asked V6 about who was supposed to watch the residents in the dining room; V6 stated I'm not working up here today, I don't know when someone will be available, you can talk to the nurses working here. At 10:22am, V16 (Psychosocial Director) came into the dining room and stated, I will stay here and watch the residents. At 10:19am, V7 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) who is the assigned CNA for R1, was asked about how many of her assigned residents still needed to be cleaned; V7 stated I have a total of five residents to get up; So far, I have done three residents. I did not get (R1) up, the night shift usually gets him (R1) up. At 10:25am, the surveyor left the dining room with V16 watching the residents (including R1) in the dining room, no Activity Staff arrived on the floor yet. On 1/10/24 at 12:40PM, V2(Director of Nursing) presented the facility's incident reports of R1's fall events dated as follows: 10/21/23 - R1 had an unobserved fall in the room with no injury. 10/26/23 - R1 observed on the floor in the dining room; R1 was sent to the hospital by ambulance. 12/11/23 - R1 fell and hit his head in the dining room and was sent to the hospital by ambulance. 12/12/23 - R1 fell and hit his head in the dining room and was sent to the hospital by ambulance. On 1/10/24 at 12:30pm, V4 (Fall Nurse/LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) was interviewed about R1's fall prevention interventions. V4 stated that R1 is a high risk for falls because he thinks he can get up by himself and he is weak and has Dementia. V4 added, We have interventions in place, to make sure he stays in a supervised area when awake, and to monitor him. R1's records reviewed include but are not limited to the following: Face sheet shows that admission diagnoses include but are not limited to Weakness, Multiple Sclerosis, Reduced Mobility, Dementia, And Disorganized Schizophrenia. Fall Risk Review forms dated 12/12/23 and 12/29/23 both show that R1 is at risk for falls. MDS (Minimum Data Set) section GG shows that R1 requires moderate assistance for functional ability activities and transfers. MDS section C dated 10/1/23 shows BIMS (Basic Interview for Mental Status) score of 4 out of 15(severe cognitive impairment). Care plan Intervention dated 12/4/23 states: Staff will encourage participation in activities when up in chair in dining room. Care plan Intervention dated 12/12/23 states: Observe frequently and place in supervised area when out of bed. Care plan Intervention dated 12/4/23 states: Gather information on past falls and attempt to determine the root cause of the fall(s). Anticipate and intervene to prevent recurrence. R1's progress notes dated as follows documents: On 10/21/23 at 10:41am, V13 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) wrote in part: Writer called by CNA to resident's room, resident noted on floor next to wheelchair. Resident denied hitting head and stated he slipped. Resident assessed head to toe no injuries noted, resident denies any pain/discomfort. On 10/26/23 at 12:11pm, V13 (LPN) documented in part: Writer's attention called to the dining parlor, resident observed on the floor lying on back. Resident stated he was going to the other spot. Head to toe assessment done, no noted injuries/bruising at the time, able to perform from upper and lower extremities at baseline. NP (Nurse Practitioner) in facility, order given to send to the Hospital. On 12/11/23 at 12:14pm, V13 documented in part: Writer's attention was called to the dining room, resident lying flat on back with nonskid footwear on. Resident stated I was getting up. Head to toe assessment done, resident hit his head but denies any pain, no swelling or bruising noted at this time. (Ambulance contacted for transportation to the hospital). On 12/12/23 at 5:47pm, V14 (LPN) wrote: Writer was called to dining room. Upon entering, writer observed resident on floor lying on his side next to his wheelchair. Staff assisted with transfer. Tolerated transfer well. Resident noted A&Ox1 (Alert and Oriented times 1). Head to toe assessment performed. Writer noted light bleeding to nose, top lip, and mouth. Vital signs obtained. Team Health phoned and spoke with NP with orders to transfer resident to the Hospital for further evaluation. On 12/13/23 at 1:36am, V21 (RN) documented in part: Resident returned to facility from ER (Emergency Room) with a diagnosis of Open Fracture of Nasal Bone. On 1/11/24 at 10:30am, V13 (LPN) was interviewed regarding how R1's falls happened during three out of four incidents that V13 was R1's nurse. V13 stated that she (V13) was R1's nurse when the falls dated 10/21/23, 10/26/23, and 12/11/23 happened. V13 explained that activity staff was present in the parlor (dining room) when R1 fell on [DATE], but the staff could not catch R1 in time to prevent the fall, and it was lunch time. V13 stated I cannot remember the staff, but I remember someone was there with the residents in the dining room when it happened. For the fall of 12/11/23, I don't remember if staff was present during the fall of 12/11/23, because staff were all passing trays at that time. On 1/11/24 at 10:34am, V17 (Activity Director) was interviewed and stated It is the responsibility of nursing to watch the residents in the dining room. Activity staff usually gets to the day room at 10:00 AM, but this staff has a day-off today. On 1/11/24 at 12:01pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) was asked why there was no staff watching residents in the dining room on the 4th floor (a total of nine residents sitting there without supervision). V2 stated Formal activity programs starts at 10am, but activity staff is supposed to be on the units before then, during breakfast and after breakfast. It's not okay to have residents in the dining room without any staff watching them. It's for safety reasons; there should be someone in there. On 1/11/23 at 1:52pm, V19 (NP/Nurse Practitioner) was interviewed regarding R1's frequent falls and why the nursing staff should follow the care plan for fall prevention, especially for a resident like R1 whose fourth fall resulted in a fracture. V19 stated the reason for a fall care plan is to help reduce the incidents of falls for residents, and the interventions stated in the care plan should be followed. V19 added that residents at risk for falls should be supervised more closely by staff. Regarding R1's last fall incident that involved hospitalization and a nasal fracture, V19 stated that the ENT (Ear, Nose, and Throat) doctor saw R1 in the hospital and there is no need for surgery on R1's nose. V19 added that nasal fractures usually heal within 6-8 weeks. On 1/16/2024, at 9:50am, R1 was observed in a different room closer to the nursing station. Inquired from V15(RN) why R1's room was changed; V15 stated After you left that day, we moved him (R1) to room [ROOM NUMBER], closer to the nursing station, so we can keep a closer eye on him. On 1/16/24 at 10:32am, V4 (Fall Nurse) stated I spoke to the nurses on the fourth floor about the fall prevention interventions for (R1) and that was when they decided to move him closer to the nursing station because his room was all the way at the back. Facility's Fall Prevention Program dated 2/28/14 states: It is the policy of this facility to have a fall prevention program to ensure the safety of all residents in the facility when possible. The program will include measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. #3 states: Safety interventions will be implemented for each resident identified at risk using a standard protocol. Facility's document CNA Job Description states in part: Ensure that residents who are unable to call for help are checked frequently. Check each resident routinely to ensure that his/her personal needs are being met in accordance with his/her wishes.
Dec 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to: ensure that one dependent resident (R1) was clean an...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to: ensure that one dependent resident (R1) was clean and dry within two hours of requesting incontinent care; and the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R1) with scaly feet and overgrown toe nails received foot care. This failure affected one of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Findings include: R1 is [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Contracture of Muscle, Lack of Coordination, Weakness, Reduced mobility, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Contracture of unspecified joint and Diabetes Mellitus. R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 11 which indicates moderate impairment. On 12/18/2023, at 1:23 PM, R1was observed lying in bed. At that time, R1 said, I am waiting on my CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) to come and change me. I've been waiting for over an hour now. On 12/18/2023 at 1:25 PM, Surveyor observed V9 (CNA) at the 2nd floor Nurse's station (outside of R1's room) conversing with peers. At that time, Surveyor asked V9 (CNA) if she was assigned to R1. On 12/18/2023 at 1:25 PM, V9 (CNA) said, Yes, I'm assigned to R1. I am going to change her now. On 12/18/2023 at 1:28 PM, V9 (CNA) proceeded to enter R1's room after gathering incontinent supplies. At that time, Surveyor entered R1's room with V9 (CNA) to observe incontinent care (with R1's permission). On 12/18/2023 at 1:30 PM, R1's bed was soaked with urine. R1's brief, sheet, pad and gown were all wet. Surveyor observed a brown ring in the middle of R1's bed sheet. Surveyor asked V9 when the last time R1's brief was changed. On 12/18/2023 at 1:30 AM, V9 said, I last changed R1's brief at 9:30 AM. She told me before lunch that she needed to be changed but the food cart came up for lunch and we had a lot of feeders (residents that requires to be fed) on this floor. I was going to change her when I got done feeding. Surveyor inquired about the condition of R1's linen. On 12/18/2023 at 1:30 AM, V9 said, Her (R1's) sheet is soiled, and her gown and mattress are wet. The brown ring is probably from the urine. At that time, Surveyor observed R1's feet when V9 removed R1's socks. R1's skin on her feet was dry, scaly, and cracked. R1's toenails on both great toes were approximately 2 inches long. Surveyor asked V10 (R1's Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) to come to R1's room and made V10 aware of R1's foot issues. On 12/18/2023 at 1:41 PM, V10 said, R1's feet are excessively dry and her toe nails are excessively long. I will have the Certified Nurse Assistant clean R1's feet and put emollient on her feet. On 12/19/2023 during investigation, R1 was observed in bed. R1's feet were still scaly, cracked and dry. On 12/19/2023 at 10:15 AM, R1 said, The CNA (V9) or Nurse (V10) never cleaned my feet. They are really dry and they hurt. At that time, V15 (RN/ Registered Nurse) entered R1's room with Surveyor. On 12/19/2023 at 10:18 AM, V15 (RN) said, R1's feet are dry. She can get an infection with the long nails and cracked skin. On 12/19/2023 at 10:20 AM, V14 (Unit Manager) said, R1's feet should have been cleaned on yesterday. She (R1) needs some emollient and her nails are way too long. She (R1) is scheduled to see the podiatrist soon but I will make sure that the Nurse or CNA cleans and moisturizes R1's feet today. Surveyor inquired about the possible outcomes of overgrown toenails and unkempt, scaly feet. On 12/19/2023 at 10:20 AM, V14 (Unit Manager) said, There is a risk for infection if the feet are not properly cleaned and groomed. She (R1) can also develop circulation problems if her feet are in that condition. Surveyor inquired about the possible outcomes of a resident not receiving timely incontinent care. On 12/19/2023 at 10:20 AM, V14 (Unit Manager) said, They (residents) should be clean and dried as soon as possible to prevent skin breakdown or rashes. R1's Minimal Data Set, Section GG documents, R1 is totally dependent with showering and bathing. Facility document titled Certified Nursing Assistant duties and responsibilities documents, Assist residents with bath functions; Keep residents dry; Assist residents with bowel and bladder functions. Facility document titled Charge Nurse Duties and responsibilities documents, Ensure that personnel providing direct care to residents are providing such care in accordance with the resident's care plan and wishes. Facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) documents, To preserve ADL function, promote independence, and increase self-esteem and dignity. Interventions may include (depending on an assessment based on individual need); Washing and drying the body, including full body sponge bath.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident's meals were the proper portion size. This failure has the potential to affect 245 residents that current...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident's meals were the proper portion size. This failure has the potential to affect 245 residents that currently depend on the facility to meet their nutritional needs. Findings include: On 12/18/2023 during kitchen visit, Surveyor observed tray line in progress for lunch. On 12/18/2023 at 11:30 AM, V8 (AM Cook) was observed preparing resident's meal trays. At that time, V8 placed a slice of Ham, ½ cup of mashed potatoes, ½ cup of peas and slice of cake on each tray. On 12/18/2023 at 11:34 PM, Surveyor asked V5 (Dietary Manager) to weight a slice of ham. At that time, V5 weighed a slice of ham on a mechanical food scale. The scale indicated that the slice of ham weighed between .75 and .8 ounce. (Not even one ounce) Surveyor inquired about the amount of ham that is supposed to be served on each resident's meal tray. On 12/18/2023 at 11:34 PM, V5 said, They (residents) are supposed to get 3 ounces of ham. Surveyor inquired about who cut the ham for lunch. On 12/18/2023 at 11:40 AM, V8 (Cook) said, I cut the ham for lunch. I'm not sure how many ounces the ham was but it is supposed to be 3 ounces per serving. No, I didn't weigh the ham because I was trying to do a lot of other stuff too. I tried to cut it close to the size that I have seen it cut here before. I've only been here for one month. Surveyor asked if the slice of ham was sufficient for a meal. On 12/18/2023 at 11:40 AM, V7 (Dietary aide) said, The ham is too thin. It should be thicker than that. On 12/18/2023 at 2:55PM, V5 (Dietary Manager) said, V8 (Cook) is the person that cut the ham. Usually V8 does a good job at giving the correct portions of food. I don't know what happened today but the ham should have been three ounces to meet the needs of the residents. Facility policy titled Menu and Nutritional Adequacy documents, Food will be served in appropriate portions a indicated on cycle menu spreadsheets and on standardized recipes. Facility policy titled Menu Week at a Glance documents, Monday December 18th lunch- Baked Ham (3 ounces of protein).
Nov 2023 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a dementia residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a dementia resident (R1) who is a fall risk. This failure resulted in R1 falling in the hallway, sustaining a laceration to his forehead, requiring emergency department evaluation and receiving eight sutures. Findings Include, R1's clinical record documents in part: R1 is a [AGE] year-old with the medical diagnosis of dementia, vascular dementia, muscle weakness, history of falling, cognitive communication deficit, unsteadiness on feet, metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, weakness, and reduced mobility. Minimum data set [MDS] Brief Interview Mental Status Score indicates R1 is cognitively impaired. R1's Care Plan documented in part five falls. Two falls 5/24/23 and 9/20/23 resulted in injury. -R1 is at risk for falls due to co-morbidities: Fall 10/17/23: Resident stated, I was getting money out the drawer for a soda, no injuries. Intervention: Fall 10/17/23: When up out of bed, resident will be monitored in supervised common areas. Fall 09/20/23 observed lying face down in hallway, facial laceration Rt Forehead Intervention: Fall 09/20/23: wear safety helmet at all times Fall 06/19/23 observed sitting on floor near bathroom door, no injuries. S/P Fall res observed sitting on bathroom floor, no injuries. Intervention: Refer to Therapy for screen and treat Fall of 05/24/23 resident stated, I was going to restroom and lost my balance, laceration to Lt hand 4th digit. Intervention: Ensure proper footwear 5/24/2023 06:57-Health Status/Progress Note Note Text: Resident return from hospital. R1's left hand 4th digit 3 sutures intact no bleeding noted to site. Fall of 01/02/23 res stated, I fell trying to go to the bathroom, no injuries. S/P Fall 01/14/23 observed sitting on buttocks in front of bed (laceration to forehead Intervention: Offered and placed Urinal at bedside. R1's Progress notes documented in part: On 9/20/2023 11:00- Nursing Progress Note Note Text: Writer heard loud noise in hallway noted R1 lying face down. Noted swelling of nose open area to forehead moderate amount of blood noted ice pack applied with pressure dressing. On 9/20/2023 23:34-Health Status/Progress Note Note Text: Received a call from hospital stated that all CT scans to cervical spine, facial bones, and head/brain read negative. On 9/20/2023 22:25-Health Status/Progress Note Note Text: R1 returned to the facility from Hospital alert and oriented x1. R1 Returned with approximately 6-7 sutures noted to laceration on face. On 11/15/23 at 11:02 AM, surveyor and V9 [Licensed Practical Nurse] observed R1 was resting in bed without his soft helmet in place. V9 stated, R1 always needs his soft helmet on, even when in bed, to prevent a head injury incase R1 falls. I last saw R1 around 9:30 AM. [Surveyor observed V9 look for R1's helmet for several minutes. V9 located R1's helmet underneath R1's bed, near the foot of the bed.] On 11/15/23 at 12:42 PM, V17 [Certified Nurse Assistant] stated, I been working with R1 for months. R1 is alert only to himself. R1 need complete assistance with ADL care. R1 needs to be spoon fed one to one. R1 tries to stand up out his bed or wheelchair often, R1 constantly needs supervision. R1 is supposed to always wear his soft helmet even while in bed. I placed on R1's helmet this morning, but I'm not sure why it was off around 11:00 AM. On 11/15/23 at 11:53 AM, V9 stated, I was R1's nurse on 9/20/23, the day R1 feel and sustained a laceration to his forehead. I was at the nursing station and heard a loud noise. I observed R1 laying in the hallway, bleeding from his forehead. I applied a pressure dressing and called 911. R1 received several sutures and returned back to the facility. R1 is alert to himself only and needs constant supervision because he is very impulsive. R1 will stand up and start to walk and needs verbal queuing and redirection. On 11/16/23 at 11:44 AM, V2 [Director of Nursing] stated, R1 is confused and impulsive. R1 uses a wheelchair to ambulate the unit. R1 needs supervision, frequent queuing, extensive assist with all areas of care, and one to one feeding. On 9/20/23, R1 was observed on the floor in the hallway. The nurse controlled R1's head bleeding. R1 returned with several sutures to forehead. Intervention was to wear the soft helmet at all times. R1 should wear the helmet at all times to prevent further head injuries from occurring. Policy documents in part: Fall Prevention and Management Policy - Facility is committed to providing a safe and secure environment for residents, staff, and visitors. -. Individualized fall prevention care plans will be developed based on the resident's risk assessment. - The fall prevention care plan will be communicated to all staff members involved in the resident's care - The environment will be routinely assessed for potential hazards, and necessary modifications will be made promptly. - All staff members will receive regular training on fall prevention strategies, resident-specific care plans, and the proper use of assistive devices - Ongoing Monitoring: a. Staff will continually monitor residents for signs of increased fall risk and report changes promptly. - Communication among staff members, including handoffs during shifts, will emphasize fall prevention strategies.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to keep two residents (R6, R8) free from abuse for 2 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to keep two residents (R6, R8) free from abuse for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R6's admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documents in part that R6 has severe cognitive impairment. During the one week look back period, R6 had wandering behaviors. R6's comprehensive care plan initiated 9/18/2023 documents in part that R6 may be at risk for potential abuse related to confusion and wandering. Intervention initiated 9/18/2023 documents in part: Monitor resident behaviors. On 11/15/2023 at 1:45 PM, V22 (Nurse) stated finding R6 ambulating in the hallway injured. After investigating, V22 found out that R6 went into R5's bathroom. When R6 exited the bathroom, R6 startled R5. '[R5] reached out and slapped [R6].' V22 stated R6 is a little bit confused and needs redirection. V22 did not know why R6 was using R5's bathroom instead of R6's bathroom. V22's incident progress note dated 9/18/2023 7:10 AM documents in part: writer observed [R6] ambulating towards nursing station with disheveled appearance. Upon approaching further resident to writer, noted resident with active bleeding from face and mouth due to laceration on face and mouth area. R6 informed V22 that R5 hit [R6] in the face. V22's incident progress note dated 9/18/2023 7:44 AM documents in part that when V22 interviewed R5, R5 stated I didn't want [R6] in my room. R5 admitted to striking R6. V22 also wrote that R5 had an un-apologetic attitude. R5 stated [R6] needs to stay out of my room or I will do it again. R8's comprehensive care plan initiated 7/05/2023 documents in part that R8 may be at risk for potential abuse related to mental/emotional challenges as evidenced by psychiatric diagnosis, confusion, disorientation, forgetfulness, and poor judgement skills. On 11/14/2023 at 12:36 PM, V6 (Nurse) stated R8 is very confused. R8 with behaviors of wandering and going through other residents' belongings. On 11/15/2023 at 12:23 PM, V19 (Nurse) stated R8 needs frequent re-direction. R8 with behaviors of taking things that do not belong to R8. V19 stated R7 and R8 used to be roommates. While doing rounds one day, V19 found R8 on the floor by R8's bed. R8 had redness and a scratch to the face but R8 did not recall what happened. V19's incident progress note dated 9/16/2023 7:16 AM documents in part that R8 had redness to the left cheek with a scratch to the upper chest. V19's incident progress note dated 9/16/2023 at 7:35 AM documents in part: Upon rounds writer noted [R7] in room agitated unable to be redirected, when asked what occurred resident stated to writer 'I hit [R8] because [R8] stole my clothes. On 11/14/2023 at 12:27 PM, R7 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R7 stated previous roommate (R8) kept going through R7's belongings. I told him to get away from my stuff and to stop going through it. I hit him one time in the jaw. R7 demonstrated to surveyor hitting R8 with a closed fist. R7's comprehensive care plan initiated 11/28/2022 documents in part that R7 has been noted to be physically aggressive towards peers when angry and displays poor impulse control. R7 had previous incidents with other peers on 6/24/2022, 12/20/2022, and 12/12/2022. Facility's Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy and Procedure dated 18-Nov-16 documents in part: This facility desires to prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment and misappropriation of resident property by establishing a resident sensitive and resident secure environment.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs by not supplying enough linen for five (R7, R9, R10, R11,12) residents out of a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs by not supplying enough linen for five (R7, R9, R10, R11,12) residents out of a total sample of 12 residents. Finding include: On 11/14/2023 at 11:54 AM, surveyor interviewed R9. R9 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R9 stated the facility did not have enough linens and are always running low. One of R9's pillows did not have a pillowcase. Fitted bed sheet had tan stains on it. At 12:01 PM, one of R10's pillows did not have a pillowcase. At 12:04 PM, R11 stated staff needed to change R11's bed linens. R11 could not recall the last time the staff changed R11's linens. R11 stated staff have not changed them this week. At 12:07 PM, R12 was sitting up in a motorized wheelchair. R12 had a pillow behind R12's back that did not have a pillowcase. At 12:18 PM, surveyor observed one, small linen cart in the hall. Linen cart had less than ten pieces of linen and there were no pillowcases. At 12:21 PM, V5 (CNA, Certified Nurse Aide) took surveyor into the clean linen room. Medium cart was empty. Large linen cart had a few pieces of linen left. V5 stated I feel like we don't have enough linens. I go downstairs too often to ask for more. At 12:27 PM, R7 stated the facility does not have linens all the time. On 11/15/2023 at 12:42 PM, V17 (CNA) stated the facility does not have enough linen. V17 stated laundry staff deliver linens in the morning but by noon time, the unit is already running low on linens. On 11/16/2023 at 10:16 AM, V26 (Housekeeping Supervisor) stated some residents hoard the linens in their room because the residents don't think more linens will come up. V26 stated the CNAs forget to bring down the linens to the laundry. V26 stated frequently finding dirty linens in the shower rooms that staff did not bag up and send down the laundry chute. Resident Care Standards policy dated 5/14 documents in part: Resident environment will be maintained in a manner that protects the resident, is pleasing to the resident and as much as possible in a home-like environment.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective Pest Control Program for two...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective Pest Control Program for two resident rooms and a hallway. Findings include: On 11/14/2023 at 11:54 AM, surveyor interviewed R9 in the bedroom. R9 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. There were two black, flying insects flying around R9's bed. R9 stated they can't control no flies. At 12:07 PM, R12 (R9's roommate) stated facility needs to have the exterminators come and spray more often. R12 stated I'm looking at a fly right now. R12 stated also finding roaches in the room. At 12:10 PM, V4 (Housekeeper) stated [V4] sees fruit flies when the residents leave out food or when the CNAs (Certified Nurse Aides) don't collect the meal trays right away. V4 reported seeing flies and fruits flies last week. At 12:12 PM, surveyor observed a black, flying insect outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. At 12:27 PM, surveyor interviewed R7 in the bedroom. R7 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R7 stated the flies come around a lot now. Observed a black, flying insect flying around R7's head of the bead. On 11/15/2023 at 12:30 PM, surveyor re-visited R9 in the bedroom. There were two black, flying insects flying around R9's bed and landing on R9's linens. Reviewed Service Inspection Reports from facility's contracted Pest Control Company. Service Inspection Report dated 10/19/2023 documents in part roach activity in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Service Inspection Report dated 11/15/2023 documents in part continued roach activity in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Pest Control Policy dated 11/14 documents in part that the purpose of the policy is To prevent or control insects and rodents from spreading disease. Resident Care Standards policy dated 5/14 documents in part: Resident environment will be maintained in a manner that protects the resident, is pleasing to the resident and as much as possible in a home-like environment.
Sept 2023 5 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedures for Fall Prevention fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedures for Fall Prevention for one (R2) of three residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R2 sustaining a fall resulting in fractures to the Humerus and finger of R2's left hand. Findings include: On 09/21/2023 at 2:16pm, R2 was observed sitting on her wheelchair smoking on the outside patio. R2 was observed wearing a sling on her left hand and left middle finger. R2 said she fell last Wednesday (09/13/2023), while standing up, after putting on the call light and no staff come to her assistance. R2 said her pants went down, and R8, who was her room mate come to assist her pull her pants up. R2 said as she was trying to pull her pants up, she fell. R2 said she was using her cane to support herself, but she lost her balance and fell. R2 said after she fell and shouted for help, and two staff members came to help her, then she was taken to the hospital. R2 is a [AGE] year old individual admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's diagnosis includes but not limited to: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, other reduced mobility, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites. R2's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) dated 8/2/2023 documents R2 has a BIMS score of 13/15, indicating R2 has intact cognition. R2's MDS(Minimum Data Set) dated 8/4/2023 documents R2 needs supervision with Bed mobility, transfer, walk in room, walk in corridor, Locomotion on/off unit, and need limited assistance with dressing, and further documents that R2 needs supervision or touching assistance with eating, Oral hygiene, Toileting hygiene: Shower/bathe self: Upper body dressing, Putting on/taking off footwear, Roll left and right, Sit to lying, Lying to sitting on side of bed, Sit to stand, Chair/bed-to-chair transfer, Toilet transfer, Walk 10 feet, Walk 50 feet with two turns. On 09/21/2023 at 2:22pm, R8 was observed on the outside patio sitting on her wheelchair smoking a cigarette. R8 said when R2 fell, she, R8 was tying to help R2 pull her pants up after they fell when R2 got up from her bed. R8 said R2 said she had put the call light on and no one came to help R2. R8 said R2 fell next to the bed. R8's BIMS dated 08/ 14/ 2023, document R8 has a BIMS score of 13/15, indicating R8 has intact cognation. On 09/21/2023 at 2:34pm, R2 was observed in bed being assisted with repositioning by V30(R2's family member). R2's bed was observed to be moving from side to side when V30 was assisting R2 to reposition. Surveyor called V13(registered Nurse) and asked her to observe R2's bed. V13 said the bed was not not stable and was moving around, and may not be locked. V13 said R2's type of bed was new, and she did not know where the wheels of the bed are locked at. V13 looked for the bed lock and found it by the bed wheels, then V13 locked the bed. V13 said the bed is supposed to be locked for safety, so that the bed does not move when R2 getsin and out of bed, to prevent R2 from falling and hurting herself. V13 said it is every staff's responsibility to make sure residents beds are in locked potion to prevent falls. On 09/22/2023 at 10:33am, V4(Falls Nurse-LPN) said when a resident first comes to the facility, the nurses perform the fall risk assessment, then the falls nurse/restorative nurse(V4) does the restorative assessment note and restorative program tracker, which tells what the resident is able to perform for ADLs, and assists in putting the resident in the right program for Activities of Daily Living(ADLs), and helps the facility know what therapy or assistant the resident will need with ADLs. The CNAs then carry out care based on the assessment. V4 said R2's Functional Abilities and Goals, dated [DATE], documents R2 needs Supervision or touching assistance with ADLs, where the helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact, guarding assistance as R2 completes activity. V4 further stated that assistance may be provided throughout the activity or intermittently. V4 further said R2's bed should be locked and in lowest position at all time, as a safety precaution to prevent falls. V4 said all staff know all residents fall precautions should be on beds that are locked and in lowest position when the resident is in bed. V4 said R2 uses a quad cane because her left side hand is impaired related to a stroke, and R2 wears a splint on the left arm, and was wearing it even before the fall, and she was using a quad cane for support. V4 said R2 is ambulatory but may require additional assist and support from staff. On 09/22/2023 at 11:50am, V2(Assistant Director of Nursing-ADON) said R2 sustained a fracture on the left shoulder and finger after R2 fall on 9/13/2023. V2 said the call light system has not been working or over a week now, and maintenance has been working on it and it is still not working. V2 said if the call light system is not working, residents cannot make their needs known in a timely manner. On 09/26/2023 at 1:32pm, V14(Director of Nursing- DON) said she was coming down the hallway when she heard R2 say she needed help. V14 said she went into R2's room and and saw R2 sitting on the floor on her buttocks, and V14 said she knew R2 had fallen, and had landed on her left side. V14 said she did Range of Motion (ROM) checks with R2 and noticed that R2 could only perform passive/limited range of motion exercises with the left hand. V14 said R2 was sent to the hospital for further evaluations, and facility was later notified that R2 had suffered fractures on her left shoulder and middle finger from the fall. Records from community hospital dated 09/13/2023-09/16/2023 document: -R2 was admitted to the community hospital because she suffered a fracture to her left humeral head and left finger due to a fall, and R2 was recommended to keep her hand in a splint -Facility incident report dated 09/13/2023 documents : R2 fell on [DATE] and suffered fractures to the Humerus and finger. Fall prevention policy, no date, documents: STANDARD FALL/SAFETY PRECAUTIONS FOR ALL RESIDENTS: -The bed locks will be checked to assure they are in locked position at all times. -Call lights are kept within reach and answered promptly.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their activities of daily living and dignity...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their activities of daily living and dignity policy to provide one resident (R1) of 3 reviewed for activities of daily living(the necessary services to maintain, grooming, and personal hygiene of three residents reviewed). Findings include: On 09/21/2023 at 12:40pm, R1 was observed lying on his bed. His food tray was observed on the bedside table. R1 said he was waiting for staff to change him because he had a bowel movement earlier today, about 10:00am, and no-one is answering his call light or checking on him, and he cannot eat his lunch when he is soiled. R1 further said that said he has not been changed since last night, and he has been lying down soiled like this all morning, and he has been putting the call light on for a long time without any staff answering his call light. R1 put his call light on, no staff came to R1's room. R1 said now they will come they know you are here. R1's urinal was observed with urine at 850cc and almost full. R1 said he was afraid his urinal would overflow if staff did not empty it soon. R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated [DATE], document R1's BIMS is 14/15, indication R1 has intact cognitive function, and R1's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance dated [DATE], documents R1 requires R1 needs extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene. R1's Functional Abilities and Goals, dated [DATE], documents R1 needs partial/moderate assistance with Toileting hygiene, Shower/bathe self, Toilet transfer. R1 uses Wheelchair for ambulation. On 9/21/2023 at 12:45pm, V10(Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) was observed going into R1's room and asked R1 what he needed. R1 told V10 that he needs a diaper change, and he has not been changed since last night, and R1 said he had a bowel movement earlier in the day, and he has been putting on the call light and no-one had been to his room to help change him. V10 told R1 that she was feeding another resident and would come back when she was done, to change R1. On 09/21/2023 at 12:58pm, V10 came back to R1's room and stated she thought R1 was independent, therefore she did not check on him since this morning or at any time today. V10 said she lost her assignment sheet that showed her which resident was a dependent care resident and needed staff assisitance to perform ADL and toileitng activies . V10 said it is my fault, it's my second day working alone today and I forgot to check on R1 to see if he needed to be changed. I lost my work sheet with my assigned residents; therefore I don't know who is a dependent care resident and who is not. On 09/21/2023 at 1:07pm, V12(CNA) come to R1's room to assist V10 provide ADL (Actives of Daily Living) care to R1. V12 went to empty R1's urinal. V12 observed R1's urinal, and the urine was at 850cc. V12 said the urinal should be emptied frequently to prevent overflow and for R1's dignity. V12 said that if R1's soiled incontinence underwear/pull-up is not changed in a timely manner, R1 can have skin breakdown, and it is also a dignity issue. On 09/21/2023 at 1:28pm, V11(Registered Nurse/2nd floor unit manager) said all CNAs are supposed to round when they first start their shift to check on their residents and know the resident's needs. V11 further said that all CNAs have written assessments that show which residents need total care assistance. V11 said she gave each CNA their assignment sheet this morning, but V10 is new and might have lost her assignment sheet. V11 said if V10 was struggling with her assigned work, she should have asked V11 for assistance. V11 said ADL care for residents is important to prevent skin breakdown. On 09/26/2023 at 1:32pm, V14(Director of Nursing- DON) said staff should make sure all residents are checked on regularly to make sure they are changed as needed to prevent skin breakdown and for resident dignity. Facility policy titled Dignity, dated 1/15, documents: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of lie, dignity, respect, and individuality. -Resident will be treated with dignity and respect at all times; even cognitively impaired residents. Facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) no date, documents: Purpose: To preserve ADL function, promote independence, and increase self esteem and dignity.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to (a) provide all 244 residents residing in the facility with needed supplies for Activities of Daily Living care items(bedsheet...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to (a) provide all 244 residents residing in the facility with needed supplies for Activities of Daily Living care items(bedsheets, gowns, towels, incontinence briefs) (b) failed to provide appropriate eating utensils to accommodate 241 residents that eat from the kitchen. Findings include: On 09/21/2023 at 12:40pm, R1 said the facility does not have enough bath and wash towels, incontinence pads, adult briefs, soap, toothpaste, and other daily use supplies, and R1 had to get these supplies from his insurance company for him to use at the facility. On 09/21/2023 at 1:07pm, during observation of clean linen cart on the hallway near R1's room with V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant), observed on the linen cart were four incontinence diapers, three hospital gowns, one flat sheet, and two face towels cut from a bath towel, with frayed sides. On 09/21/2023 at 1:07pm, V12 said that CNAs do not have enough supplies to perform resident ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care, and linen such as bath towels, face towels, incontinence reusable pads(chucks) are very few and bed sheets have holes in them, which makes it extremely difficult to take care of residents' ADL needs. V12 said she had to go to the laundry room to get wash clothes from the dryer for R1 ADL care, before she came to assist V10(CNA) with R1's ADL care. V12 said sometimes she has to cut a big towel into small wash clothes to use/give residents to perform ADL care. V12 said we have very limited supplies for residents ADL care. V12 further said that the CNAs have informed nurses and V1(administrator) that they do not have supplies to perform resident ADL care, but nothing has been done. V12 said she sometimes has had to use fitted sheets to clean residents because there are no towels or wash clothes to use. V12 said this morning, the linen cart come up from laundry with very few supplies as follows: three fitted sheets, two reusable incontinence pads(chucks), four flat sheet, one big towel, one face towel, two pillowcases and five diapers. V12 said there are about 25 residents on the second floor who need total care. On 09/21/2023 at approximately 4:30pm, V29 (House Keeping supervisor) was observed in the laundry room with another coworker doing laundry. Observed were two driers running. In the driers, V29 said and counted 20 flat sheets, 20 fitted sheets, 15 bathing towels, 10 wash clothes, seven blankets and two incontinence reusable pads (Chucks). V29 said there were no gowns in the drier. Laundry machines were observed not washing and were empty. During observation with V29, two clean linen carts were observed in the next room next to the laundry area. V29 said the clean linen carts were 10% full and observed on the carts were 20 blankets, 10 face towels, 5 clean incontinence reusable pads, 5 hospital gowns, no bath towels, and no clean bed sheets were observed on the clean linen carts. V29 said he does not have extra stock to use in case he runs out of clean linen. He further stated that he has to wait for linen from the units, or he goes to the units to search for dirty linen so that he can wash it for residents use. V29 said if he does not go to search for dirty linen and wait for staff to throw it down the shoot, he will not have any clean linen for residents since he does not have an extra stockpile to use. V29 said residents always ask for clean linen because what he has is not enough, so he does the best he can to help the residents. V29 said he has informed V1(administrator) that he does not have enough supplies for the residents to use. On 9/26/2023 ay 2:13pm, V15(Central Supplies Manager) said he could use more supplies, and further said that about a week ago, he run out of XX large adult briefs, and he had to go to another sister facility to borrow some since he had to wait until he could get another shipment. V15 said he is now getting a little bit more XX adult briefs, but he could use more, because he is running out of briefs before the next shipping comes, especially the XX-large ones. V15 further stated the facility does not buy enough linen to service the residents, and sometimes the residents have to wait for linens such as towels and bed sheets to wash because V15 does not have a stockpile that he can replenish the supplies from. V15 said this can affect the residents' hygiene and dignity. On 09/22/2023 at 2:35pm, V1(Administrator) said the facility staff, (nursing and housekeeping) do a linen swipe in the facility to find more lines so that it can be washed for residents to use, and if they cannot find the linen, then V1 places an order. V1 said If residents don't have the supplies to perform ADL care, then it's a dignity issue. On 09/21/2023 at 1:28pm, V11(Registered Nurse/2nd floor unit manager) said the census of the unit was 72 residents and all residents are supposed to perform hygiene care or assisted by CNAs each morning. V11 said ADL care for residents is important to prevent skin breakdown. On 9/21/2023 at 12:03pm, R5 said there are never enough bath and shower towels and sometimes the bath towels are cut to make bath towels. R5 said he uses his own soap because he does not like the one the facility provides. On 09/21/2023 at 2:24pm, R6 said sometimes there are no bed sheets and no towels for bathing. On 09/21/2023 at 2:29pm, R7 said he does not get bed sheets every day even if he requests for them, and stated he gets two sheets every now and then. Facility grievance log dated 08/28/23 documents R9 filed a grievance stating that he had not been able to shower due to no towels provided to him. Dignity policy dated 1/15, documents: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Findings include: On 9/21/23 at 4:45 PM, observed kitchen staff plating dinner: one slice of riblette per bun, tater tots grabbed by hand, not measured. Each tray had a sandwich and tater tots on a plate, a bowl of mixed fruit cocktail in juice, 1 fork, 1 ketchup packet. The trays were on the cart to be delivered to the floor. Staff took the cart of trays to the elevator for delivery to the resident floors. Survey team did not observe a spoon on the trays to eat the fruit cocktail with. On 9/21/23 at 12:03 PM, R5 was observed sitting on the bed eating lunch. R5s lunch ticket did not have the names of the foods served. Observed on the food tray were steamed green beans, carrots, and a type of mashed potatoes with ham. R5 said R5 did not know if it was mashed potatoes and ham, because R5 could not tell what the food was. R5 said the food was always small potions. R5 said the menu is posted by the nursing stations for residents to view the menu of the day. R5 said the food tastes terrible and most residents who can afford to do so, order out. R5 said R5 does not have a lot of money to buy food every day, so R5 eats the facility food even though it tastes terrible but orders out when R5 has some money. R5 said every morning R5 receives a fork to eat cereal with. When R5 gets a spoon with other meals, R5 saves the spoon to use to eat cereal. R5 said when R5 requests for a spoon to eat cereal, R5 is not given one. On 9/21/23 at 2:24 PM, R6 said the food is terrible and the majority of the time ham is served. R6 said the potions of food are very little and most of the time residents get a fork and no spoon regardless of the food served. R6 said R6 has asked for a spoon many times during meals but is not given one. On 9/21/23 at 4:45 PM, V20 (Dietary Manager) stated he has been the Dietary Manager for two months and was a Dietary Aide for a year. V20 said sometimes we just eyeball the amount or tator tots. On 9/26/23 at 3:00 PM, V20 (Dietary Manager) stated we don't serve powdered eggs, we serve pasteurized liquid eggs (frozen) and hard-boiled eggs. We go by the portions on the menus. Portion size determined by the utensils. Each utensil/scoop is a certain portion size. Some foods come pre-portioned. Some foods have to be measured, by weight. Scoops are in ounces. Don't know who determines the portion sizes. The Dietitian is new and comes approximately two to three times a week. The Dietitian works with me on portion size and nutrients. Each resident should be getting the portion size from the menu or a double portion if they have an order for a double portion. In order to give the right portion, you have to use the correct scoop. We serve cold and hot cereal. Typically eat cold and hot cereal with a spoon. On 9/26/23 at 2:00 PM, V14 (Director of Nursing) stated there should be a portion size to be adequate for nutrition. If cereal is eaten it should be with a spoon not a fork. Typically, cereal is eaten with a spoon. Week at a Glance for General Week 1 menu documents in part: Thursday, September 21, supper, BBQ Riblette on bun (1 ea = 2 oz pro), tator tots (1/2 cup), ketchup (1 pkt), summer fruit cup (4 oz spdl = ½ cup), hot dog bun (1 bun), 2% milk (8 oz), coffee/hot tea (6 oz), condiments (1 ea)
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received food in the acceptable amount to maintain nutritional values. This failure has the potential to affe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received food in the acceptable amount to maintain nutritional values. This failure has the potential to affect the 241 residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 9/21/23 at 4:45 PM, observed kitchen staff plating dinner: one slice of riblette per bun, tater tots grabbed by hand, not measured. Each tray had a sandwich and tater tots on a plate, a bowl of mixed fruit cocktail in juice, 1 fork, 1 ketchup packet. The trays were on the cart to be delivered to the floor. Staff took the cart of trays to the elevator for delivery to the resident floors. Survey team did not observe a spoon on the trays to eat the fruit cocktail with. On 9/21/23 at 12:03 PM, R5 was observed sitting on the bed eating lunch. R5s lunch ticket did not have the names of the foods served. Observed on the food tray were steamed green beans, carrots, and a type of mashed potatoes with ham. R5 said R5 did not know if it was mashed potatoes and ham, because R5 could not tell what the food was. R5 said the food was always small potions. R5 said the menu is posted by the nursing stations for residents to view the menu of the day. R5 said the food tastes terrible and most residents who can afford to do so, order out. R5 said R5 does not have a lot of money to buy food every day, so R5 eats the facility food even though it tastes terrible but orders out when R5 has some money. R5 said every morning R5 receives a fork to eat cereal with. When R5 gets a spoon with other meals, R5 saves the spoon to use to eat cereal. R5 said when R5 requests for a spoon to eat cereal, R5 is not given one. On 9/21/23 at 2:24 PM, R6 said the food is terrible and the majority of the time ham is served. R6 said the potions of food are very little and most of the time residents get a fork and no spoon regardless of the food served. R6 said R6 has asked for a spoon many times during meals but is not given one. On 9/21/23 at 2:29 PM, R7 said the food tasted terrible most of the times and the potions were very small. On 9/21/23 at 4:45 PM, V20 (Dietary Manager) stated he has been the Dietary Manager for two months and was a Dietary Aide for a year. V20 said sometimes we just eyeball the amount or tator tots. On 9/26/23 at 3:00 PM, V20 (Dietary Manager) stated we don't serve powdered eggs, we serve pasteurized liquid eggs (frozen) and hard-boiled eggs. We go by the portions on the menus. Portion size determined by the utensils. Each utensil/scoop is a certain portion size. Some foods come pre-portioned. Some foods have to be measured, by weight. Scoops are in ounces. Don't know who determines the portion sizes. The Dietitian is new and comes approximately two to three times a week. The Dietitian works with me on portion size and nutrients. Each resident should be getting the portion size from the menu or a double portion if they have an order for a double portion. In order to give the right portion, you have to use the correct scoop. We serve cold and hot cereal. Typically eat cold and hot cereal with a spoon. On 9/22/23 at 2:05 PM, V23 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated residents complain that it's not enough food and they complain of what type of food it is. Alternatives are usually sandwiches. One time they had two boiled eggs and a slice of bread for breakfast. It is not enough food for me. Residents always complain about the food. Somebody usually wants more food on all the floors. It'll be a sandwich. On 9/26/23 at 2:00 PM, V14 (Director of Nursing) stated there should be a portion size to be adequate for nutrition. On 9/26/23 at 3:30 PM, V27 (Cook) stated I use the predetermined size scoops, spoons that the menu tell me to use to plate the food. To make sure I serve the correct amount I use the scoop or spoon. If you don't use the scoop or spoon it is not known how much is being given. Eyeballing and scooping with my hand is not correct procedure. If I eyeball it, I don't know 100% that it's the correct portion size. The scoop should be used to scoop the tater tots. There are no powdered eggs in the kitchen, we don't use powdered eggs. On 9/27/23 at 2:50 PM, V31 (Registered/Licensed Dietitian) stated I work with the kitchen, we have interdisciplinary meetings once a week. Portion sizes are based on state guide lines. The company that creates the menus for the facility has their own Dietitian who certifies menus follow state guidelines and meet dietary/nutritional needs of the residents. I make request if the resident needs extra, for example proteins for wound healing or resident preference for double portions. Residents should be getting portion sizes from the menus because portions sizes meet state requirements. The kitchen should have ladles, spoons that specify how many ounces it serves. The kitchen should be using equipment that has been certified to serve a specific amount of food. If the kitchen is not using correct equipment the resident is not getting the correct portion size. Eyeballing is not correct and can potentially lead to fluctuations in weight of the residents. With eyeballing, there can be too much or too little of a food group or micronutrients, and the standards for the diet are not being met. The kitchen should not be eyeballing portion sizes. The kitchen should order whatever equipment is needed to equate to standard portion sizes. Week at a Glance for General Week 1 menu documents in part: Thursday, September 21, supper, BBQ Riblette on bun (1 ea = 2 oz pro), tator tots (1/2 cup), ketchup (1 pkt), summer fruit cup (4 oz spdl = ½ cup), hot dog bun (1 bun), 2% milk (8 oz), coffee/hot tea (6 oz), condiments (1 ea) Facility policy Portion Sizes, 4/2017, documents in part: Food will be served in appropriate portions as indicated on cycle menu spreadsheets and on standardized recipes. Portion sizes will be measured using the following: scoops, ladles, spoodles and scales. Prior to serving foods, the food service employees will check to ensure proper serving utensils are being used.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their call light system policy by failing to maintain a properly functioning call light system that allows residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their call light system policy by failing to maintain a properly functioning call light system that allows residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 244 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 09/21/2023 at 2:16pm, R2 said before she fell last Wednesday on 09/13/2023, she had put on the call light and no staff come to her assistance. R2 suffered a fractur on the humerus and middle finger of her left hand from the fall. On 09/21/2023 at 12:40pm, R1 said he has not been changed since last night, and he has been lying down like this all morning, and he has been putting the call light on for a long time without an answer, R1 put his call light on. R1's urinal was observed with urine at 850cc and almost full. R1 said he was afraid his urinal would overflow if staff did not empty it soon. R1 also stated he had soiled himself earlier this morning around 10am, and even after putting his call light on numerous times, not staff had come to check on him. R1 said he could not eat his lunch when he was soiled, and his lunch was observed untouched, sitting on the side table next to his bed. On 09/22/2023 at 12:12pm, V5 (Maintenance Assistant) said his director of maintenance, (V6) is on vacation, and out of town. V5 said sometimes the call lights do not function properly and will show like they are on, with the lights blinking on all of them. V5 said the call light system is serviced by an outside vender who has been coming to the facility to fix the call light. On 09/22/2023 at 2:35pm, V1 (Administrator) said it was brought to her attension that the call lights on R8, R9, R12, R13's rooms were not ringing at the nursing station desk phone. V1 further said some call lights from residents' rooms were not going to the call light phone by the nursing station, therefore nurses would not hear the call lights or know when a resident light is on, unless they round and see the call light outside the resident door was on. V1 said If the nurses cannot answer the call light, this will delay resident care, and it is a dignity and a resident right issue. On 09/22/2023 at 11:50am, V2(Assistant Director of Nursing-ADON) said the call light system has not been working for over a week now, and maintenance has been working on it and it is still not working. V2 said R1 is verbal and can make his needs know, but the call light system was not working, so R1 was not able to make his needs known. V2 said if the call light system is not working, residents cannot make their needs known in a timely manner. On 9/21/2023 at 1:56pm during call light system observation with V8(Registered Nurse-RN) on the 1st floor by the nursing station, call light system that alerts the nurses when a resident puts their call light is on was observed to be off with the call light phone screen blank/and with broken screen. On 9/21/2023 at 1:58pm V8 said the call light phone system is broken and does not light up, therefore nursing staff do not know when a resident call light is on, unless they round. V8 said she did not know what was wrong with the call light system. V8 further stated the call light on the ceiling above the nursing station that turns on when a resident puts the call light on is also malfunctioning and all the lights stay on, therefore it's hard for staff to know which resident room has a call light on. The call lights above the nursing station were observed to be on, with different colors showing on the light. V8 put the call light on in R2's room, call light did not light up outside the door, not ring/light up by the nursing station call light system. On 09/21/2023 at 1:28pm, V11 (Registered Nurse/2nd floor unit manager) said the call light system has been broken since three weeks ago and V1(administrator) is aware and is reminded every day. V11 said when the call light system is not functioning properly, verbal residents who need staff assistance shout for help, and staff do round every two hours. V11 said the call light by the nursing station that alerts staff when residents need help is blinking all day with a pink light, and staff do not know when the resident call light is on, unless the round. V11 said it is frustrating for staff because they cannot respond to residents in a timely manner when residents need assistance. Facility concerns log dated 08/29/2023 documents R10's family stated R10's call light was on for a long while they were visiting. Facility policy titled Call Light, no date, documents: -Call bell system defects will be reported promptly to the Maintenance Department for serving.
Sept 2023 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedures for Fall Prevention & ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedures for Fall Prevention & Post Fall Assessment by a.) not providing individualized preventative fall risk measures, b.) not following fall risk care plan interventions prior to fall, c.)failed to complete new or updated fall risk assessment post fall, d.) failed to update care plan with any new fall interventions after fall incident for one (R3) out of three residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R3 sustaining a fall resulting in a laceration requiring five sutures with risk for falls ongoing for lack of interventions. Findings include: R3 is a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility 12/07/15 with diagnosis not limited to Dementia, Muscle Weakness, Reduced Mobility, Lack of Coordination, Muscle Wasting And Atrophy, Weakness, Arthritis, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Chronic Ulcer Of Other Part Of Unspecified Foot With Unspecified Severity, Osteomyelitis. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 07/19/23 document R3's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 14/15 indicating intact cognition. R3's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Assistance documents that R3 requires supervision with bed mobility, limited assistance with one-person physical assist with transfer and extensive assistance with one-person physical assist with toilet use. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 07/19/23 documents that walking did not occur. Activity with balance during transitions and walking, moving on and off toilet, surface to surface transfer between bed and chair or wheelchair is not steady, and R3 is only able to stabilize with staff assistance. R3's care plan dated 06/25/23 documents in part R3 is at risk for falls related to co-morbidities with interventions including but not limited to staff will ensure resident has on appropriate footwear at all times (06/25/23), and to keep resident's immediate environment clutter free (06/25/23). On 09/13/23 at 1:16 PM, observed R3 lying in bed not in the lowest position, and R3's feet were bare. Did not observe any type of footwear nearby. R3's side table was close to R3's bed and covered in 6 cans of soda pop and papers. R3 stated that R3 does not know what caused the fall. R3 said, they got my program mixed up with the football players program and the weights from Weight Watchers. R3 then stated I was trying to use the bed pan. I went to stand up and didn't know I couldn't stand up. I was off balanced, and my legs twisted. R3 then stated that the football players injuries was messed up with my injuries and the fall was related to them wanting to weigh me. R3 then stated, I don't know what happened. On 09/13/23 at 1:20 PM, R17 (R3's Son) who is also a resident at the facility and is R3's roommate stated that R17 was lying in bed on 07/11/23 listening to music and R17 heard a loud thud when R3 fell on the floor. R3's progress notes dated 07/11/23, 2:45 AM and 4:25 AM by V11 (Registered Nurse) documents in part R3 was observed lying on her back near the bed while using the bed-pan in bed and sustained a moderate laceration on her forehead and R3 was transferred to the emergency room for CT scan of head and stitches related to fall. R3's hospital emergency room record dated 07/11/23, 3:05 AM documents in part R3 brought in with laceration to forehead after fall. (R3) states she was trying to go to the bathroom and fell hitting her forehead on floor. (R3) stated she stepped on her bed sheets causing her to slip and strike her head. (R3) has a 3 centimeter (cm) by 2 cm wound on her forehead. Radiology results of CT Head documents in part left forehead laceration with small amount of soft tissue gas and trace hematoma. R3 received five sutures in the emergency room and was discharged back to the facility. R3's progress note dated 07/12/23, 12:50 PM by V29 (Fall Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse) documents in part R3 had a fall on 07/11/23 at 3:51 PM, observed lying on the floor on her back near the bed, requires limited assist x1 with transfers and care plan updated with interventions. R3's care plan dated 06/25/23 documents in part R3 is at risk for falls related to co-morbidities with the goal for R3 to have no falls with major injuries over next review period. All interventions in R3's fall risk care plan are dated 06/25/23 and include but not limited to staff will ensure resident has on appropriate footwear at all times, and to keep resident's immediate environment clutter free. There is no mention of low bed position in R3's fall risk care plan and R3's fall risk care plan has not been updated since 06/25/23. R3's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R3's score at 13 indicating moderate fall risk. A new or updated Fall Risk Assessment was not completed after 07/11/23 fall. On 09/14/23 at 11:00 AM, V22 (R3's Nurse Practitioner) stated via phone interview that R3 has diagnoses that place her at risk for falls including lack of coordination, weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy. On 09/13/23 at 2:18 PM, V29 stated V29 is responsible for investigating falls and updating the fall care plan. V29 stated if a fall occurs the fall would be dated and documented in the resident's care plan and new interventions would be added to the fall care plan. V29 stated that new interventions would need to be added because something would need to change since the old interventions were not effective in preventing the resident from falling. V29 stated that these new interventions would be put in the resident's care plan immediately to prevent or combat another fall from happening. V29 stated that all care plan updates are done directly on the resident's electronic health record (EHR), no paper copies are kept. V29 stated that up until an actual fall occurs there are standard interventions that are in place for everyone who is at risk for a fall. V29 stated that once a fall occurs then this is when V29 would then adjust or add interventions to individualize the interventions in the care plan based on the root cause analysis of the fall. V29 stated, I don't change the standard interventions for fall risk care plan unless a resident has a fall. V29 stated that prior to R3's fall on 07/11/23 it was determined that R3 was at risk for a fall and therefore R3 had standardized fall risk care plan in place which included interventions such as having the call light within reach and the bed in the lowest position. V29 stated that all residents who are at risk for falling should have their bed in the lowest position for safety preventive measures, so if a fall does occur the resident will not be falling from a high place to a low position, there is less of a distance to fall. V29 stated that after R3 fell on [DATE] the intervention of using non-skid socks was added because the root cause analysis investigation determined that R3 had slipped on a sheet on the floor when R3 was using the bed pan in the middle of the night. Surveyor asked V29 to review R3's fall risk care plan and V29 acknowledged that R3's fall on 07/11/23 was not documented on R3's care plan, and interventions had not been updated since 06/25/23. V29 acknowledged that R3 did not have an intervention for R3's bed to be in the lowest position before or after the fall on 07/10/23. V29 stated having the bed in the lowest position when resident is in bed is not included in R3's care plan because it is a standard for all residents at risk for falls and that the staff knows R3's bed should be kept in the lowest position. V29 also acknowledged that care plan already had intervention that staff will ensure resident has on appropriate food wear at all times dated 06/25/23. On 09/13/23 at 3:12 PM, surveyor went to R3's room with V29 and V30 (Restorative Nurse) and observed R3 lying in bed in bare feet. V30 stated that R3's bed was in the lowest position. Surveyor asked V30 to check and V30 picked up the bed controller at the foot of the bed and was able to lower R3's bed further by at least 5-6 inches until R3's bed was in the lowest position. R3 did not protest or complain about the bed being in the lowest position. V30 stated R3's bed was not in the lowest bed position when we entered R3's room but R3's bed is now in the lowest position. V30 stated R3 does not like her bed to be in the lowest position and then stated to R3 you don't like the bed like this, right? On 09/13/23 at 3:18 PM, V31 (Licensed Practical Nurse) viewed R3's fall risk care plan and stated that V31 does not see that the bed being in the low bed position is included as an intervention or that R3's fall on 07/11/23 was documented in R3's fall risk care plan or that there were any changes made to R3's interventions relate to R3's fall. V31 stated V31 would like for R3's bed to be in the lowest bed position because she is a fall risk, and she spends all her time in the bed. V31 stated if the bed is in the lowest position R3 wouldn't have as much of a distance to fall if R3 did have a fall. V31 stated V31 cannot recall trying to lower R3's bed and R3 not letting V31 lower it. Facility policy and procedure titled, Fall Prevention Program undated, documents in part the policy is to assure the safety of all residents in the facility and to include measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. A Fall Risk Assessment will be performed after any fall incident and care plan incorporates preventative measures and interventions are changed with each fall as appropriate. Facility policy and procedure titled, Fall Risk and Post Fall Assessment undated, documents in part the purpose it to improve quality of life for resident, conduct appropriate assessment prior to and after falls and procedure includes if fall prevention plan failed initiate an immediate new intervention, complete or update Fall Risk Assessment, revise resident care assignment according to fall risk type with new interventions, revise the care plan to include all new fall interventions.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's medical diagnosis includes but not limited to pressure ulcer, muscle wasting. R1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's medical diagnosis includes but not limited to pressure ulcer, muscle wasting. R1's Cognitive Patterns dated 08/ 14/ 2023, documents R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13/15, indicating R1 has intact cognation. On 09/12/2023 at 1:14pm R1 said observed in her bed. Surveyors introduced themselves to R1. R1 started crying and said she was in a lot of pain on her legs, and she cannot move her legs because of the pain. R1 said all she offered for pain is Tylenol, which does not help her. R1 said before she came to the facility, her pain was managed with Norco and gabapentin to help control her pain. V4(Wound Nurse-RN) came into R1's room and asked R1 why she was upset. R1 said she was having a lot of pain in her legs. V4 said she would get R1's nurse to give R1 medication before V4 looks at R1's wounds. R1 agreed. On 9/12/2023 at 1:30pm, V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) come into R1's room and said she was coming to assist R1 in brushing her teeth. R1 said she can sit at edge of the bed to transfer to the wheelchair. R1 said she was in a lot of pain and was observed grimacing and saying her feet hurt. R1 said the Tylenol she is receiving for pain does not help her, therefore she stopped taking it. V8 said she would go and get R1's nurse. On 9/12/2023 at 1:32pm, V5(Licensed practical Nurse) come into R1's room and asked R1 where her pain was. R1 said the pain was in her legs. V5 said she would go and get R1 pain medication. V5 came back with two white pills in a cup and a cup of water. V5 told R1 here is your Tylenol 1000mg for your pain. R1 told V5 she(R1) would rather deal with the pain than take Tylenol because it does not help her. R1 said since getting at the facility, her pain has not been managed well and she(R1) would rather go home than stay at the facility with pain. V5 then said that R1 always refuses to take Tylenol for pain. V5 then left R1's room. On 09/13/2023b at 2:18PM, V2(Director of Nursing-DON) said pain assessment is ongoing and should be done at least every shift. V2 said If a resident state they have pain, the nurse should ask the resident where the pain is, the type of pain and the pain intensity on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the worst pain. V2 further said that after the nurse offers the resident pain medication, and if the resident refuses the pain medication, the nurse should document refusal, because this gives other care providers a clear picture of what is going on with the resident and can help the team identify what can be modified to help manage the resident's pain. V2 said If it not documented, it's not done. R1's orders dated 8/5/2023 document: Tylenol Extra Strength Oral Tablet 500 MG (Acetaminophen). Give 2 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Mild Pain. Under MAR all assessment including 09/12/2023 was 0 that means resident has no pain. No notes related to pain dated 09/12/2023. Facility Policy titled Pain Assessment, no date, documents: Documentation of each pain assessment will be recorded on the Pain Assessment form, in the nursing notes or on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) The resident's physician will be notified when assessment reveals inadequate pain control despite implementation of an appropriate plan of care. R1's care plan dated 8/1/2023 documents: Identify and record previous pain history and management of that pain and impact on function. Identify previous response to analgesia including pain relief, side effects and impact on function. Based on observation, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to follow pain assessment and management program by not addressing and documenting pain for 1 out of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pain management. These failures have the potential to affect 1 resident (R1) daily pain status and comfort. Findings include:
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable temperature. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 240 residents receiv...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable temperature. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 240 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 09/13/23 at 8:25 AM, surveyor entered kitchen while breakfast tray line service was still in progress. Observed three plastic meal trays stacked on top of each other each containing uncovered non-insulated bowls of hot cereal from which the diet aide was taking the bowls of hot cereal and placing onto the non-disposable plastic plates and covering the plates with a dome lid. There was no plate warmer under the non-disposable plastic plates. On 09/13/23 at 8:31 AM, observed V27 (Food Service Manager) take temperatures on the tray line as follows: pancakes 149 degrees Fahrenheit(F), sausage patty 138 degrees F, hot cereal 80 degrees F. On 09/13/23 at 8:40 AM, V21 (Dietary Aide/Prep Cook) stated that V21 portioned out the hot cereal this morning between 6:45-7:00 AM at the start of the tray line. V21 stated V21 has not had to replenish the supply of hot cereal yet and that the tray line was still using the bowls V21 portioned out earlier this morning. On 09/13/23 at 8:55 AM, temperatures were taken on the test tray as follows: pancakes 83 degrees F, sausage patty 89 degrees F, hot cereal 80 degrees F, and coffee 100 degrees F. The pancakes, sausage and hot cereal were all cold to the touch. The hot cereal was stiff and when turned onto a plate was congealed into a solid mass. The margarine did not melt or spread out when put on top of the pancake. The sausage patty was hard and dry. The coffee was served in a disposable plastic juice cup and was lukewarm, not hot. On 09/13/23 at 9:00 AM, R11 stated that the food always comes up cold and that it is so cold that R11 cannot eat it as served. R11 stated that R11 received hot cereal, pancakes, and sausage this morning and that R11 had to get up and reheat the food in the microwave in order to make it edible to eat. On 09/13/23 at 9:04 AM, R12 stated that R12 always needs to heat up R12's food using the microwave on the unit because the food is served cold and that R12 is lucky that R12 can walk to the microwave to heat the food himself so R12 does not have to wait for staff. R12 stated if R12 could not reheat R12's food R12 would not be able to eat it. R12 stated that the coffee is served in a plastic juice cup, not a mug or insulated cup and that as a result the coffee is always cold. On 09/13/23 at 9:16 AM, R13 stated R13 received hard, cold pancakes and sausage patty for breakfast today and that the coffee is served in a plastic juice cup and is always cold. R13 stated that sometimes R13 has to wait a long time before the staff is able to reheat R13's food in the microwave so sometimes R13 just does not eat. On 09/13/23 at 11:53 AM, R14 stated the coffee and food is always cold and that nobody offers to heat it up. R14 stated that if R14 asks one of the staff to reheat R14's food they say they will do it, but they are usually busy doing something else so R14 has to wait until they are finished, and this often takes a long time. On 09/13/23 at 10:10 AM, V27 stated the temperatures were not taken this morning before putting the food on the tray line. V27 stated the hot cereal was portioned out this morning at 7:00 AM and that the tray line started at 7:30 AM and lasted until 9:10 AM. He stated they used to have lids to cover the bowls of hot cereal to keep them warm longer but that they no longer have any lids. V27 stated that the potential problem with serving cold hot food is that the residents may not eat the food if they receive it cold. V27 stated that the coffee should not be served in plastic disposable cups because they do not retain the temperature. Instead, the coffee should be served in foam cups. V27 said, we forgot to put the foam cups on the beverage cart this morning, that was a mistake. On 09/14/23 at 2:03 PM, V27 stated V27 ran out of the Food Temperature Monitoring Forms so the kitchen has not been taking temperatures at meals for a couple of weeks. V27 stated that V27 found the form yesterday and started using it then. Observed Food Temperature Monitoring Forms dated 09/13/23 which revealed blank final cook temperatures for breakfast and blank holding temperatures for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Observed Food Temperature Monitoring Forms dated 09/14/23 which revealed blank final cook temperatures for lunch and blank holding temperatures for breakfast and lunch. Reviewed Food Temperature Monitoring Forms dated from 09/01/23 to 09/05/23 and all entries were blank. On 09/14/23 at 2:10 PM, V27 stated that the purpose of taking food temperatures and documenting them is to make sure the food is well done and that it is the right temperature to serve to the residents. V27 stated the temperature is taken to make sure the hot food is hot, and the cold food is cold, otherwise without taking the temperature there is no way to really know. Facility document titled, Diet Type Report printed 09/14/23, 13:58:10 CT which documents in part three residents who receive nothing by mouth (NPO). Facility form titled, Concern and/or Compliment Action Form dated 07/26/23 documents in part R16's stated that his food is cold by the time he sits to eat. Kitchen policy titled, Resident Satisfaction dated 04/2017 documents in part the facility will serve foods that are palatable and at proper temperature to ensure resident satisfaction. Kitchen policy titled, Food Serving Temperatures dated 06/2014 document in part to ensure food is served at temperatures which are palatable, hot food shall be kept at the appropriate temperature, and prior to meal services temperatures of both hot and cold foods are to be taken and recorded. Kitchen document titled Critical Control Points Food Temperature Monitoring Form dated 2018 documents in part holding temperature for hot food not less than 135 degrees F.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep pest...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep pests out of the facility. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 243 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 09/13/23 at 9:05 AM, observed gnats in R11 and R12's room near R12's bed. On 09/13/23 at 9:27 AM, surveyor observed light brown oval shaped insect crawling up and down the outside of the garbage can in the Maintenance Room located in the basement. Surveyor pointed to the insect and V20 (Maintenance Director) stated, that's a roach! On 09/13/23 at 10:02 AM, during inspection with V19 (Housekeeping Director) of Soiled Linen [NAME] Room on basement level observed 30-32 dark brown pellets which were larger than a grain of rice concentrated in one area behind a red isolation container. V19 stated that the pellets are rodent droppings and that the droppings looked larger than mice droppings so they might be from a rat. On 09/13/23 at 11:42 AM, observed gnats flying around in the 3rd floor hallway. On 09/13/23 at 9:43 AM, R10 stated I see both roaches and gnats in my room. I saw a cockroach in my bathroom yesterday. Surveyor and V20 viewed R10's bathroom and observed a large amount of standing water on the floor in the middle of the bathroom and feces smeared on the floor in front of the toilet bowl. On 09/13/23 at 9:49 AM, V26 (Housekeeper) stated that V26 sees gnats all the time in the resident rooms and that there are roaches everywhere in the building. V26 stated that the gnats are attracted to food and standing water and that roaches are attracted to garbage, food, and feces. On 09/14/23 at 12:52 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated the facility has a contract with a pest control company and they come twice per month and more as needed. V1 stated it is important not to have pests in the facility for infection control reasons and cross contamination issues. V1 stated the facility has people with compromised immune systems living here and that the facility wants to provide them with a homelike environment. Facility document titled Facility Work Order Sheet on the 3rd Floor dated 09/05/23 documented in part that one of the resident rooms got roaches. Facility policy titled Pest Control Policy undated documents in part the purpose is to prevent or control insects and rodents from spreading disease and the facility shall be kept in such condition and cleaning procedures used to prevent the harborage or feeding of insects or rodents.
Aug 2023 16 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light was within reach for one (R56) of seven residents reviewed, in a sample of 35. Findings include: On 08/02/...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light was within reach for one (R56) of seven residents reviewed, in a sample of 35. Findings include: On 08/02/2023 at 11:45am, upon entering R56's room, R56 said help me, I don't know where my call light or TV remote is. I cannot find them in my linen, and I cannot call for help. Surveyor went out of R56 room and called V20(Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) and asked her to go to R56's room and assist R56. V20, with surveyor went to R56 room and R56 stated I am not comfortable in bed, and I need someone to help me. I don't know where my call light is and I cannot find it on my bed. V20 looked for R56 call light, which was observed behind R56's bed and hanging down next to the wall. V20 said I don't know how the call light got behind R56's bed. V20 said R56 should always have her call light within reach incase R56 needs help or wants to go to the bathroom. V20 said R56 is a fall risk and should be monitored and call light in place to prevent risk for falls. On 08/02/2023 at 11:57am, V39(Certified Nurses Assistant-CNA) said that R56 call light should be within reach so that she(R56) can use it when needed to alert staff for assistant because R56 is at risk for falls. R56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated Jun 30, 2023, documents R56 uses a wheelchair for mobility and needs extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. R56's care plan initiated 6/30/2023 documents R56 is at risk for falls, and interventions include -encourage R56 to use call light for assistance. Policy titled Call light, dated 9/19 documents: -All residents shall have the nurse call light system available and within easy accessibility to the resident at the bedside or other reasonable accessible location.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Findings include: On 8/1/2023 at 11:53am, surveyor smelled a strong urine odor coming from R56, R142, R178's room. Surveyor knoc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Findings include: On 8/1/2023 at 11:53am, surveyor smelled a strong urine odor coming from R56, R142, R178's room. Surveyor knocked and R178 said Come in. Surveyor opened the door to R178's room and a strong smell of urine filled the hallway. Surveyor called V20(Licensed Practical Nurse) to go to R56, R142, R178's room. R20 opened the door and V20 and surveyor entered the room and started coughing due to the strong smell/odor of urine in the room. V20 said urine smell coming out of the room was very strong. A bed pan was observed near R178's bed, with brownish urine and toilet paper inside the bedpan. A strong smell of ammonia like odor was noted coming from the bedpan. V20 said I will get gloves and empty it. The CNAs (Certified Nurses Assistants) are supposed to check the bedpan and empty it once the R178 uses it. V20 said CNAs are supposed to round every two hours to check on residents' needs. On 8/1/2023 at 12:03pm, R178 said I used the bedside pan this morning about 8:00am before breakfast and no one has come to empty it. R178 further said the smell of urine is was strong in the room but after a while you get used to it. R178 said not all the time her bedpan is changed on time after she uses it. R142 and R56 were observed in their beds sleeping. R178 medical diagnosis include but not limited to: unspecified lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, adult failure to thrive. R178 MDS (Minimum Data Set) section G (Functional Status) dated May 9, 2023, documents R178 needs extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and R178 uses a wheelchair for mobility. Policy titled Resident Care Standards, dated 5/14 documents: -Resident environment will be maintained in a manner that protects the resident, is pleasing to the resident and as much as possible in a home-like environment. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable environment and adequate housekeeping services for four (R56, R122, R142, R178) residents in a total sample of 35 residents. Findings include: On 08/01/2023 at 12:52 PM, R122 observed inside of his room sitting in a wheelchair. R122 stated that no one come to clean his room regularly and that it has been approximately one week since housekeeping has cleaned his room. R122 shows surveyor a stain on his floor and states that the stain has been there for a week, he has complained to staff and no one has come to clean the floor. R122 states that the stain was made approximately one week ago when a Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA spilled a fruit cup with fruit juice inside onto the floor. Surveyor observed on R122's room floor: a dark stain with a sticky residue measuring approximately 13 inches in length x 4.5 inches in width. Surveyor also observed 5 dead roaches on R122's room floor. R122 states that he can't stand these bugs. On 08/01/2023 at 12:55PM, V11 (Housekeeping) also located inside of R122's room and observed the dark stain with sticky residue on the floor and the dead roaches. V11 stated that he does not clean R122's room regularly and is filling in/helping out since the staff member who regularly assigned to clean R122's room is not scheduled in the facility today. V11 states that it has been approximately one week since he has cleaned R122's room. On 08/02/2023 at 9:29AM, V15 (Housekeeping Director) stated I am responsible for overseeing the housekeepers and the floor technicians. Housekeepers clean resident rooms, dining rooms, and common areas. Floor technicians are called heavy housekeepers because they perform housekeeping duties as well as run the floor buffer machines, strip and wax the floors overnight, when there is not a lot of traffic. Housekeepers work from 7AM-3PM and Floor Technicians work from 6AM-2PM. I expect the housekeeping staff to clean the resident rooms daily. Housekeeping is responsible for sweeping and mopping residents' floors on a daily basis. Every once in a while, I receive a complaint that resident rooms are not being cleaned properly. This may be because one housekeeper may not clean the same way that another housekeeper cleans. All of the housekeeping staff are supposed to go in the resident's room and clean according to our policy which we call the 7-step process. First, we should knock and introduce ourselves, let the resident know why you staff is there, collect the trash first then clean the room in a counterclockwise order. Housekeeping staff also dust, wash walls, clean the toilets, mirrors, and windowsills. Make sure the resident room is free of debris by removing furniture and performing a deep clean. All these duties are expected to be done daily by all housekeeping staff. Mopping is also expected to be done every day. We should also clean residents' rooms as needed because we are here to help the residents. R122's Minimum Data Set/MDS dated [DATE] documents that R122 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 14/15, which indicated that R122 is cognitively intact. Facility policy, undated, titled Housekeeping Guidelines documents in part Purpose: To provide guidelines to maintain a safe and sanitary environment for residents, facility staff and visitors. 6. Housekeeping personnel shall adhere to daily cleaning assignments developed so to maintain the facility in a clean and orderly manner. 11. Cleaning A. All horizontal surfaces will be cleaned daily and as needed with an approved disinfectant. Facility document undated, titled Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Resident's Rights documents in part, Your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable and homelike.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan with goals and interventions for one resident (R32) reviewed for care plans in a sample...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan with goals and interventions for one resident (R32) reviewed for care plans in a sample of 35. Findings include: 8/3/23 at 1:45 PM, V42 (MDS/Care Plan Coordinator) stated R32 does not have a care plan for anticoagulant medication use. The purpose of the care plan is to identify areas of concern which can include medical and behavior, to have a goal to reach and provide interventions in order to achieve the goal. Anticoagulant medication should be care planned to ensure the staff is aware to monitor for any deficit areas which may include abnormal bleeding, bruising to the skin, discoloration of stools. R32 have diagnoses that include but are not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, contracture of muscle. R32 Order Summary Report documents in part: Xarelto tablet 10mg (Rivaroxaban) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for dvt prophx, start date 4/9/2023. R32 has a care plan for anticoagulant therapy with date initiated as 8/3/2023 (when surveyor asked V42 for R32 anticoagulant care plan). Facility policy Care Plan, not dated, documents in part: All residents will have comprehensive assessments and an individualized plan of care developed to assist them in achieving and maintaining their optimal status. All concerns, problems, needs and/or strengths have a corresponding goal. The format for a goal is who, what, how, and when. Goals are resident oriented, specific problem-oriented goals relative to medical and nursing diagnosis realistic, measurable, and directed towards increased functional levels.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of records, and interview the facility failed to review and update plan of care related to sacral pressure ulcer...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of records, and interview the facility failed to review and update plan of care related to sacral pressure ulcer that is worsening for 1 of 1 resident (R48) for a total of 35 residents reviewed for care plan review. This failure have the potential to result in lack of intervention that will help 1 resident (R48) sacral pressure healing. Findings include: R48 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted in the facility on 5/13/2014, medical diagnosis includes dementia. R48 has cognitive impairment with BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3. On 08/01/2023 at 11:01 AM. R48 was seen on bed on her back unable to respond when trying to interact. Multiple treatment supplies were seen on the table near the door upon entrance. Upon review of R48's treatment administration record for the month of July 2023. Multiple days including 3 successive days was seen that treatment was not signed as being performed. R48 pressure ulcer care plan only has 1 entry the date when R48's sacral pressure ulcer was identified 5/18/2023. No other review or medication was done although the same pressure ulcer was consistently deteriorating. On 08/02/2023 at 09:10 AM. V19 (Wound Coordinator) stated, I was not aware that care plan needs to be updated every time pressure ulcer deteriorates. Yes, I understand that care plan is has an important role. But I did not know that it should have been reviewed every time there is a change of status of R48's pressure ulcer. CHAPTER 2: THE ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE RAI The care plan should be revised on an on-going basis to reflect changes in the resident and the care the resident is receiving. The care plan is an interdisciplinary communication tool. Review 42 CFR 483.20(d), Comprehensive Care Plans. The comprehensive care plan must include measurable objectives and time frames and must describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The care plan must be periodically reviewed and revised, and the services provided or arranged must be in accordance with each resident's written plan of care.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0678 (Tag F0678)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of record, and interview the facility failed to follow policy on cardiopulmonary resuscitation by placing order ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of record, and interview the facility failed to follow policy on cardiopulmonary resuscitation by placing order not to resuscitate (DNR/do not resuscitate) to a resident without basis of placing the order. This failure can result to resident who is not DNR/do not resuscitate by choice will not be afforded resuscitation during emergency based on DNR/do not resuscitate physician order. Findings include: R268 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 02:16 PM. R268 has physician order for DNR/do not resuscitate but cannot locate POLST (Practitioners Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment). A request was made to present POLST form with V2 (Director of Nursing). . On [DATE] at 12:08 PM. Another request was made since POLST form was not yet received. On [DATE] at 10:55 AM. V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, It was a mistake placing DNR order for R268. R268 does not have a POLST form for DNR. Yes, it was changed to full code. I understand the risk of having an order of DNR to a resident that is full code. I get what you are saying that nurses are trained to follow doctors' order. But nurses must still check for POLST form. Yes there is a risk of nurses not performing CPR because of the order of DNR although resident is a full code. Policy on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation dated 04/14, it reads: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation will be initiated on all patients, employees, or visitors for whom the intervention is indicated. If CPR is not to be initiated, a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order must be on file.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed as follows: Failed to maintain and monitor the resident to be free fr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed as follows: Failed to maintain and monitor the resident to be free from pressure ulcer. Failed to follow policy on keeping wound physician aware of the status of sacral pressure ulcer for more than 14 days. And failed to document that treatment was done per physician order. Failures applies to 1 out of 3 residents for a total of 35 residents (R48) reviewed for pressure injuries. These failures affected 1 resident (R48) who acquired sacral pressure injury in the facility that was identified on its late stage. The same sacral pressure ulcer is consistently declining and worsening. Findings includes: R48 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted in the facility on 5/13/2014, medical diagnosis includes dementia. R48 has cognitive impairment with most current BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3. On 08/01/2023 at 11:01 AM. R48 was seen on bed on her back unable to respond when trying to interact. Multiple treatment supplies were seen on the table near the door upon entrance. Upon review of R48's treatment administration record for the month of July 2023. Multiple days including 3 successive days was seen that treatment was not signed as being performed. R48 pressure ulcer care plan only has 1 entry the date when R48's sacral pressure ulcer was identified 5/18/2023. No other review or medication was done although the same pressure ulcer was consistently deteriorating. On 08/02/2023 at 09:10 AM. V19 (Wound Coordinator) stated, I was not aware that care plan needs to be updated every time pressure ulcer deteriorates. I agree wound doctor needs to be updated at least every 2 weeks or as soon as possible. R48's sacral pressure ulcer was discovered and was already on stage 3. I don't know why it was discovered on its late stage. Yes, R48 sacral pressure ulcer deteriorates. Facility's sacral pressure ulcer assessments and physician's sacral pressure ulcer assessments were reviewed. Both assessments shows consistent worsening and/or deterioration of R48's sacral pressure ulcer. Facility Wound Assessment for Sacrum Pressure Ulcer: assessment dated [DATE] when R48 sacral pressure ulcer was identified as stage 3 and measures 1.50 by 1.50 by 0.10 (L x W x D) assessment dated [DATE] still on stage 3 with measurement 2.50 by 2.00 by 0.10 (L x W x D) assessment dated [DATE] sacral pressure ulcer not categorized as unstageable with measurement 3.5 by 4.0 by 0.10 (L x W x D) slough (yellow) 30 % per notes by V36 (Wound Nurse/Licensed practical Nurse) wound (sacral pressure ulcer) have shown decline. assessment dated [DATE] sacral pressure ulcer categorized as unstageable with measurement 3.5 by 4.0 by 0.10 (L x W x D) slough (yellow) 30 %. assessment dated [DATE] sacral pressure ulcer categorized as unstageable with measurement 2.5 by 5.5 by 0.10 (L x W x D). Increase of slough (yellow) to 70 %. Per notes by V36 sacral pressure ulcer of R48 have shown decline in size and slough tissue. assessment dated [DATE] sacral pressure ulcer categorized as unstageable with measurement 2.5 by 5.0 by 0 (L x W x D). Increase of slough (yellow) to 100 %. assessment dated [DATE] sacral pressure ulcer categorized as unstageable with measurement 9.8 by 8.5 by 0.30 (L x W x D) slough (yellow) 90 %. Per notes by V36 sacral pressure ulcer worsen or decline. There was substantial increase in size. assessment dated [DATE] sacral pressure ulcer categorized as stage 4 with measurement 9.8 by 8.5 by 0.30 (L x W x D) slough (yellow) 90 %. Per notes by V36 sacral pressure ulcer worsen or decline. There was substantial increase in size. assessment dated [DATE] sacral pressure ulcer categorized as unstageable with measurement 9.0 by 8.5 by 0.30 (L x W x D) slough (yellow) 90 %. Per notes dated 08/02/2023, R48 was hospitalized due to sacral pressure ulcer related diagnosis. V35 (Medical Doctor) assessments and recommendation: assessment dated [DATE] - Cleanse wound with Saline, protect peri wound with skin prep, apply alginate with silver to wound bed, apply Medi honey to wound bed, cover wound with gauze. Scheduled MWF. The wound measures 1.6 cm length x 1 cm width. assessment dated [DATE] - Cleanse wound with Saline, protect peri wound with skin prep, apply collagen to wound bed, cover wound with gauze, cover wound with bordered gauze. Schedule MWF. The wound measures 1.5 cm length x 1.5 cm width. assessment dated [DATE] - Cleanse wound with Saline, protect peri wound with skin prep, apply Santyl to wound bed, cover wound with gauze - moist with 0.9 Normal Saline, cover wound with bordered gauze. Change daily. The wound measures 3 cm length x 4.2 cm width. assessment dated [DATE] - Cleanse wound with Saline, protect peri wound with skin prep, apply Santyl to wound bed, cover wound with gauze - moist with 0.9 Normal Saline, cover wound with bordered gauze. Change daily. The wound measures 4 cm length x 5.5 cm width. assessment dated [DATE] - Cleanse wound with Saline, protect peri wound with skin prep, apply to wound bed Dakin's TID (3 times daily), cover wound with bordered gauze. Scheduled 3 times daily. For more than a month wound doctor (V35) was not able to give recommendation for R48 sacral pressure ulcer. During this period worsening of R48 sacral pressure ulcer was documented. Per V35 (Medical Doctor) on 7/24/2023 the wound has expanded further, now has depth, majority of the tissue is slough and eschar. Clinically the patient (Resident # 48) appears to be declining. The wound measures 9.5 cm length x 7.5 cm width x 1.5 cm depth. On 08/03/2023 at 03:12 PM. V19 (Wound Coordinator) stated, Yes, R48 has the same order for treatment for July as seen in the TAR (Treatment Administration Record) until 27 of July. Physician (V35) may have been busy or because of the holiday 4th of July was not able to see resident from 6/19/2023 to 7/24/2023. I agree when pressure deteriorates it should be communicated to the doctor. I will check if facility staff was able to coordinate due to deterioration or worsening of the wound. No documentation of sacral pressure ulcer from 06/19/2023 to 07/10/2023 (21 days) that V35 (Wound Doctor) was updated on the status of R48's sacral pressure ulcer. Per Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the month of July 2023 the following treatments documentation: July 11, 12, 13 and 26 were not signed as treatment being done. Per V19 it may be forgotten or caused by a glitch but no other documentation that treatment was done presented upon request. June and July 2023 were both months R48 significantly worsen. Per Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the month of June 2023 the following treatments documentation: Discrepancies between V35 and actual treatment orders were found. Per V35 instructions on the assessment dated [DATE] sacral pressure ulcer is to be cleansed with Saline, protect peri wound with skin prep, apply collagen to wound bed, cover wound with gauze, cover wound with bordered gauze. Schedule on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday to continue until 06/19/2023. But on 06/10/2023 it was changed to honey and foam dressing. During this time sacral pressure ulcer increased in size and deteriorate or worsen. Wound Policy dated 7/2022 as revised, in part reads: To identify factors that places the residents at risk for the development of pressure ulcers and to implement appropriate interventions to prevent the development of clinically avoidable wounds. To promote a systematic approach and monitoring process for the care of residents with existing wounds and for those who are at risk for skin breakdown. To promote healing of existing pressure and non-pressure ulcers. Nursing staff should keep the attending physician aware of the progress of all pressure ulcers, especially those in higher-risk residents, those that do not heal as anticipated, and those that developed complications. A. The physician should be notified and consulted if an ulcer does not show signs of healing after 14 days of the same treatment. Measurement are taken weekly. Facility provide document titled Pressure Ulcer Recommended Treatment Protocols not dated, it defines stages of pressure ulcers, it reads: Stage 1. Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin. Stage 2. Partial thickness loss of skin layers involving epidermis. The ulcer is superficial and present clinically as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater. Stage 3. Full thickness tissue loss extending though dermis involving subcutaneous tissue. Ulcer presents clinically as a deep crater with or without undermining or tunneling of adjacent tissue, eschar or slough may be present. Stage 4. Full thickness skin loss with extensive deep tissue destruction extending through subcutaneous tissue into fascia and may involved muscle layer, joint and/or bone. Per International Wound Infection Institute documentation about Slough, dated 2014 it reads: Slough is defined as moist devitalized host tissue. The color will vary from cream, yellow and tan depending on hydration. It can firmly attach, or loose. May be slimy, gelatinous, stringy, clumpy, or fibrinous consistency. Maybe liquefying necrosis. Recent suggestion of biofilm related slough contains: Proteinaceous tissue, Fibrin, Neutrophils, and Bacteria.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to follow policy by failing to properly reconcile controlled medications in order to prevent loss, diversion, or accidental expo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to follow policy by failing to properly reconcile controlled medications in order to prevent loss, diversion, or accidental exposure. This failure affected two (R23, R467) of eight residents reviewed in a sample of 35. Findings include: 08/01/23 11:58 during medication cart review on the 3rd floor (Small end) with V21 (Registered Nurse-RN), was observed in the Narcotics/controlled substance box R23's medication: PHENobarbital 32.4mg bingo card, with one on the medications popped open and security seal broken, the medication was taped back with a clear tape. V2 said she does not know what happened and she further stated that medications with broken security seal should not be taped back, but should be discarded because the medication is already contaminated and the taped medication might not be the same as the prescribed medication. R23's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 12/21/2022 documents: PHENobarbital Tablet 32.4 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours related to UNSPECIFIED CONVULSIONS 08/02/23 12:15 PM during medication cart review on 2nd floor (Big side) with V24(Registered Nurse-RN). Observed was R467's medication : Morphine Sul Solution 100/5ML was observed to be at 30ML, but was documented as remaining 25.5mL. V13(Second Floor Manager-RN) come by the 2nd floor cart and observed the medication documentation and compared it to the medication in the medication bottle. V13 said this documentation does not match what is in the bottle, and I am not sure if it was given. Observed with V13 and 24 was R467's controlled substance sheet for medication: Lorazepam tab 0.5mg not signed off after being given on 8/2/2023 at 9:00am. V24 said I forgot to sign after I gave the medication this morning. V13 asked V24 what is the first thing I tell you nurses to do after you give a medication? V24 said We sign for it so we know it given and so we don't have a discrepancy. R467's physician order sheet (POS) documents: Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Solution 20MG/ML. Give 10 milliliter every 4 hours as needed for anxiety. R467's physician order sheet (POS) documents: Ativan Oral Tablet 0.5MG (Lorazepam) Give 2 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for anxiety. Policy titled Psychotropic Drug Therapy (No date) documents: -Administer medication and document on medication administration record.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Drug Regimen Review (Tag F0756)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy by not obtaining consent for the administration of a psychotropic medication for one (R23) of 7 residents reviewed in a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy by not obtaining consent for the administration of a psychotropic medication for one (R23) of 7 residents reviewed in a sample of 35 residents. Findings include: On 8/3/23 at 10:30 AM, V13 (2nd floor Unit Manager and Psychotropic nurse) stated when a resident is ordered a psychotropic medication, I ask the doctor or NP (Nurse Practitioner) why they are being given the psychotropic. I check for the correct diagnosis to correspond with the medication. I educate the patient on the medication and why the doctor wants the resident to take the medication. If the patient consents, then a consent form is completed and signed. The resident is monitored for 72 hours after administration of the medication starts for side effects of the medication. If patient is not coherent to consent, then I call the POA (Power of Attorney) to educate the POA on the medication. If the POA does not consent, then we cannot give the medication. If the POA consents, then two nurses will sign as witnesses to the verbal consent. A consent is needed because Psychotropic medications can be detrimental to the patient and can be a restraint. Also need a consent just in case something adverse happens. A signed consent is needed when the medication is ordered, and a new signed consent is needed if the dosage is increased. V13 said R54 did not have a consent for the increased dosage of Celexa from 6/13/2023-today (8/3/2023). On 8/3/23 at 11:30 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated when a resident is ordered a psychotropic medication we identify if they are currently taking it, obtain consent or update consent. A consent form is need on initiation of the psychotropic medication and if the dosage is increased. The consent form should be signed by the resident or POA (Power of Attorney). If it is a verbal consent, then it is witnessed by two nurses. A consent is needed because of the potential for chemical restraint, and to identify potential side effects with taking the medication. R54 has diagnoses that include but are not limited to major depressive disorder. R54 Order Summary Report indicates R54 has an active order for Celexa oral tablet 20mg (Citalopram Hydrobromide) give 20 mg by mouth in the morning related to major depressive disorder, start date 6/13/2023. R54 progress notes includes a psychotropic progress note, dated 8/3/2023, that reads in part: Writer spoke with POA to obtain updated consent for psychotropic use resident Celexa dose was increased. Consent for Psychotropic Medication, dated 1/6/2021, lists Celexa tablet 10mg by mouth one time a day. Psychotropic Consent, dated 8/3/2023, lists Celexa oral tablet 20mg by mouth in the morning. Facility policy Psychotropic Drug Therapy, not dated, documents in part: Psychotropic medication shall not be prescribed or administered without the informed consent of the resident, the residents guardian, or other authorized representative.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 8/3/23 at 11:30 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said R54 does not have a GDR (gradual dose reduction). The purpose of the GDR is...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 8/3/23 at 11:30 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said R54 does not have a GDR (gradual dose reduction). The purpose of the GDR is to make sure medications being given to the resident are monitored and if they are therapeutic or if it is still needed. The GDR is supposed to be done quarterly by the medical doctor. R54 has diagnoses that include but are not limited to major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia. R54 Order Summary Report indicates R54 has an active order for Celexa oral tablet 20mg (Citalopram Hydrobromide) give 20 mg by mouth in the morning related to major depressive disorder, start date 6/13/2023; Risperdal tablet 0.25mg (Risperidone) give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for delusion in dementia pt related to unspecified dementia, start date 5/24/2017. R54 progress notes includes a psychotropic progress note, dated 8/3/2023, that reads in part: Writer spoke with POA to obtain updated consent for psychotropic use resident Celexa dose was increased. Consent for Psychotropic Medication, dated 1/6/2021, lists Celexa tablet 10mg by mouth one time a day. Psychotropic Consent, dated 8/3/2023, lists Celexa oral tablet 20mg by mouth in the morning. Facility policy Psychotropic Drug Therapy, not dated, documents in part: Residents are involved in a program to achieve the lowest possible dose necessary to control symptoms and/or to discontinue psychotropic medication unless clinically contraindicated. Residents who use psychotropic drugs shall receive gradual dose reductions and behavior interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue. Any resident receiving psychotropic medication will be assess by physician and/or psychiatric for drug reduction program. Based on observation, interviews, and review of records the facility failed ensure psychotropic medications that are ordered to be given as needed were reviewed after 14 days. And failed to document, assess, and monitor psychotropic medication that was given on as needed basis. These failures have the potential to affect 1 resident (R267) on the adverse effect of psychotropic medications and the facility failed to follow their policy by not assessing one (R54) of 7 residents reviewed for psychotropic medication gradual dose reduction in a sample of 35 residents. Findings include: R267 is [AGE] years old, medical diagnosis includes schizoaffective disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, abnormal posture, insomnia, and anxiety disorder. R267 was initially admitted on [DATE]. On 08/01/2023 at 11:23 AM. R267 was seen sitting on his bed. R267 was alert and verbally able to express his thoughts well. R267 was talking about his situation when he was still working, and those workers that was laid off. R267 said that he was advise by the doctor not to talk too much and that he gets anxious every time he talks too much. R267 spoke about that he became in valid in 2017 due to talking psychotropic medication. During conversation R267 became very anxious and was found shaking on his hands. During medication review following psychotropic were included on the list that physician ordered: - Benadryl tablet 25 MG to give every 4 hours as needed for extrapyramidal symptoms. - Citalopram tablet 20 MG to be given 1 time daily for Paranoid Schizophrenia. - Hydroxyzine table 25 MG to give every 4 hours as needed for anxiety. - Lorazepam Injection Solution 2 MG per ML to inject intramuscularly every 4 hours as needed. - Quetiapine Fumarate tablet 200 MG in the morning and 500 MG at bedtime for schizoaffective disorder. - Zolpidem Tartrate tablet 10 MG at bedtime for insomnia. On 08/03/2023 at 09:37 AM. Both orders for Hydroxyzine table 25 MG to give every 4 hours as needed for anxiety and Lorazepam Injection Solution 2 MG per ML to inject intramuscularly every 4 hours as needed were still reflected as continuing orders. More than 14 days after started. On 08/03/2023 at 10:41 AM. V2 (Director of Nursing) said, As needed may be asked by resident on their own when they are symptomatic. There is a limit of 14 days to review effectivity and adverse reaction. Typically, on the 14th day, order needs to be updated. Until symptoms may resolve. Adverse reaction may occur when using psychotropic medication. When a resident has scheduled or standing order of psychotropic medication. Plus, psychotropic medication that is as needed. Additional risk of adverse reaction because of as needed medication. But if PRN (as needed medication) is not being used what was the harm? On 08/03/2023 at 11:09 AM. With V34 (Licensed Practical Nurse) went to medication storage and medication cart cannot find Lorazepam 2 MG/ML. On the medication cart Hydroxyzine 25 MG as needed every 4-hour bingo card was seen. On the bingo card with 11 tablets was popped out. V34 said, Oh yes, if it was popped out it was given to the resident. None of the days for both July and August 2023 MAR (Medication Administration Record) does not reflect that Hydroxyzine 25 MG scheduled as needed every 4 hours was signed as given. On 08/03/2023 at 02:34 PM. V2 said, When giving as needed psychotropic medication to a resident. Nursing staff must document to check for effectivity and adverse reaction. Yes, assessment should be done. Per Psychotropic Drug Therapy Policy dated 11/14, it reads: Resident are involved in a program to achieve the lowest possible dose necessary to control symptoms and/or to discontinue psychotropic medication unless clinically contraindicated. Monitoring for Psychotropic Drug Side Effects The facility assures that all residents who are undergoing psychotropic drug therapy receive adequate monitoring for significant side effects of such therapy with emphasis on the following: 1. Tardive dyskinesia. 2. Postural (orthostatic) hypotension. 3. Cognitive/behavior impairment, 4. Parkinsonism. When psychotropic drugs are used without monitoring for these side effects, they may be unnecessary drugs because of inadequate monitoring.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This failure affected two (R46, R122) residents out of a total sample of 35 reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This failure affected two (R46, R122) residents out of a total sample of 35 residents. Findings include: On 08/01/2023 at 12:52 PM, R122 observed inside of his room sitting in a wheelchair. Surveyor observed 5 dead roaches on R122's room floor. R122 states that he can't stand these bugs. I use my own bug spray to kill them. I kill roaches in my room everyday with the bug spray my wife bought for me. Surveyor observed two cans of bug spray labeled Ant and Roach killer 17.5 ounces, one can located on each side of R122's bed. On 08/01/2023 at 12:55PM, V11 (Housekeeping) also located inside of R122's room and observed the dead roaches and bug spray. On 08/02/2023 at 1:20 PM, Surveyor located inside of R46s' room with V15 (Housekeeping Director). Surveyor observed 2 cups of uncovered juice and a banana sitting on R46's TV stand. Surveyor observes approximately 20 live gnats crawling on the outer surfaces of the juice cups and banana. Surveyor observed approximately 5 dead gnats floating inside both cups of juice. Surveyor observed 3 live roaches crawling on a nearby fork utensil. V15 then pulls R46's TV stand away from the wall and surveyor observes approximately 40 live roaches crawling on the wall and floor behind the TV stand. V15 states This is an infestation. On 08/02/2023 at 10:17AM, V17 (Maintenance Director) stated I have been overseeing the pest control here at the facility for about two months now. Right now, V1 (Administrator) schedules the pest control services because of the new ownership. Prior to the facility's new ownership, housekeeping was responsible for overseeing the pest control program. The pest control company comes to service the facility twice a month. When they come, they start in the kitchen and goes throughout the facility and service the resident rooms also. I have not had any complaint or have not observed insects in any of the residents' rooms. Facility pest control report reviewed from 06/2023 to 07/24/2023 and documents that the pest control company found roach activity in different areas of the facility. Facility document undated, titled Pest Control Policy documents in part, 6. Food will be covered and/or refrigerated, as applicable, to prevent pest invasion and spoiling. 10. The facility shall be kept in such condition and cleaning procedures used to prevent the harborage or feeding of insects or rodents.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: a) provide an environment that is free from accid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: a) provide an environment that is free from accidental hazards(spray chemicals) regarding one resident (R122); b) failed to clean up liquid subtance off of the floor which has the potential to affect all 70 residents residing on the second floor of the facility; c) failed to ensure one resident(R46) practiced safe smoking in faciltiy's designated area. Findings included: On 08/01/2023 at 12:52 PM, R122 observed inside of his room sitting in a wheelchair. Surveyor observed 5 dead roaches on R122's room floor. R122 states that he can't stand these bugs. I use my own bug spray to kill them. I kill roaches in my room everyday with the bug spray my wife bought for me. Surveyor observed two cans of bug spray labeled Ant and Roach killer 17.5 ounces, one can located on each side of R122's bed. On 08/02/2023 at 10:17AM, V17 (Maintenance Director) stated Residents are not able to have bug spray in their room. It is dangerous for the residents to have the bug spray in their rooms because the chemicals could be dangerous. Chemicals and bug spray should not be left in the residents' rooms because they can drink it and the spray is flammable, anything could happen to the residents. No one has informed me that R122 has bug spray in his room. On 08/02/2023 at 10:42AM, Surveyor and V17 located inside of R122's room and V17 observed the two cans of ant and roach killer 17.5 ounces located in R122's room. V12 states to R122 What are you doing with these? R122 states What do you think I'm doing with them, to keep the roaches from attacking me! V17 then states to R122 that he is not supposed to have the bug spray in his room. Surveyor and V17 then exits R122's room. On 08/02/2023 at 1:06PM, Surveyor located in the hall on the second floor of the facility adjacent to the elevators. Surveyor observed staff passing meal trays to the residents. Surveyor also observes a liquid puddle measuring approximately 4 feet in length x 1 feet in width. V25 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) observes the liquid on the floor and makes reference to the liquid puddle but continues to pass resident meal trays. V27 (CNA) observed walking pass the liquid puddle and continued to pass resident meal trays. V26 (CNA) observed looking at the liquid puddle and steps over the liquid and continue to pass resident meal trays. Surveyor observes a female resident ambulating via a rollator walker, roll her walker through the liquid puddle as she was ambulating. On 08/02/2023 at approximately 1:30PM, V25 and V27 both stated that they were too busy passing meal trays. V25 stated that she should have stopped what she was doing to prevent an accident. V27 stated that a resident could have fallen. V26 stated that she did not have an excuse and that she was sorry. Facility census dated 07/31/2023 documents that a total of 70 residents reside on the second floor of the facility. On 08/02/2023 at 1:20 PM, R46 observed in his room sitting on the bed. R46 states that he smokes inside the bathroom located in his room. R46 also states that he is not allowed to smoke in his room but he keeps his cigarettes and cigarette lighter and hides them under his pillow at times. R46 states that after he is done smoking in his room, he hides the cigarette butts inside a container with his crayons. R46 points in the direction of the container located on his TV stand. Surveyor looks inside of the container and observed several crayons and one cigarette butt. R46 states that it is okay to smoke inside of his room, as long as the staff does not catch him smoking. On 08/02/2023 at approximately 1:25PM, Surveyor located inside of R46s' room with V13 (RN/2nd Floor Unit Manager). V13 observes the cigarette butt inside of the crayon container and states that she is not aware of R46's smoking status and that V14 (Social Services Director) would know more information regarding R46's smoking status. On 08/02/2023 at 1:32PM, V14 (Social Services Director) states R46 is an independent smoker but he is not allowed to smoke in his room or keep any of his own smoking paraphernalia. The staff lights R46's cigarettes and lock/stores them. R46 is aware that he needs to smoke in the designated area only. R46 was caught before smoking in an undesignated area a while ago. If residents smoke in an undesignated area, there is no staff monitoring them and they can potentially cause harm to themselves or other residents. R46 could have burned himself, this is a safety hazard. R46s' smoking assessment dated [DATE] documents in part that R46 has a moderate problem with smoking in unauthorized areas, careless with smoking materials, and general awareness and orientation. R46 has a minimal problem with safely following the facility smoking guidelines. R46's care plan dated 06/14/2023 documents that R46 is care planned for unsafe smoking with documented incidents of R46 smoking in unauthorized areas of the facility. Facility document undated, titled Facility Smoking Safety Policy documents in part 1. Smoking is only allowed in designated areas established by management. Facility document undated, titled Supervision and Safety documents in part, Policy: Our policy strives to make the environment as free from hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision are facility-wide priorities. 9. Staff to decrease safety risk factors as much as possible.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Findings include: On 08/01/23 at 11:08 AM, observed R516 lying in bed wearing a nasal cannula with oxygen infusing. R516's oxyg...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Findings include: On 08/01/23 at 11:08 AM, observed R516 lying in bed wearing a nasal cannula with oxygen infusing. R516's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were not labeled with a date. R516 stated R516 has oxygen infusing all the time and that no one has been in to change the tubing and humidifier bottle since R516 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 08/01/23 at 11:28 AM, observed R174 lying in bed with oxygen infusing via nasal cannula. R174's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle labeled with 07/23/23 date. R174 stated R174 always uses oxygen when R174 is in R174's room and only removes it when R174 goes to the bathroom or outside. On 08/01/23 at 11:33 AM, observed R165 lying in bed with oxygen infusing via nasal cannula. R165's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle was dated 07/23/23. On 08/01/23 at 11:44 AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles should each be labeled with a date and changed weekly. V9 viewed R516's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle and then stated that there was no date on the oxygen equipment but there should be. On 08/01/23 at 11:47 AM, V9 viewed R174's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle and stated the oxygen equipment was last changed on 07/23/23 and stated that it should have been changed and dated on 07/30/23. On 08/01/23 at 11:49 AM, V9 viewed R165's oxygen equipment and stated that the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were dated 07/23/23 but they should have been changed after 7 days which should have been done on 07/30/23. On 08/02/23 at 4:47 PM, V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R174 is on oxygen which is currently infusing. V30 reviewed R174's physician orders in the electronic medical record and stated, I don't see any orders for R174 to receive oxygen. R174 stated since R174 is receiving oxygen R174 should have an order for oxygen. On 08/03/23 at 3:43 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated any resident receiving oxygen needs to have a physician generated order. R165's diagnosis not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Anxiety, Muscle Weakness, Depression. R165's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 06/28/23 indicates moderately impaired cognition. R165's Order Summary Report dated 08/02/2023 documents, in part oxygen at four liters/minute per nasal cannula ordered 01/06/23 and change oxygen tubing weekly every night shift every Sunday ordered 05/27/22. R174's diagnosis not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Shortness of Breath, Heart Failure, Anxiety, Weakness, Unsteadiness on Feet, Lack of Coordination. R174's MDS dated [DATE] indicates moderately impaired cognition. R174's Order Summary Report dated 08/02/23 does not include a physician order for oxygen therapy. R516's diagnosis not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Exacerbation, Pneumonia, Pain, Edema, Opioid Dependence. R516's MDS dated [DATE] indicates intact cognition. R516's Order Summary Report dated 08/02/23 does not include a physician order for oxygen. R516's care plan for altered respiration status/difficulty breathing related to pneumonia documents in part to provide oxygen as ordered. R516's admission progress note dated 07/19/23 documents in part R516 on oxygen four liters nasal cannula. Facility policy titled, Oxygen Equipment dated 08/2014 documents in part facility will use disposable nasal cannula and equipment will be changed weekly and dated, and humidifier bottles will be changed and dated weekly. Surveyor: Teagues, [NAME] Findings include: On 08/01/2023 at 11:23 AM, surveyor located inside of R84's room and observed that R84's oxygen tubing was not labeled with a date. R84's portable oxygen concentrator gauge observed at 0, which indicates that the oxygen inside of R84's oxygen concentrator has been depleted. On 08/01/2023 at 11:45AM, V10 states that R84's oxygen use is used as needed and R84's oxygen tubing should be labeled with a date. Record review of R84s' Facesheet documents that R84 has medical diagnoses not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/COPD with acute exacerbation. R84s' Physician Order Sheet/POS documents the following orders: Oxygen (O2) at 3 liters/minute, maintain O2 saturation at 92% or greater every hour as needed for shortness of breath/dyspnea. Change O2 tubing weekly every night shift every Sun. Facility document undated, titled Oxygen Equipment documents 4. Oxygen tubing/nebulizer masks will be changed and dated weekly and PRN/as needed. Findings include: On 08/01/2023 at 11:36 AM, Surveyor and V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) located inside of R106's room and observed that R106 did not have any Trach-Vent T covers or tracheostomy tube holders available. V10 observed checking R106's bag and bedside drawers and stated that she could not find any Trach-Vent T covers or tracheostomy tube holders. R106 did not have an oxygen tank or oxygen concentrator available at R106's bedside. Surveyor asked V10 about available oxygen in case of an emergency. V10 stated that she has never known R106 to use any oxygen. On 08/01/2023 at 1:26 PM, V10 observed checking the medication storage room located on the second floor of the facility and states that she still cannot find anymore Trach-Vent T covers for R106. Record review of R106s' Facesheet documents that R106 has medical diagnoses not limited to: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, encounter for attention to tracheostomy, and esophageal obstruction. R106s' Physician Order Sheet/POS documents the following orders: Oxygen (O2) at 5 liters/maintain O2 saturation at 96% or greater. R106's care plan dated 05/08/2022 documents in part Give humidified oxygen as prescribed. On 08/02/2023 at 12:08PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that tracheostomy tube holders should be available at R106's bedside and oxygen tubing is changed every Sunday on the night shift. V2 also stated that if oxygen tubing is not changed and dated, it can potentially cause a build up of contaminates and cause an infection. On 08/02/23 12:39 PM, Surveyor and V2 (Director of Nursing) located inside of R106's room and V2 also observed that R106 does not have any available oxygen sources at R106's bedside. V2 verbalized that R106 should have oxygen at the bedside in case of an emergency. Facility document undated, titled Tracheostomy Care Suctioning, Cleaning, and Changing Type documents Suctioning removes air and depletes needed oxygen. Resident admitted with a tracheostomy need provision for oxygen therapy and humidification in addition to suctioning equipment. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to a.) obtain physician orders for oxygen administration for two residents (R174, R516), b.) failed to date and change oxygen equipment every seven days per facility policy for four residents (R84, R165, R174, R516), and c.) faitled to ensure that oxygen and other tracheostomy supplies were available at the bedside for one (R106) resident reviewed for oxygen therapy out of a total sample of 35 residents.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food items as shown on the menu spreadsheet based on physician generated orders. This failure affected five residents (...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food items as shown on the menu spreadsheet based on physician generated orders. This failure affected five residents (R52, R145, R174, R188, R316) in a sample of 35 residents reviewed for menus and nutritional adequacy. Findings include: On 08/01/23 facility spread sheets labeled Week 2 Tuesday listed the following items in part to be served for general orders: 2 ounces Oven Herb Roasted Turkey, 2 ounces Poultry Gravy, 1 small Baked Sweet Potato, ½ cup Capri Mix Vegetables, 1 piece Frosted [NAME] Cake, 1 slice Bread, 1 teaspoon Margarine. On 08/01/23 facility spread sheets labeled Week 2 Tuesday listed the following items in part to be served for double portion orders: 4 ounces Oven Herb Roasted Turkey, 4 ounces Poultry Gravy, 2 each small Baked Sweet Potato, 1 cup Capri Mix Vegetables, 1 piece Frosted [NAME] Cake, 1 slice Bread, 1 teaspoon Margarine. On 08/01/23 at 12:15 PM, observed R145 receive a lunch tray containing the following items: 2 ounces Oven Herb Roasted Turkey, 2 ounces Poultry Gravy, 1 small Baked Sweet Potato, ½ cup Capri Mix Vegetables, 1 small cookie. R145 did not receive 1 piece of Frosted [NAME] Cake, 1 slice of Bread or 1 teaspoon Margarine. Observed R145's meal ticket which listed DOUBLE PORTIONS for lunch. R145 did not receive double portions of Oven Herb Roasted Turkey, Poultry Gravy, Baked Sweet Potato, or Capri Mix Vegetables. On 08/01/23 at 12:28 PM, R145 observed to have consumed 100% of meal. Did not observed staff offering R145 additional food. On 08/02/23 facility spread sheets labeled Week 2 Wednesday listed the following items in part to be served for general orders: 3 each Meatballs, ¾ cup Spaghetti Noodles, ½ cup Italian Blend Vegetables, ½ cup Watermelon Cubes, 1 slice Bread, 1 teaspoon Margarine. On 08/02/23 facility spread sheets labeled Week 2 Wednesday listed the following items in part to be served for double portion orders: 6 each Meatballs, 1 1/2 cup Spaghetti Noodles, 1 cup Italian Blend Vegetables, 1/2 cup Watermelon Cubes, 1 slice Bread, 1 teaspoon Margarine. On 08/02/23 at 12:15 PM, observed R145 receive a lunch tray containing the following items: 3 each Meatballs, ¾ cup Spaghetti Noodles, ½ cup Italian Blend Vegetables, ½ cup Watermelon Cubes, 1 slice Bread, 1 teaspoon Margarine. Observed R145's meal ticket which listed DOUBLE PORTIONS for lunch. R145 did not receive double portions of Meatballs, Spaghetti Noodles, or Italian Blend Vegetables. V32 (Activity Aide) who was distributing lunch trays confirmed R145 only received 3 meatballs and single portions of the spaghetti and vegetables. On 08/02/23 at 12:19 PM, observed R52 receive a lunch tray containing the following items: single portion of Pureed Meatballs, single portion of Pureed Spaghetti Noodles, single portion of Italian Blend Vegetables, single portion of pureed dessert, and single portion of pureed bread. Observed R52's meal ticket which listed diet order as Double Portion Pureed and DOUBLE PORTIONS for lunch. R52 did not receive double portions of Pureed Meatballs, Pureed Spaghetti Noodles, or Pureed Italian Blend Vegetables. On 08/02/23 at 12:21 PM, observed R188 receive a lunch tray containing the following items: 3 each Meatballs, ¾ cup Spaghetti Noodles, ½ cup Italian Blend Vegetables, ½ cup Watermelon Cubes, 1 slice Bread, 1 teaspoon Margarine. Observed R188's meal ticket which listed diet order as Double Portion Regular. R188 did not receive double portions of Meatballs, Spaghetti Noodles, or Italian Blend Vegetables. V32 (Activity Aide) confirmed R188 only received 3 meatballs and single portions of the spaghetti and vegetables. On 08/02/23 at 12:25 PM, observed R174 receive a lunch tray containing the following items: 3 each Meatballs, ¾ cup Spaghetti Noodles, ½ cup Italian Blend Vegetables, ½ cup Watermelon Cubes, 1 slice Bread, 1 teaspoon Margarine. Observed R174's meal ticket which listed diet order as Double Portion Mechanical Soft. R174 did not receive double portions of Meatballs, Spaghetti Noodles, or Italian Blend Vegetables. V32 (Activity Aide) confirmed R174 only received 3 meatballs and single portions of the spaghetti and vegetables. On 08/02/23 at 12:30 PM, V6 (Former Dietary Manager) stated for residents requiring double portions everything on the plate should be doubled, but not double portion dessert or bread. On 08/03/23 at 5:05 PM - V41 (Corporate Registered Dietitian) stated the kitchen should be following the menu spreadsheets for every meal. V41 stated residents should get double portions if there is a physician order for it. V41 stated double portions is used as an intervention to help residents gain weight, and/or if they need additional protein or calories for wound healing or it could also be provided because of a resident food preference. V41 stated if a resident did not receive the double portions as ordered then there is a potential that resident's weight may stabilize instead of gain weight and wound healing could take longer. R52's diagnosis not limited to Malignant Neoplasm of Lung, Moderate Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Abnormal Weight Loss, Dysphagia. R52's Order Summary Report dated 08/02/23 documents in part, double portions for all meals ordered 03/10/22. R52's Dietary progress note for significant weight loss review dated 07/26/23 documents in part R52 had unplanned/unavoidable weight loss and lists intervention to receive double portions at all meals. R145's diagnosis not limited to Unspecified Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Pressure Ulcer of Left Buttock Stage 4, Adult Failure to Thrive, Abnormal Weight Loss. R145's Order Summary Report dated 08/02/23 documents in part double portions at mealtimes ordered 05/17/23. R145's Dietary progress note for significant weight loss review dated 07/22/23 documents in part R145 had unplanned/unavoidable weight loss and lists intervention to receive double portions at mealtimes. R174's diagnosis not limited to Weakness, Dysphagia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. R174's Order Summary Report dated 08/02/23 documents in part double portions with all meals for nutritional supplement. R174's dietary progress note for weight update dated 04/07/23 documents in part for R174 to receive double portions with all meals. R188's diagnosis not limited to Cerebral Infarction, Major Depressive Disorder, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Alcohol Dependence. R188's Order Summary Report dated 08/02/23 documents in part, double portion ordered 12/26/22. Kitchen policy titled, Double/Large Portion dated 2021 documents in part, increased portions are available for clients requiring extra calories or requesting extra food, the diet is ordered for double or large portions, and double portions are served as double serving of food on the plate. Kitchen policy titled, Tray Cards/Meal Tickets dated 2021 documents in part, information on the tray card/meal tickets may include the following diet order and special requests and the diet is served as indicated on the tray card/meal ticket. Job description for the Dietary Aide dated 2003, documents in part to serve food in accordance with established portion control procedures. Job description for the [NAME] dated 2003, documents in part to review menus prior to preparation of food, inspect special diet trays to assure that the correct diet is served to the resident, prepare meals in accordance with planned menus, and serve food in accordance with established portion control procedures. On 08/01/2023 at 12:37 PM, during lunch meal service, R316 observed being served a meal tray by V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA). R316 verbalized to V12 that his meal portion size is too small and not enough for a grown man. Surveyor observed on R316's plate: one slice of turkey meat, one baked sweet potato, and a side of mixed vegetables measuring approximately 3 inches in width x 3 inches in length. When V12 was asked about R316's meal portion size, V12 stated to surveyor That's what it is baby V12 later stated to surveyor I did notice that other residents have a larger food portion size than R316. Surveyor observed that other residents' lunch meal trays had a side of mixed vegetables that measured approximately 4 inches in width x 4.5 inches in length. R316's entire lunch meal tray consisted of: one slice of turkey meat, one baked sweet potato, a side of mixed vegetables, one cookie, and one cup of juice. Facility lunch menu spreadsheet dated 08/01/2023, documents that frosted white cake and one slice of bread is to be served on the resident meal trays. R316's physician order sheet/POS document that R316 receives a regular texture, regular thin liquids consistency, for dietary supplement. On 07/02/2023 at approximately 11:30AM, during resident council meeting with another surveyor, residents verbalized not having enough food to consume.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0809 (Tag F0809)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure there are no more than 14 hours between the evening meal and breakfast the following day and failed to serve a snack at bedtime to al...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure there are no more than 14 hours between the evening meal and breakfast the following day and failed to serve a snack at bedtime to all residents. This deficient food service practice has the potential to affect all 223 residents receiving an oral diet from the facilities kitchen. Findings include: On 08/01/23 after initial kitchen tour V6 (Former Food Service Manager) provided schedule for mealtimes updated 5/28/22 which documents range of mealtimes between 7:30-9:25 AM for breakfast, 11:20-12:45 PM for lunch, and 4:30-6:20 PM for dinner. The nursing units are not delivered meals in the same order for every meal. The mealtime schedule documents in part, that the 1st floor receives dinner between 4:30 - 4:50 PM and breakfast between 8:00 - 8:20 AM, the 4th floor receives dinner between 5:00 - 5:20 PM and breakfast between 7:30-7:50 AM, the 2nd floor receives dinner between 5:30 - 5:50 PM and breakfast between 8:30 - 8:55 AM, the 3rd floor receives dinner between 6:00 - 6:20 PM and breakfast between 9:00 - 9:25 AM. On 08/01/23 during initial kitchen tour observed the meal schedule and times posted in the kitchen by the tray line. On 08/02/23 at 7:50 AM, observed food cart with 4th floor breakfast trays arrive on the 4th floor unit. On 08/02/23 at 8:10 AM, observed food cart with 1st floor breakfast trays delivered to the 1st floor unit. On 08/02/23 at 8:25 AM, observed food cart with 2nd floor breakfast trays arrive on the 2nd floor unit. On 08/02/23 at 8:50 AM, observed food cart with 3rd floor breakfast trays delivered to the 3rd floor. On 08/02/23 at 11:26 AM, during Resident Council Meeting conducted by another state surveyor the majority of the resident attendees stated the facility does not provide snacks during the night time and there is not enough food for the residents to eat. On 08/02/23 at 4:11 PM, V28 (3-11 Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the 1st floor dinner trays arrive between 4:30-5:00 PM and the kitchen sends up one package of cookies, and one pitcher of juice around 6:00 PM. V28 stated sometimes the kitchen sends up five to six sandwiches with the cookies but this does not happen every night. V28 stated residents on a pureed diet receive the juice only since they cannot receive the cookies or sandwiches and pureed cookies or pureed sandwiches or alternate item appropriate for the pureed diets are not sent up with the cookies or juice. On 08/02/23 at 4:17 PM, V29 (Cook) stated V29 is responsible for organizing and setting up the evening snacks for each nursing unit every night and that the snacks are sent up to the units after the dinner service is done which is around 6:00 PM. V29 stated each unit gets one package of cookies, and one pitcher of orange juice. V29 counted the number of cookies in one package to be 27 cookies. V29 stated sandwiches are not sent up to the units with the cookies. V29 stated individually labeled snacks for residents are not sent up to the unit but that some residents get a sandwich on their dinner tray but that the new company that has taken over recently is trying to phase out the extra sandwiches for the residents. On 08/02/23 at 4:45 PM, observed food cart with 1st floor dinner trays arrived on the 1st floor unit. On 08/03/23 at 12:11 PM, V4 (Food Service Supervisor) stated none of the residents receive individually labeled evening snacks, instead snacks are delivered in bulk to the unit. On 08/03/23 at 12:15 PM, R22 stated R22 has been Resident Council President for four years. R22 stated there has been no request to change meal deliver times during this time. R22 stated R22 is not being offered an evening snack at night. R22 stated R22 cannot walk so maybe snacks are delivered to the nursing unit and people who can walk have access to the snacks, but no staff has ever come into R22's room to offer R22 an evening snack. R22 stated that other residents complain to R22 about being hungry at night after dinner and that the portion sizes at meals are too small. R22 stated R22 did not receive R22's breakfast this morning until after 9:00 AM and ate dinner last night around 5:00 - 5:30 PM. R22 stated that is a long gap between meals and if they gave the residents a snack at night then maybe people would not complain as much. On 08/02/23 V6 provided copy of Week at a Glance Menu Cycle which lists late night snack as assorted juice (1/2 cup) and assorted cookies (1 each) or vanilla wafters (3 each) or graham crackers (1 package). Based on the Midnight Census Report dated 07/31/23 occupied beds for each unit of which there are residents receiving food from the kitchen are as follows: 1st floor = 44 residents, 2nd floor = 70, 3rd floor = 49, 4th floor = 60. On 08/03/23 at 5:05 PM, V41 (Corporate Registered Dietitian) stated if there is more than 14 hours between when the dinner and the breakfast meal are served then the facility must provide an evening snack to all the residents. V41 stated this would also include residents who are on an altered consistency diet such as a pureed diet. V41 stated a snack of cookies and juice would be an appropriate snack as long as all of the residents are being offered something to eat. V41 stated all the residents should be offered an evening snack not only residents who can walk to the nursing station to get the snack for themselves. On 08/03/23 surveyor reviewed Resident Council Meeting Minutes provided by V1 (Administrator) and there was no mention of resident request or approval for mealtimes to be extend beyond 14 hours lapse time between dinner and breakfast meal. Kitchen facility policy titled, Frequency of Meals dated 2021, documents in part the healthcare community will provide three meals a day along with a bedtime snack and there will be no more than fourteen hours between the evening meal and breakfast the following day. Kitchen facility policy titled, Nourishments (Night-Time Snacks) dated 2021 documents in part nourishments will be provided to clients at approximately bedtime and clients will receive an appropriate bedtime snack according to their diet order.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and stored. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 223 reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and stored. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 223 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 08/01/23 at 9:22 AM, during initial kitchen tour, V4 (Food Service Supervisor) stated all opened food items need to be labeled and dated with a delivery date, an open date and an expiration date unless specified by the manufacturer in which case the staff follows the manufacturer expiration date printed on the food container. On 08/02/23 at 9:23 AM, observed the following items in the facility walk-in refrigerator: Opened 1 gallon container of Concord Grape Jelly with no delivery, open or expiration date. Opened 1 gallon container Sweet Relish labeled with delivery date of 07/13/23 but not labeled with an open or use by date. Opened 1 gallon container Yellow Mustard labeled with delivery date of 06/26/23 but not labeled with an open or use by date. Opened 1 gallon container Italian Dressing labeled with delivery date of 03/29/23 but not labeled with an open or use by date. Opened package of sliced bologna wrapped in plastic not labeled with any date. There was no delivery date, opened or use by date written on the item. On 08/01/23 at 9:26 AM, V4 stated the items should be dated with an open and use by date so the staff knows when to discard an item. V4 stated if the item is not labeled properly the staff won't know when the item was opened or when to throw it out. On 08/01/23 at 9:43 AM, V4 stated all spices or bulk items are labeled with a delivery date and an open date. V4 stated the use by dates for spices or bulk items are usually to be used within one year from the date they are opened unless specified otherwise by manufacturer. On 08/01/23 at 9:48 AM, observed the following items being stored on a shelving rack near the meal preparation area. Opened 1 gallon container Lemon Blend from Concentrate labeled with delivery date 01/30/23 but not labeled with an open or use by date. Manufacturer had printed on label use by date of 06/08/23. V4 stated V4 did not realize the item had a use by date of 06/08/23 and therefore it would be thrown in the garbage since it had expired. Opened 1 gallon container Soy Sauce labeled with open date 06/21/23 and use by date 06/21/24. Manufacturer printed on side of container Refrigerate After Opening for Quality. V4 stated the soy sauce should be refrigerated not stored on the shelf. Opened 1 pound box Farina with top corner pulled open, uncovered. V4 stated the box of Farina should be wrapped in plastic wrap because the side of the box was left open and anything could get in there. On 08/01/23 V6 (Former Dietary Manager) provided list of residents receiving diets from the kitchen and a list of residents who receive nothing by mouth (NPO) per physician order. Kitchen policy titled Labeling and Dating Foods dated 2021 documents in part, to decrease the risk of food borne illness and to provide the highest quality, foods (are) labeled with the date received, the date opened and the date by which the item should be discarded and opened bulk condiments should be refrigerated and labeled with the date opened and with discard or use by date.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster was covered to prevent the harborage of pests. This deficient sanitation practice has the potential to aff...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster was covered to prevent the harborage of pests. This deficient sanitation practice has the potential to affect all 227 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: On 08/01/23 at 10:02 AM, an observation of the outside garbage dumpster was conducted with V4 (Food Service Supervisor) and V5 (Dietary Manager). Surveyor observed one dumpster wide open with garage protruding out of the dumpster opening. V4 stated there is no lid on that side of the dumpster and said, we cannot close the dumpster even if we wanted to. V5 stated the dumpster should have lids which are kept closed to keep the pests out of the dumpster. On 08/02/23 at 9:48 AM, V15 (Housekeeping Director) stated the dumpsters are used to collect garbage from the facility and that the dumpster lids should always be closed to keep rodents and pests out. V15 stated rodents, flies, raccoons, and coyotes can be attracted by the smell of the garbage and if the lid of the dumpster is kept open these pests could get into the dumpster. V15 stated the lids of the dumpsters should always be closed, never left open. Facility kitchen policy titled Safe Food Handling - Dumpster dated 2021 documents in part all food will be disposed of in a safe manner and the dumpster will be securely covered.
Jul 2023 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that the call light was within reach for 2 residents (R10 and R11) out of 4 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R10's...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that the call light was within reach for 2 residents (R10 and R11) out of 4 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R10's diagnosis includes but are not limited to, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, unspecified lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified, weakness, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, opioid abuse, uncomplicated, other asthma, cardiomyopathy, unspecified, essential (primary) hypertension, schizophrenia, unspecified and type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. R10 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 6/25/2023 documents that R10 has a BIMS score of 10 which indicates that R10 has some moderate cognitive impairments. R11's diagnosis includes but are not limited to, multiple sclerosis, abnormal posture, unspecified lack of coordination, weakness, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 2, contact with and (suspected) exposure to other viral communicable diseases, primary insomnia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, bipolar disorder, unspecified, long term (current) use of aspirin, constipation, unspecified and anxiety disorder, unspecified. R11 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 7/6/2023 documents that R11 has a BIMS score of 13 which indicates that R11 is cognitively intact. On 7/26/2023 at 10:54am surveyor observed R10's call light hanging from the wall behind R10's bed. Surveyor asked R10 where her call light was located and R10 stated, I do not have a call light. On 7/26/2023 at 10:55am surveyor observed R11's call light on the floor on the right side of R11's bed. On 7/26/2023 at 11:00am V7(LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R10's call light was clipped to the cord up by the wall above R10's bed. V7 stated R11's call is on the floor. On 7/26/2023 at 11:02am V7 was observed moving R10's call light which was clipped to the cord on the wall and placing the call light into the bed near R10's right hand. V7 was observed picking R11's call light up off the floor and placing the call light into the bed with R11. On 7/26/2023 at 12:17pm V9(RN/Registered Nurse) stated the call light should be within reach of the resident. On 7/26/2023 at 2:16pm V2(DON/Director of Nursing) stated the resident's call light should be located within the resident's reach. The Certified Nursing Assistant's job description dated for 2003 documents, in part, Keep the nurses' call system within easy reach of the resident. The facility's undated policy titled Call Light documents, in part, underneath Standards: 1. All residents shall have the nurse call light system available and within easy accessibility to the resident at the bedside or other reasonable accessible location.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that old food and meal trays were removed from...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that old food and meal trays were removed from two residents' (R15 and R1) room. This failure affected two residents (R15 and R1) from a sample of 3 residents reviewed for safe/clean/comfortable/homelike environment. Findings include: R1 is [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Osteoarthritis of Hip, Muscle Weakness, Pain in Right Hip, Other reduced mobility, Lack of Coordination, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Lymphedema, Cellulitis of part of limb, Unilateral Primary Osteoarthritis and Difficulty in walking. R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates cognitively intact. R15 is [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Dementia, Hoarding Disorder, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Mood Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Muscle Weakness, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis affecting Left dominant side. R15 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates cognitively intact. On 7/24/26, during room rounds, surveyor entered R15 and R1's room. R15 and R1's room smelled like urine. Surveyor observed 4 meal trays in R15 and R1's room. Surveyor observed flies surrounding a meal tray that was on the floor next to R15's bed. Flies were also on R15's privacy curtain. An empty bed was adjacent to R15's bed. A meal tray was observed on the bed. R15's lunch tray sat on his (R15's) bed, and R1's lunch tray sat on his (R1's) bed. On 7/24/26 at 12:40 PM, R15 said, this was my dinner tray from last night (pointing to the tray on the floor), and that was my breakfast tray from this morning (pointing to the tray on the empty bed.) The clothes closet near R15's bed was open and on the bottom shelf was a wet, brown liquid substance, clothes, and a red biohazard bag. On 7/24/26 at 12:42 PM R1 said, This is why there were maggots on the food tray. The staff never pick up his (R15's) meal trays. He sometimes sit his meal tray there in the closet on the shelf when he gets tired of looking at it. They (staff) know that he (R15) needs help. One time, he (R15) had an accident and urinated on the room floor. The staff took so long to clean up the urine, that I (R1) just put a blanket over the urine. Housekeeping said that before they could mop the floor, a CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) would have to pick up the blanket first. That blanket stayed on the floor in the same spot for about three days before anyone cleaned it up. On 7/24/23 at 12:53 PM, V37 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ LPN) said, The room does smell like urine. I tell R1 all the time about the condition of the room. R15 sometimes sits trays there when he is done and it may spill on the shelf. The problem is that R15 does not finish his meal right away and wants to keep it for a while. Anyone can grab the meals trays from the room. I didn't notice the tray on the floor this morning when I made my rounds. On 7/24/23 at 12:55 PM, V30 (Housekeeper) said, I am assigned this floor today. No I didn't see the old trays in the room. It is the CNAs responsibility to remove the meal trays from the rooms. When I clean the rooms and see a meal tray, I grab a CNA to get the tray. I don't remove meal trays from the resident's rooms. The trays are supposed to go on the cart on the floor to be taken down to the kitchen. On 7/24/23 at 12:57 PM, V38 (CNA) said, I've been a CNA for 9 years. I am assigned to this room (referring to room of R15 and R1). I often see trays in R15's closet or on the floor. I did not notice any trays on the floor this morning. We remove the trays. We are a team and anyone can remove a tray from a resident's room. On 7/24/23 at 1:21 PM, V18 (CNA) said, We are a team. Anyone can grab meal trays when the resident is done. When we see them, we just grab them. Sometimes R15 don't want us to take his tray because he is still picking through it. R15 has a behavior of hoarding. I usually will insist that he let me take the tray after he has had it for over an hour or so, and offer him (R15) something else like a sandwich or something. On 7/24/23 at 1:10 PM, V13 LPN said, I saw the maggots on the old meal tray. The tray was sitting in the closet on the shelf and was probably put there by R15. He sits his trays there sometimes when he's done with it. On 7/26/23 at 2:04 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said, I expect that the staff follow up with the meal trays to ensure that they are all taken down to the kitchen. Although R15 usually insists on keeping his meal tray at times, staff are expected to ensure that the tray is eventually taken from the room. There is a late pick-up for trays of our slow eaters. We all are here to assist them (the residents) and to promote a clean and healthy space. I understand that some resident's require more assistance than others. If they (residents) did not have a need, they would not be here (the facility). R15's Care Plan initiated 8/03/2022 documents, R15 displays impaired decision making ability as evidence of poor judgement, inattention, forgetfulness, and some confusion. R15 has impaired cognitive function/dementia and impaired thought process. Facility Document titled Housekeeping Guidelines documents, Trash will be removed from all areas of the facility daily and as needed to prevent spillage and odors.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from physical abuse for 2 (R3 and R4) residents reviewed for resident to resident physical abuse in the sample of...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from physical abuse for 2 (R3 and R4) residents reviewed for resident to resident physical abuse in the sample of 4 (R3, R4, R5, and R6) residents. Findings include: The (05/04/2023) Facility Final Reportable for (R3) and R4) documented, in part Circumstance of alleged incident: (R3) became verbally aggressive with (R4) in the hallway. Verbal aggression continue into the parlor at which time the two individuals became physically aggressive. (R3) sustained a swollen lip. On 07/24/2023 at 12:14pm, R3 stated he (R4) came to my room, I (R3) don't know what he was doing. I (R3) told him (R3) to get out of my (R3) room. Then I (R3) went to the parlor (dining room) and I (R3) punched him (R4). I (R3) don't know where I (R3) hit him (R4). On 07/24/2023 at 12:24pm, R4 stated he (R3) wanted to hit me (R4). I (R4) don't remember what day it was. I (R4) did not hit him (R3) but he (R3) hit me (R4). On 07/26/2023 at 1:09pm, V36 (Licensed Practice Nurse) stated towards the end my shift, on first shift 7am-3pm. (R3) and (R4) had gotten into a verbal altercation. (R4) started telling (R3) racial slurs, 'wetback' meaning an immigrant with no paper. The verbal altercation happened by (R3) room. I (V36) did not witness it. When they had the verbal altercation, it was just them. I (V36) was at the nurses station. I (V36) and (V14-LPN) went too. We separated them, (R4) went the parlor/dining room. (R3) stayed in his (R3) room, and I (V36) went back to the nurses station. And a matter of seconds, (R3) walked in front of nurse's station and (R4) started the racial slurs again. I (V36) was behind (R3) and (V14). I did not see if R3 hit R4. I (V36) documented that (R4) had redness on the left cheek. I (V36) did not see the redness on his (R4) cheek before the altercation. On 07/26/2023 at 11:20am, V27 (Social Worker) stated it is expected that resident should be separated immediately. Separate meaning one person is removed and ask what happened. It is absolutely important to monitor them. There should be visual supervision of the two residents who previously just had verbal altercation to deescalate the behavior. Locate the problem, meaning to find the problem. Honestly with the psyche floor, it is hard to gauge how agitated the residents really are. We need to hear if the parties will continue to argue. Just to see if the behavior calms down. In this case, I (V27) think the behaviors did not deescalate by just counselling them (R3 and R4). Counselling alone did not work in this case. It is not expected for a resident to be physically abused by another resident. The purpose of this facility is to provide residents with a safe environment. On 07/27/2023 at 2:05pm, V1 stated it is not expected of residents to be physically injured by another resident because nobody should be injured; this should be an environment where they feel safe and meeting their needs. Nobody should be potentially injured by anybody. R3's admission Record documented that R3's diagnoses include but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 DM, mood disorder, GERD, cocaine abuse. R3's (07/01/2023) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 14. Indicating R3's mental status as cognitively intact. R3's (04/27/2023) Petition for Involuntary/Judicial admission documented, in part Emergency in patient admission. Person continues to be subject to involuntary admission on an inpatient basis. Resident is a threat to self and others as evidenced of physically attacking a peer. Unable to redirect at this time. In need of psychiatric evaluation. R3's (07/02/2023) Care Plan documented, in part Focus: R3 is/has, potential to demonstrate physical behaviors r/t poor impulse control. will seek out staff/caregiver when agitation occurs. Analyze of key times, places, circumstances, triggers, and what de-escalates behavior and document. Assess and address for contributing sensory deficits. Monitor/document/report to MD of danger to self and others. Psychiatric/Psychogeriatric consult as indicated. When The resident becomes agitated: intervene before agitation escalates; Guide away from source of distress; Engage calmly in conversation; If response is aggressive, staff to walk calmly away, and approach later. R4's (04/27/2023 at 14:58) progress note documented, in part Writer was at nurses station at 2:50pm when resident (R4) was noted near (R3) room, resident (R3) became angry and started telling resident (R4) get out of my , resident (R4) told resident (R3) you f***n wetback I (R4) will call immigration on you. Writer and co-nurse separated residents. Resident (R4) in parlor (dining room), resident (R3) in his room. Resident (R3) proceeded to parlor, writer and co-nurse attempted to stop resident (R3), resident (R3) went inside parlor resident (R4) stood up and both residents initiated physical aggression. Writer separated residents, writer noted redness to L cheek. Authored by V36 (Licensed Practice Nurse) R4's admission record documented that R4's diagnoses include but not limited to schizophrenia, heart failure, dementia, anxiety, convulsions long term use of insulin, type 2 DM, alcohol dependence with alcohol induced. R4's (05/19/2023) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 08. Indicating R4's mental status as moderately impaired. R4's (initiated 12/13/2019) Care Plan documented, in part Focus: exhibit verbal/physical aggressive behavior when things don't go in his ways. Goal: will decrease verbal/physical aggressive behavior. Interventions: PRSC to meet resident on one on one therapeutic session 2x per week to discuss ways to manage his anger. The (3/15) Supervision and Safety facility policy and procedure documented, in part Policy: Resident safety and supervision are facility wide priorities. 7. Staff to intervene immediately whenever unfavorable event between residents, staff or visitor is noticed. The (4/14) Behavior Crisis facility policy and procedure documented, in part Policy: It is the policy of the Nursing Department to initiate appropriate measures to control and secure the environment when a resident has a behavior crisis or catastrophic reaction. Definition: A behavior crisis is a situation in which a resident is considered to be a significant danger to self or others. Protocol: 1. Implement measures to provide safety. 4. Assess need for additional intervention: remove resident from situation. Place resident in a safe environment. The (undated) Residents' Rights for people in Long-Term Care Facilities documented, in part You have the right to safety and good care. Your facility must provide services to keep your physical and mental health, and sense of satisfaction. You must not be abused by anyone- physically, verbally, mentally, financially or sexually.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of resident-to-resident altercation. This failure affected 2 (R5 and R6) residents reviewed for investiga...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of resident-to-resident altercation. This failure affected 2 (R5 and R6) residents reviewed for investigation of alleged resident to resident altercation in a sample of 4 (R3, R4, R5, and R6) residents. Findings include: On 07/25/2023 at 10:07am, V23 (Registered Nurse) stated I (V23) was working that day when (R5) was moved to another room. It has been a while. (R6) said something to him (R5) and (R5) said to leave him (R5) alone. (R5) also said that (R6) threw the Machine for the mattress on his (R5) feet. I (V23) heard them arguing and I (V23) came into their room to see what happened. On 07/25/2023 at 10:10am, V23 stated. The Abuse Coordinator (V21) did not interview me about the altercation between (R5) and (R6). She (V21) was just here for a little time. She (V21) was just here temporarily. On 07/26/2023 at 10:52am, V31 (Social Services Worker) stated when I (V31) came in the room the altercation was done already. I (V31) asked (R5) what happened and he (R5) stated that (R6) threw the machine on (R5). I asked R6 what happened, he (R6) said nothing. (R6) has severe dementia and (R5) has history of antagonizing behavior towards peers trying to get a room by himself (R5). I (V31) escorted (R5) out, he (R5) was saying you all have to move (R6). (R5) said to (R6) take a shower, you (R6) stink. And (R6) did the F*** Y**sign. He (R6) does that then walks away all the time. I (V31) never saw the altercation. Nobody interviewed me about this altercation. Nobody requested a written statement from me about this altercation. On 07/6/2023 at 12:27pm, surveyor showed V17 (CNA) the 3rd floor 04/16/23 am 7-3 shift, V17 (CNA) stated I (V17) worked on that day. I (V17) don't know what happened, but I (V17) just know he (R5) was moved to another room. The floor is split up between 3 CNAs. Nobody interviewed me or made a request for a written statement. On 07/26/2023 at 12:31pm, surveyor showed V34 (CNA) the 3rd floor 04/16/23 am 7-3 shift, V34 (CNA) stated no I (V34) don't remember what transpired. Why he (R5) had to move to another room. No one requested a written statement from me (V34), and no one interviewed me (V34) about the incident. On 7/26/2023 at 12:33pm, V35 (CNA) stated I (V35) was in the room and they (R5) and (R6) were hollering at each other. I (V35) had to run out of the room to get help and (V31) came in the room to split them (R5 and R6) up. The supervisor that day took him (R5) out of the room and (R6) remained in the room. I (V35) told (V20) what happened. The screaming and hollering. (V20) practically interviewed me (V35) right after the incident. On 07/25/2023 at 10:39am, V1 (Administrator) stated all they (corporate) have is the actual reportable. I (V1) received a 2 paged reportable dated 04/16/2023 that specifies initial and final in one report. There was no attached written or supporting documentation of the investigation. There should be a written investigation to support the documentation for any allegation of abuse and neglect. The allegation of physical abuse for R5 and R6 was not thoroughly investigated. There is no proof of investigation at all that was presented to the state. It has the narrative of the incident. On 07/26/2023 at 2:30pm, V1 (Administrator) stated the 2-page reportable for R4 and R5 came from the corporate. It is expected to include in the packet the investigation that was done like the questions being asked, the statement from the witnesses like the residents and staff, any other supporting documents like hospital records, progress notes, physician order and all relevant information should be in there. The 2-page reportable is not complete. It is missing all the documents reviewed for the investigation. I can't find the missing documents. I don't know what they did with it. On 07/27/2023 at 1:58pm, V1 (Administrator) stated the importance of writing the correct address is to know what facility it is. Because facility name changes but the address doesn't. The (04/16/2023) Incident Report Form State Public Health Notification documented, in part Initial Report: 4/16/2023. Final Report: 4/16/2023. Facility Name: (S y E e. Facility Address: 5130 W. J .n C .o. Description of incident: On April 16th staff were made aware of an altercation in (room) involving two roommates, (R5) and (R6). (R5) reported pain to his (R5) lower extremities. The MD was notified and new orders received for bilateral lower extremity x-rays. (R6) was noted with weakness to his (R6) right lower extremity. MD was notified with new orders for a right lower extremity x-ray. Type of incident: Abuse. Alleged Abuse: Physical. Of note, this report documented wrong facility address, missing entries for 'hospitalized , missing entries for 'Police Notified, and no conclusion of the investigation (substantiated or unsubstantiated.) The (07/25/2023) email correspondence with V1(Administrator) in response to the request of this surveyor for the complete reportable packet of R5 and R6's incident on 04/16/2023 documented, in part I cannot locate the time stamp receipt for the Reportable incident of 4/16/2023. Per the record, the Initial and Final were sent on the same day. The (07/26/2023) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented, in part I have looked through everything in my office. I have requested any documentation regarding this incident from corporate. All that was provided to me is a 2 page report that is in your possession. I cannot find nor locate any investigation or supporting documents. The (04/16/2023) 7-3 shift form documented that V17 (CNA), V23 (Registered Nurse), V34 (CNA), and V35 (CNA) worked on that day. The (undated) Incident/Accidents Reports documented, in part A. Policy: The Incident/Accident Report is completed for all unexplained bruises or abrasions, all accidents or incidents where there is injury or the potential to result in injury, allegations of theft and abuse registered by residents, visitors or other, and resident- to-resident physical altercations. B. Procedure: Physical or mental mistreatment (abuse - actual or suspected) of a resident is considered an 'incident' whether or not actual injury has occurred. 1. An incident/accident report is to be completed by a RN (Registered Nurse) or LPN (Licensed Practice Nurse) and is to include: b. vital signs. 3. a. i. A narrative follow up summary of the incident is to be sent to the Illinois Department of Public health within five (5) working days. 5. Documentation is to include: a. A description of the occurrence, the extent of the injury (if any), the assessment of the resident, vital signs, treatment rendered, and parties notified. b. a minimum of seventy (72) hours (longer, if indicated) of documentation by all three shift on resident status after the incident. Vital signs, mental and physical state, follow up tests, procedures, and findings are to be documented. The (01/04/2018) Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy and Procedure documented, in part VII. Internal Investigation. 7. Final Investigation Report. The investigator will report the conclusions of the investigation in writing to the administrator or designee within five working days of the reported incident. The final investigation report shall contain the following: Facts determined during the process of the investigation, review of medical record and interview witnesses. Conclusion of the investigation based on known facts. The administrator or designees is then responsible for forwarding a final written report of the results of the investigation and of any corrective action taken to the Department of Public Health within five working days of the reported incident. VIII. External reporting. 2. 5 day final investigation report. Within 5 working days after the report of the occurrence, a complete read and report the conclusion of the investigation, including steps the facility has taken in response to the allegations, will be sent to the Department of Public health. The public health requirements for a final investigation report are detailed in paragraph 7 of the internal investigation section of this procedure.
May 2023 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and review of records facility failed to protect resident right to be free from accidents, falls, hazards, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and review of records facility failed to protect resident right to be free from accidents, falls, hazards, and injury. And failed to follow safe resident policy to a resident with multiple falls, that needs 1-person extensive assistance but was left by nursing staff to be independent. Failures apply to 1 out of 3 residents (R4) for a total of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. These failures resulted to 1 resident (R4) sustaining right hip fracture and undergone surgery as a result of the fall. Findings include: R4 is [AGE] years old during review, with medical diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side diagnosed on [DATE], seizure diagnosed on [DATE] and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur diagnosed on [DATE] after the R4 had a fall on 04/22/2023. R4's cognition is impaired with brief interview of mental status score of 0 which indicates R4 is rarely or never understood. Incident Report initial and final was dated 04/22/2023. R4 was left in the toilet by himself. R4 transferred by himself and fell. Per Minimum Data Set (MDS) on functional status dated 04/13/2023, documents that R4 needs 1-person extensive assistance on bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. On 05/23/2023 at 04:32 PM, V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant) who was assigned to R4 during incident of fall on 04/22/2023 said, It was during dinner time, and we are busy. The nurse was passing medicine. And I was collecting trays, I was across the room of R4. When I looked up, R4 was on the floor. I cannot remember what happened if R4 was on the toilet or on his wheelchair. The first shift should have not transferred R4 on his chair. Yes, now I remember, I placed R4 on the toilet. But R4 is independent, R4 can transfer on his own, R4 is pretty much independent when he is on the toilet. The only thing R4 needs assistance or help was when I put him on the bed. I wiped him and helped him on the bed. Besides that, R4 is mostly independent. R4 ' s progress notes related to fall are as follows: - V3's (Registered Nurse) notes dated 04/22/2023 documents: R4 was observed on the floor of his bathroom. R4 fell in bathroom while transferring on or off the toilet. Order for right hip and leg X-Ray with neurological checks. During this fall R4 sustained right hip fracture and undergone ORIF (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) surgery. - V25's (Licensed Practical Nurse) notes dated 04/07/2023 documents: R4 had a fall on 04/06/2023 at 07:30 PM. R4 observed on bathroom floor fell attempting to transfer from toilet to chair. R4 requires supervision with transfers. R4 is alert and oriented times 1-3. - V3's notes dated 04/06/2023 documents: R4 was trying to transfer from the toilet to the wheelchair located in his room and fell while transferring. - V26's (Registered Nurse) notes dated 03/21/2023 documents: R4 ' s roommate notified her (V24) that R4 has fallen in the bathroom. R4 was on the floor in front of the toilet. - V27's (Licensed Practical Nurse) notes dated 03/16/2023 documents: R4 had a fall was observed laying on the floor on his right side of the bed facing his wheelchair. V3 (Registered Nurse) was assigned to R4 during the incident per V2 (Director of Nursing) and was called on the phone multiple times but did not answer. On 05/23/2023 at 02:04 PM V2 provided complete plan of care for R4 that does not include dates. After further review of R4's care plan, it was found out that V9 made multiple additions and modifications of R4's care plan although R4 was already discharged on 05/17/2023. On 05/24/2023 at 10:46 AM. V9 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator) said, Yes, I do some of the care plan for the residents. Care plans are reviewed when things come up as needed and also quarterly as scheduled. When a problem was identified it should be reviewed because you want it to reflect current condition. R4 does not have care plan for his right hip fracture and should have care plan on the day it was identified. Yes, I added R4 ' s right hip fracture in the care plan yesterday. I should have not done that because it should have been done when the incident happened. Or it must be added at the time of occurrence. I know that those care plan I just added does not reflect care that really happened because I just added it. But I cannot answer why I added it. V9 admitted that R4 does not have care plan for right hip fracture related to the fall. V9 presented documentation that R4 ' s care plan for alteration in musculoskeletal status related to fracture of the right hip with goals and interventions were all added on 05/25/2023 after R4 was already discharged on 05/17/2023. On 05/24/2023 at 11:15 AM. V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, R4 needs staff assistance for ADLs (Activity of Daily Living) like transfer, and toileting. Typically, staff needs to stay with the resident during toileting. Nursing staff needs to know care needs of resident. There is a care cards used in the floor that shows each resident needs. It is restorative department that provides those care cards. CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) needs to identify and follow up with the nurse and review Care Cards. Yes, V11 obviously does not know what R4 needs and should be guided. R4 is not independent or supervision, because he (R4) needs assistance. As shown in R4'ss assessment that he is rarely or never understood. Then any instructions not to get up may not be understood or followed by R4. V2 was asked that many nursing staff documents in their progress notes that R4 alert and oriented and requires supervision instead of assistance. V2 said, R4 has right-sided weakness due to hemiplegia and needs assistance not only supervision. Yes, I understand that nursing staff should direct care and assistance to residents in choosing safer side. V2 was asked about V9 modifying care plan of R4. Yes, I was informed about modification of care plan of R4. R4 is not here in the facility, and it should not have been done. On 05/24/2023 at 12:59 PM. V17 (Restorative Nurse / LPN) presented Care Alert Cards (CAC) for R4 dated 02/13/2017 and 04/28/2023. CAC dated 02/13/2017 documents that R4 needs 1-person limited assistance during transfers. V17 said that R4 does not have CAC between 02/13/2017 and 04/28/2023 because there was no change of R4 status between those dates. MDS assessment of R4 was presented to V17 that shows R4 needs extensive assistance which requires weight bearing compared to limited assistance that does not require weight bearing assistance. V17 said, Yes, R4 has right-sided weakness and needs weight bearing assistance on his right side. Comparing CAC of 02/13/2017 from CAC 04/28/2023, because of the fall that resulted to fracture of hips and surgery. R4 now requires mechanical lift (sit to stand) with 2-person assistance. V17 said, R4 never was independent in toileting and transfer. R4 needs assistance, staff needs to stay with R4 during toileting. Again, R4 has one side weakness that needs assistance during transfer because R4 cannot bear weight on that side. Minimum Data Set (MDS) of R4 dated 04/13/2023 prior to fall (04/22/2023) on cognitive patterns documents that R4 score was 0 or R4 rarely/never understood. On functional status, R4 needs 1-person extensive assists on bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. On health conditions, R4 had multiple falls since admission. Plan of Care for R4 on ADL (Activity of Daily Living) with multiple dates, documents as follows: R4 has an ADL self-care performance deficit due to hemiplegia diagnosis. R4 requires 1-person assist with toileting, transfers, bed mobility, bathing, and personal hygiene. R4 ' s hospital record dated 04/24/2023 to 04/28/2023 documents the following: R4 sustained closed comminuted fracture of the hip, other diagnosis includes impaired functional mobility and activity intolerance and right-sided weakness. Sudden fall or accident can be a life-changing event often need surgery or repair the fracture. R4 undergone a procedure Intramedullary Nail Femur, Antegrade (Right) or right femoral ORIF (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) on 04/25/2023 due to his fracture related to fall on 04/22/2023. On 05/26/2023 at 10:13 AM. Called V28 (Medical Doctor) and left a message with call back number. Safety Resident Policy not dated, in part reads: Resident transfer status will be reviewed via resident care plan time frame and on an as needed basis. Resident transfer status will be properly communicated with a resident individual Care Service Plan in Electronic Medical Record, coding system or on a Care Card or [NAME].
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and review of records, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from ph...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and review of records, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse and failed to separate 2 residents who were involved in physical aggression to prevent recurrence of similar incident(s). Failures apply to 2 out of 3 residents (R2 and R3) for a total of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. These failures have the potential to affect 2 residents (R2 and R3) in recurrence of similar incident due to proximity. Findings include: R2 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE]. R2 has a medical diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. R2's cognition is intact with brief interview of mental status (BIMS) dated 04/03/2023 score of 14. R3 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE]. R3 has medical diagnosis of brain injury and epilepsy. R3 has impaired cognition, brief interview for mental status dated 05/11/2023 score of 3. On 05/23/2023 at 12:02 PM. Per resident room assignments on resident records, R2 and R3 were in the same floor. R2's room is in the same hallway as R3's room. V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said that R2 can independently wheel his wheelchair. R2 was seen near the Nurse ' s station and agreed to go inside the smoke room for privacy to talk. On 05/23/2023 at 12:34 PM. R2 was able to wheel himself independently going inside smoke room. R2 said, I can transfer from bed to wheelchair using my arms. R3 still owes me 5 cigarettes. And I can tune him up (punching motion like a boxer). I remember what happened in the smoking area, R3 hit me, so I tossed him around. On 05/23/2023 at 12:46 AM, With V8 (Caregiver of R3), R3 was sitting on a walker/wheelchair able to use it as locomotion using his feet. R3 was slow in moving without help of any staff. R3 was alert but have difficult time staying on topic with conversation. R3 said, Yes, I know R2, and 5 to 6 times hit on the head (motion his hand as if to hit his head). Called the police and I cursed his ass out. Then R3 spoke something about his father. V8 tried to ask R3 questions but R3 insists to go out of the room. Per report, incident happened on 04/14/2023 at 09:10 AM at the backyard patio during smoke break. R3 passed by R2 and swatted him in the face. R2 pulled on R3's walker and tossed it aside. R3 fell back onto his bottom. Staff intervened to assist R3. Result of abuse investigation was substantiated. Per R2's signed document, it reads: R3 owes him 25 cigarettes and R3 refused to pay. R3 then hit him (R2) when I asked for my cigarettes that he (R3) owes me. Per R3's signed document, it reads: R2 hits him (R3) first because he (R2) is always in my face saying he (R3) owes him (R2) and he (R3) doesn't. R3 further stated R2 pushed him down and threw his walker. Per V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant) signed document, it reads: I seen R2 throwing the walker at R3's legs. On 05/23/2023 at 01:53 PM. V1 (Administrator) said that she cannot answer why R2 and R3 were not separated because she was not yet employed in the facility during that time. V1 further stated that it will be V5 (Social Worker) that can answer the question. On 05/23/2023 at 02:08 PM. V5 (Social Service Director) said, There are days that R2 is super, super, super angry. And I agree, R2 and R3 has tendency to escalate. And I understand that given the proximity of both residents there is a chance for same incident to happen. I will talk to V2 (Director of Nursing) what we can do. Abuse Policy of facility not dated, in part reads: Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property or mistreatment. This includes but is not limited to corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. The purpose of this policy and the Abuse Prevention Program is to describe the process for identification, assessment, and protection of residents from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. This will be accomplished by: Immediately protecting residents involved in identified reports of possible abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property. Physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than accidental means and that requires medical attention. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of records, and interview the facility failed to provide person-centered plan of care for a resident that sustai...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of records, and interview the facility failed to provide person-centered plan of care for a resident that sustained fracture with surgery due to fall. This failure apply to 1 out of 3 residents (R4) for a total of 3 residents reviewed for care plan. This failure has the potential to lack of addressing care needed of 1 resident (R4) fracture and post operation services. Findings include: R4 is [AGE] years old during review, with medical diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side diagnosed on [DATE], seizure diagnosed on [DATE] and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur diagnosed on [DATE] after the R4 had a fall on 04/22/2023. R4's cognition is impaired with brief interview of mental status score of 0 which indicates R4 is rarely or never understood. Incident Report initial and final was dated 04/22/2023. R4 was left in the toilet by himself. R4 transferred by himself and fell. Per Minimum Data Set (MDS) on functional status dated 04/13/2023, documents that R4 needs 1-person extensive assistance on bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R4's hospital record dated 04/24/2023 to 04/28/2023 documents the following: R4 sustained closed comminuted fracture of the hip, other diagnosis includes impaired functional mobility and activity intolerance and right-sided weakness. Sudden fall or accident can be a life-changing event often need surgery or repair the fracture. R4 undergone a procedure Intramedullary Nail Femur, Antegrade (Right) or right femoral ORIF (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) on 04/25/2023 due to his fracture related to fall on 04/22/2023. V9 presented documentation that R4's care plan for alteration in musculoskeletal status related to fracture of the right hip with goals and interventions were all added on 05/25/2023 after R4 was already discharged on 05/17/2023. On 05/24/2023 at 10:46 AM. V9 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator) said, Yes, I do some of the care plan for the residents. Care plans are reviewed when things come up as needed and also quarterly as scheduled. When a problem was identified it should be reviewed because you want it to reflect current condition. R4 does not have care plan for his right hip fracture and should have care plan on the day it was identified.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of records, and interviews the facility failed to maintain accurate resident records by adding and modifying pla...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of records, and interviews the facility failed to maintain accurate resident records by adding and modifying plan of care for a closed record resident discharged to hospital and not in the facility. This apply to 1 out of 3 residents (R4) for a total of 3 residents reviewed for resident records. This failure has the potential to affect 1 resident (R4) inaccurately documenting on resident records that does not reflect actual care. Findings include: R4 is [AGE] years old during review, with medical diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side diagnosed on [DATE], seizure diagnosed on [DATE] and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur diagnosed on [DATE] after the R4 had a fall on 04/22/2023. R4 cognition is impaired with brief interview of mental status scored 0 that indicates R4 rarely or never understood. Incident Report initial and final was dated 04/22/2023. R4 was left in the toilet by himself. R4 transferred by himself and fell. Per Minimum Data Set (MDS) on functional status dated 04/13/2023, documents that R4 needs 1-person extensive assistance on bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R4's hospital record dated 04/24/2023 to 04/28/2023 documents the following: R4 sustained closed comminuted fracture of the hip, other diagnosis includes impaired functional mobility and activity intolerance and right-sided weakness. Sudden fall or accident can be a life-changing event often need surgery or repair the fracture. R4 undergone a procedure Intramedullary Nail Femur, Antegrade (Right) or right femoral ORIF (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) on 04/25/2023 due to his fracture related to fall on 04/22/2023. On 05/23/2023 at 02:04 PM. V2 provided complete plan of care for R4 that does not include dates. After further review of R4's care plan it was found out that V9 made multiple additions and modifications of R4's care plan although R4 was already discharged on 05/17/2023. On 05/24/2023 at 10:46 AM. V9 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator) said, Yes, I do some of the care plan for the residents. Care plans are reviewed when things come up as needed and also quarterly as scheduled. When a problem was identified it should be reviewed because you want it to reflect current condition. R4 does not have care plan for his right hip fracture and should have care plan on the day it was identified. Yes, I added R4's right hip fracture in the care plan yesterday. I should have not done that because it should have been done when the incident happened. Or it must be added at the time of occurrence. I know that those care plan I just added does not reflect care that really happened because I just added it. But I cannot answer why I added it. V9 admitted that R4 does not have care plan for right hip fracture related to the fall. V9 presented documentation that R4's care plan for alteration in musculoskeletal status related to fracture of the right hip with goals and interventions were all added on 05/25/2023 after R4 was already discharged on 05/17/2023 and not in facility. On 05/24/2023 at 11:15 AM. V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, Yes, I was informed about modification of care plan of R4. R4 is not here in the facility, and it should not have been done.
Feb 2023 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to protect residents right to be free from physical abuse...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to protect residents right to be free from physical abuse. This deficient practice affected 4 residents (R2, R7, R8, R13) in a sample of 8 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R6, R7, R8, R13) reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in a.) R8, a cognitively impaired male resident being slapped on the hand by a staff member; b.) R7, a female resident who is non-ambulatory using a wheelchair (R7) being slapped on the face by an ambulatory male resident (R6) who has a history of physically aggressive behavior(s); c.) R1 punching R2 on the back; and d.) R7 hitting and scratching R13's wrist. Findings include, Facility's Final Incident Investigation Report dated (12/24/22) regarding incident which occurred on 12/21/22 between R8 and a staff member documents in part: R8 took a cup of juice from the food cart and V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant) grabbed R8's arm and took the cup away from R8. V3 stated that R8 took a cup of juice from the food cart and spit in it, V3 then grabbed R8's arm and took the juice from R8. R8 has diagnosis not limited Cognitive Communication Deficit, Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbances, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, Hypertension, Personal History of COVID-19, Glaucoma, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease with Esophagitis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia. R8's Brief Mental Status Interview (BIMS) dated 12/18/22 documents that R8's cognition is severely impaired. R8's care plans dated 12/23/22 documents in part R8 is at risk for potential abuse related to behavior problems, and mental/emotional challenges. R8's progress note dated 12/21/22 at 12:40, completed by V19 (Licensed Practical Nurse), documents in part, R8 reported to writer (V19) that R8 (was) trying to get some juice off of the cart when a CNA grabbed his (R8)'s hand and hit the cup of juice to the floor. Writer (V19) took R8 to R8's room and assessed R8 for injuries (none noted). R8 denied pain. Writer (V19) reported immediately to Abuse Coordinator. On 02/14/22 at 10:57 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that V1 did not witness the altercation between R8 and V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant) but was aware of the incident. V1 stated that it was reported to V1 that R8 was reaching for juice after R8 was told not to get the juice by V3 who was preparing the juice for lunch, and then R8 proceeded with trying to grab the juice and that V3 tapped the juice cup out of R8's hand causing the juice to fall on the floor. V1 stated that R8 was immediately separated from V3 by the unit staff and the Abuse Coordinator & V1 were notified. V1 stated at the time of the event V1 was the Social Service Director, not the Administrator. V1 met with R8 for a well-being follow up and R8 told V1 that V3 knocked the juice out of R8's hand. V1 stated that R8's care plan was updated with appropriate interventions. V1 was not sure of what steps the Administrator (V22) took with the CNA (V3) involved but V1 stated that V1 knows V3 is no longer working at the facility. V1 stated that there was a video recording of the incident however stated that after 30 days the recording is deleted. V1 stated that V1 did not view the recording of the incident but that the former Administrator (V22) did watch the video. On 02/14/22 at 1:22 PM, V1 stated to surveyors, residents have the right to be free from abuse. On 02/14/23 at 2:05 PM, V19 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that V19 did not witness the event on 12/21/22 between R8 and V3 but after the fact R8 told V19 that V3 had hit R8's hand during lunch pass. V19 stated that R8 will try to grab juice but when told to wait his (R8) turn, R8 responds well to verbal redirection and is cooperative. V19 stated that V19 called the administrator to report the abuse and R8 was separated from V3. V19 stated that V22 (Administrator) removed V3 from the unit immediately to interview V3 and that V3 never returned to the floor again. V19 stated that R8 was monitored for signs or symptoms of abuse and assessed for injury, harm and that no injuries were noted, R8 denied any pain. On 02/14/23 at 2:11 PM, R8 stated that R8 was thirsty and wanted something to drink so R8 took a cup of juice from the beverage cart during lunch time. R8 stated that one of the CNAs smacked my hand hard, and yelled, don't do that! R8 stated that R8 has not seen that CNA for a while, and said, I don't think she works here anymore. R8 stated that R8 feels safe at the facility and that there have been no other times that a staff member or resident has hit him (R8). On 02/15/23 at 11:56 AM, V22 (Former Administrator) stated that on 12/21/22 V30 (Activity Aide) came down to V22's office tearful and upset. V22 stated that V30 reported that V30 saw a resident being abused. V22 stated that V30 reported that V30 saw V3 slap R8's hand. V22 immediately went to the floor and separated R8 from V3 and made sure R8 was assessed to make sure R8 did not have any injuries and R8 was monitored by social services. V22 stated that V22 had V3 go down to the office to get V3's statement or version of what happened. V22 stated that initially, V3 denied touching R8 but, then V3 stated that V3 saw R8 spit into a cup of juice and that V3 asked R8 to put down the glass of juice but that R8 did not listen and that R8 tried to put the cup of juice back on the cart and that is when V3 tried to knock the cup away from R8. V22 stated that V22 watched the video recording of the event and that what V22 saw on the video did not correlate with V3's report of the event. V22 stated that video showed that R8 did not spit into the cup of juice and that V3 very aggressively made contact with V3's hand against R8's hand which was holding the juice causing the contents of the juice to fall on the floor. After V3 watched the video V3 admitted to trying to snatch the cup out of R8's hand. V22 stated V3 then got up and said, I resign and then V3 left the building and has not been in the building since. V22 stated that this event was substantiated as abuse. On 02/15/23 at 01:54 PM, surveyor spoke with V30 (Activity Aide) via phone. V30 stated that V30 did not see the altercation between R8 and V3 on 12/21/22 but that V30 heard the commotion in the hallway. V30 stated that V30 heard V19 (LPN 2nd floor) say to V3, why did you slap that juice out of his hand? V30 stated that V19 was referring to R8. V30 stated that there was juice spilled all over the floor. V30 stated the juice was just sitting there, I don't know why the CNA wouldn't let R8 have it. On 02/17/23 at 11:54 AM, surveyor spoke with V36 (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) over the phone. V36 stated that V36 was not aware of the altercation between R8 and a staff member. V36 stated that it is never appropriate for a staff member to hit a resident. V36 stated that the staff members should be trusted to take care of the residents and that staff members do not have any conditions and should be able to control themselves. V36 stated that if a staff member hit a resident, it was intentional and therefore would be considered abuse. Surveyor left voice mail messages for V3 the following dates/times with no response: 02/15/23 at 9:38 AM, 02/15/23 at 10:45 AM, 02/15/23 at 12:30 PM, and 02/17/23 at 1:42 PM. Facility's Final Incident Investigation Report dated (12/24/22) regarding incident which occurred on 12/20/22 between R6 and R7 documents in part: R6 went into R7 room to retrieve R6's jacket which had been taken by R7 from R6's room while R6 was sleeping. R6 stated that R6 went into R7's room and grabbed R6's jacket from R7's hands. At that time both R6 and R7 denied any physical altercation. R7's roommate reported witnessing R6 slap R7, which R7 later confirmed. R6 has diagnosis not limited Cognitive Communication Deficit, Major Depressive Disorder, Epilepsy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Vitamin D Deficiency, Nicotine Dependence. R6's Brief Mental Status Interview (BIMS) dated 11/25/22 documents that R6's cognition is moderately impaired. R6's care plan documents in part R6 has been physical aggressive toward peers when angry and displays poor impulse control. R6's MDS section G (Functional Status) documents R6 is able to walk in room and corridor with supervision (oversight, encouragement, cueing). R7 has diagnosis not limited to Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Disorder of Adult Personality and Behavior, Schizophrenia, Adult, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Difficulty Walking, Lack of Coordination, Weakness, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Epilepsy, Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Anemia, Insomnia. R7's Brief Mental Status Interview (BIMS) dated 12/02/22 documents that R7's cognition is moderately impaired. R7's care plan documents in part R7 may be at risk for potential abuse related to mental/emotional challenges, secondary to behaviors displayed as evidenced by going into peers' rooms and not respecting peers' boundaries. R7's MDS section G (Functional Status) documents R7's ability to walk in room and corridor did not occur 100% of the time. R9 has a diagnosis not limited to Schizoaffective Disorder, Morbid Obesity, Weakness, Lack of Coordination, Difficulty Walking, Alcohol Abuse, Osteoarthritis, Adult Failure to Thrive, Need for Assistance with Personal Care. R9's Brief Mental Status Interview (BIMS) dated 01/11/23 documents that R9 is cognitively intact. R7's progress note dated 12/20/22 at 06:16 completed by V32 (11-7 Registered Nurse) documents in part, R6 wandering the hall all night going in peers room taking their belongings. R9's progress note dated 12/20/22 at 06:33, completed by V32 documents in part, R9 complained of R9's roommate (R7) was slapped by a male resident in R9's room. R7's progress note dated 12/20/22 at 06:40 completed by V32 documents in part, R7's roommate informed nurse that R7 had been slapped by a male resident, R7 denied being slapped but later when questioned R7 stated that R7 took R6's coat and gloves looking for money and R6 came into R7's room and snatched R6's coat out of R7's hands and the coat sleeve hit R7. R6's progress note dated 12/20/22 at 06:48, completed by V32 documents in part, R6 stated R6 went to R7's room and snatched R6's coat out of R7's hand that's all, denied striking R7. R6's progress note dated 12/20/22 at 14:33, completed by V1 (Administrator, Former Social Service Director) documents in part R6 hit peer because R6 stated peer (R7) stole R6's jacket and R6 stated, so what. On 02/14/23 at 1:20 PM, surveyor observed R7 in R7's room sitting in a wheelchair. R7 stated that R6 was in R7's room but R7 did not know why. R7 denied taking R6's jacket. R7 stated, he (R6) hit me in the face, here and as R7 made this statement R7 took R7's hand and covered R7's face with R7's hand. R7 stated R6 has not been in R7's room since R6 hit R7. R7 stated, he's a nice guy. On 02/14/23 at 1:24 PM, R9 stated that R6 barged into R7 and R9's room early one morning and asked for R6's jacket back. R9 stated that R7 gave R6 his jacket back and then R6 slapped R7 across the face really hard. R9 stated that R9 told R6 to get out of their room and that R6 left the room at that time. R9 stated that R9 reported what R9 had witnessed to the nurse on duty. On 02/14/23 at 1:32 PM, R6 stated that R7 came into R6's room when R6 was in the washroom and took R6's jacket. R6 stated that one of R6's roommates told R6 that R7 took R6's jacket. R6 stated that R6 went into R7's room to get R6's jacket back. R6 stated that R7 tried to make it like she (R7) didn't have it. But, I saw my jacket on her (R7)'s bed as she (R7) was going through the pockets of my jacket. R6 stated that R6 snatched R6's jacket from R7's bed. R6 stated that R6 did not hit or slap her. R6 stated, I don't hit ladies. Men aren't supposed to hit ladies. R6 stated that R7's roommate told R6 that R6 should not be in the room and told R6 to leave. R6 stated that R6 then left the room with R6's jacket in hand, and said, that was all, I did not touch her. R6 stated that R7 has taken other things from R6's room before but not able to specify what items. On 02/14/22 at 11:15 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that V1 did not recall or witness the incident between R6 and R7 that occurred on 12/20/22. V1 stated that R7 has a known history of roaming into other resident rooms and taking items from them. V1 stated that initially R7 denied being touched by R6, however later R7 did confirm that R7 was slapped by R6. V1 stated that the facility confirmed abuse had occurred. On 02/14/22 at 1:22 PM, V1 stated to surveyors, residents have the right to be free from abuse. On 02/14/23 at 1:44 PM, V17 (4th Floor Social Worker) stated that R7 constantly goes into other resident's rooms uninvited and takes their things without their permission. V17 stated that R7 took R6's jacket from R6's room and that R6 went into R7's room to get R6's jacket back. V17 denied being aware that R6 hit or slapped R7 when R6 was in R6's room retrieving R6's jacket. V17 stated R6 and R7 continue to reside in the same room on the same unit but that R6 and R7's rooms are on opposite sides of the unit from each other. V17 stated that R6 and R7 don't socialize and that R6 keeps to himself except to participate in smoke breaks and activity functions. V17 stated that staff continue to monitor R7 for roaming behavior as this is an ongoing behavior and try to redirect R7 back to R7's room. On 02/14/23 at 1:54 PM, V18 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated that V18 has been working at the facility for 6 years. V18 stated that R7 is constantly taking other resident items and selling or trading them to other residents for money or cigarettes. V18 stated that this is R7's long standing behavior and is something R7 is constantly doing including all night and throughout the day. V18 stated that R7 also wanders to the other floors looking for money and cigarettes. V18 stated R6 stays in R6's room and does not wander or roam into other resident's rooms. V18 was not aware of incident between R6 and R7. On 02/15/23 at 11:56 AM, V22 (Former Administrator) reported that on 12/20/22 R7 had taken R6's jacket from R6's room and R6 went into R7's room to retrieve the jacket. V22 stated that R6 grabbed the jacket from R7's hand and that initially, R7 denied being hit by R6 however R7's roommate (R9) reported seeing R6 slap R7 on the face. V22 stated that R7 has a history of denying physical abuse even if it has occurred because R7 would then have to admit to taking items from other residents (for example R6's jacket) which R7 knows R7 is not supposed to do. V22 stated that after facility investigation was conducted the allegation of theft and abuse were both substantiated. On 02/16/23 at 10:21 AM, surveyor spoke with V32 (11-7 Registered Nurse) via phone. V32 stated that V32 has been working at the facility since June 2020 and that V32 works on the 4th floor (11-7 shift). V32 stated that V7 has a long-standing behavior of entering other resident's rooms looking for money, cigarettes or food and taking other resident's belongings. V32 stated that R7 wanders all light long into and out of other resident rooms and that most of the time R7 will respond to redirection provided however sometimes if R7 has drank a lot of soda R7 can get hyped up and in those instances R7 does not respond to redirection. V32 stated that 12/20/22 was one of those nights, R7 was in constant movement all night long, going in and out of other resident's rooms and was not responding to staff redirection. V32 stated that V32 did not see R7 go into R6's room or see R7 take R6's jacket. V32 stated that on 12/20/22 early in the morning, toward the end of V32's shift V32 was passing medications when R7's roommate (V9) approached V32 and told V32 that R6 had entered R7 and R9's room and R9 saw R6 slapped R7 in the face. V32 stated that V32 separated R6 and R7 and went to R7's room to assess R7 for injury. V32 stated R7 had no signs or symptoms of injury and denied pain. V32 state that R7 denied being hit by R6 and that R7 felt safe. V32 notified the nursing supervisor who came to the floor to interview R6 and R7 and the Administrator was notified. On 02/16/23 at 1:06 PM, V21 (Restorative Aide/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated V21 has been working at the facility for 8 years. V21 state that R7 is non-compliant with wandering and stealing behavior and that R7 is constantly wandering around the facility looking for money or cigarettes. V21 stated this is a long-standing behavior. V21 stated that R7 does have the ability to walk however R7 only uses R7's wheelchair when R7 is out of R7's room. On 02/16/23 at 1:10 PM, R9 stated that R7 goes room to room looking for items all day and night and that R7 steals things so R7 can trade them or sell to other residents in the facility. R9 stated that R7's behavior makes the other residents mad and that the residents whose stuff R7 has stolen then come looking for their items in R7 and R9's room and that those residents are very, very angry. R9 stated that R6 burst into their room early one morning when still dark outside and started arguing with R7. R9 stated that R9 got up because of the commotion and that is when R9 saw R7 slap R6 real hard across the face. On 02/16/23 at 3:05 PM, surveyor spoke with V36 (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) via phone. V32 stated that V36 provides care to R6 and R7 and that V36 has been covering the facility since the fall of 2022. V36 stated that R6 has a history of being verbally and physically aggressive and that those types of behaviors are usually exhibited when R6 is triggered by something. For example, by the way people talk to R6, or if R6 is told to do something R6 does not want to do. V32 stated that verbal and physical aggression are not new behaviors for R6. V36 stated that R7 displays a lot of aggression and agitation toward staff and other residents. V36 described R7 as being very manipulative, non-compliant with care and roams around R7's unit, and other resident floors within the facility looking for money, or cigarettes constantly. V32 stated that R7's wandering, hoarding, and stealing behaviors are not new behaviors. V36 always sees R7 sitting in R7's wheelchair but has seen R7 transfer herself from R7's wheelchair to the R7's bed when in R7's room. V36 stated that V36 was aware of the altercation between R6 and R7 in terms of R7 stealing R6's jacket but did not realize R6 had slapped R7 on the face when R6 had gone into R7's room to retrieve R6's jacket. V36 stated, that should not be happening at the facility and that physical aggression toward another resident could be triggering for that resident (R7) and for all of the other residents on the unit. V36 stated it is not a safe environment if there is physical aggression between residents. V36 stated that R7 is a high risk of this happening again because of R7's wandering and stealing behaviors are ongoing. V36 stated that the facility needs more people to make sure the residents are safe in their rooms and provide more re-direction as needed to intervene quickly. Surveyor left voice mail messages for V37 on 02/17/23 at 9:40 AM, 10:21 AM, and 12:12 PM with no response. Policy: Abuse Prevention Program - Policy undated, documents in part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property or mistreatment. Residents' Rights undated, documents in part, your (residents') rights to safety: you must not be abused, and the facility must ensure that you are free from retaliation. R1's Face Sheet documents resident is a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses including but not limited to: HYPERLIPIDEMIA, UNSPECIFIED, MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, SINGLE EPISODE, UNSPECIFIED, SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER, UNSPECIFIED, MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT OF UNCERTAIN OR UNKNOWN ETIOLOGY, FOURTH [TROCHLEAR] NERVE PALSY, LEFT EYE, DIPLOPIA, ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, UNCOMPLICATED, HOMONYMOUS BILATERAL FIELD DEFECTS, LEFT SIDE, PRESENCE OF INTRAOCULAR LENS, OTHER VISUAL DISTURBANCES. Final Incident Investigation Report (fated 01/13/2023) documents On 01/13/2023 at approximately 8:15am, AM nurse reported that she witnessed R1 hitting R2 in the back. Both residents were immediately assessed for injuries. No injuries observed. Staffed confirmed that R1 repeatedly asking R2 to leave her room as she was getting dressed. Upon further investigation of this incident, physical abuse was founded. Upon the conclusion of this investigation, it is believed that abuse is substantiated. R1's Care Plan (dated 10/24/2020) documents that R1 presents with verbal/physical act out with peers, easily agitated, poor impulse control. R1's Care Plan (revised on 01/15/2023) documents that R1 may be at risk for potential abuse r/t behavior problem as evidenced by verbally and physically acting out when agitated. R1's Minimum Date Set assignment dated 12/30/2022 indicated R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicates resident has intact cognitive response. R2's Face Sheet documents resident is a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses including but not limited to: OTHER ASTHMA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERE PROTEIN-CALORIE MALNUTRITION,IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA SECONDARY TO BLOOD LOSS (CHRONIC), UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITHOUT BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCE, PSYCHOTIC DISTURBANCE, MOOD DISTURBANCE, AND ANXIETY, SCHIZOPHRENIA, UNSPECIFIED, INSOMNIA, UNSPECIFIED, DYSPHAGIA, ORAL PHASE, RESIDUAL HEMORRHOIDAL SKIN TAGS. R2's Minimum Date Set assignment dated 11/20/2022 indicated R2 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicates resident has moderately impaired cognitive response. R2's Care Plan (dated 06/24/2022) documents that R2 may be at risk for potential abuse r/t behavior problem, communication issues/deficits as well as poor impulse control, secondary to mental and emotional challenges. Abuse Prevention Policy (dated 11/22/2017) states: Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property or mistreatment. This includes but is not limited to corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. On 02/14/2023 at 9:15am, R1 stated, On 01/13/2023, I was sitting on my bed, and I was getting dressed. Suddenly, R2 just barged into my room and stood there and was staring at me. I asked R2 to leave my room, but he did not leave. R2 just stood there and was looking at me getting dressed. So, after I asked him several times to leave, I pushed him out of my room and hit him on his back to get him out. I don't know why R2 came in here in the first place, maybe R2 was confused because R2 just stood there. R2 did not say anything to me when I asked him to leave. R2 just stood there. Finally, I became agitated and pushed R2 out of my room and hit him on his back so that R2 would leave. I didn't hit R2 hard and R2 did not sustain any injuries. I wasn't trying to hurt R2, I just wanted him to leave. I feel safe here, I just wanted some privacy so that I can get dressed. On 02/14/2023 at 9:23am, R2 stated, I don't remember what happened. I don't remember going into anyone's room. On 02/14/2023 at 1:43pm V15 (licensed practical nurse) stated, R1 is not aggressive. R1 is calm and cooperative and keep to herself. R2 is not aggressive and has not been physically aggressive towards other residents. R2 has periods of confusion and during those periods of confusion, R2 can wonder into other resident rooms. R2 wondered into R1's room because R2 was confused at the time. R1 got upset that R2 entered R1's room. On 02/15/2023 at 12:33pm, V1 (administrator) stated, On 01/13/2023, a nurse reported that R1 hit R2 on the back. Both of the residents were separated. I met with R1 first and R1 said that R2 came into her room while R1 was getting dressed. R1 said that R1 asked R2 to leave and R2 refused to leave and R1 hit R2 on the back because R2 would not leave. R1 admitted that R1 hit R2 on the back. R1 said that R2 did not take anything from the room, it was just that R1 was trying to get dressed and R2 would not leave. I asked R2 what happened and R2 indicated that R2 did not know. R2 did not remember the incident. We did a potential for abuse form for R2. R1 was encouraged to seek staff assistance when she becomes triggered. The incident between R1 and R2 was substantiated, and abuse was founded. The resident has the right to be free from abuse. On 02/16/2023 at 10:05am V21 (certified nursing assistant) stated, On 01/13/2023, I was working on the 4th floor, and I heard someone yelling get out of my room. I recognized the voice to be of R1. I immediately stopped what I was doing, and I went to R1's room. When I walked in to R1's room, I saw R1 screaming at R2 telling him to get out of her room. R2 was just standing there, and I asked R1 to calm down. I asked R2 to leave R1's room. R2 just stood there and was staring at me but he didn't move. When I was talking to R2 telling him to leave R1's room, that's when R1 became more agitated and came from behind and hit R2 in the middle of R2's back. I was in between R1 and R2, and R1 came from behind and punched R2 in the middle of his back. After R1 hit R2 on the back, R2 left R1's room and went to his room. R2 did not appear to be injured. R2 just walked to his room. R2 did not scream from pain or anything like that, R2 just left R1's room and went to his own room. After the incident, the nurses assessed R1 and R2 and both residents were immediately separated. R1's Progress Note (dated 01/13/2023) documents, Staff reported to writer co-resident entered res room while res was dressing. Res asked co-resident to leave room three times. Co-resident res did not leave room so res punched co-resident in back. Residents were immediately separated. NP notified. DON notified. POA notified. No s/s of bruising or pain noted. vitals within normal range. No further behaviors noted at this time. 72 hr behavior charting initiated at this time. Will continue to monitor. R1's Social Service Note (dated 01/13/2023) documents, Wellbeing check/ Behavior monitoring 1/3: Writer was made aware by nursing staff that resident initiated physical aggression towards peer. Resident presents to be aox3 and can verbalize her wants and needs with no issues. Resident stated He was in my room while I was changing my clothes, when I asked him to leave. I punched him because he wouldn't leave my room after I asked 3x. Writer encouraged resident to seek staff assistance when needed. Writer encouraged resident to maintain appropriate boundaries. Writer reassured resident that she resides in a safe place. Psychiatrist made aware. Appropriate departments made aware. Resident was able to be redirected and complaint. No reported aggression. Staff to continue to monitor resident accordingly. R2's Progress Note (dated 01/13/2023) documents, Staff reported to writer res was seen in co-residents' room. co-resident stated res was asked to leave room three times. res did not leave room so co-resident punched res in back. residents were immediately separated. NP [NAME] notified. POA [NAME] notified. no s/s of bruising or pain noted at this time. vitals within normal range. no further behaviors noted at this time. 72 hr behavior charting initiated at this time. will continue to monitor. R7's Face Sheet documents resident is a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses including but not limited to: BIPOLAR DISORDER, CURRENT EPISODE MIXED, MODERATE, UNSPECIFIED INJURY OF RIGHT ANKLE, INITIAL ENCOUNTER, GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER, TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS, EPILEPSY, UNSPECIFIED, NOT INTRACTABLE, WITHOUT STATUS EPILEPTICUS, UNSPECIFIED DIASTOLIC (CONGESTIVE) HEART FAILURE, DIFFICULTY IN WALKING, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED, WEAKNESS, EDEMA, UNSPECIFIED. Final Incident Investigation Report (01/03/2023) states: On 12/30/2023 at approximately 3:40pm, both residents were observed getting off the elevator together on the 4th floor. R7, then suddenly physically hit R13 while at the nurse's station unprovoked. Both residents were immediately assessed for injuries. No injuries observed. Staff confirmed that R7 hit resident in front of the nurse's station. Upon the conclusion of this investigation, it is believed that abuse is substantiated. R7's Minimum Date Set assignment dated 12/02/2022 indicated R7 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicates resident has moderately impaired cognitive response. R7's Care Plan (dated 11/15/2021) documents that R7 presents with behavioral concerns as evidenced by being physically aggressive towards peer. R13's Face Sheet documents resident is a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses including but not limited to: SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER, BIPOLAR TYPE, TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS, DYSPHAGIA, OROPHARYNGEAL PHASE, PNEUMONIA, UNSPECIFIED ORGANISM, DEHYDRATION, HYPO-OSMOLALITY AND HYPONATREMIA, ABDOMINAL RIGIDITY, UNSPECIFIED SITE, REPEATED FALLS, LONG TERM (CURRENT) USE OF ASPIRIN, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, UNSPECIFIED, DYSPHAGIA, ORAL PHASE. R13's Minimum Date Set assignment dated 01/10/2023 indicated R13 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicates resident has moderately impaired cognitive response. R13's Care plan (dated 07/10/2022) documents that R13 may be at risk for potential abuse r/t behavior problem as evidenced by verbally and physically acting out when agitated and R13 was involved in a physical altercation in which R13 received physical aggression. Abuse Prevention Policy (dated 11/22/2017) states: Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property or mistreatment. This includes but is not limited to corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. On 02/15/2023 at 1:20pm, R7 stated, I don't remember hitting anybody. I don't remember it at all. On 02/15/2023 at 10:49, R13 stated, R7 and I were on the elevator together. We got off the elevator and all of a sudden R7 grabbed my arm and scratched my wrist. I don't know why R7 attacked me this way. I didn't do anything to R7. There was no verbal altercation or any issues and R7 just attacked my arm for no reason and scratched me. On 02/15/2023 at 11:33am V1 (administrator) stated, On 12/30/2023, both residents were getting off the elevator, and that's when R7 suddenly hit R13 without being provoked. R7 hit his arm. R13 did not report any injuries after the incident occurred, but later we learned that R7 scratched R13's arm. R7 was not provoked and hit R13 without any reason. Both residents were separated. We spoke to R7 and R7 did not recall what happened. We spoke to R13 and R13 stated that R7 hit him for no reason, but that he was fine and had no injuries. R7 dos not have a history of aggressive behavior towards other. R7 has a lot of behaviors, however, it is not of norm for R7 to hit other residents without a reason. After the incident, we did an abuse assessment on R13. R7 was encouraged to utilize her positive coping skills in the milieu. R7 was encouraged to refrain from any confrontation with a peer and to refrain from being aggressive towards other. The final investigation of the incident between R7 and R13 was substantiated for abuse. The resident has the right to be free from abuse. R7's Social Service Note (dated 12/30/2022) documents, Writer was made aware that resident was involved in an altercation where she initiated physical aggression towards peer. Resident presents to be aox3 and can verbalize her wants and needs with no issues. W[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures and a resident's care plan to ensure call light was within easy reach for 1 (R11) of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures and a resident's care plan to ensure call light was within easy reach for 1 (R11) of 3 residents with multiple history of falls. Findings Include: R11's electronic health record (EHR) shows an initial admission date of 3/14/19 with listed diagnoses not limited to muscle weakness, abnormal posture, dementia, heart failure, unsteadiness on feet, and history of falling. R11's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with assessment reference date of 1/7/23 shows R11 has clear speech, able to understand others, and able to make self-understood. This MDS assessment also shows R11 has no functional limitations in range of motion to arms and legs, but has unsteady gait, and requires limited assistance with transfer and toileting. R11's progress notes dated 1/2/23 at 3:17 pm indicates R11 slipped while trying to go to the bathroom and was observed lying on right side on the floor. R11's progress notes dated 1/14/23 at 7:08 am written by V28 (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicates that at 6:32 am, V28 observed R11 sitting on the floor in front of R11's bed in a dark room. R11 sustained a laceration on the forehead. R11's care plan with date initiated on 3/18/19 shows R11 has potential for falls and at risk for injury related to weakness, unsteady gait, poor balance, and history of falls. One intervention reads, Call light within resident's reach when in room. R11's care plan also shows R11 had fall incidents on 1/2/23 and 1/14/23 and to encourage R11 to use call light and wait for staff assistance as part of the interventions. On 2/15/2023 at 9:46 am, surveyor entered R11's room and observed R11 lying in bed alert and able to verbalize needs. R11's call light was nowhere to be found. Surveyor asked R11 if R11 can reach his (R11) call light. R11 stated, I don't know where it is. Interviewed R11 of the incident that happened on 1/14/23 and stated, I was trying to go to the bathroom, and I tripped. R11 stated that R11 hit R11's head. R11 stated R11 could not find R11's call light at that time to call for help, got up to go to the bathroom and tripped. At 9:58 am, surveyor entered R11's room with V14 (Registered Nurse). R11's call light was found on the floor by R11's roommate's bed. V14 stated, It somehow ended over there. V14 stated that R11's call light should be by R11. At 10:22 am, interviewed V23 (Certified Nursing Assistant) and stated that V23 is in-charge of R11. V23 stated R11 knows how to use the call light and it should be within R11's reach. V23 stated R11 needs supervision when transferring and toileting because R11 is high risk for falls. At 12:47 pm, interviewed V29 (Restorative Nurse) and stated that R11 needs assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and has unsteady gait. V29 stated R11's call light should be placed within R11's easy reach, if not, then R11 would get up and go to the bathroom without calling for help. Facility's CALL LIGHT ANSWERING policy dated 10/21 reads in part: PROCEDURE 5. When the patient or resident is in bed or confined to bed or chair, provide the call light within easy reach of the patient or resident. Facility's Falls Management policy with review date of 6/21 shows fall prevention guidelines for residents, which includes identifying fall risks on the interim plan of care with interventions implemented to minimize fall risk. Facility's Safety and Supervision of Residents policy dated 10/21 includes identifying accident hazards or risk for the resident, and that the care team shall ensure that interventions are implemented to reduce potential for accidents.
Dec 2022 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the residents' comprehensive care plans to ensure communication boards were readily accessible at all times for 2 (...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the residents' comprehensive care plans to ensure communication boards were readily accessible at all times for 2 (R4, R8) residents who speak foreign languages in a sample of 8 reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: On 12/20/22 at 10:48 AM, interviewed V8 (Registered Nurse) and stated that V8 is R4's nurse. V8 stated that R4 is alert and oriented to person and place and barely speaks English. V8 stated that R4 can talk few words in English but is able to communicate needs mainly through gestures. V8 stated that R4 has no communication board. At 10:56 AM, R4 was sitting on R4's bed alert and verbally responsive. Surveyor attempted to interview R4 in English. R4 was able to understand but can only speak little English. R4 stated, Only little English. I speak Vietnamese. No communication aides/board found easily accessible to R4. At 11:05 AM, R8 was observed sitting in the 2nd floor dining room alert and verbally responsive. Surveyor attempted to interview R8 in English. R8 appeared not to comprehend conversation/questioning. R8 stated, Russian Ukraine. Little bit English. At 11:08 AM, interviewed V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) and stated that R8 does not speak English and uses hand gestures to communicate. V9 stated that R8 should have a communication board in R8's room with pictures so R8 can easily communicate. At 11:10 AM, Surveyor entered R8's room with V9. No communication board found inside R8's room. V9 stated, Normally it should be by his (R8) table. I believe activities should be providing them for the residents. No one here can speak his (R8) language. On 12/21/22 at 9:43 AM, interviewed V22 (Activity Director) and stated that Social Services and Activities are responsible in assessing the resident's communication capabilities. V22 stated that in order to meet the needs of the residents with language barrier, the facility makes sure that they have communication boards if needed. V22 stated that R4 requires a communication board. A record review of R4's clinical records indicate an initial admission date of 9/17/2018 with listed diagnosis not limited to Schizoaffective disorder, Bipolar type. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/19/22 shows R4 has moderate impairment with cognition. R4's comprehensive care plan with last review completed on 12/05/22 reads in part, R4 speaks Chinese but will say somethings in english. She has been provided with a communication board for assistance. A record review of R8's clinical records indicate an initial admission date of 12/3/2010 with listed diagnosis not limited to Unspecified Psychosis and Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere. R8's MDS with ARD of 10/16/22 shows R8 has severe impairment with cognition. R8's comprehensive care plan with last review completed on 11/07/22 reads in part, R8 does not speak the dominant language of the facility and has been provided with a communication board for assistance. The facility's policy titled; Residents' Rights dated November 2001 reads in part: 1 Your rights to safety and good care Your facility must provide services to keep your physical and mental health, and sense of satisfaction with yourself, at their highest practical levels. 2 Your rights to participate in your own care Your facility must develop a written care plan which states all the services your facility will provide to you and everything you are expected to do. Your facility must make reasonable arrangements to meet your needs and choices.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report a major injury of unknown source no later than two hours t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report a major injury of unknown source no later than two hours to the State Survey Agency (SA) for 1 (R3) out of 3 residents in a sample of 8 reviewed for residents' safety. Findings include: On 12/20/22 at 10:20 AM, a review of the facility's REPORT OF RESIDENT INCIDENT/ACCIDENT for R3 with date and time of occurrence 11/13/22 at 12:00 PM indicates R3 was observed with sudden bruise under right eye and R3 denied being abused or mishandled. This report also indicates that R3 went to the hospital for Computed Tomography (CT) Scan of head and came back to the facility on [DATE] at 3:15 AM with acute fracture of right orbital bone. Surveyor requested from V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) a copy of the confirmation when and what time the initial report for R3's major injury of unknown origin was sent to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH). At 2:31 PM, an interview conducted with V1 (Administrator). V1 stated, For the injury of unknow origin if residents are cognitively impaired, we report the same as abuse within two hours of the incident happening. V1 stated that V19 (Registered Nurse) sent the initial reporting to IDPH. A second request made to V1 to provide a copy of the confirmation when and what time the initial report for R3's major injury of unknown origin was sent to IDPH. At 3:32 PM, a phone interview conducted with V19 (Registered Nurse). V19 stated that V19 was the nursing supervisor on 11/13/22 morning shift. V19 stated that V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse) reported to him (V19) that R3 was assessed with bruising on R3's right eye and that no one witnessed the incident and that R3 could not verbalize what happened. V19 stated that R3 was sent to the hospital for CT scan and result came the next day around 1:00 AM. V19 stated the result shows R3 sustained a facial fracture. V19 stated that he (V19) reported to IDPH right away because it's a major injury. R3's hospital records dated 11/13/22 shows R3's CT facial bones with acute fracture. R3's progress notes dated 11/14/22 at 1:59 AM shows that the acute hospital called V28 (Nurse) and informed V28 that R3 was returning to the facility with acute facial fracture. The facility was unable to provide a copy of the confirmation when and what time the initial report for R3's major injury of unknown origin was sent to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH). A review of the SA's regional database under FACILITY INCIDENTS 2022 shows DATE RECEIVED INITIAL from the facility was on 11/14/22 and TIME RECEIVED INITIAL was 9:16 AM. The facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program- Policy dated November 22, 2017 reads in part: Any allegation of abuse or any incident that results in serious bodily injury will be reported to the Illinois Department of Public Health immediately, but not more that two hours of the allegation of abuse.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident (R2) was free from significant medication ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident (R2) was free from significant medication error for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medications. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed R2's After Visit Summary related to hospitalization prior to R2's initial admission to the facility. Discharge instructions document in part R2's diagnosis of sacral osteomyelitis. Hospital prescribed R2 with Meropenem (Merrem) 1 G (Gram) injection - Inject 1000 mg (milligram) into the vein every 12 hours for 24 days. DO NOT DELETE PER INFECTIOUS DISEASES. The hospital's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) report documents in part that the hospital was administering the Meropenem every 12 hours. V18's (Nurse) admission Report for R2 dated 11/29 1:22 PM, documents in part that the hospital communicated to V18 that R2 was to receive Meropenem every 12 hours, 5:00 AM and 5:00 PM doses, until 12/23. R2's face sheet documents in part that R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's physician order sheets document in part orders for Meropenem Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 1 GM (Gram). Use 1 gram intravenously every 12 hours every 24 days related to osteomyelitis. Surveyor reviewed R2's November and December MAR (Medication Administration Records). R2 received a 9:00 AM dose of Meropenem on 11/30/2022. R2 did not receive the 9:00 PM dose related to a hospitalization. Next scheduled Meropenem dose was not until 12/24/2022. R2's progress notes document in part that R2 returned from hospitalization on 12/02/2022. R2's discharge instructions from 11/30/2022 hospitalization document in part to continue taking Meropenem 1 gram intravenous twice a day for osteomyelitis. R2's physician orders, however, remained the same from the initial admission with Meropenem Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 1 GM intravenously every 12 hours every 24 days related to osteomyelitis. During a telephone interview with V24 (Nurse Practitioner) on 12/21/2022 at 12:08 PM, V24 stated Meropenem is never q [every] 24 days. V24 stated the facility was supposed to continue Meropenem every 12 hours for 24 days which was the prescribed therapeutic dose. Surveyor reviewed facility's Facility Assessment Tool dated 09/26/2022. Under Part 2: Services and Care We Offer Based on our Residents' Needs, it documents in part Administration of medications that residents need including by intravenous route. Facility's Medication Administration policy last revised 07/14 documents in part: All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aide residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 38% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 life-threatening violation(s), 8 harm violation(s), $413,279 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 92 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $413,279 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is California Terrace's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CALIFORNIA TERRACE an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is California Terrace Staffed?

CMS rates CALIFORNIA TERRACE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at California Terrace?

State health inspectors documented 92 deficiencies at CALIFORNIA TERRACE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 8 that caused actual resident harm, 81 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates California Terrace?

CALIFORNIA TERRACE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SABA HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 297 certified beds and approximately 243 residents (about 82% occupancy), it is a large facility located in CHICAGO, Illinois.

How Does California Terrace Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, CALIFORNIA TERRACE's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting California Terrace?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is California Terrace Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CALIFORNIA TERRACE has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at California Terrace Stick Around?

CALIFORNIA TERRACE has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was California Terrace Ever Fined?

CALIFORNIA TERRACE has been fined $413,279 across 7 penalty actions. This is 11.1x the Illinois average of $37,212. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is California Terrace on Any Federal Watch List?

CALIFORNIA TERRACE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.