WARREN PARK HEALTH & LIVING CTR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Warren Park Health & Living Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. It ranks #416 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the bottom half statewide, and #132 out of 201 in Cook County, suggesting very few local options are worse. While the facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 13 to 2 over the past year, it still has serious concerns, including incidents of physical abuse that caused harm to residents. Staffing is a relative strength, with a turnover rate of 24% that is well below the state average, but the overall star rating is only 2 out of 5, reflecting below-average performance. Additionally, fines of $37,668 are concerning and indicate ongoing compliance issues, despite the average RN coverage, which is crucial for catching potential problems.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Illinois
- #416/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 24% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 24 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $37,668 in fines. Higher than 54% of Illinois facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 27 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 30 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Low Staff Turnover (24%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (24%)
24 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Illinois average (2.5)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 30 deficiencies on record
Sept 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews facility failed to follow their policy to ensure residents are free from s...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests. This has the potential to affect all resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0557
(Tag F0557)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide dignity for two (R41, R226) residents in a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to correctly set air loss mattress based on weight for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 12/09/24 between 9:30-9:45 AM, during medication pass administration observation surveyor standing in the hallway observed R8...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and offer pneumonia vaccines prior to or upon adm...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that reusable cloth incontinence briefs intended for resident use were in good condition, this failure has the potenti...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer four (R41, R66, R72, R90) residents with serious mental illne...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were locked and secured while unattended. This failure has the potential to affect all 68 residents residin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure shared equipment was cleaned and decontaminated between each use for 4 [R27, R92, R104, R116] of 6 residents reviewed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to discard expired food based on use by guidelines and labeled use by date, failed to ensure food items were labeled and date...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, facility failed to follow their policy to report the appearance of suspicious bruise, lace...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to establish and implement interventions for one resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two dependent residents (R4 and R8) received showers a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
9 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical abuse which affected ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light device was within reach for one resident (R107) to call for staff assistance. This failure affe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide room identifiers on residents' room in an effo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately don and doff personal protective equipme...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility is free of roaches. This failure has the potential to affect...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the daily nursing staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 125 residents residing in the facility.
Findings...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label/date food items, failed to store food items/goods six inches off the floor, failed to dispose of food items after the u...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the outside dumpster lid was closed to prevent pest and rodents from migrating into the dumpster. This failure has the p...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to maintain its nurse call system in full functioning condition on 3 of 3 resident floors. This affects all 123 residents in the...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
5 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, facility failed to follow their abuse policy to ensure residents are free from physical abuse by providing necessary care in services thus resulting in a male res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy to: (a) ensure medications used in t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0888
(Tag F0888)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to track and document the COVID-19 vaccination status of all staff providing care to residents at the facility. This failure has the potential...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the designated Infection Preventionist, who is responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program, has com...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 24% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 24 points below Illinois's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 3 harm violation(s), $37,668 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 30 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $37,668 in fines. Higher than 94% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (20/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Warren Park Health & Living Ctr's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WARREN PARK HEALTH & LIVING CTR an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Warren Park Health & Living Ctr Staffed?
CMS rates WARREN PARK HEALTH & LIVING CTR's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 24%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Warren Park Health & Living Ctr?
State health inspectors documented 30 deficiencies at WARREN PARK HEALTH & LIVING CTR during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm, 26 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Warren Park Health & Living Ctr?
WARREN PARK HEALTH & LIVING CTR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CITADEL HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 127 certified beds and approximately 125 residents (about 98% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in CHICAGO, Illinois.
How Does Warren Park Health & Living Ctr Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, WARREN PARK HEALTH & LIVING CTR's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (24%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Warren Park Health & Living Ctr?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Warren Park Health & Living Ctr Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WARREN PARK HEALTH & LIVING CTR has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Warren Park Health & Living Ctr Stick Around?
Staff at WARREN PARK HEALTH & LIVING CTR tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 24%, the facility is 22 percentage points below the Illinois average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Warren Park Health & Living Ctr Ever Fined?
WARREN PARK HEALTH & LIVING CTR has been fined $37,668 across 1 penalty action. The Illinois average is $33,456. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Warren Park Health & Living Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?
WARREN PARK HEALTH & LIVING CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.