COMMUNITY CARE NURSING CENTER

4314 SOUTH WABASH AVENUE, CHICAGO, IL 60653 (773) 538-8300
For profit - Corporation 204 Beds Independent Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#494 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: August 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Community Care Nursing Center in Chicago has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns regarding its care quality. It ranks #494 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the bottom half, and #162 out of 201 in Cook County, meaning there are very few local options that perform better. The facility is showing some improvement, as the number of issues decreased from 14 in 2024 to 4 in 2025. Staffing is somewhat stable with a rating of 2 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 32%, which is better than the state average. However, the center has incurred fines totaling $18,166, which is average among Illinois facilities, and it has commendable RN coverage, exceeding that of 75% of state facilities. Despite these strengths, the nursing home has faced serious incidents, including critical failures to maintain safe temperature levels, leading to hazardous conditions for residents and requiring evacuation. There were also instances where residents were not monitored properly for heat exhaustion, resulting in hospitalization. Additionally, one resident with a history of substance abuse eloped from the facility, highlighting concerns about supervision. Families should weigh these factors carefully when considering this facility for their loved ones.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Illinois
#494/665
Bottom 26%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
14 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
32% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$18,166 in fines. Higher than 92% of Illinois facilities. Major compliance failures.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 45 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Illinois. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
63 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 14 issues
2025: 4 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (32%)

    16 points below Illinois average of 48%

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 32%

14pts below Illinois avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $18,166

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 63 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening 2 actual harm
Sept 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and review of records the facility failed to maintain resident rights to access personal funds in timely man...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and review of records the facility failed to maintain resident rights to access personal funds in timely manner for 1 out of 1 resident (R41). These failures affected 1 resident (R41) in his ability to support his wants and/or needs due to lack of financial funds.Findings include: R41 is [AGE] years old with initial admission date of 07/17/2024. R4 diagnosis includes type 2 diabetes and kidney transplant. R41 has a BIMS of 15 dated 06/24/2025 that means resident cognition is intact. On 09/02/2025 at 10:05 AM, R41 stated that he asked for his monthly allowance of 30 dollars on August 1 and 2. Facility staff told him (R41) that it was not yet available. R41 stated that he asked multiple times for his monthly allowance from activity staff but still have the same answer. R41 stated it was very hard because he does not have any money at all. R41 stated that because of his frustration he told the facility that he would report to the State. It was only then that facility gave him his monthly allowance. On 09/03/2025 at 10:28 AM, V15 (Business Manager) stated that facility give residents their personal funds or monthly allowance between day 2 to 5 of each month. V15 stated that itemization of personal funds is being done by corporate office. Every time resident received personal fund, a receipt will be made with residents' signature. Review of R41 July itemization documents that 30-dollar allowance was debited on July 18. V15 stated that it may be recorded but it is not the actual date of disbursement depending on the receipt. Review of R41's receipt for 30-dollar allowance for the month of August was dated on the 27 of August almost September. V15 stated that if it was available, it should have been given to R41. V15 was made aware that based on R41's itemization record of funds, R41 has enough balance to cover 30-dollar allowance at the start of August. V15 saw the record and did not comment. 09/03/2025 11:28 AM V18 (Activity Director) stated that when resident asked for trust fund it will be given right away. Once business office gave her (V18) the money, I gave it right away. V18 stated that what she received for resident's monthly allowance is always cash. V18 stated that for the current month (September 2025) business office will give her the money on Thursday (September 4) and will give it to the resident on Friday (September 5). V18 stated that monthly allowance of 30 or 60 dollars is the only money given to residents by the facility through Activity Department. V18 when made aware that R41 received his monthly allowance on August 27 almost September. V18 said, It's not that late. Under Resident Rights Policy dated 03/2021, residents will be assured of the following rights including rights regarding their money. And the right of every resident to manage their own money.
May 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to assist one resident (R1) of three reviewed in a sample of three w...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to assist one resident (R1) of three reviewed in a sample of three with communication and access to services inside and outside the facility. This failure resulted in R1 not getting his social security card. Findings include: R1's current face sheet documents R1's medical conditions to include but not limited to: type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease, stage 3 unspecified, acquired absence of right/left leg below knee, unspecified combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure. MDS (Minimum Data Set) section C -Cognitive Function dated [DATE], documents R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as 15/15 indicating R1 has intact cognitive function. On 05/17/2025, at 10:06 AM, R1 was observed laying in bed awake. R1 was alert, oriented to person, place, time, and situation. R1 stated he applied for his Social Security (SS) card about four weeks ago, but he has not yet received it. R1 stated he wanted to go to social security administration offices and follow up on his SS card. R1 called the senior citizen bus company for transportation to take him to SS offices but the facility told him he cannot go alone and that the facility would assist him. R1 stated to date no one in the facility has assisted him in following up with his SS card. R1 stated he needs his SS card to apply for housing and financial assistance. On 05/17/2025, at 12:40 PM, V7 (Business Office Manager) stated if R1 has applied for his social security card, the facility has not received it yet. V7 stated V9 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator (PRSC) come to the admissions office a few weeks ago in April (Cannot remember date) and was talking to V10 (Admissions Director). V10 mentioned that R1 wanted to go to social security office to get a social security card. V7 stated V10 told V9 that R1 did not have to go to the Social Security office to apply for his social security card because he can do it at the facility through the phone. V7 stated she did not follow up after that conversations and does not know if R1 was assisted with applying for or following up on his social security card. V7 stated a social security card is used for identification purposes for various things. If R1 was asking for assistance getting it, he should have been assisted by the facility. V7 stated when a resident comes to the facility all their identification including a social security card is uploaded in their electronic medical record. V7 stated R1 does not have a social security card uploaded in his electronic medical record and if R1 was assisted with getting his card, it could have been uploaded into his medical records. V7 state she, V9 and V10 could have assisted R1 in following up on his SS card. On 05/17/2025, V10 (Admissions Director) via V9's phone stated a few weeks ago (Cannot remember the date) she was informed by V9 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator -PRSC) that R1 wanted to go to social security office to get a Social Security card. V10 stated she told V9 that R1 did not have to go to the social security office to apply for the card and he (R1) can come down to her (V10's) office. V10 can help R1 call Social Security and apply by phone. V10 stated R1 did not come down to the office and she did not follow up with R1. On 05/17/2025, at 1:38 PM, V9 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator -PRSC) stated she does not remember the exact day, but it might have been between 28 and 30th of April when R1 told her he needed to apply for a social security card. V9 stated the social services department assists residents with getting documents such social security cards and Identification cards (IDs). V9 stated she does not know why R1 needed his social security card, and she did not document her conversation with R1. V9 further stated R1 has not been assisted with applying for his social security card and she was planning on taking R1 to the social security office with another resident but did not provide a date when R1's visit to social security office was scheduled. V9 she had documented on her personal notes on paper to assist R1 but not in his progress notes in in electronic health record. V9 was unable to show in her note book any note referring to her conversation with R1 and any documentation she had scheduled an appointment to take him (R1) to social security office. During the interview as surveyor was talking to V9, she (V9) was observed trying to write R1's initials in her notebook to show she had spoken to him. V9 was using a blue pen to write R1's initial in her notebook and her notes that were already written were in black ink. On 05/17/2025, at 3:05 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated he was not aware R1 needed to apply for new social security card. V1 stated if R1 had asked staff for assistance getting his social security card, staff should have assisted R1 either to apply by phone or to go to social security offices because the facility has a bus to transport residents to appointments. V1 stated V7, V9 and V10 should have assisted R1 with getting his SS card. V1 stated V9 had scheduled to take R1 to the social security office with another resident but V1 was not able to provide any documentation between R1 and V9 discussion or R1's appointment to SS office. Review of R1's progress notes do not document R1's appointment to SS office for SS card needs Facility Policy titled Resident Rights dated 3/31 documents: -The facility will meet with resident to attempt to resolve any issues in a timely matter. -The resident will be provided resources to assist them in exercising their rights.
May 2025 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, facility failed to follow their abuse policy to protect the resident's right to be free ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, facility failed to follow their abuse policy to protect the resident's right to be free from [A] physical abuse and mental abuse for one [R2] of [R1, R3] three residents. This failure resulted in R2 experiencing pain and feeling humiliated, crying, depressed and fearful of retaliation. Findings Include: Facility reported incident dated 3/27/25 documents in part: R1 and R2 were observed in alleged physical altercation. R1 clinical record indicates in part; R1 is a seventy-four-year-old male with medical diagnosis include but not limited to violent behavior, schizoaffective disorder, and hypertensive heart disease. Minimum data set [MDS] section C indicates R1 is cognitively intact, able to make his needs known. R1's Progress Notes documented in part: 3/28/2025 08:38 Daily Note Note Text: R1 admitted to the hospital diagnosis of aggressive behavior. 3/27/2025 11:12 Behavior Note Late Entry: Note Text: R1 is alert and oriented. R1 has history of confusion and forgetfulness. Writer met with R1 regarding alleged altercation with another resident [R2]. R1 seemed confused and unaware of his behavior at the time. MD was made aware, and R1 was petitioned out to the hospital. R1 being monitored till ambulance arrived. Will provide more update as needed. Care plan updated. 3/27/2025 07:30 Incident Note Note Text: This writer observed R1 standing over another resident [R2] who was sitting in a chair in the dining room. Suddenly R1 who was standing started aggressively hitting the resident [R2] who was sitting in the chair. This writer started yelling stop, stop! Called for security intervention, removed the lesser resident [R2] who was being hit to a safe location. When asked the aggressor [R1] what happened, he stated she [R2] got to stop cussing me. Then R1 then took a seat in the dining room and calmed down. Call was placed to R1's physician who gave an order to send the resident to emergency department with a petition. Administrator [V1] made aware, call placed to R1's family member, left voice mail message. R1's care plan documents in part: R1 exhibited physical aggression behavior towards another resident [4/5/25]. R1 exhibited physical aggression towards another co-peer [3/27/25]. R1 has a behavior problem [5/5/25]. R1 exhibits sexually inappropriate behavioral symptoms related to physical touching, grabbing, of staff when being assisted with ADL's. R2's clinical record indicates in part: R2 is a seventy-five-year-old female that needs an assistive device of a walker for mobility. R2 was admitted with the following medical diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease, overactive bladder, unhappiness, and personal history of mental disorders. MDS section [C] indicates R2 is cognitively intact. R2's care plan document in part: R2 is at risk for abuse due to diagnosis of mental illness [11/21/24]. Interventions, assure R2 is in a safe and secure environment with caring professionals. Monitor R2's behavior to prevent predisposition to abuse [11/21/24]. R2 was involved in a physical altercation with another resident [R1] [ 3/27/25]. R2 uses psychotropic medication related to behavior management. R2 has diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar and depressive types. R2 has a history of inappropriate attention seeking behavior but has demonstrated stability during the admission screening process; Intervene when any inappropriate behavior is observed. Communicate assertively that R2 must exercise control over impulses and behavior. R2 has history of poor verbal skills of expressing herself with the use profanity. Interviews: On 5/6 25 at 12:33 PM R1 stated, I been doing okay. I just came back from the hospital because I punched this [NAME] in the eye. I got into another fight with a lady here because she wouldn't not stop yelling. I went over and I started hitting her to make her shut up. I think I was hitting her in the head, face and chest, I am not sure I just kept swinging on her to make her shut her mouth. The nurse ran over and pulled me off R2. The lady kept screaming and crying. All that yelling makes me nervous and mad. I want to go back to my old facility where my brother lives. I do not like it here; the people here keep making me mad. On 5/6/25 at 1:10 PM R2 stated, I was attacked one morning while I was eating breakfast. This man out of nowhere started hitting me all in my head, face, and chest areas. I fell out of my chair on to the floor. I was yelling for help. The nurse stopped R1 from hitting me and helped me off the floor. I was in shock and scared. I did not know what was happening or why I was attacked. My head, face, and chest were hurting me, and I felt so humiliated, embarrassed, depressed, and scared that R1 might get mad at me because he was sent out to the hospital. I felt bad about myself, I did not know why me? Why was I attacked by this man in front of every one [residents] to see me get beat up for no reason. I cried for days every time I thought about what happened to me. They moved him to another floor. I feel safe here, but I will be nervous that I might see him again, I do not want to get beat up anymore. On 5/7/25 at 10:00 AM V3 [Licensed Practical Nurse] stated, On 3/27/25, I was in the dining room administering medications. I notice R1 moving fast, anxious, and pacing back and forth in the dining room. My intuition told me something was not right with R1. I should have removed R1 from the dining area or called extra staff for assistance, I was the only staff member in the dining area. I continue to administer medications; I could not focus all my attention on R1. Then I heard R2 say something, I am not sure what she said, but it was loud. When I looked up, I saw R1 with his hand raised up in the air standing over R2 as she was sitting in a chair, R1 started hitting R2. R1 was hitting her in the head, shoulder, and chest areas. I started to scream 'stop it, stop it' as I ran over to R2. R1 did stop striking R2 and I got R2 out of the chair to remove her from the area. During the time R1 was hitting R2, she was screaming to the top of her lungs and crying. R2 was just crying uncontrollably, she [R2] was mortified and devastated. All I could do was hug R2 trying to console her. R2 did not complain of any pain, she was just yelling out crying for quite some time, she really was not talking or answering my questions, she could not stop crying. I phoned R1 and R2's physicians, I received an order to petition R1 out for psych evaluation. I also notified the abuse coordination [V1] administrator of the incident. Moving forward I will act on my intuition and changes in resident behavior to remove the resident away from other residents to prevent an altercation. On 5/7/234 11:10 AM, V11 [Certified Nurse Assistant] stated, The day of the incident between R1 and R2, I was providing ADL care to another resident in their room. I heard screaming, and the nurse started calling my name. I ran into the dining room and saw R1 walking away from R2. She [R2] was yelling and crying. I stayed with R2, and the nurse called R1's physician. On 5/7/25 at 9:40 AM, V4 [Social Service Director] stated, R1 has a history of physical aggression. Upon R1's admission R1 appeared to be calm, but also exhibited inappropriate behaviors of physical touching, grabbing, of staff when being assisted with ADL's. I was not present during the altercation between R1 and R2, I heard R1 was hitting R2. R1 was petition out for psych evaluation. R1 had two other incidents of physical aggression toward other residents. R1 was sent out for another psych eval from a physical altercation with another resident and returned to the facility on 5/5/2. R1 is monitored one to one by social service staff. I am trying to find a nursing facility that can meet R1's needs. We will be monitoring R1 closely. On 5/7/25 at 3:40 PM, V1 [Administrator] stated, R1 and R2 had a physical altercation, V3 told me that R1 walked over and punched R2 in the chest area, while R2 was sitting in a chair. While R2 was being punched she did no retaliate or hit R1 back she did not do anything. R1 said that R2 was cursing, and he wanted her stop. R1 was petition out for psych evaluation. R1 has a history of physical aggression with other residents in the facility. Until we find placement, R1 is on one-to-one supervision to ensure the safety of other residents. All new hire receives abuse training during orientation. All staff received abuse training annually and as needed. On 5/6/25 V10 [Registered Nurse], V7, V8, V9 and V11 [Certified Nurse Assistants] all said they received abuse training about two months ago and the abuse coordinator was the administrator. On 5/6/25, R3 stated, I have not experienced any abuse in the facility, I feel safe here. Policy documented in part: Abuse dated 12/2024. -This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from verbal, physical, sexual, mental abuse neglect, misappropriation of resident property, involuntary seclusion, and exploitation. Abuse means any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish to a resident. Mental abuse includes but not limited to humiliation, harassment, threats of punishment.
Apr 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain hot water at comfortable level in one residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain hot water at comfortable level in one resident's hand sink for one of four residents (R1) in a total sample of 5. Findings include: On 4/12/2025, at 10:44 AM, V3 (Maintenance Director) stated, I received a complaint from a resident on the 3rd floor. I don't know his name; I will know him when I see him. He is in room (3rd floor room) I was in a room, maybe three weeks ago, one of the nursing staff told me the water in resident's sink was coming out cold. I spoke with the resident; he told me staff don't let water in the hand sink run before filling his wash basin. (R1) said he receives cold bed baths. I did test the water temperature of the water in the hand sink, I turned it on, it felt really cold. I left it running, put my cart away and went downstairs to the basement to get my thermometer. I tested it when I retuned; it only got up to 105 or 106 (degrees Fahrenheit). Surveyor requested facility's temperature log and asked how often temperatures were checked. V3 said, You know what, that's a good question. Honestly, I dropped the ball on that. I don't keep a log on them. Shoot, I'm not going to lie, I probably checked them three weeks ago. I check the temperatures when I do water management on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays (for legionnaires), but I don't record the temperatures. I didn't check the temperatures yesterday (Friday). No water temperature logs were provided to the surveyor. On 4/12/2025, at 11:42 AM, surveyor followed V3 (Maintenance Director) to R1's room. V3 identified R1 as the resident who earlier had a cold water complaint. V3 turned on the water in R1's hand sink, put his hand in the water and said, that's cold. On 4/12/2025, at 11:43 AM, R1 said I usually get my bed bath at 5:00 AM. The water is cold. It's going to be cold now when you check it. I reported this three to four weeks ago, it isn't any better. I don't know what the issue is. The maintenance man (V3-Maintenance Director) told me the water is cold because it takes time for the water to get up to the 3rd floor. V8 and V9 (CNAs-Certified Nursing Assistants) do not give cold baths. They get my bath water from across the hall, not my sink. On 4/12/2025, at 11:59 AM, V3's facility thermometer was verified as accurate to 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F) via ice bath prior to arrival to the floor. The water temperature was 97.3 degrees Fahrenheit. V3 said to surveyor, you let all my hot water run out. On 4/12/2025, at 12:25 PM, shower room water at northwest side of hallway is at 97 degrees. V3 tried to remove the shower head from the hose. It will be warmer without the shower head. 97 or 98 degrees Fahrenheit is okay. If it gets down to the 80's that's cold. On 4/12/2025, at 5:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) said during peak hours (early morning) residents are getting up, taking showers; bed baths are given. That's when we anticipate that water will be a little colder. The few times he (R1) complained that it (bath water) was cold, maintenance went to check. He (V3) didn't put the exact temperature on the concern form. The rooms below R1's room would be cold as well; hot water rises. It (water temperature R1's hand sink) was till 97 or 98 degrees when we (V1 and V3) checked it; it's hot but not up to what he (R1) wants. It's not cold in such a way that it's not acceptable. If it's too cold the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) know to notify maintenance; maintenance will adjust the water from the boiler as needed. R1 is the only resident who complained of cold water in March. I followed up on the concern by reviewing the form, the issues were resolved. V1 said water temperatures are checked daily as part of the facility's water management program. V3 randomly hits (checks) showers and residents' rooms. We don't keep a log of every single temperature in residents' rooms. We don't have a specific policy for water temperatures. The facility did not provide water temperature policy. On 4/13/2025, at 8:31 AM, via telephone, V7 (PRSC-Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) initially said she did not recall speaking with R1's Emergency Contact # 1 (V12). She recalled the conversation after the surveyor read the concern of 3/26/2024 to V7. V7 said, What I was doing during that call was to let that person know who I am and what support I can provide. I was instructed by my supervisor (V5 (PRSD-Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director) to reach out to the POAs (Power of Attorney)/emergency contacts. I overheard some of things that were going on, it was just kind of a suggestion. I guess it was just a suggestion with being new and how I could handle the caseload. Of, course the family members need to know who I am. V12 wanted information about R1's care plan, shower and diet. You would have to ask V12 they had any concerns. Now if they (V12) wanted to have specific details about showers, that not my duty, I would refer them to nursing. V12 wanted to know if R1 is taking showers, is there a showering schedule. On 4/13/2025, at 9:11 AM, via telephone, V12 (V1's Emergency Contact # 1) said, R1 told me about the cold water. They wash him up with a wipe. V7 (PRSC-Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) called me to introduce herself. She asked me if there was anything she could do to help me. I told her about the cold water, the baths. She was sending me all over the place. She couldn't help me with anything. I don't feel that my concerns were resolved. Maintenance App Form Task# 34342764 submitted by V8 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) on 3/3/2025, at 1:07 PM, documents hot water not working in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Task was assigned to V3 on 3/5/2025, at 5:43 AM. Under Notes: hot water is getting hotter. Concern and/or Compliment Action Form completed by V7 (PRSC-Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) on 3/26/2027 (2025), referral date 3/27/2025 documents: Patient's emergency contact #1 verbalized concerns regarding being brought abreast on patient's care plan, expressed concerns about showering patient and/or patient's showering schedule and explained that patient does not eat pork and has concerns about pork regularly being served to the patient. Action taken or resolution: PRSD (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director) spoke with the CNA and dietary supervisor regarding the concerns expressed. The issue would be resolved. No time or date resolved noted on form.
Aug 2024 12 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy by not obtaining code status order from a prescriber for 1 (R45) resident reviewed for advance directives in a sample of 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy by not obtaining code status order from a prescriber for 1 (R45) resident reviewed for advance directives in a sample of 19. The findings include: R45's face sheet showed admission date on 2/26/2024 with diagnoses not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Major depressive disorder, Anxiety disorder, Cachexia, Calculus of kidney, Low back pain, Unspecified osteoarthritis, Hyperlipidemia, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unspecified angina pectoris, Unilateral inguinal hernia, Alcohol dependence, Other psychoactive substance dependence, Anemia, Subsequent non-st elevation (nstemi) myocardial infarction, Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity, Unspecified right bundle-branch block, Chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe), Supraventricular tachycardia. On 7/31/24 at 12:46 PM V2 (Director of Nursing / DON) stated resident should have a code status, once POLST (Practitioners Order for Life Sustaining Treatment) is completed, nurse should obtain order from the doctor and place in resident's health record. Resident's code status is important so staff would know how to care for the resident during emergency whether to resuscitate or not. At 3:11 PM V10 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director / PRSD) stated Advance directives or code status. Stated they are assisting resident or representative in completing POLST form and once completed and it is communicated to the nurse to obtain order. She said it is important to know the code status of the resident especially during emergency so staff would know how to take care of the resident. R45 physician order sheet dated 7/31/24 did not show code status order. Care plan dated 4/8/2024 documented in part: R45 has chosen the following Advance Directive option. R45 has completed a POLST. Advance directive regarding treatment. Facility's POLST policy dated 3/2021 documented in part: Once the front page of the POLST form is signed, the detailed orders should be placed in the orders.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to follow fall care plan intervention for a resident with history o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to follow fall care plan intervention for a resident with history of falls and failed to update care plan fall interventions after fall had occurred. These failures affected 1 (R204) of 4 residents reviewed for falls out of a sample of 19. Findings Include: R204 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis not limited to Seizures, Epilepsy, Repeated Falls, Major Depressive Disorder, Unspecified Hearing Loss, Dementia, Bipolar Disorder with Psychotic Features, Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, Drug Induced Subacute Dyskinesia, Legal Blindness, As Defined In USA, Parkinson's Disease, Restlessness and Agitation, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. R204's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 06/14/24 documents BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 03/15 indicating severely impaired cognition. R204's Fall Risk Assessment completed on 02/12/24 identified R204 as being at high risk for falls. R204's care plan dated 02/12/24 documented in part, (R204) is high risk for falls related to unsteady gait, diagnosis of epilepsy and blindness and intentions included but not limited to ensure that (R204) is wearing appropriate footwear (non-skid socks) when ambulating. R204 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 05/31/24 resulting in a fractured right femur requiring post intramedullary nailing. R204's care plan dated 05/16/24 documented in part to provide appropriate footwear (non-skid socks) and encourage (R204) to wear when out of bed. On 08/01/24 at 10:15 AM, V22 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated V22 is taking care of R204 today and V22 is the one who dressed R204 today. At 10:19 AM, observed R204 sitting in a chair in the unit dining room wearing regular white socks. The socks were not non-slip socks. R204 was not wearing shoes. On 08/01/24 at 10:20 AM, V21 (Restorative Certified Nursing Assistant) observed R204 sitting in a chair in the unit dining room and stated, he's wearing regular socks and he still tries to get up on his own that is why he's on 1:1 now. On 08/01/24 at 11:56 AM, V22, CNA, observed R204 sitting in a chair in the unit dining room and stated, he's wearing regular socks. I don't know if he needs to be wearing non-slip socks or not. I'll have to ask the nurse. On 08/01/24 at 11:59 AM, V15 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, R204 does not need to wear any type of special socks. On 08/01/24 at 12:01 PM, V27 (Director of Rehabilitation) stated with R204's muscle strength R204 can stand up on his own and that R204 is very impulsive so R204 remains at high risk for falling. V27 stated R204 has poor safety awareness and judgement and decreased vision/hearing all of which contribute to R204 being at continued risk for falls. V27 stated R204 should be wearing non-slip socks instead of regular socks to prevent him from sliding or slipping when R204 goes to stand up to walk or transfer. On 08/01/24 at 12:10 PM, observed R204 sitting in wheelchair in R204's room wearing gray non-slip socks. On 08/01/24 at 12:12 PM - V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated V8 is the one who changed R204's socks just now. V8 stated, I took off the regular socks he had on and put on the non-slip socks to prevent him from falling. He's still able to walk and transfer so he needs the non-slip socks. On 08/01/24 at 9:05 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated all fall episodes are reviewed by the clinical team and interventions are discussed at that time which are then updated on the resident's care plan. V2 stated after every fall there should be a change in the interventions to make sure the facility is meeting the needs of the resident. V2 stated the interventions in place depend on the resident, they are individualized. V2 stated after R204's fall on 05/31/24 based on the care plan that I'm looking at no changes were made to the care plan interventions. V2 stated the interventions were last updated 05/16/24 and stated to continue with non-skid socks when R204 is out of bed. V2 verbalized that was the same intervention in place before R204 had fallen. V2 stated we did put new interventions in place such as assigning R204 to be on one-to-one supervision with staff to anticipate R204's needs because R204 is still trying to ambulate and remains at high risk for falls due to impulsivity but that intervention has not been documented in R204's care plan yet. On 08/01/24 at 10:23 AM, V17 (MDS Coordinator) during interview conducted over the phone stated the purpose of the care plan is to address residents' specific needs with goals and appropriate interventions on how to manage the problem and concern area. V17 stated care plans should be specific to the resident and changed as needed. V17 stated care plans drive the residents care so the staff needs to know what the interventions are to provide the resident with the care they need. V17 stated V17 is the one that is responsible for updating the interventions and care plans. V17 stated when a resident has a fall V17 updates the care plan with the dates of the fall and changes to interventions. V17 stated V17 was looking through R204's care plan on V17's computer and stated the same interventions were continued after R204's fall on 05/31/24. V17 stated to my knowledge none of these interventions have been changed otherwise I would have updated them in the care plan. Facility provided policy titled Fall Program dated 03/2021 documents in part, upon completion of the fall evaluation a care plan is developed or updated, new fall interventions are reviewed. Review of interventions and care plan occurs. Facility provided policy titled Care Plan Development dated 03/2021 document in part, 1.) The facilities interdisciplinary team in consultation with the resident and his her representative develops and implements a person centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the residents of medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs that are identified in the evaluation process. 2.) Identifying problem areas and their causes and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident are interdisciplinary processes that require data gathering, sequencing of events and clinical decision making. 3.) Evaluation of the residents are ongoing and care plans are reviewed and revised by the dissenter disciplinary team after each evaluation including both the comprehensive quarterly reviews and as information about the resident condition changes. 4.) The care planning interdisciplinary team is responsible for the reviews and updating of the care plans when there has been a significant change in condition, and when the desired outcome is not met. Facility provided document titled Care Plan Use dated 03/2021 which documents in part the care plan is one of the tools used in developing the resident/patient's daily care routines and will be available to staff personnel who have responsibility for providing care or services to the resident.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its policy by not performing a nutritional eval...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its policy by not performing a nutritional evaluation on readmission for 1 (R45) resident with significant weight loss. This failure affected 1 (R45) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 19. The findings include: R45's face sheet showed admission date on 2/26/2024 with diagnoses not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Major depressive disorder, Anxiety disorder, Cachexia, Calculus of kidney, Low back pain, Unspecified osteoarthritis, Hyperlipidemia, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unspecified angina pectoris, Unilateral inguinal hernia, Alcohol dependence, Other psychoactive substance dependence, Anemia, Subsequent non-st elevation (nstemi) myocardial infarction, Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity, Unspecified right bundle-branch block, Chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe), Supraventricular tachycardia. On 7/30/24 at 11:03 AM, Observed R45 sitting up on bed, alert and verbally responsive, appears skinny with collar bone protruding. R45 stated he prefers to stay in bed. He said went to the hospital several times but does not know why. R45 also stated he has been eating well. On 7/30/24 at 12:05pm Observed sitting up on bed, eating lunch, can feed self-post tray set up. Lunch tray with turkey burger in a bun, potato wedges, pineapple tidbits, juice. Observed R45 ate about 75% of the food served. On 7/31/24 at 12:46 PM V2 (Director of Nursing / DON) stated IDT (interdisciplinary team) is conducting a meeting every morning regarding health condition / issues including weight loss. She said it is important to refer to dietician and do an evaluation/ assessment for resident with weight loss to address the concern. Stated R45 had multiple hospitalization. MD (medical doctor) / NP (nurse practitioner) aware of poor appetite and weight loss and was transferred to the hospital because of this concern. On 7/31/24 at 3:18 PM V29 (Registered Dietician) was interviewed via phone and stated has been working remotely for over a year and does not come to the facility. She said nutritional assessment should be done upon admission and readmission to make sure that weights is within normal limits, if underweight - we will use nutritional supplement to maintain weight and reach a healthy weight. Nutritional assessment should be done within the month of admission or readmission. Surveyor reviewed electronic health record of R45 with V29 and stated he had multiple hospitalization in June and July. Stated that nutritional evaluation was done on 4/16/24 and today (7/31/24), she added ensure twice a day between meals to supplement poor intake. She said there should be a nutritional evaluation done in June's readmission, but it was not completed. Stated she was out and there was coverage during that month but still it was her responsibility. V29 stated R45 was hospitalized due to weight loss and poor appetite. Stated R45's BMI (Body Mass Index) = 16, is considered underweight. V29 said R45 had a significant weight loss of 8.5% for the last month. July weight was 93.2lbs (pounds) and June weight was 101.9 lbs. MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/16/24 showed R45 needed supervision or touching assistance with eating; Substantial / maximal assistance with oral, toileting and personal weight loss, not on physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. R45's health record showed the following weights: 7/10/2024 = 93.2 lbs (pounds); 6/19/2024 = 101.9 lbs; 6/7/2024 =101.9 lbs; 5/13/2024 = 99.8 lbs; 4/3/2024 =105.0 lbs; 3/14/2024 = 102.0 lbs. R45's progress notes showed multiple hospitalization on 6/11/24, 6/21/24 and 7/16/24 and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. R45's Nutrition/Dietary Note dated 7/31/2024 documented in part: Significant weight loss of 8.5% x 1 month possibly r/t (related to) recent hospitalization. Weight gain is desired for resident r/t malnutrition. Recommend adding a regular diet order and two cartons of Ensure daily between meals to support weight gains. R45's health record showed dietician evaluation on 4/16/24 and 7/31/24. Dietician / nutritional evaluation was not found for June's readmission. Facility's policy for nutritional evaluation dated 5/2020 documented in part: The dietary department will perform a nutritional evaluation on all new admissions, readmissions, quarterly, annually and with any significant change. The dietician, in conjunction with the nursing staff and healthcare practitioners, will conduct a nutritional evaluation for each resident. The nutritional evaluation will be documented in the medical record.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to date and store nebulizer mask inside a plastic bag when not in use for 1 (R103) resident in a sample of 19. Findings Inclu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to date and store nebulizer mask inside a plastic bag when not in use for 1 (R103) resident in a sample of 19. Findings Include: From 07/30/24 to 08/02/24, surveyor observed R103's nebulizer mask by the window, undated and not inside a plastic bag when not in use. On 07/30/24 at 11:10 AM, V6 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated the Nebulizer mask should be dated and kept in a plastic bag when not in use to prevent contamination which could potentially cause infection for R103. V6 stated the nebulizer was administered by previous shift, V6 then discarded the undated nebulizer mask and replaced with a new dated mask in a plastic bag. On 07/30/24 at 12:07 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) V2 stated it is V2's expectation that nurses will date and keep nebulizer mask inside the plastic bag when not in use to prevent infection. V2 stated when the nebulizer mask/tubing is not dated, nurses will not know when the tubing was changed and that can increase the risk of infection for R103. R103's Physician Order Sheet (POS) shows active order dated 7/26/24 of Albuterol Sulfate Nebulization Solution (2.5 MG/3ML) 0.083% 3 milliliter inhale orally via nebulizer every 4 hours for Shortness of Breath. Facility Policy titled, Nebulizer Mist Therapy dated 03/2021 documents in part: Labelled and dated plastic bag for nebulizer and mouthpiece or mask storage. Store dried nebulizer, t-piece, mouthpiece, or mask in separate, labeled plastic bag.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of professional practice by leaving m...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of professional practice by leaving medications at the bedside of one resident (R19), failed to date insulin for one resident (R25) and failed to store insulin inside the refrigerator for one resident (R49) in a sample of 19. Findings Include: 1. On [DATE] at 11:25 AM, 1 of 2 medication carts and 1 of 1 medication storage room inspected for medication storage and labeling. Surveyor observed R25's multi-dose vial of Humulin R Injection solution (Insulin Regular Human) inside the medication cart, opened and undated. V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated the multi-dose vial of Humulin R Insulin is opened and should have been dated per the facility's policy. V9 also stated the potential problem of the opened, undated Humulin R insulin is that it may not be effective because nurses may not know when it was opened, and V9 stated nurses may be administering an expired Humulin R Insulin to R25. 2. Surveyor also observed R49's unopened new multi-dose vial of Lantus Insulin injection 100/ML inside the top drawer of the medication cart. As per pharmacy written recommendation on the insulin label, unopened vial of Lantus Insulin should be kept refrigerated. V9 (LPN) stated the multi-dose vial of Lantus Insulin was not opened, and it was delivered a day ago. V9 stated the unopened multi-dose vial of Lantus Insulin should have been refrigerated as written and recommended by the pharmacy. V9 stated, not following the recommendation of the pharmacy to refrigerate the unopened multi-dose vial of Lantus Insulin may cause the Lantus to lose its effectiveness when administered to R49. On [DATE] at 12:10 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated it is the expectation of V2 that nurses would keep unopened vial of Lantus insulin inside the refrigerator has written on the label and recommended by the pharmacy to maintain the potency. V2 also stated that opened insulin should be labeled and dated per facility's policy for effectiveness and to avoid administering expired insulin. V2 stated undated insulin should not be used. Surveyor reviewed facility's policies: Medication Storage dated 03/2021 documents in part: The facility maintains proper store of a variety of medications in accordance with the pharmacy recommendations and regulatory guidelines. And Medication Administration dated 3/2024 documents in part: multi-dose solutions vials labeled with date opened. 3. R19's face sheet shows an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to Schizophrenia, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Drug induced subacute dyskinesia, Centrilobular emphysema, Vascular dementia, Major depressive disorder, Polyosteoarthritis, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, Nicotine dependence, Acute kidney failure, Thrombocytopenia, Hyperlipidemia, Diverticulitis of intestine, Hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, Cachexia, Dyskinesia of esophagus, Unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, Other specified diseases of blood and blood-forming organs, Chronic vascular disorders of intestine. On [DATE] at 11:17 AM Observed 3 pills inside a plastic cup at R19's bedside table. V2 (DON) requested to R19's room and shown the 3 pills inside the plasyic cup. Vv took the cup away and stated these should not be left at bedside. V2 showed 3 pills to V6 (Registered Nurse / RN), nurse on duty and stated she cannot recognize those medications, she said it was not given today. V6 stated scheduled morning medications were given to R19 while she was in the dining room. On [DATE] at 12:46 PM V2 (DON) stated nurses are not supposed to leave medications at bedside. They should get an order from the doctor for them to leave the medication at bedside. Potential problems could happen so nurses are educated not to leave medication at bedside. Facility's medication storage policy dated 3/2021 documented in part: The facility maintains proper store of a variety of medications in accordance to the pharmacy recommendations and regulatory guidelines. The facility acknowledges that medications can be stored in a variety of storage areas located within the nursing unit and under lock and key.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0790 (Tag F0790)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide dental care services to one resident (R20) in a sample of 19 residents. Findings include: On 07/30/24 at 10:41 AM R2...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide dental care services to one resident (R20) in a sample of 19 residents. Findings include: On 07/30/24 at 10:41 AM R20 stated I would like to get dentures. Someone here, I don't know her name, said that we would make an appointment with the dentist, but I haven't had an appointment yet. On 07/31/24 at 9:37AM, V16 (Registered Nurse) reviewed R20's electronic health record and stated R20 does not have an order to see a dentist. It looks like his care plan has an intervention to coordinate arrangements for dental care as needed. It is dated 1/28/2024. It looks like R20 should have seen a dentist. He did not go to the dentist. On 07/31/24 at 10:54 AM V17 (Minimum Data Set/Care Plan Coordinator) stated that R20 has a care plan for dental that states: dental appointments as needed. V17 stated It has been an intervention since 1/28/2024. We have to coordinate appointments and transportation. I would have to refer to social services regarding coordinating the dental appointment. We met in April about R20. I don't recall any conversation about his oral health. On 07/31/24 at 11:30 AM - V2 (Director of Nursing). I am looking into R20. He doesn't have an appointment to see the dentist. We can get him an appointment. On 7/31/2024 at 4:51 PM, V1 (Administrator) sent email stating that R20 is scheduled to see the dentist on 8/15/24 at 9am. Review of the provider orders has no order for a dental visit for R20. 08/01/24 at 9:02 AM V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated We would have to get an order for a resident to see a dentist. On 8/1/2024 at 1:25 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) was asked if V2 had a provider order for R20's dental visit. V2 stated I will get one. On 8/1/2024 at 1:30 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) entered an order from V34 (Physician) which stated: May be seen by outside clinic on 8/15/2024 at 9 AM. R20's Care Plan dated 1/28/2024 documents: Focus: R20 has oral/dental health problems related to being edentulous. Goal: R20 will be free of infection, pain or bleeding in the oral cavity by/through review date. Interventions/Tasks: Bullet 2: Coordinate arrangements for dental health, transportation as needed/as ordered. (Date initiated 1/28/2024). The facility's guideline titled Dental Services effective date 3/2021 stated in part: Guideline: Dental services will be made available to residents requiring such service and as requested. Procedure: 1. During the initial evaluation, an oral evaluation is completed. 3. Appointments for the dentist are made by the resident/family if possible. If not the facility will assist in making arrangements for the dentist. The facility's guideline titled Care Plan effective date 3/2021 stated in part: Guideline: A person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs, that are identified in the evaluation process, is developed and implemented for each resident. Procedure: 2. Each resident's care plan will describe the following: Bullet one: The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility's policy titled Care Plan Use effective date 3/2021 stated in part: Policy: The care plan is one of the tools used in developing the resident/patient's daily care routines and will be available to staff personnel who have responsibility for providing care or services to the resident. Procedure: 3. Documentation should be consistent with the resident/patient's care plan. The facility's policy titled Resident Rights effective date 4/2020 stated in part: Process: 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: Bullet 6: Communication with and access to people and services both inside and outside the facility.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0805 (Tag F0805)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for nectar-thick liquids for one resident (R353) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for nectar-thick liquids for one resident (R353) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: R353's admission Record documents in part: medical diagnosis of dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase. R353's 5/20/2024 Modified Barium Swallow Study documents in part: Moderate to severe oropharyngeal dysphagia [secondary to] decreased oral control/formation and propulsion, as well as decreased pharyngeal efficiency/motility resulting in moderate to severe diffuse hypopharyngeal residual after the swallow. It documents in part that R353 is at continued risk for aspiration. Recommendation is pureed diet with nectar thick liquids. R353's Order Summary Report (7/02/2024) and comprehensive care plan (4/09/2024) document in part nectar-thick liquid consistency. On 7/30/2024 at 12:08 PM, R353 sat in the dining room. V7 (Certified Nurse Aide-CNA) placed a seven-ounce cup of pink lemonade in front of R353. Lemonade was thin consistency and not nectar thick. At 12:11 PM, R353 took a drink of the pink lemonade and started coughing. V7 stated hold on [R353]. Hold on. V7 sat down next to R353. V7 stated R353's drinks need to be thickened. V7 stated the pink lemonade had thickener in it but V7 has not stirred it yet. V7 stirred it and pink lemonade began to thicken. Surveyor asked what consistency R353 needed. V7 stated you just have to thicken it until it won't be thin no more. It'll be thick. Surveyor asked how much thickener V7 added to the pink lemonade. V7 stated about two teaspoons or until the water is thick. On 7/31/24 at 10:22 AM, V4 (Dietary Director) showed surveyor the box of food thickener the facility uses to thicken R353's liquids. The label documents in part that the recommended usage for a four fluid ounce serving of water, clear juices, coffee, or tea is one tablespoon for nectar consistency. V4 stated staff should thicken the liquids to the ordered consistency prior to serving it to the residents. On 7/31/2024 at 10:34 AM, V11 (Activity Aide) prepared a mug of coffee for R353. There was a clear, seven-ounce cup half filled with thickener on the cart. V11 poured some of the thickener into the coffee mug without measuring it. V11 stirred the coffee and placed it in front of R353. The coffee was thin and not nectar thick. On 7/31/2024 at 10:35 AM, V11 stated you only need like a pinch of it (thickener). Usually, we have a scoop but they have it in the front at the nurses' station. Surveyor asked V11 what liquid consistency R353 needed. V11 stated For [R353] it just needs to be a little thick. Sorry I don't know the term for it. V11 did not know the physician's order for R353's liquid consistency. On 7/31/2024 at 12:40 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the kitchen staff will send the food thickener up in a clear cup. Nurses are thickening the liquids for the residents. V2 stated that the CNAs, restorative aides, and activity aides can do it if they were trained to thicken the food. V2 stated but I've seen them give it to the nurse to thicken the drinks. V2 stated facility trained V7 to thicken liquids. V2 stated staff should thicken the liquids to the ordered consistency prior to serving it to the residents. On 7/31/2024 at 1:05 PM, V25 (Activity Director) stated activity aides are supposed to go to the nurse and inform them that the resident's liquids need to be thickened. V25 stated that since the activity aides including V11 are not CNAs, the nurse must be the one to thicken the residents' liquids. The nurse will scoop out the thickener and thicken the liquids to the ordered consistency. Facility's 5/2020 Therapeutic Diets policy documents in part: GUIDELINE: Therapeutic diets are prescribed by the Attending Physician or extender to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with his or her goals and preferences. A 'therapeutic diet is considered a diet ordered by a physician, or extender as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to modify specific nutrients in the diet, or to alter the texture of a diet, for example but not limited to: Altered consistency. Facility's 5/2020 Food and Nutrition Services policy documents in part: Meals and/or nutritional supplements will be provided as indicated by the diet order.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow their Antibiotic Stewardship Program, [A] failed to develop...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow their Antibiotic Stewardship Program, [A] failed to develop a report for the number of residents on antibiotics that did not meet criteria for active infection, and [B] failed to keep an accurate report for surveillance tracking for 4 [R1, R6, R10, R17,] out of 5 residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in a sample of 19. Findings Include: On 7/31/24, surveyor and V3 [Infection Preventionist (IP)/Licensed Practical Nurse] reviewed the following facility antibiotic stewardship record-Infection Control Log dated 1/1/24 thru 7/23/24: R1 was admitted on [DATE], and his urine was collected for testing, no signs or symptoms documented on the log. On 1/26/24, R1's urine resulted in bacterial growth, the organism was not documented on the log. On 1/27/24, R1 was ordered Cipro 500mg twice daily for ten days. R1's antibiotic use was not observed on the facility's surveillance tracking log. R6 was admitted on [DATE], and his urine was collected for testing, no signs or symptoms documented on the log. On 2/3/24, R6's urine resulted in bacterial growth, the organism was not documented on the log. On 2/7/24, R6 was ordered Bactrim DS 800/160mg twice daily for ten days. R6's antibiotic use was not observed on the facility's surveillance tracking log. R10 was admitted on [DATE], and his urine was collected for testing, no signs or symptoms documented on the log. On 3/30/24, R10's urine resulted in bacterial growth, the organism was not documented on the log. On 3/30/24, R10 was ordered Cipro 250mg twice daily for five days. R10's antibiotic use was not observed on the facility's surveillance tracking log. R17 was admitted on [DATE], and his urine was collected for testing, no signs or symptoms documented on the log. On 3/30/24, R17's urine resulted in bacterial growth, the organism was not documented on the log. On 3/30/24, R17 was ordered Bactrim DS 800/160mg twice daily for ten days. R17's antibiotic use was not observed on the facility's surveillance tracking log. On 8/1/24 at 8:47 AM, V3 [Infection Preventionist (IP)/Licensed Practical Nurse] stated, I been working here since 6/23, and returned to the facility on 1/24. I started being the IP nurse 4/24. For the antibiotic stewardship program, I use the Mc Greer's criteria guidelines for urinary tract infections. The nurses and I need at least one symptom of the following: fever, rigors, new onset of hypotension, elevated white blood count, suprapubic pain, or abdominal tenderness, before a urinary test and culture is ordered. After the urinary culture is reviewed with 100,000 or greater colonies noted, the physician then will order an antibiotic. I understand the facility's antibiotic program. However, I was told by nursing administration that all admissions is to have a urine analysis and culture, complete blood count, and any other test needed according to their diagnosis. Most of the residents tested came back with bacterial growth and was started on antibiotics. I do not have a report for the number of residents on antibiotics that did not meet the criteria for an active infection, I was not aware I needed a report. I do not know why R1, R6, R10, and R17, or any of the residents tested upon admission that came back with positive for urinary bacterial growth was not included on the surveillance tracking log. I did not include signs or symptoms on the infection control log, because R1, R6, R10, and R17 was ordered urinary test upon admission, not due to any signs or symptoms of a urinary tract infection. The nursing staff and I was only doing what nursing administration told us to do. On 8/1/24 at 11:02 AM, V2 [Director of Nursing] stated, I been working here since March 2024. Upon admission the residents are all ordered completed blood counts and any blood work that needed for other diagnosis. I was not made aware that a urinary test and culture was order on all admission automatic. The infection control process, the nursing staff uses a criteria to determine signs and symptoms of an active infection. Such as fever, rigors, new onset of hypotension, elevated white blood count, suprapubic pain, or abdominal tenderness, prior to a urinary test and culture is ordered. I have not told staff to completed urinary test on all admissions, maybe the prior nursing administration told the staff. I will in service the staff right away. Everyone has bacteria growth, but if there is no signs or symptoms of an active infection, antibiotics should not be prescribed, it could potentially cause antibiotic resistant for future antibiotics needed to help fight infection. The infection control log, and surveillance logs should be accurate and up to date, with the organism, signs and symptoms documented. Policy documents in part: Antibiotic Stewardship Program -Antibiotic stewardship program which will promote appropriate use of antibiotics while optimizing the treatment of infections. -This policy has the potential to limit antibiotic resistance, while improving treatment efficacy and resident safety. -Include a separate report for the number of residents on antibiotics that did not meet criteria for active infection. Tracking -The type of antibiotic ordered, route of administration, and weather appropriate test such as cultures were obtained before ordering antibiotic.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to follow their Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization policy and adm...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to follow their Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization policy and administer immunizations for 3 [R5, R11, R46] of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 19. Findings Include: On 7/31/24, surveyor and V3 [Infection Preventionist (IP)/Licensed Practical Nurse] reviewed the following facility immunization records dated 1/1/24 thru 7/28/24: R5 consented on 1/17/24 for pneumococcal and influenza vaccine on 1/17/24. V3 stated, R5 originally consented on 1/17/24 according to his electric clinical record under misc. documents both consents were effective dated on 1/17/24 and scanned into R5's chart on 1/17/24. I was not aware R5 consented on 1/17/24. I received his consents again on 5/15/24 for pneumococcal and influenza vaccines. R5 did not received the influenza vaccine, R5 did not receive the pneumococcal vaccine, it was documented he was not eligible. However, I know now that R5 has a diagnosis of type II diabetes, heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R5 is eligible for the pneumococcal vaccine and should have received the vaccine. R5's clinical record does not document he received the Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccinations on the immunization section, physician orders, or medication administration records. There is no documentation in the medical record, with a contraindication that R5 should not receive the vaccination provided by the attending physician. R11 consented for the Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines on 2/16/24. V3 stated, R11's clinical record does not document he received the Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccinations on the immunization section, physician orders, or medication administration records. R46 consented for the Pneumococcal vaccine on2/3/24. V3 stated, R46 did not receive the pneumococcal vaccine, it was documented he was not eligible. However, I know now that R46 has a diagnosis of type II diabetes, and hypertensive heart disease. R46 is eligible for the pneumococcal vaccine and should have received the vaccine. R46's clinical record does not document he received the Pneumococcal vaccinations on the immunization section, physician orders, or medication administration records. There is no documentation in the medical record, with a contraindication that R46 should not receive the vaccination provided by the attending physician. Surveyor reviewed R5, R11, and R46's clinical record and did not observe any record documented in their immunization section, physician orders, or medication administration records that the vaccinations were given. On 8/1/24 at 8:47 AM, V3 [Infection Preventionist (IP)/Licensed Practical Nurse] stated, I been working here since 6/23, and returned to the facility on 1/24. I started being the IP nurse 4/24. I track all the resident's vaccinations in the resident electronic chart in the immunization section, and consents are noted under the forms section. Once I receive consent for a vaccine, the vaccine should be given within one to two days. All vaccines are offered upon admission, the influenza vaccine is offered from October 1st thru April 1st. The facility has there I am not sure how R5, R11, and R46's vaccination was missed. On 8/1/24 at 11:02 AM V2 [Director of Nursing] stated, The Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization are offered and administered upon admission. Once the resident consents, the vaccine should be administered that day or the next. The facility pharmacy supplied the vaccines so they would be readily available. If a resident consented to vaccine and did not receive the vaccine, it could potentially cause an adverse outcome on the resident. Policy documents in part Flu and Pneumovax Vaccine policy dated 10/2020 -An initial pneumococcal vaccine will be offered to all residents who have never received the vaccine -For anyone less than [AGE] years old who smoke, has chronic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, or diabetes mellitus one dose of pneumococcal polysaccharide-23 vaccine [PPSV23]. -Documentation of the medical contraindication should be provided by the attending physician
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that resident' call light is functioning for one (R22) out of a total sample of 59 residents reviewed for resident ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that resident' call light is functioning for one (R22) out of a total sample of 59 residents reviewed for resident call system. Findings Include: On 07/30/24 at 11:15 AM, surveyor observed R22 lying in bed. Surveyor observed R22's call light not functioning. R22 stated R22's call light is not working since last storm 2 Mondays ago (7/15/24). R22 stated the staff are aware of the broken call light. R22 stated R22 cannot get out of bed independently, and R22 stated R22 must wait until staff come in to help R22 when staff feel like. R22 stated R22 is wet and sad that the call light is not working. R22 stated the staff come to check on R22 sometimes. On 07/30/24 at 11:25 AM, V13 (Registered Nurse/RN) and surveyor observed R22's call light not working. V13 stated the call light is broken, and V13 did not know that the call light is broken. V13 stated R22 will not be able to communicate with the staff for toileting care and any care as needed. V13 stated the potential problem is that R22 could develop skin breakdown. On 07/30/24 at 11:45 AM, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated the importance of the call light is to keep resident safe, and for staff to be able to respond to their needs. V7 stated the potential problem could be fall, emotional fear, increased risk of skin breakdown. V2 stated the maintenance is aware that the call light is broken since weekend. On 07/30/24 at 12:03 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated, it is the expectation of V2 that staff will ensure safety of the resident by making sure the call light is working. V2 stated broken call light should be fixed immediately, V2 stated a broken call light cause the resident to miss necessary care and attention needed. V2 denied awareness of the broken call light. On 07/30/24 at 12:53 PM, V20 (Maintenance Manager) stated call light is a life and death issue. Normally the CNA will notify V20, but nobody told V20 about any broken call light. On 07/31/24 at 12:33 PM, R22's call light remains broken, and R22 is not happy about it. R22's MDS Section C (07/16/2024) documents in part: R22's BIMS score is 12, which means R22 awareness is cognitively intact. Call light policy (03/2021) documents in part: Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor and/or maintenance director; remove the guest from the room if the call light cannot be repaired. Maintenance Job Description, undated, documents in part: Inspects and identifies equipment or machines in need of repair and completes repairs.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

3. R153's face sheet showed admission date on 7/11/2024 with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Osteomyelitis of vertebra, Muscle weakness (generalized), Unsteadiness on feet, Abnormal...

Read full inspector narrative →
3. R153's face sheet showed admission date on 7/11/2024 with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Osteomyelitis of vertebra, Muscle weakness (generalized), Unsteadiness on feet, Abnormal posture, Hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, Hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, Hyperlipidemia, Myositis, Cutaneous abscess, Other specified diseases of liver, Disorder of thyroid, Low back pain. On 7/30/24 at 10:53 AM Observed with PPE supplies by the door entrance. No signage by the room. V6 (Registered Nurse / RN) stated R153 is on reverse isolation because of the IV access. Observed R153 lying in bed, alert and oriented x 3, verbally responsive. Observed IV (Intravenous) pump machine at bedside with empty IV antibiotic (Piperacillin, Vancomycin) solution bag hanging on the pole. Observed with dressing on R153's right upper arm. R153 said IV access site was removed because it was bleeding, and she is scheduled for IV reinsertion today. R153 said has been residing in the facility for 3 weeks. Stated she is on IV antibiotic for infection in the bone due to back problem. On 7/31/24 at 11:09 AM R153 observed lying in bed, alert, oriented x 3 and verbally responsive. Observed with single lumen midline on left upper arm with dressing dated 7/30/24. R153 said it was inserted yesterday and nurses were not using disposable gown when administering IV antibiotic medication. Surveyor did not observe signage by the door entrance and no PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) supplies nearby. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage posted on the resident's hallway door and failed to have accessible personal protective equipment (PPE) available for 5 [R6, R18, R49, R104, R153] of 9 residents reviewed for infection control in the sample of 19. The facility also failed to have an order in place for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for R6 and failed to include EBP in R6's comprehensive care plan. Findings include: 1. On 7/30/24, at 10:30 AM, during initial tour, surveyor entered R18 room and observed an enhanced barrier precaution sign over R18's bed. R18 was alert, oriented and dressed. R18 stated, I do not know why that sign is above only my bed and not my roommates. V8 [Certified Nurse Assistant] helped me get ready today. V8 nor any other certified nurse assistants ever wear any gown or gloves when they assist me. On 7/30/24 at 10:35 AM, V8 stated, I am R18's certified nurse assistant today. I do not have to use a gown or gloves with R18. The sign [Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage] over his bed is there because sometimes R18 goes to radiation treatment. The personal protective equipment [PPE] cart in way down the hallway near the nursing station, if I need to use a gown, I must go to the end of this hall to get a gown. On 7/30/24 at 10:45AM, surveyor entered R49's room and observed an enhanced barrier precaution sign over R49's bed. R49 was alert and oriented. R49 stated, I have no idea why I have that sign over my bed. I need the nurse to come a place a dressing on my leg wound, it is open, because the dressing got wet during my shower and the certified nurse assistant removed the bandage. The nurse nor certified nurse assistants wear a gown, only gloves when they change my wound dressing. If the certified nurse assistant come to assist me, transfer, wash my back, or like today in the shower the certified nurse assistant did not wear any gown. On 7/30/24 at 10:55 AM, V9 [Licensed Practical Nurse] stated, I am R49's nurse today. I am not sure why R49 has an Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage over his bed. That is an old sign from the previous resident. R49 stated, I need you to put a new dressing on my wound. V9 stated, I did not know R49 had a wound, I will replace the dressing. I guess R49 have a sign due to his wound. On 7/30/24 at 11:05 AM, surveyor entered R104's room and observed an enhanced barrier precaution sign over R104's bed. R104 was alert and oriented to self. V6 [Registered Nurse] stated, I am R104's nurses. R104 have an Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage over her bed because she has a gastric feeding tube. The Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage should be posted on the door, I am not sure why the sign is over her bed and not the door. On 8/1/24 at 9:00 AM, V3 [Infection Preventionist/ LPN] On 8/1/24 at 8:47 AM, V3 [Infection Preventionist (IP)/Licensed Practical Nurse] stated, I been working here since 6/23, and return to the facility in 1/24. I started being the IP nurse 4/24. The Enhance Barrier signage is use for residents with central lines, Intravenous catheters, urinary catheters, gastric feeding tubes, traches, wounds, port-a-caths, any skin openings with a device inserted. V2 told me to place the signage above the resident bed, not the door. There are two PPE carts on each side of the nursing station, one cart on each hall for nursing staff to use. The nursing staff should place on gloves and a gown when providing care to the residents with the enhance barrier precaution signs. If nursing staff do not place on gloves and a gown while providing care, dressing, bathing, transferring, changing linen, providing ADL care, incontinence care, dental care, or device care, it could potentially spread infection to other residents. On 8/1/24 at 11:02 AM, V2 [Director of Nursing] stated, I started working at the facility in March 2024. I was told that the enhanced barrier precaution signs should be placed over the resident's head of bed, not the door. The PPE carts should be placed outside the resident rooms on enhanced barrier precaution or isolation of any kind. If the sign is not posted on the door, the staff would not know to place on PPE prior to entering the room to provide care. The purpose for enhanced barrier precaution, is to prevent the spread of infection, if PPE is not being worn as needed, infection can spread over the nursing unit. Policy: Documents in part: Enhanced Barrier Precaution [EBP] dated 12/2019 - enhanced barrier precaution is a approach to prevent to spread of infections in facilities. - enhanced barrier precaution will be in place for residents with wounds, indwelling medical devices -Gloves and gowns should be used when providing the following high contact activities: dressing, bathing, showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing under briefs, assisting to toilet, device care, use of the device, and wound care. -A sign will be placed on the door for enhanced barrier precaution -PPE including gloves and gowns are available out the resident room -Each room should have access to alcohol-base hand rub both inside and out the room 2. R6's admission Record documents in part medical diagnoses of overactive bladder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, obstructive and reflux uropathy, disorder of male genital organs, retention of urine, and presence of urogenital implants. R6's Order Summary Report documents in part orders for an indwelling urinary catheter. It does not include orders for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. R6's comprehensive care plan documents in part that R6 has an indwelling urinary catheter related to diagnosis of obstructive uropathy and benign prostatic hyperplasia (initiated 3/11/2024). R6's care plan does not document in part Enhanced Barrier Precautions. On 7/30/2024 at 10:41 AM, surveyor observed an isolation bin outside R6's bedroom. There was no isolation sign inside the bin or on R6's bedroom door. V26 was cleaning the room. V26 stated R6 was not on strict isolation but was on enhanced barrier precautions for urinary catheter. V26 did not know where the sign was located. On 7/30/24 at 10:56 AM, R6 stated having a urinary catheter for many years. Facility's 12/2019 Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy documents in part: Enhanced Barrier precautions are a new approach for preventing the spread of infections in facilities. Enhanced Barrier Precautions will be in place for residents with wounds, indwelling medical devices (central lines, catheter, feeding tube, trach) regardless of MDRO [Multi-Drug Resistant Organism] status to address the issue of unknown colonization status and silent spread of MDRO's. A sign will be placed on the door for Enhanced Barrier Precautions which indicates high contact resident care activities. Facility's 3/2021 Care Plan Development documents in part: GUIDELINE: A person-centered care plan that includes measureable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs, that are identified in the evaluation process, is developed and implemented for each resident. Each resident's care plan will describe the following: The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Identifying problem areas and their causes, and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident are interdisciplinary processes that require data gathering, sequencing of events and clinical decision making. The resident comprehensive care plan is developed within 72 hours of admission and reviewed after the completion of the comprehensive MDS assessment.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that there was no ice build-up in their walk-in freezer, separate the prep area from the sanitization area, and air...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that there was no ice build-up in their walk-in freezer, separate the prep area from the sanitization area, and air-dry their blender container and pans prior to use. This has the potential to affect all 59 residents receiving nutritional needs from the kitchen. Findings include: Facility's list of residents on specialized diets document in part one resident that does not receive oral nutrition (nothing by mouth). On 7/30/2024 at 9:31 AM, V4 (Dietary Director) stated there were 60 residents in the building with one resident not receiving nutrition prepared in the kitchen. Surveyor conducted a brief kitchen tour with V4. Inside the walk-in freezer, there was ice build-up on the condenser and the surrounding areas. There was ice build-up on the food boxes, metal shelf, and floor under the condenser. There was ice build-up on the ceiling and on the metal shelves and food boxes underneath it. V4 stated V5 (Cook) left the door open earlier because [V5] was rearranging stuff in the walk-in freezer. On 7/30/2024 at 9:38 AM, V5 (Cook) was at the food prep station slicing potatoes. To V5's right side, at the end of the food prep table, there were two buckets filled with soapy solutions and a rag. V4 stated it was the sanitation area. On 7/31/2024 at 10:08 AM, V5 stated [V5] just finished pureeing the bread and was rinsing the blender container and blade in the sink. V5 then put it through the high temperature dishwasher. V4 stated the dishwasher also uses chemical solution to clean the dishes. At 10:13 AM, V4 used a brown paper towel to clean the inside of the blender container. Liquid remained after wipe-down. V5 placed two servings of scallop potatoes in the blender and proceeded to puree it. At 10:16 AM, V4 brought a small metal pan that had some liquid on it. Pan was not dry. V5 sprayed the pan with oil spray and then placed the pureed potatoes in the pan. During pureed observations, surveyor noted that the scalloped potatoes were in a metal pan next to the two buckets used for sanitization. Facility's plastic wrap and foil were next to the two buckets. V5 stated that's where [V5] has been wrapping the food after cooking-next to cleaning buckets. Facility's 5/2020 Food Receiving and Storage policy documents in part: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Facility's 5/2020 Refrigerator and Freezers policy documents in part: The facility will monitor for safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance, temperatures, and sanitation, and will observe food expiration guidelines. The Dietary Manager will inspect refrigerators and freezers monthly for gasket condition, fan condition, presence of rust, excess condensation, and any other damage or maintenance needs. Necessary repairs will be initiated immediately. Maintenance schedules per manufacturer guidelines will be scheduled and followed. Refrigerators and freezers will be kept clean, free of debris, and mopped with sanitizing solution on a scheduled basis and more often as necessary. Facility's 5/2020 Food Preparation policy documents in part: Food shall be prepared and served in a manner that complies with safe food handling practice. Areas for cleaning dishes and utensils are located in a separate area from the food service line to assure that a sanitary environment is maintained. Facility's 5/2020 Dishwashing Machine Use policy documents in part: After running items through entire cycle, allow to air-dry.
Jul 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and acquire medications as ordered by the doctor to meet the needs of each resident. These failures could potentially ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and acquire medications as ordered by the doctor to meet the needs of each resident. These failures could potentially affect 2 (R1 and R5) of 5 residents reviewed for improper nursing care. The findings include: R1's face sheet documented admission date on 4/5/2024 with diagnoses not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Transient cerebral ischemic attack, Suicidal ideations, Antiphospholipid syndrome, Coagulation defect, Hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, Hematuria, Hyperlipidemia, Calculus of kidney, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Unspecified urinary incontinence, Personal history of transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, Major depressive disorder. R5's face sheet documented admission date on 2/1/2024 with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left lower leg with fat layer exposed, Major depressive disorder, Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, Non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot with fat layer exposed, Hypoglycemia, Chronic kidney disease, Anemia, Altered mental status, Hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, Overactive bladder, Hyperlipidemia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective disorder. On 7/14/24 at 11:05am Observed R1 up and about, alert, and oriented x 4, verbally responsive. R1 said she has been residing in the facility for 3 months and did not get her COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) inhaler (Symbicort and Albuterol) since she came to the facility. R1 stated inhaler was not available. R1 said the physician / nurse practitioner and nurses are aware and was told that they will order the inhaler. R1 said she is having constant mucus in her lung, having problem with breathing at times. R1 said today she is okay. R1 said she has been taking her inhaler (Symbicort) twice a day for 12 years and she has another as needed inhaler (albuterol) if she needs it for hard time breathing. R1 stated she kept asking the nurses since admission, but she was told that inhaler was not available, and it was not given to her. R1 observed breathing easy, no shortness of breath. At 11:28am V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN) said has been working in the facility since 2018. V4 stated she is taking care R1, did not see R1 having hard time or difficulty breathing and R1 did not ask her for inhaler. V4 checked R1's physician order for inhaler and stated R1 has an order for albuterol inhaler as needed. V4 and surveyor inspected medication cart. Albuterol inhaler was not found or not available. V4 said she will order it to the pharmacy. V4 asked R1 if she needed the inhaler or is having a hard time breathing and R1 stated she is okay right now. R1 stated she has been taking Symbicort twice a day for a long time and albuterol as her rescue inhaler. V4 told R1 that she will call physician to get an order and inform pharmacy to deliver the inhalers. R1 POS (physician order sheet) showed Albuterol-Budesonide aerosol 2 inhalation inhale orally every 6 hours as needed for COPD. Order dated 4/5/24. MDS (minimum data set) dated 4/12/2024 showed R1's cognition was intact. At 12:54pm Medication observation conducted with V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN). Observed V5 check R5's blood sugar and showed 255. V5 prepared Humulin R 4 units and administered subcutaneously to R5's left lower abdomen. R5's MAR documented: Humulin R Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML Inject as per sliding scale. Scheduled at 9am 11am and 4pm. At 2:28pm V2 (Director of Nursing / DON) said V2 has been working in the facility since March 2024. V2 said nurses are expected to give or administered medications as prescribed by the doctor. Nurses are expected to follow the 5 R's (Right resident, right medication, right dose, right route, and right time) in giving meds. If medication is ordered or scheduled at 11am, it should be given at 10am and not later than 12 noon. If medication was given past 12 noon, it is considered a medication error because it was not given on a prescribed time. V2 said resident could have an adverse reaction especially if medication is given multiple times a day, medication could be administered too close to the next scheduled time and could potentially have an adverse reaction to the resident. V2 said PRN (as needed) medication should always be available in the medication cart because the resident could need the medication at any time and should be given as ordered. If PRN medication is not available, the medication could be missed by resident if they need it. V2 said PRN Inhaler medication for COPD should always be available so if resident needs, it could be given right away as ordered otherwise resident may have respiratory issue if they are not able to get the medication they need. Facility's concern form dated 6/28/24 showed R1 had reported about not receiving her inhaler. Medication administration policy dated 3/2024 documented in part: To ensure that the administration of medications is performed in a safe manner to prevent medication errors. Medications are administered according to state and federal law. Medication preparation / administration: Five rights - right medication, right dose, right time (60 minute before and after the scheduled time unless otherwise specified), right route, right resident.
May 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an elopement risk assessment, develop and implement an elo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an elopement risk assessment, develop and implement an elopement care plan, and provide a secure physical environment to minimize the risk of unwitnessed elopement for a resident with a known history of successful elopement for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for supervision. These failures resulted in an incident of successful elopement that the facility staff were not aware of until the resident had already left the facility. R1 was located two days later at his mother's home. Findings include: R1's medical record (Face Sheet) documents R1 is a [AGE] year old re-admitted to the facility on 2.13.2024 with diagnoses including but not limited to: Major Depressive Disorder, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Delusional Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, and Hallucinations. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set of 2.20.2024) documents a BIMS score (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15 or cognitively intact. Elopement Risk assessment dated 4.1.2024 documents a score of 11 and high risk for elopement, and resident has a history of elopement. Form was completed after resident eloped from the facility. R1's Care plan documents, R1 has history or current behavior of unauthorized departure from the facility. Refusal to stay in the facility. 4.1.24: Resident left the facility unauthorized. Care plan was not developed until after resident had eloped from the facility on 4.1.2024. 4/1/2024 11:42 Incident Note for R1 documents, Approx. 11 am, this writer went to give the resident his monthly injection, but he was not in his room. This writer and the floor staff searched the floor and was still unable to locate him. Security (PRSA) was notified, and the missing person protocol was initiated. All staff searched the premises and the surrounding area and was still unsuccessful with locating him. 911was notified at 11:30 and a police report was filed, case number (JH208833). MD, SS, and the facility administration were all made aware. The POA was notified and tried to reach him by phone but stated his cell phone was turned off. The resident was last seen by this writer going for a smoke break at approx. 9am. 4/1/2024 14:34 Social Service Note for R1: Writer was informed around 11:05 am that resident was missing. Staff members on duty searched each floor and resident was not accounted for. His Mother was notified and was asked to call residents phone, but phone was turned off. She was informed to be on the lookout for him and to call if he shows up at her residence. 911 was notified at 11:30am and a police report was filed (case #JH208833). Writer also called the hospitals nearby and no report of resident was listed. MD, DON, and the facility administration were all notified as well. Investigation is open and will update as needed. 4/1/2024 22:30 Daily Note for R1: The resident still did not come back to the facility and his mother called and said she will call us if he comes back. 4/2/2024 12:44 Social Service Note for R1: Resident has yet to return back to the facility at this time. Writer contacted his mother to get an update on his whereabout, she hasn't gotten in contact with him and is currently waiting for his phone to be turned on so they can track his location. The hospitals were also contacted but no record of resident admitted at this time. Staff will continue to follow up as needed. 4/3/2024 13:34 Social Service Note for R1: Resident has yet to return back to the facility at this time. Writer reached out to his mother and got no response at this time. The hospitals were also contacted but no record of resident admitted . Staff will continue to follow up as needed. 4/3/20242 2:54 General Note for R1: Per family member (Mother) resident (R1) came home. Writer instructed her to call 911 and cancel previous missing person's report. 5.7.2024 at 11:40 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) said, regarding R1, We were struggling to get him to take his medications. On the day he eloped, we were getting ready to give (R1) his medication (Haldol Dec). We went to look for him, that's when we noticed he was gone. Staff looked for him throughout the facility. Staff noticed him on the patio, but no one remembered seeing him walk away (from the facility). 5.7.2024 at 11:58 AM V3 (Activity Aide) said, That day (when R1 eloped), there were only two of us (to monitor the smoking patio) at nine (9:00 AM smoking break), me and (V6 Social Service). (V6) led the residents outside onto the patio. I passed out cigarettes to the residents, (V6) lit them. (V6) was by the gate, I was back and forth, pushing residents in wheelchairs (into and out of facility). I left the patio for a split second to return the cigarettes to the front desk, when I came back the majority of the residents were back in the facility. The gate was messed up, you couldn't close it. It's fixed now. There wasn't enough staff on the patio during the nine AM smoking break. There should be three to four on the patio during smoking breaks. The nurses noticed around ten AM that (R1) was gone. We checked the building; we couldn't find him. V3 said R1 would come down to the first floor, and when asked by staff where he was going, R1 would say he called himself an Uber. 5.7.2024 at 12:24 PM V5 (Activity Director) said, I was here when he (R1) eloped. I was in my office in the basement. I went to the second floor to pass out an activity. I overheard staff on the phone, asking other staff if they had seen him. I went back down to the basement to check for him. V5 said, During smoke break, staff monitor residents for safety, that they don't leave. V5 said, There should be at least three staff members on the smoking patio during smoking breaks because we have a lot of smokers and residents in wheelchairs who need to be pushed in and out of the facility, they (resident) could get hit by a car or lost if they are not familiar with the area. Smoke break will be suspended if there are not at last three staff members (to monitor break). 5.7.2024 at 12:52 PM V6 (Social Service) said regarding R1's elopement, At this point I can't remember what happened. I would need to confer with my boss. I was told not answer your questions to a certain extent. 5.7.2024 at 1:18 PM V7 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) said, regarding R1, I wasn't here when the incident occurred, I came in at 11, the incident had already occurred. There are three to four staff on the smoking patio during smoking break to monitor for elopement, medical reasons and for paraphernalia. I make sure that there are at least three staff members before I open the door. The patio gate was repaired after R1 eloped. (V6), he's new. He (V6) doesn't understand how this process works. I told him to confer with (V9 Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director) to confirm dates, get his facts together before speaking with you, he (V6) should have consulted with me when he knew that you wanted to speak with him. 5.7.2024 at 3:19 PM V8 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Aide) said, I called a code green when I was informed that (R1) was missing. The gate on the west side of the patio was open, I not sure that it's been fixed. I heard he escaped from the previous facility he was at. 5.8.2024 at 10:52 AM R2 said he was on the smoking patio when R1left the facility. R2 said, He (R1) got out the gate. I seen (sic) him when he went out that gate. I didn't want to tell them (staff). They (staff) don't be watching them (residents). (V3) and (V6) were on the patio, that's it. 5.8.2024 at 8:28 AM V11 (R1's Guardian) said R1 has a history of elopement; he walked away from another facility and went to the hospital. 5.8.2024 at 11:53 AM V9 (PRSD) V9 and Surveyor reviewed R1's Quarterly/Annual assessment. V9 said, (R1_) was re-admitted to the facility on 2.13.2024. I started but did not complete (R1's) Quarterly/Annual assessment. I completed that he had a history of elopement. (R1) eloped from the previous facility he was at. I would consider him an elopement risk based on his history; he should not be out on his own in the community. Facility's Elopement Policy (Effective Date 3.2021) documents in part: -Residents making an adjustment to the facility, or who do not understand where they are, may be subject to leaving the facility without supervision. -Residents should be evaluated for elopement risk on admission and throughout their stay by the interdisciplinary care planning team. R1's Resident Incentive and Contingency Management Program policy (updated 8.15.2021) documents I am aware that there is no independent outside pass privilege associated with Level 1. Resident Incentive and Contingency Management Program form signed by R1 and V6 and dated 3.8.2024 documents: I understand that I am currently on Level 1.
Oct 2023 7 deficiencies 2 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain safe and comfortable temperatures in the facility, failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain safe and comfortable temperatures in the facility, failed to monitor residents for heat exhaustion, failed to provide adequate hydration during hazardous temperature, and failed to assess and supervise one resident (R21) with a change in condition related to heat exhaustion. These failures affected R21 who was sent to the hospital exhibiting heat related signs and symptoms and has the potential to affect all 132 residents. This was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy which began on 8/23/23 at 9:35 am per (8/23/23) facility temperature log which documents a temperature of 81.2F (Fahrenheit) in resident room. On 8/30/23 at 2:22 pm, V9 (RDO/Regional Director of Operations), V17 (Corporate Administrator), V18 (Chief Financial Officer) and V19 (Attorney) were notified of the immediate jeopardy. The facility presented a final removal plan on 8/30/23 at 6:39 pm which was not approved. The facility presented a revised final removal plan on 9/1/23 at 12:46 pm which was not approved. The facility presented another revised final removal plan on 9/1/23 at 4:36 pm which was accepted/approved on 9/6/23 at 8:45 am. The surveyor conducted additional interviews and record reviews on 9/25/23 to 9/27/23 verify the plan was implemented. The immediate jeopardy was removed on (10/2/23) based on actions from the removal plan. Although the immediacy was removed, the facility remains out of compliance at severity level II until the facility can evaluate the effectiveness of the removal plan and maintain substantial compliance with this regulation. Findings include: The 8/23/23 census includes 132 residents. The (August 2023) Daily Air Temperature Logs affirm temperatures were documented 8/4, 8/7, 8/8 and 8/23 - not Daily as directed. On 8/23/23, the Chicago temperature was 98F (Fahrenheit) with heat index 116F per National Weather Service. On 8/23/23 at 6:24 pm, observed residents sitting outside of the facility in wheelchairs on the sidewalk with staff. No observation of water being offer or given to the residents outside. R21's admission Record documents, in part, that R21's diagnoses include Diabetes, depression, neuropathy, dementia, Alzheimer's, glaucoma, and hypertensive heart disease. R21's admission date to the facility is documented as 3/26/23. R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents, in part, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicates that R21 is moderately impaired. R21's (6/30/23) functional assessment affirms (1 person) physical assist is required for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, personal hygiene, and toilet use. On 8/23/23 at 7:30 pm, surveyor observed R21 sitting in a wheelchair leaning over throwing up (3 times) in the (1st floor) dining room. R21 stated I need to lay down. V11 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) pushed R21 via wheelchair into V2's (Director of Nursing) office where there was a window unit air conditioner. R21 stated, I'm not feeling well, it's too hot. I need to lie down, I feel weak. V11 took R21's blood pressure which read 100/62. V11 attempted to obtain R21's pulse oximeter reading a total of three times, however, was unsuccessful. No other vital signs were taken for R21 before leaving the building with the CFD (Chicago Fire Department). On 8/23/23 at 7:40 pm, R21 was transferred from the wheelchair to bed. V12 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) attempted to obtain R21's pulse oximetry and was unsuccessful. On 8/23/23 at 7:43 pm, V11 (LPN) affirmed the physician was contacted and orders were received to send R21 to the hospital. V11 instructed V13 (CNA) to stay in the room with R21. On 8/23/23 at 7:50 pm, R21 stated, I felt like I was going to pass out, I've been hot all day. V10 (LPN) obtained R21's temperature which was 96.2 (axillary) at this time then left the room. V13 (CNA) also left the room leaving R21 unattended. Surveyor observed R21 from 7:50 pm to 8:31 pm (41 minutes) however, staff did not reassess and/or check on the resident. R21 was left in room unattended to. On 8/23/23 from 7:30 to 8:31 surveyor observed R21 not offered or given any kind of hydration from staff. On 8/23/23 at 8:31 pm, the Fire Department arrived to transport R21 to the hospital who was appearing weak and slow to respond to questions. The (8/23/23) facility Air Temperature Log affirms the temperature was 86.2F with humidity 76.1F in resident's room, 86.0F with humidity 77.2F in another resident's room and 86.1F with humidity 78.2F at the (2nd floor) Nurse's station documented 10:00am-10:20am. The last temperature documented (8/23/23) was at 10:40am - not hourly as warranted due to temperature above 80F. On 8/23/23 at 7:07 pm, R79 stated it has been hot for about a month now, they (staff) provided fans. R79's (6/6/23) BIMS determined a score of 12 (moderate impairment). On 8/23/23 at 7:15 pm, staff on the first floor were noted to be sweating and their clothes visibly wet. On 8/23/23 at 7:22 pm, R92 reported feeling hot. R92 affirmed she was in her room and (approximately 1 hour ago) staff brought her to the 1st floor dining room. R92's (7/25/23) BIMS determined a score of 15 (cognitively intact). On 8/23/23 at 7:27pm, R75 stated, I feel terrible, I feel hot, I have not had anything to drink. Staff offered me something to drink but I refused to keep from having to use the bathroom. R75's (8/17/23) BIMS determined a score of 10 (moderate impairment). On 8/23/23 at 7:30 pm, R45 stated yesterday and today it got really hot. The AC in my room didn't work this morning, staff tried to turn it on, but it didn't work. R45's (7/21/23) BIMS determined a score of 12. On 8/23/23 at 7:45 pm surveyor observed R12 sitting in the hallway not given any food or water. V10 (LPN) stated R12 has a g-tube and receives bolus feedings. R12's lips were dry and cracked. R12's MAR (Medication Administration Record) reviewed excluding R12's 5:00 pm feedings signed out on 8/23/23. No observation of incontinence care given to R12. On 8/30/23 at 11:00 am V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated that the building was warm, and I instructed my staff to keep checking on the residents and hydrating them. We (facility) did have a cooling bus for the residents till around 6:00 pm. The building inspector said the facility had to evacuate due to high temperatures in the building. The facility started to evacuate the building around 12:00 pm. V2 DON stated that a resident with change in condition should have vital signs taken every 15 to 30 minutes until they get out of the building. V2 stated a resident with a blood pressure of 100/62 should have their vital signs taken every 15-30 minutes. Surveyor inquired about the frequency of R21's vital signs and V2 stated the nurse should have taken more vital signs. V2 stated that every nurse and CNA in the building is equipped to take vital signs. V2 stated that staff should not leave a resident unattended if the resident is unstable. Surveyorasked the DON, if a resident says they're hot, feeling weak and feel like they're going to pass out are they considered unstable? V2 stated yes, they are unstable and should have staff at bedside. On 8/31/23 at 11:43 am V11 LPN (License Practical Nurse) stated on 8/23/23 V11's shift started at 7:00 am and that morning the temperature in the building was warm and became warmer throughout the day. V11 stated after lunch at approximately 11:30 am-12:00 pm, staff was told that the building was being evacuated and all residents need to be transferred to another facility. The first thing we (Staff) did was put residents on a CTA cooling bus. V11 stated, I don't know if all the residents got on the bus. I saw two cooling buses. The buses stayed from 2:00 pm-5:00 pm. Surveyor asked V11 about R21's change in condition and V11 stated one of the staff members yelled that R21 was throwing up. V11 stated, I (V11) went into the dining room where R21 was and asked the staff to get some ice to help cool R21 down because of the hot temperature in the building. V11 stated R21 said, I (R21) do not feel good and feel weak. V11 stated R21 had been sitting up for a while and it was hot in the facility. The only cool place on the 1st floor was the Director of Nursing's (DON's) office. I took R21 to the DON's office where I took his VS (Vital Sign). Surveyor asked V11 what vital signs were obtained at that time? V11 stated, I took the blood pressure, pulse oximetry, pulse, respirations, and Accucheck. I didn't document the vitals because I did not have access to a computer. I did call the doctor because the blood pressure was low. The blood pressure was 100 over something. Surveyor asked V11 what the other VS were. V11 stated I don't remember. Surveyor asked V11 if the pulse oximetry was working and V11 stated, Oh, I forgot that the pulse oximetry was not working so I did not get the pulse oximetry or a pulse. I think the respirations were 22. V11 stated, R21 said again that he (R21) did not feel well, felt weak and wanted to lie down. I asked staff to assist me to move R21 to a room where R21 could lie down. Surveyor asked V11 if another set of VS was taken and V11 stated V11 did not take another set of VS. V11 stated, with it being very hot in the facility and R21 vomiting, V11 wanted to call the Doctor. V11 stated there was a male CNA (V12) and a female CNA (V13) in the room, and I told the female CNA (V13) to watch and monitor R21 while I went to call the doctor. V11 stated the doctor said to send R21 to the nearest ER (Emergency Room). V11 stated, I did not return back to R21's room until the ambulance came to pick up R21 at 8:31 pm. V11 stated a complete set of Vital Signs were not taken on R21 due to not having the assessable tools to assess the resident correctly. V11 stated that a complete set of vital signs is the temperature, blood pressure, respirations, pulse oximetry and if a diabetic we take an Accucheck as well. V11 stated if a resident has a change in condition, then VS should be taken every 30 minutes to an hour and the resident should be reassessed. Surveyor asked V11 if R21 should have had repeated VS and V11 stated, Yes, R21 should have had VS repeated. V11 stated, I'm upset because the residents had to leave their homes and the facility could have done better with the air conditioner situation. V11 stated V11 has not had any training on the heat exhaustion or the emergency evacuation plan. R21's (8/23/23) hospital records documents in part, history & physical states - presents with general malaise. The Nursing Home lost the air conditioning tonight and in the process of moving the patient to another facility, the patient vomited few episodes. Differential Diagnosis: dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, weakness, influenza, urosepsis, viral syndrome, dizziness. R21's (8/24/23) Critical care notes, documents in part, critical interventions of IV Fluids. R21's (8/27/23) progress note states nursing home patient presented to the emergency room complaining of nausea and weakness due to no air conditioning during the heat wave. Nausea and vomiting/weakness secondary to heat exhaustion. On 8/31/23 at 12:28 pm, V13 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the scheduler called V13 into work. V13 stated, I (V13) got to work around 5:30/6:00 pm on 8/23/23. I was instructed to take the residents out to smoke to keep them calm. I came into the room with R21 to check on R21and to put some ice on R21's head because the facility was hot. Surveyor asked V13 if V13 was instructed to stay with R21 when V11 (LPN) left out of the room and V13 stated she do not remember V11 telling her to stay with R21. V13 stated I went back into the room with R21 to check on him. V13 stated if a resident has a change in condition, then someone is supposed to stay with them. V13 stated that a resident who has a change in condition VS should be taken every 15-30 minutes. V13 stated, I did not get any report to say what I should be doing with R21. I went into R21's room on my own because I heard R21 was throwing up. It was hot in the building. I felt like I was going to pass out because of the temperature in the building, I just kept drinking water because of the heat. V13 stated I have never had any training on emergency evacuation or training on identifying heat exhaustion. On 8/31/23 at 12:45 pm, V12 (CNA) stated that he (V12) works 11pm-7am. I (V12) came in early to help put residents into the van to transfer out with the evacuation and when the residents wanted to smoke, we (staff) would take them out and try to make them (residents) comfortable. V12 stated that day it was extremely hot. V12 stated he saw they needed helped getting R21 in bed, so I went into the room to help. I tried to get a pulse oximetry on R21, but it was not working. The nurse did not tell me to stay with R21. There was another (CNA)V13 in the room when I (V12) left out of the room. V12 stated vital signs should be taken every hour with a change in condition resident. V12 stated that the last resident left the building around 1:00 am on 8/24/23. V12 stated V12 left the facility at 1:30 am after the last resident left. V12 stated, I have never had any training in emergency evacuation at the facility. On 8/31/23 at 2:00 pm V6 (LPN) stated I (V6) was working alone that day on the 1st floor. There were 33 residents on the first floor. V6 stated I work 7 am-3 pm and on 8/23/23 was asked to work a double. V6 stated that when I knew the facility had to evacuate the second shift had already come in, and the second shift starts at 3:00 pm. V6 stated it was warm in the building because it was warm outside. V6 stated on the second and third floor it was warmer, so the staff started bringing the residents from the second and third floor to the first floor around 4:00 pm, and that is when the evacuation began. The cooling buses came after lunch and the residents ate lunch around 11:30 am. I remember serving lunch and the buses came after that time. The surveyor inquired if V6 remembered R21. V6 stated R21 started vomiting in the dining room, R21 was leaning over, and I sat his (R21) head up then R21 started vomiting again. V11 (LPN) came to assist with R21. I went to get the blood pressure machine then R21 vomited a third time, so V11 pushed him (R21) in the DON's office where it was cool. V6 stated that she thinks R21 went to the hospital, but not sure. I do not remember V6 stated, V11 telling me to keep an eye on R21, as far as I know she was watching R21. R21 was moved from the DON's office into a room to lie down. I don't even know what room he went into. I was busy packing medications. I do not recall V11 telling me (V6) to watch R21. The Surveyor inquired about a change in condition, how often should vital sign and reassessment be done and what does a complete set of vital signs consist of? V6 stated, A change in condition the vital signs should be done every 2 hours. If a resident say that they feel weak, hot, and feel like they're going to pass out then you take vital signs every 1 hour. If a resident is going to the hospital check vital sign every 30 minutes to an hour. If a pulse oximetry device is not working, then you must find a pulse oximetry that works or put the resident on oxygen. V6 stated a complete set of vital signs consist of blood pressure, pulse, respirations, temperature, pulse ox, and Accucheck if a diabetic. V6 stated, the air conditioner in the building has been broken all year. Once it started to get warm that's when they (facility) started to get chillers to help cool the building down. The chillers came into the facility in July. V6 stated that she has not had been educated or in-serviced on extreme weather hot/cold or the emergency evacuation plan. On 8/31/23 at 3:30 pm V21(Primary doctor) stated he (V21) is very familiar with R21. V21 stated the nurse (V11) called and said that R21 was vomiting. V21 stated, I (V21) thought R21 could be septic because he has a wound, so I told the nurse to send R21 to the hospital. V21 stated the nurse (V11) did not tell him that the building was without AC (Air Conditioner). I was not aware of the extreme temperature in the building, that day (8/23/23) was very hot outside, so I can imagine how hot it was inside of the building where the residents were. V21 stated, If I had known the building did not have AC, I would have given an order to call 911 asap (as soon as possible) because in hazardous temperatures the residents can die. Some years ago, in Chicago there was an extreme heat advisory and there were 300 people who died in the city of Chicago because of extreme heat. I pronounced 20 of them, so I do not take lightly extreme heat situations. If I knew there was no AC, I would have told V11 to get him out of there now. Surveyor inquired if the signs and symptom R21 was exhibiting could have been due to the extreme temperature in the building. V21 stated, I could say yes, his condition was due to the extreme heat that could cause heat exhaustion. The signs that could have been related to the extreme heat is hypotension, mental status change then death. The facility cannot have an AC not working in a heat advisory situation. Residents who have comorbidities and even staff who is working there with normal conditions are at risk with extreme heat advisories. R21's condition was due to the physical environment that caused him to be like he was with the weakness and vomiting. I did not have the information about the AC. If I had that information, I would have given an order to call 911 and get him (R21) out of there (facility). This situation with R21 was preventable. I feel bad for the residents. This is the facility's responsibility to make sure the residents are taken care of 100%. The residents should have been kept safe and this was not a safe environment for the residents. On 9/6/23 at 12:10 pm V10 (LPN) stated that he came into work at 7:00 am on 8/23/23 and around 11:00 am the city came into the building because it was warm in the building. V10 stated, around 1:00 pm staff started moving mobile residents to the first floor. The non-mobile residents when down to the first floor after the mobile residents. Surveyor inquired about R21 and V10 stated the staff said R21 was sick so that's why I (V10) went into the room. I took a blood pressure and a temperature; I did not document my vital signs. I did give the vital signs to V6 (LPN). A resident with a change in condition VS should be taken every 15 minutes. I left out of the room and did not go back into the room where R21 was. A resident with a change in condition should not be left alone. 911 should have been called for R21. I've been hot since April. R21's progress notes reviewed for 8/23/23, excludes documentation regarding the change in condition and transfer to hospital on 8/23/23. R21's vital signs reviewed for 8/23/23, excludes documentation for blood pressure, temperature, pulse, and pulse oximetry regarding the change in condition. R21's name was on the list of vulnerable residents in the facility. Facility document titled List of Vulnerable Residents included R3, R12, and R13 on the list. Records reviewed for R3, R12 and R13 excluded documentation for vital signs on 8/23/23. Surveyor observations from 9:00 pm-10:00 pm residents in the first-floor dining room and by 1st floor nursing station. Eleven residents in the dining room and eight residents in the hallway by the nurse's station waiting to be transferred. Residents were frustrated and tired of waiting to be transferred. One resident stated, I'm sleepy and tired, I go to bed at 8:00 o'clock, why am I still waiting? No staff responded to resident. No observations of vital signs, fluids being offer to the residents or incontinent care to the residents who were still waiting to be transferred out. Facility Policy dated 4/2020 and titled Change in Condition, documents, in part, Guideline: To keep the physician or extender, who is in charge of medical care, responsible party, responsible for health care decisions, informed of the resident's medical condition so they may direct the plan of care as needed. Standard: A need to alter treatment. Facility Policy dated (11/1/22) titled Hot Weather/Heat Emergencies, documents, in part, the Administrator will be aware of the weather forecast of extreme temperatures and comfort levels inside the facility. The Maintenance Director will monitor the facility's air conditioning to ensure that all are in good working order. The maintenance director will monitor temperatures to ensure that air temperatures in the facility maintain comfortable temperature range of 71-80 degrees F. If temperatures increase, readings will be taken every hour. Emergency Operations Plan: Remove residents from areas that are exposed to direct sunlight. Recommending residents to stay indoors during extreme heat conditions. Report any changes in the resident's condition. Be sure to have an up-to- date and accurate list of all residents who are high risk to be adversely affected by extreme temperatures. Facility job description undated and titled Registered Nurse, documents, in part, General Job Description: The primary purpose of the job is to provide licensed nursing care to residents on assigned unit in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations. Duties and Responsibilities: Monitor the care delegated to the Certified Nursing Assistant. Document resident status, clinical care, and interactions in the medical record. Provide updates regarding resident's status to the health care providers. Facility job description undated and titled Licensed Practical Nurse, documents, in part, General Job Description: The primary purpose of the job is to provide licensed nursing care to residents on assigned unit in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations. Duties and Responsibilities: Monitor the care delegated to the Certified Nursing Assistant. Document resident status, clinical care, and interactions in the medical record. Provide updates regarding resident's status to the health care providers. Facility job description undated and titled Certified Nursing Assistant/Guest Experience Coordinator, documents, in part, General Job Description: The purpose of the job is to provide ADL (Activity of Daily Living), Restorative and other care to residents of the facility within the scope of practice .Duties and Responsibilities: Report all changes in the resident's condition to the nurse as soon as practical. Report all accidents and incidents you observe on the shift that they occur. Perform Vital Signs, weights and other task as assigned. The surveyor confirmed on 10/2/23 through interview, record review, that the facility took the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: The facility implemented all measures on the removal plan. 1) The facility has taken the following action concerning the IJ component: a.) R21 was transferred to the hospital on 8/23/23. Per hospital, R21 has since been discharged on 8/28/23 to (alternate) facility to be closer to family. *On 9/6/2023, surveyor contacted alternate facility and affirmed R21 resides there. b.) All residents in the facility were safely relocated to other facilities in an orderly manner. *Resident evacuation from the facility was completed on 8/24/23 at approximately 1:00am per V20 (Chicago Building Department Deputy Commissioner). c.) The facility reached safe and comfortable temperatures in the building on 8/23/23. *The (8/30/23) letter provided by contractor states company was engaged to supply necessary equipment to provide temporary air conditioning to the building due to broken compressor to the facility air conditioning equipment. The temporary equipment was brought in and set up by 6:00pm CST on 8/23/23. After the equipment was running for about 30-40 minutes it brought the temperature down considerably. By the time we (contractors) left the site it was already comfortable inside the building. 2) Statement regarding residents that have the potential of being affected. a.) All residents in the facility that have been identified to have potential to be affected were relocated on 8/23/23. *Resident evacuation from the facility was completed on 8/24/23 at approximately 1:00am per V20 (Chicago Building Department Deputy Commissioner). 3) Measures the facility will take or systems to ensure the problems will be corrected and will not recur. a.) The facility contracted a vendor to provide temporary cooling of the entire building. Temporary cooling was installed on 8/23/23. *The (8/23/23) service agreement affirms temporary air conditioning at the facility was provided by (2) 30-ton air conditioners. b.) The facility purchased replacement compressors to be installed in the facility. The compressors were delivered on 8/30/23. The installation is in process. *The (8/23/23) service agreement includes scope of work: non-functioning AC. Approximate start date 8/24/23. *The (8/29/23) consignee delivery receipt includes three (3) compressors sent to facility address. *On 9/25/23 at 2:25pm, V17 (Corporate Administrator) stated the AC is completely fixed. c.) The facility initiated in-servicing for all staff on the facility policy provision and maintenance of comfortable temperature in the facility. Staff in-servicing was completed on 9/1/23. *On 9/25/23 at 2:25pm V17 stated we completed the in-services by 9/1/23 except for the staff that were on vacation and affirmed the facility remains vacant. *The (Undated) facility staff roster (including phone numbers) affirms there are 150 employees. * The facility provided PowerPoints titled Maintaining Facility Temperatures which excludes a date and/or topic discussed. * On 10/3/2023, the facility provided the attachment to the staff/roster signature page including in-service date and topic of discussion. d)The facility will initiate in servicing for all staff. On the facility policy for monitoring and supervision of residents during inclement weather condition. In-services was initiated on 8/31/23 and completed by 9/1/23. The facility nurses were in-service on identification of residents showing signs and symptoms of heat exhaustion and providing hydration during hazardous temperatures. The (undated) facility staff roster (including phone numbers) affirms there are 150 employees. The facility provided Power Points entitled Maintaining Facility Temperatures & Evacuation Plan: What is my role and staff roster (endorsed by 91 staff) which excludes a date, citation number and /or topic of discussion. On 10/2/23 facility provided more in-services for facility nurses. Topic: Facility Policy on Change in Condition. Nursing signatures noted on in-service sheet were 5RN (Register Nurses) and 17 LPN (License Practical Nurses). e) All employees on vacation and any contract staff will be in serviced before their first day of work. New signatures received on 10/2/23 after the initial signature page. f) Post education will include the facility staff will demonstrating their knowledge of the facility policy related to identifying signs and symptoms of heat exhaustion. On 9/26/23 Staff interviewed about the in-services received and could not recall the content of the in-services. 4)The Director of Nursing will monitor continued compliance via the following Quality Improvement Programs once re-entry to the building is permitted by the City of Chicago: a) A QA tool will be developed to ensure safe and comfortable temperatures are maintained throughout the building by auditing the temperature logs in the building daily. The monitoring will continue for 4 weeks and twice weekly for 8 weeks. On 9/27/23 at 10:52 am, V17 affirmed the F684 QA tool was not implemented yet due to building closure ongoing. The temperature QA tool content includes Direction: The maintenance director/designee will daily check temperature on all floors and audit the temperature log to determine if the temperature is at a comfortable level. Date, Floor, was temp log audited? If yes, is temp at comfortable level? If no, what corrective action taken? Comment. b) A QA tool will be developed and completed daily to monitor residents showing a change of condition and determine the cause. On 9/27/23 at 10:52 am, V17 affirmed the F684 QA tool was not implemented yet due to building closure ongoing. F684 QA tool content includes Direction: Daily, The DON/Designee will conduct rounds on the floor to monitor if there is any resident showing signs and symptoms of change in condition (heat Exhaustion) and determine root cause. Date, Floor, was all residents monitored? If yes is there any resident showing signs of change in condition? If yes, was action taken including finding root cause? c)The results of the monitoring will be submitted to the QA/QI Committee Quarterly for review and follow-up. On 9/27/23 at 10:52 am, V17 affirmed the F684 QA tool was not implemented yet due to building closure ongoing.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and home like environment by not mainta...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and home like environment by not maintaining comfortable and safe temperature levels in the entire premises of the facility and the facility failed to follow their policy to take and record temperature levels every hour during an event of extremely hot weather. These failures resulted in an immediate jeopardy to the health and safety of all 132 residents residing in the facility who were subjected to hazardous temperatures above 80F (Fahrenheit) on 8/23/23 requiring evacuation and transfer of all 132 residents to different facilities. On 8/23/23, R1 sustained nausea, vomiting and weakness secondary to heat. This was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy which began on 8/23/23 at 9:35am per (8/23/23) facility temperature log which documents a temperature of 81.2F (Fahrenheit) in resident's room. On 8/30/23 at 2:22 pm, V9 (RDO/Regional Director of Operations), V17 (Corporate Administrator), V18 (Chief Financial Officer) and V19 (Attorney) were notified of the immediate jeopardy. The facility presented a final removal plan on 8/30/23 at 6:39pm which was not approved. The facility presented a revised final removal plan on 9/1/23 at 12:46pm which was not approved. The facility presented another revised final removal plan on 9/1/23 at 4:36pm which was accepted/approved on 9/6/23 at 8:45am. The surveyor conducted additional interviews and record reviews on 9/25/2023, 9/26/2023 and 9/27/2023 to verify the plan was implemented. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 10/02/2023 based on actions from the removal plan. Although the immediacy was removed, the facility remains out of compliance at severity level II until the facility can evaluate the effectiveness of the removal plan and maintain substantial compliance with this regulation. Findings include: On 8/23/23 at 6:15pm - Observed approximately 12 to 16 residents outside of the facility. They were sitting in wheelchairs lined up outside of the facility door. Most of the residents were sitting unshielded from the sunlight. According to Time and Date at https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/usa/chicago?month=8, in Chicago, sunrise was 6:06 am and sunset was 7:38 pm. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service at: https://www.weather.gov/lot/2023_08_2324_Heat#:~:text=Chicago%20officially%20observed%20a%20high,was%20116%C2%B0F**. Chicago officially observed a high temperature of 98°F on the 23rd at O'Hare Airport, setting a record daily high temperature for this date. The peak heat index observed at O'Hare Airport on the 23rd was 116°F**. According to Weather Underground at: https://www.wunderground.com/history/daily/us/il/chicago/KMDW/date/2023-8-23, in Chicago on 8/23/23 times and temperatures were as follows: 5:53 PM 96 °F 6:53 PM 86 °F 7:05 PM 92 °F 7:53 PM 89 °F - observed a truck located on the side of the facility building pumping air into the facility through 2 blue tubes placed in open windows. On 8/23/23 at 6:30 pm, - observed the facility to be very hot inside and uncomfortable. - observed multiple fans/cooling units operating in the hallways and dining room area on the 1st floor. On 8/23/23 at 6:46 pm, the (2nd floor) temperature was uncomfortably hot and there was a notable urine odor. V8 (Social Service Director) stated the facility air conditioner has been out since Monday 8/21/23 (2 days prior). On 8/23/23 at approximately 7:00 pm, a total of 39 residents (R4, R5, R7, R8, R11, R19, R20, R25, R29, R32, R33, R38, R42, R43, R45, R54, R56, R62, R63, R65, R66, R74, R75, R82, R84, R85, R86, R88, R92, R94, R96, R99, R106, R107, R116, R120, R121, R127, R133) were observed inside and/or outside the facility therefore not evacuated from the facility (roughly 9 hours after hazardous temperature was identified). On 8/23/23 at 7:15 pm, 1st floor staff were noted to be sweating and their clothes visibly wet. R21 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses which include but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, type II diabetes mellitus, and hypertensive heart disease. R21's (6/30/23) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 10 (moderately impaired). R21's (6/30/23) functional assessment affirms (1 person) physical assist is required for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, and toilet use. On 8/23/23 at approximately 7:30pm, surveyor observed R21 throwing up (3 times) in the (1st floor) dining room. R21 stated I'm not feeling well, it's too hot. I need to lie down, I feel weak and appeared exhausted (unable to sit upright in the wheelchair). V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse) took R21's blood pressure which read 100/62 however no additional vital signs were obtained at this time. [Low blood pressure, fatigue and weakness are signs/symptoms of heat exhaustion. Vomiting and sweating due to excess heat cause heat exhaustion]. On 8/23/23 at 7:00pm, V16 (Maintenance Director) affirmed the portable air chillers came today around 3:00pm - after the evacuation was initiated. On 8/23/23 at 7:00pm, R19 stated the air is not working in my room. On 8/23/23 at 7:02pm, V5 (PRSA/Psychiatric Rehabilitation Service Aide) stated cooling buses got here this morning around 10am and left at 5:30pm when we began evacuating the residents, however residents remained at the facility with hazardous temperature till after midnight (6+ hours longer). On 8/23/23 at 7:07pm, R79 stated it has been hot for about a month now, they (staff) provided fans. R79's (6/6/23) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 12 (moderate impairment). On 8/23/23 at 7:22pm, R92 reported feeling hot. R92 affirmed she was in her room and (approximately 1 hour ago) staff brought her to the 1st floor dining room. R92's (7/25/23) BIMS determined a score of 15 (cognitively intact). On 8/23/23 at 7:27pm, R75 stated I feel terrible, I feel hot, I have not had anything to drink. Staff offered me something to drink but I refused to keep from having to use the bathroom. R75's (8/17/23) BIMS determined a score of 10 (moderate impairment). On 8/23/23 at 7:30pm, R45 stated yesterday and today it got really hot. The AC (Air Conditioner) in my room didn't work this morning, staff tried to turn it on, but it didn't work. R45's (7/21/23) BIMS determined a score of 12. On 8/23/23 at 9:38pm, V9 (Regional Director of Operations) stated we (facility) were able to maintain comfortable temperature levels in the building until this morning. The City of Chicago Building Department called around 12:30pm, the temperature levels were not comfortable, but the portable chillers were in route. We (facility) were told to evacuate the residents. At this time one resident (referring to R21) has been sent to the hospital. On 8/31/23 at 10:39am, surveyor inquired about the facility AC. V16 (Maintenance Director) stated two compressors went down (not working) a week prior to 8/23/23. We've (facility) been using 17 temporary portable air conditioning units. V16 affirmed on 8/23/23 around 7:30 am it was beginning to get hot in the facility, and around 9:30 am the temperature became uncomfortable. V16 stated, residents started to complain about the facility temperature around 10:30am. During an emergency weather plan, we (facility) make sure residents are hydrated and cool. We put them in one area that we know is cooler. V16 stated, my (V16) role in the emergency weather plan is to make sure the dining room is cool until everything is fixed. I (V16) put all the fans in the dining area. [note: documenting hourly hazardous temperature was excluded]. V16 stated, the facility had temporary fixes in place, but the main air conditioning unit would not be able to be fixed without new compressors. The city (Building Department, Fire Department, Police) was at the facility (8/23/23) because someone called 311. By the time the portable AC unit got to the facility it was too late, the evacuation had started. V16 said temperatures are not taken daily. When temperatures get above 80 degrees outside, then we (facility) start taking temperatures every two to three hours in random rooms and in all hallways. V16 stated, the air conditioning company came out to check the air conditioning unit, V16 thinks on the 17th, and found the compressors were down. We (facility) called the air conditioning company because we (facility) thought the unit was low on freon because of the way it was blowing the air out. V16 affirmed the air was not as cold as it should have been. On 8/31/23 at 11:02am, surveyor inquired if the facility AC malfunctioned prior to 8/23/23. V17 (Corporate Administrator) replied, I want to believe that they had a problem with the air conditioner prior to that day, which they had temporary measures (portable coolers on all the floors that blow cold air, fans, taking temperature of the building to ascertain if there's any need to evacuate) in place but because of the weather that day (referring to 8/23/23) it made the measure in place not working. Surveyor inquired about staff identification of hazardous temperature in the facility. V17 responded, the maintenance person takes temperature, the policy talks about certain thresholds and when they need to notify the administrator. Surveyor inquired when facility temperatures should be documented V17 responded, daily before the threshold, it should be every hour after that (beyond the threshold). On 8/31/23 at 12:11pm, surveyor inquired about the (8/23/23) facility temperature. V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated it was humid and warm in the morning and got hotter as the day went on. Around 3pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) said to make sure residents are hydrated. Surveyor inquired about the (8/23/23) facility evacuation. V6 responded, around 4pm, V2 announced that there was a heat emergency, and the facility is evacuating [6 hours after hazardous temperature was documented]. V6 stated, the evacuation process was controlled chaos, there were no plans made to evacuate before we (staff) did it. The only orders beforehand where to hydrate the residents. V6 affirmed at 11:20pm, there were nine residents still in the facility. On 9/1/23 at 4:10pm, R86 stated, We (residents) are in another building because they (facility) didn't fix the air conditioner. They (facility) wouldn't get the compressors fixed on the unit. They were acting like nothing happened. I bought me a fan before it got really hot. Even with the fan I was hot. It was sweltering in the building. I was sweating, it was uncomfortable. It was 96F in my room. My AC (air conditioner) was not working in my room. The staff was drenched in sweat. It was hot two days before. On 9/5/23 at 12:34pm, surveyor inquired who reported the (8/23/23) facility safety concerns (re: hazardous temperature). V20 (Chicago Building Department Deputy Commissioner) stated it probably came in with 311 (non-emergency 911 equivalent) which would be called if there's a violation. Surveyor inquired about the (8/23/23) facility temperature. V20 responded V20 did temperatures in all common areas and patient rooms, readings were 85-91F between 12:30pm and 1:30pm. At that point, we (Fire/Building Departments) had made the decision that the building needed to be closed due to patient safety. We waited outside the building until all the residents were gone which was about 1 am (15 hours after hazardous temperature was identified). V20 stated, there was no deferred maintenance being done at this facility, it did not appear to me. Over time you're supposed to reinvest in your facility and make sure that any work that needs to be done gets taken care of. About a month before we shut down this building (facility) we (Buildings Department) received a complaint about their (facility) air conditioning not working. We (Buildings Department) sent someone out to take temperatures and they (facility) wouldn't let him in. I (V20) got a call from one of my inspectors that said the contractor did not get a call until that day (8/23/23) to repair the air conditioner. They (staff) tried to say that they had temporary cooling at the facility but basically, they just had fans not air conditioning. There was no air conditioning functioning in this building. This is the type of building that every room needs cooled because of the population. On 9/5/23 via email sent at 1:07pm, V17 (Corporate Administrator) wrote V16 (Maintenance Director) stated V16 did not take the temps during the evacuation due to the emergency. On 9/5/23 at 4:20pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated CHUG (Collaborative Healthcare Urgency Group) sent a CTA (Chicago Transit Authority) cooling bus and it was at the facility from approximately 11am until approximately 6pm. V16 (Maintenance Director) took temperatures in the building. The previous days before 8/23/23 it was warm but comfortable because we had the portable units. V16 stated, I was told the compressors went out on the air conditioning unit, but I don't know when. The (8/23/23) census includes 132 residents. The (8/23/23) facility Air Temperature Log affirms the temperature was 86.2F with humidity 76.1F in resident's room, 86.0F with humidity 77.2F in another resident's room and 86.1F with humidity 78.2F at the (2nd floor) Nurse's station documented 10:00am-10:20am. The last temperature documented (8/23/23) was at 10:40am - not hourly as warranted due to temperature above 80F. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service at https://www.weather.gov/wrh/climate?wfo=lot, the maximum temperature was 98F on 8/23/23 in the Chicago area. According to Weather Underground at https://www.wunderground.com/history/daily/us/il/chicago/KMDW/date/2023-8-23, in Chicago on 8/23/23 times and temperatures were as follows: 7:53 AM 80 °F 8:53 AM 84 °F 9:53 AM 88 °F 10:53 AM 91 °F 11:53 AM 94 °F 12:53 PM 95 °F 1:53 PM 97 °F 2:53 PM 97 °F 3:53 PM 97 °F 4:53 PM 97 °F 5:53 PM 96 °F 6:53 PM 86 °F 7:05 PM 92 °F 7:53 PM 89 °F 8:53 PM 90 °F 9:53 PM 89 °F 10:53 PM 89 °F 11:53 PM 87 °F City of Chicago, Department of Buildings, effective date 8/23/2023, documents in part: Re: Commissioner Closure Order, Community Care Center, located at 4314 S. Wabash Avenue. Emergency Closure Order. Community Care Center, located at 4314 S. Wabash Avenue, Chicago, Illinois is a public nuisance that is dangerous, hazardous and endangers the public health due to the violations as stated in the attached Property Condition Report. It has therefore been determined that the building constitutes an imminent and actual danger to the tenants and occupants, and to the public at large. I hereby order that Community Care Center, located at 4314 S. Wabash Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, be immediately closed, and remain vacant, and that entry be denied except by licensed and bonded contractors engaged to examine, repair, and otherwise correct the aforementioned conditions, or otherwise by authorized City of Chicago personnel until further order. City of Chicago, Department of Buildings, Department of Buildings Property Condition Report, Building Code Violations That Constitute an Actual and Imminent Danger, Inspection Date 8/23/2023, Commissioner Closure: Community Care Center, documents in part: Cooling system at this facility is inoperable, entire premises. Facility policy Hot Weather/Heat Emergencies Policy and Procedures, 11/1/2022, documents in part: Administrator will be aware of the weather forecast of extreme temperatures and comfort levels inside the facility. Maintenance Director will monitor the facility's air conditioning to ensure that all are in good working order. The Maintenance Director will monitor temperatures to ensure that air temperatures in the facility maintain comfortable temperature range of 71-80 degrees Fahrenheit. If temperatures increase, readings will be taken every hour. Maintenance will check all AC units to assure they are operating properly. On 9/5/23 via email sent at 12:54pm, V17 (Corporate Administrator) wrote we (facility) do not have a policy for homelike environment. The surveyor confirmed on 10/02/2023 through interview, record review, that the facility took the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: The facility implemented all measures on the removal plan. 1) The facility has taken the following action concerning the IJ component: a.) R21 was transferred to the hospital on 8/23/23. Per hospital, R21 has since been discharged on 8/28/23 to (alternate) facility to be closer to family. *On 9/6/2023, surveyor contacted alternate facility and affirmed R21 resides there. b.) All residents in the facility were safely relocated to other facilities in an orderly manner. *Resident evacuation from the facility was completed on 8/24/23 at approximately 1:00am per V20 (Chicago Building Department Deputy Commissioner). c.) The facility reached safe and comfortable temperatures in the building on 8/23/23. *The (8/30/23) letter provided by contractor states company was engaged to supply necessary equipment to provide temporary air conditioning to the building due to broken compressor to the facility air conditioning equipment. The temporary equipment was brought in and set up by 6:00pm CST on 8/23/23. After the equipment was running for about 30-40 minutes it brought the temperature down considerably. By the time we (contractors) left the site it was already comfortable inside the building. 2) Statement regarding residents that have the potential of being affected. a.) All residents in the facility that have been identified to have potential to be affected were relocated on 8/23/23. *Resident evacuation from the facility was completed on 8/24/23 at approximately 1:00am per V20 (Chicago Building Department Deputy Commissioner). 3) Measures the facility will take or systems to ensure the problems will be corrected and will not recur. a.) The facility contracted a vendor to provide temporary cooling of the entire building. Temporary cooling was installed on 8/23/23. *The (8/23/23) service agreement affirms temporary air conditioning at the facility was provided by (2) 30-ton air conditioners. b.) The facility purchased replacement compressors to be installed in the facility. The compressors were delivered on 8/30/23. The installation is in process. *The (8/23/23) service agreement includes scope of work: non-functioning AC. Approximate start date 8/24/23. *The (8/29/23) consignee delivery receipt includes three (3) compressors sent to facility address. *On 9/25/23 at 2:25pm, V17 (Corporate Administrator) stated the AC is completely fixed. c.) The facility initiated in-servicing for all staff on the facility policy provision and maintenance of comfortable temperature in the facility. Staff in-servicing was completed on 9/1/23. *On 9/25/23 at 2:25pm V17 stated we completed the in-services by 9/1/23 except for the staff that were on vacation and affirmed the facility remains vacant. *The (Undated) facility staff roster (including phone numbers) affirms there are 150 employees. * The facility provided PowerPoints titled Maintaining Facility Temperatures which excludes a date and/or topic discussed. * On 10/3/2023, the facility provided the attachment to the staff/roster signature page including in-service date and topic of discussion. d.) All employees on vacation and any contract staff will be in-serviced before their first day of work. *In-service titled Maintaining Facility Temperatures was documented on 10/02/2023 and includes 16 staff * A list of staff no longer working at the facility and/or unable to be reached via telephone for the in-service was also provided by the facility on 10/03/2023 4) The Director of Nursing will monitor continued compliance via the following Quality Improvement Programs once re-entry to the building is permitted by the City of Chicago. a.) A QA tool will be developed to monitor ensure safe and comfortable temperatures are maintained throughout the building by auditing the temperature logs in the building. daily. The monitoring will continue for 4 weeks and twice weekly for 8 weeks. *The F584 QA tool states the maintenance director/designee will check daily temperature on all floors and audit the temperature log to determine if the temperature is at a comfortable level however actual temperature is excluded. *On 9/27/23 at 10:52am, surveyor requested F584 QA tools for the abatement plan V17 affirmed they were not implemented. *On 9/27/23 at 3:39pm, V17 provided F584 QA tool (dated 9/27/23) which excludes temperatures. The (9/27/23) F584 QA tool was subsequently updated (as requested) to include temperatures. * On 10/03/2023 at 1:38 PM, V17 provided QA Tools with daily temperature starting logs in the building affirming that facility temperatures are taken daily starting 9/27/2023 and did not go beyond 76.3 F. b.) The results of the monitoring will be submitted to the QA/QI Committee quarterly for review and follow-up.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered and failed to ensure that three of three residents (R21, R51, R52) reviewed for medication...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered and failed to ensure that three of three residents (R21, R51, R52) reviewed for medication administration remained free from significant medication errors. These failures resulted in R21 sustaining a high blood glucose level of 249 on 8/23/23. Findings include: 1) On 8/23/23, the facility was being evacuated due to hazardous temperature in the building. R21'S diagnoses include type II diabetes mellitus. R21's (1/13/23) POS (Physician Order Sheets) include Lispro (Insulin) per sliding scale if blood glucose 200 (and above) three times daily. R21's (8/23/23) MAR (Medication Administration Record) affirms (11:00am) blood glucose level was 400 therefore 8 units of Lispro (per sliding scale) was administered. R21's (4:00pm) blood glucose level and/or Lispro insulin however were not documented (as scheduled). On 8/23/23 at 8:31pm (4.5 hours after scheduled Lispro), R21 was observed leaving the facility via ambulance. R21's (8/23/23) history & physical affirms bedside glucose level was 249 at 9:15pm. On 9/18/23 at 12:16pm, surveyor inquired about potential harm if R21 did not receive (8/23/23) blood glucose check and/or Lispro insulin as ordered V21 (Medical Director) stated, it's not good, maybe because of the chaos (referring to evacuation) they (staff) didn't do their job. He (R21) can go into a DKA (Diabetic Ketoacidosis) or something like that, it's a dangerous thing. Surveyor inquired why DKA is dangerous. V21 responded, it's not life threatening but it (DKA) can kill you. It's (DKA) preventable, I think they (facility) need to reteach the Nurses. 2) R51's diagnoses include hypertensive heart disease. R51's (4/27/23) POS includes Lisinopril (Antihypertensive) 10mg (milligrams) daily. R51's (8/23/23) MAR affirms Lisinopril was not documented at 9:00am (as scheduled). R51's (8/23/23) 9:10pm progress note states resident left facility, going to receiving facility (12 hours after scheduled Lisinopril). 3) R52's diagnoses include paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, delusional disorders, and unspecified psychosis. R52's (11/26/22) POS includes Aripiprazole (Antipsychotic) 0.5mg twice daily for behavioral disorder. R52's (8/23/23) MAR affirms Aripiprazole was not documented at 5:00pm (as scheduled). R52's (8/23/23) progress notes exclude discharge information. On 9/18/23 at 11:17am, surveyor inquired about the regulatory requirement for medication administration. V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, they (staff) need to pass them (medications) as prescribed. If they (residents) took them (medications) they (staff) supposed to sign it (Medication Administration Record). They (staff) are supposed to document they (residents) did not take it (medications). Surveyor inquired what a blank entry indicates on the MAR. V2 responded it shouldn't be a blank, it should be code for if they (staff) did or didn't give it (medications). V2 stated, The blank entry according to the law says you didn't give it. The day we had to evacuate (8/23/23) they (Building Inspectors) were trying to get the residents out the building, so I can't say what happened with medication administration that day. The instructions went out the wind when you got other entities (Building Department) giving other directions. The (undated) Licensed Practical Nurse job description states provide licensed nursing care to residents on assigned unit in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations. Dispense medications. Document the care and services delivered to the residents. The (4/2020) medication administration policy states medications are administered according to state and federal law. Document medication administration after delivering. At completion of med pass, review all EMAR's (Electronic Medication Administration Records) to assure all medications have been administered and documented.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0624 (Tag F0624)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly transfer for all 132 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly transfer for all 132 residents residing in the facility who were subjected to hazardous temperatures above 80F (Fahrenheit) on 8/23/23 requiring evacuation and transfer to different facilities. This failure affected all 132 residents residing in the facility. This failure also resulted in an unnecessary hospital transfer for R50 due to the receiving facility not being able to accommodate R50's physical needs. Findings include: R50 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses that include but are not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, heart failure, morbid obesity, myasthenia gravis, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypotension, schizophrenia, non-pressure chronic ulcer of buttock. R50 was observed being prepared for transport to the hospital by EMS (Emergency Medical Services) after returning from the receiving facility. R50 is listed on the list of Vulnerable Residents provided by the facility. Review of R50 MDS, 8/10/23, indicates R50 requires one to two persons physical assist for total dependence with bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, bathing and R50 has impairment on both sides of lower extremities. On 8/23/23 at 8:25pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated staff verbally told residents they were leaving for a couple of days and where they were going. V2 stated, I got orders to transfer everyone out/emergency evacuate from the doctor. Social Service called everybody's family. We are sending staff to sister facilities. Medications, face sheets, transfer forms are going with them. We encouraged residents to take two to three days of belongings. Nurses and CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) are with vulnerable residents and assessing them. They are taking vitals, checking for dehydration, signs, and symptoms of distress. I told the morning shift to document. Everyone will document eventually. Staff drove the van to sister facilities. CTA (Chicago Transit Authority) came with a cooling station from approximately 11am - 6pm. On 8/23/23 at 8:30pm, V8 (Social Service Director) stated V8 sent an automated/Robo message to POAs (Power of Attorneys), State Guardians, emergency contacts, friends, and family that the air conditioner is down. V8 stated, I explained we are taking care of the residents, checking hydration, they are in cool areas. I started around 12pm. I talked to the majority of calls. On 8/23/23 at 8:45pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated R50 was sent to a receiving facility. The receiving facility did not have a mechanical lift that R50 requires so R50 was sent back here (facility). The city inspector said R50 could not come back into the building. R50 is going to the hospital. On 8/31/23 at 12:11pm, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated on 8/23/23, V6 was in the facility from 7:15am until 11pm. V6 said it was humid and warm in the building in the morning and it got hotter as the day went on. V6 said it was uncomfortable but tolerable and the residents were uncomfortable but not really complaining that much. V6 said staff tried to hydrate the residents as much as they could by handing out water and there was lemon water kept at the nursing station. Residents could access it themselves. V6 said residents were served breakfast and lunch and had sandwiches for dinner. V6 said the facility had big fans that had to have water in the bottom of them and they blew out cool air. V6 said V6 worked the 1st floor and had residents in wheelchairs but no dependent residents and none confined to bed. V6 said there was one CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) on the 1st floor for the morning shift that helped with showers and meals, but residents were able to go to the bathroom on their own. V6 said, about 3pm the Director of Nursing said to make sure residents are hydrated and about 4pm, before dinner, the Director of Nursing announced to staff that there was a heat emergency, and the facility is evacuating. V6 said V6's role during the evacuation was to pack residents' medications in individual bags with the face sheets. Someone else printed the face sheets. V6 told residents that they have to leave now but they will be coming back soon. V6 said some residents were reluctant to pack up their stuff and leave. V6 said three to four residents on V6's floor said, I'm not going, I want to stay here. V6 said CNA's helped residents pack clothes. V6 said V6 did not tell residents where they were going or how long they would be there because V6 did not know where they were going or how long they would be there. V6 said Social Service contacted POA's (Power of Attorneys), and family. V6 said the facility evacuated the 2nd and 3rd floors to the 1st floor because it was cooler on the 1st floor. V6 said when V6 left the building at 11:20pm there were nine residents left in the building. V6 said V6 made sure their medications were ready and available. V6 said staff had a list of the residents getting on a certain bus. Staff would come and ask for those residents. V6 said the evacuation process was controlled chaos. V6 said there were no plans made to evacuate before we (facility) did it. The only orders beforehand where to hydrate the residents. V6 said the normal procedure for a transfer is to get orders from the doctor, give report to the receiving hospital, call the ambulance, and call the family. The nurse sends the face sheet and medication sheet with the resident when they go out. If a petition is needed, Social Service does the petition, and the nurse sends it with the face sheet and medication sheet with the resident. On 9/1/23 at 4:10pm, R86 stated we (residents) are in another building because they (facility) didn't fix the air conditioner. They wouldn't get the compressors fixed on the unit. They were acting like nothing happened. I bought me a fan before it got really hot. Even with the fan I was hot. It was sweltering in the building. I was sweating, it was uncomfortable. It was 96 degrees in my room. My AC (air conditioner) was not working in my room. The staff was drenched in sweat. It was hot two days before. They told us why we were being moved. I didn't get here (receiving facility) until 2am (8/24/23). Everything was so disorganized. I think they had to find a van that my electric chair could get in. Nobody was saying nothing/what was wrong. They finally told me where I was going around 1 am. They told us to pack clothes for three days. I been here near two weeks. They sent my medicine. I don't know when I'll be going back. Review of R86's medical records did not document if any nursing report was provided to the receiving facility. On 9/5/23 at 4:20pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated around 11am on 8/23/2023 they said the building inspector was in the building to check the air conditioner and room temperatures. The building inspector said we had to evacuate due to high temperatures. The building inspector, fire dept, police, ombudsman, and IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) were at the facility. It was chaos trying to take direction from all the different entities. I told staff to take vitals, hydrate the residents and to document. CHUG (Collaborative Healthcare Urgency Group) sent a cooling bus that was at the facility until approximately 6 PM. V16 (Maintenance Director) took temperatures in the building. The previous days before 8/23/23 it was warm but comfortable because we had the portable units. I was told the compressors went out on the air conditioning unit, but I don't know when. Staff was logging where the residents were going. I can't quote the evacuation policy. This was my first evacuation. At the point of evacuation, the temperatures were not safe for the residents. Nobody told me any residents were complaining of being too hot. For a typical transfer, we get doctors order, notify family, notify resident why they're being transferred, when they will be transferred, where they are going, how they are getting there, by ambulance, etc. and call and give report to the receiving facility. We may not have been able to call to notify everyone. There was no way that could have been done in an emergent situation. Corporate was working behind the scenes because there was no way we could keep up. They were assisting with getting doctors' orders, they gave access to the records to receiving facilities. R50 went to one of the facilities (V2 did not remember which one) and they didn't have a mechanical lift and R50 was brought back to the facility. The building inspector said R50 couldn't come back in the building, so we (facility) called 911 for R50 to go to the hospital to get R50 out of the heat. I don't know if the receiving facility got verbal report but corporate gave receiving facilities access to records. Direction came from corporate on where to send residents. Corporate was in the building giving assignments to staff and I was giving assignments to staff. Information to give for report includes cognition level, diet, vital signs, weight, etc. On 9/8/23 at 2:55pm, V24 (Administrator at receiving facility) stated R50 needed skilled nursing. We are an ICF (Intermediate Care Facility). We don't have a mechanical lift. The facility sent a van with approximately five residents, including (R50), in it and at least two staff. (R50) was sitting on a mechanical lift sling so I asked the staff if (R50) required skilled services. They said yes so, we (receiving facility) could not take (R50). I don't know if report was given to us. On 9/8/23 at 3:26pm, V25 (Director of Nursing at receiving facility) stated we (receiving facility) were unable to take R50 because R50 was a two person assist and required a mechanical lift. We don't take residents that require a mechanical lift in an ICF (Intermediate Care Facility) setting. We (V24 and V25) recognized R50 needed a mechanical lift, R50 was sitting on the sling, and R50 was sent back to the facility. It was approximately five residents on the van. We were able to keep the other residents. The facility telephoned and gave us (V24 and V25) a list of names of the residents they would be sending, and they gave us access to view records in the electronic record. We didn't have much time to look at all the records before the residents arrived at our facility. There was no verbal report given to any staff here (receiving facility), just a list of names and access to the electronic record. On 9/12/23 at 5:44pm, V91 (Primary Physician) stated there should be a hand off even between shifts, especially between facilities. The new/receiving nurse does not know the patient they are receiving. When transferring a resident, it is best standard of care to report to the receiving nurse/facility. If reporting is not done there may be gaps in care. Reporting is done to provide the best quality of care to the residents. Review of R50 physician order summary reveals an order May transfer out to receiving facility, ordered 8/23/2023, ordered by physician, created by V2 (DON) Review of R50 progress notes reveals no documentation for R50's transfer to another facility, including no documentation that report was given to another facility and no documentation of R50's transfer to a hospital. R50's hospital record reads registration date 8/23/2023; documents in part: is brought to the ED (Emergency Department) by EMS (Emergency Medical Services) from SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) c/o buttock pain. EMS states the patient was initially being transferred today to another SNF as his original SNF lost air conditioning. The new, temporary SNF also lost air conditioning and the original SNF declined to bring the patient back as they still did not have air conditioning. The patient was then transferred to the ED for evaluation of buttock pain that began while waiting. The onset was today. The course/duration of symptoms is constant. Location: buttock. The character of symptoms is pain. The degree at onset was minimal. The degree at present is minimal. (Per EHR practitioner note). admit date [DATE] 21:19 CDT, discharge date [DATE]. Review of random residents' charts affirm that there was no documentation regarding any nursing report provided to the receiving facility. Facility Resident Rights policy, 4/2020, documents in part: The residents will be assured of the following rights: safe and good care. Facility Emergency Transfer/Discharge policy, 4/2020, documents in part: Emergency transfers should include the following: A. Obtain an order for emergency transfer or discharge. B. Contact an ambulance service and provide brief synopsis of emergency situation, a) a staff member should remain with the resident until the emergency transport team arrives, b) contact receiving emergency department and give verbal report. C. Complete and send with the resident the transfer form. D. Copies of the face sheet, physician orders, bed hold policy and advance directives should be sent with the transfer form. E. A copy of the bed hold policy should be given to the resident. F. Document information regarding the transfer and related assessments in the medical records. Facility Resident Rights policy, 4/2020, documents in part: The residents will be assured of the following rights: safe and good care. Facility Emergency Transfer/Discharge policy, 4/2020, documents in part: Emergency transfers should include the following: A. Obtain an order for emergency transfer or discharge. B. Contact an ambulance service and provide brief synopsis of emergency situation, a) a staff member should remain with the resident until the emergency transport team arrives, b) contact receiving emergency department and give verbal report. C. Complete and send with the resident the transfer form. D. Copies of the face sheet, physician orders, bed hold policy and advance directives should be sent with the transfer form. E. A copy of the bed hold policy should be given to the resident. F. Document information regarding the transfer and related assessments in the medical records.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed, failed to post alternate menu, failed to provide meal options, and failed to provide meals tim...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed, failed to post alternate menu, failed to provide meal options, and failed to provide meals timely. This failure has the potential to affect 130 residents receiving meals from facility. Findings include: The 8/23/23 menu includes the following: Lunch; spaghetti noodles, Italian blend vegetables, strawberry blondie, garlic Texas toast, coffee/tea. Supper: chicken nuggets, crispy French fries seasoned corn, watermelon, milk, coffee/hot tea. On 8/23/23, residents were being evacuated from the facility due to hazardous temperatures in the building. On 8/23/23 at approximately 7:00pm, surveyor observed sandwiches, fruit and juice being served to residents however an alternate menu was not posted and/or offered at this time. On 8/23/23 at 7:05pm, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) affirmed dinner had not been served but they (staff) are bringing something for the residents now. On 8/23/23 at 7:15pm, R86 stated there was no dinner served, residents just got a sandwich. R86's (6/20/23) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 14 (Cognitively Intact). On 8/23/23 at 8:25pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated we changed to a cold menu for lunch and dinner today. For lunch residents had turkey and cheese with beets and onions, Kool-Aid and milk. For dinner residents had tuna sandwiches, fruit, and apple juice. On 8/29/23, surveyor requested the (8/23/23) alternate menu however received the always available menu dated 8/23/23 which includes but not limited to chicken nuggets, cottage cheese, deli sandwich, cheeseburger, peanut butter & jelly sandwich, grilled cheese sandwich, grilled chicken patty with cheese sandwich, and chef's salad. The (8/23/23) census includes 132 residents. On 9/11/23 at 4:09pm, surveyor inquired how many residents receive meals from the facility V22 (Dietary Manager) stated All except 2, we had 2 NPO (nothing by mouth). [therefore 130 residents]. Surveyor inquired what was served on 8/23/23 V22 responded If I'm not mistaken it was a tuna salad sandwich, a tossed salad, cookies, and juice for supper because we evacuated after lunch. We had deli sandwiches for lunch. Surveyor inquired what time supper is scheduled V22 replied at 5:00 (pm). Surveyor inquired what time supper was served on 8/23/23 V22 stated It was between 5 and 7 (pm). Surveyor inquired if chicken nuggets, cottage cheese, cheeseburgers, grilled cheese sandwich, grilled chicken patty with cheese sandwich, and/or chef's salad were served on 8/23/23 V22 responded Um, grilled cheese, I don't think so. Maybe chef salad or cottage cheese I would say yes because it wasn't no hot food served that day. We were serving tuna salad sandwiches and I wanna say beet salad and chips for regular diets. [chips, cottage cheese, cookies and/or salads were not observed 8/23/23 on resident plates]. On 9/11/23 at 4:21pm, surveyor inquired if an alternate menu was posted throughout the facility on 8/23/23 V23 (Cook) stated It should have been, I'm not for sure. Surveyor inquired what was served 8/23/23 V23 responded We didn't serve supper, we served breakfast and lunch. Supper was supposed to be tuna though. For lunch, we did deli sandwiches with beets and onions. For supper they were evacuating so we had to prepare tuna sandwiches for residents that were still there. Surveyor inquired what time supper was served on 8/23/23 V23 replied When IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) got there [IDPH surveyors entered the facility at approximately 6:30pm] I know someone called down and said supper needed served to residents that were left. Surveyor inquired if chicken nuggets, cottage cheese, cheeseburgers, peanut butter & jelly sandwich, grilled cheese sandwich, grilled chicken patty with cheese sandwich, and/or chef's salad were served on 8/23/23 V23 stated No, I think it was just fruit plates we had watermelon, cantaloupe, grapes, oranges or pineapples we put 3 different fruits on a plate. Some have cottage cheese or yogurt. [Yogurt was also not observed 8/23/23 on resident plates]. The (5/2020) menus policy states menus are developed and prepared to meet resident choices including religious, cultural, and ethnic needs while following established national guidelines for nutritional adequacy. Deviations from posted menus are recorded (including the reason for the substitution and/or deviation) and archived. Menus provide a variety of foods from the basic daily food groups and indicate standard portions at each meal. If a food group is missing from a resident's daily diet (e.g., dairy products) resident is provided an alternate means of meeting his or her nutritional needs (e.g., calcium supplementation or fortified non-dairy alternatives).
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Administration (Tag F0835)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide resources in a safe, effective, and efficient manner, and failed to provide adequate supervision, direction and instr...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide resources in a safe, effective, and efficient manner, and failed to provide adequate supervision, direction and instruction during the evacuation and discharge of facility residents. These failures have the potential to affect all 132 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The (8/23/23) census included 132 residents. On 8/23/23, the Chicago temperature was 98 degrees Fahrenheit with heat index 116 degrees Fahrenheit per National Weather Service. The Emergency closure order documents, in part, effective date 8/23/23. Community Care Center, located at 4314 S. Wabash Avenue, Chicago, IL is a public nuisance that is dangerous, hazardous and endangers the public health due to the violations as stated in the attached Property Condition Report: Department of Building Property Condition Report, Building Code Violations that Constitute an Actual and Imminent Danger, and Lift Safety: Cooling system at the facility is inoperable, Location Entire Premises. On 8/23/23 at 6:24 pm, surveyor observed residents sitting outside of the facility in wheelchairs on the sidewalk with staff. No observation of water being offer or given to the residents while outside. On 8/23/23 at approximately 7:00 pm, a total of 39 (R4, R5, R7, R8, R11, R19, R20, R25, R29, R32, R33, R38, R42, R43, R45, R54, R56, R62, R63, R65, R66, R74, R75, R82, R84, R85, R86, R88, R92, R94, R96, R99, R106, R107, R116, R120, R121, R127, R133) residents observed by surveyor inside and/or outside the facility. On 8/30/23 at 11:00 am V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated, the building was warm, and I (V2) instructed my staff to keep checking on the residents and hydrating them. We (facility) did have a cooling bus for the residents till around 6:00 pm. The building inspector said the facility had to evacuate due to high temperatures. V2 stated, I did not know the temperature in the building. The facility started to evacuate the building around 12:00 pm. On 8/31/23 at 11:02 am, surveyor inquired to V17 (Corporate Administrator) if facility staff were aware of the (8/23/23) impending heat advisory. V17 responded, I (V17) think the Administrator and the Maintenance were aware. Surveyor inquired if the facility AC (Air Conditioner) was working prior to 8/23/23. V17 replied, I want to believe that they had a problem with the air condition prior to that day which they had temporary measures (portable coolers on all the floors that blow cold air, fans, hydrating residents, taking temperature of the building to ascertain if there was any need to evacuate) in place but because of the weather that day (referring to 8/23/23) it made the measures in place not work. On 8/31/23 at 10:39 am, V16 (Maintenance Director) stated, two compressors went down (not working) a week prior to 8/23/23. We (facility) have been using 17 temporary portable air conditioning units. V16 affirmed on 8/23/23 around 7:30am it was beginning to get hot in the facility, and around 9:30am the temperature became uncomfortable. Residents started to complain about the facility temperature around 10:30am. The facility had temporary fixes in place, but the main air conditioning unit would not be able to be fixed without new compressors. The city (Building Department, Fire Department, Police) was at the facility (8/23/23) because someone called 311. By the time the portable AC unit got to the facility it was too late, the evacuation had started. August 2023 Daily Air Temperature Logs affirm temperatures were documented 8/1 -8/3/23, 8/5-8/6/23, and 8/23/23 no hourly temperatures recorded. On 9/5/23 at 12:34 pm, V20 (Chicago Building Department Deputy Commissioner) stated, I (V20) did temperatures in all common areas and patient rooms readings were 81-91 degrees between 12:30 pm and 1:30 pm. At that point, we (Fire/Building Departments) had made the decision that the building needed to be closed due to patient safety. We waited outside the building until all the residents were gone which was about 1am. Surveyor inquired who initiated the facility evacuation. V20 replied, this was a joint closure from the Department of Buildings and Chicago Fire Department. The fire alarm was not functioning properly, and the stairwells have electronic locks where you have to type in a security code, but the problem was it took a very long time to find a staff that could access those codes and a door was inoperable. V20 stated, it was chaotic in the facility. When the facility was told the building needed to be closed, it seemed like there was no organized plan to evacuate the residents and nobody knew what to do. On 9/5/23 at 4:20 pm V2 (DON) stated with a typical transfer, the facility got doctors order, notify family, notify resident why they're being transferred, when they (resident) will be transferred, where they (resident) are going, how they are getting there, and call and give report to the receiving facility. We (facility) may not have been able to call to notify everyone. There was no way that could have been done in an emergent situation. Corporate was working behind the scenes because there was no way we could keep up. On 9/11/23 at 2:12 pm, V1 (Administrator) stated, she was aware of the (8/23/23) impending heat advisory from the local news report, and I was aware that the AC was not working in the facility. The implementation that was put in place to address the facilities AC malfunction prior to 8/23/23 was the regional director put in portable? cooler units, they were supposed to be used throughout the facility. That was temporary. A contractor came out to look at the AC for repairing. Surveyor asked how staff have been trained regarding hazardous temperatures. V1 stated, the Maintenance director and department managers communicated with their staff the temperatures in the building and what to do to make the residents comfortable. V1 stated, requirements for an evacuation could be if the temperatures are above the normal temperature of 81 degrees. Surveyor asked on 8/23/2023 what time were hazardous temperatures identified in the facility. V1 stated, I believe it was 10:30 am. I cannot recall the exact time. Surveyor inquired, when did the building department and/or fire department arrived at the facility on 8/23/2023. V1 stated the building department arrived around 11:30 am or 12:00 pm. A resident family member called them. Surveyor asked, on 8/23/2023 what time did residents began evacuating from the facility. V1 stated, I don't know what time the resident started to evacuate we started putting then on a cooling bus. That was shortly after the building people came maybe around 1:00 pm. V1 stated, the social service director was notifying family members. All family members were notified within 24 hours. V1 stated, the time the residents left the facility was not on the log sheet only where the residents were transferred to. V1 stated, the regional team was responsible for the emergency plan for evacuation. V1 stated, the last resident that left the building was after midnight. The facility evacuation did not start as soon as hazardous temperatures were observed. Management was not aware what time the evacuation started. The facility did not start evacuating until the City of Chicago Building Dept. told them to do so around 1:00 pm when the engineers arrived in the building. Temperatures were not taken every hour. Management did not provide supervision to staff to ensure policies were being implemented. Some residents were left outside the building around 6:30 pm, management did not provide direction to ensure residents are not exposed to hazardous temperature. Evacuation was disorderly, management did not provide direction to staff to ensure safe transfer and evacuation. Facility Policy dated (5/1/23) titled Evacuation, Transportation and Relocation Plan, states each facility shall establish and implement policies and procedures in a written plan to provide for the health, safety, welfare and comfort of all residents when the heat index/apparent temperature (see Section 300. Table D) as established by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, inside the facility exceeds 80 degrees F. (Facility) shall have policies and procedures which address the needs of evacuees. (Facility) shall ensure that policies and procedures shall also address staff responsibilities during evacuations. (Facility) shall consider the patient population needs as well as their care and treatment. Facility Policy dated (11/1/22) titled Hot Weather/Heat Emergencies, documents, in part, the Administrator will be aware of the weather forecast of extreme temperatures and comfort levels inside the facility. The Maintenance Director will monitor the facility's air conditioning to ensure that all are in good working order. The maintenance director will monitor temperatures to ensure that air temperatures in the facility maintain comfortable temperature range of 71-80 degrees F. If temperatures increase, readings will be taken every hour. Emergency Operations Plan: Remove residents from areas that are exposed to direct sunlight. Recommending residents to stay indoors during extreme heat conditions. Report any changes in the resident's condition. Be sure to have an up-to- date and accurate list of all residents who are high risk to be adversely affected by extreme temperatures. Facility job description undated and titled Maintenance Associate- Environment Services Associate, documents, in part, General Job Description: The primary purpose of the job position is to perform general maintenance and repairs for assigned equipment and facilities including plumbing, electrical, basic carpentry, heating and cooling, and other building systems and respond to safety concerns. Duties and Responsibilities: Inspect and identifies equipment or machines in need of repair and complete repairs.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to document AC (Air Conditioner) concerns on a maintenan...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to document AC (Air Conditioner) concerns on a maintenance log/worksheet, failed to repair malfunctioning AC, failed to ensure that the AC remained operable, and failed to maintain facility air temperature below 80F (Fahrenheit). These failures affected 132 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The (8/23/23) census includes 132 residents. The (8/23/23) daily air temperature log includes but not limited to the following hazardous temperatures: 81.2F in room [ROOM NUMBER], 86.0F in room [ROOM NUMBER], 86.1F at the (2nd floor) Nurse's station and 86.2F in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 8/23/23 at 6:46pm, the (2nd floor) temperature was uncomfortably hot. V8 (Social Service Director) stated the facility air conditioner has been out since Monday 8/21/23 (2 days prior). On 8/23/23 at 7:07pm, R79 stated it has been hot for about a month now, they (staff) provided fans. R79's (6/6/23) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 12 (moderate impairment). The daily air temperatures were not documented (8/9/23-8/22/23) therefore unable to ascertain actual temperatures during that timeframe. On 8/23/23 at 7:15pm, 1st floor staff were noted to be sweating and their clothes visibly wet. On 8/23/23 at 7:22pm, R92 reported feeling hot. R92's (7/25/23) BIMS determined a score of 15 (cognitively intact). On 8/23/23 at 7:27pm, R75 stated I feel terrible, I feel hot. R75's (8/17/23) BIMS determined a score of 10 (moderate impairment). On 8/23/23 at 7:30pm, R45 stated yesterday and today it got really hot. The AC in my room didn't work this morning staff tried to turn it on, but it didn't work. R45's (7/21/23) BIMS determined a score of 12. On 8/23/23 at 9:38pm, V9 (RDO/Regional Director of Operations) stated we were able to maintain comfortable temperature levels in the building until this morning. The City of Chicago Building Department called around 12:30pm, the temperature levels were not comfortable. We (facility) were told to evacuate the residents. The (8/23/23) emergency closure order states I, Commissioner of the City of Chicago Department of Buildings, pursuant to Chicago Municipal Code Chapter 14A-3-307, hereby find that the property known as (Facility Name) is a public nuisance that is dangerous, hazardous and endangers the public health due to the violations as stated in the attached property condition report. The attached (8/23/23) property condition report states cooling system at this facility is inoperable. Location: entire premises. On 8/29/23, 8/30/23 and 9/5/23 surveyor requested the (July/August 2023) facility maintenance logs from V2 (Director of Nursing) and V17 (Corporate Administrator) however none were received. On 8/31/23 at 10:39am, surveyor inquired about the facility AC V16 (Maintenance Director) stated two compressors went down (not working) a week prior to 8/23/23. We've (facility) been using 17 temporary portable air conditioning units. On 8/23/23 around 7:30am it was beginning to get hot in the facility, and around 9:30am the temperature became uncomfortable. Residents started to complain about the facility temperature around 10:30am. The facility had temporary fixes in place, but the main air conditioning unit would not be able to be fixed without new compressors. On 8/31/23 at 11:02am, inquired if the facility AC malfunctioned prior to 8/23/23 V17 (Corporate Administrator) replied I want to believe that they had a problem with the air conditioning prior to that day which they had temporary measures (portable coolers on all the floors that blow cold air, fans, taking temperature of the building to ascertain if there's any need to evacuate) in place but because of the weather that day (referring to 8/23/23) it made the measure in place not working. The Chicago temperature was 98F (Fahrenheit) with heat index 116F per National Weather Service on 8/23/23. On 9/5/23 at 12:34pm, inquired about the (8/23/23) facility temperature V20 (Chicago Building Department Deputy Commissioner) responded I did temperatures in all the common areas and patient rooms, readings were 85-91F between 12:30pm and 1:30pm. At that point, we (Building/Fire Departments) had made the decision that the building needed to be closed due to patient safety. There was no deferred maintenance being done at this facility, it did not appear to me. Over time you're supposed to reinvest in your facility and make sure that any work that needs to be done gets taken care of. About a month before we shut down this building (facility) we (Buildings Department) received a complaint about their (facility) air conditioning not working. We (Buildings Department) sent someone out to take temperatures and they (facility staff) wouldn't let him (Buildings Inspector) in. I (V20) got a call from one of my inspectors that said the contractor did not get a call until that day (8/23/23) to repair the air conditioner. They (staff) tried to say that they had temporary cooling at the facility but basically, they just had fans not air conditioning. There was no air conditioning functioning in this building. This is the type of building that every room needs cooled because of the population. On 9/6/23 a service agreement to repair facility AC (prior to 8/23/23) was requested from V17 (Corporate Administrator). On 9/7/23 at 10:17am, an email was received (from V17) which states the facility does not have an AC service agreement. The facility employs facility maintenance personnel, including regional personnel experienced in HVAC (Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning) repair. Prior to 8/23/23, the facility and regional maintenance team continued to attempt to repair the system while looking for a replacement chiller. The following repairs were made to the system: relief valve replaced, cooling system recharged, refrigerant levels inspected. On 9/7/23 at 1:22pm, surveyor inquired how maintenance concerns are reported. V16 (Maintenance Director) stated every floor in the building has a log with maintenance care on it, staff/residents will fill it out and the log gets checked daily. Surveyor inquired if V16 has HVAC experience, V16 responded 'no ma'am and I don't mess with anything I don't know about, I call Corporate'. Surveyor inquired when the facility AC broke V16 replied, the AC went down on us on a Wednesday and affirmed it was sometime prior to Wednesday 8/23/23 evacuation. Surveyor inquired how V16 determined the AC was broken. V16 replied it wasn't getting as cool as it was and when I checked it (AC), it was off. I told Corporate that day it wasn't blowing cold air and we needed someone to come look at it. He (Corporate staff) came the very next day and brought freon. One of the AC compressors (the first one) was cracked and seized the other two compressors. You can't put freon in the first compressor, that's the one that leads to the other two compressors, so if you put freon in the first one (compressor) its (freon) just running out. Surveyor inquired what the facility implemented when the AC was broke. V16 stated we had the (Brand Name) portable cooling system. They were located throughout the building in the dining areas and hallways on each floor. We (facility) went and bought about 8 or 9 window AC units and threw them in the windows, we didn't have it (AC) in every room. By the time we (Facility) got preparation the heat took over. An invoice was provided by the facility with itemized descriptions and receipts dated 7/20/23-8/13/23 however compressors (required to repair the AC - per V16) are excluded. Eight (8) portable coolers (dated 8/4) were documented on the invoice. The (8/4/23) attached receipt includes 8 brand name (reconditioned) portable evaporative coolers (for 950 square feet). The facility is 62,529 square feet (per document received by facility 9/7/23) therefore likely not sufficient to cool the entire building. On 9/11/23, surveyor requested receipts for window AC's ordered by the facility. The (8/23/23) receipt (received 9/11/23) affirms two (2) 5,000 BTU (British Thermal Unit) window AC's were purchased. According to the EPA's (Environmental Protection Agency) rule of thumb role, 5,000 BTU room size should be 250 square feet (or less) for effective cooling. On 9/12/23, the facility provided (8/4/23) receipt including two (2) 5,000 BTU window AC's and (8/23/23) receipt including two (2) 5050 window AC's and two (2) booster fans [also likely not sufficient to cool the entire building]. The (2013) maintenance repair worksheet policy & procedure states it is the policy of this facility to communicate needed repairs to the maintenance department via the maintenance worksheet. Purpose: to assure that all maintenance needs are addressed in a regular and timely fashion. To provide staff and residents an effective reporting method for needed maintenance services. To track response time of maintenance services. The maintenance supervisor is to review this worksheet each morning and delegate assigned items between him/herself and the maintenance assistant. The maintenance worksheet must be completed for each reported item. Filed and completed maintenance worksheets are to be maintained in a separate binder labeled maintenance worksheet records.
Aug 2023 13 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling catheter drainage bag was covered for dignity. This failure affected 1 (R103) resident reviewed ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling catheter drainage bag was covered for dignity. This failure affected 1 (R103) resident reviewed for dignity in the total sample of 59 residents. Findings include: On 08/07/23 at 10:56 AM, R103's indwelling catheter drainage bag was not in privacy bag and was placed on the left side of R103's bed, towards the door. This observation was pointed out to V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant). V6 stated that it was not covered for privacy. On 08/09/2023 at 12:05pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, indwelling catheter drainage bag should be in a privacy bag for dignity. R103's diagnoses include but not limited to paranoid schizophrenia, myalgia and muscle spasm. R103's (05/23/2023) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 15. Indicating R103's mental status as cognitively intact. Section H. Bladder and Bowel. H0100. Appliances. A. Indwelling catheter. H0300. Urinary Continence. 9. Not rated, resident had a catheter. R103's (01/24/2023) Care Plan documented, in part, Focus: has indwelling catheter. Goal: Will remain free from catheter related trauma. Interventions: Position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. The (3/2021) Foley catheter - Use and Management documented, in part Guideline: Indwelling catheter should be used only when specific medical conditions exist requiring the use of the catheter. Procedure: 8. A catheter bag cover may be used to promote patient sense of dignity and to help secure the bag.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 2 residents (R87, R91) out of 59 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R91's diagno...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 2 residents (R87, R91) out of 59 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R91's diagnosis includes, but are not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, cyst of kidney, acquired, asthma, hypothyroidism, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, heart failure, unspecified, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, myasthenia gravis without (acute) exacerbation, unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site, hyperlipidemia, unspecified, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, history of falling, nonrheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis, chronic kidney disease, stage 3 unspecified, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, non-pressure chronic ulcer of buttock with unspecified severity, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness (generalized), schizophrenia, unspecified, and hypotension, unspecified. R91 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 5/12/2023 documents, R91 has a BIMS score of 12, indicating R91 has some moderate cognitive impairments. R87's diagnosis includes but are not limited to, disorganized schizophrenia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, Alzheimer's disease, unspecified, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, aphasia following cerebral infarction, dysphagia, unspecified, hyperlipidemia, unspecified, other seizures, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. R87 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 4/27/2023 documents that C0100. Should Brief Interview for Mental Status be Conducted? 0. No. C0700. Short Term Memory OK? 1. Memory Problem, C0800. Long-term Memory OK? 1.Memory problem C0900. Memory/Recall Ability? Z. None of the above were recalled. C1000. Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making? 3. Severely impaired. On 08/07/2023 at 10:49am surveyor observed R87's red call light string clipped to the wall behind the head of R87's bed. On 08/07/2023 at 10:55 am R91's orange call light string was clipped to the wall above the head of R91's bed. Surveyor asked R91 where call light string was located. R91 stated, I do not know. R91 stated, I usually must holler for the nurse to come to my room, sometimes the nurse comes into my room when I holler. On 08/07/2023 at 11:00 am V5 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R87's call light string is hanging on the wall; the call light is to be attached to the resident's bed. V5 stated, R87 doesn't typically request anything, R87 does not need much. V5 stated, we (nursing staff) do regular rounds to make sure R87 is okay. On 08/07/2023 at 11:05am V5 was observed moving R87's call light string which was clipped on the wall and placing the call light string into the bed near R87's right hand. On 08/08/2023 at 11:45am V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated, the call light should be in the bed with the resident or as close to the resident as possible. The facility's 4/2020 policy titled; Call Lights does not document a reasonably accessible location for the residents' call light system.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to list the code status for one resident (R40) on the electronic medica...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to list the code status for one resident (R40) on the electronic medical record. This failure has the potential to affect one resident (R40) in a sample of 59 residents. Findings include: R40's admission Record documents, in part, diagnoses of diabetes, hypertension, gastro esophageal reflux, pacemaker, dilated cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, sick sinus syndrome, and congestive heart failure. R40 's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents in part, Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicates that R40 is cognitively intact. R40's Order Summary Report (POS) with active orders as of 8/9/23, documents that no physician's order for advance directives (full code or DNR {Do Not Resuscitate} status) for R40. R40's admission Record Form for Advance Directive section was blank. R40's Care plan dated 5/3/23 documents in part, Goal: Advance Directive information will be assessed and discussed and honored at each time point. Interventions: Advance Directives will be honored as needed during treatment. An assessment will be completed with the resident at each quarter. Staff will assist in completing advance directive papers as needed. On 8/9/23 at 1:35 pm, V14 (Social Service Director) stated, R40 has been in the facility since May of 2023 and does not have an advance directive. Surveyor inquired about R40's advance directive on R40's face sheet. V14 stated, No it's not there. V40 not having an advance directive is my error, I should have followed up and tried to get an advance directive. V14 stated, the purpose of an advance directive is to honor the residents wishes for end of like decisions. On 8/9/23 at 3:30 pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, a code status should be on every resident in the facility. The code status should be on the resident's face sheet. The nurses call the doctor and get an order for a code status and put the order in the computer. V2 stated, the purpose of an advance directive is to know what to do pertaining to the resident's code status and wishes. Facility policy dated 4/2020 and titled Advance Directives, documents in part, Procedure: 1. Upon admission, nursing is to clarify the advance Directive orders that have accompanied the resident/patient. 2. The resident's/patient's physician should be informed of advance directives and copies should be placed in the medical record. Physician's orders to support the advanced directive should be obtain by nursing personnel as appropriate.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0582 (Tag F0582)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide two residents (R64, R138) Medicare end of coverage notice. This failure has the potential to affect all 59 residents in the sample. ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide two residents (R64, R138) Medicare end of coverage notice. This failure has the potential to affect all 59 residents in the sample. Findings include: On 08/08/23 at 12:15 pm, surveyor was provided beneficiary protection notification review forms for R64 and R138 without a signed Medicare end of coverage notice was provided to R64 and R138's or R64 and R138's representatives. On 08/07/23 at 12:25 pm, V14 (Social Service Director) was interviewed regarding Medicare end of coverage notice to residents. V14 stated, V14 is responsible for providing the residents with a Medicare end of coverage notice at the facility. V14 stated, V14 does not know why V14 did not issue R64 and R138 a Medicare end of coverage notice. V14 stated, V14 should have issued R64, and R138 a Medicare end of coverage notice within 72 hours of R64 and R138's Medicare Part A last day of covered services. V14 stated, I (V14) going to be up front and let you know I did not do it. I (V14) had just started this position in November of 22 and was still learning my job. When V14 was asked regarding the importance of residents receiving Medicare end of coverage notice, V14 stated, So the resident is aware they can appeal Medicare and will know when there Medicare coverage is scheduled to end. R64's beneficiary protection notification review form presented by V14 shows R64 Medicare Part A skilled services episode start date 12/14/2023. Last day of part A services dated 02/25/2023. R138's beneficiary protection notification review form presented by V14 shows R138 Medicare Part A skilled services episode start date 01/18/2023. Last day of part A services dated 02/02/2023. R64's Face sheet documents R64 has a diagnosis including but not limited to: Major depressive disorder single episode, bipolar disorder current episode manic severe with psychotic features, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, insomnia, and fibromyalgia. R64's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 07/29/23 documents R64 has a BIMS score of 11 which indicates R64 has some cognitive impairments. R138's Face sheet documents R138 has a diagnosis including but not limited to paranoid schizophrenia, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, acquired absence of other toe(s) unspecified side, and schizoaffective disorder. R138's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 01/30/23 documents, R138 has a BIMS score of 12 which indicates R138 has some cognitive impairments. Beneficiary Notices 1. The NOMNC is given by the facility to all Medicare beneficiaries at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay or when all of Part B therapies are ending. The NOMNC informs the beneficiaries of the right to an expedited review by a Quality Improvement Organization. 2. Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN). It is the facility's responsibility to inform the beneficiary about potential non-coverage and the option to continue services with the beneficiary accepting financial liability for those services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the piston syringe was changed daily for 1 (R84) resident reviewed for tube feeding in the total sample of 59 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the piston syringe was changed daily for 1 (R84) resident reviewed for tube feeding in the total sample of 59 residents. Findings include: On 08/07/23 at 10:21 AM, R84's piston syringe was in bag was labeled with R84's name, room number, bed number, and was dated 8/6/23. This observation was pointed out to V5 (Licensed Practice Nurse). V5 checked the piston syringe and stated, the nurse who worked here last night did not change the syringe. The piston syringe should be changed daily. On 08/09/2023 at 11:56am, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, My (V2) night shift nurse is responsible for changing the piston syringe. If they come in on the 6th of the month, the date on the piston syringe should be on the 7th of the month. The importance of changing the piston syringe daily is to prevent infection. R84's diagnoses include but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, aphasia, gastrostomy status, and seizure. R84's (05/25/2023) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: no entry. C.0700. Short Term Memory OK. 1 memory problem. C0800. Long-term memory OK. 1. Memory problem. Section K. Swallowing/Nutritional status. K0510. Nutritional approaches. B. Feeding tube. 2. While a resident. R84's (03/15/2023) Care Plan documented, in part Focus: requires tube feeding. Goal: will maintain adequate hydration. Interventions: dependent with tube feeding and water flushes. The (3/2021) Enteral Feedings - General documented, in part Policy: to provide nutrition support when the residents unable to ingest adequate nutrition orally. To promote healing thru adequate hydration. Procedure: 6. Initiate enteral tube feeding/pump: g) Check the expiration dates and label syringe and storage bag with name and date and time opened.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure incoming and outgoing nurses reconciled the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure incoming and outgoing nurses reconciled the controlled medications during shift change and failed to ensure administration of controlled medication was documented. These failures affected 3 residents (R47, R61 and R76) reviewed for pharmacy services and records in a total sample of 59 residents. Findings include: On 08/08/2023 at 11:07 am, during the controlled medication count of R76's Lorazepam 1mg, noted 18 tablets left in R76's Medication Dispensing Card (BINGO Card). R76's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form's last entry was on 08/07 at 5pm and amount left was 19. V15 (Licensed Practice Nurse) stated, I (V15) did not sign it yet. I (V15) am supposed to sign it after I (V15) gave the medication at 9am. On 08/08/2023 at 11:27am, the 08/2023 Controlled Substances Check form for 3rd floor's Team B's medication cart had missing signatures. This observation was pointed out to V16 (Licensed Practice Nurse). V16 stated, I (V16) don't know why it's not signed. There were only 2 residents on controlled medications in the cart, (R47) and (R61). On 08/09/2023 at 12:19pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated all controlled medications should be counted by the incoming and off going nurses and signed after the count. Signing the accountability sheet means the narcotic was counted and accounted for. On 08/09/2023 at 12:20pm, V2 stated administration of controlled meds should be documented once it is being given to the resident. Expectation is to sign or document the administration of control meds immediately. Signing the controlled form means the medication was given, if not signed it means the medication was not given. R47's medical diagnoses include but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and hypertensive heart disease. R47's (06/08/2023) Order details documented, in part, Clonazepam oral tablet 1 mg give 1mg by mouth two times a day for anxiety. R61 [NAME] (Active Order as of: 08/09/2023) Order Summary Report documented, in part, Diagnoses: hypertensive heart disease and neuralgia. Order Summary: Tramadol HCl tablet 50 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two time a day for pain. R76's (Active Order as of: 08/09/2023) Order Summary Report documented, in part, Diagnose: anxiety disorder and hypertensive heart disease. Order Summary: Lorazepam tablet 1mg give 1 tablet by mouth three time a day for anxiety. R76's (7/25/2 Controlled Drug receipt/Record/Disposition form documented the last entry was on Date 8/7, Time 5p (5:00pm), Amount Given 1, Amount Left 19. The (08/2023) Controlled Substance Check form have missing signatures for Date 1, Shift 7-3, 3-11, Nurse on, Nurse off, and 11-7 Nurse off. Date 2 shift 11-7, Nurse on. Date 3, 7-3 Nurse Off; Date 6. 7-3 Nurse on, 3-11, Nurse off. Date 7, 7-3 shift, Nurse on, Nurse off, and 3-11 Nurse Off. Date 8, 7-3 shift, Nurse off. The (4/2020) Medications - Controlled documented, in part Guideline: Schedule II or higher controlled substance are kept under double lock either in the medication cart, medication room or pass thru cabinets. Controlled substances are signed upon dispensing of the medication. A count of controlled drugs is maintained by nurse of the off-going and oncoming shifts. Procedure: 2. Controlled medication documentation: a. A separate controlled substance administration control record is kept on all scheduled II or higher drugs. It contains the amount verifiable inventory. 3. Administration: d. Sign out full name in appropriate space provided. E. Subtract amount given from total and verify amount remaining. The (4/2020) Medication Administration documented, in part Guideline: To ensure that the administration of medications is performed in a safe manner to prevent medications errors. Standard: Medication are administered according to state and federal law. Medications are only administered with an order. Procedure: 10. Document medication administration after delivering.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0909 (Tag F0909)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (R28) mattress was the correct siz...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (R28) mattress was the correct size for R28's bed frame. This has the potential to affect one (R28) of 59 residents in the sample reviewed for home-like environment. Findings include: R28's admission Record documents, in part, diagnoses of diabetes, hypertensive heart disease, thyroid disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar, cerebrovascular disease, intracranial injury and hemiplegia affecting left dominant side. R28's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents in part, Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicates that R28 is cognitively intact. R28's Functional Status dated, 7/17/23, documents in part, A. Bed Mobility-how resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed .Self-performance indicates 1 (Supervision). Support indicates 1 (Set-up) help only. On 8/7/23 at 11:00 am surveyor observed R28 lying in bed on a full-size mattress with a twin size bed frame. The full-size mattress on R28's bed was hanging off the twin size bed frame. On 8/7/23 at 11:40 am surveyor in room with V7 (Maintenance Director). Surveyor inquired about the size of R28's mattress on the bed frame. V7 stated, The mattress is oversized for the bed frame. The oversize mattress could cause injury to the resident because it is not the appropriate size. It could be a risk where the mattress could flip over because the mattress is oversized for the bed frame and cause harm to the resident. On 8/9/23 at 3:30 pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, It isn't safe to have an oversized mattress on a small bed frame where the mattress doesn't fit. That is a risk for injury because the resident can fall out the bed because nothing is supporting the mattress. It is expected for the staff to report this to maintenance for safety reasons. The Facility's undated document title Residents' Rights for people in Long-Term Care Facilities documents in part: Your rights to safety . your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. Facility assessment dated [DATE], Page 16, documents in part, Physical Resource Category: Physical equipment- Resources: bed frames, mattresses. If applicable, process to ensure adequate supply, appropriate maintenance, replacement. Monthly inspection of equipment to ensure safety of residents and staff who are using the equipment. The facility's undated job description titled, Director of Maintenance documents, in part: General job description: The primary purpose of the job position is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the Maintenance Department in accordance with current federal state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations. Duties and Responsibilities: Make frequent facility rounds to evaluate the ongoing function of the facility; correct any issues immediately and discuss findings with the Administrator.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

On 08/07/2023 at 10:30 am surveyor observed a hole in the wall, the baseboard hanging off the wall and the electrical plate not attached to the wall located behind R91's bed. On 08/09/2023 at 12:50 p...

Read full inspector narrative →
On 08/07/2023 at 10:30 am surveyor observed a hole in the wall, the baseboard hanging off the wall and the electrical plate not attached to the wall located behind R91's bed. On 08/09/2023 at 12:50 pm V7 (Maintenance Director) stated, maintenance staff is responsible for making repairs to the holes in the wall and making sure the baseboards are properly attached to the walls. V7 stated, maintenance staff is responsible for making sure the electrical plates are properly attached to the wall. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for eight residents (R10, R23, R25, R32, R39, R51, R68, R91) in the sample of 59 residents. Findings include: On 08/07/23 at 10:42 am, surveyor observed R23, R39 and R51's room window frame detached; broken and hanging from the windowsill with the window handles missing. R51 stated, R51 likes to have the window open in R51's room for fresh air. Surveyor observed R51's bottom closet drawer detached from R51's closet; broken (hanging from R51's closet). R51 stated, R51 cannot store R51's items in R51's closet dresser drawer because R51's dresser is broken. On 08/07/23 at 10:48 am, surveyor observed R32's mattress ripped and torn near the bottom two thirds of R32's mattress with yellow foam exposed. R32 stated, My (R32) mattress has been like . On 08/07/23 at 10:51 am, surveyor observed R25's closet door detached and hanging from R25's dresser. R25 stated, I (R25) do not put anything in there (referring to R25's closet door) because its broken. On 08/09/23 at 11:40 am, surveyor brought these observations to V7 (Maintenance Director) and V7 denied any knowledge of R23, R39 and R51's broken window, R51's broken closet drawer, R32's ripped mattress, and R25's broken closet door. On 08/09/23 at 11:45 am, V7 stated, V7 is responsible for repairing broken closet doors, closet dresser drawers, and residents windows. V7 stated, V7 is also responsible for replacing torn mattresses. V7 stated staff is responsible for filling out a Maintenance repair order on the maintenance log sheets at the nursing station and in the facility's maintenance repair request in the computer system. V7 denied receiving request from staff regarding R23, R39 and R51's broken window, R51's broken closet drawer, R32's ripped mattress, or R25's broken closet door. R23's Face sheet documents R23 has diagnoses including but not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, polyosteoarthritis, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, anemia hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, and hallucinations. R23's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 08/01/23 documents R23 has a BIMS score of 15 which indicates R23 is cognitively intact. R25's Face sheet documents R25 has diagnoses including but not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy unspecified intractable without status epilepticus, pain in left knee, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, ventral hernia without obstruction or gangrene, morbid obesity due to excess calories, schizoaffective disorder. R25's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 05/30/23 documents R25 has a BIMS score of 14 which indicates R25 is cognitively intact. R32's Face sheet documents R32 has diagnoses including but not limited to: Diabetes Mellitus without complications, unspecified asthma uncomplicated, bipolar disorder, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, and major depressive disorder. R32's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 7/20/23 documents R32 has a BIMS score of 10 which indicates R32 has some cognitive deficits. R39's Face sheet documents R39 has diagnoses including but not limited to: paranoid schizophrenia, glaucoma, insomnia, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. R39's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 5/24/23 documents R39 has a BIMS score of 13 which indicates R39 is cognitively intact. R51's Face sheet documents R51 has diagnoses including but not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, personal history of traumatic brain injury, unsteadiness on feet, angina pectoris, cerebral infarction, arthropathy, hyperlipidemia, paranoid schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. R51's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 7/25/23 documents, R51 has a BIMS score of 15 which indicates R51 is cognitively intact. The facility's undated job description titled, Director of Maintenance documents, in part: General job description: The primary purpose of the job position is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the Maintenance Department in accordance with current federal state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations. Duties and Responsibilities: Make frequent facility rounds to evaluate the ongoing function of the facility; correct any issues immediately and discuss findings with the Administrator. The Facility's undated document title Residents' Rights for people in Long-Term Care Facilities documents in part: Your rights to safety . your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. R10 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, Vitamin D Deficiency, Extrapyramidal and Movement Disorder, Seizures, Unsteadiness on Feet, and Lack of Coordination. R10 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 12 that indicates cognitively intact. R68 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder, Anemia and Hallucinations. R68 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 5 that indicates a severe impairment. On 8/07/2023 at 11:04 am surveyor observed R68's bare mattress to be tattered with the material split directly down the center of the mattress. On 8/07/2023 at 11:00 am surveyor observed R10's window with broken blinds and a privacy curtain that did not extend the appropriate length of the curtain track and not providing privacy for R10. On 8/7/2023 at 11:17am V7 (Maintenance Director) stated, we replaced the blinds on this floor at least 2-3 times already. On 8/08/2023 at about 1:07 pm surveyor observed R10's window blinds and privacy had not been changed. On 8/08/2023 at 2:51pm V7 stated, he did not have anyone to change R10's curtain on 8/07/2023 and that he went and bought more blinds to replace R10's blinds. V7 stated the purpose of having a fully functioning blind and privacy curtain is for the resident's dignity and privacy. On 8/08/2023 at 3:00 pm surveyor reviewed maintenance work request forms from May 2023 to present and there was no work request form for R10 (blinds and privacy curtain) or R68's (mattress). Resident rights policy with an effective date of 3/2021 states, in part, the residents will be assured of the following rights: right to privacy. Facility Assessment Community Care dated 11/01/2022 documents physical equipment, mattresses, monthly inspection of equipment to ensure safety of residents who are using the equipment. Resident rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities with a revised date of 11/18 documents, in part, your facility must treat you with dignity and respect and must care for you in a manner that promotes your quality of life.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for 4 (R26, R84, R96, R103) residents reviewed for fall prevention in the sample of 59...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for 4 (R26, R84, R96, R103) residents reviewed for fall prevention in the sample of 59 residents. Findings include: On 08/07/23 at 10:21 AM, there was a star next to R84's identifier by R84's door. R84 was lying on bed. There was a floor mat on R84's left side of the bed and another floor mat was folded leaning on R84's head of the bed. This observation was pointed out to V5 (Licensed Practice Nurse). V5 stated, staff might have changed him (R84) this morning and forget to put the floor mat down. On 08/07/23 at 10:46 AM, there was a star next to R96's identifier by R96's door. R96 was lying on bed. R96's call device string was on the floor. There was a folded floor mat on the side of R96's wall. These observations were pointed out to V6 (CNA). V6 stated the string is too short for him (R96) to reach it. It should not be like that. V6 also stated I (V6) don't know what happened to the floor mat. At this time, V12 (Restorative Aide) came into R96's room. V12 stated the floor mat should not be on the wall. Somebody might have moved it on the wall to give way to the other resident. On 08/07/23 at 10:56 AM, there was a star next to R26's and R103's identifiers by R26's and R103's door. R26's call device string was short about 2-3 inches from the call device switch. R26 stated I (R26) can't reach it. V6 stated they (facility) need to make the string longer and put a clipped at the end so it will stay within the reach of (R26). On 08/07/23 at 11:02 AM, R103's call device was not within reach. V6 stated he (R103) can't reach it. On 08/07/2023 at 11:46am, V8 (Wound Care Nurse/LPN) stated, the star by the resident's name means the resident is on our falling star program. It means the resident is at high risk for falls. On 08/07/2023 at 12:00pm, V12 stated, the purpose of the floor mat is when the resident rolls out of the bed, the resident falls on the floor mat and not on the floor. It is a fall intervention. The floor mats are supposedly on both sides of the bed. Sometimes the Nursing Aide might have moved the floor mat during patient care. It is expected of the aide to put it back right after they (aides) are done with the care. Sometimes the aide forgets to put the floor mat back on the floor. On 08/09/2023 at 11:59am, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, floor mats if used for fall prevention should be on the floor. During patient care, the staff can remove it and put it back on the floor once done. The purpose of the floor mat is to prevent injuries when the resident falls. On 08/09/2023 at 12:01pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, call light should be always within the reach of the residents. If the resident is on a wheelchair, call light should be in the wheel chair so they can request for assistance when the resident needs it. Call light is part of our fall prevention program. If a resident wants to use the bathroom and cannot reach the call light, the resident might go by herself or himself and fall. When in bed, the call light should be within reach. Call device should have string long enough for the resident to reach the call device. If it is not long, it should be replaced or provide the string immediately. R26's diagnoses include but not limited to schizophrenia, hypertensive heart disease, and heart failure. R26's (06/28/2023) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 15. Indicating R26's mental status as cognitively intact. Section G. Functional status. A. Bed mobility: 3/3 coding extensive assistance/Two+ persons physical assist. B. Transfer: 3/3 coding extensive assistance/Two+ persons physical assist. R26's (06/21/2023) Care Plan documented, in part Focus: is (at) moderate risk for falls r/t (related to) requiring extensive assist with ADLs (activities of daily living). Goal: will be free of falls. Interventions: be sure (R26)'s call light is within reach. R84's diagnoses include but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, aphasia, gastrostomy status, and seizure. R84's (05/25/2023) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: no entry. C.0700. Short Term Memory OK. 1 memory problem. C0800. Long-term memory OK. 1. Memory problem. R84's (3/23/2023) Post Fall Morse Fall Scale documented, in part Category: High Risk for Falling. R84's 03/15/2023) Care Plan documented, in part Focus: at risk for fall r/t (related to) limited mobility. Actual fall with no injury. Goal: will have no injury related to fall. Interventions: Floor mat on side of (R84)'s bed. Added to falling star program. R96's diagnoses include but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, hypertensive heart disease and tachycardia. R96's (07/03/2023) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 15. Indicating R96's mental status as cognitively intact. R96's (07/27/2023) readmission Morse Fall Scale documented, in part Category: High Risk for Falling. Score: 60.0 R96's (07/27/2023) Care Plan documented, in part Focus had an actual fall with no injury due to poor balance. at risk for falls r/t (related to) unsteady gait. Goal. Will resume usual activities without further incident. Interventions. Educate to use call light for assistance. R103's diagnoses include but not limited to paranoid schizophrenia, myalgia and muscle spasm. R103's (05/23/2023) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 15. Indicating R103's mental status as cognitively intact. R103's (05/27/2023) Supportive Documentation Look back documented, in part A. Services provided. 4. Additional Risk Monitoring. 2. Falls. 4aB. Fall risk evaluation. 0. Low risk. R103's (05/23/2023) Care Plan documented, in part Focus is at risk for falls r/t (related to) multiple fractures. Goal: will be free of falls. Interventions: Be sure (R103)'s call light is within reach. (R103) needs as safe environment with: (a working and reachable call light). The (3/2021) Fall Program documented, in part Guideline: the goal of this program is to provide guidance to facility staff on the fall program. Guideline: 1. All residents will be evaluated for falls. Upon completion of the fall evaluation; if resident is identified at risk for falls; the following may occur: a care plan is developed or updated. New fall interventions are reviewed with the resident and/or responsible party and applicable staff. Education regarding the residents' risk for falls and interventions to prevent fall is provided.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not pre pour medications, failed to keep medications in original packaging, failed to monitor vaccine ref...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not pre pour medications, failed to keep medications in original packaging, failed to monitor vaccine refrigerator twice a day, failed to ensure staff did not keep food item inside the medication room, failed to ensure unopened insulin vial was kept in the refrigerator, failed to ensure medication refrigerator temperature kept at appropriate temperature, failed to ensure insulin was labeled with open and discard dates, and failed to ensure medication carts were free of loose pills. These failures affected 5 (R24, R75, R85, R88, R131) residents reviewed for medication storage and labeling and have the potential to affect the 3rd floor Team B residents, all the resident in 1st and 2nd floors. Findings include: On 08/08/2023 at 10:56am, during the medication Storage and labeling task with V15 (Licensed Practice Nurse) of the 3rd floor medication cart labeled Team A, there were 3 med cups in the first drawer. V15 stated, the first med cup has 4 Tylenol 325mg tabs, the 2nd med cup has R131's Quetiapine and Lamotrigine, and the 3rd med cup contained R75's Aspirin, Folic Acid and Amlodipine 5mg. Also noted R24's opened vial of insulin (glargine) was not dated. V15 stated it should be dated so we know when to discard them. R88's unopened vial of insulin Humulin R was not kept in refrigerator. On 08/08/2023 at 11:14am, during the medication Storage and labeling task with V16 (Licensed Practice Nurse) of the 3rd floor Medication Cart labeled Team B. V16 opened the 1st drawer and observed R85's Fluticasone nasal spray with no open date. V16 stated, it should be dated when opened. Also observed R85's 5 small vials of Carboxymethylcellulose not in original packaging. V16 stated, I (V16) don't know where the container is. On 08/08/2023 at 11:23am, there were loose pills in the 3rd floor medication cart labeled Team B. V16 counted the loose pills and stated there were 12 pills including the half tablet. On 08/08/2023 at 11:29am, during the medication Storage and labeling task with V17 (Registered Nurse) of the 2nd floor Medication Cart labeled Team A, observed loose pills in the cart. On 08/08/2023 at 11:36am, V17 counted the loose pills and stated there's 12 and ½ loose pills in the medication cart. On 08/08/2023 at 11:39am, during the Medication Storage task with V18 (Registered Nurse) of the 2nd floor Medication Storage room. Observed the refrigerator thermometer was registering at 22F. There was an ice built up on the first shelf of the refrigerator. There were 2 opened vials of PPD (purified protein derivative) test; one with no date and the other one dated 3/11/2023; and two bottles of Aquafina. Also noted a brown bag inside the medication storage room. V18 stated, I don't know if it is staff's. I (V18) don't want to touch it. On 08/08/2023 at 11:46am, this surveyor inquired about the brown bag inside the medication room. V17 stated, that's my bag, I (V17) put it there because we (staff) don't have a locker room. On 08/08/2023 at 12:04pm, during the medication Storage and labeling task with V19 (Licensed Practice Nurse) of the first-floor medication storage room observed a container of Pneumovax 23 vaccines. V19 counted the vials, per this surveyor's request and stated there's 5 vials in the container. This surveyor inquired about the frequency of checking the temperature of the refrigerator where the vials of pneumovax were stored. V19 stated, the night shift checks the temperature once daily. On 08/09/2023 at 12:11pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, the temperature of the refrigerator where the vaccines were stored should be checked twice a day. On 08/09/2023 at 12:12pm, V2 stated, all medications should remain in the original container or packaging so there will be no mix up. On 08/09/2023 at 12:13pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, staff are not expected to pre pour medications. A lot could go wrong. It should be poured as you go, as you go resident to resident to prevent medication error. On 08/09/2023 at 12:15pm, V2 stated, insulin vials should be labeled with date it was opened and when to dispose of it. Once you open, it is only good for how many days. The staff should know when not to use it. On 08/09/2023 at 12:18pm, V2 stated, unopened insulin should be kept in the refrigerator to keep the potency of the medication. On 08/09/2023 at 12:18pm, V2 stated, Flonase should be labeled with open and discard date. On 08/09/2023 at 12:21pm, V2 stated, The temperature of the refrigerator should be between 36 to 41-42. Should not be at 22F. My (V2) nurse forgot to clean the refrigerator. The importance of keeping the temperature between 36F-41F is to keep the potency of all medications in the refrigerator. There should be no ice buildup in the refrigerator. Staff should have defrosted it once noticed. On 08/09/2023 at 12:24pm, V2 stated, There should be no loose pills in the medication cart. We should maintain the cleanliness of the cart. On 08/09/2023 at 12:26pm, V2 stated, There should not be food or personal items in the med room, period. We (facility) do have a locker room, but I (V2) don't know if staff know. The locker room is in the basement, at the employee breakroom. On 08/09/2023 at 12:28pm, V2 stated, insulin should be labeled with open and discard date. R24's (Active Order as Of: 08/09/2023) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia. Order Summary: Insulin Glargine solution inject 50units subcutaneously at bedtime. R75's (Active Order as Of: 08/09/2023) Order Summary Report documented, in part diagnoses: mental disorder, facial weakness following cerebral infarction, hypertensive heart disease. Order Summary: amlodipine besylate tablet 5mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for high blood pressure, Aspirin tablet chewable 81mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for blood thinner, Folbic tablet give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement. R85's (Active Order as Of: 08/09/2023) Order Summary Report documented, in part diagnoses: dry eye syndrome and hypertensive heart disease. Order Summary: Artificial Tears Solution 1.4% instill 1 drop in both eyes four times a day for dry eyes, fluticasone propionate suspension 1 spray in each nostril two times a day. R88's (Active Order as Of: 08/09/2023) Order Summary Report documented, in part diagnoses: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Order summary: Humulin R Solution inject per sliding scale. R131's (Active Order as Of: 08/09/2023) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: Post traumatic stress disorder and mood disorder. Order Summary: lamotrigine Oral tablet 100mg give 100mg by mouth one time a day for mood; Quetiapine Fumarate Oral tablet 300mg give 300mg by mouth two times a day for mood. The (08/2023) 1st floor Med (Medication) Room Refrigerator Temperature Log documented that the refrigerator was monitored once daily. The (4/2020) Medication Administration documented, in part Guideline: To ensure that the administration of medications is performed in a safe manner to prevent medications errors. Standard: Medication are administered according to state and federal law. Medications are only administered with an order. Procedure: 2. General. Carts are maintained, clean and in good repair. No discontinued or unlabeled drugs remain on the medication cart. Multidose solutions/vials labeled with date opened. 6. Medications are not prepared ahead of time. The (4/2020) Medication Storage documented, in part Guideline: The facility maintains proper store of variety of medications in accordance to the pharmacy recommendation and regulatory guidelines. Procedure: 2. The medication room is locked and only nurse are allowed to hold the key. The (3/2021) Medication Refrigerator Cleaning documented, in part Guideline: To provide guidelines for cleaning/defrosting medication refrigerators. Procedure: 3. If the staff identifies that the freezer needs to be defrosted, the Charge Nurse will be notified. The Charge Nurse will inform Director of Nursing of the need for defrosting so it can be assigned. 5. If the freezer needs to be defrosted, it will be assigned to a staff member to complete on their shift and inform the Director of Nursing that it is complete.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0802 (Tag F0802)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill set to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. The fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill set to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. The failure has the potential to affect all residents receiving oral nutrition residing in the facility. Findings: On 8/09/2023 at 10:45am V3 (Dietary Manager) stated, she (V3) was not sure when Food Handlers Certificate of Completion expires, how often it (food handlers certification) needs to be renewed and if new hires are required to have a Food Handlers Certificate. During this survey, the facility was unable to provide Food Handlers Training Certificate of Completion for V23, V33, V34, V35 and V36. Certificate of Completion provided did not have an expiration date and documented training was completed 5 years ago. Illinois requires all food workers and food employees to earn an Illinois food handlers card within 30 days of starting work. If you work with unpackaged food, food equipment, food utensils or food-contact surfaces, you need a food handlers card under the Illinois Food Handling Regulation Enforcement Act. The state also requires all food employees to repeat food handler training every three years. Food Handler Training article documents (www.dph.illinois.gov), in part, in Illinois, food handler training is required for food employees or handlers based on the type of food establishment they work in. Generally, employees should receive training within 30 days of hire and may be required to renew their training every three years.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to discard food items from the walk-in cooler by the use by date. This failure has the potential to affect all resident receiving ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to discard food items from the walk-in cooler by the use by date. This failure has the potential to affect all resident receiving oral nutrition from the kitchen. Findings: On 8/07/2023 at 9:10am surveyor observed in the walk-in cooler, 2 large steel pans of lunch meat (diced ham, sliced ham and turkey) dated 8/03/2023 and a pan of pureed mixed fruit dated 8/2/2023. V3 (Dietary Manager) stated, the dated items should be kept for 3 days from the date it was cut or prepared and then disposed of. Undated policy states, titled Storage of Food and Supplies states, in part, food and supply storage areas shall be maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner and all pack, all packaging and containers should be labeled with the name of the food and expiration date.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly clean the dryer lint screen to provide a safe environment for the residents. This failure has the potential to affe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly clean the dryer lint screen to provide a safe environment for the residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 128 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 8/08/23 at 2:00 pm, surveyor observed three dryers inside the laundry room. Dryer #1 and Dryer #2 were both in use. Surveyor requested V20 (Laundry Aide) to stop dryer #2 and open the lint compartment. The lint compartment floor was clean however the lint screen was fully covered with lint. On 8/08/23 at 2:05 pm, surveyor requested V20 to stop Dryer #1 and open the lint compartment. The lint compartment floor had loose lint on the floor. On 8/08/23 at 2:15 pm, V20 stated, Every three hours we clean the lint screens, I have not cleaned the lint compartment today. V20 stated the dryer can catch on fire if the lint screen is not cleaned out regularly. On 8/09/23 at 12:50 pm V7 (Maintenance Director) stated, the lint screens are checked and cleaned every shift by the laundry aides. V7 stated, the purpose for cleaning the lint screen is to prevent a fire from starting. On 08/08/2023 at 2:20pm V20 (Laundry Aide) presented the daily log used by the laundry aides to document what date and times dryers #1 and #2 lint screens are cleaned. Surveyor reviewed the facility's daily log for documenting what date and time the dryer #1 and dryer #2 lint screens are cleaned and observed missing dates and times. Facility Job Description titled Laundry Associate states, in part, Duties and Responsibilities: Clean the dryer vents regularly per scheduled and as needed.
Jul 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent another resident from punching another resident in the face...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent another resident from punching another resident in the face. This failure affects two of two residents (R2 and R4) reviewed for abuse, in a total sample of fifteen residents. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old male. R2's diagnoses are but not limited to paranoid schizophrenia, heart disease, schizoaffective disorder, and psychosis. R4 is a [AGE] year-old male. R4's diagnoses are but not limited to lung disease, Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. Progress note dated 06/06/2023, notes writer was informed R2 was having an altercation with R4. Writer went in and assessed the situation and met the assaulted resident on the floor. R2 stated R4 was the one choked R2 first. R2 pushed R4 away to the floor. Writer assessed the situation with the second nurse on duty on the floor. R2 was asked why R2 was in R4's room. R2 became physically aggressive to all the staff and threatened to beat everybody up. R2 ambulated aggressively towards the nursing station with the aims of punching the second nurse in the face. Writer called security and 911 was called. R2's doctor was notified and an order for R2 was given for R2 to be sent out. Behavior note dated 06/06/2023, notes R2 was observed punching a co-peer. R2 was redirected toward staff. At this time, R2 became verbally aggressive with staff. Incident note dated 06/06/2023, notes resident in hallway stated that residents were fighting in room. Nurse immediately went to room. R2 was leaving R4's room. R4 was on the floor. A head-to-toe assessment rendered with no apparent injuries noted, but R4 is unable to get up and is slow to respond to R4's name. On 07/08/2023, at 11:37 AM, R4 stated, I remember R2 coming in the room slamming the doors. This has happened before. I was not hurt but I ended up going to the hospital because of it. R2 pushed me. R2 was in the bathroom. I might have had a bruise. R2 pushed me while I was in the bathroom. R2 was always coming in the room. R2 was not my roommate. I have not seen R2 anymore. Staff did not know anything was happening because it was just us two in the room. On 07/08/2023, at 2:15 PM, V17 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) stated, R2 had delusional thoughts. I did not notice any marks on R4, but I was told R4 was unconscious. On 07/08/2023, at 2:26 PM, V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, R5 told me that they were fighting in the room. R5 sits in the hall. V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant) and I went down to the room. R2 was coming out of the room. R4 was on the floor. I tried to ask R4 what happened. R4 was semi responsive. R2 came back in the room and acted like R2 was going to stop and hurt R4 again. V19 stood in between them. I did a head-to-toe assessment on R4. R4 could still not tell me what happened. R2 was trying to come around the nurses' station and attack me. Security was called, while the aide and social services were trying to stop R2 from getting combative. I tried to go to the second floor and R2 tried to follow me. I came back upstairs to see how R4 was doing. R4 was eating dinner. R4 was in R4's room and R4 asked R2 to get out. I think R4 got knocked out. R4 was not able to answer any questions. I could not tell where R4 was hit. R2 had some scratches on R2's face. The door was closed only about eight inches. R4 got sent to the hospital. R4 did not come back the same day but R2 did. R2 was petitioned out. On 07/08/2023, at 2:42 PM, V19 stated, I did not see the altercation. Another resident informed me that they were in R4's room fighting. R5 told me this. When I arrived in the room, R4 was on the floor. R2 was standing over R4 walking towards the door. R2 was very aggressive with his language. I do not remember what R2 said. I went towards R4 and asked R2 to leave. R4 was not responding like R4 should have. R4 was in a daze. V18 came afterwards. V18 was trying to assess R4. We picked R4 off the floor and put R4 in R4's bed. R4 did not remember anything. R4 got sent out to the hospital. On 07/08/2023, at 2:48 PM, R5 stated, About a month ago, I saw them fighting. I saw R4 laying on the floor. R2 came out the room. I was sitting by my room door, and I heard someone hit the floor. R4 came out the bathroom. R4 did not remember how R4 got in the bed. R4 was knocked out. V18 went back there. R4 did not remember getting hit or nothing. This was in the evening. On 07/11/2023, at 12:58 PM, V20 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, It was in the room. I went down there. Staff saw R4 on the floor. R4 was not alert. Staff was asking what happened and R4 did not know. R2 stated R4 pushed R2 down. Staff was about to leave the room. Staff was asking R2 why R2 was in the room. R2 was about to jump on the other nurse. R2 was not compliant. The physician was called. R2 was so loud and screaming. One nurse called the physician and one called 911. Facility Abuse Policy titled Abuse, dated 3/2022, notes physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means and requires medical attention. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking.
Apr 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents, (R1, R2, R4) remained free from abuse in fi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents, (R1, R2, R4) remained free from abuse in five residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R1 slapping R2 on the face, R2 hitting R1 on the hand, R3 smacking R4 on the face and tussling R4 to the floor. Findings include: Facility's incident report (3/26/23) to state agency documents in part: R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's Diagnosis includes schizoaffective disorder Bipolar Type, Persistent mood disorder, unspecified. R3 is alert and oriented x3 and ambulates freely in the hallway on the unit and in the building. R3 can make his needs known. R3 has diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder Bipolar Type, Persistent mood disorder, unspecified. R3 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 12 out of 15=cognitively intact in the MDS assessment. When agitated, R3 can manifest verbally or physical abusive behavior. Face Sheet dated 4/15/23 documents, R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R4's diagnosis include: HTN, right leg pain, AMS, localize d swelling of right leg, mass and lump, and Altered Mental Status. R4 is alert and oriented x2 with poor verbal skills. He has diagnosis of: HTN, paranoid schizophrenia, right leg pain, AMS, Localized swelling of right leg, mass and lump and, Altered Mental Status He has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 3 out of 15= severely cognitively impaired in the current MDS assessment. R4 wanders on the unit but he is generally redirectable. He requires assistance from staff in personal grooming and dressing due to weakness. Brief Description of Incident: On 03/26/2023 around 11:30pm, R3 had a physical altercation with near the 2nd floor nursing station because R3 alleged that R4 went through R3's items in his room. Facility's incident report (3/27/23) to state agency documents in part: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnosis includes schizoaffective disorder bipolar type Insomnia, GERD, Restlessness and Agitation, Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, anxiety disorder. R1 is alert and oriented x3 with aggressive, inappropriate, attention-seeking behavior. She has diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, Hallucinations, schizophrenia, cannabis abuse, morbid obesity. R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 13 out of 15= moderately cognitively impaired in the last MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE]. R1 is independent with ambulation on the unit and able to make her needs known. When agitated, R1 manifests verbal or physical abusive behavior. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's diagnosis includes Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, difficulty in walking, major depressive disorder recurrent, anxiety disorder unspecified. R2 is alert and oriented x4 and able to verbalize needs. She has a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, difficulty in walking, major depressive disorder recurrent, anxiety disorder unspecified. She has a BIMS score of 15 in the last MDS assessment. R2 ambulates with the help of wheelchair. She is coded-limited assistance in most functional need. She requires1 person assist in care need. She has care plan for history of aggressive behavior. She continues to be monitored for the behaviors. Brief Description of Incident: On 03/27/2023, R2 went to socialize with her friend who resides in same room as R1, but R2 did not enter the room but sat in her wheelchair at the entrance of the room talking with her friend. At some point, R1 informed R2 that she (R2) was too loud and asked her to leave the entrance of R1's room. A verbal exchange ensued and R1 came to meet R2 at the entrance to the room insisting that R2 should get back to her own room. Both residents agree that R2, at some point used her finger to touch the hand of R1. R1 stated that she then pushed at R2's head to express displeasure at being touched. R2 stated that she took it to be a smack on the side of her face. Both R1 and R2 were immediately separated. Resident Interviews: On 4/15/2023 at 10:43am, R1 said she smacked R2 on the face because R2 was talking too loud in the hallway and R2 was disrespecting staff and other residents. R1 said she told R2 to shut up but R2 did not listen and attempted to hit R1 on the hand, so R1 smacked R2 on the face. R1 said there was a nurse who saw R1 smack R2. On 4/15/2023 at 10:30am, R2 was observed in R2's room watching TV while sitting in wheelchair. R2 was alert and oriented to person, place time and situation and said she was sitting on her wheelchair about two weeks ago, talking to her neighbor friend in the next room when R1 walked up to R2 and told R2 to stop talking about her (R1). R2 said she told R1 that she was not talking about R1 but R1 did not listen and R1 slapped R2 in the face. R2 said she was very upset and took her phone to call the police, but social workers told R2 not to call the police, and that the staff would take care of it. R2 said, I come here for therapy after I had a stroke, when my left side gets stronger, I will go home. I was very upset for getting hit by R1. On 4/15/2023 at 11:00am, R3 was observed in R3's room watching movies on R3's phone. R3 was alert and oriented to person, place time and situation. R3 said he was coming from the vending machine when another resident wanted to grab R3's food. R3 said he does not remember who the resident was, but R3 said he smacked that resident on the face because the resident was trying to grab R3's food. R3 said it happened right at the nursing station and staff saw it. R3 said he does not remember the names of the staff present. R3 said, I felt bad after hitting him because he was older than me. On 4/15/2023 at 4:45pm, V4 (Certified Nurses' Assistant-CNA) was observed sitting near the nursing station eating dinner. V4 said, I was attacked by someone and we were tussling on the floor. Staff interviews: On 4/15/2023 at 10:30am, V4 said she was not working on the day R1 and R2 had an altercation, but when she got back to work the following day, R2 told V4 that R1 smacked R2 on the face because R1 thought R2 was talking about her (R1). V4 said she spoke to social services, and they told her that they already knew about R1 slapping R2. V4 said V2 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director-PRSD) told V4 that R1 slapping R2 was not R1's first offence in the facility. On 4/14/3023 at 1:12pm V8 (CNA) said R2 rolled to R1's room by the door and was talking about R1, and R1 come out of the room and told R2 to keep her (R1) name out of R2's mouth. V8 said a lot was happening on the unit that day and it was very loud and both residents were both going back and forth. V8 said she was passing by the nursing station when all this was happening. V8 said R2 then hit R1 with her left hand towards R1 face and R1 hit R2 back on the shoulder. On 4/15/2023 at 2:00pm, V2(Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director-PRSD) said on 3/27/2023 in the morning, about 9:30am, V9 (PRSC) called V2 who was on the facility to let V2 know about the altercation between R1 and R2. V2 said he come down to the 2nd floor and found R2 in front of her room and said she was talking to the nursing staff, when R1 came of her room and told R2 that R2 was too loud. V2 said an argument ensured, and R1 smacked R2 on the face. V2 said after R1 came back from the hospital, R1 apologized to R2. Nobody was moved to a different floor because both R1 and R2 did not want to be moved. On 4/15/2023 at 2:11pm, V2 said residents should be safe in the facility, but because these are residents with psychiatric conditions, their mood/behavior can change rapidly, and they can become agitated in an instant. On 4/15/2023 at 3:42pm, V9 (PRSC) said R1 and R2 hit each other's hands and then R1 slapped R2 on the face. V9 said she was on the other side of the hallway when she saw R1 and R2 hitting each other before they could be separated. V9 said staff are expected to intervene before residents put hands on each other. V9 further commented, We try to prevent residents from fighting. I would have intervened if I was near R1 and R2 before they hit each other. On 4/15/2023, at 3:30pm, V1(Administrator) said in addition to the CNA and the nurses on the floor, there are Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Assistants-PRSAs and activity staff to help monitor the residents. V1 said psychiatric residents should be kept safe and residents should not fight each other. Staff should monitor residents; however, this resident population has mood swings that happen in an instant. V1 said a resident can be cool and calm in one minute, then very agitated in the next. V1 said the facility is a psychiatric facility and the facility accepts residents that the facility should be able to provide services to including keeping this resident population safe. On 4/15/2023 at 4:56pm, V7 (CNA) said she did not know what happened, but she heard something fall and upon going to see what was happening, V7 saw R3 and R4 tussling and urging. R3 was on top of R4. Staff ran to R3 and R4 and tried to stop them from fighting. R3 is the one who was aggressive towards R4. On 4/15/2023 at 5:02pm, V13 (CNA) stated that on 3/26/2023 as V13 was coming into the unit, she found R4 on the floor. V13 was directed to walk on the other side away from R4. V13 said other staff notified R13 that R3 and R4 had a physical altercation. V13 said staff should keep residents safe by making frequent rounds, monitor residents, separate residents if staff notice tension or agitation among residents. On 5/15/2023 at 5:07pm, V14 (CNA) said R2 was inside her room near the door talking to another resident when R1 told R2 and the other residents not to be so loud, and that it was a beautiful day outside. V14 said R1 told R2 to keep R1's name out of R2's mouth. R2 hit R1 on the hand, then R1 slapped R2 on the face. V14 said if residents are getting into each other's faces and urging, staff should keep the residents away from each other for safety. V14 said R1 and R2's arguments were ongoing, and this was not the first time R1 and R2 had argued. V14 said, This was an ongoing thing and both of them hit each other. On 4/15/2023 at 5:14pm, V15 (CNA) said R1 was hitting R2 on the face and R2 hit R1 on the hand. V15 said residents should not be putting hands on each other and residents are not supposed to be fighting in the units/facility. V15 said residents should be separated before they hit each other. V15 said staff should be monitoring residents, providing activities, groups and monitoring them to keep the residents safe in the units. On 4/15/2023 at 11:11am, V5(Licensed Practical Nurse -LPN) said that psychiatric residents need to be redirected constantly to prevent confrontations and altercations. On 4/15/2023 at 11:16am, V6 (Registered Nurse) said staff monitor and assess residents to prevent confrontations and altercations. V6 said staff redirect residents and separate residents if any tension is noticed among the residents before the situation gets out of hand. Review of records: R1's progress notes dated 3/27/2023 15:28 documents R1 displayed aggressive behavior to R2 by punching R2 on her face. R1's care plan dated 3/17/2023 document R1 has a history of aggressive, inappropriate behavior. Interventions for R3 are documented as: Intervene when any inappropriate behavior is observed. R1's risk for abuse assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 has a diagnosis of dementia or mental illness. R2's progress notes dated 3/37/2023 at 10:00 documents R2 was observed yelling hitting hand of R1 and R1 was observed slapping R2 on the face. R2's care plan dated 3/27/2023 document R2 is at risk for abuse/neglect with interventions documented as: assure R2 that she is in a safe and secure environment. R2's risk for abuse assessment dated [DATE] documents R2 has a diagnosis of dementia or mental illness and requires extensive assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R3 progress notes dated 3/26/2023 23:50 document R3 was aggressive to R4 and R3 pushed R4 onto the floor R3's care plan dated 3/23/2023 document R3 has a history of aggressive, inappropriate attention seeking behavior R3's abuse risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R3 has a history/current behavior of physical or threatening physical aggression towards others. Interventions for R3 are documented as: Intervene when any inappropriate behavior is observed. R4's progress notes dated 3/27/2023 02:47 documents: R4 was physically pushed to the floor by R3. R4's care plan dated 3/36/2023 documents R4 is at risk for abuse/neglect. Interventions- assure R4 that she is in a safe and secure environment. Facility policy titled: Residents Rights, dated 3/2021 documents: 1. The residents will be assured of the following rights. -Safe and good care Facility policy titled: Caring for residents with behavior health needs and substance disorder, dated 10/24/2022 documents: -Review the resident chart so that the care and services are person-centered and reflect the resident's goal of care, while maximizing resident dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization, independence, choice, and safety.
Mar 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to affirm the right of resident to be free from physical abuse. This de...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to affirm the right of resident to be free from physical abuse. This deficient practice affected 1 (R4) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R2 and R4 having a physical altercation, resulting in R2 punching R4 in the face and R4 sustaining a sore cheek. Findings include: Facility's Final Reported Incident (dated 01/25/2023) states: Based on the investigation conducted, review of medical record and the interview of residents involved and the staff member that was present during the altercation, the facility believes that the incident occurred due to R2's response to internal stimuli and not with the intent to physically harm resident R4. R2's Face Sheet documents resident is a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses including but not limited to: UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITHOUT BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCE, PSYCHOTIC DISTURBANCE, MOOD DISTURBANCE, AND ANXIETY, SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER, BIPOLAR TYPE, OTHER SEIZURES, HYPOTHYROIDISM, UNSPECIFIED, HYPERLIPIDEMIA, UNSPECIFIED, CONSTIPATION, UNSPECIFIED, PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIA, ANXIETY DISORDER, UNSPECIFIED, ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER. Minimum Data Set Section C (MDS) (dated 12/09/2022) scored R2 as (04) indicating resident is severely cognitively impaired. Care plan (dated 11/18/2022) documents R2 as having a history of aggressive, inappropriate, attention-seeking behavior. R4's Face Sheet documents resident is a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses including but not limited to: PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIA, MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, RECURRENT, UNSPECIFIED, INSOMNIA, UNSPECIFIED, DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITH OTHER BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCE, DRY EYE SYNDROME OF BILATERAL LACRIMAL GLANDS, HYPERLIPIDEMIA, UNSPECIFIED, UNILATERAL PRIMARY OSTEOARTHRITIS, RIGHT KNEE, TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS, HYPERTENSIVE HEART DISEASE WITHOUT HEART FAILURE. On 03/02/2023 at 12:14pm V3 (psychiatric social worker) stated, On 01/21/2023, R4 reported to me that R2 hit R4 on the face. R4 reported that R2 hit R4 on the smoking patio. R4 stated that R4 and R2 had a disagreement over money and R2 punched R4 on the face while they were on the smoking patio. R2 has a history of aggressive behavior towards residents and staff. We provide R2 with counseling and R2 is supposed to attend groups like anger management and R2 refuses to attend. R2 attends the counseling and it's ongoing. R2 receives 1 to 1 counseling and R2 has so many incidents that R2 needs 1 to 1 counseling due to his aggressive behavior. R2 refuses to attend the anger management group, we tried to have R2 attend the group meeting, however, R2 refuses to come. We provide R2 with constant re-direction and ask R2 to calm down continuously. On 01/21/2023, I was monitoring the dining room area, and R4 came inside from the smoking patio and informed me that R2 punched R4. I informed R4's nurse on duty and the nurse assessed R4. On 03/02/2023 V2 at 12:32pm V2 (Psych Social Director) stated, During a smoke break on 01/21/23, I received a call from V3 (psychiatric social worker), stating that during a smoke break, R2 punched R4 in the face. V3 stated that V3 attempted to calm R2 down, and R2 attempted to swing and punch V4 and V4 dodged the punch attempt. V3 stated that V3 calmed R2 down and redirected R2 back to the 3rd floor. V3 also accompanied R4 to the 3rd floor to be assessed by the nurse on duty. R4 did not sustain any injuries during the altercation. R2's physician gave for 1 to 1 supervision and the physician gave an order for R2 to be sent out to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation. On 03/02/2023 at 1:55pm V6 (activity aide) stated, On 01/21/2023, during the 1:30pm smoke break, V3 (psychiatric social worker), V7 (psychiatric rehabilitation service aide) and myself, were taking part in the smoke break. V3 was inside in the dining room passing out the cigarettes to the residents who come outside to smoke. I was standing outside on the smoking patio monitoring the residents, that's when I saw R4 walking on the ramp, heading back inside the building from smoking. As R4 was heading inside from smoking, R4 informed me that R2 had slapped R4. That's when I came inside and informed V3 that R4 told me that R2 hit him. That's when V3 went out to the patio to confront R2 about hitting R4. When V3 (social worker) asked R2 about what occurred and why R2 hit R4, R2 attempted to attack V3. I saw R2 try to punch V3, however, V3 dodged R2's punch. I went inside to get security, V7, to inform V7 about the situation and to ask his assistant to calm R2 down. V7 came outside to the patio and talked to R2. I saw V7 calm R2 down and deescalate the situation. After R2 calmed down, V7 accompanied R2 inside and escorted R2 to his unit on the 3rd floor. R2 and R4 were roommates at the time of the incident. R2 assumed that R4 stole R2's clothing and R2 confronted R4 about it, that's why the incident occurred and R2 ended up punching R4. No other resident got hit or hurt. V7 helped to calm R2 and deescalated the situation. On 03/07/2023 at 9:24am V1 (administrator) stated, The residents in this facility have a right to participate in their care and they have a right to be free from abuse. The residents have a right to have a safe environment and they have a right to all that the resident right's policy accords them. The incident that occurred on 01/21/2023 between R2 and R4 occurred during the smoke break on the smoking patio. V3, the psychosocial rehabilitation counselor, handled the situation very well, because he separated the 2 residents immediately, and redirected R2 even when R2 attempted to swing at V3. Despite R2 attempting to swing at V3, V3 responded accurately and professionally and did not attempt to fight back, instead he defused the entire situation. V3 managed to calm R2 down and redirect him. On 03/07/2023 at 10:01am R2 stated, I have had several fights in this facility. Some residents fight with me, and I try to defend myself. On 01/21/2023, what happened is that I was on the smoking patio, and I saw R4 wearing my clothes. R4 and I were roommates at the time of the incident. I saw R4 come out on the smoking patio wearing my clothes. R4 denied that he was wearing my clothes. R4 kept denying that the clothes R4 was wearing were mine, so I became frustrated, and I slapped R4 open handed. I did not punch R4, I slapped R4. I was then sent out to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation after I slapped R4, and I stayed in the hospital for 2 weeks. R4 did not try to hit me or touch me and R4 did not attempt to hit me back after I slapped him. R4 was wearing my clothes and he kept denying the fact that they were mine, so I became frustrated and hit R4 that's all. On 03/07/2023 at 10:19am R4 stated, On 01/21/2023, R2 came out of nowhere and hit me in my jaw on the smoking patio. R2 punched me on my jaw. I was sitting down on the bench outside smoking my cigarette and R2 came out of nowhere and punched me. R2 also attempted to punch V3, when V3 intervened. After R2 punched me, I reported the punch to V3, and V3 attempted to redirect R2, and when V3 was talking to R2 after the punch, R2 attempted to punch V3. After R2 punched me, I felt threatened, and I was memorized by R2's violent behavior. R2 accused me that I was wearing his clothes and I was not wearing his clothes. I told R2 that I was not wearing R2's clothes, but R2 did not believe me and R2 ended up punching me. After R2 punched me, I left my cheek bone sore, and it hurt for a few days. R2 and I are not roommates anymore. R2 was moved to another room. On 03/07/2023 at 10:34am V7 (psychiatric rehabilitation service aide) stated, On 01/21/2023, I was made aware by V3 that R2 and R4 had an altercation and R2 hit R4. I went outside, I saw that R2 was still trying to be aggressive towards V3. I was made aware that R2 hit R4 and attempted to hit V3. When I came out on the smoking patio, I calmed R2 down. R2 was screaming that R4 had R2's clothes on. I told R2 to calm down and I told R2 that we will rectify the siltation and we will make sure that R2 will get his clothes back. R2 went inside and I bought R2 a soda to cool R2 off and help him calm down. R2 went to the 3rd floor, and I stayed with R2 the entire time until R2 was sent out. R2's Progress Note (dated 01/21/2023) documents, The writer was notified by the PRSC that the resident displayed physical aggressive behavior towards co-peer hitting his face in the facility Patio. The resident also swings towards facility staff. The resident was redirected to the 3rd floor. The resident MD was notified, the MD gave the hospitalization orders. The PRSC encourages the resident to verbalizes feelings known, always follow staff redirections and always apply anger management coping skills mechanism whenever agitated responding to internal stimuli. The resident was non receptive towards counseling. The resident Violence/ Aggression behavior assessment and care plan updated by the writer. Psych social will continue to document as needed. R4's Progress Note (dated 01/21/2023) documents, Resident was struck in the face by peer on rt cheek while standing in line for cigarette resident has no complaints of pain or discomfort at this time MD notified with no new orders. Abuse Policy (dated 03/2021) states: This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from verbal, physical, sexual, mental abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, involuntary seclusion, or mistreatment.
Feb 2023 4 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor and supervise a resident (R2), who was placed on facility'...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor and supervise a resident (R2), who was placed on facility's 24-hour safety monitoring, who has a history of illegal substance abuse and suicidal ideation. This failure resulted in R2 eloping from the facility and presenting at a county hospital reporting hallucinations and suicidal ideation with a plan to jump into the lake. This was identified as an immediate jeopardy which began on 1/10/2023 when R2 eloped from the facility. V1(Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 2/07/23 at 10:17am. The facility presented a removal plan on 2/07/23 at 12:45pm. On 2/07/23 at 2:08pm, regional office acknowledged receipt of removal plan and began review at 2:40pm on 2/07/23. At this time the removal plan was not accepted. On 2/08/23 the facility re-submitted removal plan on 2/08/23 at 11:16am. The second removal plan was reviewed and conditionally accepted by the state agency, on 2/08/23 at 2:22pm. On 2/09/23 at 1:42pm, the surveyor verified by observation, record view, and interview, the immediacy was removed. The deficiency remains out of compliance at a level 2 harm until the facility can evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of their removal plan and maintain substantial compliance with this regulation. Finding include: According to a face sheet, R2 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to psychiatric rehabilitative service coordinator note dated 12/09/2022, R2 has a history has a psychiatric diagnosis of suicidal ideation, depression and the history of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. R2's Minimum Date Set assignment dated 12/20/2022 indicated R2 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicates resident has intact cognitive response. R2's care plan dated 01/09/2023, indicated R2 has a history of substance abuse and self-harm or suicidal ideation. Nursing Progress Note dated 01/10/2023 authored by V16 document: Resident noted with unauthorized departure from the facility today, staff has presented statements due this action, MD, social services, DON, and administrator are aware, no guardian/family listed, resident is responsible for self. Safety Checklist (dated 01/10/2023) documents R2 as being in another resident's room at 4pm. The checklist does not list R2's whereabouts starting from 5pm as R2 eloped. On 01/31/2023 at 9:40am V1 (administrator) stated, R2 is no longer at the facility. R2 just left and later that day we found out that R2 was at the hospital. R2 did not even sign out against medical advice (AMA), R2 just left. R2 was no trouble as a resident, maybe on occasion R2 would use vulgar language. R2 came from the sister facility to be closer to the city. R2 would go outside and smoke and would return. On 01/10/2023, we were passing trays for diner, and we realized that R2 was not here at the facility. R2 left the building and never came back. We believe that R2 left when they went out to smoke and R2 never returned. The smoke break was at 2:30pm and we believe that R2 left the facility premises during the smoke break. R2 was never a resident who we were concerned about because R2 never attempted to leave or elope. On 01/11/2023, we received a call from the community behavioral hospital, informing us that R2 was there and wanted to know if he could return. The facility's admissions department contacted the hospital and informed the hospital that we would take R2 back to the facility. They never brought the resident back and the admissions director called the hospital several times to follow up if R2 was returning. R2 did not have a pass to go out into the community alone because R2 was still being evaluated. When R2 was admitted here on 12/09/2022, R2 was still in the process of being evaluated for an independent community pass. At the time R2 left, he was able to go into the community only with supervision and was in the process of being evaluated for an independent community pass but did not possess an independent community pass at the time R2 eloped from the facility. When the residents go out to smoke, they go out to the patio. The exit door to the patio is locked. The patio is monitored by 4 to 5 staff members when the residents are outside smoking. I did not conduct an investigation on how R2 eloped, we did a whole house search and since R2 is alert and oriented, we did not report it to the police. R2 had his jacket on him at the time R2 left because he was outside smoking so he must have planned to elope. Residents at times do attempt to climb the fence to elope from the smoking patio, that's why we have staff there to monitor the residents and prevent them from eloping. I really don't know if R2 escaped from the smoking patio. There were no door alarms going off, so the process of elimination indicates that R2 eloped from the smoking patio. It is possible for residents to elope from the smoking patio. If the resident is alert and oriented, we don't investigate on how they eloped. If they are alert and oriented it's their decision if they want to leave. R2 had the capacity to make his own decision and R2 had the capacity to leave the facility. R2 never expressed the desire to leave the facility. As of right now, I do not know how R2 left, this is only our suspicion that R2 eloped from the smoking patio. R2 somehow ended up in the community psych hospital and did not get his medication and was cold and hungry and probably ended up at the psychiatric hospital. There is a loophole of how R2 eloped, so there are other residents who are potentially able to elope from the facility. We are aware of the fact that there is a loophole on how R2 escaped, and we are monitoring other residents closely. I honestly don't know how R2 escaped it is only our suspicion that R2 escaped from the smoking patio. We did not put in any new interventions, since R2 eloped, we are just closely monitoring the residents and the doors are locked. R2 has a diagnosis of schizophrenia so R2 does have a history of psychiatric disorder. As of right now, the last we know R2 was at the hospital, and I believe R2 was discharged . R2 was not suicidal at the time. In R2's diagnosis R2 does have suicidal ideation but R2 wasn't suicidal at the time. I did not report this incident to the IDPH because R2 was alert and oriented and R2 wasn't a problem. On 01/31/2023 at 10:50am, V1(administrator) identified 8 residents at risk for elopement at the time of investigation. The following residents were identified as being at risk for elopement: R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12 and R13. On 01/31/2023 at 11:32am V3 (social service director) stated, When a resident elopes and once we are made aware of the elopement, we call a code pink. Code pink means that there is a missing resident or elopement. We search for the resident that's missing in the facility and outside. If need be, we will call the Chicago Police Department. If the residents have family listed on the contact list, we will call them and make them aware. If we cannot find the resident, we will call the police and make a missing police report right away. That is protocol, that when a resident is missing and cannot be found, we have to call the police and make a missing police report. The protocol to call and make a police report when the resident is missing is for every resident, regardless of their cognitive status, a police report must be filed when a resident is missing. It does not matter how alert the missing resident is, when we cannot locate that resident when a search is unsuccessful, we are supposed to call the police immediately. On 01/31/2023 at 11:52am V4 (psychiatric rehabilitation service director) stated, R2 was living at our sister facility and was admitted to this facility on 12/09/2022. When we have a new resident admitted to this facility, we have to do a 72-hour behavior safety check list where we monitor them. After reviewing R2's admission packet from the hospital, we discovered that R2 has a past history of aggression, history of substance abuse and suicidal ideation. The social service department enrolls the resident into the substance abuse program. After reviewing R2's referral packet, R2 was placed on a facility safety monitoring rounding checklist because R2 has a history of suicidal ideation and substance abuse. R2 was residing on the 3rd floor which is a psychiatric floor. The rounding check list requires the staff to monitor R2 every hour and record R2's whereabouts on the checklist. According to the checklist filled out by V15 (psychiatric rehabilitative service aide) on 01/10/2023, R2 was last seen at 4pm, at that time R2 was in another resident's room. After 4pm, R2 was no longer seen. I received a call from V5 (PRSC) stating that they could not find R2 inside facility. Immediately after receiving that call, I notified the V1 (administrator) and explained to V1 that R2 is missing. I asked my staff to document on the computer about the elopement and we updated the care plan and the elopement form. The facility was searched prior to calling me and when they could not find the resident, they called me, and they called the administrator. The administrator did not call the police because R2 is alert and oriented. According to the administrator, if the resident is alert and oriented, we do not notify the police and we do not make a missing police report. R2 did not discharge from the facility, R2 eloped. R2 has a major depressive disorder and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type and schizophrenia and suicidal ideation and cocaine abuse usage and cannabis dependence which is why R2 was admitted to the facility in the first place. Medically, R2 is not fit to leave the facility. R2 needs help to be stabilized. R2 has a lot of mental health issues and should on be out of this facility according to his medical history. We do not know R2's mental state at the time R2 eloped. The facility's administrator would be the one who calls and makes a police report. On 01/31/2023 at 3:26pm V6 (certified nursing assistant) stated, I was the C.N.A working with R2 on 01/10/2023, when R2 eloped. The last time I saw R2 was at 1:30pm, when R2 was going down to smoke a cigarette on the smoking patio. I saw R2 leaving the 3rd floor to go to the 1:30pm smoke break. I do not recall seeing R2 return from the smoke break. R2 never mentioned that he wanted to leave the facility. I finished my shift at 3pm and when I returned to work on 01/11/2023, I was informed that R2 eloped. On 02/01/2023 at 9:56am V7 (certified nursing assistant stated, I was working on the 3rd floor on 01/10/2023. I saw R2 on 01/10/2023. The last time I can recall seeing R2 was during lunch time. I don't recall seeing R2 after lunch. The last time I saw R2 was during lunch time when I was passing trays. Typically, R2 was usually in his room. I don't recall ever seeing R2 visiting other resident room. R2 kept mostly to himself and stayed in his room. On 02/01/2023 at 12:32pm V10 (primary physician) stated, They called me from the facility and told me that R2 eloped. They told me that R2 just walked out from the facility. There was no AMA, there was no discharge for R2, he simply just left and walked out from the facility. The facility told me that R2 just left. R2 just ran away. R2 was being monitored for safety at the facility. I think that R2 could have jumped the fence, but I don't know. R2 was being monitored for safety and R2 was a psych patient. Often, the psych residents want to leave the facility and that's what R2 did, he just walked out of the facility. The nursing home was monitoring him for 24 hours a day. Based on the diagnosis that R2 has, R2 needs to be monitored and I hope that R2 does not kill himself or someone else. I thought that the facility called the police and made a police report and reported R2 missing. I thought it is protocol to call the police when a resident elopes. I thought that the facility called the police to report that he ran away. On 02/02/2023 at 10:32am V13 (Psychiatric Rehabilitative Service Coordinator) stated, I was the one that was supervising the smoking session on the day that R2 eloped. There was 4 of us supervising the smoking break. Typically, there should be an activity aide, a CNA, a PRSC and a PRSA. On 01/10/2023, there was only 4 of us supervising the smoke break. I don't remember if an activity aide was there and I don't remember if there was a CNA present. I don't remember seeing R2 on the patio during the smoke break. We monitor the residents during the smoke breaks. We have staff members on each side of the gate and a staff member in the middle to provide supervision during a smoke break. On the day that R2 eloped, I don't remember seeing a staff member on each side of the gate to supervise during the smoke break. There is usually a staff member supervising the front gate, but I don't remember seeing a staff member supervising the other end gate, the gate that is away from the front entrance. We wait until all of the residents come inside from the smoking patio. Once all the residents come in, we lock the door. On 02/02/2023 at 10:52am V14 (front door receptionist/Psychiatric Rehabilitative Service Assistant) stated, On 01/10/2023, R2 came down from the 3rd floor to the front lobby close to 2pm. R2 approached me and requested to speak to V1 (administrator). R2 remained in the front lobby, and I went to inform the administrator, that R2 was requesting to speak to V1, however, V1's door was closed. I came back out to the front lobby to let R2 know that V1 was in the meeting, and I told R2 to come back in 30 to 40 minutes. R2 said R2 would come back to speak to the administrator and got on the elevator. That same day, I saw R2 on the second floor around 3pm, visiting R5's room. That was the last time I saw R2. R2 did not escape during the 1:30pm smoke break because I saw R2 around 3pm on the second floor in R5's room. That was the last time I saw R2. I was informed around 5:30pm that R2 was missing and R5's room was the first place I went to search. I called a code Pink, which is a code called when a resident is missing. On 02/02/2023 at 11:23am, V15 (Psychiatric Rehabilitative Service Assistant) stated, On 01/10/2023, I was the one who signed the round sheet for R2 at 3pm and 4pm. The round sheet is used to monitor residents for safety. I witnessed R2 at 3 and 4 pm on the second floor, in R5's room. I did not see R2 in the facility after 4pm. On 02/02/2023 at 12:28pm V17 (maintenance director) stated, I checked all the exit doors with alarms in the entire building. All the door alarms are working properly. All the exit doors are secured and locked. After R2 eloped, I checked all the doors and alarms in the building, and everything was working properly. It is a possibility that R2 escaped through the service door in the basement, by the kitchen. We have food delivery and supply delivery, and everything is delivered through the back service door, so it is possible that R2 escaped through the service door in the basement. We had other residents attempt to elope through the basement service doors. We have cameras all over the facility. Surveyor, accompanied by V17 (maintenance director), checked all the door alarms in the facility. Surveyor observed the door alarms to be working. County Hospital Records (dated 01/11/2023) document: Voluntarily brought self in states that he has suicidal thoughts with a plan to jump off a bridge; denies HI and hallucination. Hospital Records dated 01/11/2023 document: Pt is a [AGE] year-old male who presented to behavioral hospital as a direct transfer from county hospital Emergency Department. Per hospital fax, pt presented with suicidal ideation with a plan to jump in the lake. Pt also reported visual hallucinations stating that people are following him. Pt has a history of schizophrenia and bipolar. Pt reported that he is compliant with his medications. Pt reported that he lived in a nursing home that provided him with the medication. Pt endorses cocaine. Pt was unable to contract for safety. Pt is a danger to self and is in need of inpatient psychiatric treatment for safety and stabilization of suicidal ideation and psychosis. Emergency Operations Plan: Elopement vs. Unauthorized/Unplanned Discharge Policy and Procedure (dated 11/17/2022) states: In the event of a possible elopement, the following procedures shall be utilized: a.) Proper code will be called overhead. b.) An investigation shall be coordinated by the facility administrator, director of nursing or manager/supervisor on duty. A search will be conducted to assist in locating the resident. d.) The local law enforcement will be notified. e) If the incident/falls into IDPH Reporting Guidelines, designated facility staff will report incident to IDPH within 24 hours. Progress note dated 01/10/2023 documents, The writer was notified by the facility staffs that the resident made an unauthorized departure on 01/10/2023. The writer informed the writer, the staffs carried out room search, the resident was located. Psych social will continue to monitor and document as needed. Progress note dated 01/11/2023 documents, The nurse M. called from the community behavioral hospital; stating that they have the above resident there and they will be admitting him and wanted to know if he can return. I advised the nurse to call the facility back later in the morning to speak with social services. She stated, OK! The writer also informed the nurse the resident eloped from our facility. Nurse Practitioner Progress Note dated 01/14/2023 document, Psychiatry Note Attempted to see patient for evaluation this date but was informed by RN that he was not available because he eloped a few days ago. The surveyor confirmed through observation on 02/09/2023, interview, and record review that the facility took the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: 1. The facility has taken the following actions concerning the IJ component a. The facility will review all residents who are at risk for an elopement and will update their care plans for resident specific interventions. Review and update by PRSD initiated on 2-7-23. b. Facility will immediately conduct a (RCA) root cause analysis, to be conducted by administrator, on how the resident was able to elope from the facility and what additional care plan measures could be put into place should the resident return. Plan started on 2-7-23 by the administrator. c. The resident that has been identified to be at risk of elopement has been placed on Q1-hour safety monitoring. Monitoring initiated on 2-7-23 d. Facility will ensure that residents who are at risk for self-harm, who leave the facility without authorization, will be reported to the Chicago Police Department by PRSD or designee. 2. Statement regarding how the facility identify other residents having potential to be affected by the same IJ component? a. All those at high risk for elopement have been identified to have potential to be affected. 3. Measures the facility will take or systems to ensure the problems will be corrected and will not recur. a. All residents have been reassessed for elopement risk by PRSD. The facility has used the Elopement Risk Assessment to complete the reassessments. b. Care plan for residents identified as an elopement risk have been reviewed with individualized interventions for safety. Review initiated on 02/07/23. These include hourly safety checks and behavior monitoring as needed. c. The facility has initiated an educational in-service for all staff, including Social Services, Nursing, Activities, Front Office, Housekeeping and Managers, on the facility elopement policy and the code procedures in any incident of elopement. on monitoring resident's at risk for elopement, interventions for prevention of the elopement, and the system for monitoring residents at risk for elopement; as well as steps the staff should follow should an elopement occur. Any staff on vacation or leave will be in serviced before their next scheduled shift. In-service initiated on 02/07/23. 4. The Director of Nursing or designees will monitor continued compliance via the following Quality Improvement Programs: a. Daily, the PRSD or designee, will ensure that all resident that have been identified to be at risk of elopement are monitored hourly all through the shift. b. Quarterly the care plan for residents identified as an elopement risk have been reviewed with individualized interventions for safety. c. The results of the monitoring completed under this POC are submitted to the QA/QI Committee for review and follow-up. The QA/QI committee is made up of IDT members which include Nursing, Social Services, Psycho-social Rehab, Activities, Therapy, Administration, and Medical Director.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, facility failed to affirm the right of the resident to be free from physical abuse. This d...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, facility failed to affirm the right of the resident to be free from physical abuse. This deficient practice affected 1 (R4) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R3 and R4 having an altercation and R3 screaming and kicking R4 in the leg. Findings Include: Facility's Final Reportable (01/12/2023) regarding R3 and R4 documents in part: At approximately 4:30pm, on 1/12/23, nurse stated that she heard some shouting coming from resident R3's room. Per nurse, she went into the room to investigate and saw both R3 and R4 standing in a fighting stance, with their fists up. Nurse stated that she immediately shouted for Psycho-social rehab director who rushed immediately to R3's room to intervene. The two residents were immediately separated and R4 instructed to leave R3's room and return to his own. Resident R4 stated that he went into the room to visit the roommate and R3 asked him to leave. Per R4, when he refused to leave, R3 kicked him in the leg. A body assessment was completed on both R3 and R4. No injuries, redness, bruising or swelling noted. Police intervention was declined. R3's Face Sheet documents resident is a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses including but not limited to: PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIA, HYPERTENSIVE HEART DISEASE WITHOUT HEART FAILURE, VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY, UNSPECIFIED, IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA, UNSPECIFIED, UNSPECIFIED PSYCHOSIS NOT DUE TO A SUBSTANCE OR KNOWN PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION, SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER, BIPOLAR TYPE. Care plan (dated 01/12/2023) documents that R3 has a history of aggressive behavior and has displayed physical aggressive behavior towards co-peer. Minimum Data Set Section C (MDS) (dated 12/14/2022) scored R3 as (15) indicating resident is cognitively intact. R4's Face Sheet documents resident is a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses including but not limited to: SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER, DEPRESSIVE TYPE, ANXIETY DISORDER, UNSPECIFIED, MUSCLE WASTING AND ATROPHY, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED, UNSPECIFIED SITE, UNSTEADINESS ON FEET. Minimum Data Set Section C (MDS) (dated 11/01/2022) scored R4 as (13) indicating resident is cognitively intact. On 01/31/2023 at 9:20am, R3 stated, What happened is that on 01/12/2023, R4 came to my room to talk to my roommate and I got upset and wanted R4 to leave. As R4 was leaving I kicked him because I thought that R4 was going to physically attack me. I made a mistake and this was an misunderstanding. I thought that R4 was going to attack me so I kicked R4, but R4 was only trying to walk past me to leave the room. I apologized to R4. We are friends now. I gave R4 a big hub and apologized and there are no hard feelings between us anymore. On 01/31/2023 at 9:37am, R4 stated, R3 and I had a physical altercation on 01/12/2023, and that whole thing was a misunderstanding. I went to R3's room to talk to his roommate and R3 became upset. R3 got agitated and told me to get out of his room. I was leaving and that's when R3 kicked me. R3 thought that I was going to physically attack R3, but I was only trying to walk past him to leave his room. R3 kicked me in the leg and was screaming at me. Right after that, V4 arrived to R3's room and immediately separated us. R3 apologized to me and we hugged. We are totally fine now, and there are no hard feelings between us. On 01/31/2023 at 10:04a, V1 (administrator) stated, R3 and R4 had a physical altercation on 01/12/2023. What happened is that R4 went into R3's room to talk to another resident and R3 became upset and asked R3 to leave. R4 did not want to leave so R3 kicked R4 in the leg. The 2 residents were immediately separated. R3 was sent out to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation. R4 did not sustain any injuries from the altercation. R4 was assessed by a nurse and there were no bruises, redness or injuries. R4 denied having pain after the altercation. R3 and R4 apologized to each other and there are no more concerns between the 2 residents. On 01/31/2023 at 11:32am V3 (social service director) stated, R3 can be aggressive when R3 is experiencing delusions and paranoia. R3 is typically not aggressive, however, R3 can be aggressive when he experiences delusions. On 01/31/2023 at 1:40pm, V4 (psychiatric rehabilitation service director) stated, On 01/12/2023, R3 was aggressive towards another resident R4. What happened is that R4 went to R3' s room to see another resident. R3 said that R4 should get out of the R3's room, whom he shares with other residents. R3 became upset and aggravated and kicked R4 in the leg. At that point, I heard the noise and screaming coming from R3's room. I heard a certified nursing assistant call for my assistance and I went to R3's room. When I arrived, I saw R4 standing in R3's room closer to the door. I saw R3 screaming at R4 and being verbally aggressive towards R4. At that point when I arrived, R4 told me that R3 kicked R4 in the leg. After R4 informed me that R3 kicked R4 in the leg, R3 confirmed that he did in fact kick R4. After that occurred, I notified the nurse, who came and assessed R4. R3 and R4's physician was made aware and R3 was sent out to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation. R3's Progress note (dated 01/12/2023) documents, The writer was notified by the charge nurse that noise emanating from (R3's room). The writer arrived in the room. The resident was observed being impulsive, agitated, responding to internal stimuli. The writer was informed by co-peer that resident displayed physical aggressive behavior towards him inside his room by kicking his leg. The resident stated to the writer that he informed the co-peer to leave his room because the co-peer always engages in substance use disorders with co-peer whenever he visits the room. The writer educates, 1:1 counsels the resident to verbalize feelings known, follow staff redirection at all times and always apply coping skills mechanism on anger management whenever agitated responding to internal stimuli. The writer redirects the resident to the psych social office, placed the resident on 1:1 behavioral monitoring with PRSA. The writer updates the resident aggression care plan note and assessment as needed. Psych social will continue to monitor and document as needed. R3's Progress note (dated 01/12/2023) documents, Writer called administrator and made her aware of petition order from MD to transfer patient to hospital which administrator verbalized understanding. Patient face sheet, petition forms and medications all faxed to hospital in-take department. R4's Progress note (dated 01/12/2023) documents, Writer was informed that Resident has a Physical Altercation with another Resident on the floor, around 3:20pm, writer interview the resident and he said the accused peer only gave him a slight kick toward his leg, an assessment was carried out no open skin on any part of his body, and he denied pain as of now. Resident Dr. and his psychiatrist were notified through text messages and voice messages, Dr gave an order for Tylenol 650 mg TID, prn. Resident mother was called at 4:12 pm and a voice message is left on her phone. All dept head are notified. Abuse Policy (dated 03/2022) states: This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from verbal, physical, sexual, mental abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, involuntary seclusion, or mistreatment. Facility Assessment Tool (dated 11/01/2022) states: Services Provided Based on Resident Needs: Mental Health and Behavior: Manage the medical conditions and medication-related issues causing psychiatric symptoms and behavior, identify and implement interventions to help support individuals with issues such as dealing with anxiety, care of someone with cognitive impairment, care of individuals with depression, trauma/PTSD, other psychiatric diagnoses, intellectual or developmental disabilities (page 9).
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Emergency Operations Plan by failing to report an elop...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Emergency Operations Plan by failing to report an elopement incident to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) for one resident (R2) out of 4 residents reviewed for elopement. Finding include: According to a face sheet, R2 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to psychiatric rehabilitative service coordinator note dated 12/09/2022, R2 has a history has a psychiatric diagnosis of suicidal ideation, depression and the history of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. R2's Minimum Date Set assignment dated 12/20/2022 indicated R2 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicates resident has intact cognitive response. R2's care plan dated 01/09/2023, indicated R2 has a history of substance abuse and self-harm or suicidal ideation. Nursing Progress Note dated 01/10/2023 authored by V16 document: Resident noted with unauthorized departure from the facility today, staff has presented statements due this action, MD, social services, DON, and administrator are aware, no guardian/family listed, resident is responsible for self. On 01/31/2023 at 9:40am V1 (administrator) stated, R2 is no longer at the facility. R2 just left and later that day we found out that R2 was at the hospital. R2 did not even sign out against medical advice (AMA), R2 just left. R2 was no trouble as a resident, maybe on occasion R2 would use vulgar language. R2 came from the sister facility to be closer to the city. R2 would go outside and smoke and would return. On 01/10/2023, we were passing trays for diner, and we realized that R2 was not here at the facility. R2 left the building and never came back. We believe that R2 left when they went out to smoke and R2 never returned. The smoke break was at 2:30pm and we believe that R2 left the facility premises during the smoke break. R2 was never a resident who we were concerned about because R2 never attempted to leave or elope. On 01/11/2023, we received a call from the community behavioral hospital, informing us that R2 was there and wanted to know if he could return. The facility's admissions department contacted the hospital and informed the hospital that we would take R2 back to the facility. They never brought the resident back and the admissions director called the hospital several times to follow up if R2 was returning. R2 did not have a pass to go out into the community alone because R2 was still being evaluated. When R2 was admitted here on 12/09/2022, R2 was still in the process of being evaluated for an independent community pass. At the time R2 left, he was able to go into the community only with supervision and was in the process of being evaluated for an independent community pass but did not possess an independent community pass at the time R2 eloped from the facility. When the residents go out to smoke, they go out to the patio. The exit door to the patio is locked. The patio is monitored by 4 to 5 staff members when the residents are outside smoking. I did not conduct an investigation on how R2 eloped, we did a whole house search and since R2 is alert and oriented, we did not report it to the police. R2 had his jacket on him at the time R2 left because he was outside smoking so he must have planned to elope. Residents at times do attempt to climb the fence to elope from the smoking patio, that's why we have staff there to monitor the residents and prevent them from eloping. I really don't know if R2 escaped from the smoking patio. There were no door alarms going off, so the process of elimination indicates that R2 eloped from the smoking patio. It is possible for residents to elope from the smoking patio. If the resident is alert and oriented, we don't investigate on how they eloped. If they are alert and oriented it's their decision if they want to leave. R2 had the capacity to make his own decision and R2 had the capacity to leave the facility. R2 never expressed the desire to leave the facility. As of right now, I do not know how R2 left, this is only our suspicion that R2 eloped from the smoking patio. R2 somehow ended up in the community psych hospital and did not get his medication and was cold and hungry and probably ended up at the psychiatric hospital. There is a loophole of how R2 eloped, so there are other residents who are potentially able to elope from the facility. We are aware of the fact that there is a loophole on how R2 escaped, and we are monitoring other residents closely. I honestly don't know how R2 escaped it is only our suspicion that R2 escaped from the smoking patio. We did not put in any new interventions, since R2 eloped, we are just closely monitoring the residents and the doors are locked. R2 has a diagnosis of schizophrenia so R2 does have a history of psychiatric disorder. As of right now, the last we know R2 was at the hospital, and I believe R2 was discharged . R2 was not suicidal at the time. In R2's diagnosis R2 does have suicidal ideation but R2 wasn't suicidal at the time. I did not report this incident to the IDPH because R2 was alert and oriented and R2 wasn't a problem. On 01/31/2023 at 10:50am, V1(administrator) identified 8 residents at risk for elopement at the time of investigation. The following residents were identified as being at risk for elopement: R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12 and R13. On 01/31/2023 at 11:32am V3 (social service director) stated, When a resident elopes and once we are made aware of the elopement, we call a code pink. Code pink means that there is a missing resident or elopement. We search for the resident that's missing in the facility and outside. If need be, we will call the Chicago Police Department. If the residents have family listen on the contact list, we will call them and make them aware. If we cannot find the resident, we will call the police and make a missing police report right away. That is protocol, that when a resident is missing and cannot be found, we have to call the police and make a missing police report. The protocol to call and make a police report when the resident is missing is for every resident, regardless of their cognitive status, a police report must be filed when a resident is missing. It does not matter how alert the missing resident is, when we cannot locate that resident when a search is unsuccessful, we are supposed to call the police immediately. On 01/31/2023 at 11:52am V4 (psychiatric rehabilitation service director) stated, R2 was living at our sister facility and was admitted to this facility on 12/09/2022. When we have a new resident admitted to this facility, we have to do a 72-hour behavior safety check list where we monitor them. After reviewing R2's admission packet from the hospital, we discovered that R2 has a past history of aggression, history of substance abuse and suicidal ideation. The social service department enrolls the resident into the substance abuse program. After reviewing R2's referral packet, R2 was placed on a facility safety monitoring rounding checklist because R2 has a history of suicidal ideation and substance abuse. R2 was residing on the 3rd floor which is a psychiatric floor. The rounding check list requires the staff to monitor R2 every hour and record R2's whereabouts on the checklist. According to the checklist filled out by V15 (psychiatric rehabilitative service aide) on 01/10/2023, R2 was last seen at 4pm, at that time R2 was in another resident's room. After 4pm, R2 was no longer seen. I received a call from V5 (PRSC) stating that they could not find R2 inside facility. Immediately after receiving that call, I notified the V1 (administrator) and explained to V1 that R2 is missing. I asked my staff to document on the computer about the elopement and we updated the care plan and the elopement form. The facility was searched prior to calling me and when they could not find the resident, they called me, and they called the administrator. The administrator did not call the police because R2 is alert and oriented. According to the administrator, if the resident is alert and oriented, we do not notify the police and we do not make a missing police report. R2 did not discharge from the facility, R2 eloped. R2 has a major depressive disorder and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type and schizophrenia and suicidal ideation and cocaine abuse usage and cannabis dependence which is why R2 was admitted to the facility in the first place. Medically, R2 is not fit to leave the facility. R2 needs help to be stabilized. R2 has a lot of mental health issues and should on be out of this facility according to his medical history. We do not know R2's mental state at the time R2 eloped. The facility's administrator would be the one who calls and makes a police report. On 01/31/2023 at 3:26pm V6 (certified nursing assistant) stated, I was the C.N.A working with R2 on 01/10/2023, when R2 eloped. The last time I saw R2 was at 1:30pm, when R2 was going down to smoke a cigarette on the smoking patio. I saw R2 leaving the 3rd floor to go to the 1:30pm smoke break. I do not recall seeing R2 return from the smoke break. R2 never mentioned that he wanted to leave the facility. I finished my shift at 3pm and when I returned to work on 01/11/2023, I was informed that R2 eloped. On 02/01/2023 at 9:56am V7 (certified nursing assistant stated, I was working on the 3rd floor on 01/10/2023. I saw R2 on 01/10/2023. The last time I can recall seeing R2 was during lunch time. I don't recall seeing R2 after lunch. The last time I saw R2 was during lunch time when I was passing trays. Typically, R2 was usually in his room. I don't recall ever seeing R2 visiting other resident room. R2 kept mostly to himself and stayed in his room. On 02/01/2023 at 12:32pm V10 (primary physician) stated, They called me from the facility and told me that R2 eloped. They told me that R2 just walked out from the facility. There was no AMA, there was no discharge for R2, he simply just left and walked out from the facility. The facility told me that R2 just left. R2 just ran away. R2 was being monitored for safety at the facility. I think that R2 could have jumped the fence, but I don't know. R2 was being monitored for safety and R2 was a psych patient. Often, the psych residents want to leave the facility and that's what R2 did, he just walked out of the facility. The nursing home was monitoring him for 24 hours a day. Based on the diagnosis that R2 has, R2 needs to be monitored and I hope that R2 does not kill himself or someone else. I thought that the facility called the police and made a police report and reported R2 missing. I thought it is protocol to call the police when a resident elopes. I thought that the facility called the police to report that he ran away. On 02/02/2023 at 10:32am V13 (Psychiatric Rehabilitative Service Coordinator) stated, I was the one that was supervising the smoking session on the day that R2 eloped. There was 4 of us supervising the smoking break. Typically, there should be an activity aide, a CNA, a PRSC and a PRSA. On 01/10/2023, there was only 4 of us supervising the smoke break. I don't remember if an activity aide was there and I don't remember if there was a CNA present. I don't remember seeing R2 on the patio during the smoke break. We monitor the residents during the smoke breaks. We have staff members on each side of the gate and a staff member in the middle to provide supervision during a smoke break. On the day that R2 eloped, I don't remember seeing a staff member on each side of the gate to supervise during the smoke break. There is usually a staff member supervising the front gate, but I don't remember seeing a staff member supervising the other end gate, the gate that is away from the front entrance. We wait until all of the residents come inside from the smoking patio. Once all the residents come in, we lock the door. On 02/02/2023 at 10:52am V14 (front door receptionist/Psychiatric Rehabilitative Service Assistant) stated, On 01/10/2023, R2 came down from the 3rd floor to the front lobby close to 2pm. R2 approached me and requested to speak to V1 (administrator). R2 remained in the front lobby, and I went to inform the administrator, that R2 was requesting to speak to V1, however, V1's door was closed. I came back out to the front lobby to let R2 know that V1 was in the meeting, and I told R2 to come back in 30 to 40 minutes. R2 said R2 would come back to speak to the administrator and got on the elevator. That same day, I saw R2 on the second floor around 3pm, visiting R5's room. That was the last time I saw R2. R2 did not escape during the 1:30pm smoke break because I saw R2 around 3pm on the second floor in R5's room. That was the last time I saw R2. I was informed around 5:30pm that R2 was missing and R5's room was the first place I went to search. I called a code Pink, which is a code called when a resident is missing. On 02/02/2023 at 11:23am, V15 (Psychiatric Rehabilitative Service Assistant) stated, On 01/10/2023, I was the one who signed the round sheet for R2 at 3pm and 4pm. The round sheet is used to monitor residents for safety. I witnessed R2 at 3 and 4 pm on the second floor, in R5's room. I did not see R2 in the facility after 4pm. On 02/02/2023 at 12:28pm V17 (maintenance director) stated, I checked all the exit doors with alarms in the entire building. All the door alarms are working properly. All the exit doors are secured and locked. After R2 eloped, I checked all the doors and alarms in the building, and everything was working properly. It is a possibility that R2 escaped through the service door in the basement, by the kitchen. We have food delivery and supply delivery, and everything is delivered through the back service door, so it is possible that R2 escaped through the service door in the basement. We had other residents attempt to elope through the basement service doors. We have cameras all over the facility. Surveyor, accompanied by V17 (maintenance director), checked all the door alarms in the facility. Surveyor observed the door alarms to be working. County Hospital Records (dated 01/11/2023) document: Voluntarily brought self in states that he has suicidal thoughts with a plan to jump off a bridge; denies HI and hallucination. Hospital Records dated 01/11/2023 document: Pt is a [AGE] year-old male who presented to behavioral hospital as a direct transfer from county hospital Emergency Department. Per hospital fax, pt presented with suicidal ideation with a plan to jump in the lake. Pt also reported visual hallucinations stating that people are following him. Pt has a history of schizophrenia and bipolar. Pt reported that he is compliant with his medications. Pt reported that he lived in a nursing home that provided him with the medication. Pt endorses cocaine. Pt was unable to contract for safety. Pt is a danger to self and is in need of inpatient psychiatric treatment for safety and stabilization of suicidal ideation and psychosis. Emergency Operations Plan: Elopement vs. Unauthorized/Unplanned Discharge Policy and Procedure (dated 11/17/2022) states: In the event of a possible elopement, the following procedures shall be utilized: a.) Proper code will be called overhead. b.) An investigation shall be coordinated by the facility administrator, director of nursing or manager/supervisor on duty. A search will be conducted to assist in locating the resident. d.) The local law enforcement will be notified. e) If the incident/falls into IDPH Reporting Guidelines, designated facility staff will report incident to IDPH within 24 hours. Progress note dated 01/10/2023 documents, The writer was notified by the facility staffs that the resident made an unauthorized departure on 01/10/2023. The writer informed the writer, the staffs carried out room search, the resident was located. Psych social will continue to monitor and document as needed. Progress note dated 01/11/2023 documents, The nurse M. called from the community behavioral hospital; stating that they have the above resident there and they will be admitting him and wanted to know if he can return. I advised the nurse to call the facility back later in the morning to speak with social services. She stated, OK! The writer also informed the nurse the resident eloped from our facility. Nurse Practitioner Progress Note dated 01/14/2023 document, Psychiatry Note Attempted to see patient for evaluation this date but was informed by RN that he was not available because he eloped a few days ago.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an elopement incident for 1 resident (R2) out of 4 resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an elopement incident for 1 resident (R2) out of 4 residents reviewed for elopement. Finding include: According to a face sheet, R2 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to psychiatric rehabilitative service coordinator note dated 12/09/2022, R2 has a history has a psychiatric diagnosis of suicidal ideation, depression and the history of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. R2's Minimum Date Set assignment dated 12/20/2022 indicated R2 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicates resident has intact cognitive response. R2's care plan dated 01/09/2023, indicated R2 has a history of substance abuse and self-harm or suicidal ideation. Nursing Progress Note dated 01/10/2023 authored by V16 document: Resident noted with unauthorized departure from the facility today, staff has presented statements due this action, MD, social services, DON, and administrator are aware, no guardian/family listed, resident is responsible for self. On 01/31/2023 at 9:40am V1 (administrator) stated, R2 is no longer at the facility. R2 just left and later that day we found out that R2 was at the hospital. R2 did not even sign out against medical advice (AMA), R2 just left. R2 was no trouble as a resident, maybe on occasion R2 would use vulgar language. R2 came from the sister facility to be closer to the city. R2 would go outside and smoke and would return. On 01/10/2023, we were passing trays for diner, and we realized that R2 was not here at the facility. R2 left the building and never came back. We believe that R2 left when they went out to smoke and R2 never returned. The smoke break was at 2:30pm and we believe that R2 left the facility premises during the smoke break. R2 was never a resident who we were concerned about because R2 never attempted to leave or elope. On 01/11/2023, we received a call from the community behavioral hospital, informing us that R2 was there and wanted to know if he could return. The facility's admissions department contacted the hospital and informed the hospital that we would take R2 back to the facility. They never brought the resident back and the admissions director called the hospital several times to follow up if R2 was returning. R2 did not have a pass to go out into the community alone because R2 was still being evaluated. When R2 was admitted here on 12/09/2022, R2 was still in the process of being evaluated for an independent community pass. At the time R2 left, he was able to go into the community only with supervision and was in the process of being evaluated for an independent community pass but did not possess an independent community pass at the time R2 eloped from the facility. When the residents go out to smoke, they go out to the patio. The exit door to the patio is locked. The patio is monitored by 4 to 5 staff members when the residents are outside smoking. I did not conduct an investigation on how R2 eloped, we did a whole house search and since R2 is alert and oriented, we did not report it to the police. R2 had his jacket on him at the time R2 left because he was outside smoking so he must have planned to elope. Residents at times do attempt to climb the fence to elope from the smoking patio, that's why we have staff there to monitor the residents and prevent them from eloping. I really don't know if R2 escaped from the smoking patio. There were no door alarms going off, so the process of elimination indicates that R2 eloped from the smoking patio. It is possible for residents to elope from the smoking patio. If the resident is alert and oriented, we don't investigate on how they eloped. If they are alert and oriented it's their decision if they want to leave. R2 had the capacity to make his own decision and R2 had the capacity to leave the facility. R2 never expressed the desire to leave the facility. As of right now, I do not know how R2 left, this is only our suspicion that R2 eloped from the smoking patio. R2 somehow ended up in the community psych hospital and did not get his medication and was cold and hungry and probably ended up at the psychiatric hospital. There is a loophole of how R2 eloped, so there are other residents who are potentially able to elope from the facility. We are aware of the fact that there is a loophole on how R2 escaped, and we are monitoring other residents closely. I honestly don't know how R2 escaped it is only our suspicion that R2 escaped from the smoking patio. We did not put in any new interventions, since R2 eloped, we are just closely monitoring the residents and the doors are locked. R2 has a diagnosis of schizophrenia so R2 does have a history of psychiatric disorder. As of right now, the last we know R2 was at the hospital, and I believe R2 was discharged . R2 was not suicidal at the time. In R2's diagnosis R2 does have suicidal ideation but R2 wasn't suicidal at the time. I did not report this incident to the IDPH because R2 was alert and oriented and R2 wasn't a problem. On 01/31/2023 at 10:50am, V1(administrator) identified 8 residents at risk for elopement at the time of investigation. The following residents were identified as being at risk for elopement: R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12 and R13. On 01/31/2023 at 11:32am V3 (social service director) stated, When a resident elopes and once we are made aware of the elopement, we call a code pink. Code pink means that there is a missing resident or elopement. We search for the resident that's missing in the facility and outside. If need be, we will call the Chicago Police Department. If the residents have family listen on the contact list, we will call them and make them aware. If we cannot find the resident, we will call the police and make a missing police report right away. That is protocol, that when a resident is missing and cannot be found, we have to call the police and make a missing police report. The protocol to call and make a police report when the resident is missing is for every resident, regardless of their cognitive status, a police report must be filed when a resident is missing. It does not matter how alert the missing resident is, when we cannot locate that resident when a search is unsuccessful, we are supposed to call the police immediately. On 01/31/2023 at 11:52am V4 (psychiatric rehabilitation service director) stated, R2 was living at our sister facility and was admitted to this facility on 12/09/2022. When we have a new resident admitted to this facility, we have to do a 72-hour behavior safety check list where we monitor them. After reviewing R2's admission packet from the hospital, we discovered that R2 has a past history of aggression, history of substance abuse and suicidal ideation. The social service department enrolls the resident into the substance abuse program. After reviewing R2's referral packet, R2 was placed on a facility safety monitoring rounding checklist because R2 has a history of suicidal ideation and substance abuse. R2 was residing on the 3rd floor which is a psychiatric floor. The rounding check list requires the staff to monitor R2 every hour and record R2's whereabouts on the checklist. According to the checklist filled out by V15 (psychiatric rehabilitative service aide) on 01/10/2023, R2 was last seen at 4pm, at that time R2 was in another resident's room. After 4pm, R2 was no longer seen. I received a call from V5 (PRSC) stating that they could not find R2 inside facility. Immediately after receiving that call, I notified the V1 (administrator) and explained to V1 that R2 is missing. I asked my staff to document on the computer about the elopement and we updated the care plan and the elopement form. The facility was searched prior to calling me and when they could not find the resident, they called me, and they called the administrator. The administrator did not call the police because R2 is alert and oriented. According to the administrator, if the resident is alert and oriented, we do not notify the police and we do not make a missing police report. R2 did not discharge from the facility, R2 eloped. R2 has a major depressive disorder and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type and schizophrenia and suicidal ideation and cocaine abuse usage and cannabis dependence which is why R2 was admitted to the facility in the first place. Medically, R2 is not fit to leave the facility. R2 needs help to be stabilized. R2 has a lot of mental health issues and should on be out of this facility according to his medical history. We do not know R2's mental state at the time R2 eloped. The facility's administrator would be the one who calls and makes a police report. On 01/31/2023 at 3:26pm V6 (certified nursing assistant) stated, I was the C.N.A working with R2 on 01/10/2023, when R2 eloped. The last time I saw R2 was at 1:30pm, when R2 was going down to smoke a cigarette on the smoking patio. I saw R2 leaving the 3rd floor to go to the 1:30pm smoke break. I do not recall seeing R2 return from the smoke break. R2 never mentioned that he wanted to leave the facility. I finished my shift at 3pm and when I returned to work on 01/11/2023, I was informed that R2 eloped. On 02/01/2023 at 9:56am V7 (certified nursing assistant stated, I was working on the 3rd floor on 01/10/2023. I saw R2 on 01/10/2023. The last time I can recall seeing R2 was during lunch time. I don't recall seeing R2 after lunch. The last time I saw R2 was during lunch time when I was passing trays. Typically, R2 was usually in his room. I don't recall ever seeing R2 visiting other resident room. R2 kept mostly to himself and stayed in his room. On 02/01/2023 at 12:32pm V10 (primary physician) stated, They called me from the facility and told me that R2 eloped. They told me that R2 just walked out from the facility. There was no AMA, there was no discharge for R2, he simply just left and walked out from the facility. The facility told me that R2 just left. R2 just ran away. R2 was being monitored for safety at the facility. I think that R2 could have jumped the fence, but I don't know. R2 was being monitored for safety and R2 was a psych patient. Often, the psych residents want to leave the facility and that's what R2 did, he just walked out of the facility. The nursing home was monitoring him for 24 hours a day. Based on the diagnosis that R2 has, R2 needs to be monitored and I hope that R2 does not kill himself or someone else. I thought that the facility called the police and made a police report and reported R2 missing. I thought it is protocol to call the police when a resident elopes. I thought that the facility called the police to report that he ran away. On 02/02/2023 at 10:32am V13 (Psychiatric Rehabilitative Service Coordinator) stated, I was the one that was supervising the smoking session on the day that R2 eloped. There was 4 of us supervising the smoking break. Typically, there should be an activity aide, a CNA, a PRSC and a PRSA. On 01/10/2023, there was only 4 of us supervising the smoke break. I don't remember if an activity aide was there and I don't remember if there was a CNA present. I don't remember seeing R2 on the patio during the smoke break. We monitor the residents during the smoke breaks. We have staff members on each side of the gate and a staff member in the middle to provide supervision during a smoke break. On the day that R2 eloped, I don't remember seeing a staff member on each side of the gate to supervise during the smoke break. There is usually a staff member supervising the front gate, but I don't remember seeing a staff member supervising the other end gate, the gate that is away from the front entrance. We wait until all of the residents come inside from the smoking patio. Once all the residents come in, we lock the door. On 02/02/2023 at 10:52am V14 (front door receptionist/Psychiatric Rehabilitative Service Assistant) stated, On 01/10/2023, R2 came down from the 3rd floor to the front lobby close to 2pm. R2 approached me and requested to speak to V1 (administrator). R2 remained in the front lobby, and I went to inform the administrator, that R2 was requesting to speak to V1, however, V1's door was closed. I came back out to the front lobby to let R2 know that V1 was in the meeting, and I told R2 to come back in 30 to 40 minutes. R2 said R2 would come back to speak to the administrator and got on the elevator. That same day, I saw R2 on the second floor around 3pm, visiting R5's room. That was the last time I saw R2. R2 did not escape during the 1:30pm smoke break because I saw R2 around 3pm on the second floor in R5's room. That was the last time I saw R2. I was informed around 5:30pm that R2 was missing and R5's room was the first place I went to search. I called a code Pink, which is a code called when a resident is missing. On 02/02/2023 at 11:23am, V15 (Psychiatric Rehabilitative Service Assistant) stated, On 01/10/2023, I was the one who signed the round sheet for R2 at 3pm and 4pm. The round sheet is used to monitor residents for safety. I witnessed R2 at 3 and 4 pm on the second floor, in R5's room. I did not see R2 in the facility after 4pm. On 02/02/2023 at 12:28pm V17 (maintenance director) stated, I checked all the exit doors with alarms in the entire building. All the door alarms are working properly. All the exit doors are secured and locked. After R2 eloped, I checked all the doors and alarms in the building, and everything was working properly. It is a possibility that R2 escaped through the service door in the basement, by the kitchen. We have food delivery and supply delivery, and everything is delivered through the back service door, so it is possible that R2 escaped through the service door in the basement. We had other residents attempt to elope through the basement service doors. We have cameras all over the facility. Surveyor, accompanied by V17 (maintenance director), checked all the door alarms in the facility. Surveyor observed the door alarms to be working. County Hospital Records (dated 01/11/2023) document: Voluntarily brought self in states that he has suicidal thoughts with a plan to jump off a bridge; denies HI and hallucination. Hospital Records dated 01/11/2023 document: Pt is a [AGE] year-old male who presented to behavioral hospital as a direct transfer from county hospital Emergency Department. Per hospital fax, pt presented with suicidal ideation with a plan to jump in the lake. Pt also reported visual hallucinations stating that people are following him. Pt has a history of schizophrenia and bipolar. Pt reported that he is compliant with his medications. Pt reported that he lived in a nursing home that provided him with the medication. Pt endorses cocaine. Pt was unable to contract for safety. Pt is a danger to self and is in need of inpatient psychiatric treatment for safety and stabilization of suicidal ideation and psychosis. Emergency Operations Plan: Elopement vs. Unauthorized/Unplanned Discharge Policy and Procedure (dated 11/17/2022) states: In the event of a possible elopement, the following procedures shall be utilized: a.) Proper code will be called overhead. b.) An investigation shall be coordinated by the facility administrator, director of nursing or manager/supervisor on duty. A search will be conducted to assist in locating the resident. d.) The local law enforcement will be notified. e) If the incident/falls into IDPH Reporting Guidelines, designated facility staff will report incident to IDPH within 24 hours. Progress note dated 01/10/2023 documents, The writer was notified by the facility staffs that the resident made an unauthorized departure on 01/10/2023. The writer informed the writer, the staffs carried out room search, the resident was located. Psych social will continue to monitor and document as needed. Progress note dated 01/11/2023 documents, The nurse M. called from the community behavioral hospital; stating that they have the above resident there and they will be admitting him and wanted to know if he can return. I advised the nurse to call the facility back later in the morning to speak with social services. She stated, OK! The writer also informed the nurse the resident eloped from our facility. Nurse Practitioner Progress Note dated 01/14/2023 document, Psychiatry Note Attempted to see patient for evaluation this date but was informed by RN that he was not available because he eloped a few days ago.
Sept 2022 18 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on Observation, Interviews and Record Review the facility failed to assess, care plan and acquire physician order for resident that performs self-administration of nasal inhaler to 1 of 1 reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on Observation, Interviews and Record Review the facility failed to assess, care plan and acquire physician order for resident that performs self-administration of nasal inhaler to 1 of 1 resident (R87) for a total of 26 residents reviewed. These failures have the potential to affect 1 resident (R59) on the proper administration of nasal spray. Findings include: On 09/26/2022 at 09:04 AM. With V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) preparing R87 medicine. R87 medicine includes the following: Fluticasone Propionate Suspension 50 MCG/ACT that was handed by V9 to R87 without instruction. R87 sprayed 1 time on each nostril while talking. V9 took the medication from R87 and returned it on the medication cart. V9 said that R87 sometimes kept it on the bedside. But does not know if R87 was assessed, care planned or with doctor's order to self-medicate. On 09/27/2022 10:17 AM. V2 (Director of Nursing) said, The right thing to do for a resident to start self-administration is to start educating the resident with return demonstration. I guess there needs to be doctor's order. And should be care plan. Facility policy on Self-Administration in part reads: Under procedure, requirement for an order of self-administration of drugs by residents is permitted only upon specific order. Determination of competence before allowing to administer of medication. Resident who self-administering medication shall receive training and appropriate information. And documentation requirements.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0582 (Tag F0582)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide beneficiary protection notification to one resident (R381) of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. Findin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide beneficiary protection notification to one resident (R381) of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. Findings include: On 09/27/2022 at 2:20pm, V1(Administrator)was asked to complete the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form for R381. V1 said I cannot find the notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form for R381. I don't think it was completed for R381. V1 said that residents have a right to be notified of services that are terminating and R381 should have been given notice of discharge at least seven days before discharge. V1 said that R381 should have been notified of terminating services before R381 was discharged , because that is R381's right. SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form for R381 was marked not provided to R381. Facility policy titled discharge instructions, dated 3/2021document in part; -All member of the Interdisciplinary Team will provide discharge information as needed to the resident and/or responsible party. Documentation in the medical record will include the information provided.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy during personal ca...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy during personal care for 1 resident (R431) out of 3 residents reviewed for right to personal privacy in the sample of 26 residents. Findings include: On 09/25/22 at 11:57 AM, R431 reported another resident walked into the shower room when R431 was in there taking a shower on 09/24/22. R431 stated R56 said, you got a good body. R431 stated she asked the resident to leave and after waiting for one minute the resident left the shower room. R431 stated, that made me feel uncomfortable. R431 stated she (R431) told V14 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director) and V15 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Service Counselor). R431 stated that she (R431) has had issues with R56 before regarding R56 coming into her (R431) room. On 09/25/22 at 1:54 PM, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that R56 wanders around on the floor he (R56) resides on and the other floors. V5 stated staff try to redirect R56, however he (R56) is not always responsive. On 09/25/22 at 2:00 PM, surveyor attempted to interview R56. R56 rambled his speech non-stop, there was never any periods of silence during the interview and R56 was very restless. Surveyor heard R56 state, I went inside to piss, I had to go to the bathroom, I thought it was a man, I had to go to the bathroom, if a girl was in there I would have knocked, I went inside to piss, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I had to go to the bathroom, I needed to piss. On 09/26/22 at 10:53 AM, interviewed V1 (Administrator) and V14 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director). V1 stated that R431 approached him (V1) in the hallway this past Saturday, 9/24/22 and requested to have a lock on the shower door for privacy. V1 stated that he (V1) explained to her (V431) that the shower door cannot be locked but that the nurses can prevent people from walking into the shower room if V431 lets the nurses know before she (V431) takes a shower. V1 stated that V431 responded by saying okay and walked away. V1 stated that R431 did not mention why she (R431) wanted the privacy. V1 assumed R431 wanted the privacy related to V431's gender preference. V1 stated that V431 did not mention anything about another resident walking into the shower room while she (V431) was showering. V1 stated that V431 is alert and orientated times four and does have a history of making allegations of abuse and false statements from previous facility. V1 stated that if he (V1) was told about the incident then he (V1) would have reported it to the state. V1 stated, it is our job to report it and then complete an investigation. On 09/26/22 at 11:13 AM, V14 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director) stated that on Sunday, 9/25/22 R431 reported to him (V14) that R56 walked into the shower room to urinate when she (V431) was taking a shower but did not provide any additional information. R431 stated to V14 that it was a violation of her (R431) privacy. V14 stated that R56 wanders around the facility and has an urgency problem with urination and therefore will wander into other resident's rooms looking for a bathroom to use and often R56 has urinated on himself (R56) or is pulling down his (R56) pants to urinate. On 09/26/22 at 11:16 AM, V1 stated there was a previous incident with R56 entering R431's room to go to the bathroom which was reported to the state and investigated as an alleged abuse because R431 had reported that R56 had inappropriately exposed himself (R56) to her (R431). V1 stated that the findings were not substantiated. On 09/26/22 at 11:25 AM, surveyor asked V1 and V14 since this incident involves the same resident (R56), what interventions were put in place after the first incident on 09/13/22 to prevent an event from happening again and were they effective. V14 stated that R56 is confused, and that he (R56) goes everywhere, and that staff try to redirect him (R56). On 09/26/22 at 12:16 PM, spoke with V15 over the phone. V15 stated that he (V15) was working on Saturday, 9/24/22 and that R431 did not report anything to him (V15). V15 stated if she (R431) did talk to me it would have been during the smoke breaks but V15 does not remember specifically talking to her (R431). V15 stated that if R431 has a concern even if he (V15) is not on the floor where she (R431) is she (R431) will find me. V15 stated that R431 has never expressed a concern to him (V15) about R56. R431 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included but not limited to: Bipolar Disorder, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Mood Disorder due to Known Physiological Condition with Major Depressive-Like Episode, Syphilis, Major Depressive Disorder. R431's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 09/08/22 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 15 indicating intact cognition. R56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included but not limited to: Paranoid Schizophrenia, Psychoactive Substance Abuse, Major Depressive Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, Constipation. R56's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 07/27/22 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition. R56's care plan dated 12/20/21 documents in part that R56 demonstrates inappropriate social boundaries that may include but not limited to entering co-peer rooms uninvited. Interventions include document and monitor all progress, encourage resident to participate in psychosocial programming to assist him/her in gaining insight into illness/behaviors social boundaries, and redirect and counsel resident when seen displaying inappropriate social boundaries. R431 progress note dated 09/13/22 at 13:55 documents in part, the resident reported to the writer that her co-peer from another floor (R56) came to her room and exposed himself to her inappropriately. R431 progress note dated 09/14/22 at 13:53 documents in part, she stated that another resident came to her room to use the bathroom. She stated that this happened on 3 occasions, and she asked him to get out when he came in the room again. She stated she feels safe in the facility. R431 progress note dated 09/24/22 at 11:48 written by V1 documents, resident requested from the writer if she could have a lock on the shower room door. It was explained to her that the door could not be locked as requested but was informed to let the nursing staff know when she need to you (use) the facility so that the door care be monitored for her while being used. She verbalized understanding. Facility policy titled, Resident Rights dated 03/2021 documents in part, the resident will be assured of the following rights: right to privacy, the facility will meet with resident to attempt to resolve any issues in a timely manner, the facility will consult with appropriate staff to update the plan of care as needed. Long Term Care (LTC) Facility Reported Incident submitted 09/14/22 for alleged abuse for inappropriate exposure. LTC Facility Reported Incident submitted 09/26/22 for alleged abuse.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Findings include: On 9/27/2022 at 1:04pm, V27 (Regional Director of Nursing-RDON) said that anticoagulant medications should be care planned. V27 said that R35's Eliquis medication-an anticoagulant sh...

Read full inspector narrative →
Findings include: On 9/27/2022 at 1:04pm, V27 (Regional Director of Nursing-RDON) said that anticoagulant medications should be care planned. V27 said that R35's Eliquis medication-an anticoagulant should be care planned. V27 said it was important to care plan anticoagulant medications as this will alert the nursing staff of monitoring R35 for bleeding, monitoring R35's labs and any R35's changes related to anticoagulant use. V27 said that not monitoring R35's anticoagulant medication can lead to issues such as bleeding if the medication (Eliquis) is not monitored. R35's medication dated 4/27/2021 documented: Eliquis tablet 5mg every 12 hours. Review of R35's care plan did not list R35's Eliquis tablet 5mg every 12 hours in the care plan. Facility policy titled Care Plan Development dated 3/2021 documents: -Identifying problem areas and their causes, and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident are interdisciplinary process that require data gathering, sequencing of events and clinical decision making. Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop individualized care plans for 2 residents (R77 and R35) on high-risk medications out of 26 reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 9/27/22 at 11:29AM, V27 (Regional Director of Nursing) stated, R77 is on an anticoagulant. There is no care plan for R77 anticoagulant use. R77 should have a care plan for anticoagulant use. Without a care plan there is no proper monitoring for bleeding. Can't avoid incidents/activities to avoid excessive bleeding. On 9/27/22 at 5:12PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that if a resident is taking an anticoagulant, then the resident should be care planned for anticoagulant use. The purpose of care planning the anticoagulant use is, so staff know how to care for the resident and know to monitor so the resident does not bleed out. The resident could bleed out if not care planned. The resident would be at risk for harm. R77's diagnoses include but not limited to hemiplegia, cerebrovascular disease. R77's physician order summary indicates R77 has an active order for Heparin Sodium Solution 5000 unit/ml subcutaneously every 12 hours for anticoagulants No care plan provided for review for R77's anticoagulant use. Facility Care Plan Development policy dated 3/2021 documents in part: 7. The resident comprehensive care plan is developed within 72 hours of admission and reviewed after the completion of the comprehensive MDS assessment. 8. Evaluations of the resident are ongoing and care plans are reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each evaluation including both the comprehensive and quarterly reviews and as information about the resident condition changes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews and review of record the facility failed to maintain professional standard of care for a diabetic resident (R59) whom refused insulin and blood sugar check out of 1 o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and review of record the facility failed to maintain professional standard of care for a diabetic resident (R59) whom refused insulin and blood sugar check out of 1 one reviewed for blood sugar monitoring in a total of 26 resident reviewed. These failures have the potential to affect 1 resident (R59) proper care of diabetes. Findings include: On 09/25/2022 at 11:57 AM. V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that there are 2 residents that currently take insulin and 1 of the 2 residents (R59) refused his blood sugar. V9 then went to R59 and offered to take his blood sugar. R59 agreed and his (R59) blood sugar result was 447 mg/dl. V9 offered him to take his insulin but R59 refused. R59 said that since he currently takes oral diabetic medication that is enough. No health teaching was provided to R59. On 09/26/22 11:39 AM. Outside of R59's room, V9 checked R59's blood sugar, and the result was 280. V9 offered to R59 his insulin and was refused by R59. At 11:55 AM, V9 informed writer that R59, who earlier refused has now agreed to take his insulin. After administering the insulin, V9 was asked to present the insulin medicine she gave to R59. V9 went to medication room and took out the insulin which was a vial inside the box in the refrigerator. V9 handed the box with the vial inside. On the box and vial there was another sticker with printed name of R60 and not R59. V9 said, That is why I did not show you the insulin because we are not supposed to borrow from another resident. R59's insulin was in the medication cart yesterday but for some reason I cannot find it. On 09/27/2022 10:17 AM. V2 (Director of Nursing) said, Insulin of one resident must not be used by another resident. The correct thing to do is to call and ask for in-stock insulin. But in this facility, they don't have that, not like the place where I used to work that has in-stock insulin inside the refrigerator. I don't see it on the 1st floor. I will check on other floors. At 10:37 AM, V2 stated that since R59 was refusing insulin the doctor should have been notified and there should be an ongoing plan to address the problem because he (R59) is diabetic. Upon checking his MAR almost all dates were documented as refused. Blood sugar result records do not have documentation for the result on 9/25/2022 of 447 mg/dl. The most current blood sugar result recorded was on 9/22/2022 with result of 1 mg/dl. V2 said, I don't know why she (V9) did not record the result of 447 mg/dl because that was high. With that result doctor must be notified and charted on the progress notes. Oh yes, there is a risk of hyperglycemia. R59's does not have a record that his blood sugar on 9/25/2022 at 11:57 AM was 477 mg/dl and no record that the doctor was informed. R59 medication administration record for the months of August and September 2022 documents that R59 was refusing almost every day. The Medication Refusal Policy was requested but V2 stated that the facility does not have the policy. R59's care plan for medication non-compliance intervention were all dated 2/26/2022. The same care plan documents staff will educate R59 on the prescribed medication as needed. No education was provided when R59 refused insulin with blood sugar result of 447 mg/dl on 9/25/2022.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and review of record the facility failed to record high blood sugar and notify physician for resident that refusing blood sugar check. Refusing to receive schedule insu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and review of record the facility failed to record high blood sugar and notify physician for resident that refusing blood sugar check. Refusing to receive schedule insulin multiple times for 1 of 1 resident (R59) medically diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. These failures have the potential to increase the risk of hyperglycemia and its effects for R59. Findings include: On 09/25/2022 at 11:57 AM. V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that there are 2 residents that currently take insulin and 1 of the 2 residents (R59) refused his blood sugar. V9 then went to R59 and offered to take his blood sugar. R59 agreed and his (R59) blood sugar result was 447 mg/dl. V9 offered him to take his insulin but R59 refused. R59 said that since he currently takes oral diabetic medication that is enough. No health teaching was provided to R59. On 09/26/22 11:39 AM. Outside of R59's room, V9 checked R59's blood sugar, and the result was 280. V9 offered to R59 his insulin and was refused by R59. At 11:55 AM, V9 informed writer that R59, who earlier refused has now agreed to take his insulin. After administering the insulin, V9 was asked to present the insulin medicine she gave to R59. V9 went to medication room and took out the insulin which was a vial inside the box in the refrigerator. V9 handed the box with the vial inside. On the box and vial there was another sticker with printed name of R60 and not R59. V9 said, That is why I did not show you the insulin because we are not supposed to borrow from another resident. R59's insulin was in the medication cart yesterday but for some reason I cannot find it. On 09/27/2022 10:17 AM. V2 (Director of Nursing) said, Insulin of one resident must not be used by another resident. The correct thing to do is to call and ask for in-stock insulin. But in this facility, they don't have that, not like the place where I used to work that has in-stock insulin inside the refrigerator. I don't see it on the 1st floor. I will check on other floors. At 10:37 AM, V2 stated that since R59 was refusing insulin the doctor should have been notified and there should be an ongoing plan to address the problem because he (R59) is diabetic. Upon checking his MAR almost all dates were documented as refused. Blood sugar result records do not have documentation for the result on 9/25/2022 of 447 mg/dl. The most current blood sugar result recorded was on 9/22/2022 with result of 1 mg/dl. V2 said, I don't know why she (V9) did not record the result of 447 mg/dl because that was high. With that result doctor must be notified and charted on the progress notes. Oh yes, there is a risk of hyperglycemia. R59's does not have a record that his blood sugar on 9/25/2022 at 11:57 AM was checked with 477 mg/dl result and no record that it the doctor was informed. R59's medication administration record for the months of August and September 2022 documents that R59 was refusing almost every day. V2 was requested for Medication Refusal Policy but stated that upon notification of corporate the facility does not have the policy.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow policy on providing restorative services to a resident(R94) with a medical diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis follo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow policy on providing restorative services to a resident(R94) with a medical diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side; failed to provide treatment services to prevent the potential for decrease in range of motion for 1 resident (R94) out of 1 reviewed for range of motion in a total sample of 26 residents. Finds include: On 09/25/22 12:50 PM, observed R94 with right arm hanging at side. R94 unable to open and close hand. No splint observed on R94 or at bedside. On 09/26/22 at 9:19 AM, interviewed V2 (Director of Nursing) who stated there is no restorative director for the facility right now. V2 stated that a new restorative director has been hired but will not be starting until 10/10/22. V2 stated there is one restorative aide covering the facility. V2 stated that the staff floor certified nursing assistants are not doing restorative exercises, only the restorative aide is performing the exercises with residents. On 09/26/22 at 9:25 AM, interviewed V20 (Restorative Aide) who stated that he (V20) is the only restorative aide in the facility and that he (V20) tries to see everybody everyday but that it is difficult since he (V20) is the only restorative aide in the building. V20 stated that he (V20) does not work with R94. V20 stated, I don't work with her. I never worked with her. On 09/26/22 at 9:32 AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that R94 does not have or use any kind of splint or brace. On 09/25/22 at 9:35 AM, spoke with R94 about wearing hand and leg brace. R94 stated that it is her (R94) right side of her (R94) body which is weak not her (R94) left side and that she (R94) does not like wearing the braces or splint. R94 stated that the staff do not ask her (R94) to wear them anymore. R94 stated that no one does any range of motion exercises with her (R94). R94's diagnosis includes but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, primary generalized osteo arthritis, poly osteoarthritis, vascular dementia, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, unspecified psychosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R94's MDS (Minimum Data Set) section C dated 08/04/22 score is 14 indicating intact cognition. R94's MDS section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs) dated 08/04/22 documents in part that there were zero number of days for restorative nursing programs including passive range of motion, active range of motion, and splint or brace assistance. Restorative Assessments titled, RNP - Restorative Observation & Planning dated 7/6/21 documents in part impaired range of motion right shoulder, right elbow, right wrist and hand, right hip, right knee, right ankle, and foot related to right upper and lower extremity paralysis secondary to CVA and that a right-hand resting splint and right leg brace is recommended, and resident continues to refuse. Care plan last updated 07/10/19 for limitations in range of motion related to left extremities related to CVA documents in part intervention that (R94) will perform 10-15 reps of exercise daily for a minimum of 15 minutes. Care plan last updated on 07/06/21 for refusing to wear left hand resting splint and left leg brace reviewed. Intervention is that staff will ask and encourage R94 to wear left hand resting splint and left leg brace daily. Facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing dated 03/2021 documents, in part the facility shall ensure that approaches aimed at improving, preventing decline and maintaining a resident's functional level and quality of life are integrated into the individualized care plan, care planning should be individualized and specific to a resident's needs, and evaluation and reevaluation of the resident's status is ongoing and at least quarterly. Facility job description titled, Rehabilitation Aide undated, documents in part, duties and responsibilities to include perform the restorative programs as assigned, perform direct care as needed, document performance in the medical record. Facility job description titled, Rehabilitation Nurse undated, documents in part, evaluate and care plan each resident's restorative needs, make frequent facility round to evaluate the restorative nursing program, and provide hands on restorative care.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen therapy; failed t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen therapy; failed to properly label oxygen tubing for one (R231) resident reviewed for oxygen therapy in a sample of 26 residents. Findings include: On 09/25/2022 at 12:01pm, R231 observed standing next to R231s' bed without any signs or symptoms of respiratory distress. Oxygen concentrator observed turned on at R231s' bedside with nasal cannula tubing connected to the oxygen concentrator and lying on R231s' bed. Surveyor observed that R231s' nasal cannula oxygen tubing was not properly labeled with a date. On 09/25/2022 at 12:02pm, R231 stated, I have COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and that's why I have the oxygen here, but I don't use the oxygen all the time, only when I need it. My oxygen tubing needs to be changed, the nurse said that she would change it today. I know that my oxygen tubing can get really dirty, and I don't want to get an infection. On 09/25/2022 at 12:15pm, surveyor and V5 (LPN) entered R231s' room and observed R231 sitting on R231s' bed in high fowler's position while receiving oxygen therapy via nasal cannula with oxygen tubing connected to oxygen concentrator next to R231s' bed. On 09/25/2022 at 12:16pm, V5 also observed that R231s' nasal cannula tubing was not properly labeled. V5 stated, Yes, R231s' oxygen tubing should be changed and labeled with a date. I haven't gotten around to doing it yet; it's usually done already before my shift, so I never have to change it. I've never changed R231s' oxygen tubing, I'm not sure how often R231s' oxygen tubing should be changed. If R231s' oxygen tubing is not changed then it can cause an infection. On 09/27/2022 at 1:28pm, V2 (DON), stated, Oxygen should be administered per physician orders or as needed. If there is an emergency, then the nurses can give oxygen first but contact the doctor afterwards to get an order for oxygen. A physician's order is needed to administer oxygen. Signs of an emergency situation to give oxygen can include when a resident has skin discoloration, purple/blue lips, and a low oxygen saturation. When a resident's oxygen tubing is not in use, it should be kept in a bag, so it won't get contaminated. It would be difficult to know when a residents' oxygen tubing was changed if there is no date labeled on the oxygen tubing. If a residents' oxygen tubing is not changed in a timely manner, then it could potentially cause a respiratory infection. Record review of R231s' POS documents that R231 has medical diagnoses not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, and venous insufficiency (chronic) (peripheral). On 09/25/2022 at 1:30pm, review of R231s' electronic medical record documents that R231s' physician order sheet does not have an active physician order for oxygen therapy. R231s' MDS dated [DATE] documents that R231 is alert and oriented x3 with a BIMS of 15. R231s' care plan dated 08/16/2022 states R231 has a diagnosis of COPD and is at risk of respiratory distress. R231 is taking medication for symptom management including oxygen therapy. Interventions: Give oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician. R231 has oxygen therapy r/t ineffective gas exchange due to COPD. Facility document dated March 2021 titled Guidelines Name: Nasal Cannula states in part 1. Obtain an order for oxygen via nasal cannula. 5. Obtain oxygen concentrator, follow steps B-G. Gather the following, Step C: Sticker to date nasal cannula.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and review of record the facility failed to follow policy on administering prescribed insulin medication to the right resident(R59). This failure has the potential to a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and review of record the facility failed to follow policy on administering prescribed insulin medication to the right resident(R59). This failure has the potential to affect 1 resident (R59) on receiving the right insulin medication. Findings include: On 09/25/2022 at 11:57 AM. V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that there are 2 residents that currently take insulin and 1 of the 2 residents (R59) refused his blood sugar. V9 then went to R59 and offered to take his blood sugar. R59 agreed and his (R59) blood sugar result was 447 mg/dl. V9 offered him to take his insulin but R59 refused. R59 said that since he currently takes oral diabetic medication that is enough. No health teaching was provided to R59. On 09/26/22 11:39 AM. Outside of R59's room, V9 checked R59's blood sugar, and the result was 280. V9 offered to R59 his insulin and was refused by R59. At 11:55 AM, V9 informed writer that R59, who earlier refused has now agreed to take his insulin. After administering the insulin, V9 was asked to present the insulin medicine she gave to R59. V9 went to medication room and took out the insulin which was a vial inside the box in the refrigerator. V9 handed the box with the vial inside. On the box and vial there was another sticker with printed name of R60 and not R59. V9 said, That is why I did not show you the insulin because we are not supposed to borrow from another resident. R59's insulin was in the medication cart yesterday but for some reason I cannot find it. On 09/27/2022 10:17 AM. V2 (Director of Nursing) said, Insulin of one resident must not be used by another resident. The correct thing to do is to call and ask for in-stock insulin. But in this facility, they don't have that, not like the place where I used to work that has in-stock insulin inside the refrigerator. I don't see it on the 1st floor. I will check on other floors. Facility policy on Medication Administration dated 3/2021 in part reads: Under guidelines to ensure that administration of medication is performed in a safe manner to prevent medication errors. Under procedure, medication preparation / administration must be the right person and must be identified.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the right dose of medication as ordered. There were 25 opportunities with 3 errors resulting to 12% (percent) error...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the right dose of medication as ordered. There were 25 opportunities with 3 errors resulting to 12% (percent) error rate. This applies to 2 residents (R87 and R22) of 3 observed for medication administration. Findings include: On 09/26/2022 at 08:51 AM. With V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse) preparing R22 medicines. V17 took a bottle of Folic Acid 400 MG 1 tablet and administered the medicine together with 9 more tablets. On 09/26/2022 at 09:04 AM with V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) observed V9 preparing R87's medicine. R87 medicine includes the following: Lamotrigine 25 MG that V9 gave 2 tablets showing the bingo card that has a sticker with instructions to give 2 tablets (50 MG). And Sennoside 8.6 MG 1 tablet which V9 said to give 1 tablet only since R87 earlier had bowel movement. R87 asked V9 to give her 2 tablets of Sennoside medicine which V9 said not now and maybe later. V9 said, You (R87) already had bowel movement so I will just give you 1 tablet. On 09/27/2022 at 02:45 PM. V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) checked the medication cart and search for R22 Folic Acid medication. V6 said, I cannot find it in the bingo card. V6 then took a bottle of Folic Acid 400 MCG. V6 then said, We need to give 2 tablets and cut 1 tablet into half. On 09/27/2022 at 02:55 PM. V23 (Registered Nurse) checked the medication cart and took out R87's Lamotrigine 25 MG bingo card on the bingo card a sticker that reads: Lamotrigine 25 MG - Take 2 tablets (50 MG) by mouth twice daily. V23 was asked to check the order for Lamotrigine 25 MG on R87's physician order or Medication Administration Record (MAR). V23 said, The order is for 1 tablet only. We always follow the order on the clinical records and not the bingo card. I think we need to ask the pharmacy to send us an updated sticker. On 9/27/20/2022 at 4:32 PM. V2 (Director of Nursing) was informed about medication error including Lamotrigine that is a seizure medication. V2 said, Nurses must give the right dose of medication. And I will look into it right away. Review of Medication Orders: R22 Medication Order: Folic Acid Tablet 1 MG - Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement. R87 Medication Order: Lamotrigine Tablet 25 MG - Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to seizures. Sennosides Tablet 8.6 MG - Give 2 tablets by mouth two times a day for constipation. Facility's Medication Administration Policy dated 3/2021 in part reads: Under guideline, to ensure that administration of medications is performed in a safe manner to prevent medication errors. Medication preparation / administration must be at a right dose.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to follow policy on Medication Administration Infection Control Practices for 2 out of 2 residents (R126 and R22) receiving medi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to follow policy on Medication Administration Infection Control Practices for 2 out of 2 residents (R126 and R22) receiving medications. Failures includes 1. staff not performing handwashing or cleansing with alcohol-based gel before and after medication pass; 2. not cleaning or sanitizing vital signs equipment before using it between residents. These failures have the potential to affect 2 residents (R126 and R22) for spread of infection. Findings include: On 09/26/2022 at 08:38 AM. With V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse) while preparing R126 medication. V17 stated, All residents medication was already administered and R126 was last resident that she will perform medication administration. Before giving medication, V17 took vital signs of R126 using blood pressure cuff for the left wrist, pulse oximeter on right hand pointing finger and tympanic thermometer on the left ear. V17 was not seen performing hand hygiene or sanitizing any equipment she used for R126. After administering medications to R126, V17 handled multiple resident trays and a resident pitcher. V17 touched surfaces on bedside table, tray carts and also took plastic bag on the floor and placed it on the side of the medication cart trash container. 09/26/22 08:51 AM V17 started to prepare R22's medications without performing hand hygiene. V17 then performed vital signs on R22 using same blood pressure cuff on the left wrist and pulse oximeter on left hand middle finger of R22 without cleaning or sanitizing the equipment. On 09/27/2022 at 11:54 AM V2 stated that nurses are expected to perform hand hygiene before and after each resident medication administration. Nurses must clean and sanitize vital signs equipment before every used of resident. Facility's Medication Administration Policy dated 3/2021 in part reads: Under procedure infection control practices. Hand washing or cleansing with alcohol-based gel performed: Before and after medication pass. V2 was asked to provide policy for cleaning or sanitizing clinical equipment multiple times but was not able to provide.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review; 1.) the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed were secure while not in use or view by staff; 2.) the facility failed to label i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review; 1.) the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed were secure while not in use or view by staff; 2.) the facility failed to label insulin for one (R59) resident; 3.) the facility failed to refrigerate insulin for two (R69, R117) residents; 4.) the facility failed to discard expired medications. Findings include: On 09/25/2022 at 12:24pm, surveyor on the 3rd floor of the facility with V4 (LPN). An observation made of the medication cart located on the 3rd floor of the facility identified as (Side A cart) with V4 revealed the following inside: An unopened insulin vial labeled: Humulin R Solution 100 unit/mL with R69's name An unopened insulin vial labeled: Humulin R solution 100 unit/mL with R117's name On 09/25/2022 at 12:35pm, V4 stated R69 and R117's unopened insulin vials are supposed to be refrigerated. I am going to put the medication in the refrigerator now. V4 observed walking to the medication storage room located on the 3rd floor of the facility and place R69 and R117s' insulin vials in the refrigerator inside the medication storage room. On 09/25/2022 at approximately 12:50pm, surveyor located on the 2nd floor of the facility and observed a medication cart (identified as Side A cart) unlocked and unattended. Approximately 2 minutes elapse and surveyor observed V6 (LPN) exiting a resident's room and walking down the hallway towards surveyor and Side A medication cart. On 09/25/2022 at approximately 12:52pm, V6 approached side A medication cart and locked the medication cart. V6 stated I know I left the cart unlocked, I had to step away right quick because another resident needed me to do something. I know, I'm not supposed to do that. A resident could have gotten access to the medication, and anything could have happened to the resident. On 09/26/2022 at 12:56pm, an observation made of the medication cart located on the 1st floor of the facility identified as the only medication cart on the 1st floor with V9 (LPN) revealed the following inside: A house stock bottle of Vitamin B6 100mg tablets opened and available for resident use had an expiration date of 05/2022 A house stock bottle of Famotidine 10mg tablets opened and available for resident use had an unknown expiration date. On 09/26/2022 at 1:05pm, V9 stated I check for expired medications about every 20 days. I checked this medication cart yesterday on 09/25/2022 for expired medications but I guess another nurse must have put this expired medication back on the medication cart. V9 asked by surveyor to read the expiration date on house stock Famotidine 10mg bottle and V9 stated I can't read this expiration date on this bottle, I don't know when it expires. I would not be confident giving this medication to any of the residents. We are not supposed to administer expired medications. On 09/26/2022 at 12:08pm, V8 (Pharmacist) stated, If insulin vials are unopened, they should be refrigerated. If insulin vials are left unopened and unrefrigerated, the medication would be compromised and should not be used for the resident because it would not be 100% effective. On 09/27/2022 at 1:28pm, V2 (DON), stated, To my understanding, opened insulin vials can remain in the medication cart. If an insulin vial is unopened, then it should be refrigerated. If unopened insulin is not refrigerated, then it will no longer be as effective. If medication carts are left unlocked and unattended, a resident can get access to the medications, ingest them and overdose. Medications could also be sold and diverted. Medication carts should be locked at all times when not in use by the nurses. We check the medication carts for expired medications at least every couple of weeks. Expired medications should not have been on the medication cart. Residents could potentially die or have an adverse reaction if administered expired medications. On 09/26/2022, insulin storage policy requested from V2 (DON), V2 verbalized that the facility did not have a policy related to insulin storage. On 09/27/2022, Facesheet and POS requested for R69 and R117 from V2, not provided. Facility census dated 09/24/2022 documents that 31 residents reside on the 1st floor of the facility, 44 residents reside on the 2nd floor of the facility, and 56 residents reside on the 3rd floor of the facility. Facility Document dated March 2021, titled Guideline Name: Medication Storage states in part The facility acknowledges that medications can be stored in a variety of storage areas located within the nursing unit and under lock and key. Facility document dated March 2021, titled Policy Name: Medication Administration documents in part 2. General Carts are maintained, clean and in good repair, always attended or locked when not in view. 4. Medication preparation/Administration b. Verify the expiration date. On 09/25/2022 at 11:57 AM. V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that there are 2 residents that currently takes insulin and 1 of the 2 residents (R59) refused his blood sugar. V9 then went to R59 and offered to take his blood sugar. R59 agreed and after V9 checked his (R59) blood sugar the result was 447 mg/dl. V9 offered him to take his insulin but R59 refused. R59 said that since he currently takes oral diabetic medication that is enough. No health teaching was provided to R59. On 09/26/22 11:39 AM. Outside of R59's room V9 checked R59's blood sugar, and the result was 280. V9 offered to R59 his insulin and was refused by R59. At 11:55 AM, V9 informed writer that R59 who earlier refused is now agreed to take his insulin. After administering the insulin, V9 was asked to present the insulin medicine she gave to R59. V9 went to medication room and took out the insulin which was a vial inside the box in the refrigerator. V9 handed the box with the vial inside. And on the vial, there was a sticker that was not filled up and it reads: date opened, and date expired. V9 stated that the vial should have been filed up by the nurse that first opened the insulin vial to determine its expiration date. On the box and vial there was another sticker with printed name of R60 and not R59. V9 said, That is why I did not show you the insulin because we are not supposed to borrow from another resident. R59's insulin was in the medication cart yesterday but for some reason I cannot find it. On 09/27/2022 10:17 AM. V2 (Director of Nursing) said, Insulin should be dated with open dated and expiration date the first time it is used to determine up to when it is good to use. Insulin of one resident must not be used by another resident. The correct thing to do is to call and ask for in-stock insulin. But in this facility, they don't have that, not like the place where I used to work that has in-stock insulin inside the refrigerator. But I don't see it on the 1st floor. I will check on other floors.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0809 (Tag F0809)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure there are no more than 14 hours between the evening meal and breakfast the following day and serve a nourishing snack at bedtime to r...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure there are no more than 14 hours between the evening meal and breakfast the following day and serve a nourishing snack at bedtime to residents who do not have diabetes. This deficient food service practice has the potential to affect 81 residents in a total sample size of 128 residents receiving an oral diet from the facilities kitchen. Findings include: On 09/25/22 at 10:15 AM, V13 (Food Service Director) stated mealtimes are 7:30 AM for breakfast, 11:30 AM for lunch, and 4:30 PM for dinner. On 09/26/22 at 3:05 PM, V13 stated that the meal tray lines start at 7:30 AM for breakfast and that all residents receive their breakfast tray by 8:00 AM, lunch tray line starts at 11:30 AM and that all residents receive their lunch tray by 12:00 PM, dinner tray line starts at 4:30 PM and all residents receive their dinner tray by 5:00 PM. V13 stated all residents with diabetes receive an evening snack which are prepared in the kitchen and labeled with the resident's name and room number. V13 stated that the individualized evening snacks are delivered to the unit nightly and that the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) distribute the snacks to the resident. V13 stated that an evening snack for a resident with diabetes consists of a 3 oz. turkey or peanut butter and jelly sandwich and juice. For those residents who do not have diabetes or individually ordered snacks by the physician or Registered Dietitian there are cookies and juice available for everyone else. V13 stated there is a snack schedule rotation as part of the weekly menu. V13 stated that there are not any kitchenettes on the floor. V13 stated that the night nursing supervisor has a key to the kitchen if a particular resident wants extra food. V13 stated that some extra sandwiches are sent up with the diabetic snack sandwiches in case other residents want a sandwich. On 09/27/22 at 10:22 AM, surveyor spoke with V19 (Registered Dietitian) over the phone. V19 stated that she (V19) is not in charge of the snack program and that juice and cookies are not a nourishing snack. V19 stated she would prefer residents to receive low fat milk instead of juice and something more substantial such as a sandwich, fruit, and yogurt. V19 did not know there was a regulation about the length of time between dinner and breakfast meal. V19 stated, I didn't know that was a regulation. V19 then stated 14 hours for a resident to go between meals is too long and could cause them to go into starvation mode. On 09/27/22 at 11:00 AM, during the resident council meeting the Resident Council President, R90 stated that there are not enough sandwiches sent to the 3rd floor at night for snacks. R90 stated, they run out and that people are hungry. R90 stated that if the dinner meal is not good to eat then people are looking to the evening snack for more food. On 09/27/22 at 4:12 PM, V24 (Certified Nursing Assistant) on the 3rd floor stated that the kitchen sends sandwiches for the residents with diabetes and cookies, juice for everyone else. V24 stated that they roll a cart with the snacks room by room to ask residents if they would like a snack after dinner. V24 stated that sometimes the kitchen will send extra sandwiches with the snacks and if the 3rd floor runs out of sandwiches, then the CNAs go to other floors to look for leftovers. V24 stated there is no place to keep extra food on the unit. stated that the residents also have access to a vending machine on the floor if they are still hungry. On 09/27/22 at 4:23 PM, V26 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated that the kitchen sends up a list of residents with diabetes and sandwiches for those residents. V26 stated that the residents with diabetes get the sandwiches first, and if there are any leftover sandwiches the CNAs offer them to the other residents. V26 stated that otherwise the residents without diabetes get cookies and juice. V26 stated the kitchen does not send up pureed sandwiches or pureed cookies for the one resident (R15) on a pureed diet on the floor. On 09/27/22 at 4:45 PM, surveyor reviewed Resident Council Meeting Minutes from 03/30/22 -present and there was no mention of resident request for mealtimes to extend beyond 14 hours or approval of up to 16-hour lapse time between dinner and breakfast meal. Kitchen facility policy titled, Meal Times and Frequency dated 2017, documents, in part there will be no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening snack (dinner) and breakfast the following day. All residents will be offered a bed-time snack. A nourishing snack is defined as verbal offering of items, single or in combination, from the basic food groups. Facility Week at a Glance for Week 3 dated 05/24/22 lists late snack as Orange Drink & Cookie (Sunday), Lemonade & [NAME] Crackers (Monday), Blush Punch & Vanilla Wafers (Tuesday), Orange Drink & Cookie (Wednesday), Lemonade & [NAME] Crackers (Thursday), Blush Punch & Vanilla Wafers (Friday) and Orange Drink & Cookie (Saturday).
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure by not providing documentation of education regarding the benefits of influenza and/or pneumococcal immun...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure by not providing documentation of education regarding the benefits of influenza and/or pneumococcal immunization and not providing documentation of receipt or refusal of the influenza and/or pneumococcal vaccine for 5 (R123, R20, R119, R54, R9) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations in a sample of 26. Findings include: On 9/27/22 at 1:08PM, V27 (Regional Director of Nursing) stated There is nothing in place to track influenza, pneumococcal and Covid-19 immunizations. On admission, if the resident is over the age of 65, they have to get the pneumococcal vaccine if they have not received it before. An outside clinic does the Covid-19 vaccinations. They provide the consents for the facility to get signed by the resident. When the resident refuses, we educate them. There is no documentation of the education provided. Because there is no documentation, it is not known if staff is educating the resident on the vaccine. Work not documented is work not done. On 9/27/22 at 1:42PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated Tracking of influenza, pneumococcal and Covid-19 are kept in a book/file, and that book/file should be in the IP (Infection Preventionist) office. Everything is not in the electronic medical record. Influenza, pneumococcal and Covid-19 immunizations are offered at admission and annually offered by the IP nurse, DON (Director of Nursing) or the ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). If the resident wants the influenza, pneumococcal or Covid-19 immunization, then there should be a consent form or there should be a refusal form if they refuse the immunization. There should be teaching/education offered by the staff member to the resident emphasizing the importance of the vaccine. The consent, refusal, and education should be documented in the resident's chart. If it's not documented there is no way to ensure education was done. If it is not documented, then it was not done. On 9/28/22 at 2:30PM, V27 (Regional Director of Nursing) stated My previous statement was incorrect, there is tracking in place for influenza, pneumococcal and Covid. Just cannot find the documentation or it was not documented for the residents requested by the surveyor. The education is on the consents. The same consent form is used for consent and refusal. Surveyor reviewed a list provided by facility titled Resident's Vaccination Status, Residents That Refused . with R123, R20, R119, R54, and R9. Surveyor requested but no Influenza, Pneumovax, or Covid-19 immunization education documentation was provided for review regarding: R123, R20, R119, R54, or R9 during 4 days of the survey. Facility Flu/Pneumovax Vaccine policy dated 10/2020 documents in part: Pneumococcal vaccination should be offered to residents at the time of admission. Resident refusal of vaccines should be documented in the medical record. 2. Before offering the influenza or pneumococcal immunization, each resident or the resident's representative will receive education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization. 5. The resident or the resident's representative have the opportunity to refuse immunization. Acceptance or refusal for the Flu or Pneumococcal vaccine is documented in the medical record. 8. The resident's medical record will include the following documentation: A) That the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza and pneumococcal immunization; and B) That the resident either received the immunization or did not receive he immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0887 (Tag F0887)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure by not providing documentation of education regarding the benefits of Covid-19 immunization and not provi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure by not providing documentation of education regarding the benefits of Covid-19 immunization and not providing documentation of receipt or refusal of the Covid-19 vaccine for 5 (R123, R20, R119, R54, R9) of 5 residents reviewed for Covid-19 vaccination, education. Findings include: On 9/27/22 at 1:08PM, V27 (Regional Director of Nursing) stated There is nothing in place to track influenza, pneumococcal and Covid-19 immunizations. On admission, if the resident is over the age of 65, they have to get the pneumococcal vaccine if they have not received it before. An outside clinic does the Covid-19 vaccinations. They provide the consents for the facility to get signed by the resident. When the resident refuses, we educate them. There is no documentation of the education provided. Because there is no documentation, it is not known if staff is educating the resident on the vaccine. Work not documented is work not done. On 9/27/22 at 1:42PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated Tracking of influenza, pneumococcal and Covid-19 are kept in a book/file, and that book/file should be in the IP (Infection Preventionist) office. Everything is not in the electronic medical record. Influenza, pneumococcal and Covid-19 immunizations are offered at admission and annually offered by the IP nurse, DON (Director of Nursing) or the ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). If the resident wants the influenza, pneumococcal or Covid-19 immunization, then there should be a consent form or there should be a refusal form if they refuse the immunization. There should be teaching/education offered by the staff member to the resident emphasizing the importance of the vaccine. The consent, refusal, and education should be documented in the resident's chart. If it's not documented there is no way to ensure education was done. If it is not documented, then it was not done. On 9/28/22 at 2:30PM, V27 (Regional Director of Nursing) stated My previous statement was incorrect, there is tracking in place for influenza, pneumococcal and Covid. Just cannot find the documentation or it was not documented for the residents requested by the surveyor. The education is on the consents. The same consent form is used for consent and refusal. Reviewed a list provided by facility titled Resident's Vaccination Status, Residents That Refused . with R123, R20, R119, R54, and R9. Surveyor requested but facility did not provide Covid-19 immunization education documentation for R123, R20, R119, R54, R9. Facility Covid Vaccination policy dated 5/2021 documents in part: 3. Staff will document under the immunization section of PCC if the resident has received the vaccination or if they are requesting the vaccine or refusing the vaccine. 4. Staff will provide the resident education on the benefits of receiving the vaccine and document under the comment section of the immunization tab that the education was provided. 6. If the resident refuses the vaccine, then they will be asked at each clinic and provided education as such; documentation of the education will be recorded in the medical record.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and stored; 2.) discard food products on or before the expiration date; 3....

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and stored; 2.) discard food products on or before the expiration date; 3.) store uncooked meat to prevent meat juices from dripping on other foods; 4.) practice appropriate hand hygiene; 5.) practice appropriate hair restraints including hair and beard coverings; 6.) allow cooking equipment to air-dry before use; 7.) reheat pureed food to required 165 degrees before service. These failures have the potential to affect all 129 residents receiving oral diets from the facilities kitchen. Findings include: On 09/25/22 at 9:25 AM, surveyor entered kitchen and observed V10 (Diet Cook) without hairnet or beard restraint and V12 (Dietary Aide) without hairnet restraint. On 09/25/22 at 09:27 AM, V10 (Diet Cook) conducted kitchen tour with surveyor and observed the following items in the walk-in refrigerator: 1.) 1 gallon container of Yellow Mustard dated with use by 6/22 covered with black mold-like spots on the outside of the plastic container. V10 was asked to describe what the black material was covering the container and he (V10) stated, I don't know, but it's out of date and should be thrown out. 2.) 1 gallon container Sweet Relish 50% empty - not labeled with delivery, open or use by date. 3.) 1 large metal container filled with Beef Gravy covered with tin foil dated 9/15/22. V10 stated it's more than 3 days from that date, so I'll throw it out now. 4.) Plastic container filled with sliced ham- not labeled or dated. 5.) Hard Boiled Eggs in a plastic container labeled as Pears 9/14 V10 stated that the container was mislabeled. Surveyor asked V10 when the hard-boiled eggs were made. V10 stated, I don't know. I'll need to ask around to the staff to find out when the eggs were made. I cannot tell unless the item is labeled with a date. On 09/25/22 at 9:45 AM, surveyor observed 5-5-pound packages of raw ground beef thawing in large metal container located on the middle storage shelf in the walk-in refrigerator. Underneath the ground beef located on the lower storage shelf was an opened case of fresh tomatoes, cucumbers, and cooked turkey breast wrapped in tin foil. On 09/25/22 at 9:47 AM, V11 (Diet Cook) stated the raw meat should be stored on the bottom shelf, not above fresh produce or ready to eat products. V11 stated the raw meat juice could drip into the boxes of tomatoes and cucumbers which could cause a food borne illness. On 09/25/22 at 9:51 AM, V12 (Diet Aide) stated that he (V12) did not have his (V12) hair net on earlier because he (V12) had just come in the kitchen. Diet Aide stated that his (V12) hair should be covered to prevent his (V12) hair from falling into the food. On 09/25/22 at 9:54 AM, surveyor observed the following on an open metal cart with 3 shelves located next to the kitchen prep area: 1.) Large bottle labeled Ground thyme dated 11/8/17 2.) 2nd Large bottle labeled Ground thyme dated 3/21/17 3.) No dates on the following containers: black pepper, crushed red pepper, rosemary leaves, ground basil, ground all spice 4.) Peanut butter jar opened, 25% used - no labeled with delivery or opened date. 5.) Plastic containers of potato flakes, powdered sugar, flour, thickener not labeled or dated. 6.) 1 gallon container soy sauce with refrigerate after opening printed on soy sauce label and best by October 27 2021 printed on cap by manufacturer. On 09/25/22 at 11:12 AM, observed V10 take blender base, lid, and blade from V11 after she (V11) had used it to prepare the pureed pork and bring them over to the dishwashing area. V10 rinsed the blender base, lid, and blade with water in the sink and then put them on a dishwasher rack and sent them through the dishwasher. On 09/25/22 at 11:18 AM, observed V10 return to the clean end of the dishwasher and remove the blender parts from the dishwashing rack. V10 did not wash hands in between the process of putting the dirty blender parts into the dishwasher and then pulling them out from the clean end of the dishwasher after being disinfected. V10 then put blender container, blade, and lid back on the base of the blender. Surveyor observed that the outside of the blender container, and lid was wet, and the inside of the blender container had pools of water on the bottom, around the blade. V11 then proceeded to add zucchini to the blender and turn on blender to puree the zucchini. On 09/25/22 at 11:21 AM, observed V10 take the blender base, lid, and blade from V11 after zucchini was pureed and bring them to the dishwashing area to be cleaned. V10 rinsed blender base, lid, blade in sink with water, then put on dishwasher rack and send 3 blender pieces through the dishwasher. V10 did not wash hands after handling the dirty blender container, lid, or blade. Observed V10 opening kitchen drawers and handling various serving utensils before returning to the clean side of the dishwasher to pull out the blender parts. V13 told V10, let that air dry. On 09/25/22 at 11:25 AM, V11 covered pureed pork and pureed zucchini and placed them into the oven. V11 stated that the pureed items needed to get reheated up to 165 degrees before they could be served on the tray line. On 09/25/22 at 11:28 AM, V10 took the blender container, lid, and blade out of dish machine rack and put back on to blender base. Surveyor could see pools of water inside the blender container. V11 then added bread dressing into the blender and turned-on blender to puree the bread dressing. On 09/25/22 at 11:29 AM, observed V11 wash hands at the hand sink for less than 20 seconds. On 09/25/22 at 11:31 AM, V13 took temperature on the tray line of the pureed pork using a calibrated thermometer. The pureed pork reading was130 degrees. V13 stated that the temperature needs to be at least 150 degrees and told V11 to reheat the pureed pork on the stove. On 09/25/22 at 11:32 AM, V13 took the temperature on the tray line of the pureed bread dressing using a calibrated thermometer. The pureed bread dressing reading was 140 degrees. V13 pulled the pureed bread dressing and told V11 to reheat the pureed bread dressing on the stove to get the temperature up. On 09/25/22 at 11:36 AM, V11 returned pureed pork and pureed bread dressing to tray line. V13 rechecked the temperature of the pureed pork and it was160 degrees. V13 rechecked the temperature of the pureed bread dressing and it was 150 degrees. V13 stated that the temperatures were acceptable and the tray line started. On 09/26/22 at 2:54 PM, V13 stated that the kitchen's policy is to discard food after 3 days. V13 stated that all items in the refrigerator should be labeled with a delivery date, an open date, and a use by date. V13 stated that items need to be dated so that staff knows how old something is and when to discard an item(s). V13 stated that unlabeled food items have the potential to cause harm to a resident because if a resident was to ingest a food item that had expired the resident could get sick with a food borne illness. V13 stated that raw meat should be stored at the bottom of the cooler because it has the potential to drip on the wrong food which could cause a food borne illness. V13 stated that raw beef should not have been over the tomatoes, cucumbers and ready to eat turkey. V13 stated that hair and beard nets should be worn so that staff hair does not fall into resident food. V13 stated that equipment used for cooking needs to air dry before reusing and this is important to prevent cross contamination. V13 stated there should be no standing water in items cleaned, they should be air dried. Kitchen facility titled, Food Sanitation Checklist dated 2014 documents, in part that foods should be labeled and dated, no outdated products, food are being thawed properly, pots and pans are stored properly with no visible moisture, employees have proper hair restraints, wash hands properly and frequently. Kitchen facility policy titled, Uniform/Dress Code dated 2014 document, in part hairnets or hair restraints covering all hair will be worn and the food service manager is responsible to in-service staff on personal hygiene. Kitchen facility policy titled, Ready-To-Eat TCS Food, Date Marking dated 2014 documents, in part refrigerated, ready to eat foot prepared shall be covered, labeled, and marked with the date or day by which the food shall be consumed or discarded. Kitchen facility policy titled, Leftover Food dated 2014 document, in part that leftover food will be covered, labeled, dated and used within 72 hours, any food that is suspected of not being safe and of high quality will be discarded immediately, previous cooked foods will be reheated to an internal temperature of at least 165 degrees. Kitchen recipes titled, Pureed Pork Roast and Pureed Bread Dressing undated document, in part pureed hot heating-heat until product reaches 165 degrees or higher for 15 seconds.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly by not closing the lids on the dumpsters outside the facility. This defici...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly by not closing the lids on the dumpsters outside the facility. This deficient sanitation practice has the potential to affect all 130 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: On 09/25/22 at 10:07 AM, an observation of the facilities outside garbage dumpster was conducted with V11 (Dietary Cook) and V13 (Food Service Director). Surveyor observed two large garbage dumpsters outside with numerous rat traps around the dumpster area. One of the dumpsters had the middle lid fully open. On 09/25/22 at 10:10 AM, FV13 stated that the dumpster lids should be kept closed all the time to keep rodents out of them. V13 stated that if the lids are open it will attract more rodents to the area. On 09/27/22 at 2:26 PM, V21 (Housekeeping Director) stated that all lids to the outside dumpster need to be closed to prevent rodent activity. V21 stated that if the dumpster is left uncovered it could attract rodents and provide the rodents with a food supply. V21 stated that if that were to happen it could attract rodents toward the building. Kitchen Facility policy titled, Trash Containers dated 2014 documents in part that the trash containers will be kept covered when full or not in use and that outside trash bin areas will be kept closed at all times.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0888 (Tag F0888)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to obtain 100% compliance for facility staff Covid-19 vaccination rate and failed to monitor the Covid-19 vaccination status of ou...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to obtain 100% compliance for facility staff Covid-19 vaccination rate and failed to monitor the Covid-19 vaccination status of outside/contracted staff members. This failure has the potential to affect the 131 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 9/26/22 at 4:00PM, V27 (Regional Director of Nursing) stated We do not have a list of vaccination status for contract staff. We don't know who the contracted people are. There is no matrix of vaccination status for contract staff. Of course, there should be a matrix showing contracted staff vaccination status. On 9/27/22 at 11:37AM, V27 (Regional Director of Nursing) stated There is no master list of names of contracted staff. There is no master matrix of contracted staff vaccination status. Because there is no matrix, we don't know if the staff person has Covid, if they are vaccinated, if they are tested. The facility should have this information to put in proper precautions to work to decrease the spread of Covid if need be. I can only provide a partial list of contract staff from 9/25/22 and 9/26/22. I cannot provide a full matrix of contracted staff for the time period of 9/27/22-9/28/22. The facility uses 5 healthcare staffing services. On 9/28/22 at 11:22, V1 (Administrator) stated that V1 believes the facility is not 100% compliant with the vaccination requirement. V1 stated Yes, there is staff that is not vaccinated. Some are not fully vaccinated. There are no exemptions for some of the unvaccinated. Some of the exemptions are not there, I could not find them. If staff is unvaccinated, they should have an exemption. Surveyor observed 2 contracted staff working in the facility on 9/27/2022 Reviewed facility provided staff vaccination matrix Reviewed exemptions for unvaccinated staff Reviewed Nursing Daily Staffing schedules from 8/23/22-9/22/22, multiple contracted nurses and CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) scheduled for every day of this time period Facility failed to provide a Covid-19 contracted staff vaccination matrix for review. Reviewed agreements with 5 outside agencies to provide staffing for the facility Facility Employee Covid Vaccine policy dated 1/2022 documents in part: 1. As condition of employment, appointment to the medical staff, or access to patient and clinical care areas, all facility employees, medical staff, temporary workers, students, and volunteers, must receive the Covid vaccination or possess an approved exception. 2. For current employees, you are required to be vaccinated, have a temporary delay or have a medical or religious exemption completed and on file with the Crew Chief. Facility Covid vaccination policy dated 5/2021 documents in part: 2. If the staff member refuses the vaccine, they will need to sign the declination form; the form will be uploaded into Paycom.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 32% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 3 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s), Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 63 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $18,166 in fines. Above average for Illinois. Some compliance problems on record.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Community Care Nursing Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns COMMUNITY CARE NURSING CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Community Care Nursing Center Staffed?

CMS rates COMMUNITY CARE NURSING CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 32%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Community Care Nursing Center?

State health inspectors documented 63 deficiencies at COMMUNITY CARE NURSING CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, and 58 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Community Care Nursing Center?

COMMUNITY CARE NURSING CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 204 certified beds and approximately 73 residents (about 36% occupancy), it is a large facility located in CHICAGO, Illinois.

How Does Community Care Nursing Center Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, COMMUNITY CARE NURSING CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (32%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Community Care Nursing Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Community Care Nursing Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, COMMUNITY CARE NURSING CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Community Care Nursing Center Stick Around?

COMMUNITY CARE NURSING CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 32%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Community Care Nursing Center Ever Fined?

COMMUNITY CARE NURSING CENTER has been fined $18,166 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Illinois average of $33,261. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Community Care Nursing Center on Any Federal Watch List?

COMMUNITY CARE NURSING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.