CLARK MANOR

7433 NORTH CLARK STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60626 (773) 338-8778
For profit - Corporation 267 Beds LEGACY HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
23/100
#346 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: May 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Clark Manor in Chicago has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. It ranks #346 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the bottom half, and #111 out of 201 in Cook County, meaning there are better local options available. While the overall trend shows improvement, dropping from 12 issues in 2024 to 4 in 2025, the facility still has serious challenges, including a past incident where a resident was physically abused by another resident, which resulted in hospitalization for injuries. Staffing is a relative strength, with a low turnover rate of 26%, compared to the state average, and good RN coverage that exceeds 80% of Illinois facilities. However, the facility has faced fines totaling $55,796, which is average but still concerning, and specific deficiencies included inadequate food safety practices and insufficient weekend staffing, affecting the care of all residents.

Trust Score
F
23/100
In Illinois
#346/665
Bottom 48%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
12 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
26% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 22 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
$55,796 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 39 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
37 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 12 issues
2025: 4 issues

The Good

  • Low Staff Turnover (26%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (26%)

    22 points below Illinois average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Federal Fines: $55,796

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: LEGACY HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 37 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Jul 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of rodents on 3 of 4 resident floors. Findings inclu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of rodents on 3 of 4 resident floors. Findings include: On 6/26/2025 at 09:52 AM, R1 stated, that she has seen mice in the room by a bed. R1 said, that since she has been residing at this facility, there have always been mice seen in the resident's rooms. R1 stated, that she was moved from another room before multiple times and each time, she saw mice in the room. R1 stated that the mice could be seen sometimes running from one resident's room to the other, mainly at night, but she seen it during the day too. On 6/26/25 R1's room was observed with mouse droppings on the floor behind the bedside cabinet and under the heat/air conditioning unit. On 6/26/2025 at 10:32 AM, Observed R3 laying in the bed, dressed, and groomed appropriately, wearing shoes in the bed. No insect or roaches noted on the bed or the clothes. R3 stated, that he has seen mice recently, in his bathroom. R3 said that the mice ran from under the bathroom door and slide under the room's door, into the hallway. R3 stated that he does not like the mouse trap being in the room. On 6/26/25 R3's room was observed with mouse droppings on the floor in corner next to bed. On 6/26/25 at 11:05 AM R8 stated I see mice in my room all the time at night. On 6/26/25 at 11:05 AM R8's room was observed with mouse droppings on the floor and behind the bed and under heating / air conditioning unit. On 6/26/25 at 1:15 PM R11 stated yes I see mice in my room at night. They come in here from the hallway. On 6/26/25 at 1:25 PM R12 stated I see mice in at night. I don't like seeing mice in my room. On 6/26/25 at 1:25 PM R12's room was observed with mouse droppings on the floor next to window. On 6/26/25 at 1:40 PM R13's room was observed with mouse droppings on the floor next to the heating/air register. A hole was observed next to the register at the baseboard. Facility Policy titled Pest Control Revised 8/16/24 states It is the facility policy to ensure that there is an effective pest control process in the building.
Jun 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from abuse for one of three resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from abuse for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in a total sample of four residents. Findings include: On 6.11.2025, at 12:37 PM, R1 said, R2 was screaming at me that my television was too loud. The nurse, I don't remember her name, came into my room. She said the television was not too loud. I was sitting on my bed, R2 was standing about 1 ½ feet from me. He hit me with his fist on my left cheek and part of my nose. It happened so fast; the staff couldn't have prevented it. The nurse called for help. CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) came and escorted R2 out of the room. As he was leaving, R2 said to me, I'm going to come back and kill you. I didn't sleep all night because of his threat. I feel great now that he isn't here in the facility. I'm okay if he comes back. I have V3's (Assistant Administrator's) phone number. V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) assessed me after the incident. I was interviewed multiple times; I signed my statement after reading it. On 6.12.2025, at 9:59 AM, via telephone, V8 (LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) said, on that day (6.9.2025), around ten something at night, I was at the nurses' station. I heard a noise. V7 (CNA) was on her way to call me, I met her on the way. She went into the room with me. I got to the room they, R1 and R2, were arguing about the TV being too loud. I tried to separate them. I asked R2 to follow me to the nurses' station, he did. I notified the nursing supervisor. She told me to separate them. Neither resident said anything about R2 hitting R1. On 6.10.2025 at 10:20 AM via telephone, V7 (CNA) said, it was on Monday (6.9.2025) between 10:00 PM and 11:00 PM. R2 was calling me to come see. R2 said R1's television was too loud. I went into their room. R1's television was too loud. With R1's permission, I turned his television down. I left the room, I reported to V8 what happened. She told me to move R2 to the 5th floor to prevent anything further from occurring. Facility's initial incident report of 6.10.205, documents in part: On 6.10.2025, at around 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) and V3 (Assistant Administrator) were approached by (R1) who stated that he had a disagreement with his roommate over the loudness of television in their room. During the process, his roommate (R2) made contact to his face. Both parties were immediately separated. R1 was assessed and had no redness, bruises, or discoloration noted to his face. R2 was sent to the hospital for a psych eval. R1's signed statement regarding the disagreement with R2 dated 6.10.2025, (no time) documents: My roommate and me had a disagreement the other night about the TV. He thought I had it too loud, and he wanted me to turn it down. That is when he put his hand up and ran it down my face. I don't think he had any intention to cause harm. The situation is over, he is gone, and I love my room. I don't want to discuss it anymore. R2's signed statement regarding disagreement with R1 dated 6.10.2025, (no time) documents: The other night my roommate had his TV up too loud. I was turning down the TV and (R1) walked up to me. I got startled because he is bigger and waved up my hands. I am a short, little guy. I wasn't trying to hit (R1) or cause any harm. R2 was not available for interview during the survey. R1's face sheet documents R1 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on 12.16.2024, with diagnoses including but not limited to: Chronic systolic (Congestive) heart failure, Bipolar disorder, current episode manic severe with psychotic features; Gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, Major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms; Chronic kidney disease, stage 3A. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set of 3.25.2025) documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15 denoting R1 is cognitively intact. R2's face sheet documents R1 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on 7.21.2022, with diagnoses including but not limited to: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, Alcohol abuse, uncomplicated; Other specified diseases of liver, Essential (Primary) hypertension. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set of 4.16.2025) documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15 denoting R2 is cognitively intact. On 6.10.2025, at 2:30 PM, R1's General Progress Note documents in part: On 6.10.2025 at around 2:00 PM, Administrator (V1) and Assistant Administrator (V3) were approached by R1. R1 stated that he had a disagreement with his roommate over the loudness of the television in their room. During the process, his roommate R2 made contact to his face. Both parties were immediately separated. A complete physical assessment was done for R1. No redness, bruising or discoloration noted on (R1's) face and no other visible injury noted to his body as well. (R2) will be sent out for psych evaluation. On 6.10.2025, at 6:41 PM, R2's Behavior Note documents in part: Resident was alleged of physical aggression towards his peer. Both were separated immediately, and he was placed on 1:1 monitoring. Resident requires immediate hospitalization to prevent harm to self and others. (Physician) was informed. An order was given to send resident to the local hospital emergency department on involuntary petition for psych evaluation. Order noted and carried out. On 6.11.2025, at 7:55 AM, R2's General Progress Note documents in part: Placed a call to (local hospital) emergency department to inquire about resident's disposition and made aware that resident is admitted to the psych unit due to aggressive behavior. R2's Petition for Involuntary/Judicial admission (dated 6.10.2025) documents in part: -Emergency inpatient admission by certificate. The Respondent is currently detained in a mental health facility or hospital. -Person continues to be subject to involuntary admission on an inpatient basis. -R2 is a person with mental illness who: because of his or her illness is reasonably expected, unless treated on an inpatient basis, to engage in conduct placing such person or another person in physical harm or in reasonable expectation of being physically harmed; a person with mental illness who: because of his or her illness is unable to provide for his or her basic physical needs so as to guard himself or herself from serious harm without the assistance of family or others, unless treated on an inpatient basis; a person with mental illness who: refuses treatment or is not adhering adequately to prescribed treatment; because of the nature of his or her illness is unable to understand his or her need for treatment; and if not treated on an inpatient basis, is reasonably expected based on his or her behavioral history, to suffer mental or emotional deterioration and is reasonably expected, after such deterioration, to meet the criteria of either paragraph one or paragraph two above. (Is) in need of immediate hospitalization for the prevention of such harm. (R2) was alleged of physical abuse towards his peer. He has been placed on 1:1 monitoring until sent to the hospital for psych evaluation. (R2) requires immediate hospitalization to prevent harm to self and others. Administrator and physician were notified. Initial report has been sent to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) with final report to follow. Abuse and Neglect policy (Reviewed/Revised 4.24.2025) documents in part: -Policy Statement: it is the policy of the facility to provide care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, corporal punishment, misappropriation of property, exploitation, neglect, or mistreatment. -Definitions of abuse: Abuse is willful infliction of mistreatment, injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment. Abuse assumes intent to harm, but inadvertent or careless behavior done deliberately that results in harm may be considered abuse.
Mar 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the rights of residents to be free from abuse in one of fou...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the rights of residents to be free from abuse in one of four residents (R1, R7, R8 and R10) in a sample of 10 residents. This resulted in R7 sustaining a superficial scratch to left side of face near eye. Findings include: R7 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, COPD, Schizoaffective Disorder, Diabetes 2, and Alcohol Abuse. R7 was first admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R7 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15/15. R7 hospital record dated 3/8/25 shows R7 sustained superficial abrasion to the left bridge of nose/near eye. No other injuries sustained in the altercation. On 3/11/25 at 2PM R7 stated yes, I had an altercation with R8 out on the smoking patio. R8 started urinating out on patio and did it on my leg. I pushed him away and he pushed my face with his hand. My glasses fell off my face and broke on the ground. He poked my eye, and I had a small scratch on my eyebrow. I went in and told staff. Staff called the police and got R8 from the patio. The police came but I didn't want to press charges. I didn't get hurt. They sent us both to the hospital and I returned without any injury except the scratch. I haven't seen R8. I don't want to talk about this anymore. I am safe here. R8 didn't mean it he is just sick so it's not a big deal to me. On 3/11/25 at 1:56PM V2 (Assistant Administrator) stated we received a call that R7 allegedly received a scratch. We immediately separated both residents. Both were assessed. There was no serious injury just a tiny superficial scratch to the face of R7 with no significant injury. R7 was not in pain or distress. We reported to the State Agency immediately. Chicago Police called. R7 refused to press charges. R7 stated the patient is sick and no need to do anything. Both were sent to hospital. R7 was sent to hospital with no significant injury and returned the same day. On 3/12/25 at 1:40PM V8 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated R7 came in from patio and told me R8 scratched his face and broke his glasses. I assessed him with a small scratch below his eye. I notified other staff who came and provided 1:1 to both R7 and R8. The police arrived. Family and doctor was notified. Both residents were sent to the hospital. R7 3/11/25 Social Service note states this writer went to speak to R7 to see how he was doing in regard to an incident that allegedly happened this past Saturday. He (R7) told this writer, I'm fine, and there is nothing to talk about its over with and I don't want to talk about it anymore. Social services will continue to offer support as needed. R8 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder, Hepatitis C, Nicotine Dependence, Other Drug Induced Secondary Parkinsonism and Thrombocytopenia. R8 was first admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R8 has no BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score non scorable. R8 is care planned for including Verbally Physically Aggressive Behavior as the result of the 3/8/25 incident, R8 is care planned for Delusional Behavior. Review of facility alleged abuse investigations show that on 3/8/25 at around 4:05 PM Administration received a call from V3 (RN), Nursing Supervisor who stated that resident R7 has alleged that R8 had scratched his face. R7 was assessed and had no significant injury. R8 has a diagnosis of Bipolar D/O and Mild Cognitive Impairment and other medical conditions. R7 was sent to hospital for medical and R8 was sent to hospital for psych eval. Chicago Police Department was notified, and officer responded, and a report was filed. NP/nurse practitioner and mother of R7 were both notified. This will serve as the facilities initial report. Investigation immediately initiated. R8 3/8/25 progress note states resident noted with verbal and physical aggression towards others. Un-redirectable, placed on 1:1 monitoring. DR/doctor notified with order to send resident to Hospital ER/emergency room on involuntary petition for psych evaluation. Order noted and carried out. Resident became uncontrollable, 911 was called and transferred him to Hospital. Doctor informed. Resident has no family contact. Report given to Hospital psych intake c/o. Resident face sheet, POS/physician order sheet, most recent lab results and medication list faxed to 773-xxx-xxxx. R8 3/8/25 progress note states in addition, resident was transferred to hospital with the assistance of Chicago Police, report filed. Facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Revised 7/12/24 includes statement: Policy Statement: It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, corporal punishment, misappropriation of property, exploitation, neglect, or mistreatment.
Feb 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a) ensure a residents' self-releasing seat belts (used...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a) ensure a residents' self-releasing seat belts (used to keep a resident positioned properly in their wheelchair) were secured in a manner which allowed the residents to freely release the belt, b) failed to complete an assessment for the need of a restraint and c) failed to code the Quick Release Belt in the MDS (Minimum Data Set) as a restraint for 1 (R1) out of 3 residents reviewed for physical restraints. Findings Include: R1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 12/27/23 with diagnoses not limited to Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3, Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus, Extrapyramidal and Movement Disorders, Drug Induced Subacute Dyskinesia, Other Specified Forms of Tremor, Diabetes Insipidus, Pain In Leg, Low Back Pain, Drug Induced Secondary Parkinsonism, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, Unilateral Primary Osteoarthritis, Right Knee, History of Falling and Anxiety Disorder. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 12 indicating moderately impaired. Progress note dated 07/30/24 at 4:57 pm document in part: Restorative Note Text: R1 has been provided a Quick Release Seat Belt to protect her from falls and/or injuries sustained by falls due to poor posture. R1 has tendency to frequently bend over from waist when ambulating or sitting. R1 is currently in a wheelchair and bending over while sitting can cause R1 to fall out of her chair. Progress note dated 10/09/24 at 7:52 am document in part: Behavior Note Behavior: Observed sitting up in wheelchair with face leaning on table in day room, refused to go to the bed. Refused pillow when offered. List education provided: Quick release belt provided D/T (due/to) resident EPS (Extrapyramidal Symptoms). Order Summary Report document in part: My have Quick Release Torso Safety Belt Daily when up in wheelchair to reduce risk of fall and/or injury sustained from fall dated 10/29/24. Document titled Physical Restraint Informed Consent dated 07/30/24 document in part: Method of Physical Restraint Used: Quick Release Safety Belt. The Reason the Physical Restraint is Needed: To Prevent Falls/Injury Sustained from Fall. Times when restraint will be applied: Daily when in wheelchair. Care Plan document in part: Focus: R1 is at high risk for fall d/t (Due/to) slipping from wheelchair going to the washroom, unsteady gait secondary to dx. (diagnosis) of Cerebral Infarction, delusional episodes, failure to get up from bed slowly and possible side effects from use of anti-psychotic medication. Date Initiated: 02/10/25. Interventions: R1 has tendency to frequently bend over at waist (due to back pain she states when she bends it relieves the pain somewhat) causing poor posture and risk for fall. R1 has been provided a Quick Release Belt for her wheelchair which will help to prevent her falling and/or sustaining injury. This belt should remain in place when she is sitting in her wheelchair to be released only for care and toileting needs. Date Initiated: 07/30/24. MDS Section P - Restraints and Alarms document in part: Physical restraints are any manual method, or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. The coding of 0 not used is documented on the MDS Section P. Facility Matrix indicate R1 has a Physical Restraint. Document titled Side rail/Other Devices evaluation has no restraint devices documented. On 02/25/25 at 12:22 PM V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R1 has a quick release belt in the chair due to her posture. I can't recall any falls just the quick release. On 02/25/25 at 02:07 PM R1 was sitting in wheelchair in the dining room with the quick release belt in use. R1 was transported to her room in the wheelchair by a staff member. R1 stated they never showed me how to release this belt. If it was an emergency, I would be a goner. It is connected somewhere in the back of the wheelchair. R1 was pulling the quick release belt near the bottom of the belt near the lower area around the abdomen. R1 stated its tight and not giving. R1's quick release belt Velcro was connected at R1 right lower side out of view and reach for R1 to release. On 02/26/25 at 10:40 AM V11 (Restorative Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated the quick release self-release is considered a restraint because R1 wears it. R1 is able to take it off anytime she wants. R1 is alert and oriented x/times 3. R1 has a tendency to lean forward with her head between her legs and the belt is helping her to understand to sit upright. R1 has had the belt for some months. The resident should be able to get out of the quick release belt. We had a couple of short trails to remove the quick release belt, but we put it back. We don't want R1 to tumble out of the chair. R1 is a high fall risk. I was unaware there is a physical restraint assessment. V11 was shown by the surveyor MDS Section P Restraints and Alarms that indicate R1 has no restraints. On 02/26/25 at 11:33 AM V12 (MDS Coordinator) stated the restorative nurse is in charge of restraints. The restorative nurse will assess and do the care plan because they are in charge of the order. We divide the MDS, the restorative nurse fills out section P. The quick release belt would be considered as a trunk restraint. The MDS is indicating the resident has no restraints because it is coded as zero. The MDS section P was incorrect meaning there were no restraints in use. I believe there is and assessment or evaluation that is done for restraints. On 02/26/25 at 01:23 PM R1 was in wheelchair in the dining room with the quick release belt in use. On 02/26/25 01:24 PM V13 (Certified Nurse Assistant) stated R1 leans forward in the wheelchair and the quick release belt is released every 2 hours. I put the quick release belt on R1 when I get her up. On 02/26/25 at 01:49 PM V2 (Assistant Administrator) stated R1 leans forward so we see the quick release belt for support. On 02/26/25 at 04:03 PM V19 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated we put on the quick release belt to prevent R1 from falling. When in the wheelchair R1 will lean forward. If R1 takes the quick release belt off by herself R1 will be getting up and fall. On 02/27/25 at 10:15 AM V20 (Director of Rehabilitation) stated R1 is unable to sit at the edge of the bed. According to the physical therapy evaluation it does not have any indication that R1 cannot sit up in a wheelchair. R1 had a sitting and standing instability. The physical therapist usually put recommendations in the discharge note. The quick release belt is for safety, so R1 does not fall and hurt herself. The more R1 sits upright, it helps her with her trunk control. That is nursing not therapy to reevaluate R1. On 02/27/25 at 10:37 AM V20 (Director of Rehabilitation) stated Physical Therapy was working on R1's lateral trunk stability, sitting up. Weight shift dynamic stability and facilitation of anticipatory postural adjustments to pull herself up. If R1 was leaning forward, conscious enough to pull herself back. There was training, limit balance and R1's trunk technique to facilitate proprioception and adjustment of center of mass over base of support improving proactive sitting balance training. This was in July 2024 when R1 was discharged from physical therapy R1 has made progress with skilled interventions. There were no recommendations other the restorative nursing program for ambulation and range of motion. On 02/27/25 at 11:19 AM V2 (Assistant Administrator) stated regarding the vest for R1 we gave R1 and the staff education. On 02/27/25 at 11:22 AM R1 was in the dining room in a wheelchair with the quick release belt in use. On 02/27/25 at 11:23 AM R1 was transported to her room in the wheelchair by a staff member. R1 stated they said the belt is to keep me from sliding out of the chair. The chair is low so where am I to go to. I can sit up; they don't give me enough time to demonstrate I can you sit up straight. R1 was sitting in the wheelchair with the left shoulder strap of the quick release belt hanging off of the left shoulder. R1 was leaning to the right side with her right arm hanging near the wheel of the wheelchair. When asked can she (R1) sit up straight in the wheelchair, R1 readjusted herself and sat upright in the wheelchair. R1 stated I don't feel the belt is helping, it is unnecessary and don't make sense. They put this belt on me every day when they get me up. They showed me how to take the belt off today. On 02/27/25 at 12:29 PM V4 (Direction of Nursing) stated R1 has improved a lot. The restorative nurse recommended the quick release belt. We have to assess and evaluate if they need that quick release belt, get an order, consent, and monitor if they are okay with that one. We did the in-service yesterday. Document titled In-Service Topic and Attendance Sheet dated 02/26/25 Topic: Quick release Torso Support. Summary of In-Service Topic: Use of Quick Release Torso Support for Poor Trunk Control. Attachments: (Two Pictures of the Posey Torso Support for Wheelchair). Policy: Titled Restraints reviewed 08/19/24 document in part: It is the facility's policy to ensure that each resident is not restrained for the purposes of discipline or convenience. The facility will utilize non- restraining interventions first before trying restrain-type devices which will be considered as last resort. Physical restraint is defined as any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment, or material that. A) attached or adjacent to the resident's body. B) that the individual cannot intentionally removed easily, and C) restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Procedures: 1. In the event that resident's condition warrants the use of restraint, a restraint device assessment will be done to determine if the device is appropriate for the resident. 2. Once the assessment determines that the device or intervention is a restraint, a physician order will be obtained indicating the type of device to be used. The order may be accompanied by the indication/reason for the device, the duration of use, and how often it is supposed to be released. If this information is not reflected in the POS (Physician Order Sheet), these should be specified in the device assessment, in the Progress Notes, or in the care plan. 5. T use of the restraining device may be assessed and reduced at least quarterly. 9. Any device including mobility alarms that may have a restraining effect on a resident should be assessed and evaluated to determine it is a restraint or an enabler.
Aug 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accuracy of wound location, failed to documen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accuracy of wound location, failed to document a thorough wound assessment, failed to follow physician orders, failed to ensure that treatment administration is not documented when not performed and/or failed to implement care plan interventions for three of three residents (R2, R3, R4) reviewed for wound care. Findings include: On 8/14/24, IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) received allegations that the facility does not take wounds seriously. R3's diagnoses include dementia and xerosis cutis (abnormally dry skin). R3's (8/2/24) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) states resident is rarely/never understood. R3's (8/2/24) functional assessment affirms resident is dependent on staff for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. R3's (8/15/24) initial skin/wound notes includes the following: right posterior knee abrasion. 4.0 x 1.0 x 0.1cm (centimeters). 100% epithelial. Periwound: intact, fragile. R3's (8/15/24) POS (Physician Order Sheets) includes right posterior knee: cleanse with NS (Normal Saline), pat dry with gauze, apply xeroform to the base of the wound and cover with border gauze dressing every day shift (Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday) and PRN (as needed). R3's (1/25/21) care plan includes abrasion to right posterior knee, intervention: (8/20/24) cleanse with NS, apply xeroform to base of the wound, secure with gauze 3x per week (Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday) and PRN. R3's (8/20/24) skin/wound notes state right posterior knee improving without complication, wound care will follow until resolved [therefore the wound was not resolved]. On 8/20/24 at 11:16am, surveyor inquired about R3's wound however R3 did not respond. Surveyor inquired if R3 is able to communicate, V4 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated Sometime he talk but not really. Two (2) large, scabbed areas (with redness surrounding each) were observed on the back of R3's right lower posterior thigh (not the posterior knee) and there was no dressing present. Surveyor inquired about the appearance of R3's wound, V4 responded It some sore, it look like it was a blister but it dry. Surveyor inquired if a dressing was present on R3's wound, V4 replied When they put him here temporarily last week it wasn't having dressing and affirmed she (V4) did not know that R3's wound required a dressing because he didn't have one on. On 8/20/24 at 11:24am, surveyor inquired about R3's wound, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated I could call the wound care nurse, I know that they were treating it. V5 inspected R3's wound (as requested) and responded, I see a reddened area and scabbing that's all I can really describe. Surveyor inquired if a treatment was on R3's wound (as ordered) V5 replied I don't see like a patch or anything. R3's (August 2024) TAR (Treatment Administration Record) affirms the right posterior knee dressing was last documented on 8/17 (3 days prior), the PRN entries are blank. On 8/21/24 at 11:39am, surveyor inquired about staff requirements when resident skin alterations are identified, V6 (Wound Care Coordinator) stated Somebody will call me, I (V6) do the assessment, I take picture and I call the NP (Nurse Practitioner). She (NP) will give me the treatment order and when she comes in, she will see the patient. Surveyor inquired about staff requirements if a dressing falls off a resident, V6 responded We will change it again, most of them (Residents) have PRN orders. Surveyor inquired about R3's wound, V6 replied It has like a skin tear like laceration I think it happened on the 15th of August. I called the NP, got the order and when she (NP) came in, she saw him (R3). Surveyor inquired about R3's current treatment orders, V6 stated It's a xeroform 3 times a week and PRN. That's Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays and PRN. Surveyor inquired why R3's (right posterior thigh) wound was observed Tuesday (8/20/24) without a dressing, V6 replied Usually the CNA is supposed to call me when the dressing comes off. They should have called me. ---- R4's diagnoses include dementia and xerosis cutis. The facility wound report includes (R4's) right 5th finger laceration (acquired 8/1/24). R4's (8/1/24) progress notes state, notified by nurse that patient injured his right 5th finger last night, assessed by wound care nurse, noticed the laceration may need to be sutured. Refer to wound care notes for description. R4's (8/1/24) initial wound assessment states, small cut on the 5th finger however measurements and/or a description of the wound were excluded. On 8/21/24 at 11:49am, surveyor inquired about R4's wound, V6 (Wound Care Coordinator) stated He has like a cut on his 5th finger. Surveyor requested a description of R4's wound, V6 responded Oh, laceration, he (R4) have laceration [laceration was excluded from R1's initial wound assessment]. Surveyor inquired if R4's (8/1/24) wound was measured during the initial assessment, V6 replied I think it was my colleague that did the assessment, there is no measurement there. It's supposed to be measurements there. ---- R2's diagnoses include morbid obesity, xerosis cutis and cellulitis of left lower limb. The facility wound report includes (R2's) left calf partial thickness wound (acquired 7/11/24). R2's (7/12/24) POS includes Gentamycin Sulfate external cream 0.1% apply to left calf topically every day shift for reopened surgical wound. Cleanse with NS, apply gentamycin ointment, cover with bordered gauze. The facility census affirms R2 was hospitalized [DATE] through 8/19/24. R2's (August 2024) TAR (Treatment Administration Record) affirms on 8/15/24 the left calf treatment was documented as administered [R2 was hospitalized at this time]. Surveyor inquired why R2's (8/15/24) treatment administration was documented when R2 was hospitalized [therefore not in the facility] V6 (Wound Care Coordinator) reviewed R2's TAR and responded, It must be a mistake. The wound care policy (revised 1/24/24) states this facility adheres to the Federal and State requirements for wound care management. The facility shall develop a plan of care and implement intervention. The resident's skin alteration/breakdown shall be documented in the resident's clinical records in accordance with the facility's policy and in compliance to current regulatory standards.
May 2024 10 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (R221) resident had access to call light of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (R221) resident had access to call light of six residents reviewed for call lights in a sample of 35 reviewed. Findings include: Minimum Data Set, 2/21/2024, Brief Interview for Mental Status score indicates R221 has moderate cognitive impairment; does not have behavioral concerns with inattention, disorganized thinking, altered level of consciousness. Nursing-Admission/readmission UDA, 2/14/2024, call light evaluation indicates R221 is cognitively able to use the call light and is able to call for assistance by pulling the call light string with the use of the right and left finger(s), hand or arm. On 5/14/24 at 12:29 PM, observed R221 lying in bed watching television. The call light was observed clipped to the upper right corner of R221's pillow that was behind R221's head. No part of the string draped to the front of the pillow. R221's call light system consists of a string that reaches from a toggle switch located on the wall behind and to the right of R221's bed. The other end of the string has a clip. R221 was observed with limited mobility in all four extremities. R221 stated R221 requires assistance to get up. Writer asked R221 where R221's call light is. R221 responded Not sure where the call light is. Writer informed R221 that the call light was clipped to the pillow behind R221. Writer asked R221 to pull the call light. R221 raised the right arm, bent at the elbow, and swung it back toward the pillow. R221 said I can't reach the call light. On 5/14/24 at 12:40 PM, observed R221's call light with V22 (Licensed Practical Nurse). V22 moved/clipped the call light down toward the center of the pillow to the right side. R221 attempted to reach for the call light but could not reach it. V22 stated, usually restorative assesses the call light placement so the resident can pull it. V22 had V47 (Restorative Aide) come into R221's room to add string to R221's call light to make it longer. V47 added string to lengthen R221's call light and clipped it to the pad that R221 was lying on close to R221's right hand. R221 was shown where the call light was placed and asked to pull the call light. R221 grabbed and pulled the string and was able to activate the call light. R221 stated That's better. I can pull it. V22 stated, restorative rounds in the mornings to see if residents can pull the call light. The CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistants) put the call lights in place after cleaning the resident. R221 could not use the call light where it was originally placed on the pillow. R221 would not have been able to call for help. The purpose of the call light is for emergencies, call for help, to get staff attention. Writer asked R221 what was the purpose of the call light? R221 responded To call for help if I'm having trouble. R221 stated R221 has a sense of completeness now that R221 can find the call light. On 5/14/24 at 12:55 PM, V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated V8 clipped the call light to the center of R221's pillow. On 5/14/24 at 1:09 PM, writer asked V47 (Restorative Aide) what did V47 just do to R221's call light? V47 stated V47 added a longer string to R221's call light because V47 was told it was too short. V47 stated the call light was clipped to the upper right corner of R221's pillow when V47 assessed R221 this morning. V47 stated R221 was centered in the bed and able to reach it. I asked R221 if R221 could reach it. I was not able to test R221's reach because R221 was receiving care from the CNA. V47 stated the purpose of the call light is for emergency if the resident needs help. V47 stated we do a call light assessment on admission. V47 stated we assess/round every morning. V47 stated we are checking to see if the call light is reachable. V47 stated staff is not in the resident's room [ROOM NUMBER]/7. If R221 is unable to reach the light, then R221 cannot call for help. On 5/14/24 at 3:20 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated the call light is for if the resident needs help. All residents should have a call light and it should be reachable. If the call light is not reachable the resident cannot call for assistance. Facility Call Light Policy, 7/27/23, documents in part: Be sure call lights are placed within reach of residents who are able to use it at all times.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to protect one (R101) resident's personal and confidential information of 6 residents reviewed for patient information protect...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to protect one (R101) resident's personal and confidential information of 6 residents reviewed for patient information protection in a sample of 35. Findings include: On 5/14/2024 at 10:02am during inspection of the medication cart on the 5th floor with V28 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN), V28 was observed going to the medication room and leaving her computer on, with the computer screen displaying R101's picture, medical and personal information. The computer screen was observed facing the main hallway of the unit, and it was visible to staff members and residents passing by. V28 stated she should have closed or made sure the contents of the screen were hidden and not visible to anyone (public) because that's a HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) violation. V28 stated she should have closed the computer, but since she was not going far, she didn't think she needed to close the computer. On 5/14/2024 at 12:44pm, V4 (Assistant Director of Nursing-ADON) stated computer screen needs to be closed for privacy of the residents because their pictures and medications are showing and other people might look and see what medications the resident is taking, and that's a violation of their privacy. On 05/16/2024 at 12:26 V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Assistant Administrator) stated they educate their staff on privacy, such as covering the date of birth , diagnosis, full names, not to be provided to anyone not providing care to the residents. V2 stated if the nurse is stepping away from her computer even for a short time, the nurse needs to minimize, close the screen to make sure the resident information is not visible to anyone passing by staff or residents. If the computer screen is left visible to other people not taking care of the resident, because that's a HIPPA violation and other people can get hold of resident's information which is sensitive confidential personal information for the resident. Facility Policy titled Statement of Resident Rights Cont. Documents: -(h) Privacy and Confidentiality. The Resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a new Level I screen for a resident with a known mental il...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a new Level I screen for a resident with a known mental illness for one (R223) resident reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASARR) in a sample of 35. Findings include: R223's Face sheet documents that R223 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to: Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type. R223's Level II PASARR outcome letter documents that R223 has a short-term approval without special services dated [DATE] with an expiration date of [DATE]. R223's Level II PASARR outcome letter documents in part, This determination allows you a limited number of days in a Medicaid-certified nursing facility. The short-term approval will end on the Date Short Term Approval Ends listed on the Notice of PASRR Level II Outcome that came with this letter. If you or your care provider thinks you need to stay after that date, a nursing facility staff member must submit a new Level I screen. The new Level I screen must be submitted no later than 10 days before the Date Short Term Approval Ends. On [DATE] at 2:08PM, V19 (Social Services Director) stated he has been working at the facility for five years. V19 states a PASARR/Preadmission Screening and Resident Review is a screening that needs to be done prior to a resident being admitted to the facility. V19 states he is unaware of what the PASARR screenings are indicative of. V19 states the facility checks to see if a resident has a PASARR screening upon admission. V19 states the PASARR indicates the determination of needs/DON score for the individual resident. V19 states based on the DON score, it is determined if a resident is appropriate for the nursing home setting or not. V19 states he is unaware of the DON score ranges or what the different DON score ranges are indicative of. V19 states a PASARR Level II is needed for a resident if it is determined that the resident has an SMI/severe mental illness. V19 states the determination for a Level II PASARR screening is based off of the results of the Level I PASARR screening. V19 states he reviews the PASARR screenings at least once a month and also reviews the PASARR screenings for expirations. V119 states the last time he checked the PASARR screenings was on [DATE]. V19 states he is the person responsible for submitting resident PASSAR screenings. V19 states when a resident's PASARR screening expires, he should submit another one as soon as he can. V19 states he is not sure if there is a time frame for submitting a new PASSAR screening once it expires. On [DATE] at 3:52PM, V19 states R223's PASSAR screening expired on [DATE]. V19 states once a resident's PASARR screening expires, a new Level I PASARR screening has to be submitted before a resident can receive a Level II PASARR screening. V19 states he was just made aware of this information and submitted a new PASARR screening for R223 today on [DATE]. Facility policy dated [DATE] titled PASSAR Screening of Residents with Mental Disorder of Intellectual Disability documents in part, Policy: It is the facility's policy to ensure that residents with Mental Disorder and those with Intellectual Disorder will receive PASSAR Screening within the timeframe allowed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician order policy for prescribed gastrosto...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician order policy for prescribed gastrostomy tube feeding rate. This failure affected one (R4) resident reviewed for tube feeding in a sample of 35. Findings Include: On 05/14/24 at 01:26 PM, observed R4 lying in bed with HOB/head of bed elevated, and tube feeding infusing. Observed 1.2-liter (L) bottle of Jevity 1.2 hung with label listing date (05/14/24) and hang time (9:00 AM). Observed tube feeding infusing at 55 milliliters (ml) per hour (hr.). On 05/14/24 at 01:57 PM, V15 (Registered Nurse) stated V15 knows R4 well and has taken care of R4 before. V15 stated V15 follows R4's tube feeding orders listed in R4's electronic health record (EHR) ordered by R4's physician. V15 stated R4 is NPO (nothing by mouth) and receives Jevity 1.2 at 55 ml/hr via gastrostomy tube. V15 stated V15 hung R4's tube feeding bottle at 9:00 AM this morning and set the rate at 55 ml/hr. On 05/14/24 at 02:00 PM, surveyor went with V15 to view R4's tube feeding rate and R4 stated R4's tube feeding was infusing at 55 ml/hr with Jevity 1.2. On 05/14/24 at 02:04 PM, V15 reviewed R4's orders in R4's EHR and stated R4's tube feeding rate was changed on 05/10/24 to 75 ml/hr. V15 stated 75 ml/hr is what R4's current order is and this is the rate R4 should be receiving. On 05/15/24 at 12:56 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated the nurses follow the orders in the resident's EHR. V3 stated if R4's tube feeding order says the rate should be run at 75 ml per hour then that is what the rate should have been set at. V3 stated it was an oversight and that nurse V15 (Registered Nurse) is a good nurse. On 05/16/24 at 8:52 AM, V34 (Registered Dietitian) stated for residents who are NPO they receive one hundred percent of their nutrition via a tube feeding and if a resident receiving tube feeding is losing weight, V34 would make a recommendation to adjust the tube feeding volume to provide to more calories. V34 stated the nurses should be following the doctor's order for the tube feeding rate and if the rate was not followed as ordered this would affect their total calorie intake. V34 stated R4 has had a significant weight loss over three-month period from (2/2024) to (5/2024). V34 stated R4 weighted 162.8 pounds in (2/2024) and currently weights (5/2024) 150 pounds. V34 calculated that this is a 12.8-pound weight loss or -7.9% weight change in three months. V34 stated due to R4 losing weight V34 recommended to increase the rate of R4's tube feeding from 55 ml/hr to 75 ml/hr to provide more calories. R4 has diagnosis including but not limited to Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Without Esophagitis, Presence Of Aortocoronary Bypass Graft, Gastrostomy Status, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase, Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety, Hypertension, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Unspecified Atherosclerosis Of Native Arteries Of Extremities, Bilateral Legs, Congenital Stenosis And Stricture Of Esophagus, Other Iron Deficiency Anemias, Deficiency Of Other Vitamins, Ventricular Tachycardia, Xerosis Cutis, Pressure Ulcer Of Right Buttock, Stage 2, Pressure Ulcer Of Sacral Region, Stage 2, Diverticulosis of Intestine, Part Unspecified, Without Perforation Or Abscess With Bleeding. R4's Order Summary Report dated 05/14/24 documents in part, diet NPO (nothing by mouth) dated 01/26/24 and enteral feed order Jevity 1.2 rate 75 ml/hr x23 hours and infuse until total volume of 1725 ml is reached per day dated 05/10/24. R4's Enteral Feeding care plan documents in part R4 requires enteral feedings as the primary source of nutrition due to malnutrition. R4's Nutrition care plan documents in part, provide tube feed prescription Jevity 1.2 @/at 75 ml/hr x 23 hours and infuse until 1725 ml total volume reached per day. R4's Tube Feeding care plan documents in part, provide enteral feeding as ordered. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 04/08/24 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 0 indicating R4 is rarely/never understood. Section K - Swallowing/Nutritional Status documents in part nutritional approaches - feeding tube and proportion of total calories the resident received through tube feeding 51% of more. R4's Medication Administration Record dated 05/01/24-05/31/24 documents in part, enteral feeding order(G-tube) start date 05/10/24 Jevity 1.2 rate 75 ml/hr x23 hours and infuse until total volume of 1725 ml is reached per day signed off on by V15 on 05/11/24, 05/12/24, 05/13/24, 05/15/24 day shift. R4's Weight/Tube Feeding assessment dated [DATE] completed by V34 documents in part, weight loss is unintentional and undesirable since BMI (Body Mass Index) is underweight for advanced age and recommending to increase Jevity 1.2 from 55 to 75 ml/hr x 23 hours. R4's Monthly Weight Report printed 05/14/24 at 17:40 documents R4's weight [DATE].8 lbs (pounds) and May 2024 150 pounds. Facility policy titled, Physician Orders dated 07/28/23 documents in part it is the policy of this facility to ensure that all resident/patient medications, treatment and plan of care must be in accordance to the licensed physician's orders and the facility shall ensure to follow physician orders as it is written in the POS. Facility policy titled, Enteral Tube Feeding Care dated 07/28/23 documents in part as procedure nurse will check the POS/MAR the order for enteral feeding interventions: feeding formula, type: bolus/continuous, rate and duration. Facility Job Description titled Registered Nurse dated 08/24/18 documents in part, will administer medications within the scope of practice of the R.N. Licensure.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy on controlled drug count by fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy on controlled drug count by failing to accurately count and reconcile controlled medication record/log for three (R220, R492, R211) of six residents in a sample of 35 reviewed. Findings include: R220 current face sheet documents R220 is a [AGE] year-old individual with medical diagnoses that include but not limited to: bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, severe, without psychotic features, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, unspecified type, generalized anxiety disorder, osteomyelitis, unspecified. R220's POS (Physician Order Sheet) documents Active 10/11/2023 - Lyrica Capsule 150 MG (Pregabalin) -Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for Nerve pain related to chronic pain syndrome Active 10/11/2023-clonazePAM Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Clonazepam) -Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day related to generalized anxiety disorder Active 04/17/2024-Adderall Oral Tablet 20 MG(Amphetamine-Dextroamphetamine) - Give one tablet by mouth three times a day for. R492 current face sheet documents R492 is a [AGE] year-old individual with medical diagnosis that include but not limited to: other specified arthritis, multiple sites, other low back pain, other low back pain. R492's POS documents: Active 5/11/2024 -Pregabalin Oral Capsule 75 MG (Pregabalin) Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for pain. R211's current face sheet documents R211 is a [AGE] year-old individual with diagnosis that include but not limited to: schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, severe, with psychotic disturbance, and her POS (Physician Order Sheet) documents: admitted to Unity Hospice 8/3/23. Review of R211's POS does not document an order for Morphine Sulfate 200mg/ML solution. On 5/14/2024 at 11:48am during medication cart and storage room inspection on first floor with V17(Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN), the medication narcotic count logbook was observed not signed off as given for R220 for medications administered: Lyrica Capsule 150 MG (Pregabalin), was not signed off as given, and medication counted at hand was 5 tablets remaining but narcotic sheet showed 6 tablets remaining and last signed as given on 5/13/2024 at 5pm , clonazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Clonazepam) count was 19 tablets, narcotic sheet showed 20 tablets remaining and was last signed as given on 5/13/2024 at 5pm, Adderall Oral Tablet 20 MG(Amphetamine-Dextroamphetamine)remaining 16 tablets, narcotic sheet showed 17 tablets remaining and last signed as given on 5/13/2024 at 5pm. V17 stated she gave the medications to R220 this morning, but did not sign the medications as given on the narcotic count book. V17 stated she should have signed off the medications as soon as she gave them to keep a true count of the medication to prevent confusion and to monitor the controlled medications. R492's Pregabalin Oral Capsule 75 MG (Pregabalin) count was five tablets on the bingo card, while the medication count sheet/log documented six tables on hand. The narcotic sign off sheet documented the medication was last signed off as given on 5/13/2024 at 5pm. V17 stated she gave the medication this morning but not sign it off yet. V17 said she is supposed to sign off the medications as given as soon as she gives it. On 5/14/2024 at 12:44pm, V4(Assistant Director of Nursing-ADON) said all controlled medications should be signed off on the narcotic book by the nurse who administered the medication as soon as they are given to prevent medication being given again and to prevent the medication from being misused. V4 stated signing the narcotic as soon as given helps prevent misuse and keeps proper counts of the medications. On 5/15/2024 at 12:47pm during inspection of 3rd floor medication carts and medication storage room with V30(Registered Nurse-RN), observed in the medication fridge was R211's medication Morphine Sulfate 200mg/ML solution. The medication bottle was open and in the bottle was 5mL of medication in the bottle. V30 stated R211 was V31(Registered Nurse-RN) resident for the day. During review of R211 narcotic log with V30 showed the narcotic log was not completed, there was no documentation of how much of R211's medication was remaining and R211's medication Morphine Sulphate was observed opened, and in the bottle was 5ml of the medication in the bottle. V30 stated there is no log R211 has received the medication. On 5/15/2024 at 12:50pm, V31 said she has not administered to R211 any Morphine Sulfate during her shift. V31 stated medications such as morphine sulphate should be monitored to prevent misuse. V31 stated she does not know if R211 has been prescribed morphine sulfate. On 5/15/2024 at 1:35pm, V4 (ADON) and surveyor observed R211's medication and medication sheet. V4 stated all controlled medications are supposed to be logged in the medication log sheet and if the medication is discontinued, it should be discorded/wasted to prevent medication errors, medication being misused. V4 stated she did not know why R211's morphine was opened, yet R211's morphine was discontinued and R211 is no longer on the medication. V4 stated if the medication is open and not logged in the narcotic book, it is not known what the contents in the medication bottle is since there is no way of tracking the medication, and this can lead to medication errors and misuse. Facility policy titled Controlled medications count, dated 7/27/2023 documents: -After removing the controlled medication from the bingo card or individual packet, the nurse will sign off the accompanying controlled medication sheet indicating the medication was taken. -After administration of the controlled medication, the nurse will sign off the eMAR. -If the controlled medication needs to be wasted, another nurse should witness the wasting of the controlled medication.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents were treated with respect and dignity by not passing out meals to all residents sitting at a table at the...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents were treated with respect and dignity by not passing out meals to all residents sitting at a table at the same time. These failures affected 6 residents (R31, R36, R40, R129, R139, R205) reviewed during dining in a total sample of 35 residents. Findings include: On 05/14/24 at 12:35 PM, observed R20, R36, R129, R139, R205 sitting at the same table in the unit dining room with R20 eating lunch from R20's lunch tray unassisted. R36, R129, R139 and R205 observed sitting at the table without food in front of them watching R20 eating R20's lunch. At 12:46 PM, observed R129 receive R129's lunch tray and began to eat unassisted. At 12:49 PM, observed R205 receive R205's lunch tray and began to eat unassisted. At 12:50 PM, R36 asked surveyor where is my food? At 12:51 PM, R139 said to surveyor I'm hungry. I'm waiting. At 12:55 PM, observed R36 and R139 provided with their lunch trays and began to eat right away unassisted. On 05/14/24 at 12:44 PM, observed R31, R40, R144, and R187 sitting at the same table in the unit dining room with R144 and R187 eating from their lunch trays. At this time R31 and R40 did not have any food in front of them and were watching R144 and R187 eating. At 12:49 PM, observed R31 receive R31's lunch tray and began to eat right away unassisted. At 12:56 PM, observed R40 receive R40's lunch tray and began eating right away unassisted. On 05/14/24 at 1:00 PM, V12 (Activity Aide) stated V12 usually monitors the dining room during the lunch meal and that the residents sitting in the dining room today usually eat in the dining room on a regular basis and can feed themselves without assistance. V12 stated usually the meals are served table by table and V12 does not know why the trays were not passed out like that today. V12 stated we want everyone sitting at the same table to be fed at the same time because we do not want people having to watch other people eating without having any food for themselves. On 05/14/24 at 1:12 PM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the meal trays are organized by room not dining location and passed out in the order organized on the carts. On 05/14/24 at 1:15 PM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated that V14 tries to serve residents sitting at the same table at the same time but that is not always possible depending on the location of their meal tray in the cart. On 05/15/24 at 12:18 PM, V23 (Regional Director of Operations) stated residents sitting at the same table should receive their food at that same time. V23 stated this is a dignity issue because one resident should not have to sit and watch another resident eating food when they do not have anything to eat. V23 stated there should be a seating chart for the dining rooms so that all the residents sitting at the same table get served their meals at the same time. V23 stated currently there is no seating chart for the dining rooms. On 05/16/24 at 8:21 AM, V34 (Registered Dietitian) stated residents sitting at the same table should receive their meals at that same time. V34 stated it is a dignity issue because everyone should not be watching one person eating their food. R31's diagnoses which includes but not limited to Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia, and Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type. R31's Physician Orders dated 05/15/24 documents in part General diet regular texture, thin liquids consistency ordered 05/13/20. R31's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 02/22/24 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. R36's diagnoses which includes but not limited to Polyosteoarthritis, Mild Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Chronic Peptic Ulcer, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Paranoid Schizophrenia R36's Physician Orders dated 05/15/24 documents in part No restriction (Regular) diet regular texture, thin liquids consistency ordered 02/07/24. R36's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 05/03/24 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 10 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired cognition. R40's diagnoses which includes but not limited to Polyosteoarthritis, Epileptic Seizures, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease without Esophagitis. R40's Physician Orders dated 05/15/24 documents in part NAS (No Added Salt) diet regular texture, thin liquids consistency ordered 03/22/22. R40's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 03/12/24 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 05 out of 15 indicating severely impaired cognition. R129's diagnoses which includes but not limited to Major Depressive Disorder, History of Falling, Anxiety Disorder, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, and Unspecified Dementia. R129's Physician Orders dated 05/15/24 documents in part General diet regular texture, thin liquids consistency ordered 07/10/21. R129's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 03/12/24 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 10 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired cognition. R139's diagnoses which includes but not limited to Asthma, Schizoaffective Disorder, Dementia, Restlessness and Agitation, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease without Esophagitis, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. R139's Physician Orders dated 05/15/24 documents in part CCHO (Consistent Carbohydrates) diet regular texture, thin liquids consistency large portions to current diet ordered 12/22/22. R139's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 04/02/24 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 07 out of 15 indicating severely impaired cognition. R205's diagnoses which includes but not limited to Arthritis, Bipolar Disorder, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Dementia, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. R205's Physician Orders dated 05/15/24 documents in part Regular diet regular texture, thin liquids consistency ordered 03/31/23. R205's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 04/03/24 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 04 out of 15 indicating severely impaired cognition. On 05/15/24 at 2:01 PM, V2 (Assistant Director) showed surveyor document titled, HCCI Health Care Council of Illinois, Resident admission Packet and stated every resident receives this packet upon admission to the facility. Facility provided document titled, HCCI Health Care Council of Illinois, Resident admission Packet dated July 2023, which documents in part no resident shall be deprived of any rights, benefits, or privileges guaranteed by law, the Constitution of the State of Illinois, or the Constitution of the United States solely on account of his or her status as a resident of the Community and a facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, and the facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 5/14/24 at 8:11 PM R44 was observed sleeping on a specialty bed. R44 heel protectors were observed off of the resident and on...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 5/14/24 at 8:11 PM R44 was observed sleeping on a specialty bed. R44 heel protectors were observed off of the resident and on the bedside table. On 5/15/24 at 10:01 AM R44 was in bed and heel protectors were observed on the bedside table. R44 was awake and lying in bed. V33 (Staffing Coordinator) was at R44's bedside. V33 stated that heel boots are only used at night. R44 confirmed that he only wears the heel boots at night. On 5/16/24 at 8:40 AM R44's skin care and pressure injury prevention orders were reviewed with V4 (RN/ADON). V4 (RN/ADON) stated that bilateral heel protectors were ordered to be on R44 any time R44 is in bed. The heel protectors should be on R44 while R44 is in bed. V4 (RN/ADON) stated that R44 gets up in the chair two to three times a week. Aside from being in the chair, the heel boots should be on. V4 (RN/ADON) stated that the risk to R44 if the heel boots are not on, is that R44's skin will break down. He is at risk for skin breakdown. On 5/16/24 at 8:43 AM V27 (Wound Nurse) stated that R44 has no wounds but is at risk of skin breakdown. V27 (Wound Nurse) stated that prevention measures for R44 are the low air loss mattress, moisture barrier cream, frequent turning, and heel protectors. V27 stated The heel protectors should be on when he is in bed. On 5/14/24 at 02:14 PM record review shows a provider order dated 4/19/2024 by V39 (Physician) and entered by V4 (RN/ADON). The order states: Bilateral heel protectors while in bed. On 5/15/2024 at 1 PM review of R44 care plan dated 4/29/2024 includes the following focus areas: R44 has impaired mobility function related to diagnoses adult failure to thrive. R44 is on bed mobility program. I am assessed to be at risk for pressure sore development, based on Braden score of 13 related to: occasional bladder and bowel incontinence and fragile skin. Currently my skin status is intact. Review of policy titled Physician Orders adopted 11/10/2014 and revised 7/28/2023 states in part: Policy Statement: It is the policy of the facility to ensure that all resident/patient medications, treatment and plan of care must be in accordance to the licensed physician's orders. The facility shall ensure to follow physician orders as it is written in the POS. Procedures: 5. The nurse may question and clarify physician orders that are not clear and or questionable. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary services that are consistent with professional standards to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcers. The facility failed to a. follow the provider order in the prevention of pressure injury for one resident (R44), b. follow policy and manufacturer directions when adding multiple layers on low air loss mattresses for two residents (R212) and (R91) and c. provide adequate supervision for low air loss devices to prevent accidents for one resident (R158) out of a total sample of thirty-five residents. Finding include: On 05/14/24 10:00AM R91 observed in bed with a drive low air loss mattress head of bed elevated. R91 observed laying on one fitted sheet, two incontinent cloth pads and a folded flat sheet used for a draw sheet along with adult brief. On 05/16/24 11:00AM PM surveyor accompanied with V27 and V10 observed R158 lying in bed on air mattress g-tube infusing rate of 60ml/hr. Observed V27 and V10 reposition and do skin check. Observed R158 with redness to sacral area. R158 on low air loss mattress Drive manufacturer. Low air loss mattress noted unplugged. On 05/15/24 9:50AM surveyor observed R212 in bed with g-tube feeding infusing. R212 with foley catheter. Surveyor observed R212 on low air loss mattress with one fitted sheet, flat sheet double folded, one cloth pad and incontinence brief. On 05/14/2024 at 12:38PM V9 states, residents that have air mattresses should have two layers and diaper. If multiple layers are on the air mattress can possibly cause bed sores or make the wounds worse. On 5/14/2024 at 9:50AM V10 states, residents with air mattress should only have one layer on the mattress multiple layers can cause wounds to get worst. On 5/15/2024 at 2:00PM V27 (Wound care nurse) stated, I've been here for 9 years. Residents with air mattresses should only have flat sheet and pad on each. Resident with wounds should only have two layers. Individuals that don't have wounds and is on the air mattress for prevention can have fitted sheet and a pad. If multiple layers are on the air mattress it can cause additional skin breakdown. All staff should make sure air mattresses are working properly and making sure mattress are plugged. If mattress malfunction staff should report immediately. R91 record reviewed physician orders dated 5/9/2024 document SITE: Right ischial tuberosity- Cleanse with normal saline. apply Collagen and calcium alginate to base of the wound, secure with Bordered gauze. physician order dated 11/08/2023. Reviewed R91 current wound assessment dated [DATE],4/30/2024,5/7/2024,5/14/24 showed wound had increase from 5/7/2024 to next assessment date 5/14/2024. Foley catheters care every shift for pressure injury. Physician order dated 11/08/2023 low air loss mattress. On 5/16/2024 2:30PM Review of R91 care plan dated 4/17/2024 includes the following focus areas: R91 has pressure injuries to the following sites: left buttocks- stage 3-resolved 12/2/2023 right ischium- stage 3 R91 pressure injuries will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by/through the next review date. R91 requires low air loss mattress bed and gel cushion for his wheelchair. Braden Scale and Clinical Evaluation dated 4/21/2024 documents R91 is high risk for pressure ulcer development score 12. On 4/16/2024 at 2:30PM reviewed R158 record physician order sheet dated 4/24/2024 documents, SKIN: Mattress: Low Air Loss Mattress due to prevention of decubitus. R158 Braden Scale and Clinical Evaluation dated 4/28/2024 score is 8 high risks.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staffing on the weekend. This failure affects all 245 residents residing in the facility reviewed for lack of staff. Findin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staffing on the weekend. This failure affects all 245 residents residing in the facility reviewed for lack of staff. Findings include: Review of staffing data submitted via the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system revealed the facility had been triggered for weekend staffing data is excessively low. On 05/14/2024, V2 (Assistant Administrator) provided surveyor with the facility's Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) report dated 10/01/2023 to 12/31/2023. Facility document, dated 02/01/2024, titled Facility Assessment Tool documents in part, Part 3: Facility Resources Needed to Provide Competent Support and Care for our Resident Population Every Day and During Emergencies. Plan (please list the actual plan being used in your facility, as below are examples that may not fit your facility's staffing plan and status. Please check as well that your building is compliant with Illinois' Minimum Staffing calculation). RN (Registered Nurse) or LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) Charge Nurse: 10 for Days and Evenings, and 5 Nights shift, 1:29 LN ratio Days and Evenings 1:58 LN. facility's Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) report reviewed for the following weekend dates: 10/15/2023, 11/04/2023, 11/05/2023, and 12/17/2023. 10/15/2023 documents that there were 23 licensed nurses working with total hours of 182.25. 11/04/2023 documents that there were 19 licensed nurses working with total hours of 182.5. 11/05/2023 documents that there were 23 licensed nurses working with total hours of 179. 12/17/2023 documents that there were 23 licensed nurses working with total hours of 198.25. Facility's document dated 10/15/2023 titled Daily Nursing Staff Report documents that 24 nurses worked with total hours worked were 186. Facility's document dated 11/04/2023 titled Daily Nursing Staff Report documents that 24 nurses worked with total hours worked were 192. Facility's document dated 11/05/2023 titled Daily Nursing Staff Report documents that 24 nurses worked with total hours worked were 192. Facility's document dated 12/17/2023 titled Daily Nursing Staff Report documents that 24 nurses worked with total hours worked were 192. 05/16/2024 at 9:59 AM V33 (Staffing Coordinator) states that she is responsible to make sure there are enough staff working on the units. V33 states that both nurses and CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) work 8-hour shifts. On 05/16/24 at 11:25 AM V33 states that first floor 1 nurse 7-3 3-11, 2nd floor we have two nurses, 3rd floor two nurses, 4th floor two nurses, and 5th floor two nurses. V33 states that there should be nine nurses on 7am-3pm shift, nine nurses on 3pm-11pm shift, and five nurses on the 11pm-7am shift. V33 states that there should be a total of 23 nurses providing resident care in a 24-hour period. Facility census dated 05/14/2024 documents that a total of 245 residents reside in the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to a.) ensure food items were labeled and dated per facility policy, b.) keep food storage areas clean, c.) conduct hand wash...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to a.) ensure food items were labeled and dated per facility policy, b.) keep food storage areas clean, c.) conduct hand washing in between handling dirty and clean plate ware/equipment, d.) thaw frozen meat under running cold water. These failures have the potential to affect all 242 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 05/14/24 at 9:33 AM, during initial kitchen tour V5 (Culinary Development Specialist) stated everything should be labeled and dated with an open and use by date. Dry good items are labeled with the received/delivery date and dated with an open and use by date once the item is opened. V5 stated there are different use by dates depending on what the item is. V5 referred to a sign posted on the outside of the walk-in refrigerator which listed different use by dates titled Visual Aid Use by Dates. On 05/14/24 at 9:40 AM, observed in the walk-in refrigerator the following: 1.) Opened gallon of Coleslaw Dressing labeled with received date 04/17/24, opened date 04/26/24, use by date 06/26/24. Black speckled material observed around ridges of the lid to the Coleslaw Dressing. V5 stated, that is mold and it should be thrown out despite the expiration date still being within use by range. 2.) Opened 5-pound bag of shredded mozzarella cheese wrapped tightly in plastic. Not labeled or dated. V5 stated because the item is not labeled/dated there is no way to know how long the item has been in there and it may not be safe to still use. 3.) Black material imbedded into the folds of the refrigerator door seal/gasket. V5 stated that is mold and should not be there. V5 stated that needs to be cleaned and should be part of the cleaning process. On 05/14/24 at 10:00 AM, observed in dry storage area an opened container of Worcestershire Sauce labeled with delivery date 10/19/22. There was no opened date or use by date on the container. V5 stated this product should be thrown out after 6 months from when it was opened because bacteria can grow in it. V5 stated because there is no opened date on it, and therefore it should be tossed. On 05/14/24 at 10:13 AM, surveyor and V5 observed two employees working in the dish machine area. Observed one staff was bringing in the dirty carts and breaking them down and the other staff (V6, Dietary Aide) was observed putting dirty trays and lids into the dish washer and grabbing the cleaned items from the dish washer without performing hand hygiene in between. V5 stated the dish machine area is staffed with two to three people. V5 stated if there are two people working in the dish room then the person handling the dirty items needs to wash their hands before handling the cleaned items to prevent cross contamination. V5 stated V6 should have washed V6's hands before touching the cleaned items. On 05/14/24 at 10:20 AM, V6 (Dietary Aide) stated there are supposed to be three people working in the dish room but if they do not have the staff there are only two. V6 stated, I am supposed to wash my hands after putting the dirty items into the dish machine and before pulling the cleaned items out of the dish machine. On 05/15/24 between 10:50 -11:28 AM, observed V26 (Chef) prepare pureed lunch meal items in the kitchen using two sets of blender container/lid/blades. On 05/15/24 at 11:35 AM, V26 (Chef) stated V26 needed to puree dinner rolls because they do not have a mix. Observed V25 (Kitchen Supervisor) bring the two dirty blender container/lid/blades to the dish room for cleaning. On 05/15/24 at 11:36 AM, observed V25 place the two dirty blender containers/lids/blades into dish racks and place the dish racks into the dish machine. On 05/15/24 at 11:39 AM, observed V25 remove two cleaned blender containers/lid/blades in dish racks out of the dish machine. Observed V25 pick up the blender containers and lids with V25's hands looking inside and then turning them upside down and placing them back into the dish rack. V25 did not wash V25's hands in between touching the dirty and cleaned blender items. On 05/15/24 at 11:50 AM, observed V26 retrieve a blender container/lid/blade from the dish room area and add dinner rolls to the container to begin the puree the dinner rolls. On 05/15/24 at 11:55 AM, observed large plastic bag containing meat sitting in a sink filled with water. There was no running water from the faucet into the sink containing the meat. V25 stated the meat was cubed steak and it was being defrosted. V25 stated usually they defrost items ahead of time in the refrigerator for a couple of days but in an emergency, they defrost items under cold running water in the sink. V25 stated the cubed steak should be defrosted under cold running water and someone just turned off the water. V25 stated if the frozen meat is left sitting in a sink full of water without running cold water over the product, then the water in the sink could be at room temperature which means it could reach the danger zone temperature between 41-135 degrees F. On 05/15/24 at 12:29 PM, V23 (Regional Director of Operations) stated when staffing the dish room there should be one person assigned to the dirty side of the dish machine and another person pulling out the cleaned items from the dish machine. V23 stated if there is only one person working the dish machine then that person would need to wash their hands after handling the dirty items and before handling the cleaned items. V23 stated handwashing is needed due to infection control concerns to prevent cross contamination. On 05/14/24, facility provided list of diet orders for all residents in the facility printed 05/14/24 at 11:20 AM from the facility electronic health system. Diet order list indicates there are three residents receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). Facility provided policy titled Receiving dated October 2019 documents in part safe food handling procedures for time and temperature control will be practiced in the transportation, delivery and subsequent storage of all food items, and all food items will be appropriately labeled and dated either through manufacturer packaging or staff notation. Facility provide policy titled Labeling Processes Standards and Procedures dated 2024 documents in part, TCS (Time/Temperature Control for Safety) refrigerated food label requirements these food labels intended for storage must include item name, preparation date, use-by-date (within 7 days of preparation or opening commercially prepared TCS foods), and employee initials. Facility provided document titled Visual Aid Use by Dates dated 2019 documents in part, Commercially Prepared Ready-To-Eat (RTE) Foods - opened shredded cheddar/mozzarella use by date 14 days after opening and RTE Non-Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) Food - condiments, sauces use by date 30 days after opening. Facility provided policy titled Hand & Arm Hygiene dated 2021 documents in part, employees must wash hands before handling clean dishes, utensils, and glasses and after handling dirty equipment and utensils. Facility provided policy titled Food Handling - Thawing dated 2024 documents in part thawing under cold running water steps: run cold water continuously over the product and maintain an air gap between faucet and water.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dumpster was covered to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests, insects, and rodents. This deficient sanitation pra...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dumpster was covered to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests, insects, and rodents. This deficient sanitation practice has the potential to affect all 245 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: On 05/15/24 at 8:35 AM, upon entry to the facility observed one of four lids opened to the north facing dumpster outside the facility. The lid was wide open. On 05/15/24 at 12:36 PM, during observation of the outside garbage dumpsters with V24 (Visiting Food Service Manager) observed one of the four lids opened to the south facing dumpster. The lid was wide open. V24 stated the lid should be closed so that garbage does not fly out and pests do not get inside. On 05/16/24 at 11:53 AM, during observation of the outside dumpsters with V40 (Housekeeping Director) observed one of the lids to the south facing dumpster propped open with garbage and boxes. V40 stated the lid should be fully closed but it may be unavoidable if the dumpsters are completely full. The other three lids to the south facing dumpster were opened and observed that the rest of the south facing dumpster was completely empty. V40 observed the empty dumpster sections and stated, oh, yes that is avoidable then. V40 stated the staff should have put the trash in one of the other empty sections of the dumpster because clearly there is room and that way the lid could be fully closed flat. V40 stated the lids should be closed all the way. V40 stated the way the dumpster is now rodents could jump in and start feeding on the food thrown away by the kitchen. On 05/16/24 at 11:40 AM, V40 (Housekeeping Director) stated the lids of the dumpster should be closed after the Floor Technician puts the trash into the dumpster to prevent anything from flying out or any animals' such as rodents climbing inside. V40 stated the garbage inside the dumpster could attract rodents and/or pests and if the lids are left open, they could get inside and feed on the garbage inside. V40 stated we do not want rodents or pests close to the building for sanitation reasons because they can carry disease. Kitchen policy titled, Environment dated October 2019 documents in part, the Dining Services Director will insure (ensure) that all trash is properly disposed in external receptables (dumpsters).
Mar 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and protect residents from resident-to-resident physical ab...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and protect residents from resident-to-resident physical abuse. This failure affects two (R1, R5) residents out of seven residents reviewed for abuse. As a result of this failure, R2 hit R1 in the face with a shoe on 02/28/2024 resulting in R1 sustaining a facial laceration, being sent to the hospital, and requiring four sutures; facility failed to protect R5 from physical abuse by R4. Findings includes: Facility reported incident/FRI dated 02/28/2024 documents that the facility reported an altercation between R1 and R2. FRI documents that R1 reported R2 hit R1 with a shoe. R1's face sheet dated 03/26/2024 documents that R1 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses not limited to: wernicke's encephalopathy, laceration without foreign body of other part of head, subsequent encounter, dysphagia, oral phase, epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus, major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms, other hyperlipidemia, history of falling, basal cell carcinoma of skin of left lower eyelid. R1's MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents that R1 has a BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9/15, indicating that R1 is moderately cognitively impaired. R1's hospital records dated 02/28/2024 documents that R1 was seen in the hospital and diagnosed with a facial laceration requiring four sutures. On 03/26/2024 at 12:07 PM observed R1 alert and responsive. Noted R1 with a scar on top of his nasal bridge/forehead. R1 said that he got stitches after his roommate (identified as R2) hit R1 with his own shoe. R1 states that the incident occurred in the facility. R1 states that R2 told R1 that he stunk and if R1 didn't get out of his bedroom, R2 and R1 were going to get into a fight. R1 states that staff were present but does not recall the staff's name. R1 states that R2 removed R1's shoe and swung it at R1 and then R2 was choking R1. R1 states that the staff member removed R2 away from R1. R1 remembers he then went to the hospital. R1's Nurse's notes dated 2/28/2024 23:45 Note Text: On this day, the writer received the resident via transport and 2 assistants. The resident received discharge papers from the hospital stating that he received a CT/computerized tomography without any additional findings and that the resident needs to follow up with MD/medical doctor as soon as possible. After assessment, it was found that the resident had received 4 sutures to the left side of his forehead. The writer called back to the hospital and spoke to the charge nurse. The charge nurse stated that he did not receive any medication and no discharge orders. The resident did not complain of pain and was seen laying comfortably in bed. Will endorse to AM nurse to follow up with appointment. R2's face sheet dated 03/26/2024 documents that R2 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses not limited to: other spondylosis, lumbar region, other psychoactive substance abuse with unspecified psychoactive substance-induced disorder, major depressive disorder, recurrent, mild, generalized anxiety disorder, other insomnia, essential (primary) hypertension. R2's MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents that R2 has a BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15, indicating that R2 is cognitively intact. R2's general progress note dated 2/28/2024 23:01 documents Note Text: R2 displayed verbal and physical aggression towards roommate. Roommate was sent out due to facial injury. R2 placed on 1:1 supervision. Doctor informed with order to send him to the hospital for psych evaluation with petition. Order noted and carried out. Report given to psych intake at hospital. R2 made aware going to hospital for psych evaluation. R2 emergency contact #1 informed. Ambulance informed of transportation. R2's social service note dated 2/28/2024 21:40 documents Note Text: On 2/28/24, a peer alleged that R2 tossed a shoe across the room and it brazed peer's face. Both residents were immediately separated by staff. R2 was placed on 1:1 monitoring until sent to the hospital for psych evaluation. Administrator, MD, and family member were notified. Police Department was also notified. Initial report was sent to state agency with final report to follow. R2's Medical Professional Progress note dated 3/1/2024 12:43 documents Note Text: Notified by nursing staff that on 2/28 nighttime, R2 displayed verbal and physical aggression towards his roommate. Roommate was sent out due to facial injury. R2 presented with verbal aggression toward staff and medication non-compliance. R2 was sent to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation and admitted with dx of aggressive behavior. The facility issued an IVD/involuntary discharge. R2 should not return to facility due to his behaviors and requires elsewhere placement. R2's nurse's notes dated 1/3/2024 08:14 documents Behavior: R2 is verbally abusive towards the writer because he was asked not to dump water inside the garbage can in the hallway. R2 is very demanding, wants everything his way and if it is not done R2 gets mad and ready to curse the staff out. Sometimes R2 is cussing his roommate, demanding the roommate to shower, because he claimed that he did not see the roommate when he took his shower, even though roommate took shower on the scheduled day. If he does not want any resident as a roommate R2 may pour water in the bed or spray the room just to make the roommate to be uncomfortable. Non-Pharmacological Interventions: Educated and encouraged R2 that he needs to be calm and be nice to staff and to his roommate, Social Worker made aware. Pharmacological Interventions: Summary/Outcome remarks: R2 is unable to be redirected. R2's care plan dated 02/28/2024 documents in part that R2 is care planned for presence of abuse and neglect factors . care plan documents A peer alleged that R2 tossed a shoe across the room and it brazed peer's face. R2's care plan dated 04/18/2023 documents in part that R2 act(s) in self-defeating ways and engages in behavior to attempt to intimidate, antagonize, and provoke others. Behavioral symptoms include Acting territorial and not allowing peers in certain areas . He has behaviors of not getting along with roommates and will confabulate stories. R2's abuse assessment dated [DATE] written by V7 (Social Worker) does not document that R2 has a history or presence of behaviors such as aggression, disrespect, and/or abrasive/inappropriate behavior. R2's involuntary discharge form dated 02/28/2024 documents R2 was discharged from the facility due to the safety of individuals in the facility being endangered. On 03/26/24 at 1:52 PM V4 (Social Worker) states that he was on the 5th floor, walking down the hallway when V4 heard a commotion. V4 states that he opened the door which was slightly cracked opened and V4 saw R1 right in front of the door, bleeding from his face. V4 states that he observed R1 with his right shoe off. V4 stated that he saw R2 also inside the room next to R2's bed. V4 stated R1 and R2 were already separated. V4 stated it is a 4 bedroom, R1's bed is bed four, R2's bed is bed three. V4 states one of the other roommates was not in the room. V4 states that he does not remember if the 4th roommate was in the room. V4 states that there were no staff in the room. V4 states that he then yelled out for help. V4 states that when R1 and V4 were walking to the nurse's station, V4 asked R1 what happened and V4 states that R1 responded that he got hit with a shoe. V4 states that he observed the nurse cleaning R1's wound. V4 states that he called the administrator to report the allegation. V4 states that the administrator is the abuse coordinator. V4 states 911 was called. V4 states that he called the facility's security and V4 states that R2 was brought to the first floor for 1:1 with the security guard. V4 states that he did not witness the altercation between R1 and R2. On 03/26/24 at 2:11 PM surveyor inquired to V4 what would happen if a resident's abuse assessment were not accurate. V4 states that this would lead one to think that the resident has no behaviors present. V4 states that this can lead to an incident or a situation that could have been prevented. On 03/26/2024 at 2:41 PM V7 (Social Worker) states she made rounds on the floor and met with R1 to follow up on what had happened the night before. V7 states that R1 informed her that R2 came to R1 and told R1 that he smelled. V7 states that V7 asked R1 how he got the injury and V7 states that R1 informed her that R1 told R2 to go away, and that is when R2 tossed a shoe at R1. V7 states that R2 is usually verbally aggressive towards staff and V7 states that R2 always is feeling superior to others. V7 states that one thing R2 does is complains that R2's roommate's smell. V7 states that every time there is a new roommate, R2 complains about the roommate. V7 states that she has had to move two residents for R2 to make him peaceful. V7 states that R2 would say he liked clean people. V7 states she was made aware that R2 sprayed air freshener at his roommates. Facility document dated 07/14/2023, titled Abuse and Neglect documents in part, Policy statement: It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, corporal punishment, misappropriation of property, exploitation, neglect, or mistreatment . Prevention: Have procedures to: Identification, assessment, care planning for intervention, and monitoring of residents with needs and behaviors that might lead to conflicts or neglect. Facility Reported Incidents, date of occurrence 3/15/2024, documents in part: On 3/15/24 at around 8:45pm, R5 reported to V4(Social Worker) that R4 had struck R5 on the left ear. According to R4's face sheet, 3/26/24, R4 is a [AGE] year-old resident. R4's diagnoses include but are not limited to major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, violent behavior, and generalized anxiety disorder. According to R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/13/2024, Brief Interview for Mental Status score indicates R4 is cognitively intact. According to R4's care plan, R4 presents with a difficult or troubled past secondary to severe mental illness, chronic health conditions, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, spinal stenosis, seizures, and paraplegia. R4 presents with risk factors related to acting as a recipient or perpetrator of mistreatment and/or neglect, exploitation, psychiatric history, and present mental health symptoms. A peer alleged that R4 was physically aggressive towards the peer. R4 was placed on 1:1 monitoring until sent to the hospital for psych evaluation, 12/7/23. R4 has and has a history of problems with anxiety and severe mental illness and healthcare workers. R4 has been noted with several behaviors related to verbal aggression towards staff when redirected. R4 also has behaviors of videoing staff without their consent or permission, 12/13/23. R4 has a history of criminal behavior. Convictions: aggravated battery/Peace Officer, aggravated battery/nurse. R4 is on adult probation and is currently on parole, 12/10/23. According to R4's Social Services, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Trauma, and Identified Offender assessment, 3/12/2024, R4 presents at risk for being abused or for being an abuser. This is due to R4's behavioral history, substance abuse history, as well as R4's current diagnosis. According to Progress Note, 3/15/2024 22:58, R4 is verbally and physically aggressive towards staff members with an allegation of physical abuse towards one resident. R4 is using inappropriate language and threatening staff. Refused to be redirected. In need of immediate hospitalization to prevent harm to self and others. Placed on 1:1 supervision. Doctor informed with order to send R4 to the hospital on involuntary petition for psychiatric evaluation. Medical Professional Progress Note, 3/18/2024 11:46, documents in part: Notified by staff that resident (R4) was verbally aggressive and loud toward staff. There is an allegation of physical abuse toward a peer resident. R4 was sent to the hospital and admitted with diagnosis of aggression. Due to the safety needs of others, R4 would benefit from elsewhere placement. Behavior Note dated 3/8/2024 18:21, documents in part: Resident (R4) was very abusive towards staff and continue to videotape everyone on the floor, claims that R4 is an advocate to other residents even if the resident is on fluid restriction. They are entitled to give them anything they want. Behavior Note, 1/27/2024 00:31, documents in part: Resident (R4) noted verbally and physically aggressive towards staff. Refused to be redirected. R4 called police on staff. Resident stated, I am going to set the facility ablaze. R4's Notice of Involuntary Transfer or Discharge and Opportunity for Hearing for Nursing Home Residents, 3/18/2024, reads in part: the safety of individuals in this facility is endangered. According to R5's face sheet, 3/26/24, R5 is a [AGE] year-old resident. R5 diagnoses include but are not limited to obesity, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, asthma, cirrhosis of liver, localized swelling, mas and lump, lower limb, bilateral. According to R5's MDS, 3/6/2024, Brief Interview for Mental Status score, R5 is cognitively intact. According to R5's care plan, R5 presents with a host of medical problems and a psychiatric, substance abuse history. R5 is at risk for becoming a recipient or perpetrator of abuse and/or neglect. R5 alleged that a peer was physically aggressive towards R5, 9/9/22. According to R5's Social Services, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Trauma, and Identified Offender assessment, 3/7/2024, R5 is at risk for being abused or for being the abuser, this is due to R5's medical diagnosis as well as R5's behavioral history. Health Status Note, 3/15/2024 22:06, documents in part: Resident (R5) alleged that a peer struck R5 on the left ear. Both residents were immediately separated by staff. Full body assessment done, no injury. No changes in ROM/range of motion. No loss of consciousness. Denied pain. R5 stated, I am fine. Vital Signs stable. Police Department notified. On 3/26/24 at 1:54 PM, V4 (Social Worker) stated I was not on the 2nd floor when the incident happened. V8 called me and said we have a situation and asked for my help. When I arrived on the 2nd floor, security was talking to R4. I talked to R5. R5 alleged R4 was upset and hit R5. R5 said R4 hit R5 on the head like a punch. R5 said, I want R4 arrested, I already called police. I did not speak to R4 before R4 left the facility. I gave the involuntary petition to the ambulance. The ambulance transported R4 to the hospital. On 3/26/24 at 3:00 PM, V11 (Social Worker) stated I have been the social worker for the second floor for four years. I was not here when the incident happened. From what I heard there was an alleged altercation between R4 and R5. R4 was sent to the hospital. I was informed R4 will not be returning to the facility. R4 was involuntary discharged . I got reports of R4 being verbally aggressive towards staff, using gender and racial slurs. I did not get reports from residents of any issues with R4. R4 was sent out before for verbal aggression toward staff. R5 does not have behaviors. R5 is polite and gets along with residents and staff. R4 and R5 never really interacted, they were not in the same room. On 3/26/24 at 3:52 PM, R5 was observed in room sitting in a wheelchair with R5's mother visiting. R5 stated, on 3/15, R4 was screaming and cussing at the nurse (V12) regarding another resident being in pain. R4 was calling V12 every name in the book including b###h. V12 took medication into the resident's room and R4 followed V12. R5 went to the nursing station to get security, I said call 911. V10 (Registered Nurse) was at the nursing station. R5 called 911. Facility security came to the floor. R5 said R4 hit R5 two times on the left ear. R5 did not feel pain at the time. R5 noticed ringing in the left ear after everything had calmed down. R4 was recording everything. I saw the video on the internet. On 3/26/24 at 4:12 PM, V10 (Registered Nurse) stated V10 heard R5 screaming that R5 was attacked by R4. I was passing medications on the other side of the unit. I tried to put my body between R4 and R5 to protect R5 from R4. R4 is stronger than R5. R5 is in a wheelchair. R4 can walk. R5 was screaming R5 was already hurt three times by R4. R4 was saying it doesn't matter if R4 goes to jail because R4 already killed a man. R4 was filming with a cell phone. V10 stated V10 did not see R5 get hit. R4 was sent to the hospital. V10 stated R4 has a behavior problem. This was not the first time they had an altercation. On 3/26/24 at 5:00 PM, V8 (Nursing Supervisor) stated I did not witness anything. I was told R4 was verbally and physically aggressive toward V12 (Registered Nurse). I saw R4 with aggression, so I removed R4 and put R4 on 1:1 with security. I called the ambulance to send R4 out for aggressive behavior. The police came and I told them I got an order from the doctor to send R4 out for aggressive behavior. Later, R5 alleged R4 struck R5. On 3/26/24 at 8:15 PM, V12 (Registered Nurse) stated one of my patients shares a room with R4. I was going to assess my patient in the room. I wheeled the patient into the room. I was inside the room. R4 was verbally abusive following me and forcefully closed the door on me. R4 was outside of the room. I don't know why R4 was cussing at me and verbally abusive. R4 said R4 was recording this. I did not pay R4 no mind. I was not looking at R4, so I did not see R4 recording. After I finished with my patient I went and told V8 that R4 was verbally abusive and banged the door on me. Someone called the ambulance and R4 went to the hospital. I'm not sure why R4 went to the hospital it might be because R4 was verbally abusive to me. Both R4 and R5 were my patients that evening. On 3/27/24 at 9:20 AM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated I'm always working on the second floor. I heard the argument between both of them (R4 and R5). I was in a resident room with a total care resident. They were on the other side of the unit. I could hear loudness, arguing. I know their voices. I went to get security after coming out of the room. I told them R5 and R4 were getting loud and to come diffuse the situation. Security came up and I went about my business to finish my resident. On 3/27/24 at 3:15 PM V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Assistant Administrator) stated V1 is the abuse coordinator. In the event I'm not available V2 gets the calls. We just had abuse training in January. Any instance of abuse staff should report immediately to us. Then we report to the State Agency within two hours. V4 said there was an alleged physical abuse toward R5 from R4. R5 told V4 that R5 was hit in the ear. The nurse assessed R5. R5 refused to be sent to hospital. R4 and R5 were separated immediately. R4 was sent to the hospital for behavior. R5 called the police. Ambulance also came. R4 was IVD (Involuntary discharged ) due to behavior toward staff. In general, if a resident is verbally aggressive or abusive toward staff, it is possible for them to become aggressive to other residents. Facility policy Abuse and Neglect, 7/14/23, documents in part: It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, corporal punishment, misappropriation of property, exploitation, neglect, or mistreatment. Abuse is willful infliction of mistreatment, injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment. Abuse assumes intent to harm, but inadvertent or careless behavior done deliberately that results in harm may be considered abuse. Types of abuse: 1. physical, 2. verbal, 3. mental, 4. sexual, 5. neglect (including medical neglect), 6. theft/misappropriation of property/financial abuse, 7. Involuntary seclusion, 8. exploitation, 9. injury of unknown origin.
Nov 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and review of records, the facility failed to protect a resident's right (R15) to be free from...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and review of records, the facility failed to protect a resident's right (R15) to be free from physical abuse and failed to address continuing abusive behaviors of a resident (R4). These failures affected 2 residents (R4 and R15) out of 5 residents (R4, R9, R10, R11, and R15) reviewed for abuse. These failures resulted to R4 requiring hospitalization for psychiatric evaluation and R15 being transferred to local hospital after sustaining skin tear on left eyebrow. Findings include: R4 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE]. R4 has diagnoses of seizure, and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. R4's minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] shows R4 scored 15 indicating that R4's cognition is intact. On 10/31/2023 at 11:38 AM, R4 was seen sitting in his wheelchair talking to himself. R4 agreed to talk in his room and was able to answer questions within topic. R4 stated that he sometimes has disagreements with other residents but cannot remember who those other residents were. R4 was noticed to get easily agitated during conversation. R4 insisted R4 be wheeled down to the first floor. V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that R4 had verbal altercation with R15 about an ice cream. V5 said that R4 said to R15, I want your ice cream. R15 was seen alert, answered only with a few words and unable to elaborate what happened. At 12:23 PM, V3 (Social Service Director) stated that he was not familiar with R4 and was not aware of any incident that happened. On 11/1/2023 at 10:17 AM, V6 (Assistant Social Service Director) stated that it was V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant) who informed him about the incident between R4 and R15. V7 told him that R15 had a laceration on his left eye. When I spoke to R15 he pointed to R4, and said ice cream, ice cream. I (V6) right away informed V3 about the situation. R4 has history of multiple behavioral problems including physical and verbal aggression. V3 (Social Service Director): Notes dated 2/3/2023, documents that R4 was verbally and physically aggressive towards staff with delusional and paranoid behavior. Notes dated 5/2/2023, documents that R4 was verbally and physically aggressive hitting staff. Notes dated 6/14/2023, by V15 (Psychiatry/Nurse Practitioner) documents that R4 present history was outburst. R4 has loud, and aggressive thought process, delusional, anxious, and blunted. Notes dated 3/28/2023, by V15 (Psychiatrist/Nurse Practitioner) documents that R15 Spanish speaking and poor historian. On 11/3/2023 at 12:21 PM. V15 (Psychiatry/Nurse Practitioner) stated, I really think that R4 is cognitively impaired and does not know right from wrong. Present history means that during that time nurses reported that he has an outburst. R15 Spanish speaking and poor historian mean that R15 having long mental illness may affect his ability to perform during conversation. I cannot tell you if R4 and R15 are a good fit on being roommates. I don't think anyone is a good fit for R4. Then on 6/29/2023, notes of V6 (Assistant Social Services Director) documents that R4 and R15 had altercation that led to R4 being transferred to hospital for psych evaluation. R15 went to ER (emergency room) for evaluation of injury (notes of V8 / Licensed Practical Nurse dated 6/29/2023). During the duration of review, R4 and R15 are on the same floor. R4 has access to R15 by using his wheelchair as a means of locomotion. R15 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE]. R15 has diagnoses of dementia, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. R15's BIMS (brief interview for mental status) dated 5/10/2023 noted by V6 (Assistant Social Service Director) document that R15 score was 7 with significant cognitive impairment. On 11/2/2023 at 9:48 AM, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated during lunch time while doing rounds, V7 went inside room where R4 and R15 were. V7 stated that she observed R15 had a wound that was moderately bleeding on his eyebrow. V7 stated that when she asked R15 what happened? R15 pointed to R4 and said, Ice cream! Ice cream! R15 cannot talk to you during conversation. R4 likes food too much and is very loud. At 10:54 AM, with V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Assistant Administrator), V1 stated that there was no particular reason why R4 and R15 were placed in the same room. V2 stated that it could have happened to anyone. V1 and V2 were asked given that R15 cannot verbalize very well and R4 has history of physical and verbal aggression was there any precautions initiated? V2 stated that it could happen to anyone. V2 said, It could happen to you and me. At 1:10 PM, V6 stated that R15 cannot tell you or make his need known. V6 said that he needs to talk in Spanish just to make R15 understand better and R4 does not speak Spanish and would have a hard time communicating with R15. When asked what interventions facility did to address verbal and physical aggressive behavior, V6 said, Care plan should address recent behavioral problems like physical and verbal aggression. At 11/2/2023 at 2:45 PM. Police report was requested, V2 stated that the incident on 6/29/2023 was not reported because not all physical abuse incidents are reported to law enforcement agency. Per notes dated 6/29/2023 by V6, documents that R15 has skin tear above his left eye. Hospital records provided by V2 regarding R15's CT (Computed Tomography) scan results indicate that R15 sustained left maxillary subcutaneous soft tissue edema or swelling on or near the left eye. Abuse policy dated 7/14/2023, reads: It is the policy of the facility to provide profession care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse. The facility must identify, correct, and intervene in situation in which abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or misappropriation of resident property, is more likely to occur.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to report and initiate an investigation of an injury of unknown source in the time frame required resulting in the delay of the investigat...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to report and initiate an investigation of an injury of unknown source in the time frame required resulting in the delay of the investigation. This failure affected 1 resident (R3) out of 15 residents reviewed. Findings include: On 11/01/2023 at 1:15 pm V2 (Assistant Administrator -AADM) states R3 was sent to the hospital due to lethargy; it was the nurses and the CNAs and the supervisor who found out that she was lethargic, and R3 was sent to the hospital in the same day. On 11/01/23 at 1:17 pm V1 (Administrator) states when we were reviewing the hospital paperwork, we saw the diagnosis. The liaison updated us on the 9/8/23 about the hospital diagnosis based on the CT scan results. Based on this information received, we initiated the investigation. On 11/01/23 at 1:19 pm V2 (AADM) says Once we learned about the diagnosis on 9/8/23, we started interviewing staff to see if there was a fall. R3 was on 1:1 supervision after she came back from the hospital in April due to the fall incident. Staff said there was no fall between April and September. The staff who did the 1:1 is always the same people and we interviewed all of them. We have the radiologist summary from the hospital with the findings. When R3 was in the hospital in April due to the fall, they sent her back right way and we were monitoring her, but they had the CT negative. Our believe is the hematoma was related to the fall that happened in April, subdural takes some time to develop. R3's doctor said with the aging, this can happen. R3's doctor could not make an explanation other the aging condition. Prior the fall, R3's dementia was getting bad. Progress notes dated 9/2 23 reads: Note Text: Followed up with (local hospital) regarding resident status spoke to ER-Nurse/C . with response resident is admitted diagnosis-Sepsis and Subdural Hematoma. Belongings kept in resident closet, medication kept in med room for pharmacy return, kitchen aware of resident's transfer. This note was signed by V12 (Registered Nurse -RN). On 11/2/23 at 8:51 am V12 (Registered Nurse/RN) states I don't know if subdural hematoma is reportable. That's why I didn't do anything. I have to inform the administrator regarding the incident, if its reportable. Surveyor asked if V12 knows what to report to the administrator in which he answered, If there is abuse, I have to report to the administrator, nothing else. Asked about an injury of unknown origin, he says, It depends on the nature of injury. If the resident has wounds, cuts, fractures, change of condition, we report it. Then says I just wanted to confirm R3's diagnosis and they (hospital) told me it was subdural hematoma. I did not mention to anybody. I didn't think it was an issue. That's what happened. Now that I understand what subdural hematoma is, yes, it needs to be reported to the administrator. Facility Reported Investigation (FRI) initial and final reviewed and documents facility initiated the investigation on 8/23, 6 days after facility had been informed of R3's diagnosis by the ER nurse to V12 (RN). On 11/02/23 at 11:39 am V1 and V2 presented to surveyor a sheet dated 9/9/23 of education on abuse policy and has V12's name and a signature. V2 says V12 was educated on injury of unknow origin. V2 states I agree 100% it was not reported on the time frame because they didn't understand that subdural hematoma is an injury. They thought it was reportable only if something is physically visible, such as bruises, cuts, fractures. Facility's abuse policy and procedure reads: Type of abuse: 9- Injury of unknown Origin. Unobserved/Unexplained injury requiring transfer to a hospital for examination. 7 steps in abuse prevention: VII - reporting/response All allegations and/or suspicions of abuse must be reported to the Administrator immediately. If the Administrator is not present, the report must be made to the Administrator's designee. All allegations of abuse will be reported to the state agency immediately not exceeding 2 hours after the initial allegation is received. A final investigation report will be submitted to the state agency within 5 working days.
Aug 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and review of records, the facility failed to follow policy in discarding expired medications ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and review of records, the facility failed to follow policy in discarding expired medications for 1 out of 3 residents (R4) for a total of 4 residents reviewed for insulin medication. This failure has the potential to affect 1 resident (R4) in receiving quality insulin. Findings include: R4 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE]. R4 has medical diagnosis that include diabetes mellitus. R4's medication list includes injectable insulins and oral medication for diabetes. R4 currently has an order to check blood sugar four times every day. At the nurse's station on 8/22/2023 at 10:49 AM with V6 (Registered Nurse) medication cart was reviewed. R4's insulin (Lantus) vial was seen, and it was written as follows: Date Opened 7/23/2023 and Date Expired 8/19/2023. V6 said, Yes, that was expired. It should have been taken out of the medication cart and discarded. Expired insulin is not as effective as insulin that is not expired. The right thing to do is to take it out of the cart right away and discard it. Because if not, it can be used for the resident. At 11:39 AM, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) said, If insulin is not open it should be placed inside the refrigerator. And if it is opened it should be dated. Policy is to remove the old one or the expired one and replace it with new one. Medication cart must not have insulin beyond the 28 days or when expired. It will affect the potency of insulin. R4's Medication Administration Record for both July and August documents that there are multiple dates R4 did not have recorded blood sugar levels and R4's blood sugar results were mostly high up to 400. Per Medication Pass policy dated 7/28/2023 as reviewed, reads: All opened medication vials in the refrigerator should be labeled with the date when it was opened and discarded within 28 days of opening except for Levemir insulin which can be discarded 42 days after opening and Xalatan eye drops which can be discarded 6 weeks after opening. Insulin vials are to be discarded within 28 days after opening, except for Levemir insulin which are to be discarded 42 days after opening. Per insulin drug chart Lantus U-100 vial has 28 days window after opening.
Aug 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 1 resident (R1) out of 4 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R1'...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 1 resident (R1) out of 4 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R1's diagnosis includes, but are not limited to, parkinson's disease, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, hypotension, unspecified, fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, history of falling, dysphagia, oral phase, urinary tract infection, site not specified, vitamin d deficiency, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, generalized anxiety disorder, regular astigmatism, left eye, hypermetropia, bilateral, presbyopia, age-related nuclear cataract, bilateral, other hyperlipidemia, paranoid schizophrenia, other constipation, essential (primary) hypertension. R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 7/20/2023 which documents that R1 has a BIMS score of 10, indicating R1 has some moderate cognitive impairments. On 8/15/2023 at 2:38pm observed R1 lying in the bed, bed was in the lowest position. R1 had socks with nonskid soles on both feet. R1's call light pull string was located on the nightstand to the left side of R1's bed. Upon interview R1 stated I do not know where my call light cord is. On 8/15/2023 at 2:42pm V3(LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated the call light cord is located on top of the nightstand. V3 stated the call light cord is supposed to be attached to R1's sheets in case R1 needs help R1 can just pull the call light cord. V3 stated R1 is able to use the call light cord. On 8/15/2023 at 2:42pm the surveyor observed V3(LPN) pick the call light cord off the top of the nightstand and clip the call light cord to R1's bedsheet. On 8/16/2023 at 2:26pm V8 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated I attach the resident's call light cord to the resident's gown, so that the resident will be able to pull the call light. On 8/16/2023 at 2:39pm V9(CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the call light cord is placed on the resident's gown or the resident's sheets. V9 stated the purpose for the call light is to let staff know what is going on with the resident and to prevent the resident from falling to the floor. On 8/16/2023 at 4:40pm V11(ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) stated the call light cord is to be located at the resident's side, clipped to the resident's blanket or the side of the resident's pillow. V11 stated this is done so when the resident moves it will activate the call light and that will let staff know the resident requires assistance. On 8/16/2023 reviewed R1's care plan dated 8/6/2023, which documents, in part, Focus: Falls. I am at high risk for falls related to recent fall and poor endurance secondary to dx(diagnosis). Goal: I will be free of further falls through next review date. Intervention: Please make sure that my call light is within my reach and encourage me to use it to ask for assistance as needed. The facility's October 26, 2016, policy titled Call Light Policy documents, in part, 5. Be sure call lights are placed within reach of residents who are able to use it at all times.
Jun 2023 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two medication carts were free of expired medications. This failure has the potential to effect 25 residents receiving ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two medication carts were free of expired medications. This failure has the potential to effect 25 residents receiving medications from the medication cart on the 1st floor and R22 receiving insulin from the medication cart on the 3rd floor. Findings include: On 5/30/23 at 10:15 AM, surveyor observed 1st floor medication cart with V12 (Registered Nurse). Surveyor notes Melatonin 1MG tablets with best by date of 4/23. On 5/31/23 at 9:45 AM, surveyor observed 3rd floor medication cart, 2nd side, with V19 (Registered Nurse). Surveyor notes Humalog Mix 50/50 KwikPen/Insulin Lispro Protamine and Insulin Lispro 3ML, opened date 5/30/23, Manufacturer Expiration date of 4/8/2023. Surveyor notes labeling documents in part that the medication was prescribed to R22. R22 has diagnosis that include but are not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. On 5/30/23 at 10:25 AM, V12 (Registered Nurse) stated there should not be expired medications in the medication cart. V12 state the medication is not good after the expiration date. V12 stated the medication could lose potency and will be useless to the resident. V12 stated the medication could be a potential hazard. On 5/31/23 at 10:00 AM, V19 (Registered Nurse) stated there should not be expired medication in the medication cart. I'm at a loss for words. On 6/01/23 at 11:14 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated there should be no expired medications in the medication carts. V3 stated we don't give meds that are expired because you don't know the side effects. V3 stated the medication may not be effective. Facility policy Medication Storage, Labeling, and Disposal, revised 10/24/22, documents in part: House stocks designed for multiple administration will be labeled with the name of the medication, the strength, instruction, and expiration. The information from the manufacturer is enough to meet this requirement. The facility does not date this medication when opened. And the medication automatically expires based on the expiration date based on the manufacture's guidelines.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable, attractive, and appetizing for four (R164, R145, R57, R155) residents reviewed for food q...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable, attractive, and appetizing for four (R164, R145, R57, R155) residents reviewed for food quality in a sample of 35. Findings include: On 05/30/23 at 11:30 AM, V22 (Ombudsman) stated that the main issues she usually faces at this facility is the food. V22 stated the food quality is poor at this facility. On 05/30/23 01:10 PM, R145 was observed in her room with her lunch tray on the side table, with the food uneaten. Surveyor notes honey glazed ham, seasoned roasted cabbage, braised red cabbage, dinner roll, lemon pudding, hot tea/coffee, and margarine. R145 stated the food at the facility did not taste good and even if she requested a meal alternative, it was very rare to get it. R145 stated she relies on family members to bring her food from home for her to get the nutrition she needs. R145 stated she is losing weight because the food does not taste good and sometimes, they get served very little potions. R145 stated family brought her fruits, cereals and other refreshments that were observed in R145's room. On 05/30/23 12:59 PM, R57 was observed in his room eating lunch: honey glazed ham, seasoned roasted cabbage, braised red cabbage, dinner roll, lemon pudding, hot tea/coffee and margarine. R57 was observed getting up from the chair with two slices of ham on his folk and went towards his bathroom. Surveyor asked R57 what he was doing R57 stated I am going to wash this ham because it tastes terrible, and it has a lot of honey on it, and I cannot eat all this sugar. I am diabetic and this is too much sugar for me. If I eat all this sugar, my blood sugars will go up. R57 stated that he gets a lot of sugary foods and if he asks for alternatives, he is told there is none. R57 stated look at this desert of lemon pudding. I cannot eat this. My blood sugars would be so high. I am losing weight because of the foods they serve here which don't taste good and are full of sugar. R57 stated even the evening snack is cookies full of sugar and there is no alternative. V57 was observed giving his roommate his lemon pudding and stated it was too sugary for him to eat. R57 stated he is served a regular diet, yet they know he is diabetic. R57 stated the only thing that helps him is the nutritional supplement that he gets twice a day, during breakfast and dinner. 05/30/23 1:26 PM, R155 stated he did not eat his lunch: honey glazed ham, seasoned roasted cabbage, braised red cabbage, dinner roll, lemon pudding, hot tea, and margarine because he did not like it. R155 stated even if he asked for something different, he would not get it, therefore, his family brings him food. 05/31/23 12:18 PM, R164 stated the food tasted horrible and there is no flavor, and they barely follow the menu provided. On 06/01/2023 at 12:20 PM, V15 (Dietitian) stated that the food menus are decided at the cooperate office. V15 stated the cooperate dietitian plans the food menus, and she does not know the nutritional value of the foods, but the nutritional value of the food is per cooperate dietitian, and V15 does not have control over it. Resident food Committee minutes dated 1/18/2023 documents: Some residents express that when they call down to dietary, no one picks up the phone. Some concerns about residents' meal tickets not being followed. Juice is watered down. No representative from dietary. Resident food Committee minutes dated 11/30/2022 documents: Vegetables are over cooked. Resident received a plate of noodles with nothing else. No representative from dietary at the meetings. Presentation of meals are poor and messy. Resident food Committee minutes dated 12/28/2022 documents: Concern-Why would a resident only get noodles on the tray? Weak coffee/watered down. Cold food. Concern-No flavor in the fruit punch.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to follow multiple policies related to the following: Failed to maintain ice free from outside leaks coming from sanitary s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to follow multiple policies related to the following: Failed to maintain ice free from outside leaks coming from sanitary source or exposed to unsanitary surface. Failed to prepare food free of contact to object that sanitation was not maintained. Failed to store fruits inside walk in cooler fruits that are without molds and discolorations to prevent possible serving to residents. Failed to label food in dry storage that are opened. Failed to follow FIFO (first-in first-out) policy on canned fruits in dry storage room These failures have the potential to affect 229 residents who is taking food by mouth in receiving quality dietary services. Findings include: On 05/30/2023 at 10:09 AM. Surveyor observed V4 (Food Service Director) inside walk in cooler, a few inches under the condenser were a bag of fries, bags of cauliflower, peas and carrots not dated. V4 stated that food items when taken out of the box should be dated. Surveyor notes at the Dry Storage room ice machine on top of the ice compartment dripping water passing through the lid cover. Surveyor notes once lid is open sliding upward motion, water from the machine on top dripped and entered the ice storage where all the ice was located. V4 stated, Yes, this ice is being used by all residents. It should not be doing that. I will inform maintenance. On the shelves multiple large cans of apple slices, mandarins, and slice pears with recent dates where in front and later dates where at the back. V4 stated, It should be at the back (referring to those cans dated recently). Surveyor notes light brownish color powder was seen on a separate shelve. V4 stated, That is gravy and does not have a date. V4 stated the gravy is supposed to be dated to determine when it is still good to use. Surveyor notes inside walk in cooler lemon inside a container has sticker that reads received on 05/20/2023 and used by 05/30/2023. V4 stated that kitchen staff does not follow those dates. Surveyor observed five transparent containers with strawberries inside, all containers were seen with strawberries that are discolored and with mold (whitish grey). V4 stated, Yes, I can see the mold, I will discard these right away. Inside a large transparent container full of pears were discolored. V4 stated, Those are still good to use. Surveyor notes when the lid was opened discoloration was more visible. V4 stated, Once you opened it. I think those are not good to use. I will discard them. On 05/30/2023 at approximately 12:30 PM, meal carts and a beverage cart with pitchers of juice, cups, and lids observed arriving on the 4th floor of the facility. On 05/30/2023 at 12:42 PM, V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) observed on the 4th floor of the facility passing meal trays and beverages. V10 observed placing disposable foam cups and disposable plastic cup lids upside down onto the top of the meal cart. Placement of the cups and lids exposed the surface of the cup's drinking rim and the inside of the cup lids directly to the surface of the top of the meal cart. V10 observed pouring juice from the pitcher into the cups, placing the lids on the cups, and serving it to the residents. Surveyor notes the top of the meal cart observed with white residue on the surface. V10 stated Yes, this is my normal routine when I pass the trays. I don't know what the white residue is on top of the meal cart, I can't see up there. V10 and surveyor then ran a finger across the top of the meal cart and dust was observed on surveyor's finger. V10 stated I'll just throw these cups and lids away and get new ones. On 05/31/2023 at 9:14 AM. V5 (Food Service Director) stated that V4 was covering for her and is also Food Service Director for another facility. V6 (Regional Director for Dietary) stated, Fruits are stored and used until it is spoiled. V6 stated they need to be monitored on a daily basis to make sure it is still good for consumption. V6 was asked why they place a sticker that contains dates when it was received and used by date. V6 stated, I cannot answer that, why put a sticker with dates when it is not being used. Right? Surveyor notes inside dry storage room ice maker still dripping and when opened it dripped again inside compartment full of ice. V6 stated, I will put sign not to use ice maker and I already notified V21 (Maintenance Director). They should have done this yesterday. On 05/31/2023 at 11:21 AM. V21 (Maintenance Director) stated, I was not informed about the problem of ice maker yesterday. V21 stated I checked it, and the gasket was loose. Yes, water dripping from the machine into the ice is still clean. V21 was asked even if the water came out of ice machine engine, then touches on the lid cover which is high touched area is still clean? V21 stated, I get it, it is not clean the cover is not clean. At 11:49 AM during tray line preparation, water came down from the ventilation system about 6 to 8 feet near the food preparation area. V6 was informed and took container to catch the drip. V6 stated, I will make sure that staff will be safe and not slip on the wet area. V21 stated, That came from the air conditioning system, and I will check on it. V23 (Dietary Aide) was seen transferring garlic bread on a flat baking pan taken out of the oven using mittens to guide multiple garlic breads. V23 was asked why mitten was used to touched high touch area including handlebar of the oven. V23 stated, I could have used a utensil, but I was thinking to deliver the garlic bread faster. V6 stated, I think there is a better way of transferring garlic bread. Ice policy dated 10/2019, in part reads: It is the center policy that ice is prepared and distributed in a safe and sanitary manner. The Dining Services Director and / or Maintenance Director will ensure that all ice machines are plumbed from a potable water source and that air gaps drains are properly and appropriately maintained. Food Preparation policy dated 10/2019, in part reads: It is the center policy that all foods are prepared in accordance with the guidelines of the FDA Food Code. The Dining Services Director of Cook(s) are responsible for food preparation procedures that avoid contamination by potentially harmful physical, biological, and chemical contamination. The Dining Services Director or Cook(s) is responsible to ensure that all utensils, food contact equipment, and food contact surfaces are cleaned and sanitized after every use. All staff will use serving utensils appropriately to prevent cross contamination. Under FDA Food Code of 2022 in part reads: 3-304 Preventing Contamination from Equipment, Utensils, and Linens. 3-304.11 Food Contact with Equipment and Utensils. FOOD shall only contact surfaces of: (A) EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS that are cleaned as specified under Part 4-6 of this Code and SANITIZED as specified under Part 4-7 of this Code. Food Storage: Cold policy dated 10/2019, in part reads: It is the center policy to insure all Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS), frozen and refrigerated food items, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food Code. Under Food Storage Chart Whole Fresh Fruits and Vegetable will be stored in refrigerator with 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below until spoiled. Receiving of food policy dated 10/2019, in part reads: It is the center of policy that safe food handling procedures for time and temperature control will be practiced in the transportation, delivery, and subsequent storage of all food items. All food items will be appropriately labeled and dated either through manufacturer packaging or staff notation. All food items will be stored in a manner that insures appropriate and timely utilization based on the principle of first in - first out (FIFO). Facility policy titled Kitchen, dated 07/28/2022, documents in part, c. Food tray, dinnerware, and utensils clean and in good condition. d. During transport, food is covered and protected from contamination.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to remove garbage in a safe and efficient manner per policy to prevent garbage from overflowing with lids to contain garbag...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to remove garbage in a safe and efficient manner per policy to prevent garbage from overflowing with lids to contain garbage in order to not be exposed near food. These failures have the potential to affect 229 residents who is taking food by mouth in receiving quality dietary services. Findings include: On 05/30/2023 at 10:09 AM. Surveyor observed V4 (Food Service Director) at the stove area that food where being cooked and prepared garbage bin was full of garbage that lid cannot be closed. V4 stated I will notify the staff to empty the trash. V4 was asked for the schedule when to dispose garbage near food? V4 stated, The garbage needs to be discarded. On 05/31/2023 at 9:14 AM. V6 (Regional Director for Dietary) stated, There is a schedule for when garbage is to be discarded. V6 stated sometime when dietary staff are still doing food preparation they wait to be done and dispose garbage. V6 was asked if it is proper procedure to wait until garbage overflows to discard? V6 did not reply. On 06/01/2023 at 9:40 AM. V5 (Food Service Director) was seen inside her office. Near V5's office is a sink with garbage container that needs to be stepped on in order for the lid to open. Lid was unable to be closed due to overflow of garbage. V5 stated, Yes, garbage should be empty as scheduled and when needed. V5 then asked dietary staff present to empty the garbage. Dispose of Garbage and Refuse policy dated 10/2019, in part reads: It is the center policy all garbage and refuse will collected and disposed in a safe efficient manner. Garbage and refuse removed from the kitchen area routinely during the day and at the end of the workday.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to place signs per policy for two residents (R168 and R176) who are in contact precautions for diagnosis of infectious dise...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to place signs per policy for two residents (R168 and R176) who are in contact precautions for diagnosis of infectious disease. These failures have the potential to spread infection for all persons entering the room without taking proper precautions. This failure has the potential to affect all 234 residents. Findings include: On 05/30/2023 at 11:47 AM V12 (Registered Nurse) informed writer that there are two residents that are on contact isolation or on contact precautions. V12 stated, You need to use full PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) when entering rooms of R168 and R176. R168 has KPC (Klebsiella Pneumoniae) infection in his rectum and R176 has C. Diff (Clostridioides difficile) infection. At 12:20 PM, in the hallway at R168's room there was no posting or information that R168 was on contact isolation/precaution. Surveyor notes signage Enhanced Barrier Precautions that instruct Providers and Staff to use PPE. V12 was asked why the signage does not include other persons besides Providers and Staff. V12 reiterated that full PPE must be used by all persons entering the room. V12 stated, I don't know why there is no poster for contact isolation. After V12 left, V14 (Nurse Practitioner) approached writer and was asking why surveyors are at present. V14 was asked whether R168 is on contact precautions. V14 stated, Wait I will check it. Using her laptop, V14 then stated, Yes, R168 is on contact isolation. V14 was asked why there is no sign for contact isolation to direct all persons entering the room to take proper precaution. V14 stated, I am not sure, there should be. I am not sure if there is. At 12:33 PM V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was seen exiting R176's room. R176's door and wall does not have contact isolation/precaution sign or posting. Surveyor notes signage what it Enhanced Barrier Precaution same as posting on R168's room. V13 stated, I used a gown when I enter the room pointing at Enhanced Barrier Precautions Poster. V13 was asked if I need to use gown and gloves when entering R176's room? V13 stated, It includes providers and staff, does not include you. But between you and me, it is safer to use gown and gloves. On 05/31/2023 at 09:40 AM. R168 and R176 entrance area still does not have any signs that will inform persons entering the room to take contact precautions. On 06/01/2023 at 12:38 PM V11 (Infection Preventionist) stated, Yes, I agree there are two residents on the 1st floor that are on contact isolation. V11stated there must be a sign or posting outside of their rooms for contact isolation. V11 stated Yes, in order to prevent the spread of infection. V11 was informed that since Tuesday 05/30/2023 no sign for contact isolation was posted outside R168 and R176 rooms. Instead, Enhanced Barrier Precaution was posted that instruct Staff and Providers to use PPE and not other persons that may enter the room such as visitors, outside vendors and alike. V11 insisted that what was posted was Contact Isolation not Enhanced Barrier Precaution. V11 stated, If you want let us go now and check the rooms of R168 and R176. V11 got up exited the room going to R168's room which is first to pass by before going to R176's room. Upon turning left on the hallway, R168's room was seen to have Enhanced Barrier Precaution poster that caught V11's attention. Then V11 got upset and emotional, stating in a loud voice, No! No! No! this could not happen to me. I could have sworn that it was contact isolation posted. V11 began sobbing, and when writer spoke to. V11 began approaching staff still with a loud voice and asked staff to verify that it was contact isolation that was posted. V11 went to the assistant administrator's office and retrieved a Contact Isolation/Precaution poster and stated, You have to understand, I have this poster it may have dropped on the floor. V11 stated that she will provide the policy but still very emotional about the poster. Writer left the room to let V11 and inform V2 (Assistant Administrator) about what happened. A request for documents was made to V2. V2 stated, I apologize for what happened, and thank you for understanding. V2 presented documentation that includes as follows: R168 physician order dated 01/11/2023 for contact isolation due to KPC (Klebsiella Pneumoniae) infection on his rectum. Per National Library of Medicine published on May 14, 2020, in part reads: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae represent an increasing global threat worldwide and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP) has become one of the most important contemporary pathogens, especially in endemic areas. Strict infection control measures remain necessary. R176 physician order dated 05/27/2023 for contact isolation C. Diff infection. Per HHS (Health and Human Services) Public Access dated 01/01/2020, in part reads: Clostridium difficile is the leading infectious cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis. Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) places a heavy burden on the health care system, with nearly half a million infections yearly and an approximate 20% recurrence risk after successful initial therapy. The high incidence has driven new research on improved prevention such as the emerging use of probiotics, intestinal microbiome manipulation during antibiotic therapies, vaccinations, and newer antibiotics that reduce the disruption of the intestinal microbiome. While the treatment of acute C. difficile is effective in most patients, it can be further optimized by adjuvant therapies that improve the initial treatment success and decrease the risk of subsequent recurrence. Lastly, the high risk of recurrence has led to multiple emerging therapies that target toxin activity, recovery of the intestinal microbial community, and elimination of latent C. difficile in the intestine. In summary, CDIs illustrate the complex interaction among host physiology, microbial community, and pathogen that requires specific therapies to address each of the factors leading to primary infection and recurrence. Enhanced Barrier Precautions that instruct only Providers and Staff must wear gloves and gown for high-contact resident care activities. Like dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, changing linens etc. Infection Prevention and Control policy dated 03/10/2023 as revised, in part reads: The facility has established a policy to identify, record, investigate, control, test, and prevent infection in the facility. A sign will be provided outside the room for resident on transmission-based precaution indicating the type of the precaution (Contact or Droplet). Contact Precaution is intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents spread by direct or indirect contact with patient or the environment. Use of gown and gloves is necessary for all interactions. Based on documentation Enhanced Barrier Precaution requires only Providers and Staff to wear gloves and gown when performing high-contact resident care activity. Contact Precaution requires all persons to wear gown and gloves by direct or indirect contact with resident or environment for all interactions.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to address maintenance issues with the ice machine that was exposed to leakage from an unclean source. These failures have ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to address maintenance issues with the ice machine that was exposed to leakage from an unclean source. These failures have the potential to affect 229 residents who is taking receiving ice use for daily consumption. Findings include: On 05/30/2023 at 10:09 AM. Surveyor observed V4 (Food Service Director) at Dry Storage room ice machine on top of the ice compartment dripping water was passing through the lid cover. Once lid open in a sliding upward motion, water from the machine on top dripped and entered ice storage where all the ice was located. V4 stated, Yes, this ice is being used by all residents. It should not be doing that. I will inform maintenance. On 05/31/2023 at 9:14 AM. Surveyor observed V6 (Regional Director for Dietary) inside the dry storage room where the ice maker is still dripping, when opened it dripped again inside the compartment full of ice. V6 stated, I will put a sign not to use ice maker. V6 stated I already notified V21 (Maintenance Director). They should have done this yesterday. V6 presented policy for cleaning and record of cleaning the ice machine/maker. V6 was asked for records of maintaining ice machine/maker not cleaning. V6 did not reply. On 05/31/2023 at 11:21 AM. V21 (Maintenance Director) was asked about why the leakage was not address as soon as possible since residents were using ice from the ice maker? V21 stated, I was not informed about the problem of ice maker yesterday. Now I checked it, and the gasket was loose. Yes, water dripping from the machine into the ice is still clean. V21 was asked even if the water came out of ice machine engine, then touches the lid cover which is high touched area is still clean? V21 stated, I get it, it is not clean the cover is not clean. At 11:49 AM during tray line preparation, water came down from the ventilation system about 6 to 8 feet near the food preparation area. V6 was informed and took container to catch the drip. V6 stated, I will make sure that staff will be safe and not slip on the wet area. V21 stated, That came from air conditioning system, and I will check on it. Ice policy dated 10/2019, in part reads: It is the center policy that ice is prepared and distributed in a safe and sanitary manner. The Dining Services Director and/or Maintenance Director will ensure that all ice machines are plumbed from a potable water source and that air gaps drains are properly and appropriately maintained.
Apr 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of rodents on 3 of 5 floors of resident living areas. Findings include: On 3/29/23 the facility was toured and observed for evidence of pests with V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Assistant Administrator). The following areas were observed with mouse droppings: room [ROOM NUMBER]aa on floor next to bed at window. room [ROOM NUMBER]bb on floor in toilet room. room [ROOM NUMBER]aa on floor next to bed in outside wall corner. 3rd floor storage room across room [ROOM NUMBER]aa on floor. room [ROOM NUMBER]bb on floor under bedside cabinet of outside wall. 3rd floor janitors closet next to room [ROOM NUMBER]bb on floor. 3cc on floor in corner of room. 4th floor Storage room next to room [ROOM NUMBER]aa. 4th floor storage room across room [ROOM NUMBER]bb mouse droppings on floor. On 3/29/23 at 2PM R5 stated I see mice in my room all the time. Once you move, they take off. I see them at night. On 3/29/23 at 1:10PM R6 stated I see mice. On 3/29/23 at 1:15PM R7 stated I see mice at night. That's when they come out. On 3/29/23 at 1:20PM R8 stated I saw a mouse about a week ago. I tried to kill him, but he got away. I reported it to the staff. Review of pest control report dated 3/24/23 shows documentation of the technician to please fix damaged door sweep to prevent rodents from coming inside building at basement south exit door. On 4/3/23 10:09AM the basement south exit door was observed with an approximate three-quarter inch opening along the bottom of the steel door. V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Assistant Administrator) were present during this observation. Facility policy titled Pest Control states including, it is the policy to ensure that there is an effective pest control process in the building.
Feb 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for 4 of 4 (R1, R2,...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for 4 of 4 (R1, R2, R3, R5) residents reviewed for dining services. This failure has the potential to affect 250 residents. Findings include: The (1/29/23) census includes 250 residents. On 1/23/23 and 1/27/23, IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) received allegations regarding meals served at the facility. On 1/30/23, the Monday Lunch menu was observed posted in the (3rd floor) hallway which includes roast beef, beef gravy, buttered egg noodles, baked chicken breast, chicken gravy, mashed potatoes, dinner roll, Italian parmesan vegetable medley, broccoli florets, lemon bar, and apricot halves. The Monday [DATE] (2023) menu affirms the primary meal includes roast beef, beef gravy, mashed potatoes, Italian parmesan vegetable medley, dinner roll and lemon bar. The secondary meal includes baked chicken breast, chicken gravy, buttered egg noodles and broccoli florets [apricot halves were excluded]. R5's (12/9/22) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 15 (cognitively intact). R5's (1/23/23) POS (Physician Order Sheets) include CCHONAS (Consistent, Constant, or Controlled Carbohydrate, No Added Salt) diet. On 1/30/23 at 12:35pm, surveyor inquired about concerns with the facility food R5 stated It's a pretty good place here put that down in the record. I give this place a 5-star rating or a 10-star rating however R5 received 2 hot dogs, a dinner roll, cheese sandwich, and tropical fruit at this time [roast beef or baked chicken were excluded]. R2's (12/20/22) BIMS determined a score of 7 (severely impaired). R2's (12/15/22) POS (Physician Order Sheets) includes CCHO (Consistent, Constant or Controlled Carbohydrate) diet, Regular texture, thin liquids consistency. On 1/30/23 at 12:45pm, R2 voiced no concerns regarding facility food however R2 received polish sausage, cabbage, potato, dinner roll and tropical fruit at this time [roast beef or baked chicken were excluded]. R1's (11/21/22) BIMS determined a score of 15 (cognitively intact). R1's (11/15/22) POS includes general diet. On (1/30/23) at 12:55pm, surveyor inquired about concerns with the facility food R1 stated the menu is not always followed. I've reported concerns to staff, the administrator, and ombudsman they improve for a week and go back to the usual. Surveyor inspected R1's (1/30/23) Monday lunch dietary card which stated, We apologize for the inconvenience, today's menu will be substituted with polish sausage, potatoes, cabbage and tropical fruit. R1 received polish sausage, cabbage, potato, dinner roll, tropical fruit and ham sandwich [roast beef or chicken were excluded]. R3's (12/12/22) BIMS determined a score of 10 (moderate impairment). R3's (8/4/20) POS includes general diet. On 1/30/23 at 1:10pm, surveyor inquired about concerns with the facility food R3 responded To be honest with you, I don't look at the piece of paper on the tray. I just eat what I can. Today I got sausage, a ham sandwich, potato, mixed fruit, and a little bread. [roast beef or chicken were excluded]. On 2/1/23 at 2:59, surveyor inquired if all the residents receive meals from the kitchen. V13 (Assistant Dietary Manager) stated, We don't have any g (Gastrostomy) tube feedings, everybody does eat here. Surveyor inquired when food is ordered and delivered to the facility. V13 responded, We place the order Monday for it to come on Wednesday and then we place the orders Thursday for it to come on Saturday. Surveyor inquired why the (1/30/23) lunch menu was not followed. V13 replied, To my knowledge the order that we placed for Saturday was not received. So, we had to promptly change the menu for that day. Surveyor inquired how menu changes are relayed to residents. V13 stated, When we change the menu, we should be posting the menu and letting the residents know. V13 affirmed that the (1/30/23) Primary lunch was supposed to be roast beef, the alternative option was baked chicken and stated So, if they (Residents) don't like the meal, we also have alternative food if they don't like the food they receive. The meal substitute policy (revised 7/28/22) states menus may be distributed to the resident up to the day before the meal being served, to allow resident a choice in food items prior to the actual mealtime.
Jan 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to administer medication in accordance to acceptable clinical practice for 2 (R5, R7) of 4 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to administer medication in accordance to acceptable clinical practice for 2 (R5, R7) of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 01/21/2023 at 9:28am, V9 (Licensed Practice Nurse) dispensed Folic Acid 400mcg and administered all of R5's morning medications including Folic Acid 400mcg. R5's (Printed Date: 01/21/2023) Order Review Report documented, in part Folic Acid 1mg Give 1 tablet by mouth. Active Order Date: 09/19/2022. On 01/21/2023 at 9:35am, V9 dispensed Folic Acid 1mg and administered all of R7's morning medications including Folic Acid 1mg. R7's (Printed Date: 01/21/2023) Order Review Report documented, in part Folic Acid Oral Tablet 400mcg Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. On 01/21/2023 at 1:01pm, V9 checked R5's electronic medical record and looked for the dosage of R5's Folic Acid. V9 stated, The order is 1mg. This surveyor inquired if Folic Acid 400mcg is equivalent to Folic Acid 1mg. V9 stated, No. On 01/21/2023 at 1:06pm, V9 checked R7 electronic record and looked for the dosage of R7's Folic Acid, per this surveyor's request, and stated, The order is Folic Acid 400mcg. Surveyor inquired if Folic Acid 400mcg is the equivalent to Folic Acid 1mg. V9 stated, No. They're not the same dosage. On 01/21/2023 at 1:13pm, surveyor inquired about expectation with physician's order in reference to medication dosage. V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, Expectation is for the staff to follow the physician's order. Whatever is being ordered, we need to follow the order. This surveyor then inquired if Folic Acid 400mcg is equivalent to Folic Acid 1mg. V2 stated, 1000mcg is equal to 1mg. This surveyor inquired again if Folic Acid 400mcg is equivalent to Folic Acid 1mg. V2 stated, No. Surveyor inquired if the physician's order was being followed for a resident who was administered Folic Acid 400mcg and the order was for Folic Acid 1mg. V2 stated, No. This surveyor then inquired if the physician's order was being followed for a resident who was administered with Folic 1mg, and the order was Folic Acid 400mcg. V2 stated, No. 01/23/2023 at 2:28pm, V2 stated, I talked to our pharmacy and said 400mcg is only 0.4mg. R5's (Target Date: 01/06/2023) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 03. Indicating R5's mental status as severely impaired. R7's (Target Dated: 12/29/2022) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 15. Indicating R7's mental status as cognitively intact. The (Revised: 7/28/22) Physician Orders documented, in part It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all resident/patient medication, treatment and plan of care must be in accordance to the licensed physician's order. The facility shall ensure to follow physician orders as it is written in the POS (Physician Order Sheet).
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication pass error rate of <5% for 2 (R5, R7) of 4 residents observed for medication administration. There wer...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication pass error rate of <5% for 2 (R5, R7) of 4 residents observed for medication administration. There were 28 opportunities and 2 errors resulting in 7.14% medication pass error rate. Findings include: On 01/21/2023 at 9:28am, V9 (Licensed Practice Nurse) dispensed Folic Acid 400mcg and administered all of R5's morning medications including Folic Acid 400mcg. R5's (Printed Date: 01/21/2023) Order Review Report documented, in part Folic Acid 1mg Give 1 tablet by mouth. Active Order Date: 09/19/2022. On 01/21/2023 at 9:35am, V9 dispensed Folic Acid 1mg and administered all of R7's morning medications including Folic Acid 1mg. R7's (Printed Date: 01/21/2023) Order Review Report documented, in part Folic Acid Oral Tablet 400mcg Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. On 01/21/2023 at 1:01pm, V9 checked R5's electronic medical record and looked for the dosage of R5's Folic Acid. V9 stated, The order is 1mg. This surveyor inquired if Folic Acid 400mcg is equivalent to Folic Acid 1mg. V9 stated, No. On 01/21/2023 at 1:06pm, V9 checked R7 electronic record and looked for the dosage of R7's Folic Acid, per this surveyor's request, and stated, The order is Folic Acid 400mcg. Surveyor inquired if Folic Acid 400mcg is the equivalent to Folic Acid 1mg. V9 stated, No. They're not the same dosage. On 01/21/2023 at 1:13pm, this surveyor inquired if Folic Acid 400mcg is equivalent to Folic Acid 1mg. V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, 1000mcg is equal to 1mg. This surveyor inquired again if Folic Acid 400mcg is equivalent to Folic Acid 1mg. V2 stated, No. R5's (Target Date: 01/06/2023) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 03. Indicating R5's mental status as severely impaired. R7's (Target Dated: 12/29/2022) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 15. Indicating R7's mental status as cognitively intact. The (Revised: 7/28/22) Physician Orders documented, in part It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all resident/patient medication, treatment and plan of care must be in accordance to the licensed physician's order. The facility shall ensure to follow physician orders as it is written in the POS (Physician Order Sheet).
Sept 2022 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate code status orders that follow a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate code status orders that follow a resident's (R87) POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form and failed to remove a resident's (R108) hospital bracelet that was not consistent with the resident's code status for 2 of 35 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. Findings include: On [DATE] at 10:49 AM, R87 oriented to person, city and year. R87 stated [R87] would like to be resuscitated if anything happens to [R87]. At 11:45 AM, surveyor reviewed R87's POS (Physician Order Sheet) and comprehensive care plan. POS documents in part a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) code status dated [DATE] created by V5 (Nurse). R87's comprehensive care plan initiated [DATE] documents in part that R87 is a DNR. At 11:55 AM, surveyor reviewed R87's POLST in the EMR (Electronic Medical Records). POLST signed by R87 on [DATE] documents in part that R87 wants staff to Attempt Resuscitation/CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation), Intubation, Mechanical Ventilation, and Long-term artificial nutrition by tube. During the follow-up interview with R87 at 12:08 PM, R87 stated [R87] wants to be resuscitated and intubated. R87 stated [R87] wants to be on life support but have family decide how long to be on it. R87 also stated [R87] wanted to be on artificial nutrition if needed. At 12:11 PM, V6 (Nurse) reviewed R87's code status on the EMR. V6 stated R87 is a DNR. V6 stated if there is an emergency, one nurse will stay with the patient and the other nurse will print the resident's face sheet to check code status. V6 stated if the resident is a DNR on the face sheet, staff will not perform CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). V6 also stated that the facility has a DNR residents list. Surveyor reviewed the list and R87's name is on the list. At 1:26 PM, surveyor reviewed R87's progress notes. V7's (Social Worker) progress note dated [DATE] 3:26 PM, documents in part: [R87] remains FULL CODE and has been educated on [R87's] advance directives. Reviewed the remainder of R87's progress notes. No progress note from [DATE] to explain the DNR order from [DATE]. During a follow-up interview with R87 at 1:48 PM, R87 stated [R87] did not inform the facility that R87 wanted to be DNR. At 1:57 PM, surveyor interviewed V5. V5 stated [V5] put R87's DNR order based off the POLST form in R87's EMR. Surveyor opened the POLST form uploaded in R87's EMR. V5 stated the POLST form is the most recent one the facility has on file. V5 reviewed the POSLT form with the surveyor. V5 stated POLST form indicates R87 is a Full Code. V5 stated will clarify with social services. At 2:01 PM, V2 (Assistant Administrator) stated R87's 2019 POLST form is the most recent one on file for R87. At 2:51 PM, V1 (Administrator) and V2 stated it was V24 (R87's Guardian) that wanted R87 to be a DNR. V2 stated V24 didn't know how to fill out the paperwork properly and send it to the facility. V2 stated staff spoke with R87 and R87 wants to be Full Code. V2 provided surveyor with the updated Full Code order for R87. Full Code order dated [DATE] 2:28 PM. During a telephone interview with V26 (Nurse Practitioner) on [DATE] at 11:22 AM, V26 stated if residents are alert and oriented and capable of making their own decisions, their code status is up to the residents. At 11:36 AM, surveyor reviewed R87's progress notes. V30's (Psychiatrist) progress note dated [DATE] 11:35 AM, documents in part that R87 is alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation. At 2:38 PM, V7 (Social Worker) stated V24 told [V7] that [V24] had documents that read R87 is a DNR. V7 stated [V7] doesn't know if the facility ever received those updated documents as V7 was no longer assigned to R87. V7 stated facility should not have changed R87's code status if they did not receive the official documentation. V7 stated it was just a conversation. V7 stated Unless we received the new POLST, they shouldn't have changed the order status. During a telephone order with V12 (R87's Primary Physician) at 3:06 PM, V12 stated the facility needs to follow the most updated advanced directives in the EMR. V12 stated if the POLST reads Full Code then everything must be done for the resident. Surveyor discussed concern with V12. V12 stated Then this was an error in documentation. We don't go by verbal order. We follow the POLST. On [DATE] at 10:44 AM, surveyor observed R108 with a purple No CPR band on the right wrist. On [DATE] at 10:06 AM, surveyor reviewed R108's face sheet and POS. Both document in part that R108 is a Full Code with order created on [DATE]. Comprehensive care plan initiated on [DATE] documents in part that R108 has a POLST and is a Full Code. At 10:19 AM, surveyor reviewed Advanced Directive Acknowledgement form dated [DATE]. It documents in part that R108 chooses Life Sustaining Measures. Surveyor requested R108's POLST form from V2 and V3 (Director of Nursing) but did not receive it at the completion of the survey. At 11:45 AM, purple No CPR band remained on R108's right wrist. At 11:47 AM, V31 (Nurse) checked R108's code status on the computer. V31 stated R108 is a Full Code. At 11:49 AM, surveyor showed V31 R108's wrist. V31 stated the purple No CPR band is not from the facility. V31 believes R108 got it from the hospital. V31 stated will clarify with social services. At 12:03 PM, V9 (Social Worker) stated R108 should be a Full Code. Family or guardian did not communicate with V9 regarding No CPR. V9 stated if the band reads No CPR that means DNR. At 12:12 PM, V9 stated there were no other Advanced Directives on file for R108. V9 stated R108 is a Full Code. During a telephone interview with V12 at 3:06 PM, V12 stated the facility is supposed to remove all bands from the hospital. If there is no POLST form, the resident is a Full Code. Facility's policy titled Advanced Directives last revised [DATE] documents in part: Upon admission: . 5. Appropriate Information will be added to Physician Order Sheet (POS) . 10. If the resident is unable or choose not to initiate any type of Advance Directive, it is the policy of this facility for the resident to be a Full Code and to receive appropriate life sustaining treatment interventions such as CPR. In also documents in part: Review of Advance Directives 1. Advanced Directive information should be reviewed periodically during the resident's stay, but no less than once per year. 2. The staff shall review treatment options with the resident or legal representative to determine if the wish remains the same or if changes are desired. . 4. The chart should be updated to record that advance directives were reviewed and the outcome of the conversation. It is expected that Social Service staff will document this conversation.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to (a) assess the removal of a resident's (R219) urinary catheter as soon as possible, (b) provide a dignity bag for a residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to (a) assess the removal of a resident's (R219) urinary catheter as soon as possible, (b) provide a dignity bag for a resident (R219) and (c) keep a resident's (R108) urinary catheter bag off the floor for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. Findings include: On 09/18/2022 at 10:43 AM, surveyor observed R108's urinary catheter bag laying on the floor. At 11:10 AM, surveyor proceeded to R219's room. From the hallway, surveyor could see R219's urinary catheter bag hanging from the bed frame. Urinary catheter bag was not in a privacy bag. At 4:50 PM, surveyor reviewed R219's discharge hospital records from a recent readmission. Hospital records printed 9/11/2022 4:28 PM document in part on page 7 of 7: Please evaluate for [urinary catheter] removal at NH [nursing home]. On 09/19/2022 at 2:45 PM, V14 (Nurse) stated R219 went to the bathroom and voided independently prior to recent hospitalization. At 2:57 PM, V13 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated R219 went to the bathroom and voided independently prior to recent hospitalization. On 09/20/2022 at 10:31 AM, surveyor reviewed R219's medical diagnoses. Facility added Retention of Urine on 09/12/2022. At 10:32 AM, surveyor reviewed R219's POS (Physician Order Sheet). No orders that explain reasoning for R219's urinary catheter. No orders to assess the removal of the urinary catheter. At 10:35 AM, surveyor reviewed R219's progress notes from 09/11/2022 (R219's re-admission date). No documentation that the facility attempted to discontinue the foley. No reasoning or diagnosis for continued need for urinary catheter use. At 10:55 AM, surveyor attempted to review the readmission UDA (User Defined Assessment) for R219's urinary catheter, but facility did not complete it at the time of the re-admission. At 11:04 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated prior to R219's hospitalization, R219 voided and went to the bathroom independently. V3 stated R219 readmitted from the hospital with urinary catheter with diagnosis of urinary retention. V3 stated facility has not attempted to take out R219's urinary catheter since readmission and re-evaluate the necessity for it. V3 also stated urinary catheter bags should not be on the floor and should be placed in privacy bags for the residents' dignity. Facility policy titled Indwelling Catheter last reviewed 07/28/2022 documents in part: Policy Statement It is the facility's policy to ensure that no resident will have indwelling catheter, unless condition shows that there is a medical reason to justify the use of the indwelling catheter. Procedures 1. Upon admission or readmission, each resident who came in with a catheter will be reassessed to determine if there is a medical reason to suppose the use of the indwelling catheter. 2. An indwelling catheter assessment will be filled out by the nurse. 3. If the assessment shows a justified use of the indwelling catheter (example: acute urinary retention or bladder outlet obstruction, need for accurate measurements of urinary output, to assist in healing of open sacral or perineal wounds in incontinent resident, resident requires prolonged immobilization (e.g., potentially unstable thoracic or lumbar spine, multiple traumatic injuries such as pelvic fracture>, or to improve comfort for end of life care if needed) a physician order must be obtained.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label an opened insulin vial for 1 (R166) ou...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label an opened insulin vial for 1 (R166) out of 1 residents reviewed for insulin in a sample of 35 residents. Findings Include: On [DATE] at 11:10 AM, the 5th floor medication cart 2 was inspected with V21 (Licensed Practical Nurse). A 10ml vial of 70/30 insulin for R166 was stored in medication cart with no open date on the vial. On [DATE] at 11:10 AM, V21 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, insulin should have an open date written on the vial when it is opened. The open date lets you know when to discard the insulin. Insulin is only good for 28 days. Whoever opened this insulin must have forgot to put an open date on it. On [DATE] 11:25 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated, insulin should be dated with an open date, so you know when to dispose of it. Insulin should be discarded 28 days after it is open. After 28 days 70/30 insulin is expired. R166 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis, not limited to, diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic chronic kidney disease. R166's physician order dated [DATE] reads: NovoLIN 70/30 Subcutaneous Suspension (70-30) 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin NPH Isophane & Reg (Human)) Inject 40 unit subcutaneously one time a day related to diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic chronic kidney disease and inject 20 unit subcutaneously at bedtime related to diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic chronic kidney disease(E08.22). Policy titled, Medication Pass, reads: Medication Labeling: 1. All opened medication vials in the refrigerator should be labeled with the date when it was opened and discarded within 28 days of opening. 3. Insulin vials are to be discarded within 28 days after opening.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Dental Services (Tag F0791)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and records review, the facility failed to provide dental services for one resident (R171) revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and records review, the facility failed to provide dental services for one resident (R171) reviewed for dental care, in a sample of 35 residents. Findings include: R171 is a [AGE] year-old individual admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated [DATE], document R171 scored 13/15, indicating R171 has slight cognitive disability. 09/18/22 12:35 PM, R171 was observed laying down. R171 was alert and oriented to person, place, and day. R171 stated that because R171 has only two teeth remaining, R171 found it difficult to chew food, and R171 stated swallowing was hard because R171 was not able to chew food completely because of missing teeth. R171 opened R171's mouth to show R171 had only two upper teeth remaining. R171 stated that R171 would like partial or complete dentures. R171 stated having partials or full dentures would help R171 eat better and feel better. R171 stated that no one at the facility has ever offered to assist R171 with a dental appointment. R171 stated that R171 would like a dental appointment. 09/18/22 12:36 PM V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) stated that residents are supposed to be assessed for dental care. V10 stated that R171's teeth should be assessed for teeth recommendations for dentures. V10 stated that V10 looked at R171's physician orders and progress notes and no one had addressed R171's teeth concerns. V10 stated residents' teeth issues should be addressed to assist resident in eating and getting the proper nutrition that the resident needs. V10 stated dental issues can affect a resident's nutritional status. On 09/19/2022 at 9:55 AM, V3(Director of Nursing-DON) stated that nurses are supposed to assess residents for dental care because nurses are the ones that see the patients daily. V3 stated dental assessment is part of resident care for the nurses. V3 stated it is important for R171 to have proper dental care because if R171 does not get proper dental care, it can cause pain, and can leave R171 unable to chew food, and R171's appetite will be affected and if R171's appetite is poor, R171's nutrition, appetite and weight can be affected. V3 stated improper mouth and teeth care can cause gum infection and gum disease. V3 stated nurses should be assessing R171's mouth to make sure R171's teeth are not hurting. V3 stated teeth are very important to residents and residents should have oral assessments. V3 stated R171 should be evaluated and assessed for dentures per R171's preference. V3 stated R171 should have dental care and assessment because this is R171's right and it is a dignity issue for R171. V3 stated having dentures can assist R171 to maintain R171's weight and nutritional requirements. R171's physician orders did not document dental appointment orders for R171. R171's progress notes did not document assessment of any dental care addressed. Facility policy titled Dental Services Policy, dated 7/27/22, documents: -The facility will assist all residents in obtaining dental services according to the resident's needs -The facility will assist in making the appointments and in arranging the transportation to and from dental services.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their menu and provide a nutritionally equivalent product (due to making a food substitution change) for residents on me...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their menu and provide a nutritionally equivalent product (due to making a food substitution change) for residents on mechanically altered diets and 2-gram Na (sodium) diets. This failure has the potential to affect all 16 residents receiving pureed diets, 29 residents receiving mechanical soft diets, 2 residents receiving 2 gm Na diets and 7 residents receiving 2 gm Na/low fat/low cholesterol diets of those reviewed for food and nutrition services. Findings Include: On 09/18/22 at 11:58 AM, the following items were observed being served on the tray line for lunch service: 1 breaded chicken patty, # 8 scoop mashed potatoes, 4 oz. broccoli, 3 oz. ground breaded chicken, #10 scoop pureed breaded chicken, #8 scoop pureed broccoli, 2 oz. chicken gravy. On 09/18/22, during lunch tray line observation surveyor observed residents on mechanical soft diets receiving the following items for lunch: 3 oz. ground breaded chicken, 2 oz. chicken gravy, #8 scoop mashed potatoes, 4 oz. broccoli, 1 dinner roll, 1 slice of apple pie. On 09/18/22, during lunch tray line observation surveyor observed residents on pureed diets receiving the following items: #10 scoop pureed breaded chicken, 2 oz. chicken gravy, #8 scoop mashed potatoes, #8 scoop pureed broccoli, small dish of applesauce. Pureed diets did not receive pureed apple pie or pureed bread. On 09/18/22 at 12:05 PM, V17 (Dietary Cook) stated, the number 10 scoop gives the pureed diets 3 ounces of chicken. On 09/18/22 at 12:11 PM, surveyor asked V18 (Dietary Cook) to weigh 1 piece of breaded chicken being served on the lunch tray line for regular diet consistencies. V18 selected a piece of breaded chicken and placed it on a digital food scale. It weighed 1.2 ounces. V18 stated she (V18) would like to recheck the weight of the breaded chicken patty using another digital food scale. V18 retrieved a different digital food scale and used this to weigh the same breaded chicken patty. It weighed 2.1 ounces. V18 stated that she (V18) did not know who much the chicken should weigh. On 09/18/22 at 12:16 PM, Surveyor asked V11 (Regional Food Service Director) how much protein should be in the chicken entrée served for lunch. V11 provided surveyor with a copy of the recipe for Country Fried Chicken which indicated 4-ounce portion size of raw skinless, boneless chicken breast as an ingredient component of the recipe. Surveyor asked V11 to show surveyor the box of skinless, boneless chicken breast used by the cooks to make the Country Fried Chicken per the recipe ingredient list. When V11 was in the freezer looking for the product, surveyor heard V18 tell V11 that the cooks used a pre-made frozen breaded chicken product for the lunch meal instead of following the recipe. Surveyor observed V18 showing V11 the box of product the cooks used. Surveyor observed the nutrition label of the pre-made breaded chicken patty titled, Homestyle Chicken Breast Pattie fritters with rib meat documents in part: 230 calories, 12 gm protein, 580 mg Na. On 09/18/22 at 12:22 PM. V16 (Food Service Director) stated that due to supply issues the 4 oz. raw chicken breast did not come in and the pre-made frozen breaded chicken product used was substituted. A menu substitution log was not provided or available to surveyor. On 09/18/22 at 12:26 PM, V11 provided surveyor with document titled, Daily Nutrition Cycle: NL Northern 2, Week: 3rd Week, Day: 1 which documents in part that 1 each (portion) Country Fried Chicken provides 261.50 kilocalories, 28.93 grams protein, 148.11 milligrams sodium. On 09/18/22 at 12:31 PM, V19 (Dietary Aide) stated that the residents on pureed diets were receiving apple sauce or pudding for lunch and that pureed apple pie was not prepared. V19 stated that the pureed diet orders usually receive either applesauce or pudding with their meals. On 09/18/22 at 1:22 PM, surveyor observed R232 eating meal in 4th floor dining room. R232 received the following items on his (R232) tray: pureed breaded chicken with gravy, mashed potatoes, pureed broccoli, pudding, frozen nutritional supplement, thickened juice. R232 did not receive pureed apple pie or pureed bread. On 09/18/22 at 1:40 PM, surveyor did not observe any whole milk being served on resident lunch trays. On 09/19/22 at 2:46 PM, V16 stated that the cooks should be following the recipes and spreadsheets to make sure they are following the resident's therapeutic diet which they need to be on for medical reasons and to make sure they are giving the correct portion sizes. V16 stated that if residents do not receive the correct portion size of food, then this could cause weight loss. V16 stated that if a resident is on a pureed diet, they should receive the same food items as residents receiving a regular diet texture except the food needs to be pureed. V16 stated that it is the resident's right to receive the same food items as other residents and that could be a dignity issue. On 09/19/22 at 3:00 PM, V16 provided surveyor with document titled, Diet list with Facility Diet dated 09/19/22. V16 stated that the diets on the list were based on physician diet orders. On 09/20/22 at 8:02 AM, V15 (Registered Dietitian) stated that menus were created to ensure nutritional adequacy and that is why recipes and spreadsheets need to be followed. V15 stated that she (V15) was not notified about the menu substitution which occurred on 09/18/22 because she (V15) does not work on the weekends. V15 stated that if a substitution needs to be made when she (V15) is working then she (V15) discusses an appropriate substitution that is nutritionally equivalent to the original menu item including similar protein, calories, and sodium content. Surveyor showed V15 a copy of the Country Fried Chicken Breast recipe and V15 stated that 4 oz. raw chicken breast should have been used to prepare the entrée based on the recipe. V15 stated that a 4 oz. chicken breast would provide approximately 28 gm protein. Surveyor told V15 info on nutritional label of pre-made frozen chicken patty served as a substitute. V15 stated that 12 gm protein is less than 2 ounces and would therefore not be nutritional equivalent to 28 gm protein. V15 stated that this could lead to potential weight loss, and that certain residents with malnutrition, on dialysis and/or skin wounds have increased protein requirements and therefore those residents may not receive adequate amounts of protein which is not recommended. V15 stated that the pre-made frozen chicken patty substituted had 580 milligrams of sodium compared to 148.11 milligrams of sodium in the original menu option and would therefore be over the 2-gram Na (sodium) upper limit order by the physician which could cause issues with weight gain, and/or fluid retention. V15 stated physicians may prescribe a 2 gm Na diet for a resident for various reasons including congestive heart failure, hypertension, hyperlipidemia. V15 stated that residents on a pureed diet should receive the same items on the regular consistency menu just in a pureed form. V15 stated residents on a pureed diet receiving different items such as apple sauce instead of pureed apple pie could be a dignity issue. V15 stated that everyone should be treated the same no matter if they are on a pureed diet or not. V15 stated that residents on mechanically altered diets receiving less protein due to inappropriate portion sizes at meals and if food items are missing this could lead to chronic issues such as weight loss, and hunger. V15 stated that most of the residents on pureed diet have reduced food items due to the change in texture. On 09/20/22 at 10:40 AM, V11 stated that the food service company did not have a specific policy and procedure on menu substitutions. On 09/20/22 at 12:22 PM, R134 stated he (R134) would prefer to receive pureed apple pie instead of applesauce because it tastes better. Foods service facility Job Description titled, Chef undated, documents in part, responsibilities include prepare meals in accordance with planned menu and prepare food in accordance with standard recipes and special diets. Foods service facility Job Description titled, Culinary Service Manager undated, documents in part, responsibilities include ensure that all nutritional guidelines are maintained in the accordance with company policies and procedures. Food service policy titled, Menus documents in part, menu cycles will include standardized recipes, menus are reserved as written, unless changed in response to unavailability and a menu substitution log will be maintained on file. Facility spreadsheets dated 09/18/22 list lunch meal as follows for regular diet: 1 each Country Fried Chicken, 2 oz. Country Gravy, 1 Orange Twist, 4 oz. Mashed Potatoes, 4 oz. Buttered Broccoli Florets, 1 Buttered Dinner Roll, 1 each Margarine, 1 each Apple Pie, 8 oz. Whole Milk, 6 oz. Hot Coffee or Tea. Facility spreadsheets dated 09/18/22 list lunch meal as follows for mechanical soft diet: 4 oz. Ground Country Fried Chicken, 2 oz. Country Gravy, 3 oz. Mashed Potatoes, 4 oz. Buttered Broccoli Florets, 1 Buttered Dinner Roll, 1 each Margarine, ½ each Apple Pie, 8 oz. Whole Milk, 6 oz. Hot Coffee or Tea. Facility spreadsheets dated 09/18/22 list lunch meal as follows for pureed diet: 5 oz. Pureed Country Fried Chicken, 2 oz. Country Gravy, 4 oz. Mashed Potatoes, 4 oz. Pureed Buttered Broccoli Florets, 3 oz. Pureed Buttered Dinner Roll, 4 oz. Pureed Apple Pie, 8 oz. Whole Milk, 6 oz. Hot Coffee or Tea.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner for 5 residents (R7, R25, R36, R84, R176) receiving dessert served from the kitch...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner for 5 residents (R7, R25, R36, R84, R176) receiving dessert served from the kitchen and beverages served on the second-floor unit. Findings include: On 9/18/22 at 12:17 PM during the second-floor dining observation, V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed passing residents' room trays that were placed on a 3-tier uncovered rolling cart. Food trays were observed with uncovered apple pie desserts and uncovered lemonades. From 12:17 PM to 12:35 PM, surveyor observed V8 serve R36, R7, R84, R176, and R25 with uncovered apple pies and uncovered lemonades on their lunch trays. At 12:36 PM, an interview conducted with V8. V8 stated that the desserts on the food tray should be covered because germs and bugs could get into the food. V8 stated that all foods and drinks should be covered. V8 stated that if food is not covered it could get contaminated and could cause the residents to get sick. V8 stated, Normally they cover the foods. I don't know why they're not covered today. We pour the drinks here on the floor and put them on the trays. We don't cover them, but they should give us lids to cover them. On 9/19/2022 at 12:03 PM, an interview conducted with V11 (Regional Food Service Director). V11 stated that food trays are made in the kitchen and are placed in a closed cart and transported to the units. V11 stated that the certified nursing assistants (CNAs) are supposed to pull the covered cart room to room to deliver the trays to the residents. V11 stated CNAs are not supposed to place the food trays on an uncovered cart, but if that happens then all foods and beverages on the trays should be covered. V11 stated that if foods are not covered there would be an infection control risk and residents could potentially get sick. A review of the facility's policy titled Meal Distribution with revision date of October 2019 reads in part: Policy Statement It is the center policy that meals are transported to the dining locations in a manner that insures proper temperature maintenance, protects against contamination, and are delivered in a timely and accurate manner. Actions Steps 3. All foods that are transported to dining areas that are not adjacent to the kitchen will be covered. 6. Proper food handling techniques to prevent contamination and temperature maintenance will be used at point of service dining.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store the ice scoop and wash the portable ice coolers for the residents residing on floors 2 through 5. This deficien...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store the ice scoop and wash the portable ice coolers for the residents residing on floors 2 through 5. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 55 residents on 2nd floor, all 49 residents on the 3rd floor, all 57 residents on the 4th floor and all 56 residents on the 5th floor that receive ice from portable coolers on the unit of those reviewed for infection control. Findings include: On 09/18/22 at 1:41 PM, surveyor observed metal ice scoop sitting on top of a portable plastic cooler containing ice in the 4th floor unit utility room. No storage bag or separate storage container observed for the ice scoop. On 09/18/22 at 1:55 PM, surveyor observed plastic ice scoop sitting on top of a portable plastic cooler containing ice in the 5th floor unit utility room. No storage bag or separate storage container observed for ice scoop. On 09/18/22 at 1:57 PM, surveyor observed plastic ice scoop sitting on top of a portable plastic cooler containing ice in the 3rd floor unit utility room. The exterior top of the portable plastic cooler appeared dirty with black and light gray spots spread throughout, and in addition to pink juice stains. No storage bag or separate storage container observed for ice scoop. On 09/18/22 at 1:58 PM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated that the CNAs use the ice scoop to collect ice from the cooler which is used to fill up the resident's water pitchers. V13 stated that the CNAs put the ice scoop on top of the cooler lid when not in use. Surveyor asked V13 if it was okay to have the ice scoop laying on top of the cooler. V13 did not answer the question. V13 then took the plastic ice scoop, rinsed it under water, and then placed it back on the lid of the portable cooler and stated, the ice will be changed soon. Surveyor asked V13 to describe what the black and light gray matter was on top of the cooler lid. V13 stated, I don't know. On 09/18/22 at 2:04 PM, surveyor observed 2L (liter) plastic food storage container on top of a plastic cooler containing ice in the 2nd floor utility room. Surveyor observed black spotted matter incrusted into the exterior lid of the portable plastic cooler. V29 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated that the ice scoop broke so the kitchen sent up the 2L plastic container which the staff is using to scoop ice from the cooler into resident water pitchers and other kind of drinks like soda. V29 stated that when a staff member is done getting ice for a resident the 2L food storage container goes back on top of the lid to the cooler. No storage bag or separate storage container observed for ice scoop. On 09/18/22 at 2:06 PM, surveyor observed plastic ice scoop in a large plastic bag which was on top of a plastic cooler containing ice located on the 1st floor nurses station. V4 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated that the ice scoop is kept in the bag to keep it clean. V4 stated that if the ice scoop was not kept in a bag this would be a sanitation issue as the ice scoop would get dirty. On 09/19/22 at 2:39 PM, V16 (Food Service Director) stated that it was not acceptable to put the ice scoop directly on top of the ice cooler lid and that all ice scoops should be stored in a container or storage bag to prevent cross contamination which could cause infection control concerns for the residents. V16 was not aware that the ice scoops on the floors were not being stored in containers or storage bags or that the 2nd floor ice scoop was broken or missing. On 09/20/22 at 9:45 AM, V16 stated that the portable ice storage coolers are not being sent down to the kitchen to be cleaned. 09/20/22 at 2:45 PM, V2 (Assistant Administrator) stated that the facility does not have an infection control policy and procedure related to ice scoop storage. Food service company policy titled, Ice undated documents, in part that ice is prepared and distributed in a safe and sanitary manner, the dining services director will ensure that the ice bins are cleaned monthly and as needed, and that the ice scoops are clean and stored in a separate container that limits exposure to dust and moisture retention. Facility job description titled, Registered Nurse dated 05/05/15 documents, in part to assure that established infection control and standard precaution practices are maintained when providing care and to follow established safety precautions when performing tasks and using equipment and supplies. Facility job description titled, Certified Nursing Assistant dated 05/05/15 documents, in part to assure that established infection control and standard precaution practices are maintained when providing care and to follow established safety precautions when performing tasks and using equipment and supplies. Foods service facility Job Description titled, Culinary Service Manager undated, documents in part, responsibilities include ensure that all staff is trained properly on all aspects of the culinary departments policies and procedures and continued in-servicing as required.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 26% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 22 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 harm violation(s), $55,796 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 37 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $55,796 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (23/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Clark Manor's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CLARK MANOR an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Clark Manor Staffed?

CMS rates CLARK MANOR's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 26%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Clark Manor?

State health inspectors documented 37 deficiencies at CLARK MANOR during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 36 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Clark Manor?

CLARK MANOR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by LEGACY HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 267 certified beds and approximately 241 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a large facility located in CHICAGO, Illinois.

How Does Clark Manor Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, CLARK MANOR's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (26%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Clark Manor?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Clark Manor Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CLARK MANOR has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Clark Manor Stick Around?

Staff at CLARK MANOR tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 26%, the facility is 20 percentage points below the Illinois average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 13%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Clark Manor Ever Fined?

CLARK MANOR has been fined $55,796 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Illinois average of $33,637. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Clark Manor on Any Federal Watch List?

CLARK MANOR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.