WARREN BARR LINCOLN PARK

2732 NORTH HAMPDEN COURT, CHICAGO, IL 60614 (773) 248-6000
For profit - Limited Liability company 109 Beds LEGACY HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
16/100
#297 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: November 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Warren Barr Lincoln Park has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's care and operations. Ranking #297 out of 665 in Illinois places it in the top half of state facilities, while its county rank of #91 out of 201 indicates that there are only a few local options that perform better. The facility's trend is stable, maintaining 15 issues from 2023 to 2024, but the number of critical incidents is alarming. Staffing is rated 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average, with a turnover rate of 56%, suggesting that many staff do not stay long, impacting continuity of care. The facility has incurred fines totaling $125,108, which is concerning but average for Illinois. It offers good RN coverage, exceeding that of 77% of other Illinois facilities, which is a positive aspect since registered nurses can identify problems that nursing assistants might miss. However, serious issues have been identified, including a critical incident where a resident was physically abused by a staff member and another where a cognitively impaired resident was allowed to wander off the premises, raising significant safety concerns. Additionally, there were problems noted in food safety practices, such as failing to properly store food and manage cleanliness in the kitchen. Overall, while there are some strengths, the serious deficiencies and incidents raise red flags for families considering this facility for their loved ones.

Trust Score
F
16/100
In Illinois
#297/665
Top 44%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Holding Steady
15 → 15 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$125,108 in fines. Higher than 60% of Illinois facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 55 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Illinois. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
37 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 15 issues
2024: 15 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Illinois average (2.5)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 56%

10pts above Illinois avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $125,108

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: LEGACY HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (56%)

8 points above Illinois average of 48%

The Ugly 37 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening
Nov 2024 9 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete one residents (R29) comprehensive annual assessment. Findings include: On 10/30/24 at 3:58 PM, V24 (Regional Director o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete one residents (R29) comprehensive annual assessment. Findings include: On 10/30/24 at 3:58 PM, V24 (Regional Director of Clinical Data Quality and Performance Audits) stated, Someone is covering MDS (Minimum Data Set) from another facility. On 10/30/24 at 4:25 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, We do not have a current MDS Coordinator. On 10/31/24 at 9:10 AM, V19 (MDS Consultant) stated, (R29's) Census, 5/18/2024, is an error. (R29) went to the hospital and was admitted and returned with qualifying nights at the hospital. (R29) came back to the facility as dual (Medicaid and Medicare payor). MDS is scheduled in sequence. The census line has an error. The submitted MDS on 10/17/24, was a quarterly assessment, modified to be inactivated. MDS annual created it to be finalized on 10/31/24, with the same ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of the submitted MDS (10/17/24). Census drives the MDS. Assessments are in sequence. A quarterly was sent. The type of assessment was an error. We inactivated the quarterly and made an annual. Today (10/31/2024) is the last day to complete the annual. Entry and admission assessment and comprehensive are done yearly. Quarterly is every 92 days. A quarterly does not suffice as an annual, it is not comprehensive. We submitted the quarterly in place of annual in error. According to document provided by facility on 10/31/24, R29's next full ARD is 10/23/2024; next quarterly ARD is 1/17/2025. A quarterly assessment was submitted 10/17/2024 and inactivated. Annual and inactivation of quarterly are in progress.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a new Level I screen for one (R70) resident reviewed for P...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a new Level I screen for one (R70) resident reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASARR) in a total sample of 21. Findings include: R70's Facesheet documents R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R70's Level I PASARR outcome documents R70 has an exempted hospital discharge, with a 30-day length of stay that expired on [DATE]. On [DATE], at 2:19 PM, V1 (Administrator) states the facility checks to see if a resident has a PASARR screening upon admission. V1 states the PASARR indicates the determination of needs/DON score for the individual resident. V1 states based on the DON score, it is determined if a resident is appropriate for the nursing home setting or not. V1 states she is unaware of the DON score ranges or what the different DON score ranges are indicative of. V1 states a PASARR Level II is needed for a resident if it is determined that the resident has an SMI/severe mental illness. V1 states the determination for a Level II PASARR screening is based off of the results of the Level I PASARR screening. V1 states R70 has been admitted to the facility for longer than 30 days, therefore, R70's exemption status has expired. V1 states R70's PASSAR screening expired on [DATE]. V1 states once a resident's PASARR screening expires, a new Level I PASARR screening has to be submitted to the designated screening agency. V1 states the purpose of the PASARR screening is to determine if a resident have any significant mental illnesses and to ensure that the facility is an appropriate setting for the residents. Facility policy, dated [DATE], titled PASSAR Screening of Residents with Mental Disorder of Intellectual Disability documents, Policy: It is the facility's policy to ensure that resident's with Mental Disorder and those with Intellectual Disorder will receive PASSAR Screening within the timeframe allowed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address a high blood sugar result for 1 out of 3 residents (R75) re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address a high blood sugar result for 1 out of 3 residents (R75) reviewed for blood sugar testing. Findings include: R75 was [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE], in the facility with medical diagnosis that includes diabetes mellitus. V25 (Registered Nurse) progress notes, dated [DATE], reads R75 expired in the facility pronounced expired by EMS (Emergency Medical Service) at 3:15 PM. Also on the same progress notes, at 2:31 PM, R75's blood sugar was obtained, with 397 result. Per physician order, R75 was receiving Paxlovid medication for Covid-19 from [DATE] to [DATE]. There was an order to check R75's blood sugar before meals and at bedtime, and to call the MD (Medical Doctor) if blood sugar result is below 60 or above 300. R75's MAR (Medication Administration Record), dated [DATE], R75's blood sugar result was scheduled at 11:00 AM. R75's result was 33,3 which was above 300 that per physician order to call physician. Review of all documentation in R75's resident record does not reflect any documentation that any physician or nurse practitioner was informed of R75 blood sugar result. On [DATE] at 10:35 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated during the time that R75 expired, she was not in the facility. V2 stated, I am not sure if the doctor was notified when blood sugar was 333. But I don't see any documentation that the doctor was aware. My expectation with my nurses is that they should follow doctor's order. A result of 333 was high blood sugar and the order was to notify the physician. Therefore, there should have been proper notification. V2 stated V25 is not employed by the facility anymore. On [DATE] at 11:13 AM, V13 (Restorative Director / Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she worked as nurse manager that day. V25 did not inform her R75's blood sugar was elevated. On [DATE], at 2:10 PM, V27 (Nurse Practitioner) stated R75's high blood sugar may be due to Covid-19, and may be due to non-complianace with diet. The first blood sugar result was more than 300. He was informed, but he did not get the next result until after 2:00 PM. V27 stated he instructed V25 to monitor R75. V27 stated he did not know R75's blood sugar further increased to 397 after 2:00 PM. V27 stated he should have been informed also about the other result which is 397. V27 stated normally he would order Hgb (Hemoglobin) A1C in this situation to address the problem, but did not. V27 stated he just ordered V25 to monitor R75. V27 stated he did some notes he saw R75 that day in the morning. V27 stated he did not document V25 informing him of R75's elevated blood sugar because the notes were done in the morning before he was informed by V25. Upon further review of V27's progress notes, it documents the progress notes were created on [DATE], contrary to R27's statement that he made his notes prior to R75's elevated blood sugar result. V27 was asked why he failed to document R75's blood sugar was elevated, and what has he done to address the problem? V27 stated he was referring to his early encounter; that is why he did not include R75's elevated blood sugar result. V27 was asked if he was informed by V25 that R75 had an elevated blood sugar result of 333. Was it important enough to include what care that was provided in his progress notes? V27 responded he did not document regarding R75 elevated blood sugar. He understands there was no documentation to support his statement he was informed of R75's elevated blood sugar, or that he addressed R75's elevated blood sugar. V27 said, Well you cannot prove that I was informed by (V25). I understand that if it was not documented, then it was not done. Management of Diabetes in Long Term Care and Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association, dated 2016, reads: Glucose meter readings .250 mg/dL two or more times within 24-h period accompanied by a new or change in medical or functional status: - Call practitioner, - Increase frequency of glucose monitoring Glucose meter readings. Glucose meter readings .300 mg/dL during all or part of 2 consecutive days: - Confirm high glucose value by laboratory test, - Evaluate nutritional intake Any glucose reading too high to measure by glucose meter, - Adjust diabetes regimen as needed c If glucose levels are persistently high after changes to the diabetes regimen, consider medical evaluation for other causes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer preventative measures were accurately applied for two residents (R4 and R62) in a sample of 18 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer preventative measures were accurately applied for two residents (R4 and R62) in a sample of 18 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer. Findings include: 1. R4's POS (Physician Order Summary) has active order, Patient to be on low air loss mattress at all times daily, afterrnoon, and every shift for pressure reduction, order date 8/27/24. On 10/29/24 at 12:40 PM, R62 was lying in bed on a low air loss. A fitted sheet was on the mattress, and a flat sheet folded two times was between R62 and the mattress. On 10/29/24 at 12:45 PM, V2 verified there was a fitted sheet, a flat sheet folded two times, and R62 was wearing a brief. 2. R62's POS has active order, Patient on LAL (Low Air Loss) mattress at all times every shift for pressure reduction. Order date 9/23/24. On 10/29/24 at 1:00 PM, R4 was lying in bed on a low air loss mattress. A fitted sheet was on the mattress. On 10/29/24 at 1:05 PM, V22 verified there was a fitted sheet, a flat sheet folded two times used as a draw sheet, and R4 was wearing a brief. V22 stated, Wound care said a fitted sheet and a draw sheet can be used on the low air loss mattress. On 10/31/24 at 2:00 PM, V28 (Wound Care Manager) stated, I started here May 21, 2024. According to company protocol, the air loss mattress should have a flat or fitted sheet, not both. They (staff) cannot use a draw sheet. They cannot use the flat sheet folded twice. That is four layers. They can use a blue pad or a chuck in place of the draw sheet, and the resident can have a brief on. There can be nothing more, no more layers. (R4) and (R62) are on a low air loss mattress by weight. (R4) needs the mattress for preventative measures. (R62) needs the mattress because (R62) has active wounds. There should be only three layers between the mattress and the resident, a sheet, blue pad, and a diaper. It was not correct to have the flat sheet folded two times. Proactive Medical Products Operation Manual reads in part: Installation Instructions Step 2, you may place a thin cotton sheet over the quilted mattress to cover. Operating Instructions Step 5, Patients can directly lie on the mattress or cover with a sheet and tuck loosely to increase the comfort of the patient. Med-Aire 8 Alternating Pressure Mattress Replacement System With Low Air Loss User Manual, obtained from https://www.unitedmedsupply.com/drive-14027-drv14027 reads in part: Recommended Linen: Drive DeVilbiss Healthcare bed support surfaces are designed to be used with appropriate linens. Deep pocketed fitted or flat sheets are recommended. Multiple layering of linens or underpads beneath the patient should be avoided, when possible, for the prevention and treatment of pressure injuries.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0806 (Tag F0806)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy on resident food preferences for one (R70) resident in a total sample of 21 residents reviewed. Findings...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy on resident food preferences for one (R70) resident in a total sample of 21 residents reviewed. Findings include: R70's Nutrition Progress Note, dated 10/20/2024, documents in part, Review of diet tolerance, PO (by mouth) intakes, appetite changes, weights, labs, medications, skin conditions. Recommend: Continue current diet, provide food preferences, provide foods from alternative menu, provide assistance with meals as needed, closely monitor diet tolerance, PO intakes, labs, and weights. Continue Pro Stat three times daily to maintain skin integrity. Will continue to monitor and make changes as necessary. Facility menu documents eggs were served in the facility for breakfast on 10/27/24, and 10/28/24. On 10/29/2024, at 11:50 AM, R70 stated the facility staff continues to serve her eggs on her meal trays for breakfast although she has informed the facility that she does not like eggs to eat. R70 states she has informed the Dietary Manager (identified as V8) of her dislike for eggs, and the facility still serves them to her on her meal tray. On 10/30/2024, at 9:55 AM, R70 states the facility served her eggs again today for breakfast, so she refused her breakfast meal tray. On 10/30/2024 at 10:06 AM, V8 stated she is aware R70 does not like eggs as a food preference. V8 stated she completes a food preference interview form with all the residents who are admitted to the facility. V8 stated she usually tries to complete the form within 2 days of the resident being admitted to the facility. V8 stated she completed a food preference interview form for R70, but is unable to locate the form in her files in her file cabinet. V8 then observed looking inside of a dark colored tote bag sitting in a chair next to V8. V8 took out a storage clipboard from the bag. V8 opened the storage clipboard and located R70's food preference interview form. R70's food preference interview form documented no eggs written in ink on the form. V8 observed deploying R70's facility dietary meal ticket on the computer. V8 stated R70's no egg preference was not documented on R70's facility dietary meal ticket. V8 stated R70's no egg preference should be documented on R70's facility dietary meal ticket. On 10/31/2024 at 1:36 PM, V8 stated eggs were served for breakfast in the facility yesterday on 10/30/2024, but did not print on the facility's menu. Facility policy, dated 07/26/2024, titled Food Preference Policy documents, Purpose: The facility will provide food that accommodates allergies and preferences. Policy: 1) The facility will identify resident's allergies, intolerances, and preferences based on medical record and interviews.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R3's Face sheet documents R3 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], who has diagnoses not limited to:...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R3's Face sheet documents R3 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], who has diagnoses not limited to: morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R3 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15, indicating R3 is cognitively intact. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), section GG dated 08/23/2024, documents in part R3 requires Substantial/maximal assistance for shower/bathe self. On 10/29/2024 at 11:09 AM, R3 was lying on her bed, alert and responsive, and in no apparent distress. R3 stated there are certain CNAs (certified nursing assistants) that don't give her adequate bed baths, and R3 stated they just dab and don't clean her perineal area well. R3 stated staff don't clean certain areas on the body, and they need to clean between the buttocks. R3 stated the CNAs tell her that they are told they can't go that far, and they won't clean between her buttocks, by her rectum. R3 stated she last had a bed bath on Friday and is due for today. R3 stated she has had times where her skin is irritated and feels itchy under her breasts. R3 stated she once thought she had a bowel movement and when the CNA checked her, R3 didn't have a bowel movement, but the smell was coming from R3's right under arm. On 10/29/2024 at 11:30 AM V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated that she has one resident's bed bath to complete. V14 stated that R3's bed bath is scheduled today. V14 stated she just started working on October 15, 2024. V14 stated that she has been a CNA for a long time. On 10/29/2024at 1:39 PM, V14 gathered supplies for R3's bed bath. V14 was approached by V29 (CNA/Wound Tech) to ask V14 if she needed her assistance. V14 agreed for V29 to assist her. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) enhanced barrier precaution sign outside of R3's bedroom door. Both V14 and V29 applied disposable gowns, gloves, and entered R3's room. V14 grabbed R3's basin, filled it with R3's body wash and water. V14 handed R3 a wet washcloth and R3 washed her face and then arms. V14 was standing watching television. V29 was standing too. V14 proceeded to remove soiled linen and applied new gloves. R3 stated, Can you get under my breast, it's really itchy. V14 lifted R3's breast and cleaned under it. V14 washed both of R3's under arms, rinsed the same washcloth with the same water. V14 proceeded to dry R3's under breast and under arms and threw the drying towel on the floor. V29 covered R3's breast for privacy. Surveyor observed bin with unclean water/murky appearance water. V14 questioned R3 if she would like for her to change the water, and R3 responded no. V14 did not verbalize any words to R3, and V14 then proceeded to use the same washcloth and clean R3's perineal area. V14 cleaned area around urinal catheter. R3 requested for V14 to clean her perineal area again. V14 cleaned area and proceeded to assist R3 to turn to her right side. V29 standing next to R3's right side for support. V14 cleansed R3's upper, mid, and lower back with the same washcloth that V14 cleaned R3's perineal area. V14 proceeded to wash R3's buttocks and rectal area. R3 noted with light brown stool between R3's buttocks. V14 used a clean new dry towel to dry R3's back. V14 looked at surveyor and stated, Just so you know this is not how I give bed baths. V14 continued to use the large dry towel to wipe R3's stool and V14 wiped all R3's stool. V29 applied body lotion onto R3's back. V14 changed her gloves and proceeded to apply new flat linen sheet, new yellow disposable brief, and assisted R3 to turn and lay on her back. R3 turned to her left side with assistance. R3's linen and brief were straightened out under her. R3 turned and laid on her back. V14 applied a clean hospital gown onto R3. R3's call light placed within reach. R3 placed in a comfortable position. V14 stated that he has completed the bed bath for R3. On 10/30/2024 at 10:36 AM, V4 (Infection Preventionist/Registered Nurse) stated, If they want to clean the perineal area, they should have one washcloth, and then they must change the gloves and the washcloth to prevent infection. The best practice is start from head to toes and clean from the cleanest area of the body to the dirtiest area the body. V4 stated once the nurse aid finishes washing the perineal area with the washcloth, they should grab a new washcloth to clean another part of the area. On 10/30/2024 at 2:12 PM, V30 (Regional Nurse Consultant) stated there is no bed bath procedure policy. V30 stated, The facility hosts skills fair; you have staff go over skills that were trained to reiterate on how to do the procedure, we do have those. Facility documen,t dated 08/19/24, titled Shower and Hygiene documents in part, it is the policy of this facility to ensure that resident shower/hygienic care is provided by the nursing staff to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and observe the condition of the resident's skin. Maintain clean techniques and isolation precautions as indicated. Facility document, dated 7/31/24, titled Infection Prevention and Control documents in part, the facility has established a policy to identify, record, investigate, control, test, and prevent infections in the facility. Staff will be educated about current infection control practices and procedures at least annually. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) worn by staff caring for a resident with a known infectious disease (R50), and failed to ensure staff maintains clean technique/infection control practice while performing a bed bath (R3) for one resident. These failures affect 2 residents (R3 and R50) reviewed for infection prevention and control in a total sample of 21 residents reviewed. Findings include: 1. R50's physician order sheet/POS, dated 10/21/2024, documents R50 is on contact isolation precautions for shingles. On 10/29/2024, at 11:41 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated R50 is on contact isolation in the facility due to R50 being diagnosed with shingles. On 10/29/2024, at 11:48 PM, surveyor observed a sign posted on R50's door that reads, Contact Precautions Everyone Must: clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff must also: Put on gloves before room entry. Discard gloves before room exit. Put on gown before room entry. Discard gown before room exit. On 10/29/2024 at 12:39 PM, V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA Supervisor) entered R50's room with a meal tray, without donning any personal protective equipment/PPE. V6 observed moving items on R50's bedside table and placing the meal tray on R50's bedside table. V6 then observed exiting R50's room. V6 stated she was aware R50 has shingles. V6 stated she is aware staff only need to wear PPE inside of R50's room whenever staff are providing direct patient care. After reading the sign on the door, V6 stated she should have worn a gown and gloves prior to entering R50's room. V6 stated she did not really read the sign posted on R50's door. V6 stated she could potentially cross contaminate and spread R50's infectious disease to another resident if the appropriate PPE is not worn while inside of R50's room. On 10/29/2024 at 1:16 PM, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was observed entering R50's room without donning any personal protective equipment/PPE. V7 was observed grabbing R50's meal tray located on R50's bedside table. V7 then exited R50's room and placed the meal tray onto a meal cart located outside of R50's room. V7 stated she is aware R50 has shingles. V7 stated she was made aware by management, the nursing department, and the infection preventionist that staff does not have to wear PPE inside of R50's room if staff are only passing meal trays. V7 stated she was made aware she only needs to wear PPE inside of R50's room if she has contact with R50. After reading the sign, V7 stated she should have worn a gown and gloves prior to entering R50's room. V7 stated she is not the only staff member who enters R50's room without wearing PPE. V7 stated she could potentially spread R50's infectious disease to another resident if the appropriate PPE is not worn while inside of R50's room. On 10/30/2024 at 2:28 PM, V4 (Infection Preventionist/RN) stated he expects staff to perform hand hygiene prior to entering a resident's room who is on contact isolation. V4 stated staff should also wear a gown and gloves prior to entering a contact isolation room regardless of what services are being provided, including passing meal trays. V4 stated if the appropriate PPE is not worn while inside of a contact isolation room, there is potential for transmission of the infection by the staff members. Facility policy, dated 07/31/2024, titled Infection Prevention and Control documents in part, 2. Contact Precaution- Intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents spread by direct or indirect contact with a patient or the environment. b. Use of gown and gloves is necessary prior to room entry.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medication or controlled substance we...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medication or controlled substance were accounted correctly as to recording compared to the actual medication per policy; failed to separate each medication during gastronomy tube administration; and failed to ensure insulin is available per physician order to avoid delay of administration. These failures affect 6 residents (R23, R2, R53, R127, R69, and R11) reviewed for medication administration. These failures affect 6 residents (R2, R11 R23, R53, R69, R127) in receiving proper pharmaceutical services. On [DATE], at 10:25 AM, V10 (Registered Nurse / Agency) gave a folder that includes narcotic record documents. A document titled Shift Change Accountability Record for Controlled Substances, dated [DATE], was not signed/initialed. V10 stated, I forgot to sign that narcotic medications were counted as correct. The nurse that will be leaving and the nurse that is incoming (V10) during change of shift need to count all narcotics to make sure that the count is correct. V10 was asked if the counting was done. V10 did not answer. All narcotic medications inside the cart were counted with V10. After counting, R23's Pregabalin 75 MG was seen with discrepancy. Controlled Drug Administration Record documents from the pharmacy reads there is one (1) capsule left. The card for the same narcotic was seen without any medicine left. V10 said he forgot to sign, took out his pen and was about to sign the document. When V10 gave both copies after request, both documents were filled up to correct discrepancies. V10 stated when he went to the nurse station, he signed the documents. On [DATE] at 10:53 AM, with V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse) inside the medication carts two resident's narcotic medications did not tally to the records, and the actual count of medicines were: R53 Oxycodone 10 MG record has 4, actual count of tablets has 3. R127 Morphine Sulfate 15 MG record has 18, actual count of tablets has 17. V11 stated she was supposed to sign when giving narcotic medications, but forgot. On [DATE], at 9:34 AM, V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was preparing medications to administer via gastronomy tube to R69. The following medications in tablets form were prepared: - Senna Plus 8.6-50 MG 2 tablets - Amlodipine 10 MG 1 tablet - Carvedilol 25 MG 1 tablet - Modafinil 200 MG 1 tablet - Vitamin C 250 MG 2 tablets V12 popped each tablet out, putting it inside the medication cups. Each cup was stacked on top of each another. All four cups were exposed to high touch areas and made contact with the medicine. Not all medications were placed in individual medication cups. Amlodipine and Carvedilol medications were placed in a single cup. After V12 washed her hands and put on her gloves, V12 touched the bed surroundings, including the rails and bed remote control to elevate the head of the bed. V12 then administered each cup touching the enteral/gastronomy tube with one hand and the other hand inserting the syringe to the tube to administer the medication. V12 uses the same gloves that touched unclean surrounds/environment. V12 stated she placed two different medications in a single cup because they are both blood pressure medicines. V12 stated she should have separated those two medications since they need to be flushed independently with 10 ML of water in between. V12 stated she should refrain from touching high touched areas to maintain cleanliness including contacting the tubing, but she forgot. On [DATE] at 12:28 PM, V13 (Restorative Director / Licensed Practical Nurse) took the blood sugar of R11; the result was 243. After getting the result of blood sugar, V13 used an alcohol pad to apply to the open skin of R11's finger. V13 then put a tissue on the bed which was open and was sticking out of the box. V13 then wiped the blood off R11's finger. V13 returned to her medication cart and took the insulin out for R11, that read Humalog insulin. V13 was asked, Is this the insulin that you will give to (R11)? V13 stated, Yes. V13 was then asked, For how long does this insulin expire? V13 stated, 28 days. The insulin had a written open date of [DATE] and expiration date of [DATE]. The number 30 was written on top of the original number. V13 was asked if the calculation of 28 days after [DATE] is correct? V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse), sitting at the nurse station near V13, stated after checking her phone's calendar, It expired on [DATE]. It was corrected by V13 to [DATE] after rechecking. V13 then checked her medication cart and could not find R11's insulin that was not expired. V13 was not able to give R11's insulin until 2:20 PM. Per V13, she needed to call the physician to get a one-time dose, because the only available insulin is a pen, and not a vial. On [DATE] at 10:43 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, Insulin needs to have an open date and expiration date when first opened. Nurses who gave narcotic medication should sign on the eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) and pharmacy document in the narcotic book. When giving medication via G Tube (stomach tube), each medication needs to in separate cups to identify each medication in case the resident vomited when administering. It also needs to be flushed with 10 CC's of water per pill. Medication Pass policy dated [DATE], reads: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to all Federal and State regulations with medication pass procedures. Under medication labeling, all opened medication vials in the refrigerator should be labeled with the date when it was opened and discarded within 28 days of opening except for Levemir insulin which can be discarded 42 days after opening and Xalatan eye drops which can be discarded 6 weeks after opening. Follow pharmacy recommendation as to when the medication should be discarded after opening. Insulin vials are to be discarded within 28 days after opening, except for Levemir insulin which are to be discarded 42 days after opening. Under controlled substances, all scheduled 2 controlled substances will be stored properly and double locked. Under procedure related to G - Tube medications, separate each medication in medication cup and flush in between each medicine with at least 5 ML of water. Can use the water to rinse the medication cup as flushing in between medicine. Under controlled substances, all scheduled 2 controlled substances will be stored properly and double locked. Controlled Medications Count policy dated [DATE], reads: It is the policy of the facility to maintain accurate count of Scheduled 2 controlled medications. Under procedure, after removing the controlled medication from the bingo card or individual packet, the nurse will sign off the accompanying controlled medication sheet indicating the medication is taken.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date and label insulins and eye drops per policy; fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date and label insulins and eye drops per policy; failed to maintain medication carts free from insulin that were expired; failed to store controlled substances inside a double locked storage; and failed to maintain medication storage area free from controlled substance that was discontinued. These failures affect 6 residents (R19, R30, R2, R1, R53, and R3) reviewed for drug storage. Findings include: On [DATE] at 10:25 AM, with V10 (Registered Nurse / Agency), the following insulins were found: R19's Insulins Lispro had no date and Fiasp insulin had written as follows: date opened [DATE], and date expired was [DATE]. V10 stated it should not be in the medication cart because it was already expired. R30's insulins Lispro and Fiasp both had no date written. V10 stated, All of insulins are being used because it is inside the medication cart. It should have been dated when opened and the expiration date is 28 days after opening. R2's Lorazepam Injection Solution 2 MG per ML was not in the medication cart. V10 stated, It is in the refrigerator at the nurse station. All floors of the facility with residents does not have medication room. They have a cabinet with small refrigerator where medications are stored. At the nurse station, there is a cabinet that has a small refrigerator inside. The cabinet door has a lock and the refrigerator has a padlock.Both of them were not in a locked position. It could be opened without using a key. V10 opened the cabinet and padlock. Both of them were already opened and not locked. V10 was asked why both cabinet door and padlock was left unlock when there is narcotic inside the refrigerator. V10 stated it supposed to be locked, but he forgot. Inside the refrigerator, V2's Lorazepam vial was found. V10 stated, It needs to be locked because there is narcotic inside the refrigerator. Without locking either the cabinet door or the refrigerator anyone can access the narcotic medicine. Review of R2's Lorazepam order by the physician reads this medication was discontinued on [DATE], but ir still inside the refrigerator, with other medication was for general usage. On [DATE], at 10:53 AM, with V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse), the following insulins were found: R1's Novolog insulin vial has written as follows: date opened [DATE], and date expired [DATE]. R53's Humulin 70/30 insulins has written as follows: date opened [DATE], and date expired [DATE]. And Lantus insulin has no date. R3's insulins Lantus and Humulin 70/30 insulin has no date written. On [DATE], at 11:15 AM, R65's Latanoprost eye drop, inside the medication cart, has no date. On [DATE], at 10:43 AM, with V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, Insulin needs to have an open date and expiration date when first opened. When narcotic medication is discontinued, normally nursing staff brings it and be destroyed per Pharmacy guidelines.All narcotics should be stored in double lock storage. 10 CC's of water per pill. Medication Pass policy dated [DATE], reads: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to all Federal and State regulations with medication pass procedures. Under medication labeling, all opened medication vials in the refrigerator should be labeled with the date when it was opened and discarded within 28 days of opening except for Levemir insulin which can be discarded 42 days after opening and Xalatan eye drops which can be discarded 6 weeks after opening. Follow pharmacy recommendation as to when the medication should be discarded after opening. Insulin vials are to be discarded within 28 days after opening, except for Levemir insulin which are to be discarded 42 days after opening. Under controlled substances, all scheduled 2 controlled substances will be stored properly and double locked.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are accurately documented f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are accurately documented for eight (R8, R16, R26, R33, R53, R61, R127, R277) out of eight residents reviewed for resident records. Findings include: On 10/29/2024 at 11:30 AM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated, I believe there are 10 residents I am responsible for. Surveyor questioned V14 what room numbers she was responsible for. V14 voiced the room numbers she was assigned to. V14 stated she works from 7:00 AM until 3:00 PM. Surveyor questioned V14 on what her next duties/tasks she was going to carry out. V14 stated, I was waiting on the other lady to come in, so she can chart under my name, lunch is about to come, she doesn't have a log in. V14 reported she is just helping the lady out with the charting. Surveyor questioned V14 for the name of the person that doesn't have log in. V14 stated the other CNA is V15 (CNA). V14 stated, If the resident received care and it is documented, that is what matters. On 10/29/2024 at 1:07 PM, V15 stated she works through an agency, and she works for the facility once in a blue moon. V15 stated she is documenting resident's care provided under another CNAs account. V15 stated she has not been able to log in the account she was given. On 10/29/2024 at 1:09 PM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated all agency staff are provided with an individual electronic login access to document their work. On 10/30/24 at 3:48 PM, V32 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated =she has worked for the facility for about 7 months. V32 stated she has her own individualized login to POC (Plan of Care) access. V32 stated POC is where the CNAs document what care they provided. V32 stated staff are not allowed to share login information. V32 stated, If I can't remember my password, I will request new one. It is private information. HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) law. Employees cannot share that information. It doesn't matter if I was assigned CNA yesterday. The facility's floor assignment, dated 10/29/2024, documents the assignments assigned to V14 and V15. V15 is assigned to R8, R16, R33, R52, R61, R127, and R277. R8's bowel task, dated 10/29/2024 at 11:24 AM, documents R8 had a bowel movement, and it was documented by V14 (CNA). R8's urinary/bladder task, dated 10/29/2024 at 11:24 AM, documents R8 is continent, and it was documented by V14. R16's urinary/bladder, dated 10/29/2024 at 1:21 PM, documents R16 is continent, and it was documented by V14. R16's bowel task, dated 10/29/2024 at 1:21 PM, documents none and it was documented by V14. R26's bowel task, dated 10/29/2024 at 11:48 AM, documents none and it was documented by V14. R26's bladder task, dated 10/29/2024 at 11:48 AM, documents continent and it was documented by V14. R33's bowel task, dated 10/29/2024 at 1:24 PM, documents none and documented by V14. R33's bladder task, dated 10/29/2024 at 1:24 PM, documents incontinent and it was documented by V14. R52's urinary/bladder task, dated 10/29/2024 at 11:37 AM, documents incontinent and it was documented by V14. R52's behavior monitoring, and intervention task, dated 10/29/2024 at 11:28 AM, documents no behaviors observed, and it was documented by V14. R52's bowel task, dated 10/29/2024 at 11:37 AM, documents none and it was documented by V14. R61's urinary/bladder task, dated 10/29/2024 at 11:40 AM, documents incontinent and it was documented by V14. R127's urinary/bladder task, dated 10/29/2024 at 1:35 PM, documents incontinent and it was documented by V14. R127's behavior monitoring and intervention task, dated 10/29/2024 at 1:35 PM, documents no behaviors observed and documented by V14. R277's urinary/bladder, dated 10/29/2024 at 11:44 AM, documents continent and it was documented by V14. R277's bowel task, dated 10/29/24 at 11:44 AM, documents none and it was documented by V14. Facility document, dated 05/20/2022, titled Certified Nursing Assistant documents, in keeping with our organization's goal of improving the lives of the guests we serve, the Certified Nursing Assistant (C.N.A.) plays a critical role in providing superior customer service and nursing care to all Guests. The C.N.A. safeguards the health, safety and welfare of all guests under their care by following applicable laws, regulations, and established nursing policies and procedures. Completes medical records documenting care provided and other information in accordance with nursing policies while maintaining strict confidentiality.
Jul 2024 5 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from physical abuse by staff...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from physical abuse by staff. This failure affected one resident (R1) who was handled roughly and was hit on the arm and the back by a facility CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) as she attempted to redirect R1. This was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy which began on 06/30/24 when V20, Certified Nursing Assistant, physically abused R1. The immediacy was removed on 07/22/24. On 07/17/24, V1 (Administrator) was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy and the Immediate Jeopardy template was presented on 07/17/24 at 2:41pm. The facility provided an acceptable removal plan on 07/22/34 at 5:34pm. On 07/23/24, through onsite observation, interviews, and record reviews, the surveyor confirmed the implementation of facility's removal plan. Although the immediacy was removed and the removal plan accepted, the deficiency remains at the second level of harm until the facility can determine the effectiveness of the implementation of removal. Findings include: R1's medical record documented R1 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that includes but not limited to Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere mild with agitation, insomnia due to medical condition, essential hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R1's plan of care for potential to demonstrate verbally and physically aggressive behaviors related to dementia, with initial date 08/11/2022, listed interventions including but not limited to when R1 becomes agitated, staff should walk calmly away, and approach later. R1's plan of care for presence of abuse and neglect factors, initiated 05/18/2024, has goals that include R1 will be treated with respect, dignity and reside in the facility free of mistreatment (abuse/neglect). On 07/10/24 at 10:34am, R1 was noted in the dining area, which is also used for activity with peers. R1 does not speak English, but is able to understand greetings in English language. At 12:25pm, V14 (Activity Director) stated R1 speaks Chinese; R1 was unable to recollect or speak of any abuse incident. On 7/10/24 at 12:26pm, V4 (Registered Nurse) and V5 (Registered Nurse) assessed R1's body, which showed bruising to the right antecubital area, which V4 attributed to R1's visitation to ER (Emergency Room) on 07/08/24. V4 stated the bruising might be from possible IV insertion site at the hospital ER (Emergency Room). On 07/10/24 at 3:00pm, V20, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), stated, I (V20) will tell you the truth. It happened about two weeks ago, and the whole thing was in the hallway where the video camera can pick it up (see it). Another staff, (V21, CNA) was also present when the incident occurred. V20 checked the calendar for the day she worked, and stated the incident happened on 06/30/24. V20 stated, (R1) was trying to sit on the floor. (R1) usually does this, and I was trying to grab (R1) quickly to get (R1) seated in the chair to avoid sitting on the floor. (R1) hit me with the elbow on the same spot I have being having pain. To be honest with you, I hit (R1) on the right hand. V20 was asked whether hitting a resident is a form of abuse, and whether V20 reported it to V1 (Administrator). V20 stated, Yes it is a form of abuse, but I never saw it as an abuse. When V20 was asked about the facility abuse policy and prevention of abuse and what V20 will do if she witnesses a resident being abused by staff, peers, or family member, V20 stated, I will report it immediately within 2 hours. On 07/10/24 3:13pm, V1, Administrator, stated the camera is reviewed daily and only 7 days of recording is stored. The only video camera recording history was from 07/01/24 to 07/10/24. V1 stated, The history from 06/30/24 has been wiped off. V1 was asked about the facility policy, and whether it is appropriate for staff to hit any of the residents. V1 stated, Abuse is a willful act that causes harm. V1 was asked under what situation/condition it is appropriate for your staff to hit a resident? V1 stated, Under no condition. V1 was asked whether hitting is a form of abuse, and V1 stated, Yes. On 07/11/24 at 4:05pm, V21 (CNA), whom V20 stated was present and witnessed the incident at the time of alleged abuse, stated, (R1) has dementia and can be combative at times, but that does not mean that the staff should abuse him ). I was in the dining area, and I saw (V20) hitting (R1) multiple times on the back, hands, and grabbing (R1) roughly on the arm. I told (V20) not to hit (R1), and (V20) said that (R1) hit her first, and 'I am not going to let (R1) hit me.' I told (V20) that she should have handled it in a better way that does not involve hitting (R1), which will not be abusive. No staff should hit any of the residents or handle them roughly, even with their bad behavior. V21 stated R1 has dementia and does not speak English. V21 stated, (R1) was crying and shouting, and that was why I looked in their direction. I reported it to the nurse (on duty) (V10), and nothing was done until you (referring to the surveyor) came here (facility). V21 was asked when would you report any alleged abuse. V21 stated, Immediately as soon as you see it. I reported it to the nurse on duty (V10) and they did nothing. She did it in front of the camera, it's not like she was hiding it. Even when I told her that it is not right, (V20) was confrontational about it. (V20) retaliated by hitting (R1) and that is wrong. On 07/11/24 at 4:30pm, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated, It is not appropriate for any of the staff to hit or handle any of the resident roughly. It should be reported when that happens. According to facility investigation, the facility concluded the allegation of abuse cannot be substantiated. On 07/23/24 at 2:09pm, V27 (Facility Medical Director) was asked whether hitting a resident is a form of abuse in V27's professional opinion. V27 stated, In this case, we (facility) think it is a form of self-defense. Residents should not be touched (physically abused). We protect them at all costs. They (staff) have the right to defend themselves. V27 stated the staff should defend themselves without aggressively attacking the resident and de-escalate the situation. V27 was asked whether staff should be correcting residents' aggressive behavior by hitting or slapping a resident. V27 stated, Of course not, no one should hit anyone. De-escalate. Protect your face, move away, and ask for help. On 7/23/24 at 2:26pm, V28 (Social Services Director) stated, (R1) has dementia and that was why (R1) was discharged to a memory care unit at a long-term care yesterday (07/22/24). (R1) has wandering behavior. Cognitively is severely impaired. Some behavior problems with history of verbal and physical aggression. V28 was asked whether V28 was informed of R1 being physically hit by staff. V28 stated, Yes, by (V1) when (V1) was informed (07/10/24). V28 stated staff hitting a resident is a form of physical abuse. V28 stated, It is never appropriate to hit a resident. Staff should de-escalate a resident's aggressive behavior, separate, get help, and make sure the resident is safe. V28 stated the Abuse Coordinator (V1), the Administrator, must be informed of any alleged abuse incident. On 7/23/24 at 3:09pm, V1 (Administrator) was asked whether it is appropriate for staff to hit a resident to de-escalate aggressive behavior. V1 stated, No, it is not appropriate. At no time is it appropriate for staff to hit a resident. V1 was asked how about in self-defense. V1 stated, It is not appropriate to hit a resident. It is a form of abuse. The facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect, with revised date of 06/06/24, documented it is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from abuse, corporal punishment, or mistreatment. The facility follows the federal guidelines dedicated to prevention of abuse and timely and thorough investigations of allegations. These guidelines include compliance with the seven (7) federal components of prevention and investigation. Abuse is defined as willful infliction mistreatment that includes punishment. The policy documented examples of physical abuse that includes but not limited to hitting, slapping, grabbing, and roughly handing. Potential aggressors listed include but not limited to facility staff. The policy listed 7 steps in abuse prevention including reporting/response. Listed procedure includes all allegations and/or suspicion of abuse must be reported to the administrator immediately. The facility Behavior Monitoring of Residents presented, with revised date of 06/06/24, documented policy statement it is the facility's policy to ensure that the residents with aggressive behavior are monitored. Listed procedure includes but not limited to if the resident's aggressive behavior is monitored anytime. On 07/23/24, the surveyor through observations, interviews, and record review, confirmed the following removal plan by the facility: 1. V20 suspended 07/10/14. 2. R1 is no longer residing at the facility. R1 has been discharged to another Long-Term Care on 07/11/24 3. R1 full skin assessment conducted 07/10/24. 4. R1 seen by psychotherapist on 07/10/24. 5. R1 evaluated by Physiatrist. 6. R1 screened for abuse/neglect 07/10/24. 7. V21 was suspended on 07/11/24 for not reporting to V1, pending investigation. 8. Staff are being educated on Abuse, initiated 07/10/24, with quiz to monitor effectiveness. 9. Abuse in-service completed 07/16/24. 10. Abuse in-service on Handling Aggressive Behaviors with quiz for 5 staff members three times per week for 12 weeks on-going. 11. Social Work outside consultation group initiated monthly in-service on de-escalation techniques and handling aggressive residents, initiated 07/19/24. 12. Staff training on facility code gray for aggressive behavior/violence, initiated and completed 07/22/24. 13. QA (Quality Assurance) audit on 3 times weekly times 12 weeks to ensure direct staff care staff (Nurses and CNA's), initiated 07/15/24. 14. Thirteen residents R1, R7, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, and R22, were reviewed for abuse and aggressive behaviors. List of residents with behaviors provided and posted at the nurse's station inside a closed cupboard. 15. V27 (Medical Director) interviewed and was aware of the removal plan with V27's approval. 16. Staff interviewed: V4, V33, V40, RN (Registered Nurse), V14 (Activity Director), V29, V38 (Activity Aides), V22, HR (Human Resources), V28, SSD (Social Services Director), V31 (restorative aide), V37 (Certified Nurse's Aide Supervisor), V30, V32, V36 CNAs (Certified Nurse's Aides), V24, V26, V34 and V39 LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurses) were interviewed. No concerns identified.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) w...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) within required time, the allegation of abuse of one of four residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. This failure affected R1 who was handled roughly and was hit on the arm and back by a facility staff as an attempt to redirect R1. Findings include: R1's medical record documented R1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that includes but not limited to Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere mild with agitation, insomnia due to medical condition, essential hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 07/10/24 at 3:00pm, V20, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), stated, I will tell you the truth, it happened about two weeks ago, and the whole thing was in the hallway where the video camera can pick it up (see it). V20 checked the calendar of the day she worked and stated the incident happened on 06/30/24. V20 stated, (R1) was trying to sit on the floor. (R1) usually does this, and when I was trying to grab (R1) quickly to get (R1) seated in the chair to avoid sitting on the floor, (R1) hit me with the elbow on the same spot have being having pain. To be honest with you, I hit (R1) on the right hand. V20 was asked whether hitting a resident is a form of abuse and whether V20 reported it to V1 (Administrator). V20 stated, Yes, it is but I never saw it as an abuse. V20 was asked about the facility abuse policy and prevention of abuse and what V20 will do if she witnesses a resident being abused by staff, peers, or family member. V20 stated, I will report it immediately within 2 hours. On 07/11/24 at 4:05pm, V21 (CNA), who V20 stated was present and witnessed the incident at the time of alleged abuse, stated, (R1) has dementia and can be combative at times, but that does not mean that the staff should abuse (R1). I was in the dining area, and I saw (V20) hitting (R1) multiple times on the back and hands, and grabbing (R1) roughly on the arm. I told (V20) not to hit (R1), and (V20) said (R1) hit her first, and she said she was not going to let (R1) hit her. I told (V20) that she should have handled it in a better way that does not involve hitting (R1), which will not be abusive. No staff should hit any of the residents or handle them roughly, even with their bad behavior. (R1) has dementia and does not speak English. (R1) was crying and shouting and that was why I looked in their direction. I reported it to the nurse (on duty), and nothing was done until you (surveyor) came here (facility). V21 was asked when any alleged abuse should be reported. V21 stated, Immediately as soon as you see it. I did report it to the nurse on duty and they did nothing. She (V20) did it in front of the camera, is not like she was hiding it. Even when I told her that it is not right, (V20) was confrontational about it. (V20) retaliated by hitting (R1) and that is wrong. On 07/23/24 at 2:12pm, V28, SSD (Social Services Director), stated all alleged abuse incidents must be reported to V1 (Administrator), who is the Abuse Coordinator, and must be reported initially to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health). V28 stated, Always inform the Abuse Coordinator (V1), the Administrator, of any abuse incident. The facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect, with revised date of 06/06/24, documented it is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from abuse, corporal punishment, or mistreatment. The facility follows the federal guidelines dedicated to prevention of abuse and timely and thorough investigations of allegations. These guidelines include compliance with the seven (7) federal components of prevention and investigation. Abuse is defined as willful infliction mistreatment that includes punishment. The policy documented examples of physical abuse that includes but not limited to hitting, slapping, grabbing, and roughly handing. Potential aggressors listed include but not limited to facility staff. The policy listed 7 steps in abuse prevention that includes but not limited to reporting/response. The listed procedures include that all allegations and/or suspicion of abuse must be reported to the administrator immediately.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately initiate an investigation into an alleged physical abus...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately initiate an investigation into an alleged physical abuse for one of four residents (R1) in the sample reviewed for physical abuse. This failure affected R1 who was handled roughly and was physically hit in the arm and back by a staff to redirect R1. Findings include: R1's medical record documented R1 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that includes but not limited to dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere mild with agitation, insomnia due to medical condition, essential hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 07/10/24 at 2:50pm, V20, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), stated, I will tell you the truth. It happened about two weeks ago, and the whole thing was in the hallway where the video camera can pick it up (see it). V20 checked the calendar for the day she worked and stated the incident happened on 06/30/24. (R1) was trying to sit on the floor. (R1) usually does this, and when I was trying to grab (R1) quickly to get (R1) seated in the chair to avoid sitting on the floor, (R1) hit me with the elbow on the same spot I have being having pain. To be honest with you, I hit (R1) on the right hand. V20 was asked whether hitting a resident a form of abuse. V20 stated, Yes. V20 was asked whether it was reported to V1 (Administrator), who is the Abuse Coordinator. V20 stated, I did not report it because I did not think it was abuse. And it happened in the hallway. Maybe when V1, Administrator, looks at the camera they would have seen it and ask V20. This resulted in the facility not initiating an investigation into allegation of abuse until 07/10/24. On 07/11/24 at 4:05pm, V21 (CNA), who V20 stated was present and witnessed the incident at the time of alleged abuse, stated, (R1) has dementia and can be combative at times, but that does not mean that the staff should abuse (R1). I was in the dining area, and I saw (V20) hitting (R1) multiple times on the back and hands and grabbing (R1) roughly on the arm. I told (V20) not to hit (R1), and (V20) said (R1) hit her (V20) first, and V20 said 'I am not going to let R1 hit' her. I told (V20) that she should have handled it in a better way that does not involve hitting (R1), which will not be abusive. No staff should hit any of the resident or handle them roughly even with their bad behavior. (R1) has dementia and does not speak English. R1 was crying and shouting and that was why I looked in their direction. I reported it to the nurse (on duty), and nothing was done until you (referring to the surveyor) came here (facility). V21 was asked about when to report any alleged abuse. V21 stated, Immediately as soon as you see it. V21 stated, I reported it to the nurse on duty (V10) and they did nothing. She did it in front of the camera, it is not like she was hiding it. Even when I told her that it is not right, (V20) was confrontational about it. (V20) retaliated by hitting R1 and that is wrong. On 07/23/24 at 2:12pm, V28, SSD (Social Services Director), stated all alleged abuse incident must be reported to V1 (Administrator), who is the Abuse Coordinator and must be investigated. The facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect, with revised date of 06/06/24, documented it is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from abuse, corporal punishment, or mistreatment. The facility follows the federal guidelines dedicated to prevention of abuse and timely and thorough investigations of allegations. These guidelines include compliance with the seven (7) federal components of prevention and investigation. Abuse is defined as willful infliction mistreatment that includes punishment. The policy documented examples of physical abuse that includes but not limited to hitting, slapping, grabbing, and roughly handing. Potential aggressors listed include but not limited to facility staff. The policy listed 7 steps in abuse prevention that includes but not limited to investigation and protection of the resident.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication is administered as ordered for one ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication is administered as ordered for one resident (R3) for residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R3's MAR (Medication Administration Record) and POS (Physician Order Sheet) showed an order for Potassium chloride crys ER 20 meq tablet extended release give 20 [NAME] by mouth one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for supplement. The MAR showed R3 was administered this medication on 07/10/24, a Wednesday, and should not have been given any potassium on 07/11/24. On 07/11/24 at 11:45am, R3 was observed in bed, with two plastic medication cups on the over bed table. One had a big whitish pill and the second cup had six medications. R3 asked the surveyor to identify the pills. R3 stated, I am stressed because I have been calling the nurse and the nurse will not help me. I don't know what this big pill is. V16, RN (Registered Nurse) stated they were R3's morning scheduled medications, and was not aware R3 did not take the medication. V16 stated, (R3) must have spit it out; R3 stated, I was waiting for you to tell me what this big medicine is. V16 replied to R3, I told you what medication you are taking before giving them to you this morning. V16 identify the big pill as potassium. V16 stated the medications were scheduled for 9:00am, and proceeded to administer the medications to R3 including the potassium. When the surveyor asked about facility policy on medication pass and the professional standard regarding medication administration, V16 stated, The medications are to be given to the resident, and walked away from the surveyor and continued to talk to R3. V16 stated R1 was not on self-administration program. V16 refused to talk with surveyor stating, Lady (referring to the surveyor), I did what I'm supposed to do. I gave the medications period. On 7/11/24 at 11:55am, V2, DON (Director of Nursing) stated all medications should be administered as ordered. On 7/11/24 at 12:45pm, V2, DON (Director of Nursing), stated medication should not be left at the bedside of the resident unless ordered and assessed that the resident can administer the medication safely. Medications as ordered, right route, right medication, right dose, right patient, and right time. The facility was unable to provide any documentation where the physician was notified of the medication error and V16 did not document that potassium was administered at 11:50am instead of 9:00am. V16 signed all the scheduled medication as given at 9:00am. Facility policy on Medication Pass, with revised date 06/06/24, documented it is the policy of the facility to adhere to all Federal and State regulations with medication pass procedure. The facility policy on Physician orders with revised date of 06/06/24 documented that it is the policy of the facility to ensure that all resident/patient medications, treatment, and plan of care must be in accordance with the licensed physician's orders. the facility shall ensure to follow physician orders as it is written in the POS (Physician Order Sheet). The facility job description for RN (Registered Nurse) Floor Nurse documented summary/objective in keeping with our organization's goal of improving the lives of the Guests we serve; the RN plays a critical role in providing superior customer service and nursing care to all Guest and guests. The RN provides supervision of staff and will safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of all Guests under their care by following applicable laws, regulations, and established nursing policies and procedures.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication was locked up safely when not in visual proximity of the licensed nurses and not in use to prevent tam...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication was locked up safely when not in visual proximity of the licensed nurses and not in use to prevent tampering and accidental hazard. This failure has the potential to affect all the residents residing on the 2nd and 3rd floor of the facility. Findings include: On 07/10/24 at 11:29am, the treatment cart was observed in the hallway on the 3rd floor, not in visual proximity of the nurse, and was unlocked. V16, RN (Registered Nurse) was asked about the facility policy/protocol on treatment carts storage and medication storage. V16 stated the medications are to be locked in a cart when not in use and not in visual proximity of a nurse. V16 stated, I did not put it there so I was not watching to see whether it is locked or not. You will have to ask the treatment nurse (referring to V18 (Wound Care Nurse) why the cart was left unlocked. On 7/10/24 at 11:31am, V18, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) Wound Care Nurse, stated, The wound care cart (treatment cart) should be locked because the treatment medications are stored in it and so it should be locked preventing any of the resident to get into the cart. On 7/10/24 at 1:35am, V3, ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing), stated, Treatment cart or general medication cart should be locked and placed within the visual proximity of the nurse to prevent either the resident or unauthorized staff/ visitor to get into it. On 07/11/24 at 11:28am, on the 2nd floor, the medication cart observed in the hallway, unlocked, and not in visual proximity of V24, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). V24 stated it is supposed to be locked when the nurse is not visually able to see the cart so no one can get into it (tamper). V24 stated, I just went into the dining room to give a resident medicine; I did not know I did not lock it. The facility policy presented titled Hazards, with a revised date of 06/06/24, documented it is the facility's policy to ensure the safety of each resident in the building and remove hazardous items and correct situations to prevent accidents. Listed procedures include but not limited to ensuring that residents have no access to medications, sharps and chemicals that would be hazardous to them. Facility policy on Medication Pass, with revised date 06/06/24, documented it is the policy of the facility to adhere to all Federal and State regulations with medication pass procedure. The facility policy on Medication storage, Labelling, and Disposal presented, with revised date of 06/06/24, documented it is the facility's policy to comply with federal regulations in storage, labelling and disposal of medications. Procedures listed includes but not limited to medications will be secured in locked storage area.
May 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy on enteral tube feeding care by failing to label the date and time the feeding was started for two (R2, R...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy on enteral tube feeding care by failing to label the date and time the feeding was started for two (R2, R3) residents of three residents reviewed for enteral feedings. Findings include: 1. R2's medical diagnoses in current face sheet includes: cerebral infarction due to embolism of bilateral posterior cerebral arteries, encounter for attention to gastrostomy, and cognitive communication deficit. R2's Diet: NPO (Nothing by Mouth) diet, NPO texture, NPO consistency and her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 5/3/24 is documented as 6/15, indicating R2 has severe cognitive impairment. R2's Physician's orders, dated 04/26/2024, document: Enteral Feed Order every shift Enteral feeding G-Tube feeds with Jevity1.5 at 75ml/hour. Start at 17:00 and infuse until 1575ml is reached per day. On 5/6/2024 at 10:20am, R2 was observed sleeping with head of bed elevated to about 75 degrees, and R2's nutritional supplement was observed running at a rate of 75mL/hour. The pump showed R2 had received 1025 ml, and the bottle of R2's nutritional supplement in the bottle still infusing was 300mL. The nutritional supplement bottle was labeled with R2's name, but there was no date or time when the nutritional supplement feeding was started. V12, Licensed Practical Nurse/LPNstated he found the G-tube feeding running this morning, and the nurse who hung and started the feeding should have labeled the bottle with the time and date to let the next nurse know when to change it to make sure R2 gets fresh feedings per orders. V12 stated he did not know when the tube feeding was started. 2. R3's medical diagnoses in current face sheet includes: moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. R3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 4/30/24, is documented as 3/15, indicating R2 has severe cognitive impairment. R3's diet is documented as: NAS (No Added Salt) diet, Puree texture, thin liquids consistency. R3's Physician's orders, dated 01/15/2024, document: Enteral Feed Order every shift Enteral feeding G-Tube type(G-tube) Jevity1.2, Rate: 60ml/hr. Start at 5pm and infuse until (2pm: total volume 1260 cc) is reached per day. Turn off during ADLs(Activities od Daily Living) and PRN(As Needed). On 5/6/2024 at 10:25am, R3 was observed in bed with head of bed elevated to about 45 degrees angle. R3 was difficult to understand, but expressed she wanted her door to remain open. R3's nutritional supplement was observed running at a rate of 60mL/hr, and the pump showed R3 had received 848mL, with 500mL in the bottle and feeding was still running. The bottle of R2's nutritional supplement was labeled with R3's name, but there was no date or time when the nutritional supplement feeding was started. V12 stated he found the G-tube feeding running this morning, and the nurse who hang and started the feeding should have labeled the bottle with the time and date to let the next nurse know when to change it to make sure R2 gets fresh feedings per orders. V12 stated he did not know when the tube feeding was started because there was no date or time on the bottle. On 05/05/2024 at 1:18pm, V9 (Registered Dietitian /Registered Nutritionist) stated the nurse who hangs the tube feeding should date and time the actual time the nutritional supplement was opened because it should not be used for more than 24 hours. V9 stated if not labeled with time when it was opened and it is past 24 hours, it increases the risk for GI (gastrointestinal) issues. V9 stated she would not trust an open bottle of nutritional supplement for more than 24 hours because it increases the risk of infection and the residents on G-tube feedings have compromised health, and the facility should minimize the risk for infections as much as possible by making sure the nutritional supplements are labeled and dated. On 05/05/2024 at 2:37pm, V2(Director of Nursing-DON) stated the tube feeding should have a date and time for when it was hung to let the nurses know the time it was opened, and after 24 hours, the nutritional supplement should be changed to a new one to prevent infections from old nutritional supplement which can clog the G-tube preventing the resident from getting the nutrition needed, and it can lead to GI (Gastroenteral) issues. Facility policy titled Enteral Tube Feeding Care, dated 7/28/23, documents: Check that the feeding bag is properly labeled to include: -Date and time feeding was started
Dec 2023 9 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were treated with respect and dignity by not passing out meals to residents sitting at a table at the sa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were treated with respect and dignity by not passing out meals to residents sitting at a table at the same time. These failures affected 1 resident (R70) reviewed during dining in a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: R70's diagnosis which includes but not limited to End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications, Hypertension, Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Anemia In Chronic Kidney Disease, Malignant Neoplasm Of Sigmoid, History Of Falling, Unspecified Protein Calorie Malnutrition, and Pressure Ulcer Of Sacral Region, Stage 3. R70's Physician Orders, dated 12/12/23, documents Regular diet, ordered 12/08/23, and resident sent out to ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation of aggressive behavior, dated 11/30/23. R70's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 11/17/23 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 13 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. R70's nutrition care plan, dated 12/11/23, documents, (R70) is at high nutritional risk related to medical conditions/symptoms: End Stage Renal Disease On Hemodialysis, Anemia, Malignant Neoplasm Of Sigmoid, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Congestive Heart Failure, Lack Of Coordination and Skin Alterations with goal for R70 to be free from signs and symptoms of dehydration and malnutrition. On 12/12/23 at 11:58 AM, lunch trays arrived on the 2nd floor unit, and staff began to distribute trays to residents. At 12:25 PM, in the 2nd floor dining room, R70 was sitting a table with R17. R70 was watching R17 eat R17's lunch. R17 had consumed 75% of entire meal at this time. R70 stated, I'm hungry! and I always get my tray late and have to wait a long time to eat. R70 stated R17 received R17's lunch tray about 30 minutes ago, and R70 was still waiting to receive his tray. R70 stated R70 also did not receive a breakfast tray this morning, and had to wait 45 minutes for his tray to come up from the kitchen, after which everyone else was already done eating their breakfast. R70 stated since he is not being given a meal at the same time as everyone else, it makes him feel somewhat neglected. On 12/12/23 at 12:32 PM, V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the kitchen keeps forgetting to send R70 up a tray. V17 stated R70 did not receive a lunch tray today, and R70 did not receive a breakfast tray this morning. V17 stated V17 had to call down to the kitchen to request a tray, which they did eventually send up. V17 stated the nurse on duty has already called down to the kitchen for R70's lunch tray, and they are still waiting for it to be delivered to the unit. On 12/12/23 at 12:41 PM, R70 was provided with a lunch tray. R70 began to eat immediately. R17 had finished eating by this time. When R70 saw the surveyor R70 stated, I got a tray, finally! On 12/12/23 at 12:50 PM, V16 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) stated V16 had to call down to the kitchen this morning for R70's breakfast tray, and had to call down at lunch to request a tray for R70, because R70's tray was missing from the meal carts. V16 stated R70 was readmitted from the hospital on Friday 12/08/23, and the kitchen must not have been notified about R70's readmission. On 12/12/23 at 1:05 PM, V10 (Food Service Manager) looked through the diet slips previously sent down by nursing. V10 stated V10 could not find a recent diet split for R70, which meant the kitchen was not notified R70 was readmitted to the facility. V10 stated if the nursing units do not notify the kitchen R70 was readmitted , then the kitchen would not know to send R70's meal trays. On 12/12/23 at 2:45 PM, V10 provided surveyor with a copy of a diet slip, which was sent down from the nursing unit for R70 notifying the kitchen R70 about R70's diet order and room number. The pink slip was titled Dietary Communication, and dated 12/12/23. On 12/13/23 at 3:54 PM, V14 (Registered Dietitian) stated, Staff should pass out meal trays to residents sitting at the same table at the same time so that residents who are together can eat at the same time. Eating is a social activity and can encourage residents to eat better, so the facility encourages residents to eat together at the same time. This creates a sense of community. V14 stated it was a mistake the way the trays were distributed, and R70 should have been served R70's meal at the same time as the other person R70 was sitting with. V14 stated it was not okay for R70 to have to wait so long to receive a meal and have to sit and watch the other resident eat their meal. On 12/14/23 at 10:12 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, When a resident is readmitted from the hospital, the nurse on duty is responsible for sending a diet slip down to the kitchen, because that lets the kitchen know the resident is back in the building, and what diet they should receive. For dignity, all residents sitting at the same table for meals should be served their meals at the same time, and one resident should not have to sit and watch everyone else eating their meals. On 12/14/23 at 10:19 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the facility did not have a policy on meal tray distribution. V1 stated residents sitting at the same table should receive their meal trays at the same time, and a resident should not have to watch another person eat due to dignity issues. Facility provided document titled, Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities undated, which documents the facility must treat you with dignity and respect and must care for you in a manner that promotes your quality of life.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 1 (R60) resident reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 19. Findings I...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 1 (R60) resident reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 19. Findings Include: R60 has diagnoses not limited to Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) Resistance, Major Depressive Disorder, Insomnia, Hallucinations, Dementia in other Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Mild, with other Behavioral Disturbance, Acute on Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3, Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Lobar Pneumonia, and Acute Cough. R60's Care Plan documents: Intervention: Keep call light within reach when in bedroom or bathroom Date Initiated: 12/08/23. Focus: (R60) has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care deficits r/t (related/to) decline in ADL functions. Resident needs staff assistance to safely complete ADL task r/t cognitive impairment, confusions, poor balance, limited mobility and decrease activity endurance. Intervention: CALL LIGHT: Call light within easy reach and encourage (R60) to use call light for assistance with ADLs. R60 is at [high] risk for falls related to cognitive impairment, confusions, impaired balance during transitions, decrease activity endurance and hx (history) of fall. On 12/12/23 at 10:38 AM, R60's call light was observed hanging on the wall lamp to the left side of the head of R60 bed out of R60 reach. Surveyor asked R60 could she reach the call light. R60 stated, I can't reach that. On 12/12/23 at 11:24 AM, surveyor asked V22 (Agency Registered Nurse) to enter R60's room then asked the location of R60's call light. V22 proceeded to remove the call light from the wall lamp and stated, The call light should be attached to (R60). V22 then attached the call light cord to R60 left upper side rail and placed the call button on R60 left side stating, I will put it right here where (R60) can get it. On 12/14/23 at 9:28 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, My expectation is that the call light is answered promptly and for all staff to see what the resident needs. The call light should be located within reach or clipped where the resident can reach it. If the call light is not within reach there is a potential that if a resident need something, we are not able to know what they need. If a resident is a fall risk and the call light is not in reach depending on what they need it would be a risk of them doing it on their own. This would put them at risk for falling. Policy: Titled Call Light Policy revised 07/27/23 documents: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that there is prompt response to the resident's call for assistance. Procedures: 1. Facility shall answer call lights in a timely manner. 5. Be sure call lights are placed within reach of residents who are able to use it at all times.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

2. R14's health record documented admission date of 9/7/23, with diagnoses not limited to Extended spectrum beta lactamase (esbl) resistance, Primary osteoarthritis left shoulder, Essential (primary) ...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. R14's health record documented admission date of 9/7/23, with diagnoses not limited to Extended spectrum beta lactamase (esbl) resistance, Primary osteoarthritis left shoulder, Essential (primary) hypertension, Other specified nutritional anemias, Chronic fatigue, Respiratory failure, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Bipolar disorder current episode manic severe with psychotic features, Personal history of covid-19, Pulmonary fibrosis, Unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, Hydronephrosis with ureteral stricture, Other specified disorders of urethra, Peritoneal abscess, Encounter for attention to colostomy, Other chronic pain, Pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, Acquired absence of right leg above knee, Acquired absence of left leg above knee, Encounter for, attention to other artificial openings of urinary tract, Activated protein c resistance, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectori, Hyperlipidemia, Peripheral vascular disease, Acute cough, Chronic kidney disease, stage 3 unspecified, Hyperkalemia, and Anemia. On 12/13/23 at 10:41 AM, V23 (Social Service Director / SSD) stated, Code status needs an order if DNR or Full code and is care planned. If there is no order of code status in resident's electronic health record, it can cause confusion. Code status should be consistent to prevent confusion to staff. R14's POS (Physician Order Sheet) or order review report, dated 12/12/23, showed no active order of code status. R14's care plan, dated 11/15/21, documented in part: ADVANCE DIRECTIVE STATUS (CODE STATUS: DNR comfort focused). Care plan interventions included but not limited to document the code status on the POS in the EMR system. R14's POLST (Practitioner Order for Life Sustaining Treatment) form, dated 12/16/22, showed DNR (do not resuscitate). Policy: Titled Advance Directives, revised 05/20/23, documentsm 4. An Advance Directive form (as provided by the healthcare Facility) shall be completed with resident and/or legal representative to verify treatment options as well as code status. 5. Appropriate information will be added to Physician Order Sheet (POS).: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Physician's order with the code status for 2 (R14, R66) of 2 residents reviewed for Advance Directives in a sample of 19. Findings Include: 1. R66 has diagnosis not limited to Acute on Chronic Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrilelation, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Right Axillary Vein, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Acute and Chronic Postprocedural Respiratory Failure, Personal History of Pneumonia, Cardiomyopathies, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. R66's Care Plan documents: Focus: (R66) Advance Directive Status (Code Status: Full Code) Pursuant to resident rights, personal choices, and the individual's desire to retain control and autonomy over his health care decisions, the individual (or representative) has been educated on Advance Health Care (including end of life care) options. Date Initiated: 11/25/23. Intervention: As indicated, document the code status on the Physician's Order Sheet (POS) in the EMR system Date Initiated: 11/25/23. Order Summary Report has no physician order or special instructions with the code status for R66. On 12/14/23 at 9:31 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, The code status for DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), Social Service review and if the resident is a DNR we would put it in the POS (Physician Order Sheet). The POLST (Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment) form is uploaded into their file. A full code is not really an order if they do not have a DNR, it would be in the Advanced Directive about the full code. If they are a DNR, it will be there under their code status, but if they do not have a DNR, they will be a full code. We also have a binder on the floor; a binder Social Service does update and a red bracelet to say they are a DNR. The code status will be under the special instructions.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered oral nutritional supplements. This failure affected 2 residents (R23, R34) of 6 residents reviewed ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered oral nutritional supplements. This failure affected 2 residents (R23, R34) of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: On 12/12/23 during initial kitchen tour conducted between 9:15-9:56 AM, observed cases of Magic Cup supplement stored in the reach-in freezer. 1. R34's diagnosis includes but not limited to Unspecified Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Alzheimer's Disease, Major Depressive Disorder with Severe Psychotic Symptoms, Schizophrenia, and Unspecified Bipolar Disorder. R34's Order Review Report, dated 12/12/23, documents in part Magic Cup three times per day, ordered on 10/11/22. R34's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 12/07/23 indicates BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was not conducted. R34 is rarely/never understood. R34's nutrition care plan, dated 12/05/23, documents R34 is at risk for compromised nutritional status related to diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and R34 has experienced weight loss. Interventions include but not limited to Magic Cup three times daily. R34's Dietary Evaluation Assessment completed by V14, dated 12/07/23, documents R34 is at nutritional risk and to continue with Magic Cup three times daily. R34's meal ticket from 12/12/23 document in part, Magic Cup 1 each at lunch. On 12/12/23 at 12:30 PM, observed R34 being fed lunch by V19 (Agency CNA). R34's meal ticket listed Magic Cup as item for R34 to receive at lunch. Magic Cup was not provided on R34's tray. On 12/12/23 at 12:35 PM, R34 consumed 100% pureed items on lunch tray. V19 stated R34 eats well and would have probably consumed the Magic Cup if it was provided on R34's lunch tray. V19 stated Magic Cup is put on the trays by the kitchen staff before they come up to the unit. On 12/12/23 at 3:25 PM, V14 stated R34 is having a gradual weight loss, and is receiving Magic Cup to provide more calories to try to prevent further weight loss. V14 stated R34 did not trigger for weight loss over 1 month 3 months or 6-month period, but R34's weight is a big problem because of the gradual weight loss. V14 stated if R34 does not receive the nutritional supplements as ordered, then there is the potential for R34 to lose more weight. 2. R23's diagnosis includes but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphasia, Unspecified Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Lack Of Coordination, Fracture Of Right Femur and Major Depressive Disorder. R23's Order Summary Report dated 12/12/23 documents in part Magic Cup three times a day. R23's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 12/08/23 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 07 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognitive function. R23's nutrition care plan, dated 12/06/23, documents R23 nutritional status is compromised due to symptoms of depression with loss of appetite, cognitive communication deficit, weight loss contributed to inadequate PO intakes (changing appetite) and medical conditions/symptoms. Interventions include but not limited to provide dietary supplements as ordered including Magic Cup three times daily. R23's Dietary Evaluation Assessment completed by V14, dated 12/07/23, documents R23's BMI (Body Mass Index) is less than 23, R23 is at nutritional risk and to continue Magic Cup three times daily. R23's meal ticket from 12/12/23 documents in part, Magic Cup 1 each at lunch. On 12/12/23 at 12:40 PM, surveyor viewed R23's completed lunch tray. R23 consumed 100% all pureed items. There was no empty container of Magic Cup on R23's finished tray. On 12/12/23 at 12:41 PM, V18 (Restorative Aide) stated V18 fed R23, and R23 did not receive Magic Cup on R23's lunch tray. V18 stated the kitchen puts the Magic Cups on the trays. On 12/12/23 at 3:03 PM, V14 stated R23 is gradually losing weight, has a BMI (Body Mass Index) below recommended range for age, and is at moderate risk for malnutrition. V14 stated R23's is getting oral supplements because of R23's history of weight loss. V14 stated the oral supplements are used to increase R23's caloric intake. On 12/12/23 at 3:00 PM, V14 (Registered Dietitian) stated, If a resident has a physician order for a nutritional supplement like Magic Cup, the items will print on the resident's meal ticket and the kitchen would read the ticket and put the item on the tray before it reaches the nursing unit. Magic Cup supplements are not store on the nursing unit. Whatever is printed on the meal ticket should be given to the resident. Kitchen policy titled, Nourishments undated documents in part the Culinary Services Manager will assure that individuals receive the nourishments/supplements that have been ordered by the physician and designated staff delivers supplements to the nursing unit.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct oxygen flow rat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct oxygen flow rate as ordered for 2 (R4, R66) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 19. Findings Include: 1. R66 has diagnoses not limited to Acute on Chronic Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Right Axillary Vein, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Acute and Chronic Postprocedural Respiratory Failure, Personal History of Pneumonia, Cardiomyopathies, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Order Review Report, dated 12/12/23, documents: Oxygen 2L (Liters)/min (Minute) via nasal cannula to maintain Oxygen Saturation level equal or above 92% as needed for SOB (Shortness of Breath). R66's Care Plan documents Focus: R66 is at risk for alteration in respiratory functioning related to CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), Acute on Chronic respiratory failure, Hx (History) of pneumonia and Hx of R (Right) Hydropneumothorax s/p (status post) chest tube. Date Initiated: 11/16/23. Intervention: Administer oxygen (O2 (oxygen) @ 2L/min via NC (nasal cannula) to maintain O2 sat (saturation) equal or greater than 92%) and other medications and respiratory treatments as ordered Date Initiated: 11/16/23. On 12/12/23 at 10:46 AM, R66 was lying in bed with the oxygen nasal canula on the bed and not in use. The oxygen concentrator was observed with the setting of 4 liters. On 12/12/23 at 11:26 AM, V22 (Agency Registered Nurse) asked R66 did (R66) take off his oxygen? and R66 responded yes. V22 stated, (R66's) supposed to have oxygen on that he takes off. It is supposed to be set on 2 liters, and it is all the way on 4 liters. (R66) messes with the oxygen. V22 proceeded to obtain some gloves to reapply R66's nasal cannula and adjust R66's oxygen flow rate. On 12/12/13 at 11:49 AM, V22 (Agency Registered Nurse) stated, I put the nasal cannula back on (R66) and turned the oxygen concentrator to 2 liters. I don't know why (R66) takes the oxygen off. 2. R4's clinical records show R4 has a diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Dementia. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], shows R4's cognition is severely impaired. R4's physician order sheet (POS) shows O2 @ 3 liters via NC as needed for SOB ordered on 12/2/23. R4's comprehensive care plan initiated on 12/2/23 shows R4 has oxygen therapy related to COPD and Congestive Heart Failure. One intervention reads, Give oxygen as ordered by the physician (O2 @ 3L/min via NC PRN for SOB). On 12/12/23 at 11:24 AM, R4 was resting in bed and was not interviewable. R4 was receiving oxygen set to 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula. On 12/14/23 at 9:44 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, My expectation for the oxygen flow rate is when the nurse makes rounds to check the oxygen order and check the flow rate when entering the resident room. If the residents are taking the oxygen off, the nurse should notify Social sServices, the doctor, or Nurse Practitioner to see if it is a behavior, or that they don't need it, if the oxygen saturation is above 92%. If the resident is receiving too much oxygen it depends on the diagnosis or need for oxygen it can affect the flow of oxygen to the body and the carbon dioxide. Policy: Oxygen Therapy and Administration, revised 07/28/23, documents: Oxygen therapy shall be administered to patients as indicated and upon a physician's order. Purpose: To assure adequate oxygenation to all spontaneously breathing and ventilator dependent patients. Caution should be taken in patients with CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) retention where oxygen administration could depress the respiratory drive. Procedure: Confirm order from physician (this should include liter flow, FiO2 and delivery device). Physician Orders, revised 07/28/23, documents: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all resident/patient medications, treatment, and plan of care must be in accordance to the licensed physician's orders. The facility shall ensure to follow physician orders as it is written in the POS (Plan of Care).
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored in 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This affects 4 residents (R54, R3, R...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored in 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This affects 4 residents (R54, R3, R64, and R68) reviewed for medication storage. Findings Include: 1. R54 has diagnoses of Asthma and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. R54's Order Summary Report, dated 12/13/23, documents: Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol 160-4.5 MCG/ACT 2 puff inhale orally every 12 hours. R54's Care Plan documents: Focus: R54 has Asthma. Intervention: Give medications as ordered (Budesonide Inhaler). Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. 2. R3 has diagnoses not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Disorders of Electrolyte and Fluid Balance, and Urinary Tract Infection. R3's Order Review Report, dated 12/12/23, documents: Insulin Glargine Solution 100 UNIT/ML 25 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for diabetes. Humalog Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) 3 unit subcutaneously three times a day for Antidiabetics give medication with meals. R3's Care Plan documents R3 is at risk for fluctuating blood sugars due to diabetes mellitus. 3. R64 has diagnosis not limited to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary. R64's Physician Orders documents: NovoLog Flex Pen 100 UNIT/ML Solution pen-injector Inject 5 unit subcutaneously with meals. R64's Care Plan documents R64 is at risk for fluctuating blood sugars due to diabetes mellitus. 4. R68 has diagnoses not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Pseudocyst of Pancreas. R68's Order Review Report, dated 12/12/23, documents: Insulin Glargine Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Milliliter) 25 unit subcutaneously at bedtime. R68's Care Plan documents R68 is at risk for fluctuating blood sugars due to diabetes mellitus. On 12/12/23 at 11:31 AM, the fourth-floor medication cart was reviewed with V22 (Agency Registered Nurse). R54's Symbicort (Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol) 160-4.5 MCG/ACT (microgram/asthma count test) 2 puffs every 12 hours was observed in the medication cart drawer, with no open date. V22 stated, I have to blame myself because I gave the Symbicort this morning. R3's Insulin Glargine Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Milliliter) Lantus was observed in the red and clear plastic container unopened. V22 (Agency Registered Nurse) stated, It doesn't look like it's been opened. They did not put any dates on them. R3's Humalog Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (milliliter) (Insulin Lispro) insulin vial was observed ,with an open date of 11/20/23 stored in the red and clear plastic container without a bag. A Lispro Kwik pen was observed unlabeled, undated, and stored in the red and clear plastic container with no bag. V22 (Agency Registered Nurse) stated, I can throw that away because it has no name. On 12/12/23 at 11:44 AM, V22 (Agency Registered Nurse) stated, The insulin pen does not have any thing on it, and it don't (sic) say when they opened it or who it belongs to. The insulin vials and insulin pens being stored without a bag could cause cross contamination because it is open. R64's NovoLog flex pen was observed stored in the red and clear plastic container unopened in a bag labeled refrigerate. V22 (Agency Registered Nurse) took R64's Novolog flex pen and put it in the refrigerator. On 12/12/23 at 12:54 PM, the third-floor medication cart was reviewed with V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse). R68's Lantus insulin was observed unopened and stored in the blue plastic container in the third drawer of the medication cart. V4 stated, I think it was delivered today; I will put it in the refrigerator. On 12/14/23 at 9:50 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, My expectation when the insulin pen is open, to put the open date on the pen. There is a tag on the pen and the expiration date can be a 28-day depending on the type of insulin. The insulin pen can be kept in the medication cart once it is open, but if not opened, the insulin pen is refrigerated. If the insulin pen is not refrigerated and not open it would affect the effectiveness of the insulin. The insulin pen and insulin vial have their own bag. When stored in the plastic pencil case, the insulin pen and insulin vial should be in zip lock bags to avoid cross contamination. The inhaler has a gauge and we put a label when it was started. When done with the inhaler we toss them out. Policy: Medication Storage, Labeling, and Disposal, revised 08/24/23, documents: It is the facility's policy to comply with federal regulations in storage, labeling, and disposal of medications. Procedures: 1. Medications from pharmacy will be labeled by the pharmacy to include the name of the resident, route of administration, instruction, medication name (generic/brand), strength, and expiration date when applicable. 3. Medications will be stored safely under appropriate environmental controls.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for infection prevention and control by: 1. Failed to ensure that proper PPE (Personal Pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for infection prevention and control by: 1. Failed to ensure that proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) such as N95 mask is worn by staff during COVID outbreak in the affected area. 2. Failed to ensure that a sign will be provided outside the room for residents on transmission-based precautions indicating the type of the precaution for 5 residents (R9, R14, R60, R68, R274). 3. Failed to follow enhanced barrier precaution policy and procedures for resident (R68) with PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line. These failures affect 5 residents (R9, F14, R68, R274, and R60), and could potentially affect 23 residents residing on 3rd floor for facility's census, dated 12/12/23, reviewed for infection control. The findings include: 1. R9's health record documented admission, dated 3/9/2020, with diagnoses not limited to Covid-19, Spinal stenosis, lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, Mixed hyperlipidemia, Personal history of covid-19, Generalized anxiety disorder, Major depressive disorder, single episode, Chronic kidney disease stage 3b, Unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, Essential (primary) hypertension, Benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, Nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, Unspecified lack of coordination, Other lack of coordination. R9's care plan, dated 12/5/23, documented: R9 requires Droplet/Contact Precautions related to + COVID-19. Care plan interventions included but not limited to observe isolation precautions as clinically indicated. Use appropriate protective equipment. R9's POS (physician order sheet) with active order not limited to: Isolation - Droplet/Contact COVID 19. At 11:22 AM, Observed with 1:1 staff outside of R9's room, door closed. Observed door signage indicating Droplet Precautions. V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated R274 is on contact/droplet precautions for COVID 19. 2. R14's health record documented admission, dated 9/7/23, with diagnoses not limited to Extended spectrum beta lactamase (esbl) resistance, Primary osteoarthritis left shoulder, Essential (primary) hypertension, Other specified nutritional anemias, Chronic fatigue, Respiratory failure, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Bipolar disorder current episode manic severe with psychotic features, Personal history of covid-19, Pulmonary fibrosis, Unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, Hydronephrosis with ureteral stricture, Other specified disorders of urethra, Peritoneal abscess, Encounter for attention to colostomy, Other chronic pain, Pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, Acquired absence of right leg above knee, Acquired absence of left leg above knee, Encounter for, attention to other artificial openings of urinary tract, Activated protein c resistance, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectori, Hyperlipidemia, Peripheral vascular disease, Acute cough, Chronic kidney disease, stage 3 unspecified, Hyperkalemia, and Anemia. R14's care plan, dated 12/11/23, documented: requires droplet precautions related to influenza. Contact precautions related to ESBL in urine. Care plan interventions included but not limited to initiate proper precaution. Observe isolation precautions as clinically indicated (Droplet). Use appropriate protective equipment. Maintain contact isolation precautions in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. R14's POS with active order not limited to Isolation- contact precaution, ESBL in urine. Droplet precaution for flu. At 11:20 AM, R14's room door was closed with signage indicating Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). V4 (LPN) stated R14 is on contact/droplet precautions for ESBL in urine and Influenza. 3. R68's health record documented admission date of 11/8/2023, with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, Cervicalgia, Chronic viral hepatitis b without delta-agent, Hepatitis a without hepatic coma, Pneumonia due to klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae [k. Pneumoniae] as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, Other gram-negative sepsis, Other disorders of lung, Iron deficiency anemia secondary to blood loss (chronic), Acute pyelonephritis, Renal and perinephric abscess, Pseudocyst of pancreas, Other specified diseases of liver, Alcohol induced chronic pancreatitis, Alcohol dependence with other alcohol-induced disorder, Unspecified severe protein-calorie, Major depressive disorder, and Insomnia due to medical condition. R68's POS with active order not limited to change PICC line dressing weekly, measure external catheter. At 12:25 PM, R68 was sitting on the bed, alert, and oriented x 3, verbally responsive with PICC line single lumen on right upper arm. R68 stated he is getting IV (intravenous) antibiotic. R68 stated staff is not wearing gown when giving IV antibiotic or providing direct care. There was no EBP signage on R68's room. 4. R274's health record documented admission date of 11/29/2023, with diagnoses not limited to Covid-19, Typical atrial flutter, Unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, Repeated falls, Adult failure to thrive, Personal history of transient ischemic attack (tia) and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, Presence of other cardiac implants and grafts, Major depressive disorder, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, Mixed hyperlipidemia, Essential (primary) hypertension, Benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, Malignant neoplasm of prostate, Hematuria, and Vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance. R274's care plan, dated 12/8/23, documented: requires Droplet/Contact Precautions related to + COVID-19. Care plan interventions included but not limited to observe isolation precautions as clinically indicated. Use appropriate protective equipment. R274's POS with active order not limited to Isolation - Droplet/Contact Reason: COVID 19. On 12/12/23 at 10:44 AM, Observed with 1:1 staff outside R274's room, door closed, with signage indicating Droplet Precautions. V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated R274 is on contact/droplet precautions for COVID 19. At 2:01 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing / DON) and V26 (Regional Nurse Consultant) were interviewed and stated IP (Infection Preventionist) Nurse is not available at this time. Both stated they oversee infection control program, and they have an outbreak for COVID. V2 stated COVID outbreak is defined as 1 or more positive COVID resident. V2 stated R9 and R274 both tested positive for COVID in the hospital, and were placed under contact/droplet precautions. Both residents have 1:1 staff for close monitoring due to behavioral issues. V2 stated staff is expected to wear proper PPE such N95 mask and face shield when on the 3rd floor due to COVID outbreak. V2 stated proper signage for transmission-based precautions with appropriate instructions for use of PPE should be in place. V2 stated criteria for EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) are those residents with open areas / wounds, devices such as foley cath, G-tube, IVs, ostomies, dialysis patient, PICC or central line. V2 confirmed R68 has a PICC line and should be on placed on EBP. V2 stated staff should be wearing gown, gloves and mask when providing direct care to R68. The potential risk if staff is not wearing proper PPEs and does not follow TBP (transmission-based precautions) procedures could potentially cause cross contamination or spread of infection. 5. R60 has diagnoses not limited to Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) Resistance, Major Depressive Disorder, Insomnia, Hallucinations, Dementia in other Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Mild, with other Behavioral Disturbance, Acute on Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3, Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Lobar Pneumonia, and Acute Cough. R60's Order Review Report, dated 12/12/23, documents: Meropenem Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 1 GM (Gram) intravenously every 12 hours for ESBL urine for 10 Days -Start Date-12/11/23. Contact Isolation ESBL urine order date 12/09/23. R60's Care Plan documents: Focus: R60 is on antibiotic therapy for ESBL in Urine & Pneumonia (R lower lobe) Date Initiated: 12/09/23. Intervention: Focus: ISOLATION CONTACT PRECAUTIONS R60 is on contact isolation related to Positive ESBL in urine Date Initiated: 12/09/23. Interventions: Contact precautions include: [ Gloves, gown, mask, goggles, and biohazard supplies] Date Initiated: 12/09/23. Maintain contact isolation precaution in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. Date Initiated: 12/09/23. R60's Progress note, dated 12/8/2023 at 06:44, documents: Health Status Note Text: Notified Dr. (doctor) of UA (urinalysis) culture results with new orders received noted and carried out. R60's Progress note, dated 12/12/23 at 12:06, documents in part: General Progress Note Text: IVABT (Intravenous Antibiotics) to start d/t (due/to) ESBL of urine. Laboratory Report, dated Specimen Collected 12/06/23, Final Report 12/09/23, Urine Culture Positive for ESBL. Lab Results Report, dated 12/09/23, document in part: Urine Culture. Positive for ESBL. On 12/12/23 at 10:24 AM, V22 (Agency Registered Nurse) stated (R60) is on Contact Isolation for ESBL of the urine. On 12/12/23 at 10:38 AM, upon entering R60 room, signage was posted on the entry door indicating Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The call light was observed hanging on the wall lamp to the left side of the head of R60's bed out of R60's reach. On 12/12/23 at 12:46 PM, V22 (Agency Registered Nurse) stated (R60) is on Contact Isolation for ESBL of the Urine. Somebody removed (R60's) sign. I don't know who removed the sign, but until the order is changed, the sign is supposed to be up there. V22 removed a contact isolation sign from a tray near the nurse station then placed it on R60 door, also leaving the enhanced barrier precaution sign on R60 door. On 12/14/23 9:54 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, If a resident is on contact isolation for ESBL of the urine, staff is expected to use PPE (Personal Protective Equipment). The signage should say contact isolation. If a resident is on a special isolation it surpasses the Enhanced Barrier Precaution, the Enhanced Barrier Precaution signage should be taken down. Policy: Titled Infection Prevention and Control, revised 10/23/23, documents: The facility has established a policy to Identify, Record, Investigate, Control, Test, and Prevent infections in the facility. 8. A sign will be provided outside the room for residents on transmission-based precautions indicating the type of the precaution (Contact, Droplet, or EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions)). 14. The transmission-based precaution for the resident is discontinued once the treatment is completed and the resident is no longer considered infected according to the Mc Greer's criteria. Precautions to Prevent Transmission of Infectious Agents and Transmission Based Precautions: 2. Contact Precaution - intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents spread by direct or indirect contact with patient or environment. b. Use of Gown and gloves is necessary prior to room entry. Facility's infection prevention and control policy and procedures dated 10/23/23 documented: - The facility has established a policy to identify, record, investigate, control, test and prevent infections in the facility. - A sign will be provided outside the room for residents on transmission-based precaution (TBP) indicating the type of the precaution (Contact, Droplet, or EBP). - Contact precaution - intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents spread by direct or indirect contact with patient or the environment. Use of gown and gloves is necessary prior to room entry. Face protection may be necessary if performing activity with risk of splashing or spraying. - Droplet Precaution - intended to prevent transmission through close respiratory or mucous membrane contract with respiratory secretions. Eye protection, and mask should be worn for close contact with the resident. If there are infectious material that can be transmitted through contact, then gown and gloves should also be used. Facility's enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) policy and procedure dated 10/23/23 documented: - The facility will use EBP to reduce transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) in the nursing home. - EBP involves the use of gowns, gloves to reduce transmission of resistant organisms during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with MDRO as well as residents with wounds and / or indwelling medical devices. - EBP will be used for any resident in the facility: has indwelling medical devices (e.g. central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator) regardless of XDRO colonization status. Facility's COVID 19 testing plan and response strategy policy dated 9/27/23 documented: - During outbreaks = N95 + face shield for staff in the affected area. - N95: working in an area / unit with COVID 19 transmission. Staff to use N95 = face shield during care during outbreak in the affected unit.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: (1) provide eligible residents and/or resident representatives edu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: (1) provide eligible residents and/or resident representatives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of all available pneumococcal and Influenza vaccinations; (2) assess eligibility and offer Influenza vaccination to 2 (R9, R68) residents; and (3) assess eligibility and offer pneumococcal vaccinations to 4 (R9, R60, R68 and R274) residents. These failures affect 4 (R9, R60, R68 and R274) of 5 residents reviewed for pneumococcal / influenza vaccinations. The findings include: 1. R9's health record documented admission date of 3/9/2020, with diagnoses not limited to Covid-19, Spinal stenosis, lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, Mixed hyperlipidemia, Personal history of covid-19, Generalized anxiety disorder, Major depressive disorder, single episode, Chronic kidney disease stage 3b, Unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, Essential (primary) hypertension, Benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, Nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, Unspecified lack of coordination, and Other lack of coordination. 2. R60's health record documented admission date of 9/30/2023 with diagnoses not limited to Aftercare following joint replacement surgery, Dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, Other symptoms and signs involving the musculoskeletal system, Lobar pneumonia, Pleural effusion in other conditions classified elsewhere, Unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, Cognitive communication deficit, Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, Lack of coordination, Major depressive disorder, Insomnia, Hallucinations, Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, mild, with other behavioral disturbance, Fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, Presence of left artificial hip joint, Acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, Essential (primary) hypertension, Mixed hyperlipidemia, Chronic kidney disease stage 3 unspecified, Anemia in chronic kidney disease, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, Extended spectrum beta lactamase (esbl) resistance, and Acute cough. 3. R68's health record documented admission date of 11/8/2023, with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, Cervicalgia, Chronic viral hepatitis b without delta-agent, Hepatitis a without hepatic coma, Pneumonia due to klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae [k. Pneumoniae] as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, Other gram-negative sepsis, Other disorders of lung, Iron deficiency anemia secondary to blood loss (chronic), Acute pyelonephritis, Renal and perinephric abscess, Pseudocyst of pancreas, Other specified diseases of liver, Alcohol induced chronic pancreatitis, Alcohol dependence with other alcohol-induced disorder, Unspecified severe protein-calorie, Major depressive disorder, and Insomnia due to medical condition. 4. R274's health record documented admission date of 11/29/2023, with diagnoses not limited to Covid-19, Typical atrial flutter, Unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, Repeated falls, Adult failure to thrive, Personal history of transient ischemic attack (tia) and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, Presence of other cardiac implants and grafts, Major depressive disorder, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, Mixed hyperlipidemia, Essential (primary) hypertension, Benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, Malignant neoplasm of prostate, Hematuria, and Vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance. On 12/13/23 at 2:21 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing / DON), V26 (Regional Nurse Consultant), and V5 (Registered Nurse / RN) were interviewed. V5 said she is helping V2 (DON) with the Infection Control Program about 1-2 times per week. V5 stated V2 is giving her Infection Control tasks with instructions, such as Antibiotic stewardship, handwashing, pneumonia, flu, COVID immunization. V5 stated she assesses, implements, and monitors on a regular basis. V5 stated she has IP (Infection Preventionist) certification, but she is not the IP nurse in the facility. V2 stated she and V26 are overseeing IPCP (infection prevention and control program). V5 stated, Upon admission, immunization record is checked including flu, pneumonia and COVID. If the resident is appropriate or eligible for vaccination, consent is obtained, education is provided, and documentation is done in resident's EHR. If the resident is eligible, obtain an order from MD/NP and give the vaccine to the resident. Consent is obtained whether resident/ representative agree to take the vaccine or decline vaccination. Consent, education, and documentation is important to show that vaccine was offered. CDC guidelines are followed for Pneumonia and influenza vaccination. Flu vaccine is seasonal, offered to all residents starting from September to March. On 12/14/23 at 10:41 AM, electronic immunization records and immunization consents were reviewed with V2 and V5 for the following residents: 1. R9 with no flu and pneumonia immunization record. No pneumonia and / or flu screening, education or consent found. Immunization record showed R9 refused for pneumonia vaccination and education was provided on 7/9/20. 2. R60 no pneumonia vaccination record. No pneumonia screening, consent or education found. 3. R68 no pneumonia and influenza vaccination record. No pneumonia and influenza screening, consent or education found. 4. R274's PPSV23 (Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine) was administered on 2/3/14. V2 and V5 stated flu and pneumonia vaccine is offered at least yearly. V2 stated if the resident refuses, then it will be offered and educated on yearly basis. V5 stated potential risk if flu or pneumonia vaccine was not offered, and education not provided, the resident could easily get infection and be more sick and could die due to complications. Facility's pneumococcal vaccination policy, dated 10/31/23, documented: - It is the policy of the facility to offer and administer pneumococcal vaccinations to each resident who has not received immunization prior to or upon admission, unless otherwise contraindicated or the resident or responsible party has refused the vaccine. - All residents and responsible parties will receive education about the risks and benefits of the pneumococcal vaccines. - Consent for vaccination is obtained. - All adults age [AGE] years or older, and assess residents 19-[AGE] years old with certain underlying medical conditi8ons or other risk factors. - For adults who require pneumococcal vaccination, if they have previously received PPSV23 but no PCV13, PCV15 or PCV20, one dose of PCV15 or PCV20 should be administered at least one year after PPSV23. - All refusals will be documented. Facility's influenza vaccination policy, dated 2/8/23, documented: - It is the policy of the facility to annually offer and administer vaccination against influenza to each resident unless otherwise contraindicated or the resident or responsible party has refused the vaccine. - Influenza vaccination will be offered to residents seasonally when it becomes available, in preparation for flu season which is typically from October 1 to March 31. Any newly admitted residents during this period shall be offered the vaccination. - All current residents shall be offered vaccination during flu season unless otherwise contraindicated or the resident or responsible party refuses. All refusals will be documented. - Education of the risks and benefits of receiving vaccination will be provided to the resident and / or responsible party. - Consent for vaccination will be obtained.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a.) food items were properly stored per manufacturer guidelines, b.) expired foods were discarded, and c.) proper hand...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a.) food items were properly stored per manufacturer guidelines, b.) expired foods were discarded, and c.) proper hand washing was done in between handling dirty and clean plate ware. These failures have the potential to affect all 77 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 9:15 AM, during initial kitchen tour, V10 (Food Service Manager) stated all food items in the refrigerator should be labeled with a delivery date, an open data, and an expiration date or use by date. V10 stated all items should be discarded after labeled use by date. On 12/12/23 at 9:20 AM, walk-in refrigerator had a container of opened package of French Toast labeled, with preparation date 12/08/23, and use by date 12/10/23. V10 stated this item would not be served to a resident because it is past its use by date. V10 stated I'll throw it out now. On 12/12/23 at 9:32 AM, V11 (Dietary Aide) was handling dirty plate ware, and placing dirty items into a dish rack before feeding the racks into the dish machine to be cleaned. At 9:33 AM, V11 walked to the other side of the dish machine, picked up mugs that had just come out of the clean side of the dish machine, and then placed the mugs back into the dishwasher racks. V11 did not wash V11's hands in between touching the dirty and clean items. At 9:34 AM, V11 walked back to the dirty side of the dish machine, began to sort through dirty plat ware, placed dirty items into dish racks and then placed the racks into the dish machine to be cleaned. On 12/12/23 at 9:38 AM, V11 stated he went to the clean side of the dish machine to make sure the mugs were clean enough, and that he should have washed his hands in between touching the dirty items and the clean mugs. On 12/12/23 at 9:43 AM, observed opened 1-quart bottle of lemon juice 50% full, stored in the food prep area on metal storage rack, with other spices and condiments. The lemon juice bottle was labeled with an opened date of 12/08/23, and use by date of 12/12/23. The lemon juice bottle had printed on it Refrigerate After Opening. On 12/12/23 at 9:44 AM, V10 stated V10 did not know the lemon juice bottle had those manufacturer instructions to Refrigerate After Opening printed on the label, and that based on this label, the lemon juice should have been stored in the refrigerator. V10 stated, I'll throw this out right now. On 12/12/23 at 9:45 AM, observed opened 1-gallon Louisiana Hot Sauce 60% full, labeled with an open date of 10/31/23, and use by date of 11/30/23. At 9:46 AM, V10 stated the hot sauce should have been thrown out on or before the use by date 11/30/23, and the item should not be served to residents. On 12/13/23 at 12:04 PM, V10 stated food should be thrown out after the use by date, because it could potentially be a hazard to the resident by causing a food borne illness. V10 stated it is all kitchen staff's responsibility to check items daily, and any past use by date items should be discarded. V10 stated manufacturer storage guidelines should be followed. For example, the lemon juice should have been refrigerated not left out stored at room temperature. The lemon juice could potentially go bad if not refrigerated. V10 stated the purpose of running items in the dish machine is so they can be cleaned, washed, and sanitized. V10 stated the dish machine area is always staffed with two employees, so there is one staff to work on the dirty side, and another to work on the clean side. V10 said this is done to prevent cross contamination because if the person on the dirty side goes to the clean side and touches items that came out of the dishwasher, those items are no longer clean or sanitized. V10 stated this could cause cross contamination and is an infection control issue. V10 stated the exception would be if the staff washed their hands before touching the cleaned items. On 12/13/23 and 12/14/23, V1 (Administrator) provided policies on Food Receiving and Storage, Handwashing, Dishwashing Machine Use, and a form titled Expiration Dates. On 12/14/23 at 2:30 PM, V2 provided surveyor with a list of residents and their diet orders. V2 stated currently there are no residents who are NPO (Nothing by Mouth). Kitchen policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, undated, documents foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Kitchen form titled, Expiration Dates, undated, documents product that is in the original container and has a manufacturer expiration or use-by-date, follow that date, and foods that expire 3 days after opening and foods that expire 30 days after opening. Kitchen policy titled, Handwashing, undated, documents, staff will wash hands as frequently as needed throughout the day following proper hand washing procedures and when to wash hands including after handling soiled equipment or utensils. Kitchen policy titled, Dishwashing Machine Use, undated, documents, Culinary services staff required to operate the dishwashing machine will be trained in all steps of dishwashing machine use by the supervisor or a designee proficient in all aspects of proper use and sanitation.
Nov 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their fall policy and R5's comprehensive care plan to prevent further falls for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for falls. Findings inclu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their fall policy and R5's comprehensive care plan to prevent further falls for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: R5's face sheet documents medical diagnoses of lack of coordination and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R5's Fall Risk Evaluation, dated 7/29/2023, documents R5 is at high risk for falls. R5's Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 10/28/2023, documents R5 requires partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene and toilet transfer. R5's comprehensive care plan contains a focus that documents R5 is at high risk for falls related to history of falls, Parkinson's Disease, poor safety awareness, poor balance, coordination, limited mobility, and decreased activity endurance. R5 also continues to over-estimate functional limitation. Intervention initiated on 8/23/2022 documents in part: Staff to address [R5's] needs with a prompt response to all requests for assistance. V8's (Nurse) progress note, dated 11/05/2023 at 1:53 PM, documents: The resident fell on the floor and c/o (complained of) pain to [R5's] mid back 7 out of 10. Prior to the fall the resident requested to be toileted. I informed the resident that [R5's] CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) was on break and I would toilet [R5], but I had to go to the bathroom first. On 11/28/2023 at 3:40 PM, V8 stated R5 requires pivot assistance with going to the commode. V8 stated R5 had loose stools prior to fall and needed to go to the commode frequently. V8 stated [R5] saw me and said [R5] needed to go to the commode. I looked for [V14, CNA] but they said [V14] was on break. I told [R5] before I take you to the commode, let me go to the bathroom because I've been holding it too long. On 11/29/2023 at 10:09 AM, R5 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R5 stated falling a few weeks ago while going to the commode. R5 stated, I told them that I had to go right away. On 11/29/2023 at 10:34 AM, V11 (Physical Therapist) and V12 (Therapy Director) stated R5 is impulsive and needs a lot of precautions. V11 stated while sitting down, R5 will sometimes just lunge up and not follow safety precautions. R5 will forget to use proper walking techniques or forget to use the walker. V11 stated R5 needs to use the walker even for short distances to assist with getting up and pivoting. V11 and V12 stated R5's impulsiveness and lack of safety awareness puts R5 at high risk for falls. On 11/29/2023 at 10:57 AM, V13 (Escort/Sitter) stated, [R5] kept saying [R5] had to go to the bathroom. I told her that [R5's] CNA went on break. [R5] told me twice that [R5] had to go. V13 stated, I walked by [R5's] room. [R5] stood up. I told [R5] to sit down. Soon as I turn back around [R5] was on the floor. Facility's Fall Occurrence policy last revised 7/17/2023 documents: It is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents are assessed for risk for falls, that interventions are put in place, and interventions are reevaluated and revised as necessary. Those identified as high risk for falls will be provided fall interventions.
Oct 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0806 (Tag F0806)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy on resident food preferences for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy on resident food preferences for one (R6) of four residents reviewed. Findings include: R6 is a [AGE] year-old individual, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6's medical diagnoes include but are not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, unspecified, and mixed hyperlipidemia. R6's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score, dated [DATE], documents R6's score as 15/15, indicating R6's cognation is intact. On 10/05/2023 on 10:00am, R6 said she does not get her boiled egg each morning, which she prefers, despite requesting for it each day. R6 further stated she has received the boiled egg only once, and even today she did not receive one. On 10/05/2023 10:55am, V5(Food Services Director) said she met R6 about two weeks ago, and R6 told her of her food preferences, including boiled egg/s for breakfast, no sweeteners, no canned foods. V5 said today's breakfast was baked egg with cheese and sausage. V5 showed surveyor R6's meal ticket. On the breakfast ticket, breakfast was listed as: Sausage Egg & Cheese baked, Assorted Mini Danish, Grits, Whole Milk, Hot Coffee, or Hot Tea. V5 said the boiled egg was not listed on the breakfast ticket, therefore, the line servers would not know R6 prefers boiled eggs, therefore, it was not served to R6. V5 said there were boiled eggs in the kitchen fridge. Surveyor with V5 toured the kitchen fridge and observed five crates of eggs, with each crate holding 30 eggs. V6 said R6 should have received a boiled egg at breakfast time, and further commented, It was my mistake that I did not correct her ticket and put the boiled egg/s in when she (R6) told me that she would like boiled egg/s for breakfast. On 10/04/2023 11:18am, V21 (Registered Dietitian) each resident is offered their food preferences and given options to choose form, to encourage residents to eat their meals to meet their nutritional needs. V21 said kitchen staff are responsible for monitoring resident meal tickets to make sure residents receive their preferred/prescribed diet/meals. On 10/05/2023 11:15am, V1(Administrator) said when the resident comes to the facility, the food services manager meets with the resident to discuss the resident's food preference, and the meal ticket is updated so the resident can get their preferred food. V1 further said if the resident's food preference is not put on the meal ticket, and the resident will not get their preferred food. On 10/05/2023 at 12:15pm, V29(Culinary Development Specialist) said, Food preferences are offered to residents because the facility wants the residents to enjoy their food and meet their dietary needs, and to create a homelike environment because the facility is their home. If a resident is not provided their preferred foods, it can make resident unhappy. (R6) should have received the boiled egg because it does not affect her diet. It is just that the boiled egg/s was not included in her meal ticket. R6 diet is documented in R6's Electronic Medical Record as CCHO (Consistent Carbohydrates) diet, Regular texture, Thin liquids consistency Dietitian note, dated 10/1/202,3 documents: provide R6 food preferences, provide foods from alternative menu, provide assistance as needed. Policy titled Dinning and Food Preferences, dated October 2019 documents; -Food Preference Interview will be entered into the medical record. -Food allergies, food intolerance, food dislikes, and food and fluid preferences will be entered into the resident profile in menu management software system.
Jun 2023 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor R2, a cognitively impaired resident who was a known wandere...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor R2, a cognitively impaired resident who was a known wanderer with an electronic monitoring safety device on R2's right wrist and left ankle; failed to respond to a stairwell door alarm; failed to identify R2, who was assessed at risk for elopement, on the facility's elopement risk list; failed to check the placement of R2's electronic monitoring safety device every shift per facility policy; and failed to weekly test the functioning of R2's electronic monitoring safety device per facility policy. These failures affected R2 who eloped from the facility on 6/4/23, was in an apartment 4 miles away and was returned to the facility over 15 hours later by the local police department which placed R2 at a potential risk for harm when reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample of six elopement risk residents (R2, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9). These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 6/4/23 at 11:08 am when facility video footage showed R2 walking out the back door of the facility by R2's self into the parking lot then into the street. On 6/12/23 at 12:57 pm, V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. The survey team confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 6/21/23, but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. Findings include: R2's admission Record documents, in part, that R2's diagnoses include traumatic subdural hemorrhage, cognition communication deficit, restlessness and agitation, lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility and repeated falls. R2's admission date to the facility was documented as 5/13/23. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents, in part, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 which indicates that R2 has severe cognitive impairment. R2's Functional Status indicates that for R2's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) task like walking in room, walking in corridor and locomotion on unit, R2 is coded for a staff support of supervision - oversight, encouragement or cueing. On 6/6/23 at 11:38 am, R2 was asked about leaving the facility (eloping) on 6/4/23. R2 stated, R2 doesn't go outside. R2, asked again about walking out of the facility on 6/4/23. R2 stated, R2 doesn't remember. On 6/6/23 at 1:19 pm, V1 (Administrator) viewed the facility's video footage from separate video camera views as follows: 3rd floor video camera: 6/4/23 11:05 am: R2 observed walking in the hallway near the nurse's station wearing a hoodie jacket, shirt, pants, and shoes. R2 turns out of the view of video camera back towards R2's room. 6/4/23 11:06 am: V4 (Agency Registered Nurse, RN) and V5 (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA) observed at the 3rd floor nurse's station. V4 is standing outside of the nurse's station with the medication cart up against the nurse's station wall. V5 is sitting in a chair at nurse's station. R2 enters the video camera view and walks behind V4 (who's back was to R2) and walks down the 3rd floor hallway. R2 was wearing a hoodie jacket (color appears gray or pale brown), shirt, pants, and shoes. 6/4/23 11:06:50 am: R2 observed pushing the 3rd floor west stairwell door open and exiting through the door. V4 observed with V4's head down looking at the medication cart. V5 observed sitting in the nurse's station in a chair with V5's head down looking at V5's cellular phone. Neither V4 or V5 turn their heads towards the west stairwell alarm or make any attempt to respond to the alarm. 6/4/23 11:08 am: V15 (Housekeeper) observed in view next to V4 still standing at the 3rd floor nurse's station medication cart. V15 observed conversing with V4 at the medication cart. 6/4/23 11:09 am: V5 observed walking down the 3rd floor hallway. V3 (CNA) observed walking out of the bathroom directly next to the nurse's station. After observing the 3rd floor video footage (from 6/4/23), V1 showed the video footage in a split screen with the 1ST floor back door, 3RD floor, and 2ND floor cameras at the same time. 1st floor video camera: 6/4/23 11:07:46: R2 observed walking out of the west stairwell into1st floor hallway. 6/4/23 11:07:56: R2 observed walking out of the first back door of the facility. V18 (Dietary Aide) observed walking in the 1st floor hallway towards the back door direction. Blue laundry bins observed in the 1st floor hallway. 2nd floor video camera: 6/4/23 11:07 am: 2nd floor nurse's station observed with several staff members sitting in chairs at the nurse's station. V1 stated, the electronic monitoring safety device alarm wasn't going off on the second floor. Parking lot camera: 6/4/23 11:08:12 am: R2 observed walking from the second back door of the facility into the parking lot. R2 walked through the small parking lot to the adjoining street (alley-like). R2 walked south (turning left) and then turned and walked north in the street. 6/4/23 11:08:53 am: R2 last observed on the facility video footage. On 6/6/23 at 11:17 am, V3 (CNA) stated, V3 was working on 6/4/23 on the 7:00 am to 3:00 pm shift on the 3rd floor and was R2's assigned CNA. V3 stated, (R2) speaks Spanish and a little English. (R2) likes to walk around all on the floor. (R2) goes into other resident's rooms. When (R2) does, I (V3) do redirection. When asked if R2 responds to the redirection, V3 stated, Sometimes redirection don't work. V3 stated, the 3rd floor is not a locked floor, and staff have a code for the stairwell doors when they exit via the stairwell doors. When asked to see the code keypad for the stairwell door, V3 walked to the west stairwell door. V3 then demonstrated, that the stairwell door will open by pushing the bar on the door, but then the alarm goes off, and staff must put in the code on the keypad, which V3 performed, to stop the alarm. When asked about R2's elopement from the facility on 6/4/23, V3 stated, It was around 11:00 am. When asked V3 about seeing R2 prior to 11:00 am on 6/4/23, V3 stated, V3 saw R2 in R2's bed at 7:00 am when V3 started the shift. V3 stated, (R2) ate (R2's) breakfast. (R2) was already dressed. Wandering, which is constant for (R2). I (V3) would redirect (R2). (R2) was going into other resident's rooms. They (other residents) were frightened. They (other residents) would put on the call light, and they would say, 'There's a (person) in my room.' I (V3) know who they (other residents) were talking about. Then I (V3) would see (R2) and redirect (R2) out of their (other persons') room. When asked about R2's cognitive status on 6/4/23, V3 stated (R2) was up and alert that morning. (R2) was roaming in other rooms. I (V3) was redirecting (R2), but I (V3) have to clean other patients and am doing my rounds. When asked the last time that V3 saw R2 on 6/4/23, V3 stated, It was in the hallway, but I (V3) don't know the exact time. When (R2) went missing, I (V3) was in the washroom. I (V3) heard the alarm going off when I (V3) came out of the bathroom walking down the hallway. (V4, Agency RN) or CNA (V5) heard it. They (V4, V5) were saying, 'Where did (R2) go?' I (V3) hear the alarm going off, possibly (R2) could have closed it (the west stairwell door). I (V3) then went down the stairs (west stairwell) and didn't see (R2). I (V3) asked (V21, Receptionist), and (V21) didn't see (R2). I (V3) thought that maybe (R2's) still here, so I went out the back door to the parking lot. I (V3) didn't see (R2). I (V3) came back to the floor, and we (staff) searched all the rooms and in empty room, room [ROOM NUMBER]. When asked how is V3 ensuring that a resident who wanders, like R2, is safely supervised, V3 stated, For me (V3) personally, I know (R2) likes to walk. I (V3) let (R2) walk. (R2) doesn't like being in (R2's) room. I (V3) let (R2) walk sometimes and give (R2) a cookie if (R2) goes into someone's room. I (V3) have rounds to do. I (V3) have other patients to care for. V3 stated, Sometimes (R2's) confused and V3 gives R2 verbal cues if R2 needs it. R2's Progress Notes, on 6/4/23 at 2:48 pm, V4 (Agency RN) documents, in part, 11:05 am: (R2) walked up to (V4) to get (R2's) scheduled medication. 11:10 am: It was reported that (R2) was no longer in (R2's) room. Room search was done on the facility and a code was called. (R2) was still not found. (V1) was called and the security camera reviewed that (R2) left through the back door. On 6/7/23 at 4:00 pm, V4 (Agency RN) stated, V4 works frequently at the facility as an agency nurse, and V4 stated, on 6/4/23, V4 worked the 7:00 am to 3:00 pm shift on R2's floor (3rd floor). When asked about R2 on 6/4/23 at beginning of V4's shift, V4 stated, I (V4) saw (R2) standing by (R2) room. (R2) stood there. I (V4) said, 'Hi, I am your nurse. I am going to be giving you your meds.' (R2) said (R2) wanted to go pee in the staff bathroom. I (V4) told (R2) there is a bathroom in (R2's) room; pointing to (R2's) room. V4 stated, the staff bathroom is not open for R2 to use. V4 stated, I (V4) told the CNAs (V4 and V5, Agency CNA) to pay attention to (R2). V4 stated, (R2) looked confused. V4 stated, Sometimes, I (V4) did not understand (R2). (R2) would go to elevator. (R2) always asking for (R2's) insurance money. (R2) needs (R2's) money. (R2) needs to go get it. At the moment, I (V4) didn't understand. I (V4) then put 2 and 2 together. V4 stated, R2 was making these statement about getting R2's money on 6/4/23 prior to eloping from the facility. When asked if R2 had spoken about getting R2's money prior to 6/4/23, V4 stated, On other occasions, (R2) had talked about getting money from somewhere. When asked if R2 would give specifics about where R2 was wanting to go to get R2's money, V4 stated, No location. (R2) would point to elevator to go down. V4 stated, V4 never see him get in the elevator, but R2 would stand next (to the) elevator and did not get in the elevator because (R2) didn't recognize that there was a button. V4 stated, (R2) has (an) alarm. (R2) never seen that (R2) activated an (electronic monitoring safety device) alarm. V4 stated, (R2) always had on (electronic monitoring safety device). Surveyor asked V4 if V4 observed R2's electronic monitoring safety device prior to 6/4/23. V4 stated, Yes, before June 4th, (R2) had on (electronic monitoring safety device). Asked what R2 continued to do throughout the morning on 6/4/23. V4 stated, The next time I (V4) see (R2). I (V4) push my (medication) cart down the hall. I (V4) saw (R2). (R2) says, 'Where's my room?' (R2) came again into another resident's room. I (V4) redirected (R2) to (R2's) room. I (V4) talked to the CNAs (V3, V5) and told them to watch (R2), and it's not appropriate for (R2) to go into another resident's room. When asked which room did R2 go into, V4 stated that it was the room opposite, the room right across the stair door at the (west) end. V4 stated, R2 took one medication from V4. V4 stated, I (V4) told (R2) (about the medication). (R2) refused. So, I (V4) pushed back and at 11:00 am, (R2) said, (R2) wants (R2's) meds. V4 stated, on 6/4/23 at 11:00 am, V4 stated, I (V4) asked (R2) why (R2) was wearing a sweater. (R2) said, 'It was cold.' Then in a 5-to-7-minute time (frame), it was 'Where was (R2) '?' V4 stated, (R2) was not in (R2's) room. Oh, okay. I (V4) felt like (R2) was confused. I (V4) told CNAs (V3, V5) to focus on (R2) all the time. 'You need to pay attention.' Redirect as much as possible. (R2) listens. It's a different story if (R2) doesn't listen. No pacing. (R2) was just walking. When asked where was V4 at 11:07 am on 6/4/23, V4 stated, Then I (V4) was at nurse's station at the med cart. I (V4) had to do (blood sugar checks) and had the paper and was checking from the (medication) cart; from the people (residents) and marking through the names. I (V4) checked my list. Then (R2) walked behind me. V4 stated, 5 minutes later. I (V4) turned to (V15, Housekeeper) 'Where's (R2)?' (V15) said, 'Where is (R2)?' I (V4) said let's check the bathroom. Nobody. We opened all the bathrooms. V4 stated, First thing, (R2) was walking close to the stairs. Maybe (R2) went through. That was by the original bathroom (R2) was trying to get into. V4 stated, We checked all resident rooms. When asked did V4 hear any alarms on 6/4/23 at 11:07 am, I (V4) was focusing on it (blood sugar checks). There was like a bed alarm. When a resident moves (with a bed alarm) and it (stairwell alarm) was the same thing. I (V4) look at all the residents. My thinking, it was the alarm. I (V4) was thinking it (stairwell alarm) was a bed alarm. When asked where other staff (V3, V5) were at when V4 heard the alarm, V4 stated, People were looking, moving around, and came back to my station. (V15) was there in front of (R2's) room. CNA (V3) was in the (staff) bathroom. My mind was that (R2) was in the bathroom. V4 stated, V3 (CNA) then went to the 2nd floor. V4 stated, V4 called the 4th floor staff and R2 was not on the 4th floor. V4 stated, I (V4) called down to reception (V21) for a code (yellow). V4 stated, I (V4) did hear (the stairwell) alarm. It wasn't loud, so you can know that someone can pass through. It was like a bed alarm. I (V4) am not familiar with stairs alarm. People don't use the stairs. 'Where is this alarm coming from?' V4 stated, CNA (V5) was running with me (V4). We have resident bathroom down there. We were looking. I (V4) called him then, called a code (yellow). (V21, Receptionist) said, 'I didn't see (R2) down there.' I (V4) said, 'Be on the lookout. (R2) didn't go on elevator.' V4 stated, I (V4) hear it, (stairwell) alarm, but it's like a bed alarm. You use a code to stop it (stairwell alarm). V4 stated, (V3, CNA) was down the stairs then. I guess we (V3, V4) met at reception. We can't find (R2). On 6/6/23 at 2:15 pm, V5 (Agency CNA) stated, on 6/4/23 from 7:00 am to 3:00 pm, V5 worked on R2's floor (3rd floor). V5 stated, on 6/4/23 prior to R2's elopement, I (V5) see (R2). Both in (R2's) room and hallway. At the beginning, (R2) was in other resident rooms. I (V5) was assisting (R2) back to (R2's) room. I would redirect (R2) saying, 'Hey, let's go back to your room. You are in someone else's room.' (R2) didn't speak much English. (R2) speaking back in Spanish. I (V5) escorted (R2) in (R2's) room for a while then (R2) came back out. I (V5) was at nurse's station. (V4) asked me (V5) by the stairs (about R2's location). I (V5) didn't see (R2) walk out it (stairwell door). When asked where was V5 on 6/4/23 at 11:07 am, I (V5) was at nurse's station. (V3) was in the bathroom. (V4) was at the med cart who saw (R2) walking towards (the west stairwell) door. I (V5) didn't hear the stair alarm. Surveyor asked if R2 had an electronic monitoring safety device on. V5 stated, Yes. On (R2's) wrist and ankle. Normally, the alarm will go off. That's what the CNA (V3) told me. I (V5) didn't hear it. That's why I (V5) didn't see (R2) leave. On 6/8/23 at 11:17 am, V15 (Housekeeper) stated, V15 worked on the 3rd floor on 6/4/23 from 7:00 am to 3:00 pm. When asked if V15 was familiar with R2, V15 stated, I (V15) could say something specific about (R2). (R2) was walking whenever (R2) wanted and sometimes coming from other people rooms. So, CNAs and nurse keep eye on (R2) all the time. Sometimes (R2) would go back to (R2's) room. (R2) was nervous about it. (R2) would do whatever (R2) wanted to do. It was Sunday (6/4/23). That morning, (R2) was the same. Nothing different in (R2's) behavior. I (V15) said, 'How are you?' V15 stated, (R2) was talking to (V4, Agency RN). (R2) going back and forth to (V4) and (R2's) room. When asked on 6/4/23 at 11:07 am, where was V15 on the 3rd floor, and V15 stated, When I (V15) came to clean (R2's) room. (R2) was there, standing in the door. (R2) going back and forth to (V4) and talking about something. (R2) coming back and forth. I (V15) cleaned (R2's) room and mopped the floor. I (V15) was at the door and (R2) was there just a couple of minutes ago and I (V15) didn't see (R2). I (V15) told (V4) that I didn't see (R2). Then (V4) and CNA went to look (for R2). They checked other rooms, bathrooms and shower room on the floor and didn't find (R2). When asked the description of what (R2) was wearing, V15 stated, Jacket with zipper in front. Put zipper on. (V4) turned. (V4) asked (R2) 'Why (R2's) wearing jacket? It's hot here.' R2 said, '(R2's) cold.' That's when (R2) was coming out of (R2's) room to the nurse's station. (V4) was standing by nurses' station at (medication) cart. In front of cart. One CNA (V5). I (V15) don't remember where other CNA (V3) came from. When asked if V15 heard any alarms, V15 stated, No, I (V15) didn't hear any alarm from the stairs. On 6/12/23 at 11:00 am, V21 (Receptionist) stated, V21 worked from 8:30 am to 9:00 pm on 6/4/23 at the receptionist station at the desk in the front lobby of the facility. V21 stated, as part of V21's responsibilities, the video footage images are monitored by us (receptionists) of each screening area in the facility including the back door on the 1st floor. When asked about the 1st floor back door alarm, V21 stated, We are also monitoring. They (visitors) must ring doorbell. Back door visitors must be buzzed in 24 (hours)/7 (days a week). Workers or employees will use code for entry. Visitors must be buzzed in. When asked if V21 is sitting at the receptionist desk in the front lobby, can V21 visually see the back door, and V21 stated, Sitting there physically. I (V21) can see normally down the hallway. I (V21) can see that door. When asked would V21 be able to see someone leaving the facility via the back door, V21 stated, It depends. I (V21) can see. I (V21) can't make there person out. I could make out body stance. There are 3 racks with towels. When those (racks) are there, they are blocking. (They're) not all the way blocking the (back) door. It's iffy, I (V21) can't see. I (V21) can't make them (person exiting back door) out. When asked if the blue laundry bins (racks) are in the 1st floor hallway on the wall, can V21 physically see a person exiting at the back door without the video camera screen, and V21 stated, No, not really. When asked how would V21 be able to see the person leaving out the back door then, V21 stated, Camera. V21 stated, it's not a clear picture of individuals with seeing the back of their head since the video camera is positioned from the hallway view outward. When asked if there is an alarm system on facility 1st floor doors, V21 stated, Yes. They (front and back doors) both do. V21 stated, the 1st floor front and back doors are equipped with an electronic monitoring safety device alarm, and when a resident with an electronic monitoring safety device gets near the front and back doors, the alarm would be activated. V21 stated, I (V21) would hear 'beep and beep' as I am sitting there at desk. V21 stated, when the 1st floor back door alarm is triggered, V21 would hear the alarm noise at the back door location. When asked if V21 can hear the 1st floor back door electronic monitoring safety device alarm, V21 stated, I (V21) would have to be listening. If they (the resident with an electronic monitoring safety device) got out. I (V21) would hear beep, beep. I (V21) would see on the camera and see if there is an individual. A resident or something that would have caused the issue. I (V21) physically go down (to the back door) and disarm the alarm. When asked how the alarm is disarmed, V21 stated, V21 puts in a number code, and it (alarm) will fade out and go away. V21 stated, It will continue to beep until you disarm it. When asked if V21 knew R2 prior to R2's elopement on 6/4/23, V21 stated, Yes that it was when R2 was first admitted to the facility (R2's admission date is 5/13/23). When asked if V21 would be able to visually recognize R2 in physical appearance, V21 stated, Yes. V21 stated, On 6/4/23, it was a typical morning. Around 11:00 am something. I (V21) can't recall exact time. I (V21) got a call from (V4), asking if I knew where abouts of R2. I (V21) told (V4) that I (V21) haven't seen (R2). I (V21) asked 'What happened?' (V4) said, (V4) don't see (R2) in (R2's) room. I (V21) told (V4) that I (V21) never saw (R2) come down the front or side elevators. I (V21) am thinking if (R2) came down the stairs, I (V21) could see the back of (R2). But how did (R2) get downstairs? I (V21) told (V4) if you are not seeing (R2), I (V21) will call code yellow. After (V4) confirmed, I (V21) got on overhead page. When asked where was V21 at 11:08 am on 6/4/23, V21 stated, I (V21) was at the receptionist desk, speaking to (R13) in a wheelchair. When asked where was R13 positioned when V21 was conversing with R13, V21 stated, R13 was kitty corner (diagonal) on my right side, and I (V21) am facing the middle elevator. V21 stated, from the back area (on 1st floor), R2 did not come towards the receptionist desk, Not at all. V21 stated, never heard anything. Nothing alarmed that someone got out there (back door). When asked if the back stairwell (west stairwell) is locked on the first floor, V21 stated, No. Residents can take a stairwell down. When asked if V21 heard an electronic monitoring safety device alarm from the 1st floor back door on 6/4/23 at 11:08 am, V21 stated, No. Nope. When asked if there were blue laundry bins (racks) in the 1st floor hallway on 6/4/23, V21 stated, Yes. When asked if V21 saw R2 on the 1st floor back door video camera view on 6/4/23 at 11:08 am, V21 stated, No. If there was an image, I (V21) wouldn't have known it was (R2). (R2) would have had an (electronic monitoring safety device) on. We have regular employees who walk back there. I (V21) would not be able to make (R2) out. On 6/14/23 at 2:01 pm, V21 (Receptionist) stated, the elopement risk list (residents who are assessed as an elopement risk) is posted at the receptionist's desk in a red binder. V21 stated, V21 checked the elopement risk list on 6/4/23. V21 was asked on 6/4/23, was R2 on the elopement risk. V21 stated, No, I (V21) don't think so. On 6/8/23 at 1:42 pm, V18 (Dietary Aide) stated, V18 works in the kitchen and works on the weekends. V18 stated, on 6/4/23, V18 worked from 6:00 am to 2:00 pm. When asked on 6/4/23 at 11:08 am, did V18 see R2 eloping from back door on the 1st floor, and V18 stated, No, I (V18) don't recall. V18 stated, V18 had met R2 prior to 6/4/23 and V18 would see R2 in R2's bed each time V18 would be picking up meal trays. V18 stated, I (V18) know (R2's) general appearance. I (V18) would recognize (R2) if I saw (R2). This surveyor informed V18 that this surveyor and V1 viewed the facility video footage from 6/4/23 when R2 eloped out the 1st floor back door. When asked where V18 was going when V18 was walking down the 1st floor hallway towards the back door direction on 6/4/23 (as observed on the video), V18 stated, Around that time, I (V18) turned to the laundry or lady's locker room. When asked on 6/4/23 at 11:08 am, did V18 hear alarms at the back door, V18 stated, No, I (V18) didn't hear anything. On 6/8/23 at 11:30 am, V16 (Clinical Care Coordinator) stated, V16 was the manager on duty or MOD on 6/4/23 and arrived around 9:10 am. V16 stated, one of V16's responsibilities as the MOD is to use the remote for the electronic monitoring safety device alarm systems for the 1st floor front and back doors in the facility. V16 stated, V16 checked the doors on 6/4/23 around 10:00 am after V16 did V16's rounds and the remote showed Good when the door is working. V16 stated, So, I was in my office, around 11:00 am. (V21, Receptionist) said (V4, Agency RN) was saying that they can't find (R2). I (V16) asked (V4) when (V4) saw (V4) last, and (V4) said, 'Recently. I (V4) just gave (R2) (R2's) medications.' I (V16) said, 'Did you see (R2) in what direction?' (V4) could not identify which door and maybe (R2) left in back door because (V21) didn't see (R2). When asked as the MOD, does V16 review the elopement risk list? V16 stated, It's at the front desk at receptionist (desk). Yes, I (V16) check on it. When asked on 6/4/23, did V16 check the elopement risk list, and V16 stated, I (V16) check the list, but we were already searching (for R2). I (V16) check on the pictures. We are looking for (R2). When asked was R2 on the elopement risk list on 6/4/23, V16 stated, I (V16) don't think so. V16 verified with this surveyor that it was the elopement risk list, updated on 6/2/23, that V16 saw on 6/4/23. V16 stated, (R2) was not on this (elopement risk) list at this time. When asked did V16 have knowledge that R2 was at risk for elopement (prior to 6/4/23), V16 stated, No, not really. On 6/7/23 at 12:53 pm, V13 (Social Worker) stated, I (V13) report to (V11, Social Services Director, SSD) and was assigned to the 3rd floor and half of the 2nd floor. V13 stated, When (R2) was first admitted , (R2) was confused and wandering a little bit. Since (R2) was Spanish speaking, we had a couple staff members who speak Spanish. A CNA who speaks Spanish translated for (the social services) intake. (R2) had wandering tendencies. Nursing was asking if we could put an (electronic monitoring safety device) on (R2). I (V13) put it (electronic monitoring safety device) on (R2) on 5/16/23. I (V13) placed it on (R2's) right wrist. I (V13) checked it (electronic monitoring safety device) prior to putting it on (R2). We had the old one (from the previous electronic monitoring safety device alarm system). And then I (V13) grabbed a new one. And I (V13) checked it prior. I (V13) used a remote to check it. We can get the remote. It's (remote for electronic monitoring safety device checks) in (V12's, Maintenance Director) office. V13 stated, I (V13) did see (R2) walking and pacing the hallway. When asked who the nurse was who asked for the electronic monitoring safety device to be placed on R2, V13 stated, It was the nurse on the floor, the restorative nurse (V14). When asked if V13 ever tested R2's electronic monitoring safety device after applying it on R2 on 5/16/23, V13 stated, I (V13) had tested it on another day because I (V13) tested it prior (to putting it on R2). When asked when this date was, V13 stated, It was on a really busy for (V11, SSD). (V11) does the updates on Fridays. I (V13) did it that next Friday (5/19/23). It (R2's electronic monitoring safety device) was functioning at that time. V13 was asked to demonstrate the testing method of a resident's electronic monitoring safety device with the remote (present in the conference room on the table), You turn it on. And the message says good. I (V13) tested it that way with (R2). V13 stated, V13 performed the elopement risk assessment for R2 on 5/16/23 as part of R2's social services admission assessments and V13 did (R2's) care plan. When asked about the score of R2's elopement risk assessment, V13 said, Score, right down here, would be (R2's) score. At risk. V13 stated, V13 fills out all the elopement risk evaluation questions, and the questions that are marked with yes totals for the final score. V13 stated, any score above a 4 is a high risk on the elopement risk evaluation. V13 stated for at risk for elopement residents does include behaviors that would be concerning, like wandering tendency. V13 stated, (R2) was at risk for elopement. Wandering tendency. Keep eye on (R2). Eye on (R2) and a personal safety alarm device. When asked what the personal safety alarm device (electronic monitoring safety device) is, V13 stated, It sounds an alarm that someone has gotten in the elevator or gone out one of the doors. Bracelets made to one of those 4 exits. Doors on the main floor and elevators, there's an alarm. V13 stated, (R2) is oriented to self. Oriented to person and not to situation or what was going on. When asked about testing R2's wander guard other than when V13 stated on 5/16/23 and on 5/19/23, V13 stated, I (V13) don't recall testing (R2) another time. When asked if V13 informed V11 (SSD) when V13 placed R2's electronic monitoring safety device on R2 on 5/16/23, V11 stated, I (V13) did not that day. It's one of those things that slipped through the crack. When asked V13 in reference to the elopement risk list, can V13 update the elopement risk list, and V13 stated, That's (V11, SSD.) I (V13) have not updated it. V13 stated, For the elopement risk list, they (residents) all have (electronic monitoring safety devices) on them attached. V13 stated, residents who are at risk for elopement are making statements, consecutively needing to go to the store, saying 'I need to pay my bills.' They have more of an idea or plan. Obsessive thinking with poor cognition. They have it in their mind that 'I have to do it.' V13 stated, (R2) was pacing, walking into rooms. Now (R2) has 1:1 sitter. V13 stated with R2's electronic monitoring safety device, (R2's) on the list now. That's how staff are able to know who an elopement risk is. V13 stated, on 5/16/23 when V13 applied R2's electronic monitoring safety device, I (V13) did not document the device number or mode. I (V13) was unaware that we needed to document it. On 6/8/23 at 3:39 pm, V13 (Social Worker) asked if she checked the functioning of the electronic monitoring safety device on 5/16/23 after placing it on R2. V13 stated, Since I (V13) checked it right before, I didn't check after putting on (R2). V13 asked if V13 completed electronic monitoring safety device inventory log. V13 stated, (V11) does the (electronic monitoring safety device) log. Not me. So, no. R2's Elopement Risk Evaluation, dated 5/16/23, documents, in part, 8 questions to be completed for the risk score total. V13 performed and documented R2's 5/16/23 Elopement Risk Evaluation and answered Yes to the following 3 questions: The resident has the physical ability to leave the facility, The resident has a firm desire/intent to leave the facility, and The resident has attempted or has an actual elopement in the last year. Question #8 (The resident is confused to time and place and has the physical ability to leave the building?) was not answered Yes or No by V13 (left blank). V13 documented that all interventions that apply to R2 is Personal Safety Alarm Device. On 6/20/23 at 1:58 pm, reviewed the 5/16/23 elopement risk evaluation V13 performed for R2, V13 stated, the answers to the questions determine the risk score. V13 stated, That's why (R2) had score of 3 because (R2) had 3 yeses. V13 stated, with question #5 The resident has attempted or has an actual elopement in the last year, V13 documented yes because of R2's wandering. V13 stated, R2 was at 'low risk' with a score of 3. This surveyor then pointed out to V13 that V13 did not answer question #8 The resident is confused to time and place and has the physical ability to leave the building? When asked why did V13 not answer question #8, V13 stated, It was a m[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Health Care Worker Background Checks were done in a timely manner and were documented to prevent abuse. This failure has the potenti...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Health Care Worker Background Checks were done in a timely manner and were documented to prevent abuse. This failure has the potential to affect all 75 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility Daily Census dated 6/6/23 documents, in part, that there are 75 active residents in the facility. On 6/14/23 at 3:17 pm, V29 (Human Resources Director) initiated the Health Care Worker Background Check as follows: V20's (Former Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA) paper file was reviewed. No date and time show on V20's Illinois Department of Public Health: Health Care Worker Registry, Individuals in Custody, Individual in Custody Search, and Wanted Fugitives registry checks. V20's date of hire was 3/9/23. When asked where the date and times are that these registry checks were performed, V29 stated, It doesn't allow me to check the date on the bottom (of these pages). V29 stated that V29 has been in the HR Director role since 12/2022 and can see that some of the employee files that were processed prior to V29's employment do have the date and times on all Health Care Worker Registry checks. V29 stated that the Health Care Worker Background checks are done during the interview process of the potential employee. V3's (CNA) paper file was reviewed next by V29. No date and time show on V3's Illinois Department of Public Health: Health Care Worker Registry, Individuals in Custody, Individual in Custody Search, and Wanted Fugitives registry checks. V3's date of hire was 1/29/23. V27's (Former CNA) paper file was reviewed then by V29. No date and time show on V27's Illinois Department of Public Health: Health Care Worker Registry, Individuals in Custody, Individual in Custody Search, and Wanted Fugitives registry checks. V27's date of hire was 5/30/23. V28's (CNA) paper file was reviewed next by V29. V28's hire date was 11/29/21 (prior to V29 working in the facility). All V28's Health Care Worker Registry documents (6) showed the date and time when the background checks were performed. V7's (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) paper file was reviewed then by V29. No date and time show on V27's Illinois Department of Public Health: Health Care Worker Registry, Individuals in Custody, Individual in Custody Search, and Wanted Fugitives registry checks. V7's License Lookup was dated and timed on 3/11/23 at 12:44 pm. V7's date of hire was 3/10/23. On 6/15/23 at 2:53 pm, V29 (HR Director) reviewed 5 more employees' Health Care Worker Registry checks (V10, CNA Supervisor; V14, Restorative Nurse; V22, CNA; V23, CNA; and V26, LPN). These 5 additional employees had hire dates prior to December 2022, and their Health Care Worker Registry checks contained dates and times to confirm when the checks were performed. V29 stated, There are 6 registries. I (V29) can't think of them all. I have a list. V29 stated, I (V29) have to make sure they are eligible. Be in the clear with the aide registry. I look for 'work eligible.' When asked the purpose of performing Health Care Worker Background checks, V29 stated, To make sure the employee we are hiring are able to work with residents here. It's a safety issue. When asked if health care workers have more in-depth contact with residents, V29 stated, Absolutely. V29 stated, Each registry is done separately. When asked where the physical evidence of the date of checks is, Some of them don't have dates. When asked how is V29 able to produce Health Care Worker Background check documents that were performed on the date and time that V29 performed the registry checks, V29 stated, At the moment, I (V29) am trying to figure out how to have the date on every paper. On 6/21/23 at 3:49 pm, V34 (Assistant Administrator) Health Care Worker Background check checks are done for perspective employees to ensure that there's no hit for their eligibility to work in a long-term care facility. V34 stated that staff can then work when Human Resources has cleared them, and there's no history of being a perpetration of abuse. When asked when Health Care Worker Background checks are done, V34 stated, I (V34) believe prior to hire. When asked what's the purpose of Health Care Worker Background checks prior to employment. V34 stated, In case something comes up in their background. When asked how someone is to know when the Health Care Worker Background checks are being completed. V34 stated, There's a time stamp when it's printed. Facility policy dated 11/28/2017 and titled Abuse and Neglect, documents, in part, Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, corporal punishment, misappropriation of property, exploitation, neglect, or mistreatment. The facility follows the federal guidelines dedicated to prevention of abuse and timely and thorough investigations of allegations. These guidelines include compliance with the seven (7) federal components of prevention and investigation .7 Steps in Abuse Prevention: The seven elements of prevention and investigation include: screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection, reporting/response. 1. Screening: Have procedures to: screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreating residents. This includes attempting to obtain information from previous employers and/or current employers and checking with the appropriate licensing boards and registries. Prior to placement in the facility, the facility will require background check of prospective consultants, contractors, volunteers, caregivers working on behalf of the facility, and students in its nurse aide training program. 3. Check with the Illinois Nurse Aide Registry now known as the Healthcare Worker Registry upon hire, to determine reports of abuse, neglect, and theft, if staff is not a licensed staff. 4. Initiate Illinois State Police fingerprint check for non-licensed applicants or new hires within 10 days of hiring, unless the applicant had been previously finger-printed in accordance with the Illinois background Check Act. The Illinois State Police Web Portal will automatically update convictions of those previously fingerprinted. 5. No licensed individual with a disciplinary action in effect against their license because of finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation or mistreatment will be employed by the facility. No individual found to be guilty in the court of law with findings of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation, and mistreatment will be employed by the facility. Facility job description dated 3/4/22 and titled Human Resource Director, documents, in part, Summary/Objective: In keeping with our organization's goal of improving the lives of the Guests we serve, the Human Resource Director directs the Human Resources Department in accordance with current applicable federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations, to assure that quality personnel are interviewed, trained and employed. Essential Functions: . 10. Provide public information (i.e. (that is), verification of employment). 21. Conduct and ensure employee hiring, vetting, and discharge procedures are in compliance with federal, state, and local regulations and established facility policies and procedures.
Jan 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications and blood sugar checks are documented on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) according to facility policy fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications and blood sugar checks are documented on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) according to facility policy for two residents (R5 and R7) and failed to notify the practitioner of elevated blood sugar results for one resident (R7). Findings include: R7 On 01/11/22 at 8:50 AM, the surveyor inquired if R7's blood sugars have been high recently. R7 responded, Yeah they have been. I'm not sure why. R7's 10/29/22 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) determined a score of 10, indicating R10's cognition is moderately impaired. R7's medical diagnoses include but are not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, epileptic seizures, cerebral infarction due to embolism of left middle cerebral artery and essential hypertension. Review of R7's January 2023 MAR (printed on 1/10/23 at 5:46 pm) showed multiple blank spaces or missing documentation. The following medications were missing documentation for the following dates and times: -Lantus Solution 100 unit/ml (insulin glargine) Inject 30 ml (milliliters) subcutaneously at bedtime for DM (Diabetes Mellitus): missing documentation for the 9pm dose on 1/4/23, 1/7/23, and 1/8/23 -Lantus Solution 100 unit/ml (insulin glargine) Inject 35 unit subcutaneously one time a day for DM: missing documentation for the 6 am dose on 1/1/23, 1/5/23, 1/8/23 and 1/9/23. -Humalog Solution 100 unit/ml (insulin lispro inject as per sliding scale subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for DM: missing documentation for the 6 am dose on 1/1/23, 1/5/23, 1/8/23, and 1/9/23. Also, for the 9 pm dose on 1/4/23, 1/8/23, and 1/9/23. -Accucheck 4 times a day before meals and at bedtime: missing documentation for the 6 am check on 1/1/23, 1/5/23, 1/8/23 and 1/9/23 and for the 9 pm check on 1/5/23, 1/8/23, and 1/9/23. -Apixaban Tablet 5 mg Give 5 mg by mouth two times a day for prophylaxis: missing documentation for the 9 pm dose on 1/4/23, 1/7/23, and 1/8/23. -Keppra Tablet 750 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two time a day for epilepsy: missing documentation for the 9 pm dose on 1/4/23, 1/7/23, and 1/8/23. -Senna-docusate sodium tablet give two tablets by mouth two times a day for constipation: missing documentation for the 9 pm dose on 1/4/23, 1/7/23 and 1/8/23. R7's blood sugar was documented as 400 for the 11 am check on 1/2/23 and 448 for the 9 pm check on 1/3/23. R7's 6/15/2020 care plan documents, in part, Focus: (R7) has diabetes mellitus. Interventions: . Monitor/document/report to MD (medical doctor) as needed for signs/symptoms of hyperglyecemia. On 01/12/23 at 10:56 AM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) provided the surveyor with R7's progress notes for the month of January 2023. No notes were documented regarding reason for R7's missed doses of medication or of physician notification regarding R7's elevated blood sugars. On 01/11/23 at 3:26 PM, the surveyor inquired what Lantus (insulin glargine) is used for. V27 (Nurse Practitioner) replied that it's a long-acting medication for diabetes management. The surveyor inquired what could happen if a dose is missed. V27 replied, It would increase the blood glucose. V27 also mentioned that short-acting insulin is usually given before or with meals and the dose is based on certain parameters known as a sliding scale. V27 added, If the blood sugar is below 70 or above 400, you have to call the practitioner. The surveyor inquired if a resident's blood sugars are consistently in 300-400's should a practitioner be notified? V27 replied, Yes, the nurses need to notify one of us so we can change or recalibrate the orders. The surveyor inquired what are the side effects or risks of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). V27 replied, Confusion, can cause a fall, long-term can lose eyesight (years of non-compliance with that). The surveyor inquired if V27 was ever notified of R7's blood sugars being over 400. V27 stated, I don't remember. R5 R5's admission Record documents diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, mixed hyperlipidemia, dementia, major depressive disorder, essential hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia and schizophrenia. R5's 12/30/22 BIMS determined a score of 3, indicating R3's cognition is severely impaired. Review of R5's January 2023 MAR (printed on 1/10/23 at 2:30 PM) showed multiple blank spaces or missing documentation. The following medications were missing documentation for the following dates and times: -Aricept tablet 5 mg give by mouth 1 time a day for dementia: missing documentation for the 5 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Insulin Glargine Solution 100 unit/ml inject 10 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for DM2 (diabetes mellitus type 2): missing documentation for the 9 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Levofloxacin 750 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for UTI (urinary tract infection): missing documentation for the 6 am dose on 1/1/23 and 1/2/23. -Lipitor 10 mg give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for HLD (hyperlipidemia): missing documentation for the 9 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Mirtazapine 7.5 mg give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for major depressive disorder: missing documentation for the 9 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Spiriva Handihaler capsule 18 mcg inhale 1 capsule orally in the morning for COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease): missing documentation for the 6 am dose on 1/1/23, 1/2/23, 1/5/23, 1/8/23, and 1/9/23. -Tamsulosin HCL (hydrochloride) 0.4 mg give 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime for urinary retention: missing documentation for the 9 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Amantadine HCL 100 mg tablet by mouth two times a day for Parkinson's: missing documentation for the 5 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Docusate sodium capsule 100 mg by mouth two times a day for constipation: missing documentation for the 5 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Levetiracetam 500 mg tablet give by mouth two times a day for seizure: missing documentation for the 5 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Metformin HCL 1000 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for diabetes mellitus: missing documentation for the 5 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Risperdal 4 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for schizophrenia: missing documentation for the 9 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Symbicort aerosol 160-4.5 mg/act 2 puffs inhale orally tow times a day for prophylaxis: missing documentation for the 6 am shift on 1/1/23, 1/2/23, 1/5/23, 1/8/23, and 1/9/23; and on the 5 pm shift on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Gabapentin 300 mg give 1 capsule by mouth three times a day for neuropathy: missing documentation for the 6 am dose on 1/1/23, 1/2/23, 1/5/23, 1/8/23 and 1/9/23; and for the 10 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Humalog Solution 100 unit/ml inject as per sliding scale subcutaneously with meals for diabetes: missing documentation for the 5 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Pro-stat AWC three times a day for supplement: missing documentation for the 5 pm dose on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. -Accucheck 4 times a day related to type 2 diabetes mellitus: missing documentation for the 6 am check on 1/1/23, 1/2/23, 1/5/23, 1/8/23 and 1/9/23.; the 4 pm check on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23; and the 9 pm check on 1/4/23 and 1/7/23. R5's progress notes were reviewed with no documentation as to why medications or blood sugar checks were not given or done. On 01/11/23 at 12:23 PM, regarding the process for medication administration and documentation, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated, You don't save it on the MAR until the nurse sees that all the medication has been taken then she goes and signs off the medication on the MAR. V2 added that a check mark indicates that a medication was given. The revised 7/28/22 Medication Policy documents, in part, Policy Statement: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to all Federal and State regulations with medication pass procedure .e. After medication administered to each resident, sign MAR that it was given. The revised 7/28/22 Physician Orders documents, in part, Policy statement: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all resident/patient medications, treatment and plan of care must be in accordance with the licensed physician's orders. The facility shall ensure to follow physician orders as it is written in the POS (Physician Order Sheet) .Medication orders entered in the POS shall be reflected accurately in the MAR. The updated 12/1/2019 LPN Floor Nurse and RN Floor Nurse job descriptions document, in part, The L.P.N./R.N. provides supervision of staff and will safeguard the health, safety and welfare of all Guests under their care by following applicable laws, regulations, and established nursing policies and procedure. Essential functions: . 4. Administer all parenteral, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injections . 8. Carry out direct contemporaneous charting in your shift. 9. Responsible for all nursing care of assigned guests while on duty. Must notify appropriate persons if there is any significant change in a guest's condition or any transfer to a hospital.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that insulin was properly labeled and dated and...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that insulin was properly labeled and dated and failed to ensure that expired insulin was not stored in the medication cart. These failures affected two residents (R5 and R9) out of three residents reviewed during medication pass. Findings include: On [DATE] at 9:26 AM, the surveyor observed V21 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) prepare R5's scheduled 9 am medications. V21 retrieved a vial of lispro insulin 100 unit/ml (milliliter) from a plastic container stored in the 1st set medication cart. The vial had a pharmacy label with R5's name, but there was no open date or expiration date noted on the vial. V21 looked through the insulin container and pulled out another vial of lispro insulin 100 unit/ml labeled with R5's name and a sticker on the vial that listed an open and expiration date. The expiration date written on the vial was [DATE]. A vial of Lantus (insulin glargine) 100 unit/ml with R5's name was also noted to have an expiration date of [DATE]. The surveyor inquired what the facility protocol is for dating insulin vials. V21 replied, Supposed to write down the date it was opened and when it expires. We don't want to give expired insulin because it's not effective. If it's not bringing down his (R5) blood sugar, then we don't want that to lead to a diabetic coma. R5's admission Record documents diagnoses including but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. R5's [DATE] BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) determined a score of 3, indicating that R5's cognition is severely impaired. R5's Order Summary Report documents, in part, an order dated [DATE] for Humalog Solution 100 unit/ml (insulin lispro) Inject as per sliding scale subcutaneously with meals for diabetes and an order dated [DATE] for Insulin Glargine Solution 100 unit/ml Inject 10 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for DM2 (diabetes mellitus type 2). On [DATE] at 10:29 AM, the surveyor observed V25 (LPN) prepare R9's scheduled dose of insulin. V25 pulled the plastic insulin container out of the 2nd set medication cart and searched for R9's insulin vial. A vial of Humalog insulin was observed with no pharmacy label indicating which resident the insulin belonged to but had a sticker with an expiration date of [DATE]. R9's vial of insulin glargine was observed with an expiration date of [DATE]. The surveyor inquired if expired insulin should be used? V25 replied, No, because it's not safe to use and not any good. R9's admission Record documents diagnoses including but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. R9's [DATE] BIMS determined a score of 4, indicating that R9's cognition is severely impaired. R9's Order Summary Report documents, in part, an order dated [DATE] for Humalog Subcutaneous Solution 100 unit/ml (insulin lispro) inject 4 unit subcutaneously three times a day for dm (diabetes mellitus) and an order dated [DATE] for Insulin Glargine-yfgn subcutaneous solution 100 unit/ml inject 10 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for dm (diabetes mellitus). On [DATE] at 12:33 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated that the expectation of nursing staff is to put the open date on a newly opened vial of insulin along with the expiration date. V2 added, When passing medications, nurses should be checking for the expiration and any expired meds should be pulled out. The surveyor inquired why it is important to not administer medications that are expired. V2 replied, The effectiveness of the medication may not be accurate anymore. The revised [DATE] Medication Storage, Labeling and Disposal policy documents, in part, Policy statement: It is the facility's policy to comply with federal regulations in storage, labeling, and disposal of medications. Procedures: 1. Medications from pharmacy will be labeled by the pharmacy to include the name of the resident, route of administration, instruction, medication name (generic/brand), strength, and expiration date when applicable. The revised [DATE] Medication Pass policy documents, in part, Policy statement: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to all Federal and State regulations with medication pass procedures. Procedures: . Medication labeling: 1. All opened medication vials in the refrigerator should be labeled with the date when it was opened and discarded within 28 days of opening .3. Insulin vials are to be discarded within 28 days after opening.
Nov 2022 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents' window curtains are not dusty. This failure affected 2 (R22 and R36) residents reviewed for homelike...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents' window curtains are not dusty. This failure affected 2 (R22 and R36) residents reviewed for homelike environment in the total sample of 42 residents. Findings include: On 11/14/22 at 11:28 AM, there was an accumulation of dusts on R22's and R36's window curtain (window blinds). V10 (Maintenance Director) swiped his (V10) finger on one of the slats of the window blinds, per this surveyor's request, and stated, It's dusty. This surveyor then inquired if dusty window curtain promotes homelike environment for the residents. V10 stated, No. On 11/14/22 at 11:33 AM, V11 (Housekeeper) swiped his (V11) finger on one of the slats of the window blinds, per this surveyor's request, and stated, It's dusty. This surveyor then inquired if dusty window curtains promotes homelike environment for the residents. V11 stated, No. V11 added, Everyday, the window should be cleaned because I (V11) do know this floor attracts dust. No, it should not be dusty. Residents are sick and can inhale the dust. On 11/16/2022 at 12:40pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, To provide a home environment, we have to ensure the resident's room is clean, they have to have their necessity within reach. Window curtain (blinds) should be clean, not dusty. The (Revised 6/2020) EVS Environmental Specialist Job Description documented, in part Job Summary. The environmental Specialist is responsible for: The goal is to create a clean and orderly environment for our residents that will become a critical factor in maintaining and strengthening our reputation. Responsibilities. A successful Environmental Specialist will be able to: Perform a variety of cleaning activities such as sweeping, mopping, dusting, and polishing. The (undated) Residents' Rights for People in the Long-Term Care Facilities documented, in part Your right to safety. Your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable and homelike.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for 1 (R14) resident who required the use of bed alarm to prevent falls. This failure affected ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for 1 (R14) resident who required the use of bed alarm to prevent falls. This failure affected R14 who was reviewed for falls in the total sample of 42 residents. Findings include: On 11/14/22 at 10:58 AM, there was gold star next to R14's name by R14's room entry way. R14's bed alarm box was dangling on the bedside with no light on. On 11/14/22 at 11:02 AM, V9 (CNA-Supervisor) checked R14's bed alarm, per this surveyor's request, and stated, He (R14) is not even on it. The bed alarm pad was not underneath R14's torso. On 11/14/22 at 11:06 AM, surveyor inquired about the placement of R14's bed alarm pad. V7 (Restorative Aide) checked the location of R14's bed alarm pad, and moved the bed alarm pad under R14 buttocks. Upon moving the bed alarm pad, no alarm was appreciated. This surveyor requested V7 to check R14's bed alarm box. V7 opened the bed alarm box. There was no battery in place. V7 then stated, Come on people. Who took the battery out? This surveyor then inquired about the purpose of the bed alarm for R14. V7 stated, He (R14) is a fall risk, he (R14) has a potential to fall on the floor. Bed alarm is care planned for him (R14) to prevent falls. On 11/16/2022 at 12:43pm, surveyor inquired about fall prevention program . V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, Do the assessment if a resident at risk for falls. Interventions are individualized; can include bed alarm because it prompts the staff that the resident is attempting to get out of chair or bed. Bed alarm should be in good condition and functioning. For it to function there should be a battery and probe is connected. Restorative, CNA, nurses, all staff going to the resident's room are responsible for checking if the bed alarm is working. R14's (08/02/2018) Side rail/Other Device Evaluation documented, in part 1. Select type of device being applied. Check mark on b. Alarm. What type of alarm/s is used. 1b.Select all that apply: check mark on c. Sensor pad alarm in bed . b2. What is the purpose of the alarm? Check mark on b. to prevent falls. R14's (09/07/2022) Fall Risk Evaluation documented, in part Category: High Risk. Score: 16.0. R14's (08/10/2022) Care plan documented, in part Focus: at high risk for falls. Goal: will be free of falls Interventions: Bed alarm to alert staff when (R14) attempts to get out of bed unassisted. R14's (10/21/2022) Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS Summary Score: 03. Indicating R14's mental status is severely impaired. The (Revised 5/17/22) Fall Occurrence documented, in part Policy Statement. It is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents are assessed for risk for falls, that interventions are put in place, and interventions are reevaluated and revised as necessary. Procedure. 2. Those identified as high risk for falls will be provided fall interventions. An interim Falls Care Plan may be started but a Falls Care Plan is necessary and required after the State required MDS was done.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical status code remained private and failed to ensure empty medication dispensing cards which cont...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical status code remained private and failed to ensure empty medication dispensing cards which contain resident's protected health information were not left unattended. These failures affected 4 (R20, R23, R36, and R41) residents reviewed for confidentiality of records in the total sample of 42 residents. Findings include: On 11/14/22 at 11:16 AM, inside R22's and R36's room, there was a red DNR bracelet attached to the wall below R36's night light visible to everyone passing R36's bed. R36's curtain was not drawn. On 11/14/22 at 11:17AM, V14 (R22's family) Family member #1 walked passed R36's bed and went to R22's bedside. On 11/14/2022 at 12:09pm, R20's empty medication dispensing card for Ciprofloxacin 500mg, R23's empty medication dispensing card for Metformin ER 500mg, and R41's empty medication dispensing card for Potassium Chloride micro 20meq were left unattended on the medication cart with R20's, R23's, and R41's DOB (date of birth ). On 11/14/22 at 12:11 PM, surveyor inquired about the process of discarding empty medication cards. V6 (Licensed Practice Nurse) stated, Process is to tear the top part of the BINGO (referring to the medication dispensing cards) cards that contain resident's information and discard them on the shredder for resident's privacy. This surveyor pointed out to V6 the empty medication dispensing cards for R20, R23, and R41. V6 stated, This is Medication cart 2Back or 2B, the same thing. This is not my (V6) cart. We are not supposed to leave these (referring to the medication dispensing cards) on the cart unattended for resident's privacy. At this time, the nurse who was assigned to the medication cart 2B had not returned. This surveyor inquired where the nurse went. V6 stated, I (V6) don't know where the other nurse is. On 11/15/2022 at 11:03am, the red DNR bracelet remained attached to R36 bedroom wall below the night light. V24 (R22's Family) Family Member #2 was in the room with R22. This surveyor pointed out to V2 (Director of Nursing) the DNR bracelet attached on R36's wall. V2 stated, She (R36) is a DNR but it (referring to the DNR bracelet) should not be visible for everyone to see. It is a HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) violation. V2 immediately covered the DNR bracelet with a blank white paper. On 11/16/2022 at 12:35pm, surveyor inquired about discarding of empty medication card (BINGO) card. V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, Expectation with dispensing of BINGO card when empty, staff should be scratching off the name from the BINGO (medication dispensing card) card then should be put in the shredder or HIPAA box located at each nursing station. Purpose is to protect the information of the residents. Anybody can just obtain information of the patient that can lead to identify theft. Information like social security (number). Any information of the patient, can be taken by anyone who is not privileged to know these. And also, to keep the privacy of the patient. Protected health information of the resident include Medical history of the resident, birthdate of the resident, social security number, medications of the resident, financial information, and advance directive of the resident. R20's (2/13/2022) Order Details documented, in part Cipro Tablet 500MG (Ciprofloxacin HCl) give 500mg via G-tube two times a day for UTI for 7days. R23's (8/17/2022) Order Details documented, in part Metformin HCl ER (OSM) Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 500MG give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day R41's (9/23/2022) Order Details documented, in part Potassium Chloride Crys ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 20MEQ Give 3tablet(s) by mouth one time only for low potassium for 1 day. The (11/16/2022) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented, in part No policy for disposing of empty medication card. (Residents right's is attached regarding privacy). The (undated) Residents' Rights for People in the Long-Term Care Facilities documented, in part Your rights to privacy and confidentiality. You have the right to privacy and confidentiality of your personal and medical records. Your medical and personal care are private.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0813 (Tag F0813)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain safe refrigerated food storage (refrigerator not defrosted) for one resident (R64); and failed to properly log refrige...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain safe refrigerated food storage (refrigerator not defrosted) for one resident (R64); and failed to properly log refrigerator temperatures for five residents (R12, R15, R35, R64, and R220). These failures have the potential to affect all 42 residents in the sample. Findings include: On 11/14/22 at 11:06 am, Surveyor observed room R64's room refrigerator with a thick layer of ice buildup, adhered to the back of the refrigerator's solid wall surface, coming in contact with R64's food items that were stored in R64's refrigerator. R64 stated, That is not a freezer, it's (referring to the refrigerator in R64's room) only a refrigerator. Surveyor observed R64's refrigerator thermometer with a temperature of 42 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the temperature log sheet last temperature recorded 11/11/22 at 38 (F) degrees. On 11/14/22 at 11:09 am, V20 (Housekeeper) was interviewed regarding defrosting refrigerators in a timely manner causing decreased mold spores and grime build up in the refrigerators and stated, I (V20) do not defrost the resident refrigerators. I (V20) only clean them (referring to the residents refrigerators), and I (V20) let V10 (Maintenance Director) know if a residents refrigerator need defrosting. When V20 was asked regarding the temperature logs on the residents refrigerators V20 stated, I (V20) am responsible for checking the residents refrigerators and recording the temperature on the log sheet every day. On 11/14/22 at 11:45 am, Surveyor observed R35's room refrigerator with food items stored inside. Surveyor observed R35's refrigerator temperature log sheet last temperature recorded 11/07/22 at 38 degrees Fahrenheit (F). On 11/15/22 at 9:51 am, V10 (Maintenance Director) was interviewed regarding defrosting refrigerators in a timely manner causing decreased mold spores and grime build up in the refrigerators and V10 stated that V10 is responsible for defrosting the residents refrigerators. Surveyor observed R64's refrigerator with V10 and V10 stated, I (V10) see the ice. It (referring to R64's refrigerator) should be defrosted. When V10 was asked when was the last time R64'S refrigerator was defrosted V10 stated, I (V10) don't know when the last time R64's refrigerator has been defrosted. I (V10) come around and see if it (referring to R64's refrigerator) has too much ice and I (V10) defrost it (referring to R64's refrigerator). On 11/15/22 at 10:59 am, V1 (Administrator) was interviewed regarding defrosting the floor refrigerators causing decreased mold spores and grime build up and denied any issues or knowledge with floor refrigerator's not being defrosted in a timely manner causing an increased mold spores and other grime to build up. V1 stated that there is a manager assigned to each unit Monday through Friday that is responsible for checking the residents personal refrigerators for cleanliness and defrosting. V1 explained that the manager on duty is responsible for checking the residents refrigerators for the entire building for cleanliness and defrosting on Saturday's and Sunday's. V1 also stated if a refrigerator need defrosting the manager reports it to V10 (Maintenance Director). When V1 was asked regarding the importance of the refrigerators on the unit temperatures being logged, refrigerators on the units being kept clean and defrosted and V1 stated, The importance is for food safety for the residents to consume proper foods. On 11/16/22 1:32 pm, V15 (Food Service Director) was interviewed regarding defrosting the floor refrigerators causing decreased mold spores and grime build up in the residents refrigerators and V15 stated that V15 is the facility's ambassador that is responsible for rounding and checking the refrigerators on the fourth floor for rooms 406-409. V15 stated that V15 is responsible for the checking the refrigerators for cleanliness, items in the refrigerators to be labeled, dated and eatable for the residents. V15 also stated that V15 is responsible for checking and recording the temperature logs on the refrigerators for rooms 406-409 and reporting to V15 (Maintenance Director) the refrigerators that need to be defrosted. When V15 asked when the last time was the refrigerators defrosted and the temperature logs were checked for R35 and R64's refrigerator, V15 stated, Last week. When V15 was asked why it is important to check the refrigerators daily and V15 stated, It (referring to the refrigerators) can be a hazard and foods can become uneatable. R35's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 10/31/22 Section C C0500 documents that R35 has a BIMS score of 15 which indicates that R35 is cognitively intact. R64's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 09/17/22 Section C C0500 documents that R64 has a BIMS score of 15 which indicates that R64 is cognitively intact. Facility untitled document dated 2022 documents, in part that R35's last temperature log on 11/07/22 with a temperature of 38 (F). Facility untitled document dated 2022 documents, in part that R64's last temperature log on 11/11/22 with a temperature of 38 (F). Facility's document dated 12/01/2019 and titled Director of Maintenance documents, in part: Essential Functions: 2. Operates the maintenance department in a safe manner by ensuring compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations and following established policies and procedures . 13. Follow established safety precautions when performing tasks and using equipment and supplies. Facility's document dated revised 07/28/22 and titled Refrigerator and Resident Appliance Maintenance Service documents, in part: Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance services for refrigerator units in residents rooms, common areas/dining rooms and nurses station. Procedure: 1. The maintenance department or facility designee is responsible for maintaining that resident appliance e.g., refrigerators are safe, clean, and operable at all times . 2. c. Temperature is maintained below 41 (F) and above 32 (F) using a thermometer with +-3 degrees temperature variance. Facility's document dated revised 07/28/22 and titled Food from the Outside Policy documents, in part: Policy: The facility will comply with sanitary food practices in storing, handling, and consumption of food brought by family and visitors from the outside of the facility. On 11/14/2022 at 10:45am surveyor reviewed R220's refrigerator temperature log for 2022 with temperatures written in from 11/01/2022 to 11/08/2022. R220's refrigerator temperature log was not completed for 11/09/2022 to 11/14/2022. On 11/14/2022 at 10:55am surveyor reviewed R12's refrigerator log for 2022 with temperatures written in from 11/01/2022 to 11/08/2022. R12's refrigerator temperature log was not completed for 11/09/2022 to 11/14/2022. On 11/14/2022 at 11:47am surveyor reviewed R15's refrigerator log for 2022 with temperatures written in from 11/01/2022 to 11/08/2022. R15's refrigerator temperature log was not completed for 11/09/2022 to 11/14/2022. On 11/16/2022 at 2:47pm V26 (Staffing Coordinator) stated that resident's personal refrigerator logs are completed every day to make sure the refrigerator is working properly and to make the food does not spoil.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during mealtime and before donning PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) when entering one resident's room (...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during mealtime and before donning PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) when entering one resident's room (R62) who is on Contact Isolation. This failure has the potential to affect all the residents residing on the third floor. Finding: On 11/14/2022 at 12:34pm surveyor observed V18 (CNA) enter several resident rooms, while passing lunch trays on the third floor, without performing hand hygiene between each resident's tray. On 11/14/2022 at 12:38pm surveyor observed V18 (CNA) enter R62's room without performing hand hygiene when donning PPE (Personal Protective Equipment). On 11/14/2022 at 12:40pm V18 stated you are to perform hand hygiene when passing trays after every third tray and should perform hand hygiene when you are leaving the resident's room for sure. Then, V18 said, I don't know when surveyor asked was that the only time, she needed to perform hand hygiene? On 11/14/2022 at 12:43pm V19 (LPN) stated that hand hygiene should be performed between each meal tray that is passed and before donning and after doffing PPE. On 11/16/2022 at 2:08pm V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that hand hygiene should be performed between each meal tray passed and before and after donning and doffing PPE. R62's Order Summary Report with an active date of 11/17/2022 indicates that R62 is on Contact Isolation. Policy with a revised date of 07/28/2022 titled Hand Hygiene states, in part, hand hygiene is important in controlling infections, before and after entering isolation precautions settings, and before and after assisting a resident with meals. Policy with a revised date of 7/28/2022 titled Infection Prevention and Control states, in part, hand hygiene will be performed by staff after direct patient contact and after each situation that necessitates hand hygiene and infection prevention practices includes hand hygiene.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was cleaned appropriately in an effort to prevent foodborne illnesses. This failure has the potential ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was cleaned appropriately in an effort to prevent foodborne illnesses. This failure has the potential to affect all 70 residents taking oral nutrition in the facility. Findings include: The (11/14/2022) Facility census was 71. The (printed 11/15/2022) Facility 672 Question Detail documented that there was one resident on NPO (nothing per orem/mouth). On 11/15/2022 at 10:10am, on the first floor, the front panel of the ice machine was noted with accumulation of grayish-blackish matter. This surveyor pointed this out to V15 (Food Service Director) and stated, I think it is dirt, not mold. On 11/15/2022 at 10:11am, surveyor inquired who was using the ice machine. V15 stated, It serves the whole facility. This surveyor followed this up with an inquiry on who was responsible in cleaning the ice machine. V15 stated, I don't want to say this but the CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) come down here to fill the ice bucket for the residents. Kitchen (department) is not checking if the ice machine is dirty. On 11/15/2022 at 10:17am, this surveyor pointed out to V10 (Maintenance Director) the condition of the ice machine and inquired if it was safe for the resident to consume ice from the ice machine. V10 stated, No, residents can get sick. On 11/15/2022 at 2:30pm, surveyor inquired about cleanliness of the ice machine. V23 (Registered Dietician/Licensed Dietician-Nutritionist) stated, I (V23) think we need to turn it off, making sure there is no accumulation of dirt. Everything should be clean; inside and outside should be clean. Because even it is in the outside, it could still get in the ice of the residents. It is a safety issue, we have residents who have health problems. We don't want to add anything to their condition. Some have lower immune response, we don't want to add risk factor like microbial infection to the resident. The (11/16/2022) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented, in part Ice Machine Cleaning - there is no policy. The (11/17/2022) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented, in part Our ice machine is professionally cleaned and serviced monthly and the outside is checked and cleaned by dietary daily.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the outside dumpsters were close at all times, failed to ensure outside dumpsters were not overflowing with trash a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the outside dumpsters were close at all times, failed to ensure outside dumpsters were not overflowing with trash and failed to ensure the main exit door has no gap to maintain a sanitary environment and to prevent pests and rodent's migration. These failures have the potential to affect all 71 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: The (11/14/2022) facility census was 71. On 11/14/2022 at 12:25pm, the outside large dumpster and small dumpster were not closed and were overflowing with trash. This surveyor pointed this out to V10 (Maintenance Director). V10 stated, These are not supposed to be open and overflowing with trash. These should be closed all the time so no rats can get in the dumpsters. This surveyor inquired about the importance of keeping the dumpsters closed at all times and not overflowing. V10 stated, To make sure no animals get in the dumpster. We don't want to attract animals to go inside the building. On 11/14/2022 at 12:31pm, there was a gap between the two doors of the main exit French doors located at the back of the building. This surveyor pointed this out to V10. V10 stated, It is not supposed to be this way. We don't want the pest or rodents to get in the building. The (11/16/2022) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented, in part No policy for the outside dumpster. The (undated) Residents' Rights for People in the Long-Term Care Facilities documented, in part Your right to safety. Your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable and homelike.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), $125,108 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 37 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $125,108 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (16/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 16/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Warren Barr Lincoln Park's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns WARREN BARR LINCOLN PARK an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Warren Barr Lincoln Park Staffed?

CMS rates WARREN BARR LINCOLN PARK's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 56%, which is 10 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 62%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Warren Barr Lincoln Park?

State health inspectors documented 37 deficiencies at WARREN BARR LINCOLN PARK during 2022 to 2024. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 35 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Warren Barr Lincoln Park?

WARREN BARR LINCOLN PARK is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by LEGACY HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 109 certified beds and approximately 77 residents (about 71% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in CHICAGO, Illinois.

How Does Warren Barr Lincoln Park Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, WARREN BARR LINCOLN PARK's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (56%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Warren Barr Lincoln Park?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Warren Barr Lincoln Park Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, WARREN BARR LINCOLN PARK has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Warren Barr Lincoln Park Stick Around?

Staff turnover at WARREN BARR LINCOLN PARK is high. At 56%, the facility is 10 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 62%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Warren Barr Lincoln Park Ever Fined?

WARREN BARR LINCOLN PARK has been fined $125,108 across 2 penalty actions. This is 3.6x the Illinois average of $34,330. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Warren Barr Lincoln Park on Any Federal Watch List?

WARREN BARR LINCOLN PARK is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.