Complete Care at the Boulevard

5905 WEST WASHINGTON, CHICAGO, IL 60644 (773) 261-7074
For profit - Corporation 156 Beds COMPLETE CARE Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#501 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: February 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Complete Care at the Boulevard in Chicago has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's overall quality and care. It ranks #501 out of 665 in Illinois and #166 out of 201 in Cook County, placing it in the bottom half of local nursing homes. The facility is showing some signs of improvement, as the number of reported issues has decreased from 34 in 2024 to 18 in 2025. However, staffing is a major concern, with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is around the state average. The facility has been fined $416,551, which is alarming and suggests ongoing compliance issues. Notably, there have been serious incidents of abuse, including a staff member tying a resident's wrists to bed rails and another incident where a resident was sprayed with a chemical agent, resulting in injury and requiring emergency care. While the facility has some average quality measures, families should weigh these serious concerns against any positives before making a decision.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Illinois
#501/665
Bottom 25%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
34 → 18 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$416,551 in fines. Higher than 61% of Illinois facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 12 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
80 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 34 issues
2025: 18 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 48%

Near Illinois avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $416,551

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: COMPLETE CARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 80 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening 9 actual harm
Sept 2025 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care and assure that one resident (R1) at high ri...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care and assure that one resident (R1) at high risk for skin breakdown received the treatment and services to prevent the development and worsening of a new pressure ulcer. This failure resulted in R1's development and deterioration of a unstageable pressure ulcer, requiring hospitalization and surgical intervention for Sacral ulcer with underlying destruction of the coccyx.Findings include:R1's medical diagnoses include but are not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, cognitive communication deficit, depression, essential hypertension. R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE].R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12, indicating R1's cognition is moderately intact. R1's Braden scale dated 08/13/25 has a score of 12, indicating R1's risk for skin breakdown is high.R1's care plan dated 05/29/25 documents in part, The resident has potential/actual impairment to skin integrity with possible complications.I will not experience any additional skin breakdown or other complications.Assist me with my general hygiene and comfort measures. (No interventions noted after skin impairment reported on 8/3/25.)R1's orders include Turn and Reposition every 2 hours dated 5/6/25 (no change after development of new skin impairment.) R1's progress note titled Heath Status Note dated 08/03/25 documents in part, While receiving incontinence care CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) on duty alerted writer of some discomfort the resident was having. Upon assessment writer noticed resident's sacrum has an opening and both interior thighs have MASD (moisture associated skin dermatitis). Resident stated sacrum and inner thigh were painful and burning.R1's progress noted titled Skin/Wound Note dated 08/04/25 documents in part, Writer made aware by staff of resident observed with skin integrity issue to sacrum. Upon writer assessment resident observed with unstageable pressure ulcer to sacrum.Preventive measures in place plan of care remain in place.On 09/22/25 at 11:10am V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that R1 was a total assist and could not reposition herself. V3 stated that R1's sacrum was intact on admission, but R1 developed a wound to the sacrum while in the facility. V3 stated that R1 would have to be transferred to her wheelchair via mechanical lift. V3 stated that R1 would sit in her chair for greater than 2 hours at a time. V3 stated that R1 was compliant with care and did not refuse to be cared for.0n 09/22/25 at 11:31am V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated that R1 was dependent on staff to be cleaned and repositioned. V4 stated that R1 was compliant and did not refuse care. V4 stated that R1 needed two staff members for transfers and repositioning. V4 said when R1 was in the chair she was not repositioned every 2 hours. V4 stated that R1's sacrum wound was small but grew bigger. V4 stated that R1's sacrum wound had an odor for approximately a week before R1 was sent to the hospital. V4 stated that all the nurses were aware that R1 had an odor to the sacrum wound.On 09/23/25 9:40am V8 (Wound care tech) said when I come in, I make sure that the residents are being turned every two hours. V8 said even if they are up in the wheelchair, they may get put back down to be turned. V8 said we would try to have R1 get up at 11:00am and would try to put her back to bed after lunch and she would refuse.On 09/23/25 at 11:00am V9 (Wound Care Nurse) stated that R1 had no wound to her sacrum upon admission on [DATE]. V9 stated that R1 developed an unstageable pressure ulcer to her sacrum while at the facility. V9 stated that R1 was a high risk for skin breakdown due to being incontinent, immobile, and sitting up for 4 hours instead of 2 hours. V9 stated that R1's daughter informed him that she felt the R1 was not being repositioned enough. V9 stated that he began to bathe and reposition R1 himself to make sure that R1 was being cleaned and turned. V9 stated that he was on vacation from 08/06/25 through 08/18/25, and R1's sacrum wound had necrotic tissue, but was stable before his vacation. V9 said for R1 preventive measures in place for her included turn and reposition. V9 said I put an order for her to be turned and repositioned under physician orders. V9 said I informed the staff to make sure that she was not sitting up in the chair when I wasn't here. V9 said the purpose of interventions are to help and resolve any skin integrity issues. On 09/22/25 at 3:44pm V5, CNA, said sometimes R1 would be in her chair when she came on shift at 3:00PM. V5 said R1 would stay up until around 6:15PM (greater than 2 hours).On 09/24/25 at 10:43am V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that it is the expectation of the facility for the nurses to follow the physician orders. V2 said it is my expectation that staff reposition the residents at least every 2 hours or more. They should clean the residents when they come in in the morning time, and at least every 2 hours they should be checking the for incontinent episodes. V2 said a care plan should be in place if a resident refuses care. If should be documented first by the nurse if a resident refuses care. V2 said for a resident with wounds interventions should include repositioning and not sitting up too long on the wound. V2 said if a resident develops a new wound that means that the preventive measures are not working. V2 said when wounds are not changed as scheduled, they could deteriorate, and the nurse is not following the doctor's orders. V2 said I am not aware that R1 had no new interventions once she developed the new wound. V2 said R1's wound care plan is not complete and is the interventions are not individualized. On 09/24/25 at 11:58am V11, LPN, said for charting in the record, normally when I press 7, it's because the wound was already done by wound care nurse. I don't know if that was a generated note. I do recall changing the sacrum dressing before and changing the groin one week before. V11 said R1's wound was so painful to her she used to scream when we had to try to clean it.On 09/24/25 at 08:52am, V18 (Wound care doctor) stated that if R1 would have been turning herself in bed, that would have helped the MASD and prevented the sacrum wound from worsening.On 9/24/25 at 1:05pm V12, Social Service director said I never was told that R1 refused care or had behaviors. V12 said social services is notified of resident care refusals. Review of R1's record shows no documentation of sacrum wound before 08/03/25. R1's wound assessment dated [DATE] documents in part, Unstageable sacrum Full Thickness.Wound size (Length by width by dept) 2.5 by 3.5 by 0.3 cm (centimeters).R1's wound assessment dated [DATE] documents in part, Unstageable sacrum Full Thickness.Wound size (Length by width by dept) 4.1 by 4.2 by 0.7 cm (centimeters).R1's physician order dated 08/07/25 documents in part, Sacrum unstageable leptospermum honey apply once daily and as needed: If saturated, soiled, or dislodged.R1's treatment administration record (TAR) documents in part, Sacrum unstageable leptospermum honey apply once daily and as needed. On 08/09/25 R1's TAR shows a code of 7, which indicates to see progress note. R1's progress note dated 08/09/25 documents in part, No dressing change needed, dressing remain intact.R1's MDS dated [DATE] section GG for Functional Abilities has a score of 2 for Personal Hygiene, which indicates R1 requires substantial/maximal assistance to maintain personal hygiene, a score of 3 for rolling left and right, which indicates R1 needs partial/moderate assistance to roll from left to right and a score of 1 for chair/bed to chair transfer, which indicates R1 is totally dependent and helper does all of the effort.R1's progress noted dated 08/18/25 documents in part, Writer alerted by CNA on duty that the resident was not as responsive as usual. Upon assessment vital signs 98/54, P (pulse) 113, t (temperature) 101.9, R (respirations) 19, SPO2 (oxygen saturation of peripheral blood) 95% on room air. Notified NP (Nurse Practitioner) new orders to send to ER (emergency room).Progress note dated 8/19/25 document R1 admitted with diagnosis of Sepsis and necrotizing fasciitis in ICU intubated.Progress notes reviewed 7/30/25 - 8/19/25, no documentation that R1 refused repositioning or lay down. Review of wound care provider notes 8/8/25 and 8/13/25 do not identify R1 refusing care.R1's hospital record dated 08/18/25 documents in part, Patient presented to ED (Emergency Department) after being found to be febrile to 100.7, as well as hypotensive in her SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility). Upon arrival she was found to be afebrile, normotensive, although with leukocytosis to 33 and hyperglycemia to 388. Labs also significant for venous lactate to 2.2. Infectious workup showing sacral ulcer with underlying destruction of coccyx concerning for osteomyelitis with gas tracking into the R (right) gluteal musculature, R gluteal cleft, and perineum c/f (concern for) active infection. CT abdomen and pelvis: 1. Sacral ulcer with underlying destruction of the coccyx concerning for osteomyelitis. Additionally, there is gas tracking into the right gluteal musculature, right gluteal cleft, and perineum concerning for active infection. Given the extent of gas tracking along the subcutaneous tissues and into the right gluteal musculature there is concerning for developing necrotizing fasciitis. No drainable abscess. R1's hospital surgical report dated 08/18/25 documents in part, Findings: Stage 4 sacral decubitus ulcer with frankly necrotic surrounding tissue and malodorous murky grey output liquid output, probed to coccyx. Wide excision and debridement of wound to underlying healthy tissue. Anterior tracking along the R medial gluteal fold along anorectal junction. Wound base 14cm (centimeters) wide x 18.5 long x 3.5cm deep. R1's hospital records dated 08/19/25 documents in part, Patient intubated and sedated s/p (status post) emergent wound debridement on 8/18/25, unable to participate in interview.Facility's policy titled Turning and Repositioning dated 09/01/24 documents in part, Policy: It is our policy to implement turning and repositioning as part of our systematic approach to pressure injury prevention and management.Facility's policy titled Wound Treatment Management dated 09/01/24 documents in part, Policy: To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change.7. Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record or in the electronic health record.8. The effectiveness of treatments will be monitored through ongoing assessment of the wound. Considerations for needed modifications include: a. Lack of progression towards healing.
Jul 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident using a mobility device. This failure affected one resident (R2) out of 5 reviewed for adapti...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident using a mobility device. This failure affected one resident (R2) out of 5 reviewed for adaptive equipment use in the facility.Findings include:R2's face sheet shows that R2 has diagnoses which includes but not limited to benign prostatic hyperplasia, retention of urine, urogenital implants, hypertension, anemia, osteoarthritis, and pleural effusions.R2's Minimal Data Set (MDS) documents in part, Section C: Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score is a 9. R2 has moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG: Mobility devices: C. wheelchair. On 7/21/25 at 11:00 am, observed R2 in room sitting in wheelchair next to bed. R2 brought to surveyor's attention that the wheelchair R2 was sitting in was broken. R2's right brake on the wheelchair noted to be broken and was unable to lock. Surveyor inquired to R2 if staff assist with transferring to the wheelchair? R2 stated, No, I get in the wheelchair by myself.On 7/21/25 at 12:45 pm, Surveyor inquired to V7 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) how do they lock and secure the wheelchair when transferring R2 to the wheelchair? V7 looked at the wheelchair and stated, I (V7) was not aware of the wheelchair being broken. R2 gets into the wheelchair by himself. I will put it in the repair book that the wheelchair is broken.On 7/21/25 at 1:34 pm, V6 Maintance Director stated, Rounds is made every two hours and I (V6) look at the maintenance book or sometimes the residents or staff will say if something needs to be fixed. Surveyor inquired to V6 if V6 was aware of R2's wheelchair brake being broken? V6 stated, I am not aware.On 7/22/25 at 11:24 am, R2 in room sitting in wheelchair with right brake still broken.On 7/22/25 at 11:30 am, V4 LPN (License Practical Nurse) stated that R2's wheelchair is not safe, because R2 could fall with the brake being broken. The purpose of the brake is to prevent the chair from moving. It the chair move while transferring it could cause an incident. R2 is a one person assist. On 7/22/25 at 12:12 pm, (V6) Maintenance Director, stated, I (V6) did not look at the Maintance log today my assistant was supposed to have looked. I was aware that the wheelchair was broke yesterday, but I did not get a chance to go look at it. I got caught doing many things at the same time. It is not safe for the resident to have a broken brake on the wheelchair. They can fall and have to be sent to the hospital. The patient is the priority for safety.On 7/22/25 at 12:30 pm, (V16) Maintenance Assistant stated, I (V16) did not check the maintenance book.On 7/22/25 at 1:56 pm, V9 Restorative Director stated I (V9) went to R2's room yesterday to remove the broken wheelchair. I explained to R2 that one of the brakes is not good and we need to fix it. R2 was gesturing and did not want the wheelchair removed. I went to tell the maintenance that there is a request for the wheelchair to be fixed. Surveyor inquired to V9, is it safe to leave the wheelchair with the brake broken? V9 stated, Most times R2 doesn't use the chair. If R2 chooses to use the chair it should not be broken. Surveyor inquired to V9, should all equipment in the facility be functioning and in safe working condition? V9 stated, Absolutely, it was not safe to leave the wheelchair. Social service was supposed to be notify of the refusal. I did not notify social service.On 7/22/25 at 2:40 pm, V3 SSD (Social Service Director) stated, It was not brought to my attention that R2 was refusing to give restorative R2's broken wheelchair. The process is to notify social service with refusals. Our goal is to remove the chair because it is a safety hazard because the brake is not working.Facility's Maintenance Work Request Form dated 7/21/25 documents in part, work location: 205-2 wheelchair. Description of work/repair: residents wheelchair lock is broken on the right side.R2's (7/16/25) Fall Risk Assessment documents in part, R1 has a history of falling. Mental Status: Overestimates or forgets limits. R2's fall risk score is 55 which indicates that R2 is high risk for falling. (Morse Fall Scoring-High Risk 45 or higher).R2's (7/16/25) Functional Abilities Evaluation documents in part, Mobility: Chair/bed-to chair transfer is coded 1 for dependent.R2's care plan documents in part, Focus: The resident has limited physical mobility related to disease process, weakness, and impaired balance. Resident uses wheelchair as a primary mode of locomotion.Facility's policy dated 2016 and titled, Equipment Maintance and Repair dated documents in part, Policy: All equipment utilized in this facility shall be maintained, operated, and repaired as directed. Repair: If equipment shows signs of needing repair, staff shall immediately stop usage of the equipment and report it to maintenance. Facility's policy dated 11/24 and titled, Fall and Fall Prevention documents in part, Procedure: 9. Malfunctioning equipment will be immediately given to maintenance for repair or removal service.
Mar 2025 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of one (R1) resident of change in...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of one (R1) resident of change in condition of three residents reviewed. This failure resulted in delaying R1's transfer to the hospital for further evaluation for a contusion and bruised right eye in a total sample of three residents. Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old individual whose medical diagnosis include but not limited to: dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, mild, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, mild intellectual disabilities, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, disorganized schizophrenia. MDS (Minimum Data Set) section C Cognitive function, dated [DATE], documents R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as 99/15 indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. R1's MDS section GG -Functional Abilities documents R1 requires supervision or touching assistance while eating, partial/moderate assistance with oral hygiene and upper body dressing, substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene. Nursing progress notes dated [DATE], documents: Summary of the Fall: observes resident (R1) with raised area over right eyebrow with discoloration. R1 has raised area to right eye and broken blood vessel to right eye. Nursing progress notes dated [DATE], documents nurse to nurse report with admitting hospital stated R1 had CT(Computed Tomography) scan showed edema and hematoma and R1 was going to be admitted for fall and head contusion. R1's hospital record dated [DATE], documents: A contusion is a deep bruise. Contusions are the result of a blunt injury to tissues and muscle fibers under the skin. The injury causes bleeding under the skin.R1 presented to the hospital with bruised or swollen eye. Fall with right sided periorbital edema. Head CT shows there is hemorrhage and edema throughout the right supraorbital and periorbital region. On [DATE], at 10:43 AM, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) and surveyor observed R1 laying in bed. R1 was observed with a bruise on the right eye above and below the eyebrow. The bruise was below the eye and it was covering the whole lower part of the right eye from side to side. V5 described the bruise as black/reddish/purplish in color. V5 stated R1 does not get out of bed or try to get out of bed by herself and needs two staff when performing ADL (Activities of Living) care. V5 stated R1 is not able to hold the bedside grab bars to move herself and two staff move R1 from the bed to the wheelchair because R1 cannot assist with transfers. On [DATE], at 2:10 PM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN [Former]) via phone stated she worked with R1 on [DATE], on the 11:00 PM-7:00 AM shift. She was not aware R1 had a fall that day. But in the morning on [DATE], before the end of her (V8) shift, she observed R1 with a bruising above and below her (R1) right eye. The bruise below R1's eye was a long line running the length of the right eye. V8 stated she did not notify R1's physician or V2(Director of Nursing) about R1's change in condition. This delayed R1's care and that is why V8 was terminated because she is supposed to notify the physician as soon as a resident has a change in condition. On [DATE], at 3:00 PM, V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant- CNA [Former]) via phone V10 worked on [DATE], on the 3:00 PM-11:00 PM shift but he was not assigned to R1 when R1 fell. V10 stated V9 (Former Certified Nursing Assistant) came and got V10 to come help V9 to transfer R1 back to bed. Upon reaching R1's room, R1 was sitting on the floor on her bottom. V10 stated he did not know V9 had not informed the nurse on duty that R1 had fallen and was on the floor. The facility protocol is to let the nurse know first if a resident falls before touching the resident. V10 stated he was terminated for not informing the nurse about R1's fall. On [DATE], at 3:31 PM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) via phone stated she worked with R1 on [DATE] on the 7:00 AM-3:00 PM shift. She went to R1's room to take her vitals around 9:00 AM and to give R1 her medications. She noticed R1's right side of the face by her eyebrow had a big knot. V4 stated she notified V2 who went and saw R1's bruise and told V4 to call 911, V13 (Nurse Practitioner) and R1's family and notify them. V4 stated 911 came, took report, and took R1 to the hospital. V4 stated during change of shift that morning, V8 did not report R1 had a knot below and above her right eye. V4 stated if a resident has a change in condition and a staff does not report it, that is neglect which is a form of abuse. On [DATE], at 4:48 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated on [DATE], V9 was doing ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for R1, and R1 fell out of the bed. V1 stated V9 ran out of the room and went to get help from V10, and V9 and V10 rushed to R1's room past V8 who was at the nursing station. V9 did not notify V8 that R1 fell. V1 stated on [DATE], about 5:30 AM, V14 (CNA) noticed a swelling on R1's face and notified V8 but V8 did not do anything about it including notifying the physician, V2 or V13 (Nurse Practitioner). V9 left at the end of her shift at 7:30 AM.V1 stated V9 and V10 neglected R1 when they failed to notify V8 that R1 had fallen therefore V9 and V10 were terminated for failure to follow facility policy and protocol. V8 was also terminated for failure to follow facility policy when a resident has a change in condition which states the nurse notifies the physician right away. V1 stated on [DATE], around 9:00 AM or 10:00 AM, V4, who was assigned to R1, noticed R1 had a swelling on the right eye. V4 competed an assessment of R1, applied a cold pack, notified V2 and V13 and called 911 to take R1 to the hospital for further evaluation. On [DATE], at 5:44 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) stated on [DATE], about 10:00 AM, V4 called V2 to R1's room. When she got to R1's room, she (V2) stated wow! what happened because R1 had a big knot on the right forehead area. V2 stated she assisted V4 to assess R1 and put an ice pack on R1's forehead. V4 called 911, V13 and R1's family. R1 was taken to the nearest hospital and was admitted with head edema, hematoma, fall, and head contusion. V2 stated on [DATE], after she completed her investigation regarding R1's injury, she notified V1 of her findings. After discussing with V1, he gave ok to terminate V8, V9, and V10 for failure to follow facility's policies and procedures on reporting falls and notifying physicians of resident change in condition. V2 stated not notifying the physician when R1 was noted to have a swelling on the forehead caused a delay in care and R1 could have died of the head injuries sustained during the fall. R1 is on blood thinner medications which could cause bleeding in the brain and death. V2 stated R1 did not receive the care she needed in a timely manner and could have resulted in her death. On [DATE], at 6:45 PM, V15 (Restorative Manager) stated R1 is a two person assist for transfer and for bed mobility. R1 requires a two person assist during ADLs and incontinence care for safety to prevent falls. On [DATE], at 12:45 PM, V11 (Human Resources Manager-HR) stated HR does a background check before employing a perspective employee and annually thereafter. V11 stated the supervisors/administrator lets V11 know which staff has an offence. V11 and the manager who reported the offence go through the facility's policies and procedures to determine which policy the staff violated and if the employee will be terminated. V11 stated V8, V9, V10 were terminated because they did not follow policies and procedures of the facility. Policy titled Change in Condition dated 1/14 documents: -Residents will receive full assessment of status change with notification to physician and immediate medical emergency care via 911 if indicated. -Resident will be assessed by the charge nurse or nursing supervisor in response to any changes or deterioration in condition upon notification. Family and physician will be notified. Facility Reported Incident Report -Final, dated [DATE], 4:23 PM documents: -R1 was transferred to a nearby hospital after a fall with an above right eye raised area. R1 was unable to communicate what happened to her -R1's roommate (R2) was unable to state what happened to R1 -According to hospital report, R1 was admitted to hospital for fall and head contusion. -V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN), and V9, V10(Certified Nursing Assistants-CNAs) were terminated for not reporting the incident. V8's HR (Human Recourses) File documents: V8's Employee Termination Form dated [DATE], documents: -V8 was terminated for gross misconduct, not reporting a resident (R1 change in condition). R8's Employee Report dated [DATE] documents: -V8 failed to follow facility policy and procedures by not notifying provider of resident's change in condition. V9's HR (Human Recourses) File documents: V9's Employee Termination Form dated [DATE], documents: -V9-Gross misconduct- not reporting a fall, dishonesty, or theft V9's Employee Report dated [DATE] documents: -V9 failed to follow facility policy and procedure; did not report a resident (R1) fall to supervisor. V10's HR (Human Recourses) File documents: V10's Employee Termination Form dated [DATE], documents: -V10-Gross misconduct- not reporting a fall, dishonesty, or theft V10's Employee Report dated [DATE] documents: -V10 failed to follow facility policy and procedure; did not report a resident (R1) fall to supervisor. Facility policy titled -Fall Prevention Policy dated [DATE], documents: -If a resident experiences a fall, nursed will complete an incident report and document the fall in the resident record as well as the 24-hour report. Facility policy titled Change in Condition dated 1/14, documents: -Resident will receive full assessment of stats change with notification to physician and immediate medical emergency care via 911 in indicated. Resident will be assessed by the charge nurse or nursing supervisor in response to any changes or deterioration in condition upon notification. Family and physician will be notified.
Feb 2025 15 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to maintain resident rights pertaining to dignity f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to maintain resident rights pertaining to dignity for 3 out of 3 residents (R 18, R37, R69) for a total sample of 21 residents reviewed for resident rights. Facility failures are as follows: failed to provide feeding assistant with dignity for one resident (R37); failed to protect/promote the right to confidentiality of medical information for two residents (R18 and R69). These failures have the potential to affect 3 residents (R18, R37, R69) in their right to maintain dignity. Finding includes: On 02/04/2025, at 1:09 PM, in the dining room, V21 (Certified Nursing Assistant) brought R37 who was sitting on a Geri-chair near table to be fed. V21 while standing took a spoon, and fed R37 the whole meal. V21 kept on inserting food to R37's mouth while R37 was still chewing. The food inside R37's mouth was hard to see. V21 kept on calling R37 by the first name. R37 does respond with words and was making moaning sounds when addressed by name. By 1:17 PM, all of R37's food was done except green peas. During feeding of R37 by V21, R37 had a hard time keeping up with the food V21 was giving. V21 stated that during feeding residents, it should be on eye level to resident's mouth. But since R37 head was tilting up she stood while feeding. V21 stated I was having a hard time seeing if R37 still had food in her mouth. V21 insisted to go back to R37 to check her prior position (standing). V21 then went to R37 and pulled up a chair. After V21 sat on the chair and on eye level position to R37's mouth, V21 was asked if it was better position compared to standing because she sat on the chair. V21 did not answer. On 02/05/2025, at 11:03 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that V21 should sit and feed the resident on eye level position to make sure that V21 can see that R37 was able to take the food while feeding. By doing so, it helps prevent aspiration. On 02/06/2025, at 12:45 PM, V14 (Director of Rehabilitation) stated that when feeding a resident that needs assistance reposition up to 90 degrees, take smaller bites and alternate solid with liquid. Check if the resident's mouth has food in it. Staff and the resident need to be at same level position. This way staff can see a little bit better, because when standing you cannot see the mouth of resident. V14 said, For me it is a dignity thing when you are standing and feeding at the same time. R37 is [AGE] years old with severely cognitive impairment BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) dated 01/02/2025 scored 99 because R37 unable to complete interview. R37 medical diagnosis includes dementia, anxiety disorder, major depression disorder, psychotic disorder. Per nutrition care plan of R37, resident needs one on one assist during meals. Resident Rights policy dated 08/2022 reads: The right to live in an environment that promotes and support each other's dignity with consideration and respect. On 02/04/25, 10:43 AM, R18 was lying down in bed, wearing a hospital gown, wearing glasses, and in no apparent distress. Fall mats noted on the floor on both sides of R18's bed. R18's bed with lock on. A hot pink or fuchsia color sign at R18's head of the bed's wall documents in part R18's name, diet puree visible. On 02/04/25,12:47 PM, R69 in his room sitting on his wheelchair, dressed in his own clothes, and in no apparent distress. A yellow sign visible at R69's head of the bed's wall documents in part R69's name, dated 12/4/24, diet: regular solids, liquid: thin liquids. R69 states that he does receive occasional visitors. On 2/6/25, 12:39 PM, V14 (Director of Rehab) states that when speech therapy (ST) has recommendations for a resident, they will usually leave a swallow precaution sign with a list of instructions of what ST recommend. V14 states it is typically a hot pink sign and it is usually posted above the resident's bed or beside countertop. V14 continues to state that the swallow precaution sign will include information such as how the patient should be eating, and cues to remind patients if they are feeders. We give proper recommendations on how to properly feed the residents. V14 reports that the form will also notate if the resident requires 1:1 feeding assistance. V14 states that the rationale for posting the form is for speech department to make sure the staff are following precautions, so patients won't get aspiration pneumonia. V14 states that he does believe all the information on a swallow precaution form is a resident's medical record and it is their personal information because not everyone is on a special diet so not everyone should be aware of their medical records such as the type of diet they are on. V14 states if visitors are coming in to visit the resident or the resident's roommate, they can visibly see this information. R18's current face sheet documents R18 is a [AGE] year-old individual with diagnoses not limited to: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, other sequelae of other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, aphasia. R18's MDS/Minimum Data Set Section C dated 12/13/2024, documents that R18 was unable to complete the interview for BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status. R18's current physician order set documents in part regular diet puree texture, nectar consistency. R69's current face sheet documents R69 is a [AGE] year-old individual with diagnoses not limited to: encephalopathy, unspecified, malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of lip, oral cavity and pharynx, unspecified visual loss. R69's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R69 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15, indicating R69 is cognitively intact. R69's current physician order set documents in part diet regular texture, thin liquids consistency. Facility document dated 8/22 titled Resident's Rights documents in part no resident shall be deprived of any rights, benefits, or privileges guaranteed by law, the constitution of the State of Illinois, or the Constitution of the United States solely on account of his or her status as a resident of this Community, nor shall a resident forfeit any of the following rights: the right to confidentiality of the resident's medical, financial, or other records.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess/monitor one of three residents (R30) for self-administration of medication out of a total sample of 21 residents revie...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess/monitor one of three residents (R30) for self-administration of medication out of a total sample of 21 residents reviewed. Findings include: On 02/05/2025, at 9:07 AM, during a medication administration pass with V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN), surveyor observes V17 with a nasal medication labeled Fluticasone Propionate 50mcg. V17 gives the Fluticasone medication to R30. R30 asks V17 how many sprays, 2 right? V17 replies Yes. R30 then observed self-administering the Fluticasone medication to herself, administering 2 sprays into both of her nostrils. V17 states she gave R30s' Fluticasone medication to R30 to self-administer because R30 is able to self-administer her medication and does not trust the facility staff nurses to administer it to her correctly. Review of R30s' Physician order sheet/POS, medication administration record/MAR, and electronic health record/EHR documents that R30 does not have a physician order and has not been assessed to self-administer her own medications. Facility policy dated 07/02/2018, titled Medication Administration and Storage Policy documents in part, 13. Self-administration of medications by residents is permitted only when resident has been assessed and is capable of self-administration and a physician order has been written for self-administration.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0575 (Tag F0575)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed the following related to [NAME] Program: facility f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed the following related to [NAME] Program: facility failed to display [NAME] information in a public and accessible location, a department provided poster informing residents of their right to explore or decline community transition, and their right to be free from retaliation, regardless of their decision on transition. Failure includes 12 out of 12 residents (R1, R6, R13, R25, R42, R47, R69, R98, R99, R103, R207, R307) included in the sample list for December 2024 and January 2025 of residents that can be a part of the [NAME] program. This failure has the potential to affect 12 residents (R1, R6, R13, R25, R42, R47, R69, R98, R99, R103, R207, R307) in their right to exercise community transition given proper information. Findings include: On 02/04/2025, at 2:35 PM, after checking all floors to verify the [NAME] program posting, there was none seen posted. V16 (Social Service Director) was asked about poster for the [NAME] program. V16 replied that she is not sure if there are any posting in the facility. V16 said that best area for resident to see any posting is the main dining room on the 1st floor. During that time, the bingo activity was going on. Upon checking all areas on the main dining room there was no poster found. V16 agreed to go to all floors to check for posting. Using the elevator, the 2nd floor was checked. The 3rd floor was checked as well. All floors were seen without posting for the [NAME] program. V16 stated that she will make sure poster will be posted for residents to have information and be able to see contact information when wanting to be a part of the [NAME] program. On 02/05/2025, at 10:28 AM, V16 stated educational materials and information to all residents was not given until yesterday after checking facility. There was no poster in the building. On 02/06/2025, at 12:15 PM, V16 stated that [NAME] program is important because it provides access to residents to see if they are ready to be in community setting. Community settings are less restrictive than skilled settings. There are residents that are self-sufficient that can live in the community. On 02/07/2025, at 8:21 AM, V16 provided list of possible candidates for [NAME] program for the month of December 2024 and January 2025. Included in the list are (R1, R6, R13, R25, R42, R47, R69, R98, R99, R103, R207, R307) that could be a part of the [NAME] program if proper information, assessments, and education were provided.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed provide privacy and confidentiality of personal inform...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed provide privacy and confidentiality of personal information for one (R307) of four residents reviewed in a sample of 21. Findings include: R307 is an [AGE] year-old individual admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnosis that include but not limited to: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, human immunodeficiency virus [hiv] disease, other abnormalities of gait and mobility. MDS (Minimum Data Set) section C- Section C - Cognitive Patterns, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Dated [DATE], documents R307's BIMS as 13/15, indicating R307 has intact cognitive function. On 02/4/2025, at 11:13 AM, R307 was observed in his room sitting on the bed and stated he came to the facility recently. R307 was observed wearing a white wristband which showed R307's full name, date of birth , and medical record number. R307 stated the wristband was from the hospital and the hospital staff were using it to identify him before he was transferred to the facility. R307 stated he does not want his information to be seen by other people. On 02/04/2025, at 11:31 AM, V4 (Registered Nurse-RN) went to R307's room with surveyor and observed R307 wearing a white wristband which showed R307's full name, date of birth , medical record number. V4 stated the wristband is from the hospital and should have been removed on 1/21/2025, when R307 was first admitted to the facility because it has his identifying private information which is visible to other residents and visitors. V4 stated that is a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) violation and stated she would get scissors and cut R307's wristband off. On 02/04/2025, at 11:34 AM, V3 (Unit manager/Infection control nurse-LPN) stated there have been no issues with residents wearing their wristbands with identifying personal information from the hospital in the facility, but she was going to check with V10 (Assistant Director of Nursing-ADON) to confirm. On 02/04/2025, at 11:38 AM, V3 and surveyor spoke to V10 who stated residents should not be wearing wristbands from the hospital because these wristbands have private personal identifying information of the resident such as full name, and date of birth which is visible to other residents and visitors. V10 stated R307's wristband should have been taken off as soon as he got to the facility on 1/21/2025, to preventa HIPAA violation. Policy titled Resident's Rights dated 8/22 documents: -No resident shall be deprived of any rights, benefits, or privileges guaranteed by law, the constitution of the state of Illinois, or the constitution of the United States solely on account of his or her status as a resident of this Community, nor shall a resident forfeit any of the following rights: -The right to confidentiality of the resident's medical, financial, or other records. -The right to privacy in financial and personal affairs.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to help a resident maintain their highest practical level...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to help a resident maintain their highest practical level by failing to provide consistent restorative therapy for one of three residents (R61) in a total sample of 21. This failure places residents at risk to be provided with inappropriate care and services to meet the resident's physical, mental and/or psychosocial needs. 02/04/25, 11:33 AM, R61 lying down on his bed, with his personal belongings within reach. R61 alert, responsive, and in no apparent distress. R61 states that this is the first time someone applied his splint in a very long time. R61 states that he understands now probably because the state agency is in the building. R61 reports that staff are supposed to come and exercise his legs, but staff do not do this. R61 states that staff do not come in to talk about restorative therapy or exercises. 2/6/25, 11:17 AM, V12 (Restorative Aide / Certified Nursing Assistant) states that her and another restorative aide split the 4th floor. V12 states that the restorative aides document in the resident's electronic medical record in POC (plan of care) tasks, under restorative rehab programs. V12 states that on the weekend the assigned CNAs (certified nursing assistants) should be providing the restorative therapy to the residents since restorative aides work Monday through Friday. V12 states that she does not get pulled to work the floor assignment as much. V12 states that restorative aides get pulled approximately 1-3 times a month. V12 states that the importance for a resident to wear a splint is to not lose the mobility they have and to make sure you don't lose the independent you have and helps avoid develop contracture. 2/6/25, 3:32 PM, V24 (Restorative Director/Registered Nurse) states that R61 is on a splint program every day in the morning. V24 states that the importance of restorative therapy program is like the name applies, it is to return or maintain the resident to their optimal function abilities. It can also be a continuing of physical therapy. We understand that some can decline after they stop physical therapy. V24 states that he is not sure why staff did not document. R61's current face sheet documents R68 is a [AGE] year-old individual with diagnoses not limited to: Rhabdomyolysis, paraplegia, unspecified, polyneuropathy, unspecified, other muscle spasm. R61's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C, dated 11/22/2024, documents R61 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15, indicating R61 is cognitively intact. R61's MDS section GG dated 11/22/2024, documents in part R61 has impairment on one side of his upper extremities and impairment on one side of his lower extremities. R61's current care plan documents in part R61 requires AROM (active range of motion) as evidence by the risk factors and potential contributing diagnosis of weakness, paraplegic, stroke. The goal is to prevent any contracture and maintain ROM (range of motion) through next review. Interventions document in part restorative program: active range of motion. Teach the resident to do the following: 10 repetitions times 3 sets. R61's current care plan documents in part R61 has impaired mobility and requires the use of a splint on; left functional hand splints as evidenced by the following limitations and potential contributing diagnosis; stroke. The goal is R61 will have maintained or improved functional movement with use of the splint. Interventions document in part ROM (range of motion) AM (before noon) and PM (after noon) shifts. Provide PROM (passive range of motion) to the joints affected by splint use. R61's past 90 days task nursing rehab: assistance with splint or brace: left functional splint. Apply after morning care for 6 hours as tolerated daily document in part several days (11/8/24, 11/9/24, 11/10/24, 11/14/24, 11/23/24, 11/24/24, 11/26/24, 11/29/24, 11/30/24, 12/01/24-12/4/24, 12/6/24-12/12/24, 1/11/25-1/13/25, 1/15/25, 1/17/25-1/24/25, 2/1/25, 2/2/25 no documentation that assistance with splint or brace provided. Facility document not dated documents in part the nursing rehabilitation restorative program will provide interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. Regulations require that a facility provide, and each resident receive the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest level of physical, mental, and psychological well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Criteria for nursing rehab program classification, must occur at least 7 days per week for at least 15 minutes per day. Daily documentation that programs were provided .the purpose of the nursing rehabilitation restorative splint or brace assistance program is to provide residents the opportunity to apply, manipulate or care for a brace or splint with an optimal level of independence or to maintain the best position of the affected body part to preserve function, prevent contractures and maintain skin integrity. Splint or brace application for progressive periods of time will allow for appropriate positioning of the affected body part. Splint or brace application will prevent loss of function (joint range of motion).
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for two (R3, R30) residents reviewed for medication administration in a total s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for two (R3, R30) residents reviewed for medication administration in a total sample of 21 residents reviewed, resulting in a 7.69% error rate. Findings Include: R3 has diagnoses not limited to: Type 2 Diabetes without complications, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebrovascular disease, and overactive bladder. R3s' electronic medication administration record (eMAR) dated 02/01/2025 - 02/28/2025 documents: Metformin HCL 500mg- 1 tablet by mouth two times a day scheduled at 9:00 AM. On 02/05/2025, at 8:37 AM, surveyor observed that this medication was not given to R3 during the 9:00 AM medication administration pass with V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN). R30 has diagnoses not limited to: Multiple Sclerosis, Essential (primary) hypertension, trigeminal neuralgia, and history of falling. R30s' electronic medication administration record (eMAR) dated 02/01/2025 - 02/28/2025 documents: Lidocaine External Patch 5%- Apply to left shoulder topically one time a day scheduled at 9:00 AM. On 02/05/2025, at 9:07 AM, surveyor observed that this medication was not given to R30 during the 9:00 AM medication administration pass with V17 (LPN). On 02/06/2025, at 10:20 AM, V17 (LPN) states she did not administer R3s' Metformin medication on 02/05/2025, because R3s' Metformin medication was not available in the facility, and she had to reorder it. V17 states the facility has an automated medication dispenser/AMD located on the fourth floor of the facility. V17 states the AMD has emergency medications inside available to administer to residents if their own personal supply of medications run out. V17 states she has access to the AMD via password but did not think to check the AMD for R3s' Metformin medication on 02/05/2025. V17 states R30s' Lidocaine patch medication is considered house stock supply and is available inside the facility located in the basement central supply stock room. V17 states she did not check in the central supply stock room for R30s' Lidocaine patch medication on 02/05/2025, because she was nervous and wasn't thinking. V17 states she did not notify R3s' or R30s' physician of medications not administered on 02/05/2025. On 02/06/2025, at 10:49 AM, surveyor located in the basement of the facility with V23 (Central Supply). Surveyor observes several boxes of Lidocaine 5% patches on a utility storage shelf. V23 states the Lidocaine patches are house stock supply and readily available for resident use. V23 states V17 (LPN) just left the central supply room approximately 4-5 minutes ago. V23 states V17 retrieved a box of Lidocaine patches from the utility shelf. On 02/06/2025, at 9:59 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) provides surveyor a list of medications available inside of the emergency automated medication dispenser/AMD. Facility document dated 02/06/2025, titled Inventory Replenishment Report documents that R3s' Metformin medication is readily available stored inside of the AMD. Facility policy dated 07/02/2018, titled Medication Administration and Storage Policy documents in part, Policy: To ensure medications are administered and stored in accordance with Standard of Practice. 20. Physician must be notified when medications are not administered as per physician orders. 21. Physician orders must be obtained for medications that are held.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0809 (Tag F0809)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and ensure night-time snacks were offered and se...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and ensure night-time snacks were offered and served consistently in accordance with the facility's policy for one (R87) resident in a sample of 21. 02/05/25, 10:15 AM, during resident council meeting, R87 states that he does not receive or is offered the nighttime snacks consistently and he would like to receive them consistently. 2/6/25, 1:01 PM, V8 (Dietary Manager) states that if a resident is not diabetic, they get the graham crackers or peanut butter crackers and juice at night-time snack. V8 states that everyone is supposed to be offered a night-time snack. V8 continues to state we close at 7:30 PM at night. Before my aids leave, they take the snacks to the floors, and give them, on a tray or in a bag. They are given to the floor CNAs (certified nursing assistants). V8 continues to state at that point, whoever is on the floor at that time, will distribute the evening snacks to the residents.V8 states once we drop them off it is out of dietary's hand, and it is nursing responsibility to pass out the snacks to the residents. Normally they are in the dining room, and when we drop them off it is out of my hands. V8 states that from time to time they will say they haven't received it. V8 states that R71 said that he didn't receive his snack last Saturday. V8 states that if the resident does not receive their night snack, V8 states she is assuming they will be hungry, if they are diabetic, V8 states she is assuming their sugar may drop. V8 states that's what I hear, I am diabetic I need my snack. 2/6/2025, 2:43 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) states that she was made aware of the concern last week and she placed a note on the board by the nurse's station. V2 states that she did not conduct in-services or training to the staff. R87's current face sheet documents R87 is a [AGE] year-old individual with diagnoses not limited to: difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left lower leg limited to breakdown of skin, other low back pain. R87's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C, dated 1/3/2025, documents R87 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15, indicating R87 is cognitively intact. R87's nutrition snack offered task 30-day look-back documents in part, R87 was not offered snack on the following dates: 1/8/25, 1/11/25, 1/17/25, 1/20/25, 1/22/25, 1/23/25, 1/25/25, 1/27/25, 1/29/25, 1/30/25. Facility document not dated titled night-time snacks documents in part nourishments will be provided to the residents at approximately bedtime. Nursing will distribute the bedtime nourishments. Residents will receive appropriate bedtime snack according to their diet order.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of records and interview the facility failed to accurately classify resident record on psychotropic medication c...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of records and interview the facility failed to accurately classify resident record on psychotropic medication consent form to 1 out of 1 resident (R37) for a total of 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic medication. This failure has the potential to affect 1 resident (R37) on psychotropic medication side effects. Consent was given with error in classifying psychotropic medication having different side effects for which the consent was given. Findings include: R37 is [AGE] years old with severely cognitive impairment BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) dated 01/02/2025, scored 99 because R37 unable to complete interview. R37 medical diagnosis includes dementia, anxiety disorder, major depression disorder, psychotic disorder. On 02/06/2025, at 11:11 AM, V10 (Psychotropic Nurse / Assistant Director of Nursing) presented R37's Psychotropic Medication Form dated 02/04/2025, for Remeron or Mirtazapine medication. V10 stated that currently he is updating consent for all residents in the facility because psychotropic consent needs to be updated every 15 months per policy. That is why R37's consent form is date is 02/04/2025. V10 was asked to present Psychotropic Consent Form prior to 02/04/2025. V10 reviewed R37's electronic record and Psychotropic Medication Form for the same medication (Remeron or Mirtazapine) dated 03/03/2021, was noted. Per comparison between two (2) forms, Psychotropic Medication Form dated 03/03/2021, classify Remeron as antipsychotic but Psychotropic Medication Form dated 02/04/2025, classify Remeron as antidepressant. V10 stated that form dated 03/03/2021 is wrong. Remeron should be classified as antidepressant. V10 stated that R37 was taking Remeron (antidepressant) for a long time since 03/03/2021, as seen on the form. Prolonged use of psychotropic medication has potential side effects. Antidepressants have different side effects than antipsychotics. The consent that was given when wrongly classified can be a problem. The person consenting does not give consent to the side effect of antidepressant but to antipsychotic. Per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Drug information dated 03/2020, reads: Under indication and use, REMERON is indicated for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults. Per facility's Psychotropic Consent Form, antidepressant have dizziness, nausea, and syncope as a side effect that is not included with antipsychotic medication. Facility policy on Psychotropic Medication Consent dated 12/2024, reads: Psychotropic medication will have appropriate indication for use and will be monitored for continued side effects and will be reduced or discontinued as clinically indicated. Psychotropic consent to be updated upon readmission and/or every 15-months.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of records and interviews the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Residential Review (PASSAR...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of records and interviews the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Residential Review (PASSAR) were done for 5 out of 5 residents (R9, R15, R16, R37, R54) prior to admission. These failures have the potential to affect 5 residents (R9, R15, R16, R37, R54) in a total sample of 21. Findings include: On 02/05/2025, at 10:25 AM, V16 (Social Service Director) submitted for R9, R16, and R37's print out document that reads PASRR Level 1 currently queued for review. V16 stated that she just submitted the request on 02/04/2025. V16 stated that PASRR is important to determine proper placement of resident. It should be done before the actual admission in the facility. R9 is [AGE] years old with diagnosis that includes psychosis, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and major depression. Per R9's PASSR report it documents the following: Notice Date: February 5, 2025: PASRR Level 1 review date February 5, 2025, determination of Level 1 is to refer to Level 11 onsite with suspected or confirmed PASRR condition of Mental Health Disability (MH). PASRR Outcome Explanation of Notice of PASSR Level 11 Onsite Evaluation Required. Your health care professional and Maximus completed a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR) Level 1 screen for you. This screen shows that you need a face-to-face Level 11 evaluation. PASSR Level1 screens and Level 11 evaluations are required by Federal law. You need this evaluation because you may have serious mental illness or intellectual/developmental disability. The purpose of this evaluation is to decide whether a nursing facility is able to meet your needs. R9's diagnosis includes Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective disorder, Major Depression. R37 is [AGE] years old with severely cognitive impairment BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) dated 01/02/2025, scored 99 because R37 unable to complete interview. R37 medical diagnosis includes dementia, anxiety disorder, major depression disorder, psychotic disorder. Per R37's PASSR report it documents the following: Notice Date: February 5, 2025: PASRR Level 1 review date February 5, 2025, determination of Level 1 is to refer to Level 11 onsite with suspected or confirmed PASRR condition of Mental Health Disability (MH). PASRR Outcome Explanation of Notice of PASSR Level 11 Onsite Evaluation Required. Your health care professional and Maximus completed a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR) Level 1 screen for you. This screen shows that you need a face-to-face Level 11 evaluation. PASSR Level1 screens and Level 11 evaluations are required by Federal law. You need this evaluation because you may have serious mental illness or intellectual/developmental disability. The purpose of this evaluation is to decide whether a nursing facility is able to meet your needs. R37 Diagnosis includes Major Depression, Psychotic/Delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, other mental health diagnosis, insomnia. R16 is [AGE] years old with diagnosis that includes major depression and psychosis. Per R16's PASRR level 1 dated 02/05/2025, reads that level 11 is not required. Facility policy on Pre-admission Screening and Residential Review (PASRR) dated 11/2024, reads: To comply with State and appointed screening agency. Request full and complete Pre-admission Screening (PAS) documents to help assess and determine what type of problems, needs and issues need to be addressed to help resident function at his/her maximum level of well-being. R15s' Facesheet documents that R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses not limited to: Other psychotic disorder not due to a substance or known physiological condition. R15s' Level I PASARR/Preadmission Screening and Resident Review screening dated 11/13/2024, documents that R15 does not require a Level II PASARR because R15 does not have a SMI/severe mental illness, ID/intellectual disability, or RC/related concern. R33s' Facesheet documents that R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses not limited to: Bipolar disorder and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. R33s' Level I PASARR/Preadmission Screening and Resident Review screening dated 09/02/2023, documents that R33 does not require a Level II PASARR because R33 does not have a SMI/severe mental illness, ID/intellectual disability, or RC/related concern. On 02/06/2025, at 11:04 AM, V16 (Social Services Director) states she is responsible for inputting residents' PASARR information into the screening agency website. V16 states a PASARR/Preadmission Screening and Resident Review is a screening that needs to be done prior to a resident being admitted to the facility. V16 states the facility checks to see if a resident has a PASARR screening upon admission. V16 states usually, the hospital completes a residents' PASARR prior to the facility admitting the resident to the facility. V16 states the facility is responsible for ensuring that residents' PASARR information is accurate prior to admitting the resident to the facility. V16 states she is aware that the PASARR screenings are indicative of determining if a resident is appropriate for the nursing home setting or not. V16 states a PASARR Level II is needed for a resident if it is determined that the resident has a severe mental illness/SMI. V16 states the determination for a Level II PASARR screening is based off of the results of the Level I PASARR screening. V16 states R15 and R33s' current Level I PASARR screening are inaccurate, and they both require a new Level I PASARR screening to be completed. V16 states a new Level I PASARR screening has to be completed and submitted before R15 and R33 can receive a Level II PASARR screening. V16 states now that she is aware of this information, she will follow up to ensure that R15 and R33 have new PASARR screenings completed. Facility policy dated 11/2024 titled Preadmission Screening and Residential Review (PASRR) documents in part, Policy: 1. To comply with Illinois and the appointed screening agency. Procedure: 2. The screening material must be reviewed as a component of the assessment process and treatment, suggestions and recommendations should be identified and appropriately addressed. 6. All residents with possible serious mental disorders, intellectual disability or newly diagnosis with a mental disorder will be referred for Level II screening. R54 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. medical diagnosis includes but not limited to: schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type dated-6/19/2023, major depressive disorder, recurrent, mild dated -9/20/2023. R54's MDS (minimum Data Set) dated 12/07/2024, documents R54's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as 14/15. Indicating R54 has intact cognitive abilities. On 02/05/2025, at 1:45 PM, V17 (Social Services Director) provided R54's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) 1 & 11 referral form dated 02/05/2025. On 02/05/2025, at 3:00 PM, V17 stated residents need to have their PASRR 1 completed before the resident comes to the facility, and the admissions office usually looks at the resident's referral packet from the hospital to see if there is a PASRR 1. V17 stated if the PASRR 1 is not in the packet, the admissions office should call the hospital to ask for it to be completed before the resident is discharged to the facility. V17 stated a PASRR 1 is completed to determine if a resident is a candidate for a nursing facility. V17 stated if the resident is coming from the community, or supportive living program, the facility must complete a PASRR 1 within 48 hours of the resident arriving to the facility. V17 stated R54 was first admitted to the facility on [DATE], from a community hospital and should have had a PASRR 1 completed from the hospital and should have been part of R54's medical records received from the hospital. V17 stated if R54 did not have a PASRR 1 upon admission, the admission director should have gone to PASRR screening agency's website and searched R54 under his social security number and put him on the queue so that the screening agency can come to the facility and complete R54's PASRR 1 screening assessment. V17 further said the facility should have referred R54 for a PASRR 11 screening because R54 has serious mental health diagnosis of schizophrenia, mood disorder, and major depressive disorder since 2023. V17 stated a PASRR 11 evacuation lets facility know what specialized treatment R54 needs to stay the facility for treatment and monitoring. V17 stated a PASRR 11 determines if a resident is approved for short term stay or long term stay for specialized services at the facility, and because R54 has not been assessed for PASRR level 11, he is not receiving the specialized treatment he requires. R54's PASRR 1 & 11 referral is dated 02/05/2025. PASRR Outcome Explanation -Notice of PASRR 11 Onsite Evaluation Required documents: -Your health care professional and outside screening vendor completed a Preadmission Screen Review (PASRR) Level 1 Screen for you. PASRR 1 screens and Level 11 evaluations are required by Federal law. -You need this evaluation because you have serious mental illness or an intellectual/developmental disability. -The purpose of this evaluation is to decide whether a nursing home facility is able to meet your needs. Policy titled Pre-admission Screening and Residential Review (PASRR) documents: -The admissions director and/or social service director will request the complete screening from the referral source. -All residents with possible serious mental health disorders, intellectual disability or newly diagnosed with a mental disorder will be referred for level 11 screening.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to a.) administer residents' prescribed medications in a timely manner according to the physician orders and b.) keep an accurat...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to a.) administer residents' prescribed medications in a timely manner according to the physician orders and b.) keep an accurate count of all narcotic medications for four (R3, R24, R30, R31) residents reviewed for medications in a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: On 02/04/2025, at 9:24 AM, surveyor and V4 (Registered Nurse/RN) located on the second floor of the facility performing a controlled substance count and record review. Surveyor observes the following: A medication bingo card labeled R31s' name, Tramadol 50mg, surveyor observes there were 22 pills inside of the medication bingo card. R31s' controlled drug receipt record documents a count of 23 pills. A medication bingo card labeled R31s' name, Pregabalin 25mg, surveyor observes there were 13 pills inside of the medication bingo card. R31s' controlled drug receipt record documents a count of 14 pills. A medication bingo card labeled R31s' name, Diazepam 5mg, surveyor observes there were 19 pills inside of the medication bingo card. R31s' controlled drug receipt record documents a count of 20 pills. 8 liquid medication bottles labeled R24s' name, Methadone 10mg/ml R24s' controlled drug receipt record documents a count of 9 liquid medication bottles. V4 (RN) states she administered the medications to R24 and R31 this morning and forgot to document that she administered them. On 02/05/2025, at 8:37 AM, surveyor observes that the following medication was not given to R3 during the 9:00 AM medication administration pass with V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN): Gemtesa 75mg. V17 states R3s' Gemtesa medication is not available in the facility, and she has to reorder it from the pharmacy. V17 observed deploying R3s' electronic medication administration record (eMAR) and reordering R3s' Gemtesa medication from the pharmacy via computer. R3 has diagnoses not limited to: Type 2 Diabetes without complications, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebrovascular disease, and overactive bladder. R3s' electronic medication administration record (eMAR) dated 02/01/2025 - 02/28/2025 documents: Gemtesa 75mg- Give 75mg by mouth one time a day scheduled at 9:00 AM. R3s' eMAR documents that R3s' Gemtesa medication was not administered on 02/05/2025 and 02/06/2025 at 9:00 AM. Facility document dated 02/06/2025, titled Inventory Replenishment Report documents that R3s' Gemtesa medication is not available stored inside of the automated medication dispenser/AMD. On 02/06/2025, at 10:20 AM, surveyor located at the medication cart with V17 (LPN) and observes that R3s' Gemtesa is not located inside of the medication cart. V17 states she did not notify R3s' physician that R3s' Gemtesa medication was not administered on 02/05/2025 and 02/06/2025. On 02/05/2025, at 9:07 AM, surveyor observes that the following medication was not given to R30 during the 9:00 AM medication administration pass with V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN): Mupirocin External Ointment 2%. V17 states R30s' Mupirocin medication is not available in the facility, and she has to reorder it from the pharmacy. V17 observed deploying R30s' electronic medication administration record (eMAR) and reordering R30s' Mupirocin medication from the pharmacy via computer. R30s' electronic medication administration record (eMAR) dated 02/01/2025 - 02/28/2025 documents: Mupirocin External Ointment 2%- Apply to bilateral thighs topically one time a day scheduled at 9:00 AM. R30s' eMAR documents that R30s' Mupirocin medication was not administered on 02/05/2025, at 9:00AM. R30s' eMAR documents that R30s' Mupirocin medication was administered on 02/06/2025 at 9:00 AM. On 02/06/2025, at 10:20 AM, surveyor located at the medication cart with V17 (LPN) and observes that R30s' Mupirocin medication is not located inside of the medication cart and V17 is unable to locate R30s' Mupirocin medication. V17 states she did not administer R30s' Mupirocin medication today on 02/06/2025. V17 states she documented that she administered R30s' medication in error because she wasn't paying attention when she was clicking the computer mouse to sign for medications. V17 states she did not notify R30s' physician that R30s' Mupirocin medication was not administered on 02/05/2025 and 02/06/2025. Facility document dated 02/06/2025 titled Inventory Replenishment Report documents that R30s' Mupirocin medication is not available stored inside of the automated medication dispenser/AMD. Facility policy dated 07/02/2018, titled Medication Administration and Storage Policy documents in part, 2. Medications shall be given within one (1) hour of the specified time, by the same nurse that prepared the dose. 11. Narcotics and all class II drugs must be recorded when given on the individual sheet 19. Narcotics must be signed out in the HER/electronic health record and the narcotic sheet.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a.) remove and discard expired medications that had been open in three of six medication carts, b.) remove and discard expired...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a.) remove and discard expired medications that had been open in three of six medication carts, b.) remove and discard expired enteral feedings located in one of three medication storage rooms, and c.) properly label medications that had been open for resident use. These failures have the potential to affect 68 residents residing in the facility reviewed for medication labeling and storage. Findings Include: On 02/04/2025, at 9:24 AM, surveyor and V4 (Registered Nurse/RN) located on the second floor of the facility at the medication cart performing a controlled substance count and record review. Surveyor observes the following: 1 open liquid medication bottle labeled R32s' name, Morphine Sulfate 20mg/ml inside of the medication cart. R32s' liquid Morphine medication observed with an expiration date labeled 05/17/2024. V4 states that R32s' liquid Morphine medication should not be stored in the medication cart and should have been discarded once it expired on 05/17/2024. V4 states R32 could experience adverse reactions if she is given expired medications. On 02/04/2025, at 10:01 AM, surveyor and V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) located on the third floor of the facility at the medication cart. Surveyor observes the following: 1 open house stock bottle medication labeled Bisacodyl Enteric Coated 5mg with an expiration date labeled 12/2024. 1 vial of Lispro insulin inside a clear plastic zip lock bag without a pharmacy label. V6 states the Lispro insulin belongs to R71. V6 states the Bisacodyl medication should not be stored in the medication cart and should have been discarded once it expired on 12/2024. V6 states R71s' Lispro insulin should have a proper pharmacy label identifying R71s' name, medication, and dosage on the insulin package. On 02/04/2025, at 10:05 AM, surveyor located inside of the third-floor medication storage room with V6 (LPN). Surveyor observes the following: 2 house stock enteral feeding containers labeled Nepro 1.8 CAL 33.8 ounces with an expiration date labeled 11/2024. Surveyor also observes milk curdles at the bottom of both enteral feeding containers. V6 states the enteral feeding containers should not be stored in the medication storage room for resident use and should have been discarded once it expired on 11/2024. V6 states residents could potentially get sick if expired enteral feedings are administered to them. On 02/04/2025, at 10:22 AM, surveyor and V22 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) located on the fourth floor of the facility at the medication cart. Surveyor observes the following: 1 open house stock bottle medication labeled Bisacodyl Enteric Coated 5mg with an expiration date labeled 09/2023. 1 open house stock bottle medication labeled Vitamin C 500mg with an expiration date labeled 11/2024. 1 open house stock bottle medication labeled Vitamin D 250mcg with an expiration date labeled 10/2024. V22 states the Bisacodyl, Vitamin C, and Vitamin D medications should not be stored in the medication cart for resident use and should have been discarded once they expired. On 02/05/2025, at 9:07 AM, during a medication administration pass with V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN), surveyor observes V17 with a nasal medication labeled Fluticasone Propionate 50mcg. Fluticasone medication does not have a pharmacy label with R30s' name, medication, and dosage on the packaging. V17 states R30s' Fluticasone medication should have a proper pharmacy label identifying R30s' name, medication, and dosage on the package. V17 states she cannot be sure if the Fluticasone medication is prescribed to R30 since it does not have a proper pharmacy label. Facility census dated 02/04/2025, documents a total of 43 residents resides on the third floor of the facility and 21 residents reside on the fourth floor of the facility. Facility document titled G-tube Residents lists a total of 6 residents residing in the facility who have gastrostomy tubes for enteral feedings. Facility policy dated 07/02/2018, titled Medication Administration and Storage Policy documents in part, 7. A nurse may not write the name and/or strength of the medication on the label. Should the pharmacy fail to label it properly, the drug must be returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling. 8. House stocked medications should not be administered after expiration date located on the manufacture's bottle. 16. Never use medicine from an unmarked container. Return containers bearing illegal, unclear or stained labels to pharmacy for re-labeling.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza and Covid-19 for six residents (R27, R62, R73, R2...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza and Covid-19 for six residents (R27, R62, R73, R207, R257, R307). Findings include: According to R27 progress note, 8/29/2024, R27 was offered and refused the influenza (flu) vaccination in 8/2024. The facility is not able to provide documentation that R27 was offered the influenza vaccination subsequently or provide a refusal of the influenza vaccination by R27 for the current flu season. According to electronic record, immunizations sections for R62, R73 and R307, they were not provided immunization education prior to vaccine administration or refusal. Review of R207 Authorization and Release for Influenza Vaccine, 2/4/25, does not indicate if R207 consented or refused the influenza vaccine. Also, according to V3 (Infection Preventionist / Licensed Practical Nurse), V3 signed the form for R207 and there is no witness signature. Review of R257 Authorization and Release for Influenza Vaccine, no date, indicates R257 consented to receive the influenza vaccination. R257 has not received the influenza vaccine to date. Review of R257 Authorization and Release for Vaccinations, 1/28/25, indicates R257 consented to the administration of the Covid-19 vaccine. R257 has not received the Covid-19 vaccine to date. 2/6/25, at 9:13 AM, V3 (Infection Preventionist / Licensed Practical Nurse) stated V3 has been IP nurse since January 2024. V3 does the antibiotic surveillance, immunizations, outbreaks of Covid, flu, C. diff (Clostridium difficile), etc., all infections, immunizations for residents and staff. V3 makes sure infection protocols are maintained throughout the building. Influenza season starts in September and ends in March. During the season I offer to residents and staff the influenza immunization. If they refuse, I continue to offer throughout the season and encourage and educate of the benefits and risks of receiving the vaccine for added protection. If they want it, then I place an order for the vaccine or schedule a clinic. I started offering it on 9/2024 for flu season 2024/2025. If it is a new admission resident, within 72 hours I offer any and all immunizations/vaccines. I take historical information. I document and offer education. If they refuse, I document and offer education and tell them I'll come back to reoffer. I continue to document that I offer. I educate and encourage each time. I document under immunizations or progress notes in the electronic record. I offered R27 the influenza vaccine in January, but I did not document it. R27 has not received the flu vaccine. R27 received RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus). There was an issue with R27's insurance not paying. R27 was hospitalized for pneumonia. I don't have a refusal for this flu season for R27. Education is provided so the residents know the risks and benefits of the vaccine. If education is not given the resident is not informed. R62, R73 and R307 education is not documented. R207 did not want to sign the consent. R207 wanted me to sign. The ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) was a witness but did not sign the consent as a witness. Consent was given 1/27/25 for R257 to receive the influenza and pneumo (Pneumococcal pneumonia) vaccines but the influenza has not been given at this time. I had given R257 the pneumo vaccine. R257 did not get the influenza because I was spacing it from the pneumo vaccine. I wanted to space the vaccines out. I talked to the NP (Nurse Practitioner) who consulted with the doctor. It is not documented that I received an order to space out the vaccines. I received consent for R257 for Covid-19 on 1/28/25. R257 has not been given Covid-19 vaccine. It was refused by pharmacy due to no insurance. I have not checked with our pharmacy. I have not ordered the Covid-19 vaccine yet for R257. 2/6/25, at 4:05 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated immunizations are important because of a lot of different populations in the facility, immunosuppressed residents. We have to safeguard the population by making sure of no outbreaks, keeping residents healthy, and keeping them vaccinated from viruses and diseases. Facility policy Immunizations, no date, documents in part: In order to minimize the risk of residents acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia, it is the policy of this facility to offer influenza and pneumococcal vaccination to all residents. Each resident or the resident's representative will receive education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza immunization. Each resident will be offered the influenza vaccination between October 1 and November 30 or as soon as possible if vaccine is not available by November 1, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized during this time period. Residents admitted after November 30 and until March 31 shall as medically appropriate receive an influenza vaccination prior to or upon admission or as soon as possible if vaccine is limited. The residents medical record will indicate: a. That the resident or residents legal representative was provided education regarding the benefits and the potential side effects of influenza immunization; and b. That the resident either received the influenza immunization or did not receive the influenza immunization due to medical contraindications or refusal.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure there are enough nursing staff to respond to call lights in a timely manner. In a resident council minute meeting residents' complai...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure there are enough nursing staff to respond to call lights in a timely manner. In a resident council minute meeting residents' complain that sometimes the facility only has one or two CNAs (certified nursing assistant) for the 2nd and 3rd shift. Review of staffing data submitted via the PBJ system revealed the facility was triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. This failure places all 104 residents in the facility at risk to be provided with inappropriate care and services to meet the resident's physical, mental and/or psychosocial needs. 02/05/25, 10:15 AM, residents agreed that the resident council meets regular, monthly. Residents' complain that sometimes they only have one CNA (certified nursing assistant) on the 2nd or 3rd shift and the call lights don't get answered for a long time. 2/5/2025, 3:43 PM, V26 (Staffing Coordinator) states that the facility wants her to staff nine CNAs (certified nursing assistants) for the morning shift, nine CNAs for the evening shift, and 8 CNAs for the night shift. V26 states that she schedules five nurses for the morning shift, five nurses for the evening shift, and three nurses for the night shift. V26 states that she has been the staffing coordinator since September 2024. V26 states that prior to being the staffing coordinator she was the wound care tech. V26 states that when the census goes up, then she would have to have more staff. V26 states that the facility uses an application where the staff can view open shifts and they can pick up and as well as be able to view their schedules. V26 states that if no staff are able to pick up a shift then she reserves to agency. V26 continues to state that if the agency do not pick up an open shift then V26 states that she will come in to work. Facility document dated 2/4/25, documents in part there are 104 residents (census) in the facility. Facility document dated 03/1/2024, titled facility assessment documents in part nursing services staffing should have 12 CNAs for day shift, 9 for evening shift, and 8 for night shift. Facility document dated 07/24/2024, titled resident council minutes documents in part CNAs on their cell phones during work hours and not answering the call light in a timely manner. Facility provided document 7/20/24-7/21/24 titled simplified time detail documents in part work short bonus, 8 CNAs worked morning shift on 7/20/24, 6 CNAs worked night shift on 7/21/24. Facility provided document 7/27/24-7/28/24 titled simplified time detail documents in part work short bonus, 7 CNAs worked morning shift on 7/27/24, 5 CNAs worked morning shift on 7/28/24.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy on sanitation and food safety by failing to (a) dish washer temperatures not reaching recommended tempe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy on sanitation and food safety by failing to (a) dish washer temperatures not reaching recommended temperatures, (b) properly sanitizing dishes in the three-compartment sink, (c) properly wearing hair net in the kitchen, (d) date open food item with open date and use by date. This failure has the potential to affect 101 residents who are on an oral diet. Findings include: On 02/04/2025, at 9:30 AM, V7 (Cook) was observed washing dishes in the three-compartment sink. The third compartment sink (Sanitizing) was observed with water that had whitish particles and the water was whitish cloudy. V8 (Dietary Manager) and surveyor observed V7 test the chlorine concentration on the third compartment sink with chlorine testing strips marked 10 P.P.M, (Parts per million) 50 P.P.M, 100 P.P.M, 200 P.P.M. The testing strips had color change marks from very light purple to black. V8 stated the black marking indicated the highest chlorine concentration. The testing strips did not turn color and remained white. V7 and V8 stated the chorine testing strips should turn blackish and at lease reach 100 PPMs to make sure the dishes are properly sanitized to prevent cross contamination which can make residents sick. The chlorine test strips were observed with an expiration date of 12/26/21. V8 stated she was not aware test strips have an expiration date, and stated there are 101 residents on oral diet receiving food from the kitchen. On 02/04/2025, at 9:36 AM, V10 (Dietary Aide) was observed assisting with loading the dish washing machine in the kitchen wearing a hair net that only covered the top of her hair bun, and the rest of her hair was observed without a hair net. V10 stated her hair is too big to fit in one hair net. V8 and V10 stated all staff in the kitchen should cover their hair completely to prevent hair from getting into resident food to prevent contamination. V10 stated she will wear two hair nets to cover the rest of her hair that was not covered. On 02/04/2025, at 9:40 AM, dishes were being washed in the dish washer. After each wash, the next load was put in and the machine was run immediately. V8 put a test strip (yellow with a white strip) in the dish washer to test if the machine was washing and sanitizing dishes properly. V8 stated the center of the testing strips which is white is supposed to turn black indicating the machine is working properly. The test strip did not turn black. V8 run the machine again and the hot water gauge for hot water was observed to be approximately 100-110 degrees F. V8 stated the washing cycle should reach at least 150 degrees F, and sanitation cycle should reach at least 180 degrees. V8 stated the water cools down if the machine is run continuously, and asked staff to wait a little bit before running each cycle to let the water heat up. V8 tested the machine three times and each time the testing strips remained white. V8 stated the dishwasher was recently serviced and the yellow testing strips are new, and she did not know why they did not turn black. V8 stated if the strips don't turn black, it means the right temperatures were not reached during the wash/sanitize cycle, and the dishes are not being washed and sanitized properly. V8 stated this can cause cross contamination which can lead to residents getting food borne illnesses. V8 stated the dishwasher is a high temperature machine and the wash cycle water temperature should be above 150 degrees F, and the rinse cycle above 180 degrees F. On 02/04/2025, at 2:32 PM V15(Dishwasher Repair Services/Vendor) stated the company has been having a lot of problems with the yellow dish washer testing strips he gave to the facility to test the dishwasher two weeks ago. The facility called him today (02/04/2025) to let him know the dishwasher temperatures are not reaching the recommended temperature. V15 stated he has just checked the dishwasher sprays and they had food particles clogging the sprays and that could have contributed to the water not getting hot, therefore, V16 has cleaned the spays and turned up the dishwasher temperatures and now its washing at over 200 degrees F. On 02/04/2025, during tour of the kitchen, with V8, observed in the freezer, an open big plastic bag of peas and carrots without a date indicating when opened or expiration date. V8 stated all opened food should be labeled with date it was opened and use by date so that it can be used before the food expires to prevent expired foods being cooked for the resident which can make residents sick. Policy titled Mechanical Cleaning and Sanitizing dated 2010 documents: Dish machines using hot water for sanitizing may be used if temperature of washing water is no less than that specified by the manufacturer, which may vary from 150 degrees F to 165 degrees F, depending on the type of machine, and if the final rinse temperature is no less than 180 degrees F. Policy titled Manual Sanitizing dated 2010 documents: -Chlorine-50 -100 PPM minimum 10 second contact time. -A test kit or other device that accurately measures the parts per million concentrations of solution will be available and used. Precision Chlorine Test Paper documented: Use dry finders to remove strip of paper from vial, dip strip into solution to be tested, without agitation and compare immediately with color chart on label. This color indicates approximate strength of the solution in parts per million (p.p.m) available chlorine. Policy titled hair restrains/Jewelry dated 2010 documents: -To reduce the spread of microorganism, employees shall use effective hair restraints. -Hair nets will be worn at all times in the kitchen. [NAME] guards or masks will be worn as indicated if necessary. -If taken out of original container, food will be tightly wrapped and labelled with the name of the item and date of delivery. Dish washer Operational Manual titled Getting started- introduction to CMA-180 documents: -Operation of the CMA-180 is automatic. The water tank heater will maintain the water temperature at 155 degrees F. The booster heater will produce a minimum of 180 degrees F final rinse water each cycle providing the in coming water supply is 120 degrees F.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0882 (Tag F0882)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Prevention nurse completed specialized training in infection prevention and control in nursing homes. This f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Prevention nurse completed specialized training in infection prevention and control in nursing homes. This failure has the potential to affect 104 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During the survey period, the facility was not able to provide valid documentation/certification for V3 (Infection Preventionist / Licensed Practical Nurse) of the completion of the required training program to implement programs and activities to prevent and control infections in nursing homes. 2/4/25, the facility was asked to provide completion of Infection Prevention program certification, including total hours for accumulated for V3 (Infection Preventionist / Licensed Practical Nurse). 2/6/25, V3 provided a CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Certificate of Training, Completion for Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course, dated 2/5/2025. 2/06/25, at 9:13 AM, V3 (Infection Preventionist / Licensed Practical Nurse) stated V3 has been the IP nurse since January 2024. V3 does the antibiotic surveillance, immunizations, outbreaks of Covid, flu, C. diff (Clostridium difficile), etc., all infections, immunizations for residents and staff. V3 makes sure infection protocols are maintained throughout the building. V3 stated the infection prevention program requires completing the training modules and then taking and passing a cumulative/completion test. The test shows completion of the required hours and competency for the IP role. 2/6/25, at 4:05 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated it is important to have a certified IP (Infection Preventionist) because it keeps us up to date with CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) recommendations. That person is updated with the latest bacteria and germs, isolation requirements and protecting the staff and residents. Facility policy Infection Prevention Program, no date, documents in part: The Infection Preventionist serves as a resource for all staff and all departments relating to prevention of infections. The Infection Preventionist has knowledge, competence, and interest in infection prevention.
Dec 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure resident is free from verbal abuse. This failure affected 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure resident is free from verbal abuse. This failure affected 1 ( R1) of 4 ( R1,R2,R3 and R4) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year old female with a diagnosis including epilepsy , anxiety disorder and chronic embolism and thrombosis. Resident is alert and oriented x 3, able to make all needs known to staff. Resident is a max assist with all adl cares. Incontinent of bowel of bladder. Uses a manual wheelchair for ambulation. R1 has a BIMS ( Brief Interview Of Mental Status) Score of 13/15. R1 was first admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 is care planned for abuse revised (12/3/24) . R1 is assessed as moderate risk for abuse. On 12/17/24, at 12:59 PM, R1 stated I had an incident in October where a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) started cursing at me because I asked her to help another resident who needed it. The CNA got mad at me and started yelling at me. I reported it. I haven't seen her since. On 12/17/24, at 1:10 PM, R1 stated there was another incident this month when a CNA told me that I stink and I have to take a shower. I did not like that at all. Her (CNA) and I were the only people in my room at the time. I reported it to the staff. They investigated and the CNA is gone. Per review of facility abuse investigations show the following two abuse investigations were conducted concerning R1. Both were substantiated. Facility abuse investigation incident dated 10/27/24 ( final) shows : Based on written statements from residents ( R1 ) and several statements residents and staff members. An investigation was conducted by the Administrator and the incident is noted to be found. One resident stated in his statement that he thought it was two staff members about to fight until he looked out his bedroom door and saw that it was a resident ( R1 ) and a staff person arguing , the staff person ( V3 CNA ) was really angry. This writer tried to contact V3 ( C N A ) ,she returned the call and stated that the resident asked her to push her to the elevator and she told the resident that she had to stay at the nurses station. V3 stated that that R1 got upset and started cursing her out. V3 denied cursing at the resident despite several statements from other residents who claimed that they witnessed the altercation. This writer has asked for a written statement , but V3 has yet to present one. V3 was terminated. R1 was again asked about her safety: do you feel safe here? R1 stated that , of course I feel safe , I don't have a problem with anybody here. R1 was instructed to inform staff whenever a situation comes up that needs staff intervention. R1 stated she would do so. Physician notified of results of investigation and no new orders other than to monitor. R1 representatives notified of the results of outcome of this investigation. The care plan and assessment were updated as appropriate. On 12/17/24, at 1:32 PM, V4 (CNA) stated in the hallway when R1 stopped me and said V3 (CNA) was yelling at her and called he a crippled b**** and she was going to beat R1s a**. I immediately reported the alleged incident to V1 ( Administrator) . On 12/17/24, at 1:50 PM, R3 stated yes about a month ago I heard 2 people cursing and yelling loud. I didn't go to my door because it sounded like they were about to fight. On 12/17/24, at 1:58 PM, R4 stated R1 and a CNA were arguing in the hallway calling each other bad names. The CNA said she isn't doing s*** and continuing to yell at R1. They did not hit each other . I haven't seen the CNA since then . I feel safe here. Facility final abuse investigation dated 11/28/24 shows based on written statement from R1 . R1 and alleged victim and statements from other residents and staff. The allegation of abuse is substantiated. R1 stated she was quite offended when V5 (CNA) said to her that she stinks and needed to take a shower. R1 stated she thinks V5 was trying to make her feel bad because she was not doing anything to help herself go home to be with daughter. However , per V5 written statement and verbal interview , she stated she has known the resident for years and that she would not do anything to abuse her. Nonetheless , according to Abuse Prevention Program that meets C M S requirement, Appendix PP and Final Rule , 81 Fed . Reg 68688-68872- Verbal abuse is the use of oral , written , or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families, or within hearing distance, regardless of an individuals age , ability to understand, or disability. It is not uncommon for staff to know residents personally, but, in a nursing home setting , All residents must be treated respectfully. While the staff member may not have willfully spoken , the resident stated that she felt horrible about what the staff member said to her. V5 was terminated. On 12/18/24, at 11:00 AM, V1 (Administrator/Abuse Prevention Coordinator) stated I investigate all allegations of abuse to the residents. We follow out abuse prevention policy. We have a no tolerance for any abuse to the residents by staff. I investigated both allegations of verbal abuse to R1 on 11/28/24 and 12/18/24. Both allegations were substantiated and the CNAs were terminated from employment. Facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program 2-2017 includes statement the facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents.
Dec 2024 5 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse and menta...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse and mental anguish by staff and also failed to appropriately identify incident(s) of abuse. This failure affected one resident (R2) whose wrists were tied to their bed side rails using pillowcases by a facility nurse as an attempt to confine R2 in bed for the nurse's convenience. As a result, R2 experienced feelings of humiliation and despair as evidenced by being tearful as well as physical pain and discomfort in both wrists. Any reasonable person in this situation would feel humiliated and ashamed. This was identified as an immediate jeopardy which begin on 10/12/24 at 3:00pm when V6 RN (Registered Nurse) tied R2 with pillowcase to the bed side rails. V1 (Administrator) was informed of the immediate jeopardy and template was presented 11/25/24 at 2:17 pm. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 11/28/24 at 3:36 pm. However, the deficiency remains at the second level of harm until the facility determine the effectiveness of the implementation of the removal plan. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old, cognitively impaired resident with diagnosis that includes but not limited to restlessness and agitation, tracheostomy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, aphasia, muscle wasting and atrophy and repeated falls. On 11/14/24 at 2:43 pm, V6 RN (Registered Nurse) stated that the shortage (referring to facility staffing) started at the beginning of the shift (referring to CNA shift 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm). V6 stated normally the second-floor staffing is to have three CNAs (Certified Nurse's Aide) but only two were working. V6 stated because R2 is known for climbing out of bed and falling and the RN (V6) was busy passing medication, V6 decided to tie R2's wrists to the bedrail with a pillowcase. V6 stated R2 had become agitated when the family member who came to visit R2 left. V6 stated that they (V6) knew what they did was wrong, but it was done so R2 would not fall when there was not enough staff (referring to CNAs). V6 stated that there was no other staff involved in tying R2 down. When the surveyor asked if R2 was willing to be tied down V6 stated that R2 was not cooperative with the tying down, but V6 was busy and could not stay with R2 and supervise them. V6 acknowledge that there was no physician order in R2s chart to restraint R2 with a pillowcase or any other restraint. When asked if that is a form of abuse V6 stated Yes, it can be abuse. The surveyor asked V6 if R2 is able to easily remove a pillowcase tied to their wrist and V6 stated No, because both hands were tied. On 11/14/25 at 2:51 pm, V20 CNA (Certified Nurse's Aide) stated On 10/12/24 I (V20) was not in the building, but V21 (CNA) called me at home very upset and told me how she found R2 tied down like a dog with a pillowcase in the bed. So, I called V2 (Director of Nursing). On 11/14/24 at 2:58 pm, V21 (CNA) stated that she witnessed R2's wrists tied to the bed side rails by use of pillowcases on 10/12/24. V21 stated she called V8 (Registered Nurse) working on the floor to see what was going on. V21 then stated that tying a resident to the bedrail with a pillowcase was a form of abuse. V21 confirmed that when she found R2, they were tearful, showing gestures for help and when she released R2's wrists from the pillowcase, R2 began rubbing their wrists and gesturing to pain and discomfort by use of mouth gestures. V21 also stated that R2 was grateful for V21's help and began blowing kisses and mouthing thank you. V21 acknowledged that a reasonable person would not want to be tied down like R2 was. V21 said, I could not believe what I saw so I walked out and called the other nurse V8 (RN) and V25 (CNA). I also called a union representative because this traumatized me, and I was not allowed to go home because we (facility) were short of working CNAs. I had to go off the floor for a short period in the staffing lounge. V21 confirmed that she called V20 at home to talk about what happened and at that time, V20 called V2 (Director of Nursing) to report what had happened. On 11/14/24 at 3:28 pm, V1 (Administrator) stated that the incident was marked as abuse but it was not founded to be abuse an applying the pillowcase was for safety of R2 and no injury was discovered. V1 attributed V6's action to V6 being busy with another resident and did not have other staff available to assist them (V6) in making sure R2 was supervised. Present during the interview with V1 was V22 (Nurse Consultant) who stated, it is a form of abuse, and it should absolutely be reported to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health). On 11/18/24 at 10:42 am, V19 (Restorative Director) stated that it is not appropriate to use a pillowcase as a restraint device because it can cause psychological and emotional anguish. V19 stated, This can cause the resident to be sad and feel isolated .a pillowcase can block flow of blood circulation due to it not being designed for use as a restraint device. The surveyor asked V19 that in his own professional opinion can this be a form of abuse and V19 stated Yes, it can be a form of abuse that should be reported. On 11/18/24 the facility staffing schedule dated 10/12/24, showed documentation that V21 was pulled from the 3rd floor to work on the 2nd floor because there was only one CNA present with two nurses at 3:00 pm. On 11/25/24 at 2:04 pm, V1 stated that V6's action did not constitute a form of abuse because it was not unreasonable confinement. V2 (DON) who was present at the time of V1 interview stated that it was a form of abuse because the effect can be psychological/ mental anguish. Record review of R2's medical record showed that the only way R2 can communicate with facility staff is by using R2's hands, either by writing or using hand gestures. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/18/2024 section C-cognitive patterns did not score R2's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) indicating that R2 was unable to complete the interview. R2's medical record did not show any Plan of Care stating R2 was susceptible to abuse. On 11/18/24 at 1:30 pm, R2 was observed in the room sitting in a recliner chair using the right hand to wipe saliva from the mouth. R2's left hand was noted with weakness; R2 was using their right hand to lift their left hand onto their lap. When asked about the incident on 10/12/24, R2 answered with thumbs down while shaking their head back and forth in a No gesture. The surveyor asked R2 whether R2 wanted to be tied down R2 shook the head back and forth in a No gesture and mouthed NO. When asked if R2 experienced pain, R2 shook their head Yes. On 11/18/24 at 3:21 pm, V23 (Physician) stated that he has never heard of staff tying down a resident and will never give an order to do so. V23 stated How can anyone do that? In 28 years of being in medicine, I know that it is not professional, and it is not right. On 11/18/24 at 3:46 pm, V24 (Psychiatrist) stated, I will never give such order. The nurse (V6) acted on their own. V24 stated Use of mitten may be used, not a use of pillowcase. It is not good, and it should not be done, and no physician should give that kind of order. That kind of abuse it is unheard of. When asked about what can happen to a resident who is inappropriately restrained, V24 stated that it can compromise their breathing. On the 11/25/24 facility census report for 10/12/24 presented for the 2nd floor showed that 41-residents were residing on the 2nd floor and 110 total residents residing in the facility. On 12/04/24 at 10:14 am, V29 (PRSD/Psychiatrist Rehabilitation Services Director) stated that she is new to the facility and was not sure what happened for the nurse to tie down R2. When the surveyor asked about the 10/12/24 incident in which V6 restrained R2 with a pillowcase when the facility was short-staffed and if that can be a form of abuse, V29 stated In my own professional opinion, yes, it will be considered abuse, and it should have been reported. On 12/05/24 at 1:12 pm V6's time sheet presented showed that on 10 /12/24 V6 clocked in at 7:11 am and clocked out at 7:26 pm, showing that V6 worked the whole shift. The facility Abuse Prevention Program policy presented with revised date 04 January 2018 documented that definition of abuse includes but not limited to willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, pain and mental anguish. Willful as used in the definition of abuse means the individual must have deliberately, or that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. The policy under external reporting documented that initial reporting of allegations documented that when an allegation of abuse occurred the department of Public Health's regional office shall be informed by telephone or fax. The facility policy presented titled Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy and Procedure with revised date January 4, 2018, documented that abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury that includes but not limited to unreasonable confinement, or punishment that is resulting in pain or mental anguish. The policy documented that Willful as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must acted deliberately not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. The surveyor confirmed on 12/04/24 and 12/05/24 through observation, interview, and record review that the facility took the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: the facility completed all measures on the abatement plan. Therefore, the abatement plan could be approved on 11/18/24. 1. R2 screened, reassessed for risk for abuse with care plan interventions. 2. All staff in-serviced training completed on 11/26/24 by V1, V2 and V29. 3. Documentation showed that all residents were re-educated on abuse with completion date of 11/26/24. 4. R2, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19 and R20 were screened for potential abuse with care plan reviewed and initiated. 5. All staff will be responsible for monitoring residents for behavior that can make them vulnerable for abuse. 6. All residents determined to be vulnerable or those that will be affected by this deficiency citation R2, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19 and R20 were identified, and plan of care initiated, with ongoing, on admission, quarterly and annually. 7. Review Quality Assurance audit tool started on 11/27/24 weekly ongoing to ensure compliance.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that residents are free of unnecessary physical restraint(s)...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that residents are free of unnecessary physical restraint(s), failed to identify the specific medical symptoms warranting the use of physical restraint(s) and failed to obtain physician orders with medical justification for physical restraint(s). This failure affected R2 whose wrists were tied to the bed side by a pillowcase by a nurse with no physician order, no consent or resident permission, and no medical justification. Any reasonable person in this situation would feel humiliated and ashamed. This was identified as an immediate jeopardy which begin on 10/12/24 at 3:00pm when V6 (Registered Nurse) tied R2 to their bedside rails with a pillowcase. V1 (Administrator) was informed of the immediate jeopardy and template was presented 11/25/24 at 2:17pm. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 12/3/24 at 3:29 pm. However, the deficiency remains at the second level of harm until the facility determine the effectiveness of the implementation of the removal plan. Findings include: R2's medical record admission Record showed documented that R2 was admitted originally to the facility on [DATE] with latest admission on [DATE]. Listed diagnosis includes but not limited to Tracheotomy status, restlessness and agitation, hematemesis, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, acute and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and repeated falls. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/18/2024 section C-cognitive patterns did not score R2's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) indicating that R2 was unable to complete the interview. R2's medical record did not show any documentation of medical symptoms or behavior that would justify the use of restraint, no physician order for restraint usage, no restraint assessment, no consent, and no plan of care for restraint usage. On 11/14/24 at 2:43pm, V6 (Registered Nurse) stated that there was staffing shortage for CNAs that started at the beginning of the shift (referring to 3:00pm to 11:00pm shift on 10/12/24). V6 stated that normally the second-floor staffing is to have three CNAs, but only two were working. V6 stated Because R2 is known for climbing out of bed and falling and I (V6) was busy passing medication and taking care of other residents that were screaming and yelling, I (V6) decided to tie R2's hands with a pillowcase to prevent R2 from falling. I know what I've done is wrong, but it was done so R2 will not fall when there was not enough staff . When asked about the daily staffing for 2nd floor, V6 stated there should be two nurses and three CNAs (3pm to 11pm shift). When the surveyor asked for any medical justification like R2 trying to remove the tracheostomy tube or the oxygen, V6 stated that R2 was not trying to remove the tracheostomy tube or the oxygen, but was just trying to climb out of bed. V6 stated, R2 became restless and agitated because the family (V41) came to visit R2, and V41 (family member) had just left. V6 confirmed that R2 did not have any physician order(s) for restraint and that R2 was tied at the beginning of the shift. V6 also confirmed that before V6 could return to check on R2, V21 (CNA) discovered that R2 has been tied down. When the surveyor asked whether R2 was willing to be tied down V6 stated that R2 was not cooperative with the tying down, but V6 was busy and could not stay and supervise R2. V6 stated, I know that is not a restraint device but tying R2 down is a form of restraint that was not ordered. V6 stated, I did not want R2 to fall. The surveyor then asked whether restraints is a part facility intervention for falls and can R2 free self from the restraints without injury. V6 stated I should not have tied R2 down, and it is not part of intervention for fall prevention. On 11/14/24 at 3:28pm, when this was brought to V1 (Administrator) attention, V1 stated that applying the pillowcase was for safety of R2 and no injury was founded. V1 attributed V6's action to V6 being busy with another resident and did not have other staff available to assist him (V6) in making sure R2 is stabilized not fall. On 11/25/24 at 2:26 pm, V2 DON (Director Of Nursing) stated that the nurse (V6) should not have used a restraint on R2 and if this was left to her she would have terminated V6 but V1 (Administrator) prefers for this situation to go through them first. V2 confirmed that the situation with R2 was an unnecessary use of restraint. R2's medical record showed no recorded documentation that R2 had prior to 10/12/24, or after, any physical restraint assessment performed by the facility. There also was not any consent obtained from R2 or a resident representative, either written or verbal for the use of physical restraints. There was also no medical justification for physical restraints documented in R2's medical record. R2's care plan for communication initiated 07/15/2024 and revised on 08/05/2024 showed that R2 is non-verbal and can only communicate with staff using a writing pad and pen as well as using hand or mouth gestures. When the surveyor asked R2 about how R2 feels about being tied with pillowcase. R2 responded with hand gestures showing a thumbs down and shaking the head to gesture No. R2's medical record, Risk for Falls Assessment dated 11/21/2024 showed that R2 scored 18 and under category deemed to be at a moderate risk for falls. Facility in-house investigation report on 10/12/24 documents in part: Staff witnessed R2 tied up to the bed side rails with a pillowcase by V6 (Registered Nurse). As a result, R2 experienced psychosocial impact that was described as crying for help and tearful. V6 stated R2 was agitated and restless and because there was not enough staff working at the time of the incident he tied R2 with the pillowcase. V6 stated that he was busy with other residents and could not supervise R2. V42 (Director of Rehabilitation services) statement dated 10/16/24 with no date of incident and interview. V42 wrote I (V42) was not present at the time of incident but R2 was in therapy due to having multiple falls out of bed. V42 documented in part in the statement that whenever R2 is trying to get out of bed he can usually redirect R2 and that R2 can usually tell of the needs through on-verbal communication. V42 further stated that R2 likes to have a towel to clean up saliva the mouth/trach (Tracheostomy) and R2 can become anxious if (R2) does not have one. V8's statement documentation dated 10/12/24 documented that on 10/12/24 at 6:10 pm when (V21 CNA) called her (V8 RN) to R2's room the room was dark and when the light was turned on, she (V8) observed R2's left, and right wrist tied with pillowcase. On 11/18/24 at 10:40 am, V19 (Restorative Director) stated that the facility is a restraint free facility therefore no physical restraint should be used on any of the resident and if there is justification for emergency usage for the restraint there must be a physician order immediately after or within eight hours of use. V19 stated that the resident must be placed on 1:1 staff supervision for safety reasons and it is not appropriate to use a pillowcase as a restraint devise because it can cause psychological/ psychological emotional anguish. V19 stated that this can cause the resident to be sad and isolated. And a pillowcase can cause flow of blood circulation due to it not designed to be used as a restraint device. R2's medical record did not show any documentation of medical symptoms or behavior that justify use of restraint, no physician order for restraint usage, no restraint assessment, no consent, and no plan of care for restraint usage. R2's medical record review showed that the only way of R2 communicating with facility staff is by using writing or using mouth and hand gestures. R2's medical record showed no recorded documentation that R2 before 10/12/24 and after had any physical restraint assessment done. There was no consent obtained either written or verbal. R2 was not informed. No physician order, no psych-evaluation and no medical justification for the use of restraints. On 11/18/24 at 1:30 pm, R2 was observed in the room sitting in a recliner chair using the right hand to wipe saliva from the mouth. R2's left hand was noted with weakness while R2 was using the right hand to lift the left hand unto the lap. When asked about the incident on (10/12/24). R2 answered with thumbs down and shaking the head that it was bad. The surveyor asked R2 whether R2 wanted to be tied down R2 shook the head and with lip movement to gesture NO. R2 indicate with yes that it was painful. R2's medical record risk for Falls assessment dated [DATE] record that R2 scored 18 and under category deemed to be at a moderate risk for falls. On 11/18/24 at 3:21 pm, V23 (Physician) stated that he has never heard of staff tying down a resident with a pillowcase and will never give an order to do so. On 11/18/24 at 3:46 pm, V24 (Psychiatrist) stated, I will never give such order, V6 acted on their own. V24 stated that use of mitten may be used in a hospital but not a use of pillowcase. V23 stated it is not good and it should not be done, and no physician should give that kind of order, it is a kind of abuse it is un-heard off. When asked about what can happen to the resident. V24 stated that it can compromise R2's breathing. V24 stated, No, I did not give that order because there is no such thing in physician book for a staff to tie up a resident with a pillowcase. On 12/04/24 at 10:36 am, interview conducted with V8 (Registered Nurse) regarding the incident of 10/12/24 where R2 was tied down to the bedside rails with pillowcase. The surveyor asked if R2 was able to remove the pillowcase if R2 wanted to and if it was easily removable. V8 stated No, R2 would not be able to remove the pillowcase. I reported it to V2 (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked why did V8 report the incident, V8 said that they did because it was wrong and it was abuse. Surveyor asked if V8 ever tied any of the resident up like that, V8 said No, that will be abusive. With any restraint use, we must get a doctor's order and monitor the resident. The restraint is not necessary and the purpose of pillowcases is to be used for pillows, it should not be used as a restraint. The incident happened around 5:30 pm and R2 was happy to be released. This is restraint free facility. When asked what was R2's reaction to what happened. V8 stated that R2 was using hand gestures to thank us. V8 also said that a reasonable person would not have liked to be tied down and it is wrong to do that and no one would like to be tied down. On 12/04/24 at 1:00pm, V19 (Restorative Director) stated that I V19 returned to work 12/02/24 and is still auditing the residents records. V19 stated that the facility is a restraint free facility and that safety belt, medical recliners, side rails and mittens are forms of restraint devices, but the facility does not use restraints. V19 stated that medical recliners are used for positioning and comfort for poor trunk control All those things listed that V6 (RN) did not follow with R2. On 12/04/24 at 2:06 pm, V25 CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) stated that she worked 3pm to 11pm on 10/12/24. V25 stated, at the beginning of the shift when making rounds, R2 kept trying to get out of bed and the V6 (Registered Nurse) came in R2's room and stated he will stay in the room with R2. V25 stated, I (V25) was doing my rounds. Dinner trays came and the other CNA (V21) was passing the dinner trays when she saw R2's arm restrained to the bed rails. V21 told me to come and look and I saw R2's hands tied with pillowcases to the bed rails. R2 was just lying there on the bed. When V25 was asked about what a reasonable person would like and if would R2 liked to be tied down to the bed rails, V25 stated No. On 12/05/24 at 1:12 pm V6 time sheet presented showed that on 10 /12/24 V6 clocked in at 7:11 am and clocked out at 7:26 pm, showing that V6 worked the whole shift. The facility procedure for the use of Physical Restraint:Exception for emergency Situations documented that after less restrictive interventions to prevent the resident from serious harm have proven ineffective, determined the need for an emergency physical restrain. This determination may be made by the nurse. Under emergency authorization documentation documented that approval for the use of emergency physical restraints must be made by attending physician , the medical director or a supervisory nurse.if approval is given by a nurse , a physician's order must be received within eight (8) hours, validating the supervisory nurse's decision. Physician orders regarding emergency physical restraint placement may be taken by telephone or fax machine. The facility Fall Prevention policy presented with revised date 12/20/22 documented that based on the result of the falls assessment, the Inter disciplinary team will determine the best approach to implement for fall prevention, adjust the care plan, inform the family and resident and implement comprehensive fall prevention management approach. The facility titled Restraints Policy presented with revised date 9/17 documented under policy statement that in accordance with federal and state laws has a stringent policy regarding the use of physical and chemical restraints on resident. Our philosophy (Facility) of providing residents with the highest possible quality of care and life is reflective of our belief that is essential for our residents to maintain their dignity and independence by being permitted to take the normal risks of everyday life. For these reasons and in accordance with federal and state laws, restraint use in our facility will only be considered to treat a medical symptom/condition that endangers the physical safety of the resident. Listed procedures includes but not limited to with a physician order, with consent of the resident (or legal representative); when the benefits of the restraint outweigh the identified risks. If the restraint use is deemed necessary, the goal will be to use the least restrictive type of restraint for the shortest period possible. On 12/04/24 and 12 /05/24, the surveyor made observations, conducted interviews, and received documentation to confirm the following removal plan was initiated. 1. All staff were trained on what constitute proper training, unnecessary use of restraint, with ongoing training scheduled Quarterly by V29 and completed on 11/28/24. 2. All residents have been assessed to ensure that none are restrained improperly or unnecessarily by V19. 3. Assessment will be ongoing and conducted at admission, quarterly and annually 4. Outside consultant and V2 and V29 conducted in-service training on behavior management. On 11/27/24 and 12/05/24. 5. Documentation showed all the facility residents were in-service on abuse and restraints by V29. 6. R2, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19 and R20 were care planned/interventions with potential for abuse and proper restraints related to their diagnoses. 7. A system put in place for audit to be done weekly to ensure compliance with unnecessary use of restraint to be monitored by V1, V2 and V29.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report an alleged abuse for one three residents (R2) in the sample reviewed for abuse. This failure affected R2 who was tied up ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report an alleged abuse for one three residents (R2) in the sample reviewed for abuse. This failure affected R2 who was tied up to the bedside rails with pillowcase and this was not reported to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health). This has the potential to affect all 39 residents residing on the 2nd floor of the facility. Finding include: On 11/14/24 the facility in-house investigation documented that on Saturday, October 12, 2024, the writer V1 (Administrator) received a phone call informing (V1) that a Nurse (Referring to V6 RN (Registered Nurse) had tied a resident (R2) to the siderail of the bed with a pillowcase. The DON (Director of Nursing) who reported this alleged incident sent the nurse (V6) home pending investigation. V1, wrote that based on known facts from medical records review and interviews conclusion has been determined about allegation of abuse indicating that there was an alleged abuse. On 11/14/24 at 2:30 pm, when the surveyor asked whether this alleged incident was reported to IDPH, V1 (Administrator) stated this allegation of abuse was not reported because in conclusion the allegation of abuse was un-founded and there was no injury.The surveyor then asked whether any allegation of abuse should be reported V2 stated yes, any allegation of abuse should be reported. During the same conference, V2 DON (Director of Nurse's) and V22 (Nurse consultant) who were present at the time of interview was asked about the incident reporting to IDPH. They both stated that it should have been reported. As at 11/14/24 at 3:30pm, the facility did not present any documentation that this incident has been reported to IDPH. On 11/18/24 at 9:50am, V1 presented documentation that the initial report was sent to IDPH at 6:28pm. Showing that it was reported 32 days after the alleged abuse incident. The facility policy presented titled Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy and Procedure with revised date January 4,2018 documented that abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury that includes but not limited to unreasonable confinement, or punishment that is resulting in pain or mental anguish. The policy documented that Willful as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must acted deliberately not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. The facility policy on Abuse Prevention Program documented under external reporting initial reporting of allegations that when an allegation of abuse has occurred the Department of Public Health's regional office shall be informed by telephone or fax and that it is being investigated. This report shall be made immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made with injury and within 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury. Under five -day final investigation the policy documented that after complete written report of conclusion of investigation, including steps the facility has taken in response to the allegation, will be sent to the Department of Public Health. This guideline was not followed.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that treatment cart and resident medication was not left at the bedside un-attended when not in visual proximity of the...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that treatment cart and resident medication was not left at the bedside un-attended when not in visual proximity of the nurse and not in use to prevent tampering and accidental hazard. This failure affected R4 whose inhaler was left at bed side over bed-table visible to the hallway and treatment cart left unlocked and un-attended in the hallway. This has the potential to affect all the 39 residents residing on the 2nd floor of the facility. Findings include: On 11/13/24 at 10:32 am R4 was noted sitting on the bed and visible to the hallway, an inhaler was observed on the over-bed side table. R4 stated that's mine, I use it. It helps me to breath. The inhaler Symbicort 160mcg/4.5 not in manufacturer's container and no pharmacy label. On 11/13/24 at 10:35 am, when shown to V8 RN (Registered Nurse). V8 stated the inhaler is for R4 and R4 can self-medicate. The surveyor asked V8 whether R4 has an order to do so. V8 said let me check. On 11/13/24 at 10:40 am, V8 checked and stated I (V8) am supposed to give it to R4. When asked to show the surveyor the physician order in the EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) and the EPOS (Electronic Physician Order Sheet). R4 has an order for Symbicort 80mcg/4.5 and no order for the 160mcg/4.5. V8 could not provide any physician order for R4 to keep the inhaler at bedside and self-administration. V8 stated, R4 is not in any self-administration program. When asked if R4 got the inhaler this morning as scheduled, V8 stated I did not give (R4) any inhaler yet. MAR showed the medication has been administered. On 11/13/24 at 11:00 am, when this observation was brought to V2 DON (Director of Nurse's) and was asked about the facility policy on medication administration and self-administration program. V2 stated, unless the physician orders the medication it should not be administered or left at bedside. V2 stated, R4 is not in self-administration program because there was no order for it. V2 stated, R4 should not be self-administering any medication, the medication found is at a stronger dose and side-effects can include tachycardia or respiratory distress. V2 stated, any medication ordered to be kept at bedside are kept locked in the drawer. V2 stated, that the staff are to make rounds every two hours, but it ended up been every hour because the nurses and the CNAs alternate the hours. The staff are to check for anything abnormal and if any medication is found at the bedside, I am expecting them to bring it to the nurses. On 11/13/24 at 2:00pm, on the 2nd floor the treatment cart noted un-locked un-attended and not in visual proximity of the nurses. When this observation was shown to V8 RN (Registered Nurse) V8 stated we just forgot to lock it. When the surveyor asked about the facility policy on medication/treatment cart storage, V8 stated, it should be locked (referring to the treatment cart) period. At 2:12 pm, When V2 was made aware of the surveyors' observation and was asked about the facility policy on medication storage and treatment cart. V2 stated that if the treatment cart or the medication cart is not with the nurses or in view of the nurse, it must be locked. V2 stated, only the nurses should have access to the key and should go into the cart and by leaving it un-locked the residents can get into the cart. V2 stated that it is a safety issue. The facility policy for self-administration of medication presented with revised date 4/24 documented that each resident has a right to self-administer drugs unless the interdisciplinary team and the resident's physician have determined for each resident that this practice is safe. The facility Medication Administration and storage policy presented with revised date 07/02/18 documented that the policy is to ensure medications are administered and stored in accordance with Standard of Practice. Listed procedures includes but not limited to no medication may be given without a physician's order. A nurse may not write the name and/or strength of the medication on the label. Should the pharmacy fail to label it properly, the drug should be returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling. Self-administration of medications by resident is permitted only when the resident has been assessed and is capable of self-medication administration and a physician order has been written for self-administration.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient staff on duty to meet resident's needs. This failure affected R2 was known to need adequate supervision for...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient staff on duty to meet resident's needs. This failure affected R2 was known to need adequate supervision for trying to get out of bed without help and who was tied to bed rails due to facility short staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 39 resident residing on the 2nd floor of the facility. Findings include: The facility in-house investigation documented that on Saturday, October 12, 2024, the writer V1 (Administrator) received a phone call informing (V1) that a Nurse (Referring to V6 RN (Registered Nurse) had tied a resident (R2) to the siderail of the bed with a pillowcase. The DON (Director of Nursing) who reported this alleged incident sent the nurse (V6) home pending investigation. V1, wrote that based on known facts from medical records review and interviews conclusion has been determined about allegation of abuse indicating that there was an alleged abuse. On the 11/25/24 facility census report for 10/12/24 presented for the 2nd floor showed that 41-residents were residing on the floor and 110 total residents residing in the facility. On 11/14/24 at 2:43pm, V6 stated that the shortage started at the beginning of the shift. V6 stated normally the second-floor staffing is to have three CNAs (Certified Nurse's Aide) but only two were working. V6 stated, because R2 is known for climbing out of bed and fall and he (V6) was busy passing medication and taking care of other residents that were screaming and yelling. V6 stated, he decided to tie R2's hands with a pillowcase. V6 stated, I know what I've done is wrong, but it was done so R2 will not fall when there was not enough staff (referring to CNAs). When asked about the normal daily staffing for 2nd floor, V6 stated that there should be two nurses and three CNAs, but it was two nurses and one CNA at the beginning of the 3 pm to 11 pm shift because the CNAs works 3 pm to 11 pm and the nurses shift is 7 am to 7 pm. On 11/18/24 at 3:55 pm, the facility daily staffing sheet and assignment sheet presented showed that two nurses and two CNAs were scheduled to work on the 2nd floor. V2 DON (Director of Nurse's) stated that normally there should be five staff, two nurses and three CNAs but there was a call off. When V2 was asked about the facility preparation in anticipation for call offs. V2 states, the facility staff will be asked to volunteer to work overtime or call the agency services, but this happened on a weekend shift. V2 stated, on a weekend it is difficult to get replacement. The facility Staffing policy for nursing department documented that the purpose of the policy is to ensure adequate staffing levels and skills mix to deliver high-quality, person-centered care in compliance with federal and state regulations. This policy applies to all nursing staff, including RNs (Registered Nurse, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), and CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants). Under scheduling the policy documented that a designated nurse will be on-call for emergencies when additional staffing is required.
Oct 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to refer five (R2, R3, R4, R5, R6) of five residents reviewed for new...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to refer five (R2, R3, R4, R5, R6) of five residents reviewed for newly or possible serious mental disorders for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I and II in a sample of five. Findings include: On [DATE], at 9:53AM, V4 (Director of social Services) stated R2's PASARR 1 ended on [DATE]st, 2023. Another Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) 1 should have been renewed when R2 come back from the hospital on [DATE], and a PASSAR II should also have been done because R2 had serious mental illness. V4 stated to date, R2 does not have a PASARR II. R2 has a notification/red flag in assessment tool census stating R2 should be assessed for level II PASARR. V4 stated after surveyor and V4 reviewed documents that showed R2 was flagged for assessment, created a PASARR screening notification for R2 to be assessed for level II by the appointed screening agency. V4 stated R3's assessment tool documents R3 was approved for PASARR level II on [DATE]th, 2023, it expired on [DATE]rd, 2023, therefore, another level II PASARR should have been completed for his renewal before [DATE]rd, 2023. V4 stated the assessment tool website sent notification to facility via email on [DATE]th, 2023, and another reminder on [DATE]th, 2023, that another level II PASARR needed to be completed for R3. R2's face sheet documents R2's diagnosis with onset date of [DATE], to include but not limited to anxiety disorder, unspecified and schizoaffective disorder, unspecified. R2's initial admission date as [DATE]. R2's admission date is [DATE]. R3's face sheet documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], and R2's diagnosis dated [DATE] include but not limited to Major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and [DATE], bipolar disorder unspecified. V4 stated R4's PASARR II was approved from previous facility on [DATE], and was approved for 180 days -short term. It termed on [DATE]th, 2023. The assessment tool tracker sent a service matter letter to the facility on [DATE], notifying the facility that another PASSAR II for R4 was required. The evaluation request should have been completed before [DATE]th, 2023. R4's current face sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE], and his medical diagnoses dated [DATE] include but not limited to: Major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe psychotic symptoms, Auditory hallucinations, suicidal ideations, bipolar 11 disorder. V4 stated R5 was approved for level II PASARR for 60 days on [DATE]th, 2023, was renewed on Dec, 1st 2023, for 30 days and expired [DATE], therefore, R5 needed another level II PASARR, and someone (No name provided) should have requested another PASARR completion. Instead a referral for a Specialized Mental Health Rehabilitation Facility (SMHRF) was completed. But R4 was denied SMHRF, therefore, R5's PASARR II should been renewed by the facility before [DATE]st, 2023, because R5 remained in the facility. R5's current face sheet documents R5's admission date as [DATE], readmission was [DATE], and his diagnosis, dated [DATE], include but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, unspecified, bipolar disorder, current episode mixed unspecified, depression, unspecified, schizophrenia, unspecified, attention -deficit hyperactive disorder, unspecified type. V4 stated R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6 was discharged to the community on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. R6's PASARR level II was done in the hospital on [DATE]. It was approved for 180 days, and the approval ended on [DATE], therefore R6's PASARR II should have been renewed. V4 stated a service letter, which stated R6's PASARR level II should be renewed was sent to the facility on [DATE], but the facility did not follow up on the assessments needed. R6's current face sheet documents R6 initial admission date as [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and documents R6's diagnosis dated [DATE], as major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified, anxiety disorder unspecified, [DATE]-violent behavior, suicidal ideations. V4 stated she sent the renewal assessments for R2, R3, R4, R5, R6 yesterday ([DATE]) after interview with surveyor on [DATE]. She was not aware before then that these residents needed a PASARR II screening because she was new at the facility, and further stated she has now created an assessment tool for R2, R3, R4, R5, R6 to be reviewed by the appointed screening agency. V4 stated it was important for PASARRs to be completed on time to assure the residents are receiving their specialized programs and treatment goals and to make sure the residents are in the right environment related to their diagnosis. V4 further stated if the PASARRs are not completed, the resident will not get the services they need and are in a stand still position because the facility will not know what the resident's rehabilitation needs are. Therefore, these needs will not be met, and the resident might not be stabilized. On [DATE], at 10:37AM, V4 (Social Services Director) stated newly admitted residents should come with a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level 1 from the hospital. PASARR level 11 is completed for residents who have Serious Mental Illness (SMI), Intellectual Disability (ID), or Developmental Disability (DD) or significant change in mental condition. V4 further said the facility's social services department is responsible of entering a resident's information into the assessment tool of the appointed screening agency so that the screening agency can access and review the date and schedule a time to come to the facility to assess the resident for PASARR 11 within 48-72 hours. On [DATE], at 1:16 PM V5 (Business office manager) stated when a resident is admitted to the facility, the business office adds the resident's information into the online assessment tool so that the newly admitted residents needing PASARR II, can be screened by appointed screening agency within 15 days of admission to the facility. V5 stated that some PASARR II's were not completed because there was a transition period in social services and the facility did not have a Social Services Director to enter resident PASARR information into the assessment tool which alerts the appointed screening agency that a resident need to be assessed for PASARR 1 or 11. V5 stated new social services director (V4) started on [DATE], and is training on entering the assessments into the assessment tool on-line. V5 stated it is the facility's responsibility to update the screenings and to notify the appointed screening agency when a staff member who collaborates the residents need for PASARR assessments is no longer working in the facility and give appointed agency the new contact information to reach the right worker at the facility for residents' assessments needs. V5 stated the appointed screening agency was sending service matters request for reviews for the residents, but there was no response from the facility since the social services director was no longer working at the facility. V4 stated when a resident comes to the facility from the hospital with a new diagnosis of a severe mental health issue, social services is supposed to use the online assessment tool within 12-48 hours so that the appointed screening agency can come to the facility to screen the resident for level II PASARR. V5 stated the appointed screening agency comes within 24-48 hours to assess the complete the resident assessment. V4 stated if the resident is not reviewed and assessed on time, they are not getting the services they need such as programs/interventions for their psychiatric diagnosis. Document titled: Path Tracker Census documents dates with exclamation mark residents needing PASARR review attention. Policy titled: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, no date, documents: -PASRR can also advance person-centered care planning by assuring that psychological, psychiatric, and functional needed considered along with personal goals and preferences in planning long-term care. - In brief, the PASRR process requires that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be given preliminary assessment to determine whether they might have SMI or ID. This is called Level 1 screen. Those individuals who test positive at level 1 are then evaluated in depth, called Level 11 PASRR. The results of this evaluation result in a determination of need, determination of appropriate setting, and a set of recommendations for the services to inform the individual's plan of care.
Oct 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatments for 2 (R1,R4) of 3 residents who were revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatments for 2 (R1,R4) of 3 residents who were reviewed for wounds. The facility failed to : 1. Provide wound treatment for R1's surgical site. 2. Develop skin care plan interventions for R1. 3. Ensure wound skin assessment and Braden scale assessment completed on weekly basis for R1. 4 Provide wound treatment as ordered by physician for R4. These failures resulted in R1 being admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for dehiscence of the wound to groin area and R4's wound dressing not being changed daily. The findings include: R1's admission record documented admission date on 8/20/24 with diagnoses not limited to Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Other obesity due to excess calories, Essential (primary) hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Angina pectoris, Other specified anemia, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, Peripheral vascular disease, Encounter for other specified surgical aftercare, Depression, Other abnormalities of gait and mobility, Other lack of coordination. R4's admission record documented admission date on 3/14/23 with diagnoses not limited to Central Cord syndrome at C5 level of cervical spina cord, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Retention Of Urine, Mild Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Pressure Ulcer Of Right Hip Stage 4, Pressure Ulcer Of Right Heel Stage 3, Pressure Ulcer Of Other Site Stage 4, Non-Pressure Chronic Ulcer Of Skin Of Other Sites With Unspecified Severity, Anemia Due To Enzyme Disorder, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Acquired Absence Of Left Leg Above Knee, Atherosclerosis Of Native Arteries Of Left Leg With Ulceration Of Other Part Of Foot, Non-pressure Chronic Ulcer Of Other Part Of Left Foot With Fat Layer Exposed. R1's progress notes dated 9/4/2024 documented in part: Resident went out on appointment with escort. Resident was being admitted for dehiscence of the wound to groin area. MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/27/24 showed R1's cognition was moderately impaired. She needed set up or clean up assistance with upper body dressing; Supervision or touching assistance with toileting and personal hygiene, shower / bathe self; Partial / moderate assistance with lower body dressing, chair / bed, and toilet transfer. MDS showed R1 had surgical wound. R1's wound / skin assessment dated [DATE] documented in part: Lt Inner Thigh measuring 4.5 x 1.5 x 0.1cm with light serosanguinous drainage. R1's admission History and Physical notes dated 8/21/24 documented in part: Patient underwent Left femoral above to the knee popliteal bypass with Graft. ENCOUNTER FOR OTHER SPECIFIED SURGICAL AFTERCARE - Monitor and change surgical site as per facility protocol. On 10/06/24 at 10:11am Interview with V3 (Wound care nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN) stated she started working in the facility in July 2024. She said resident's skin condition is checked upon admission and if there is skin alteration such as pressure, non-pressure or surgical wounds, assessment and documentation should be done weekly as it would give information about the wound that include drainage, measurement, treatment, and status of the wound. Any skin alteration, need to have a treatment in place. Treatment will make the wound healed and prevent infection. If there is no wound treatment, could lead to infection, necrosis, worsening of wound. Braden scale assessment is to identify if the resident is at risk for skin breakdown. It is done upon admission / readmission x 4 weeks then quarterly and significant change. Reviewed R1's electronic health record (EHR) with V3 and stated R1 was admitted with surgical site to her left inner thigh related to poor circulation. R1 had stent placement - Left femoral popliteal bypass. She said assessment was done on 8/21/24, showed surgical site on left inner thigh with sutures in place with moderate serosanguinous drainage. She said Treatment: Border gauze dry dressing every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and as needed. Upper part of the left groin area site was closed. She said surgical sutures are dissolvable. Stated standard of practice, treatment order should be in the POS (physician order sheet) and reflected in the TAR (treatment administration record), should be signed after each treatment. If not documented, treatment was not done or provided. R1 went out for a doctor's appointment and was directly admitted to the hospital. Diagnosis: Worsening / Dehisce of the wound on the left groin area. V3 said, she was not aware that wound on left groin area re opened. It was a closed wound that re open. Reviewed R1's POS and TAR with V3 and said did not see treatment order for left groin and left inner thigh surgical wound. Weekly skin wound assessment completed on 8/21/24. She said there should have another documentation on 8/28/24 but was not completed. On 9/4/24, R1 went to the hospital so weekly skin wound assessment was not completed. She said surgical wound should have a care plan that would include interventions to provide guidance for the staff on how to care for the resident. Reviewed R1's skin care plan with V3, no intervention found. Braden scale was completed upon admission on [DATE]. None for 8/27/24 and 9/3/24. At 12:19am Interview with V2 (DON) stated if resident has a surgical wound, assessment and documentation should be done weekly, it is a reference regarding the status of the wound. Care plan should include interventions and goals to help staff how to care for resident. There should be a treatment order for every wound and can be found in POS (Physician Order Sheet), TAR (Treatment Administration Record), or MAR (Medication Administration Record). After treatment was provided TAR should be signed or documented. Nursing standard practice, if it was not documented then it was not done. If treatment is not done or provided could possibly lead to wound deterioration / worsening / decline in the status / wound infection. She said on 9/4/24, R1 went out for doctor's appointment and was directly admitted to the hospital due to wound on groin area. She said there was an odor in the room. Not sure where the odor was coming from. Did not see R1's wound. She said the wound nurse saw R1 and odor was not from the wound. Stated R1 has a sister working as a CNA (V18) in the facility. On 10/7/24 at 9:07am Interview with V18 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated she has been working in the facility for over a year. She said R1 is her sister who had a surgery, stent was placed on her left leg. It was inserted to the groin down to the leg. R1 has 2 surgical sites, on left groin and left inner leg. She said R1's surgical wound was not properly taking care of. She escorted R1 on 9/4/24 for Doctor's appointment and she could smell the odor. She said the doctor checked the surgical sites on left groin area and it got infected. The doctor said that R1 needed to go back to the hospital to clean up the infection. She said from appointment, R1 was directly admitted to the hospital. She said R1 was placed in ICU (Intensive Care Unit), tracheostomy tube and G-tube were inserted. R1 is still admitted in the hospital. At 9:33am Interview with V17 (Nurse Practitioner / NP) stated he was not able to fully recall R1 and reviewed R1's EHR and stated patient underwent Left femoral above to the knee popliteal bypass with Graft. V17 stated he did not see the surgical sites. He assumes that there would be a surgical incision on left groin area where stent was inserted and should be monitored. Wound care should notify the wound specialist for any changes. Treatment care would depend on the assessment of would care. He said any surgical site, nursing should make sure that a daily skin check is done. He said surgical site is a vulnerable area - it would not expect any dehiscing process. Never seen dehisce surgical wound before from stent placement. V17 stated he does not know the events that happened why the surgical wound had dehisced. No wound assessment found for Left groin surgical incision in R1's EHR. No weekly skin assessment found on 8/28/24 and 9/4/24 for R1's left inner thigh surgical site. R1's POS, MAR and TAR for August and September 2024 reviewed, no treatment order for left inner thigh / left groin surgical site. R1's care plan dated 8/21/24 documented in part: The resident has potential / actual impairment to skin integrity. No interventions documented / found. R1's Braden assessment dated [DATE] and 9/4/24 with lock date on 9/8/24 and 9/9/24 respectively showed low risk for skin breakdown. No Braden assessment found on 8/27/24 and 9/3/24. On 10/6/24 at 11:54am R4 was observed lying in bed, alert, and oriented x 3, verbally responsive, no odor. Air mattress in placed. R4 stated his wound dressings should be changed daily, but they are not being done. He said wound treatment is done thoroughly every Wednesday when the wound doctor is here in the facility. R4's TAR: Right hip and buttock: Cleanse with Dakins then pack wound loosely with dakins wet to dry, cover with border gauze one time a day and as needed. Treatment was not signed as provided on 8/16/24, 9/24/24 and 9/25/24. MDS dated [DATE] showed R4 was cognitively Intact. Dependent with ADLs. MDS showed 2 Stage IV pressure ulcers, 2 venous and arterial ulcers present. R4 Care plan Update Review on 9/11/24 showed: Treatment to wounds as directed. Facility's surgical wound care policy dated 4/2023 documented in part: To establish clear guidelines for the care, management, and monitoring of surgical wounds to minimize the risk of infection, promote optimal healing and ensure patient safety. All surgical wounds must be assessed and documented upon admission, after surgery and during each dressing change. Comprehensive wound documentation must be completed after each assessment and dressing change. In patients with co-morbidities such as diabetes, obesity or immune-compromised states, more frequent wound assessment and specialized care may be required. R4's TAR: Right hip and buttock: Cleanse with Dakins then pack wound loosely with dakins wet to dry, cover with border gauze one time a day and as needed. Treatment was not signed as provided on 8/16/24, 9/24/24 and 9/25/24. MDS dated [DATE] showed R4 was cognitively Intact. Dependent with ADLs. MDS showed 2 Stage IV pressure ulcers, 2 venous and arterial ulcers present. R4 Care plan Update Review on 9/11/24 showed: Treatment to wounds as directed. Facility's surgical wound care policy dated 4/2023 documented in part: To establish clear guidelines for the care, management, and monitoring of surgical wounds to minimize the risk of infection, promote optimal healing and ensure patient safety. All surgical wounds must be assessed and documented upon admission, after surgery and during each dressing change. Comprehensive wound documentation must be completed after each assessment and dressing change. In patients with co-morbidities such as diabetes, obesity or immune-compromised states, more frequent wound assessment and specialized care may be required. Facility wound treatment procedure (undated) documented in part: Apply treatment as ordered. Document. Facility's skin inspection and reporting policy dated September 2024 documented in part: All changes in resident's skin must be documented in the EHR (electronic health record) care will be updated.
Mar 2024 21 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order prior to administering a urine drug screen and have a nurse conduct the screening for one (R74) out of a total...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order prior to administering a urine drug screen and have a nurse conduct the screening for one (R74) out of a total sample of 23 residents reviewed for residents' rights. Findings include: On 3/19/2024 at 12:12 PM, R74 stated facility asked R74 to do a urine drug test. R74 stated two staff members that were not nurses administered it. On 3/20/2024 at 10:31 AM, V8 (Infection Control Nurse) stated if a resident appears to be under the influence of illicit drugs, the nurse needs to inform the doctor and get an order for a drug screen whether it is by urine or blood. V8 stated only the nurse can administer the urine drug test, not social service. The nurse will hand the urine cup to the resident and watch the resident. The nurse will then notate the results in a progress note in the electronic medical record. On 3/20/2024 at 11:19 AM, V5 (Social Worker) stated V7 (Social Service Director) assisted with R74's recent urine drug test that occurred one to two weeks ago. V5 did not know if there was a doctor's order for the urine drug test. V5 stated R74 verbally agreed to the urine drug test. V5 and V7 were in the room with R74. V7 handed the urine cup to R74 and V5 stood to the side of the bathroom. V5 stated the nurse was not in the room. During a follow-up interview with R74 on 3/20/2024 at 11:36 AM, R74 stated V5 and V7 were in the room with R74. V7 stood near the cabinet across from the bathroom. R74 stated the bathroom door was open and each time R74 tried to pee in the cup. V7 looked and peaked at R74. R74 stated no nurse was in the room. R74 stated during recent care plan meeting, facility informed R74 that only a nurse should be doing the urine drug screen. On 3/20/2024 at 3:05 PM, V7 stated facility conducted a urine drug test on R74 because the nurse found a bag with white powdery substance in R74's room the previous night. V7 stated they did not get a doctor's order for the urine drug test. V7 stated V5 and [V7] conducted the test and no nurse was in the room. V7 stated giving R74's urine drug test results to the nurse to read and chart it. R74's progress note dated 3/05/2024 5:25 PM documents in part that the facility found a rolled-up dollar bill and white powdery substance with a green bag beside it in R74's room. No progress note from 3/05/2024 to 3/19/2024 that documents that a physician or nurse practitioner ordered a urine drug screen for R74. No documentation found that facility administered a urine drug screen to R74 following the 3/05/2024 incident. Reviewed R74's physician order sheets for active, discontinued, and completed orders. No order for a urine drug screen following the 3/05/2024 incident found. Facility's Suspicion of Illegal Drug and Alcohol Use policy, created 11/18/2019, documents in part: Physician will be informed of the assessment and orders will be obtained, as indicated. If orders are given for urine test to be administered, nursing will complete this task.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0557 (Tag F0557)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and review of record the facility failed to follow policy on maintaining privacy and dignity o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and review of record the facility failed to follow policy on maintaining privacy and dignity of a resident for 1 out of 2 residents (R267) for a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: R267 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE] medical diagnosis includes urinary tract infection. On 03/19/2024 at 12:59 PM, from the hallway, R267 was seen without clothes on through an open door. V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was informed about R267 situation, people passing in the hallway can see R267 without clothes. V14 said he always takes off his clothes. V14 did not address the issue and went inside the elevator. At 01:09 PM, V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was informed. V13 stated R267 is confused and takes off his clothes or gown every time staff put clothes on R267. V13 stated R267 should not be exposed to people in the hallway. V13 then went to R267's room, and covered the resident, closed privacy curtain and closed the door. On 03/20/2024 at 02:46 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated R267 should have clothing on, staff needs to provide communication, there is a curtain in place for privacy. R267 frequently needs direction and assessment if due to his behavior. It is inappropriate when people see R267 without clothes on. Resident Privacy and Dignity policy not dated, reads: The purpose is to ensure all residents are provided with dignity and privacy. To provide all resident with a home like environment promotes dignity and respect to the residents of the facility. Privacy will be maintained for all resident's receiving ADLs (Activity of Daily Living) such as bathing, dressing and peri-care with the resident room closed and curtain drawn.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance in relocating one [R34] resident to another faci...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance in relocating one [R34] resident to another facility out of 23 residents in the sample Findings include: On 3/19/24 at 9:39 AM, V18 [R34's Family Member] stated, I have asked the facility social worker upon R34's admission to please help me transfer (R34) to a south side suburban facility. I live out south and wanted (R34) close to me so I can visit with him frequently. The current facility is so far away, and it is hard for me to travel almost two hours to and two hours back home with traffic for a visit. The social worker has not assisted me with transferring (R34) closer to the south side of Chicago. (R34) would like to live closer to me as well. It is (R34's) right to transfer to another facility, they are holding him there. On 3/19/24 at 11:44 AM, V7 [Social Service Director] stated, [V5 Social Worker] oversees R34's floor. Social service notes showed V5 reached out to one nursing center, but V5 did not complete a follow up with the facility or family in January. There was no further follow up or assistance provided to R34 or V18 [R34's Family Member]. V5 was to continue to follow up with V18 and other facilities to assist R34 transfer closer to V18. On 3/20/24 at 1:48 PM V5 [Social Worker] stated, I am R34's social worker. I sent R34's information packet to one facility and did not hear anything from that facility. I did not follow up with the facility, R34, or V18. I should have called V18 to asked if there was any more facilities to send R34's information. To be honest, I forgot to follow up with V18. On 3/21/24 at 2:24PM, V1 [Administrator] stated, All residents have the right to move, discharge, or transfer to another facility as they please. This facility social service department will provide assistance in their discharge or transfer to ensure the transition is safe for the resident. The social worker should follow up with the resident, family members and alternative facility within three days. R34's progress notes document in part: 1/19/2024 17:12 Social Service Note Note Text: Referral package has been sent over to a long term care facility located in [NAME] Park writer will continue to follow up. Policy documents in part: Resident Rights [No date] -No resident shall be deprived of any rights, benefits, or privileges guaranteed by law. No resident forfeit any of the following rights: -The resident has the right to request to relocate
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from phy...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical and/or mental abuse by resident (R47) against another resident (R64); failed to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment per abuse policy after physical abuse was determined. These failures affected 2 out of 23 residents (R64 and R47) right to be from abuse or the threat of abuse. Findings include: R64 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnosis of adjustment disorder with anxiety and acquired absence of left leg below knee. R64 cognition is intact most recent brief interview for mental status (BIMS) dated 01/05/2024 scored 15. Per R64's care plan he has impaired mobility and requires the use of prosthesis due to left extremity below the knee amputation. R47 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder. R47 cognition is intact most recent brief interview for mental status (BIMS) dated 1/19/2024 scored 15. On 03/19/2024 at 10:19 AM R64 approached V2 (Assistant Administrator) near reception area and told V2 that another resident that hit him on the back is on the same floor with R64, and that R64 spoke with Social Worker about the problem but was not addressed. On 03/19/2024 at 10:30 AM, R64 was alert and verbally able to express his thoughts. R64 stated R47, a resident who hit him on the back, kicked his wheelchair, was violent and physically aggressive and was sent to the hospital for psychological evaluation was transferred on the same floor yesterday Monday (03/18/2024) evening. R64 stated he is afraid of R47 and told V6 (Social Worker Assistant) last night Monday (03/18/2024) that he feels unsafe with R47 back on the same floor with him. R64 said, She (V6) don't listen to me! We (R64 and R47) still walk in the same elevator, and we are around each other. That is why I want to get out of here. I want to leave this facility, but they are holding me up. No, I don't feel safe with R47 around! I don't want to be around R47. Look at me, I use wheelchair to move around, and R47 can walk. He may come to my room without me knowing it. V27 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated R47 had been confrontational and physically aggressive with other residents in the past. V27 was not able to give any specific details when asked. On 03/19/2024 at 12:41 PM, R47 stated he was moved around multiple rooms on different floors because of conflict with other residents. R47 said he remembers the incident with R64. R47 said, I was agitated that day. I told him (R64) not to do any movement which he (R64) did not follow. So, I got more agitated. I told him shut up, shut the fXXX up [NAME]! I went so close to R64 I may have made contact. R47 stated he was moved from another floor because his roommate R58 did not want him in the same room. Facility's reportable documents incident of 8/21/23 as R47 as the perpetrator and R64 as the victim. Per report R47 made physical contact with R64 hitting him (R64). R47 got upset because he took something to another resident (R90). When it was returned to R90, R47 got upset and attempted to run up to the R90. R47 was escorted out in the process then R47 reach over the staff and hit R64 because R64 made a comment. R64 stated, I knew he was going to do that. R64 stated he was speaking with R90 when R47 came over by them and slammed a chair on the floor and broke the legs of the chair. R47 hit R64 on the back and kicked his wheelchair as they were removing R47 from the dining room. Conclusion of report document based on known facts this incident did occur. On 03/20/2024 at 09:20 AM, V6 (Social Worker Assistant) stated she was notified by nursing that R47 will be moving to the same floor with R64. On Monday evening R64 informed V6 and said, you cannot put R47 up here due to altercation in the past. V6 stated R47 was transferred because R47 was placed in a different hall from R64. V6 stated the reason why R47 transferred to the same floor with R64 was that R47's roommate was complaining R47 cannot keep his side clean and being messy. V6 said, I do not think R47 is a threat to R64 because incident with R47 was a long time ago. I was not here when it happened but I understand given their history of R47 hitting R64, R64 can be traumatized. V6 stated he informed V7 (Social Service Director) but not V1 (Administrator) or V2 (Assistant Administrator) about R64's concern with R47. V6 was informed R64 fears R47 because he cannot ambulate and uses wheelchair for locomotion. Unlike R47 who is ambulatory, R47 can approach R64 anytime he wants. V6 stated, I did not think about R47 being ambulatory and R64 uses wheelchair. V6 stated R47 is currently on the same floor with R64 but is scheduled to be moved to a different floor sometime today. On 03/20/2024 at 09:43 AM, V2 (Assistant Administrator) stated she was approached by R64 yesterday morning (Tuesday 03/19/2024) and asked if R47 can be moved to a different floor because in the past there was an incident R47 hitting him (R64) on his back. V2 stated she spoke with Social Service, and they told her although on the same floor, R47 is on different area with R64. V2 was asked if she was informed by any staff regarding the transfer of R47 to the same floor with R64. V2 replied, We normally discuss room changes and things like in morning meeting. Social Service needs to inform me but did not. I was not aware the transfer was done. was not discuss as a team. All transfer should be discussed by interdisciplinary team. V2 was asked after being informed by R64 about his concern related to the transfer of R47 on the same floor and given their past incident they are still currently on the same floor? V2 said, I did not know R47 was not yet transferred. I will check on this right away. R47's progress notes documents R47 was transferred to a different floor on 03/20/2024 at 4:15 PM. V2 said, R64 has all the right to feel uncomfortable because of what happened in the past. I understand there is an effect he fears R47. He (R64) expressed he (R47) hit his back. Facility's Abuse Prevention Program documents in part: The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to refer R74 to the state-designated authority for Level II PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to refer R74 to the state-designated authority for Level II PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination after new onset of possible serious mental disorder for one out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: R74's face sheet documents in part initial admission date of 7/21/2021. Medical diagnoses include but are not limited to schizoaffective disorder, depressive type (onset date 8/17/2023), major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate (onset date 8/17/2023), anxiety disorder (onset date 8/17/2023), and auditory hallucinations (onset date 8/17/2023). Requested R74's Level II PASRR screening multiple times from V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Assistant Administrator) on 3/20/2024 at 12:20 PM and 4:33 PM and again on 3/21/2024 at 9:38 AM. On 3/21/2024 at 10:38 AM, V33 (Admissions) stated no Level II PASRR evaluation for R74. Facility's undated Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) policy documents in part: It is the policy of this facility to comply with Illinois and the appointed screening agency, [state-designated authority], in standard addressing the PAS (Pre-admission Screening)/ screening process.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide proper positioning for a dependent resident during mealtime. This deficient practice was observed f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide proper positioning for a dependent resident during mealtime. This deficient practice was observed for 1 (R17) resident reviewed for positioning in a sample of 23. Findings include: R17 has diagnosis not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side, Anemia, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, Dementia in other Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Unspecified Severity, with other Behavioral Disturbance, Abnormal Posture, Contracture, Right Hand, and Lack of Coordination. Care Plan document in part: Focus: R17 has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit. Interventions: Eating: The resident is able to feed self with set up assist. Bed Mobility: The resident requires Extensive assistance by one staff to turn and reposition in bed every shift and as necessary. Focus: R17 is at risk for discomfort, complications related to diagnosis of Right Hemiparesis following a Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA/Stroke) for possible complications. Interventions: Turn and reposition q (every) 2 hours and PRN (as needed). Keep body in good alignment. On 03/19/24 at 01:05 PM R17 was observed trying to eat lunch from an overbed table while lying in bed in a low fowlers position leaning to the right side. On 03/19/24 at 01:10 PM surveyor entered R17's room with V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) and asked the position R17 should be in while eating in bed. V8 responded, At 90 degrees. I will sit R17 up. R17 often sits himself back due to his height. There is a potential for aspiration pneumonia and choking. V8 proceeded to reposition R17 in bed. On 03/21/24 at 11:08 AM V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated, When a resident is in bed eating the position of the bed has to be elevated at least 90 degrees to prevent aspiration. Policy: Titled Personal Care Services Policy revised 01/23 document in part: Policy: Each resident shall receive nursing care and supervision based on individual needs. Each resident shall show evidence of good personal hygiene. A patient care plan for each resident is developed based on the nature of the illness, treatment prescribed, and short-term goals, and other pertinent information. The nursing care plan is a personalized plan of care for individual residents. Care Plan indicates what nursing care is needed, how it can be accomplished for each resident, how the resident likes things done, what methods and approaches are most Successful: and what modifications are necessary to insure best results. Titled Aspirations/Swallowing Precautions undated document in part: Purpose: To ensure residents who are at risk for aspiration during meals, care is coordinated between Nursing, Speech, Dietary, and the MD (Medical Doctor).
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure low air loss mattress devices were on the c...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure low air loss mattress devices were on the correct settings for 1 dependent resident (R30) who is high risk in developing pressure ulcer and for 1 (R70) out of 2 dependent residents with current pressure ulcers in a final sample of 23 residents. Findings Include: On 3/19/24 at 10:40 AM R30's lying in bed alert and awake but confused. R30's low air loss mattress weight control knob was set between 350 pounds. At 10:45 AM, R70's lying in bed alert and able to verbalize needs. R70'a low air loss mattress weight control knob was set to 350 pounds. R70 stated R70 has wounds on R70's back and the staff do not reposition R70. R70's legs and hands were noted contracted. At 3/20/24 at 11:35 AM, V9 (Wound Care Nurse) stated if a resident stays primarily in bed and has impaired bed mobility, they are considered high risk for developing pressure ulcer. V9 stated the facility uses the BRADEN score (assessment tool) to assess the resident's score if they are high risk for developing pressure ulcer. V9 stated a score of 6-10 is considered high risk. V9 stated for residents who are at risk and high risk in developing pressure ulcers, the preventative measure the facility uses is the low air loss mattress. V9 stated the purpose of the low air loss mattress is to relieve the pressure on the area and promote wound healing. V9 stated the nurse, and the Certified Nursing Assistants monitor if the low air loss mattress is on the correct setting. V9 stated the correct setting is based on the resident's current weight. V9 stated if the low air loss mattress is not in the right setting, the resident could be at risk for skin injury and pressure ulcers. R30's clinical records show R30 has diagnoses not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Alzheimer's Disease, and Adult Failure to Thrive. R30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) stated 2/2/24 shows R30 is cognitively impaired and requires assistance with bed mobility. R30's Braden Scale dated 12/7/23 shows R30 is at moderate risk in developing pressure ulcer. R30's current weight shows a weight of 153.5 pounds dated 3/11/24. R70's clinical records show R70 has diagnoses note limited to Essential Hypertension, and Protein Calorie Malnutrition. R70's MDS dated [DATE] shows R70 is cognitively intact and requires assistance with bed mobility. R70 Braden Scale dated 12/7/23 shows R70 is high risk in developing pressure ulcer. R70's current weight shows a weight of 147.9 pounds dated 3/14/24. R70's Wound/Skin assessment dated [DATE] shows R70 has stage 4 right hip pressure wound, stage 4 left medial foot pressure wound, stage 4 right buttock pressure wound, and stage 3 right heel pressure wound. The facility's policy titled; Wounds Assessment dated 11/18 reads in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to do a systemic ongoing wound assessment on all wounds in order to determine the response to nursing care and treatment modalities. Procedure: 5. Residents needing a low air loss mattress based on assessment: a. The air loss mattress will be ordered.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed (a) to follow physician's order and ensure left hand ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed (a) to follow physician's order and ensure left hand splint was applied and in place and (b) failed to implement an individualized plan of care addressing the use of left hand split for 1 (R75) out of 3 residents reviewed for limited range of motion in a final sample of 23. Findings Include: R75's clinical records show an initial admission date of 8/7/23 with diagnoses not limited to paraplegia and muscle spasm. R75's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R75 is cognitively intact and has impairment on one side of R75's upper extremity. R75's physician orders with active orders as of 3/19/24 shows an order that reads in part: Left Functional Splint. Apply after AM care for 6 hours as tolerated daily ordered on 1/30/24. R75's THERAPY TO NURSING RECOMMENDATIONS dated 12/20/23 shows a recommendation for a left resting hand splint. R75's comprehensive care plan does not address the use of left hand splint. On 3/19/24 at 11:08 AM, R75 was lying in bed alert and able to verbalize needs. R75 was noted with left hand limitations with range of motion (ROM). R75 had no splint on R75's left hand. R75 stated that R75 does not get restorative exercises. At 12:42 PM, R75 was in bed just finished eating lunch. R75's left hand splint was not applied. R75's left hand splint was on top of R75's wheelchair. On 3/20/24 at 09:10 AM, R75 lying in bed and noted left hand splint was not applied. At 9:11 AM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated V14 is in-charge of R75 and usually finishes the residents' morning care no later than 11:00 AM. At 11:25 AM and 2:15 PM, R75 was observed lying bed with no left hand splint on. On 3/20/24 at 9:17 AM, V16 (Restorative Director) stated that the residents' splints are applied after morning care by restorative department no later than 10:00 AM. V16 stated the purpose of the splints for the residents who have contractures is to stop the progression of the contracture. V16 stated if the splint is not applied, it may result in further contracture, or the contracture get worsens. V16 stated the splint should be care planned and ordered by the physician. V16 stated applying the resident's splint is part of restorative program. At 2:08 PM, V24 (Rehab Director) stated R75 completed skilled therapy and the recommendations was for R75 to receive restorative programs and wear a left hand splint for R75's contracture. The facility's policy titled; Contracture Prevention Policy dated 2008 reads in part: Contracture Prevention: 1. The resident will be assessed for Contracture Prevention Appliances by a skilled therapist. 2. The assigned CNA will apply and remove all contracture prevention appliances such as splints, hand rolls, valgus pads, and ankle foot orthosis per physician's orders, and licensed nurse will monitor to ensure physician's orders are followed.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate assistive device was provided ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate assistive device was provided for 1 (R34) out of 1 resident with history of multiple falls in a final sample of 23 reviewed for accidents and hazards. Findings Include: On 3/20/24 at 11:22 PM, R34 was observed sleeping in a geriatric chair in the 4th floor dining room. V20 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated V20 is the nurse in charge for R34. V20 stated R34 was placed on the geriatric (Geri) chair because R34 is high risk for fall and tries to get up on his own. At 2:03 PM, V16 (Restorative Director) stated a Geri chair assessment needs to be completed before using for the resident. V16 stated Geri chair assessment is done if therapy determines the resident has poor trunk control. V16 stated R34 is high risk for falls. V16 stated R34 should not be in a geriatric (Geri) chair because R34 was not assessed to safely use the geriatric chair. V16 stated R34 can still walk with assistance. V16 stated, They probably put [R34] in Geri chair because [R34] kept falling. The therapy has not determined [R34] has poor trunk control. [R34] is still in therapy. At 2:08 PM, V24 (Rehab Director) stated R34 is on skilled therapy and still able to walk with assistance. V24 stated the best form of mobility for R34 is a regular wheelchair. V24 stated R34 should not be on a geriatric chair. R34's electronic health record (EHR) shows an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with listed diagnoses not limited to dementia with other behavioral disturbance, bipolar disorder, essential hypertension, and history of falling. R34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R10 has moderately impaired cognition and able to walk 150 feet with supervision. R34's progress notes show R34 had fall incidents on 1/11/24, 1/13/24, 1/23/24, 2/12/24, 2/25/24, and 2/29/24. R34's comprehensive care plan does not address the use of the Geri chair. R34's fall care plan has one intervention that reads: PT [Physical Therapy] screening for Wheelchair safety and use date Initiated on 01/23/2024. R34's physician order sheet does not show an order for a geriatric chair. The facility's policy titled; GERICHAIR POLICY with no date reads in part: Policy A Geri Chair provides support and comfort in a recliner. These chairs are designed to meet the needs of patients requiring optimal positioning, providing the comfort and support needed for prolonged sitting. Procedures: Any Resident requiring a Geri chair will be assessed prior to application/use to determine the most effective appliance to be used. Physical therapy will be responsible to ensure the appropriate fit and additional appliance application to the Geri chair (if needed). Geri chair assessment as well as MDS orders for Geri chair use will be documented in PCC by the Restorative Nurse. Geri chair assessment is completed to justify the purpose of Geri chair use, and not as restraints. Care plan will be complete for Geri chair use.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to disconnect and flush the gastric tube per physician order for a resident receiving enteral feedings. This failure has the poten...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to disconnect and flush the gastric tube per physician order for a resident receiving enteral feedings. This failure has the potential for the gastric tubing to become clogged and malfunction for 1 (R50) resident reviewed for enteral feedings in a sample of 23. Findings Include: R50 has diagnosis not limited to Dysphagia, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Aphasia, Vitamin D Deficiency, Disorders of Plasma-Protein Metabolism, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Gastrostomy. R50's Physician order document in part: in the afternoon related to Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition Jevity 1.5 @55ml (milliliter)/hr. (hour) continuous 18hrs: Up at 3PM and down at 9AM Total Volume 990ML. Enteral Feed Order one time a day related to Unspecified Protein Calorie Malnutrition Take down feeding. Scheduled on R50 MAR (Medication Administration Record) at 09:00 AM. Care plan document in part: Focus: R50 currently requires tube feeding to meet nutrition/hydration needs related to diagnosis of Dysphagia, Protein/Calorie Malnutrition with possible serious complication. R50 is dependent on tube feeding/inadequate food and beverage intake with possible complications. Interventions: Water flushes as ordered. Focus: R50 requires tube feeding (Jevity as directed) r/t (related/to) Dysphagia, malnutrition for possible complication. Interventions: Flush G tube w/150ml every four hours. Date Initiated: 05/10/23. The resident is dependent with tube feeding and water flushes. On 03/19/23 at 11:04 AM R50 gastric tube feeding tubing was observed connected to R50 and not infusing with the feeding pump turned off. On 03/19/23 at 11:52 AM R50 gastric tube feeding tubing was observed connected to R50 and not infusing with the feeding pump turned off. On 03/19/24 at 01:07 PM surveyor entered R50's room with V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) and asked about the gastric tube feeding that was observed connected to R50 and not infusing with the feeding pump turned off. V8 stated, The feeding was supposed to have been taken down. R50 is also a dual feeder. On 03/21/24 at 11:08 AM V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated, If a G-(gastric) tube feeding runs from 3pm - 8 am the nurse should turn off the feeding pump, disconnect the tubing from the resident and then flush the g-tube so that it won't clog. Policy: Titled Enteral Tube Medication Administration Procedure and Maintenance Protocol dated 01/15/15 document in part: Purpose: To safely and accurately administer oral medication through an enteral tube and to maintain in functioning of G (gastric)-tube site. Titled Physician Order Policy revised 01/18 document in part: Proper channels of communication are used to ensure accurate delivery of medications and treatments to all residents. Titled Care of Gastrostomy Tube revised 04/18 document in part: Purpose: To ensure proper care of gastrostomy. 4. Clean tubing with an alcohol pad before connecting tubing or syringe to the gastrostomy tube and after you remove it.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to a.) ensure pain medications were ordered in a timely ma...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to a.) ensure pain medications were ordered in a timely manner, b.) failed to maintain a sufficient supply and administer pain medication as ordered by the physician and c.) failed to document a prn (as needed) pain medication administration on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) for 1 (R10) resident reviewed for pain management. This failure resulted in R10 going multiple days without pain medications. Findings Include: R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis not limited to Paraplegia, Injury at Unspecified Level of Cervical Spinal Cord, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Pulmonary Embolism, Neuralgia and Neuritis, Lumbago with Sciatica, Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Pneumonia, Myalgia, Acute Respiratory Failure, Depression, Cough, Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation. R10's MDS (Minimum Data Set) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Care Plan document in part: Focus: R10 has (chronic) pain r/t (related to) dx: (diagnosis) paraplegia is prescribed phenazopyridine, T3, lidocaine patch as directed for possible complications. Update/Review: Acetaminophen-Codeine as orders for increased pain for possible complications. Date Initiated: 10/17/23 Revision on: 02/09/24. Interventions: Administer my pain medication per orders and notify MD (Medical Doctor) if goal is not met with regime. Complete pain assessment on admission and per facility policy to determine the nature of the discomfort, my desired response and any previously successful strategies used. Update MD/NP (Nurse Practitioner) for any new or unrelieved pain. R10 Order Summary Report dated 03/19/24 document in part: Norco Oral Tablet 5-325 MG (milligram) (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Monitor for pain every shift and prn as needed. Controlled substance schedule III-V orders are for 30-day supply with 5 refills for 6 months. R10's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form dated 02/16/24 document in apart: Hydrocodone (Hydrocodone/APAP (Acetaminophen) Tab 5-325 MG, take 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Quantity Dispensed 30. Last dose administered on 02/27/24 at 0600. R10's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form dated 03/08/24 document in apart: Hydrocodone (Hydrocodone/APAP (Acetaminophen) Tab 5-325 MG, take 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Quantity Dispensed 30. First dose administered on 03/08/24 at 11:45 PM and last dose administered on 03/17/24 at 10:00 PM. On 03/19/24 at 09:59 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, R10 doesn't have pain medication because it ran out again. On 03/19/24 at 12:35 PM when the surveyor and V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) were standing near R10's door, R10 said, I have missed my pain medications for 5-6 days. I am tired of being abused and I did not come here to die. I have been here for almost 5 months with them having trouble getting my pain medications. I just lay up here and suffer. On 03/19/24 at 12:40 PM R10 said, This is the second day without pain medication. They said the paper was sent. I go through this every month. On 03/19/24 at 12:40 PM surveyor asked V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) what pain medication was R10 referring to. V8 responded, R10 is talking about Norco. From the last time that I remember pharmacy said the Norco was on back order. The doctor was not getting the order to the pharmacy on time. Surveyor asked V8 what is done when the Norco is not available. V8 responded, The doctor will give a new order for another medication instead. On 03/19/24 at 12:49 PM surveyor entered R10's room. R10 stated, I stay in pain at a pain level 10 because I have Fibromyalgia and had back surgery. On 03/19/24 at 01:07 PM surveyor entered R10's room with V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) and V8 stated, I notified the doctor about R10's pain medication. On 03/19/24 at 03:02 PM V45 (R10 Insurance Representative) stated R10 called and complained of the facility being out of pain medication today. V45 stated, This has been an ongoing problem. They need preauthorization for the pain medication, and they are not ordering the medication in a timely manner. Originally R10 complained of the facility not having her pain medications for 4 days and R10 refuses the alternative medications because she has fibromyalgia. On 03/20/24 at 01:23 PM R10 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in the facilities lobby awaiting pickup for a pass. R10 stated, I asked for the pain medication today and I did not get any pain medication today. This is the third day that the pain medication did not come. On 03/20/24 at 01:32 PM V20 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, Last Saturday R10 had six Norco pain pills remaining and that script should have been sent in on Friday. R10 does not have any Norco pain pills today. This has been an ongoing problem. When the script is sent in the pharmacy it's rejected because they have to send a preauthorization. Something has been going on with R10's Norco pain medication since R10 has been here. I called the pharmacy today, sent in a script and the pharmacy rejected it. I gave the Director of Nursing the pharmacy phone number. We have to make the doctor aware that R10 is out of the pain medication. R10 ask for the pain medication often. I told R10 that the Norco is a PRN (as needed) medication, and she (R10) has to tell us when she is in pain. Once the narcotics are signed out on the Controlled Drug Receipt it should also be documented on the MAR (Medication Administration Record). I document in the progress notes once I give the pain medication. There have not been any discrepancies with the narcotic count. On 03/20/24 at 02:32 PM R87 stated, Sometimes my pain medication (Tramadol) runs out and I will have to wait a few days for the prescription to be filled. This happened last month in February because they waited too late to reorder the Tramadol. They will offer Tylenol, but the Tramadol works much better. I have severe back pain, stenosis bulging disk, and bone spurs. I rate my pain at an eight or nine out of ten. On 03/20/24 at 02:42 PM R59 was observed in the hallway in a wheelchair. R59 stated, My pain pills have been late before. The nurse had to call the pharmacy to see what was going on. When I am in pain, I receive Tylenol #3. When they ran out of my pain medication, I was in pain for 4-5 days. On 03/21/24 at 11:08 AM V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated, When a narcotic is given, it should be documented in the MAR (Medication Administration Record) and if it is a prn (as needed) we have to document why we gave the medication and sign the narcotic book. The narcotic should be signed out on the MAR and narcotic book. Medications should be reordered when there is a 3-day supply on hand. If there is a problem with billing, we still have time to work on it so that the resident will not go without their medication. I did not find out until yesterday that R10 does not have any pain meds. My expectation for pain management is that we address pain immediately when the resident say that they are in pain. If the resident run out of medication the doctor has to be notified right away. I called the pharmacy to follow up on R10 pain medication, they sent me to the billing department and billing said they already responded, and the pain was not covered. I told the pharmacy to send me the form so that the medication can be ordered. I had to authorize that the facility would cover the cost. If there is a problem that the medication cannot be refilled, I will reach the doctor to see if there is any other medication that can be given, if not the facility will have to pay for the medication. I am going to make sure I take care of this. The pharmacy may need more documentation why R10 need this medication. Policy: Titled Pain Assessment Management revised 01/02/14 document in part: Purpose: 1. To ensure that resident with complaints of pain are properly identified and assessed. 2. To ensure that appropriate pain management is provided. Procedure: 2. Assessment for pain will be done initially upon admission and quarterly, or whenever pain is identified. 4. Residents identified to need pain management will be referred to MD (Medical Doctor) and corresponding care plan and will be followed. Titled Ordering/reordering Medications undated document in part: Medications and related products are ordered from the pharmacy on a timely basis. Procedure: 2. Refill orders are placed through Point Click Care: Reorder medication three days in advance of need to assure and adequate supply is on hand. Medications not readily available in the CAPSA (Emergency Medication Cart), there should be at least 2-day supply of the medication in house, if there is not the nurse must contact pharmacy to assure that it has been reordered and to confirm the delivery time. If medication need administrative approval the nurse should contact DON (Director of Nursing), Administrator, or nursing supervisor immediately. 4. Medications that are temporarily unavailable from the pharmacy: If a particular medication is not available from the pharmacy, the RN (Registered Nurse) should call the patient's physician to let him/her know that the ordered medication is not available. Titled Physician Order Policy revised 01/18 document in part: Proper channels of communication are used to ensure accurate delivery of medications and treatments to all residents. Procedure: e. When new orders are received the nurse will obtain medications from the pharmacy.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain an error rate of less than 5%. There were five medication errors out of 31 opportunities which resulted in a 16.13% m...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain an error rate of less than 5%. There were five medication errors out of 31 opportunities which resulted in a 16.13% medication error rate. Findings Include: On 03/19/24 at 10:00 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) retrieved the green tray containing the blood glucose supplies from the top of the medication cart then entered R76 room. V8 placed the green tray on R76 overbed table, retrieved the glucometer, glucose strip and alcohol wipe from the green tray, checked R76 blood glucose with a reading of 196. V8 placed the glucometer back in the green tray then exited R76 room. On 03/19/24 at 10:04 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) placed the green tray containing the glucometer on top of the medication cart then began preparing R76 medications. Surveyor asked V8 the number of pills in R76 medication cup. V8 responded, eight. On 03/19/24 at 10:16 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) entered R76 room then told R76 I forgot your pain medication. V8 returned to the medication cart and retrieved two pain pills then administered R76 medications. 1. Aspirin Tablet 81 mg (milligram) Daily 2. Clopidogrel Bisulfate Tablet 75 MG Daily 3. Ferrosol Tablet (Ferrous Sulfate) 1 tablet Daily 4. Finasteride Oral Tablet 5 MG Daily 5. Vitamin D Tablet 25 MCG (microgram) (1000 UT (unit)) Daily 6. Carvedilol Tablet 6.25 MG Twice a day 7. Amoxicillin Oral Capsule 500 MG Three times a day 8. Acetaminophen Tablet 500 MG 2 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed. 9. Metformin HCl Oral Tablet 500 MG 2 tablet Twice a day (only one tablet was given) 10. Furosemide Tablet 20 MG Daily (was not given) 11. Enalapril Maleate Tablet 10 MG 2 tablet Daily (was not given) 12. Humalog Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 150 = 0; 151 - 200 = 2; 201 - 250 = 4; 251 - 300 = 6; 301 - 350 = 8; 351 - 400 = 10, subcutaneously with meals (blood glucose reading of 196 required 2 units of insulin that was not given) 13. Humalog Solution 100 UNIT/ML Inject 8 unit subcutaneously before meals Hold if Accuchecks is below 150 or not eating. (Blood glucose reading was 153 requiring 8 units of insulin to be given) On 03/19/24 at 12:19 PM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) retrieved the green blood glucose supplies tray from the top of the medication cart and entered R63 room to obtain R63 blood glucose with the result of 153, then exited R63 room placing the green glucose supplies tray on top of the medication cart then prepared R63's medications. On 03/19/24 at 12:25 PM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R63 blood sugar indicates no insulin is needed. Policy: Titled Physician Order Policy revised 01/18 document in part: Proper channels of communication are used to ensure accurate delivery of medications and treatments to all residents. Titled Medication Administration and Storage Policy revised 07/02/18 document in part: To ensure medications are administered and stored in accordance with Standard of Practice. 2. Medications shall be given within one (1) hour of the specified time, by the same nurse that prepared the dose. Preparation of the medications is allowed one (1) hour prior to the time allowed for med pass. 5. Medication Error Report must be completed when B) Medication given at the wrong time, F) Medication omitted in error. 6. An incident report must be filled out for; B) Medication given at the wrong time, F) Medication omitted in error. 19. Narcotics must be signed out in the EHR (Electronic Health Record) and the narcotic sheet. 20. Physician must be notified when medications are not administered as per physician orders. 21. Physician orders must be obtained for medications that are held. 22. Medication that are not administered as per physician orders must be documented in the drop-down box and/or progress notes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for 2 (R63, R76) residents reviewed for significant medication errors durin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for 2 (R63, R76) residents reviewed for significant medication errors during the medication administration observation. This failure has the potential to affect R63 blood glucose level and R76 blood glucose level and blood pressure. Finding Include: During medication administration V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) failed to administer R63 scheduled Humalog Insulin, and R76 scheduled Humalog insulin, Metformin 2 tablets, Furosemide and Enalapril. On 03/19/24 at 10:00 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) retrieved the green tray containing the blood glucose supplies then entered R76 room. V8 placed the green tray on R76 overbed table, retrieved the glucometer, glucose strip and alcohol wipe, checked R76 blood glucose with a reading of 196. On 03/19/24 at 10:04 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) began preparing R76 medications. Surveyor asked V8 the number of pills in R76 medication cup. V8 responded, eight. On 03/19/24 at 10:16 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) entered R76 room then told R76 I forgot your pain medication. V8 returned to the medication cart and retrieved two pain pills then administered R76 medications. 1. Aspirin Tablet 81 mg (milligram) Daily 2. Clopidogrel Bisulfate Tablet 75 MG Daily 3. Ferrosol Tablet (Ferrous Sulfate) 1 tablet Daily 4. Finasteride Oral Tablet 5 MG Daily 5. Vitamin D Tablet 25 MCG (microgram) (1000 UT (unit)) Daily 6. Carvedilol Tablet 6.25 MG Twice a day 7. Amoxicillin Oral Capsule 500 MG Three times a day 8. Acetaminophen Tablet 500 MG 2 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed. 9. Metformin HCl Oral Tablet 500 MG 2 tablet Twice a day (only one tablet was given) 10. Furosemide Tablet 20 MG Daily (was not given) 11. Enalapril Maleate Tablet 10 MG 2 tablet Daily (was not given) 12. Humalog Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 150 = 0; 151 - 200 = 2; 201 - 250 = 4; 251 - 300 = 6; 301 - 350 = 8; 351 - 400 = 10, subcutaneously with meals (blood glucose reading of 196 required 2 units of insulin that was not given) 13. Humalog Solution 100 UNIT/ML Inject 8 unit subcutaneously before meals Hold if Accuchecks is below 150 or not eating. (Blood glucose reading was 153 requiring 8 units of insulin to be given) On 03/19/24 at 12:19 PM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) retrieved the green blood glucose supplies tray from the top of the medication cart and entered R63 room to obtain R63 blood glucose with the result of 153, then exited R63 room placing the green glucose supplies tray on top of the medication cart then prepared R63's medications. On 03/19/24 at 12:25 PM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R63 blood sugar indicates no insulin is needed. On 03/20/24 at 02:53 PM during the interview with V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) the surveyor confirmed that the first resident the surveyor observed V8 passing medication to was R76 and that once V8 put R76 pills in the medication cup V8 was asked how many pills were in the medication cup. V8 confirmed that there were eight pills in the medication cup, and V8 added two Tylenol which made it a total of 10 pills in R76 medication cup. Surveyor asked V8 if she returned to R76 to give R76 any additional medication. V8 responded, I cannot recall giving R76 any additional medications at that time. I had to go back to R76 for the afternoon dose but not for the morning meds. I did not give R76 any insulin yesterday 3/19/24. Surveyor confirmed R76 blood glucose was 196 and receives a sliding scale for the insulin that read blood glucose between 151- 200, give 2 units of Humalog insulin. V8 stated, I only gave 1 tablet of Metformin instead of 2 tablets. Missing the dose of Furosemide, I am not too sure what affects that might have. Missing R76 Humalog and Metformin could have affected his blood glucose. I got R76's Enalapril out of the CAPSA (Emergency Medication Cart). I don't think the CAPSA (Emergency Medication Cart) has a history for the medications that were taken out of it. Surveyor confirmed with V8 that R63 blood glucose was 153. V8 stated, R63 did not need any insulin because his coverage started at 180 and R63 did not receive any insulin. For R63 I put, no insulin given. R63's 08:00 am insulin dose was missed. I read the MAR (Medication Administration Record) for the insulin and was using my nursing judgement because R63 does not have a good appetite and me giving R63 insulin would have dropped his blood glucose and probably sent R63 in a coma. I do not have documentation that I notified the doctor that R63 insulin was not given. The order reads to hold insulin if below 150 but R63 blood glucose was 153. On 03/21/24 at 11:08 AM V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated, Medications can be given one hour before and up to one hour after the scheduled time. The purpose is that gives ample time so that everybody receives their medication on time. We had a call in that morning. When we have a call in, and we can't get agency one of the staff managers have to cover the floor. When the screen turns pink the medications is late and overdue. If the medication is not given or given late the doctor has to be notified. On 03/21/24 the surveyor was provided a printout from the pharmacy for the CAPSA (Emergency Medication Cart) which did not confirm V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) retrieved or gave R76 Enalapril on 03/19/24. Policy: Titled Physician Order Policy revised 01/18 document in part: Proper channels of communication are used to ensure accurate delivery of medications and treatments to all residents. Titled Medication Administration and Storage Policy revised 07/02/18 document in part: To ensure medications are administered and stored in accordance with Standard of Practice. 2. Medications shall be given within one (1) hour of the specified time, by the same nurse that prepared the dose. Preparation of the medications is allowed one (1) hour prior to the time allowed for med pass. 5. Medication Error Report must be completed when B) Medication given at the wrong time, F) Medication omitted in error. 6. An incident report must be filled out for; B) Medication given at the wrong time, F) Medication omitted in error. 19. Narcotics must be signed out in the HER (Electronic Health Record) and the narcotic sheet. 20. Physician must be notified when medications are not administered as per physician orders. 21. Physician orders must be obtained for medications that are held. 22. Medication that are not administered as per physician orders must be documented in the drop-down box and/or progress notes.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications did not exceed the time frame for medication administration for 5 (R8, R9, R34, R54, R63) of 7 (R63, R76) r...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications did not exceed the time frame for medication administration for 5 (R8, R9, R34, R54, R63) of 7 (R63, R76) residents reviewed during medication administration. Findings Include: During medication reconciliation and review of the Medication Administration Audit Report dated 03/20/24 it was determined that the 09:00 AM scheduled medications were given outside of the facilities policies 2-hour window for medication administration. R34's Medication Administration Record document in part: 09:00 AM scheduled medications administered by V9 (Wound Care Nurse) include: Aspirin 81 MG (milligram), Cyanocobalamin Oral Tablet 500 MG, Ergocalciferol Oral Capsule 50 MG, Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25 MG, Paxil Oral Tablet 40 MG, Divalproex Sodium Oral Tablet Delayed Release 250 MG, and Memantine HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG. The Medication Administration Audit Report documented the medications were given at 11:38 AM. The actual time medications were observed being administered is 11:27 AM. R8's Medication Administration Record document in part: 09:00 AM scheduled medications administered by V9 (Wound Care Nurse) include: Amlodipine Besylate Tablet 5 MG, Aspirin 81 MG and Ascorbic Acid Tablet 500 MG were documented as given at 11:52 AM, Escitalopram Oxalate Oral Tablet 20 MG, Ferrous Sulfate Tablet 325 (65 Fe) MG, Losartan Potassium Tablet 50 MG, Multivitamin Tablet (Multiple Vitamin) 1 tablet and Metformin HCl Tablet 1000 MG. The Medication Administration Audit Report documented the medications were given at 11:53 AM. The actual time that the medications were administered is 11:43 AM. R54's Medication Administration Record document in part: 09:00 AM scheduled medications administered by V9 (Wound Care Nurse) include: Calcium 600/Vitamin D Oral Tablet 600-10 MG-MCG (microgram), Hydrochlorothiazide Oral Tablet 25 MG, Propranolol HCl Oral Tablet 10 MG and Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 50 MG. The Medication Administration Audit Report documented the medications were given at 12:07 PM. The actual time medications were observed being administered is 12:02 PM. R9's Medication Administration Record document in part: 09:00 AM scheduled medications administered by V9 (Wound Care Nurse) include: Amlodipine Besylate Tablet 10 MG, Ascorbic Acid Tablet 500 MG, Aspirin EC Tablet 81 MG, Austedo Oral Tablet 12 MG, Multivitamin Oral Tablet (Multiple Vitamin) Give 1 tablet, Vitamin D3 Capsule Give 1 capsule, Carvedilol Tablet 25 MG, Depakote Tablet Delayed Release 500 MG, Ferrous Sulfate Tablet 325 (65 Fe) MG, Minoxidil Oral Tablet 10 MG and Hydralazine HCl Tablet 100 MG. The Medication Administration Audit Report documented the medications were given at 12:15 PM. The actual time medications were observed being administered is 12:10 PM. R63's Medication Administration Record document in part: 09:00 AM scheduled medications administered by V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) include: Ascorbic Acid Tablet 500 MG, Cholecalciferol Tablet 1000 UNIT, Glucophage XR Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 500 MG, Invokana Tablet 300 MG, Multiple Vitamins-Minerals Tablet Give 1 tablet, Pioglitazone HCL 30 MG, Thiamine HCl Tablet 100 MG and Ferrous Sulfate Tablet 325 (65 Fe) MG. The Medication Administration Audit Report documented the medications were given at 12:33 PM. The actual time medications were observed being administered is 12:25 PM. On 03/19/24 at 10:48 AM V9 (Wound Care Nurse) stated, V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) is filling in for the nurse. I will not be assigned to the floor for the rest of the day. On 03/19/24 at 10:53 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) left the floor giving the medication cart keys to V9 (Wound Care Nurse) to continue passing the medications. On 03/19/24 at 11:53 AM Surveyor asked V9 (Wound Care Nurse) the meaning when the resident names appear pink on the computer screen. V9 responded, They just popped up. We have a 2-hour window to give the medication. On 03/19/24 at 12:17 PM V9 (Wound Care Nurse) stated, Once the residents name turns pink on the computer screen the medications are overdue. On 03/20/24 at 02:13 PM V40 (Activity Aide) stated, I was in the Resident Council meeting on 02/28/24. R59 was the resident that complained that medications are given late. On 03/19/24 at 12:19 PM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the nursing unit and retrieved the medication cart keys from V9 (Wound Care Nurse) to continue passing the medications. On 03/19/24 at 01:19 PM when reviewing R63 MAR (Medication Administration Record) with V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse), V8 stated, I didn't get to this floor until after 08:00 AM. R63 blood glucose was missed at 08:00 AM and I documented the blood glucose result of 153 in the wrong area. On 03/20/24 at 02:32 PM R87 stated, When the nurse gets here late, we might not get our 09:00 AM medications until 10:30 AM or later. Surveyor asked R87 if there is an explanation given when the medications are administered late. R87 responded, Sometimes they may say someone called off or that they are the only nurse on the floor. On 03/21/24 at 11:08 AM V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated, Medications can be given one hour before and up to one hour after the scheduled time. The purpose is that gives ample time so that everybody receives their medication on time. We had a call in that morning 03/19/24. When we have a call in, and we can't get agency, one of the staff managers have to cover the floor. When the screen turns pink the medications is late and overdue. Resident Council Minutes dated 02/28/24 document in part: Nursing: Receives meds late. Policy: Titled Physician Order Policy revised 01/18 document in part: Proper channels of communication are used to ensure accurate delivery of medications and treatments to all residents. Titled Medication Administration and Storage Policy revised 07/02/18 document in part: To ensure medications are administered and stored in accordance with Standard of Practice. 2. Medications shall be given within one (1) hour of the specified time, by the same nurse that prepared the dose. Preparation of the medications is allowed one (1) hour prior to the time allowed for med pass. 5. Medication Error Report must be completed when B) Medication given at the wrong time, F) Medication omitted in error. 6. An incident report must be filled out for; B) Medication given at the wrong time, F) Medication omitted in error. 19. Narcotics must be signed out in the HER (Electronic Health Record) and the narcotic sheet. 20. Physician must be notified when medications are not administered as per physician orders. 21. Physician orders must be obtained for medications that are held. 22. Medication that are not administered as per physician orders must be documented in the drop-down box and/or progress notes.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

3. On 03/19/24 at 12:40 PM, oxygen tank was observed in room of R7 with tubing wrapped around the top of the tank and not in a bag and not in use. On 3/19/2024 at 12:45 PM, observed oxygen tank with ...

Read full inspector narrative →
3. On 03/19/24 at 12:40 PM, oxygen tank was observed in room of R7 with tubing wrapped around the top of the tank and not in a bag and not in use. On 3/19/2024 at 12:45 PM, observed oxygen tank with V12 (RN). When asked how oxygen tubing should be stored when not in use, V12 (RN) replied, It should be in a bag. 4. On 03/19/24 at 02:10 PM the oxygen for R107 was observed to be off the resident with tubing not in a bag and wrapped around top of oxygen canister. On 3/19/2024 at 3:00 PM, review of the electronic medical record documented an active order for continuous oxygen at a rate of 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula. The order was effective 2/18/2024. On 3/20/2024, at 9:27 AM an interview with V11 (LPN) and V3 (Director of Nursing) in R107's room confirmed the oxygen was not on the resident and the tubing was not in a bag. When surveyor asked how oxygen tubing should be stored, V11 (LPN) responded, It should be bagged. I will go get one. On 3/20/2024 at 9:35 AM, review of the electronic medical record with V11 (LPN) and V3 (Director of Nursing) confirmed that there was an active physician order for oxygen continuous (4L/min) via nasal cannula effective 2/18/2024. The policy entitled Oxygen Administration was provided by V1 (Administrator) and reviewed on 3/21/2024 at 11:50 AM. The first step in the procedure states that the physician's order is checked for liter flow and method of administration. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policies, provide oxygen therapy in alignment with professional standards of practice, follow physician orders, label/store oxygen tubing and nebulizer and update a resident's oxygen care plan for four residents (R7, R10, R52, R107) out of a total sample of 23 residents reviewed for nursing care. Findings include: 1. R52's face sheet and comprehensive care plan documents in part medical diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and tracheostomy (trach) status (artificial airway in neck). R52' physician order sheets (POS) document in part orders for oxygen 5 liters (L) via trach collar mask every shift related to chronic respiratory failure and dependence on supplemental oxygen (ordered 11/01/2022). R52's POS also documents in part: Before suctioning, assess lung sounds, oxygen saturation, and respirations every four hours as needed related to tracheostomy status. Before and after treatment, evaluate the heart rate, respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, and breath sounds (ordered 8/02/2023). On 03/19/2024 at 10:03 AM, R52 was lying in bed receiving oxygen via trach collar. R52 had dark green secretions coming out of the trach with cough. The oxygen compressor was on top of a dresser to R52's left side. R52's oxygen flow regulator was set in between 5L/28% FiO2 (Fraction of inspired oxygen) and 10L/98% FiO2. Not set to a marking. At 10:05 AM, V25 (Nurse) stated [V25] does not usually work the unit and was not sure of R52's oxygen orders. V25 stated V25 will go look it up, left R52's room, and went to the nursing station. At 10:20 AM, V25 returned to R52's room and stated R52's FiO2 should be at 21%. V25 began moving knobs on the compressor and touched the oxygen flow regulator. V25 stated V25 did not know how to adjust the regulator and left the room. FiO2 setting remained at the unmarked location for the remainder of the observation. At 10:27 AM, V25 was back in R52's room. V25 stated R52's nurse is supposed to be the one performing R52's trach care. V25 stated, I'm [R52's] nurse so I guess I have to do it. At 10:44 AM, V25 stated V25 will perform R52's trach care and began setting up for the care. V25 did not don a gown or face shield/goggles. V25 did not set up a sterile field. At 10:51 AM, donned non-sterile gloves and removed the sputum covered gauze around R52's trach. V25 performed hand hygiene. At 10:55 AM, V25 donned non-sterile gloves from scrub pocket and suctioned R52 via trach. V25 did not assess lung sounds, oxygen saturation, respirations, or heart rate prior to or after suctioning. V25 left R52's room and came back at 10:59 AM with a box of non-sterile gloves. V25 donned non-sterile gloves and did not don a gown or face shield/goggles. At 11:01 AM, V25 removed the inner cannula from R52's trach. V25 washed hands and donned non-sterile gloves. V25 attempted to insert inner cannula size 7.5 mm (millimeter) but it did not fit. V25 walked to a metal cart with trach supplies near the bedroom window. V25 rummaged through the items and found an inner cannula size 6.5 mm. V25 opened that packet and inserted the inner cannula size 6.5 mm without performing hand hygiene or donning sterile gloves. At 11:06 AM, V25 stated [V25] doesn't usually work R52's unit. V25 works on a different floor which does not have patients with tracheostomy. At 11:07 AM, V25 released the left side of R52's trach collar strap. V25 let go of the strap to grab a pen to write a date on the new trach strap. This left R52's trach collar unsecured risking dislodgement. V25 put the new trach strap on the left side and released the old strap on the right side of R52's trach. V25 let go of R52's trach collar and walked around the bed leaving the trach unsecured. Once on R52's right side, V25 removed the old trach strap and secured the new trach strap on the right side. After cleaning up the supplies at the bedside, V25 stated [V25] completed R52's trach care. V25 did not clean tracheostomy stoma, surrounding skin, or apply dry gauze around R52's trach. V25 did not assess R52's vitals or lung sounds after tracheostomy care. R52's comprehensive care plan has a focus for R52's tracheostomy status (initiated 11/30/2020; last revised 2/09/2024). Intervention documents in part: Ensure that trach ties are secured at all times (last revised 8/10/2021). R52's care plan also contains interventions that are not updated to coincide with current oxygen orders. Intervention documents in part 8L with 28% humidity but current orders read 5L. On 03/20/2024 at 2:54 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated the floor nurses are to perform the tracheostomy care. When performing care, the expectation is for the nurse to don personal protective equipment including a mask, gown, gloves and goggles or face shield to prevent contact with the secretions. V3 stated when the nurse is changing the inner cannula, the nurse is to wear sterile gloves and keep a sterile technique due to it being an invasive procedure. V3 stated when the nurse is changing the trach collar strap, the nurse is to always hold the trach in place while switching the dirty trach strap for a new one to prevent dislodgement. V3 recommends two nurses to do the procedure due to possibility of complications with the resident's airway. V3 also stated that a resident's care plan should be updated to coincide with the current tracheostomy care. Facility's Tracheostomy Care policy, last revised 8/2021, documents in part: Open tracheostomy cleaning tray and set up sterile field Put on sterile gloves Clean the stoma by beginning at the insertion site and moving out toward the periphery; swab the trachea stoma and flanges of the tracheostomy tube with the cotton applicators moistened with hydrogen peroxide/saline solution; discard after use Swab tracheal stoma and flanges of tracheostomy tube with cotton tipped applicator moistened with sterile saline. Policy does not have procedural instructions on how to change trach collar strap. Facility's Resident Care Planning policy, last revised 01/2017, documents in part: Each resident has a resident care plan that is current, individualized and consistent with the medical regimen. Following interdisciplinary team conferences completed quarterly and as needed, the interdisciplinary team update goals and actions that were discussed. 2. R10 has diagnosis not limited to Paraplegia, Injury at Unspecified Level of Cervical Spinal Cord, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Pulmonary Embolism, Neuralgia and Neuritis, Lumbago with Sciatica, Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Pneumonia, Myalgia, Acute Respiratory Failure, Depression, Cough, Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation. Care Plan document in part: Focus: R10 has altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing r/t (related/to) Anxiety, dx. (diagnosis) acute respiratory distress, oxygen dependence, morbid obesity with possible complications. Oxygen Settings: O2 via nasal canula. R10 Physician orders document in part: Oxygen Tubing Change Weekly and as Needed every night shift every Sunday. Oxygen Continuous at 2-3 Liters/min (minute) Via Nasal Cannula every shift. Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Nebulization Solution 1 each inhale orally via nebulizer every 4 hours as needed. Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Nebulization Solution 0.63 MG (milligram)/3ML (milliliter) 1 application inhale orally via nebulizer every 6 hours as needed. Oxygen Tubing Change Weekly and as Needed. On 03/19/24 at 12:49 PM upon entering R10's room an oxygen canister with undated oxygen tubing was observed with no oxygen tank stand on the floor near R10's window. R10 stated, That oxygen tank is empty. Oxygen tubing was observed on R10's bedside table unlabeled and not stored in a bag. A Nebulizer setup with a nebulizer mask dated 03/11/24 was observed on the overbed table not stored in a bag. A large liquid oxygen tank with an undated humidity bottle and oxygen tubing was observed to the right side of R10's bed and in use at 2 liters. R10 stated, Most of the time you have to ask them to change the oxygen tubing, or it will not get changed. On 03/19/24 at 01:07 PM surveyor entered R10's room with V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) and asked about the oxygen tubing and nebulizer mask. V8 responded, The nebulizer mask and oxygen tubing, nothing should touch the floor because of infection control. On 03/21/24 at 11:08 AM V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated, Oxygen tubing and the Nebulizer set up if not in use or after each use should be bagged. The nebulizer mask and tubing should be labeled, dated, and changed every 3 days. The purpose is for infection control. The oxygen tubing and nebulizer mask are labeled so we don't use it past the change date for infection control. A policy titled Oxygen Storage Policy revised 08/22 was provided by the facility but does not contain any information concerning labeling and storage of the oxygen tubing or nebulizer setup. Policy: Titled Oxygen Administration dated 11/10 document in part: 12. Oxygen tubing must be dated and label and change every 72 hours. Titled Infection Prevention and Control Program revised 01/17 document in part: Purpose: To comply with a system for preventing, identifying, investigation, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, visitors, and other individuals providing services. 16. The facility shall ensure that necessary training, equipment, and supplies are maintained to carry out an effective Infection Control Program.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and label medications and medication administration supplies according to standards as evidenced by expired medications,...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and label medications and medication administration supplies according to standards as evidenced by expired medications, expired supplies, and refrigerated medications stored in unrefrigerated locations in two medication rooms observed out of three total medication rooms in the facility, and three medication carts out of a total of six medication carts in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to maintain crash carts in alignment with policy as evidenced by missing supplies, supplies in the wrong drawers, and expired supplies in three out of three crash carts in the facility. Findings include, On 03/19/24 10:02 AM, review of medication storage room on the 2nd floor with V12 (RN) demonstrated a bottle of Sodium Chloride open date 11/3/2023 and no end date. Geri Not was opened on 9/17/2023 with no end date. When asked how long a multi-dose can be used once opened, V12 (RN) stated I don't know. Artificial Tears were found open in a box with a resident's name only on label and no last name. When V12 (RN) was asked if there is more than one resident with that name on the floor, she stated There are 2. When asked which resident the Artificial Tears were for, she stated she could not tell because there was no last name on the container. An IV start kit was read by V12 (RN) as having expired on 2/19/2024. Five Amsino Urethral self-catheter kits had an expiration date of 6/30/2023. An oxygen cannula was found in the medication room in an open bag with a label on the tubing dated 7/18/2022. V12 (RN) looked at the bag and tubing and stated, It's used. It has a date on the it. There were three central line trays with an expiration date of 2/29/2024, 6/30/2023 and 11/30/2023. An IV administration kit had an expiration date of 4/20/2023. Ready care thickened orange juice had an expiration date of 2/29/2024. An IV catheter had an expiration date of 3/10/2024. Covid Binex Now Kit had an expiration date of 1/7/2024. Irrigation Tray had an expiration date of 12/31/2023. On 03/19/24 at 10:30 AM, observation of the medication cart on the second floor was conducted with V12 (RN). Glucose testing solution had no open date or discard date. V12 (RN) stated, It seems open. Lantus had no open date. V12 (RN) stated, It should have been dated. It is good for 28 days after opening. Insulin for 2 residents had Refrigerate on the label but were in the medication cart. Insulin Aspart had an open date of 2/7/2024. The label stated Refrigerate, but it was found in the medication cart. Ondansetron tablets for R81 had an expiration date of 3/2/2024 and were in the medication cart. On 03/19/24 at 2:20 PM, the medication cart on the third floor was assessed with V9 (LPN). The medication cart contained the following medications that all stated Refrigerate on the label: Humalog for R13, Lexamil with no name on it, Lantus for R10, Insulin Lispro for R76, Humalog for R10, Humalog for R63. Brimonidine eye drops for R87 that had no open date and Latanoprost was open with no resident name or open date. When V9 (LPN) was asked if she could describe the medication labeling and refrigeration policy, she stated that it was only her 2nd day at the facility. There was a pink capsule and a while pill found loose in the medication cart which V9 did not know the names of or how they got there. On 03/19/24 at 11:08 AM, the medication storage room on the 4th floor was reviewed with V13 (LPN). Multiple vacutainers with found expired dated. V13 (LPN) read the expiration dates as: 11 Red tops with expiration date of 3/2/2024, 1 orange top with expiration date of 7/31/2023, 10 green tops with expiration date of 1/31/2024, 11 purple tops with expiration date of 3/5/2024. In addition, a Protect IV Cath had an expiration date of 9/25/2023, a Scopolamine kit for V470 expired 1/18/2024. Review of the crash cart log on 4th floor had no check for 3/7/2024. Review of the medication cart on the 4th floor with V13 (LPN) found Lispro insulin in the medication cart with a blue label stating Refrigerate. V13 (LPN) stated, I took it out to give it this morning. Glargine Insulin 2 vials for R7 were also found in the medication cart. The blue label stated Refrigerate A stock bottle of Vitamin B12 stock had a handwritten date on the bottle of 12/8/2023. The best by date on the bottle of Vitamin B12 was read by V13 (LPN) as 10/2023. A stock bottle of Aspirin 325 mg had an expiration date of 6/2023. A plastic container with a red lid had a handwritten date of 4/4/2023 and was found in the medication cart. V13 (LPN) described the contents of the container as a white powder and a medicine cup in it. V13 stated, I don't know what it is. Four containers of Twocal supplement were found in the medication cart with expiration date of 11/1/2023 as well as a container of Ensure which was opened on 11/6/2023 and expired on 2/1/2024. On 03/19/24 at 11:48 AM, V10 (Nurse Consultant) was on the unit. V13 (LPN) handed her the container with white powder. V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated, It looks like thickener. When asked about the expired dates on the vacutainers found in the medication room, V10 stated, That is Lab, not nursing. I don't even know why we have those because Lab carries their own vacutainers. On 03/20/24 at 09:11 AM, The 2nd floor medication cart was assessed with V11 (LPN). The following medications had blue labels stating Refrigerate and were in the medication cart: Levemir for R67, Glargine for R7, Lantus for R90, Novolog for R46. Artificial Tears were in the medication cart with a handwritten date of 3/11/2024. There was no resident name on the bottle or packaging. V3 (Director of Nursing) was interviewed at the medication cart location. When V3 (Director of Nursing) was shown a box containing Glargine, V3 stated, It is supposed to be refrigerated. When shown the box of artificial tears with a handwritten date of 3/11/2023, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated, It has to be named. There is no name and no expiration date; only an open date. They can't share meds like that. On 03/20/24 at 09:23 AM, The process of assessing crash cart readiness was discussed with V3 (Director of Nursing). When asked how crash carts are checked, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated, the numbers should match. V3 motioned to the security tag number securing the crash cart. When asked where the numbers were documented, V3 could not locate the numbers in the log or in a separate location. V3 stated the Ambu bag is checked, expiration dates are checked. V3 stated the cart is checked each shift. On 3/20/2024 at 11:10 AM, V19 (RN) was interviewed on the 3rd floor regarding crash cart maintenance and readiness. V19 stated the crash cart is checked every day. When asked when the first supply or medication will expire, V19 (RN) stated, I can't tell without opening it. V19 (RN) opened the cart. In the top drawer was an extension cord, gloves, a flashlight, two IV start kits that expired 2/18/20243 and glucose strips that expired 11/10/2023. In the second drawer, five saline flushes expired 2/28/2023, one saline flush expired 1/23/2024, five Luer lock caps expired 10/3/2021, a rate flow regulator expired 10/29/2020, two-20-gauge IV needles expired in 9/1/2021, eighteen- 18-gauge needles expired 7/1/2022. In Drawer three, twenty-two TB safety syringes expired 8/7/2022, five insulin syringes expired 11/30/2022, four-22-gauge needles expired 10/31/2023, two dressing kits expired 11/19/2023. In Drawer four, one rate flow regulator extension kit expired 4/2019, In drawer five, one irrigation set expired 12/31/2023 and one shiley trach tube expired 4/25/2022. All expiration dates were verified by surveyor and V19 (RN). On 3/20/2024 at 11:45 AM, V12 (RN) was interviewed on the second floor. When asked how she knows that the crash cart is ready for use, V12 stated, It was checked today. Nothing should be expired. Surveyor and V12 (RN) reviewed the cart contents. In drawer one was an oxygen regulator, gloves, a blood pressure cuff, and a pen light. In drawer 2, there was a Yankauer suction catheter that expired 5/2020, a Yankauer suction catheter that expired 7/28/2021, six luer locks expired 10/3/2021, eleven-22 gauge needles expired 3/10/2024, fifteen saline flushes expired 2/28/2023, one-18 gauge needle expired 7/1/2022. In drawer three, thirteen TB safety syringes expired 12/26/2022, two TB safety syringes expired 8/16/2022, three TB safety syringes expired 12/26/2022, nine TB safety syringes expired 11/30/2022, one TB Safety syringes expired 3/2019, one-22 gauge syringe expired 10/3/2022, five TB syringes expired 9/7/2022, one 3 ml syringe expired 6/30/2023, four-22 gauge needles expired 10/31/2022, a dressing change kit expired 11/19/2023, seven IV start kits expired 2/19/2024, seven vials of sodium chloride expired 1/2023. In drawer four, a shiley trach tube expired 9/6/2022, a shiley trach tube expired 6/8/2022. In drawer five, a dressing change tray expired 11/19/2023, 1 Liter 5% dextrose expired 1/20/2024, an unopened box of thirty saline flushes expired 2/28/2023. All expiration dates were verified by surveyor and V12 (RN). On 3/20/2024 at 11:50 AM, surveyor met with V3 (Director of Nursing), advised of findings and concern that all crash carts now have a considerable deficit of inventory given that nurses made the clinical decision to remove expired supplies on all three floors. V3 (Director of Nursing) responded, We are restocking now. Surveyor also advised that stocking of each crash cart drawer does not appear to be in alignment with policy. V3 (Director of Nursing) stated she would look into it and align with policy if necessary. On 03/20/24 at 12:43 PM, surveyor met with V1 (Administrator) and V10 (Nurse Consultant). When asked if where IV fluids are obtained. V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated, We call Pharmacy if we need IV fluid. Pharmacy supplies our IV fluid and brings us what we need. Facility's policy (1/16) Medication Storage Policy documents in part: internal and external medications are to be kept separately in the medication administration cart. Facility's policy (rev.2012) Crash Cart documents in part: the facility to maintain a basic crash cart for use in medical emergencies. Crash cart is checked daily. The nurse on the unit or designee will check the contents of the crash cart for expiration monthly. The crash cart expiration date shall be determined based upon the date of the first cart item to expire. The date shall be indicated on the expiration sticker (top left hand corner). The crash cart contents are defined in the policy and include 2 IV start kits, a syringe with needle, tourniquet, tongue repressor, IV tubing, CVP dressing, and tape will be in the first drawer. Gauze, gloves, alcohol pad, instant cold, rebreather, blood pressure cuff, stethoscope, oral airway, kerlix, suction catheter, cannula and extension tubing will be in the 2nd drawer. Disposable gloves, Ambu bag, 1 liter DSW and 1 liter NSS will be in the third drawer. The bottom drawer will have 1 Ambu bag, sharps container and suction machine. Facility's policy (undated) Emergency Carts documents in part: emergency carts will provide supplies for emergency situations.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on review of records and interviews the facility failed to follow policy in offering, educating, and documenting influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations to 4 of 5 residents (R72, R108, R117, R26...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of records and interviews the facility failed to follow policy in offering, educating, and documenting influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations to 4 of 5 residents (R72, R108, R117, R267) for a total sample of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations. These failures have the potential to affect 4 residents (R72, R108, R117, R267) in determining their option by knowing and receiving the benefits of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Findings include: Five (5) residents were sampled for pneumococcal and influenza vaccination determination and documentation under immunization tab of the electronic health record (EHR): - R72 documentation reads, no immunization found on record. - R117 documentation reads, no immunization found on record. - R267 documentation reads, all vaccination consent refused. - R108 documentation reads, influenza and pneumococcal immunization required. V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated that it means resident did not get it. - R16 documentation reads, influenza refused no date, last influenza received on 9/23/2020 and received pneumococcal 4/16/2019. On 03/20/2024 at 01:37 PM, V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated it should reflect under immunization tab. V10 told V8 (Infection Preventionist) to make sure all residents will be address as to their respective influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations and that resident record needs to be updated and will be updated accordingly. Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccinations policy dated 09/2021, reads: In order to minimize the risk of residents acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia. It is the policy of this facility to offer influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations to all residents. Procedure for influenza vaccination reads that each resident or resident's representative will receive education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza immunization. The resident's medical record will indicate the resident or resident's legal representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza immunization; and the resident either received the influenza immunization or did not receive the influenza immunization due to medical contraindications or refusal. Procedure for pneumococcal immunization the resident's medical record will include documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following: The resident or resident's legal representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of pneumococcal immunization. The resident: - Received the pneumococcal immunization. - Did not receive the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication; or refuse it; or stated that it was previously given, but the date cannot be verified.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

On 3/20/24 at 11:30 AM, during the Resident Council meeting with twelve residents. R90, R87, R98, R68, and R64 all stated that the facility is very short staffed of nurses and Certified Nurse Assistan...

Read full inspector narrative →
On 3/20/24 at 11:30 AM, during the Resident Council meeting with twelve residents. R90, R87, R98, R68, and R64 all stated that the facility is very short staffed of nurses and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) On 3/20/24 at 11:38 AM, R90 stated, We sometimes do not have nurses on the floor. About two weeks ago, we had only one nurse instead of two nurses, so I received my 6 AM medications late. On 3/20/24 at 11:45 AM, R98 stated CNAs are always short especially during the 11-7 shift, and sometimes they do not answer the call lights. On 3/20/24 at 11:47 AM, R87 stated, They are short of staff, sometimes we do not have nurse up here. Mostly the night shift, we suppose to get medication at 8 PM but nurses do not get here until 9:30 PM on a weekend. About two weeks ago we had only one nurse on the 3-11 shift. Resident Council Minutes dated 3/29/23 documents in part; need more staff. Resident Council Minutes dated 8/30/23 documents in part; need more CNA and Nurse. Resident Council Minutes dated 2/28/24 documents in part; receives medications late. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to ensure medications are administered on time, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care are provided in a timely manner and completed, and Resident Council concerns are addressed. This has the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During interviews with V34 (Certified Nurse Aide, CNA) on 3/19/2024 at 11:12 AM and again on 3/20/2024 at 10:02 AM, V34 stated the third floor has multiple residents require total assistance and mechanical lift to get out of bed. V34 stated the unit is supposed to have four CNAs for morning and evening shift but the unit is short staffed. V34 stated when there are three CNAs, all the ADL care can't get done. V34 stated the facility calls V34 frequently to pick up extra shifts because CNAs call-in or don't show up for work. On 3/19/2024 at 3:09 PM, V25 (Nurse) stated V25 is taking care of team one on the third floor. V25 stated the nurse that was supposed to take care of team two did not show up so other nurses (V8-Infection Control Nurse and V9-Wound Nurse) had to fill in to do the morning and noon medications. V25 stated V25 was not sure who was taking care of the residents from 3:00 PM to 7:00 PM. V25 guessed V8 but was not sure. On 3/19/2024 at 3:13 PM, V35 (Wound Tech) stated V35 working the third floor evening as a CNA. V35 stated there are supposed to be four CNAs that evening but someone called off. V35 stated people call off often. V35 stated facility sometimes pulls other CNAs from the other units to staff the third floor but leaves the other units short staffed. V35 stated on 3/03/2024, the facility asked V35 to pick up a shift to help staff the third floor. When V35 arrived on the unit, V34 was the only other CNA working. V35 stated there were supposed to be four CNAs but it was only V34 and V35. On 3/19/2024 at 3:16 PM, V36 (CNA) stated [V36] works the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift on the third floor. V36 stated when there are three CNAs on the third floor, it is short staffed. The CNAs don't get a chance to do all they're supposed to do. On 3/20/2024 at 10:07 AM, V37 (CNA) stated the third floor is short staffed during the evening shifts and night shifts. V37 stated it is worst on the weekends. On 3/20/2024 at 10:14 AM, V14 (CNA) stated the third floor has more residents that require a lot more care. V14 stated the unit needs four CNAs but it is short staffed with three CNAs at least twice a week. V14 stated the staffing is worse on weekends. V14 stated depending on whose working, there's no teamwork when the third floor is short-staffed. On 3/20/2024 at 10:22 AM, V8 (Infection Control Nurse) stated, Staffing can be equipped if everyone all came in. Stuff happens and there's random call-offs. They try to equip us with the right staff but there's call-offs and people don't show up. On 3/20/2024 at 10:22 AM, V38 (CNA) stated working the third floor for the past six months. V38 stated there's supposed to be four CNAs on the third floor, but people call off and most of the time there's only three CNAs. During the weekends, it's mostly three CNAs during the morning shift. V38 stated, :Sometimes there's only two aides and that happens weekly. V38 stated it is rarely four CNAs. On 3/21/2024 at 9:17 AM, there were three CNAs assigned on the third floor. On 3/21/2024 at 9:58 AM, surveyor conducted an interview with V3 (Director of Nursing), V8 (Infection Control Nurse), and V10 (Nurse Consultant). V8 stated facility asked V8 to take over the role of scheduler. V8 and V10 stated V32 (former Assistant Director of Nursing) used to handle the nursing and CNA schedules but quit during the survey. Surveyor requested V32's telephone number from V10 but did not receive it. V8 stated there are supposed to be four CNAs on the third floor during the morning and evening shifts. Resident Council Minutes from August of 2023 documents in part the residents stated the facility needed more CNAs and nurses. Review of the March 2024 nursing daily schedules document in part short staffing for CNAs on the third floor on March 3, 10-12, 15-18, 20 and 21. Facility's undated Staffing Policy documents in part: The facility shall schedule nursing personnel, so the nursing needs of all residents are met accordingly. On 03/19/24 at 10:48 AM V9 (Wound Care Nurse) stated, V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) is filling in for the nurse. I will not be assigned to the floor for the rest of the day. On 03/19/24 at 10:53 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) left the floor giving the medication cart keys to V9 (Wound Care Nurse) to continue passing the medications. On 03/19/24 at 11:53 AM Surveyor asked V9 (Wound Care Nurse) the meaning when the resident names appear pink on the computer screen. V9 responded, They just popped up. We have a 2-hour window to give the medication. On 03/19/24 at 12:17 PM V9 (Wound Care Nurse) stated, Once the residents name turns pink on the computer screen the medications are overdue. On 03/19/24 at 12:19 PM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) returned to the nursing unit and retrieved the medication cart keys from V9 (Wound Care Nurse) to continue passing the medications. On 03/19/24 at 01:19 PM when reviewing R63 MAR (Medication Administration Record) with V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse), V8 stated, I didn't get to this floor until after 08:00 AM. R63 blood glucose was missed at 08:00 AM and I documented the blood glucose result of 153 in the wrong area. On 03/20/24 at 02:13 PM V40 (Activity Aide) stated, I was in the Resident Council meeting on 02/28/24. R59 was the resident that complained that medications are given late. On 03/20/24 at 02:32 PM R87 stated, When the nurse gets here late, we might not get our 09:00 AM medications until 10:30 AM or later. Surveyor asked R87 if there is an explanation given when the medications are administered late. R87 responded, Sometimes they may say someone called off or that they are the only nurse on the floor. On 03/21/24 at 11:08 AM V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated, Medications can be given one hour before and up to one hour after the scheduled time. The purpose is that gives ample time so that everybody receives their medication on time. We had a call in that morning 03/19/24. When we have a call in, and we can't get agency, one of the staff managers have to cover the floor. When the screen turns pink the medications is late and overdue.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy on storage of food and hand washing by not discarding expired food and staff not washing hands after h...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy on storage of food and hand washing by not discarding expired food and staff not washing hands after handling dirty dishes and before handling clean dishes. These failures have the potential to affect all 112 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings Include: On 3/19/24 at 9:25 AM, observed V43 (Dietary Aide) and V22 (Cook/Dietary Aide) working in the dish room. V43 was breaking down dirty resident lunch trays scraping food debris from the trays into the garbage. At 9:28 AM observed V22 placed scraped dirty dishes in a rack before pushing the rack into the dish machine to be washed. Observed V22 move to the clean side of the dish machine and pull out the rack containing cleaned dome lids and plates from the dish machine and then placed them on an open cart to dry. V22 did not perform any type of hand hygiene in between handling dirty and cleaned plateware. At 9:30 AM, surveyor asked V22 why hand hygiene was not performed in between dirty and clean dishes? V22 stated, V22 should have washed hands and wear gloves before touching clean dishes. On 3/19/24 at 9:45 AM, observed on the kitchen table where other condiments were stored an expired Smucker's Plate Scrapers Caramel flavored dessert topping best by dated 2/9/24 and expired dated 2/9/24. V21 stated expired food should be discarded as dated, the caramel topping should have been discarded. V21 did not know what happened. V21 stated using expired item can cause food borne illness. On 3/20/24 at 9:30 AM, V21 (Food Manager) stated V22 should wash her hands and change gloves in between touching dirty plateware and equipment items to prevent cross contamination. V21 stated the dish machine disinfects the items so if the staff does not wash their hands after touching dirty items and then touches the cleaned, disinfected items they run the risk of contaminating those items which could make the residents sick. On 3/20/24 at 11:00 AM, V21 provided surveyor with a list of residents and their diet orders. V21 stated there are 3 residents who receive nothing by mouth (NPO). 03/21/24 09:58 AM V23 (Dietitian) stated there should be no expired items in the kitchen, using expired condiment can lead to bad taste and food borne illness. Kitchen policy titled handwashing dated 4/2017, documents in part the facility will practice safe food handling and avoid cross contamination through proper and adequate handwashing techniques. Kitchen policy titled labeling and dating foods, documents in part to decrease the risk of food borne illness and to provide the highest quality, foods is labeled with the date received, the date opened and the date by which the item should be discarded.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

On 3/19/24 at 10:54 AM Surveyor asked V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V15 (CNA) to check R70's wound dressing. R70's door has a signage that shows Enhanced Barrier Precaution. V14 and V15 we...

Read full inspector narrative →
On 3/19/24 at 10:54 AM Surveyor asked V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V15 (CNA) to check R70's wound dressing. R70's door has a signage that shows Enhanced Barrier Precaution. V14 and V15 went inside R70's room with the Surveyor. V14 and V15 did not wear personal protective gown. V14 and V15 repositioned R70, arranged R70's indwelling catheter, and opened R70's incontinence pad to look at R70's wound dressing. V15 stated that there are two Certified Nursing Assistants working on the 4th floor and that they cover each other answering call lights for the entire floor. R70's electronic health record (EHR) shows R70 has an indwelling catheter and multiple open wounds. R70 is on the facility's list of residents requiring Enhance Barrier Protection. Based on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed the following: The facility failed to follow policy on hand hygiene before and after care of a resident on contact precaution due to urine infection. Linen found on the floor was also used to cover resident (R267) without clothes on direct contact to skin. In the laundry area, the facility failed to use clean fan equipment blowing air at clean linens and failed to ensure clean linens inside large plastic bins does not overflow and make contact to unclean surfaces. The facility failed to clean and disinfect the reusable medical equipment after checking 5 (R8, R34, R54, R63, R87) residents vital signs and 3 (R10, R63, R76) residents blood glucose during medication administration. The facility failed to have readily available personal protective equipment (PPE), wear proper PPE during R52's tracheostomy care and have isolation precautions care planned for R44 and R52. The facility failed to update policies related to infection control at least annually. These failures have the potential to affect all 112 living in the facility in preventing the spread of infections. Findings include: On 03/19/2024 at 01:09 PM, R267 was seen without any cover exposed and without clothes through the open door. V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R267 is confused and takes off his clothes or gown every time staff put it on R267. V13 went to R267's room after being informed, picked up sheet from the floor and covered R267. V13 after performing care to R267 did not perform hand hygiene. V13 said she forgot to perform hand hygiene and R267 is in contact isolation for urine infection. R267 physician order dated 3/15/2024, reads: Isolation - Contact Precautions ESBL of urine until medical clearance active. On 03/20/2024 at 11:57 AM, in the laundry room/area a large plastic bin in front of the dryer was full of clothes were overflowing and touching surface of the dryer door. V29 (Laundry Aide) stated those linens were already washed and clean because it came from the washer. V29 said it should not be overflowing and touching surface that are not clean. At the folding area large plastic bin like the previous bin at the dryer area was also overflowing with linens. V30 (Environmental Service Director) stated that it should not be overflowing and touching unclean surfaces. On the hallway just outside laundry area, a large fan was blowing air pointing to the folding area. V30 was asked to stop the fan, greyish dirt can be seen all over grill and blade. Pointed out to V30 that the fan is pointing to the open of laundry area blowing air to clean linens at the folding area. V30 stated he will make sure to clean the fan. On 03/20/2024 at 01:37 PM with V8 (Infection Control Preventionist) and V10 (Nurse Consultant). V10 stated hand hygiene must be performed before and after care or in taking care of isolated residents in contact precaution or enhance-based precaution to prevent the spread of infection. V8 stated the nurse should not cover resident with linen taken from the floor. When handling of linens, clean linens must not touch unclean surfaces. It may contaminate other linens that are already clean. The following are facility policies that are not up to date: - Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) general policy date revised 1/2017. - Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) itemize with purpose and procedure date revised 12/2016. - Antibiotic Usage Policy date revised 1/2018. - Hand Washing and Hand Hygiene Policy date revised 6/4/2020. - Hand Hygiene Program Policy date 2020. - Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination Policy dated 09/2021. - Transmission-Based Precaution Policy was not provided after request. Hand Washing and Hand Hygiene Policy dated 6/4/2020, reads: The purpose of the policy is essential in preventing the spread of infectious organism in healthcare settings. Hand hygiene must be performed after touching blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions, and contaminated items. Specific examples include but are not limited to before contact with particular susceptible residents. Before and after providing personal care of resident. Infection Control as it relates to housekeeping and laundry staff instruction reads: The purpose is to provide housekeeping and laundry staff with basic information about infection control as it relates to their position. Under indirect contact, this is a critical area in the infection control program for housekeeping and laundry employees. Items such as furniture, beds, and floors - may all be contaminated by an infected carrier who comes in contact with these items. R44's physician orders document in part: Enhance Barrier Precaution for sacrum MASD (moisture associated skin damage) ordered 6/16/2023. R52's physician orders document in part an order for enhanced barrier precautions related to tracheostomy status (ordered 6/16/2023). During random observations on 3/19/2024, 3/20/2024, and 3/21/2024, both R44 and R52 had Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage on their doors. Signage documents in part: Wear gloves and a gown for the following high-contact resident care activities - dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, or assisting with toileting, device care or use (central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy), and wound care (any skin opening requiring a dressing). There was no readily available personal protective equipment outside or near R44 and R52's room. Reviewed R44 and R52's comprehensive care plans. They do not contain focuses for enhance barrier precautions. On 03/19/2024 at 10:44 AM, V25 (Nurse) stated V25 will perform R52's tracheostomy care and began setting up for the care. V25 did not don a gown or face shield/goggles during the tracheostomy care. V25 left R52's room and came back at 10:59 AM with a box of non-sterile gloves. V25 donned non-sterile gloves but did not don a gown or face shield/goggles for the entirety of the tracheostomy care. On 03/20/2024 at 2:54 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated the floor nurses are to perform the tracheostomy care. When performing care, the expectation is for the nurse to don personal protective equipment including a mask, gown, gloves and goggles or face shield to prevent contact with the secretions. Facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 3/01/2023, documents in part: Gloves and gowns must be worn for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities: dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use (central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy), and wound care (any skin opening requiring a dressing). Facility's Resident Care Planning policy, last revised 01/2017, documents in part: Each resident has a resident care plan that is current, individualized and consistent with the medical regimen. Following interdisciplinary team conferences completed quarterly and as needed, the interdisciplinary team update goals and actions that were discussed. On 03/19/24 at 10:00 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) retrieved the green tray containing the blood glucose supplies, wrist blood pressure cuff and tympanic thermometer from the top of the medication cart then entered R76 room. V8 placed the blood pressure cuff on R76 left wrist and checked R76 temperature using the tympanic thermometer. V8 placed the green tray on R76 overbed table, retrieved the glucometer, glucose strip and alcohol wipe, checked R76 blood glucose with a reading of 196. V8 placed the glucometer back in the green tray then exited R76 room. On 03/19/24 at 10:04 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) placed the green tray with the glucometer, wrist blood pressure cuff and tympanic thermometer on top of the medication cart without cleaning them then began preparing R76 medications. On 03/19/24 at 10:23 AM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) retrieved the wrist blood pressure cuff from the top of the medication cart, entered R87 room, placed the wrist blood pressure cuff on R87 left wrist then placed the wrist blood pressure cuff on top of the medication cart without cleaning it. On 03/19/24 at 11:12 AM V9 (Wound Care Nurse) retrieved the wrist blood pressure cuff and tympanic thermometer then entered R34 and obtained R34 blood pressure and temperature. On 03/19/24 at 11:17 AM V9 (Wound Care Nurse) exited R34 room placing the wrist blood pressure cuff and tympanic thermometer on top of the medication cart without cleaning it. On 03/19/24 at 11:41 AM V9 (Wound Care Nurse) retrieved the wrist blood pressure cuff and tympanic thermometer from the top of the medication cart, entered R8 room and obtained R8 blood pressure. V9 placed the tympanic thermometer on R8 bed before checking R8 temperature. On 03/19/24 at 11:43 AM V9 (Wound Care Nurse) exited R8 room placing the wrist blood pressure cuff and tympanic thermometer on top of the medication cart without cleaning them. On 03/19/24 at 11:55 AM V9 (Wound Care Nurse) retrieved the wrist blood pressure cuff from the top of the medication cart then entered R54 room who is on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, obtained R54 blood pressure then returned to the medication cart placing the wrist blood pressure cuff on top of the medication cart without cleaning it. On 03/19/24 at 12:17 PM V9 (Wound Care Nurse) stated the wrist blood pressure cuff and tympanic thermometer should be cleaned between residents so that the germs or whatever the residents have won't contaminate each other. On 03/19/24 at 12:19 PM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) retrieved the green blood glucose supplies tray and wrist blood pressure cuff from the top of the medication cart, entered R63 to obtain R63 blood pressure and blood glucose with the result of 153, then exited R63 room placing the green glucose supplies tray and wrist blood pressure cuff on top of the medication cart without cleaning the glucometer or wrist blood pressure cuff. On 03/19/24 at 12:38 PM V8 (Infection Control Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse) retrieved the glucometer from the top of the medication cart, entered R10's room to obtain the blood glucose with a result of 323 then exited R10's room placing the glucometer on top of the medication cart without cleaning it. On 03/21/24 at 11:08 AM V10 (Nurse Consultant) stated, There should be 2 glucometers in each medication cart. When using one for the resident, wipe it off with a bleach wipe and let it sit for 2 minutes. We need 2 glucometers so that you won't have to wait for the other glucometer to dry. It should be cleaned after each use for infection control to prevent cross contamination. The wrist blood pressure cuff and tympanic thermometer should be cleaned after each use with the bleach wipes to prevent cross contamination. Policy: Titled Infection Prevention and Control Program revised 01/17 document in part: Purpose: To comply with a system for preventing, identifying, investigation, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, visitors, and other individuals providing services. 1. The facility has established an Infection Control Program which addresses all phases of the organization's operation to reduce or prevent the risks of nosocomial infections in residents and health care workers. 16. The facility shall ensure that necessary training, equipment, and supplies are maintained to carry out an effective Infection Control Program. Titled Glucometer Policy revised 06/22 document in part: It is the policy of this facility to maintain infection control practice when using glucometer machines. Glucometer machines will be cleaned and disinfected after each use with disinfectant towels with bleach. Procedure: Apply pre-moistened towel to glucometer after resident use and let stand 2 minutes. Proceed to next resident with 2nd glucometer and repeat process after Accuchecks done. 3. Clean both glucometers utilizing pre-moistened towel allowing two minute to dry. 4. After cleaning 1st glucometer, proceed to next resident with 2nd glucometer and repeat the previous steps. Titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment dated 11/08 document in part: Resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) recommendations for disinfection and the OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) Bloodborne Pathogen Standards. Procedure: c. non-critical items are those that come in contact with intact skin but not mucous membranes. (1) Non-critical resident-care items include bedpans, blood pressure cuffs) d. Reusable items are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents. 3. Durable medical equipment (DME) must be cleaned and disinfected before reuse by another resident. 4. Reusable resident care equipment will be decontaminated and/or sterilized between residents according to manufacturers' instructions. Titled Storage of Reusable Medical Equipment undated document in part: 1. All equipment needs to be disinfected according to manufacture guidelines or facility policies prior to being placed in the clean medication storage.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0887 (Tag F0887)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on review of records and interview the facility failed to follow COVID-19 vaccination policy in offering, educating, and documenting COVID-19 for both staff and residents. These failures have th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of records and interview the facility failed to follow COVID-19 vaccination policy in offering, educating, and documenting COVID-19 for both staff and residents. These failures have the potential to affect residents (R72, R108, R117, R267) on receiving the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination and potential to affect all 112 residents taken care by facility staff that are not vaccinated. Findings include: Five (5) residents were sampled for pneumococcal and influenza vaccination determination and documentation under immunization tab of the electronic health record (EHR): - R72 documentation reads, no immunization for Covid-19 found on record. - R117 documentation reads, no immunization for Covid-19 found on record. - R267 documentation reads, no immunization for Covid-19 found on record. - R108 documentation reads, no immunization for Covid-19 found on record. - R16 documentation reads, SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) received on 1/25/2021 and 2/22/2021. On 03/20/2024 at 11:39 AM, V28 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated V28 got her booster a long time ago and she does not know if facility is offering any Covid-19 vaccination. On 03/20/2024 at 01:37 PM, V10 (Nurse Consultant) was requested for any documentation that staff was being monitored for Covid-19 giving emphasis to direct care staff or newly hired staff. V10 was asked for documentation when was the most recent clinic of Covid-19 offered to staff or education was provided to staff. No documentation given. COVID-19 Vaccinations policy dated 4/27/2023, reads: The purpose of the policy is to ensure compliance with emergency regulation requiring COVID-19 vaccination for healthcare workers and residents that live in a LTC (Long Term Care) facility. This policy is for all residents, employees, and contracted staff will be educated and counseled on the importance of COVID-19 vaccination per CDC guidelines and recommendations. - Residents who are not up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccination will be educated and counseled on the COVID-19 vaccination risk and benefits. - Employees who are not up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccination will be in-serviced on vaccine risk and benefits. - The facility will schedule COVID-19 vaccination clinics ongoing as needed.
Mar 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1) remained free from physical abuse. This failure affected one resident (R1) out of three residents reviewed for abuse...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1) remained free from physical abuse. This failure affected one resident (R1) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1's Face sheet documents R1 has a diagnosis which includes, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance and anxiety, hypokalemia, low back pain, essential hypertension, vitamin d deficiency, hyperlipidemia, urinary tract infection site vascular dementia severe with mood disturbance, COVID 19, and ptosis of bilateral eyelids. R2's Face sheet documents R2 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to schizophrenia, aphasia, violent behavior, rhabdomyolysis, severe intellectual disabilities, unspecified open wound left lower leg sequela, long term use of anticoagulants, other abnormal involuntary movements, essential hypertension, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, urinary tract infection, and autistic disorder. R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 01/18/24 documents in part 00 BIMS score for R1 which indicates R1 has some cognitive impairments. R2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 01/17/24 documents in part R2's BIMS score not assess and R2 is rarely understood. The facility's initial Reportable Incident to the local state agency dated 02/13/24 at 6:47 pm documents, in part R1 was sitting in a wheelchair near the nursing station when R1 was aggressively grabbed by R1's neck from behind by R2 for no apparent reason. The facility's final Reportable Incident to the local state agency dated 02/19/24 at 9:35 pm documents, in part after the facility's investigation was conducted it was concluded R2 gabbed R1 by R1 neck from behind for no apparent reason . R1 or R2 did not sustain any injuries. On 03/11/24 at 11:31 am, R2 was observed in R2's room in bed. R2 was unable to verbally speak or communicate with surveyor. According to V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA), R2 is nonverbal, uses a wheelchair for ambulation and is able to self-propel with wheelchair. On 03/11/23 at 11:33 am, R1 was observed sitting in a geriatric chair asleep at the nursing station. According to V7, R1 is not able to answer questions appropriately. On 03/12/24 at 10:48 am, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN, Infection Preventionist, IP) stated V4 was the nurse on duty on 02/13/24 at time of R1 and R2's incident. V4 stated on 02/13/24 V4 brought R1 and R2 out of the dining area and across from the nursing station and placed R1's wheelchair in front of R2's wheelchair across from the nursing station before V4 went to sit at the nursing station. V4 stated V4 was typing at the computer at the nursing station when V4 heard a commotion. V4 stated V4 observed R1 saying to R2, What are you doing? V4 then explained V4 observed one of R2's hands placed around R1's neck. V4 stated V5 (Social Service) was observed removing R2's hand from R1's neck while V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA, Wound technician) separated R1 from R2. V4 stated R1 did not have any apparent injury and no complaints of pain. V4 explained V4 called R1 and R2's physician, family and both R1 and R2 were sent out for an evaluation. When V5 was asked regarding R2's behavior prior to the incident, V4 stated R2 was agitated and making noises prior to the incident with R1. On 03/12/24 at 11:19 am, V6 (CNA, Wound Technician) stated V6 was helping on the fourth-floor unit on 02/13/24 when V6 observed R2 agitated in the dining area. V6 stated V6 informed V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN, Infection Preventionist, IP) of R2's agitation in the dining room and V4 stated to bring all the residents from the fourth-floor dining room and into the hallway area. V6 then explained V6 removed R1 and R2 from the fourth-floor dining room and placed R1 in front of R2 across from the fourth-floor nursing station. V6 explained R2 was still agitated and making noises. V6 stated V5 (Social Services) was talking to R1 when R2 used the handrail in the hallway to move closer to R1 and aggressively grab R1's neck from behind with one of R2's hands. V6 explained V5 removed R2's hand from R1's neck and V6 separated R1 and R2. V6 stated V6 did not observe R1 with any injuries and R1 and R2 were both sent out for an evaluation. On 03/12/24 at 1:02 pm, Surveyor was informed by V3 (Assistant Administrator) that V5 (Social Service) no longer works at the facility. V3 provided V5's contact information. Surveyor attempted to reach V5 during this investigation and was not successful. On 03/13/24 at 11:29 am, V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) stated V2 has been the DON at the facility since February 2024. V2 stated V2 is not familiar with R1 or R2 and was not working at the facility on 02/13/24. V2 explained if a resident grabs another resident by the neck aggressively it is considered physical abuse. V2 explained if a resident is showing aggressive behaviors the resident should be removed and taken to a quiet place to try and calm the resident down before taken the resident around other residents. V2 stated it is important to avoid residents from being abused by other residents to protect all the residents from harming themselves, other residents, and staff. On 03/13/24 at 12:04 pm, V1 (Administrator) stated V1 is the facility's abuse coordinator since January 2024. V1 stated V1 has presented abuse in-services monthly at the facility. When V1 was asked regarding R2 grabbing R1 aggressively by the neck on 02/13/24, V1 stated, If a resident aggressively grabs another resident by the neck, it would be considered abuse. V1 stated if a resident is displaying aggressive behaviors and agitation the staff should intervene and secure the safety of the resident. V1 explained the importance of making sure a resident is free from abuse, so the residents feel safe and to provide residents with quality care. V1 stated, It is the facility's job to ensure (referring to the resident's safety). R1's progress note dated 02/13/24 at 3:51 pm, authored by V4 (LPN, IP) documents in part, R1 was sitting in the wheelchair near the nursing station. Co Peer (R2) self-propelled near R1 and aggressively grabbed R1 by R1's neck from behind. R1's progress note dated 02/13/24 at 7:51 pm, authored by V9 (Assistant Director of Nursing ADON, Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN,) documents in part, R1 returned to the facility via ambulance. R1 skin noted with no open areas or abrasion to R1's neck. R1's care plan dated 02/14/24 documents in part, Focus: R1 may have signs of neck and back discomfort, skin integrity related to co-peers grabbing R1 neck from behind with possible complications. R2's progress note dated 02/13/24 at 3:35 pm, authored by V4 (LPN, IP) documents in part, R2 noted to self-propel near peer (R1) pulling R1's wheelchair and aggressively grabbing R1 by the neck from behind. R2's care plan dated 07/14/23 documents in part, Focus: R2 has a diagnosis (dx): schizophrenia aggressive behaviors . Interventions: Monitor/record occurrence of for target symptoms (e.g. (example) pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication, violence/aggression towards staff/others et.). R2's care plan dated 02/14/23 documents in part, Focus: R2 has potential to be physically aggressive as evidence by (AEB) history of aggressiveness prior to admission and recent episode with co-peer (R1) grabbing from back of the neck related to (r/t) poor impulse control due to diagnosis (dx) Autism and other diagnosis and core morbidities with possible serious complications. The facility's undated policy titled Abuse Policy documents, in part: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse. Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, contractors, volunteers, or staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, friends, or other individuals . 3. Physical Abuse includes but limited to hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking. The facility's undated document titled Abuse Prevention Program documents in part, Policy: The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The facility's document titled 1:1 Monitoring documents in part: Purpose 1. To ensure residents exhibits harmful behaviors to self and other are closely supervised to prevent harm to self and others.
Feb 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse. This failure affect...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse. This failure affected R5 who was physically pushed by R1, causing R5 to fall and sustained a left hip fracture required emergency transfer to the hospital with surgical repair of the left hip fracture and affected R7 who was physically punched in the face by R1 causing a periorbital contusion when reviewed for resident to resident, physical assault, in the sample of 4 residents (R1, R3, R5 and R7). Findings include: 1. On 2/22/24 at 1:23 pm, R5 observed lying in bed with a left arm mold cast wrapped with bandage. R5 stated R5 just got back from hospital. R5 stated R5 had surgery on left hip and elbow due to being hurt real bad while showing surveyor R5's left hip surgical bandage. When asked how R5 injured left hip and elbow, R5 stated, Someone (R1) punched me on the elevator, and I fell down. When asked the name of the someone, R5 said R5 didn't know the name, but it was another resident with a physical description matched by R1. When this surveyor stated R1's first name, R1 stated, Yes, it was (R1). R5 stated this occurred days ago. R5's admission Record, documents, in part, diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, pain, hyperlipidemia, vitamin D deficiency, major depressive disorder, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and hypertension. R5's emergency ambulance records, dated 2/19/24, V35 (Emergency Medical Services, EMS/Fire Department Paramedic) documents, in part, upon EMS staffs' arrival at the facility, R5 was found laying supine in the elevator complaining of left leg pain with R5 alert and oriented x 4. Trauma assessment found obvious deformity of the high left femur, shortening of the left leg and rotation outwards of the left leg. Nursing home staff stated, (R5) stated, (R5) was pushed by another resident (R1) and that's how (R5) fell. V35 documented R5's cause of injury was assault. R5's emergency hospital records, document, in part, R5 was brought in by ambulance after being pushed to the ground by another resident (R1) at the facility. R5's hospital radiology report for left hip X-ray (2-3 views), dated 2/17/24, documents, in part, the results of acute, complete obliquely oriented fracture involving the left proximal femoral diaphysis. In R5's hospital operative report, dated 2/18/24, V36 (Orthopedic Surgeon) documents, in part, in discussion with R5 prior to surgery, R5 was able to tell (V36) (R5) is admitted for (R5's) hip fracture after being pushed at the nursing home. V36 documented, in part, V36 performed R5's surgery of a left hip cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric hip fracture. On 2/27/24 at 12:21 pm, V12 (Front Desk Receptionist) stated V12 was working on 2/17/24 from 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm. V12 stated V12 was seated at the facility's front lobby receptionist's desk shortly after 3:00 pm. V12 heard R1 yelling, Hurry up or I am going to push you. V12 stated, I (V12) don't think a second went by and I heard the fall. V12 stated despite a door separating the front lobby receptionist's desk from the 1st floor elevator area, which is very close in proximity, R1 yelled loud enough for me to hear it. V12 stated when V12 immediately got up to see what happened, V12 saw R5 on the elevator floor. R5 was screaming, Oh, my leg, my leg. V12 stated R1 standing outside the elevator looking at R5. V12 stated nursing staff responded from the dining room which is located on the east side of the elevators. V12 ran back to the receptionist desk to call an emergency overpage code for further staff assistance. When asked how V12 recognized it was R1's voice yelling, Hurry up or I am going to push you!, V12 stated V12 definitely knew R1's voice and recognized it right away. V12 stated R5's fall sound in the elevator was a loud thud. V12 stated V12 reported this information about R1 pushing R5 to V3 (Assistant Administrator) on 2/17/24. Facility document titled Statement, dated 2/18/24, V12 documents, in part, I (V12) heard (R1) screaming and saying, 'Hurry up or I'll push you.' Then I heard a loud noise. I got up and saw (R1) standing in front of the elevator and (R5) screaming on the elevator floor. On 2/28/24 12:46 pm, V20 (Escort) stated on 2/17/24, V20 was working as activities staff in the 1st floor dining room. V20 stated R1 and R5, amongst other residents, were in the 1st floor dining room on 2/17/24 afternoon. V20 heard residents saying R5 was on the floor in the elevator. V20 stated V20 immediately responded to see R5 was laying on R5's back, somewhat on left side with R5's walker on its side on the elevator floor next to R5. V20 stated R1 was standing directly outside the elevator. R1's admission Record, documents, in part, diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, psychosis, restlessness and agitation, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, vitamin D deficiency, depression, and cocaine abuse with intoxication. R1's MDS, dated [DATE], documents, in part, a BIMS score of 13 which indicates R1 is cognitively intact. R1 no longer resides in the facility and was unable to be interviewed. On 2/22/24 at 3:17 pm, V3 (Assistant Administrator) stated V3 was informed by V12 that R5 had fallen in the elevator and V12 heard R1 yelling if you don't hurry, I will push you with a few seconds later hearing a noise like a fall. On 2/28/24 at 11:35 am, V3 stated V3 interviewed R5 on 2/22/24 and R5 stated another resident pushed R5 in the elevator. V3 stated R5 provided a physical description matched R1 with a first name very similar to R1. When asked for the conclusion of R1/R5's allegation of physical abuse on 2/17/24, V3 stated, (R1) pushed (R5), and R1 didn't think R1 wanted to get on the elevator with R5. When asked with the allegation of physical abuse of R1 towards R5 on 2/17/24, was this allegation substantiated, V3 stated, Yes. (R1) did push (R5) on purpose. On 2/28/24 at 11:49 am, V1 (Administrator) stated V1 is the abuse coordinator for the facility and has a duty to protect all the residents in the facility. V1 stated after conducting the investigation with V3 about R1/R5's incident on 2/17/24, V1 can see R5 was very sharp. V1 concluded R5 provided a clear description of what occurred with R1. When asked if physical abuse is substantiated, V1 stated, That's really hard. I (V1) can substantiate the incident occurred. V1 stated V1 knows abuse is the intent to cause harm. 2. On 2/27/24 at 3:05 pm, R7 observed sitting at a table in the 1st floor dining room with other residents present at other tables. R7 stated R7 was agreeable with an interview. This surveyor observed R7's speech very slow and pronounced. R7 stated R7 doesn't remember what happened when asked about a physical incident involving R1 where R7 was hit in face in November 2023. R7's admission Record, documents, in part, diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, anemia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis, thyrotoxicosis, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, chronic atrial fibrillation, mild cognitive impairment, dysphagia, tachycardia, and mood disorder. R7's MDS, dated [DATE], documents, in part, a BIMS score of 9 which indicates R7's cognition is moderately intact. On 2/28/24 at 1:04 pm, V21 (Activities Aide) stated on 11/18/23 around 9:30 am, during activities program in the 1st floor dining room, V21 observed R1 walking into the dining room, talking to V21. V21 stated R7 was sitting at a table for the activities. V21 stated R1 was walking past R7 when R1 swung and hit (R7) in the eye with a closed fist. V21 stated V21 immediately intervened and separated R1 from R7. On 2/27/24 at 11:01 am, V10 (PRSA, Psychiatry Rehabilitation Services Assistant) stated on 11/18/23, V10 was walking with R1 from the 1st floor dining room. R1 heard R7's voice from a conversation with another resident, and R1 turned, going back to R7 (who was in a seated position) and punched R7 in the side of the head. When asked what did R7 do, V10 stated R7 sat there and didn't say anything. V10 stated an emergency code was paged overhead for staff assistance. On 2/27/24 at 1:21 pm, V15 (LPN) stated V15 responded to the emergency code in the 1st floor dining room on 11/18/23 due to R1 hitting R7 with a closed fist. V15 stated V15 brought R7 upstairs, performed assessment with R7 having redness to right side of face. V15 notified V37 (Attending Physician) who ordered for monitoring R7. V15 stated on 11/20/23, R7 continued to have redness on R7's right side of face with no complaints of pain from R7. V15 stated on 11/21/23, V15 noted R7's right side of face with increased redness. V15 notified V37 who ordered for R7 to be transferred to the hospital for further evaluation. R7's hospital discharge instructions, dated [DATE], document, in part diagnoses from R7's hospital visit as periorbital contusion, eye injury, and contusions are the result of a blunt injury to tissues and muscle fibers under the skin. Facility policy dated January 2023 and titled Abuse Policy, documents, in part, Each resident has the right to be free from abuse. Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to . other residents . 'Abuse means the willful infliction of injury . 3. 'Physical Abuse' includes, but not limited to hitting. Facility policy dated August 2022 and titled Resident's Rights, documents, in part, Purpose: No resident shall be deprived of any rights, benefits, or privileges guaranteed by law, the constitution of the State of Illinois, or the Constitution of the United States solely on account of his or her status as a resident of this Community, nor shall the resident forfeit any of the following rights: . 14. The right to be free of abuse.
Jan 2024 3 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to keep R6 free from abuse. This failure resulted in ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to keep R6 free from abuse. This failure resulted in R6 being sprayed in the face with a chemical agent by a staff member (V26). R6 experienced eye irritation and pain which required irrigation at the emergency department. The facility further failed to keep V26 away from R6 after the incident by allowing V26 to continue to work with R6 and allowed V26 to remain on the same unit. This situation was identified as an immediate jeopardy. The Administrator, Assistant Administrator-in-training, and the Director of Nursing were presented with the immediate jeopardy template on 1/5/2024 at 9:55 AM. The immediate jeopardy began on 11/15/2023 and removed on 1/12/2024. The facility presented an acceptable removal plan on 1/12/2024. However, the deficiency remains out of compliance at the second level of harm until the facility evaluates the effectiveness of the removal plan. Findings include: R6's face sheet documents in part medical diagnoses of psychosis, restlessness, and agitation. R6's comprehensive care plan does not contain a focus for R6's risk for abuse. Facility's final reportable to the Illinois Department of Public Health reads: an incident occurred between R6 and V26 (former Restorative Aide) on 11/15/2023. It documents in part: Based on the known fact's resident appeared aggressive towards staff. Staff was fearful of resident and sprayed pepper spray at the resident and not on the resident. Surveyor reviewed the written witness statements and interviewed staff regarding the incident. During interview regarding 11/15/2023 incident on 1/2/2024 at 12:19 PM, V18 (Nurse) stated, There was something in the air when I got to the floor. I started coughing because it was something in the air. It was clear. Not cloudy or hazy or smoky but it made my eyes burn and caused me to cough that I had to turn right around. I couldn't respond properly to the code. V18's written witness statement dated 11/15/2023 documents in part that V18 could not properly respond to the code because V18 started coughing bad and eyes were burning. On 1/2/2024 at 1:46 PM, V20 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated around 7:20 AM on 11/15/23, R6 was at the desk asking V39 (Nurse) about coffee and breakfast. V39 told R6 that breakfast will be up shortly and directed R6 back to the bedroom. The elevator opened and V26 (former Restorative Aide) was there. V26 told R6 to go to the bedroom. R6 stated [R6] did not want to go back to the bedroom and started yelling. V20 stated, [R6] started coming towards [V26] a little aggressive so [V26] sprayed [R6] with something towards [R6's] face. R6 grabbed R6's head with R6's hands and put R6's head down. V20 stated V26 later took R6 to the bedroom. On 1/3/2024 at 2:13 PM, V35 (Nurse) stated, I got off the elevator that day and it was something in the air that caused my eyes and nose running. I had to go someplace to get some air. I was coughing and had a headache for two days. I never experienced it before. I didn't know what it was. I had to drink cold water to get me through that day. I had to flush my eyes out and I wear glasses. Never felt that way while at work. V35 written witness statement dated 11/15/2023 documents in part: When I came off the floor, something was in the air. My eyes were running. I started coughing and throwing up. V13's (Nurse) written witness statement dated 11/15/2023 documents in part: Elevator opened smell of pepper spray. I couldn't get off the elevator because the smell was so strong. On 1/3/2024 at 2:27 PM, V24 (Psychiatric Rehabilitative Services Director) stated, If a resident is agitated and aggressive towards someone, you try to separate them. Try to get them to calm them down by talking to them calmly. Ask what's going on and see what brought them to that level of agitation. We have to see what we can do to help them. When asked about R6's incident, V24 stated they should have calmed [R6] down and talked to [R6] calmly and not be aggressive with it. You don't spray. No spraying. If it was that bad, you always call for help. Call for more assistance. If [R6] was escalating bad and showing more agitation, I'd call for help and step back and see what they can do. You're not supposed to have something on you in here to spray. I will walk away and get more assistance and let them know how [R6] is reacting. Find my exit and let them know this is what's going on so we can get more people to help. On 1/4/2024 at 8:46 AM, V34 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated, Me and [V18], the nurse, came out the stairwell and before I even reached the nurses' station, I had to turn around. I probably only got half-way through the hallway because the smell was so strong. It smelled like pepper spray. I had to turn around. It was affecting my eyes and getting into my nose. I just remember [R6] standing there by the nurses' station rubbing [R6's] eyes. V34's written witness statement dated 11/15/2023 documents in part that when V34 arrived on scene, it smelled like bear spray. V34 had to turn around because V34's eyes were burning. During interviews on 1/4/2024 at 9:22 AM and 11:35 AM, V26 stated R6 came towards V26 aggressively but [V26] did not spray anything at R6. V26 stated someone was spraying an air freshener in the hall. V26 stated afterwards that V26 brought R6 coffee and breakfast. V26 stated [V26] did not leave the facility until around 9:30 AM on 11/15/23. V26 acknowledged the facility provided an in-service about how to handle residents with behaviors at the beginning of the year but felt it wasn't specific to psychiatric behaviors or offered frequently enough throughout the year. On 1/4/2024 at 11:58 AM, V37 (Director of Nursing at the time of the incident) stated staff are not to carry pepper spray or anything that is caustic or that's an eye irritant while working with residents. V37 stated if a resident is displaying aggressive behaviors, the first line is to separate the individuals and try to talk and see what's going on or find root cause. On 1/5/2024 at 12:08 PM, V42 (R6's Physician) stated, Staff should not be using pepper spray in the facility. They shouldn't be carrying it. The purpose of pepper spray is to keep a person away from you. If it is sprayed and it goes into your eyes, it will have irritating effects because it is a chemical. You have to wash out your eyes. On 1/9/2024 at 9:24 AM, V1 (Administrator/Vice President of Quality Assurance) stated a substance got into R6's eyes and the resident was sent to the emergency room for evaluation. V1 stated when facility reviewed the surveillance video of the incident, it was not an air freshener. V1 stated it was clear what the employee had on hand in the video. On 1/9/2024 at 11:57 AM, V47 (Manager on Duty at time of incident) stated when [V47] arrived at the unit, R6 was frustrated, loud and upset. V47 stated, I saw orange on him like orange pepper spray. V47 stated R6's face and eyes were red. On 1/9/2024 at 10:02 AM, surveyor reviewed facility's surveillance footage of the incident with V3 (Director of Nursing), V25 (Assistant Administrator-in training), and V45 (Human Resources). No audio was with the footage. First review was of the fourth floor nurses' station camera angle which showed, on 11/15/2023 at 7:26:52 AM, V20 (Certified Nurse Aide) and V39 (Day Nurse) were at the nurses' station. Elevators are in front of the nurses' station. R6 came out of the bedroom and pressed the elevator button at 7:27:02 AM. R6 remained standing in front of the elevator door with R6's back turned to V20 and V39 waiting. No observation of physical aggression from R6 observed. At 7:30:50 AM, V7 (Wound Tech) emerged from the big elevator and went to grab the wound cart. There is a hand seen out of the elevator stopping R6 from getting on. At 7:31:04 AM, V7 brought the wound cart into the big elevator and V26 (former Restorative Aide) stepped left out of the elevator. At 7:31:10 AM, V26 is west of the elevator (if facing the elevator, V26 is on the right side) motioning in front of R6 and pointing towards east hallway - R6's room. R6 is facing V26. During video footage review surveyor does not observe R6 to be puffing chest, running, or swinging arms. At 7:31:11 AM, V26 holds a small, black, cylindrical item with a silver split key ring with right hand. At 7:31:15 AM, V26 raises up the black cylindrical item with right hand as the left hand starts messing with it. V26 steps out of frame. At 7:31:29 AM, R6 remains facing west where V26 exited the frame. V5 (Anonymous Staff) is facing R6 standing to R6's right front. V39 came out of the nurses' station and grabbed gloves from the top of one of the medications carts. V20 is standing behind V39. V20 and V39 are facing R6. R6 takes a step, and a dark orange/almost brown substance shoots linear into frame and hits directly at R6's face. R6 raises left hand up over face. R6 stumbles back towards the nurses' station and hits the medication carts with right side at 7:31:34 AM. Staff start to disperse away from the scene. V20 (Certified Nurse Aide) has a hand over nose and mouth. V46 (Maintenance) uses blue shirt to cover nose and mouth. V39 (Nurse) is covering mouth. R6 remains by the medication carts holding head. At 7:32:20 AM, V5 (Anonymous Staff) is waving a white item to swat the air. At 7:32:40 AM, V26 (former Restorative Aide) passes R6 and heads to the dining room which is behind the nurses' station. At 7:33:40 AM, R6 remains near the medication carts. No staff has approached R6. R6 is bent over with head down. R6 grabs [R6's] face with the left hand. At 7:34:00 AM, multiple staff come out of the big elevator including V7 (Wound Tech), V21 (Certified Nurse Aide), V27 (Nurse), and V35 (Nurse). V27 can be seen bending at the hip, leaning forward, and coughing. At 7:34:18 AM, V26 is walking around R6 who remains near medication carts. V26 gets on the elevator at 7:34:22 AM. R6 remains in place while switching from standing to bending at the hip and leaning forward. At 7:36:23 AM, as R6 is hunched over, two large, liquid/fluid drops come from R6's face which appears to be saliva/spit. At 7:37:15 AM, V26 emerges from the elevator and returns to the unit. At 7:37:36 AM, R6 leaves the nurses' station unassisted to return to the bedroom. During video footage review surveyor does not observe any staff come near R6 to assess or assist R6 in rinsing eyes or face out. At 7:38:15 AM, V47 (Manager on Duty) is seen standing by R6's room talking to someone (person can't be seen from camera angle). V26 remains on the unit and is seen at the nurses' station at 7:38:50 AM. At 7:41:09 AM, V26 has a white spray bottle and sprays repeatedly in the air. V26 does this multiple times throughout the unit including a few times in front of R6's room. At 7:46:38 AM, V26 went into R6's room. At 7:47:02 AM, V26 leaves R6's room, then went back in at 7:47:06 AM, and back out at 7:47:15 AM. At 7:47:35 AM, staff bring out coffee and breakfast carts from the big elevator. V26 grabbed a mug and pours a liquid into it. At 7:47:54 AM, V26 went into R6's room with white spray bottle in left hand and mug in right hand. At 7:48:09 AM, V26 leaves R6's room with the white spray bottle in right hand. V26 continues to walk around and spray the hall with the white spray bottle. At 7:51:24 AM, V26 went inside R6's room and leaves room at 7:51:38 AM. At 7:52:04 AM, V26 gets into the elevator. At 8:00:50 AM, V26 (former Restorative Aide) emerges from the elevator and returns to the unit. Paramedics arrive on scene at 8:09:56 AM. R6 went onto their stretcher at 8:10:59 AM and R6 is in the elevator at 8:12:46 AM. V26 remained on the unit with other residents. On 1/5/2024 at 11:22 AM, surveyor reviewed the Fourth Floor [NAME] Hall camera angle surveillance footage with V3 (Director of Nursing), V25 (Assistant Administrator-in-training), and V45 (Human Resources). V26 is at the top of the frame. Housekeeping cart is behind V26. View of the left side of hall near nurses' station is blocked by an open door. At 7:31:29 AM, V26 is standing near the elevators. V26 then starts moving left with right hand up. V45 stated, Yeah, I see [V26] go forward and bring that right hand up. On 1/5/2024 at 11:30 AM, surveyor reviewed the Fourth Floor East Hall camera angle surveillance footage with V3, V25, and V45. At 7:31:29 AM, V26 brings up the right arm as V26 moves left. V45 stated, [V26] brought [V26's] right hand up after [R6] stepped forward. V26's Employee Report documents in part: Investigation Review that something was sprayed, and several staff were coughing. Witness statement indicate that employee did spray pepper spray at resident. R6's 11/15/2023 ambulance records (page 2 of 6) document in part: [Patient] is complaining of eye pain from being maced. [Patient] appears to have been maced. [Patient] is coughing and [patient's] eyes are irritated. Scene smells like [NAME] was discharged . R6's 11/15/2023 hospital records document in part: Patient was pepper sprayed. When I reevaluated the patient, patient reports persistent pain in [R6's] left eye after irrigation (page 3 of 16). [Patient] was reportedly maced by [Nursing Home] staff. [Patient] arrives with red, irritated face and eyes. [Positive] tearing. [Positive] pain (Page 6 of 16). V26 signed Receipt and Acknowledgement Employee Handbook - Local No. 4 (11/99) on 11/16/2011. V26 signed Certificate of Receipt of Employee Handbook on 3/8/2013. V26 signed additional Code of Conduct Attestation Statement on 4/5/2013. Facility's Employee Handbook dated 6/11/2021 documents in part: The Facility will not tolerate any physical, verbal or mental abuse, bullying, or intimidation 'Workplace Violence' whether of residents, patients, employees, visitors, vendors, and/or volunteers. We do not tolerate fighting (physical or verbal) or disorderly conduct on the job. In addition, we prohibit the possession of firearms, knives, or any other weapon on company property or while conducting business on behalf of the Company (page 14). V26's signed Compliance/False Claims Act/Ethics Program and Code of Conduct Employee Understanding Agreement dated 11/15/2013 documents in part: Don't mistreat a resident in any way. V26 signed facility's educational in-service for Managing Difficult Behaviors on 02/07/2023. Slide 23 titled 10 Tips for Communication documents in part: Set a positive mood for interaction. Watch your body language and verbal tone. When the going gets tough, distract and redirect. Slide 24 titled Specific Strategies-Agitation document in part: Distract the persons with an activity or snack. Confronting a confused person increases anxiety. Allow the person to do as much for themselves as possible. Support independence. Facility's Abuse Prevention Program last revised 03/08/2016 documents in part: This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. Abuse is any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means in a facility. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting harm, pain, or mental anguish. The facility will take steps to prevent potential abuse while the investigation is underway. Employees of this facility who have been accused of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property will be removed from the resident contact immediately until the results of the investigation have been reviewed by the administrator. The Immediate Jeopardy that began on 11/15/2023 was removed on 1/12/2024 when the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy: The following Plan of Abatement shall also serve as the Facility's written credible allegation of compliance that will be or has been achieved by the stated date of completion. Submission of this Plan of Abatement does not constitute in any way an admission of any facts and/or conclusions of law reflected in the alleged deficiencies, nor does it constitute a waiver of the Facility's right to contest the deficiencies and/or any remedies imposed because of this or future surveys. On 11/15/2023, The restorative aide V26 was accused of spraying pepper spray towards resident R6. Employee was suspended pending investigation. The incident occurred at 7:30am. V38 was informed immediately and was in route to the facility with an arrival at 8:15am. The employee punched out at 9:35am (see timecard). Preliminary incident investigation was sent to IDPH. Investigation was initiated, based on witness statements and review of video camera, employee was terminated. The final abuse investigation report was sent to IDPH on 11/21/2023. I. 1. All residents will always be free from abuse. 2. R6 is no longer in the facility after being sent to the hospital the day of the incident he left AMA. 3. V26 was relieved of her duties immediately and was subsequently terminated in accordance with the facility policy. She then filed a grievance, the facility responded and maintained that the termination was justified. 4. Abuse In-service was conducted on 11/28/23 after the incident occurred. The Inservice included: individual including a caretaker of goods or services that are necessary to attain and/or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This assumes that all instances of abuse of residents, even those in a coma, cause physical harm or pain or mental anguish. Review physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal abuse, mental abuse, and misappropriation of resident property, involuntary seclusion, and neglect. Review that employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the Administrator immediately or to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to an administrator. Reviewed that employee accused of allegations of abuse will be suspended pending investigation. II. 1. A review of the requirement that all residents be always free from physical abuse. 2. A review of the alleged deficiency. 3. All staff will be re- in serviced on the facility abuse policy and procedures. The Inservice will include: individual including a caretaker of goods or services that are necessary to attain and/or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This assumes that all instances of abuse of residents, even those in a coma, cause physical harm or pain or mental anguish. Review physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal abuse, mental abuse, and misappropriation of resident property, involuntary seclusion, and neglect. Review that employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the Administrator immediately or to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to an administrator. Reviewed that employee accused of allegations of abuse will be suspended pending investigation. The facility employee list will be used to ensure all staff are in service in each department to be completed by 1/10/24 conducted by V1, RN, LNHA and V24, ASST ADMINISTRATOR. Any staff not available at the time of these in services will be retrained upon arriving at work. All new nursing staff will be trained in these policies at the time of hire. All agency staff who have not worked at the facility before will be required to arrive one hour before their shift to be trained on the facility abuse policy. V3, DON, RN will conduct Inservice. 4. Any staff on vacation will be trained upon returning to work. V3, DON, RN will conduct Inservice. All staff will be Inservice on facility policy on calling code grey when resident is observed with increased behavior and/or agitation. Inservice will be conducted by V25, ASST ADMINISTRATOR completed by 1/16/24. 5. All staff will be in serviced on their responsibilities for the care and the safety of all residents in a crisis. Inservice will be conducted by V25, ASST ADMINISTRATOR will be complete by 1/16/24. 6. All staff will be in serviced on the facility code of conduct policy which include the facility prohibit the possession of firearms, knives, or any other weapon on company property or while conducting business on behalf of the company, this also includes pepper spray or any other caustic agent that could harm a resident, this Inservice will be conducted by V1, RN, LNHA and V25, ASST ADMINISTRATOR to be completed by 1/16/24. 7. Social service consultants V66 LCSW will conduct an Inservice on De-escalation and conflict resolution to be completed by 1/18 /24. 8. Social Service consultant V65, LCSW will be conduction ongoing CPI training by 01/24/24. All allegations of abuse will be reviewed immediately as the event occur to assure the timeliness of reporting and the removal of staff immediately. Each event will be discussed daily during morning meeting and reported monthly to the QA. The Asst. Administrator V25 will conduct a QA audit via random direct questions during daily rounds to determine staff retention of abuse policy. A QA audit will be conducted monthly x 3 months quarterly thereafter and upon hire to ensure continued compliance. The results of the QA audit will be submitted to the QAPI committee for review and follow up. The QAPI committee will ensure that the systems are in place and are effective. This will be done monthly x 3 months the quarterly thereafter unless additional meetings are deemed appropriate to prevent reoccurrence. The facility presented a plan to remove the immediacy on 1/5/2024. The survey team reviewed the abetment plan and was unable to accept the plan to remove the immediacy. The abatement plan was returned to the facility for revisions. The facility presented a revised plan on 1/8/2024, 1/11/2024, and 1/12/2024. The survey team accepted the plan on 1/12/2024. On 1/16/2024 and 1/18/2024 the surveyor, via observation, interview and record, confirmed the implementation of facility's removal plan. On 1/16/2024 at 9:15 AM, V46 (Maintenance) stated V46 did not receive recent abuse or code of conduct in-services. On 1/16/2024 at 9:37 AM, V10 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated attending the in-services for abuse and de-escalation techniques; however, did not receive code of conduct in-service. On 1/16/2024 at 9:42 AM, V5 (Anonymous Staff) stated attending abuse in-service but did not receive one for de-escalation, code greys, or code of conduct. On 1/16/2024 at 9:47 AM, V6 (Nurse) stated attending the in-services on abuse and de-escalation techniques but did not receive the ones for code grey or the code of conduct. On 1/16/2024 at 9:49 AM, V20 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated attending the abuse in-service but did not receive one on code of conduct. On 1/16/2024 at 9:55 AM, V13 (Nurse) stated attending the abuse in-service but did not receive one on code of conduct. On 1/16/2024 at 9:59 AM, V17 (Nurse) stated attending the abuse in-service but did not receive one on code of conduct. On 1/16/2024 at 10:05 AM, V48 (Activities) stated attending the abuse in-service but did not receive the ones for code grey or the code of conduct. On 1/16/2024 at 10:08 AM, V50 (Dietary Manager) stated attending all the in-services. On 1/16/2024 at 10:16 AM, V49 (Receptionist) stated attending the abuse in-service but did not receive the ones for code grey or the code of conduct. Discussed the above interviews with V1 (Administrator) and V25 (Assistant Administrator in-training) on 1/16/2024 at 10:45 AM. Facility did not complete the target goals on 1/16/2024. Surveyor returned 1/18/2024 to confirm the implementation of facility's removal plan. On 1/18/2024 at 9:43 AM, V1 and V25 stated they re-in-serviced all the required topics with the staff. Facility also has ongoing de-escalation in-services and will have CPI (Crisis Prevention Intervention) training in the coming weeks. During interviews on 1/18/2024 from 9:49 AM to 10:48 AM, V9 (Restorative Aide), V44 (Certified Nurse Aide), V53 (Dietary), V54 (Dietary), V48 (Activities), V46 (Maintenance), V56 (Housekeeping), V57 (Social Services), V59 (Certified Nurse Aide), V60 (Nurse), V61 (Certified Nurse Aide), V62 (Housekeeping), and V49 (Receptionist) stated they received in-services on abuse, de-escalation techniques, code grey, and code of conduct. On 1/16/2024 and 1/18/2024, did not observe any staff carrying weapons or caustic agents. Reviewed facility's in-service summary sheets, in-service materials, and sign-in sheets.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have a nurse assess a resident (R1) immediately after a fall and notify the physician. This resulted in a delay of care for R1 who sustai...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have a nurse assess a resident (R1) immediately after a fall and notify the physician. This resulted in a delay of care for R1 who sustained a displaced fracture of the greater trochanter of the right femur (right hip fracture) from the fall. R1 required surgical intervention. This affected one of six residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: R1's face sheet documents in part medical diagnoses of displaced fracture of greater trochanter of right femur and history of falling. On 1/2/2024 at 11:29 AM, R7 stated R1 fell while staff were trying to help R1 get into the shower. R7 stated R1 kept backing up, slipped, and fell between the footboard and the wall. During a follow-up interview on 1/3/2024 at 10:02 AM, R7 stated, [R1] was trying to get away from those ladies that wanted to give [R1] a shower. [R1] slipped some sort of way and hurt [R1's] back. R7 stated, [R1] was hurting on [R1's] side down to [R1's] feet. [R1] was shaking and hollering. R7 stated the facility did not send the resident out until later in the day. On 1/2/2024 at 11:51 AM, V9 (Restorative Aide) stated staff tried to assist R1 with incontinence care because R1 had soiled pants. V9 stated R1 got up and walked around the bed and when R1 came around the bed, R1 slipped to the wall and slid onto the floor. V9 stated R1 complained of hip pain but didn't say which hip. V9 called for help and staff got R1 up. During a follow-up interview on 1/3/2024 at 9:22 AM, V9 stated, When [R1] slid down, [R1] laid flat on the floor then [R1] was like 'oh I broke my hip.' [R1] slid all the way to the floor and was hollering that [R1's] hip was broke. V9 stated staff used a draw sheet to get R1 off the floor. V9 stated R1 complained of pain at the time of transfer from floor to bed. On 1/3/2024 at 11:11 AM, V29 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated staff were trying to give R1 a shower around 1:00 PM on 12/15/23. R1 declined so V29 removed gloves and began to exit the room. When V29 turned back around, R1 was sitting on the floor. V29 did not witness how R1 got to the floor but stated R1 stumbled between the footboard and wall. V29 got additional help and assisted R1 back in bed. V29 stated R1 complained of leg pain. Surveyor interviewed V32 (R1's Day Nurse during time of incident) on 1/3/2024 at 2:45 PM. V32 stated staff did not inform [V32] that R1 fell. V32 stated, I don't know about a fall. Nobody called me for anything. I don't know anything about a fall. Reviewed facility's nursing schedule for 12/15/2023 showed V32 was the only nurse listed for the unit. R1's day shift (7:00 AM - 7:00 PM) progress notes for 12/15/2023 show no documentation of R1's fall, which V29 stated occurred around 1:00 PM. No documentation of staff's assessments immediately post fall. On 1/3/2024 at 11:26 AM, V20 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated [V20] took over R1's care for the evening shift (3:00 PM to 11:30 PM). V20 stated staff did not inform [V20] that R1 fell. On 1/3/2024 at 11:48 AM, V33 (Night Nurse) stated [V33] took over R1's care at 7:00 PM. V33 did not receive shift-to-shift nurse report that R1 fell. At around 9:00 PM, R1 complained of pain and stated [R1] fell when it was still daylight. V33's progress note dated 12/15/2023 9:29 PM documents in part: upon medication administration resident verbalized [R1] is experiencing pain to bilateral hips and [R1] is unable to move them. Resident was asked if [R1] fell and per resident [R1] believe [R1] fell earlier in the day when it was day light. On 1/4/2024 at 1:21 PM, V40 (Facility's onsite Nurse Practitioner) stated staff did not notify (V40) of R1's fall. On 1/5/2024 at 12:47 PM, V43 (Physician) stated staff should have sent R1 to the hospital when [R1] fell and complained of pain. If they would have notified me, I would have sent [R1] out. On 1/4/2024 at 10:06 AM, V36 (Fall/Restorative Nurse) stated if an aide witnesses a fall, the aide must first get the nurse before getting the resident up. The nurse assesses the resident and their pain. The nurse looks for redness, warmth, shortening, or rotation. V36 stated, They don't lift the resident until assessment is completed by the nurse because what if they had a fracture or dislocation and you lift the resident then you might make it worst. Depending on the nurse's assessment, the nurse will either call the doctor or send the resident out to hospital right away. On 1/9/2024 at 12:08 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated if a resident is on the floor and complains of pain, [V3] would assess the resident and call 911. V3 would not transfer or move the resident for safety purposes. R1's 12/16/23 hospital records documents in part, when R1 arrived in the emergency department, R1 had right hip deformity with right lower extremity shortened and externally rotated (page 25 of 99). The x-ray of the hip revealed an acute comminuted intertrochanteric fracture of the right proximal femur. Mild displacement of the fracture fragments. Mild valgus angulation (page 26 of 99). Orthopedic consultation documents in part right hip fracture requiring Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) surgery on 12/16/2023 (pages 4-5 of 99). R1's comprehensive care plan contains a focus last revised on 11/27/2023 which documents in part: [R1] is High Risk for falls [related to] Gait/balance problems, poor safety awareness due to impaired cognition, use of psychotropic medication, poor safety awareness. Interventions initiated 6/21/2021 documents in part: Follow facility fall protocol. Facility's Fall Prevention Policy last revised 12/20/2022 documents in part: If a resident experiences a fall, nurses will complete an incident report and document the fall in the resident record, as well as the 24-hour report. The policy does not have procedures or protocols on how to care for a resident immediately post fall. Physician Notification Policy last revised 2020 documents in part: Physician will be informed of any significant changes in the resident's condition and or any abnormal labs/x-ray results. Staff will document in the resident's record when a physician is notified including who was notified, date, time, and physician response/plan of care. Unsuccessful attempts to notify a physician will also be documented with any further actions that are taken by the nursing staff.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to (a) carry out physician orders in a timely manner, (b) notify physician of delayed services and family's request for hospital transfer, a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to (a) carry out physician orders in a timely manner, (b) notify physician of delayed services and family's request for hospital transfer, and (c) administer the correct dosage for one (R5) of 12 residents reviewed for improper nursing care. Findings include: V35's (Nurse) progress note dated 12/06/2023 9:26 AM documents in part: [R5] in shower vomited 5-10 [milliliter] of green emesis with broccoli. States pain in stomach is 10 [severe]. Morning medication given. Evaluated by [Nurse Practitioner]. R5's physician orders document in part that V40 (Nurse Practitioner) ordered a STAT KUB (Kidney, Ureter, Bladder X-ray) on 12/06/2023 at 11:07 AM and STAT blood labs at 11:16 AM. V35's progress note for R5 dated 12/06/2023 4:43 PM documents in part: [Complained of] pain in stomach rated at 8-10. Tylenol 500 given. [Followed-up] with [contracted company] for STAT testing. Arrival anticipated by 7. No documentation that V35 notified V40 or V42 (Physician) of R5's condition or that STAT orders were delayed or not done. No documentation as to which provider ordered Tylenol 500 order. R5's Laboratory Report and Lab Results Reports dated 12/06/2023 documents in part the specimens were collected 12/06/2023 7:20 PM. No KUB results. Reviewed R5's Order Summary Report and December Medication Administration Records. R5 has an as needed order for Acetaminophen (Tylenol) but not for the 500 mg (milligram) dose. On 01/02/2024 at 11:02 AM, V5 (Anonymous Staff) stated [R5] was throwing up green stuff. The nurse told the family that they were going to send [R5] out but they never did. On 01/04/2024 at 9:22 AM, V26 (former Restorative Aide) stated R5 threw up in the shower and had blood in the incontinence product. V26 stated the staff reported it to the nurse. V26 said, They were supposed to send R5 out to the hospital, but it never happened. On 01/04/2024 at 1:21 PM, V40 stated V35 notified [V40] that R5 had a small amount of emesis in the morning. V40 stated R5 had mild to moderate discomfort at the time. V40 evaluated R5 and ordered STAT KUB and labs. V40 stated the usual turnaround time for STAT orders is around four hours. V40 stated nursing is supposed to follow-up on it. V40 stated nursing staff did not notify [V40] about R5's reoccurring pain in the evening, that STAT orders were delayed, or that family requested R5 to go to the hospital. V40 stated [V40] did not order for Tylenol 500 mg for R5. V40 stated, Nursing can call me until 05:00 PM. After 5, then they're supposed to call the attending. If the attending can't be reached, then they're supposed to call the medical director. On 01/04/2024 at 3:11 PM, V41 (Nurse) stated V41 started taking over R5's care around 07:00 PM on 12/6/23. V41 stated STAT orders were not done before the shift change. V41 stated could not recall if staff notified the doctor that the STAT KUB was not done. On 01/05/2024 at 11:19 AM, V35 stated R5's family wanted hospital evaluation. V35 stated [V35] discussed it with the DON (Director of Nursing) at that time. V35 received instructions to continue to monitor R5 and not send out to the hospital yet. V35 could not recall the name of the DON. Both V3 (Current DON) and V37 (Former DON) denied being the DON for this incident.) V35 stated [V35] did not notify V40 or V42 [Physician]about R5's 8-10 (severe) pain in the evening or that family requested hospital evaluation for R5. V35 confirmed administering Tylenol 500 mg for pain. On 01/05/2024 at 12:08 PM, V42 stated, If they notified me of [R5's] change in condition, it should be written somewhere. V42 stated the staff should notify [V42] for every change in condition and it should be written in the medical chart. V42 stated STAT orders need to be carried out within four hours. V42 stated eight hours is too much and facility should have notified [V42] that the STAT KUB was not done. V42 stated, That's not right. Not acceptable to be honest. R5's comprehensive care plan contains a focus initiated on 02/10/2023 which documents in part: [R5] has (acute/chronic/Potential for) pain [related to] disease process for possible complications. Intervention initiated 11/24/2023 document in part: Acetaminophen, Biofreeze as orders for pain, reassess for effectiveness. Intervention initiated 02/10/2023 documents in part: Update [Medical Doctor/Nurse Practitioner] for any new or unrelieved pain upon occurrence. Medication Administration and Storage Policy last revised 07/02/2018 documents in part: No medication may be given without a physician's order. Physician Notification Policy last revised 2020 documents in part: Physician will be informed of any significant changes in the resident's condition and or any abnormal labs/x-ray results. Staff will document in the resident's record when a physician is notified including who was notified, date, time, and physician response/plan of care. Unsuccessful attempts to notify a physician will also be documented with any further actions that are taken by the nursing staff. Physician will be notified if medications or supplies necessary to the resident's care or treatment cannot be immediately accessed.
Nov 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate measures to ensure adequate supe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate measures to ensure adequate supervision for 2 residents (R1 and R2) out of 3 residents reviewed for supervision and use of illicit substances. As a result, R1 overdosed twice and R2 overdosed once. Findings include: R1's face sheet shows R1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that includes but not limited to major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms; cocaine dependence; opioid dependence; insomnia; nicotine dependence, cigarettes ; suicidal ideations ; respiratory failure, unspecified, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia. On 11/22/23 at 10:44 am R1 stated, I used heroin in the past. I haven't been out in the community yet. You have to be okayed by the doctor and the nurses to go out to the community. I don't remember who gave me the drug here, but it was another resident. I don't know if the person is still here. I don't remember what happened. I know they took me to the hospital. I snorted it. I don't have any with me. On 11/22/23 at 11:48 am V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said social services work with residents who are drug users by referring them to the drug treatment program. V2 said some people use methadone to prevent the craving for the drugs and some people use the suboxone depending on the order. V2 stated, It helps with the craves and withdrawal. On 11/22/23 at 2:00 pm, V1 (Administrator- ADM) said, We contacted the police to see if they can bring a sniffer dog, but they said they can't. They said they can do rounds in this area, but not inside the facility. We can't randomly ask to search the rooms. We can't just look in the residents' room. We have to ask their permission. Most residents have a history of drugs. We try to keep them out of the rooms as much as possible, but sometimes they use drugs. They go to the methadone clinic. When this happens, we call the doctor and he tells us to observe if the residents allow it. If we become suspicious, we will search them, but if they refuse, we cannot. We restrict their pass. On 11/22/23 at 12:09 PM, V3 (SOCIAL SERVICE DIRECTOR- SSD) stated, If we have suspicion, we do the drug test on them. If they are showing signs, not normal, leaning over, talking slurred speech, like they are going fall over, they normally do not respond well and not comprehend nothing you are saying. I did not see (R1) because I was not here. If they refuse, we get in touch with the doctor, depends on what the doctor says. We have to follow what the doctor said. The nurses are the one who do the drug tests and document it. We have the program who came in using drugs, we would refer them to the program. They talk to them about how to deal with drugs. (R1) used to go out to the community, but we stopped it. She does not have the privilege. That's what we're trying to find out, how she (R1) got the drug. She can go to the patio to smoke; the patio is locked, and the staff is there with her. Residents have to sign in and out when they go to the community. It could be someone bringing it in. We don't check on them when they come back. Will they allow us to do this? I don't know. We don't know who's coming back with drugs. (R1) is not allowed to go to the community, not right now. After the incident she will be on restriction for 14 days, and then when she gets off, we will evaluate again and then lift the restriction. (R1) will be going out to the community with supervision. I will be evaluating her and lifting the restriction. I don't think is safe for her to go out to the community, not in this area. We will make sure she will go to this program, and if she wants to go somewhere, such to the store, one of the staff will walk with her, or myself, if I have to do, yes, I will walk with her. On 11/22/23 at 02:18 pm V4 (Social Services) stated, With R1 I tell her about the open room policy, meaning she can come to talk to me anytime, so she won't be defensive. I just try to keep my eyes on her, trying to make her comfortable so she will confide in me. Let me know how she is doing. See if she needs anything. If she would talk to me instead of going to drugs. R1 is safe to go out to the community with supervision. It can be a family member, but they have to leave their information here in the front desk, ID, phone number, address. Regarding on how R1 got the drug, she won't tell me anything, or she will acting confused and denies it. I tried a couple times to have her tested for drugs, but she would say, It's my right, I can refuse it, no. On 11/22/23 at 02:41 pm V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) said two residents went out for overdosing on 11/15/23 (R1 and R2). V2 stated, Neither one gives any information. They won't tell us. We just trying to figure out by talking to them, communicate with them, trying to find out how did they get the drugs. I talked to Social Services, but we never found out how the drugs were brought over here. It was a regular day. I saw nothing suspicious on the camera, nothing outside of the normal. We are monitoring our visits, if we see there is someone that is not family, we will ask who they are. We have the Guardian Angels. They are managers who come up on the floor, and they act like extra pair of eyes. They go to the floor and inside rooms that they are assigned to. The administrator assigns them. They will report to the administrator if they find anything out of the normal. I think it was the nurse who found out the residents who overdosed. On 11/28/23 at 11:42 am V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) stated, R1 was sent to the bedside for breakfast. The only person with her was her roommate, but she is bedbound. I did my rounds and R1 was in the bathroom. Upon me passing the medication, she was sitting on the side of the bed eating breakfast. I'm not sure if she was using drugs when she was in the bathroom because I didn't see her. When I knocked on the door, she answered quickly. I said, 'are you there', and she said yes. I want to say, maybe it was an hour, an hour and a half after that, to the point where I saw her lethargic. I gave her the medication; she took the it and I didn't notice any changes. I noticed her breakfast tray was still there and she was leaning over the side table. It was then that I noticed that she was lethargic and when I called her name, she was slow to respond. I went to get Narcan, did one nostril first, she didn't respond and then did the second nostril and she was back to baseline. I don't know how many residents are at risk of overdose on my floor. If they arrive with a diagnosis of drug use, we just monitor them to see if there is any change, for example, I knew R1's baseline . She is oriented and stable person, so I knew she was not in her baseline, so I intervened. I didn't ask where she got the drugs. Before this incident she was normal, at first, communicating well. I watched her take her medication. For monitoring, we just do our usual rounds to check them. Making rounds and making sure they are at baseline. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) usually does rounds for one hour and nurses for the next hour. After the R1 overdose, I personally went to her room to see if she could see anything, but I didn't. I didn't go through her personal belongings because we cannot do without the presence of the SS. I did an environment check and didn't see anything. In the episode on 10/21/23, when the CNA went to check on her, the CNA said that R1 was in the bathroom. I became suspecting because of the last incident. So, I went to the other side of the bathroom because on her side the door was locked. I saw something, but she flicked it in the toilet. I asked what it was, she said it was nothing. I asked what she was doing, and she said nothing, but I noticed she was about to use the drug. I don't know what kind of drugs. I notified the doctor, there was no new order, just to continue monitoring. I notified the SS and they came to talk to her. I informed the administrator and the DON of the situation. I didn't see anyone in her room, but she walks around, so she can get it from someone who doesn't necessarily go to her room. On 11/28/23 at 01:50 pm V1 stated, We asked the Chicago Police Department (CPD) to bring a search dog into the facility, but they said they cannot, only to the area, unless we have a suspicious individual. R1 does not receive external visitors but has friends within the facilities. We don't know who is bringing drugs into the facility. We're trying to see who she's friends with. We are keeping her out of her room as much as possible, leaving her in the activity room with the staff and in an open area so we can see her. R1's progress note dated 09/10/23 reads: Upon medications administration writer noted resident to be lethargic. Resident normal baseline is A/o/x3. Resident received scheduled medications; medications tolerated well. Resident became more lethargic than usual; Resident began to lean forward before knocking breakfast off bedside table. Resident was alert but slow to respond. Writer then administered Narcan once. No change in condition. Writer then gave Narcan to resident 1 more time, before returning back to normal baseline. MD made aware, orders to send resident out to hospital for further evaluation. All appropriate parties made aware. Resident is responsible for self. Resident waiting for ambulance transportation. R1's progress note dated 10/21/23 reads: describe Behavior/Mood: : Resident noted to indulged in illegal substance in room bathroom. What was the resident doing prior to or at the time of behavior/mood: Resident was ambulating the facility. Interventions attempted: Writer educated resident on the importance of follow facility protocol and only taking prescribed medications via current pcp (procedure). Resident encouraged to not interfere in healing process. MD and SS made aware of situation. Resident is responsible for self. Effectiveness of the interventions: MD gave orders to monitor resident for any change and conditions. R1's progress note dated 11/15/23 reads: Writer contacted hospital at this time to obtain a status update of resident's condition. ER Nurse informed writer that resident was still waiting to be medically cleared d/t heroin overdose. Once cleared resident will be returning back to the facility. R1's hospital record shows a drug screen was performed on 11/16/23 and the result came up as positive for cocaine and opiate. R1's care plan was reviewed on 9/10/23; 10/21/23 and 11/15/23, but there are no monitoring interventions described. R2's face sheet shows R2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that includes but not limited to asthma, opioid abuse with intoxication, uncomplicated heroine dependence anxiety disorder, unspecified ; tobacco use ; other bipolar disorder. R2's Progress note dated 10/5/2 reads: Writer was notified by staff of resident's behavior. Resident was leaning forward in chair, nodding in and out. Resident admitted to taking illicit drugs. Resident was reminded of restriction for 14 days. Resident was referred to psychologist. Resident was remorseful and receptive to information. R2's progress note dated 10/2/23 reads: resident has returned from methadone clinic and came back with 3 bottles. Call placed to MD to have resident community access pass restricted for 72 hours. R2's progress note dated11/15/23 reads: Upon rounds resident was observed sitting in her wheelchair slouched over extremely drowsy. During resident was noted with decreased respirations. Resident was issued naloxone (2) MG via nasal route. 911 was called immediately to transport resident to the nearest ER for medical clearance. Nursing supervisor informed. Resident's primary care physician informed at this time. resident's niece notified of incident at this time. R2's hospital record document R2's diagnosis dated 11/15/23 was opiate overdose and opioid withdrawal. Facility Policy on Resident Drug Use and Trafficking reads: The use of any alcohol and/or opiates (narcotics), other substances used for the purpose of obtaining a high (spray paint fumes, glue, etc.) prescription or non-prescription (over-the-counter medications, Nyquil, Cough Syrup, etc.) medication without a doctor's order is expressly prohibited within this healthcare facility. This policy includes and extends to day/home passes. Residents are expected to only use prescribed medication and only alcohol with the permission of the attending physician.
Aug 2023 3 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to follow the abuse prevention policy, failed to implement mood/behavior interventions, and failed to ensure that two of four residents (R4, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to follow the abuse prevention policy, failed to implement mood/behavior interventions, and failed to ensure that two of four residents (R4, R5) reviewed for abuse remained free from abuse. These failures resulted in R4 being struck by R5 thereby sustaining right forehead raised area, bruise, abrasion, and skin tear which required first aid. Findings include: R4's diagnoses include major depressive disorder, human immunodeficiency virus and encounter for palliative care. R4's (7/17/23) progress notes state resident was hit by another resident, causing a skin tear to her forehead. The other resident was passing by and just proceed to hit her in the head. There was no conversation exchanged between the two residents. The area was cleaned with normal saline solution, pat dry, and covered with an island border gauze. The (7/17/23) preliminary incident investigation report states (R5) made physical contact with (R4). Body assessment completed with bruise noted to (R4) forehead. The (7/17/23) final abuse investigation report states when (R4) got off the elevator (R5) was in resident's face and hit (R4). (R4) was noted with a raised area with an abrasion to her right forehead. R4's (7/22/23) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 15 (cognitively intact). On 8/22/23 at 11:09am, R4 was lying in bed and verbally unresponsive likely due to dying process. A small linear scar was observed above R4's right eyebrow, V18 (Family) affirmed R4's scar resulted from injury sustained during (7/17/23) incident. R5's diagnoses include dementia, schizoaffective disorder and violent behavior. R5's care plan includes (2/4/23) Resident has a mood problem related to irritability, anger, and delusional disorder. Interventions: administer medications as ordered. Provide resident with a program of activities that is meaningful and of interest. Encourage and provide opportunities for exercise and physical activity. (4/10/23) Resident sometimes have behaviors which include bumping into others, hitting during care, kicking, shouting and spitting. Interventions: help me to avoid situations or people that are upsetting to me. Attempt interventions before my behaviors begin. Refer me to my psychologist/psychiatrist as needed. R5's (5/9/23) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 5 (severely impaired). On 8/14/23 at 1:14pm, R5 refused to respond during interview. On 8/22/23 at 10:13am, V1 (Administrator) stated, I got a call stating that (R5) hit (R4) abruptly when walking by. She (R4) had an abrasion to the head and refused to go to the hospital. He (R5) was sent out for a psychological evaluation, and they changed his meds. He's (R5) a 1:1 now. V1 stated, Everyone's saying he (R5) had no reason, and he (R5) don't remember what happened. He (R5) has a diagnosis of dementia, nothing triggered him or anything. The (10/2022) abuse prevention policy states in part this facility desires to prevent abuse and mistreatment by establishing a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. This will be accomplished by a comprehensive quality management approach involving the following: On the comprehensive care plan, staff will identify residents with increased vulnerability for abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or history of trauma, who have needs, triggers and behaviors that might lead to conflict. Through the care planning process, staff will identify any problems and approaches, which would reduce the chances of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property for these residents. Staff will continue to monitor the goals and approaches on a regular basis and update as necessary.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Requirements (Tag F0622)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to meet discharge requirements for one of three residents (R1) review...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to meet discharge requirements for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for discharge. Findings include: The (8/14/23) census includes 126 residents. On 6/30/23, IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) received the following allegations R1 was discharged without coordination of the following needed services: housing, medications, and/or assistance with social security. R1 currently resides in a cemetery. The census affirms R1 was admitted [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. R1's diagnoses include but not limited to major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, hypertension and asthma R1's (6/16/23) functional assessment affirms (1 person) physical assist is required for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. R1's POS (Physician Order Sheets) include but not limited to (3/16/23) Haldol Decanoate injection 100mg (milligrams) every month on the 28th related to schizoaffective disorder. Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg daily related to hypertension. Sertraline 50mg daily related to major depressive disorder. (3/27/23) Quetiapine Fumarate ER (extended release) 300mg at bedtime related to bipolar and schizoaffective disorder. (6/19/23) May discharge to community (location, required services and/or medications are excluded). R1's (3/16/23) comprehensive care plan excludes discharge planning. R1's (3/16/23-6/19/23) social service progress notes exclude discharge planning. R1's (6/20/23) Discharge Note states resident was escorted out of the facility by police. Police took resident to (Hospital). Nurse from (Hospital) called stating if resident was independent or needs an ambulance. Writer told nurse resident is not allowed in the building no more. On 8/15/23 at 10:27am, V13 (Social Service) stated, He wanted to get his own apartment through (housing provider). There's like a process: they (residents) go on a waiting list they (housing provider) come out and assess and they go from there. V13 stated, I can't recall if that was done before I got here or where they (housing provider) were at in process. V13 stated, He came back the next day and was apologetic about what happened. He came back, but he was already discharged out the system. Inquired where R1 is currently residing. V13 replied, When I asked him, he said he was in front of the police station but that was a long time ago, so I don't know exactly where he's at now. On 8/15/23 at 10:37am, Inquired about R1's (6/20/23) discharge V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated I believe he was under the influence of something cause he wasn't his normal self. He charged at the administrator, actually hit the maintenance director and we was trying to calm him down. He actually kicked the police car when they had him detained. I believe he was getting discharged , but I don't really remember. Surveyor inquired about the required discharge process. V14 replied, That's the Social Service and Medical Doctor's decision we put the order in and if they have medications, they take them with them. I believe that social service handed him paperwork, but I can't remember. On 8/15/23 at 11:25am, Inquired about R1's (6/20/23) discharge. V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated, He was discharged that day and was still within the building. What he was saying wasn't making no sense he was mumbling about demons and seemed as if he was under the influence of something. I told him you are already discharged but he started attacking everyone. He literally pushed me in the wall and hit the maintenance director in the head with a cell phone. It was very odd he was always very polite. Earlier that day he kept saying it was a good day. Inquired about transportation arrangements to the location where R1 was supposed to be discharged . V2 affirmed, she was unsure [no additional information was provided]. R1's (6/16/23) discharge planning review states what determination was made by the resident and the care planning team regarding discharge to the community? Determination not made. [4 days prior to discharge]. R1's (6/20/23) discharge summary includes treatment provided: resident received mental health and medical health treatment. Discharge potential: (blank). Drug therapy required: (blank). Transportation: N/A (Not Applicable). You are being discharged : home. However, a supportive living facility name/address (roughly 300 miles away from the facility) is denoted. On 8/15/23 at 1:26pm, the supportive living facility listed on R1's discharge and inquired if R1 was accepted (6/20/23). V15 (Administrative Services Coordinator) stated, I don't have a record with him, so I don't have a possible admission. I can't find him in our system. On 8/22/23 at 12:42pm, inquired about potential harm to a resident with schizophrenia and hypertension if discharged without medications V19 (Medical Director) stated, I don't think they can be discharged without any medications and proper social service follow-up. If they are schizophrenic they can have chest pain, cardiac issues and stuff like that. If they (schizophrenics) don't get medication, they can decompensate psychologically and they can become more paranoid. Blood pressure medications they have to take every day because they can have a hypertensive emergency or cardiac issues. They (staff) have to make sure that the prescriptions are sent when I discharge patients. On 8/21/23 requested the facility discharge planning policy however an (undated) discharge summary/post discharge plan of care policy was received. On 8/21/23 at 10:20am, requested the facility discharge planning policy again. V2 (DON) responded, That's our policy (referring to discharge summary/post discharge plan of care policy which excludes discharge planning - prior to discharge).
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0660 (Tag F0660)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to document a discharge plan of care for one of three residents (R1) ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to document a discharge plan of care for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for discharge planning process. Findings include: The census affirms R1 was admitted [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. On 8/15/23, R1's (3/16/23) comprehensive care plan was reviewed however discharge planning was excluded. On 8/15/23 at 10:27am, inquired about R1's discharge plan. V13 (Social Service) stated, He wanted to get his own apartment through (housing provider). On 8/15/23 at 11:25am, inquired if R1's comprehensive care plan includes discharge planning. V2 (Director of Nursing) reviewed R1's care plan and stated, No. The (undated) resident care planning policy states the care plan is initiated on admission, interim care plan is to be completed within 48 hours and comprehensive care plan fully developed by day 21. Long-term goals must be individualized and realistic for resident involved, potential for discharge is considered from the day of admission.
Aug 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse. This failure affects one of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse. This failure affects one of three residents (R3) reviewed for abuse in a total sample of eight residents. Findings include: R3 is a [AGE] year-old male. R3's diagnoses are but not limited to high cholesterol, high blood pressure, mood disorder, depression, and swelling. R3's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) dated 05/16/2023, notes R3 is alert. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 05/16/2023, notes R3 requires extensive one person assistance. R3's care plan notes R3 has impaired cognitive function thought processes due to impaired decision making and developmental disability. R4 is a [AGE] year-old male. R4's diagnoses are but not limited to lung disorders, heart failure, kidney disease, heart failure, and dependance on renal dialysis. R4's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) dated 07/05/2023, notes R4 is alert. R4's MDS dated [DATE], notes R4 requires limited one person assistance. R4's care plan notes R4 displays manipulative behavior which is disruptive, insensitive, and or disrespectful to staff and peers. R4 has the potential to be physically aggressive due to anger and poor impulse control. Progress note dated 05/27/2023, notes while on the 1st floor in the main dining room R4 made physical contact with R3. R3 reported a pain level of 10 out of 10. R4 stated R3 threatened him (R4). Residents immediately separated and R3 brought back to 3rd floor. Body assessment completed. R3 states that he (R3) feels safe. Progress note dated 05/27/2023, notes R4 had an altercation with R3 in the main dining room. R4 hit R3 across the face. All parties notified. Physician ordered the R3 to be sent to local hospital for evaluation. On 08/03/2023, at 2:44 PM, V4 (Activity Aide) stated, R4 hit R3 in the jaw. I was one of the witnesses. R4 was trying to get by to the vending machine. I overheard R4 ask R3 to get by. I know R4 got by the first time. When R4 was trying to come back they (R3 and R4) had an altercation. R3 stated go around and R3 and R4 had words. It happened so fast. R4 just punched R3. They had to be separated. R3 was taken to his floor. I think he (R4) went overboard and put his (R4) hands on him (R3). On 08/05/2023, at 12:41 PM, V9 (Registered Nurse) stated, I was R4's nurse that day. I did not witness the altercation. I was informed that R4 had struck R3 in the face in the main dining room. They were in the main dining room. They had words. R4 struck R3 in the face. I needed to send R3 to the hospital for evaluation. I talked to R4. R4 stated I hit R3 because R3 is always running R3's mouth. So, I popped R3 in the mouth. The other nurse talked to R3. R4 stated that R4 is sick of R3, and that staff let R3 get away with anything. Nothing is ever done to R3 it is always the other people's fault. These two residents are separated since that altercation occurred. Facility abuse investigation pertaining to R3 and R4 dated 06/01/2023, notes R4 stated R3 called him out and R4 hit R3. Facility Abuse Policy, undated, physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means and requires medical attention. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, punching, and kicking.
Apr 2023 19 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow policy and procedures for Fall Prevention by not completin...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow policy and procedures for Fall Prevention by not completing a fall risk assessment to determine fall risk factors and target approaches to reduce risks, on a quarterly basis, for 1 (R37) of 1 resident reviewed for falls out of a total sample of 26 residents. As a result of this failure, R37 fell on the ground on 12/7/22 while wheeling herself independently on a wheelchair and sustained a left clavicle fracture. Findings Include: On 4/4/23 at 1:09 PM, R37 was eating lunch in R37's room. R37 complained of left shoulder pain radiating to R37's left arm and hand. R37 stated that R37 broke R37's clavicle sometime last year due to a fall. R37 stated, I was wheeling myself in the wheelchair from my smoking break. My wheelchair got stuck in a dirt. It tipped over and I landed on my left side on the ground. R37's progress notes dated 12/8/22 at 2:00 PM documented by V22 (Registered Nurse) documents that R37 came to V22 and stated that R37 fell on [DATE] outside during smoke break while wheeling herself (R37) back into the building. R37's wheelchair got stuck in the dirt and fell out of the wheelchair. R37 complained of left arm pain and an X-ray was ordered. R37's X-ray of the left shoulder dated 12/8/22 findings show Acute distal clavicle fracture. R37's clinical records show R37 has diagnoses not limited to Multiple Sclerosis, Trigeminal Neuralgia, and Left Clavicle Fracture. R37's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R37 is cognitively intact. R37's comprehensive care plan shows R37 has impaired visual function, impaired decision making, and requires supervision and monitoring during smoking break. There was no Fall Risk Assessment found in R37's electronic health record from the last annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] until R37's fall on 12/7/22. On 4/6/23 at 9:14 AM, V17 (Restorative Nurse) stated that a resident's Fall Risk Assessment should be completed at the time of admission and should have a re-assessment done quarterly, annually, and with significant changes. V17 stated that the Fall Risk Assessment can only be found under the assessment tab in the resident's electronic health record. V17 stated that the purpose of the Fall Risk Assessment is to determine the potential risks of falling for the residents and has the components that will determine the risk score of the resident. V17 stated that staff implement fall preventative interventions based on the fall risk score of the resident. V17 stated that if the Fall Risk Assessment is not completed for the resident, the resident can potentially fall because staff would not know what type of interventions and assistance to provide the resident to prevent them from falling. At around 9:20 AM, surveyor checked R37's electronic health record with V17, and there were no Fall Risk Assessments completed within the one-year lookback period prior to R37's fall on 12/7/22. The facility's policy titled; Fall Prevention Policy with no date reads in part: Every resident will be evaluated for falls upon admission and subsequently thereafter when the resident's condition changes or at least quarterly. The care plan will state the goals, interventions and approaches for every resident who is identified as being at risk for falls. Staff will be trained to be alert to risk and hazards for falls in the environment. Procedure: Within three days of admission, the resident will be assessed for risk of falls. Either nursing staff or therapy staff may complete the falls assessments. Based on the results of the falls assessment, the interdisciplinary team will determine the best approach to implement for fall prevention, adjust the care plan, inform the family and resident and implement comprehensive fall prevention management approach.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 (R36, R104) residents call lights were within reach in a sample of 26. Findings Include: R104 has diagnosis not ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 (R36, R104) residents call lights were within reach in a sample of 26. Findings Include: R104 has diagnosis not limited to Tracheostomy, Gastrostomy, Heart Failure, Ventricular Tachycardia, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Dementia Chronic Respiratory Failure and Encephalopathy. R104 BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) Section C Cognitive Pattern BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 09 indicating moderately impaired. R104 Care Plan document in part: Focus: At risk for falls related to assistance needed. Date Initiated: 02/10/23. Interventions: Make sure my call light/personal belongings are in reach. Date Initiated: 02/10/23. Focus: The resident has a communication problem r/t (related /to) Dysphagia Date Initiated: 02/13/23. On 04/04/23 at 10:34 AM V14 (Registered Nurse) was observed standing at the medication cart before entering R104 room. On 04/04/23 at 10:47 AM R104 was observed lying in bed with a tracheostomy tube in place. The call light was observed on the floor next to the right side of the bed. On 04/04/23 at 10:52 AM V14 (Registered Nurse) was asked to accompany the surveyor to R104 room. V14 was asked by the surveyor the location of R104 call light. V14 entered R104 room, picked up the call light from the floor next to R104 bed and attached the call light cord to R104 bed sheet. Upon exiting R104 room V14 (Registered Nurse) was asked to accompany the surveyor to Resident 36 room and asked the location of R36 call light. V14 proceeded to the right side of the bed then pulled up the call light that was hanging out of reach on the right side of R36 bed and placed it on R36 bed within R36 reach. V14 stated, I was just in R104 room. The call light should be within reach if the resident need assistance. R36 has diagnosis not limited to Syncope and Collapse, Gastrostomy, Adult Failure to Thrive, Age Related Osteoporosis, Major Depressive Disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia and Peripheral Vascular Disease. R36 BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) Section C Cognitive Pattern BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 09 indicating moderately impaired. R36 Care Plan document in part: Focus: R36 requires use of Non-Restrictive Side Rail(s) to enhance/enable and /or maintain functional bed mobility independence and promote skin integrity. Interventions: Place call light within easy reach. Focus: R36 has a communication Impairment r/t dx (Diagnosis) of Dysphagia. Focus: R36 is at risk for falls r/t Confusion, Gait/balance problems, Incontinence, Unaware of safety needs. Intervention: Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. On 04/06/23 at 11:29 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the call light should be within the resident's easy reach so that the resident can get to it and so they can call not fall and so that their needs can be met. Policy: Titled Call Light undated document in part: The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs. When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair, staff shall ensure the call light is within reach of the resident.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to revise a resident's (R91) comprehensive care plan after weight loss for 1 of 26 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: R91's...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to revise a resident's (R91) comprehensive care plan after weight loss for 1 of 26 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: R91's recorded weights document in part that on 09/19/2022 R91 weighed 158.4 lbs (pounds). On 03/25/2023, R91 weighed 126.7 lbs. R91 had a 20.01 % severe weight loss in six months. V20's (Dietician) progress notes dated 03/20/2023 2:16 PM and 04/06/2023 10:04 AM document in part that R91 triggered for significant weight loss in 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month comparisons. R91's comprehensive care plan did not reflect the 1-month significant weight loss when it occurred, or the 3-month or 6-month. During a telephone interview with V20 on 04/06/23 at 11:17 AM, V20 reviewed R91's comprehensive care plan. V20 stated [V20] did not see a care plan for R91's weight loss. V20 stated [V20] does not update the nutritional care plan. V20 stated it is usually the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Nurse or V5 (Dietary Manager). V20 stated if there is a change in a resident's nutritional status or diet, staff should update the resident's comprehensive care plan. Facility's undated Resident Care Planning policy documents in part: Policy: Each resident has a resident care plan that is current, individualized and consistent with the medical regimen. Following interdisciplinary team conferences completed quarterly and as needed, the interdisciplinary team update goals and actions that were discussed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow a resident's (R25) comprehensive care plan ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow a resident's (R25) comprehensive care plan and provide turning and repositioning every two hours or as needed for 1 of 26 residents reviewed for nursing care. Findings include: R25's face sheet documents in part diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side (right-sided paralysis and weakness after a stroke). R25's comprehensive care plan contains a focus initiated on 11/05/2021 that documents in part: [R25] has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t [related to] Confusion, Hemiplegia, Impaired balance, Limited Mobility, Limited ROM [Range of Motion]. Intervention initiated 07/09/2019 documents in part: bed mobility: The resident requires Extensive assistance by one staff to turn and reposition in bed every shift and as necessary. R25's comprehensive care plan also contains a more recent focus initiated on 02/24/2023 that documents in part: [R25] is at risk for discomfort, complications related to diagnosis of Right Hemiparesis, Dysphagia, Aphasia following a Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA/Stroke). Intervention initiated 02/24/2023 documents in part: Turn and reposition q [every] 2 hours and PRN [as needed]. Keep body in good alignment. R25's latest MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents in part that R25 requires extensive assistance with two plus persons physical assist for bed mobility. R25's Braden Scale Assessments dated 1/12/2023 and 2/23/2023 documents in part a score of 13.0 - Moderate Risk for pressure ulcer development. On 04/04/2023 at 12:05 PM, surveyor observed R25 lying supine (on back side) in bed. Body weight pressure on R25's buttocks. Conducted further observations at 12:10 PM, 12:15PM, and 12:25 PM. R25 remained lying on back side. At 12:32 PM, observed R25's head of the bed elevated. R25 was sitting up in bed for lunch. Body weight pressure on buttocks. Did not observe positional pillows. Conducted further observations at 12:45 PM, 12:56 PM, 1:10 PM, 1:17 PM, and 1:32 PM. R25 remained sitting up in bed with body weight pressure on buttocks. At 1:35 PM, V24 (Certified Nurse Aide) entered R25's room to provide incontinence care. V24 completed the care at 1:44 PM. V24 lowered R25's head of the bed and positioned R25 lying on back side. No positional pillows on either side of R25. Body weight pressure remained on buttocks. Conducted further observations at 1:48 PM, 1:55 PM, 2:02 PM, and 2:11 PM. Staff did not reposition R25 to relieve pressure off R25's buttocks. On 04/06/2023 at 9:21 AM, V17 (Restorative Nurse) stated R25 has contractures on one of the extremities and has weakness on one side of the body. V17 stated R25 needs staff assistance to turn from side to side to complete bed mobility task. V17 stated R25 was not on a turning and reposition program. Facility's Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Guidelines, last revised 08/2016, documents in part: It is the policy of this facility to ensure based on an admission Comprehensive Assessment that residents at risk for skin break down are assessed and that preventative measures are implemented. Residents assessed for moderate risk will have Repositioning per resident's specific need.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper placement of the gastrostomy tube prior to medication administration and provide gastrostomy care per orders for...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper placement of the gastrostomy tube prior to medication administration and provide gastrostomy care per orders for 1 (R98) of 3 (R36, R104) residents with gastrostomy tubes reviewed in a sample of 26. Findings Include: R98 has diagnosis not limited to Gastrostomy, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Dysphagia, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Adult Failure to Thrive and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux. Order Summary Report dated 04/05/23 document in part: Enteral Feed Order every shift related to Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy Check placement prior to feeding, flushing, and medication administration. -Order Date- 05/16/22. Enteral Feed Order every shift related to Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy Flush G-Tube with 60ml of water before and after medication administration -Order Date-05/16/22. R98 Care Plan Document in part: Check for tube placement and gastric contents/residual volume per facility protocol and record. Date Initiated: 05/05/22. On 04/05/23 at 09:39 AM V14 (Registered Nurse) prepared R98 medication by crushing the Vitamin D3 Capsule 400 UNIT Daily then entered R98 room. V14 obtained 2 paper towels and placed them on R98 abdomen under the gastrostomy tube. V14 mixed the crushed medication with water in the medication cup. V14 then flushed R98 gastric tube with 30 ml (milliliters) of water using a syringe, poured the medication in the syringe then flushed the gastrostomy tube with an additional 30 ml of water and clamped the gastrostomy tube. On 04/05/23 at 09:49 AM the surveyor asked V14 (Registered Nurse) the procedure for administering medication through a gastrostomy tube. V14 (Registered Nurse) responded I had already flushed the gastrostomy tube earlier in the shift. R98 gastrostomy tube feeding stopped at 08:00 AM and I had already flushed the gastrostomy tube. The gastrostomy tube placement should be checked before giving medication. On 04/06/23 at 11:29 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated my expectations of the staff when administering medication through the gastrostomy tube is to first knock, tell the resident what you are going to do and aspirate to check the placement of the gastrostomy tube. Flush before giving medications with 30 - 50 ml of water, based on the doctor's order. Crush meds, have the resident at a 30 - 45-degree angle to prevent aspiration, give meds slowly to gravity then flush with 30-50 ml of water after the medication is given. The flush amount is based on the doctor order. If the gastrostomy tube placement is not checked there is a potential that they can aspirate and for safety reasons. If the gastrostomy tube is not in the stomach, the water, medication or feeding can go into surrounding tissue. Policy: Titled Protocol for Tube Fed Residents revised 11/16 document in part: Purpose: to maintain a consistent plan of care for the resident receiving tube feeding. 7. To check position of tube: apply gentle suction with irrigating syringe: if tube is I stomach, fluid will usually be obtained, place stethoscope over stomach, insert small amount of air into the tube, listen for air entering the stomach.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview and record reviews the facility failed to follow policy and procedure on oxygen administration ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview and record reviews the facility failed to follow policy and procedure on oxygen administration (a) to check physician's order for liter flow and method of administration; (b) to ensure that oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle changed and dated for one (R66) resident in a sample of 26 reviewed for oxygen use. Findings include: On 4/4/23 at 10:44 AM R66 observed with oxygen at 3L/min. Oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle observed with no date on it. R66 stated he (R66) has been using oxygen all the time for couple of years due to COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). R66 stated I would have a hard time breathing when I don't use oxygen. On 4/6/23 at 10:15 AM V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) was interviewed and stated that oxygen use should be ordered in resident's electronic health record (EHR) - physician order sheet (POS) including the liter flow, method of administration, change of tubing and humidifier bottle every week and as needed; V2 further stated that these oxygen tubing / administration order would be reflected in resident's treatment administration record (TAR). Reviewed R66 EHR with V2 and V2 stated she (V2) did not see any order of oxygen use in R66 POS. V2 stated that she (V2) is aware that R66 is using oxygen and R66 is cognitively intact. V2 stated that if there is no order of oxygen in resident's EHR then there is nothing to verify for the liter flow and nurse will not administer oxygen. V2 further stated that if there is no order of oxygen in R66 POS then it would not reflect in R66 TAR or MAR. R66 face sheet was reviewed and documented in part: R66 admission date was on 12/7/22 with diagnosis not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with hypoxia, Essential hypertension, Anemia, Dependence on supplemental oxygen. R66 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was reviewed and documented that R66 was cognitively intact; R66 required limited assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; R66 received oxygen therapy. R66 care plan with revision date of 4/4/23 was reviewed and documented in part: dx (diagnosis): COPD, oxygen dependent. R66 has oxygen therapy r/t (related to) ineffective gas exchange for possible complications. R66 care plan interventions documented in part: Oxygen settings: O2 via (nasal prongs/mask) @ 3L cont./prn as orders. R66 POS dated 4/4/23 was reviewed with no order for oxygen use. R66 TAR for the month of March and April were reviewed with no documentation of oxygen use and oxygen tubing was changed. Facility's policy and procedure for oxygen administration (no date) documented in part: Check physician's order for liter flow and method of administration. At regular intervals check and clean oxygen equipment, tubing with cannulas or pre-filled humidifier bottles should be changed every 72 hours. Oxygen administration noted on MAR. This policy must be followed at all times.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive care plan to ensure pain pat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive care plan to ensure pain patch was applied as ordered by the physician for 1 (R37) of 1 resident reviewed for pain management in a sample of 26. Findings Include: On 4/4/23 at 1:09 PM, R37 was eating lunch in R37's room. R37 complained of left shoulder pain radiating to R37's left arm and hand. R37 stated that R37 broke R37's clavicle sometime last year due to a fall. R37 stated, I was wheeling myself in the wheelchair from my smoking break. My wheelchair got stuck in a dirt. It tipped over and I landed on my left side on the ground. I'm supposed to get a pain patch on my left shoulder, but I never got it today. I'm supposed to get it every morning at 6 AM. It's the only thing that takes away the pain on my shoulder. It helps with my muscle pain. Now my pain is at 6. Surveyor immediately notified V9 (Registered Nurse). At 1:14 PM, V9 stated that R37 has an order for Lidocaine patch to apply at 6:00 AM on R37's left shoulder and to be removed in the evening. At approximately 1:16 PM, surveyor entered R37's room with V9. V9 checked to see if R37 had the pain patch on R37's left shoulder. V9 confirmed that the patch was not applied. V9 stated will get one to be applied now. R37's clinical records show R37 has diagnoses not limited to Multiple Sclerosis, Trigeminal Neuralgia, and Left Clavicle Fracture. R37's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R37 is cognitively intact. R37's physician order sheet (POS) shows R37 has an order of Lidocaine External Patch 5 % (Lidocaine) to be applied to R37's left shoulder at 6:00 AM for diagnosis of Trigeminal Neuralgia. R37's comprehensive care plan shows R37 had a fall on 12/7/22 and sustained left clavicle fracture. One care plan intervention initiated on 2/1/23 reads in part, Apply pain patch as directed and follow up on effectiveness. The facility's policy titled; Pain Assessment Mangement dated 1/2/14 reads in part: Purpose: 2. To ensure that appropriate pain management is provided. Procedure: 4. Residents identified to need pain management will be referred to MD and corresponding care plan will be followed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the system used for acceptable standard of practice to account for the receipt, usage, disposition, and reconciliation ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the system used for acceptable standard of practice to account for the receipt, usage, disposition, and reconciliation of controlled medications was followed by staff for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed. Findings Include: R94 has diagnosis not limited to Unspecified Convulsions, Mood (Affective) Disorder, Repeated Falls and Unspecified Intracranial Injury with loss of consciousness. R94 BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) Section C Cognitive Pattern BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 07 indicating severe impairment. On 04/05/23 at 12:07 PM during the third-floor low medication cart review with V9 (Registered Nurse) it was observed that R94 Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form dated 03/10/23 document in part: Phenobarb (Phenobarbital) 15 mg (Milligrams) take 1 tablet by mouth daily for seizures, Quantity Dispensed 30. Last documented remaining quantity of 4 dated 04/05/23 09:00 AM. Medication punch card dispended 03/10/23 with a quantity of 30 document in part: Phenobarbital Tablet 15 mg take 1 tablet by mouth once daily for seizures related to unspecified convulsions with a quantity of 5 pills remaining in the punch card. V9 stated the narcotic count is done at the beginning and end of each shift. There are 5 pills remaining. The narcotic count was done this morning with V21 (Licensed Practical Nurse). Surveyor requested and received a copy of the punch card with the quantity of 5 pills and the Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form with the documented quantity of 4 pills On 04/06/23 at 11:29 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the Narcotic count is done by 2 nurses, one count the narcotics and one reading the sheets while counting to verify the count is correct. If there is an incorrect count the nurse should notify the Director of Nursing. If the count is incorrect, we will investigate what happen to the medication. The nurse should not accept the cart if the narcotic count is incorrect. If a medication was not given, I would want to know why. That mean someone signed it and did not give the medication. The medication is signed for once the medication is given. V9 (Registered Nurse) admitted that she (V9) missed giving the medication. If the medication is missed the doctor should be called to get a recommendation. There was a potential that the resident would have a seizure. On 04/06/23 at 01:40 PM per telephone interview V21 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated I work on the 3rd floor and did the narcotic count with V9 (Registered Nurse). If the narcotic count is not correct, we will recount and make sure the numbers properly line up and notify the Director of Nursing. R has 2 bingo cards for phenobarbital. We work 12-hour shifts and when V9 (Registered Nurse) relieved me on the narcotic count was correct. Progress note dated 04/05/23 16:51 document in part: Nurses Note: Resident missed the morning dose of Phenobarbital 15mg. Resident received the missed dose at 1:30 pm. Spoke with Dr. (Doctor) regarding missed dose, no new labs were ordered. Continue with scheduled dose and monitor patient. Policy: Titled Control Substances dated 10/25/14 document in part: Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and recordkeeping in the facility, in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. D. Accurate accountability of the inventory of all controlled drugs is maintained at all times. When a controlled substance is administered, the licensed nurse administering the medication immediately enters the following information on the accountability record and the medication administration record (MAR). 1. Date and time of administration, 2. Amount administered, 3. Remaining quantity, 4. Initials of the nurse administering the dose, completed after the medication is actually administered. Titled Medication Administration and Storage Policy undated document in part: 11. Narcotics and all class II drugs must be recorded when given on the individual sheet for same and balance on hand must be verified at each change of shifts by charge nurse. 19. Narcotics must be signed out in the EHR (Electronic Health Record) and the narcotic sheet.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for 2 (R2, R49) of 6 (R71, R98, R108, R121) residents reviewed for medication a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for 2 (R2, R49) of 6 (R71, R98, R108, R121) residents reviewed for medication administration resulting in a 6.9% error rate. Findings Include: R2 has diagnosis not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebrovascular Disease Affecting the Right Dominant Side, Cerebral Infarction, Essential (Primary) Hypertension and Intracranial Injury. R2 Administration History Report with administration date of 04/04/23 09:00 AM and the Medication Administration Record dated 04/01/23 - 04/30/23 document Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG as not given. R49 has diagnosis not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebrovascular Disease Affecting the Left Non-Dominant Side, Cerebral Infarction and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. R49 Administration History Report with administration date of 04/04/23 09:00 AM and the Medication Administration Record dated 04/01/23 - 04/30/23 document Amlodipine Besylate Tablet 5 MG as not given. On 04/04/23 at 09:07 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) entered Resident # 2 room with the blood pressure machine and placed the blood pressure cuff on R2 right arm to obtain the blood pressure reading of 99/56 pulse 77. On 04/04/23 at 09:08 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart with the blood pressure machine to prepare R2 medications. Surveyor asked and verified the total number of pills in the medication cup with V8. V8 then entered R2 room to administer the medication. Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG (Milligrams) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Tachycardia -Order Date- 12/12/19 (Was not given to R2) V8 told R2 I am not giving you the Metoprolol because of your blood pressure. On 04/04/23 at 09:14 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) entered R49 room with the blood pressure machine placed the blood pressure cuff on R49 left arm to obtain the blood pressure reading of 112/77 pulse 65. On 04/04/23 at 09:17 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart leaving the blood pressure machine in R49 room near the bed to prepare R49 medications. Surveyor asked and verified the total number of pills in the medication cup with V8. Amlodipine Besylate Tablet 5 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day (Was not given to R49 with no explanation from V8). Upon review of R2 and R49 Order Summary report there we no documented physician orders or parameters indicating that R2 Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG or R49 Amlodipine Besylate Tablet 5 MG should have been held. On 04/06/23 at 08:29 AM telephone interview attempted with V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) after the completion of the medication reconciliation with no response. Message left with return contact information on voicemail. Second attempt to contact V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was made on 04/07/23 at 12:20 PM with no response. On 04/06/23 at 11:29 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated If R2 blood pressure was 99/56 V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) did nursing judgement and she should have called the doctor to get parameters to hold the Metoprolol. The nurse is supposed to let the doctor make the choice of the order. By V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) holding the Metoprolol without a doctor order that was a medication error because it was held without parameters or notifying the doctor. It is the doctor that dictate the care of his patients. V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) should have called the doctor. You cannot hold medications only the doctor can delegate holding the medications and the care of the resident. Medications are signed out once given. Policy: Title Medication Administration dated 10/25/14 document in part: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices. Titled Medication Administration and Storage Policy undated document in part: To ensure medications are administered and stored in accordance with Standards of Practice. 5. Medication Error Report must be completed when F) Medication omitted in error. 6. An incident report must be filled out for: F) Medication omitted in error. 20 Physician must be notified when medications are not administered as per physicians' orders. 21. Physician orders must be obtained for medications that are held. 22. Medication that are not administered per physician orders must be documented in the drop down box and/or progress notes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for 2 (R2, R49) residents reviewed for significant medication errors during...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for 2 (R2, R49) residents reviewed for significant medication errors during the medication administration observation. This failure has the potential to affect R2 blood pressure and heart rate and R49 blood pressure. Findings Include: R2 has diagnosis not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebrovascular Disease Affecting the Right Dominant Side, Cerebral Infarction, Essential (Primary) Hypertension and Intracranial Injury. R2 Administration History Report with administration date of 04/04/23 09:00 AM and the Medication Administration Record dated 04/01/23 - 04/30/23 document Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG as not given. The next documented blood pressure was 130/70, pulse 86 dated 04/05/23. R49 has diagnosis not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebrovascular Disease Affecting the Left Non-Dominant Side, Cerebral Infarction and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. R49 Administration History Report with administration date of 04/04/23 09:00 AM and the Medication Administration Record dated 04/01/23 - 04/30/23 document Amlodipine Besylate Tablet 5 MG as not given On 04/04/23 at 09:07 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) entered Resident # 2 room with the blood pressure machine and placed the blood pressure cuff on R2 right arm to obtain the blood pressure reading of 99/56 pulse 77. On 04/04/23 at 09:08 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart with the blood pressure machine to prepare R2 medications. Surveyor asked and verified the total number of pills in the medication cup with V8. V8 then entered R2 room to administer the medication. Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG (Milligrams) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Tachycardia -Order Date- 12/12/19 (Was not given to R2) V8 told R2 I am not giving you the Metoprolol because of your blood pressure. On 04/04/23 at 09:14 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) entered R49 room with the blood pressure machine placed the blood pressure cuff on R49 left arm to obtain the blood pressure reading of 112/77 pulse 65. On 04/04/23 at 09:17 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) returned to the medication to prepare R49 medications. Surveyor asked and verified the total number of pills in the medication cup with V8. Amlodipine Besylate Tablet 5 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day (Was not given to R49 with no explanation from V8). Upon review of R2 and R49 Order Summary report there we no documented physician orders or parameters indicating that R2 Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG or R49 Amlodipine Besylate Tablet 5 MG should have been held. On 04/06/23 at 08:29 AM telephone interview attempted with V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) after the completion of the medication reconciliation with no response. Message left with return contact information on voicemail. Second attempt to contact V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was made on 04/07/23 at 12:20 PM with no response. On 04/06/23 at 11:29 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated If R2 blood pressure was 99/56 V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) did nursing judgement and she should have called the doctor to get parameters to hold the Metoprolol. The nurse is supposed to let the doctor make the choice of the order. By V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) holding the Metoprolol without a doctor order that was a medication error because it was held without parameters or notifying the doctor. It is the doctor that dictate the care of his patients. V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) should have called the doctor. You cannot hold medications only the doctor can delegate holding the medications and the care of the resident. Medications are signed out once given. Policy: Title Medication Administration dated 10/25/14 document in part: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices. Titled Medication Administration and Storage Policy undated document in part: To ensure medications are administered and stored in accordance with Standards of Practice. 5. Medication Error Report must be completed when F) Medication omitted in error. 6. An incident report must be filled out for: F) Medication omitted in error. 20 Physician must be notified when medications are not administered as per physicians' orders. 21. Physician orders must be obtained for medications that are held. 22. Medication that are not administered per physician orders must be documented in the drop down box and/or progress notes. Title Medication Administration dated 10/25/14 document in part: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a.) ensure medications were not left on top of the medication cart unattended, b.) ensure medications were properly labeled an...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a.) ensure medications were not left on top of the medication cart unattended, b.) ensure medications were properly labeled and stored and c.) remove and discard insulin stored in the medication cart that had been open and in use for more than 28 day in 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication labeling and storage. Findings Include: On 04/04/23 at 09:29 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) entered R105 room leaving the bottles with Miralax Powder 17 GM/SCOOP 17 gram, Thera-M Tablet (Multiple Vitamins-Minerals) and Loratadine Tablet 10 MG on top of the medication cart unattended. On 04/05/23 at 09:51 AM the fourth-floor high medication cart was reviewed with V15 (Licensed Practical Nurse). R226 Lantus Solution 100 ml (Milliliters) flex pen was observed without a bag, laying in a red plastic tray in the top drawer of the medication cart with an open date of 03/17/23. V15 stated the insulin pen is usually in a bag. R226 Order Summary Report dated 04/05/23 document in part: Basaglar KwikPen Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) Inject 12 unit subcutaneously two times a day. On 04/05/23 at 12:11 PM during the third-floor High medication cart review with V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse). R73 insulin flex pen and lispro insulin vial u100 was observed in the top drawer of the medication cart in a blue plastic tray without a bag. R73 insulin flex pen date opened 03/01/23. The insulin vial was without a resident name. V16 stated the bag for the insulin flex pen and the box for the insulin vial were soiled. The insulin vial belongs to R73. The insulin is good for 28 days after opening and the flex pen should have been discarded. The insulin should have a name on it. The flex pen was in a bag and the insulin vial was in a box but were soiled with the proheal so I took them out. R73 Medication Administration Record dated 04/01/23 - 04/30/23 document in part: Lantus SoloStar Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) Inject 75 unit subcutaneously at bedtime. Humalog Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro (Human)) Inject 8 unit subcutaneously before meals. On 04/05/23 at 12:24 PM V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated I am putting the insulin vial in a plastic bag now. On 04/06/23 at 11:29 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the staff should make sure there is a label on all medications. By the insulin pens and insulin vials being stored in a plastic tray in the medication cart there is a potential for cross contamination. The insulin is good for 28 days. The medications should be ordered to make sure it is readily available. The insulin that has been open for more than 28 days should have discarded. There is a potential that the insulin may not be affective and there can be side effects. The nurse should never leave medications unattended on top of the medication cart because another resident can get it off the cart and take it p.o. (By mouth) on their own and it is an unsafe practice. Document provided by the facility titled Insulin Storage Recommendations document in part: opened insulin can be used for 28 days. Policy: Title Medication Administration dated 10/25/14 document in part: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices. 16. No medications are kept on top of the cart. Titled Medication Administration and Storage Policy undated document in part: To ensure medications are administered and stored in accordance with Standards of Practice. Titled Storage of Medications dated 05/01/18 document in part: Medications and Biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only by licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. C. All medications dispensed by the pharmacy are stored in the container with pharmacy label. H. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications are those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closure are immediately removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. Expiration Dating: C. Certain medications or package types require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's expiration date to insure medication purity and potency. E. When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. 1. The nurse shall place a date opened sticker on the medication and enter the date opened and the new date of expiration.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to 1.) identify presence of PICC (Peripherally inserted...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to 1.) identify presence of PICC (Peripherally inserted central catheter) line and provide needed care and services for one (R115) resident. 2.) follow the facility's policy for PICC line or midline to (a) change transparent dressing every 7 days for 3 residents (R115, R5, R108); (b) change transparent dressing as needed for one (R226) resident; (c) measure PICC line external catheter and record with each dressing change; (d) failed to flush PICC line or midline for four residents (R115, R5, R108, R226). 3.) failed to develop the comprehensive person-centered care plan for four residents (R115, R5, R108, R226) and 4.)failed to ensure the PICC lumen (Hub) port was cleaned prior to administering IV (intravenous) antibiotic medication for one (R108) resident. These failures resulted in residents with PICC line or midline not receiving treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for four residents (R115, R5, R108, R226) in a sample of 26 reviewed for PICC line or midline. Findings include: On 4/4/23 at 10:50 AM Observed R115 lying on bed, alert and verbally responsive. Observed with single lumen PICC line on left arm with dressing dated 3/25/23. V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) requested to R115's room and confirmed that R115 PICC line dressing date was on 3/25/23. V6 stated that PICC line dressing should be changed at least every week or as needed. At 10:56 AM Observed R5 lying in bed, alert with confusion. Observed with single lumen midline on left arm, dressing in placed with no date on it. On 4/6/23 at 9:58 am V2 (Director of Nursing - DON) was interviewed and stated that facility is using the same policy for PICC (Peripherally inserted central catheter) line and Midline. V2 stated that outside company is coming to the facility to insert midline or PICC line. V2 stated that presence of midline and PICC line should be assessed upon admission or readmission and documented in resident's electronic health record (EHR). V2 stated that PICC line or midline dressing change, measuring of external catheter and flushing should be ordered in physician order sheet (POS) and would reflect in treatment administration record (TAR) or medication administration record (MAR). V2 stated that PICC line or Midline dressing should be monitored, changed and documented every 7 days and as needed. V2 stated that PICC line or Midline external catheter should be measured and documented every 7 days and as needed. V2 stated that nurse could either document PICC line or midline dressing changed in resident's progress notes. V2 stated that PICC line or midline should be flushed as ordered or after medication administration or as needed for patency. R115 EHR reviewed with V2 and stated that there was no documentation of midline or PICC line in R115 physician order sheet or R115 progress notes. V2 stated maybe R115 PICC line could have been inserted while R115 was in the hospital. V2 stated that R115 readmission date was on 3/25/23. V2 stated that there was no documentation in R115 POS regarding change of PICC line dressing, measuring of external catheter and flushing order. V2 stated if there was no order in the POS then it would not reflect in either MAR or TAR. R115 progress notes reviewed with V2 and stated there were no documentation found regarding PICC line dressing changed, external catheter was measured or PICC line flushing was done for R115. V2 stated that PICC line should be care planned to monitor and identify the needs or interventions of PICC line care for R115. Reviewed R115 care plan with V2 and stated no care plan found for R115 regarding PICC line. V2 stated that if there was no documentation that R115 has PICC line then it was not monitored. R5 EHR reviewed with V2 and stated that R5 has a midline on left arm. V2 stated that there was no documentation in R5 POS regarding midline dressing change, measuring of midline external catheter and midline flushing. R5 progress notes, MAR, TAR reviewed with V2 and stated there were no documentation regarding R5 midline dressing was changed, external catheter was measured and midline flushing was done. Reviewed R5 care plan with V2 and stated no care plan regarding midline found for R5. V2 stated that if there was no documentation in R115 and R5 EHR then PICC line or midline dressing was not changed, external catheter was not measured and was not flushed. V2 stated it would cause associated infection if PICC line or midline was not maintained properly. R115 face sheet reviewed and documented that R115 admission date was on 3/25/23 with diagnosis not limited to Urinary Tract Infection, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Adult failure to thrive, Anemia, Essential hypertension. R115 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R115 is cognitively intact. R115 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. R5 face sheet reviewed and documented that R5 admission date was on 3/21/23 with diagnosis not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease, Epilepsy, Diabetes Mellitus type 2, Pneumonia, Urinary tract infection. R5 MDS dated [DATE] documented that R5 was cognitively impaired. Reviewed facility's policy for PICC line dressing change (no date) documented in part: Objective: To assess insertion site / catheter status. Policy: A transparent dressing will be used unless a gauze dressing is indicated. Transparent dressing will be changed at 24 hours, and then every 7 days or as needed if loose, wet or soiled. External catheter is to be measured and recorded with each dressing change. Procedure: 5) Inspect insertion site for redness, edema, pain, or tenderness. Measure the exposed length of the PICC line form the hub to the insertion site. 15) Apply a dressing change label near the edge of the dressing, stating the date and time that the dressing was changed, and the initials of the nurse who changed the dressing. 17) Chart dressing change procedure and all observations on the patient's progress notes to include length of exposed catheter. Reviewed facility's PICC flush procedure and documented in part: Objective: To maintain patency of the catheter. Policy: PICC's should be flushed after each use or every 12 hours. Use SASH (Saline/Administer/Saline/Heparin) technique with medication administration. Line maintenance only requires Heparin flush. Procedure: 4) Cleanse injection port with alcohol swab for 15 seconds. Findings include: On 04/04/23 at 11:06 AM, R226 was sitting in a wheelchair in the day room. Surveyor observed a single-lumen PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line on R226's left upper arm. The top (proximal) portion of the dressing had three pieces of clear tape going horizontally over the transparent dressing. However, the bottom (distal) portion of the transparent dressing lifted when R226 bent the arm a certain way. Dressing was not adhered to R226's skin. The date on the dressing was 03/31. At 1:45 PM, R226 was sitting in a wheelchair in the bedroom watching television. R226's left arm dressing continued to lift and peel when R226 moved the left arm. On 04/05/2023 at 11:31 AM, R226 was sitting in a wheelchair in the bedroom. R226's PICC line dressing remained unchanged. R226 stated the nurse from 03/31 just taped it up pointing to the pieces of clear tape going horizontally on the transparent dressing. At 11:32 AM, V15 (R226's Nurse from 04/04/23 and 04/05/23) stated V2 (Director of Nursing-Registered Nurse) was the one that taped up R226's PICC line on 03/31/2023. V15 stated [V15] cannot do PICC line dressings as a Licensed Practical Nurse. V15 needs to call a Registered Nurse for treatment or dressing assistance for R226's PICC line. V15 stated [V15's] role was to observe R226's PICC line insertion site for signs of infection or infiltration. V15 stated if the PICC line dressing is compromised, there is a potential for infection to the site. Reviewed R226's April TAR (Treatment Administration Record). No documentation regarding PICC line's external catheter measurements. R226's comprehensive care plan did not contain a focus for R226's PICC line. Facility's undated Resident Care Planning policy documents in part: Policy: Each resident has a resident care plan that is current, individualized and consistent with the medical regimen. Findings Include: On 04/05/23 at 10:20 AM V14 (Registered Nurse) prepared R108 IVPB (Intravenous Piggyback) then entered R108 room. R108 was observed lying in bed with a right arm double lumen PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line. The Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter insertion site was covered with a white gauze that was secured in place with a transparent dressing undated and bordered with tape. R108 stated the dressing was changed about a week or two ago. I asked the nurse to change the dressing, but she put tape on it instead of changing it. I don't know the nurse's name. On 04/05/23 at 10:25 AM the surveyor asked V14 (Registered Nurse) how often the PICC line dressing is changed. V14 responded the dressing is changed as needed but let me look. On 04/05/23 at 11:07 AM V14 (Registered Nurse) stated a peripheral line dressing is changed every 3 days and as needed. The PICC line dressing that R108 has is changed every 7 days and as needed. The dressing should be dated. On 04/06/23 at 11:29 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the PICC line dressings are changed every 7 days and as needed. When the dressing is changed it should be dated. If the dressing is not changed and dated there is a potential for CLSBSI (A central Line bloodstream infection) and infection to the site. The registered nurses are the only one to change the PICC line dressing. When giving an IVPB the hub (port) should be scrubbed with an alcohol wipe for 30 seconds, maintain aseptic technique, flush the PICC line to check patency then scrub the hub (port) again before connecting the IV (Intravenous) tubing and infusing the medication. That is an infection control prevention strategy to prevent infections. Policy: Titled PICC Line Dressing Change and Male Adaptor Cap Change undated document in part: 15. Apply a dressing change label near the edge of the dressing, stating date and time that the dressing was changed, and initials of the nurse who changed the dressing. Titled Infusion Equipment and Supplies revised 09/01/16 document in part: All infusion equipment and supplies must be sterile upon opening and then remain aseptic in nature. This is to avoid contamination and decrease in the potential for sepsis related to the infusion therapy process. All tubing and dressings must have a label or they are considered to be out of date and should be changed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on review of records and interviews the facility failed to follow policy related to monitoring and recording in the immunization log as part of resident record influenza and pneumococcal vaccina...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of records and interviews the facility failed to follow policy related to monitoring and recording in the immunization log as part of resident record influenza and pneumococcal vaccination for 4 out of 5 residents (R8, R53, R61 and R118) reviewed for immunization. These failures have the potential to affect 4 residents vaccination benefits. Findings include: On 04/05/2023 at 10:28 AM. V4 (Infection Preventionist) and V2 (Director of Nursing) were requested for pneumococcal, influenza and Covid-19 vaccinations of the following residents: Under Immunization Log the following were documented: - R8 Prevnar-13 noted as consent refused without a date, influenza no date, and 2 doses of Covid-19 completed. - R53 most current influenza vaccination record was dated 09/23/2020, Pneumovax 1 historical, Pneumovax 2 dated 11/21/2019, and 2 doses of Covid-19 completed. - R61 most current influenza vaccination recorded was 10/14/2019, no pneumococcal vaccination on record, and 2 doses of Covid-19 completed. - R118 no record for all vaccinations (influenza, pneumococcal and Covid-19) - R104 influenza vaccination was recorded as historical dated 01/09/2023, pneumococcal was documented as consent refuse but undated, and Covid-19 vaccination for Moderna has only 1 dose noted as historical and dated 01/19/2023. On 04/06/2023 at 09:37 AM. V2 (Director of Nursing) said, V4 is aware that immunization log should be filed up if resident refused or declined. I came on in the facility last January 11, so we are trying to correct all that is lacking. Including vaccinations must be input to the immunization log per facility's policy. Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations dared 2020, in part reads: Immunizations are an important measure in preventing morbidity and mortality in Long Term Care residents. The use of vaccines reduces this morbidity and mortality and reduces health care cost through preventing illness and hospitalization. In order to minimize the risk of residents acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia. This facility will minimize the risk of resident acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing the complications from influenza and Pneumococcal pneumonia. Each resident is informed about the benefits and risks of immunization and has the opportunity to receive, unless medically contraindicated or already immunized, the influenza and Pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine. This facility will assure documentation in the medical record of the information and education provided regarding the benefits and risks of immunization and the administration or refusal or medical contraindication of the vaccine. Under immunization documentation of both Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccination, both be documented in the medical record on the immunization log.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interview and record reviews the facility failed to 1.) prepare food under sanitary conditions. 2.)failed to ensure that frozen meat have not been left to thaw at room temperatu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interview and record reviews the facility failed to 1.) prepare food under sanitary conditions. 2.)failed to ensure that frozen meat have not been left to thaw at room temperature.3.) failed to date perishable items in the refrigerator. 4.)failed to routinely monitor food temperatures on the steam table by not logging the temperature in the food temperature logbook. 5.)failed to ensure that dishwasher draining pipeline is not leaking and 6.)failed to maintain cold food item at 41F or cooler. These failures have the potential to affect 124 residents living in the facility with 4 residents on Nothing by Mouth (NPO) for a total facility's census of 128 dated 4/4/23. The findings include: On 4/4/23 at 9:10 AM observed the following: 1. Kitchen toured with V5 (Dietary Manager) and observed gray garbage bin lid was half open. Observed 2 brown boxes on the floor by garbage bin with garbage on it. Observed V5 throwing garbage in the brown box on the floor. Observed kitchen floor with scattered disposable plates, packet of pepper, silver spoon, multiple plastic lids, clear plastic, papers, food particles, toasted half muffin, etc. Observed with multiple sliced ham, sliced onions, sliced tomatoes left on the chopping board overflowing on the prep area. Observed with multiple slices of toasted bread left on the flat grill. Observed flat grill with scattered old-crumbled bread, observed brownish and blackish crusted food particles around the flat grill. V5 stated those toasted bread will be thrown away. Observed steam table with scattered papers, with food particles, with bunch of keys, with silver utensils scattered on the steam table. Observed garbage bin without lid in the dishwashing area. V5 stated I don't know where the lid is. 2. Observed prep area with 2 plastic bags of frozen chicken drumstick in a stainless container with no running water. V5 stated that bags of chicken drumstick were just taken out from the fridge. Observed a packed of ham on the sink of the prep area with no running water. V5 stated ham will be used for lunch. V5 stated frozen food items need to be thawed in the running water. 3. Observed walk in refrigerator with temperature at 38F. Observed with sliced / open cucumber wrapped in clear plastic with no date on it. Observed pitcher of cool aid drink with no date on it. V5 stated all items should be dated and if not dated items will be discarded. Observed walk in freezer, temperature at -7F. 2 cups of frozen juices on the floor. Observed with scattered white particles / ice on the floor. 4. On 4/5/23 at 10:30 AM Reviewed food temperature logbook with no entries of temperature logged for breakfast on 3/31/23 and no entries of temperature logged for breakfast and lunch on 4/1/23. V5 confirmed that there were missing temperature logged on 3/31/23 and 4/1/23 on the food temperature logbook, V5 stated I don't know because I was not here at that time. Two (R67 and R75) residents both cognitively intact stated that most of the time the food is cold. R75 further stated that he (R75) is eating in the first floor dining by the kitchen area but the food is still cold when served. Survey team stated that during resident council meeting, residents were complaining of cold food. 5.Observed dishwasher pipeline with leaking water on the floor. V5 checked the pipeline and V5 stated that it was not properly connected. V5 stated that a work order will be made for the maintenance to fix it. 6.At 12:50 pm Requested a test tray for 2nd floor and V5 checked food temperature of cold fruit cocktail and revealed a temperature at 59.2F. V5 stated that cold foods should be maintained at 41F or cooler. On 04/04/23 at 10:16 AM R75 stated the kitchen is torn up. I eat in the dining room and the food is cold all the time. People don't eat the food and I have to buy my own food. As much as we complain about that kitchen nothing is being done. On 04/04/23 at 10:27 AM R98 stated I receive tube feedings twice a day and they are trying to slow down with the feedings. The food be cold and the Certified Nurse Assistant have will reheat the food. Reviewed facility's policy for storage of refrigerated foods (no date) documented in part: Food in the refrigerator will be covered, labeled and dated. Reviewed facility's food temperature monitoring sheet form (no date) documented in part: Holding temperature: Hot food not less than 135F and cold food not greater than 41F.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility (a) failed to dispose of garbage properly in a contained dumpsters (b) failed to keep the dumpster area clean and free of garbage or wa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility (a) failed to dispose of garbage properly in a contained dumpsters (b) failed to keep the dumpster area clean and free of garbage or waste to maintain a sanitary condition to prevent harborage and feeding of pest. These failures could potentially affect all 128 residents that reside in the facility as of census 4/4/23. The Findings include: On 4/5/23 at 11:10 AM During the 2nd day kitchen tour with V5 (Dietary Manager) observed outside dumpster lid halfway open with overflowing garbage. V5 stated it should be tightly closed then V5 closed the dumpster lid. Observed 3 mattresses on the ground, 2 black plastic bins, brown boxes or cartons, clear plastic and paper waste around the dumpster area. V5 stated maybe maintenance staff was the one who placed those mattresses. V5 stated that kitchen staff is aware that when throwing garbage in the dumpster the lid should be closed after use to prevent rodents / pests harborage around the dumpster area. On 4/6/23 at 8:50 am V13 (Maintenance Director) was interviewed and stated 3 times a week garbage is pick up. V13 stated that all garbage should be inside the dumpster and lid should always be closed after use. V13 stated that if there are garbage / waste around the dumpster or if lid is not completely closed it could bring attention to rodents and pests. V13 stated that it is hard to control garbage disposal because there a lot of staff using that dumpster. Facility's policy and procedure for dumpster / waste pick and containment (no date) documented in part: - The building will ensure timely pick up of garbage on a weekly basis and containment of garbage is maintained. - The maintenance director / designee shall ensure the dumpster is covered at all times. The waste company is scheduled to pick up the waste from the dumpster 3 times weekly. - Should the waste company be unable to remove garbage on their scheduled days, the maintenance director / designee will contract the company to ensure pick up will occur or be re-scheduled. The maintenance director or designee will then notify the administrator. - If waste pick-up will be re-scheduled, the maintenance director / designee will ensure proper containment of garbage occurs so as not to attract pests.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed the following; related to infection prevention and control: Failed to follow policy in perform hand hygiene during bedside car...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed the following; related to infection prevention and control: Failed to follow policy in perform hand hygiene during bedside care from soiled to clean surfaces for 1 resident (R56). Failed to maintain linen bag off the floor. Failed to clean reusable equipment (blood cuff) used by 3 residents (R2, R49 and R105). The facilty also failed to follow Water management Program related to risk assessment of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens. These failures have the potential to affect all 128 residents in preventing infections. Findings include: 04/04/23 11:20 AM. R56 was seen on his bed with tracheostomy tubing connected. V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant) and V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was performing bedside care including bed bath to R56. V11 was seen placing 2 blue bags, 1 bag was placed on the floor and dirty linen was put inside. And 2nd bag was also placed on the floor for garbage. Both V10 and V11 performing direct care to R56 wore surgical masks and gloves without wearing a gown. After performing perineal care, V10 using the same gloves that was used for incontinent care was also used to touch tracheostomy cannula without hand hygiene. During duration of care no hand hygiene was performed. On 04/06/2023 at 09:37 AM. V2 said, Nursing staff when performing bedside care must change gloves and perform hand hygiene after performing perineal care and before touching tracheostomy tubing. Hand Hygiene Policy not dated, in part reads: Effective hand hygiene reduces the incidence of healthcare-associated infections. All members of the healthcare team will comply with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) hand hygiene guidelines. Handwashing may also be used for routinely decontaminating hands in the following clinical situations: When moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during patient care. Linen Handling and Storage Policy dated as revised 12/09/2014, in part reads: Policy is to establish the guideline for the proper handling and storage of clean and soiled linen. All linen is handled, stored, transported, and processed in a manner that will prevent contamination and maintain a clean environment for residents, healthcare workers, and visitors. Strict handwashing is followed by all personnel when handling linen. On 04/05/2023 at 09:59 AM. With V13 (Maintenance Director) said that he took over his position last February 1, 2023. And V13 said, I am not aware, but I think that corporate handle the checking of water system to be free from Legionella. V12 (Special Project) presented a printout of a chemical product and said, This is the chemical that we used on a seasonal basis for Legionella. I don't have any paper work to show that we are using it. Water Management Program dated as revised 10/01/2017, in part reads: Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: - The maintenance Director will maintain documentation that describes the facility's water system. - A risk assessment of water system components will be conducted to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread in the facility's water system. - The risk assessment will be completed by facility leadership and the Infection Prevention collaboration from other facility team members such as maintenance employees, safety officers, risk and quality management staff, and Director of Nursing. Under data to be used in the risk assessment may include, but are not limited to: - Lab reports - Environmental culture results - Rounding observation data - Water temperature logs - Water quality reports from drinking water provider. On 04/05/2023 at 10:41 AM. V12 said, We did not have all of those things done. But looking forward we contracted outside company to come. To reduce cases of Legionnaires' disease in health care facilities, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that Medicare certified healthcare facilities must develop and maintain water management policies and procedures to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in building water systems. The directive has an immediate effective date. (https://www.ashrae.org/about/news/2017/cms-issues-directive-requiring-medicare-certified-healthcare-facilities-to-implement-and-maintain-legionella-prevention-policies) Legionella, the bacterium that causes Legionnaires' disease, .Legionella can pose a health risk when it gets into building water systems. Legionella first must grow (increase in numbers). Then it has to spread through small water droplets (aerosolization) that people can breathe in. (https://www.cdc.gov/legionella/wmp/overview/growth-and-spread.html) Seven key elements of a Legionella water management program are to: Establish a water management program team, describe the building water systems using text and flow diagrams; identify areas where Legionella could grow and spread; decide where control measures should be applied and how to monitor them; establish ways to intervene when control limits are not met; make sure the program is running as designed (verification) and is effective (validation) and document and communicate all the activities. (https://www.cdc.gov/legionella/wmp/overview.html) Findings Include: On 04/04/23 at 09:07 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) entered R2 room with the blood pressure machine and placed the blood pressure cuff on R2 right arm to obtain the blood pressure reading of 99/56 pulse 77. On 04/04/23 at 09:08 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart with the blood pressure machine to prepare R2 medications. V8 did not clean the blood pressure machine. R2 Order Summary Report document in part: Vital signs two times a day for Prophylaxis/Covid (Coronavirus) Symptoms. On 04/04/23 at 09:14 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) entered R49 room with the blood pressure machine placed the blood pressure cuff on R49 left arm to obtain the blood pressure reading of 112/77 pulse 65. On 04/04/23 at 09:17 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) returned to the medication cart leaving the blood pressure machine in R49 room near the bed to prepare R49 medications. V8 did not clean the blood pressure machine. R49 Order Summary Report document in part: Vital signs two times a day for Prophylaxis/Covid Symptoms. On 04/04/23 at 09:29 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) obtained the blood pressure machine that was next to R49 bed then placed the blood pressure cuff on R105 right arm to obtain the blood pressure reading of 115/80 pulse 74. R105 Order Summary Report document in part: Vital Signs two times a day for Monitoring Vital Signs. On 04/04/23 at 09:31 AM V8 (License Practical Nurse) was asked by the surveyor what is the policy for cleaning reusable equipment. V8 stated the reusable equipment should be cleaned and sanitized between each resident use, not to spread germs. I have bleach wipes. V8 began to look for the bleach wipes in the medication cart and did not locate any bleach wipes. On 04/06/23 at 09:05 AM V4 (Infection Preventionist) stated the staff will have to clean the blood pressure cuff with the bleach wipes after each resident use for Infection control purposes. On 04/06/23 at 11:29 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the blood pressure machine should be cleaned between each resident for infection control purposes. If the reusable equipment is making contact with the resident, you are supposed to sanitize it. Policy: Titled Sanitizing Nursing Equipment Policy dated 12/01/22 document in part: Purpose: To prevent the spread of infectious diseases and maintain a safe and clean environment for patients, staff and visitors by establishing guidelines for the cleaning and disinfecting of nursing equipment in the skilled nursing facility. Policy: All nursing equipment used in patient care must be properly cleaned and disinfected after each use or as necessary, using appropriate cleaning and disinfecting products and following the manufacturer's instructions. Equipment includes but is not limited to: Blood pressure cuffs. Procedure: 1. The nursing staff is responsible for cleaning and disinfecting equipment after each use. 2. All equipment should be cleaned with a detergent solution and rinsed with water before disinfecting. 3. A disinfecting solution with an EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) - approved label for use in healthcare settings should be applied to the equipment an allowed to sit for the manufacturer-recommended contact time. 5. Equipment should be allowed to air dry before reuse.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0886 (Tag F0886)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on review of records and interviews the facility failed to follow policy of Covid-19 testing for resident and staff having close contact or exposed to confirmed case of Covid-19. These failures ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of records and interviews the facility failed to follow policy of Covid-19 testing for resident and staff having close contact or exposed to confirmed case of Covid-19. These failures have the potential to affect all residents on the same floor in preventing infections. Findings include: On 04/04/2023 at 09:28 AM. V4 (Infection Preventionist) stated, A resident (R74) was positive last Saturday (04/01/2023) and she (R74) went to hospital. V4 was asked what measures was done to mitigate or prevent Covid-19 infection transmission to other resident and staff. V4 said, Facility has a scheduled testing twice a week on Mondays and Thursdays. A log was requested on testing documentation to ensure those that were exposed are tested. V4 agreed to present documentation on a later time. Per R74 notes dated 4/2/2023 by V23 (Licensed Practical Nurse) reads that R74 was admitted to hospital for Covid-19 positive. On 04/06/2023 at 09:06 AM. Per V4 outbreak is defined if facility has 1 staff or resident that is positive with Covid-19. On 04/06/2023 at 09:49 AM. After multiple request V4 was not able to submit documentation that good faith effort was performed by facility to prevent or mitigate transmission of Covid-19 after an outbreak. V4 stated, Since facility was doing testing anyway, I just requested lab to print out results. I don't have policy for contact tracing. Nursing schedule was presented to V4 dated 03/30/2023 and 04/01/2023 that shows staff performing direct care to R74. And a request was made to V4 to present Covid-19 test results. And requested residents on the same floor as R74 testing result or contact tracing effort. No documentation for testing or test result of staff was submitted. V4 said, I understand the risk of spread of Covid-19 infections, moving forward will address these issues. Review of Staff Matrix vaccination status does not include individual providing services arrangement (Agency / Contractual Staff) for monitoring. V4 was asked how facility determines Covid-19 vaccination status or testing of those staff not vaccinated. V4 did not answer. Per list of Covid-19 residents and staff R74 was positive dated 04/01/2023, R12 was positive dated 02/23/2023, 1 facility staff, and outside staffs. R74 and R12 was living on the same floor when R74 was still in the facility. V4 presented Covid-19 policy not dated, that in part reads: To ensure compliance with Illinois Executive Order issued on 10/14/22 related to universal masking and vaccination / testing requirement. Under Routine Testing Guidance: Residents and staff having close contact to confirmed case for both not up to date and up to date with vaccination. Test must be done on day 1, day 3, and day 5 post exposure.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0887 (Tag F0887)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on review of records and interviews the facility failed to follow Covid-19 Vaccination policy related to determining facility staff and residents' vaccination status to offer Covid-19 Vaccinatio...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of records and interviews the facility failed to follow Covid-19 Vaccination policy related to determining facility staff and residents' vaccination status to offer Covid-19 Vaccination, and documentation of education provided to residents. These failures have the potential to affect all 128 residents in preventing infections. Findings include: On 04/04/2023 at 09:56 AM. V4 (Infection Preventionist) submitted Matrix for staff that does not include contractual or agency staff. On the same Matrix facility staff, Covid-19 vaccination does not indicate dates when vaccination received. And all vaccination that needs 2 doses (Pfizer and Moderna) cannot be determine since Matrix does not provide date when it was given. V4 stated, I understand what you mean, it should look the same as resident matrix that has both dates for vaccines that needs 2 doses. On 04/06/2023 at 01:51 PM. V4 submitted staff matrix that now includes contractual / agency staff that includes direct care and facility staff vaccination including dates when they received. Multiple facility staff have no records of receiving vaccination. V4 said, We are trying to update our Matrix to include all staff including agency staff. On 04/05/2023 at 10:28 AM. V4 (Infection Preventionist) and V2 (Director of Nursing) were requested for pneumococcal, influenza and Covid-19 vaccinations of the following residents: Under Immunization Log the following were documented: - R8 Prevnar-13 noted as consent refused without a date, influenza no date, and 2 doses of Covid-19 completed. - R53 most current influenza vaccination record was dated 09/23/2020, Pneumovax 1 historical, Pneumovax 2 dated 11/21/2019, and 2 doses of Covid-19 completed. - R61 most current influenza vaccination recorded was 10/14/2019, no pneumococcal vaccination on record, and 2 doses of Covid-19 completed. - R118 no record for all vaccinations (influenza, pneumococcal and Covid-19) - R104 influenza vaccination was recorded as historical dated 01/09/2023, pneumococcal was documented as consent refuse but undated, and Covid-19 vaccination for Moderna has only 1 dose noted as historical and dated 01/19/2023. Per resident vaccination status matrix presented by V4, multiple residents refused vaccination. Three residents were at randomly chosen (R50, R4 and R24) no education material was presented. On 04/06/2023 at 09:37 AM. V2 said, V4 is aware that immunization log should be filed up if resident refused or declined. I came on in the facility last January 11, so we are trying to correct all that is lacking. Including vaccinations must be input to the immunization log per facility's policy. Covid-19 Vaccination policy dated 2/22, in part reads: To ensure compliance with emergency regulation requiring Covid-19 vaccination for healthcare workers and residents that live in a LTC facility. All eligible staff must receive the first dose of a two dose Covid-19 vaccine prior to providing any care, treatment, or other services by March 1, 2022. All eligible staff must receive the necessary doses to be fully vaccinated; either 2 doses of Pfizer or Moderna or 1 dose of Johnson and Johnson by March 28, 2022. Residents must be educated and counseled on the importance of being vaccinated. Following education of vaccine, if resident chooses to be vaccinated, the facility must provide access to vaccination for resident. Non-vaccinated residents must be educated and counseled on importance of being vaccinated. If a resident refuses vaccine following education and counseling, the physician will be aware. Interim Guidance for Managing Healthcare Personnel with SARS-CoV-2 Infection or Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Updated Sept. 23, 2022, in part reads: For the purposes of this guidance, higher-risk exposures are classified as HCP who had prolonged1 close contact2 with a patient, visitor, or HCP with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection3 and: HCP was not wearing a respirator (or if wearing a facemask, the person with SARS-CoV-2 infection was not wearing a cloth mask or facemask)4 HCP was not wearing eye protection if the person with SARS-CoV-2 infection was not wearing a cloth mask or facemask HCP was not wearing all recommended PPE (i.e., gown, gloves, eye protection, respirator) while present in the room for an aerosol-generating procedure Following a higher-risk exposure, HCP should: Have a series of three viral tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection. o Testing is recommended immediately (but not earlier than 24 hours after the exposure) and, if negative, again 48 hours after the first negative test and, if negative, again 48 hours after the second negative test. This will typically be at day 1 (where day of exposure is day 0), day 3, and day 5. Healthcare Personnel (HCP): HCP refers to all paid and unpaid persons serving in healthcare settings who have the potential for direct or indirect exposure to patients or infectious materials, including body substances (e.g., blood, tissue, and specific body fluids); contaminated medical supplies, devices, and equipment; contaminated environmental surfaces; or contaminated air. HCP include, but are not limited to, emergency medical service personnel, nurses, nursing assistants, home healthcare personnel, physicians, technicians, therapists, phlebotomists, pharmacists, dental healthcare personnel, students and trainees, contractual staff not employed by the healthcare facility, and persons not directly involved in patient care, but who could be exposed to infectious agents that can be transmitted in the healthcare setting (e.g., clerical, dietary, environmental services, laundry, security, engineering and facilities management, administrative, billing, and volunteer personnel). For this guidance, HCP does not include clinical laboratory personnel.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0888 (Tag F0888)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on review of records, and interviews the facility failed to monitor staff (facility and contracted) vaccination status. And failed to develop policy and procedure to ensure that all staff are fu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of records, and interviews the facility failed to monitor staff (facility and contracted) vaccination status. And failed to develop policy and procedure to ensure that all staff are fully vaccinated for Covid-19. These failures have the potential to affect all residents on the same floor in preventing infections. Findings include: On 04/04/2023 at 09:56 AM. V4 (Infection Preventionist) submitted Matrix for staff that does not include contractual or agency staff. On the same Matrix facility staff, Covid-19 vaccination does not indicate dates when vaccination received. And all vaccination that needs 2 doses (Pfizer and Moderna) cannot be determine since Matrix does not provide date when it was given. V4 stated, I understand what you mean, it should look the same as resident matrix that has both dates for vaccines that needs 2 doses. On 04/06/2023 at 01:51 PM. V4 submitted staff matrix that now includes contractual / agency staff that includes direct care and facility staff vaccination including dates when they received. Multiple facility staff have no records of receiving vaccination. V4 said, We are trying to update our Matrix to include all staff including agency staff. Facility Matrix for Staff Vaccination has 107 total employee count presented 04/04/2023. Facility submission to NHSN (National Healthcare Safety Network) for the week 04/03/2023 to 04/09/2023 has 90 total HCP (Healthcare Personnel) that does not match 107 total employees on the Matrix. The Matrix does not include staff that are contractual staff not employed by the healthcare facility. On 04/06/2023 at 09:37 AM. V2 (Director of Nursing) said, Contracted and agency workers must be included on the Staff Matrix. The list provided to you is not complete. Moving forward we will address all issues. V4 just started and I will help her address the issues. On 04/04/2023 09:28 AM, 04/05/23 10:28 AM V4 was requested for policy addressing full staff vaccination that includes contractual staff working in the facility. On 04/06/2023 at V4 said, I don't have it. Covid-19 Vaccination policy dated 02/22, in part reads: To ensure compliance with emergency regulation requiring Covid-19 vaccination for healthcare workers and residents that live in a LTC facility. All eligible staff must receive the first dose of a two dose Covid-19 vaccine prior to providing any care, treatment, or other services by March 1, 2022. All eligible staff must receive the necessary doses to be fully vaccinated; either 2 doses of Pfizer or Moderna or 1 dose of Johnson and Johnson by March 28, 2022. Residents must be educated and counseled on the importance of being vaccinated. Following education of vaccine, if resident chooses to be vaccinated, the facility must provide access to vaccination for resident. Non-vaccinated residents must be educated and counseled on importance of being vaccinated. If a resident refuses vaccine following education and counseling, the physician will be aware. Interim Guidance for Managing Healthcare Personnel with SARS-CoV-2 Infection or Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Updated Sept. 23, 2022, in part reads: Healthcare Personnel (HCP): HCP refers to all paid and unpaid persons serving in healthcare settings who have the potential for direct or indirect exposure to patients or infectious materials, including body substances (e.g., blood, tissue, and specific body fluids); contaminated medical supplies, devices, and equipment; contaminated environmental surfaces; or contaminated air. HCP include, but are not limited to, emergency medical service personnel, nurses, nursing assistants, home healthcare personnel, physicians, technicians, therapists, phlebotomists, pharmacists, dental healthcare personnel, students and trainees, contractual staff not employed by the healthcare facility, and persons not directly involved in patient care, but who could be exposed to infectious agents that can be transmitted in the healthcare setting (e.g., clerical, dietary, environmental services, laundry, security, engineering and facilities management, administrative, billing, and volunteer personnel). For this guidance, HCP does not include clinical laboratory personnel.
Mar 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their fall prevention policy by failing to provide adequat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their fall prevention policy by failing to provide adequate monitoring and fall prevention for 1 resident(R2) of 4 residents reviewed. This failure resulted in R2 sustaining head injury. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old individua with multiple admissions to the facility, and last admission is documented as 12/2/2022. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Section C (Cognitive Patterns) dated 3/2/ 2023, document R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 9/15, indicating R2 has some cognitive deficits. R2's MDS section G, ADL (Activities of Daily Living- Assistance), dated 3/2/2023, documents R2 needs extensive assistance, two persons plus assistance with Bed mobility, transfer, and toilet use. R2 needs extensive assistance with one person assist with locomotion on and off unit, dressing, eating and personal hygiene. For balance during transitions and walking, R2 is documented as not steady moving from seated to standing position, not steady, able to stabilize with staff assistance for surface-to-surface transfer (Transfer between bed and chair or wheelchair). Walking is documented as Activity did not occur. Functional Limitation in Range of Motion; Impairment on one side, lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot)-impairment on one side. Mobility Devices, R2 uses manual wheelchair. On 3/11/2023 at 10:07am, R1 was observed in bed with bed in low position and fall mattresses in place. R2's call light was near R2, and his room is near the nurse's station. R2 answered questions with yes and no answers. On 3/11/2023 at 11:34am, V2(Director of Nursing) said on 2/18/2023, V3(Registered Nurse -RN) reported to V2 that R2 was in the hallway sitting in his wheelchair and V3 said when she turned her back away from R2 that R2 fell in the hallway and was found in facing up position, R2 had a small open area on right eyebrow. V2 said V3 applied pressure and ice to the area, and the bleeding stopped. R2 was sent to the local hospital for further evaluation. V2 said all residents are fall risks and must be monitored. V2 said, at that time, R2's room was not close to the nursing station when R2 fell. V2 said high fall risk residents like R2, should be near the nursing station when in wheelchair so that if resident slides or turns to the side, the nurse can see and reposition the resident before the resident falls. V2 said R2 should have been always monitored to prevent falls, because R2 has had many falls in the past. On 3/11/2023 at 12:36AM, V3(Registered Nurse) said that on 2/18/2023 in the morning about 10:30am, V4(Certified Nurses' Assistant-CNA) came running to V3 saying that R2 was on the floor in the hallway after falling and was bleeding on the face. V3 said V4 was in a resident room performing her daily duties and when she come out a resident room, V4 found R2 in the hallway on the floor, face up and bleeding from the face. V3 said she run to R2 to assess R2 and provide care, and V3 found R2 on the floor and he(R2) was bleeding to the right brow and had moderate bleeding to oral cavity. V3 said V3 applied pressure to R2's bleeding right brow and the bleeding subsided. V3 said she assessed R2 and R2 was not in pain, and R2 did not lose consciousness. V3 said V3 got an order to send R2 out to the hospital for further evaluation especially because R3 was on blood thinner medications. V3 said high risk fall residents are supposed to be always monitored. they are supposed to be in the day room with staff, or in activities room on the first floor or at nursing station where they can be monitored by nurses if the CNAs are busy taking care of other residents. V3 said monitoring the residents always helps maintain safety. V3 said high risk residents have star/leaf on the door to alert staff that a resident is a fall risk. V3 said R2 is a high fall risk because he is a stoke patient and has right Hemiplegia(paralysis). V3 said staff are supposed to always monitor R2 because he a high fall risk and has a history of falls before this fall. On 3/11/2023 at 1:22pm, V4(Certified Nurse's Assistant -CNA) said she was in a resident room doing patient care and as she was coming out of the other resident room, V4 saw R2 lying on his right side by his room, just outside the room. V4 said she went and got the nurse(V3) who come and assessed R2. V4 said R2 is a high falls risk resident. V4 said fall risk residents are not supposed to be left alone because anything can happen. They might try to get up and fall. V4 said to prevent R2 from falling, staff should have taken R2 to activities room on the first-floor main dining room where he could have been monitored, or in the day room with staff, or put him(R2) by the nursing station so that R2 could have been always monitored. V4 said fall risk residents who are fall risk have a leaf on their doors to alert staff of their fall risks, and R2 is one of the high-risk residents. R2's hospital records with encounter date of 2/19/2023 document: -Date of admission: [DATE] -Primary diagnosis: ICH (Intracerebral hemorrhage) -History of Present Illness (HPI) documents: R2 has a fall from wheelchair on 2/18/2023 at the nursing home where R2 resides, was taken to (ED)emergency room and was admitted to trauma service, CTH (Computed Tomography Head) and at that time per report, was found to demonstrate L(Left) frontal traumatic: ICH (Intracerebral hemorrhage). Hospital notes further document: R2 admitted to NSICU (Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit) on 2/19. R2 transferred to another hospital for further work up of suspected aneurysm in setting of expanded L(Left frontal ICH (Intracerebral hemorrhage) with SAH(subarachnoid hemorrhage) S/P(Status Post) fall at nursing home. R2's care plan with initiated date of 10/6/2021, Revised 11/10/2022 documents R2 has had multiple falls on: 10/5/2021, 3/9/2022, 3/17/2022, 3/25/2022, 411/2022, 12/0/2022, 12/15, 2022, 2/18/2023. Facility Policy titled: Fall Prevention Policy, no date documents: -it is the policy of [NAME] to identify residents at risk for falls and to implement a fall prevention approach to reduce the risk for falls and possible injuries. -Direct Care Providers will be instructed regarding approaches and goals for the management of the resident falls risk -Any resident experiencing a pattern of falls (two or more during a 30-day period) or an injury from a fall will be referred for a falls assessment to be completed by the nurse or therapist. R2's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents -R2 is a falls risk related to having fallen before, has more than one diagnosis on the chart, has an impaired gait, overestimates, or forgets limits. For ambulatory aids, R2 is documented as: None/bedrest/wheelchair/nurse assist.
Dec 2022 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy to monitor/supervise one reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy to monitor/supervise one resident(R4) of the 3 residents reviewed for smoking supervision. Finding include: R4 is a [AGE] year-old individual admitted to the facility initially on 11/01/2012, and 12/09/2022. R4's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) dated 10/11/22 document has a BIMS score of 13/15. R4's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance, dated [DATE], document R4 needs limited assistance with ADLs. On 12/17/2022 at 3:50pm, R4 was observed sitting in manual wheelchair. R4 was asked if R4 can remember the day R4 was left outside in the patio while on a smoking break. R4 was confused not sure what V5( Social Services Director/Assistant Administrator) and surveyor were asking R4. R4 said R4 can remember being pushed back into the facility by this guy, who I don't know who he was.R4 was unable to give any other information the day R4 was left outside during a smoking break. On 12/17/2022 at 12:44pm, V16(Activities Aide) said R4 was left outside on 12/07/2022 at about 6pm during smoke break. V16 said residents were smoking at the other side of the building by the therapy patio that is not completely secure and is open to the outside of the facility on the front side and back because the secure smoking patio was under renovation. V16 said R4 wondered off to the back of the alley. V16 said V16 looked and could not find R4. V16 said V16 and V16 supervisor (V6-Activity Director) looked for R4 and found R4 at the back of the alley. V16 said R4 did not know where R4 was when R4 was found. V16 said R4 was lost like for 10-15 minutes. On 12/17/2022 at 1:58pm, V5 (Social Services Director/Assistant Administrator) said on 12/07/2022, only 4 residents were able to go out at the time because the smoking patio was under renovation so other the partially enclosed patio was designated for smoking. V5 said V16 (Activities Aide) was the person supervising the smoking break. V5 said V16 called the units to find out if all the residents were accounted for. V5 said an unknown nurse said R4 was back in the unit. V5 said V16 should have known which residents V16 had taken out to the smoking patio. V5 said V16 told V5 that after a while, V16 went out to the smoking patio to check if anyone was out there and V16 found R4 still outside in the partially secure smoking patio. V5 said it was during the evening smoking break which is around 4-6pm, and the weather in the 40s that day. V5 said any resident on the smoking program are on supervision and R4 should have been supervised. V5 said the residents such R4 are on supervision for smoking because they have not been deemed to smoke safely by themselves at these times. V5 said if not supervised, these residents can burn themselves and the place they were smoking at on this day is partially enclosed because it is still a driveway. V5 said without supervision, R4 could have left the premises, and that's a huge safety concern within itself. V5 and surveyor went outside to the partially closed patio. One side of the patio was open to the main road at the front of the building, and back side of the patio was open to an alley and cars were observed parked on the alley. On 12/17/2022 at 6:00pm, V5(Assistant Administrator/Social Services Director) said after R4 was left outside, it was not documented. V5 said V5 met with R4 and did a wellbeing visit/note. V5 said there should have been a note saying what happened after R4 was found outside, and the note should have said what was done. R4's care plan dated 7/27/2020 documents that R4 will not smoke without supervision Facility policy titled Smoking Behavior Contract, dated 01/07/2012 Documents: -All residents that smoke will be supervised during smoking activities.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to offer the influenza vaccination to one resident (R2). Findings include: Reviewed R2's immunizations in the electroni...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to offer the influenza vaccination to one resident (R2). Findings include: Reviewed R2's immunizations in the electronic medical record. Indicates R2 has not been administered the influenza vaccine in 2022. Facility could not provide documentation that R2 was offered the influenza vaccine for the 2022 influenza season, that R2 consented to or declined the vaccine or that teaching was provided to R2 or R2's power of attorney. On 12/17/22 at 10:50 AM, V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R2 has not had a flu shot. Infection prevention nurse offers the flu shot. 12/17/22 at 1:30 PM, V1 (Director of Nursing) stated We administer flu shots in the facility. The Infection control nurse will ask the resident or power of attorney if they want to consent to the flu shot. The resident or power of attorney will sign a form to accept or decline. The Infection Control nurse administers the shot. 12/17/22 at 4:12 PM, V8 (Infection Control Nurse) stated I started working here October 18, 2022. We started to offer the flu shot in October. We ask those that can consent for themselves, we ask the POA, the family. If they consent, they sign a form and then given the shot. If they decline, they sign a decline form. If the resident is not administered the flu vaccine, they will be prone to having the flu. They are not protected from having the flu. R2 should have been offered the flu vaccine. Facility Immunization Policy, revised 6/18, reads in part: In order to minimize the risk of residents acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia, it is the policy of this facility to offer influenza and pneumococcal vaccination to all residents. 1. Each resident or the resident's representative will receive education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza immunization. 2. Each resident will be offered the influenza vaccination between October 1 and November 30 or as soon as possible if vaccine is not available by November 1, 4. The resident's medical record will indicate: a. That the resident or resident's legal representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza immunization; and b. That the resident either received the influenza immunization or did not receive the influenza immunization due to medical contraindications or refusal. Facility Influenza Vaccinations policy, not dated, reads in part: Standard - Residents are protected from the influenza virus by receiving the vaccine annually.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy and staff(V16) failed to maintain proper infection control. This has a potential to affect all resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy and staff(V16) failed to maintain proper infection control. This has a potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings Include: On 12/17/2022 at 12:44pm, V16(Activities Aide) the ice scoop should not be picked up from the floor and placed back on the ice scoop slot. V16 and two surveyors observed a communal resident telephone placed on top of the ice scoop slot, which was not completely covered, and the phone was observed to be touching the ice scoop. V16 said the phone should not be placed on the ice scoop slot while the ice scoop is in there because residents are using the phone and placing it back on top of the ice scoop slot. V16 said the ice scoop can get contaminated and make residents sick. V16 said V16 assists residents with meals. On 12/17/2022 at 1:03pm, V6(Activities Director), said that on 12/13/2022 R1 come to V6's office and told V6 not to drink the water that V6 brought to V6 because V16 had dropped to ice scoop and put it right back on the slot on the wall. V6 said if the scoop fell, it should be replaced because it was contaminated, and it can cause illness if used after it fell. On 12/17/2022 at 1:58pm, V5 (Social Services Director/Assistant Administrator) said on 12/13/2022, V16 was getting V6 Ice water, the ice scope fell and V16 picked up and put it back in the ice machine. R1 saw it and went and reported it to V6 and told V6 not to drink the water. V5 said, that is infection control issue. The resident could have gotten sick drinking tainted ice. V5 said the ice machine serves 15-20 residents and staff. On 12/17/2022 at 3:31pm V7 (Dietary Manager) said if the ice scoop falls on the floor, the staff should not put that scoop back in its slot but should get another scoop and make sure the scoop that fell is washed sanitized and air dried before being used again. V7 said I have multiple ice scoops, so there is no excuse to use an ice scoop that fell. V7 said using a dirty ice cube can cause cross contamination, which can get residents' sick. V7 said communal resident phone should not be put on top of the ice scoop slot, especially when the ice scoop is in there because multiple people are touching the phone and putting it on the ice scoop. V7 said this can cause cross contamination. V7 said nothing should be placed on the ice scoop. On 12/17/2022 at 4:23pm, V8 (Infection Control Nurse) said Ice scoop should not be placed back to the ice slot for storage if the ice scoop fell, without washing it and sanitizing it first to prevent introducing bacteria to the ice. V8 said the danger of introducing bacteria to the ice scoop is that it can cause big infection for the residents and can make the residents sick. V8 said a communal phone should not be placed on the ice scoop slot especially when the ice scoop is in the slot since the slot is not 100% covered. V8 said the phone is being used by multiple people and is contaminated and can introduce germs to the ice scoop. V7 said This is huge infection control issue. Allegation is documented in the concerns log dated 12/13/2022 Facility Policy Titled Ice Machine dated 2010 documents: - After washing & sanitizing, the ice dispensing utensils shall be stored on a clean surface or in the ice with the dispensing utensil's handle extended out of the ice. Facility Policy titled Hand Washing dated 2010 documents: -Dietary employees will practice safe food handling to prevent food borne illnesses.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 3 life-threatening violation(s), 9 harm violation(s), $416,551 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 80 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $416,551 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Complete Care At The Boulevard's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Complete Care at the Boulevard an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Complete Care At The Boulevard Staffed?

CMS rates Complete Care at the Boulevard's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Complete Care At The Boulevard?

State health inspectors documented 80 deficiencies at Complete Care at the Boulevard during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 9 that caused actual resident harm, and 68 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Complete Care At The Boulevard?

Complete Care at the Boulevard is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by COMPLETE CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 156 certified beds and approximately 113 residents (about 72% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in CHICAGO, Illinois.

How Does Complete Care At The Boulevard Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, Complete Care at the Boulevard's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Complete Care At The Boulevard?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Complete Care At The Boulevard Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Complete Care at the Boulevard has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Complete Care At The Boulevard Stick Around?

Complete Care at the Boulevard has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Complete Care At The Boulevard Ever Fined?

Complete Care at the Boulevard has been fined $416,551 across 9 penalty actions. This is 11.2x the Illinois average of $37,244. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Complete Care At The Boulevard on Any Federal Watch List?

Complete Care at the Boulevard is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.