PAUL HOUSE & HEALTH CR CTR

3800 NORTH CALIFORNIA AVENUE, CHICAGO, IL 60618 (773) 478-4222
For profit - Limited Liability company 110 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
5/100
#603 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: June 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Paul House & Health Care Center in Chicago has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor quality of care with significant concerns. Ranking #603 out of 665 in Illinois places it in the bottom half of facilities, and #185 out of 201 in Cook County suggests there are only a few local options that are better. The facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 20 in 2024 to 27 in 2025. Staffing is a concern, rated at 1 out of 5 stars, and turnover is at 55%, which is higher than the state average. Additionally, there were $67,907 in fines, which is concerning, indicating potential ongoing compliance problems. Serious incidents included a resident not receiving timely assistance for incontinence care, resulting in feelings of humiliation, and another resident suffering from untreated pressure ulcers that required hospital intervention. While the facility has some RN coverage, it is less than 92% of other Illinois facilities, which raises concerns about the quality of care residents receive. Overall, families should weigh these significant weaknesses against any potential strengths when considering this nursing home.

Trust Score
F
5/100
In Illinois
#603/665
Bottom 10%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
20 → 27 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
55% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$67,907 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 20 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
61 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 20 issues
2025: 27 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 55%

Near Illinois avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $67,907

Well above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Staff turnover is elevated (55%)

7 points above Illinois average of 48%

The Ugly 61 deficiencies on record

4 actual harm
Jun 2025 23 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one (R504) resident who depends on staff assistance for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care was provided inc...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one (R504) resident who depends on staff assistance for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care was provided incontinence care and transfer assistance in a timely manner, demonstrating inadequate care in a sample of 55 residents. This failure resulted in R504 suffering psychosocial harm stating feelings of humiliation and embarrassment. Findings include: On 06/02/25 at 11:00am, R504 was observed, in his (R504) room, sitting on the side of bed with a walker in front of him, and R504's call light was wrapped on the bedside table behind R504 not within reach of R504. Surveyor observed urine on the floor below R504 with his (R504) foot lying in the puddle of urine. R504 stated, It has been over an hour that I (R504) have been waiting for help to get to chair and get cleaned up. A nurse came in, helped me sit on the side of the bed, and said that he (nurse) would be back once he (nurse) could find another nurse to help him (nurse). I'm sorry. This is humiliating. I'm (R504) so embarrassed. R504's face sheet documents diagnoses that include but are not limited to need for assistance with personal care; muscle weakness; fall; other abnormalities of gait and mobility; unsteadiness on feet; and periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left hip joint. R504's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score, dated 5/16/25, documents, in part, a BIMS score of 15 which indicates R504 is cognitively intact. On 6/2/2025 at 11:05am, V11 (Certified Nurse's Assistant/CNA) stated, My resident's load is heavy because many of them require increased surveillance and two people assistance, and they are always short staffed. I (V11) already waited for over an hour for another CNA to help me (V11) to move the resident from bed to chair. There is only one nurse and one other CNA working this unit. I (V11) will not risk the resident falling by moving him (R504) by himself (V11). On 6/4/25 at 12:01pm, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing/DON) said, Any staff can help a resident. Physical therapy, social workers. You (staff) do not have to be a nurse. An hour is too much for a resident to get assistance. Right away. Assist them (residents) right away. Waiting for an hour with sitting in urine would probably make a resident mad and sad. Facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, reviewed date 9/01/24, documents, in part, Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene . Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently . including . hygiene; . mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking); elimination (toileting) . Facility policy titled, Answering the Call light, reviewed date9/1/22, documents, in part, . When the resident is in the bed . be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

On 6/2/25 at 11:15am, R104 was observed in bed with the indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag without privacy bag. The urine bag was hung on the side of the bed visible to anyone walking down the h...

Read full inspector narrative →
On 6/2/25 at 11:15am, R104 was observed in bed with the indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag without privacy bag. The urine bag was hung on the side of the bed visible to anyone walking down the hallway when the door is not closed. On 6/2/25 at 11:18am, R18 was observed in bed with the indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag without privacy bag. The urine bag was hung on the side of the bed visible to anyone walking down the hallway when the door is not closed. On 6/2/25 at 12:05pm, both residents still had the urine bags without privacy bags. V5 (Registered Nurse) was notified and V5 stated that she (V5) would ensure to put the urine bags in privacy bags. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the indwelling catheter drainage bag was covered for three residents (R18, R51 and R104) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 55 residents. Findings include: On 06/02/25 at 11:19 am, R51 was observed in bed with indwelling catheter bag hanging on the bottom of R51's bed, visible to the doorway and not covered in a privacy bag. R51 stated that R51 has been at the facility for several months and has never had a privacy bag for R51's indwelling catheter. On 06/02/25 at 11:22 am, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) stated that residents with indwelling catheters should have a privacy bag to cover the residents indwelling catheter. V16 stated that if a residents indwelling catheter bag is not covered then the facility is not protecting the residents privacy. On 06/04/25 at 9:35 am, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing, ADON) stated that indwelling catheters should be in a privacy bag for the residents dignity. V2 explained if the indwelling catheter should be placed on the side of the bed not visible to the hallway so that no one can see the residents indwelling catheter and to protect the residents dignity. R51's face sheet shows that R51 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to indwelling and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, initial encounter, hydronephrosis with ureteral stricture, and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. R51's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 03/24/25 shows a BIMS score for R51 of 15 and indicates that R51 is cognitively intact. R51's physician order sheet (POS) show active orders dated 06/03/25 shows that R51 has orders for indwelling catheter care every shift. The facility undated policy titled Dignity documents in part: Policy Statement: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 12. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents; for example: a. helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bags covered. The facility's undated policy and titled Resident Rights documents, in part Policy Statement: Employees shall treat all resident with kindness, respect, and dignity.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call lights of residents are accessible as stated in the care plans. This failure has the potential to affect...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call lights of residents are accessible as stated in the care plans. This failure has the potential to affect 3 residents (R74, R94, and R504) reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 55 residents. Findings include: On 06/02/25 at 11:27am, R74 was observed at the edge of the bed and the surveyor asked R74 to use the call light to ask staff for help. The call light could not be found and R74 did not know where to find the call light. The surveyor went to the Nursing Station and called V5 (RN/Registered Nurse). V5 came and stated I found it. It's here under the bed. Inquired from V5 why the call light should be within reach of the resident; V5 stated to allow the resident to get help and to prevent falling. V5 added that she will remind the CNAs (Certified Nurse Assistants). R74's records reviewed are as follows: Face sheet shows diagnoses which include but are not limited to Repeated Falls, Vascular Dementia, Unsteadiness on Feet, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Lack of Coordination, Right Foot Drop, Osteoarthritis, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Care plan dated 3/21/25 states in part that R74 is at risk for falls related to Deconditioning, musculoskeletal impairment, neurological impairment, vascular dementia with anxiety, Interventions states to be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. Fall Risk Evaluation dated 1/28/25 shows that R74 is at high risk for falls. Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score is 12 out of 15 (Mild Cognitive Impairment). Facility's Call Light Policy dated 9/1/22 states in #5: When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair, be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. On 6/2/2025 at 12:48pm, R94 was lying in bed with a clean kept appearance. R94's call light was observed on the floor. On 6/2/2025 at 12:51 pm, V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse-(LPN) affirmed R94's call light on the floor next to R94's bed. V12 stated R94 doesn't use the call light so that's why we keep the door open. V12 stated R94 can fall if the call light is not within easy reach. On 6/4/2025 at 3:36pm, V2 (Acting Director of Nursing-(ADON) stated the call light should be within easy reach so that a resident's needs can be met. V2 stated an example is when a resident is in pain and the call light is not in reach, there will be a delay in relieving the resident's pain if the call light is not in easy reach. Facility's undated policy titled Answering Call Light Policy documents in part: When a resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. On 06/02/25 at 11:00am, R504 was observed, in his (R504) room, sitting on the side of bed with a walker in front of him, and R504's call light was wrapped on the bedside table behind R504 not within reach of R504. Surveyor observed urine on the floor below R504 with his (R504) foot lying in the puddle of urine. R504 stated, It has been over an hour that I (R504) have been waiting for help to get to chair and get cleaned up. A nurse came in, helped me sit on the side of the bed, and said that he (nurse) would be back once he (nurse) could find another nurse to help him (nurse). I'm sorry. This is humiliating. I'm (R504) so embarrassed. No, I (R504) can't reach the call light over there. R504's face sheet documents diagnoses that include but are not limited to need for assistance with personal care; muscle weakness; fall; other abnormalities of gait and mobility; unsteadiness on feet; and periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left hip joint. R504's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score, dated 5/16/25, documents, in part, a BIMS score of 15 which indicates R504 is cognitively intact. On 6/2/2025 at 11:05am, V11 (Certified Nurse's Assistant/CNA) stated, My resident's load is heavy because many of them require increased surveillance and two people assistance, and they are always short staffed. I (V11) already waited for over an hour for another CNA to help me (V11) to move the resident from bed to chair. There is only one nurse and one other CNA working this unit. I (V11) will not risk the resident falling by moving him (R504) by himself (V11). No, he (R504) cannot reach the call light over there. On 6/4/25 at 12:01pm, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing/DON) said, Call lights should be answered immediately. At least go and see what the resident needs. Any staff can help a resident. Physical therapy, social workers. You (staff) do not have to be a nurse. An hour is too much for a resident to get assistance. Right away. Assist them (residents) right away. Waiting for an hour with sitting in urine would probably make a resident mad and sad. Facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, reviewed date 9/01/24, documents, in part, Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene . Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently . including . hygiene; . mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking); elimination (toileting) . Facility policy titled, Answering the Call light, reviewed 9/1/22, documents, in part, . When the resident is in the bed . be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

MDS Data Transmission (Tag F0640)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit a minimum data set (MDS) assessment within required timeframes. This failure affects 1 resident (R354) in a sample of 55. Finding...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit a minimum data set (MDS) assessment within required timeframes. This failure affects 1 resident (R354) in a sample of 55. Findings include: Review of R354's minimum data set (assessment reference date 4/7/2025) documents in part that the assessment was signed as complete as of 4/16/2025. No documentation could be found within R354's electronic health record. Review of R354's electronic health record does not document that R354's minimum data set (assessment reference date 4/7/2025) was transmitted to CMS. Review of R354's validation report related to the minimum data set (assessment reference date 4/7/2025) documents in part that the assessment was transmitted to CMS on 6/3/2025. On 6/4/2025 at 10:43 AM, V19 (Registered Nurse, MDS Coordinator) stated that the assessment was completed on 4/16/2025 and should have been transmitted within 14 days of completion. V19 explained that when the MDS was requested by the survey team, V19 noticed it was not submitted to CMS, which is why it was submitted yesterday (6/3/2025). V19 stated, it (the transmission of the assessment) must have gotten missed, I forgot to check. V19 affirmed that a purpose of transmitting the MDS to CMS is to track quality data for residents and for the facility's financial reimbursement. Facility policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes (reviewed 9.2.24) documents in part, Policy Statement Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with currrent federal and state submission timeframes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for obtaining resident weights for a resident with known weight loss and congestive heart failure. This failure aff...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for obtaining resident weights for a resident with known weight loss and congestive heart failure. This failure affects 1 resident (R80) in a sample of 55. Findings include: R80's face sheet documents in part a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease and heart failure. R80's care plan identifies that R80 has a history of weight loss and is on diuretic medications that may cause weight fluctuations. R80's physician orders documents in part an active order (4/24/25) for Heart Failure Order Set- Weight every morning; Call MD if gain wt (weight) of 2 lbs (pounds)/1day and 5 lbs/1 week. one time a day every Tue and Thu Review of R80's weights for 5/2025 documents in part that R80's weight was collected on 5/5/2025. R80's weight was not documented again until 5/21/2025 (16 days later). On 6/4/2025 at 11:16 AM, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) affirmed that V2 is familiar with R80. V2 stated that R80 has a history of weight loss and heart failure. V2 reviewed R80's physician order for weights and affirmed that the order reads both every day and on Tuesdays and Thursdays. V2 stated, I think it is supposed to be done on Tuesdays and Thursdays. V2 reviewed R80's weights and affirmed that the weights were not completed per the physician order and no weights were obtained between 5/6/2025 and 5/20/2025. V2 stated the purpose of the obtaining daily weights for a heart failure patient is to ensure and monitor for exacerbations which can be identified by frequent weighing of the patient. No further weights for R80 during the date range of 5/5/2025-5/21/25 were provided prior to the exit of the survey. Facility policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention (undated) documents in part, The multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor and intervene for undesireable weight loss for our residents . 2. Weights will be recorded in each unit's weight record chart or notebeek and in the individuals medical record .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

On 6/3/25 at 11:05am, R74 was observed in the room sitting in the wheelchair without a cushion to relieve pressure. Again, on 6/3/25 at 12:02pm, R74 was observed still in the same wheelchair without a...

Read full inspector narrative →
On 6/3/25 at 11:05am, R74 was observed in the room sitting in the wheelchair without a cushion to relieve pressure. Again, on 6/3/25 at 12:02pm, R74 was observed still in the same wheelchair without a cushion. At this time, V5(RN/Registered Nurse) was called to see R74. V5 stated that a cushion is needed to prevent pressure ulcer and that she (V5) will get a cushion for R74's wheelchair. R74's records reviewed are as follows: Face sheet shows diagnoses which include but are not limited to Vascular Dementia, Unsteadiness on Feet, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Lack of Coordination, Right Foot Drop, Osteoarthritis, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Care plan dated 10/4/24 states in part that R74 has actual impairment to skin integrity. MDS (Minimum Data Status) dated 4/11/25 states that R74 uses wheelchair, and that R74 is at risk of developing pressure ulcer. Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score is 12 out of 15(Mild Cognitive Impairment). Facility's policy on Pressure ulcer prevention states in part: Support Surfaces and Pressure Redistribution: 1.Select appropriate support surfaces based the resident's risk factors, in accordance with current clinical practice. Device-Related Pressure Injuries: 1. Review and select medical devices with consideration to the ability to minimize tissue damage, including size, shape, its application and ability to secure the device. 2. Monitor regularly for comfort and signs of pressure-related injury. 3. For prevention measures associated with specific devices, consult current clinical practice guidelines. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the low air loss mattress was set appropriately for 1 resident (R66), failed to ensure the low air loss mattresses were not layered with multiple layers for 2 (R52 and R66) residents; and failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair has cushion for 1 (R74) resident. These failures affected 3 (R52, R66, and R74) residents reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment in the total sample of 55 residents. Findings include: On 06/02/25 at 11:10 AM, R52 was lying on a low air loss mattress. This surveyor requested V6 (Agency Licensed Practice Nurse) to check how many layers were between the low air loss mattress and R52. With assistance from V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant) V6 counted the layers and stated he (R52) was using an incontinence brief, there's a blanket that's twice folded making 4 layers of blanket plus the flat sheet. V6 stated we usually use the flat sheet and incontinence brief. V7 stated we use the blanket in case, the incontinence brief leaks. On 06/02/25 at 11:18 AM, V6 stated he (R52) is being changed every 2 hours. There is no purpose of placing the folded blanket underneath him. On 06/02/25 at 11:48 AM, R66 was lying on low air loss mattress. The low air loss mattress setting was between 320lbs and 400lbs. V6 stated the pointer (of the dial) is close to 320. I would say the low air loss mattress is set at 340lbs. This surveyor requested V6 to check how many layers between R66 and the low air loss mattress. V6 stated she has a flat sheet that is twice folded making it 4 layers, there is another flat sheet, and she is using incontinence brief. Total of 6 layers. On 06/04/2025 at 9:41am, V2 (Assistant Director Of Nursing) stated the setting of the low air loss mattress should be based on the resident's weight. It will not work as it should if setting is higher than the resident's weight because it will be hard like a board and defeats the purpose of the low air loss mattress. The resident should be layered with just a flat sheet and incontinence brief. For the same reason, multiple layers defeats the purpose of the low air loss mattress. R52's (Active Order as Of: 06/02/2025) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) muscle waiting and atrophy, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Order summary. low air loss mattress. Active. Order Date: 01/16/2025. R52's (04/10/2025) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: no entry. C0700. Short-Term memory Ok: 1 memory problem. C0800. Long-Term Memory Ok: 1. Memory Problem C1000. Cognitive Skills for daily decision making: 3 severely impaired. Section M - skin conditions. M1200. Skin and Ulcer/Injury Treatments. B. Pressure reducing device for bed. R52's (05/22/2025) care plan documented, in part is at risk for alteration in skin integrity due to total incontinence of bowel and bladder and impaired mobility. Will not develop any skin integrity issues. low air loss mattress check. Provide and maintain an air pressure redistribution mattress to protect the resident's skin integrity while in bed. R66's (Active Order as Of: 06/02/2025) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) gastrostomy status, dysphagia and cognitive social or emotional deficit following cerebral infarction. Order Summary. Utilize air loss mattress. Order Date: 02/21/2025. R66's (printed on: 06/02/2025) Weight and Vitals summary documented that R66 weighed 170.8lbs on 05/06/2025. R66's (05/03/2025) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 06. Indicating R66's mental status as severely impaired. Section M - Skin Conditions. M0100. Determination of Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk. A. Resident has a pressure ulcer/injury. M0150. Risk of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries. 1. Yes. M0210. Unhealed Pressure Ulcers/Injuries. 1. Yes. M1200. Skin and Ulcer/Injury Treatments. B. Pressure reducing device for bed. R66's (Target Date: 05/05/2025) care plan documented, in part is at moderate risk of alteration in skin integrity. Provide preventive measure including preventive mattress. The (undated) Proactive medical products Operation Manual documented, in part INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. Step 2. You may place a thin cotton sheet over the quilted mattress top cover. OPERATING INSTRUCTION. Step 5. Patients can directly lie of the mattress or cover with a sheet and tuck loosely to increase the comfort of the patient. Step 6. Determine the patient's weight and set the control knob to that weight setting on the control unit.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the containers of the piston syringe were labe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the containers of the piston syringe were labeled with the dates these were changed for 3 (R24, R55, and R66) residents and failed to ensure the containers of the distilled water used for flushing the g-tubes (gastrostomy tubes) were labeled with open date for 2 (R55 and R66) residents. These failures affected 3 (R24, R55, and R66) residents reviewed for tube feedings in the total sample of 55 residents. Findings include: On 06/02/25 at 11:48 AM, R66 had a G-Tube feeding on going with Jevity 1.5 rate of 50cc/hour. This surveyor requested V6 (Agency Licensed Practice Nurse) to check for the label on the container of the piston syringe. V6 stated it is not labeled. V6 stated the container should be labeled to know how old the piston syringe is for infection control. On 06/02/2025 at 11:49am, there was a gallon of [NAME] Choice distilled water at R66's nightstand. V6 stated we use it for flushing her g-tube. This surveyor requested V6 to check for the open date. V6 stated it is not labeled with the date it was opened. It should be labeled with the date it was opened so we know when this was opened. On 06/03/2025 at 12:59pm, V21 (Regional Nurse Consultant/Infection Preventionist) stated the piston syringe should be labeled with the date it was provided to know when it should be replaced. Inquiring about labeling and dating of gallon of distilled water use for flushing g-tube. V21 stated the expectation is anything that is opened should be labeled with the date it was opened for infection control. On 06/04/2025 at 9:43am, V2 (Assistant Director Of Nursing) stated we use piston syringe for med pass and with use, there'll be an accumulation of thick substance on the piston syringe. It is expected of staff to change the piston syringe daily and to label the container with the date it was changed so we know when it was changed for infection control. R66's (Active Order as Of: 06/02/2025) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) gastrostomy status, dysphagia and cognitive social or emotional deficit following cerebral infarction. Enteral Feed Order. Every shift Enteral tube flush with water 300ml (milliliters) every 4 hours. Order Date: 01/31/2025. Enteral Feed Order every shift Jevity 1.5 at 50ml/hr 12hours. Order Date: 02/24/2025. R66's (05/03/2025) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 06. Indicating R66's mental status as severely impaired. Section K. Swallowing/Nutritional Status. K0520. B. Feeding tube. 3. While a resident. R66's (01/13/2025) care plan documented, in part is on G-tube due to dysphagia and is at risk for aspiration. Administer G-tube feeding/flushes as ordered. Change tubing and flushing syringe every 24H (hours) at bedtime. The (undated) enteral Feedings - Safety Precautions documented, in part Purpose: To ensure the safe administration of enteral nutrition. Preparation. 2. The facility will remain current in and follow accepted best practices in enteral nutrition. Preventing contamination. 4. Administration set changes: b. Change piston syringe with administration set for enteral feeding and label with date. On 06/02/25 at 10:58 am, R24 was observed in bed awake, alert unable to communicate needs, with a feeding tube in place. Surveyor observed a feeding tube piston syringe at the bedside not labeled with a date. Surveyor brought this observation to V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) and V16 stated that the feeding tube piston syringes are changed weekly on Sundays or as needed. V16 further explained that feeding tube piston syringes should be labeled with a date so that staff knows when the syringe needs to be change and the piston syringe does not create bacteria. On 06/04/25 at 9:38 am, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing, ADON) stated that feeding syringes should be labeled with a date so that nurses know when the feeding syringe were placed. V2 explained if a feeding syringe does not have a date there is potential for infection control. V2 further explained that the feeding tube syringe may sometimes accumulate medication residue and should be changed daily by the floor nurse to avoid bacteria growth. R24's face sheet shows that R24 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to gastrostomy status, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase. R24's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 05/03/25 does not show a BIMS score and indicates that R24's memory is ok. R24's physician order sheet (POS) show active orders dated 06/03/25 shows that R24 has orders for Enteral Feed Order every 24 hours Jevity 1.5 at 45 ml (milliliters) hr (hour) times 21 hours (on at 9am and off at 6am). On 6/2/2025 at 11:25 AM surveyor observed in R55's room tube feeding syringe placed on the bedside table, not labeled, or contained. Surveyor also observed next to the syringe an enteral tube feeding adaptor, that was placed loosely on the table, not contained. On the bedside table surveyor observed an open gallon container of distilled water, no open date marked. R55's Order Summary Report dated 6/2/2025, documents diagnosis included but not limited to Gastrostomy status, Dysphagia, following cerebral infarction. R55's Order Summary Report dated 6/2/2025, documents orders for flushing G tube with 5mls of water before ad after each medication administration every shift and free water flush (FWF) 150ml via g-tube every 4 hours for hydration. On 6/4/2025 at 12:10 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that tube feeding syringe should be contained in the container from the set or a plastic bag and labeled with a date opened. The container and the pistol syringe should be changed daily. The tube feeding adaptor should not be left on the table, it could get thrown away. It should stay with the patient. The distilled water container used for flushing of the tube, should be labeled, or marked with a date when opened.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R504) reviewed for medication administration remained free from significant medication errors in a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R504) reviewed for medication administration remained free from significant medication errors in a sample of 55 residents. Findings include: On 06/02/25 at 11:00am, R504 was observed, in his (R504) room, sitting on the side of bed with a walker in front of him. Also observed in R504's room, a full bag of IV (intravenous) Cefazolin Solution 2gm (gram) bag, on IV pole with primed tubing, not connected to resident. R504 stated that he (R504) is not sure if he (R504) received the antibiotic in the morning, he (R504) was sleeping. R504 stated that few times the nurses just come to connect IV antibiotic while he (R504) sleeps. Observed IV Access on right upper arm (PICC or Central Line) with gauze sleeve around the site. R504 stated that R504 did not refuse the antibiotic. R504's face sheet documents medical diagnoses that include but are not limited to infection and inflammatory reaction due to unspecified internal joint prosthesis. R504's active physician orders documents, in part, PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) Line: Observe site for S/S (signs and symptoms) of infection or infiltration every shift for PICC Line; Sterile dressing change to PICC LINE once each week and prn; and Cefazolin Sodium Injection Solution Reconstituted 2 GM (Cefazolin Sodium) Use 2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours for prophylaxis for 8 Days. On 6/2/2022 at 12:32 PM, V12 (Licensed Practice Nurse/LPN), stated that R504's dose of Cefazolin Sodium was supposed to be hung at six in the morning. Usually, the outgoing nurse (pm shift) will give report to the ongoing nurse if medication was held. V12 did not receive report handoff this morning and checked R504's EMR (electronic medication record). V12 stated that six am dose was not given and that the reason for not given antibiotic documented. V12 also stated that the antibiotic should be refrigerated, and that the pharmacy would bring it out when called prior administration. At 12:33 PM in resident's room V12 affirmed, that there was a full IV bag of Cefazolin hanging on the IV pole and there was a two pm dose in the refrigerator. V12 stated that the physician should be notified about missed dose of antibiotic and will call and place a progress note in the computer. Upon review of R504's EMR, in regard to R504's IV medication Cefazolin that was due for 6:00am, there was no documentation as to the reason the medication was not given. R504's progress note, dated 6/03/25 at 12:06pm, documents, in part, md (medical doctor) aware of dose missed (Cafazolin ABT) and replied back, no orders now. On 6/4/25 at 10:55am, V21 (Infection Preventionist/IP) said that V21 spoke with R504 and R504 stated to V21 that R504 did not refuse the 6:00am dose of Cefazolin antibiotic. V21 said that V21 has attempted to contact the nurse that should have given R504's antibiotic but has been unable to reach the nurse. V21 affirmed that R504 is receiving to antibiotic prophylactically to prevent infection. Facility policy titled, Administering Medications, reviewed date 9/01/24, documents, in part, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed . Staffing schedules are arranged to ensure the medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0941 (Tag F0941)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide communication training to the staff. This failure affects 1 resident (R354) out of 55 residents in the sample. Findings include: R...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide communication training to the staff. This failure affects 1 resident (R354) out of 55 residents in the sample. Findings include: Record review of facility census documentation provided on 6/2/2025 documents in part that 93 residents reside within the facility. Review of R354's minimum data set (4/7/25) documents in part that R354's primary language is Chinese and requires an interpreter for communication. On 6/2/2025 at 11:40 AM, V29 (R354's Family Member) stated that R354 has difficulty communicating and that English is not R354's first language. V29 explained that it is hard for the staff to communicate with (R354), so I have to be here-I am here every day as much as I can be. None of them speak the language, we speak Chinese. I am the interpreter to ensure (R354) gets the care (R354) needs. On 6/4/2025 at 10:39 AM, surveyor requested documentation for staff training on communication. On 6/4/2025 at 1:39 PM, V1 (Administrator) provided surveyor with 2 binders labeled In-services 2025 and In-services 2024 and stated, all of our in-services are within that binder, if we in-serviced on it, it would be in there. Record review of in-servicing binders for 2024 and 2025 was completed and no training related to communication was observed completed for staff. On 6/4/2025 at 3:37 PM, V1 (Administrator) affirmed there is no further documentation that the facility can produce related to communication training. V21 (Infection Preventionist, Registered Nurse, Nurse Consultant) stated that V21 is the nurse consultant and provides multi-facility oversight. V21 stated that the facility might have documentation in the director of nursing's office. Surveyor observed V21 and V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) search the office and V21 stated, we don't have any other documentation. V21 denied that there is a training schedule for required in-services and stated, we are currently working on that. On 6/5/2025 at 10:21 AM, V21 affirmed that there was no further documentation that the facility could produce regarding communication training. V21 explained, Communication training is important so that staff know how to speak with the residents verbally and non-verbally. We have residents and staff with a wide variety of cognitive needs, communication impairments and cultural backgrounds. Communication varies from culture to culture. In some cultures, it is normal for them to talk loudly and more shrill, while other cultures might be offended or scared by their tone. No further documentation was provided related to communication in-services prior to the exit of the survey. Record review of facility assessment (6/24 through 7/25) does not identify a training need for communication training. Record review of job description titled Certified Nursing Assistant documents in part Essential Duties and Responsibilities: . Involved in yearly mandated education according to local, state and federal laws .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were conducted and failed to ensure resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were conducted and failed to ensure residents/resident's family members participated in the development of the comprehensive care plan. This failure affects 4 residents (R49, R65, R83, and R354) out of a sample of 55. Findings include: R65's minimum data set (5/16/2025) documents in part a brief interview of mental status summary score of 12, indicating that R65 has moderate cognitive impairment. On 6/2/2025 at 11:09 AM, R65 stated that R65 was not familiar with R65's plan of care and denied ever receiving a copy of R65's care plan. R65 denied that R65 has attended a plan of care meeting. R65 stated, I would want to go if there were meetings about me like that. R65's progress notes indicate that on 4/26/22, R65's was scheduled for a care plan meeting on 5/4/22. No further documentation of care plan meetings or care plan participation was observed in R65's medical record. R49's minimum data set (5/7/2025) documents in part a brief interview of mental status summary score of 9, indicating that R49 has moderate cognitive impairment. On 6/2/2025 at 11:33 AM, R49 denied knowledge of what a care plan was and denied that R49 had ever attended a plan of care meeting. R49 stated, Well, yeah, of course I would want to go to a care plan meeting if they were having them. I really don't remember ever having one. Review of R49's progress notes does not document any care plan meeting participation or resident input in development of R49's plan of care. R354's minimum data set (4/6/2025) documents in part that R354's cognition was unable to be assessed due to being rarely/never understood. On 6/2/2025 at 11:40 AM, V29 (R354's Family Member) stated that R354 is on hospice services and has difficulty communicating/impaired cognition. V29 could not recall the last time R354 had a care plan meeting. Review of R354's progress notes documents in part that R354's last care plan meeting was held on 10/5/2023 prior to discharge. R354 was readmitted on [DATE] and no care plan meeting documentation or participation was noted in the medical record. R83's minimum data set (5/9/25) documents in part a brief interview of mental status summary score of 15, indicating that R83 is cognitively intact. On 6/2/2025 at 11:50 AM, R83 explained that R83 has a lot going on right now with a lot of different health issues and wants to be discharged to a lower level of care (such as supportive living or a community apartment) but doesn't know where we (the facility) are at with that. R83 stated that R83 has not had a care plan meeting but would like to be invited to participate if the facility was conducting them. R83 stated that R83 never got a copy of R83's care plan since being a resident of the facility. Review of R83's progress notes does not document any care plan meeting participation or resident input in development of R83's plan of care. On 6/4/2025 at 10:43 AM, V19 (Registered Nurse, MDS Coordinator) stated that residents get care plan meetings quarterly and with significant changes. V19 affirmed that social services and nursing conducts the care plan meetings in accordance to the minimum data set (MDS) schedule, quarterly, annually and with any signficant change, about a week after the MDS. V19 denied that members of the dietary department or certified nursing assistants participate in the development of a resident's plan of care and that the nurse usually covers all that (dietary/certified nursing assistant). V19 affirmed that residents have the right to participate in the development of their plan of care. On 6/4/2025 at 1:51 PM, V35 (Social Services Director) stated that V35 could not find any documentation that indicates that R49, R83, and R65 received care plan meetings. V35 affirmed that the last documentation that R354 had a care plan meeting was in 10/2023. V35 affirmed that the care plan meetings are conducted quarterly for residents. No further documentation was provided prior to the exit of the survey. Facility policy titled Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team (undated), . 3. The resident, the resident's family and/or the residents legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan. 4. Every effort will be made to schedule care plan meetings at the best time of day for the resident and family 5. The mechanics of how the interdisciplinary team meets is responsibilities in the development of the interdisciplinary care plan (e.g. face-to-face, teleconference, written communication, etc.) is at the discretion of the care planning committee.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula was labeled with the date changed for 1 (R26) resident; failed to follow the prescribed oxygen flow ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula was labeled with the date changed for 1 (R26) resident; failed to follow the prescribed oxygen flow rate for 2 (R26 and R42) residents; and failed to ensure oxygen was delivered to 1 (R12) resident. These failures affected 3 (R12, R26, and R42) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy in the total sample of 55 residents. Findings include: On 06/02/2025 at 11:41am, R12 was using a nasal cannula, the tubing was connected to a humidifier bottle via an oxygen concentrator. The humidifier bottle was filled with water. No bubbles noted in the humidifier bottle. The concentrator regulator was set at 3liters per minute. This was pointed out to V6 (Agency LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse). V6 stated she (R12) is not assigned to me. V6 checked the humidifier bottle and stated there is no bubbles because the oxygen tubing is not screwed tightly to the humidifier bottle. V6 was then observed unscrewing and screwing the oxygen tubing to the humidifier bottle with multiple attempts until bubbles appeared in the humidifier bottle. V6 stated now it is fixed. No bubbles in the humidifier bottle means no oxygen is delivered to the resident. On 06/04/2025 at 9:45am, V2 (Assistant Director Of Nursing) stated we use humidifier when we administer oxygen via an oxygen concentrator. The humidifier bottle should have bubbles to ensure oxygen is delivered to the resident. if there is no bubbles, it means no oxygen was delivered to the resident. R12's (Active Order as Of: 06/02/2025) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) dependence on supplemental oxygen, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), respiratory failure with hypoxia. Order Summary. Oxygen 3/lnc (liters nasal cannula) continuously. Order Date: 08/26/2024. R12's (03/07/2025) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 11. Indicating R12's mental status as moderately impaired. Section O. - special treatments, Procedures, and Programs. O0110. C1. Oxygen therapy. B. While a resident. R12's (Target Date: 02/09/2025) COPD: The resident has COPD/Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, on continuous oxygen inhalation 2-3L. via NC (nasal canula). The resident will display optimal breathing patterns daily. The (undated) Oxygen Administration documented, in part Purpose. The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Steps in the Procedure: 11. Check the humidifying jar they are in good working order and are securely fastened. Be sure there is water in the humidifying jar and that the water level is high enough that the water bubbles as oxygen flows through. On 6/02/25 at 12:06pm, R26 was observed in the day area, across from the nurse's station, sitting up in a wheelchair with oxygen being administered at 2 liters and the oxygen tubing was not labeled. On 6/03/25 at 12:21pm, R26 was again observed in the day area, across from the nurse's station, sitting up in a wheelchair with oxygen being administered at 2 liters and the oxygen tubing was not labeled. R26 was unable to be interviewed due to altered mental status. R26's face sheet documented diagnoses that include but are not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. R26's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score, dated 4/2/25, documents, in part, a BIMS score of 00 which indicates R26's cognition is severely impaired. R26's Order Summary Report, dated 6/4/25, documents, in part, Oxygen Continuous 41iters per minute Via Nasal Cannula every shift. Oxygen Tubing: Date tubing and Change Weekly and as needed, every night shift every, Sunday change all tubing and label and date new tubing every week on Sundays. R26's care plan, date revised 3/31/25, documents, in part, Resident has 02 (oxygen) per NC (nasal cannula). On 6/04/25 at 12:01pm, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) said, Oxygen tubing should be changed every week and labeled with a date and time that way we (staff) know when to change it (oxygen tubing). It (oxygen tubing) needs to be changed at least weekly because boogers get in there and for infection control. I (V2) expect the oxygen to be running at the rate the physician ordered it to run. R42's Face Sheet documents a diagnosis of but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Asthma, Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, and Congestive Heart Failure. R42's Physician Order Sheet documents an active order for Oxygen at 3 Liters Per Minute Continuously with a start date of 4/24/2025. R42's Minimum Data Set Section O dated 2/21/2025 documents in part, R42 is receiving oxygen therapy. On 06/02/25 11:39 AM, surveyor observed R42's oxygen concentrator set at 4 liter per minute continuously in progress. On 06/02/25 at 11:42 AM, V12, (Licensed Practical Nurse-(LPN) affirmed V42's oxygen concentrator was set at 4 liters per minute continuously in progress. V12 verified R42 has a active physician's order for Oxygen 3 liters per minute continuously via Electronic Health Record. V12 stated nurses should follow the physician's order to prevent a resident from developing hypoxia instead of Hyperoxia. On 6/4/25 at 3:36pm, V2, (Acting Director of Nurses-(ADON) stated the nurses are responsible for assessing resident's oxygen is set according to the doctor's orders. V2 stated, nurses should assess if the residents' oxygen concentrator is set at the correct setting every time the nurse pass medication and when the nurse checks the residents' pulse oxygenation. V2 stated residents can experience retention of Carbon Dioxide, especially for residents with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that sufficient nursing staff were available to meet the needs for one residents (R504) in the sample of 55 residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that sufficient nursing staff were available to meet the needs for one residents (R504) in the sample of 55 residents. These failures have the potential to affect all 24 residents on 2 East. Findings include: On 6/3/2025 at 12:07PM, V12 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse), stated that current census for the 2 East unit is 24 residents. On 06/02/25 at 11:00am, R504 was observed, in his (R504) room, sitting on the side of bed with a walker in front of him, and R504's call light was wrapped on the bedside table behind R504 not within reach of R504. Surveyor observed urine on the floor below R504 with his (R504) foot lying in the puddle of urine. R504 stated, It has been over an hour that I (R504) have been waiting for help to get to chair and get cleaned up. A nurse came in, helped me sit on the side of the bed, and said that he (nurse) would be back once he (nurse) could find another nurse to help him (nurse). I'm sorry. This is humiliating. I'm (R504) so embarrassed. R504's face sheet documents diagnoses that include but are not limited to need for assistance with personal care; muscle weakness; fall; other abnormalities of gait and mobility; unsteadiness on feet; and periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left hip joint. R504's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score, dated 5/16/25, documents, in part, a BIMS score of 15 which indicates R504 is cognitively intact. On 6/2/2025 at 11:05am, V11 (Certified Nurse's Assistant/CNA) stated, My resident's load is heavy because many of them require increased surveillance and two people assistance, and they are always short staffed. I (V11) already waited for over an hour for another CNA to help me (V11) to move the resident from bed to chair. There is only one nurse and one other CNA working this unit. I (V11) will not risk the resident falling by moving him (R504) by himself (V11). On 6/3/2025 at 12:10pm, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA), worked at the facility for 2 years, stated that since the new management took over, there has been many changes in laundry, supplies, staffing. V13 stated that this morning there are two CNA's working and two nurses on the unit with 24 residents, but it is not the standards. It is because the agency (Illinois Department of Public Health) is in the building. Normally there would be only one nurse. The two aides must work together effectively to help residents as much as they can, but sometimes the residents will have to wait for a long time for help. It might be even longer than an hour of wait on occasion. V13 stated that the work would be much better if there were three aides and two nurses, because the units are spread into three different hallways and sometimes it's hard-to-get help. On 6/4/25 at 12:01pm, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing/DON) said, 2 East should always have 2 nurses and 2 CNAs for at least am shift (AM: 7:00am to 7:00pm) Sometimes, it is hard to find coverage, especially when there is a call off. Sometimes, we (nurses/CNAs) work short. I (V2) have to fight with the owner to raise the hourly rate to get agency nurses to pick up shifts. Any staff can help a resident. Physical therapy, social workers. You (staff) do not have to be a nurse. An hour is too much for a resident to get assistance. Right away. Assist them (residents) right away. Waiting for an hour with sitting in urine would probably make a resident mad and sad. Facility documents titled Nursing Staff Schedule, documents, in part: May 1, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 2, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 3, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 4, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 5, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 6, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 8, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 9, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 10, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 11, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 12, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 13, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 14, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 15, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 16, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 17, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 18, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 19, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 20, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 22, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 23, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 25, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 26, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 27, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 28, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 29, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 30, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. May 31, 2025: 1 LPN and 2 CNAs for am shift. Evidence shows that 28 days of 31 days in the month of May 2025, 2 East am shift worked short 1 nurse. Facility policy titled, Staffing, reviewed date 9/01/24, documents, in part, Our facility provides sufficient numbers of staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment . Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff are determined by the needs of the residents based on each resident's plan of care. Facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, reviewed date 9/01/24, documents, in part, Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene . Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently . including . hygiene; . mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking); elimination (toileting) . Facility policy titled, Answering the Call light, reviewed date9/1/22, documents, in part, . When the resident is in the bed . be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident . Pamphlet titled, Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities, revised date 11/18, documents, in part, Your facility must provide services to keep your physical and mental health, at their highest practical levels. Your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike . Facility job description titled, Certified Nursing Assistant, revised date 3/24/16, documents, in part, .is responsible for providing resident care and support in all activities of daily living and ensures the health, welfare and safety of all residents .Provides assistance in all activities od daily living including but not limited to; personal hygiene by giving bedpans, urinals, baths, .; assisting with ambulation to the bathroom; assisting with showers and baths. Provide assistance in ambulation and movement including but not limited to; turning, and positioning residents, transferring residents from bed to chair.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure incoming and outgoing nurses counted the controlled medications during shift change; failed to ensure administration...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure incoming and outgoing nurses counted the controlled medications during shift change; failed to ensure administration of controlled medication was documented; failed to ensure that the medication refrigerator had a temperature log sheets; and failed to ensure that staff do not store personal food items inside the medication refrigerator used for residents medication storage. These failures affected two residents (R99 and R104) and have the potential to affect all 47 residents on the 2 [NAME] unit. Findings include: On 06/02/25 the V1(Administrator) provided a facility census of 47 residents on the 2 [NAME] unit. On 06/02/25 at 11:00 am, during the controlled medication count of R104's Pregabalin 150 mg (milligrams) 150 mg capsule, surveyor and V5 (Registered Nurse, RN) observed 52 tablets left in R104's Medication Dispensing Card however, R104's Controlled Drug Record/Disposition Form's last entry was on 06/01/25 at 5:00 pm and amount of Pregabalin 150 mg was observed with 53 capsules. V5 (Registered Nurse, RN) stated, I (V5) gave one this morning. I did not sign it out yet. V5 stated that narcotic medications should be signed out when given so that the medication count can be accurate. On 06/02/25 at 12:14 pm, during the 2 [NAME] Team 1 cart narcotics count review Surveyor and V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) observed the 2 [NAME] Narcotic Accountability sheet not signed for the on-coming nurse for June 1, 2025. V14 (LPN) stated, I don't know who should have signed there. That is not me. At 12:15 pm, Surveyor and V14 observed R99's Briviact Oral Tablet 10 mg (milligram) (Brivaracetam) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for seizures 60 tablets repackaged in increments of ten inside six medication pill sleeves. V14 stated, I didn't do that. That was like that when I came. I'm not sure if we can do that (referring to the repackaging of medications for R99. I don't know who did that. On 06/02/25 at 12:17 pm, Surveyor and V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) observed 2 [NAME] with two medication refrigerators inside of the 2 [NAME] Medication room with one medication refrigerator without a temperature log sheet and the other medication refrigerator with the facility's document dated May 2025 and titled Nursing Unit Daily Refrigerator Temperature Log posted. V14 stated that there should be a daily refrigerator log for June 2025 posted for both medication refrigerators so that the medication refrigerator can be monitored for a safe range in temperature for medication storage. V14 stated that if the medication refrigerator is not being monitored medication can possibly be stored at an unsafe temperature range. At 12:18 pm, Surveyor and V14 observed a sandwich package labeled Uncrustables in the freezer section of the 2 [NAME] medication refrigerator without a temperature log. V14 stated, That is the staffs. That should not be in there because it can grow mold and bacteria and harm the residents medication. On 06/03/25 at 10:04 am, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing, ADON) stated that when a nurse administers a narcotic the narcotic should be signed out immediately upon administration. V2 explained that it is important for narcotic medication to be accurately signed during the narcotics count and when medications are administered so that double doses are not administered to residents and to ensure the narcotics count is accurate. V2 explained if a narcotic is not signed out there is no evidence that the resident received the medication. V2 further explained that medication should be administered from the medications original packaging. V2 stated that each medication refrigerator should have a refrigerator temperature log sheet to monitor the temperature of the medication and so that the medication will not lose its potency. R99's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated active orders as of 06/04/25 shows that R99 has orders for Briviact Oral Tablet 10 mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for seizures. R99's Controlled Drug/Receipt/Record/Disposition Form dated received on 05/13/25 shows that R99 has Briviact Oral Tablet 10 mg (milligram) BID (twice a day) quantity received 60 tablets. R104's POS dated 05/28/25 shows that R104 has orders for Pregabalin Oral Capsule 150 MG (Pregabalin) *Controlled Drug* Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for Pain Take 1 capsule by mouth 2 times daily. The facility's document dated June 2025 and titled Controlled Substance Verification Sheet shows Nurses Station: 2 [NAME] Team with missing signatures for June 1, 2025 on the 7:00 am -7:00 pm on coming shift. The facility's documented dated received 05/29/25 and titled Controlled Drug Record shows that R104 has 53 tablets of Pregabalin 150 mg (milligrams)150 mg capsule left to dispense however, Surveyor and V5 (Registered Nurse, RN) observed R104's medication dispensing card for Pregabalin 150 mg (milligrams)150 mg capsule with 52 tablets left to dispense. The facility's undated policy titled Controlled Substances documents, in part: Policy Statement: The facility complies with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: .8. 8. Controlled substances are reconciled upon receipt, administration, disposition, and at the end of each shift . 9. Upon Receipt: . b. Both individuals sign the controlled substance record of receipt . 10. Upon Administration: a. The nurse administering the medication is responsible for recording: (1) name of the resident receiving the medication; (2) name, strength, and dose of the medication; (3) time of administration; (4) method of administration; (5) quantity of the medication remaining; and (6) signature of nurse administering medication . 12. At the End of Each Shift: a. Controlled medications are counted at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty determine the count together. The facility's undated policy titled Storage of Medications documents, in part: Policy heading: The facility stores all drugs and biological in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. Drugs and biological's are stored in the packaging, containers, or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers 7. Medications requiring refrigeration are stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room at the nurses' station or other secured location. Medications are stored separately from food and are labeled accordingly. The facility's undated policy titled Labeling of Medications Containers documents, in part: Policy Statement: All medications maintained in the facility are properly labeled in accordance with current state and federal guidelines and regulations. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 3. Labels for individual resident medications include all necessary information, such as: a. the resident's name . h. the expiration date when applicable. The facility's undated policy titled Refrigerator and Freezers documents, in part: Policy Statement: The facility will ensure safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance, temperatures, and sanitation, and will observe food expiration guidelines . 2. Monthly tracking sheets for all refrigerators and freezers will be posted to record temperatures.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide clean bed and bath linens for residents wit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide clean bed and bath linens for residents with the need of assistance with daily hygiene, bathing, or showers. This failure affected two residents (R96, R504) out of three reviewed in the final sample of 55 residents, however, this failure has the potential to affect all 93 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 6/2/2025 the Census sheet provided by the facility showed 93 residents. On 6/2/2025 at 11:00 AM, observed R504 sitting on the side of the bed, holding a walker. Underneath the bed, observed a fresh urine-like spot on the floor and on the resident's left foot. R504 stated, that it has been over an hour, that someone came in to help to transfer R504 from bed to the chair. R504 could not wait longer and tried to use the urinal, could not reach it in time and had an accident. R504 stated that R504 felt embarrassed, humiliated, and angry and did not have any clean towels or washcloths to use. On 6/2/2025 at 11:05 AM V11 (Certified Nurse's Aide/CNA) stated the resident's wait for help for a long time sometimes because the patient load is heavy because many of the residents require increased surveillance and two people assistance. V11 stated that the facility is always out of towels and washcloths and many times V11 had to use blankets to give residents bed baths. V11 stated that to cover the urine spot until cleaned, blanket must be used, because there are no towels available on the unit. 6/2/2025 at 11:10 AM, in the 2 East Unit's Clean Linen Room, observed no towels or washcloths on the linen carts. On 6/2/2025 at 11:30 AM R96 stated that sometimes the facility runs out of towels and washcloths and pillowcases and must use blankets instead when receiving a shower. R96 receives showers twice a week on Wednesday and Saturday. R96 had to take towels or a pillowcase from a cart when available, because the facility is often short of linens. R96 stated that sometimes she uses her own linens. On 6/3/2025 at 11:45 AM in the Facility's Laundry room observed with V22 (Laundry Aide), Observed on the top of the clean linen folding table, a total of eight towels and eight washcloths. Next to clean linen folding table, observed three full bins of clean linen (blankets, gowns, sheets, chucks,) and one empty linen cart with a pink cover attached to it. Surveyor observed additional room with clean linen storage area, with four carts of clean linen on the carts, covered with pink covers. No additional towels or washcloths observed in the additional clean linen storage room. No towels or washcloths observed in the four working dryer machines or the clean bins. V22 stated that there is a certain amount of linen placed on the linen carts for each unit specifically, and then the carts get distributed to each unit at 7am and again in the evening. The amount of linen varies per unit and is written on a paper form on the bulletin board in the laundry room. Surveyor observed, written in permanent black marker on each unit's linen cart, the amount of linen each unit is dispersed (the same amounts that are written on the paper form on the bulletin board in the laundry room). Evidence shows that the amount of linen that is dispersed to each unit is less than the number of residents on each unit. V22 said, sometimes V22 does not have clean towels and other linens ready, because V22 is the only one laundry aide until 2pm. V22 said, that another laundry aide comes in at 2pm and works until 8pm. V22 does not have enough time or help to wash and sort, fold, and disburse all linen in a timely manner. V22 said, that the reason why the towels and wash cloths are not visible in the laundry room, is that a full cart of fresh linen, was delivered at 7am to each unit and the dirty linen is still being washed. On 6/3/2025 at 11:55 AM Laundry's room bulletin board sign for distribution of linens showed linen placement as follows but not limited to 1 East 13 towels, 15 wash cloths; 2 East morning linen 10 towels, 15 wash cloths, 2 East night linen 6 towels, 10 wash cloths; 2 [NAME] linen Morning 12 towels, 20 washcloths, Night 6 towels, 20 wash cloths. 2 East Unit on 6/3/2025 at 12:07PM, V12 (LPN), stated that current census for the unit is 24 residents. 2 East Unit's Linen Room on 6/3/2025 at 12:08 PM, observed NO towels or washcloths on linen carts. On 6/3/2025 at 12:10 PM V13 (Certified Nurse's Aide/CNA), stated that since the new management took over, there has been many changes in laundry practices. V13 stated at 7am V13 removed four washcloths and two towels from the delivered linen cart and the other aide took the rest, which was about the same number of towels and washcloths. V13 affirmed that the facility is often short on linens, especially towels and washcloths and that since the new changes in laundry staff (now only one person working), it got worse. V13 must often call for more linens, sometimes must leave the unit and go to the laundry room and try to obtain more linens. V13 also stated that a few times, when V13 went to obtain more linens from the laundry room, the laundry room did not have the linens needed. On 6/3/2025 at 14:34 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that there should be clean linen observed and available on every unit. V1 wasn't aware of not having towels or washcloths available. Observed two linen carts brought up by the maintenance personnel by the conference room. One cart was half empty with clean linen, including five towels and four washcloths, the second cart had only sheets, blankets, and gown on it, halfway full. When asked about the number of available towels and washcloths for residents on the clean linen carts coming from laundry, V1 stated that the amount gets refilled as needed, the laundry aide delivers more linen to the units, when needed. On 6/4/2025 at 11:19 AM V1 (Administrator) stated, that, the bulletin board signs used for stocking the linen carts in the laundry room, were made prior V1's start at the facility. V1 was not aware that the linen carts were stocked with the limited number of towels and other linens as shown on the bulletin board signs in the laundry room. V1 stated that each resident should be provided two towels and two washcloths. V1 provided document that listed linen inventory summary as of 6/4/2025. On 6/4/2025 at 12:10 PM V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) stated that to provide a resident with a bed bath, a minimum of four bath towels and four washcloths are necessary to use. There should be a separate washcloth used for face and arms and resident's chest and lower extremities. V2 stated that the linen gets delivered in the morning, but there is not enough to give bed baths for all the residents. On 6/4/2025 at 14:20 PM V24 (Maintenance Director), stated that when more linen is need, the staff should call the maintenance, or the laundry and the linen would be brought up to the unit. V24 also stated that often the linen gets discarded to trash bins and therefore some linen gets locked in the storage room. V24 was not aware of no towels and washcloths not available on 6/2/2025. On 6/4/2025 at 15:00 PM V1 affirmed that according to the inventory document provided, the facility does not have enough towels to provide minimum of two towels for 93 residents. Facility's Linen Inventory Document provided by facility dated 6/4/2025 showed in part 120 towels in circulation and 60 towels in storage, which equals to a total of 180 towels in the building. R96's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE], in Section C- Cognitive Patterns documents Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score of 12 which indicates moderate cognitive impairment. R96's Diagnosis included but not limited to palliative care, interstitial pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism. R96's Care Plan Report (POC) initiated on 5/28/2025, showed in part that R96 is on hospice care and the staff should meet R96's comfort needs and provide support and comfort care (pg. 3 of POC). POC also showed in part that R96's palliative care status prioritizes comfort. (pg. 7 of POC) R504's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE], in Section C- Cognitive Patterns documents Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score of 15 which indicates intact cognitive function. R504's Diagnosis included but not limited to history of unsteadiness on feet, acute thrombosis of veins, falls, aftercare following joint replacement surgery, presence of left artificial hip joint, major depressive disorder, benign prostatic hyperplasia R504's Care Plan Report (POC) initiated on 5/24/2025, showed in part that R504 had surgery on left hip and needs assistance in hygiene when there is an episode of incontinence, needs assistance to toilet in the morning, before or after meals, before bed and as needed, provide peri care, Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) self-care deficit. (pg4, 5, 7,11) Facility's Laundry Aide Job Description documents in part, that the laundry aide is responsible for ensuring that all resident linens and facility laundry are properly cleaned, sanitized, folded, and returned in a timely and efficient manner. Facility's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Job Description documents in part, that the CNA is responsible for providing resident care and support all activities of daily living and ensures the health, welfare, and safety of all residents. The document also states in part, that CNA should aid in all activities of daily living including but not limited to personal hygiene by giving bedpans, urinals, baths, backrubs, shampoos, and shaves, assisting with showers and baths; provide for resident comfort by utilizing resources and material. Facility's Assistant of Director of Nursing (ADON) Job Description documents in part, that the one of the purposes of ADON is to direct the day-to-day functions of the Nursing Department and ensure that the highest degree of quality care is always maintained. Facility's Administrator Job Description documents in part, that some of essential duties and responsibilities expectations are to plan, develop, organize, implement, evaluate, and direct the facility's programs and activities in accordance with guidelines issued by the governing board, to develop and implement strategies to improve the quality of care of the residents. Administrator ensures that the facility is maintained in a clean and safe manner for resident comfort and convenience by assuring that necessary equipment and supplies are maintained to perform such duties/services. Facility's Policy titled Resident Rights, documents in part that federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include but not limited resident's right to: be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity. Facility's Policy titled Homelike Environment presented 6/5/2025, revised 9/1/2024, showed in part that residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility staff and management should maximize, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics including but not limited to clean, sanitary, and orderly environment; clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition. Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Resident's rights booklet, dated 11/18, states in part that the facility must be safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. The residents should receive the services and/or items included in the plan of care.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was scheduled for 8 consecutive hours daily, 7 days a week. This failure affected one (R504) resident reviewed fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was scheduled for 8 consecutive hours daily, 7 days a week. This failure affected one (R504) resident reviewed for Registered Nurse coverage and has the potential to affect all 93 residents at the facility. Findings include: The (06/02/2025) facility census was 93. The (undated) Residents on IVABT (intravenous antibiotic) in MAY 2025 to present include R504. R504 ' s (printed: 06/05/2025) Order Summary Report documented, in part Diagnoses: (include but not limited to) infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal joint prosthesis. Status. Discontinued. Order Summary Cefazolin Sodium injection solution reconstituted 2 grams (GM), use 2000 milligram intravenously every 8 hours for prophylaxis for 7 days. Order Date: 5/24/2025. End Date: 06/01/2025. R504 (Active Order as Of: 06/05/2025) Order Summary Report documented, in part Status: Active. Cefazolin Sodium Injection Solution Reconstituted 2 GM (Cefazolin Sodium) Use 2000 mg intravenously, every 8 hours for prophylaxis for 8 Days. Order Date: 05/31/2025. End Date: 06/08/2025. Status: Active. PICC Line: Measure external length of catheter once each week. every day shift every Tue for PICC Line. Order Date: 06/03/2025. End Date: 06/10/2025. R504 ' s (05/28/2025) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary Score: 15. Indicating R504 ' s mental status as cognitively intact. Section O. Special Treatment, Procedures, and Programs. O0110. H1. IV medications. A. On admission and b. while a resident. H3. Antibiotics. A. On admission. R504 ' s (05/2025) Medication Administration Record documented the following: 5/25/2025 at 21:17 V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/26/2025 at 06:28 V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/26/2025 at 13:41 V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/26/2025 at 23:28 V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/27/2025 at 05:32 V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/27/2025 at 14:16 V12(Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/27/2025 at 04:06 V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/28/2025 at 06:13 V30(Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/28/2025 at 14:15 V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/28/25 at 22:19 V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/29/2025 at 05:11 V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/29/2025 at 15:20 V31 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/29/2025 at 00:11 V32 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/30/2025 at 05:38 V32 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/30/2025 at 15:46 V33 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/30/2025 at 22:13 V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously 5/31/2025 at 22:00 V34 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Cefazolin 2 GM Intravenously On 6/4/2025 review of documents titled, Department Of Financial Regulation Nursing License shows that V12, V30, V31, and V32 all have an active Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) license which will expire January 31,2027. On 6/4/2025 review of documents titled, Nurses Quick Confirm, Quick Confirm License Verification Report shows that V33 and V34 have an active Licensed Practical Nurse license which will expire January 31, 2027. On 6/3/2025 at 9:36 am, V18 (Nursing Scheduler) stated I have two master schedules for nurses that are color coded, the blue coded schedules consist of mostly registered nurses (RN) and the yellow coded schedules has most of the LPN ' s scheduled. V18 stated currently on yellow coded schedule there are no RN 's scheduled and I (V18) am not sure why but that this is how the schedule has been since I started working on schedules, and if a nurse calls off to the nursing director, I (V18) place a call to the Agency staffing to come in and work the shift. On 06/05/2025 at 1:56pm, V20 (Registered Nurse) stated I have not monitored or supervised a Licensed Practice Nurse administer an IV (intravenous) antibiotic. On 06/05/025 at 2:21pm, V5 (Registered Nurse) stated I only work on 1East. I never work on the other floor. I have never monitored or supervised an LPN hanging an IV antibiotic for him (R504). On 6/3/2025 at 10:11 am, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated there are no LPNs in the facility that are certified to administer intravenous medications. On 06/04/2025 at 9:47am, V2 stated LPN can administer IV medications in the presence of a Registered Nurse. It is not in the scope of their practice. All our LPNs are not certified to administer IV medications. I know the regulation states that we are supposed to have an RN (Registered Nurse) coverage for 8hours daily, seven days a week. I cannot lie to you; you have a copy of our schedule and there are days we don't have an RN on our schedules. On 06/03/25 9:36 AM V18 Staffing coordinator reported that she schedules staff by teams blue or yellow, and that Licensed practical nurses are staffed on yellow team and on those days Licensed practical nurses are scheduled she does not have Registered nurses scheduled. Staff calls off to assistant director of nursing and then the assistant director then calls V18 and informs her that she needs a nurse to replace the shift, V18 states she is able to replace the shift quickly because she has prn staff who give their availability and are able to work when called. The facility nursing staff work 12 hour shifts and each unit is staffed as below. Some days there is no RN scheduled 7am-7pm: First floor- two nurses, two nursing assistants Second floor east wing- two nurses, 2 nursing assistants Second floor west wing-two nurses, 3 nursing assistants 7pm-7am: First floor-one nurse, two nursing assistants Second floor east wing- one nurse, 2 nursing assistants Second floor west wing-two nurses, 3 nursing assistants The (05/2025) Facility Nursing Staffing indicated no Registered Nurse working in the units on May 02, 03, 04, 08, 18, 22, 27, and 31. The (06/04/2025) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented, in part It is our expectation that we have RN coverage daily. The (3/25/2016) Registered Nurse (RN) Job Description documented, in part Summary: The RN is responsible for providing direct Nursing care to the residents, evaluations and OR assessments, and to supervise the day-to-day clinical care performed by other nursing staff. Such supervision must be in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern our facility., and ask may be required by the Director of Nursing to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times. Essential Duties and responsibilities. Administer clinical care according to the standard of care and in accordance with local, state, federal and facility policies and procedures. The (09/01/2024) Staffing documented, in part Policy Statement. Our facility provides sufficient numbers of staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 1. Licensed nurses and certified nursing assistants are available 24 hours a day to provide direct resident care services. 2. Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff are determined by the needs of the residents based on each resident ' s plan of care.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure foods were stored and labeled according to stan...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure foods were stored and labeled according to standards, failed to monitor refrigerator, freezer, and cooler temperatures daily; and failed to maintain dishwashing sanitizing water concentrations. This failure has the potential to affect all 93 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 6/2/2025 at 10:03 am, during the initial tour of the kitchen, the following was identifed: the refrigerator, freezer, cooler lacked June temperature logs. May temperature logs were taped to the refrigerator, freezer, and cooler with several missing temperature checks. All foods in the refrigerator, cooler, and freezer lacked open and expiration dates, except potentially hazardous foods in particular; Tuna Fish, [NAME] Slaw Salad Dressing, Cottage Cheese, and Bacon with past due expiration dates. Ice cream freezer lacked monthly temperature tracking sheet. On 6/2/2025 at 10:26 am, surveyor observed Low Fat Cottage Cheese dated 5/15/2025. V3, (Dietary Manager-(DM) stated the date on the Low-Fat Cottage Cheese is the opening date. V3 stated when the dietary department receives a food delivery, the receiving date is applied to each food item. V3 stated, I will throw away the cottage cheese dated 5/15/2025 out. V3 stated residents can get sick from outdated perishable foods. On 6/2/2025 at 10:29 am, surveyor and V3 observed a box of bacon in a plastic bag unsealed and open to air. The bacon contained no open or expiration date. On 6/2/2025 at 10:31am, Surveyor and V3 observed a container labeled Tuna Salad with a date of 5/25/2025. Surveyor and V3 observed a large jar of [NAME] Slaw Salad Dressing with receiving date of 10/30/24. V3 affirmed bacon in plastic bag open to air, tuna salad with written date of 5/25/25, and [NAME] slaw salad dressing with a receiving date of 10/30/2024. V3 stated , I just started here, and I haven't had a chance to inspect the entire kitchen. V3 stated residents can get food poisoning from outdated meat, tuna, and salad dressing. Facility Policy titled Food Receiving and Storage with a revised date of October 2017 documents in part: Uncooked and raw animal products and fish will be stored separately in drip-proof containers and below fruits, vegetables and other ready to eat foods. On 6/4/2025 at 9:44 am, V27, (Cook) conducted a critical control points test on the sanitation bucket 1 at the 3-compartment sink. V27 affirmed the results was 300 ppm. V27 stated the critical control points range is 200ppm. V27 stated when the results is out of range, the dishes aren't clean and is not safe. On 6/4/2025 at 9:51 am, V26, (Dishwasher) performed a critical control points test on the sanitation bucket stored by the dishwashing machine. V26 stated the sanitation bucket is used to sanitize the silverware. V26 performed a critical control points test on the sanitation bucket stored on the dishwasher and the results were 100 ppm. V26 stated the critical control points normal range is 200ppm to 300ppm. V26 stated the critical control points test is performed on the sanitation buckets to make sure the silverware are clean to prevent residents from getting sick. Facility Policy titled Food Receiving and Storage with a revised date of October 2017 documents in part, Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices and All food stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date). Facility Policy titled Refrigerators and Freezers with a revised date of September 20, 2024 documents in part: This facility will ensure safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance, temperatures, and sanitation, and will observe food expiration guidelines. 1. Monthly tracking sheets for all refrigerators and freezers will be posted to record temperatures. 2. Monthly tracking sheets will include time, temperature, initials, and action taken. The last column will be completed only if temperatures are not acceptable. 3. Food Service supervisors or designated employees will check and record refrigerator and freezer temperatures daily with first opening and at closing in the evening. Facility Policy titled Preventing Foodborne Illness-Food Handling with a last reviewed date of 9/1/24 documents in part: I. Food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized. II. This facility recognizes that the critical factors implicated in foodborne illness are: a. Contaminated equipment b. Unsafe food sources III. With these factors as the primary focus of preventative measures, this facility strives to minimize the risk of foodborne illness to our residents.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain garbage waste with a closed lid to prevent pest infestation and foul odor. This failure affects all 93 residents resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain garbage waste with a closed lid to prevent pest infestation and foul odor. This failure affects all 93 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Facility's Census dated 6/2/2025 documents 93 residents are residing in the facility. On 6/2/2025 at 11:04am, a garbage can stored near the dry storage room was observed without a lid giving off a foul smell and several small black insects flying around the opening. On 6/2/2025 at 11:06 am, V3, (Dietary Manager-(DM) stated, this has been a problem since I started working here, this is fruit fly central. V3 affirmed the garbage can had a foul odor, did not have a lid on it was filled with garbage and black insects flying in and around the garbage can. V3 stated pest control treated the kitchen for fruit flies 3 weeks ago. Facility Policy titled Waste Disposal with a reviewed date of September 1, 20124 documents in part, All infectious and regulated waste destined for disposal shall be placed in closable leak-proof containers or bags that are color-coded or labeled as herein described.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0838 (Tag F0838)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough and accurate facility assessment. This failure ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough and accurate facility assessment. This failure has the potential to affect all 93 residents that reside within the facility. Findings include: Record review of facility census documentation provided on 6/2/2025 documents in part that 93 residents reside within the facility. Record review of the document titled Facility Assessment Tool for [NAME] House 6/2024 though 7/2025 documents in part the following: A) no resident/resident family member input in the completion of the facility assessment B) no direct care staff input in the completion of the facility assessment c) no specific staffing needs based on shift and unit D) no plan developed/maintained to maximize recruitment/retention of staff E) no Informed contingency planning for events that do not require activation of the facility's emergency plan, but do have the potential to affect resident care, such as, but not limited to, the availability of direct care nurse staffing or other resources needed for resident care F) Describe your plan to recruit and retain enough medical practitioners (e.g., physicians, nurse practitioners) who are adequately trained and knowledgeable in the care of your residents/patients, including how you will collaborate with them to ensure that the facility has appropriate medical practices for the needs and scope of your population. - This section is left blank G) Describe how the management and staff familiarize themselves with what they should expect from medical practitioners and other healthcare professionals related to standards of care and competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for your resident population. For example, do you share expectations for providers that see residents in your nursing home on the use of standards, protocols, or other information developed by your medical director? Do you have discussions on what providers and staff expect of each other in terms of the care delivery process and clinical reasoning essential to providing high quality care? - This section is left blank. H) List (or refer to or provide a link to inventory) physical resources for the following categories. Review the resources in the example below and modify as needed. If applicable, describe your processes to ensure adequate supplies and to ensure equipment is maintained to protect and promote the health and safety of residents- This section does not indicate the process to ensure adequate supply, appropriate maintenance, replacement as applicable I) List health information technology resources, such as systems for electronically managing patient records and electronically sharing information with other organizations. Consider including a description of a) how the facility will securely transfer health information to a hospital, home health agency, or other providers for any resident transferred or discharged from the facility; b) how downtime procedures are developed and implemented; and c) how the facility ensures that residents and their representative can access their records upon request and obtain copies within required timeframes. - This section is left blank. J) Describe how you evaluate if your infection prevention and control program includes effective systems for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement, that follow accepted national standards. This section is left blank. K) .The purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Use this assessment to make decisions about your direct care staff needs, as well as your capabilities to provide services to the residents in your facility. Using a competency-based approach focuses on ensuring that each resident is provided care that allows the resident to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The intent of the facility assessment is for the facility to evaluate its resident population and identify the resources needed to provide the necessary person-centered care and services the residents require . On 6/4/2025 at 3:37 PM, V1 (Administrator) affirmed that V1 completed the facility assessment with V21 (Infection Preventionist, Registered Nurse, Nurse Consultant), V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) and the governing body of the facility. V1 denied that input was obtained by residents and families when completing the facility assessment, and added, other facilities I have worked with have done that. Facility assessment was reviewed with V1 and V1 affirmed that there is no contingency staffing plan or a system for recruitment/retention of the facility within the facility assessment. When asked why sections of the facility assessment was not completed or left blank, V1 replied, it is because those sections are not required. V1 affirmed that the purpose of the facility assessment is to analyze and identify the overall needs of the facility, its staff/residents and to address the identified needs.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

On 06/02/25 at 11:17 am, R86 was observed in bed awake and alert with feeding tube feeding in place running at 40 ml (milliliter) per hour and wound care dressing to R86's left ischium and sacral regi...

Read full inspector narrative →
On 06/02/25 at 11:17 am, R86 was observed in bed awake and alert with feeding tube feeding in place running at 40 ml (milliliter) per hour and wound care dressing to R86's left ischium and sacral region. R86's door did not have an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign on R86's door or wall outside of R86's room. On 06/02/25 at 11:22 am, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) stated that residents with feeding tubes and wounds should have EBP signs on the residents door. V16 stated that if a resident who requires EBP does not have a EBP sign on the residents door then staff will not know to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (gown and gloves) when providing care to the resident and can transmit bacteria to residents and staff. V16 stated, I (V16) thought she (R86) had a sign on her (R86) door. On 06/03/25 at 12:57 pm, V21 (Infection Preventionist, IP) stated residents tube feedings, indwelling catheters, receiving dialysis and residents with wounds require Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to prevent the staff from passing Multi Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO's) and bacteria to other staff and residents. V21 stated that residents who require EBP, the staff should be wearing gown and gloves when performing high contact resident care. R86 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to gastrostomy status, and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase. R86 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 05/19/25 a BIMS score of 2 which indicates that R86 has some cognitive impairments. R86's Physician Order Sheet shows active orders as of 06/03/25 shows orders for Enhanced Barrier Precautions for wound care. Gloves and gown to be worn during wound care and prolonged contact activity. R86 Enteral Feed Order every 4 hours flush 140 ml Q4 (every four). Enteral Feed Order every shift (enteral) flush feeding tube with 20-30 ml (milliliter) of water before and after medication administration . Site: Left Ischium cleanse with NSS (Normal Saline Solution) apply /cover with Ca+ (calcium alginate) silver, cover with bordered foam dressing as needed for wound care. Site Sacral cleanse with NSS APPLY Bordered foam dressing as needed for wound care. The facility's document dated 06/02/25 shows a list of residents in the facility who require EBP and that R86 requires Enhanced Barrier Precautions at the facility. The facility's undated policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions documents in part: Policy Statement: Enhanced Barrier Precautions are used in the care for residents with wounds requiring dressings or indwelling medical devices and successfully admit and care for those residents with XDRO (Multi drug resistant organism, MDRO) or epidemiologically important MDRO . 2. Enhanced Barrier Precautions is to be implemented in conjunction with Standard Precautions . 4. Evidence Based Precautions will be implemented for residents with wounds that requiring dressing changes (e.g. (example) pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed surgical wounds, and chronic venous stasis ulcers) and only when the wound drainage is contained. 5. Evidenced Based Precautions will be implemented for residents with indwelling devices. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene in between residents while passing food trays for 4 residents (R21, R42, R48, and R77); failed to ensure a resident (R86) with an indwelling catheter and wounds was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP); failed to provide easily accessible areas/supplies to perform proper hand hygiene on 2 East; and failed to properly bag and secure soiled linen that is put down the laundry chute. These failures have the potential to affect R21, R39, R42, R48, R77, R86; all 24 residents residing on 2 East; and all 93 residents residing at the facility reviewed for infection control. Findings include: On 6/02/25, V1 (Administrator) stated that there are total of 93 active residents residing at the facility. On 6/2/2025 at 11:20am, with V11(CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant), during observation of the soiled utility room on 2 East, surveyor and V11 observed a brown substance on the walls of the laundry chute. V11(CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated, that soiled linens get thrown into a laundry chute without being put in a plastic bag. On 6/3/2025 at 10:44am, V21 (Infection Preventionist/IP) stated, Soiled linen gets bagged and sent down a laundry chute in the dirty utility room. All resident's laundry bins should have a bag in them. Soiled linen is bagged and contained to prevent the spread of infection. On 6/3/2025 at 11:47am, while in the Facility's Laundry room with V22 (Laundry Aide), an opened bag of visibly soiled linen was on the floor under the laundry chute with multiple articles of visibly soiled linen on top of the bag not contained. V22 said, The linen should come down the chute in a bag. Sometimes the bag gets caught on this (V22 pointed to a metal piece at the end of the laundry chute) and rips open. Sometimes linen comes down the chute without a bag but most of the time the linen is bagged. Facility policy titled, Departmental (Environmental Services) - Laundry and Linen, reviewed date 9/01/24, documents, in part, The purpose of this procedure is to provide a process for the safe and aseptic handling, washing, and storage of linen . Consider all soiled linen to be potentially infectious and handle with standard operations . If laundry chutes are used, only closed and leak resistant bags will be put into the chute. Loose items will not be placed in the laundry chute . Facility policy titled, Laundry and bedding, soiled, reviewed date 9/01/24, documents, in part, Soiled laundry/bedding shall be handled, transported and processed according to best practices for infection prevention and control . all used laundry is handled as potentially contaminated until it is properly bagged and labeled for appropriate processing .Contaminated laundry is placed in a bag or container at the location where it is used . Facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, reviewed date 9/1/24, documents, in part, An infection prevention and control program (IPCP) is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections . instituting measures to avoid complications and dissemination; educating staff and ensuring that they adhere to proper techniques and procedures. On 6/2/2025 at 12:07 p.m, V13, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was passing residents' lunch trays in the hallway. V13 pulled a lunch tray from the dietary cart and headed toward R77's room. After exiting R77's room, V13 removed her hair from her face while walking down the hallway, then took the lemonade pitcher from the cart and began pouring lemonade into a cup, without using hand sanitizer. There were no hand sanitizer dispensers available in the hallway of the unit. V13 then rolled the dietary cart down the hall and removed another lunch tray, and placed it on R42's bedside table. V13 opened food items on R42's tray but exited the room without performing hand hygiene. V13 then took another tray from the cart and proceeded to R48's room, placing the tray on R48's bedside table. Again, V13 removed her hair from her face in the hallway, took another tray from the cart, and handed it to another staff member in the dining room. V13 pushed the dietary cart down the hall without using hand sanitizer. V13, removed R21's from the dietary cart and placed the lunch tray on R21's bedside table. V13 did not practice hand hygiene after delivering the lunch tray to R21. On 6/2/2025 at 12:23pm, V13 stated I wash my hands after I pass the trays. V13 was asked if V13 uses hand sanitizer when passing trays. V13 stated I used hand hygiene. V13 was made aware V13 was observed passing several residents trays without using hand sanitizer. V13 stated hand hygiene is used to prevent infection. On 6/3/2025 at 12:07PM, V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN), stated that current census for the 2 East unit is 24 residents. On 6/2/2025 at 10:55am, surveyor observed no hand sanitizer: on or in any of the PPE (personal protective equipment) bins outside resident's room, on the walls in the hallway, on the 2 East Unit nurse's station, or in the resident's room. On 6/2/2025 at 11:05am V11 (Certified Nurse's Assistant/CNA) stated that the facility does not provide them with enough hand sanitizers, usually only one bottle placed at the nurse's station and the facility also tends to be out of hand soaps in the resident's bathrooms often. On 6/3/2025 at 10:44 AM, V21 (Infection Preventionist/IP) stated that hand hygiene is an ongoing project, facility has monthly meeting and IP is part of morning clinical huddles. Expectation for staff is to use hand gel sanitizer or soap and water, and wash hands between residents. Hand gel sanitizers should be on the PPE carts, and at nurse's station, and the smaller pocket size bottles should be available for the staff to carry in pockets. V21 said that hand sand sanitizer and hand hygiene stations should be readily accessible for the employees and visitors to prevent the spread of infection. On 6/3/2025 at 12:10pm, V13 (Certified Nurse's Assistant/CNA), stated that the facility does supply hand sanitizer but is only one small bottle per nursing station that is located so far from the end rooms, that the hand washing is harder to do. The facility does not provide hand sanitizers inside the PPE carts nor pocket size for employees to carry with them. On 6/4/2025 at 12:15pm, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) stated that hand sanitizing gel should be provided by the facility when needed, but sometimes when ordered, the supplies are not received. Occasionally the staff will have to purchase hand sanitizing gel themselves in the store nearby. V2 stated that the facility used to carry hand sanitizers on the walls of the facility but were removed due to malfunction and breakage. V2 stated that there is usually one bottle of hand sanitizing gel in the nursing station, and the staff can wash the hands in the washroom. V2 affirmed that sometimes it is very inconvenient to not have the ability to have handwashing supplies nearby and it makes it more challenging for staff to perform hand hygiene if they need to perform care in rooms on the far end of the hallways. V2 stated that the lack of supply could lead to spread in infection due to staff not washing their hands as often. Facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, reviewed date 9/1/24, documents, in part, Policy statement . to prevent the spread of infection . importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of health-care associated infections . hand hygiene products and supplies (sink, soap, towels, alcohol based hand rub, etc.) shall be readily accessible and convenient for staff use to encourage compliance with hand hygiene policies . the following equipment and supplies are necessary for hand hygiene: alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; . Soap .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to clean the lint screens thoroughly, to provide a safe environment for the residents of the facility. This failure has the pot...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to clean the lint screens thoroughly, to provide a safe environment for the residents of the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 93 residents living at the facility. Findings include: On 6/2/2025 the Census sheet provided by the facility showed 93 residents living in the facility. On 6/3/2025 at 11: 50 AM a tour of facility's Laundry room was completed with V22 (laundry aide) and follow observations were noted: Dryer #1 had copious amount of white fluffy lint on the floor, underneath the filter trap. The filter was bulging and overfilled with lint. Dryer #2 had also overfilled lint trap and some white fluffy lint on the floor underneath the trap. Dryer # 3 was not in use and out of order, but it did contain a full lint trap. Dryer #4 lint filter was overfilled with lint and bulging, and white fuzzy lint was on the floor underneath the lint trap. On 6/3/2025 at 11:55 AM V22 stated, that the lint traps should be cleaned twice on his shift at 11 AM and 2PM and again, when the next laundry aide comes and cleans the traps around 5pm. V22 stated that V22 did not get chance to clean the lint traps today. V22 affirmed that cleaning of the lint traps under the dryers is important, so clothes would dry better and because the trapped lint could be a potential hazard for a fire. 6/4/2025 at 14:20 PM V24 (Maintenance Director), stated that V24 is responsible for maintaining and supervision of laundry machines working properly. The laundry aides are responsible for cleaning the dryer's lint traps and V24 provides education and training for them. V24 stated that the lint traps should be cleaned daily at 11am and 2pm by the day shift and 8pm by the evening shift laundry aide. The cleaning of the lint tramps is important because the accumulation of the lint could potentially cause a fire and put the whole facility and all residents in danger. Also, empty lint trap helps with proficiency and effective drying of laundry. On 6/5/2025 at 11:13 AM V1 (Administrator) in the email stated that all equipment are covered under our maintenance policy as provided. Facility's Laundry Aide Job Description documents in part that, the laundry aide is responsible for ensuring that all resident linens and facility laundry are properly cleaned, sanitized, folded, and returned in a timely and efficient manner. The document shows in part that the aide is responsible for operating washers, dryers, and other laundry equipment according to manufacturer instructions and maintain laundry area cleanliness and report equipment malfunctions. Facility's Administrator Job Description documents in part that Administrator should ensure that all facility personnel, follow established safety regulations such as fire protection/prevention, smoking regulations, infection control etc. Administrator ensures that the facility is maintained in a clean and safe manner for resident comfort and convenience by assuring that necessary equipment and supplies are maintained to perform such deities/services Facility's policy titled Maintenance Services, revised April 01,2020, showed in part that purpose of maintenance services is to protect the health and safety of residents, visitors, and facility staff. Policy also stated that the maintenance department maintains all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment. The policy further stated in part, that the Director of Maintenance is responsible for conducting regular inspections that may include but are not limited to laundry.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control that eliminated black flying insects in the kitchen. This failure has the potential to affe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control that eliminated black flying insects in the kitchen. This failure has the potential to affect all 93 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 6/2/2025 at 11:04am, a garbage can stored near the dry storage room was observed without a lid giving off a foul smell and several small black insects flying around the opening. On 6/2/2025 at 11:06 am, V3, (Dietary Manager-(DM) stated, this has been a problem since I started working here, this is fruit fly central. V3 affirmed the garbage can had a foul odor, did not have a lid on it was filled with garbage and black insects flying in and around the garbage can. V3 stated pest control treated the kitchen for fruit flies 3 weeks ago. On 6/4/2025 at 12:14 pm, V1 (Administrator) stated the Facility's Maintenance Director is responsible for pest control. V1 stated V1 was not aware of a pest control problem in the kitchen until yesterday when it was brought to his attention by the Dietary Manager. V1 stated V1 provided the pest control reports to the survey team. V1 stated V1 was not aware. V1 stated pest control services are provided to the facility once a week for preventive measures. On 6/4/2025 at 1:26pm V24 (Maintenance Director) stated pest control comes out every 2 weeks or twice a month on a regular basis regardless of if there is a pest control problem within the facility. V24 stated no one has brought it to his attention regarding fruit flies in the kitchen. V24 stated V24 noticed some fruit flies primarily in the dish room but no one has brought it to V24's attention of sightings of fruit flies anywhere else in the building. V24 stated I know that fruit flies are annoying and are a nuisance. V24 stated V24 honestly don't know how long the fruit flies has been a problem here. V24 stated V24 thinks the facility probably needs to be a little more aggressive treating the fruit flies. Facility's Pest Control Service Inspection Report from Sentry Pest Control does not document any treatment for fruit flies, gnats, or any flying black insects on the following preventive service dates: 1/17/2025, 1/23/2025, 2/5/2025, 2/21/2025, 3/6/2025, 3/10/2025, 4/16/2025, 4/30/2025, 5/12/2025, and 5/27/2025. Facility's Policy titled Pest Control with a revision date of April 1, 2020, documents in part, The facility maintains an ongoing pest control program to ensure the building and grounds are kept free of insects, rodents, and other pests.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0944 (Tag F0944)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) training to the staff. This failure has the potential to affect all 93 residents t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) training to the staff. This failure has the potential to affect all 93 residents that reside within the facility. Findings include: On 6/4/2025 at 10:39 AM, surveyor requested documentation for staff training on QAPI. On 6/4/2025 at 1:39 PM, V1 (Administrator) provided surveyor with 2 binders labeled In-services 2025 and In-services 2024 and stated, all of our in-services are within that binder, if we in-serviced on it, it would be in there. Record review of in-servicing binders for 2024 and 2025 was completed and no training related to QAPI was observed completed for staff. On 6/4/2025 at 3:37 PM, V1 (Administrator) affirmed there is no further documentation that the facility can produce related to QAPI training. V1 stated that direct care staff do not get trained on QAPI but if they have a concern, they can tell their supervisor and they can bring it to the QAPI committee. V1 stated that the direct care staff would not know how to submit things to the QAPI committee because our chain of command is to tell the supervisor. V21 (Infection Preventionist, Registered Nurse, Nurse Consultant) stated that V21 is the nurse consultant and provides multi-facility oversight. V21 stated that the facility might have documentation of QAPI training in the director of nursing's office. Surveyor observed V21 and V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) search the office and V21 stated, we don't have any other documentation. V21 denied that there is a training schedule for required in-services and stated, we are currently working on that. On 6/5/2025 at 10:21 AM, V21 affirmed that there was no further documentation that the facility could produce regarding QAPI training. V21 explained, The purpose of QAPI is to analyze our facility systems/processes and improve or fix them if appropriate. QAPI is a driving force for improving care and the direct care staff should be involved too. Direct care staff know a lot more about system processes and what is working or what is not working. They would also be responsible for driving the needed change identified within the QAPI committee. No further documentation was provided related to QAPI in-services prior to the exit of the survey. Record review of facility assessment (6/24 through 7/25) does not identify a training need for QAPI training. Record review of job description titled Certified Nursing Assistant documents in part Essential Duties and Responsibilities: . Involved in yearly mandated education according to local, state and federal laws .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0946 (Tag F0946)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide compliance and ethics training to the staff. This failure affects has the potential to affect all 93 residents that reside within t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide compliance and ethics training to the staff. This failure affects has the potential to affect all 93 residents that reside within the facility. Findings include: On 6/4/2025 at 10:39 AM, surveyor requested documentation for staff training on compliance and ethics. On 6/4/2025 at 1:39 PM, V1 (Administrator) provided surveyor with 2 binders labeled In-services 2025 and In-services 2024 and stated, all of our in-services are within that binder, if we in-serviced on it, it would be in there. Record review of in-servicing binders for 2024 and 2025 was completed and no training related to compliance/ethics was observed completed for staff. On 6/4/2025 at 3:37 PM, V1 (Administrator) affirmed there is no further documentation that the facility can produce related to compliance or ethics. V1 produced a binder labeled compliance and ethics program and affirmed that the facility does have a compliance and ethics program. V21 (Infection Preventionist, Registered Nurse, Nurse Consultant) stated that V21 is the nurse consultant and provides multi-facility oversight (4 facilities). V21 stated that the facility might have documentation (on ethics or compliance) in the director of nursing's office. Surveyor observed V21 and V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) search the office and V21 stated, we don't have any other documentation. V21 denied that there is a training schedule for required in-services and stated, we are currently working on that. On 6/5/2025 at 10:21 AM, V21 affirmed that there was no further documentation that the facility could produce regarding compliance/ethics training. V21 explained, In our company, we have a compliance and ethics program for our staff members. Any staff member can call a hotline to our company and report ethical concerns. It could be things like not following regulations or other ethical issues like accepting bribes or tips. It is important because we can become aware of issues that affect the resident's care and staff need to know that they can report ethical issues without fear of retailation. If they don't report it, the issues could continue. No further documentation was provided related to compliance/ethics in-services prior to the exit of the survey. Record review of facility assessment (6/24 through 7/25) does not identify a training need for compliance and ethics training. Record review of job description titled Certified Nursing Assistant documents in part Essential Duties and Responsibilities: . Involved in yearly mandated education according to local, state and federal laws .
Apr 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to deliver mail and not open mail without permission for one (R1) of four residents reviewed for resident rights. R1's clinical record indica...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to deliver mail and not open mail without permission for one (R1) of four residents reviewed for resident rights. R1's clinical record indicates: R1 is a sixty-six-year-old man admitted with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, sleep apnea, type II diabetes, long term use of insulin, major depression, anxiety disorder, and essential hypertension. R1's minimum data set assessment section [C] indicates R1 is alert and oriented, able to make his needs known. On 4/12/25 at 10:58 AM, R1 stated, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) opened up my mail, and she had no right opening up my personal mail. V2 opened my mail and took my pills, I don't know what the veteran pharmacy sent, how many, or nothing. On 4/13/25 at 2:00PM, V6 (R1's Family Member) stated, I have never been to the facility, but R1 calls me regarding all his concerns. R1 told me that V2 (DON) opened up R1's mail, and that was against the law. On 4/12/25 at 2:55 PM, V2 (DON) stated, one day the receptionist called me and said that she thought R1 received medications in the mail. I opened the package from R1's veteran pharmacy and there were several bottles of pills. I placed the pills inside the medication cart. Then I told R1, I got the package of medications sent to him in the mail and placed the pills on the med cart. I was not supposed to open his personal mail without R1's permission. Or I could have asked if I could be present while he opened his mail, and I should have explained the medication storage policy to him. I am sorry for opening his mail. On 4/12/25 at 3:15 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, no one should open anyone's mail. V2 (DON) opened R1's mail because she thought it had pills in the package, but V2 should not have opened the package without R1's permission or presence. Policy documented in part: Resident Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities, Ombudsman Program. Your Rights to Privacy and Confidentiality: Your facility must deliver and send your mail promptly. Your facility may not open your mail without your permission [page 5].
Mar 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to answer a residents (R3) call light timely who is depen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to answer a residents (R3) call light timely who is dependent for care. This failure affected 1 out 3 residents reviewed for call light response. Findings include: On 02/27/25 at 12:55 pm, R3 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in R3's room, awake, alert and able to communicate needs. When R3 was asked regarding staff responding to R3's call light. R3 stated that a few weeks ago R3 was in R3's bed, began to have chest pain, and activated R3's call device. R3 stated that no staff responded to R3's call light after 10 minutes so R3 phoned V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) on R3's cellular phone. R3 explained that V2 stated that V2 would send a nurse to R3's room. R3 explained once R3 hung up from speaking to V2 a few minutes later a nurse came into R3's room to assist R3. R3 then explained that R3 was sent to the local hospital and was treated for having a heart attack. Surveyor then requested to perform a call device response check with R3 and R3 pulled R3's call device cord and at 1:00 pm, and at 1:11 pm, V8 (Restorative Aide) responded to R3's call device. On 02/27/25 at 1:12 pm, V8 stated that V8 did not know who R3's CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA) was and that V8 was the facility's restorative nurse. V8 explained that any staff member can respond to a residents call light. V8 stated that if a residents call light is not answered the resident can possibly fall and hurt themselves. On 03/03/25 at 12:10 pm, R3 was observed in R3's bathroom attempting to transfer from R3's wheelchair to the toilet without assistance. Surveyor questioned R3 regarding asking staff to assist R3 to the toilet and R3 stated that R3 asked V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) for help to the bathroom and V12 informed R3, that R3's CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was on break. R3 then stated that R3 asked R3's nurse V22 (LPN) for assistance and V22 informed R3 that V22 would let R3's CNA know when R3's CNA returned from break. R3 then stated that R3 had been waiting 20-30 minutes when R3 decided to transfer herself to the toilet. Surveyor then instructed R3 to activate R3's bathroom call light device for assistance at 12:13 pm. Surveyor observed R3 pull R3's call light cord in R3's bathroom with the red light on R3's bathroom call device activated and flashing. At 12:33 pm, Surveyor and R3 remained in R3's bathroom awaiting staff assistance. Surveyor then observed R3's call device outside of R3's room door not functioning, not showing activated (without a flashing light or indicator of R3 signaling for help in R3's bathroom). On 03/03/25 at 12:33 pm, Surveyor pushed the call box button for help in R3's room and at 12:40 pm, V8 (Restorative Aide) responded to R3's call device button. Surveyor questioned V8 regarding R3's call device cord in R3's bathroom functioning and V8 stated that R3's call device cord was able to light up for assistance in R3's bathroom but was not activated and signaling in the hallway above R3's door. V8 explained that only R3's call box was functioning. V8 stated that V8 was not R3's assigned CNA and that V8 was just responding to R3's call light. On 03/03/25 at 12:41 pm, V22 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) was asked regarding responding to R3's call device V22 stated that R3 was in bed 1 hour ago and pulled R3's call device from R3's bed and asked V22 if R3 could go to therapy and V22 informed R3 that R3's CNA was on break and would assist R3 when she returned. V22 stated, It is not the nurses responsibility to get the residents dressed. That's the CNA's job. When V22 was asked regarding V22 being aware that R3 was inside of R3's bathroom pulling R3's call device requesting for help V22 stated, I did not know that R3 was in the bathroom calling for help. Her (R3) call device was not on. She (R3) should not be trying to transfer herself. She (R3) requires assistance from staff for transferring. She (R3) could have hurt herself. On 03/04/25 at 10:26 am, V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) denied any knowledge of R3's having complaints of R3's call light not being answered in a timely manner or R3's call light device not functioning. V2 also denied knowledge of R3's call light not being answered when R3 had complaints of chest pain a few weeks ago. V2 stated that R3 called V2 on V2's cell phone and notified V2 that R3 was having chest pain and that V2 immediately went to R3's room to address R3's chest pain. When V2 was asked regarding what can happen if a resident's call light is not answered timely or if a residents call light is not functioning and V2 stated that if a residents call light is not answered timely the staff would not be able to tend to the resident and the resident can go into distress. V2 explained that any staff can respond to a residents call light device, and the nursing staff should be checking the residents call lights daily during rounds to ensure the call light is functioning. V2 also explained that resident call lights that are not functioning properly should be immediately reported to the maintenance department for repair. R3's face sheet shows that R3 has a diagnosis included but not limited to: Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia without mention of fluctuations, spinal stenosis lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, osteoporosis with current pathological fracture vertebrae subsequent encounter for fracture, wedge compression fracture of third lumbar vertebra, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of the knee, and chronic kidney disease stage 3b. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] section C shows that R3 has a BIMS score of which indicates that R3 is cognitively intact. R3's MDS section GG shows that R3 requires substantial maximal assistance with toileting. R3's Call Light Ability Screen dated 02/12/25 documents in part: IV. Conclusion: A. Resident is able to use the call light after the screening process. The facility's undated document titled Answering Call Lights documents in part. Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. General Guidelines: 4. Be sure the call light is plugged in and functioning at all times . 7. Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call device for a dependent r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call device for a dependent resident (R3) who requires assistance from staff. This failure affected 1 out of 4 residents reviewed for resident call system. Findings include: On 03/03/25 at 12:10 pm, R3 was observed in R3's bathroom attempting to transfer from R3's wheelchair to the toilet. Surveyor questioned R3 regarding R3 asking staff to assist R3 to the toilet and R3 stated that R3 asked V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) for help to the bathroom and V12 informed R3, that R3's CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was on break. R3 then stated that R3 asked R3's nurse V22 (LPN) (R3's assigned nurse) for assistance and V22 informed R3 that V22 would let R3's CNA know when R3's CNA return from break. R3 then stated that R3 had been waiting 20-30 minutes when R3 decided to transfer herself to the toilet. Surveyor then instructed R3 to activate R3's bathroom call light device for assistance at 12:13 pm. Surveyor observed R3 pull R3's call light cord in R3's bathroom with the red light on R3's bathroom call device activated and flashing. At 12:33 pm, Surveyor and R3 remained in R3's bathroom awaiting staff assistance. Surveyor then observed R3's call device outside of R3's room door not functioning, not showing activated (without a flashing light or indicator of R3 signaling for help in R3's bathroom). On 03/03/25 at 12:33 pm, Surveyor pushed the call box button for help in R3's room and at 12:40 pm, V8 (Restorative Aide) responded to R3's call device button. Surveyor questioned V8 regarding R3's call device cord in R3's bathroom functioning and V8 stated that R3's call device cord was able to light up for assistance in R3's bathroom but was not activated and signaling in the hallway above R3's door. V8 stated that V8 did not know how long R3's call light was not functioning properly. On 03/03/25 at 12:47 pm, V23 (Maintenance Director) assessed R3's bathroom call device that was not alarming in the 2nd floor hallway and stated, It may just need a bulb. Surveyor and V23 both went to the 2nd floor nurses station to assess the call box at the nurse station and observed that R3's call light was not alarming at the nurses station either. V23 stated, I think replacing the bulb will make it sound and fix it. When V23 was asked regarding performing call device functioning checks for the facility V23 stated, I (V23) don't perform call device checks. The staff has to make me aware that the call device is not functioning. When V23 was asked regarding the importance of the call device for resident to be functioning in the residents rooms and bathrooms and V23 stated, To alert someone they need help in the bathroom. When V23 was asked regarding what could happen if a call device is not functioning and V23 stated, Various things. A resident could fall. On 03/04/25 at 10:35 am, V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) explained that it is the nursing staff responsibility to check to ensure that the call lights are functioning and if the call device is not functioning staff should notify the maintenance. V2 stated that if a resident call device is not functioning staff would not be able to tend to the resident and the resident can go into distress. V2 stated if a residents call device is not working and a resident who requires maximum assistance for toileting attempts to transfer themselves the resident can fall. R3's face sheet shows that R3 has a diagnosis included but not limited to: Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia without mention of fluctuations, spinal stenosis lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, osteoporosis with current pathological fracture vertebrae subsequent encounter for fracture, wedge compression fracture of third lumbar vertebra, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of the knee, and chronic kidney disease stage 3b. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] section C shows that R3 has a BIMS score of which indicates that R3 is cognitively intact. R3's MDS section GG shows that R3 requires substantial maximal assistance with toileting. R3's Call light Ability Screen dated 02/12/2025 documents in part, IV Conclusion: A. Resident is able to use the call light after the screening process. The facility's undated document titled Answering Call Lights documents in part. Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. General Guidelines: 4. Be sure the call light is plugged in and functioning at all times . 7. Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly. The facility's job description titled Maintenance Director documents in part: Summary: the primary purpose of the maintenance director is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the maintenance department in accordance with current, federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations governing our facility, and as may be directed by the administrator, to ensure that our facility is maintained in a safe and comfortable manner. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: . ensure that supplies, equipment, etcetera, are maintained to provide safe and comfortable environment. Make periodic rounds check equipment and ensure that necessary equipment is available and working properly.
Jan 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an overbed table was maintained in good working condition for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for accidents in the sample ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an overbed table was maintained in good working condition for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for accidents in the sample of four. This failure resulted in R2 sustaining a fall after the overbed table top she was leaning on detached from the table base. R2's incident report of 1/1/2025, documents in part, resident was sitting in the hallway by the nurses' station in 2E. She was leaning on the bedside table in front of her when the table broke. R2 fell on the floor hitting her right side. 1/21/2025, at 3:20 PM, V4 (LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) said I was in a resident room with a resident when R2 fell. After I got through with my patient, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) told me she (R2) fell; the fall was witnessed by a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and physical therapy. V4 told me R2 was lying with her head down on an overbed table, the table gave way, and resident fell to floor. V4 added, I went to look at the overbed table and the tabletop was not connected to the base. 1/22/2025, at 9:45 AM, V6 (Maintenance Director) I saw the table after the fact. The tabletop detached from the base. The screws were no longer attached to the tabletop, but it still attached to the base. Those tables are meant for food, not for naps or to lean on, they're just not strong enough. There was no preventative maintenance completed prior to the incident, I wasn't checking them unless it was brought to my attention. After the incident, I looked through most of the tables and threw out a whole bunch. Moving forward, I will probably do an in-service with nurses/CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) to inform them that these tables are not meant for napping, food only. 1/22/2025, at 12:17 PM, V8 (Restorative Aide) said when R2 fell, the resident may have been pushing and leaned over on the overbed table. I'm not sure how it happened, R2 fell, and the tabletop was no longer attached to the base. 1/22/2025, at 12:42 PM, V9 (Physical Therapy Assistant) said he heard a commotion but did not see R2 fall. V9 said I saw R2 on the floor; the overbed table was on the floor, the tabletop was no longer connected to the base. 1/22/2025, at 2:39 PM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) said R2 was sitting near the Nurses Station on 2East, resting her head on the overbed table, the table gave way, and R2 fell to the floor. V8 (Restorative Aide) and V9 (Physical Therapy Assistant) witnessed the fall as well.
Oct 2024 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that staf...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that staff are aware of required LALM (Low Air Loss Mattress) settings, failed to ensure that LALM checks were conducted, failed to ensure the LALM is on the correct setting/mode, failed to implement care plan interventions, failed to turn/reposition dependent residents every 2 hours, failed to ensure that wound assessments were accurate & staged correctly, failed to follow physician orders, and/or failed to ensure that treatments were administered as ordered for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for pressure ulcers. These failures resulted in R1 sustaining a (facility acquired) infected large sacrum decubitus which required surgical intervention and osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the sacrum/coccyx. These failures also resulted in R3's (stage 3) sacrum pressure ulcer declining to (stage 4). Findings include: 1. On 10/8/24 and 10/18/24, IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) received allegations that the facility failed to provide timely/adequate care to prevent stage 4 wounds. (R1) sustained a stage 4 infected wound that required surgery. R1's wound was down to the bone. R1's diagnoses include but not limited to obesity, generalized muscle weakness, hypertensive heart disease, and congestive heart failure. R1 was admitted [DATE] transferred to the hospital on 9/21/24 and did not return to the facility. R1's (12/22/23) risk for skin integrity impairment assessment determined a score of 12 (High Risk). R1's (9/13/24) functional assessment affirms resident is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and requires substantial/maximal assistance for rolling left and right (turning/repositioning). R1's care plan includes (12/25/23) Resident has alteration of bowel & bladder functioning due to weakness and decreased mobility. (9/16/24) MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage) sacrum area. Interventions: perform skin at risk assessment per facility protocol. Notify MD (Medical Doctor) of significant changes. Identify potential causative factors and eliminate/ resolve when possible. Keep skin clean and dry. Turn and reposition every 2 hours. On 10/28/24 at 1:05pm, surveyor inquired about R1's (facility acquired) skin integrity impairment, V2 (Director of Nursing) presented R1's (2/23/24) initial skin alteration record and (3/21/24) weekly skin alteration record and stated 2/23 is when the MASD started and 3/21 is when the MASD got resolved. Then, the 9/16 (2024) MASD was identified next. R1's (9/16/24) initial skin alteration record states sacrum MASD. 7 x 4.5 x 0cm (centimeters). Wound margins/edges: erythema (redness). Peri -wound area erythema, warm to touch, cracked/excoriation. No pain verbalized or observed during treatment. Assist to reposition totally dependent. Preventive measures daily skin checks during CNA routine rounds, reposition every 2 hours and PRN (as needed), moisture barrier, incontinence care. R1's POS (Physician Order Sheets) include (3/7/24) Air loss mattress checks for function every shift. Turn and reposition every 2 hours. (9/16/24) Medihoney apply to sacrum daily for excoriating/MASD. Cover with foam dressing. R1's (9/16/24) progress notes state wound care provided. R1's (September 2024) TAR (Treatment Administration Record) affirms Medihoney to sacrum was not documented (blank spaces noted) on 9/17, 9/18, 9/19, 9/20, and 9/21 (5 days). R1's (9/13/24) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 12 (cognition intact). R1's (9/21/24) ER (Emergency Room) progress notes state patient herself reports pain in her butt with pressure ulcer noted to her sacrum. Dressed with white substance and dressing on arrival [Medihoney which was prescribed - is not a white substance]. R1's (9/21/24) history and physical states patient presents to ER, patient is complaining of butt pain. Musculoskeletal: positive for back pain. Skin: Findings: Lesion present. Comments: Large sacral decubitus. Patient does endorse back pain near butt. Patient has large sacral decubitus. Differential diagnosis includes infection. R1's surgical consults state (9/24/24) wound appears likely to involve muscle and likely periostium (membranous tissue that covers the surface of bone). Recommend MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) to evaluate bone involvement. (9/26/24) Patient was noted to have sacral decubitus ulcer on admission with imaging/MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) confirming osteomyelitis of the sacrum and coccyx. Seen by surgery and plan for debridement today. R1's (10/3/24) discharge summary states wound cultures resulted pseudomonas (Bacteria) and VRE (Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci) faecium (Bacteria). On 10/28/24, surveyor requested credentials for the facility Wound Care Nurse. At 12:05pm, V1 (Administrator) stated that the facility employs two wound care Nurses (V8 & V10) however only presented V10's (Wound Care Nurse) wound care certification. Surveyor inquired when V10 was hired V1 responded He (V10) started last Monday so that would be on October 21st [7 days prior]. On 10/28/24 at 12:47pm, V1 stated that (V8/Wound Care Nurse) Does not have wound care certification and subsequently affirmed in writing that V8 does not possess the WCC (Wound Care Certified) certification. This employee (V8) was hired on September 18, 2023 (over 1 year ago). On 10/29/24 at 12:11pm, surveyor inquired who's responsible for wound care at the facility V11 (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) stated I troubleshoot for the facility just to do the dressing when the wound care is not here and affirmed that when V8 (Wound Care Nurse) is not working she (V11) provides wound care. Surveyor inquired when V8 works at the facility V11 responded Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Monday. Surveyor inquired if V11 is wound care certified V11 replied No, I'm not. Surveyor inquired about R1's cognitive and functional status V11 stated She is bedridden. She's incontinent both of urine and stool. She's alert 2-3, she can tell you change me, or I have poop. Surveyor inquired about R1's skin integrity impairment (prior to 9/21/24) hospital transfer V11 responded she (R1) has excoriation because she is incontinent of urine and stool. Surveyor inquired what causes excoriation V11 replied Urine and stool, urine is very corrosive and stool. Surveyor inquired what blank spaces on the TAR indicates V11 stated That they didn't do anything. Surveyor inquired if R1's Medihoney treatment/dressing was documented on the (August 2024 TAR) V11 reviewed R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Records) and responded Nobody sign it or it means it's not there 5 days, the blank one. The Nurses on the floor should be doing this. Surveyor advised that V11 affirmed that she (V11) and V8 were responsible for wound care (in prior statement) V11 replied I (V11) know, but if I cannot do it, I told them (assigned Nurses) that they have to do it. Surveyor inquired about potential harm to a resident if skin integrity impairments are not treated (as ordered) V11 stated Well, it will just deteriorate with the stool and urine there. You need to clean it and put another dressing. On 10/30/24 at 12:59pm, surveyor inquired about staff requirements for resident change in condition re: sacrum Decubitus V14 (Medical Director) stated I would expect that the staging is done properly, the dressing requirements are very clear in the wound care plan, and the offloading mechanisms such as the low air loss mattress is ordered, and as a Physician or in-house Nurse Practitioner, there's a rounding and we treat infection if there's infection. Surveyor inquired about potential harm to a resident if treatments are not administered as ordered V14 responded So there is potential for serious harm, the wound can become infected, and the resident can become septic. Surveyor inquired how osteomyelitis occurs V14 replied It is a progression of any skin or soft tissue infection or trauma, the deeper the wound goes there's muscle and facia. The deeper the wound goes; it can involve the bone and it can be an infection which is osteomyelitis. On 10/30/24 at 1:32pm, V13 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) affirmed that she was assigned to R1 on 9/21/24. Surveyor inquired about R1's sacrum skin integrity impairment V13 stated That I'm not too familiar with it because I know that someone is there doing wound care [R1's TAR affirms that wound care was not documented for 5 days]. I'm not sure what kind of wound that (R1) had. V13 affirmed that V15 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) was also assigned to R1 on 9/21/24. On 10/30/24 at 2:15pm, surveyor inquired about R1's sacrum wound, V15 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated When I changed her, (R1) had like a patch on her butt and we (staff) usually put the zinc on it, it was just red. Surveyor inquired if R1 reported pain V15 replied She might say that she is uncomfortable, so we just turn her side to side. 2. R3's diagnoses include Parkinson's disease and reduced mobility. R3's (9/3/24) risk for skin integrity impairment assessment determined a score of 12 (high risk). R3's (10/3/24) functional assessment affirms resident is dependent on staff for rolling left and right. R3's (4/4/24) initial skin alteration record (admission) includes (stage 3) sacrum pressure ulcer. R3's (10/24/24) weekly skin alteration record includes (stage 4) sacrum pressure ulcer [therefore wound declined]. R3's POS includes (4/5/24) turning and repositioning every 2 hours. (4/9/24) air loss mattress check function every shift. (7/23/34) Calcium Alginate apply to sacral daily for stage 4 pressure ulcer after cleansing with NSS (Normal Saline Solution) and cover with dry dressing. R3's care plan includes (4/5/24) high risk for alteration in skin integrity, Interventions: identify potential causative factors and eliminate/resolve when possible. LALM (Low Air Loss Mattress) check for function every shift. On 10/23/24 at 3:44pm, R3 was lying on a LALM, and the setting was on static mode (therefore providing a firm surface). Surveyor inquired about R3's current LALM settings V5 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated Usually it's preset. Surveyor inquired what static mode means V5 responded I'm not familiar with this machine. R3 was noted to be lying on a white flat sheet, a thick blue folded sheet (8 layers), and folded bath blanket (4 layers). V5 counted the layers beneath R3 (as requested) and affirmed that there were 13 excluding the brief (therefore a total of 14 layers placed beneath the buttocks). Surveyor relayed concerns with all the linens placed between R3 and the LALM V5 replied It should only be one, otherwise this one (LALM) won't work. V5 then proceeded to cover R3 with the blanket and left the room, V5 did not remove any of the sheets and/or blanket beneath R3 at this time. R3's (October 2024) TAR affirms for low air loss mattress checks (blank entries) were noted on 10/5, 10/6, 10/8, 10/19, 10/23, 10/24, 10/25, and 10/27. For Calcium Alginate treatments 9 is documented on 10/6, 10/14, 10/17, 10/20 and 10/28. For turning/repositioning every 2 hours blank spaces were noted on 10/3, 10/5, 10/6, 10/7, 10/8, 10/9, 10/19, 10/20, 10/23, 10/24, 10/25, 10/27 and 10/28. On 10/29/24 at 12:45pm, surveyor inquired why 9 was documented on R3's (October 2024) TAR, V11 (ADON) stated I don't know why they (Nurses) do this number nine. 10/6 (2024) it says done by wound nurse (referring to R3's progress notes). 10/8 says done by wound nurse. 10/14 says done by wound nurse. 10/20 is done by wound nurse. 10/24 will be done by wound nurse. Surveyor inquired if Nurses should be charting wound care for other staff V11 responded No, they have to chart when they are doing it, the dressing and everything. Surveyor inquired what mode the LALM should be in while a resident is lying in bed V11 replied The mattress should just stay in alternating because that is where the cell is alternating, go up and go down the bed, so the patient should be floating in the mattress. Surveyor inquired if several linen layers were placed under R3's buttocks while lying on a LALM is the mattress effective V11 stated No, it has to be one layer only because the air can go to the patients skin. 3. R4's diagnoses include Parkinson's disease, generalized muscle weakness, and protein calorie malnutrition. R4's (10/12/24) Braden determined a score of 11 (high risk). R4's (9/13/24) initial skin alteration record was signed on 9/15/24 (2 days after assessment). Site: Abdomen. Description: Sacral wound stage 4 [the description is incongruent with the site]. Preventive measures: redistribution mattress. R4's (10/12/24) re-admission skin alteration record states site: abdomen. Description: sacral wound stage 4. [again, the description is incongruent with the site]. R4's (10/24/24) weekly skin alteration record states sacrum stage 3 [therefore back staged]. R4's (9/13/24) POS states cleanse sacral wound with NS, apply Alginate, cover with dry dressing daily and as needed. R4's (October 2024) TAR affirms sacral treatment was not documented (blank entries) on 10/4, 10/5, 10/6, 10/7, 10/8, 10/9, 10/10, 10/11, 10/12, 10/15, 10/17, 10/18, 10/19, and 10/22. Low air loss mattress checks were initiated on 10/24 (1.5 months after implementation). On 10/23/24 at 3:55pm, inquired if R4 has a wound V6 (RN) stated It's on the back, he (R4) was just turned by the CNA. R4's (10/15/24) BIMS determined a score of 9 (moderate impairment). On 10/23/24 at 3:57pm, surveyor inquired if R4's dressing was changed today R4 replied Uh um nodded his head no and affirmed that it was not. R4 was lying atop of a LALM, surveyor inquired about the current settings on R4's LALM, V6 (RN) stated Unfortunately I (V6) was not told as to what setting he (R4) should be in. Right now, the setting is at 250 (pounds) I wound say however R4 appeared to be about half that weight. Surveyor inquired how much R4 weighs R4 responded 122 pounds. Surveyor requested to inspect R4 at this time. V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant) removed R4's incontinence brief which was dry however a dressing was not present and white cream was noted on the open sacral wound. Surveyor inquired about R4's exposed wound, V6 replied I see a wound on the tailbone, it is an open wound. Surveyor inquired what was on R4's (stage 4) sacrum wound V6 stated Zinc oxide. Surveyor inquired if a dressing was supposed to be on R4's sacrum V6 responded Yes. On 10/28/24 at 10:36am, surveyor inquired why R4's initial wound assessment states stage 4 and the current wound assessment states stage 3, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated Good question. Surveyor inquired about staging wounds, V2 responded When staging from a stage 4 going to a stage 3, if the wound is getting better by the week-by-week assessment of the wound nurse. Surveyor inquired if back staging of wounds is appropriate V2 replied Don't we indicate if its progressing or getting better? Surveyor inquired if V2 was familiar with staging wounds V2 stated No. [The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel advises against reverse staging of pressure ulcers, or bedsores, because it doesn't accurately reflect the healing process]. On 10/29/24 at 1:07pm, surveyor inquired why R4's initial sacral wound assessment (dated 9/13/24) was documented/signed on 9/15 (3 days after admission). V11 (ADON) stated (R4) was admitted on the 12th and the assessment was done the next day. When you do it on the day it will give you the day that you did the assessment. If I do the assessment today, I have to sign the assessment for today. Surveyor inquired about concerns with R4's (9/13/24) initial wound assessment, V11 responded The site says abdomen how can you put abdomen when the site is sacrum. 4. R2's diagnoses include dementia, type II diabetes mellitus, protein calorie malnutrition, and generalized muscle weakness. R2's (10/12/24) risk for skin integrity impairment assessment determined a score of 10 (high risk). R2's (10/12/24) initial skin alteration record (admission) includes left buttock stage 4 pressure ulcer and sacrum MASD. R2's (10/24/24) weekly skin alteration record includes sacrum stage 4 [incongruent with the initial assessment] and buttocks MASD [incongruent with the initial assessment]. On 10/29/24 at 12:28pm, V11 (ADON) affirmed that (V8/Wound Care Nurse) documented R2's (10/12/24) and (10/24/24) wound assessments. Surveyor inquired why R2's (10/12/24) initial wound assessment includes left buttock stage 4 (black/eschar tissue) however the (10/24/24) assessment (conducted 12 days later) states buttocks MASD, V11 stated (R2) cannot have MASD because (R2) is not eating. That cannot be, you cannot come back and change that to MASD. Stage 4 cannot go back to MASD. The documentation was not entered properly. R2's (10/23/24) POS states cleanse sacral 1/2 strength Dakins, pat dry, apply metrocream, cover with dry dressing daily. R2's (October 2024) TAR affirms the sacral treatment was not documented (blank entry) on 10/26/24. The (7/2023) low air loss mattress policy states the purpose is to provide features of a mattress support system that provides a flow of air to assist in managing the heat and humidity of the skin. Low air loss mattresses will be utilized for residents with stage III and IV pressure ulcers of the trunk as well as residents with multiple stage II pressure ulcers. The low air loss mattress will be checked on a regular basis to ensure that all cells of the mattress are functioning appropriately. Any resident on a low air loss mattress will have a single non-fitted sheet which may be used for assistance with repositioning. The management of wounds policy (revised 12/31/23) states it is the policy of this facility to manage tissue load and improve tissue tolerance to pressure, friction, and shearing forces. This will be accomplished through the use of appropriate positioning practices, positioning devices, and support services. It is the policy of this facility to treat the wound according to the guidelines of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, and current standards of clinical practice. According to the AHRQ, Care of the ulcer itself involves debridement of necrotic tissue, cleansing of the wound at initial examination and at each dressing change, and using a dressing that keeps the ulcer bed continuously moist but the surrounding intact skin dry. The following policies and procedures will be utilized: wound cleansing policy and procedure and wound dressing policy and procedure.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to follow policy procedures and failed to ensure that the Physician, family and/or responsible parties were notified of change in condition f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to follow policy procedures and failed to ensure that the Physician, family and/or responsible parties were notified of change in condition for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 10/18/24, IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) received allegations that the family was not notified of R1's infected (stage 4) sacral wound. R1's (9/16/24) progress notes state Nurse on duty observed changes in resident skin integrity, right away notified wound nurse. Head to toe skin assessment performed. Notably sacrum MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage) measured in (7 x 4.5 x 0). Family member at bedside. All responsible parties aware. On 10/23/24 at 1:14pm, surveyor inquired if V3 (Family) was notified by the facility of R1's skin integrity impairment V3 stated (R1) was sent to the hospital from the facility, I think like in September. The facility staff never even told me about the bed sores and affirmed an infected pressure ulcer was identified by hospital staff. R1's (9/21/24) progress notes state writer made MD (Medical Doctor) aware of resident being lethargic and having altered mental status [change in skin integrity was excluded]. MD ordered for resident to be sent out to Hospital [V13/Agency Licensed Practical Nurse entered the progress note]. R1's (9/21/24) hospital history and physical states patient has large sacral decubitus. Differential diagnosis includes infection. R1's (9/26/24) surgical consult states patient was noted to have sacral decubitus ulcer on admission with imaging/MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) confirming osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the sacrum and coccyx. On 10/30/24 at 1:32pm, surveyor inquired about R1's sacrum skin integrity impairment V13 stated I'm not too familiar with it because I know that someone is there doing wound care. I'm not sure what kind of wound that she had. The change in resident's condition policy (revised September 18, 2023) states our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's condition and/or status. The Nurse will notify the resident's attending physician when: there is a significant change in the resident's physical status. There is a need to alter the resident's treatment significantly. Deems necessary or appropriate in the best interest of the resident. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, the Nurse will notify the resident's representative when: there is a significant change in the resident's physical condition. The Nurse will record in the resident's medical record any changes in the resident's medical condition or status.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that care plans are acc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that care plans are accurate, and/or failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans include required problems/focus and/or approaches/interventions for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) in the sample. Findings include: 1. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnoses include obesity and generalized muscle weakness. R1's (12/22/23) risk assessment for skin integrity impairment determined a score of 12 (High Risk). R1's (9/13/24) functional assessment affirms resident is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and requires substantial/maximal assistance for rolling left and right (turning/repositioning), sit to stand and toilet transfer were not applicable. On 10/29/24 at 12:11pm, surveyor inquired about R1's functional status, V11 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated She is bedridden, we have to mechanical lift her. R1's comprehensive care plan (received 10/24/24) states (12/24/23) resident is at moderate risk for alteration in skin integrity due to comorbidities [R1 is high risk]. ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care (re: mechanical lift transfer) is excluded. On 10/29/24 at 2:33pm, surveyor inquired about the requirements for developing comprehensive care plans, V12 (MDS/Minimum Data Set) Coordinator stated When a patient is admitted we do an interim care plan with the risk factors. After that then we do the comprehensive care plan. When we do the MDS assessment, we have to develop comprehensive care plan. The care plan will be completed within 15 to 21 days from the completion of the MDS assessment, which is 14 day plus 7. Surveyor inquired what resident care plans are based on, V12 responded First of all need to do an assessment, physical assessment of the patient, a comprehensive of their physical functional ability, their continence, nutritional status. Surveyor inquired if dependent residents should have an ADL care plan, V12 replied So there's a dependent patient that's usually triggered with developing pressure ulcers, or contractures. Surveyor inquired if the patient is obese and immobile what should be care planned, V12 stated The immobility is the risk factor that we are care planning. Surveyor inquired about R1's functional status, V12 responded I would have to base my answer to the MDS because I don't remember she was here. Her functional status I could see that she's dependent in bed mobility and transfer, she's not walking. The only thing she can do is rolling in the bed with substantial assist, but the rest are total care. Surveyor inquired about R1's moderate risk for skin breakdown (not high - as warranted) V12 replied I see it says moderate risk for alteration in skin integrity and it was noted that she has MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage) on the sacral area on 9/16 [referring to R1's care plan]. Usually, the term that we are using is that they are at risk. There's a (risk for skin integrity impairment) assessment and it will let you know what the score is, let me see here. The July 21 (2024) says its 13, so that is high risk [Referring to R1's latest risk assessment for skin integrity impairment]. Surveyor inquired if ADL care and/or required mechanical lift transfer is on R1's care plan, V12 stated The only ADL I can see here is turn and reposition. 2. R2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's diagnoses include dementia and generalized muscle weakness. R2's (10/16/24) functional assessment affirms resident is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and chair/bed to chair transfer. R2's care plan includes ADL self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance and limited mobility. Toileting: dependent. Interventions: ensure that resident is properly assisted by staff as indicated during ADLs to ensure safety at all times [Interventions exclude required toileting and/or transfer needs]. On 10/29/24 at 3:00pm, surveyor inquired if R2's care plan includes incontinence care, V12 (MDS Coordinator) stated I could see a care plan for the catheter, but I don't see a separate care plan for the bowel incontinence. It's incorporated in the pressure ulcer risks. R2 is incontinent. 3. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's diagnoses include Parkinson's disease and reduced mobility. R3's (10/3/24) functional assessment affirms resident is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. R3's (4/5/24) care plan includes ADL self-care performance deficit related to disease process however, interventions exclude incontinence care and/or toileting needs. On 10/29/24 at 3:03pm, surveyor inquired if R3's care plan includes incontinence care, V12 (MDS Coordinator) stated It's not a separate care plan, its incorporated in the risk for skin breakdown. Surveyor inquired what interventions were included, V12 responded I would say keep clean and dry, use lotion, check and change. Surveyor relayed concerns with facility care plans excluding specific problems and required interventions, so staff know how to care for each resident. A CNA searching for incontinence care needs is likely not checking the risk for skin breakdown care plan for toileting needs. V12 replied We lost our Restorative Nurse about 2 weeks ago but I'm putting in the check [NAME] and will be placing it at the Nurse's station. Because I see that that's a problem when I come in here. 4. R4 was admitted [DATE]. R4's diagnoses include Parkinson's disease and generalized muscle weakness. R4's (9/13/24) initial skin assessment includes a sacral (stage 4) pressure ulcer. On 10/29/24 at 1:07pm, surveyor inquired if preventive interventions were implemented (on admission) for R4's stage 4 wound, V11 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated Yes, air loss mattress. Surveyor inquired when R4's air loss mattress was implemented V11 responded Next day because he came in late in the afternoon. R4's (9/13/24) care plan states resident has an actual alteration in skin integrity related to sacral wound pressure ulcer [Interventions exclude use of low air loss mattress]. On 10/30/24 at 3:15pm, surveyor inquired if R4's care plan includes use of air loss mattress and/or interventions required for use, V12 (MDS Coordinator) stated I don't see that in the care plan. The low air loss mattress was ordered, it was in place, but I don't' see it in the care plan. The care plan policy (reviewed 1/1/24) states a written, individualized plan of care will be completed by the Interdisciplinary Care Team within 14 days of admission and revised every 90 days or more frequently if a change of status and/or condition warrants an interim review and update. A problem list calls for identification of problems that require intervention in order to maintain or achieve quality of life for the resident involved. Each discipline is responsible for completion and presentation to the Care Team a Care Plan, which identified problems suggests goals, and suggests approaches to reaching the goals.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that competent nursing staff are available to meet the needs for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for wound care. T...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that competent nursing staff are available to meet the needs for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for wound care. The facility failed to ensure that the Wound Care Nurse is certified, failed to ensure that wound assessments are accurate, failed to stage wounds correctly, failed to ensure that all Nursing staff are aware of LALM (Low Air Loss Mattress) use requirements, failed to in-service all Nursing staff for LALM use, failed to follow physician orders, failed to ensure that treatment administration is documented on the TAR (Treatment Administration Record), failed to administer treatments as ordered, and failed to follow policy procedures. Findings include: 1. R1 was transferred from the facility to the hospital on 9/21/24. On 10/28/24 at 1:05pm, surveyor inquired about R1's (facility acquired) skin integrity impairment, V2 (Director of Nursing) presented R1's (2/23/34) initial skin alteration record and (3/21/24) weekly skin alteration record and stated 2/23 is when the MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage) started and 3/21 is when the MASD got resolved. Then, the 9/16 (2024) MASD was identified next. R1's (9/16/24) initial skin alteration record affirms sacrum MASD was documented however R1's (9/21/24) hospital history and physical (5 days later) states patient has large sacral decubitus [therefore incongruent with R1's facility assessment]. R1's (9/16/24) POS (Physician Order Sheets) include Medihoney apply to sacrum daily for excoriating/MASD. Cover with foam dressing however R1's (9/21/24) ER (Emergency Room) progress notes state pressure ulcer noted to (R1) sacrum dressed with white substance and dressing on arrival [Medihoney which was prescribed - is not a white substance]. On 10/28/24, surveyor requested credentials for the facility Wound Care Nurse. At 12:05pm, V1 (Administrator) stated that the facility employs two wound care Nurses (V8, V10) however only presented V10's (Wound Care Nurse) wound care certification. Surveyor inquired when V10 was hired V1 responded (V10) started last Monday so that would be on October 21st [7 days prior]. On 10/28/24 at 12:47pm, V1 stated that (V8/Wound Care Nurse) Does not have wound care certification and subsequently affirmed in writing that V8 does not possess the WCC (Wound Care Certified) certification. This employee (V8) was hired on September 18, 2023 (over 1 year ago). On 10/29/24 at 12:11pm, surveyor inquired who's responsible for wound care at the facility V11 (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) stated I troubleshoot for the facility just to do the dressing when the wound care is not here and affirmed that when V8 (Wound Care Nurse) is not working she (V11) provides wound care. Surveyor inquired when V8 works at the facility V11 responded Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Monday. Surveyor inquired if V11 is wound care certified V11 replied No, I'm not. Surveyor inquired about R1's skin integrity impairment (prior to 9/21/24) hospital transfer V11 stated (R1) has excoriation. Surveyor inquired what blank spaces on the TAR indicates, V11 responded That they didn't do anything. Surveyor inquired if R1's Medihoney treatment/dressing was documented on the (August 2024 TAR) V11 reviewed R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Records) and responded Nobody sign it or it means it's not there, 5 days, the blank one. The Nurses on the floor should be doing this. Surveyor advised that V11 affirmed that she (V11) and V8 were responsible for wound care (in prior statement) V11 replied I know, but if I cannot do it, I told them (assigned Nurses) that they have to do it. 2. On 10/23/24 at 3:44pm, R3 was lying on a (Low Air Loss Mattress) LALM, and the setting was on static mode (therefore providing a firm surface). Surveyor inquired about R3's current LALM settings, V5 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated Usually it's preset. Surveyor inquired what static mode means, V5 responded I'm not familiar with this machine. R3 was noted to be lying on a white flat sheet, a thick blue folded sheet (8 layers), and folded bath blanket (4 layers). V5 counted the layers beneath R3 (as requested) and affirmed that there were 13 excluding the brief (therefore a total of 14 layers placed beneath the buttocks). Surveyor relayed concerns with all the linens placed between R3 and the LALM, V5 replied It should only be one, otherwise this one (LALM) won't work. V5 then proceeded to cover R3 with the blanket and left the room, V5 did not remove any of the sheets and/or blanket beneath R3 at this time. R3's (October 2024) TAR affirms for low air loss mattress checks (blank entries) were noted on 10/5, 10/6, 10/8, 10/19, 10/23, 10/24, 10/25, and 10/27. For Calcium Alginate treatments 9 (see progress note) is documented on 10/6, 10/14, 10/17, 10/20 and 10/28. For turning/ repositioning every 2 hours blank spaces were noted on 10/3, 10/5, 10/6, 10/7, 10/8, 10/9, 10/19, 10/20, 10/23, 10/24, 10/25, 10/27 and 10/28. On 10/29/24 at 12:45pm, surveyor inquired why 9 was documented on R3's (October 2024) TAR, V11 (ADON) stated I don't know why they (Nurses) do this number nine. 10/6 (2024) it says done by wound nurse (referring to R3's progress notes). 10/8 says done by wound nurse. 10/14 says done by wound nurse. 10/20 is done by wound nurse. 10/24 will be done by wound nurse. Surveyor inquired if Nurses should be charting wound care for other staff, V11 responded No, they have to chart when they are doing it, the dressing and everything. Surveyor inquired what mode the LALM should be in while a resident is lying in bed V11 replied The mattress should just stay in alternating because that is where the cell is alternating, go up and go down the bed, so the patient should be floating in the mattress. Surveyor inquired if several linen layers were placed under R3's buttocks while lying on a LALM, is the mattress effective. V11 stated No, it has to be one layer only because the air can go to the patients skin. Surveyor inquired if in-services for LALM were provided to staff, V11 stated Oh yeah, every day when I make rounds I say only 1 linen, 1 linen because you know it should be one sheet only. We do in-services quarterly for like an air mattress because we have a agency aide or something like that. If I have in-service, I have a guest binder for them (Agency Staff). Surveyor requested the LALM in-services at this time. The (9/20/24) Air Mattress in-service sign in sheet was endorsed by 7 staff and the (10/11/24) Air Loss Mattress in-service sign in sheet was endorsed by 8 staff therefore a total of 15 staff [additional Air Loss Mattress in-services were conducted - after surveyor inquiry]. On 10/30/24, V1 (Administrator) presented the employee roster and affirmed that a total 66 Nurses and CNAs are employed by the facility (excluding agency staff). 3. R4's (9/13/24) initial skin alteration record was signed on 9/15/24 (2 days after assessment). Site: Abdomen. Description: Sacral wound stage 4 [the description is incongruent with the site]. Preventive measures: redistribution mattress. R4's (9/13/24) POS states cleanse sacral wound with NS, apply Alginate, cover with dry dressing daily and as needed. R4's (October 2024) TAR affirms sacral treatment was not documented (blank entries) on 10/4, 10/5, 10/6, 10/7, 10/8, 10/9, 10/10, 10/11, 10/12, 10/15, 10/17, 10/18, 10/19, and 10/22. Low air loss mattress checks were initiated on 10/24 (1.5 months after implementation). On 10/23/24 at 3:55pm, inquired if R4 has a wound V6 (RN) stated It's on the back, he (R4) was just turned by the CNA. R4's (10/15/24) BIMS determined a score of 9 (moderate impairment). On 10/23/24 at 3:57pm, surveyor inquired if R4's dressing was changed today R4 replied Uh um nodded his head no and affirmed it was not. R4 was lying atop of a LALM, surveyor inquired about the current settings on R4's LALM, V6 (RN) stated Unfortunately I (V6) was not told as to what setting (R4) should be in. Right now, the setting is at 250 (pounds) I wound say however R4 appeared to be about half that weight. Surveyor inquired how much R4 weighs, R4 responded 122 pounds. Surveyor requested to inspect R4 at this time. V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant) removed R4's incontinence brief which was dry however a dressing was not present and white cream was noted on the open sacral wound. Surveyor inquired about R4's exposed wound, V6 replied I see a wound on the tailbone, it is an open wound. Surveyor inquired what was on R4's (stage 4) sacrum wound, V6 stated Zinc oxide. Surveyor inquired if a dressing was supposed to be on R4's sacrum, V6 responded Yes. On 10/28/24 at 10:36am, surveyor inquired why R4's initial wound assessment states stage 4 and the current wound assessment states stage 3 (therefore back staging the wound), V2 (Director of Nursing) stated Good question. Surveyor inquired about staging wounds V2 responded When staging from a stage 4 going to a stage 3, if the wound is getting better by the week-by-week assessment of the wound nurse. Surveyor inquired if back staging of wounds is appropriate, V2 replied Don't we indicate if its progressing or getting better? Surveyor inquired if V2 was familiar with staging wounds V2 stated No. [The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel advises against reverse staging of pressure ulcers, or bedsores, because it doesn't accurately reflect the healing process]. On 10/29/24 at 1:07pm, surveyor inquired why R4's initial sacral wound assessment (dated 9/13/24) was documented/signed on 9/15 (3 days after admission). V11 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated (R4) was admitted on the 12th and the assessment was done the next day. When you do it on the day it will give you the day that you did the assessment. If I do the assessment today, I have to sign the assessment for today. Surveyor inquired about concerns with R4's (9/13/24) initial wound assessment, V11 responded The site says abdomen how can you put abdomen when the site is sacrum. 4. R2's (10/12/24) initial skin alteration record (admission) includes left buttock stage 4 pressure ulcer and sacrum MASD. R2's (10/24/24) current skin alteration record includes sacrum stage 4 (left buttock was stated on the initial assessment) and buttocks MASD (sacrum MASD was stated on the initial assessment). On 10/29/24 at 12:28pm, V11 (ADON) affirmed that (V8/Wound Care Nurse) documented R2's (10/12/24) and (10/24/24) wound assessments. Surveyor inquired why R2's (10/12/24) initial wound assessment includes left buttock stage 4 (black/eschar tissue) however the (10/24/24) assessment (conducted 12 days later) states buttocks MASD. V11 stated She (R2) cannot have MASD because she (R2) is not eating. That cannot be, you cannot come back and change that to MASD. Stage 4 cannot go back to MASD. The documentation was not entered properly. R2's (10/23/24) POS states cleanse sacral 1/2 strength Dakins, pat dry, apply metrocream, cover with dry dressing daily. R2's (October 2024) TAR affirms the sacral treatment was not documented (blank entry) on 10/26/24. The management of wounds policy (revised 12/31/23) states it is the policy of this facility to manage tissue load and improve tissue tolerance to pressure, friction, and shearing forces. This will be accomplished through the use of appropriate positioning practices, positioning devices, and support services. It is the policy of this facility to treat the wound according to the guidelines of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, and current standards of clinical practice. According to the AHRQ, Care of the ulcer itself involves debridement of necrotic tissue, cleansing of the wound at initial examination and at each dressing change, and using a dressing that keeps the ulcer bed continuously moist but the surrounding intact skin dry. The following policies and procedures will be utilized: wound cleansing policy and procedure and wound dressing policy and procedure. The (7/2023) low air loss mattress policy states the purpose is to provide features of a mattress support system that provides a flow of air to assist in managing the heat and humidity of the skin. Low air loss mattresses will be utilized for residents with stage III and IV pressure ulcers of the trunk as well as residents with multiple stage II pressure ulcers. The low air loss mattress will be checked on a regular basis to ensure that all cells of the mattress are functioning appropriately. Any resident on a low air loss mattress will have a single non-fitted sheet which may be used for assistance with repositioning.
Jul 2024 14 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's call light was within reach for one resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's call light was within reach for one resident (R94), in the sample of 24. Findings include: R94's medical record (Face Sheet) documents R94 is an [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: Encephalopathy, Abnormalities of gait and mobility, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Muscle weakness. R94's MDS (Minimum Data Set-6/29/2024) documents a BIMS score (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 12 (moderately impaired). On 07/16/24 at 11:21 AM, R94 was observed sitting up in chair in resident's room. R94's call light was noted hanging over side of R94's nightstand, not within resident's reach. R94 said he did know where his call light was. On 07/16/24 at 11:23 AM, V9 (LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R94's call light was not within resident's reach. V9 added call lights should be within a resident's reach. On 07/18/24 at 10:15 AM, V3 (DON-Director of Nursing) stated call lights should be within a resident's reach in case a resident needs something. R94's care plan potential risk for falls (created 5/27/2024, revised 5/30/2024) documents in part under Interventions: Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance. R94's usual function care plan (created/revised 6/2/2024) documents in part under interventions: Keep call light within reach. Facility Call Light policy (Revised 1/1/2022) documents: Objective 1. To respond to resident's requests and need. Policy does not reference where call light should be located (within resident's reach).
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have an order for a code status for one resident (R153) out of a total sample of 24 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Findings ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have an order for a code status for one resident (R153) out of a total sample of 24 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: On 7/16/2024 at 2:53 PM, R153 stated, wanting to be resuscitated (Full Code) if [R153] had a change in condition. On 7/16/2024 at 2:54 PM, V8 (Nurse) stated R153 is Full Code if there are no DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) papers in the paper chart. If there are no DNR papers in the chart, then V8 will check the computer. V8 stated I think [R153] is Full Code. R153's admission Record does not document a code status under the section Advance Directive. R153's Order Summary Report does not contain an order for a code status. R153's care plan did not contain a code status. R153's admission Summary progress note dated 7/12/2024 8:47 PM documents in part that R153 is Full Code. Surveyor reviewed R153's orders on 7/17/2024 at 10:09 AM and 11:42 AM. R153 remained without an order for a code status. On 7/17/2024 at 12:15 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated staff assess a resident's code status upon admission. Staff will consult with the resident about their wishes and if the resident is not decisional, staff will consult with the hospital or family representative or guardian. The resident's code status will show on their profile in the electronic medical records. Surveyor showed V3 R153's profile on the laptop. No code status listed. V3 stated R153 is supposed to have a code status. Facility's 1/15/13 Policy and Procedure Advance Directives document in part: The facility provides to all residents the right to accept or refuse medical and surgical treatment, and at the resident's option, formulate an advance directive. The resident choice of advance directive will be developed into the resident's plan of care.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided in a timely mann...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided in a timely manner for 2 (R10 and R50) residents who needed assistance with toileting; and failed to ensure personal hygiene assistance was provided for 1 resident (R51) after returning from the hospital. This failure affected 3 residents (R10, R50, R51) reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) care in a sample of 24. The findings include: 1. R10's face sheet showed admission date on 8/4/2023 with diagnoses not limited to Unilateral primary osteoarthritis right knee, Chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, Hypothyroidism, Personal history of transient ischemic attack (tia), and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, Presence of cardiac pacemaker, Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, Other asthma, Muscle wasting and atrophy, Insomnia, Unspecified atrial fibrillation, Hyperlipidemia, Unspecified glaucoma, Carpal tunnel syndrome left upper limb, Unspecified fall, Cellulitis, Cutaneous-vesicostomy status, Unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, Pain in right knee, Unspecified superficial injury of right knee, Fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur. 07/16/24 at 12:02 pm, R10 Observed lying in bed, alert and verbally responsive, Spanish speaking but can speak simple English. Stated she wanted to be changed. Surveyor conducted incontinence care observation with V10 (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant / CNA), R10 incontinence brief was heavily soiled with urine. Incontinence care provided. V10 said R10 was last changed around 8am. At 12:35 pm, V11 (CNA) Spanish speaking interpreter requested to R10's room. V11 said that R10 stated she was last changed at 5am was not change for 7 hours and she has a lot of urine in her incontinence brief. V11 said that R10 has been calling the staff to be changed but was not attended to. MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/20/2024 showed R10's cognition was intact. She needed supervision / touching assistance with eating; Partial / moderate assistance with oral and personal hygiene, upper body dressing; Dependent with toileting hygiene; Substantial / maximal assistance with shower / bathe self, lower body dressing, chair / bed, and toilet transfer. MDS showed R10 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. 2. R50's face sheet showed admission date on 4/22/2021 with diagnoses not limited to Chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, Paranoid personality disorder, Other Alzheimer's disease, Fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, Unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, Acute embolism and thrombosis of other specified veins, Major depressive disorder, Acute posthemorrhagic anemia, Hyperlipidemia, Essential (primary) hypertension, Vitamin D deficiency, Elevated white blood cell count, Anemia, Other pulmonary embolism with acute cor pulmonale, Contusion of left hip, Chronic kidney disease, Aphasia, Unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, Unspecified fall, Personal history of covid-19, Unspecified dementia. At 12:10 pm, Observed R50 lying in bed, alert with confusion, with strong odor of urine. V10 stated R50 was last changed around 8am. Surveyor requested V10 to check R50. Surveyor observed incontinence care with V10, R50's incontinence brief was soiled with urine. On 7/18/24 at 10:23 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing / DON) said staff is expected to check and change or provide incontinence care to resident at least every 2 hours and as needed. Stated incontinence care should be done timely and promptly to prevent pressure ulcer or skin breakdown. MDS dated [DATE] showed R50's cognition was severely impaired. She needed total assistance / dependent with eating, oral, personal and toileting hygiene, shower / bathe self, upper and lower body dressing, and chair / bed transfer. MDS showed R50 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Facility's policy for bowel and bladder incontinence dated 1/20/24 documented in part: to prevent skin breakdown. Facility's policy for perineal care dated 12/2013 documented in part: to cleanse the perineum and to prevent infection and odors. 3. R51's 6/19/2024 Minimum Data Set Assessment documents in part that R51 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and upper/lower body dressing. R51's Clinical Census documents in part a hospital leave on 7/09/2024. R51 returned to the facility on 7/15/2024. On 7/16/2024 at 11:21 AM, V29 (R51's family member) stated R51 came back from the hospital last night. V29 stated when [V29] arrived at the facility to check on R51 this morning, R51 was not settled in bed and still had multiple sheets from the hospital and ambulance under R51. V29 stated, calling the facility multiple times last night to speak with the nurse that received R51 from the hospital but did not get a return call. V29 stated the CNA (V30, Certified Nurse Assistant) that was just here just changed [R51]. No one changed [R51] until right now. [V30] just got rid of the sheets that were brought from the hospital. On 7/16/2024 at 11:50 AM, V30 stated I cleaned [R51]. I took the hospital stuff off [R51] and hospital gown off [R51]. V30 stated there were extra sheets and an incontinence pad under R51. On 7/17/2024 at 10:34 AM, V16 (CNA) stated upon a resident arriving to the facility, staff are supposed to introduce themselves to the resident and orient them to their room. Staff are to remove all the ambulance and hospital sheets and dress the resident. Staff are supposed to make sure the resident is comfortable and has everything they need. V16 stated this is done within 10-15 minutes of admission. V16 stated it is not acceptable to leave the resident with the hospital and ambulance transfer sheets overnight. Facility's 11/02/2020 Policy on Resident Rights, Respect & Dignity documents in part that the resident has a right to a dignified existence. Facility's undated Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) policy documents in part: To preserve ADL function, promote independence, and increase self-esteem and dignity.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to re-evaluate the necessity of a resident's (R83) enteral feeding for one out of a total sample of 24 residents reviewed for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to re-evaluate the necessity of a resident's (R83) enteral feeding for one out of a total sample of 24 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: R83's admission Record documents in part medical diagnoses of adult failure to thrive (onset 3/05/2024), gastroparesis (onset 12/16/2023), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (onset 3/05/2024), and encounter for attention to gastrostomy (onset 3/05/2024). R83's Order Summary Report documents in part orders for Low concentrated sweets (LCS) diet Mechanical Soft texture, Thin Liquid consistency, No Added Salt, pleasure feed only (active since 3/29/2024). R83 also had an order for Enteral tube feeding Glucerna 1.2 at 65 [milliliter/hour] continuous [every] shift (active 6/10/2024) and Enteral tube [flush] 150 [milliliter] [three times] a day including medication administration three times a day for hydration (active 3/29/2024). R83's medications varied between oral and enteral feed administration. On 7/17/2024 at 8:55 AM, R83 received enteral feed of Glucerna 1.2 at 65 milliliters per hour via gastrostomy tube (g-tube). R83 also had empty breakfast tray at bedside. R83 stated, consumed all the meal. R83 stated, doing good and eating most meals. R83 stated, also ate all of last night's dinner. R83 also went into describing favorite cultural dishes and wishing to have more of those. When asked about the enteral feeding, R83 did not know why [R83] needed the g-tube. On 7/17/2024 at approximately 9:05 AM, V16 (CNA-Certified Nurse Aide) stated, working with R83 during most shifts. V16 stated that R83 has been eating 50% or more of [R83's] meals. V16 stated if R83 likes the food, R83 will eat 100% of the meal. V16 stated R83 has been eating well because R83 wants the g-tube out. Reviewed facility's charting for R83's NUTRITION-Amount Eaten for the last 30 days. Facility failed to chart meal intakes daily and for each meal. Of the charted meal intakes, the majority charted 51% - 100% meal consumed with most of that being 76-100%. R83's 7/14/2024 8:31 PM, Dietary Assessment progress note documents in part significant weight gain of 7.6% in the last three months. It documents in part: [Weights are going back up to previous weights likely [due to] increased appetite. [Tube feeding] was decreased last month. Noted with additional 4 [pound] [weight] gain. R83's comprehensive care plan documents in part a focus related to R83's enteral feeding (last revised 3/06/2024) and potential for alteration in nutrition/hydration (last revised 3/15/2024). Listed goals do not include removing the enteral feeding or g-tube. On 7/17/2024 at 10:59 AM, V18 (Nurse Practitioner) stated, R83's oral intake used to be terrible. V18 stated, that the goal for the enteral feeding was to get R83 back on track. V18 stated, no recent reports of R83 with low appetite. V18 stated, since R83 came back from the hospital, R83 has improved and is eating. V18 stated, now I feel like [R83] is back on track and probably doesn't need it anymore. During a telephone interview with V19 (R83's Primary Physician) on 7/17/2024 at 11:12 AM, V19 stated, facility did not inform V19 of R83's weight gain or that R83 was eating well. V19 stated, when staff inform [V19] of a resident's nutritional improvement, V19 will usually order a calorie count to obtain objective information to further evaluate need for the g-tube. If the calorie count proves adequate intake, then V19 will order for the g-tube removal. R83's progress notes do not document in part that staff notified V19 of R83's nutritional improvement. R83's orders did not include a calorie count. During a follow-up interview on 7/18/2024 at 9:05 AM, V19 stated, evaluating R83 early that morning. V19 stated R83 looked good overall and R83 talked about missing cultural foods. V19 stated will order a calorie count and was 90% confident that R83's g-tube can be removed. V19 stated if the calorie count was good, the goal was to schedule the g-tube removal next week. Facility's 3/31/2023 Nutritional Intervention Procedure documents in part: It is the policy of the Nursing Department to routinely evaluate resident food and beverage consumption, and to notify the resident of their legal representative, dietary supervisor, dietitian, and physician or resident nutritional problems. The Charge Nurse, or assigned Licensed Nurse, or CNAs shall evaluate and record resident's nutritional intake after each meal and after consumption of nourishments and physician ordered nutritional supplements. A licensed nurse is responsible for assuring staff request and offer dietary substitutions for the resident who consumes less than 50% of the meal and documenting the amount consumed. A licensed nurse is responsible for analyzing resident's nutritional consumption by reviewing the food consumption record, in between meal nourishments, and physician ordered supplements.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and bubbler were dated and change...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and bubbler were dated and changed and failed to administer oxygen as ordered for 2 residents (R49 and R71) reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 24. The findings include: 1. R49's face sheet showed admission date on 7/6/2021 with diagnoses not limited to End stage heart failure, Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Unspecified intestinal obstruction, Other asthma, Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, Unspecified abdominal pain, Peripheral vascular disease, Spinal stenosis cervical region, Other chronic pain, Nonrheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis with insufficiency, Unspecified atrial fibrillation, Primary insomnia, Zoster without complications, Unspecified abdominal hernia with obstruction without gangrene, Personal history of Covid-19, Presence of coronary angioplasty implant and graft, Coronary angioplasty status, Acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure. On 07/16/24 at 11:10 AM, R49 Observed lying in bed, alert and verbally responsive. Observed with oxygen at 3L/min, oxygen tubing with no date. Requested V5 (Registered Nurse / RN) to R49's room and stated oxygen tubing should be changed weekly and dated when it was changed. V5 (RN) checked R49's oxygen tubing and stated it was not dated. R49's POS (Physician order sheet) showed order not limited to: Change and Label O2 tubing and humidifier weekly when in use at bedtime every Sat. Oxygen Therapy @ 3 LPM (Liters Per Minute) via nc (nasal cannula) CONTINOUS to maintain saturation > 90%. MDS (Minimum data set) dated 6/7/2024 showed R49's cognition was intact. She needed supervision / touching assistance with eating; Partial / moderate assistance with oral hygiene, upper body dressing; Dependent with toileting and personal hygiene, shower / bathe self, lower body dressing, and chair / bed transfer. 2. R71's face sheet showed admission date on 6/22/2023 with diagnoses not limited to Radiculopathy lumbar region, Dorsalgia, Unspecified osteoarthritis, Hypertensive urgency, Anemia, Unspecified fall, Tachycardia, Nicotine dependence, Acute kidney failure, Insomnia, Difficulty in walking, Fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur. At 11:23 AM, R71 Observed lying in bed, alert and verbally responsive, oxygen concentrator was on, and regulator indicated at 2L/min. Observed O2 cannula tubing at the side of the bed and was not in place in R71's nares. At 11:35 am, Requested V5 (Registered Nurse / RN) in R71's room. R71's oxygen tubing was not in place. V5 stated she is not sure why the oxygen was not in place as the resident is not assigned to her and V5 was not sure if oxygen order is continuous. At 12:42 pm, Requested V7 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN), the assigned nurse, to R71's room. Oxygen cannula tubing was not in place and was at bedside. Oxygen concentrator was on. On 7/18/24 10:23 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing / DON) stated that staff is expected to administer oxygen as ordered and change oxygen tubing every week and should be dated. She said if oxygen tubing is not changed it can accumulate molds and cannula can get stiff. She said it is important to follow doctor's order for oxygen administration. V3 said when it is ordered continuous then resident should use it all the time and monitor the resident. R71's POS showed order not limited to: Oxygen Therapy @ 2 LPM via nc (nasal cannula) continuous to maintain saturation > 90% every shift. MDS dated [DATE] showed R71's cognition was moderately impaired. She needed supervision / touching assistance with eating, oral hygiene; Partial / moderate assistance with upper body dressing and personal hygiene; Dependent with toileting hygiene, shower / bathe self and lower body dressing and chair / bed transfer. Facility's policy for oxygen therapy dated 1/1/20 documented in part: MD (medical doctor) order will provide: when to use, how often, liter flow and whether to use cannula or mask. If using cannula gently place the tops of the cannula into the nares. Loop the tubing around each ear and secure with the slide adjustment, which should be under the resident's chin.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R79) received medication as ordered out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: R79's admission R...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R79) received medication as ordered out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: R79's admission Record documents in part a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. R79's Order Summary Report documents in part an order for Wellbutrin SR (Sustained Release) oral tablet 150 milligram by mouth one time a day for depression. Order active on 5/06/2024. R79's care plan contains a focus for R79's use of antidepressant medication (last revised 8/10/2023). However, care plan is not updated to include R79's current antidepressant (Wellbutrin). Intervention for this focus includes to Administer ANTIDEPRESSANT medications as ordered by physician (initiated 8/10/2023). On 7/16/2024 at 11:10 AM, R79 was oriented to person, place, and year. R79 answered questions appropriately. R79 stated facility is not consistently providing medications. R79 stated facility did not provide Wellbutrin for six days a month or two ago. Random days when facility doesn't have Wellbutrin. R79 stated nurses keep telling R79 that the medication is not available. R79's May 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documents in part that staff charted 9 (charting code for 'Other / See Progress Notes) on 5/7-5/11, 5/14, and 5/16-5/18 for Wellbutrin SR. R79's June 2024 MAR documents in part that staff charted 9 on 6/18 and 6/24-6/26. Progress notes from 5/10/2024, 5/17/2024, 5/18/2024 and 6/25/2024 document in part that WellButrin SR was not available, and facility was waiting for pharmacy delivery. No other related progress notes for the rest of the listed dates above. No pharmacy progress notes document in part the reasoning for why pharmacy has not delivered it. No progress notes document in part that staff notified the physician. On 7/16/2024 at 12:04 PM, V8 (Nurse) stated 9 on the MAR means the medication was not available or not here. V8 stated the nurse has to follow-up on why the medication was not available. If it is due to insurance or billing, then the nurse needs to let administration know. V8 also stated that if a medication is running low, the nurse is supposed to order a refill within 4-5 days before it finishes. On 7/18/2024 at 10:09 AM, V17 (Nurse) stated nurses should call for a medication refill when they reach the blue portion of the medication blister packet. V17 showed surveyor R79's Wellbutrin SR blister pack. R79's WellButrin SR blister pack has designated blue area starting at when there are eight pills left in the packet. V17 stated the designated blue portion prompts nurses to reorder the medication to ensure that the medication does not run out for the resident. On 7/18/2024 at 10:33 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated I tell the nurses to order once they get in the blue. Like the first pill in the blue, they need to reorder it. Facility's 12/2022 Administration of Medication policy documents in part: Residents shall receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with our established policies.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% during medication administration observations. The facility had four medica...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% during medication administration observations. The facility had four medication errors out of 37 opportunities resulting in a 10.81% medication error rate. Findings include: On 7/16/2024 at 10:19 AM, V7 (Nurse) prepared medications for R9. V7 prepared Amlodipine, Buspirone, Lisinopril, Vitamin C and Vitamin D. At 10:26 AM, V7 stated [V7] needed to prepare MiraLAX (brand name) for R9. V7 pulled out a bottle of Polyethylene glycol 3350 (generic). V7 stated, did not have a spoon in the medication cart. V7 locked up the medication cart and went to the nurses' station. V7 retrieved plastic spoons and returned to medication cart. At 10:27 AM, V7 stated R9 needs one teaspoon of MiraLax. V7 took one spoonful of the Polyethylene Glycol 3350, put it in a clear, plastic cup, and mixed it with water. At 10:30 AM, R9 finished taking the medications and V7 returned to the medication cart to chart. V7 charted administering Aspirin 81 milligram but surveyor did not observe V7 pull the medication during medication prep. On 7/16/2024 at 12:25 PM, R9 stated did not receive Aspirin. On 7/16/2024 at 12:26 PM, V7 stated, administering R9's Aspirin during 10:19 AM medication pass with surveyor. R9's Order Summary Report and Medication Administration Records document in part orders for Aspirin 81 Oral Tablet Chewable (Aspirin) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for pain and MiraLax Oral Powder 17 [Gram]/Scoop (Polyethylene Glycol 3350) Give 1 scoop by mouth two times a day for constipation. On 7/17/2024 at 9:25 AM, V17 (Nurse) stated, for MiraLax, the nurse must use the medication bottle cap to measure the scoop. V17 stated the cap has a specific measure that designates 17 Grams. On 7/17/2024 at 12:20 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated for the multi-dose MiraLax or Polyethylene Glycol 3350, the scoop is one bottle cap. The nurse is not supposed to use a spoon. V3 is not sure how many grams of MiraLax a spoonful is so nurses are not to use it as measurement. V3 also stated that nurses should only chart medications they administered. On 7/17/2024 at 8:35 AM, V15 (Nurse) prepared medications for R83. V15 prepared Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Calcium Carbonate, Rivastigmine transdermal patch, Thiamine Hydrochloride, and Metformin Hydrochloride. At 8:44 AM, V15 applied the patch to R83's left upper arm and instructed R83 to take the rest of the medications orally. R83's Order Summary Report and Medication Administration Records document in part that Thiamine Hydrochloride and Metformin Hydrochloride were to be administered enterally via gastrostomy tube. On 7/17/2024 at 12:20 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated the five rights of medication administration were the right patient, time, medication, route and dose. Facility's 12/2022 Administration of Medication policy documents in part: Residents shall receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with our established policies. Medications must be administered by the route ordered by the Physician, unless specified route is orally.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

MDS Data Transmission (Tag F0640)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit MDS (Minimum Data Set) records to CMS system using the CMS-specified Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process w...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit MDS (Minimum Data Set) records to CMS system using the CMS-specified Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process within the regulatory timeframes for 10 (R11, R16, R20, R32, R33, R39, R41, R49, R59, R90) of 10 residents reviewed for resident assessment in a sample of 24. The findings include: On 7/17/24 at 3:10 pm, V28 (MDS Regional Consultant, RN) stated she is covering the facility as there is no full time MDS coordinator currently working in the facility but there is a part time MDS coordinator who comes to the facility on weekends and working remotely on weekdays for few hours. She said the facility is in the process of hiring a full time MDS coordinator. She said facility is following CMS RAI guidelines in completing and transmitting MDS records. V28 said MDS assessment is completed for all residents, it is a snapshot of the resident's condition and how they should be taken care of. MDS includes resident's functional capabilities, it helps staff identify health problems or concerns and care planning decision. MDS should be completed accurately and timely as much as possible and should follow regulatory timeframes. V28 said MDS records should be transmitted 14 days or prior from completion date otherwise it is considered late transmission. She said there could be financial and medical implications if MDS assessment is not completed accurately and timely. Surveyor reviewed MDS records of the following residents with V28: 1. R11 MDS ARD (assessment reference date) 6/13/24 was completed on 6/27/24 and transmitted / accepted on 7/15/24. V28 said transmission date should have been on 7/10/24, it is considered late transmission. 2. R16 MDS ARD 6/7/24 was completed on 6/21/24 and was transmitted / accepted on 7/15/24. V28 said transmission date should have been on 7/4/24, it is considered late transmission. 3. R20 MDS ARD 6/10/24 was completed on 6/24/24 and transmitted / accepted on 7/15/24. V28 said transmission date should have been on 7/7/24, it is considered late transmission. 4. R32 MDS ARD 6/8/24 was completed on 6/22/24 and was transmitted / accepted on 7/15/24. V28 said transmission date should have been on 7/5/24, it is considered late transmission. 5. R33 MDS ARD 6/12/24 was completed on 6/26/24 and was transmitted / accepted on 7/15/24. V28 said transmission date should have been on 7/9/24, it is considered late transmission. 6. R39 MDS ARD 6/6/24 was completed on 6/20/24 and was transmitted or / accepted on 7/15/24. V28 said transmission date should have been on 7/3/24, it is considered late transmission. 7. R41 MDS ARD 6/10/24 was completed on 6/24/24 and was transmitted / accepted on 7/15/24. V28 said transmission date should have been on 7/7/24, it is considered late transmission. 8. R49 MDS ARD 6/7/24 was completed on 6/21/24 and was transmitted or accepted on 7/15/24. V28 said transmission date should have been on 7/4/24, it is considered late transmission. 9. R59 MDS ARD 6/6/24 was completed on 6/20/24 and was transmitted or accepted on 7/15/24. V28 said transmission date should have been on 7/3/24, it is considered late transmission. 10. R90 - admission ARD 3/11/24 was completed on 3/17/24 and was transmitted or accepted on 4/12/24. V28 said transmission date should have been on 3/30/24, it is considered late transmission. V28 said facility is keeping the final validation report electronically to verify or confirm that MDS assessment were transmitted and accepted successfully to the national data base. Facility provided final validation report with message documented in part: Record submitted late - the submission date is more than 14days after the completion date for 10 residents (R11, R16, R20, R32, R33, R39, R41, R49, R59, R90). Chapter 2 of the RAI manual dated October 2023 page 2-17 titled RAI OBRA-required Assessment Summary documented in part: Transmission date no later than MDS completion date + 14 calendar days.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to refrigerate unopened insulin, discard loose tablets and expired medications, defrost medication refrigerators, and double-...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to refrigerate unopened insulin, discard loose tablets and expired medications, defrost medication refrigerators, and double-lock controlled medications from 2 of 2 medication rooms and 3 of 3 medications carts reviewed during medication storage observations. Findings include: On 7/16/2024 at 9:47 AM, surveyor reviewed the 1-East Team 1 medication cart with V4 (Nurse). In one of the top drawers, there was a bottle of Insulin Aspart 100 unit/milliliter vial for R154. The label on the bottle documents in part Refrigerate until open. V4 stated the vial was unopened. In the drawer with the house stock medications, there was a bottle of One-Daily Multivitamin 200 tabs. Written open date on the bottle was 5/27/2024. The best by date on the bottle was 3/2024. V4 started administering medications from the bottle that morning. At 9:52 AM, V4 stated the night shift nurses are supposed to check the medication carts for expired medications. On 7/16/2024 at 10:02 AM, surveyor reviewed the 2-West medication room with V5 (Nurse). There were two medication refrigerators on top of a counter. There was ice buildup in the freezer with some of the ice falling off onto the medication shelves. V5 stated, did not know who was responsible for maintaining the refrigerators or how often they were defrosted. On 7/16/2024 at 12:34 PM, surveyor reviewed the 2-East medication room with V6 (Nurse). The medication refrigerator was on the floor at the nurses' station. V6 unlocked the padlock to the refrigerator door. Inside there was a clear box with R351's Hydromorphone and Lorazepam. Surveyor was able to remove the box from the refrigerator. The box had a lock, but it was not locked. Surveyor was able to pull the medications out of the box without V6's key. On 7/16/2024 at 12:42 PM, surveyor reviewed the 2-East Team 1 medication cart with V17 (Nurse). In the drawer containing the residents' medication blister packets, there were seven loose tablets outside of their packaging. There were three orange tablets, three white tablets, and one pink tablet. V17 did not know what the tablets were. On 7/17/2024 at 12:20 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated narcotics and controlled medications should be double locked in the fridge. The small box in the fridge should be locked including the pad lock on the fridge. The medication fridge should be defrosted every week or once a week. V3 stated if insulin is not open, it should be in the fridge. On 7/18/2024 at 10:14 AM, surveyor reviewed the 2-West Team 1 medication cart with V31 (Nurse). In the third, large drawer, there were loose pills (one yellow and two white pills) outside of their packaging. V31 did not know what the pills were and discarded them. Facility's 12/31/2022 Medication Storage in the Facility policy documents in part: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer or supplier recommendations. All drugs classified as Schedule II of the Controlled Substance Act will be stored under double locks. Medications requiring 'refrigeration' or temperatures between 36 degrees Fahrenheit and 46 degrees Fahrenheit are kept in a refrigerator. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated drugs and those in containers, which are cracked, soiled or without secure closures will be immediately withdrawn from stock. They will be disposed of according to drug disposal procedures, and reordered from the pharmacy if a current order exists. Medication storage areas are kept clean, well lit, and free of clutter. Facility's 11/17 Medication Storage Controlled Medication Storage policy documents in part: Controlled medications requiring refrigeration are stored within a locked, permanently affixed box within the refrigerator.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

3. On 07/17/24 at 10:22 AM, surveyor and V23 (Certified Nursing Aide/CNA) entered R6's room. R6's oxygen nasal cannula was on the floor. Surveyor observed V23 pick up the nasal cannula from the floor ...

Read full inspector narrative →
3. On 07/17/24 at 10:22 AM, surveyor and V23 (Certified Nursing Aide/CNA) entered R6's room. R6's oxygen nasal cannula was on the floor. Surveyor observed V23 pick up the nasal cannula from the floor and then placed the nasal cannula into R6's nostrils. V23 was asked why V23 applied the nasal cannula that was picked up from the floor into R6's nostrils? V23 stated she is sorry and that she should have sanitized the nasal cannula or replaced the nasal cannula. V23 was asked what could be the potential effect of what she did by not sanitizing the nasal cannula? V23 stated, the nasal cannula is contaminated, and it could cause infection for R6. V23 then replaced the dirty cannula with a new cannula. On 07/17/24 at 12:03 PM, V25 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) stated when staff observe a nasal cannula on the floor, the nasal cannula should be replaced with a new cannula. V25 stated, applying into R6's nostrils a dirty cannula that was picked up from the floor put R6 at risk for respiratory infection. On 07/17/24 at 12:25 PM, V24 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated R6 is on continuous oxygen at 3Liters per nasal cannula. V24 stated the nasal cannula should not be on the floor, but R6 tends to remove the nasal cannula. V24 stated once staff observed the nasal cannula on the floor, such cannula is dirty and contaminated. So, the dirty cannula should not be placed back on R6's nostrils but be discarded and replaced with a new cannula. V24 stated, placing a contaminated nasal cannula on R6 could lead to respiratory infection. The facility policy on infection prevention and control program dated 10/24/22, documents in part: Ensure the facility establishes and maintains an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. 2. On 7/16/24 at 12:02 pm, R10 Observed lying in bed, alert and verbally responsive, Spanish speaking but can speak simple English. R10 requested to be changed. Surveyor conducted incontinence care observation with V10 (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant / CNA). R10's incontinence brief was heavily soiled with urine. V10 used a wet wash cloth in wiping R10's genitalia and the same washcloth in cleaning the buttocks. V10 used the same gloves for the entire procedure of providing incontinence care. V10 did not wipe dry R10's genitalia or buttocks. V10 did not perform hand washing before and after incontinence care procedure. V10 then proceeded with putting on new disposable gloves and took care of R10's roommate (R50). At 12:10 pm, Observed R50 lying in bed, alert with confusion, with strong odor of urine. Incontinence care observation conducted with V10 (Agency CNA). R50's incontinence brief was soiled with urine. V10 put on disposable gloves and did not wash her hands before starting care. V10 observed wiping R50's genitalia with a wet wash cloth and then used the same washcloth to wipe R50's buttocks. V10 did not wipe dry R50's genitalia or buttocks. V10 did not perform proper hand washing before and after care. V10 did not bring washbasin, soap, and water to provide incontinence or perineal care to the 2 residents (R10 and R50). On 7/18/24 10:23 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing / DON) stated staff is expected to bring wash basin with soap and water and should have at least 2-3 wash cloth one for front (genitalia) and another washcloth to cleanse the buttocks and 3rd towel to dry the resident. She said staff is expected to perform proper hand hygiene / hand washing before and after care to prevent cross contamination or for infection control. Facility's policy and procedure for perineal care dated 12/2013 documented in part: To cleanse the perineum and prevent infection. Wash hands and put on disposable gloves. Wash perineal area with soap and water or perineal cleanser. After cleansing is complete, rinse if necessary, and then dry the resident by patting skin gently with a clean bath towel. Remove gloves and wash hands. Facility's policy for handwashing dated 12/31/21 documented in part: Proper handwashing technique is used for the prevention of transmission of infectious diseases. All personnel working in the long-term care facility are required to wash their hands before and after resident contact, before and after performing any procedure. Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure proper infection control guideline practices are followed related to personal protective equipment was not worn prior to entering a contact isolation room for 1 resident (R403), failed to use standard precautions during incontinence care and perform hand washing/hand hygiene for 2 residents (R10, R50), failed to follow their policy to ensure proper infection control guideline practice are followed related to the use of a nasal cannula that was picked up from the floor and was placed in the nostrils of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 24. Findings Include: 1. On 07/17/2024 at 09:45 AM, surveyor observed R403's room had contact isolation sign on her door. On 07/17/2024 at 10:41 AM, V20 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that R403 is on isolation for Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL). On 07/17/2024 at 11:45 AM, surveyor observed V22 (R403's daughter) sitting with R403 on the bed, hugging R403 without wearing any personal protective equipment. V22 stated that she did not know her mother had an infection and required contact isolation precautions. On 07/17/2024 at 11:50 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that if a resident is on contact isolation, anyone who touches the resident needs to be wearing personal protective equipment, which includes gown and gloves. V2 stated that R403 is on contact isolation for ESBL and that her daughter should be wearing personal protective equipment if she is going to sitting and holding her mother in bed. R403's care plan documents in part: 7/14/24 Meropenem IV Solution as ordered, via Heparin lock related to Urinary Tract Infection (ESBL/E. Coli). On Contact Isolation. Facility's Transmission Based Precautions policy (6/2023) documents in part: The purpose of the guideline is to summarize best practices for the use of transmission based precautions in SNFs and to assist with decision-making regarding the placement of residents with organisms of concern. Contact Precautions: wear a gown and gloves for all interactions with the patient or potentially contaminated areas in the patient's environment. Donning personal protective equipment (PPE) upon room entry and discarding it before exiting the patient room.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to offer, educate, and document the benefits and risks of Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines to 4 (R80, R401, R403, R404) of 5 residents revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to offer, educate, and document the benefits and risks of Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines to 4 (R80, R401, R403, R404) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations. Findings include: Per residents' vaccination record, R80, R401, R403, and R404 did not receive any of the following vaccines (influenza and pneumococcal ). Surveyor requested for all documentation related to vaccination including immunization record, consent forms, documentation of education and other documents that residents were offered and educated on before refusal. V2 (Director of Nursing / Infection Preventionist) was not able to provide any consent forms, and there was no documentation that any resident or representative of resident was educated and the reason for refusal. R401's consent for Influenza and Pneumonia vaccine documents in part: Yes to receiving influenza and pneumonia vaccine. R401's immunization record does not document any administration of vaccine. On 07/18/2024 at 10:24 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing / Infection Preventionist) reviewing electronic health records and said, I cannot find any documentation that specific education was given, or if resident was able to understand education. V2 stated that if it's not in the resident's electronic health record, then the consent and education should be in their physical chart. Surveyor followed V2 to first floor nurses station to review resident's chart. Surveyor observed V2 look through R80, R401, R403 and R404's chart and could not find any immunization record, consent form or education provided for influenza and pneumococcal immunization. V2 stated, that she understands that residents can benefit from vaccination, and it is important to let them know what their options are. V2 stated I will check for any documentation. On 07/18/2024 at 11:00 AM, R404 was seen inside his room alert and able to express thoughts well. R403 stated that he did not receive any information about any vaccines. R404 stated that he doesn't think he received any vaccine. On 07/18/2024 at 11:05 AM, R401 was seen alert and verbally able to express needs. R401 said, I was offered vaccine but, no one came to give it to me. I would like to get all vaccines if it was offered to me. No one explained to me about any vaccine. On 07/18/2024 at 11:15 AM, R403 was seen on her bed and does not respond during interview. R403 cognition is impaired with BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) dated 07/05/2024 score of 8. On 07/18/2024 at 11:30 AM, R80 was seen on her bed and does not respond to question within topic during interview. R80 cognition is impaired, BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) dated 04/25/2024 was not performed due to R80 rarely or never understood. Immunizations (Influenza and Pneumococcal) policy dated 12/2022, reads: To minimize the risk of residents acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from Influenza or Pneumococcal pneumonia, it is the policy of this facility to offer Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccinations to all residents. Under procedure for Influenza Vaccination: Each resident or resident's representative will receive education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza immunization. Each resident will be offered the influenza vaccination between October 1 and March 31, unless the immunization is contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized during this time. Consent for and education about the vaccine must be given each time the vaccine is offered. The resident's medical record will indicate: That the resident or resident's legal representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza immunization; and that the resident either receive the influenza immunization or did not receive the influenza immunization due to medical contraindications or refusal. Under procedure for Pneumococcal Immunization: Each resident or resident's representative will receive education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of pneumococcal immunization. Pneumococcal vaccine will be offered to all residents upon admission unless they report prior immunization. Facility will make best efforts to validate prior immunization. Consent for and education about the vaccine must be given each time the vaccine is offered. The resident's medical record will indicate: That the resident or resident's legal representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of pneumococcal immunization; and that the resident either receive the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindications or refusal or they received it before.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0887 (Tag F0887)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to offer, educate, and document the benefits and risks of the COVID-19 vaccines to 4 (R80, R401, R403, and R404) of 5 residents reviewed for v...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to offer, educate, and document the benefits and risks of the COVID-19 vaccines to 4 (R80, R401, R403, and R404) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations. Findings include: Per residents' vaccination record, R80, R401, R403, and R404 did not receive any vaccine (Covid-19). Surveyor requested for all documentation related to vaccination including immunization record, consent forms, documentation of education and other documents that residents were offered and educated before refusal. V2 (Director of Nursing / Infection Preventionist) was not able to provide any consent forms, and no documentation that any resident or representative of resident was educated and the reason for refusal. Reviewed R401, R403, R404 and R80's immunization record. No documentation of administering COVID-19 vaccine. On 07/18/2024 at 10:24 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing / Infection Preventionist) reviewed electronic health records and said, I cannot find any documentation that specific education was given, or if resident was able to understand education. V2 stated, that if it's not in the resident's electronic health record, then the consent and education should be in their physical chart. Surveyor followed V2 to first floor nurses station to review resident's chart. Surveyor observed V2 look through R80, R401, R403 and R404's chart and could not find any immunization record, consent form or education provided for COVID-19 vaccination. V2 stated that she understands that resident can benefit from vaccination, and it is important to let them know what their options are. V2 stated, I will check for any documentation. On 07/18/2024 at 2:00 PM, V2 provided surveyor with the binder of all residents who consented and was offered education for COVID-19 vaccination. R80, R401, 403 and R404's consent form and education was not found by V2 in the binder. On 07/18/2024 at 11:00 AM, R404 was seen inside his room alert and able to express thoughts well. R403 stated that he did not receive any information about any vaccines. R404 stated that he doesn't think he received any vaccine. On 07/18/2024 at 11:05 AM, R401 was seen alert and verbally able to express needs. R401 said, I was offered vaccine but, no one came to give it to me. I would like to get all vaccines if it was offered to me. No one explained to me about any vaccine. On 07/18/2024 at 11:15 AM, R403 was seen on her bed and does not respond during interview. R403 cognition is impaired with BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) dated 07/05/2024 score of 8. On 07/18/2024 at 11:30 AM, R80 was seen on her bed and does not respond to question within topic during interview. R80 cognition is impaired, BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) dated 04/25/2024 was not performed due to R80 rarely or never understood. Covid - 19 Vaccination Policy dated 12/31/2022, reads: The purpose of this policy is to educate and offer residents the opportunity to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. All residents and their representatives will be provided with education on COVID 19 vaccination per Center of Disease Control. Under Covid - 19 Vaccine procedures, all residents will be offered the COVID-19 vaccine. All residents will receive education materials about the benefits of COVID-19 vaccine and adverse reactions post vaccination. If the resident declines the vaccination, COVID-19 vaccination declination waiver signed by resident or representative declining the vaccine must be obtained.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was labeled, dated, and discarded after use by date and failed to ensure equipment has been immersed in the saniti...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was labeled, dated, and discarded after use by date and failed to ensure equipment has been immersed in the sanitizer sink for a full minute and then air-dried before use. These failures could potentially affect 100 residents who were to receive meals from the kitchen on 7/16/24. The findings include: On 7/16/24 at 9:34 AM, Surveyor toured kitchen with V12 (Dietary Manager), reach-in fridge checked and observed thickened water with open date on 7/3/24. V12 said thickened water is good for 7 days from date it was opened, and it should be discarded. V12 removed the opened thickened water from the fridge and tossed it. Thickened water container label showed after opening, may be kept up to 7 days under refrigeration. V12 said if food item is used beyond used by date there is a risk of making resident get sick, food / drink could be contaminated or spoiled. Surveyor inspected dry food storage room with V12, observed box of tea bags opened with no date labelled. V12 said once food item or product was opened it should be dated, so everybody is aware when it was opened and when to discard it. On 7/17/24 at 10:46 AM, observed pureed food preparation conducted by V13 (Cook) and stated there are 3 food items to be pureed (pasta, meat balls and Italian blended vegetables). Observed V13 puree the pasta using a blender machine. At 10:53 am, Observed V13 cleaned, rinsed the equipment and immersed the container, lid, blade in the sanitizing solution in the 3-compartment sink for less than 20 seconds then he placed the equipment to the drying rack. At 10:55 am, Observed V13 use the equipment (container, blade, and lid) not fully air-dried, water was dripping. V13 put Italian blended vegetables into the container that was not fully air-dried, and water was dripping. V13 blended the vegetables into pureed consistency. At 10:59 am, V13 cleaned and rinsed the equipment. Observed V13 immersed the equipment in the sanitizing solution in the 3-compartment sink for at least 10 seconds. He placed the equipment in the drying rack. At 11:01 am, V13 used the container, blade and lid that were not fully air dried, water was still dripping. He put meat balls with sauce inside the wet container, blade and lid with dripping water. Blended the meat balls into pureed consistency. V13 cleaned the equipment, rinsed and immersed into the sanitizing solution in the 3-compartment sink for less than 10 seconds and placed the equipment (container, lid and blade) to the drying rack. On 7/18/24 at 9:08 am, V12 (Dietary Manager) said they are using Quaternary solution / ammonium compound as a sanitizing solution in the 3 compartment sink and staff is expected to immerse or soaked kitchen equipment such as blender container, lid, blades, pots and pans, etc. for 60 seconds or full minute to kill bacteria or any food particles gotten in the equipment will be removed and 60 seconds immersing could allow time to kill the bacteria and disinfect the equipment. V12 said after immersing the equipment in the sanitizing solution, should be kept on the air-drying rack, turn it over until fully air dried. She said equipment should not be used if it is wet, it should be fully air dried. She said if equipment such as blender container, blade and lid were not fully air dried and were used there could be moisture / growth and potential contamination could happen. Facility census dated 7/16/24 showed 102 residents. Facility provided list of residents on NPO (nothing by mouth) and showed 2 residents on NPO as of 7/16/24. Facility's policy for labeling and dating foods dated 2010 documented in part: Prepared and packaged foods will be labeled and rotated to decrease the risk of food borne illnesses, provide the highest quality product for the residents and minimize waste. Foods prepared on the premises to be hold cold will be labeled with the date of preparation and time as required for cooling purposes. This food will also be labeled with date to discard or use by. The discard / use by date will be a maximum of 6 days after preparation. For example, food prepared on June 10th will be labeled to discard on, or use by, June 16th. Commercially processed foods that have been prepared and packaged by a food processing plant will be labeled with the date it is opened. Facility's policy for manual sanitizing in three-compartment sink dated 2017 documented in part: After washing and rinsing utensils and equipment are sanitized in the third sink by immersion. Chemical sanitizing solution used according to manufacturer's instructions. Facility provided manufacturer's procedures for 3 compartment sinks and documented in part: Immersed utensils in sanitizer sink for a full minute. Facility's policy for sanitation and food safety dated 2021 documented in part: Utensils and equipment are air-dried.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to dispose garbage properly in a contained dumpster; ensure garbage receptacles were covered and keep the dumpster area clean and...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to dispose garbage properly in a contained dumpster; ensure garbage receptacles were covered and keep the dumpster area clean and free of garbage or waste to maintain a sanitary condition and to prevent harborage and feeding of pest. These failures could potentially affect all 102 residents that reside in the facility as of census 7/16/24. The findings include: On 7/16/24 at 10:15 AM, Surveyor inspected dumpster with V12 (Dietary Manager), observed dumpster with recycled items not closed, lid broken and/or bent. Another dumpster, with trash, had a lid not fully closed. V12 stated it was not fully closed because it is full of waste. V12 said the dumpster or garbage bin should be completely closed or covered to prevent flies or insects to come by. Surveyor also observed broken furniture and equipment around the dumpster area and garbage bins with waste inside, not covered. V27 (Maintenance Staff) interviewed and he stated the dumpster lid has bended and it does not close completely. He said another dumpster with trash was not completely closed because it is full of garbage. V27 said the dumpster or garbage should be closed as rodents could go in there and stuff could happen. On 7/18/24 08:56 AM, V26 (Director of Maintenance) said he provides oversight for dumpster or garbage disposal and there is 1 custodian staff (V27) who is responsible for waste management. V26 said dumpster or garbage bins should be completely closed or covered to prevent rodents and insects. The policy for garbage disposal / refuse or waste / dumpster management requested. On 7/16/24, 7/17/24 and 7/18/24 Surveyor made multiple requests for facility's policy regarding garbage disposal / refuse or dumpster management but V1 (Administrator) said there is no policy for such. V1 provided policy for pest control instead. Facility's policy for pest control dated 12/14 documented in part: Garbage and trash are not permitted to accumulate and are removed from the facility per policy.
Jul 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to properly assess one resident (R1) for skin breakdown; and failed t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to properly assess one resident (R1) for skin breakdown; and failed to prevent, recognize and treat a new wound that was acquired in the facility for 1 resident (R1) out of 7 residents reviewed for nursing care. This failure resulted in R1 being sent out to the hospital on 5/29/24 for altered mental status in which it was discovered R1 had a unstageable wound to the sacrum and again R1 was evaluated in the hospital on 6/5/24 where R1's sacral wound extended to the anus and required surgical debridement. Findings include: R1 is an [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and balance, cognitive communication deficit, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side. On 7/01/2024 at 10:10 AM, V1 (Administrator) said, R1 has been discharged from the facility. He went to the hospital on 6/5/2024 and the family decided to take him home from the Hospital. (R1 was sent on 6/5/24 to the hospital for wound evaluation) On 7/1/2024 at 10:15 AM, V6 (R1's family) said, There have been times that I have gone to visit my dad (R1) and noticed that he smelled of urine and feces. He (R1) had a rash and wound on his scrotum. He (R1) had developed a wound on his back that spread to his anus. It was so deep that he had to have surgery and also had a colostomy bag placed. He (R1) had necrotic tissue that had to be removed and he also had formed infections in the wound. He (R1) is still not completely healed from the wound. My dad (R1) did not have any wounds when he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and now he (R1) has an unstageable wound from which he (R1) is having many complications. The facility didn't prevent my dad's pressure wound from forming and did not treat my dad (R1's) wound until it was too late. He (R1) developed the pressure ulcer in the facility, before he was even hospitalized . He (R1) then got a wound infection in the facility and went back out to the Hospital for the infection. On 07/02/2024 at 1:12 PM, V14 (ADON/ Assistant Director of Nursing) said, I help with wounds sometimes when the wound nurse is not here. On 07/02/2024 at 1:12 PM, V14 said, R1 was incontinent. He (R1) was not alert and oriented and will not call for help if he is wet. For incontinent patients, they are usually rounded on every two hours to reposition and change. I was not in the facility on the day that R1 was readmitted to the facility. I live close by, so I have no problems coming into the facility to assess a wound. I was not aware of R1's wound. I (V14) am not sure why the wound care orders were not entered until 6/2/2024 because he (R1) came back to the facility on 5/31/2024. I was not aware of R1 having any skin breakdown. On 07/02/2024 at 1:12 PM, V14 (ADON) said, If a patient has a wound upon admission, wound care team is notified to assess the patient and implement treatment. We (wound team) will call the Doctor to get orders for a wound to ensure that it is treated. A patient can have skin breakdown within 24 hours because the skin is very tender and older patients are more prone to skin breakdown. For wound prevention, we use air mattresses, zinc oxide to protect the skin and we reposition and change the patients every two hours. The wounds can quickly worsen without treatment. My expectation is that there are no wounds developed or worsening in this facility. On 07/02/2024 at 1:14 PM, V14 (ADON) said, There can be many complications from a pressure ulcer including: sepsis (blood infection) or skin infections such as cellulitis. On 7/3/2024 at 1:50 PM, V18 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said, I re-admitted R1 back to the facility. I don't recall any further orders for wound care at the time of R1's admission. I'm sure that I notified the nursing manager and I did document my findings of the open area on the skin. I am not sure what was done after that. On 7/3/2024 at 2:24 PM, V19 (Nurse Practitioner) said, If I saw the patent (R1) after re-admission to the facility, I would have definitely entered orders for wound treatment. Ideally, the nurse would call the primary Doctor and the wound care consult is ordered for assessment on the next day. The purpose of the treatment would be to heal the wound and to prevent it from worsening. Facility Census report documents, R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; R1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]; R1 was re-admitted to the facility from the hospital on 5/31/2024; R1 was discharged from the facility on 6/5/2024. Facility admission Summary note dated 4/26/2024 documents, head to toe assessment done with no skin issue noted. Facility admission Screener dated 4/26/2024 documents, R1 does not have impaired skin integrity upon admission. R1's Interim Care Plan dated 4/26/2024 documents, R1 is at risk for altered skin integrity related to incontinence and decreased mobility. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) - Section M dated 5/1/2024 documents, the resident (R1) is not at risk for developing pressure injuries/ulcers; the resident (R1) has no unhealed pressure injuries/ulcers. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) - Section H dated 5/1/2024 documents, R1 has occasional urinary and bowel incontinence; trial of a toileting program has not been attempted; No toileting program currently being used. Hospital Emergency Department Nurse note dated 5/29/2024 and written by V17 (Hospital Nurse) documents, Patient (R1) has wound on the sacrum, partial thickness. R1's (6/5/24) hospital record documents in part: R1 was sent for sacral wound evaluation. Wound measured 9 cm x 9 cm, base: moist, necrotic, extends to the anus. Hospital Discharge instructions dated 5/31/2024 documents a new order for miconazole nitrate ointment. Facility Nurse Progress note dated 5/31/2024 documents, body assessment completed, patient (R1) has open area on sacrum, dressing is covering the area, and R1 has noted irritation to penis area. Medical Doctor made aware R1 has returned. Orders are to stay the same. Facility admission Screener dated 5/31/2024 documents, R1 has impaired skin integrity upon admission (R1 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital). R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) - Section H dated 5/29/2024 documents, R1 is always incontinent. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) - Section M dated 6/5/2024 documents, R1 has one or more unhealed pressure ulcers. R1's Physician Order Summary Report documents wound care orders for treatment of buttock and sacrum entered on 6/2/2024; orders for LALM (Low Air Loss Mattress) entered on 6/3/2023; orders for treatment of perianal/ scrotum entered on 6/5/2024; turn and reposition orders entered on 6/5/2024; and order for wound cream entered on 6/5/2024. R1's Physician Order Summary Report documents no order for miconazole nitrate ointment. R1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) documents, no treatments implemented for R1's wounds on 5/31/24, 6/1/24 or 6/2/2024. Hospital summary dated 6/12/2024 documents, R1 was seen for sacral wound cellulitis and osteomyelitis; R1 will also need a diverting colostomy, sharp excisional debridement of sacral decubitus on 6/7/2024, post operation day one. Facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer Treatment and Management documents, Residents with pressure ulcers will have a physician's order for treatment; residents with pressure ulcers will be determined to be at high risk for pressure ulcer prevention and all components of the At Risk Protocol will include; pressure relieving devices, nutritional support, assistance with mobility including repositioning and ROM (range of motion) as outlined in the At Risk Protocol. Facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention protocol documents, Daily skin checks conducted by either the CNA (Certified Nurse Assistance) or Licensed Nurse to ensure early identification of potential problem areas. Facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment documents, to implement a standardized plan of pressure ulcer prevention based upon a reliable and valid assessment of pressure ulcer risk.
Jan 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0573 (Tag F0573)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide requested medical records for one resident (R1) out of three...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide requested medical records for one resident (R1) out of three residents reviewed for medical records request. R1 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, pressure ulcer of left heel stage 4, Alzheimer's disease with early, onset, dementia unspecified severity without behavioral. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows no Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score for R1 which indicates that R1 has some memory impairments. On 01/16/23 at 1:41 pm, V10 (R1's Family Member) stated that R1's family requested R1's medical records from the facility in December 2023. V10 stated that V10 spoke with V1 (Administrator) regarding obtaining R1's medical records and V10 still has not received R1's medical records. V10 then explained that V10 received a call from the facility right before surveyor called V10 stating that R1's medical records were ready for V10 to pick up at the facility after V10 has been waiting a month for R1's medical records. On 01/16/23 at 2:18 pm, V3 (Medical Records Coordinator) stated that V3 has been the facility's Medical Records coordinator at the facility for 2 years. V3 stated that when there is a request for a residents medical record there is a medical record request form completed. V3 then explained once V3 receives the medical records request form V3 gives the medical records request to V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) for approval to release the residents medical record. When V3 was asked regarding the timeframe in which a residents medical record request is released/given, V3 stated, It depends on when they ask for the request. When V3 was asked regarding the facility policy for the timeframe to release a residents medical record request V3 stated, I (V3) don't know the facility policy regarding giving the family a medical records request. It takes about 1-2 days. V3 was asked regarding R1's medical record request and V3 stated that V1 instructed V3 to do not release R1's medical records until the facility receives R1's death certificate. V3 stated that V3 received R1's death certificate about three weeks ago and that V3 did not send R1's family the medical records request. V3 stated that V3 was off for the holidays and that V1 (Administrator) covers for V3 when V3 is absent from work. V3 stated that V3 phoned V10 (R1's family) right before speaking to surveyor to inform V10 that R1's medical records were ready to be picked up. On 01/16/23 at 2:34 pm, V1 (Administrator) stated that V1 oversee V3 (Medical Records) at the facility. V1 explained that V3 is currently responsible for processing residents medical records request at the facility. V1 explained that for a residents medical record to be released there is a form called authorization for release for medical records to be completed. V1 then explained once the release for a residents medical record form is completed the form is given to V3 to be processed. When V1 was asked regarding the timeframe to complete a residents medical records request once the release for residents medical record form is completed and given to V3, V1 stated that the residents medical record request should be complete as soon as possible and that a medical records request can take up to a week to complete at the facility. When V1 was asked regarding R1's December 15, 2023, medical record request, V1 stated that R1's medical record request has been pending for about one month. V1 stated that V1 is responsible for covering medical records request in the absence of V3. V1 then stated, With the holidays there was a mix up with issuing R1's medical records while V3 was absent from the facility. When V1 was asked the importance of providing a request of a residents medical record, V1 explained that it is the residents right to obtain the residents medical record at the facility. The facility's document dated December 15, 2023, and titled Release of Information shows that R1's medical records information is to be disclosed to V10 (R1's Family Member) requested on December 15, 2023. R1's death certificate dated December 12, 2023, shows that R1's medical record was issued on December 22, 2023. The facility's policy titled Residents Rights for People in Long-term Care Facilities documents, in part: Participate in your own care: You have the right to all information about your medical condition and treatment in a language that you understand . You may purchase a copy of part or all of your records at a reasonable copy fee within two working days of your request. The facility's undated policy titled Release of Information documents, in part: Procedure: . 5. Resident may initiate a request to release such information contained in their medical records and charges to anyone they wish. Such request will be honored only upon receipt of a written, signed, and dated request from the residents or legal representative.
Oct 2023 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care was prov...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care was provided for dependent residents who required assistance with bladder and bowel incontinence for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for ADL care. Findings include: On 10.21.2023 at 11:33 AM, R1 was observed awake, alert, lying in bed. R1 said he was soiled. 1) R1's medical record (Face Sheet) documents R1 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on 2.20.2020 with diagnoses including but not limited to: Parkinson's Disease, Venous Insufficiency (Chronic) (Peripheral), Acute Kidney Failure, and Weakness. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set of 7.23.2023) documents R1 is cognitively intact, requires extensive assistance/two + persons physical assist with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use; R1 is frequently incontinent of urine and stool. 10.21.2023 at 11:33 AM, R1 was observed sitting up in bed. A blue brief was observed sticking out from the top of R1's yellow brief. R1 said staff double diapered him (on the night shift). R1 said, I don't like it. They do that so that they don't have to change me so much. It's my fault because I wet so much. R1 appeared sad (sad facial expression) as he told the Surveyor about the double diapering. At 11:37 AM, V5 (Agency CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) entered R1's room to provide incontinent care. R1's blue brief and back of R1's yellow brief were saturated with urine; a pungent odor was noted. R1's draw sheet was saturated with urine; a dark ring was noted on R1's fitted sheet. 2) R2's medical record (Face Sheet) documents R2 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on 1.16.2020 with diagnoses including but not limited to: Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia, Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, and Hyperlipidemia, Unspecified. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set of 7.11.2023) documents R2 is severely cognitively impaired, requires extensive assistance/two+ persons physical assist with bed mobility, total dependence/two+ persons physical assist with transfers and toilet use; R2 is always incontinent of urine and stool. 10.21.2023 at 10:38 AM, R2 is sitting up in bed with eyes closed, non-verbal. V4 said this is the first time I'm seeing him (to provide incontinent care); I did feed him earlier. V4 lowered the head of R2's bed and undid his brief. Surveyor observed a blue brief (with flaps removed) inside R2's outer brief. R2's blue brief was saturated with urine, the back of R2's yellow brief was saturated with urine. V4 said the line down the front of R2's yellow brief will change color when the resident is wet, however because R2 was double diapered (blue brief inside of yellow brief) the line on the outer brief will not change color even though resident is wet. 3) R3's medical record (Face Sheet) documents R3 is an [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on 2.10.2022 with diagnoses including but not limited to: Radiculopathy, Lumbar Region; Muscle Weakness (Generalized), Fusion of Spine, Lumbar Region, and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Ectasia. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set of 8.13.2023) documents R3 is severely cognitively impaired, requires extensive assistance/one-person physical assist with bed mobility and transfers, total dependence/two+ persons physical assist with toilet use; R3 is always incontinent of urine and stool. 10.21.2023 at 10:50 AM, with V4 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) and V5 (Agency CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant), R3 was observed awake and alert lying in bed, R3 did not respond to Surveyors questions. R3's brief was saturated with urine. R3's incontinent pad was wet with urine; a dark ring was noted as well. R3's fitted sheet was wet with urine. 4) R4's medical record (Face Sheet) documents R4 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on 2.20.2018 with diagnoses including but not limited to: Chronic Combined Systolic (Congestive) and Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Hyperlipidemia, Unspecified; Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery Without Angina Pectoris, and Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode, Unspecified. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set of 8.13.2023) documents R3 is cognitively intact, requires extensive assistance/two+ persons physical assist with bed mobility, total dependence/two+ persons physical assist with transfers, total dependence/one-person physical assist with toilet use; R4 is always incontinent of urine and stool. 10.21.2023 at 11:06 AM, with V4 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant), R4 was observed awake and alert, sitting up in bed. R4 said she was changed once on the night shift but was currently wet. Surveyor observed a blue brief with flaps removed) inside R4's outer brief. R4's blue brief was saturated with urine, the back of R4's yellow brief was saturated with urine. The line down the front of R4's brief had not changed color. A folded bath blanket and an incontinent pad were observed under R4. The bath blanket was wet with dark urine; dark rings were noted on the bath blanket, incontinent pad, and fitted sheet.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care was provided for dependent residents who required assistance wi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care was provided for dependent residents who required assistance with bladder and bowel incontinence for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for ADL care. Findings include: On 10.21.2023 at 9:25 AM, the census on 2 [NAME] was 48. There were two nurses (V6 and V7, both Agency Licensed Practical Nurses) and CNAs. There was one call off, who was replaced by an agency CNA who had not arrived to the facility. 10.21.2023 at 9:31 AM, V3 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) said when she starts work, at 7:00 AM, they're (the residents) are never clean and dry; they should be clean and dry. V3 said there is not enough help. I have 17 or 18 residents today; nine of those residents are complete and/or require assistance with their ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R5 was soaked if they did their rounds (CNAs on 7p-7A shift), they (the residents) wouldn't be soaked (with urine). This is the busiest side. R5 demands constant attention. I'm constantly chasing after R6 because she goes into other resident's rooms and takes things. R7 is fall risk, he can't be left alone when he's on the toilet. 10.21.2023 at 9:45 AM, V6 (Agency LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) said We did have a last-minute call off, so we're waiting for a replacement. Two CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) are not enough. We used to have four, it was better with four, but the new owner took the fourth CNA away. 10.21.2023 at 9:50 AM, V7 (Agency LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) said there is not enough help with two CNAs; there won't be enough help with three CNAs. We need four CNAs. 10.21.2023 at 10:00 AM, V4 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) said I changed R10 around 7:00AM. She was really wet as if she hadn't been changed, the incontinent pad underneath her was wet as well. I still haven't rounded or changed my residents. If you go into the rooms, you'll find residents who are wet. I also have four feeders. I'm being totally honest, there isn't enough help and we're working short because someone called off. 10.21.2023 at 10:38 AM, R2 sitting up in bed with eyes closed, non-verbal. V4 said this is the first time I'm seeing him (to provide incontinent care); I did feed him earlier. V4 lowered the head of R2's bed and undid his brief. Surveyor observed a blue brief (with flaps removed) inside R2's outer brief. R2's blue brief was saturated with urine, the back of R2's yellow brief was saturated with urine. V4 said the line down the front of R2's yellow brief will change color when the resident is wet, however because R2 was double diapered (blue brief inside of yellow brief) the line on the outer brief will not change color even though resident is wet. 10.21.2023 at 10:50 AM, with V4 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) and V5 (Agency CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant), R3 was observed awake and alert lying in bed, R3 did not respond to Surveyors questions. R3's brief was saturated with urine. R2's incontinent pad was wet with urine; a dark ring was noted as well. R2's fitted sheet was wet with urine. 10.21.2023 at 11:06 AM, with V4 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant), R4 was observed awake and alert, sitting up in bed. R4 said she was changed once on the night shift but was currently wet. Surveyor observed a blue brief with flaps removed) inside R4's outer brief. R4's blue brief was saturated with urine, the back of R4's yellow brief was saturated with urine. The line down the front of R4's brief had not changed color. A folded bath blanket and an incontinent pad were observed under R4. The bath blanket was wet with dark urine; dark rings were noted on the bath blanket, incontinent pad, and fitted sheet. 10.21.2023 at 11:33 AM, R1 was observed sitting up in bed. A blue brief was observed sticking out from the top of R1's yellow brief. R1 said staff double diapered him (on the night shift). At 11:37 AM, V5 (Agency CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) entered R1's room to provide incontinent care. R1's blue brief and back of R1's yellow brief were saturated with urine; a pungent odor was noted. R1's draw sheet was saturated with urine; a dark ring was noted on R1's fitted sheet.
Aug 2023 12 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to develop and implement a compreh...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (R55) of five residents reviewed in a sample of 18. Findings include: R55 is a [AGE] year-old individual admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R55's medical diagnosis includes but not limited to: Cerebral Infarction due to embolism of left middle cerebral artery. R55's physician order sheet (POS) documents R55's orders to include but not limited to: Eliquis Oral Tablet 5 MG (Apixaban) Give 1 tablet via G-Tube two times a day for CVA (Cerebral Vascular Accident). Active (Start date for medication)7/1/2023. On 8/9/2023 at 2:54 pm, V16 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator -MDS) and surveyor reviewed R55's care plan. V16 said R55's anticoagulant medication, Eliquis Oral Tablet 5 MG, was not care planned and it should have been care planned after it was ordered so that R55's nurses can monitor for side effects including bleeding, bruising, blood clots, and effectiveness of the medication. V16 further stated that a resident's specialized care plan paints a picture of the resident specific needs, and it is customized to meet the individual needs of that resident. V16 said she does the care plans for medications including but not limited to psychotropic and anti-coagulant medications for all residents. V16 further said for new admissions, she reviews the charts from the hospital records when the resident gets to the facility, then then she adds the diagnosis in the residents' electronic medical chart, and once the nurses put the orders in the residents' electronic record, V16 checks the orders and based on the orders, she develops the residents individualized the care plan. V16 said after doing daily morning rounds with the inter- disciplinary team, if there are any changes or resident's orders, she updates the care plan. V16 said if R55's medication Eliquis 5MG is not care planned, R55 can develop adverse side effects from the medications, and it might not be monitored because the medication is not care planned and nurse will not see interventions or goals for the medication. On 8/9/2023 at 12:55pm, V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) said all psychotropic, blood pressure, diuretics, and anticoagulant medications are care planned to check for effectiveness of the medications, side effects and care plans guide the nurses and gives parameters for what interventions, goals, and side effects of the medications that the nurses need to watch for. V2 further said that the care plan guides, and based on the care plan goals and interventions the nurses will know when to contact the nurses physician for any adverse side effects of the medication(s). Policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, no date, documents; -A comprehensive care plan than includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs shall be developed for each resident. -The comprehensive care plan has been designed to: Incorporate identified risk factors associated wit identified problems, Reflect treatment goals and objectives in measurable outcomes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for two (R13, R179) out of five residents reviewed for medication administrati...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for two (R13, R179) out of five residents reviewed for medication administration resulting in a 12.12% error rate. Findings Include: R179's Facesheet documents that R179 has diagnoses not limited to major depressive disorder, Parkinson's disease, chronic systolic heart failure, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. R179's medication administration record (MAR) dated 08/01/2023 - 08/09/2023 documents: Co Q 10 (Ubidecarenone) 30mg- 1 tab by mouth one time a day. Sertraline 100mg- 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. Review of R179's MAR documents that V9 signed the MAR to indicate that the above medications were given. This documentation does not align with direct observation. On 08/09/2023 at 8:55AM, observed that these medications were not given during medication administration pass with V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN). R13's Facesheet documents that R13 has diagnoses not limited to: Chronic Kidney Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and major depressive disorder. R13's medication administration record (MAR) dated 08/01/2023 - 08/09/2023 documents: Potassium Chloride 10 MEQ- 1 tablet by mouth in the morning. Vitamin D3 75mcg- 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. Review of R13's MAR documents that V9 signed the MAR to indicate that the above medications were given. This documentation does not align with direct observation. On 08/09/2023 at 8:59AM, observed that these medications were not given during medication administration pass with V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN). On 08/09/2023 at 2:01PM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) located in conference room and states, I can't believe that I did not give those medications. I thought I gave them all, I don't know what happened. I don't have a reason or explanation of why I did not administer the medications to R179 and R13. On 08/09/2023 at 2:22PM, V9 (LPN) re-enters the conference room and states, I forgot to give those medications to R13 and R179, so now I have to call the doctor. V9 was not consulted or advised on any actions to be taken. Facility Policy dated 08/15/2022, titled Medication Administration Policy documents in part, Medications must be administered in accordance with a physician's order at his/her discretion, e.g., the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right route, and right time.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0806 (Tag F0806)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy taking in to account preferences of food and beverages for 3 of 3 residents (R53, R52, and R11) during dining o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy taking in to account preferences of food and beverages for 3 of 3 residents (R53, R52, and R11) during dining observations. These failures have the potential to affect 3 residents (R53, R52, and R11) meal preference and consumption of food and beverage during meals. Findings include: On 08/08/2023 at 12:21 PM, at the dining room during lunch, R53 and R52 who were seated on the same table were asked if they are enjoying their food. R53 said, Look what they gave me (holding grilled cheese sandwich), they did not give me my chocolate milk. They always fail to give me my chocolate milk. Then R52 said, Look what they gave me (holding a grilled cheese sandwich). I would like a Tuna Sandwich, but I always don't get what I asked. V17 (Dietary Staff) was informed but responded, I am not sure what they are getting. V18 (Director of Dietary and Dining Services) were informed and said, Let me talk to them. During conversation with R53 and R52, R53 said, I did not receive my chocolate milk. Then R52, when asked if she would like tuna sandwich said, Yes, I would like tuna sandwich. R53's tray ticket under preference reads chocolate milk. And R52's tray ticket under preference has only tuna sandwich. V18 said, Dietary staff much always check meal tickets and follow food preference. I will make sure staff provide what the resident has on their meal ticket as their preference. On 08/10/2023 at 12:17 PM, at the same dining room, R11 was asked how her lunch was. R11 said, I like chocolate milk, but they gave me this (holding a carton of 2% milk). They say chocolate milk is not available. On 08/10/2023 at 12:45 PM, V18 was informed and said, I am very upset, I specifically told them to follow meal tickets. I will check who gave R11 milk instead of chocolate milk. V18 came back with V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and said, I will let V19 explain to you because she gave R11 the chocolate milk. At first V19 said, I asked R11 what she wanted, and she said regular milk. Later, V19 said, I placed chocolate milk on R11's table, and somebody took it. V18 then said, It is the facility staff, may it be nursing or dietary staff to make sure residents get food and beverages that they prefer. I understand that it is not good when you order a specific food, and you get a different one. Food Preferences policy dated 2023, reads: The healthcare community provides each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets their nutritional needs and takes their food and beverage preferences in to account.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0813 (Tag F0813)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and review of records, the facility failed to date and refrigerate food from outside source to 1 out of 1 resident (R41) reviewed for food on the bedside. These fail...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and review of records, the facility failed to date and refrigerate food from outside source to 1 out of 1 resident (R41) reviewed for food on the bedside. These failures have the potential to affect 1 resident (R41) in consuming food that are not appropriate for consumption. Findings include: On 08/08/2023 at 11:45 AM, R41 was seen alert and verbally able to express his thoughts. R1 has a lot of food on the bedside table and drawer, including a sandwich dated 8/6/2023, milk in a carton, cucumber, peanuts on the bottle, crackers, Tortillas, Dreamies Raspberry, Donette's Danish, chips on a zip lock all not dated, and a banana with discoloration. R41 said, Some of this food is old, but I don't to know when I got them. On 08/10/2023 at 12:15 PM, V18 (Director of Dietary Services and Dining Services) said, Food on the bed side must be dated to know if it is still good to be consumed. Then it must be placed in resident's personal refrigerator that must be checked daily for temperature. If the resident does not have personal refrigerator, it will be placed inside the refrigerator for food at the Nurses' Station. All food must be dated to determine when to discard. On 08/10/2023 at 12:23 PM, R41 still has a bottle of peanut that was not dated. Per facility policy of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors Personal Refrigerator dated 2021, it reads: Clients may accept food from family or visitors. The healthcare community provides visitor information on safe food handling practices. Food or beverages brought in by family or visitors may be stored in the client's personal refrigerator or in a food refrigerator on the unit. Perishable foods are discarded on the sixth day after preparation / opening or on the expiration date.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy on Antibiotic Stewardship Program on tracking antibiotic use of all residents taking antibiotics and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy on Antibiotic Stewardship Program on tracking antibiotic use of all residents taking antibiotics and indication of antibiotic use by prescriber for 3 out of 5 residents (R41, R49, and R228) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. These failures have the potential to affect 3 residents (R41, R49, and R228) with the risk of developing resistance with antibiotic. Findings include: Per review of facility's July 2023 Antibiotic Tracking, 3 residents (R41, R49, and R228) taking antibiotic were not included in the tracking log. R41 has multiple antibiotic use that includes: Levaquin 250 MG to give 1 tablet by mouth in the afternoon for ESBL (Extended-spectrum Beta-Lactamases) of urine for 1 week until 04/06/2023. Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystal Oral Capsule 100 MG Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for ESBL of urine until 04/06/2023. CefTRIAXone Sodium Injection Solution Reconstituted 1 GM Use 1 gram intravenously one time a day for antibiotic for 4 Weeks order date 5/2/2023 to 5/30/2023. Ampicillin-Sulbactam Sodium Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 1.5 (1-0.5) GM Use 1.5 gram intravenously every 6 hours for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) for 4 Weeks order date 6/9/2023 until 7/3/2023. On 08/08/2023 at 11:55 AM, R41 was seen alert and verbally able to express his thoughts. R41 has 2 urinals hanging on the right-side rails of his bed. R41 said, I still have discomfort during urination, and frequently urinating during night. R41 has multiple antibiotics for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) including ESBL (Extended-spectrum Beta-Lactamases) in urine. Per CDC information on ESBL dated 11/22/2019, Enterobacterales can produce enzymes called extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs). ESBL enzymes break down and destroy some commonly used antibiotics, including penicillins and cephalosporins, and make these drugs ineffective for treating infections. R41's care plan on Enhanced Barrier Precautions reads: R41 is at risk of acquiring MDRO (Multi-Drug Resistant Organism). Per DPH Multi-Drug Resistant Organism Toolkit for LTC (Long Term Care) dated 08/2019, it reads: When a drug that can normally be used to treat an infection does not work to treat the organism causing the infection, the organism is called resistant to that drug. Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are organisms or microbes that have become resistant to multiple types of drugs that are normally used to treat them. MDROs can include fungi, viruses, and parasites, but many are bacteria. Antimicrobial resistance is the ability of these microbes to resist the effects of drugs - that is, the germs are not killed, and their growth is not stopped. One type of antimicrobial resistance is antibiotic resistance, when bacteria are resistant to the antibiotics used to treat them. R49 has orders for antibiotics: - Ertapenem Sodium 1 GM intravenous solution for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) for 5 days. Although it was ordered for 5 days, ordered date was 7/18/2023 and was discontinued the next day 7/19/2023. - Invanz 1 GM intravenous solution with order date 7/19/2023 to 7/22/2023. All of these antibiotic order by physician were not included in the antibiotic tracking for the month of July. R228 has antibiotic order for Metronidazole 500 MG every 8 hours for C. Diff (Clostridioides difficile) is a bacterium that causes diarrhea and colitis (an inflammation of the colon). C. diff infection can be life-threatening. R228's antibiotic was not included in the antibiotic tracking for the month of July. 08/09/2023 at 09:40 AM, V2 (Infection Preventionist / Director of Nursing) said, There are antibiotics that does not have indication what it is being used for, and it needs clarification. Yes, all residents that are taking antibiotics must be included in the tracking form to monitor effectivity, adverse reaction of antibiotic use. Policy for Antibiotic Stewardship Program dated 10/15/19, reads: To limit antibiotic resistance in the post-acute setting, improve treatment efficacy and resident safety, and reduce treatment-related costs. The Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) is designed to promote appropriate use of antibiotics while optimizing the treatment of infections, and simultaneously reducing the possible of adverse events associated with antibiotic use. Under tracking the IP (Infection Preventionist) will be responsible for infection surveillance and MDRO tracking. Policy for Antibiotic Stewardship Program not dated, reads: Requires prescribers to document a dose, duration, and indication for all antibiotic prescription. Monitor rates of C. Diff infection, antibiotic-resistant organisms, and adverse drug reactions due to antibiotics.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure liquid medications were properly labeled with ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure liquid medications were properly labeled with an open date and ensure that one out of two medication carts reviewed were locked/secured while unattended. These failures have the potential to affect 27 residents residing in the facility. Findings Included: On 08/08/2023 at 9:39AM, an observation of the medication cart (Identified as 1 East Medication Cart) on the first floor of the facility with V4 (Registered Nurse/RN) present revealed the following medication to be opened and undated: Levetiracetam 100mg/ml with R66's name on it. V4 stated that she administered R66 the above medication this morning and that there should be an open date labeled on the medication. On 08/08/2023 at 9:53AM, an observation of the medication cart (Identified as 2 East Medication Cart) on the second floor of the facility with V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) present revealed the following medication to be opened and undated: Albuterol Sulfate 2.5mg/3ml with R69's name on it. Ipratropium Bromide 2.5mg/3ml with R21's name on it. V5 stated that all liquid medications should be labeled with an open date when they are first opened. On 08/09/2023, during a medication administration pass with V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) from approximately 8:00AM to 9:00AM, V9 observed leaving medication cart (identified as 2 [NAME] team 2 medication cart) unlocked and unattended. V9 stated that medication carts should not be left unlocked when unattended because someone could potentially access medications inside of the cart. On 08/09/2023 at approximately 8:00AM, V9 (LPN) stated that she was responsible for administering medications to residents residing in room [ROOM NUMBER] and rooms 244-254. V9 is assigned to the 2 [NAME] team 2 medication cart, which stores the medications for the room numbers listed above. Facility Census dated 08/08/2023 documents that a total of 24 residents reside in the room numbers listed above. On 08/10/2023 at 10:50AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that all medications, including stock supply should be labeled with an open date. Facility Policy dated 08/15/2022, titled Medication Administration Policy documents in part, Multi-use vials and house stock liquids must be dated when opened. Liquids must be dated when opened. Facility Policy dated 12/10/2022, titled Medication Storage in the Facility documents in part, 3. Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked and attended by person with authorized access.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has the following failures related to infection prevention and control. The facility failed to clean and disinfect reusable equipment (...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has the following failures related to infection prevention and control. The facility failed to clean and disinfect reusable equipment (blood pressure cuff device) used by four residents (R13, R51, R62, and R179). The facility also failed to follow appropriate infection control procedures after using a glucometer on one (R14) of one resident observed for a blood glucose reading in a total sample of 5 residents reviewed during medication administration. Facility also failed to provide access to perform hand hygiene for 1 out of 20 residents (R41) with multiple infections reviewed for facility infection control and prevention practices. Findings include: On 08/08/2023 at 11:55 AM, R41 was seen alert and verbally able to express his thoughts. R41 has 2 urinals hanging on the right-side rails of his bed. R41 said, I still have discomfort during urination, and frequently urinating during night. I cannot go to toilet by myself, and I also need to wash my hands in the toilet. I need to use the walker (pointing at the right side of the bed where walker was located). R41 was asked how he performs hand hygiene after using his urinals. R41 did not respond. Upon review of R41's room, no hand sanitizer available for him to use. R41 has multiple antibiotics for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) including ESBL (Extended-spectrum Beta-Lactamases) in urine. Enterobacterales can produce enzymes called extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs). ESBL enzymes break down and destroy some commonly used antibiotics, including penicillins and cephalosporins, and make these drugs ineffective for treating infections. CDC information on ESBL dated 11/22/2019. Hand Hygiene policy reads: To ensure that all individuals use appropriate hand hygiene while at the facility. The facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infection. Alcohol-based hand hygiene products can and should be used to decontaminate hands. R41's care plan on Enhanced Barrier Precautions reads: R41 is at risk of acquiring MDRO (Multi-Drug Resistant Organism). Per DPH Multi-Drug Resistant Organism Toolkit for LTC (Long Term Care) dated 08/2019, it reads: When a drug that can normally be used to treat an infection does not work to treat the organism causing the infection, the organism is called resistant to that drug. Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are organisms or microbes that have become resistant to multiple types of drugs that are normally used to treat them. MDROs can include fungi, viruses, and parasites, but many are bacteria. Antimicrobial resistance is the ability of these microbes to resist the effects of drugs - that is, the germs are not killed, and their growth is not stopped. One type of antimicrobial resistance is antibiotic resistance, when bacteria are resistant to the antibiotics used to treat them R41's antibiotic are as follows: Levaquin 250 MG to give 1 tablet by mouth in the afternoon for ESBL (Extended-spectrum Beta-Lactamases) of urine for 1 week until 04/06/2023 Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystal Oral Capsule 100 MG Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for ESBL of urine until 04/06/2023. Ceftriaxone Sodium Injection Solution Reconstituted 1 GM Use 1 gram intravenously one time a day for antibiotic for 4 Weeks order date 5/2/2023 to 5/30/2023. Ampicillin-Sulbactam Sodium Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 1.5 (1-0.5) GM Use 1.5 gram intravenously every 6 hours for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) for 4 Weeks order date 6/9/2023 until 7/3/2023. Voriconazole Oral Tablet 50 MG Give 2 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for fungal infection order date 7/14/2023. On 08/09/2023 at 09:40 AM, V2 (Infection Preventionist / Director of Nursing) said, Yes, we provide hand sanitizers or alcohol-based hand rub. Since, R41 uses urinal at the bedside, he needs to perform hand hygiene. R41 needs hand sanitizer on the bedside. On 08/09/2023 at 8:19AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) performed a blood glucose reading on R14 using a glucometer. On 08/09/2023 at 8:19AM, V9 observed wiping the same glucometer used on R14 with a Bleach Wipe for approximately 3 seconds and then disposing the Bleach Wipe in a garbage container. V9 then placed the glucometer back into the top drawer of the medication cart. On 08/09/2023 at 08:25 AM, V9 (License Practical Nurse/LPN) entered R62's room with the blood pressure device and placed the blood pressure cuff on R62's arm to obtain the blood pressure reading of 147/80. V9 (LPN) returned to the medication cart with the blood pressure machine to prepare R62's medications. V9 did not clean the blood pressure device. On 08/09/2023 at 8:30 AM, V9 (License Practical Nurse/LPN) entered R13's room with the blood pressure device and placed the blood pressure cuff on R13's arm to obtain the blood pressure reading of 143/79. V9 (LPN) returned to the medication cart with the blood pressure device to prepare R13's medications. V9 did not clean the blood pressure device. On 08/09/2023 at 8:37 AM, V9 (License Practical Nurse/LPN) located inside of R179's room with the blood pressure device and placed the blood pressure cuff on R179's arm to obtain the blood pressure reading of 150/65. V9 did not clean the blood pressure device. On 08/09/2023 at 8:41AM, V9 takes the blood pressure device and placed the blood pressure cuff on R51's arm, who is located in the same room as R13 and R179. V9 did not clean the blood pressure device. V9 observed exiting R51's room and states R51's blood pressure reading did not register on the blood pressure device, I have to take R51's blood pressure reading manually. V9 did not clean the blood pressure device. On 08/10/2023 at 10:50AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that reusable equipment such as blood glucometers and blood pressure cuff devices should be disinfected in between resident use and that if not performed, then infections can potentially be spread from resident to resident. V2 stated that reusable devices are cleaned with bleach wipes according to the label/manufacturer's guidelines for cleaning/disinfecting. Facility policy undated, titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident Care Equipment documents in part, V. Reusable items (equipment that is designated reusable by more than one resident) are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents. Facility policy dated 12/31/2022, titled Glucometer Infection Control Policy documents in part, 4. While wearing gloves, the blood glucose monitor will be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected after each use per manufacturer's guidelines. Per record review, facility document of Bleach Wipe label document in part 5. Apply towelette and wipe desired surface to be disinfected. A 30 second contact time is required to kill the bacteria and viruses on the label except a 1 minute contact time is required to kill Candida albicans and Trichophyton interdigitale, and a 3 minute contact time is required to kill Clostridium difficile spores. Reapply as necessary to ensure that the surface remains visibly wet for the entire contact time.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0887 (Tag F0887)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. This failure has the potentia...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. This failure has the potential to affect the 87 residents that are served food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 8/8/23 at 9:40 AM, surveyor toured the facility kitchen with V18 (Director of Dietary and Dining) and observed: -a staff lunch bag and a pan of roast beef (to be served at lunch) on the food prep counter/cooking area. -a bag of dry cereal not completely sealed. -7 bottles of thickened orange juice, nectar consistency with use by date 5/24/23. -a bag of dry pasta with no OPENED date. -a package of hotdog buns not sealed closed. On 8/8/23 at 10:40 AM, V21 (Cook) stated staff personal belongings are not supposed to be in the kitchen on cooking areas according to the rules. It is not sanitary. There is a potential for contamination and for residents to get bacteria. On 8/10/23 at 11:45 AM, V18 (Director of Dietary and Dining) stated because a staff person placed their lunch bag on the food prep counter/cooking area there was a potential to contaminate food because the bag was from outside. The bag should not have been there. Should not have staff personal items in the kitchen. If contamination occurs, there is potential for the residents to get sick. The thickener should have been discarded on the day it expired at the end of the night. Everybody is responsible for checking expiration dates before they use the product. The thickener should have been thrown out to prevent residents from getting sick. Packages that are not properly sealed or resealed can become contaminated and can attract rodents. Items should be labeled with the Opened date, so it is known when to throw it away. It lasts for only a certain amount of time after it is opened. When you open something, it should be dated with the date it was opened. Everything should be labeled with the date it was opened so you know when to throw it away. Facility policy Food Safety Requirements-Use and Storage of Food and Beverage Brought in for Residents, Food Procurement, not dated, documents in part: It is the policy of this facility to provide safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of all foods. Cross-contamination means the transfer of harmful substances or disease-causing microorganisms to food by hands, food contact surfaces, sponges, cloth towels, or utensils which are not cleaned after touching raw food, and then touch ready-to-eat foods. The objective/intent of this requirement is to ensure that the facility follows proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. Safe food handling for the prevention of foodborne illnesses begins when food is received from the vendor and continues throughout the facility's food handling processes. Facility policy Labeling and Dating Foods, date 2010, documents in part: Prepared and packaged foods will be labeled and rotated to decrease the risk of food borne illnesses, provide the highest quality product for the residents and minimize waste. Potentially hazardous foods that contain a Sell by date, will be labeled with the date it is opened and a use by date which is either the 6th day it is opened or the Sell by date, whichever is sooner. Commercially processed foods that have been prepared and packaged by a food processing plant will be labeled with the date it is opened. This will be discarded either on the 6th day or the Best Used By date.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly contain waste in the dumpsters. This failure has the potential to affect all 73 residents in the facility. Findings i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly contain waste in the dumpsters. This failure has the potential to affect all 73 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 8/9/23 at 9:00 AM, toured the dumpster area with V18 (Director of Dietary and Dining). Observed three dumpsters, two recycle dumpsters with cardboard and plastic in them and one trash dumpster with bags of trash in it. The lids on all three dumpsters were open. On 8/9/23 at 9:20 AM, V22 (Maintenance) stated the dumpster lids should be closed. On 8/9/23 at 9:25 AM, V23 (Maintenance Director) stated the lids should be closed on the dumpsters. They should be closed because of the risk to attract rodents, and pests. On 8/10/23 at 11:45 AM, V18 (Director of Dietary and Dining) stated the dumpsters should be closed. There is a potential for odors and to attract cockroaches, flies, rodents. There is potential for pest infestations in the building. Facility Pest Control Physical Environment policy, date 4/1/2020, documents in part: Purpose: To ensure the facility is free of insects, rodents, and other pests that could compromise the health, safety, and comfort of residents, facility staff, and visitors.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 harm violation(s), $67,907 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 61 deficiencies on record, including 4 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $67,907 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (5/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 5/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Paul House & Health Cr Ctr's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns PAUL HOUSE & HEALTH CR CTR an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Paul House & Health Cr Ctr Staffed?

CMS rates PAUL HOUSE & HEALTH CR CTR's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 55%, which is 9 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Paul House & Health Cr Ctr?

State health inspectors documented 61 deficiencies at PAUL HOUSE & HEALTH CR CTR during 2023 to 2025. These included: 4 that caused actual resident harm and 57 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Paul House & Health Cr Ctr?

PAUL HOUSE & HEALTH CR CTR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 110 certified beds and approximately 98 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in CHICAGO, Illinois.

How Does Paul House & Health Cr Ctr Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, PAUL HOUSE & HEALTH CR CTR's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (55%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Paul House & Health Cr Ctr?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Paul House & Health Cr Ctr Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, PAUL HOUSE & HEALTH CR CTR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Paul House & Health Cr Ctr Stick Around?

Staff turnover at PAUL HOUSE & HEALTH CR CTR is high. At 55%, the facility is 9 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Paul House & Health Cr Ctr Ever Fined?

PAUL HOUSE & HEALTH CR CTR has been fined $67,907 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Illinois average of $33,758. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Paul House & Health Cr Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?

PAUL HOUSE & HEALTH CR CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.