SELFHELP HOME OF CHICAGO
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Selfhelp Home of Chicago has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #79 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and #25 out of 201 in Cook County, meaning there are only a few better local options. The facility is improving, with a decrease in reported issues from 10 in 2023 to 9 in 2024. Staffing is a strength, with a perfect 5-star rating and a low turnover rate of 20%, significantly better than the state average. Notably, there are no fines on record, and the facility has more RN coverage than 82% of Illinois facilities, which is beneficial for resident care. However, there are some weaknesses to note. A serious incident occurred where a resident suffered a fracture due to inadequate supervision and failure to follow fall protocols. Additionally, the kitchen was found to have expired food products, which could potentially impact residents' health. Lastly, the facility failed to post daily nursing staffing information, which could affect transparency for residents and families. Overall, while there are several strengths in care and staffing, these incidents indicate areas that require attention.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Illinois
- #79/665
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 20% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 28 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 89 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Illinois nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 21 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (20%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (20%)
28 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
No Significant Concerns Identified
This facility shows no red flags. Among Illinois's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.
The Ugly 21 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. R4's admission diagnoses include but not limited to obstructive and reflux uropathy, hydronephrosis with renal and urethral calculous obstruction, benign prostatic hyperplasia of lower urinary trac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL (Activity of Daily Living) care for one de...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications for one resident (R16) was administ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the urinary drainage bag was hanging below the bladder. This failure affected one resident (R4) reviewed in a samp...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and date oxygen equipment (oxygen tubing and nebulizer mask); and failed to properly contain oxygen equipment (nebulizer...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0813
(Tag F0813)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a personal freezer has a temperature log and a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a medication cart was kept locked. This failure has the potential to affect all 15 residents on the 6th floor unit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two residents (R33 and R56) intravenous site (I...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the daily nursing staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility.
Findings ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their fall protocol, failed to provide adequate supervision,...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview ,and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from physical restraints for 1 resident (R47) out 3 residents reviewed for restraints, in a sample ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to follow their policy to use gait belts to transfer residents who require limited to extensive assistance with partial, toe-touch, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate record of residents for 3 out of 15 residents (R111, R17, and R47) for a total sample of 15 residents revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow enhance barrier precautions procedure by not w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0565
(Tag F0565)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with private space for resident council meetings, and failed to notify resident representative (Ombudsman) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly secure controlled medications for 3(R261, R27, R36) residents reviewed in a sample of 15 residents.
Findings includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose/discard expired medications in one two medications carts/medication room/storage reviewed. This failure has the poten...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was free of expired food products. This failure has the potential to affect 52 residents residing in the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0888
(Tag F0888)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy on ensuring and monitoring all HCP (Healthcare Personnel) Covid-19 vaccination status, and failed to ensu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bottles of eye drops were dated when opened. This failure affected two residents (R21 and R30) of ten residents review...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to track the status of influenza and pneumococcal vaccin...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Illinois.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 20% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 28 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 21 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Selfhelp Home Of Chicago's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SELFHELP HOME OF CHICAGO an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Selfhelp Home Of Chicago Staffed?
CMS rates SELFHELP HOME OF CHICAGO's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 20%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Selfhelp Home Of Chicago?
State health inspectors documented 21 deficiencies at SELFHELP HOME OF CHICAGO during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 20 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Selfhelp Home Of Chicago?
SELFHELP HOME OF CHICAGO is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 72 certified beds and approximately 55 residents (about 76% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CHICAGO, Illinois.
How Does Selfhelp Home Of Chicago Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, SELFHELP HOME OF CHICAGO's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (20%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Selfhelp Home Of Chicago?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Selfhelp Home Of Chicago Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SELFHELP HOME OF CHICAGO has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Selfhelp Home Of Chicago Stick Around?
Staff at SELFHELP HOME OF CHICAGO tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 20%, the facility is 26 percentage points below the Illinois average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 5%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Selfhelp Home Of Chicago Ever Fined?
SELFHELP HOME OF CHICAGO has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Selfhelp Home Of Chicago on Any Federal Watch List?
SELFHELP HOME OF CHICAGO is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.